1: %TEX
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: \def\dex#1{\hbox{10$^{#1}$}}
5: \def\tdex#1{\hbox{$\times10^{#1}$}}
6: \def\deg{$^\circ$}
7: \def\cmm#1{\hbox{${\rm cm^{-#1}}$}}
8: \def\fu{erg\,\cmm2\,s$^{-1}$\,\AA$^{-1}$}
9: \def\kms{km\,s$^{-1}$}
10: \def\mA{m\AA}
11: \def\e{$\pm$}
12: \def\Msun{M$_\odot$}
13: \def\Msunpyr{M$_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$}
14: \def\HI{\protect\ion{H}{1}}
15: \def\Ha{H$\alpha$}
16: \def\He{H$\epsilon$}
17: \def\CaII{\protect\ion{Ca}{2}}
18: \def\FeI{\protect\ion{Fe}{1}}
19: \def\FeII{\protect\ion{Fe}{2}}
20: \def\vlsr{$v_{\rm LSR}$}
21:
22: \begin{document}
23: \title{Distances to Galactic high-velocity clouds. Complex~C}
24:
25: \author{B.P. Wakker\altaffilmark{1}, D.G. York\altaffilmark{2}, C. Howk\altaffilmark{3}, J.C. Barentine\altaffilmark{4}, R. Wilhelm\altaffilmark{5}, R.F. Peletier\altaffilmark{6}}
26: \author{H. van Woerden\altaffilmark{6}, T.C. Beers\altaffilmark{7}, \v{Z}. Ivezi\'c\altaffilmark{8}, P. Richter\altaffilmark{9}, U.J. Schwarz\altaffilmark{6,10}}
27:
28: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706; wakker@astro.wisc.edu}
29: \altaffiltext{2}{Astronomy \& Astrophysics Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; don@oddjob.uchicago.edu}
30: \altaffiltext{3}{Dept. of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556; jhowk@nd.edu}
31: \altaffiltext{4}{Dept. of Astronomy, Univ. of Texas, Austin TX 78712 and Apache Point Observatory, Sunspot, NM 88349; jcb@astro.as.utexas.edu}
32: \altaffiltext{5}{Dept. of Physics \& Astronomy, Texas Tech University, Lubbock TX 79409; ron.wilhelm@ttu.edu}
33: \altaffiltext{6}{Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, Postbus 800, 9700 AV, Groningen; peletier@astro.rug.nl, hugo@astro.rug.nl}
34: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, CSCE: Center for the Study of Cosmic Evolution and JINA: Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, Michigan State University, E.\ Lansing, MI 48824, USA; beers@pa.msu.edu}
35: \altaffiltext{8}{Dept. of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195; ivezic@astro.washington.edu}
36: \altaffiltext{9}{Institut f\"ur Physik, Universit\"at Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469 Potsdam, Germany; prichter@astro.physik.uni-potsdam.de}
37: \altaffiltext{10}{Department of Astrophysics, Radboud University Nijmegen, Toernooiveld 1, NL-6525 ED, The Netherlands; schwarz@kun.nl}
38:
39: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
40:
41: \begin{abstract}
42: We report the first determination of a distance bracket for the high-velocity
43: cloud (HVC) complex~C. Combined with previous measurements showing that this
44: cloud has a metallicity of 0.15 times solar, these results provide ample
45: evidence that complex~C traces the continuing accretion of intergalactic gas
46: falling onto the Milky Way. Accounting for both neutral and ionized hydrogen as
47: well as He, the distance bracket implies a mass of 3--14\tdex6~\Msun, and the
48: complex represents a mass inflow of 0.1--0.25~\Msunpyr. We base our distance
49: bracket on the detection of \CaII\ absorption in the spectrum of the blue
50: horizontal branch star SDSS\,J120404.78+623345.6, in combination with a
51: significant non-detection toward the BHB star BS\,16034-0114. These results set
52: a strong distance bracket of 3.7--11.2~kpc on the distance to complex~C. A more
53: weakly supported lower limit of 6.7~kpc may be derived from the spectrum of the
54: BHB star BS\,16079-0017.
55: \end{abstract}
56:
57: \keywords{
58: ISM: clouds,
59: Galaxy: halo,
60: Galaxy: evolution,
61: Galaxy: general,
62: Galaxy: structure,
63: stars: distances
64: }
65:
66: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
67:
68: \section{Introduction}
69: \par The evolution of galaxies is strongly driven by the gas in the interstellar
70: medium. There is strong evidence for the infall of new material that provides
71: fuel for galaxy growth. This gas may originate in accreted satellite galaxies,
72: as gas tidally pulled out of passing galaxies, or from pristine intergalactic
73: gas. The cool, infalling clouds appear to be embedded in an extended
74: (100--200~kpc radius) hot Corona (Sembach et al.\ 2003). Indirect evidence for
75: infalling gas is provided by two arguments: (a) At the current rate of star
76: formation, all of the ISM will be turned into stars within about a Gyr. (b) The
77: narrowness of the distribution of metallicities of long-lived stars implies that
78: the metallicity of the ISM remains more or less constant over a Hubble time,
79: which can happen if there is a continuing inflow of low-metallicity material
80: with a present-day rate of about 1~\Msunpyr. Item (b) is known as the ``G-dwarf
81: problem'' (van den Bergh 1961). Using the infall hypothesis to solve it has been
82: the subject of much theoretical work (see e.g.\ Pagel 1997 for a good summary).
83: Continuing infall is essential in detailed numerical modeling of the chemical
84: evolution of the Galaxy and the development of abundance gradients (e.g.\
85: Chiappini et al.\ 2001 and references therein). Infall of low-metallicity gas
86: also seems necessary to reproduce the relatively high abundance of deuterium
87: measured in the local interstellar medium (Linksy et al.\ 2006).
88: \par Direct observational evidence for infalling low-metallicity gas is provided
89: by the high-velocity clouds (HVCs; see reviews by Wakker \& van Woerden 1997;
90: Richter 2006). Subsolar metallicities have now been determined for eleven clouds
91: (see van Woerden \& Wakker 2004 for a summary). In particular, the metallicity
92: of complex~C is well established as 0.15 times solar (see summary by Fox et al.\
93: 2004). Complex~C also has a high deuterium abundance (Sembach et al.\ 2004).
94: Distance brackets have been more elusive, with just one known before 2006
95: (8--10~kpc for complex~A -- van Woerden et al.\ 1999a; Wakker et al.\ 2003).
96: Thom et al.\ (2006) derive an 8.8~kpc upper limit for cloud WW\,35, while in a
97: separate paper (paper~I, Wakker et al.\ 2007), we present new results for two
98: HVCs (9.8--15.1~kpc for complex~GCP and 5.0--11.7~kpc for the Cohen Stream). In
99: this letter we report a distance bracket for the HVC covering the largest sky
100: area -- complex~C. We summarize our method in Sect.~2. The data are described in
101: Sect.~3, the results in Sect.~4, while in Sect.~5 we summarize the implications.
102:
103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
104:
105: \section{Method}
106: \par To find the distance to a HVC, we search for interstellar absorption at the
107: cloud's velocity in spectra of stars with known distances. A detection sets an
108: upper limit, while a {\it significant} non-detection sets a lower limit. A
109: significant non-detection means that the ratio of the expected equivalent width
110: to the observed 3$\sigma$ upper limit is sufficiently large (e.g.$>$3; see
111: Appendix item 15 in Wakker 2001). We also refer to paper~I for a detailed
112: discussion.
113: \par We find probe stars from the HK survey (Beers et al.\ 1996), the Sloan
114: Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; Fukugita et al.\ 1996; Gunn et al.\ 1998, 2006; York
115: et al.\ 2000; Stoughton et al.\ 2002; Pier et al.\ 2003; Adelman-McCarthy et
116: al.\ 2007) and the 2MASS survey (Cutri et al.\ 2003; Brown et al.\ 2004). Using
117: color criteria we identify blue horizontal branch (BHB) and RR\,Lyrae
118: candidates, for which we then obtain intermediate-resolution spectra and
119: photometry to derive the stellar parameters. See paper~I for more details and
120: Wilhelm et al.\ (2008, in preparation) for a complete description.
121:
122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
123:
124: \section{Observations}
125: \subsection{WHT observations}
126: \par In 1997, we selected several stars with estimated distances between 2 and
127: 8~kpc projected on the complex~C core CI (Fig~1). Five of these were observed by
128: Peletier and van Woerden with the 4.2-m William Herschel Telescope (WHT) on La
129: Palma on May 17/18/19 1997, using the Utrecht Echelle Spectrograph (UES) at the
130: WHT Nasmyth focus. The spectra covered the wavelength range from 3610 to
131: 4510~\AA, with a velocity resolution of 6~\kms. The wavelength calibration was
132: obtained with a ThAr lamp. The standard IRAF reduction included bias and
133: flatfield corrections, summing of pixels across the spectrum, and sky
134: subtraction.
135: \par A preliminary analysis of these spectra and preliminary distances to the
136: stars yielded a lower limit of 6.1~kpc to the distance of complex~C (van Woerden
137: et al.\ 1999b; Wakker 2001). We have now derived final stellar distances for
138: three stars, using photometric data and intermediate-resolution spectra obtained
139: at the McDonald observatory 2.7m telescope. Table~1 presents the basic data for
140: these stars. All three are hot, high-gravity stars, and we carefully checked the
141: spectral details against the derived stellar parameters. For one star
142: (BS\,16086-0123) we do not have classification data, and one star
143: (BS\,16034-0002) turns out to be a cool, nearby, star.
144:
145: \subsection{Keck observations}
146: \par In 2007, we selected several stars from the SDSS that lie projected onto
147: core CIII (see Fig.~1), with distances ranging from 9.3 to 40.6~kpc. These
148: distances are based on SDSS spectroscopic and photometric data. On April 24 2007
149: Barentine observed three of these using the upgraded High Resolution Echelle
150: Spectrometer (HIRES; Vogt et al.\ 1994) on the Keck~I telescope. The 2004 HIRES
151: upgrade replaced the single CCD with a three-CCD mosaic, including two with
152: enhanced blue sensitivity. All data were collected using the UV cross disperser
153: and the C5 decker (1\farcs15 wide slit). The data were binned by 2 pixels
154: (0\farcs24) in the spatial direction. The seeing was approximately 1\farcs5.
155: The spectra cover the wavelength range 3380 to 4330~\AA\ and have a spectral
156: resolution of 8.8~\kms. Three stars could be observed before weather conditions
157: forced the telescope to close for the night. Two are useful (see Table~1), while
158: for SDSS\,J120557.16+625251.6 the stellar \CaII\ line obscures the interstellar
159: lines.
160: \par The spectra were extracted by Howk using the HIRedux package (v2.2) of
161: J.X.\ Prochaska.\footnote{Available through:
162: http://www.ucolick.org/$\sim$xavier/IDL/.} The two-dimensional echelle images
163: were bias-subtracted, flat-fielded, and wavelength-calibrated using the HIRES
164: ThAr and quartz (flat field) lamps. One-dimensional spectra are extracted using
165: an optimal extraction routine, and individual exposures and orders were co-added
166: with an inverse variance weighting. The blaze function of the instrument was
167: removed (before co-adding orders) by fitting a polynomial to the average flux
168: distribution of the orders within each of the three CCDs.
169:
170: \subsection{\HI\ data}
171: \par We also have 21-cm \HI\ profiles toward the probe stars. Effelsberg spectra
172: (9\farcm7, 1~\kms\ resolution; Wakker et al.\ 2001) are available for the stars
173: observed with the WHT. For the Keck stars we use the LAB dataset of Kalberla et
174: al.\ (2005; 36\arcmin, 1~\kms\ resolution). However, Wakker et al.\ (2001) found
175: that $N$(\HI) measured with a 36\arcmin\ beam can be up to a factor 2.5 larger
176: or smaller than $N$(\HI) measured with a 9\farcm7 beam; the ratio distribution
177: has a mean of 1 and rms of 0.2. The \HI\ column densities therefore have a large
178: ($>$20\%) systematic uncertainty. Higher resolution observations
179: ($\sim$1\arcmin) with a synthesis telescope are needed to obtain more accurate
180: values.
181:
182: \section{Results}
183: %\subsection{Upper limit to the distance of complex~C}
184: \par Columns 8--13 of Table~1 list the \HI\ and \CaII\ measurements, including
185: predictions for the equivalent width (EW) based on the relation between $N$(\HI)
186: and \CaII\ abundance found by Wakker \& Mathis (2000; see notes). Figure~2 shows
187: the \CaII~K and H and \HI\ 21-cm spectra for the four stars that yield
188: significant results.
189: \par We detect \CaII~K and H absorption associated with complex~C toward the
190: star SDSS\,J120404.78+623345.6, with EW(K)=42\e3\e4~\mA\ and EW(H)=19\e6\e3~\mA.
191: The first error is statistical error associated with the noise in the spectrum
192: and the placement of the continuum. The second error is a systematic error
193: associated with a 3~\kms\ uncertainty in choosing the velocity limits of the
194: equivalent width integration. See Wakker et al.\ (2003) for a full discussion of
195: these errors. That this line is interstellar is shown by two facts. (a) It is
196: much narrower (FWHM 6.7~\kms) than the stellar lines (FWHM $\sim$15~\kms). (b)
197: Stars with effective temperatures of about 7000~K do not have a stellar line at
198: this location (see Fig.~3). The distance of SDSS\,J120404.78+623345.6 is found
199: to be 10.9$\pm$0.7~kpc. As we discuss in Paper~I, this implies a 68\% confidence
200: interval for the upper limit on the distance of complex~C of
201: $D_*$+0.47$\sigma$($D_*$)= 11.2~kpc.
202:
203: %\subsection{Lower limit to the distance of complex~C}
204: \par The three WHT stars yield non-detections for \CaII\ in complex~C. The
205: spectrum of BS\,16079-0017 ($D$=8,1$\pm$2.9~~kpc) shows many broad stellar
206: lines, but no narrow interstellar line is visible at the velocity of complex~C.
207: This star thus sets a tentative lower limit of 6.7~kpc to the distance of
208: complex~C. On the other hand, a firm lower limit of 3.7~kpc is set by
209: BS\,16034-0114 ($D$=3.8$\pm$0.3~kpc), whose spectrum shows few stellar lines
210: and which has EW(expected)/3$\sigma$(EW)=11. The star BS\,16079-0015 also yields
211: a significant non-detection, but since it is closer than BS\.16034-0114, we do
212: not show its spectrum in Fig.~2.
213: \par Complex~C is also not detected toward the star SDSS\,J121611.13+645811.0,
214: even though this star is more distant than SDSS\,J120404.78+623345.6. However,
215: the expected EW is only a factor 2.5 higher than the 3$\sigma$ limit.
216: Considering possible intrinsic variations in the \CaII\ abundance, and the
217: large uncertainty in the \HI\ column density (see above), this non-detection is
218: not considered significant, though only marginally so. In fact, there is a hint
219: of an interstellar absorption line at the velocity of complex~C (see Fig.~2).
220: Data with higher S/N ratio are needed to resolve this issue.
221:
222: \section{Conclusions}
223: \par Forty years after the first attempt (Prata \& Wallerstein 1967), we report
224: the first successful detection of interstellar \CaII\ H and K absorption from
225: HVC complex~C. This sets an upper limit on the distance of core CIII (left side
226: in Fig.~1) of 11.2~kpc. For core CI (right side in Fig.~1) we find a lower limit
227: of 3.7~kpc, possibly 6.7~kpc. Although the stars are 27\deg\ apart on the sky,
228: it is still safe to conclude that complex~C is located at Galactocentric radius
229: $<$14~kpc, and lies high above the Galactic plane ($z$=3--9~kpc). A more precise
230: determination requires a lower limit for core CIII and an upper limit for CI.
231: \par Integrating $N$(\HI) across the cloud, we estimate $M$(\HI) as
232: 0.7--6\tdex{6}~\Msun. \Ha\ emission has also been detected (Tufte et al.\ 1998).
233: We can assume either that the H$^+$ and \HI\ are thorougly mixed or that the
234: H$^+$ originates in a photoionized skin around the cloud. In either case, the
235: observed \Ha\ intensity suggests that there is roughly as much ionized as
236: neutral gas.
237: \par We can also estimate the mass inflow associated with complex~C, using a
238: method described in paper~I. Including the neutral and ionized hydrogen, as well
239: as a 40\% contribution from helium, we derive that complex~C represents about
240: 0.1--0.25~\Msunpyr\ of infalling gas. This is a substantial fraction of the
241: theoretically required amount of 1~\Msunpyr. Other HVCs may contribute the rest,
242: but we have not yet determined distances and metallicities for the most likely
243: candidates.
244: \par From our results, we conclude that the mystery of the distances to the HVCs
245: is beginning to be solved. The evidence shows that several HVCs are located in
246: the upper reaches of the gaseous Galactic Halo and that they contribute
247: significantly to the inflow of metal-poor gas onto the Galaxy. Once the mass
248: inflow rate is constrained from observations of a sufficient number of HVCs, the
249: next step will be to determine their three-dimensional structure, so that we can
250: use their velocities and galactic location to derive orbits and solve the
251: outstanding mystery of their ultimate origins.
252:
253: \bigskip
254: Acknowledgements
255: \par B.P.W., D.G.Y, R.W. and T.C.B. acknowledge support from grant AST-06-07154
256: awarded by the US National Science Foundation. T.C.B. also acknowledges NSF
257: grants AST 04-06784 and PHY-02-16783; Physics Frontier Center/Joint Institute
258: for Nuclear Astrophysics (JINA).
259: \par Some of the data presented were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory,
260: which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of
261: Technology, the University of California and the National Aeronautics and Space
262: Administration. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial
263: support of the W.M. Keck Foundation.
264: \par The William Herschel telescope is operated on the Island of La Palma by the
265: Isaac Newton group in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the
266: Instituto de Astrophysica de Canarias.
267: \par Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan
268: Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, the
269: U.S. Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
270: the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck Society, and the Higher Education
271: Funding Council for England. The SDSS Web Site is http://www.sdss.org/. The SDSS
272: is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the Participating
273: Institutions. The Participating Institutions are the American Museum of Natural
274: History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, University of Basel, University of
275: Cambridge, Case Western Reserve University, University of Chicago, Drexel
276: University, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation
277: Group, Johns Hopkins University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics,
278: the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean
279: Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos National
280: Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the
281: Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, Ohio
282: State University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth, Princeton
283: University, the United States Naval Observatory, and the University of
284: Washington.
285:
286: \begin{references}
287: \def\ref#1{\reference{DUMMY}{#1}}\parskip=0pt
288: \ref Adelman-McCarthy J., et al.\ 2007, ApJS, submitted (SDSS-DR5)
289: \ref Beers T.C., Wilhelm R., Doinidis S.P., Mattson C.J., 1996, ApJS 103, 433
290: \ref Brown W.R., Geller M.J., Kenyon S.J., Beers T.C., Kurtz M.J., Roll J.B., 2004, AJ 127, 1555
291: \ref Chiappini C., Matteucci F., Romano D., 2001, ApJ, 554, 1044
292: \ref Cutri R.M., et al.\ 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of Point Sources (VizieR Online Data Catalog 2246)
293: \ref Fox A.J., Savage B.D., Wakker B.P., Richter P., Sembach K.R., Tripp T.M., 2004, ApJ, 602, 738
294: \ref Gunn J.E., et al.\ 1998, AJ, 116, 3040
295: \ref Gunn J.E., et al.\ 2006, AJ, 131, 2332
296: \ref Kalberla P.W.W., Burton W.B., Hartmann D., Arnal E.M., Bajaja E., Morras R., P\"oppel W.G.L., 2005, A\&A, 440, 775
297: \ref Linsky J.L., Draine B.T., Moos H.W., Jenkins E.B., Wood B.E., et al., 2006, ApJ, 647, 1106
298: \ref Pagel B.E.J., Nucleosynthesis and chemical evolution of galaxies, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)
299: \ref Pier J.R., Munn J.A., Hindsley R.B., Hennessy G.S., Kent S.M., Lupton R.H., Ivezic Z., 2003, AJ, 125, 1559
300: \ref Prata S., Wallerstein G., 1967, PASP 79, 202
301: \ref Richter P., 2006, Reviews in Modern Astronomy, 19, 31
302: \ref Sembach K.R., Wakker B.P., Savage B.D., Richter P., Meade M., et al., 2003, ApJS, 146, 165 %Jenkins E.B., Shull J.M., Sonneborn G., Moos H.W., 2003, ApJS 146, 165
303: \ref Sembach K.R., Wakker B.P., Tripp T.M., Richter P., Kruk J.W., Blair W.P., Moos H.W., Savage B.D., Shull J.M., York D.G., Sonneborn G., H\'ebrard G., Ferlet R., Vidal-Madjar A., Friedman S., Jenkins E.B., 2004, ApJS, 150, 387
304: \ref Stoughton C., et al.\ 2002, AJ, 123, 485
305: \ref Thom C., Putman M.E., Gibson B.K., Christlieb N., Flynn C., Beers T.C., Wilhelm R., Lee Y.S., 2006, ApJ 638, L97
306: \ref Tufte S.L., Reynolds R.J., Haffner L.M., 1998, ApJ, 504, 773
307: \ref van den Bergh S., 1962, AJ, 67, 486
308: \ref van Woerden H., Schwarz U.J., Peletier R.F., Wakker B.P., Kalberla P.M.W., 1999a, Nature 400, 138
309: \ref van Woerden H., Peletier R.F., Schwarz U.J., Wakker B.P., Kalberla P.M.W., 1999b, in ``Stromlo workshop on high-velocity clouds'', eds. B.K.\ Gibson \& M.E.\ Putman, ASP Conf.\ Ser.\ 166, 1
310: \ref van Woerden H., Wakker B.P., 2004, in ``High velocity clouds'', eds.\ H.\ van Woerden, B.P.\ Wakker, U.J.\ Schwarz, K.S.\ de Boer, Kluwer Acad.\ Press, p195,
311: \ref Vogt, S.S. et al., 1994, Proc. SPIE, 2198, 362
312: \ref Wakker B.P., van Woerden H., 1997, ARA\&A 35, 217
313: \ref Wakker B.P., Mathis J.S., 2000, ApJL, 544, L107
314: \ref Wakker B.P., 2001, ApJS 136, 463
315: \ref Wakker B.P., Kalberla P.M.W., van Woerden H., de Boer K.S., Putman M.E., 2001, ApJS, 136 537
316: \ref Wakker B.P., Savage B.D., Sembach K.R., Richter P., Meade M., et al., 2003, ApJ, 146, 1 %Jenkins E.B., Shull J.M., Ake T.B., Blair W.P., Dixon W.V., Friedman S.D., Green, R.F., Kruk J.W., Moos W.H., Murphy E.M., Oegerle W.R., Sahnow D.J., Sonneborn G., Wilkinson E., York D.G., 2003, ApJS 146, 1
317: \ref Wakker B.P., York D.G., Wilhelm R., Barentine J.C., Richter P., Beers T.C., Ivezic Z., Howk C, 2007, ApJ, submitted, paper~I
318: \ref York D.G., et al.\ 2000, AJ 120, 1579
319: \end{references}
320:
321: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
322: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
323:
324: %\newpage\par
325:
326: \input tab1.tex
327:
328: %fiddle: size angle hscale vscale hoff voff
329: \begin{figure}\plotfiddle{f1.eps}{0.1in}{270}{300}{510}{0}{0}\figurenum{1} % APJMS
330: \caption{%
331: \HI\ map of complex~C, based on the data of Hulsbosch \& Wakker (1988). Colors
332: represent LSR velocities, as coded in the wedge. Half circles show positions
333: with multiple \HI\ components. Contour levels are at brightness temperatures of
334: 0.05, 0.25, 0.5 and 1~K. The positions of the stars discussed in this paper are
335: shown by the symbols -- closed stars for the detections, closed triangles for
336: the significant non-detections, open circles for non-significant non-detections.
337: The symbol diameters are proportional to the stellar distances. Several cores
338: inside complex~C are labeled.
339: }\end{figure}
340:
341: \begin{figure}\plotfiddle{f2.eps}{0in}{0}{450}{450}{0}{0}\figurenum{2} % APJMS
342: %\begin{figure}\plotone{f2.eps}\figurenum{2} % APJMS
343: \caption{%
344: Spectra near \CaII\ K, H and \HI\ for the four most significant stars in our
345: sample. Note that the Keck data are flux-calibrated (units \dex{-15}
346: erg\,\cmm2\,s$^{-1}$\,\AA$^{-1}$), while the WHT data are not. Vertical lines
347: are placed at the velocity of the low-, intermediate- and high-velocity \HI\
348: emission components, while detected absorption lines are labeled ``cpxC'' and
349: ``IVC''. The locations of stellar \CaII\ and \FeII\ lines are shown by the (*).
350: Note that near the H line toward BS\,16079-0017 there are many unidentified
351: stellar lines.
352: }\end{figure}
353:
354: \begin{figure}\plotfiddle{f3.eps}{0in}{0}{450}{270}{0}{0}\figurenum{3} % APJMS
355: %\begin{figure}\plotone{f3.eps}\figurenum{3} % APJMS
356: \caption{%
357: Spectra of three stars, shifted to the stellar reference frame. The top two
358: (2MASS) stars were observed with the VLT by Wakker et al.\ (2007; paper~I). Most
359: of the stellar lines can be identified as \FeI\ or \FeII\ absorption. Some
360: features have not yet been identified. Clearly, no stellar line is expected at
361: the wavelength of the complex~C \CaII~K absorption. The two-component
362: intermediate-velocity and low-velocity \CaII~K absorption in the direction of
363: SDSS\,J120404.78+623345.6 blends with stellar \FeII\ absorption.
364: }\end{figure}
365:
366: \end{document}
367: %TEX
368: