1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %
4: %\usepackage{graphicx}
5: %\usepackage{natbib}
6:
7: % Definitions
8: \newcommand\eq{\begin{equation}}
9: \newcommand\eeq{\end{equation}}
10: \newcommand\eqn{\begin{eqnarray}}
11: \newcommand\eeqn{\end{eqnarray}}
12: \newcommand\simgreat{\mathrel{\copy\simgreatbox}}
13: \newcommand\simless{\mathrel{\copy\simlessbox}}
14: %\newbox\simppropto
15: %\setbox\simppropto=\hbox{\raise.5ex\hbox{$\sim$}\llap
16: % {\lower.5ex\hbox{$\propto$}}}\ht2=\grdimen\dp2=0pt
17: %\newcommand\simpropto{\mathrel{\copy\simppropto}}
18:
19: \newcommand\Msol{M$_{\odot}$}
20: \newcommand\kms{km s$^{-1}$}
21: \newcommand\ergs{erg s$^{-1}$}
22: \newcommand\scl{$\sigma_{cl}$}
23: \newcommand\lx{L$_X$}
24: \newcommand\tx{T$_X$}
25: \newcommand\sloani{$i^\prime$}
26: \newcommand\sloang{$g^\prime$}
27: \newcommand\RXJ{RX~J1416.4+2315$\,$}
28: \newcommand\RXJold{RX~J1552.2+2013$\,$}
29:
30:
31: \shorttitle{The compact group -- fossil group connection}
32: \shortauthors{Mendes de Oliveira \& Carrasco}
33: \slugcomment{ApJ Letter, accepted}
34:
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \title{The compact group--fossil group connection: observations of a
38: massive compact group at z$=$0.22\altaffilmark{1}}
39:
40: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory,
41: which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in
42: Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of
43: the Gemini partnership: the National Science Foundation (United States),
44: the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council (United Kingdom),
45: the National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the Australian
46: Research Council (Australia), CNPq (Brazil) and CONICET (Argentina) --
47: Program ID: GS-2005B-Q-37}
48:
49: \author{Claudia L. Mendes de Oliveira}
50: \affil{Departamento de Astronomia, Instituto de Astronomia,
51: Geof\'isica e Ci\^encias Atmosf\'ericas, Universidade de S\~ao Paulo,
52: Rua do Mat\~ao 1226, Cidade Universitaria, 05508--090,
53: S\~ao Paulo, Brazil; oliveira@astro.iag.usp.br}
54: \and
55: \author{Eleazar R. Carrasco}
56: \affil{Gemini Observatory, Southern Operations Center, AURA, Casilla 603,
57: La Serena, Chile; rcarrasco@gemini.edu}
58:
59: \begin{abstract}
60: It has been suggested that fossil groups could be the canibalized remains
61: of compact groups, that lost energy through tidal friction. However,
62: in the nearby universe, compact groups which are close to the merging
63: phase and display a wealth of interacting features (such as HCG 31 and
64: HCG 79) have very low velocity dispersions and poor neighborhoods,
65: unlike the massive, cluster-like fossil groups studied to date. In
66: fact, known z$=$0 compact groups are very seldom embedded in massive
67: enough structures which may have resembled the intergalactic medium of
68: fossil groups. In this paper we study the dynamical properties of CG6, a
69: massive compact group at z$=$0.220 that has several properties
70: in common with known fossil groups. We report on new \sloang~and
71: \sloani~imaging and multi-slit spectroscopic performed with
72: GMOS on Gemini South. The system has 20 members, within a radius of 1
73: h$_{70}^{-1}$ Mpc, a velocity dispersion of 700~\kms~and has a mass of
74: 1.8 $\times$ 10$^{14}$ h$_{70}^{-1}$~\Msol, similar to that of the most
75: massive fossil groups known. The merging of the four central galaxies in
76: this group would form a galaxy with magnitude $M_{r'} \sim -23.4$, typical
77: for first-ranked galaxies of fossil groups. Although nearby compact groups
78: with similar properties to CG 6 are rare, we speculate that such systems
79: occurred more frequently in the past and they may have been the precursors
80: of fossil groups.
81: \end{abstract}
82:
83: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: individual: HCG 31, HCG 79, HGC 92, SDSS CG 6
84: -- galaxies: kinematics -- galaxies: structure}
85:
86: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
87:
88: Groups of galaxies are small systems of typically a few L$^{*}$ galaxies,
89: which comprise over 55\% of the nearby structures in the universe. A
90: small fraction of galaxy groups are classified as {\it compact}
91: groups, which are responsible for $\sim$ 1\% of the luminosity
92: density of the universe \citep{mdoh91}. Although they are rare
93: objects in the nearby universe, their high galactic densities and low
94: velocity dispersions make them ideal systems for the study of galaxy
95: transformation through galaxy-galaxy collisions. As expected, these
96: systems have a high fraction of interacting members, although merged
97: objects are rare \citep{zepf93}. They are commonly believed to
98: evolve through dynamical friction and finally merge to form one
99: single galaxy \citep{Barnes92}. \citet{vikhlinin99} and
100: \citet{jones03} have suggested that the merging of compact groups
101: can lead to the formation of fossil groups.
102: A fossil group (FG, hereafter) is a
103: system with an extended and luminous X-ray halo (L$_X$ $>$ $10^{42}$
104: h$_{70}^{-2}$ erg s$^{-1}$), dominated by one single brighter than
105: L$^{*}$ elliptical galaxy, surrounded by low-luminosity companions
106: \citep[where the difference in magnitude between the bright dominant elliptical and the next brightest companion is $>$ 2 mag in the R-band;][]{jones03}.
107:
108: One important goal of this article is to investigate if compact groups (CG,
109: hereafter)
110: as we known them today, could be the precursors of FGs.
111: In order to answer this question, we summarize, in section 2, the
112: properties of a few of the most strongly interacting nearby CGs
113: known, which are about to merge, and in section 3, we describe the
114: properties of the five FGs which have been studied
115: spectroscopically so far. In section 4, we present new observations
116: for a CG embedded in a cluster-size potential,
117: at redshift z$=$0.22 and section 5 puts together all the observations
118: described and discusses the CG-FG scenario. Throughout this paper we adopt
119: when necessary a standard cosmological model:
120: $H_{0}=70\,h_{70}\,$km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_{m}=0.3$ and
121: $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$. At z$=$0.22, 1\arcsec~corresponds to $ 3.5\,
122: h_{70}^{-1}\,$kpc.
123:
124: \section {Interacting compact groups: HCG 31, HCG 79 and HCG 92}
125: \label{sec:hcg}
126:
127: There is evidence from both observations and simulations
128: that groups evolve through dynamical friction and coalesce to
129: form more compact structures as the universe ages. A few of
130: the most compact, and therefore most evolved groups known,
131: from Hickson's catalogue \citep{h92} are HCG 31, HCG 79 (or
132: Seyfert Sextet) and HCG 92 (or Stephan's quintet). The study
133: of these groups is important to help understanding
134: processes common in merging systems, environments that may
135: have occurred more often in the high-redshift universe.
136:
137: HCG 31 is a group at z$\sim$0.013 and with a velocity dispersion of
138: $\sigma$ $\sim$ 60 \kms. This is a gas-rich group with intense star
139: forming activity \cite[e.g. ][]{moetal06, amram07}, dominated by a central
140: pair of interacting dwarf galaxies A$+$C. HCG 31 is thought to be in a
141: pre-merging phase \citep{amram05,vm05} and it has well developed tidal
142: tails seen in H$\alpha$ and HI. The group hosts two excellent candidates
143: for tidal dwarf galaxies, namely member F, in the southern tail and
144: member R, 50 h$_{70}^{-1}$ kpc to the north of the group (for an assumed
145: distance modulus of DM=33.8).
146:
147: HCG 79, also known as {\it Seyfert Sextet}, was originally
148: identified as a sextet of galaxies but it is now known to be a
149: quartet at z$=$ 0.0145 (the 5th object is in
150: the background and the 6th is a luminous tidal debris to the
151: northeast of the group). This is the most CG in
152: Hickson's catalogue with a galaxy-galaxy distance below
153: 10 kpc (for an adopted DM=34.0)
154: and a velocity dispersion of $\sigma$ = 138 \kms.
155: The four galaxies present morphological
156: distortions and increased activity (tidal debris, bar in HCG
157: 79B, dust lane in HCG 79A, radio and infrared emission,
158: disturbed rotation curves and nuclear activity). The group
159: presents a prominent intra-group light envelope which contains
160: 45\% of the total light of the group \citep{darocha05} and
161: irregular envelopes of HI \citep{wil91} and X--rays
162: \citep{pil95}. These suggest that recent or on-going
163: interaction is taking place within this system.
164:
165: HCG 92, also known as Stephan's quintet, is in reality a quartet
166: with z$=$ 0.0215 and a foreground galaxy. It is the most well
167: studied CG -- multi wavelength data are available from
168: radio to X-rays. Most of the gaseous material in Stephan's quintet is
169: concentrated not in the galaxies but in the intragroup
170: medium, suggesting that collisions among group members may have
171: happened frequently. A number of tidal dwarf galaxies and intergalactic
172: HII regions have been
173: identified in this group \citep[e.g.][]{moetal01,moetal04,xu05}.
174: Of the three groups
175: described above, HCG 92 is the only one to have detected X-rays, with
176: a total bolometric luminosity of 2.96$\times$10$^{42}$ h$^{-2}_{70}$
177: \ergs~\citep{Xue2000}.
178:
179: These three spiral-rich groups are thought to be in their
180: final stages of evolution -- they are, in fact, some of the
181: most compact systems found in the Hickson's catalogue. Yet,
182: they have members that can be clearly identified as individual
183: galaxies, suggesting that once merging starts, it may proceed
184: quickly, and the groups may no longer be recognized as such.
185: The bright members of these groups will almost certainly end
186: up as a single galaxy pile. A discussion of
187: whether these systems will most likely end up as
188: FGs or as single isolated elliptical galaxies is deferred
189: to section 5. In the following section, some of the optical
190: properties of the FGs studied so far are summarized.
191:
192: \section{Dynamical properties of FGs} \label{sec:fossil}
193:
194: Only five FGs have been studied so far in any level of
195: detail in the
196: optical bands (imaging and spectroscopy).
197:
198: \citet{mo06} derived the physical properties of the FG \RXJold,
199: at a redshift of z$=$0.136, and computed its luminosity function, based
200: on the spectroscopy of 36 member galaxies. This system was found to
201: be a fossil cluster, given its high number of members and high velocity
202: dispersion (close to 700 km/s).
203:
204: \cite{cypriano06} studied a second FG, \RXJ, at a
205: similar redshift of z=0.137. For this system also a fairly
206: high velocity dispersion was measured (584 km s$^{-1}$), for
207: 25 members located in the inner 542 h$_{70}^{-1}$ kpc ($\sim$ 0.45
208: of the virial radius) of the system. Similar results were found by
209: \citet{habib06}.
210:
211: In two recent studies Mendes de Oliveira et al. (2007, in preparation)
212: and Cypriano et al. (2007, in preparation) two other
213: FGs were also found to have cluster-like masses: RX
214: J1340.5+4017, with 25 members, was found to have a velocity
215: dispersion of 580~\kms\ and for RX J1256.0+2556, a velocity
216: dispersion of 582~\kms\ was determined from spectroscopy of 28
217: members. In all four cases the systems presented very pronounced
218: red sequences in their color-magnitude diagrams and they were
219: dominated by early-type galaxies. Table 3 of \citet{habib06} lists
220: one other FG for which spectroscopy for a significant
221: number of members has been obtained, ESO 3060170, which is found to
222: have a velocity dispersion of 648~\kms\, derived from velocity
223: measurements of
224: 15 members.
225:
226: The conclusion is then that for all five groups studied so far,
227: for which more than six members are known, they all have
228: velocity dispersions of $\sim$ 600~\kms\ or higher, and dynamical
229: virial masses $\sim$ 10$^{14}$ h$_{70}^{-1}$ \Msol.
230:
231: Fossil groups were suggested to be the end products of
232: merging of L$^{*}$ galaxies in low-density environments
233: \citep{jones03}. However, the five FGs studied
234: do not constitute low-density environments and, in
235: fact, are more similar to galaxy clusters. The fairly high
236: X-ray emission, the large fraction of elliptical galaxies,
237: as well as the lack of obvious substructures,
238: suggest that these FGs are fairly massive
239: virialized systems.
240:
241: The FGs described above have masses, kinematics and
242: environments which are very different from those of nearby CGs.
243: At first sight, this evidence would seem to indicate that there
244: is no connection between these two kinds of systems. However,
245: before discussing this point any further, we would like to
246: present in the next section, an example of a CG that does have
247: similar optical properties to those of FGs. It is the farthest
248: away CG known to date, at z$=$0.22. New imaging and
249: spectroscopic observations of this group are presented in the
250: next section. A detail description of the properties of
251: CG 6 will be presented in a future paper (Carrasco et al.
252: 2007, in preparation).
253:
254: \section{CG 6 - a compact group at z=0.22}\label{sec:imaobs}
255:
256: CG 6 is a group from the \citet{lee04} catalog of CG
257: galaxies, chosen from the SDSS database. Before the present study,
258: only one galaxy in the system, the central one, had a measured
259: redshift. The observations of SDSS CG 6 were carried out using the
260: Gemini Multiobject Spectrograph \citep[hereafter GMOS][]{hook04} at
261: the Gemini South telescope.
262:
263: The group was imaged using the standards \sloang~and \sloani~filters
264: \citep{fuk96} in December 1$^{st}$, 2005. Exposures of 3$\times$150
265: seconds in \sloang~and 3$\times$120 seconds in \sloani~filter, under
266: photometric conditions, were obtained. The images were observed with
267: median seeing values of 0$\farcs$73 and 0$\farcs$55 in \sloang~and
268: \sloani~filters respectively. Figure \ref{sloanimage} shows the color
269: composite image of the SDSS-CG-6 group. All galaxies with measured
270: radial velocities are marked (see below).
271:
272: All observations were processed with the Gemini IRAF package
273: version 1.8 inside IRAF\footnote[2]{IRAF is distributed by NOAO,
274: which is operated by the Association of Universities for
275: Research in Astronomy Inc., under contract with the National
276: Science Foundationand} in a standard way. Calibrations of the
277: magnitudes to the standard system were derived using observations
278: of standard stars from \citet{lan92} field RU149.
279:
280: Object detection and photometry were performed on the
281: \sloani-band image with the SExtractor program \citep{ber96}.
282: {\rm MAG$\_$AUTO} was adopted as the total magnitude. Colors were
283: derived by measuring fluxes inside a fixed circular aperture of 24 pixels
284: (1$\farcs$75) in both filters, corresponding to a physical aperture
285: of 6.2 h$^{-1}_{70}$ kpc at the rest frame of the group.
286: All objects with SExtractor {\em stellarity} flag $\le0.85$ were
287: selected as galaxies. We estimate that the catalog is complete down
288: to \sloani$=$23.5 mag, since the number counts start to turn over
289: at this value. The final
290: catologue contains the total magnitudes, colors and structural
291: parameters for 409 galaxies brighter than \sloani$=23.5$
292: ($M_{i^{'}}\sim-16.7$ mag at the distance of the group, with no
293: k-correction).
294:
295: Galaxies for spectroscopic follow-up were selected based on
296: their magnitudes and colors. Figure \ref{colormag} shows the
297: color-magnitude diagram for galaxies with \sloani$\le$23 mag. A
298: pronounced red sequence is readly seen. Objects in the region
299: below the red cluster sequence (continuous line) and brighter
300: than \sloani$=21$ mag ($M_{i'}<-19.2$, (dashed line) were selected
301: as potential candidates of the system.
302:
303: Galaxy spectra were observed in December 2005, during dark time,
304: with relatively good transparency and with a seeing that varied
305: between 0$\farcs$9 and 1$\farcs$0. Three exposures of 1400 seconds
306: were obtained through a mask with 1$\farcs$0 slits, using the 400
307: lines mm$^{-1}$ ruling density grating (R400) and centered at
308: 6300\AA, for a resolution of 8\AA. Reduction and calibration of
309: the data were done in the standard way, using the Gemini IRAF
310: package version 1.8.
311:
312: We were able to measure redshifts for 35 observed galaxies
313: using cross-correlation techniques or emission-line fitting
314: %(the measured velocities are available upon request to the authors).
315: Twenty two of the galaxies are located at the redshift
316: of the group (within $\pm2000$ km s$^{-1}$ and between
317: 0.213$<$z$<$0.226). We used the ROSTAT program \citep{bee90}
318: to calculate the average velocity and the one-dimensional
319: line-of-sight velocity dispersion of the group. We found
320: that the group is located at $\langle z \rangle=0.21981\pm0.00054$,
321: with a velocity dispersion of $\sigma=703\pm103$ km s$^{-1}$, and
322: with 20 member galaxies. Figure \ref{histovel} shows the
323: velocity distribution of the 20 galaxies at the redshift of
324: the group. We used the same software to do a statistical analysis
325: of the velocities and we found no large gap in the velocity distribution,
326: which follows close to a gaussian shape. The virial mass computed
327: using the 20 galaxies with concordant redshifts, for a distance
328: modulus of 40.18 is M$_{vir}=1.77_{-0.21}^{+0.45}$ $\times$ 10$^{14}$ h$^{-1}_{70}$
329: \Msol\ and the virial radius is R$_{vir}=0.82_{-0.01}^{+0.16}$
330: h$^{-1}_{70}$ Mpc (the errors are 68\% confidence intervals).
331:
332: We checked for any significant effects in the velocity
333: dispersion and total mass of the system when we exclude the
334: emission line galaxies from the sample. The hashed histogram in
335: Figure \ref{histovel} shows the distribution of the 15 non-emission
336: line galaxies. For this smaller sample, we obtained a lower velocity
337: dispersion of $\sigma=608\pm99$ km s$^{-1}$, a virial mass of
338: M$_{vir}=0.95_{-0.11}^{+0.32}$ $\times$ 10$^{14}$ h$^{-1}_{70}$
339: \Msol\ and a virial radius R$_{vir}=0.64_{-0.02}^{+0.18}$
340: h$^{-1}_{70}$ Mpc (again the errors are 68\% confidence intervals),
341: values not significantly different from those considering the whole
342: sample. The results go in the direction of what was previously
343: seen also for other systems: inclusion of the emission-line galaxies
344: enhance the velocity dispersion of the system.
345:
346: \section{Discussion}
347:
348: Dynamical friction and subsequent merging are probably the processes
349: responsible for the lack of L$^{*}$ galaxies in FGs.
350: Considering the merging scenario, it is possible that the
351: overluminous central galaxy in a FG has been formed within
352: a substructure, inside a larger structure. In that case, one could
353: think of a scenario where a CG was formed within a rich
354: group, which would then have merged, leaving behind the
355: brightest elliptical galaxy of what today is seen as a FG.
356: One weak argument against this scenario is that the nearby examples
357: of CGs are not usually found within such massive
358: structures, but instead are more often surrounded by very sparse
359: structures. There are, however, examples such as CG6, surrounded by
360: large numbers of lower-luminosity galaxies, inhabiting a deep potential
361: well.
362:
363: We would like to test the hypothesis that CGs, as
364: observed in the nearby universe, could be the precursors of FGs.
365: We may examine two aspects: (1) if the sum
366: of the luminosities of the brightest CG galaxies is
367: similar to the luminosity of a first-ranked FG galaxy and;
368: (2) if the neighbourhoods of CGs are rich, i.e., if the
369: system as a whole (group plus environment) has a velocity
370: dispersion/mass similar to that of a FG.
371:
372: We compute the total luminosity of the galaxies in the soon-to-merge
373: CGs, HCG 31, HCG 79 and HCG 92, to check how these compare with the
374: luminosities of first-ranked galaxies in FGs. Adding up the luminosities
375: of galaxies HCG 31 A to C, G and Q, which are the brightest in the
376: group HCG 31, a magnitude of M$_R = -22.5$ is obtained (for a distance
377: modulus, DM = 33.8). Summing up the luminosities of galaxies HCG 79 A-D,
378: an equal total magnitude of M$_R=-22.5$ is obtained (for DM = 34.0).
379: These are upper limits on the luminosities of these objects given that
380: several members are starburst galaxies. After fading, the merged central
381: object in HCG 31 and HCG 79 will have somewhat lower magnitudes than that
382: of a typical first-ranked galaxy in a FG. Fossil groups first-ranked
383: galaxies have luminosities well above L$^{*}$. For the five FGs studied by
384: \citet{jones03}, the first-ranked galaxies had a median luminosity
385: of $M_R=-23.2$ and for the 34 FGs found in the SDSS DR5 by \citet{dosSantos07}
386: the median luminosity was $M_R=-23.5$.
387:
388: Although for HCG 92, the final object (adding up luminosities of galaxies
389: A-E) would have an absolute magnitude of $M_R=-24.2$ (for DM$=$34.8),
390: which after allowing for some fading, could be similar to that of
391: an FG first-ranked galaxy, HCG 92 would possibly still
392: not resemble an FG when merged,
393: because its neighbourhood is very sparse, i.e., it is
394: not embedded in any larger structure, as it is often the case for the
395: central galaxy in FGs. This is in agreement with its relatively
396: low bolometric X-ray luminosity of 2.96 $\times$ 10$^{42}$ h$_{70}^{-2}$
397: ergs s$^{-1}$ \citep{Xue2000}.
398:
399: The environments of nearby CGs have been surveyed by
400: \citet{ribeiro98,zabludoff98,carrasco06} among others.
401: Spectroscopy of dozens of members in the neighbourhood
402: of quite a number of groups was obtained, confirming in all cases that
403: CGs have low velocity dispersions typical of the group regime
404: (typically 200-300 km s$^{-1}$). In fact, even for HCG 62, thought to
405: be one of the most massive CGs in Hickson's catalogue, the
406: velocity dispersion obtained from 45 members of the system showed that
407: it is a bonafide group (376 km s$^{-1}$). HCG 62 was suggested by
408: \citet{ponman93} as an example of a system that could turn into a FG
409: in a few Gygayears, but its velocity dispersion is still much lower
410: than the value of $\sim$ 600 km s$^{-1}$, typical for
411: rich FGs. Two other massive nearby CGs
412: in Hickson's catalogue are HCG 94 and HCG 65. The first is known
413: to have a very high bolometric X-ray luminosity of 2.35 $\times$ 10$^{44}$
414: h$_{70}^{-2}$ \citep{Xue2000} which may, however, be contaminated by
415: the emission of a nearby cluster. The velocity dispersion obtained from
416: 11 members in this system gives a value of 479 km s$^{-1}$. HCG 65 is the
417: center of the cluster Abell 3559. It is in the heart of the Shapley
418: supercluster and its location makes it hard to
419: disentangle its dynamics and determine its mass. The three most massive
420: Hickson CGs known, HCG 62, HCG 65 and HCG 94, are strongly
421: early-type dominated, as expected from the velocity dispersion-morphology
422: relation observed for CGs.
423:
424: The conclusion is then that a typical CG, as observed at z=0, is unlike to
425: turn into a FG. It is more likely to merge into an isolated elliptical
426: galaxy. For the compact group CG 6, at $z=0.22$ and $\sigma =$703 km
427: s$^{-1}$, if we merge the four central galaxies (A, B, C and D), we end up
428: with a galaxy with total magnitude \sloani$=$16.31 and \sloang$=$17.80
429: mag (M$_{i'}$=--23.87 and M$_{g'}$=--22.38, with no k-correction). Using the
430: color relation for a galaxy at z$=$0.2 from \cite{fuk95}, the magnitude in
431: r$^{'}$ will be 16.83 or M$_{r}=-23.35$. This magnitude is similar to those
432: of typical central galaxies in FGs and the velocity dispersion of the
433: system is typical for the studied FGs. However, no gap of at least two
434: magnitudes between the first-ranked relic and the remaining objects of the
435: system would be observed because there is at least one other bright galaxy
436: in the system within half the virial radius of the group. We point out
437: that one other example of a possible massive system, at z=0.39, which may
438: turn into a FG, has recently been discovered by \cite{rines07}.
439: Spectroscopic studies of CGs at medium redshifts may find many more of
440: such objects.
441:
442: \acknowledgments
443:
444: We acknowledge support from the Brazilian agencies FAPESP (projeto tem\'atico
445: 01/07342-7), CNPq and CAPES. We thank Laerte Sodr\'e Jr. and Eduardo Cypriano
446: for useful discussions in the earlier phase of this project.
447:
448: \begin{thebibliography}{}
449:
450: \bibitem[Amram et al.(2004)]{amram05} Amram, P., Mendes de Oliveira,
451: C., Plana, H., Balkowski, C., Hernandez, O., Carignan, C. et al. 2004, \apjl, 612, L5
452:
453: \bibitem[Amram et al.(2007)]{amram07} Amram, P., Mendes de Oliveira, C.,
454: Plana, H., Balkowski, C. \& Hernandez, O. 2007, \aap, 471, 753
455:
456: \bibitem[Barnes(1992)]{Barnes92} Barnes, J. E. 1992, \apj, 393, 484
457:
458: \bibitem[Beers at al.(1990)]{bee90} Beers, T. C., Flynn, K. \& Gebhardt, K.
459: 1990, \aj, 100, 32
460:
461: \bibitem[Bertin and Arnouts(1996)]{ber96} Bertin, E. \&
462: Arnouts, S. 1996, A\&AS, 117, 393
463:
464: \bibitem[Carrasco et al.(2006)]{carrasco06} Carrasco, E. R., Mendes de Oliveira, C.
465: \& Infante, L. 2006, \aj, 132, 1796
466:
467: \bibitem[Cypriano et al.(2006)]{cypriano06} Cypriano, E. S., Mendes de
468: Oliveira, C. L., Sodr\'e Jr., L. 2006, \aj, 132, 514
469:
470: \bibitem[Da Rocha and Mendes de Oliveira(2005)]{darocha05} Da
471: Rocha, C., de Oliveira, C. Mendes 2005, \mnras, 364, 1069
472:
473: \bibitem[dos Santos et al.(2007)]{dosSantos07} dos Santos, W., Mendes de
474: Oliveira, C. \& Sodr\'e Jr., L. 2007, \aj, 134, 1551
475:
476: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(1995)]{fuk95} Fukugita, M., Shimasaku, K. \&
477: Ichikawa, T. 1995, \pasp,
478:
479: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(1996)]{fuk96} Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E.,
480: Doi, M., Shimasaku, K. \& Schneider, D. P. 1996, \aj, 111,
481: 1748
482:
483: \bibitem[Hickson et al.(1992)]{h92} Hickson, P., Mendes de
484: Oliveira, C., Huchra, J. P., Palumbo, G. G. 1992, \apj, 399,
485: 353
486:
487: \bibitem[Hook et al.(2004)]{hook04} Hook, I., J\o rgensen, I.,
488: Allington-Smith, J. R., Davies, R. L., Metcalfe, N.,
489: Murowinski, R. G., Crampton, D. 2004, PASP, 116, 425
490:
491: \bibitem[Jones et al.(2003)]{jones03} Jones, L. R., Ponman, T.
492: J., Horton, A., Babul, A., Ebeling, H., Burke, D. J. 2003,
493: \mnras, 343, 627
494:
495: \bibitem[Khosroshahi et al.(2006)]{habib06} Khosroshahi,
496: H.G., Maughan, B.J., Ponman, T.J. \& Jones, L.R., 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1211
497:
498: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{lan92} Landolt, A.U. 1992, \aj, 104, 340
499:
500: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2004)]{lee04} Lee, B. C., Allam, S. S.,
501: Tucker, D. L., Annis, J., Johnston, D. E., Scranton, R., et
502: al. 2004, \aj, 127, 1811
503:
504: \bibitem[Mendes de Oliveira \& Hickson(1991)]{mdoh91} Mendes
505: de Oliveira, C. \& Hickson P. 1991, \apj, 380, 30
506:
507: \bibitem[Mendes de Oliveira et al.(2001)]{moetal01} Mendes de
508: Oliveira, C., Plana, H., Amram, P., Balkowski, C., Bolte, M.
509: 2001, \aj, 121, 2524
510:
511: \bibitem[Mendes de Oliveira et al.(2004)]{moetal04} Mendes de
512: Oliveira, C., Cypriano, E. S., Sodr\'e., Jr., Balkowski, C,
513: 2004, \apjl, 605, 17
514:
515: \bibitem[Mendes de Oliveira et al.(2006a)]{mo06} Mendes de Oliveira, C. L.,
516: Cypriano, E. S., Sodr\'e Jr., L. 2006a, \aj, 131, 158
517:
518: \bibitem[Mendes de Oliveira et al.(2006b)]{moetal06} Mendes de
519: Oliveira, C. L., Temporin, S., Cypriano, E. S., et al., 2006b, AJ, 132, 570
520:
521: \bibitem[Pildis et al.(1995)]{pil95} Pildis, R. A., Bregman,
522: J. N., Evrard, A. E. 1995, \apj, 443, 514
523:
524: \bibitem[Ponman \& Bertram(1993)]{ponman93} Ponman, T. J. \& Bertram, D.
525: 1993, \nat, 363, 51
526:
527: \bibitem[Ribeiro et al.(1998)]{ribeiro98} Ribeiro, A. L. B. et al. 1998,
528: \apj, 497, 72
529:
530: \bibitem[Rines et al.(2007)]{rines07} Rines, K., Finn, R. and Vikhlinin, A.
531: 2007, \apjl, 665, 9
532:
533: \bibitem[Verdes-Montenegro et al.(2005)]{vm05}
534: Verdes-Montenegro, L., Del Olmo, A., Yun, M. S., \& Perea, J.
535: 2005, \aap, 430, 443
536:
537: \bibitem[Vikhlinin et al.(1999)]{vikhlinin99} Vikhlinin, A.,
538: McNamara, B. R., Hornstrup, A., Quintana, H., Forman, W. et
539: al., 1999, \apjl, 520, 1
540:
541: \bibitem[Williams et al.(1991)]{wil91} Williams, B. A., McMahon, P. M.
542: \& van Gorkom, J. H. 1991, \aj, 101, 1957
543:
544: \bibitem[Xu et al.(2005)]{xu05} Xu, C. Kevin et al. 2005, \apjl,
545: 619, 95
546:
547: \bibitem[Xue \& Wu(2000)]{Xue2000} Xue, Y. J. \& Wu, X. P. 2000,
548: \apj, 538, 65
549:
550: \bibitem[Zabludoff \& Mulchaey(1998)]{zabludoff98} Zabludoff,
551: A. I., Mulchaey, J. S. 1998, \apjl, 498, 5
552:
553: \bibitem[Zepf(1993)]{zepf93} Zepf, S. E. 1993, \apj, 407, 448
554: \end{thebibliography}
555:
556: \clearpage
557:
558: \begin{figure}[!htb]
559: \centering
560: \includegraphics[width=0.9 \columnwidth]{f1.eps}%
561: \caption[]{Color composite image of SDSS-CG-6. The field of
562: view is 5\farcm15 on a side (1.12 h$^{-1}_{70}$ Mpc at the
563: distance of the group). The squares are galaxies members of
564: the group. The circles are galaxies in the foreground and
565: background of the group. The inner circle is the smallest circle
566: that contains the centers of the group members with magnitudes
567: within 3 mag from the brightest group member. The outer concentric
568: circle corresponds to the angular diameter that contains no other
569: (external) galaxies within 3 mag from the brightest group member,
570: as defined by \citet{lee04}. The zoom (inner 0.2 h$^{-1}_{70}$ Mpc)
571: shows the four central galaxies in the group.}
572: \label{sloanimage}
573: \end{figure}
574:
575:
576: \begin{figure}[!htb]
577: \centering
578: \includegraphics[width=0.9 \columnwidth]{f2.eps}
579: \caption{Color-magnitude diagram of all galaxies brighter than
580: 23 mag in the CG 6 field ({\em dots}). Colors and
581: magnitude are corrected for galactic extinction. The symbols
582: are the same as in Figure~\ref{sloanimage}. The solid and dashed
583: lines indicate the upper limit for the red sequence and the
584: limiting magnitude we adopted for the spectroscopic target
585: selection.}
586: \label{colormag}
587: \end{figure}
588:
589: \begin{figure}[!htb]
590: \centering
591: \includegraphics[width=0.9 \columnwidth]{f3.eps}%
592: \caption{Histogram of the redshift distribution of 20 galaxies
593: in area of SDSS-CG-6. The average redshift and the velcity
594: dispersion for the whole sample (20 galaxies) is $\langle z
595: \rangle=0.21981$ and $\sigma=703$ km s$^{-1}$ (continuous
596: line). The hashed histogram show the velocity distribution for
597: the 15 non-emission line galaxies in the sample. For this
598: sub-sample, the average redshift is $\langle z
599: \rangle=0.21837$ and the velocity dispersion is $\sigma=608$
600: km s$^{-1}$ ({\em dashed line}).}
601: \label{histovel}
602: \end{figure}
603:
604:
605: \end{document}
606: