1: \documentclass{appolb}
2: \usepackage{epsfig,cite,amsmath,amssymb}
3: \pagestyle{plain}
4: \topmargin=-0.5cm
5: % epsfig package included for placing EPS figures in the text
6: %------------------------------------------------------
7:
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9: % %
10: % BEGINNING OF TEXT %
11: % %
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13: \newcommand{\ppbar}{p^{\!\!\!\!\!\textsuperscript{\tiny{(--)}}}\!\!}
14: \newcommand{\nubar}{\nu^{\!\!\!\!\!\textsuperscript{\tiny{(--)}}}\!\!}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17: % \eqsec % uncomment this line to get equations numbered by (sec.num)
18: \title{Looking for signals beyond the neutrino Standard Model
19: \thanks{Presented by F. del Aguila at the XXXI International School of
20: Theoretical Physics ``Matter To The Deepest: Recent Developments in
21: Theory of Fundamental Interactions", Ustro\'n, Poland, September 5-11,
22: 2007.}%
23: % you can use '\\' to break lines
24: }
25: \author{F. del Aguila, J.A. Aguilar Saavedra, J. de Blas
26: \address{Departamento de F{\'\i}sica Te\'orica y del Cosmos and CAFPE, \\
27: Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain}
28: \and
29: M. Zra{\l}ek
30: \address{Department of Field Theory and Particle Physics, Institute of Physics, \\
31: University of Silesia, Uniwersytecka 4, 40-007 Katowice, Poland}
32: %
33: %the Name(s) of other Author(s)
34: %\address{and their affiliation}
35: }
36: \maketitle
37: \begin{abstract}
38: Any new neutrino physics at the TeV scale must include a suppression mechanism
39: to keep its contribution to light neutrino masses small enough.
40: We review some seesaw model examples with weakly broken lepton number,
41: and comment on the expected effects at
42: large colliders and in neutrino oscillations.
43: \end{abstract}
44: \PACS{14.60.St,13.35.Hb,14.60.Pq,13.15.+g}
45:
46: % 13.15.+g Neutrino interactions
47: % 13.35.Hb Decays of heavy neutrinos
48: % 14.80.-j Other particles (including hypothetical)
49: % 14.60.St Non-standard-model neutrinos, right-handed neutrinos, etc.
50: % 14.60.Pq Neutrino mass and mixing (see also 12.15.Ff Quark and lepton masses
51: % and mixing)
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54:
55: Lepton flavour-changing processes have been only observed in neutrino
56: oscillations \cite{Yao:2006px}.
57: These can be explained by introducing nonzero neutrino masses
58: and the corresponding charged current mixing matrix (MNS)
59: \cite{MNS}
60: which relates neutrino mass and current eigenstates. This defines the minimal
61: neutrino Standard Model $\nu$SM \cite{Mohapatra:1998rq},
62: which can be realised with the
63: addition of a Majorana mass term or introducing three light right-handed
64: neutrinos with Yukawa couplings to the SM ones.
65:
66: The small size of the light neutrino masses, $m_{\nu_i} \sim 1$ eV, makes
67: the observation of neutrino mixing very difficult.
68: In neutrino oscillations the long baseline distance $L$ enhances the small
69: ratio $\Delta m^2_{ij} / E_\nu$, where $\Delta m^2_{ij} = m^2_{\nu_i} -
70: m^2_{\nu_j}$, making the relevant quantity for neutrino oscillations
71: \begin{equation}
72: \frac{\Delta m^2_{ij} [{\rm eV}^2] \; L [{\rm km}]}
73: {E_{\nu} [{\rm GeV}]}
74: \end{equation}
75: of order unity. However,
76: in high energy
77: collider experiments the available luminosities cannot sufficiently enhance the
78: small mass ratios $m^2_{\nu_i} / E^2$, with $E$ the relevant
79: energy scale in the process, and then lepton flavour violating (LFV) effects
80: are negligible. Hence, the observation of lepton flavour violation at colliders
81: will imply new physics near the TeV scale, which is the scale to be probed at
82: LHC. Conversely, it is also expected that if there is new physics at this scale,
83: it violates lepton flavour because the new interactions do not need to be
84: aligned with the neutrino current eigenstates in general.
85: Any extended model with new neutrino physics near the electroweak scale must
86: include a mechanism for decoupling the generation of light neutrino masses
87: from the physics at the new scale. In section 2 we discuss how this works in
88: the three types of seesaw. The symmetry protecting light neutrino masses
89: appears to be in all three cases lepton number conservation. We also
90: discuss
91: the limits on the coefficients of the dimension 6 operators parameterising the
92: new physics at low energy. Limits on masses and mixings of heavy neutrinos at
93: large colliders like ILC, CLIC and LHC are
94: presented in section 3. Section 4 is devoted to new possible effects in
95: neutrino oscillations.
96:
97: \section{Low energy physics}
98:
99: At energies much smaller than the mass of any new resonance, the departures
100: from the SM can be
101: parameterised by an effective lagrangian, which is determined by the
102: light field content and the required symmetries. The precision is given by the
103: order considered in the momentum expansion. In the case of light neutrinos
104: the effective Lagrangian depends on their Dirac or Majorana nature.
105: In the Dirac case we have to introduce at least three new right-handed
106: neutrinos to pair with the SM left-handed counterparts, and lepton number is
107: in principle conserved. The smallness of SM neutrino masses stems from the
108: smallness of the Yukawa couplings, which requires a satisfactory explanation. In
109: the Majorana case the field content is the same as
110: in the SM, light neutrinos are Majorana particles and lepton
111: number is broken. The smallness of neutrino masses is related to the
112: large scale of this symmetry breaking.
113:
114: We will concentrate on the second possibility.
115: The most general effective lagrangian invariant under
116: $\mathrm{SU}(3)_C \times \mathrm{SU}(2)_L \times \mathrm{U}(1)_Y$,
117: %
118: \begin{equation}
119: {\mathcal L}^{eff} = {\mathcal L}_4 + \frac{1}{\Lambda} {\mathcal L}_5
120: + \frac{1}{\Lambda^2} {\mathcal L}_6 + \dots \,,
121: \end{equation}
122: %
123: is explicit up to dimension 6 in Ref.~\cite{Buchmuller:1985jz}.
124: ${\cal L}_4$ stands for the SM lagrangian, ${\cal L}_5$ contains the only
125: dimension 5 operator allowed by gauge
126: symmetry,\footnote{We use the operator basis of Ref.~\cite{Buchmuller:1985jz}.
127: $L$ stands for the lepton doublet and $\tilde{\phi} = i \sigma _2 \phi ^*$
128: is the Higgs doublet with hypercharge $Y = -\frac{1}{2}$. Family indices are
129: not shown, unless otherwise stated.}
130: %
131: \begin{equation}
132: {\mathcal O}_5 = \overline{L^c} \tilde{\phi}^* \tilde{\phi}^\dagger L \ ,
133: \end{equation}
134: %
135: and ${\mathcal L}_6$ includes all dimension 6 operators (81 without taking
136: into account flavour indices) which preserve lepton and baryon number.
137: This lagrangian is valid for energies below $\Lambda$, the cut-off scale.
138: After spontaneous symmetry breaking ${\mathcal O}_5$ generates light neutrino
139: Majorana masses $m_\nu = -x_5 v^2 / \Lambda$, being $x_5/\Lambda$ the
140: coefficient of
141: this dimension 5 operator and $v=246$ GeV the Higgs vacuum expectation value.
142: For $m_\nu \sim 1$ eV, as required by experimental data,
143: $\Lambda \sim 10^{14}$ GeV if
144: $x_5 \sim 1$, or $x_5 \sim 10^{-11}$ if $\Lambda \sim 1$ TeV. In the
145: first case new physics cannot manifest itself in any high energy experiment
146: considered up to now. In the latter, new effects can
147: show up in the new generation of accelerator experiments if the coefficients
148: of the dimension 6 operators are relatively large. However, in this scenario
149: one has to explain why the coefficient of $\mathcal{O}_5$ is so small.
150: The simplest models including such a decoupling mechanism distinguish between
151: the cut-off scale $\Lambda$ and the effective lepton number violating (LNV)
152: parameter entering in the definition of $x_5$ (see for examples
153: Refs.~\cite{Abada:2007ux,Chen:2007dc}). In the rest of this section we partly
154: review the results in Refs.~\cite{Abada:2007ux,Kersten:2007vk},
155: following approximately the notation in Ref.~\cite{Abada:2007ux}.
156: The different values of the coefficients reflects the different
157: normalisation and the different operator basis used.
158:
159: The minimal SM extension exhibiting this decoupling only requires the
160: addition of heavy Dirac neutrino singlets $N$. In this case lepton number can
161: be assigned so that left-handed fields $N_L$ have quantum number $\mathbf{q}$
162: and $-\mathbf{q}$ the right-handed counterparts
163: $N^c_R$. Then, the generic mass matrix reduces to
164: %
165: \begin{equation}
166: \label{matrix}
167: \begin{array}{c} \\[0.5mm] \nu_L \\[1mm] N \end{array} \!\!\!\!
168: %
169: \begin{array}{cc}
170: \ \ \nu_L & N \\[0.2cm]
171: %
172: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{c}
173: 0\\Y_N\frac{v}{\sqrt{2}}\end{array}\right. &\left.\begin{array}{c}
174: Y^T_N\frac{v}{\sqrt{2}}\\M_N\end{array}\!\!\right)
175: \end{array}
176: %
177: ~ \raisebox{-2.05mm}{$\longrightarrow$} ~
178: %
179: \begin{array}{c}\\ \nu_L\\N_L\\N_R^c\end{array} \!\!\!\!
180: %
181: \begin{array}{c c l}
182: \ \ \nu_L& N_L& \ \ N_R^c\\[0.2cm]
183: \left(\begin{array}{c}
184: 0\\0\\\frac{y_N \,v}{\sqrt{2}}\end{array}\right.&\begin{array}{c}
185: 0\\0\\m_N\end{array}&\left.\begin{array}{c}
186: \frac{y_N \, v}{\sqrt{2}}\\m_N\\0\end{array}\right)
187: \end{array}
188: %
189: \end{equation}
190: %
191: for one family,
192: where $y_N$ is the Yukawa coupling between the SM neutrino and the
193: right-handed one. If $y_N \neq 0$, $N_L$ and $\nu _L$ have the same
194: lepton number, $\mathbf{q} = 1$,
195: and they mix. When lepton number is broken by a small entry $\mu$ instead of
196: some of
197: the zeroes in the above matrix, the light neutrino gets a Majorana mass
198: proportional to it, even if the nonzero entry is in the $(3,3)$ position
199: because one-loop radiative corrections also generate a nonzero mass
200: for $\nu _L$ proportional to $\mu$. (A similar behaviour is found in Little
201: Higgs models \cite{del Aguila:2005yi}.)
202:
203:
204: More generally, all three types of seesaw mechanisms generating
205: ${\cal O}_5$ at the tree level upon integration of heavy fields
206: \cite{Arzt:1994gp} can incorporate a similar decoupling.
207: In Tables \ref{Fsinglet}--\ref{Ftriplet} we collect the operators
208: up to dimension 6 obtained from the integration of
209: heavy fermion singlets $N$ (type I seesaw),
210: scalar triplets $\Delta$ (type II) and
211: fermion triplets $\Sigma$ (type III),
212: respectively, and the corresponding coefficients \cite{Abada:2007ux},
213: where now $\Lambda$ is the mass of the heavy resonance.
214: %
215: \begin{table}[htb]
216: \begin{center}
217: \begin{tabular}{| c | c l | c |} \hline
218: $\mbox{Dimension}$&$ $&$\quad \quad\mbox{Operator}$&$\mbox{Coefficient}$\\
219: \hline\hline
220: ~&~&~\\[-0.4cm]
221: $5$&${\cal O}_{5}$&$= \overline{L^c} \tilde \phi^* \tilde \phi^\dagger L$&
222: $\frac 12 Y_N^T M_{N}^{-1} Y_N$\\[1mm]
223: \hline
224: ~&~&~\\[-0.4cm]
225: $6$&${\cal O}_{\phi L}^{(1)}$&$=\left(\phi^{\dagger}iD_\mu \phi\right)
226: \left(\overline{L} \gamma^\mu L\right)$&$\frac 14 Y_N^\dagger
227: (M^\dagger_{N})^{-1} M_N^{-1} Y_N$\\[1mm]
228: $ $&${\cal O}_{\phi L}^{(3)}$&$=\left(\phi^{\dagger}i\sigma_a D_\mu \phi\right)
229: \left(\overline{L} \sigma_a \gamma^\mu L\right)$&$-\frac 14 Y_N^\dagger
230: (M^\dagger_{N})^{-1} M_N^{-1} Y_N$\\[1mm]
231: \hline
232: \end{tabular}
233: \caption{Operators arising from the integration of heavy Majorana fermion singlets
234: $N$. $Y_N$ is the coupling matrix in the Yukawa term
235: $-\overline{L} \tilde{\phi} Y_N^\dagger N_R$.}
236: \label{Fsinglet}
237: \end{center}
238: \end{table}
239: %
240: %
241: \begin{table}[htb]
242: \begin{center}
243: \begin{tabular}{| c | c l | c |} \hline
244: $\mbox{Dimension}$&$ $&$\quad \quad\mbox{Operator}$&$\mbox{Coefficient}$\\
245: \hline\hline
246: ~&~&~\\[-0.4cm]
247: $4$&${\cal O}_{4}$&$= \left(\phi^\dagger \phi\right)^2$&
248: $2 \left|\mu_\Delta\right|^2 / M_{\Delta}^2$\\[1mm]
249: \hline
250: ~&~&~\\[-0.4cm]
251: $5$&${\cal O}_{5}$&$= \overline{L^c} \tilde \phi^* \tilde\phi^\dagger L$&
252: $-2 \, Y_\Delta \mu_\Delta / M_{\Delta}^2$\\[1mm]
253: \hline
254: ~&~&~\\[-0.4cm]
255: $6$&${\cal O}_{LL}^{(1)}$&$=\frac 12\left(\overline{L^i} \gamma^\mu L^j\right)
256: \left(\overline{L^k} \gamma_\mu L^l\right)$&$2 / M^2_{\Delta}
257: (Y_\Delta)_{jl} (Y_\Delta^\dagger)_{ki}$\\[1mm]
258: $ $&${\cal O}_{\phi}$&$=\frac 13 \left(\phi^{\dagger}\phi\right)^3$&
259: $-6\left(\lambda_3+\lambda_5\right)
260: \left|\mu_\Delta\right|^2 / M^4_{\Delta}$\\[1mm]
261: $ $&${\cal O}_{\phi}^{(1)}$&$=\left(\phi^{\dagger}\phi\right)
262: \left(D_\mu \phi\right)^\dagger D^\mu \phi$&
263: $4 \left|\mu_\Delta\right|^2 / M^4_{\Delta}$\\[1mm]
264: $ $&${\cal O}_{\phi}^{(3)}$&$=\left(\phi^{\dagger}D_\mu \phi\right)
265: \left( D^\mu \phi^\dagger \phi\right)$&
266: $4 \left|\mu_\Delta\right|^2 / M^4_{\Delta} $\\[1mm]
267: \hline
268: \end{tabular}
269: \caption{Operators arising from the integration of heavy scalar triplets
270: $\Delta$. $Y_\Delta$ is the coupling matrix in the Yukawa term
271: $\overline{\tilde{L}} Y_\Delta \left(\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{\Delta}\right) L$,
272: with $\overline{\tilde{L}} = -L^T C i \sigma _2$ and $C$ the matrix entering the
273: spinor charge conjugation definition;
274: and $\mu_\Delta$, $\lambda_3$ and $\lambda_5$ are the coefficients of the
275: scalar potential terms
276: $\tilde \phi^\dagger\left(\vec{\sigma}\cdot \vec{\Delta}\right)^\dagger \phi$,
277: $-\left(\phi^\dagger \phi\right)\left(\vec{\Delta}^\dagger \vec{\Delta}\right)$
278: and
279: $-\left(\vec{\Delta}^\dagger T_i \vec{\Delta}\right)\phi^\dagger \sigma_i \phi$,
280: respectively.}
281: \label{Striplet}
282: \end{center}
283: \end{table}
284: %
285: %
286: \begin{table}[htb]
287: \begin{center}
288: \begin{tabular}{| c | c l | c |} \hline
289: $\mbox{Dimension}$&$ $&$\quad \quad\mbox{Operator}$&$\mbox{Coefficient}$\\
290: \hline\hline
291: ~&~&~\\[-0.4cm]
292: $5$&${\cal O}_{5}$&$= \overline{L^c} \tilde{\phi}^* \tilde{\phi}^\dagger L$&
293: $\frac{1}{2} Y_\Sigma^T M_{\Sigma}^{-1} Y_\Sigma$\\[1mm]
294: \hline
295: ~&~&~\\[-0.4cm]
296: $6$&${\cal O}_{\phi L}^{(1)}$&$=\left(\phi^{\dagger}iD_\mu \phi\right)
297: \left(\overline{L} \gamma^\mu L\right)$&$\frac{3}{4} Y_\Sigma^\dagger
298: (M^\dagger_{\Sigma})^{-1} M_\Sigma^{-1} Y_\Sigma$\\[1mm]
299: $ $&${\cal O}_{\phi L}^{(3)}$&$=\left(\phi^{\dagger}i\sigma_a D_\mu \phi\right)
300: \left(\overline{L} \sigma_a \gamma^\mu L\right)$&$\frac{1}{4}
301: Y_\Sigma^\dagger
302: (M^\dagger_{\Sigma})^{-1} M_\Sigma^{-1} Y_\Sigma$\\[1mm]
303: $ $&${\cal O}_{l \phi}$&$=\left(\phi^{\dagger}\phi\right)\overline{L} \phi l_R$&
304: $Y_\Sigma^\dagger (M^\dagger_{\Sigma})^{-1} M_\Sigma^{-1} Y_\Sigma Y_l$\\[1mm]
305: \hline
306: \end{tabular}
307: \caption{Operators arising from the integration of heavy Majorana fermion triplets
308: $\Sigma$. $Y_\Sigma$ is the coupling matrix in the Yukawa term
309: $-\overline{\vec{\Sigma}_R} Y_\Sigma (\tilde{\phi}^\dagger \vec{\sigma} L)$
310: and $Y_l$ in $-\overline{L} Y_l \phi l_R$.}
311: \label{Ftriplet}
312: \end{center}
313: \end{table}
314: %
315: In type II seesaw the coefficient of ${\cal O}_5$ is
316: explicitly proportional to the LNV product
317: $\mu_\Delta Y_\Delta$, while none of the other coefficients contains
318: both parameters. This allows for a relatively light
319: scalar triplet with
320: $M_\Delta \sim 1$ TeV and possibly observable effects at forthcoming
321: experiments, while keeping SM neutrino masses very small (in definite models
322: \cite{Chen:2007dc} there can be also extra loop suppression factors).
323: In the other two types of seesaw the decoupling is not so explicit.
324: In both cases the coefficient of the dimension 5 operator is proportional to
325: $Y^T M^{-1} Y$, thus it only depends (quadratically)
326: on $Y$, while the coefficients of the dimension 6 operators
327: involve $Y^\dagger (M^\dagger)^{-1} M^{-1} Y$, with $Y$ and $Y^\dagger$.
328: In this way it is possible that there are cancellations in the former product
329: which do not hold in the latter one.
330: This is indeed what happens for quasi-Dirac neutrinos.
331: For our one-family example
332: in Eq. (\ref{matrix}), if the LNV parameter $\mu$ is in the (2,2) position,
333: the SM neutrino acquires a Majorana mass $m_\nu$ \footnote{The
334: $2 \times 2$ bottom-right submatrix must be diagonalised before applying the
335: seesaw formula in order to make the cancellation apparent.
336: The masses of the two Majorana eigenstates are taken to
337: be positive, $m_{N_1} \simeq m_N + \mu/2$,
338: $m_{N_2} \simeq m_N - \mu/2$.}
339: %
340: \begin{equation}
341: - Y_{N}^T M_{N}^{-1} Y_{N} \frac{v^2}{2}
342: \simeq - \frac{y_N^2}{2} \left[
343: \frac{(1-\frac{\mu}{4m_N})^2}{m_N+\frac{\mu}{2}}
344: -\frac{(1+\frac{\mu}{4m_N})^2}{m_N-\frac{\mu}{2}}
345: \right] \frac{v^2}{2}
346: \simeq \frac{\mu y_N^2}{m_N^2} \frac{v^2}{2},
347: \end{equation}
348: %
349: where we only keep the dominant terms in $\mu/m_N$.
350: (Less natural cancellations are also possible in more involved
351: models \cite{Kersten:2007vk,del Aguila:2005mf}.)
352: While $m_\nu$ is proportional to $\mu$, the coefficients of the dimension
353: 6 operators are not,
354: %
355: \begin{equation}
356: Y_{N}^\dagger (M_{N}^\dagger)^{-1} M_{N}^{-1} Y_{N}
357: \simeq \frac{|y_N|^2}{2} \left[
358: \frac{(1-\frac{\mu}{4m_N})^2}{(m_N+\frac{\mu}{2})^2}
359: +\frac{(1+\frac{\mu}{4m_N})^2}{(m_N-\frac{\mu}{2})^2}
360: \right] \simeq \frac{|y_N|^2}{m_N^2} \,.
361: \end{equation}
362: %
363: Hence, new fermions can exist near the TeV scale with observable effects
364: beyond the SM in future experiments, while maintaining the SM neutrinos light
365: enough.
366:
367: Present experimental limits on the different combinations
368: of quadratic products of Yukawa couplings $y^* y$ entering the
369: dimension 6 operators range from 0.3 to 0.002 for a heavy
370: neutrino singlet $N$ with a mass of 1 TeV;
371: from 1 to $10^{-5}$ for a heavy scalar triplet $\Delta$
372: of the same mass, and from 0.01 to
373: $3 \times 10^{-5}$ for a heavy fermion triplet $\Sigma$
374: equally heavy . A detailed analysis can be found in
375: Ref. \cite{Abada:2007ux}.
376:
377:
378: \section{Lepton signals at large colliders}
379:
380: The next generation of large colliders will be able to further constrain the
381: masses and mixings of the seesaw messengers (see Ref. \cite{del Aguila:2006dx}
382: for a review in the case of heavy neutrino singlets). Here we restrict
383: ourselves to $e^+ e^-$ and hadron colliders.
384:
385: \subsection{$e^+ e^-$ colliders}
386:
387: The process $e^+e^- \rightarrow N \nu \rightarrow \ell^{\pm} W^{\mp}
388: (\rightarrow q \bar q') \nu $
389: sets the most stringent limits on the mass and the mixing of a heavy
390: neutrino singlet (seesaw type I) for a large enough center of mass
391: energy so that $N$ is produced \cite{del Aguila:2005pf}
392: (see also Ref. \cite{Gluza:1996bz}).
393: Lepton colliders are a rather clean environment, being the irreducible
394: background for this process SM four-fermion $\ell \nu q \bar q'$ production
395: (which includes $W^+ W^-$ plus non-resonant diagrams).
396: The non-observation of an excess in the $\ell jj$ invariant mass
397: distribution will set limits on the heavy neutrino mass $m_N$ and
398: its mixing with the charged leptons
399: $V_{\ell N} = Y^*_{N \ell} v/(\sqrt 2 m_N)$, $\ell = e, \mu, \tau$.
400: Limits are rather independent of $m_N$ up to nearly the kinematical
401: limit, and independent of the Dirac or Majorana character of the heavy
402: neutrino. In Fig.~\ref{fig:ilc} we show the combined limits on the
403: mixing of a new heavy neutrino singlet
404: (i) at ILC, with a centre of mass energy $\sqrt s = 500$ GeV
405: and an integrated luminosity $L = 345$ fb$^{-1}$,
406: taking $m_N = 300$ GeV;
407: (ii) at CLIC, with $\sqrt s = 3$ TeV, $L = 1000$ fb$^{-1}$, and
408: taking $m_N = 1.5$ TeV.
409: %
410: \begin{figure}[htb]
411: \begin{center}
412: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
413: \epsfig{file=Figs/bound-em-ILC.eps,height=4cm,clip=} & &
414: \epsfig{file=Figs/bound-et-ILC.eps,height=4cm,clip=} \\
415: \epsfig{file=Figs/bound-em-CLIC.eps,height=4cm,clip=} & &
416: \epsfig{file=Figs/bound-et-CLIC.eps,height=4cm,clip=}
417: \end{tabular}
418: \caption{Combined limits on heavy neutrino mixings at ILC (up) and
419: CLIC (down), for the cases $V_{\tau N} = 0$ (left) and
420: $V_{\mu N} = 0$ (right).
421: The red areas represent the 90\% CL limits if no signal is observed.
422: The white areas extend up to present bounds
423: $V_{eN} \leq 0.073$, $V_{\mu N} \leq 0.098$,
424: $V_{\tau N} \leq 0.13$ \cite{Bergmann:1998rg,Bekman:2002zk}
425: , and correspond to the region where a combined
426: statistical significance of $5\sigma$ or larger is achieved.
427: The indirect limit from $\mu - e$ LFV processes is also shown.}
428: \label{fig:ilc}
429: \end{center}
430: \end{figure}
431: %
432:
433: \subsection{Hadron colliders}
434:
435: Hadron colliders produce large electroweak signals, and in particular
436: they can produce new leptons with relatively large cross sections.
437: If the usually huge SM backgrounds contribute relatively little to
438: a specific final state, one can derive non-trivial limits on these
439: new leptons. This is the case of heavy neutrino singlets (seesaw type I)
440: \cite{Datta:1993nm,Almeida:2000pz,Han:2006ip} in like-sign
441: dilepton final states $\ell^\pm \ell'^\pm X$. Let us summarise the analysis of
442: Ref.~\cite{del Aguila:2007em}. At hadron colliders the heavy neutrino
443: character plays an important role because Dirac neutrinos conserve lepton number
444: and,
445: in general, their signals are overwhelmed by the backgrounds. On the other
446: hand, heavy Majorana neutrinos produce LNV signals,
447: $p \ppbar \rightarrow W^\pm \rightarrow \ell^\pm N \rightarrow
448: \ell^\pm \ell'^\pm jj$, which have smaller backgrounds, and present limits
449: on their masses and mixings can be eventually improved.
450: (However, realising these masses and mixings in a specific model still
451: requires complicated cancellations to avoid generating too large SM
452: neutrino masses, as emphasised in the former section.)
453: At Tevatron the signal cross sections are in practice too small, but
454: at LHC they are sizeable for heavy neutrino masses of the order of the
455: electroweak scale (and especially for $m_N < M_W$, when the heavy neutrino
456: is produced on its mass shell). The limits on the mixing of a heavy Majorana
457: neutrino are plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig:lhc1} for the case $V_{\tau N} = 0$
458: and two heavy neutrino masses above and below $M_W$, for a luminosity $L = 30$
459: fb$^{-1}$. We point out that for $m_N = 60$ GeV the direct limit is more
460: stringent than the indirect one from $\mu-e$ LFV processes.
461:
462: \begin{figure}[htb]
463: \begin{center}
464: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
465: \epsfig{file=Figs/bound-em150-LHC.eps,height=4cm,clip=} & &
466: \epsfig{file=Figs/bound-em60-LHC.eps,height=4cm,clip=}
467: \end{tabular}
468: \caption{Combined limits on heavy neutrino mixings at LHC for
469: $V_{\tau N} = 0$ and two heavy Majorana neutrino masses.
470: The meaning of the coloured areas is the same as in Fig.~\ref{fig:ilc}}
471: \label{fig:lhc1}
472: \end{center}
473: \end{figure}
474:
475: A Dirac neutrino does not give observable signals at LHC except if $N$
476: is lighter than the $W$ boson and couples to both electron and muon.
477: In this situation it can produce the LFV signal
478: $e^\pm \mu^\mp X$ with a large cross section, so that it can be observed
479: above the large opposite sign dilepton background. In Fig.~\ref{fig:lhc2}
480: we show the corresponding limits on the heavy Dirac neutrino mixings
481: for $m_N = 60$ GeV and $L = 30$ fb$^{-1}$.
482:
483: \begin{figure}[htb]
484: \begin{center}
485: \epsfig{file=Figs/bound-em60D-LHC.eps,height=4cm,clip=}
486: \caption{The same as in Fig.~\ref{fig:lhc1} but for a Dirac neutrino with a
487: mass $m_N = 60$ GeV.}
488: \label{fig:lhc2}
489: \end{center}
490: \end{figure}
491:
492: Heavy neutrino limits improve significantly in the presence of new
493: interactions, for example of a new $W'$ \cite{Keung:1983uu}
494: or a $Z'$ \cite{delAguila:2007ua}. In the former case, LHC is sensitive
495: to masses up to $M_{W'} = 3$ TeV, $m_N = 2.1$ TeV~\cite{Gninenko:2006br},
496: while in the latter it is sensitive to
497: $M_{Z'} = 2.5$ TeV, $m_N = 800$ GeV~\cite{delAguila:2007ua}
498: (in both cases assuming $L = 30$ fb$^{-1}$).
499:
500: Finally, we point out that like-sign dilepton signals also arise in the other
501: two seesaw scenarios: in the production of doubly charged scalar
502: triplets~\cite{Hektor:2007uu}, and in pair production of fermion
503: triplets~\cite{Bajc:2006ia}. For this reason,
504: like-sign dileptons
505: constitute an interesting final state in which to test seesaw at LHC.
506:
507: \section{Neutrino oscillations beyond the $\nu$SM}
508:
509: Neutrino oscillation experiments will improve their precision in the future,
510: and they may be sensitive to new physics through its effects on light
511: neutrinos. For example, deviations from unitarity of the MNS matrix due to
512: mixing with heavy neutrinos can manifest at the percent level in
513: $\nu_\mu-\nu_\tau$ transitions
514: \cite{Bekman:2002zk}. In the presence of new right-handed interactions,
515: the transition probability amplitude differs if light neutrinos have Dirac
516: or Majorana nature, as it is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:oscillations}
517: \cite{delAguila:2007ug}.
518: The difference (dashed line) can be at the 10 \% level but only for very long
519: baseline distance $L$. For the examples shown, it reduces by a factor of 4
520: from $L = 13000$ km to $L = 6500$ km. It is also proportional to the
521: strength of the new four-fermion interaction.
522:
523: %
524: \begin{figure}[htb]
525: \begin{center}
526: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
527: \epsfig{file=Figs/Pmt13eta1.eps,height=4cm,clip=} & &
528: \epsfig{file=Figs/Pmt65eta1.eps,height=4cm,clip=}
529: \end{tabular}
530: \caption{Transition probabilities for Majorana (M) and
531: Dirac (D) neutrinos and their difference $\Delta P$ as a
532: function of the neutrino energy $E_{\nu}$ (in GeV) for
533: two different baseline distances $L$. The new four-fermion interactions have a strength which is 1\% $(\eta = 1)$ of the weak interactions
534: \cite{Gonzalez-Garcia:2004wg}.
535: Note that in the Dirac case the transition amplitude with new interactions
536: is the same as in the $\nu$SM.}
537: \label{fig:oscillations}
538: \end{center}
539: \end{figure}
540: %
541:
542: \vspace{0.5cm}
543:
544: We thank discussions with
545: C. Biggio, T. Hambye, M. P\'erez-Victoria, R. Pittau and J. Syska.
546: This work has been supported by MEC project FPA2006-05294,
547: Junta de Andaluc{\'\i}a projects FQM 101 and FQM 437,
548: and by the European Community's Marie-Curie Research Training
549: Network under contract MRTN-CT-2006-035505 ``Tools and Precision
550: Calculations for Physics Discoveries at Colliders''.
551: J.A.A.-S. acknowledges support by a MEC Ram\'on y Cajal contract.
552: J.B. also thanks MEC for an FPU grant.
553:
554: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
555:
556: \bibitem{Yao:2006px}
557: W.~M.~Yao {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group],
558: %``Review of particle physics,''
559: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 33} (2006) 1.
560: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G33,1;%%
561:
562: \bibitem{MNS}
563: Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata,
564: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys. {\bf 28} (1962) 870.
565: %%CITATION = PTPKA,28,870;%%
566:
567: \bibitem{Mohapatra:1998rq}
568: R.~N.~Mohapatra and P.~B.~Pal,
569: %``Massive neutrinos in physics and astrophysics. Second edition,''
570: World Sci.\ Lect.\ Notes Phys.\ {\bf 60}, 1 (1998)
571: [World Sci.\ Lect.\ Notes Phys.\ {\bf 72}, 1 (2004)].
572: %%CITATION = 00327,72,1;%%
573:
574: \bibitem{Buchmuller:1985jz}
575: W.~Buchmuller and D.~Wyler,
576: %``Effective Lagrangian Analysis Of New Interactions And Flavor
577: %Conservation,''
578: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 268} (1986) 621.
579: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B268,621;%%
580:
581: \bibitem{Abada:2007ux}
582: A.~Abada, C.~Biggio, F.~Bonnet, M.~B.~Gavela and T.~Hambye,
583: %``Low energy effects of neutrino masses,''
584: arXiv:0707.4058 [hep-ph].
585: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0707.4058;%%
586:
587: \bibitem{Chen:2007dc}
588: C.~S.~Chen, C.~Q.~Geng, J.~N.~Ng and J.~M.~S.~Wu,
589: %``Testing Radiative Neutrino Mass Generation at the LHC,''
590: arXiv:0706.1964 [hep-ph].
591: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0706.1964;%%
592:
593: \bibitem{Kersten:2007vk}
594: J.~Kersten and A.~Y.~Smirnov,
595: %``Right-Handed Neutrinos at LHC and the Mechanism of Neutrino Mass
596: %Generation,''
597: arXiv:0705.3221 [hep-ph].
598: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0705.3221;%%
599:
600: \bibitem{delAguila:2005yi}
601: F.~del Aguila, M.~Masip and J.~L.~Padilla,
602: %``A little Higgs model of neutrino masses,''
603: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 627} (2005) 131
604: [arXiv:hep-ph/0506063].
605: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B627,131;%%
606:
607: \bibitem{Arzt:1994gp}
608: C.~Arzt, M.~B.~Einhorn and J.~Wudka,
609: %``Patterns of deviation from the standard model,''
610: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 433} (1995) 41
611: [arXiv:hep-ph/9405214].
612: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B433,41;%%
613:
614: \bibitem{delAguila:2005mf}
615: F.~del Aguila, J.~A.~Aguilar-Saavedra, A.~Mart{\'\i}nez de la Ossa and D.~Meloni,
616: %``Flavour and polarisation in heavy neutrino production at e+ e-
617: %colliders,''
618: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 613} (2005) 170
619: [arXiv:hep-ph/0502189].
620: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B613,170;%%
621:
622: \bibitem{delAguila:2006dx}
623: F.~del Aguila, J.~A.~Aguilar-Saavedra and R.~Pittau,
624: %``Neutrino physics at large colliders,''
625: J.\ Phys.\ Conf.\ Ser.\ {\bf 53} (2006) 506
626: [arXiv:hep-ph/0606198].
627: %%CITATION = 00462,53,506;%%
628:
629: \bibitem{delAguila:2005pf}
630: F.~del Aguila and J.~A.~Aguilar-Saavedra,
631: %``l W nu production at CLIC: A window to TeV scale non-decoupled
632: %neutrinos,''
633: JHEP {\bf 0505} (2005) 026
634: [arXiv:hep-ph/0503026].
635: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0505,026;%%
636:
637: \bibitem{Gluza:1996bz}
638: J.~Gluza and M.~Zralek,
639: %``Heavy neutrinos production and decay in future $e^+ e^-$ colliders,''
640: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 55} (1997) 7030
641: [arXiv:hep-ph/9612227].
642: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D55,7030;%%
643:
644: \bibitem{Bergmann:1998rg}
645: S.~Bergmann and A.~Kagan,
646: %``Z-induced FCNCs and their effects on neutrino oscillations,''
647: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 538} (1999) 368
648: [arXiv:hep-ph/9803305].
649: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B538,368;%%
650:
651: \bibitem{Bekman:2002zk}
652: B.~Bekman, J.~Gluza, J.~Holeczek, J.~Syska and M.~Zralek,
653: %``Matter effects and CP violating neutrino oscillations with non-decoupling
654: %heavy neutrinos,''
655: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 093004
656: [arXiv:hep-ph/0207015].
657: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,093004;%%
658:
659: \bibitem{Datta:1993nm}
660: A.~Datta, M.~Guchait and A.~Pilaftsis,
661: %``Probing lepton number violation via Majorana neutrinos at hadron
662: %supercolliders,''
663: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 50} (1994) 3195
664: [arXiv:hep-ph/9311257].
665: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D50,3195;%%
666:
667: \bibitem{Almeida:2000pz}
668: F.~M.~L.~Almeida, Y.~A.~Coutinho, J.~A.~Martins Simoes and M.~A.~B.~do Vale,
669: %``On a signature for heavy Majorana neutrinos in hadronic collisions,''
670: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 62} (2000) 075004
671: [arXiv:hep-ph/0002024].
672: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D62,075004;%%
673:
674: \bibitem{Han:2006ip}
675: T.~Han and B.~Zhang,
676: %``Signatures for Majorana neutrinos at hadron colliders,''
677: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 97} (2006) 171804
678: [arXiv:hep-ph/0604064].
679: %%CITATION = PRLTA,97,171804;%%
680:
681: \bibitem{delAguila:2007em}
682: F.~del Aguila, J.~A.~Aguilar-Saavedra and R.~Pittau,
683: %``Heavy neutrino signals at large hadron colliders,''
684: JHEP {\bf 10} (2007) 047
685: [arXiv:hep-ph/0703261].
686: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0710,047;%%
687:
688: \bibitem{Keung:1983uu}
689: W.~Y.~Keung and G.~Senjanovic,
690: %``Majorana Neutrinos And The Production Of The Right-Handed Charged Gauge
691: %Boson,''
692: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 50} (1983) 1427.
693: %%CITATION = PRLTA,50,1427;%%
694:
695:
696:
697: \bibitem{delAguila:2007ua}
698: F.~del Aguila and J.~A.~Aguilar-Saavedra,
699: %``Like-sign dilepton signals from a leptophobic $Z'$ boson,''
700: arXiv:0705.4117 [hep-ph].
701: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0705.4117;%%
702:
703: \bibitem{Gninenko:2006br}
704: S.~N.~Gninenko, M.~M.~Kirsanov, N.~V.~Krasnikov and V.~A.~Matveev,
705: % {\em Detection of heavy Majorana neutrinos and right-handed bosons,}
706: CMS-NOTE-2006-098.
707: %%CITATION = CERN-CMS-NOTE-2006-098;%%
708:
709:
710: \bibitem{Hektor:2007uu}
711: A.~Hektor, M.~Kadastik, M.~Muntel, M.~Raidal and L.~Rebane,
712: %``Testing neutrino masses in little Higgs models via discovery of doubly
713: %charged Higgs at LHC,''
714: arXiv:0705.1495 [hep-ph].
715: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0705.1495;%%
716:
717: \bibitem{Bajc:2006ia}
718: B.~Bajc and G.~Senjanovic,
719: %``Seesaw at LHC,''
720: arXiv:hep-ph/0612029.
721: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0612029;%%
722:
723: \bibitem{delAguila:2007ug}
724: F.~del Aguila, J.~Syska and M.~Zralek,
725: %``Impact of right-handed interactions on the propagation of Dirac and
726: %Majorana neutrinos in matter,''
727: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76} (2007) 013007
728: [arXiv:hep-ph/0702182].
729: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,013007;%%
730:
731:
732: \bibitem{Gonzalez-Garcia:2004wg}
733: M.~C.~Gonzalez-Garcia and M.~Maltoni,
734: %``Atmospheric neutrino oscillations and new physics,''
735: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 033010 (2004)
736: [arXiv:hep-ph/0404085].
737: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D70,033010;%%
738:
739:
740: \end{thebibliography}
741:
742: \end{document}
743: