1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: \slugcomment{A Search for SS Cyg Outburst Predictors}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{Photometry and Trend Analysis of SS Cyg Outbursts}
58: \shortauthors{Price, Henden, Foster, Petriew, et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{SS Cyg Outburst Predictors and Long Term Quasi-Periodic Behavior}
70:
71: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
72: %% author and affiliation information.
73: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
74: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
75: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
76: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
77:
78: \author{A. Price\altaffilmark{1,2}, A. A. Henden \altaffilmark{1}, G. Foster \altaffilmark{1}, V. Petriew \altaffilmark{1}, R. Huziak
79: \altaffilmark{1}, R.
80: James \altaffilmark{1}, M. D. Koppelman \altaffilmark{3}, J. Blackwell \altaffilmark{1}, D. Boyd \altaffilmark{4}, S. Brady \altaffilmark{1}, Lewis M. Cook \altaffilmark{1}, T. Crawford
81: \altaffilmark{1}, B. Dillon \altaffilmark{1}, B. L. Gary \altaffilmark{5}, B. Goff \altaffilmark{1}, K. Graham \altaffilmark{1}, K. Holland \altaffilmark{1}, J. Jones \altaffilmark{1}, R. Miles \altaffilmark{1},
82: D. Starkey \altaffilmark{1}, S. Robinson \altaffilmark{1}, T. Vanmunster \altaffilmark{1}, G. Walker \altaffilmark{1} }
83:
84: \affil{\altaffilmark{1}American Association of Variable Star Observers
85: Clinton B. Ford Astronomical Data and Research Center,
86: 49 Bay State Road,
87: Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
88: }
89: \affil{\altaffilmark{2}Wright Center for Science Education,
90: Tufts University,
91: 4 Colby St.,
92: Medford, MA 02155 USA}
93:
94: \affil{\altaffilmark{3}University of Minnesota,
95: Astronomy Department,
96: Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA}
97:
98: \affil{\altaffilmark{4}British Astronomical Association Variable Star Section,
99: West Challow, OX12 9TX, UK}
100:
101: \affil{\altaffilmark{5}G95 Hereford Arizona Observatory,
102: Hereford, AZ USA}
103:
104: %%\affil{National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ 85719}
105:
106: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
107: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
108: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
109: %% affiliation.
110:
111: %%\altaffiltext{1}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
112:
113: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
114: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
115: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
116: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
117: %% editorial office after submission.
118:
119: \begin{abstract}
120: We report null results on a two year photometric search for outburst predictors in SS Cyg.
121: Observations in Johnson V and Cousins I were obtained almost daily for multiple hours per night
122: for two observing seasons. The accumulated data are put through
123: various statistical and visual analysis techniques but fails to detect any outburst predictors.
124: However, analysis of 102 years of AAVSO archival visual data led to the detection of a correlation between a long term
125: quasi-periodic feature at around 1,000-2,000 days in length and an increase in outburst
126: rate.
127:
128:
129: \end{abstract}
130:
131: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
132: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
133: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
134: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
135:
136: \keywords{Stars}
137:
138: %%\keywords{variable stars: cataclysmic --- variable stars: individual{SS CYG}}
139:
140: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
141: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
142: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
143: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
144: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
145: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
146: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
147: %% each reference.
148:
149:
150: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
151: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
152: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
153: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
154: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
155: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
156: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
157: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
158: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
159: %%
160: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
161: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
162: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
163: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
164:
165: \section{Introduction \& Prior Work}
166:
167: SS Cyg is one of the most popular and studied variable stars. It is a cataclysmic variable (CV-a.k.a
168: dwarf novae) of the U Gem (UG) class, and prototype of the SS Cyg (UGSS) subclass \citep{kho85}. UG class
169: CVs are a binary system consisting of a late main sequence secondary star orbiting a white dwarf primary. The
170: secondary star continuously fills its Roche lobe and transfers mass to the primary, which forms an accretion
171: disc around the primary as angular momentum is conserved and spread within the disc. Occasionally the
172: accretion disc flares up into a bright state referred to as an "outburst". The UGSS subclass have outbursts
173: that are usually separated on the order of months, but are largely unpredictable. Outbursts typically have an
174: amplitude of 2-6 magnitudes and last a few days to a few weeks.
175:
176: The most popular fundamental model for the outburst mechanism in UG stars is the disk instability model
177: first proposed by Osaki (1976). In it, the region where the in-falling matter hits the accretion disc, known
178: as the hot spot, reaches a critical mass. This is a result of a higher rate of mass transfer from the
179: secondary to the disc than from the disc to the white dwarf (due to viscosity). When the
180: leftover material reaches a critical mass, the accretion disc becomes unstable. Viscosity increases, along with the mass transport rate,
181: through the disc. Both increases are driven by angular momentum. Eventually the system blazes in additional
182: light as the mass built up emits energy due to enhanced ionization of Hydrogen. Only about 3-10\% of the
183: material from the disc actually falls onto the white dwarf (see panel 3 of figure 13 in Cannizzo [1993]).
184:
185:
186: \subsection{Outburst Types}
187:
188: SS Cyg's quiescence magnitude is around v=12. Outbursts are usually expected every 4-10 weeks,
189: with a duration of 7-18 days each \citep{jev03}. During outburst, the star reaches
190: maximum light near magnitude v=8. Cannizzo and Mattei (1992) describe the outbursts as bimodal with long
191: outbursts typically lasting $>$12 days and short outbursts lasting $<$12 days. They assigned the letter "L" to the
192: long outbursts and "S" to the short and anomalous outbursts. The anomalous outbursts tend to have a
193: linear, lower rate of change and smaller amplitude than long and short outbursts (Figure 1). They found the most common sequence as LS (with
194: 134 occurrences), LLS (69), LSSS (14), and LLSS (8). About 89\% of all outbursts can fall into one of these
195: four sequences.
196:
197: \begin{figure}
198: \epsscale{1}
199: \plotone{f1.eps}
200: \caption{A sample of the SS Cyg visual light curve showing the three category of outbursts: long, short and anomalous (left to right).}
201: \end{figure}
202:
203: \subsection{Outburst Cycles \& Periodicity}
204:
205: Honey et al. (1989) photometrically observed SS Cyg over a single long and a single short outburst cycle.
206: They reported substantial flickering on the order of minutes but were unable to find any modulation (including near the orbital
207: period) or periodicity to an amplitude limit of 0.05 magnitude. Giovannelli, Martinez-Pais and Graziati (1992) review the
208: flickering behavior of SS Cyg in both outburst and quiescence, but find no correlation with outburst type, although
209: they do find an inverse correlation between flickering amplitude and system brightness.
210:
211: Cannizzo and Mattei (1992) analyzed the historical light curve of the American Association of Variable Star
212: Observer's (AAVSO) International Database (hereafter: AID), which at the time included 29,387 individual
213: daily means from 1896 September 27 to 1992 April 7. They found no correlation between outburst duration time
214: and cycle time but did confirm a correlation between quiescent magnitude and cycle time, caused by a variation
215: in the mass transfer rate of up to a factor of 2 on yearly time scales and a variation of 20\%-30\% on decadal
216: time scales. They did not find any periodicity in cycle time.
217:
218: In a later study \citep{can98}, using a smaller subset of the data (1963 - 1997), they discovered a variable decay rate in
219: some outburst declines. In a minority of the outbursts, the decay rate slows down about two-thirds of the way into the decline for about a day and
220: a half, then the decay returns to its previous rate. The significance of the break is proportional to the length of the total
221: decline. The break manifests itself as a 20\%-300\% decrease in the decay rate for around one day. Cannizzo and Mattei (1998) refers to this
222: phenomenon as a "glitch", we refer to it hereafter as the "Cannizzo Glitch".
223:
224: Ak et al. (2001) analyzed the quiescence magnitude and outburst cycles of 23 dwarf novae mostly using
225: Fourier analysis. They found no correlation between outburst cycle period and masses of component stars, mean
226: outburst interval, mean outburst duration, mean decline and rise rates of outbursts, absolute quiescent
227: magnitudes and outburst states.
228:
229: In a poster, Hill and Waagen (2005) suggested the existence of a pre-outburst brightening of about 2\% over the course of
230: around 12 hours followed by a plateau which lasts another 12 hours leading up to the onset of the outburst. The analyzed data
231: set included about half of the AID visual data and excluded CCD observations. This was the only search for predictors found in
232: published literature.
233:
234: \subsection{Long Term Variation}
235:
236: Kiplinger, et al. (1988) report a 0.15 magnitude amplitude, 7.2 year period in the quiescent behavior of SS Cyg, determined
237: through Fourier analysis of one day means in the AID data from 1896 - 1984. Also, Bianchini (1988) discovered a
238: similar 6.9 year period through Fourier analysis of the intervals between outbursts and attributes it to solar type
239: variation in the secondary \citep{Bia92}.
240:
241: However, Richman, Applegate and Patterson's (1994) own analysis of the individual data points plus various long term moving averages find that the power of the
242: reported $\sim$7 year period is not significantly greater than that of other low frequency signals in the power spectrum and
243: caution that the reported significance is due to the eye being, "...very prone to spot one to three cycles of periodic behavior
244: in any randomly varying time series." However, their analysis excluded all quiescent data points within 12 days on either side
245: of the outburst, thus if the source for the reported $\sim$7 year period was found in activity near the outburst then it would
246: be hidden from their analysis.
247:
248: Hemplemann and Kurths (1990) O-C analysis found secular variation within 100 years as well as deviations from the sample mean over intervals
249: of a few tens of cycles. Jevtic,
250: Mattei and Schweitzer (2003) performed a nonlinear analysis using Poincar\'{e} section and found a period of around 52 years. It
251: is unclear whether the two periods are related as a fundamental and a harmonic pair.
252:
253: \section{Observations}
254:
255: SS Cyg was observed in the {\it V} and Cousins {\it I} (hereafter {\it I}$_{c}$) \citep{Cou76} bands over 483 nights
256: during a period from May 1, 2005 to February 5, 2007 by AAVSO observers participating in a coordinated campaign. The average length of coverage
257: per observing day was 446 minutes
258: in {\it V} and 348 minutes in {\it I$_{c}$}. In total, 108,612 individual observations in {\it V} and 14,292 observations in
259: {\it I$_{c}$} were obtained from 24 observing locations during the course of the campaign.
260:
261: Each observer reduced his/her own differential photometry using comparison stars published on an AAVSO chart. The values from
262: those stars were determined via precision photometry obtained over multiple nights using the U.S. Naval Observatory - Flagstaff
263: Station (NOFS) 1.0m telescope along with a large set of Landolt standards \citep{lan92} having a range of color and airmass.
264: The raw data and reported uncertainties are available for download from the AAVSO web site.
265:
266: Uncertainty in the individual observations varied widely. When simultaneous data was available, the data with the
267: higher reported uncertainty was excluded.
268: A collective uncertainty for the entire dataset was determined by averaging
269: the observations into one day bins and then adding the standard deviation in quadrature. The result gives an zeropoint
270: uncertainty of 0.1 magnitudes in {\it V} and 0.16 magnitude in {\it I$_{c}$}. This includes both stochastic uncertainty and
271: uncertainty caused by the flickering. When considered separately, most individual datasets had a stochastic
272: uncertainty (precision) between 0.01-0.05 magnitudes.
273:
274: In addition to our photometric data, we also analysed 366,614 visual observations available from the AAVSO International
275: Database \citep{Tur06}. The observations date from May 17, 1904 to July 31, 2006. Previous studies have determined an
276: uncertainty of 0.2-0.3 magnitudes for visual observations while exceptional visual observers can reach a precision of 0.02
277: magnitudes \citep{pri06}. The visual bandpass varies by observer, but in general is slightly bluer than {\it V} \citep{Col99}.
278:
279: \section{Analysis}
280: \subsection{Photometric Data}
281:
282: The resulting light curve covers most of the 2005 and 2006 observing seasons (Figure 2). It includes four long outbursts, six short outbursts, and no anomalous
283: outbursts. Inspection of the AAVSO visual light curve confirms no outbursts were missed.
284:
285: There was considerable flickering in both bands during quiescence (Figure 3). A straight line was removed from a dataset consisting of ({\it
286: V}-{\it I$_{c}$}) measurements converted to flux space \citep{bes79}. No trends were found in either the standard deviation of the coefficients or the residuals of the straight line.
287: Note that due to the flickering in this star, any color not formed from simultaneous observations has built-in error greater than the Poisson
288: or measurement error.
289:
290: To look for predictors, we folded the {\it V}, {\it I$_{c}$}, ({\it V}-{\it I$_{c}$}) and visual datasets onto a single light curve correlated
291: with the onset of outburst, defined as the first observation greater than 0.1 Jy in {\it V}, 0.14 Jy in {\it I$_{c}$} and 0.25 Jy for visual
292: observations (Figure 4) and which is greater than 20 days since the start of the previous outburst (to filter out observational scatter around the
293: outburst thresholds during the decay). We did not find any consistent predictor in the light curves. We also folded the residuals of the detrended
294: ({\it V}-{\it I$_{c}$}) dataset to look for any change in the flickering rate prior to outburst, but none were found.
295:
296: A Fourier analysis \citep{fer81} of the quiescent observations is dominated by red noise caused by the flickering (Figure 5). The orbital period was detected
297: at 0.275300 +/- 0.000006 days along with a strong harmonic at 0.13757 +/- 0.000001 days. No other periodic signals were
298: detected. Significance in all Fourier analysis was determined at the 3 sigma level by tripling the standard deviation from the average power of each spectrum computed with the minimum frequency resolution supported by the data.
299:
300: The Cannizzo Glitch was originally detected in around 1/6 of the outbursts of SS Cyg. \citep{can98} We did not detect the glitch among our ten analyzed outbursts.
301:
302: \subsection{Visual Data}
303:
304: The AID collection of visual observations was analysed to look for periodicity in the outbursts and quiescence activity which could be a predictor of future outburst
305: behavior. One day means for the complete 102 year visual database were computed in magnitude space so errors will remain unbiased in the magnitude domain rather than
306: becoming biased after transformation into flux space. To look for long term periodicity, such as Kiplinger's 7.2 year and Bianchini's 6.9 year periods (hereafter
307: {\it KB's}) periods, a Fourier analysis for signals in the 1,000-10,000 day range was computed (Figure 6). It reveals multiple signals, including KB's periods, but
308: nothing that stands out on its own above background activity levels. This confirms the results of Richman, Applegate and Patterson's earlier analysis using a smaller
309: sample of the visual database.
310:
311: However, periods consistent with the KB reports are present from the beginning of the light curve until
312: approximately 2426500. Fourier analysis with the CLEANEST algorithm \citep{fos96b} of data until 2426500 reveals
313: a strong signal at 3076 days (Figure 8). Another strong signal appears around 2436500, this one around 1,530
314: +/- 94 days. It only lasts roughly 13,600 days, but it also appears roughly 10,000 days earlier and again 10,000 days
315: later.
316:
317:
318: A weighted wavelet Z-transform \citep{fos96a} (Figure 7) of the same frequency range with a window size
319: of two full cycles between the inflection points of the Gaussian envelope (c=0.0125) shows intermittent presence of
320: various signals. The WWZ is designed to be approximately an F-statistic with non-integer numbers of degrees of freedom. But with a generous quantity of data, it
321: can be treated roughly as chi-square with three degrees of freedom. Hence the values of its peaks are statistically significant, although we express two caveats. First, a significant
322: value does {\it not} indicate that the data matches a periodic or pseudo-periodic fluctuation, only that it contradicts the null hypothesis (that there is no signal at all, just noise).
323: Second, the stated statistical behavior is for a white-noise process; for red noise the "critical values" will be higher. Nonetheless, the peaks in the time-frequency plot are at high enough
324: values that we consider them strong evidence of transient pseudoperiodic fluctuation.
325:
326: We also calculated the time between onset of outbursts in the visual dataset. Due to inconsistent coverage, we
327: ignored the interval 2417586 - 2419339 because we could not be sure an outburst was not missed by the
328: observers. Simply ignoring the gaps during this interval, as opposed to the entire interval, would have created a
329: selection effect that favored shorter times between outbursts. We found 703 outbursts with an average outburst onset
330: interval of 49.2 +/- 15.8 days.
331:
332: To look for changes in this interval, we averaged the outburst intervals in 500d bins. The result (Figure 9) shows a
333: possible relationship between outburst interval and the 1,000 - 2,000d periods detected in the wavelet analysis. We
334: computed the peak periods via Fourier analysis of 10,000d windows centered on the midpoints of each of the 500d mean bins.
335: We dropped the first and last 10 bins since they had $<$10,000d of data in them. Finally, we computed a bivariate
336: Pearson Correlation coefficient \citep{tur08} between the peak period and the average outburst intervals. The result
337: was a coefficient of -.356, significant to the 0.01 level, which is moderately strong according to Cohen's guidelines.
338: Thus we conclude there is a moderate negative relationship between the strength of 1,000-2,000d periods in the
339: quiescent visual database and the intervals between outbursts.
340:
341: \section{Conclusion}
342:
343: We have analysed intensive {\it V} and {\it I$_{c}$} band observations of SS Cyg over two observing seasons. We were unable to detect any
344: predictors or other activity which could be used to predict an oncoming outburst. However, the combined uncertainty of our photometric data was
345: high enough to warrant further investigation with more precise observations. In particular, some of the data suggest a rise in the ({\it
346: V-I$_{c}$}) color beginning five days prior to outburst. The rise level was barely within our uncertainty so we cannot report it. A similar
347: dataset in ({\it B-$I_{c}$}) may increase the photometric sensitivity to such a feature, if it exists.
348:
349: We also analysed 102 years of AAVSO visual observations. No periodicity was detected which had not already been reported. However, long term
350: quasiperiodic features were detected on the order of 1,000-2,000 days. Their existence is moderately correlated with shortened intervals between
351: outbursts. If the quasiperiodic features are due to solar type variation, as previously reported, then it is possible that the
352: enhanced activity drives additional mass transfer thus decreasing the mean time between outbursts.
353:
354: \section{Acknowledgments}
355:
356: We would like to thank Eric Chaisson and Matthew Templeton for advice in preparation of this manuscript and Dave Tandy for support during
357: the observing campaign.
358:
359:
360:
361: %%\begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccc}
362: %%\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
363: %%\rotate
364: %%\tablecolumns{2}
365: %%\tablewidth{0pc}
366: %%\tablecaption{2000-3000d quiescence quasiperiodicity in visual observations from 1902-2006}
367: %%\tablehead{
368: %% \colhead{{\it Time span (JD)}} & \colhead{{\it Quasiperiod(s) }} }
369: %%\startdata
370: %%2416617 - 2426617 & 2971.997836$\pm$71.794965 \\
371: %%2426617 - 2436617 & 2074.000332$\pm$76.708974 \\
372: %%2436617 - 2446617 & 2651.999342$\pm$58.711582 \\
373: %%2446617 - 2453947 & 2708.999296$\pm$N/A \\
374: %%\enddata
375: %%\end{deluxetable}
376:
377:
378:
379:
380: \begin{figure}
381: \epsscale{1}
382: \plotone{f2.eps}
383: \caption{{\it V} (green) and {\it I$_{c}$} (red) band photometric light curve for the 2005 and 2006 observing seasons.}
384: \end{figure}
385:
386: \begin{figure}
387: \epsscale{1}
388: \plotone{f3.eps}
389: \caption{A sample of {\it V} and {\it I$_{c}$} flickering in the photemetric light curve.}
390: \end{figure}
391:
392: \begin{figure}
393: \epsscale{1}
394: \plotone{f4.eps}
395: \caption{{\it V}, {\it I$_{c}$} and visual observations averaged into 1d bins and folded at the start of an outburst.}
396: \end{figure}
397:
398: \begin{figure}
399: \epsscale{1}
400: \plotone{f5.eps}
401: \caption{ Red noise caused by flickering in quiescent observations. The horizontal lines represent 3, 2 and 1 sigma significance (descending). }
402: \end{figure}
403:
404: \begin{figure}
405: \epsscale{1}
406: \plotone{f6.eps}
407: \caption{ Wavelet analysis of 1,000-2,000d quasiperiodic activity in the AAVSO 102 year database of visual observations. }
408: \end{figure}
409:
410: \begin{figure}
411: \epsscale{1}
412: \plotone{f7.eps}
413: \caption{ Fourier analysis of 1,000-2,000d quasiperiodic activity in the AAVSO 102 year database of visual observations. The horizontal lines
414: represent 3, 2 and 1 sigma significance (descending).}
415: \end{figure}
416:
417: \begin{figure}
418: \epsscale{1}
419: \plotone{f8.eps}
420: \caption{ Fourier analysis of 1,000-2,000d quasiperiodic activity from to 2416617.7 - 2426500.0. The horizontal lines represent 3, 2 and 1 sigma
421: significance (descending). }
422: \end{figure}
423:
424: \begin{figure}
425: \epsscale{1}
426: \plotone{f9.eps}
427: \caption{ Average interval between outburst onsets (500d bins). A moderate bivariate
428: Pearson Correlation coefficient of -.356 (p$<$.01) was found between these averages and
429: the 1,000-2,000d quasiperiodic activity. }
430: \end{figure}
431:
432:
433:
434: %%Averaging the residuals of a straight line through the quiescent data shows that the flickering amplitude is 17% (+/- 02) greater in I$_{c}$ than in V.
435:
436:
437: %% All observations were converted to flux (Jy) for analysis, unless otherwise noted. First, the photometric data was folded
438: %% on the 0.2751302d orbital period /citep{vol00} to confirm the data's sensitivity (Figure 2).
439:
440:
441:
442:
443: %%in {\it V} December 30, 2005 - May 4, 2006 when SS Cyg was in conjunction with the Sun. Observations in
444:
445:
446:
447:
448: %%\section{Discussion}
449:
450: %%\subsection{Discussion} \label{bozomath}
451:
452:
453:
454: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
455: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
456: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
457: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
458: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
459: %%
460: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
461: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
462: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
463: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
464: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
465: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
466: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
467: %% place of the \cite commands.
468:
469: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
470: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
471: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
472:
473: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
474: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
475: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
476: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
477: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
478:
479: \begin{thebibliography}{}
480: \bibitem[Ak, Ozkan, \& Mattei(2001)]{Ak01}Ak, T., Ozkan, M.T., \& Mattei, J.A. 2001, A\&A, 369, 882
481: \bibitem[Bessell(1979)]{bes79}Bessell, M. S. 1979, \pasp, 91, 589
482: \bibitem[Bianchini(1988)]{Bia88}Bianchini, A. 1988, IBVS, No. 3136
483: \bibitem[Bianchini(1992)]{Bia92}Bianchini, A. Vina del Mar Workshop on Cataclysmic Variable Stars, ed. by Nikolaus Vogt, 1992. ASP Conference Series. 29, p. 284
484: \bibitem[Cannizzo \& Mattei(1992)]{can92}Cannizzo, J. K. \& Mattei, J. A., 1992, \apj, 401, 642
485: \bibitem[Cannizzo(1993)]{can93}Cannizzo, J. K., 1993, \apj, 419, 318
486: \bibitem[Cannizzo \& Mattei(1998)]{can98}Cannizzo, J. K. \& Mattei, J. A., 1998, \apj, 505, 344
487: \bibitem[Collins(1999)]{Col99}Collins, P. L. 1999, J. Amer. Asoc. Var. Star Obs., 27, 1
488: \bibitem[Cousins(1976)]{Cou76}Cousins, A., 1976, Mem. R. Astron. Soc., 81, 25
489: \bibitem[Ferraz-Mello(1981)]{fer81} Ferraz-Mello, S. 1981, \aj, 86, 619
490: \bibitem[Foster(1996a)]{fos96a} Foster, G. 1996, \aj, 111, 541
491: \bibitem[Foster(1996b)]{fos96b} Foster, G. 1996, \aj, 112, 1709
492: \bibitem[Giovannelli(1992)]{gia92}Giovannelli, Martinez-Pais, I. G., \& Sabau Graziati, L. 1992, in ASP Conf. Ser. 29, Vina del Mar Workshop on Cataclysmic Variable Stars,
493: ed. Nikolaus Vogt (San Francisco: ASP), 119
494: \bibitem[Hemplemann \& Kurths et al.(1990)]{hem90}Hemplemann, A., \& Kurths, J. 1990, A\&A, 232, 356
495: \bibitem[Honey et al.(2005)]{hon05}Honey, W. B., Bath, G. T., Charles, P. A., et al. 2005, \mnras, 236, 727
496: \bibitem[Hill \& Waagen(2005)]{Hil05}Hill, R. L. and Waagen, E. O. 2005, Amer. Astr. Soc. Meeting 205, \#19.08
497: \bibitem[Jevtic, Mattei \& Schweitzer(2003)]{jev03} Jevtic, N., Mattei, J. A., \& Schweitzer, J. S. 2003, J. Amer. Asoc. Var. Star Obs., 31, 138
498: \bibitem[Kholopov(1985)]{kho85} Kholopov, P. N. 1985, General Catalog of Variable Stars, 4th edition, Moscow
499: \bibitem[Kiplinger et al.(1988)]{kip88} Kiplinger, A. L., Mattei, J. A., Danskin, K. H., Morgan, J. E. 1988, J. Amer. Asoc. Var. Star
500: Obs. 17, 34
501: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{lan92} Landolt, A. 1992, \aj, 104, 340
502: \bibitem[Osaki(1974)]{osa74} Osaki, Y. 1974, \pasj, 26, 429
503: \bibitem[Price et al.(2006)]{pri06} Price, A., Foster, G., Skiff, B., \& Henden, A. 2006, Amer. Astr. Soc. Meeting 209, \#162.06
504: \bibitem[Richman, Applegate \& Patterson(1994)]{ric94}Richman, H. R., Applegate, J. H., \& Patterson, J. 1994, \pasp, 106, 1075
505: \bibitem[Turner(1908)]{tur08} Turner, H. H. 1908, \mnras, 68, 544
506: \bibitem[Turner et al.(2006)]{Tur06} Turner, R., Price, A., Templeton, M., Waagen, E. O., \& Henden, A. 2006, Amer. Astr. Soc. Meeting 209, \#162.05.
507: \bibitem[Voloshina \& Khruzina(2000)]{vol00} Voloshina, I. B., \& Khruzina, T. S. 2000, Astr. Rep., 44, 2
508: \end{thebibliography}
509:
510: \clearpage
511:
512: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
513: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
514: %% To embed the sample graphics in
515: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
516: %% \includegraphics commands
517: %%
518: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
519: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
520: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
521: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
522: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
523: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
524: %%
525: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
526: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
527: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
528: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
529: %% journal to journal.
530:
531: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
532: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
533: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
534: %% available in the electronic journal.
535:
536:
537: \clearpage
538:
539:
540: \end{document}
541:
542: %%
543: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
544: