1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: % one-column, double-spaced document ...
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass[10pt,manuscript]{aastex}
5: % one-column, single-spaced document ...
6: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
7: % double-column, single-spaced document ...
8: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
9:
10: %=====================================================================
11: % CUSTOM: PACKAGES, MACROS & SETTINGS
12: %=====================================================================
13:
14: % packages for figures
15: \usepackage{graphicx}
16: % packages for symbols
17: \usepackage{latexsym,amssymb}
18: % AMS-LaTeX package for e.g. subequations
19: %\usepackage{amsmath}
20: \usepackage{natbib}
21:
22: % upright d in integrals
23: \newcommand{\du}{\mathrm{d}}
24: % units
25: \newcommand{\masyr}{mas\,yr$^{-1}$}
26: \newcommand{\kms}{km\,s$^{-1}$}
27: \newcommand{\dgr}{$^\circ$}
28: \newcommand{\Msun}{M$_{\odot$}}
29: \newcommand{\Lsun}{L$_{\odot$}}
30: \newcommand{\Lsunpcsq}{L$_{\odot$}\,pc$^{-2}$}
31: \newcommand{\Msunpcsq}{M$_{\odot$}\,pc$^{-2}$}
32: \newcommand{\Lsunpccube}{L$_{\odot$}\,pc$^{-3}$}
33: \newcommand{\Msunpccube}{M$_{\odot$}\,pc$^{-3}$}
34: \newcommand{\MLsun}{M$_{\odot$}/L$_{\odot$}}
35: % abbrevations
36: \newcommand{\Mbh}{M_{\textrm{BH}}}
37: \newcommand{\Msph}{M_{\textrm{sph}}}
38: \newcommand{\Mgal}{M_{\textrm{gal}}}
39: \newcommand{\Mvir}{M_{\textrm{vir}}}
40: \newcommand{\Mnuc}{M_{\textrm{NC}}}
41: \newcommand{\Mcmo}{M_{\textrm{CMO}}}
42: \newcommand{\Lsph}{L_{\textrm{sph}}}
43: \newcommand{\Lgal}{L_{\textrm{gal}}}
44: \newcommand{\Lnuc}{L_{\textrm{NC}}}
45: \newcommand{\Lcmo}{L_{\textrm{CMO}}}
46: \newcommand{\MLsph}{\Upsilon_{\textrm{sph}}}
47: \newcommand{\MLgal}{\Upsilon_{\textrm{gal}}}
48: \newcommand{\MLnuc}{\Upsilon_{\textrm{NC}}}
49: \newcommand{\MLcmo}{\Upsilon_{\textrm{CMO}}}
50:
51: %=====================================================================
52: % FRONT MATTER
53: %=====================================================================
54:
55: %\slugcomment{Draft \today, DO NOT DISTRIBUTE}
56:
57: %\shorttitle{CMO formation via tidal compression}
58: %\shortauthors{Eric Emsellem \& Glenn van de Ven}
59:
60: %=====================================================================
61: % BEGIN DOCUMENT
62: %=====================================================================
63:
64: \begin{document}
65:
66: \title{Formation of central massive objects via tidal compression}
67:
68: \author{Eric Emsellem}
69: \affil{Universit\'e de Lyon, Lyon, F-69003, France ; Universit\'e Lyon~1,
70: Observatoire de Lyon, 9 avenue Charles Andr\'e, Saint-Genis
71: Laval, F-69230, France ; CNRS, UMR 5574, Centre de Recherche Astrophysique
72: de Lyon ; Ecole Normale Sup\'erieure de Lyon, Lyon, F-69007, France}
73: \email{emsellem@obs.univ-lyon1.fr}
74:
75: \and
76:
77: \author{Glenn van de Ven\altaffilmark{1}}
78: \affil{Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ
79: 08540, USA}
80: \email{glenn@ias.edu}
81:
82: \altaffiltext{1}{Hubble Fellow}
83:
84: \begin{abstract}
85: For a density that is not too sharply peaked towards the center, the
86: local tidal field becomes compressive in all three directions.
87: Available gas can then collapse and form a cluster of stars in the
88: center, including or even being dominated by a central black hole.
89: We show that for a wide range of (deprojected) S\'ersic profiles in
90: a spherical potential, the tidal forces are compressive within a
91: region which encloses most of the corresponding light of observed
92: nuclear clusters in both late-type and early-type galaxies. In such
93: models, tidal forces become disruptive nearly everywhere for
94: relatively large S\'ersic indices $n \ga 3.5$. We also show that
95: the mass of a central massive object (CMO) required to remove all
96: radial compressive tidal forces scales linearly with the mass of the
97: host galaxy. If CMOs formed in (progenitor) galaxies with $n \sim
98: 1$, we predict a mass fraction of $\sim 0.1-0.5$\,\%, consistent
99: with observations of nuclear clusters and super-massive black holes.
100: While we find that tidal compression possibly drives the formation
101: of CMOs in galaxies, beyond the central regions and on larger scales
102: in clusters disruptive tidal forces might contribute to prevent gas
103: from cooling.
104: \end{abstract}
105:
106: \keywords{stellar dynamics --- galaxies: nuclei --- galaxies:
107: structure --- galaxies: clusters: general}
108:
109: %============================= section 1 =============================
110: \section{Introduction}
111: \label{sec:intro}
112: %=====================================================================
113:
114: It is now well-known that the masses of supermassive black holes
115: (SMBHs) in the centres of galaxies and bulges correlate with the
116: stellar velocity dispersion, $\Mbh \propto \sigma_\star^{\alpha}$ with
117: $\alpha \sim 4-5$ \citep[e.g.][]{Ferrarese+01, Gebhardt+01,
118: Tremaine+02}, as well as nearly linearly with the mass of these
119: spheroids, $\Mbh \propto \Msph^{1.12\,\pm\,0.06}$ \citep[e.g.][]{MF01,
120: HaringRix04}. \cite{Ferrarese+06}, \cite{WH06} and \cite{Rossa+06}
121: also found that the masses of nuclear (star) clusters (NCs), which are
122: present in many both late and early-type galaxies \citep[see,
123: e.g.][]{Boeker+02, Cote+06}, are similarly related to the properties
124: of the host galaxy \citep[see also][]{GD07}. Recently,
125: \cite{McLaughlin+06} proposed momentum feedback, from accretion onto
126: SMBHs or from stellar and supernovae winds in the case of NCs, as an
127: explanation for the observed relations.
128:
129: We investigate if central massive objects (CMOs), in the form of NCs,
130: may have formed from gas being tidally compressed in the centers of
131: galaxies. This effect, resembling compressive shocking of globular
132: clusters by the Galactic disk \citep{Ostriker+72}, has been studied by
133: \cite{Valluri93} in the context of tidal compression of a (disk)
134: galaxy in the core of galaxy cluster. At the scale of galaxies,
135: \cite{DasJog99} argue for tidal compression of molecular clouds in the
136: centers of flat-core early-type galaxies and ultraluminous galaxies as
137: an explanation for the presence of observed dense gas. Very recently,
138: an independent study by \cite{Masi07} emphasised the potential
139: importance of compressive tidal forces.
140:
141: Low luminosity early-type galaxies and late-type galaxies share an
142: overall luminosity profile with relatively low central power-law
143: slopes. The fact that NCs are predominantly found in such galaxies
144: \citep[see e.g.][]{Cote+06} may provide an interesting link between
145: the presence of CMOs in galaxies and the properties of the host
146: galaxy. In the present study, we investigate whether tidal forces may
147: help explaining this link. We first derive the radial component of the
148: tidal force associated with a (deprojected) S\'ersic profile in
149: \S~\ref{sec:tidalcompression}. We then examine in \S~\ref{sec:scaling}
150: how this applies to simple models of CMO hosts, including early-type
151: and late-type galaxies. The corresponding results are then briefly
152: discussed in \S~\ref{sec:disc}, and conclusions are drawn in
153: \S~\ref{sec:concl}.
154:
155: %============================= section 2 =============================
156: \section{Tidal compression}
157: \label{sec:tidalcompression}
158: %=====================================================================
159:
160: The radial component of the tidal field in a spherical potential is
161: given by
162: %
163: \begin{equation}
164: \label{eq:Trad}
165: T_R(r) = 4 \pi G \left[ 2\langle\rho\rangle/3 - \rho(r) \right] R,
166: \end{equation}
167: %
168: at a distance $R$ from the position at radius $r$ about which the
169: gravitational field is expanded to first order. This radial component
170: is compressive ($T_R<0$) if the local density $\rho(r)$ is larger than
171: $2/3$ of the mean density $\langle\rho\rangle = 3 M(<r)/(4 \pi r^3)$
172: within the radius $r$. The two components perpendicular to the radial
173: direction are always compressive, but with varying magnitude, so that
174: the tidal field is generally anisotropic.
175: %% \citep[see e.g.][and references therein]{Valluri93, DasJog99, Masi07}.
176: However, since the compression of a gas cloud tends to become rapidly
177: isotropic, we only consider the radial component \citep[see
178: also][]{DasJog99}.
179:
180: %============================= subsection 2.1 =============================
181: \subsection{Density profiles}
182: \label{sec:sersic}
183: %==========================================================================
184:
185: It is today well-known that the surface brightness profiles of
186: early-type galaxies as well as bulges are overall well fitted by a
187: S\'ersic (\citeyear{Sersic63, Sersic68}) profile
188: %
189: \begin{equation}
190: \label{eq:rhoSersic}
191: I(R) = I_e \exp\left\{
192: -b_n \left[ \left(\frac{R}{R_e}\right)^{1/n} - 1 \right] \right\},
193: \end{equation}
194: %
195: with $I_e$ the surface brightness at the half-light radius $R_e$, and
196: $b$ a constant that depends on the index $n$. The latter follows by
197: solving $\Gamma(2n) = 2 \Gamma(2n,b)$, with $\Gamma$ the gamma
198: function, but to high precision can be approximated by $b_n = 2\,n -
199: 1/3 + 4/405\,n + 46/25515\,n^2$ \citep{1999A&A...352..447C}.
200:
201: The deprojection of the S\'ersic profile (assuming spherical symmetry)
202: has to be done numerically \citep{1991A&A...249...99C}.
203: However, the analytic density profile of \cite{PrugnielSimien97}
204: %
205: \begin{eqnarray}
206: \label{eq:rhoPS}
207: \rho^{PS97}(r) = \rho_e \left(\frac{r}{R_e}\right)^{-p_n}
208: \exp\left\{
209: -b_n\left[ \left(\frac{r}{R_e}\right)^{1/n} - 1 \right] \right\}.
210: \end{eqnarray}
211: %
212: provides in projection a good match\footnote{Although not significant,
213: please note that there is a typo in the expression of $p$ in most
214: published papers (with $0.05563/n^2$ instead of $0.05463/n^2$), the
215: best fit as given in \cite{LimaNeto+99} being the one mentioned
216: here.} to the S\'ersic profile when $p_n=1.0-0.6097/n+0.05463/n^2$
217: and a constant (stellar) mass-to-light ratio is assumed. When $p_n=0$,
218: the density profile reduces to the `intrinsic' S\'ersic profile, also
219: known as Einasto's model \citep[see][and references therein]{Einasto+89}. Recently, it has been
220: shown that both the Prugniel-Simien and Einasto models provide a very
221: good fit to simulated dark matter halos, better than a (generalized)
222: NFW profile \citep[e.g.][]{Merritt+06}.
223:
224: The Prugniel-Simien profile is a reasonable approximation for the
225: deprojected S\'ersic profile for a relatively wide range of values of
226: $n$ \citep{Marquez+00}, but not as accurate as originally claimed.
227: \cite{Trujillo+02} proposed a much improved expression using modified
228: Bessel functions, with relative errors less than $0.1$\,\% in the
229: radial range $10^{-3} \le r/R_e \le 10^3$ for $n>1$. We extended their
230: expression to
231: %
232: \begin{equation}
233: \label{eq:Abel}
234: \rho(r) = \Upsilon \, \frac{I_e \exp(b_n) b_n}{n \pi R_e} \,
235: \frac{(r/R_e)^{k(1-n)/n} \, 2^{(n-1)/2n} \, K_\nu\left[b_n(r/R_e)^{1/n}\right]}
236: {1- \Sigma_{i=0}^m \, a_i \, \log(r/R_e)^i},
237: \end{equation}
238: %
239: where $\Upsilon$ is the (constant) mass-to-light ratio and $K_\nu[x]$
240: is the $\nu$\,th-order modified Bessel function of the third kind. The
241: fitting parameters are $\nu$, $k$ and the coefficients $a_i$
242: ($i=0,1,\dots,m$) of the $m$\,th-order polynomial in $\log(r/R_e)$.
243: With a cubic polynomial ($m=3$), this approximation results in a fit
244: with residuals still of the order of $0.1$\,\% or (often
245: significantly) less, but this time for all values between $0.5 \le n
246: \le 10$ (see Appendix~\ref{app:Abel} for details). It surpasses (by a
247: factor $>100$) the Prugniel-Simien profile.
248:
249: %%FIG
250: \begin{figure}
251: \begin{center}
252: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth,trim=0 0 0 0 mm]{f1s.eps}
253: \end{center}
254: \caption{Slopes $\gamma$ of the intrinsic density associated with the deprojected
255: S\'ersic profile (solid lines) and the Prugniel-Simien model with
256: $p_n=1.0-0.6097/n+0.05463/n^2$ (dashed lines), for values of $n$
257: from 0.5 to 5 (with steps of 0.5).}
258: \label{fig:slopes}
259: \end{figure}
260: %%FIG
261:
262: In the following, we favour Eq.~\ref{eq:Abel} as approximation for the
263: intrinsic density $\rho(r)$, but also consider the Prugniel-Simien
264: profile in Eq.~\ref{eq:rhoPS}. To compute $\langle \rho \rangle$ in
265: Eq.~\ref{eq:Trad} for the radial component of the tidal field, we also
266: need the enclosed mass $M(r) \equiv 4\pi \int_0^r \rho(r') {r'}^2
267: \du{r'}$, which in case of the Prugniel-Simien profile reduces to
268: $M^{PS97}(r) = 4 \pi R_e^3 \rho_e \exp(b_n) n b_n^{(p_n-3)n}
269: \gamma[(3-p_n)n,b_n(r/R_e)^{1/n}]$, with $\gamma[a;x]$ the incomplete
270: gamma function. The latter should not be confused with the (negative)
271: slope of the density $\gamma(r) \equiv -\du\log\rho/\du\log r$, which
272: for the Prugniel-Simien model becomes $\gamma^{PS97}(r) = p_n + b_n
273: (r/R_e)^{1/n}/n$. In Fig.~\ref{fig:slopes}, we present $\gamma(r)$ for
274: both cases out to the effective radius. For large values of $n$ ($\ga
275: 5$), there is no significant difference in the values of $\gamma$ for
276: $10^{-3} < r / R_e < 1$, but for lower values of $n$, the
277: Prugniel-Simien profile tends to have slightly larger $\gamma$ slopes
278: at small radii.
279:
280: %======================= subsection 2.2 =============================
281: \subsection{Tidal field}
282: \label{sec:tidalfield}
283: %=====================================================================
284:
285: For a spherical model with an average density $\overline{\rho}(r)
286: \propto r^{- \gamma}$, we have $\rho(r) / \overline{\rho}(r) = 1 -
287: \gamma / 3$ and the radial component of the tidal field is then
288: proportional to $(\gamma - 1) \overline{\rho}(r) R$: it is therefore
289: negative (compressive) only when $\gamma \le 1$. This becomes less
290: straightforward when $\gamma$ varies with radius, but
291: Fig.~\ref{fig:slopes} still suggests that we should expect compressive
292: tidal forces for S\'ersic indices $n \la 3.5$ at least within $r/R_e
293: \la 10^{-3}$. For a typical galaxy, the latter corresponds to a few pc
294: and is similar to the smallest observed half-light radii of NCs (see
295: also Fig.~\ref{fig:rh_n}).
296:
297: %%FIG
298: \begin{figure}
299: \begin{center}
300: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth,trim=0 0 0 0 mm]{f2s.eps}
301: \end{center}
302: \caption{Radial component of the tidal field (per unit mass) in a spherical
303: potential for the deprojected S\'ersic profile (left) and the
304: Prugniel-Simien model (right) for different values of $n$ and for
305: radii between $10^{-3}$ and $1$ $R_e$. The dashed lines show where
306: the radial tidal field is compressive.}
307: %% For this plot, the total luminosity $L_\mathrm{tot}$ of each
308: %% model has been set to 1.
309: \label{fig:Trad}
310: \end{figure}
311: %%FIG
312:
313: This is confirmed in Fig.~\ref{fig:Trad}, where we show the radial
314: component of the tidal field (per unit mass) for different values of
315: the S\'ersic index $n$. Both the deprojected S\'ersic approximation in
316: Eq.~\ref{eq:Abel} (left panel) and the Prugniel-Simien profile in
317: Eq.~\ref{eq:rhoPS} (right panel) yield similar behaviour: $T_R < 0$ is
318: found only for $n \la 3.5$ given the same minimum radius of $10^{-3}
319: R_e$ as above, and $r/R_e \la 1$ given as minimum S\'ersic index that
320: of an exponential disk ($n=1$). Between these limits, there is a range in
321: radii from the center to a truncation radius $r_t$, within which the
322: tidal field is compressive. Within this range, the radius $r_{minT_R}$
323: at which the radial force reaches its minimum, increases with
324: decreasing $n$ index, with a reasonably good approximation given by $n
325: = -0.73 \, \log{(r_{minT_R}/R_e) + 0.38}$.
326:
327: For the Prugniel-Simien profile, $n \la 3.5$ corresponds to $p_n \la
328: 0.83$. As expected, forcing the latter inner slope to small values
329: (e.g., $p_n=0$) implies that the tidal forces are compressive for
330: rather large $n$ and for a larger radial range at a given $n$. For
331: $p_n = 1$, the radial tidal force per unit mass is obviously positive
332: everywhere.
333:
334: %============================= section 3 =============================
335: \section{Scaling relations}
336: \label{sec:scaling}
337: %=====================================================================
338:
339: The above analysis shows that the inner slope $\gamma$, which is a
340: function of the S\'ersic index $n$, determines the truncation radius
341: $r_t/R_e$ within which there exists compressive tidal forces. If we
342: now assume that these negative tidal forces play a role to trigger
343: star formation from passing-by molecular clouds, we can expect that
344: $r_t$ provides a scaling for the size of the CMO as function of $n$
345: and $R_e$.
346:
347: %======================= subsection 3.1 =============================
348: \subsection{Truncation radius}
349: \label{sec:truncationradius}
350: %=====================================================================
351:
352: For 51 early-type galaxies in the Virgo cluster, \cite{Ferrarese+06b}
353: and \cite{Cote+06} have detected a central NC, for which they measured
354: the half-light radius $r_h$, as well as the S\'ersic parameters $n$
355: and $R_e$ of their host galaxy. They have also included the
356: characteristics of 5 NCs which were detected but offset from the
357: photometric centre: in these five cases, the bright NCs were located
358: within about 5\arcsec\ from the centre. In the left panel of
359: Fig.~\ref{fig:rh_n}, we show $n$ versus $r_h/R_e$ of the observed NCs,
360: as compared to the truncation radius $r_t/R_e$ for the deprojected
361: S\'ersic profile. In the right panel, we also take into account the
362: offsets $\delta_r$ measured by \cite{Cote+06}, which clearly
363: emphasises the 5 special cases mentioned above (for the other NCs, the
364: addition of $\delta_r$ does not significantly change their position in
365: the diagram).
366:
367: Only two NCs (in NGC\,4578 and NGC\,4612) are significantly outside
368: the presumed region where compressive tidal forces exist. Remarkably,
369: the five offset NCs lie within that region too, rather close to the
370: radius of minimum (negative) compressive tidal force, when including
371: their apparent position with respect to the galaxy centre. This
372: indicates that the stars in these clusters may have formed in a region
373: where the tidal forces were negative, or moved via dynamical friction
374: within that region since their formation with typical timescales of
375: the order of a few hundreds Myr. Moreover, as we argue below,
376: especially the old NCs in early-type galaxies might have already
377: formed in their possibly gas-rich and spiral-like progenitors with
378: S\'ersic index values lower than the currently measured $n$ values. As
379: a result, this can move the points in Fig.~\ref{fig:rh_n} downwards
380: more into the region of compressive tidal forces, and, at the same
381: time, the variation in progenitors as well as merging history might
382: contribute to the large scatter observed.
383:
384: %%FIG
385: \begin{figure}
386: \begin{center}
387: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth,trim=0 0 0 0 mm]{f3.eps}
388: \end{center}
389: \caption{S\'ersic index $n$ versus the half-light radius $r_h$ (normalised by
390: the effective radius $R_e$ of the host galaxy) for the NCs
391: detected by \cite{Ferrarese+06b} and \cite{Cote+06} (circles with
392: error bars). Uncertainties on $n$ and $r_h$ have been assumed to
393: be 10\,\% and 0.01 arcsec, respectively \citep[see e.g., Fig.~114 of][]{Ferrarese+06b}. The empty circles
394: correspond to the 5 offset NCs revealed by \cite{Ferrarese+06b}
395: and \cite{Cote+06}. In the right panel, the measured offsets
396: $\delta_r$ have been added to the half-light radius $r_h$. The
397: solid line corresponds to the truncation radius, at each given
398: $n$, within which the tidal forces are compressive for a
399: deprojected S\'ersic profile, and the dotted line indicates the
400: location of the minimum (negative) radial tidal force (see also
401: Fig.~\ref{fig:Trad}).}
402: \label{fig:rh_n}
403: \end{figure}
404: %%FIG
405:
406: %======================= subsection 3.2 =============================
407: \subsection{Central mass}
408: \label{sec:entralmass}
409: %=====================================================================
410:
411: The presence of an additional (compact) CMO in a galaxy increases the
412: averaged mass density $\langle\rho\rangle$ (see Eq.~\ref{eq:Trad}),
413: and therefore directly reduces the size of the radial region where
414: tidal forces are compressive. Henceforth, given a host galaxy with
415: S\'ersic parameters $n$, $R_e$, and $I_e$ (or total luminosity $\Lgal$)
416: and mass-to-light ratio $\MLgal$, there is therefore a mass $M_+$
417: above which the radial tidal force $T_R$ becomes positive (disruptive)
418: everywhere. When adding a central mass intermediate between
419: 0 and $M_+$, negative $T_R$ values are restricted to
420: a ring-like region. Offset stellar nuclei could form there,
421: and subsequently take significant time before being dragged into the centre
422: via dynamical friction. For large S\'ersic index $n \ga 3.5$, $M_+ \approx 0$
423: since $T_R$ is already positive nearly everywhere. For $n \la 3.5$, we
424: (numerically) derive $M_+$ from the maximum of $r^3 \left[3 \rho(r) -
425: 2\langle\rho\rangle \right] / 3$, and corresponding luminosity $L_+$
426: for a given mass-to-light ratio $\MLcmo$ of the CMO. When $\MLcmo
427: \approx \MLgal$, the mass-to-light ratio cancels out and we obtain
428: directly $L_+$ for given $n$, $R_e$ and $\Lgal$ of the host galaxy.
429:
430: %%%FIG
431: \begin{figure}
432: \begin{center}
433: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth,trim=0 0 0 0 mm]{f4.eps}
434: \end{center}
435: \caption{Nuclear cluster luminosity $L_{NC}$ (black circles) versus
436: the S\'ersic index $n$ (left panel) and the absolute $B$ band
437: magnitude of the host galaxy (right panel). The crosses in the left panel
438: represent the predictions for $L_+$ for the Virgo
439: NCs observed by \citep{Ferrarese+06b}, using the measured
440: $n$ of the host galaxy.
441: The black solid line shows $L_+$ as derived from the scaling laws described in
442: the main text. In the right panel, empty circles correspond to
443: the NCs observed in late-type spirals \citep{Rossa+06}, empty
444: triangles to NCs in early-type spirals \citep{Carollo+02}, empty
445: squares to dwarf ellipticals \citep{Lotz+04}, and the black (solid
446: and dashed) lines to $L_+$ prediction for models where the
447: S\'ersic index $n$ was fixed to three different values (0.5, 1,
448: 1.5 as indicated). The observed $B$ band luminosities for the NCs
449: observed by \cite{Carollo+02} and \cite{Lotz+04} were converted
450: from the $V$ band, using a mean $B-V = 1$.}
451: \label{fig:Lnuc}
452: \end{figure}
453: %%%FIG
454:
455: Adopting the latter assumption, we compute $L_+$ corresponding to the
456: measured parameters $(M_B, n, R_e)$ for each of the Virgo early-type
457: galaxies studied by \cite{Ferrarese+06b} and \cite{Cote+06}. In
458: Fig.~\ref{fig:Lnuc}, we show the resulting $L_+$ values (crosses)
459: together with the measured luminosity $\Lnuc$ of the observed NCs
460: \citep{Cote+06} versus $n$ and $M_B$ of the host galaxy (left and
461: right panel, respectively). The solid line in the left panel shows the
462: prediction of $L_+$ as function of $n$ based on empirical scaling
463: relations of galaxies. Here we use the global correlations derived in
464: \cite{Andredakis+95} and \cite{Graham01} to obtain $\log\,n = - 0.216
465: \, (M_B + 18) + 0.44$ and (for $R_e$ in kpc)
466: $\log\,R_e = - 0.277 \, (M_B + 18) + 0.4$.
467: For a given ($B$-band) luminosity of the host galaxy these relations
468: provide us with a pair of $n$ and $R_e$, so that together they yield
469: an estimate of $L_+$. Although these relations significantly differ
470: from $\log\,n = -0.10 \, (M_B + 18) + 0.39$ and $\log\,R_e = - 0.055
471: \, (M_B + 18) + 0.04$ derived by \cite{Ferrarese+06b} for Virgo
472: early-type galaxies, they are still consistent with the observed
473: measurements, and have the advantage to also fit the observed
474: correlation for spiral bulges.
475:
476: For large values of $n$, the predicted $L_+$ are much smaller than the
477: observed CMO luminosities $L_{NC}$, as expected. Only for values of $n
478: \la 1.5$, the predicted $L_+$ are in the same luminosity range as the
479: corresponding observed $L_{NC}$ values. In the right panel, we have
480: added samples of NCs observed in dwarf ellipticals \citep{Lotz+04}
481: (empty squares), in early-type spirals by \cite{Carollo+02} (empty
482: triangles) and in late-type spiral galaxies by \cite{Rossa+06} (empty
483: circles). Again we see that the predicted $L_+$ are much lower than
484: the observed $L_{NC}$ values in early-type galaxies, except for faint
485: galaxies with $M_B$ around $-16$. Although we do not know the S\'ersic
486: index associated with the spiral and dwarf elliptical hosts of
487: observed NCs, we can safely assume that it should be low with $n \sim
488: 1$ being a good approximation for the overall surface brightness
489: profile. It is interesting to note that most spiral NCs lie {\em
490: below} the $L_+$ curve with $n = 1$, and all of them are below the
491: one with $n=0.5$.
492:
493: %============================= section 4 =============================
494: \section{Discussion}
495: \label{sec:disc}
496: %=====================================================================
497:
498: The frequency of occurence of NCs in both intermediate luminosity
499: early-type galaxies, and in spiral galaxies is reported to be between
500: about 60 and 80\,\% \citep{Carollo+98, Carollo+02, Boeker+02, Cote+06,
501: Balcells+07a}. For nearly all galaxies in the samples mentioned
502: above, the observed nuclear clusters have individual luminosities
503: $L_{NC}$ in a range similar to (for early-type galaxies and dwarfs
504: ellipticals) or lower than (for spirals) the $L_+$ values derived from
505: the total galaxy luminosity, considering that each NC and its host
506: galaxy have the same mass-to-light ratio, and assuming a spherical
507: model with $n \sim 1$ (exponential profile).
508:
509: Even though the density distribution of most galaxies is clearly not
510: spherical, the tidal forces are determined by their gravitational
511: potential, which in general is significantly rounder than the density,
512: even for spiral galaxies. For example, an axisymmetric logarithmic
513: potential, which is only about a third as flattened as the
514: corresponding density distribution \citep[e.g.\ \S~2.2.2 of][]{BT87},
515: lowers the predicted $L_+$ values by a factor of about two if the
516: flattening of the potential is reduced from unity (sphere) to one-half
517: (disk). The latter would then only shift down the lines at fixed $n$
518: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Lnuc} by $\sim 0.3$ dex.
519:
520: The assumption of equal mass-to-light ratio $\MLnuc = \MLgal$ between
521: NC and host galaxy might have a stronger effect. NCs are sometimes
522: relatively bluer than their host galaxies (e.g., in late-type spiral
523: galaxies), so that we can expect $\MLnuc < \MLgal$ \citep[by a factor
524: of 1 to 10, see e.g.][]{Boeker+04}. This implies that most of these
525: NCs have masses which would in fact lie even {\em lower}, with respect
526: to the predictions of $M_+$, than presently illustrated in
527: Fig.~\ref{fig:Lnuc}. On the other hand, their host galaxies typically
528: have $n \approx 1$ and are gas-rich, so that one might expect ongoing
529: star formation driven by the significant tidal compression. Indeed,
530: late-type spiral galaxies seem to witness recurrent star formation in
531: their central regions and most of the NCs observed in these galaxies
532: correspond to multiple formation episodes. Henceforth, the NC might be
533: still building up its mass $\Mnuc$ towards the predicted $M_+$ value.
534: Moreover, the youngest population of stars likely dominates the total
535: light $\Lnuc$ of the cluster and hence the (measured) mass-to-light
536: ratio $\MLnuc$, but contributes (much) less to its mass $\Mnuc$
537: \citep[e.g.][]{Walcher+06, Rossa+06}. Finally, the seemingly strong
538: link between the luminosity (and mass) of the NC and its host galaxy
539: might only hold true for the centrally dominating spheroidal component
540: \citep[e.g.][]{Rossa+06, WH06}. Whereas in early-type galaxies the
541: spheroidal component dominates (the light of) the galaxy, the
542: bulge-to-total-light ratio decreases significantly towards later-type
543: galaxies, with $B/T \sim 1/4$ already for lenticular (S0) and
544: early-type spiral (Sa) galaxies \citep[e.g.][]{Balcells+07b} and $B/T
545: \la 1/10$ for later-type spiral galaxies \citep[e.g.][]{Graham01}. As
546: a result, if instead of the total luminosity, we compare in the right
547: panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:Lnuc} $\Lnuc$ with the spheroidal luminosity,
548: we expect the NCs in the spiral galaxies to move by a maximum of $\sim
549: 2.5$ dex to the left, i.e., closer to the predicted line for $n=1$.
550: Also, this implies that nearly all NCs appear in spheroids fainter
551: than $M_B = -18$, consistent with the transition between NCs and SMBHs
552: as emphasised by \cite{Cote+06} and \cite{Ferrarese+06}.
553:
554: Although $\MLnuc$ might be similar to the \emph{stellar} mass-to-light
555: ratio of the host galaxy (especially in early-type galaxies with old
556: stellar populations), its \emph{total} mass-to-light ratio $\MLgal$
557: might be different and vary among galaxies due to a contribution from
558: possible dark matter. The tilt of the Fundamental Plane of elliptical
559: galaxies implies $\MLgal \propto L^{0.3}$
560: \citep[e.g.][]{Jorgensen+96}, so that $\Lnuc \propto \Lgal^{1.3}$.
561: This results in a steeper slope in the right panel of
562: Fig.~\ref{fig:Lnuc} compared to the predicted relations (solid and
563: dashed lines), and similarly a shallower slope if $\MLgal$ decreases
564: with $\Lgal$. There is an indication that the NCs in observed
565: early-type galaxies (filled circles) indeed follow a slightly steeper
566: slope. The NCs in late-type spirals (open circles) and dwarf
567: ellipticals (open squares) seem to indicate a shallower slope,
568: consistent with the corresponding correlations $\Lnuc \propto
569: \Lgal^{0.78}$ and $\Lnuc \propto \Lgal^{0.87}$ derived by
570: \cite{Boeker+04} and \cite{GrahamGuzman03}, respectively. In all
571: cases, when converting from luminosities to masses the slope
572: approaches unity \citep[see also][]{Ferrarese+06, WH06}, consistently
573: with the predicted linear scaling of $M_+$ with $\Mgal$ at fixed $n$.
574:
575: In other words, if we, from now on, assume that all these observed NCs
576: originated in host galaxies with nearly exponential surface brightness
577: profiles ($n\sim1$), they would have formed in the presence of
578: compressive tidal forces. The amplitude of these compressive tidal
579: forces directly scales with the total mass $\Mgal$ of the host galaxy
580: (or with the component which dominates the central mass profile). For
581: the models described above, $M_+$ thus linearly scales with the host
582: mass at fixed $n$. If compressive tidal forces dictate the efficiency
583: of the triggering of star formation in the central regions of such
584: galaxies, they would impose a direct linear scaling between the mass
585: of the formed NCs and the host mass. By changing the S\'ersic index
586: $n$ of the models, we obviously shift the relation between $M_+$ and
587: $\Mgal$, predicting lower $M_+$ for a larger $n$ at a given $\Mgal$.
588: For a deprojected S\'ersic profile, we find $\log{(M_+/\Mgal)} \sim
589: -1.9 \, n - 0.4$, which implies a ratio of $0.5$\,\% for $n=1$.
590: \cite{Cote+06} mention a typical ratio of nucleus-to-galaxy luminosity
591: of $0.3$\,\%, and \cite{Ferrarese+06} a corresponding mass ratio of
592: $0.18$\,\% for CMOs (NCs and SMBHs) in early-type galaxies. The
593: corresponding S\'ersic index $n$ are respectively $\sim 1.1$ and $\sim
594: 1.2$, i.e., close to unity in both cases.
595:
596: The picture in which NCs form in galaxy hosts with $n \sim 1$ seems
597: appropriate for spiral galaxies \citep[see][]{Seth+06}, but
598: low-luminosity early-type galaxies have $n$ values as high as $\sim
599: 4.5$. NCs in early-type galaxies, like the ones observed by
600: \cite{Cote+06} are red and old. Since elliptical and S0 galaxies are
601: thought to have assembled a significant fraction of their mass via
602: galaxy mergers, we speculate that NCs in early-type galaxies may not
603: have formed in their present hosts, but in their progenitors, which
604: may very well have had a less massive spheroidal component and a lower
605: S\'ersic index $n$ \citep[e.g.,][]{Aguerri+01, NaabTrujillo06}. This
606: is also supported by recent cosmological merger simulations, in which
607: today's elliptical galaxies had to form early-on through the mergers
608: of gas-rich spiral galaxies to explain the tilt in the Fundamental
609: Plane \citep[e.g.,][]{Robertson+06}.
610: % Secular evolution could also have played a role in reshaping the
611: % NCs' hosts.
612:
613: Around 20-30\% of spirals and early-type galaxies do not show any
614: evidence of an NC \citep{Boeker+02}. Especially in spiral galaxies,
615: this is unlikely due to a lack of gas fuel, but the presence of an
616: already existing central (dark) mass might suppress the radial tidal
617: compressive forces throughout the central region. Remarkably, spirals
618: without observed NCs tend to show a flattening of the surface
619: brightness profiles towards the centre, reminiscent of the cores
620: observed in giant ellipticals.
621: %% Moreover, the active early-type spirals that are radio-loud
622: %% show core-like profiles, whereas radio-quiet tend to have power-law
623: %% profiles \citep[see e.g.,][]{Capetti+07}.
624:
625: In addition to the surface brightness of galaxies, \cite{Merritt+06}
626: show that the (deprojected) S\'ersic profile also provides a very good
627: fit to their (simulated) dark matter halos with $n \sim 3.0$, as well
628: as those at the scales of clusters with $n \sim 2.4$. Apart from the
629: (very) center, we thus expect nearly everywhere disruptive tidal
630: forces which work against (efficient) formation of stars from
631: collapsing gas. Whereas in the outer parts of early-type galaxies
632: there is hardly any gas available, in the intracluster medium of
633: clusters the tidal forces might contribute in preventing the gas from
634: cooling. Finally, we should note that the existence of NCs in galaxies
635: where dark matter is expected to dominate in the central regions
636: (e.g., some dwarf galaxies) may imply that their corresponding dark
637: matter halos cannot exhibit very cuspy central profiles, or that
638: another mechanism prevailed during their formation (if the NCs formed
639: in situ).
640:
641: %============================= section 4 =============================
642: \section{Conclusions}
643: \label{sec:concl}
644: %=====================================================================
645:
646: We have built simple spherical models following deprojected S\'ersic
647: profiles to show that compressive tidal forces are naturally present
648: in the central region when the S\'ersic index $n \la 3.5$. For $n \ga
649: 3.5$, the radial component of the tidal forces is disruptive almost
650: everywhere (i.e., for $r / R_e > 10^{-3}$). Observed nuclear (star)
651: clusters in early-type and late-type galaxies have extents and/or
652: apparent locations which are within the tidally compressed region.
653:
654: If we assume that most NCs form when their host galaxies have density
655: profiles corresponding to rather low S\'ersic indices $n \sim 1$, we
656: have shown that the masses of the NCs are consistent with $M_+$, the
657: mass above which the radial tidal force becomes disruptive due the
658: presence of the central massive object. In this picture, the predicted
659: $M_+$ scales linearly with the host galaxy mass (or the mass of the
660: spheroidal component) with $M_+/\Msph \sim 0.1-0.5$\,\% for $n \sim
661: 1$, in agreement with what is observed for both NCs and super-massive
662: black holes in the centers of (more luminous) galaxies. If indeed
663: compressive tidal forces are a key actor in the formation of CMOs,
664: only late-type galaxies have, today, the required gas content and
665: density profiles ($n \sim 1$), which allow the recurrent and common
666: formation of CMOs (in the form of NCs). This is consistent with the
667: fact that young NCs are predominantly found in late-type spiral
668: galaxies. Finally, while we find that tidal compression possibly
669: drives the formation of CMOs in galaxies, beyond the central regions
670: and on larger scales in clusters disruptive tidal forces might
671: contribute to prevent gas from cooling.
672:
673: Such a simple scenario must be tested and extended to accomodate
674: galaxies with e.g., core-Sersic surface brightness profiles \citep[see
675: e.g.][]{Ferrarese+06b} as well as to allow more realistic
676: (non-spherical, multi-component) galaxy models. Moreover, using
677: specific (stellar) mass-to-light ratios for the NCs and virial mass
678: estimates for the host galaxy enables a direct comparison in mass
679: instead of luminosity. Finally, hydrodynamical simulations are needed
680: to examine the role of compressive tidal forces in the evolution of
681: galaxies (and cluster).
682:
683: %=====================================================================
684: % ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
685: %=====================================================================
686:
687: \section*{Acknowledgments}
688: \label{sec:acknowledgments}
689:
690: We thank an anonymous referee for a constructive report which
691: helped clarifying the text. We would like to sincerely thank Jes\'us
692: Falc\'on--Barroso, Torsten B\"oker, Pierre Ferruit, Alister Graham,
693: Richard McDermid, Emmanuel P\'econtal and Scott Tremaine for useful discussions. GvdV
694: acknowledges support provided by NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant
695: HST-HF-01202.01-A awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute,
696: which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in
697: Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract NAS 5-26555.
698:
699: %=====================================================================
700: % REFERENCES
701: %=====================================================================
702:
703: %\input{ms.bbl}
704: \bibliographystyle{apj}
705: \bibliography{ref_cmo}
706:
707: %=====================================================================
708: % APPENDICES
709: %=====================================================================
710:
711: \appendix
712:
713: %============================= appendix A ============================
714: \section{Deprojected S\'ersic profiles}
715: \label{app:Abel}
716: %=====================================================================
717:
718: The deprojection of the S\'ersic profile (assuming spherical symmetry)
719: can be solved through an Abel integral equation. This yields for the
720: (intrinsic) density
721: %
722: \begin{equation}
723: \label{eq:densabel}
724: \rho(r) = \Upsilon \, \frac{I_e \exp(b_n) b_n}{n \pi R_e}
725: \int_r^\infty \left(\frac{R}{R_e}\right)^{1/n-1}
726: \exp\left[-b_n\left(\frac{R}{R_e}\right)^{1/n}\right]
727: \frac{\du R}{\sqrt{R^2-r^2}},
728: \end{equation}
729: %
730: where $\Upsilon$ is the (constant) mass-to-light ratio. Substituting $R =
731: r \cosh^nu$ gives
732: %
733: \begin{equation}
734: \label{eq:densabelu}
735: \rho(r) = \Upsilon \, \frac{I_e \exp(b_n) b_n}{n \pi R_e} \;
736: \left(\frac{r}{R_e}\right)^{1/n-1}
737: \int_0^\infty \exp\left[-\beta\cosh u\right] \, n \,
738: \left(\frac{\cosh^2u-1}{\cosh^{2n}u-1}\right)^{1/2} \du u,
739: \end{equation}
740: %
741: where $\beta \equiv b_n (r/R_e)^{1/n}$. In general, this integral has
742: to be solved numerically.
743:
744: However, for $n=1$ it reduces to $K_0(\beta)$, with $K_\nu(\beta) =
745: \int_0^\infty \exp\left[-\beta\cosh u\right] \cosh(\nu u) \, \du u$
746: the $\nu$\,th-order modified Bessel function of the third kind. For
747: $n=1/2$, using $\cosh u + 1 = 2\cosh^2(u/2)$, the integral becomes
748: $K_{1/2}(\beta)/\sqrt{2}$. For other values of $n$, the density is
749: very well approximated by
750: %
751: \begin{equation}
752: \label{eq:densabelapprox}
753: \rho(r) \approx \Upsilon \, \frac{I_e \exp(b_n) b_n}{n \pi R_e} \,
754: \frac{(r/R_e)^{k(1-n)/n} \, 2^{(n-1)/2n} \, K_\nu(\beta)}
755: {1- \Sigma_{i=0}^m a_i \log(r/R_e)^i},
756: \end{equation}
757: %
758: with fitting parameters $\nu$, $k$ and coefficients $a_i$
759: ($i=0,1,\dots,m$) of the $m$\,th-order polynomial in $\log(r/R_e)$.
760: \cite{Trujillo+02} showed that for $n>1$ a parabolic polynomial
761: ($m=2$) already provides relative errors less than 0.1\,\% in the
762: radial range $10^{-3} \le r/R_e \le 10^3$. For $0.5<n<1$ (and also
763: $n<0.5$), a cubic polynomial ($m=3$) is needed to obtain a similarly
764: good fit. The corresponding best-fit parameters for a range of profiles
765: with $0.5 < n < 10$ are provided in Table~\ref{tab:Abelparam}.
766:
767: \input{tab1.tex}
768: %=====================================================================
769: % END DOCUMENT
770: %=====================================================================
771:
772: \end{document}
773:
774: %%% Local Variables:
775: %%% mode: latex
776: %%% TeX-master: t
777: %%% End:
778:
779:
780: