1: \documentstyle[12pt]{article}
2: \def\baselinestretch{1.2}
3: %\topmargin -0.5in
4: \evensidemargin 0.0in
5: \oddsidemargin 0.0in
6: \textheight 8.5in
7: \textwidth 6.0in
8: %\usepackage{psfig}
9: \begin{document}
10: \begin{center}
11: {\bf
12: Probing deviation of tribimaximal mixing and reach
13: of $\theta_{13}$ using neutrino factory at CERN and
14: ICAL detector at INO}
15: \end{center}
16: \vskip 3mm
17: \begin{center}
18: {\bf Debasish Majumdar, Ambar Ghosal, Sudeb Bhattacharya, Kamales Kar }
19: \end{center}
20: \begin{center}
21: {\it Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics,
22: 1/AF Bidhannagar, Kolkata 700 064, India
23: }
24: \end{center}
25: \vskip 3mm
26: {\small
27: We investigate the deviation from tribimaximal mixing value and the reach of $\theta_{13}$
28: using neutrino factory at CERN and ICAL detector at INO.
29: }
30:
31: \vskip 4mm
32: \noindent
33: High energy neutrino beams are now playing a very crucial role in determining
34: the yet unknown features of neutrino physics. Determination of the
35: neutrino mass hierarchy and determination of the mixing angle
36: $\theta_{13}$, probing CP violation effects
37: at neutrino sector are the rich physics possibilities envisaged
38: from the neutrino beam of a neutrino factory.
39:
40: In the present work, we explore the possibility
41: to observe the deviation, if any, of the neutrino mixing angles
42: from their tribimaximal mixing \cite{tri-bi} values
43: using a long baseline neutrino experiment
44: with the neutrino beam from muon storage ring at CERN and the detector at the
45: India-based Neutrino
46: observatory (INO) covering the distance of about 7152 Km.
47: The tribimaximal mixing values for neutrino oscillations are given by
48: $\sin\theta_{12} = 1/\sqrt{3} = \sin\theta_{\odot}$,
49: $\sin\theta_{23} = 1/\sqrt{2} = \sin\theta_{\rm atm}$
50: and $\theta_{13} = 0^o$ \cite{Ma}.
51: These results exactly follow from the theory with $A4$ group symmetry
52: \cite{Ma}.
53: It is also to be noted that the CERN-INO baseline length is close to
54: the ``magic baseline"
55: length -- the baseline length at which the CP effects on neutrino oscillation
56: become virtually insignificant and hence reduce greatly the possibility
57: of confusing matter effects on neutrino oscillation with the CP violation
58: effects.
59:
60: The detector at INO site is a magnetized Iron Calorimeter (ICAL)
61: \cite{ino}
62: which has the unique ability to determine the sign of the charge
63: of the particle
64: passing through it. Thus it has the capability to distinguish between the
65: signature of $\bar{\nu_e} \rightarrow \bar{\nu_\mu}$ oscillation
66: (appearence channel, $\mu^+$ signal at ICAL) and the survival of $\nu_\mu$
67: ($\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_\mu$ oscillation in disappearence
68: channel; $\mu^-$ signal at ICAL) using the neutrino beam.
69: The calculations done here are for the ICAL detector of is 50 kTon
70: mass and with an exposure time of 5 years.
71:
72: %In the present
73: %work we also calculate the wrong sign muon yield at ICAL for different
74: %values of $\theta_{13}$ and CP phases.
75:
76: The reach of $\theta_{13}$ for ICAL at INO detector is also investigated.
77: This is defined as the lowest value of $\theta_{13}$ that can be probed
78: by ICAL for different energies of initial decaying muons at the
79: horn of the neutrino factory.
80:
81: Neutrino beams are generated from the decay of muons,
82: $\mu^{\pm}\rightarrow e^{\pm}+\nu_e(\bar{\nu_e})+\nu_\mu(\bar{\nu_\mu})$
83: from the srtaight section of the muon storage ring
84: \cite{ref2,ref3}. For unpolarized muon beam,
85: the flux distributions of $\nu_\mu$ and $\bar\nu_e$ are given by
86: $$
87: {\left({\frac{d^3N}{dtdAdE_\nu}}\right)}^{\nu_\mu}_{lab}
88: =
89: \frac{4g_{lab}J^2}{\pi L^2 E_\mu^3}E_{\nu_\mu}^2\left(3 - 4\frac{E_{\nu_\mu}}
90: {E_\mu}\right)
91: \eqno(1)
92: $$
93: $$
94: {\left({\frac{d^3N}{dtdAdE_\nu}}\right)}^{\bar\nu_e}_{lab}
95: =
96: \frac{28g_{lab}J^2}{\pi L^2 E_\mu^4}E_{\bar\nu_e}^2\left(E_\mu
97: - 2E_{\bar\nu_e}\right)
98: \eqno(2)
99: $$
100: where $g_{lab}$ is the number of muons produced,
101: $J$ is the Jacobian factor arising due to transformation
102: from rest frame to lab frame and is given by
103: $$
104: J = \frac{1}{\gamma(1-\beta\cos\theta)}
105: \eqno(3)
106: $$
107: $E_\mu$ is the energy of the decaying muon and
108: $E_{\nu_\mu}$ and $E_{\bar\nu_e}$ are energies of the
109: neutrinos produced due to decay of these muons. Also, $\gamma$ is
110: the boost factor and
111: $\beta = p_\mu/E_\mu$. The angle $\theta$ is the off axis angle which
112: we set to zero.
113:
114: For our analysis, we set the parameters as
115: $g_{lab} = 0.35\times {10}^{20}$ considering $35\%$ efficiency
116: of the produced muon number.
117: %with energy $E_\mu$ = 20 GeV.
118: The parameter $L$ is the length traversed by the neutrino
119: from the source to the detector through the earth. In the
120: present work, as mentioned, we take $L = 7152$ Km which is the
121: distance
122: between the source at CERN to the detector at the INO site
123: at PUSHEP ($11^o5^`$N, $76^o6^`$E) \cite{sanjib}.
124: The distribution of flux for both $\bar\nu_e$ and $\nu_\mu$
125: are shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 respectively,
126: where $E_{\bar\nu_e}$ varies from 0-10 GeV and
127: $E_{\nu_\mu}$ varies from 0-15 GeV and we observe for both the cases
128: a large
129: number of muons hitting the detector.
130:
131: We consider here a three flavour neutrino oscillation with matter
132: effects \cite{huber} due to the passage of the neutrino through the earth.
133: It may be noted here that the average earth matter density for
134: CERN-INO baseline can be calculated to be 4.15 gm/cm$^3$.
135: \vskip 0.1in
136: \noindent
137: We consider the $\nu_\mu\rightarrow\nu_\mu$ as well as
138: $\bar\nu_e\rightarrow\bar\nu_\mu$ mode in the three flavour
139: oscillation scenario. The interaction
140: of $\nu$ with the ICAL (Iron Calorimeter) detector proposed
141: at INO site are mainly arising through quasi-ealstic (QE) and
142: Deep inealstic scattering (DIS). At low energy we have considered
143: QE mode ($E_\nu \leq 1$GeV), and for $E_\nu >1$GeV the dominant
144: contribution will come from DIS.
145:
146: We emphasise here that the resolution function
147: of the detector obtained
148: from the exact simulation of the ICAL detector using GEANT 3.2 simulation
149: code has been included.
150:
151: We have calculated the total muon yields for CERN-INO baseline
152: for the deviation from tribimaximal mixing and the maximum and the minimum
153: muon yield values
154: for such deviation are tabulated in Table 1. In order to estimate
155: the deviation, we take the experimentally obtained range for
156: the three mixing angles given as $30^o \leq \theta_{12} \leq 38^o$,
157: $38^o \leq \theta_{23} \leq 53^o$ and $\theta_{13} < 12^o$.
158: The calculation is
159: repeated for several values of the CP violation phases, $\delta$.
160:
161: The wrong sign muon yield for the best fit values of the oscillation
162: parameters \cite{huber} is also calculated for the CERN-INO distance.
163: This is tabulated in Table 2.
164:
165: \begin{center}
166: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
167: \hline
168: CERN-INO & $\delta$ & $\theta_{13}$ & \multicolumn{2}{c|} {Muon yield}& Boost \\
169: \cline{4-5}
170: &CP&&Max & Min & \\
171: \hline
172: &&&&& \\
173: 50 kton & 0$^o$ & 9$^o$ & 605835 & 486304 & \\
174: 5 years & 0$^o$ & 6$^o$ & 613035 & 483768 & 472.0 \\
175: & 270$^o$ & 6$^o$ & 626210 & 491390 & $E_\mu$=50 GeV \\
176: \hline
177: \end{tabular}
178: \end{center}
179: \noindent {\bf Table 1.} {\small Variations of muon yield at INO with
180: the deviation from tribimaximal mixing for
181: neutrino beam from a neutrino factory at CERN}
182:
183: \begin{center}
184: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
185: \hline
186: CERN-INO & $E_\mu$ & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{Muon Yield} & $\delta$ & $\theta_{13}$ \\
187: \cline{3-4}
188: & & Wrong & Right & & \\
189: & (GeV) & sign $\mu$ & sign $\mu$ & CP & (in degrees) \\
190: \hline
191: &&&&& \\
192: 50 kton & 50 & 79447 & 458893 & 0$^o$ & 6\\
193: 5 years & & 85834 & 449788 & 0$^o$ & 9 \\
194: & & 72827 & 477637 & 90$^o$ & 6 \\
195: & & 75857 & 473150 & 90$^o$ & 9 \\
196: \hline
197: \end{tabular}
198: \end{center}
199: \noindent {\bf Table 2.} {\small The wrong sign muon yield at
200: INO for a neutrino beam from CERN.}
201: \vskip 0.1in
202:
203: The reach of $\theta_{13}$ at the ICAL detector at INO is also addressed.
204: For this purpose, we first calculate the wrong sign muon yield
205: for $\theta_{13} = 0.0$. Then we investigate the minimum value
206: of $\theta_{13}$ that will be required to obtain the wrong sign
207: muon yield with 1$\sigma$ deviation. In this case we consider
208: the statistical error only.
209: The process is repeated for the inverted
210: mas hierarchy as well.
211:
212: In Fig. 3, the $\sin^2 2\theta_{13}$ reach,
213: thus calculated, is shown for different values of muon energies
214: (i.e. for different values of the boost) that are allowed to decay in a
215: neutrino factory. Here too the CERN-INO baseline is considered.
216: There is no significant difference for the $\theta_{13}$ reach
217: values for normal and inverted mass hierarchies.
218: It is also seen from Fig. 3 that INO is capable of detecting
219: $\theta_{13}$ as low as $\sim 1^o$ for $E_\mu \sim 25$ GeV. The
220: reach is further reduced to $\sim 0.2^o$ for higher boost (higher
221: $E_\mu \sim 60$ GeV). This is an encouraging result.
222:
223: A detailed Geant-based study is under progress.
224:
225: The authors thank S. Goswami and R. Gandhi for helpful discussions.
226:
227: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
228: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
229: \bibitem{tri-bi}P. F. Harrison, D. H. Perkins, and W. G. Scott, Phys. Lett.
230: {\bf B 530}, 167 (2002); P. F. Harrison and W. G. Scott, arXiv:
231: hep-ph/0402006.
232: \bibitem{Ma} E. Ma and G. Rajasekaran, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64}, 113012 (2001); E Ma,
233: Mod. Phys. Lett A {\bf 17}, 627 (2002); K.S. Babu, E Ma and J.W.F. Valle, Phys. Lett B {\bf 552}, 207 (2003);
234: E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}, 031901 (2004); ibid Phys. Rev. D {\bf 72}, 037301 (2005);
235: G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 720}, 64 (2005); K.S. Babu and X.G. He, arXiv:hep-ph/0507217;
236: B. Adhikary et al, Phys. Lett B {\bf 638}, 345 (2006); B. Adhikary and A. Ghosal, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 75}, 113004
237: (2007).
238: \bibitem{ino} India-based Neutrino Observatory: Interim project report. Vol. 1.
239: By INO Collaboration (V. Arumugam et al.). INO-2005-01, 2005. 200pp;
240: India-based Neutrino Observatory: Project Report. Volume I.
241: By INO Collaboration (M.Sajjad Athar et al.). INO-2006-01, May 2006. 233pp.
242: A Report of the INO Feasibility Study.
243: Updated from the earlier Interim Report of May 1, 2005, see also the web-site.
244: http://www.imsc.res.in/~ino/.
245: \bibitem{ref2} S. Geer, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57}, 6989 (1998).
246: \bibitem{ref3}V. Barger, S. Geer, K. Whisnant, Phys. Rev. {\bf D61},
247: 053004 (2000).
248: \bibitem{sanjib} S. K. Agarwalla, A. Raychaudhuri, A. Samanta,
249: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 629}, 33 (2005).
250: \bibitem{huber} P. Huber, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec and W. Winter,
251: Phys. Rev. {\bf D74}, 07303 (2006).
252: \end{thebibliography}
253:
254: \newpage
255: \begin{center}
256: {\bf Figure Captions}
257: \end{center}
258:
259: \noindent {\bf Fig. 1} The $\bar {\nu_e}$ flux from a neutrino
260: factory with muon energy $E_\mu = 50$ GeV. See text
261: for details.
262:
263: \vskip 2mm
264:
265: \noindent {\bf Fig. 2} The $\nu_\mu$ flux from a neutrino
266: factory with muon energy $E_\mu = 50$ GeV. See text
267: for details.
268:
269: \vskip 2mm
270:
271: \noindent {\bf Fig. 3}
272: The reach of $\sin^2 2\theta_{13}$ at INO
273: for neutrinos from a neutrino factory at CERN for various enrgies $E_\mu$
274: of decaying muons. See text for details.
275:
276:
277: \end{document}
278: