1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48:
49: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
50: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
51: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
52: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
53: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
54: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
55:
56: \shorttitle{Low-Ionization Emission Regions in Quasars}
57: \shortauthors{Matsuoka et al.}
58:
59: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
60: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
61:
62: \begin{document}
63:
64: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
65: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
66: %% you desire.
67:
68: %\title{A study of broad \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} emission lines for locating \ion{Fe}{2}-emitting clouds in quasars}
69: \title{Low-Ionization Emission Regions in Quasars: \\
70: Gas Properties Probed with Broad \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} Lines}
71: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
72: %% author and affiliation information.
73: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
74: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
75: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
76: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
77:
78: \author{Y. Matsuoka\altaffilmark{1,}\altaffilmark{3}}
79: \author{K. Kawara\altaffilmark{1}}
80: \and
81: \author{S. Oyabu\altaffilmark{2}}
82:
83:
84:
85: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
86: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
87: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
88: %% affiliation.
89:
90: \altaffiltext{1}{Institute of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015,
91: Japan; matsuoka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp.}
92: \altaffiltext{2}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, 3-1-1,
93: Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan.}
94: \altaffiltext{3}{Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.}
95:
96: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
97: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
98: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
99: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
100: %% editorial office after submission.
101:
102: \begin{abstract}
103: We have compiled the emission-line fluxes of \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446, \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$11287,
104: and the near-infrared (IR) \ion{Ca}{2} triplet ($\lambda$8579) observed in 11 quasars.
105: These lines are considered to emerge from the same gas as do the \ion{Fe}{2} lines in the low-ionized
106: portion of the broad emission line region (BELR).
107: The compiled quasars are distributed over wide ranges of redshift (0.06 $\le z \le$ 1.08) and of
108: luminosity ($-29.8 \le M_{B} \le -22.1$), thus providing a useful sample to investigate the
109: line-emitting gas properties in various quasar environments.
110: The measured line strengths and velocities, as functions of the quasar properties, are analyzed using
111: photoionization model calculations. % and simple analytical considerations.
112: We found that the flux ratio between the \ion{Ca}{2} triplet and \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 is hardly dependent
113: on the redshift or luminosity, indicating similar gas densities in the emission region from quasar to quasar.
114: On the other hand, a scatter of the \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$11287/$\lambda$8446 ratios appears to imply the diversity
115: of the ionization parameter.
116: These facts invoke a picture of the line-emitting gases in quasars that have similar densities and are
117: located at regions exposed to various ionizing radiation fluxes.
118: The observed \ion{O}{1} line widths are found to be remarkably similar over more than 3 orders
119: of magnitude in luminosity, which indicates a kinematically determined location of the emission region and is
120: in clear contrast to the case of \ion{H}{1} lines.
121: We also argue about the dust presence in the emission region since the region is suggested to be located
122: near the dust sublimation point at the outer edge of the BELR.
123: \end{abstract}
124:
125: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
126: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
127: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
128: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
129:
130: \keywords{galaxies: active --- galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: nuclei --- line: formation --- quasars: emission lines}
131:
132: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
133: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
134: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
135: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
136: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
137: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
138: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
139: %% each reference.
140:
141:
142: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
143: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
144: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
145: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
146: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
147: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
148: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
149: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
150: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
151: %%
152: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
153: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
154: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
155: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
156:
157: \section{Introduction}
158:
159: Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are known to have strong emission lines of various ion species.
160: Among them, the
161: \ion{Fe}{2} emission lines are one of the most prominent features in the ultraviolet (UV) to optical spectrum of many AGNs.
162: They have long been hoped to provide significant information about some aspects of the AGNs and their host environments,
163: e.g., energy budget of the line emission region %partly-ionized gas present in the BELR, where the \ion{Fe}{2} lines are formed,
164: and the epoch of the first star formation in the host galaxies.
165: The determination of the first star formation epoch is based on the standard theory that the iron enrichment in galaxies
166: is delayed compared to
167: that of the $\alpha$-elements, such as magnesium, due to their different origins; Type Ia supernovae for iron and Type II
168: supernovae for the $\alpha$-elements \citep{hamann93,yoshii98}.
169: The delay corresponds to the difference in life-times of the progenitors of the two types of supernovae, and is estimated to
170: be 0.3 -- 1 Gyr depending on the host galaxy environments \citep{yoshii96, matteucci01}.
171: Many observations have been devoted to the measurement of \ion{Fe}{2}/\ion{Mg}{2} line flux ratios in high-redshift quasars
172: for this purpose over the last decade \citep[e.g.,][]{elston94,kawara96,dietrich02,dietrich03,iwamuro02,iwamuro04,freudling03,maiolino03}.
173: However, the observed \ion{Fe}{2}/\ion{Mg}{2} ratios show a large scatter, preventing a detection of any significant trend in the
174: Fe abundance as a function of redshift.
175: While a part of the scatter might be due to the difference in the intrinsic Fe/Mg abundance ratio, it is presumable that
176: the diversity of the physical condition within the line-forming gas, affecting line emissivities, is the main cause
177: \citep{verner03, baldwin04}.
178: In the same sense, a change of the observed \ion{Fe}{2}/\ion{Mg}{2} ratio as a function of redshift, if found, should
179: be carefully examined to tell whether it reflects the abundance evolution or the systematic variation of the line emissivity.
180: Thus establishment of a method to probe the line-emitting gas and estimate its physical parameters such as
181: density and incident-ionizing radiation flux has been much awaited.
182:
183:
184: Unfortunately, the Fe$^+$ atom is characterized by an enormous numbers of possible electronic transitions, yielding the ``\ion{Fe}{2}
185: pseudocontinuum'' often observed in AGN spectra, which makes analysis of the observations extremely difficult
186: from both the observational and theoretical viewpoints \citep[e.g., ][hereafter T06]{tsuzuki06}.
187: On the other hand, a promising approach is to use the emission lines emitted by simple atoms in the same region as the \ion{Fe}{2}
188: lines.
189: The most potent lines are \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2}, whose co-spatial emergence with \ion{Fe}{2} is indicated by a resemblance of
190: their profiles \citep{rodriguez02a} and by a correlation between the line strengths \citep{persson88}.
191: Note that it is a natural consequence of similar ionization potentials of the relevant ions, i.e., 16.2 eV for \ion{Fe}{2}, 13.6 eV
192: for \ion{O}{1}, and 11.9 eV for \ion{Ca}{2}.
193:
194:
195:
196: The first extensive study of the physical properties of \ion{O}{1} emitting gases in AGNs was presented by \citet{grandi80}, who
197: observed the strongest \ion{O}{1} line, $\lambda$8446, as well as other weaker \ion{O}{1} lines in Seyfert 1 (Sy1) galaxies.
198: He found that \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 lacks the narrow component that characterizes other permitted lines, and concluded that the
199: line is purely a BELR phenomenon.
200: He also suggested that \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 is produced by Ly$\beta$ fluorescence, which was later confirmed by the observation
201: of I Zw 1, the prototype narrow-line Seyfert 1 (NLS1), by \citet{rudy89}.
202: \citet{rodriguez02b} compiled the UV and near-IR \ion{O}{1} lines, namely, $\lambda$1304, $\lambda$8446, and $\lambda$11287, in
203: normal Sy1s and NLS1s in order to investigate their flux ratios.
204: They found that there must be an additional excitation mechanism for \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446---besides Ly$\beta$ fluorescence---which
205: they concluded is collisional excitation.
206: As for the \ion{Ca}{2} lines, extensive studies of Sy1s were presented by \citet{persson88} and \citet{ferland89}.
207: We have observed seven quasars at redshifts up to $\sim$1.0 for the purpose of obtaining the UV and near-IR \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} lines, thus extending
208: the previous studies to include quasars at high redshifts.
209: Photoionization model calculations were performed and compared with the observations, which led us to conclude that the \ion{O}{1} and
210: \ion{Ca}{2} lines are formed in a gas with density $n_{\rm H} = 10^{11.5} - 10^{12.0}$ cm$^{-3}$, illuminated by the ionizing
211: radiation corresponding to the ionization parameter of $U = 10^{-3.0} - 10^{-2.5}$ \citep[][the latter is referred to as Paper I hereafter]{matsuoka05,
212: matsuoka07}.
213: %The gas is expected to be located at an outer portion of the BELR.
214:
215:
216:
217: Now that the general properties of the \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} emitting gas, as a whole, are thus being revealed, we should turn our
218: eyes to the following question: how are these gas properties related to the quasar characteristics, such as redshift and luminosity?
219: Here we present results of a compilation of the emission-line fluxes of \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446, \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$11287, and the near-IR
220: \ion{Ca}{2} triplet ($\lambda$8498, $\lambda$8542, and $\lambda$8662) observed in 11 quasars.
221: The quasars are distributed over wide ranges of redshift (0.06 $\le z \le$ 1.08) and of luminosity ($-29.8 \le M_{B}
222: \le -22.1$), thus providing a useful sample to track the line-emitting gas properties in various quasar environments.
223: The observational and theoretical data used in this work are described in \S \ref{sec:data}, and results and discussion appear in \S
224: \ref{sec:results}.
225: Our conclusions are summarized in \S \ref{sec:summary}.
226:
227:
228:
229: \section{Data \label{sec:data}}
230:
231: %% In a manner similar to \objectname authors can provide links to dataset
232: %% hosted at participating data centers via the \dataset{} command. The
233: %% second curly bracket argument is printed in the text while the first
234: %% parentheses argument serves as the valid data set identifier. Large
235: %% lists of data set are best provided in a table (see Table 3 for an example).
236: %% Valid data set identifiers should be obtained from the data center that
237: %% is currently hosting the data.
238: %%
239: %% Note that AASTeX interprets everything between the curly braces in the
240: %% macro as regular text, so any special characters, e.g. "#" or "_," must be
241: %% preceded by a backslash. Otherwise, you will get a LaTeX error when you
242: %% compile your manuscript. Special characters do not
243: %% need to be escaped in the optional, square-bracket argument.
244:
245:
246: \subsection{Observations}
247:
248: A quasar sample is compiled from \citet{matsuoka05}, \citet{riffel06}, and Paper I.
249: Their observational characteristics\footnote{
250: The $B$-band absolute magnitudes of the quasars are taken from \citet{veron06} who assumed the cosmological parameters of
251: $H_{\rm 0}$ = 50 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ and $q_{\rm 0}$ = 0.
252: In a flat cosmology with $H_{\rm 0}$ = 71 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, ${\rm \Omega}_{\rm M}$ = 0.29, and ${\rm \Omega}_{\rm \Lambda}$ = 0.71
253: \citep[e.g.,][]{riess04},
254: the absolute magnitudes would be systematically smaller than listed in Table \ref{sample} by 0.6 -- 0.7 mag
255: \citep[see Fig. 2 in][]{veron06}.
256: However, such a systematic change does not affect our arguments below.}
257: are summarized in Table \ref{sample}.
258: The sample in \citet{riffel06} mainly provides quasars in the local universe ($z \la$ 0.1);
259: they selected the quasars from the Palomer bright quasar survey of \citet{schmidt83} with the criteria of (1)
260: being well-known
261: studied sources in the optical/UV and X-ray regions, and (2) having the $K$-band magnitude limited to $K <$ 12.
262: %The objects that had been already extensively studied in the near-IR region were cut out from the target list.
263: On the other hand, the quasars in \citet{matsuoka05} and Paper I constitute a high-redshift sample with redshifts up to $\sim$1.0.
264: The selection criteria used in those works are that (1) the UV spectrum is available in the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} Faint Object Spectrograph archive
265: \citep{evans04}; and (2) \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446, \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$11287, and the near-IR \ion{Ca}{2} triplet fall within the
266: atmospheric windows.
267: Then the brightest objects in the target list were observed, which have the $H$-band magnitudes of $H <$ 15.
268:
269:
270: Although the fluxes of the relevant \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} lines have been measured in \citet{riffel06}, we re-measured them
271: with the identical method to Paper I in order to remove any systematic differences due to the different
272: measurement strategies, especially for deblending the \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 + the \ion{Ca}{2} triplet feature.
273: %(see \S 2.4 in Paper I for details of the emission-line measurements).
274: The 1$\sigma$ error of the spectra is assumed to be 1\% of the continuum level while their spectra apparently have the higher qualities.
275: The measured fluxes of \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$11287 is plotted versus those listed in \citet{riffel06} in Figure \ref{compare};
276: they are in good agreement with each other, which is well within the accuracy needed in this work.
277: We also re-measured the emission-line fluxes of PG 1116$+$215 studied in \citet{matsuoka05}, since we did not cover the \ion{Ca}{2}
278: lines in that work.
279: %and the measurement method of \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 is different from those of Paper I.
280: %However, no significant difference was found between the measured fluxes in the two method.
281:
282:
283:
284: The measured line strengths are listed in Table \ref{lineflux} as the photon number flux ratios of the
285: \ion{Ca}{2} triplet/\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446
286: and of \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$11287/\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446, and as the rest-frame equivalent widths (EWs) of \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446.
287: These forms of expression are particularly useful in discussing the line formation processes.
288: Hereafter they are expressed as $n$(\ion{Ca}{2})/$n$(\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446), \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$11287)/$n$($\lambda$8446),
289: and EW (\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446), respectively.
290:
291:
292:
293:
294:
295:
296: \subsection{Model Calculations\label{data_model}}
297:
298: In order to interpret the observations, we utilize the model calculations presented in Paper I.
299: They are briefly summarized below.
300:
301: The model calculations were performed in the framework of the photoionized BELR gas using the photoionization code Cloudy,
302: version 06.02 \citep{ferland98}.
303: Two shapes of the incident continuum were adopted, which are ``standard AGN ionizing continuum''s reported in T06
304: and in \citet[][hereafter K97]{korista97}.
305: However, we found little effect on the predicted \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} line ratios by changing
306: the incident continuum shape from one to another.
307: The BELR gas was modeled to have a constant hydrogen density $n_{\rm H}$ (cm$^{-3}$) and be exposed to the ionizing continuum with a
308: photon flux of $\Phi$ (s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$).
309: In the calculations, the ionizing continuum flux was expressed with the ionization parameter $U \equiv \Phi/(n_{\rm H}c)$
310: where $c$ is the speed of light.
311: The gas column density was set to 10$^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ and was changed in a range of $N_{\rm H} = 10^{17} - 10^{25}$ cm$^{-2}$, while
312: the chemical abundance was assumed to be solar.
313: Three cases of the microturbulence were considered, whose velocity $v_{\rm turb}$ is 0, 10, and 100 km s$^{-1}$.
314:
315:
316: The different continuum shapes and the microturbulent velocities were combined into four baseline models (Model 1 with T06 continuum and
317: $v_{\rm turb}$ = 0 km s$^{-1}$, Model 2 with T06 continuum and $v_{\rm turb}$ = 10 km s$^{-1}$, Model 3 with T06 continuum and
318: $v_{\rm turb}$ = 100 km s$^{-1}$, and Model 4 with K97 continuum and $v_{\rm turb}$ = 100 km s$^{-1}$).
319: %, which are listed in Table \ref{models}.
320: We searched in the gas physical parameter space of ($n_{\rm H}$, $U$) in each model for the parameter sets that reproduce the
321: observed \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} line strengths, and
322: found that all baseline models with ($n_{\rm H}$, $U$) around ($10^{11.5}$ cm$^{-3}$, $10^{-3.0}$) best fit to the observations.
323: % (see Table \ref{models}).
324: %It is noted that the predicted line ratios are altered only by a factor of $\sim$2 when the gas column density is changed in a range
325: %of $N_{\rm H} = 10^{23} - 10^{25}$ cm$^{-2}$, which could hardly affect our results.
326: On the other hand, the observed shape and EW of the \ion{Fe}{2} UV emission could not be reproduced unless the microturbulent velocity of
327: $v_{\rm turb} >$ 100 km s$^{-1}$ was assumed \citep{baldwin04}.
328: Thus we adopt Model 3 as the default baseline model below, while we get little change of the results in this work concerning the
329: analysis of the \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} lines when other baseline models are adopted.
330: The ($n_{\rm H}$, $U$) parameters that best fit to the observations in Model 3 are ($n_{\rm H}$, $U$) = (10$^{12.0}$ cm$^{-3}$, 10$^{-2.5}$),
331: which are used as the reference grid point below.
332:
333:
334: %% In this section, we use the \subsection command to set off
335: %% a subsection. \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.
336:
337: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label
338: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the
339: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.
340: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of
341: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.
342: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will
343: %% automatically renumber them.
344:
345: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments
346: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.
347:
348:
349:
350: \section{Results and Discussion \label{sec:results}}
351:
352:
353: \subsection{A Picture of the Dust-Free Emission Region}
354:
355:
356: We plot the observed values of $n$(\ion{Ca}{2})/$n$(\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446), \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$11287)/$n$($\lambda$8446),
357: and EW (\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) as functions of the redshift and of the $B$-band absolute
358: magnitude $M_{B}$ in Figure \ref{vsprop2}.
359: One of the remarkable results is found in the top panels; the \ion{Ca}{2}/\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 ratio is hardly dependent on
360: redshift or luminosity over the plotted range,
361: while the ratio is predicted to be very sensitive to the density of the line-emitting gas in the photoionization models.
362: %In fact, the \ion{Ca}{2}/\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 ratio increases with the increased density rapidly and monotonically.
363: We show the model predictions on the $n$(\ion{Ca}{2})/$n$(\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) --
364: \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$11287)/$n$($\lambda$8446) plane in Figure \ref{oioi} ({\it left}), as well as the observed values (see also Fig. 7
365: in Paper I\footnote{
366: Note that Figure 7 in Paper I shows the predictions of Model 1, which is not adopted in this paper since the assumed microturbulent
367: velocity, $v_{\rm turb}$ = 0 km s$^{-1}$, could not reproduce the observed \ion{Fe}{2} UV emissions (see \S \ref{data_model}).
368: However, Model 3 adopted in this work predict very similar results to those shown in Figure 7 regarding the \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2}
369: emissions, while the whole pattern of contour is slightly ($\sim$ 0.5 dex) shifted to the high-density regime; the best-fit
370: parameters in Model 1 are ($n_{\rm H}$, $U$) = (10$^{11.5}$ cm$^{-3}$, 10$^{-3.0}$).
371: }).
372: The gas density $n_{\rm H}$ and the ionization parameter $U$ are changed around the reference grid point, ($n_{\rm H}$, $U$)
373: = (10$^{12.0}$ cm$^{-3}$, 10$^{-2.5}$), over 2 orders of magnitude in both parameters.
374: It is clearly seen that the predicted $n$(\ion{Ca}{2})/$n$(\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) ratio increases monotonically with
375: the increased gas density, and that all the observed values are marked with the density in the vicinity of the
376: reference point, log $n_{\rm H}$ = 12.0.
377: Thus the similar density of the line-emitting gases are strongly indicated for the quasars distributed over these redshift and luminosity ranges.
378:
379:
380: The values of EW (\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446), both observed and calculated with the density of log $n_{\rm H}$ = 12.0, are shown in Figure \ref{oioi}
381: ({\it right}) as a function of the \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$11287)/ $n$($\lambda$8446) ratio.
382: It shows that the predictions of EWs are also consistent with the observed data when log $n_{\rm H}$ = 12.0 and a covering fraction (cf) of the
383: line-emitting gas as seen from the central energy source of 0.2 -- 0.5 are assumed.
384: Note that the covering fraction could be much smaller if we assumed oxygen overabundance relative to the solar value.
385:
386:
387:
388: On the other hand, a scatter of the observed data in the \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$11287)/ $n$($\lambda$8446) axis seems to be related to the
389: diversity of the ionization parameter (Fig. \ref{oioi}, {\it left}).
390: Note that the diversity of other parameters, such as microturbulent velocity, gas column density, and chemical composition,
391: could not explain this diagram since they significantly alter the $n$(\ion{Ca}{2})/$n$(\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) ratio,
392: rather than \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$11287)/ $n$($\lambda$8446), and thus they are unable to explain the observed similarity of the former
393: ratios (Paper I).
394: It is also quite unlikely that the diversity of these parameter values is balanced out by the fine-tuned density in such a way that
395: the $n$(\ion{Ca}{2})/$n$(\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) ratio is always kept to be $\sim$1.0, unless these lines are the dominant
396: heating or cooling sources of the emission region.
397: As with the $n$(\ion{Ca}{2})/$n$(\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) ratio, \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$11287)/ $n$($\lambda$8446) is not clearly
398: dependent on the redshift or luminosity (Fig. \ref{vsprop2}, {\it middle left and middle right}).
399:
400:
401:
402: The above arguments invoke a picture of the line-emitting gases in quasars that have similar densities and are
403: located at regions exposed to various ionizing radiation fluxes.
404: It would be a consequence of the difference in distance to the central continuum source and/or in the intrinsic
405: luminosity of the quasars.
406: Note that it is in clear contrast to the well-studied case of H$\beta$, whose emission regions in AGNs are known to be
407: characterized by similar ionization parameters.
408: In fact, reverberation mapping results for H$\beta$ show the emission region size ($r$) -- luminosity ($L$) relation of
409: $r \propto L^{0.5}$, which is consistent with the constant ionization parameter regime \citep{peterson02, bentz06}.
410: Such a situation has long been expected in order to account for the remarkably similar AGN spectra over a broad range of luminosity,
411: and was incorporated into the locally optimally emitting cloud (LOC) model suggested by \citet{baldwin95}, that is, that the BELR is composed
412: of gas with widely distributed physical parameters and each emission line arises from its preferable environment.
413: %Thus, location of the H$\beta$ emission region in the BELR is determined based on the incident ionization radiation flux.
414: On the other hand, the case in \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} lines apparently indicates that the location of the emission region is not
415: radiation-selected.
416: %, as opposed to H$\beta$.
417:
418:
419:
420: In line with the above arguments, we found a clear difference of the velocity-luminosity relation between \ion{O}{1} and H$\beta$;
421: the measured \ion{O}{1} line widths are plotted versus $M_B$ in Figure \ref{mag_width}, which shows that the \ion{O}{1} line widths
422: are remarkably similar, concentrated around 1500 -- 2000 km s$^{-1}$, over more than 3 orders of magnitude in the $B$-band luminosity.
423: On the other hand, those for the hydrogen Balmer lines usually have a large scatter as shown by, e.g., \citet{kaspi00}; their sample of
424: 34 AGNs, spanning over 4 orders
425: of magnitude in continuum luminosity, has the line widths of 1000 -- 10,000 km s$^{-1}$.
426: Such a trend is also indicated by \citet{persson88}, who reported that while the correlation between FWHM (\ion{O}{1}) and FWHM (H$\beta$) is good for
427: the small FWHM regime, the \ion{O}{1} lines grow systematically narrower than H$\beta$ at large line width.
428: \citet{rodriguez02a} conducted a detailed study of the near-IR emission line profiles in NLS1s, and found that \ion{O}{1}, \ion{Ca}{2}, and \ion{Fe}{2} lines
429: are systematically narrower than the broad components of other low-ionization lines such as hydrogen Paschen lines and \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$10830.
430: They also argued that these lines are produced in the outermost portion of the BELR, since their widths are just slightly
431: broader than those of [\ion{S}{3}] $\lambda$9531 which they assumed is formed in the inner portion of the narrow emission line region (NELR).
432: While the scattered widths of \ion{H}{1} lines could be interpreted as a consequence of the radiation-selected locations of the emitting gases, regardless of the
433: gas kinematics, the remarkable similarity of the \ion{O}{1} line widths might imply the kinematically determined emission regions.
434: In such a situation, the diversity of the ionization parameters, as discussed above, would be an inevitable result.
435: As stated by \citet{persson88}, there is clearly interesting information which could be deduced from studies of the \ion{O}{1} and \ion{H}{1} line profiles;
436: especially, reverberation mapping of these \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} lines would be a powerful tool to reveal the underlying physics.
437:
438:
439:
440:
441: \subsection{A Picture of the Dusty Emission Region}
442:
443: The widely-accepted theory of the BELR describes its outer edge, where the \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} emission lines are likely to be formed,
444: set by the dust sublimation \citep[e.g.,][]{laor93, netzer93}.
445: If we accept this picture, the dust grains are possibly mixed in the line-emitting gas and suppress the \ion{Ca}{2} emission through the substantial
446: Ca depletion. % of Ca which easily condenses onto the dust grains.
447: Such a situation is in fact reported for the NELR by the absence or significant weakness of the observed [\ion{Ca}{2}] $\lambda$7291 line
448: \citep{kingdon95, villar97}.
449: \citet{ferguson97} presented the LOC model calculations of the narrow emission lines and argued that Ca is depleted relative to the solar value
450: by factors of 3 -- 160.
451:
452:
453: It is hard to see an evidence of the dust presence in the emission region from our results, since Figure \ref{oioi} appears to show that our dust-free
454: models successfully reproduce the observations.
455: However, it is noteworthy that %the data points in the figure lie slightly to the left of where the models lie, and that
456: it is quite difficult to account for %reproduce
457: the observed data at \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$ 11287)/$n$($\lambda$ 8446) $<$ 0.4 by the models with log $n_{\rm H}$ = 12.0.
458: The problem is that such small values of \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$ 11287)/$n$($\lambda$ 8446) could only be reproduced with the higher densities than
459: log $n_{\rm H}$ = 12.0 so that \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 emission is exclusively enhanced by the collisional excitation, while such a dense gas produces
460: intense \ion{Ca}{2} emission that is much stronger than observed.
461: One can clearly see this trend in Figure \ref{oioi} ({\it left}).
462: If we assumed significant Ca depletion in the line-emitting gas, these difficulties are naturally resolved since it significantly suppresses the
463: otherwise intense \ion{Ca}{2} emissions.
464: For example, the data point representing (log $n_{\rm H}$, log $U$) = (13.0, $-$2.5) in Figure \ref{oioi} ({\it left}) could provide a plausible model for
465: the observations at \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$ 11287)/$n$($\lambda$ 8446) $<$ 0.4 if the \ion{Ca}{2} emission is suppressed by a factor of a few times 10.\footnote{
466: The predicted EW for the model with (log $n_{\rm H}$, log $U$) = (13.0, $-$2.5) is EW (\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) = 30 \AA, which is consistent with
467: the observations if rather large covering factors of 0.5 -- 1.0 and/or oxygen overabundance relative to the solar value are assumed.
468: }
469: %For example, the model with ($n_H$, $U$, Ca/Ca$_{\odot}$) = (10$^{12.5}$, 10$^{-2.0}$, 10$^{-2.0}$) predicts
470: %\ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$ 11287)/$n$($\lambda$ 8446) = ???, $n$(\ion{Ca}{2})/$n$(\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) = ???, and EW (\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) = ???
471: %with the covering factor of ???, thus reproducing the observations with \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$ 11287)/$n$($\lambda$ 8446) $<$ 0.4.
472:
473:
474: The dust grains present in the line-emitting gas might also give the natural explanation to the observed lack of some UV emission lines relative to
475: their optical or near-IR counterparts.
476: \citet{ferland89} mentioned the possibility of the dust survival in the BELR gas in order to explain the extreme weakness of the observed \ion{Ca}{2}
477: $\lambda$3934 and $\lambda$3639 lines relative to the near-IR triplet.
478: At least a part of the long-standing \ion{Fe}{2} UV/opt problem, in which the observed ratios of \ion{Fe}{2} UV flux to the optical flux fall far below
479: the photoionization model predictions \citep[see, e.g.,][]{baldwin04}, could also be explained.
480: However, it should be noted that the dust would affect the line formation processes in a very complicated manner, which should be precisely
481: addressed when discussing the specific lines;
482: for the \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} lines, one of the most apparent effects as well as the Ca depletion would be the destruction
483: of Ly$\beta$ photons which otherwise excite \ion{O}{1} atoms, thus the suppression of the \ion{O}{1} emissions.
484: The resultant line flux ratios could be much different from those derived from the simple speculations.
485:
486:
487:
488: %Finally we address the issue of the Baldwin effect, i.e., an anti-correlation between the EW and the quasar luminosity.
489: %It was first discovered by \citet{baldwin77} and subsequently confirmed for many UV and optical emission lines such
490: %as \ion{C}{4} $\lambda$1549, Ly$\alpha$, and \ion{O}{4} $\lambda$1034 \citep{veron83, baldwin89, kinney90, osmer94, zheng95, green01}.
491: %We could see that there is a weak correlation between EW (\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) and $M_B$ (Fig. \ref{vsprop2}, {\it bottom right})
492: %if we omit the clearly deviated data point at $M_B = -28.0$ (PG 1148$+$549).
493: %Actually, if we omit the quasar from the fit, the correlation coefficient is 0.668 and its confidence
494: %level is 0.965; thus we obtain a marginally significant correlation.
495: %To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the Baldwin effect found in the near-IR lines.
496: %Although several models have been suggested, the driving mechanism of the Baldwin effect is still not clearly understood
497: %\citep[see][for a recent review]{shields07}.
498: %A compelling scenario is the luminosity-dependent continuum shape incident on the line-emitting gas, which is
499: %related to the mass of the central black hole and the accretion rate \citep[][and references therein]{dietrich02b}.
500: %The exceptionally large EW observed in PG 1148$+$549 might be explained by an unusually large covering factor of the line-emitting gas.
501:
502:
503:
504: \section{Summary \label{sec:summary}}
505:
506: We have compiled the emission-line fluxes of \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446, \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$11287, and the near-IR \ion{Ca}{2} triplet
507: ($\lambda$8579) observed in 11 quasars.
508: The quasars are distributed over wide ranges of redshift (0.06 $\le z \le$ 1.08) and of luminosity ($-29.8 \le M_B \le -22.1$), thus
509: providing a useful sample to track the line-emitting gas properties in various quasar environments.
510: The measured line strengths and velocities, as functions of the quasar properties, were analyzed with photoionization model calculations.
511: %and simple analytical considerations.
512: Our findings and conclusions are as follows:
513:
514: 1. There is no sign of a significant change in the flux ratios of the \ion{Ca}{2} triplet and \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 over the
515: redshift and luminosity ranges studied here.
516: It strongly indicates similar gas densities in the line-emission region from quasar to quasar.
517:
518: 2. The observed scatter of the \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$11287/$\lambda$8446 ratios appears to be related to the diversity of the
519: ionization parameter, while the ratio is not clearly dependent on the redshift or luminosity.
520: Combined with the similarity of the \ion{Ca}{2}/\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 ratios,
521: it invokes the picture of the line-emitting gases in quasars that have similar densities and are located at regions exposed to various
522: ionizing radiation fluxes.
523: %, which is also consistent with the observed line ratios -- width relation.
524:
525:
526: 3. The \ion{O}{1} line widths are remarkably similar from quasar to quasar over more than 3 orders of magnitude in luminosity.
527: It might imply a kinematically determined location of the line emission region and is in clear contrast to the case of \ion{H}{1} lines,
528: whose emission region is considered to be radiation-selected.
529:
530:
531: 4. If we accept that the \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} emission lines are formed at the outer edge of the BELR and that the outer edge is set by
532: the dust sublimation, the line-emitting gas is possibly mixed with the dust grains.
533: In fact such a situation may better reproduce the observations than the dust-free case through the significant Ca depletion.
534: % which leads to the suppression of the \ion{Ca}{2} emissions.
535:
536:
537:
538: %4. The EW of \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 shows an anti-correlation with the quasar absolute magnitude with a marginal significance.
539: %It is the Baldwin effect, found in the near-IR lines.
540:
541:
542:
543: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
544: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
545: %% command.
546:
547: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
548: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
549: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
550: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
551: %% text to be printed in the second.
552:
553: \acknowledgments
554:
555: We are grateful to the referee for giving useful and suggestive comments to improve this paper.
556: Y.M. acknowledges grants-in-aid from the Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
557: (JSPS) for Young Scientists.
558: This work has been supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
559: (15253002, 17104002) and the Japan-Australia Research Cooperative Program from JSPS.
560:
561:
562:
563:
564: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
565: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
566: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
567: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
568: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
569: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
570: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
571: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
572:
573: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
574: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
575: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
576: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
577: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
578:
579:
580: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
581: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
582: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
583:
584: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
585: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
586: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
587:
588: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
589: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
590: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
591: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
592: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
593: %%
594: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
595: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
596: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
597: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
598: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
599: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
600: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
601: %% place of the \cite commands.
602:
603: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
604: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
605: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
606:
607: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
608: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
609: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
610: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
611: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
612:
613: \begin{thebibliography}{}
614: \bibitem[Baldwin et al.(2004)]{baldwin04} Baldwin, J. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Hamann, F., \& LaCluyz\'{e}, A. 2004, \apj, 615, 610
615: \bibitem[Baldwin et al.(1995)]{baldwin95} Baldwin, J. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., \& Verner, D. 1995, \apj, 455, L119
616: \bibitem[Bentz et al.(2006)]{bentz06} Bentz, M. C., Peterson, B. M., Pogge, R. W., Vestergaard, M., \& Onken, C. A. 2006, \apj, 644, 133
617: %\bibitem[Boroson \& Green(1992)]{boroson92} Boroson, T. A., \& Green, R. F. 1992, \apjs, 80, 109
618: \bibitem[Dietrich et al.(2002)]{dietrich02} Dietrich, M., Appenzeller, I., Vestergaard, M., \& Wagner, S. J. 2002a, \apj, 564, 581
619: \bibitem[Dietrich et al.(2003)]{dietrich03} Dietrich, M., Hamann, F., Appenzeller, I., \& Vestergaard, M. 2003, \apj, 596, 817
620: \bibitem[Elston et al.(1994)]{elston94} Elston, R., Thompson, K. L., \& Hill, G. J. 1994, \nat, 367, 250
621: \bibitem[Evans \& Koratkar(2004)]{evans04} Evans, I. N., \& Koratkar, A. P. 2004, \apjs, 150, 73
622: \bibitem[Ferguson et al.(1997)]{ferguson97} Ferguson, J. W.,Korista, K. T., Baldwin, J. A., \& Ferland, G. J. 1997, \apj, 487, 122
623: \bibitem[Ferland et al.(1998)]{ferland98} Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., Ferguson, J. W., Kingdon, J. B., \& Verner, E., M. 1998, \pasp, 110, 761
624: \bibitem[Ferland \& Persson(1989)]{ferland89} Ferland, G. J., \& Persson, S. E. 1989, \apj, 347, 656
625: \bibitem[Freudling et al.(2003)]{freudling03} Freudling, W., Corbin, M. R., \& Korista, K. T. 2003, \apj, 587, L67
626: \bibitem[Grandi(1980)]{grandi80} Grandi, S. A. 1980, \apj, 238, 10
627: \bibitem[Hamann \& Ferland(1993)]{hamann93} Hamann, F., \& Ferland, G. 1993, \apj, 418, 11
628: \bibitem[Iwamuro et al.(2004)]{iwamuro04} Iwamuro, F., Kimura, M., Eto, S., Maihara, T., Motohara, K., Yoshii, Y., \& Doi, M. 2004, \apj, 614, 69
629: \bibitem[Iwamuro et al.(2002)]{iwamuro02} Iwamuro, F., Motohara, K., Maihara, T., Kimura, M., Yoshii, Y., \& Doi, M. 2002, \apj, 565, 63
630: %\bibitem[Joly et al.(1985)]{joly85} Joly, M., Collin-Souffrin, S., Masnou, J. L, \& Nottale, L. 1985, \aap, 152, 282
631: \bibitem[Kaspi et al.(2000)]{kaspi00} Kaspi, S., Smith, P. S., Netzer, H., Maoz, D., Jannuzi, B. T., \& Giveon, U. 2000, \apj, 533, 631
632: \bibitem[Kawara et al.(1996)]{kawara96} Kawara, K., Murayama, T., Taniguchi, Y., \& Arimoto, N. 1996, \apj, 470, L85
633: \bibitem[Kingdon et al.(1995)]{kingdon95} Kingdon, J., Ferland, G. J., \& Feibelman, W. A. 1995, \apj, 439, 793
634: \bibitem[Korista et al.(1997)]{korista97} Korista, K., Baldwin, J., Ferland, G., \& Verner, D. 1997, \apjs, 108, 401 (K97)
635: \bibitem[Laor \& Draine(1993)]{laor93} Laor, A., \& Draine, B. T. 1993, \apj, 402, 441
636: \bibitem[Maiolino et al.(2003)]{maiolino03} Maiolino, R., Juarez, Y., Mujica, R., Nagar, N. M., \& Oliva, E. 2003, \apj, 596, L155
637: \bibitem[Matsuoka et al.(2007)]{matsuoka07} Matsuoka, Y., Oyabu, S., Tsuzuki, Y., \& Kawara, K. 2007, \apj, 663, 781 (Paper I)
638: \bibitem[Matsuoka et al.(2005)]{matsuoka05} Matsuoka, Y., Oyabu, S., Tsuzuki, Y., Kawara, K., \& Yoshii, Y. 2005, \pasj, 57, 563
639: \bibitem[Matteucci \& Recchi (2001)]{matteucci01} Matteucci, F., \& Recchi, S. 2001, \apj, 558, 351
640: %\bibitem[McLure \& Jarvis(2002)]{mclure02} McLure, R. J., \& Jarvis, M. J. 2002, \mnras, 337, 109
641: \bibitem[Netzer \& Laor(1993)]{netzer93} Netzer, H., \& Laor, A. 1993, \apj, 404, L51
642: \bibitem[Persson(1988)]{persson88} Persson, S. E. 1988, \apj, 330, 751
643: \bibitem[Peterson et al.(2002)]{peterson02} Peterson, B. M., et al. 2002, \apj, 581, 197
644: \bibitem[Riess et al.(2004)]{riess04} Riess, A. G., et al. 2004, \apj, 607, 665
645: \bibitem[Riffel et al.(2006)]{riffel06} Riffel, R., Rodr\'{i}guez-Ardila, A., \& Pastoriza, M. G. 2006, \aap, 457, 61
646: \bibitem[Rodr\'{i}guez-Ardila et al.(2002a)]{rodriguez02a} Rodr\'{i}guez-Ardila, A., Viegas, S. M., Pastoriza, M. G., \& Prato, L. 2002a, \apj, 565, 140
647: \bibitem[Rodr\'{i}guez-Ardila et al.(2002b)]{rodriguez02b} Rodr\'{i}guez-Ardila, A., Viegas, S. M., Pastoriza, M. G., Prato, L., \& Donzelli, C. J.
648: 2002b, \apj, 572, 94
649: \bibitem[Rudy et al.(1989)]{rudy89} Rudy, R. J., Rossano, G. S., \& Puetter, R. C. 1989, \apj, 342, 235
650: \bibitem[Schmidt \& Green(1983)]{schmidt83} Schmidt, M., \& Green, R. F. 1983, \apj, 269, 352
651: %\bibitem[Shuder(1984)]{shuder84} Shuder, J. M. 1984, \apj, 280, 491
652: \bibitem[Tsuzuki et al.(2006)]{tsuzuki06} Tsuzuki, Y., Kawara, K., Yoshii, Y., Oyabu, S., Tanab\'{e}, T., \& Matsuoka, Y. 2006, \apj, 650, 57 (T06)
653: \bibitem[Verner et al.(2003)]{verner03} Verner, E., Bruhweiler, F., Verner, D., Johansson, S., \& Gull, T. 2003, \apj, 592, L59
654: \bibitem[V{\'{e}}ron-Cetty \& V{\'{e}}ron(2006)]{veron06} V{\'{e}}ron-Cetty, M.-P., \& V{\'{e}}ron, P. 2006, \aap, 455, 773
655: \bibitem[Villar-Mart\'{i}n \& Binette(1997)]{villar97} Villar-Mart\'{i}n, M., \& Binette, L. 1997, \aap, 317, 350
656: %\bibitem[Wandel \& Yahil(1985)]{wandel85} Wandel, A., \& Yahil, A. 1985, \apj, 295, L1
657: \bibitem[Yoshii et al.(1998)]{yoshii98} Yoshii, Y., Tsujimoto, T., \& Kawara, K. 1998, \apj, 507, L113
658: \bibitem[Yoshii et al.(1996)]{yoshii96} Yoshii, Y., Tsujimoto, T., \& Nomoto, K. 1996, \apj, 462, 266
659:
660: \end{thebibliography}
661:
662:
663: \clearpage
664:
665:
666: \begin{table}
667: \begin{center}
668: \caption{Sample Characteristics\label{sample}}
669: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
670: \tableline\tableline
671: Quasar & Redshift & $M_B$\tablenotemark{a} & Reference\tablenotemark{b}\\
672: \tableline
673: QSO B0850$+$440 & 0.514 & $-$25.2 & 3\\
674: PG 1116$+$215 & 0.176 & $-$25.3 & 2\\
675: PG 1126$-$041 & 0.060 & $-$22.8 & 1\\
676: QSO J1139$-$1350 & 0.560 & $-$26.3 & 3\\
677: PG 1148$+$549 & 0.978 & $-$28.0 & 3\\
678: 3C 273 & 0.158 & $-$26.9 & 3\\
679: PG 1415$+$451 & 0.114 & $-$22.1 & 1\\
680: PG 1448$+$273 & 0.065 & $-$23.0 & 1\\
681: PG 1519$+$226 & 0.137 & $-$22.9 & 1\\
682: PG 1612$+$261 & 0.131 & $-$22.6 & 1\\
683: PG 1718$+$481 & 1.084 & $-$29.8 & 3\\
684: \tableline
685: \end{tabular}
686: \tablenotetext{a}{The $B$-band absolute magnitude taken from \citet{veron06}.}
687: \tablenotetext{b}{References --- (1) \citet{riffel06}; (2) \citet{matsuoka05}; (3) Paper I}
688: \end{center}
689: \end{table}
690:
691:
692:
693:
694: \begin{table}
695: \begin{center}
696: \caption{Observed Photon Number Flux Ratios and EWs of the \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} Emission Lines \label{lineflux}}
697: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
698: \tableline\tableline
699: Quasar & $n$(\ion{Ca}{2})/$n$(\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446)
700: & \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$11287)/$n$($\lambda$8446) & EW (\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) [\AA]\\
701: \tableline
702: QSO B0850$+$440 & 1.63 $\pm$ 0.53 & 0.62 $\pm$ 0.15 & 24.9 $\pm$ 5.9\\ % 37.7 $\pm$ 8.9\\
703: PG 1116$+$215 & 1.22 $\pm$ 0.43 & 0.67 $\pm$ 0.20 & 19.8 $\pm$ 5.2\\ % 23.3 $\pm$ 6.1\\
704: PG 1126$-$041 & 1.12 $\pm$ 0.06 & 0.52 $\pm$ 0.04 & 38.2 $\pm$ 1.4\\ % 40.5 $\pm$ 1.5\\
705: QSO J1139$-$1350 & 0.49 $\pm$ 0.16 & 0.24 $\pm$ 0.05 & 16.0 $\pm$ 2.9\\ % 25.0 $\pm$ 4.5\\
706: PG 1148$+$549 & 1.18 $\pm$ 0.05 & 0.33 $\pm$ 0.02 & 26.0 $\pm$ 0.9\\ % 51.5 $\pm$ 1.7\\
707: 3C 273 & 1.46 $\pm$ 0.21 & 0.33 $\pm$ 0.04 & 17.2 $\pm$ 1.9\\ % 19.9 $\pm$ 2.2\\
708: PG 1415$+$451 & 0.87 $\pm$ 0.12 & 0.35 $\pm$ 0.05 & 23.3 $\pm$ 2.2\\ % 26.0 $\pm$ 2.4\\
709: PG 1448$+$273 & 0.34 $\pm$ 0.12 & 0.54 $\pm$ 0.08 & 22.1 $\pm$ 2.5\\ % 23.5 $\pm$ 2.7\\
710: PG 1519$+$226 & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.07 & 0.41 $\pm$ 0.03 & 31.9 $\pm$ 1.6\\ % 36.3 $\pm$ 1.8\\
711: PG 1612$+$261 & 0.47 $\pm$ 0.07 & 0.44 $\pm$ 0.05 & 35.5 $\pm$ 2.3\\ % 40.2 $\pm$ 2.6\\
712: PG 1718$+$481 & 1.11 $\pm$ 0.22 & 0.47 $\pm$ 0.12 & 7.6 $\pm$ 0.8\\ % 15.9 $\pm$ 1.7\\
713: \tableline
714: \end{tabular}
715: \tablenotetext{}{Note. --- The representative wavelength of 8579 \AA\ is used to convert
716: the \ion{Ca}{2} triplet fluxes to the photon number fluxes.}
717: \end{center}
718: \end{table}
719:
720:
721: \clearpage
722:
723: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
724: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
725: %% To embed the sample graphics in
726: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
727: %% \includegraphics commands
728: %%
729: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
730: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
731: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
732: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
733: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
734: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
735: %%
736: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
737: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
738: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
739: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
740: %% journal to journal.
741:
742: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
743: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
744: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
745: %% available in the electronic journal.
746:
747: \begin{figure}
748: \epsscale{.80}
749: \plotone{f1.eps}
750: \caption{The fluxes of \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$11287 measured in this work are plotted versus those listed in \citet{riffel06}.
751: The units of both axes are 10$^{-15}$ ergs cm$^{-2} $ s$^{-1}$.
752: The fluxes measured in PG 1126$-$041 (at the top-right corner) was multiplied by 0.5 in both axes in order to improve the
753: visibility.
754: A dotted line represents the locations where our \ion{O}{1} fluxes are identical to those by \citet{riffel06}.
755: \label{compare}}
756: \end{figure}
757:
758:
759: \begin{figure}
760: \epsscale{1.0}
761: \plotone{f2.eps}
762: \caption{The observed values of $n$(\ion{Ca}{2})/$n$(\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446), \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$11287)/$n$($\lambda$8446),
763: and EW (\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) are plotted as functions of the redshift ({\it left}) and of the $B$-band absolute
764: magnitude ({\it right}).
765: \label{vsprop2}}
766: \end{figure}
767:
768:
769:
770: \begin{figure}
771: \epsscale{1.00}
772: \plotone{f3b.eps}
773: \caption{Observed and theoretical values of $n$(\ion{Ca}{2})/$n$(\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) ({\it left}) and EW (\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446)
774: ({\it right}) versus \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$11287)/$n$($\lambda$8446).
775: Filled circles represent the observations while diamonds represent the model predictions.
776: The models with the same gas density, log $n_{\rm H}$ = 11.0, 11.5, 12.0, 12.5, and 13.0 ({\it left}), or with the same covering factor,
777: cf = 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 with log $n_{\rm H}$ = 12.0 ({\it right}), are connected with dashed lines.
778: Gray scale filling the diamonds distinguishes different values of the ionization parameter $U$ as indicated at the bottom-left corner
779: of the left panel.
780: % The models predicting EW (\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) $>$ 5 \AA\ and $>$ 10 \AA, with the covering factor of 0.1, are indicated by open
781: % circles and double open circles, respectively.
782: \label{oioi}}
783: \end{figure}
784:
785: \begin{figure}
786: \epsscale{0.80}
787: \plotone{f4.eps}
788: \caption{The observed line widths of \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$11287 versus the $B$-band absolute magnitudes.
789: \label{mag_width}}
790: \end{figure}
791:
792:
793: %\begin{figure}
794: %\epsscale{.60}
795: %\plotone{f5.eps}
796: %\caption{The observed $n$(\ion{Ca}{2})/$n$(\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446) and \ion{O}{1} $n$($\lambda$11287)/$n$($\lambda$8446) ratios
797: % versus the line widths.
798: % Filled circles, open circles, diamonds, and squares represent quasars with $-24 \le M_{\rm B}$, $-26 \le M_{\rm B} < -24$,
799: % $-28 \le M_{\rm B} < -26$, and $M_{\rm B} < -28$, respectively.
800: % Dashed lines represent the theoretical predictions (see text)
801: % .\label{width}}
802: %\end{figure}
803:
804:
805:
806:
807:
808: %\begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
809: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
810: %\rotate
811: %\tablecaption{Photoionization Models\label{models}}
812: %\tablewidth{0pt}
813: %\tablehead{
814: %\colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Model 1} & \colhead{Model 2} & \colhead{Model 3} & \colhead{Model 4}}
815: %\startdata
816: %\cutinhead{Input Parameters}
817: %Incident Continuum\tablenotemark{a} & T06 & T06 & T06 & K97\\
818: %Microturbulent Verocity (km s$^{-1}$) & 0 & 10 & 100 & 100\\
819: %\cutinhead{Best-Fit Parameters to the Observations}
820: %Gas Density $n_{\rm H}$ (cm$^{-3}$) & 10$^{11.5}$ & 10$^{11.5}$ & 10$^{12.0}$ & 10$^{12.0}$\\
821: %Ionization Parameter $U$ & 10$^{-3.0}$ & 10$^{-2.5}$ & 10$^{-2.5}$ & 10$^{-2.5}$\\
822: %\enddata
823: %\tablenotetext{a}{Incident Continuum: T06 represents the ``standard AGN continuum'' reported in \citet{tsuzuki06},
824: % while K97 represents that of \citet{korista97}.}
825: %\end{deluxetable}
826:
827:
828:
829: \end{document}
830:
831: %%
832: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
833: