1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
3: \usepackage{psfig,amsfonts,amsmath,graphicx,natbib,apjfonts}
4: \citestyle{aa}
5:
6: \def\ra#1#2#3{#1$^{\rm h}$#2$^{\rm m}$#3$^{\rm s}$}
7: \def\dec#1#2#3{$#1^\circ#2'#3''$}
8: \def\nod{\nodata}
9: \def\lsr{LSR\,1835+32}
10: \def\vb{VB\,10}
11: \def\tvlm{TVLM\,513-46546}
12: \def\swift{{\it Swift}}
13:
14: \def\prince{1}
15: \def\ociw{2}
16: \def\ucb{3}
17: \def\udel{4}
18: \def\noao{5}
19: \def\mcgill{6}
20: \def\steward{7}
21: \def\iac{8}
22: \def\ucf{9}
23: \def\rice{10}
24: \def\iaa{11}
25:
26:
27: \begin{document}
28:
29: \title{Simultaneous Multi-Wavelength Observations of Magnetic Activity
30: in Ultracool Dwarfs. II. Mixed Trends in VB\,10 and LSR\,1835+32 and
31: the Possible Role of Rotation}
32:
33: \author{
34: E.~Berger\altaffilmark{\prince,}\altaffilmark{\ociw},
35: G.~Basri\altaffilmark{\ucb},
36: J.~E.~Gizis\altaffilmark{\udel},
37: M.~S.~Giampapa\altaffilmark{\noao},
38: R.~E.~Rutledge\altaffilmark{\mcgill},
39: J.~Liebert\altaffilmark{\steward},
40: E.~Mart{\'{\i}}n\altaffilmark{\iac,}\altaffilmark{\ucf},
41: T.~A.~Fleming\altaffilmark{\steward},
42: C.~M.~Johns-Krull\altaffilmark{\rice},
43: N.~Phan-Bao\altaffilmark{\iaa},
44: W.~H.~Sherry\altaffilmark{\noao}
45: }
46:
47: \altaffiltext{\prince}{Princeton University Observatory,
48: Peyton Hall, Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544}
49:
50: \altaffiltext{\ociw}{Observatories of the Carnegie Institution
51: of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101}
52:
53: \altaffiltext{\ucb}{Astronomy Department, University of
54: California, Berkeley, CA 94720}
55:
56: \altaffiltext{\udel}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
57: University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716}
58:
59: \altaffiltext{\noao}{National Solar Observatory, National Optical
60: Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ 85726}
61:
62: \altaffiltext{\mcgill}{Department of Physics, McGill University,
63: 3600 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2T8, Canada}
64:
65: \altaffiltext{\steward}{Department of Astronomy and Steward
66: Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue,
67: Tucson, AZ 85721}
68:
69: \altaffiltext{\iac}{Instituto de Astrof{\'{\i}}sica de Canarias,
70: C/ V{\'{\i}}a L\'actea s/n, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain}
71:
72: \altaffiltext{\ucf}{University of Central Florida, Department of
73: Physics, PO Box 162385, Orlando, FL 32816}
74:
75: \altaffiltext{\rice}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice
76: University, 6100 Main Street, MS-61 Houston, TX 77005}
77:
78: \altaffiltext{\iaa}{Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia
79: Sinica, PO Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan, ROC}
80:
81: \begin{abstract} As part of our on-going investigation of magnetic
82: activity in ultracool dwarfs we present simultaneous radio, X-ray, UV,
83: and optical observations of \lsr\ (M8.5), and simultaneous X-ray and
84: UV observations of \vb\ (M8), both with a duration of about 9 hours.
85: \lsr\ exhibits persistent radio emission and H$\alpha$ variability on
86: timescales of $\sim 0.5-2$ hr. The detected UV flux is consistent
87: with photospheric emission, and no X-ray emission is detected to a
88: deep limit of $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\lesssim 10^{-5.7}$. The H$\alpha$ and
89: radio emission are temporally uncorrelated, and the ratio of radio to
90: X-ray luminosity exceeds the correlation seen in F--M6 stars by
91: $\gtrsim\!2\times 10^4$. Similarly, $L_{\rm H\alpha}/L_X\gtrsim 10$
92: is at least 30 times larger than in early M dwarfs, and eliminates
93: coronal emission as the source of chromospheric heating. The lack of
94: radio variability during four rotations of \lsr\ requires a uniform
95: stellar-scale field of $\sim 10$ G, and indicates that the H$\alpha$
96: variability is dominated by much smaller scales, $\lesssim 10\%$ of
97: the chromospheric volume. \vb, on the other hand, shows correlated
98: flaring and quiescent X-ray and UV emission, similar to the behavior
99: of early M dwarfs. Delayed and densely-sampled optical spectra
100: exhibit a similar range of variability amplitudes and timescales to
101: those seen in the X-rays and UV, with $L_{\rm H\alpha}/L_X\sim 1$.
102: Along with our previous observations of the M8.5 dwarf \tvlm\ we
103: conclude that late M dwarfs exhibit a mix of activity patterns, which
104: points to a transition in the structure and heating of the outer
105: atmosphere by large-scale magnetic fields. We find that rotation may
106: play a role in generating the fields as evidenced by a tentative
107: correlation between radio activity and rotation velocity. The X-ray
108: emission, however, shows evidence for super-saturation at $v{\rm
109: sin}i\gtrsim 25$ km s$^{-1}$, which could be the result of secondary
110: effects such as inefficient heating or centrifugal stripping of
111: extended coronal loops. These effects may underlie the severe
112: violation of the radio/X-ray correlation in ultracool dwarfs.
113: Upcoming observations of L dwarfs will reveal whether these trends
114: continue in substellar objects. \end{abstract}
115:
116: \keywords{radio continuum:stars --- stars:activity --- stars:low-mass,
117: brown dwarfs --- stars:magnetic fields}
118:
119:
120: \section{Introduction}
121: \label{sec:intro}
122:
123: Over the past several decades, observations of magnetic activity in
124: stars of spectral type F--M have uncovered a variety of correlations
125: between the different activity indicators, as well as between the
126: level of activity and properties such as stellar rotation and age.
127: Coronal X-ray emission, transition region UV emission, chromospheric
128: H$\alpha$ emission, and non-thermal radio emission increase with both
129: rotation and youth (e.g., \citealt{kra67,pgr+81,sis+88}), and are
130: temporally and energetically correlated in quiescence and during
131: flares (e.g., \citealt{cra82,gb93,bg94,hgr96}). These observations
132: have led to a general paradigm of magnetic field amplification at the
133: shearing interface between the radiative and convective zones -- the
134: so-called $\alpha\Omega$ dynamo \citep{par55}. This dynamo operates
135: through a combination of stretching by differential rotation
136: ($\Omega$) and twisting by convective motions ($\alpha$).
137:
138: In quiescence, the dynamo-generated fields provide a heating source
139: for the chromospheres and coronae primarily through magnetic waves and
140: field dissipation on small scales (e.g., \citealt{nu96,apr01}). The
141: interplay between the chromosphere, transition region, and corona is
142: not fully understood, but is known to involve a complex combination of
143: radiation, conduction, and mass flows. In dMe stars it has been
144: proposed that the transition region and chromosphere are instead
145: heated by coronal X-rays, leading to the observed typical luminosity
146: ratios of $L_{\rm CIV}/L_X\sim 10^{-1.5}$ and $L_{\rm H\alpha}/L_X\sim
147: 10^{-0.5}$, respectively (e.g., \citealt{cra82,hj03}). In addition to
148: quiescent emission, sudden and large-scale dissipation of the field
149: through large-scale magnetic reconnection may lead to particle
150: acceleration and evaporation of the lower atmosphere into the
151: chromosphere, transition region, and corona, giving rise to correlated
152: radio, X-ray, UV, and H$\alpha$ flares (e.g., \citealt{neu68}).
153:
154: The level of activity increases with faster rotation, but eventually
155: saturates at $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\sim 10^{-3}$ and $L_{\rm H\alpha}/L_{\rm
156: bol}\approx 10^{-3.5}$ for rotation periods of $\lesssim 3$ d in F--M
157: stars. It remains unclear whether this trend reflects a saturation of
158: the dynamo itself or secondary centrifugal effects such as coronal
159: stripping or sweeping of the field toward the poles (e.g.,
160: \citealt{vil84,ju99,ssv01}).
161:
162: These activity trends continue to hold even beyond spectral type $\sim
163: {\rm M3}$, where the stellar interiors become fully convective and the
164: $\alpha\Omega$ dynamo can no longer operate. Indeed, the level of
165: X-ray and H$\alpha$ activity peaks in mid M dwarfs at saturated levels
166: \citep{vw87,gmr+00,mb03,whw+04}. This suggests that whatever dynamo
167: mechanism operates in these low mass stars, it is already present in
168: higher mass objects, and becomes increasingly dominant beyond spectral
169: type M3. However, the level of X-ray and H$\alpha$ activity drops
170: precipitously beyond spectral type M7, reaching mostly non-detectable
171: levels by spectral type L5. This decrease is accompanied by a clear
172: transition from quiescent emission to flares in the few percent of
173: active objects \citep{rkg+99,gmr+00,rbm+00,lkc+03,whw+04}. These
174: trends point to a change in the dynamo mechanism, the field
175: configuration, and/or the field dissipation process.
176:
177: Radio observations, however, have uncovered a substantial fraction of
178: active late M and L dwarfs ($\sim 10\%$ or higher; \citealt{ber06}),
179: which exhibit both quiescent and flaring emission
180: \citep{bbb+01,ber02,brr+05,bp05,ber06,ohb+06,adh+07,pol+07,hbl+07,aob+07,bgg+07}.
181: Unlike the trend in H$\alpha$ and X-rays, the level of radio activity
182: appears to {\it increase} with later spectral type
183: \citep{ber02,ber06}. The radio emission is orders of magnitude
184: brighter than expected based on the radio/X-ray correlations that are
185: observed in stars down to spectral type M6, and requires magnetic
186: fields of $\sim 0.1-3$ kG with order unity filling factor sustained
187: over timescales of at least several years \citep{brr+05,ber06,bgg+07}.
188: Thus, contrary to evidence from X-rays and H$\alpha$, a substantial
189: fraction of ultracool dwarfs continue to generate and dissipate
190: magnetic fields.
191:
192: In order to investigate the field generation and dissipation in
193: detail, we have recently initiated a program of simultaneous,
194: multi-wavelength observations of ultracool dwarfs. Such observations
195: are required to trace the temporal evolution of flares across the
196: corona, transition region, and chromosphere, and to study the relation
197: between particle acceleration and heating, particularly in the context
198: of the known correlations in F--M stars. In a previous paper
199: (\citealt{bgg+07}; hereafter Paper I) we presented observations of the
200: M8.5 rapid rotator \tvlm, which exhibited a wide range of temporally
201: uncorrelated emission in the radio, H$\alpha$, and X-rays. These
202: included quiescent radio emission from a large-scale field, radio
203: flares from a tangled field component with $B\approx 3$ kG, and
204: periodic H$\alpha$ emission matching the stellar rotation period with
205: an inferred hot spot covering about $50\%$ of the stellar photosphere.
206: In addition, the quiescent H$\alpha$ emission exceeded the X-ray
207: luminosity by about a factor of two, likely ruling out coronal X-ray
208: emission as the source of chromospheric heating.
209:
210: Here we present observations of the M8 and M8.5 dwarfs \vb\ and \lsr,
211: both of which are known to exhibit magnetic activity. We find
212: substantially different behavior in each of these two objects, with
213: correlated X-ray/UV flares and quiescent emission in \vb, and
214: uncorrelated radio/H$\alpha$ emission in \lsr. Along with \tvlm, the
215: mixed behavior in late M dwarfs thus indicates a transition in the
216: properties of the magnetic field and its dissipation in this spectral
217: type range. We show that rotation may play at least a partial role in
218: explaining these trends.
219:
220:
221:
222: \section{Targets and Observations}
223: \label{sec:obs}
224:
225: We chose to target the nearby dwarf stars \vb\ and \lsr\ due to
226: previous detections of activity from these objects in the
227: optical/UV/X-ray and radio bands, respectively. \lsr\ (8.5) is
228: located at a distance of 5.7 pc and has a bolometric luminosity of
229: $L_{\rm bol}\approx 10^{-3.4}$ L$_\odot$ \citep{rcl+03}. A previous
230: $1.7$-hr radio observation revealed persistent emission with
231: $F_\nu(8.46)=525\pm 15$ $\mu$Jy and a limit of $\lesssim 9\%$ on the
232: fraction of circular polarization \citep{ber06}. The rotation
233: velocity of \lsr\ was not previously known, but we measure it here to
234: be $v{\rm sin}i=50\pm 5$ km s$^{-1}$ (\S\ref{sec:optical}), similar to
235: fast rotators such as \tvlm\ and Kelu-1.
236:
237: \vb\ (M8) is located at a distance of 6.1 pc \citep{tin96}, has
238: $L_{\rm bol}\approx 10^{-3.34}$ L$_\odot$, and a slow rotation
239: velocity, $v{\rm sin}i\approx 6.5$ km s$^{-1}$ \citep{mb03}. An X-ray
240: flare from \vb\ was previously detected by ROSAT, with a duration of
241: $\sim 20$ min and an average luminosity, $L_X=(8.4\pm 2.7)\times
242: 10^{26}$ erg s$^{-1}$, or $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\approx 10^{-3.3}$
243: \citep{fgs00}. Subsequent Chandra observations revealed quiescent
244: emission with $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\approx 10^{-4.9}$ \citep{fgg03}. In
245: addition, {\it Hubble Space Telescope} observations revealed flaring
246: and quiescent transition region emission \citep{lwb+95,hj03}. \vb\ is
247: also known to produce H$\alpha$ emission with equivalent widths of
248: $\sim 2-6$ \AA\ reported in the literature \citep{mdb+99,mb03,rb07},
249: or $L_{\rm H\alpha}/L_{\rm bol}\approx 10^{-4.4}$. No radio emission
250: has been detected to date, with a limit of $\lesssim 80$ $\mu$Jy at
251: 8.5 GHz \citep{kll99}. Finally, \citet{rb07} recently estimated the
252: surface magnetic field to be $Bf\sim 1.3$ kG, where $f$ is the field
253: filling factor.
254:
255: The simultaneous observations of \lsr\ presented here were conducted
256: on 2007 May 3 for a total of 8.7 hr in the radio (06:40--15:20 UT),
257: 8.4 hr in the X-rays (07:16--15:43 UT), and 5.4 hr in the optical
258: (09:42--15:04 UT). Observations with the \swift/UVOT took place
259: intermittently between 08:09 and 16:31 UT with a total on-source
260: exposure time of 9.4 ks.
261:
262: Observations of \vb\ were conducted on 2007 July 1 for a total of 8.9
263: hr in the X-rays (10:29--19:21 UT), with intermittent UV coverage
264: between 11:08 and 19:15 UT for a total of 8.4 ks. Optical
265: spectroscopy was obtained only two weeks later, on 2007 July 15
266: (08:10--13:33 UT).
267:
268:
269: \subsection{Radio}
270: \label{sec:rad}
271:
272: Very Large Array\footnotemark\footnotetext{The VLA is operated by the
273: National Radio Astronomy Observatory, a facility of the National
274: Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
275: Universities, Inc.} observations of \lsr\ were obtained at a frequency
276: of 8.46 GHz in the standard continuum mode with $2\times 50$ MHz
277: contiguous bands. Scans of 295 s on source were interleaved with 50 s
278: scans on the phase calibrator J1850+284. The flux density scale was
279: determined using the extragalactic source 3C\,286 (J1331+305). Data
280: reduction and analysis follow the procedure outlined in Paper I. The
281: total intensity and circular polarization light curves are shown in
282: Figure~\ref{fig:lsrall}.
283:
284:
285: \subsection{X-Rays}
286: \label{sec:xrays}
287:
288: Observations were performed with the Chandra/ACIS-S3
289: backside-illuminated chip, with both \lsr\ and \vb\ offset from the
290: on-axis focal point by $3.17'$. A total of 28.33 and 29.29 ks were
291: obtained, respectively. The data were analyzed using CIAO version
292: 3.4, and counts were extracted in a $2''$ radius circle centered on
293: the position of each source.
294:
295: For \lsr\ we established a bore-sight correction based on one source
296: in common between the VLA and Chandra images. The derived correction
297: is $\delta{\rm RA}=-1.7\pm 0.7''$ and $\delta{\rm DEC}=0.2\pm 0.5''$.
298: Within the $2''$ aperture centered on the position of \lsr\ we find
299: only 2 counts, with 1.5 counts expected from the background as
300: determined from annuli centered on the source position. Thus, the
301: resulting upper limit is about 7 counts ($95\%$ confidence level).
302: Using an energy conversion factor of $1\,{\rm cps}=3.4\times 10^{-12}$
303: erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ (appropriate for a 1 keV Raymond-Smith plasma
304: model in the $0.2-2$ keV range) we find $F_X<8.4\times 10^{-16}$ erg
305: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, or $L_X/L_{\rm bol}<10^{-5.7}$, one of the
306: faintest limits to date for any ultracool dwarf.
307:
308: In the observation of \vb\ we detect a total of 60 counts within the
309: $2''$ extraction aperture; 2 counts are expected from the background.
310: Of the 60 detected counts, 59 are in the energy range $0.2-2$ keV,
311: similar to what has been found for other M dwarfs (including \tvlm:
312: Paper I). Using this energy range we construct light curves and
313: spectra. The light curve is shown at various time binnings in
314: Figure~\ref{fig:vb10all}, and is composed of a bright flare with a
315: duration of $\sim 3$ hr, followed by about 4 hr of low-level quiescent
316: emission, and finally a fainter flare during the final hour of the
317: observation. Using the time range 14:30--18:00 UT to represent the
318: quiescent component we find a total of 10 counts, or a count rate of
319: $\approx 6.2\times 10^{-4}$ s$^{-1}$.
320:
321: To determine the flux and plasma temperature we fit the $0.2-2$ keV
322: spectrum using a Raymond-Smith model. We find that a single-component
323: model provides a poor fit to the data, with $\chi^2_r=1.4$ for 9
324: degrees of freedom (null hypothesis probability of 0.2);
325: Figure~\ref{fig:vb10xspec}. The fit parameters are $kT\approx 0.3$
326: keV, and a normalization of $1.4\times 10^{-5}$.
327:
328: An improved fit is achieved using two components, with $\chi^2_r=0.3$
329: for 7 degrees of freedom (null hypothesis probability of 0.94);
330: Figure~\ref{fig:vb10xspec}. The best-fit temperatures are $kT_1=
331: 0.26^{+0.06}_{-0.03}$ keV and $kT_2\approx 1.3$ keV (formally,
332: $kT_2\gtrsim 1$ keV). The normalizations of the two components are
333: $(1.35\pm 0.35)\times 10^{-5}$ and $(6.5\pm 2.1)\times 10^{-6}$,
334: respectively. The resulting average flux over the full observation is
335: $F_X=(1.2\pm 0.4)\times 10^{-14}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, or
336: $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\approx 10^{-4.5}$.
337:
338: Using the same model for the quiescent component, we find $F_X\approx
339: 3.7\times 10^{-15}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, or $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\approx
340: 10^{-5.0}$, in excellent agreement with the value found previously by
341: \citet{fgg03}. The peak count rate of the first flare is about
342: $5\times 10^{-3}$ s$^{-1}$, corresponding to $F_X\approx 3.2\times
343: 10^{-14}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ and $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\approx
344: 10^{-4.1}$. For the second flare, $F_X\approx 2.0\times 10^{-14}$ erg
345: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ and $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\approx 10^{-4.3}$.
346:
347:
348: \subsection{Optical Spectroscopy}
349: \label{sec:optical}
350:
351: We used\footnotemark\footnotetext{Observations were obtained as part
352: of program GN-2007A-Q-60.} the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS;
353: \citealt{hja+04}) mounted on the Gemini-North 8-m telescope with the
354: B600 grating set at a central wavelength of 5250 \AA, and with a $1''$
355: slit. The individual 300-s exposures were reduced using the {\tt
356: gemini} package in IRAF (bias subtraction, flat-fielding, and sky
357: subtraction). Wavelength calibration was performed using CuAr arc
358: lamps and air-to-vacuum corrections were applied. The spectra cover
359: $3840-6680$ \AA\ at a resolution of about 5 \AA. For \lsr\ we
360: obtained a series of sixty exposures, while for \vb\ the data were
361: obtained non-simultaneously with a total of 61 exposures. The fast
362: readout time of $18$ s provides $94\%$ on-source efficiency.
363:
364: We detect highly variable H$\alpha$ emission in \lsr\
365: (Figure~\ref{fig:lsrall}). Spectra with strong H$\alpha$ emission
366: also exhibit higher-order Balmer lines (H$\beta$--H$\delta$) and
367: \ion{Ca}{2} H\&K emission. Sample spectra in the High and Low
368: emission line states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:lsrspec}.
369:
370: The spectrum of \vb\ exhibits strong variability in the Balmer
371: (H$\alpha$--H$\xi$) and \ion{Ca}{2} H\&K lines;
372: Figure~\ref{fig:vb10balmer}. As in the case of \lsr\ we identify High
373: and Low emission line states (Figure~\ref{fig:vb10spec}), but we also
374: identify an impulsive Flare state marked by a short duration
375: ($\lesssim 300$ s; Figure~\ref{fig:vb10balmer}) and emission lines of
376: \ion{He}{1} (Figure~\ref{fig:vb10spec}).
377:
378: In addition to the low-resolution Gemini spectra, we obtained high
379: resolution spectra of \lsr\ to measure its rotation velocity, using
380: the High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer (HIRES) on the Keck I 10-m
381: telescope. The spectroscopic setup and data reduction are detailed in
382: \citet{mb03} and \citet{rb07}. Using the slow rotator CN Leo (M6;
383: $v{\rm sin}i\approx 3$ km s$^{-1}$) as a template, we measure a
384: rotation velocity for \lsr\ of $v{\rm sin}i=50\pm 5$ km s$^{-1}$, or a
385: period of about 2.4 hr; Figure~\ref{fig:lsrrot}.
386:
387:
388: \subsection{Ultraviolet}
389:
390: Data were obtained with the \swift\ UV/optical telescope in the UVW1
391: filter ($\lambda_{\rm eff}\approx 2600$ \AA), as a series of 6 images
392: with exposure times ranging from 560 to 1630 s for \lsr\
393: (Figure~\ref{fig:lsrall}) and 980 to 1630 s for \vb\
394: (Table~\ref{tab:vb10uvot} and Figure~\ref{fig:vb10all}).
395:
396: No source is detected at the position of \lsr\ in any of the
397: individual exposures, but we detect a source at $3.5\sigma$ confidence
398: level in the combined 9.4 ks image. Photometry of the combined image
399: (including a 0.2 mag correction to the standard $5''$ aperture)
400: reveals a flux of $F_\lambda=(4.7\pm 1.3)\times 10^{-18}$ erg
401: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-1}$, or $m_{\rm AB}=23.7\pm 0.3$ mag. To
402: estimate the expected UV photospheric emission we convolve the
403: UVOT/UVW1 transmission curve with an AMES-cond
404: model\footnotemark\footnotetext{The AMES-cond model assumes that all
405: dust has gravitationally settled out of the atmosphere \citep{aha+01}.
406: We find that the opposite case of no gravitational settling
407: (AMES-dusty model) provides essentially the same result in the UV.}
408: with ${\rm log}(g)=5.5$ and $T_{\rm eff}=2400$ K \citep{aha+01},
409: which provides an excellent fit to the optical and IR data for \lsr\
410: (Figure~\ref{fig:lsrsed}). We find an expected photospheric
411: brightness of $m_{\rm AB}\approx 23.3$ mag, in excellent agreement
412: with the observed flux. Thus, no contribution from a quiescent
413: or flaring transition region is detected.
414:
415: \vb, on the other hand, is clearly variable in the UV, and is detected
416: in exposures 1, 2, and 6, with an additional detection when combining
417: exposures 3, 4, and 5. A summary of the derived magnitudes, corrected
418: to the standard $5''$ aperture, is provided in
419: Table~\ref{tab:vb10uvot}, and the light curve is shown in
420: Figure~\ref{fig:vb10all}. Repeating the same analysis as for \lsr, we
421: find that the minimum observed UV emission exceeds the expected
422: photospheric emission by about an order of magnitude. Thus, in \vb\
423: the flaring and quiescent UV emission are due to an active transition
424: region.
425:
426:
427: \section{Multi-Wavelength Emission Properties}
428: \label{sec:prop}
429:
430: We observed \lsr\ and \vb\ across a wide wavelength range that traces
431: activity in various layers of the outer atmosphere. The radio
432: emission is due to particle acceleration by magnetic processes, the
433: optical emission lines trace the chromospheric plasma, the UV emission
434: arises in the transition region, and the X-ray thermal emission is
435: produced in the corona.
436:
437: \subsection{\lsr}
438: \label{sec:lsr}
439:
440: The broad-band emission properties of \lsr\ are summarized in
441: Figure~\ref{fig:lsrall}. The radio emission appears to be nearly
442: constant both in total intensity and circular polarization. The
443: average flux density is $F_\nu(8.46)=464\pm 10$ $\mu$Jy, while the
444: $3\sigma$ upper limit on the fraction of circular polarization is
445: $r_c<6.5\%$. For comparison, previous observations of \lsr\ revealed
446: a flux of $F_\nu(8.46)=525\pm 15$ $\mu$Jy, with an upper limit on the
447: circular polarization of $r_c<9\%$ \citep{ber06}. We note the
448: possible detection of one weak flare (at 08:05 UT) with a peak flux
449: density of about 1.3 mJy and a duration of about 5 min
450: (Figure~\ref{fig:lsrall}). The average flux density during the
451: putative flare is only $370\pm 105$ $\mu$Jy above the quiescent
452: emission level, and the average fraction of circular polarization is
453: $r_c=-50\pm 15\%$.
454:
455: We therefore conclude that the radio emission from \lsr\ is generally
456: persistent in origin, with at most a mild variability at the level of
457: $\sim 20\%$ on hour to year timescales. The one possible short
458: duration flare points to a duty cycle of less than a few percent if
459: the flare distribution is uniform. Alternatively, it is possible that
460: we observed \lsr\ in a period of relative quiescence, and future
461: observations may reveal the existence of flares with a higher duty
462: cycle.
463:
464: Since our radio observation covers nearly 4 rotation periods of \lsr,
465: the lack of significant variability points to emission from a uniform
466: and stable magnetic field configuration. Assuming a structure with
467: $R\sim R_*\approx 7\times 10^9$ cm we infer a brightness temperature,
468: $T_b=2\times 10^9\,F_{\rm \nu,mJy}\,\nu_{\rm GHz}^{-2}\,d_{\rm pc}^2\,
469: (R/R_*)^{-2}\approx 4\times 10^8$ K, indicative of non-thermal
470: gyrosynchrotron emission. This conclusion is supported by the overall
471: persistence of the radio emission and the low fraction of circular
472: polarization.
473:
474: In the context of gyrosynchrotron radiation the emission spectrum is
475: determined by the size of the emitting region ($R$), the density of
476: radiating electrons ($n_e$), and the magnetic field strength ($B$)
477: according to \citep{dm82}:
478: \begin{equation}
479: r_c=0.3\times 10^{1.93{\rm cos}\theta-1.16{\rm cos}^2\theta}
480: (3\times 10^3/B)^{-0.21-0.37{\rm sin}\theta},
481: \end{equation}
482: \begin{equation}
483: \nu_m=1.8\times 10^4\,({\rm sin}\theta)^{0.5}\,(n_eR)^{0.23}
484: \,B^{0.77}\,\,\,{\rm Hz},
485: \end{equation}
486: \begin{equation}
487: F_{\nu,m}=2.5\times 10^{-41}\,B^{2.48}\,R^3\,n_e\,({\rm
488: sin}\theta)^{-1.52}\,\,\,{\rm \mu Jy},
489: \end{equation}
490: where $\theta$ is the angle between the magnetic field and the line of
491: sight. Using a range of $\theta=20-70^\circ$ we find $B\lesssim
492: 0.1-20$ G, respectively. Assuming $\nu_m=8.5$ GHz, we find $R\lesssim
493: (0.1-7)\times 10^9$ cm, and $n_e\gtrsim 2.4\times 10^{10}-2.3\times
494: 10^{20}$ cm$^{-3}$; the latter is for the range $\theta=70-20^\circ$.
495: Typical coronal densities in M dwarfs are $\sim 10^{10}-10^{13}$
496: cm$^{-3}$ \citep{vrm+03,oha+06,bgg+07}, suggesting that $\theta\sim
497: \pi/3$, and hence $B\sim 10$ G and $R\sim 7\times 10^9\,{\rm cm}\sim
498: R_*$. Since the corona is likely to have an overall shell geometry,
499: the derived physical properties can be interpreted as a structure
500: extending $\sim 0.3R_*$ above the stellar photosphere with order unity
501: filling factor. Smaller filling factors will lead to more extended
502: magnetic structures.
503:
504: With strong persistent radio emission and no corresponding X-ray
505: emission, \lsr\ joins the sample of ultracool dwarfs which strongly
506: violate the radio/X-ray correlation, $L_R/L_X\approx 10^{-15.5}$
507: Hz$^{-1}$ \citep{gb93}, observed in F--M6 active stars and in solar
508: flares. We find $L_R/L_X\gtrsim 10^{-11.3}$ Hz$^{-1}$, more than four
509: orders of magnitude in excess of the expected value;
510: Figure~\ref{fig:gb}. We stress that the long-term persistence and low
511: circular polarization of the radio emission clearly point to
512: gyrosynchrotron radiation from a stellar-scale magnetic field, so the
513: severe violation cannot be explained away with small-scale,
514: short-duration heating by coherent processes such as electron
515: cyclotron maser or plasma radiation.
516:
517: We next turn to the H$\alpha$ emission for which we measure a range of
518: equivalent widths of $2-7$ \AA\ (Figure~\ref{fig:lsrall}). This range
519: corresponds\footnotemark\footnotetext{To convert from equivalent width
520: to $L_{\rm H\alpha}/L_{\rm bol}$ we use a conversion factor ($\chi$)
521: of $10^{-5.3}$ appropriate for \lsr\ \citep{whw04}.} to $L_{\rm
522: H\alpha}/L_{\rm bol}\approx (1-3.5)\times 10^{-5}$, about an order of
523: magnitude lower than the saturated H$\alpha$ emission found in mid M
524: dwarfs. The weaker chromospheric emission from \lsr\ is in good
525: agreement with the general trend of decreasing H$\alpha$ emission in
526: ultracool dwarfs.
527:
528: As in the case of the radio emission, the level of detected H$\alpha$
529: emission is puzzling in the context of the non-detected X-ray
530: emission. Observations of M0--M6 dwarfs reveal a typical ratio,
531: $\langle F_{\rm H\alpha}/F_X\rangle\sim 1/3$, with a full range of
532: $\sim 0.1-1$ \citep{hgr96}. For \lsr\ this ratio is $F_{\rm H\alpha}/
533: F_X\gtrsim 5$ (using the weakest H$\alpha$ flux), at least an order of
534: magnitude larger than in M0--M6 dwarfs. The significantly brighter
535: H$\alpha$ emission indicates that chromospheric heating is
536: significantly more efficient in \lsr\ than coronal heating, possibly
537: as a result of the field configuration. We return to this point in
538: \S\ref{sec:rot}. Moreover, the elevated H$\alpha$ emission rules out
539: coronal X-ray emission as the source of chromospheric heating, as
540: proposed for dMe stars.
541:
542: While both radio and H$\alpha$ emission are detected, we find a clear
543: lack of temporal correlation between these two activity indicators.
544: The H$\alpha$ light curve exhibits significant variability on
545: timescales of $\sim 0.5-2$ hr, with a wide range of amplitudes,
546: $\delta {\rm EW}\sim 0.5-5$ \AA. However, no clear radio variability
547: is observed in coincidence with any of the H$\alpha$ brightening
548: episodes. In particular, during the large increase in H$\alpha$
549: equivalent width centered on 13:40 UT (Figure~\ref{fig:lsrall}), we
550: find a limit of $\lesssim 8\%$ on the variability of the radio
551: emission. This can be explained in two ways. First, the H$\alpha$
552: variability originates from much smaller physical scales than the
553: radio emission (for which $R\sim R_*$), and any associated radio
554: variability is therefore dwarfed by the overall persistent flux. In
555: this case, we infer that the typical scale of chromospheric regions
556: giving rise to H$\alpha$ variability is $\lesssim 10\%$ of the overall
557: chromospheric volume. Alternatively, the radio emission associated
558: with the variable H$\alpha$ emission is produced at a much different
559: frequency than our observed 8.5 GHz band. This may be the result of
560: coherent radio emission from fields weaker than $\sim 3$ kG, which
561: would lead to emission at $\nu=2.8\times 10^6\,B\lesssim 8.5\times
562: 10^9$ Hz.
563:
564: To summarize, \lsr\ exhibits quiescent radio emission with no
565: appreciable variability over the timescale of our observation (4
566: rotation periods), or on year timescales. The chromospheric H$\alpha$
567: emission, on the other hand, is highly variable with changes of a
568: factor of 3 in equivalent width on timescales of $\lesssim 1$ hr. The
569: H$\alpha$ flux exceeds the undetected X-ray emission by at least an
570: order of magnitude, indicating that the chromosphere is not heated by
571: coronal emission. The radio emission violates the radio/X-ray
572: correlation of F--M6 stars by about 4 order of magnitude.
573:
574:
575: \subsection{\vb}
576: \label{sec:vb}
577:
578: For \vb\ we were able to obtain simultaneous observations only in the
579: X-rays and UV (Figure~\ref{fig:vb10all}). The X-ray light curve
580: exhibits both flaring and quiescent emission with ratios of
581: $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\approx 10^{-4.1}$ and $10^{-5.0}$, respectively. As
582: noted in \S\ref{sec:obs}, quiescent X-ray emission was previously
583: detected from \vb\ in a shorter observation \citep{fgg03} and we
584: confirm its existence here at the same flux level. The X-ray spectrum
585: is dominated by a $T\approx 3.5\times 10^{6}$ K plasma, with a
586: possible second component with $T\sim 1.5\times 10^7$ K
587: (Figure~\ref{fig:vb10xspec}). These temperatures are typical of
588: coronal X-ray emission from M dwarfs, and similar to what we
589: previously found for \tvlm, $T\approx 10^7$ K (Paper I).
590:
591: The UV emission clearly tracks the X-ray behavior, with detections of
592: the two flares and the quiescent component. The peak UV brightness
593: exceeds the quiescent emission by a factor of about 5
594: (Table~\ref{tab:vb10uvot}), somewhat less that the order of magnitude
595: change in X-ray brightness (\S\ref{sec:xrays}). Moreover, the
596: quiescent component exceeds the expected photospheric emission by
597: about an order of magnitude, and thus points to the existence of a
598: persistent transition region, as noted previously by \citet{hj03}. So
599: far this is the only case of correlated emission found in any of our
600: targets, suggesting that at least some late M dwarfs may follow the
601: behavior seen in early M dwarfs.
602:
603: As in the case of the X-ray and UV data, our non-simultaneous optical
604: spectroscopy also reveals a significant level of variability. As far
605: as we know, our spectroscopic observations provide the most extensive
606: coverage of \vb\ in the published literature, and are thus valuable
607: even if no multi-wavelength coverage is available. Here we provide a
608: brief summary of the observations, and defer a detailed analysis to a
609: future publication.
610:
611: We clearly detect H$\alpha$ in emission in all of the individual
612: exposures. An equivalent width light curve is shown in
613: Figure~\ref{fig:vb10balmer}. The range of measured values is
614: $3.7-8.6$ \AA, extending to somewhat higher values than previously
615: published for \vb. Similarly, the H$\beta$ line varies from 5 to 26
616: \AA, while H$\gamma$ and H$\delta$ range from undetectable levels
617: ($\lesssim {\rm few}$ \AA) to about 80 \AA. We also detect
618: \ion{Ca}{2} H\&K emission ranging from non-detectable levels to a K
619: line\footnotemark\footnotetext{The \ion{Ca}{2} H line is blended with
620: H$\epsilon$.} equivalent width of about 30 \AA.
621:
622: The emission line light curves exhibit a wide range of variability
623: timescales. We note that the total duration of our observation
624: samples only about 1/4 of a rotation of \vb\ ($v{\rm sin}i=6.5$ km
625: s$^{-1}$), and we therefore have no information on rotational
626: modulation, which was detected in our previous target, \tvlm\ (Paper
627: I). The variability is primarily gradual with the rise and fall times
628: of individual episodes being roughly the same. The broadest
629: brightening has a rise time of about 0.7 hr and a decay time of about
630: 2 hr, with a factor of two increase in equivalent width. The
631: variability is reflected in all of the detected Balmer lines, but the
632: relative change in equivalent width is largest for the weakest lines.
633: This mild change in the Balmer decrement points to increased densities
634: and temperatures during brighter emission episodes. Sample spectra in
635: these High and Low states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:vb10spec}.
636:
637: In addition to the time-resolved and gradual changes in emission line
638: equivalent width we detect two episodes of rapid brightening with a
639: duration of $\lesssim 300$ s (Flare state). These flares are marked
640: by a large increase in the equivalent width of the higher-order Balmer
641: lines and the \ion{Ca}{2} lines relative to the High state spectra.
642: They are further distinguished from the High state spectra by the
643: appearance of \ion{He}{1} lines (Figure~\ref{fig:vb10spec}).
644: Temporally, both of the detected flares are superposed on gradual
645: brightenings, suggesting that the two modes of variability are
646: causally and temporally unrelated and arise in different regions of
647: the chromosphere.
648:
649: The significant difference in Balmer decrement between the High and
650: Flare states, and the appearance of \ion{He}{1} lines in the latter
651: indicate higher plasma densities, and most likely temperatures in the
652: Flare state. A comparison to flares on mid M dwarfs (\citealt{aha+06}
653: and references therein) reveals shallower Balmer decrements in the
654: impulsive flares on \vb: ${\rm H\delta}/{\rm H\gamma}\approx 0.9$,
655: ${\rm H\epsilon}/{\rm H\gamma} \approx 0.9$, and ${\rm H\xi}/{\rm
656: H\gamma}\approx 0.6$, compared to average values of 0.8, 0.5, and 0.4,
657: respectively. Similarly, the formation of \ion{He}{1} lines generally
658: requires dense plasma ($n_e\sim 10^{13}-10^{16}$ cm$^{-3}$) at $T\sim
659: {\rm few}\times 10^4$ K, approaching the transition region
660: temperatures.
661:
662: Although our X-ray and optical observations are not simultaneous, the
663: variability timescales in both bands are similar
664: (Figures~\ref{fig:vb10all} and \ref{fig:vb10balmer}). This suggests
665: that in \vb\ chromospheric heating by coronal X-rays may in fact work.
666: Indeed, the observed range of $L_{\rm H\alpha}/L_{\rm bol}\approx
667: 10^{-4.5}-10^{-4.9}$ (Table~\ref{tab:vb10spec}) is similar to the
668: range of $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\approx 10^{-4.1}-10^{-5.0}$. Thus, the
669: chromospheric and coronal structure of \vb\ is markedly different than
670: that of \lsr, for which the H$\alpha$ luminosity exceeds the X-ray
671: luminosity by at least an order of magnitude, and no evidence for
672: plasma at coronal temperatures exists.
673:
674: To conclude, the magnetic activity in \vb\ differs significantly from
675: that of \lsr\ and \tvlm, and is more typical of M0--M6 dwarfs. The
676: X-ray and UV emission are clearly correlated and point to the presence
677: of quiescent and flaring corona and transition region. The optical
678: chromospheric emission exhibits similar timescales and amplitudes of
679: variability, and can be separated into a gradually variable component
680: (Low and High states), and a rapidly flaring component (Flare state)
681: that is marked by higher plasma densities and temperatures.
682:
683:
684: \section{The Possible Role of Rotation}
685: \label{sec:rot}
686:
687: With the increasing sample of ultracool dwarfs observed in the radio
688: and X-rays we can begin to address the physical conditions that
689: underlie the generation of magnetic fields and their influence on the
690: coronae and chromospheres. It is clear from our work that late M
691: dwarfs exhibit a mix of activity patterns in comparison to stars with
692: spectral types F to early M stars, whose magnetic activity is powered
693: by the $\alpha\Omega$ dynamo. Thus, it is instructive to investigate
694: whether rotation also plays a role in the magnetic activity of
695: ultracool dwarfs.
696:
697:
698: \subsection{X-ray Activity}
699: \label{sec:xr}
700:
701: The generation of persistent X-ray emission in F--M stars is still not
702: fully understood, but its correlation with radio activity and rotation
703: velocity suggests that it is directly tied to heating by magnetic
704: field dissipation and particle acceleration. In
705: Figure~\ref{fig:lxrot} we show the well-known rotation-activity
706: relation and saturation of $L_X/L_{\rm bol}$ for stars with spectral
707: type F--M6. The rotation-activity relation provides evidence for the
708: existence of an $\alpha\Omega$ dynamo, while three primary
709: explanations have been proposed for the saturation of $L_X/L_{\rm
710: bol}$ (see also \citealt{gud04}). The first is saturation of the
711: dynamo mechanism itself at low Rossby numbers, ${\rm Ro}\equiv
712: P/\tau_c\lesssim 0.1$ (e.g., \citealt{vil84}); here $\tau_c$ is the
713: convective turnover time. Second, centrifugal effects in rapid
714: rotators may lead to a circulation pattern that sweeps the magnetic
715: fields from the lower convection zone toward the poles, thereby
716: reducing the field filling factor \citep{ssv01}.
717:
718: The third explanation is centrifugal stripping of the corona at the
719: corotation radius\footnotemark\footnotetext{The corotation radius,
720: $R_c=(GM_*/\Omega^2)^{1/3}$, is the radius at which the centrifugal
721: and gravitational forces are exactly balanced.}, $R_c$
722: \citep{ju99,jjj+00}. In this scenario, the particle density,
723: $n_e\propto\Omega$, and emission volume, $V\propto R_c^3\propto
724: \Omega^{-2}$, conspire to produce an emission measure ($\propto
725: n_e^2V$) that is independent of the rotation period, i.e., saturation.
726: However, this balance breaks down when the corotation radius is well
727: inside the corona, $R_c\lesssim R_*$, leading to super-saturation -- a
728: reduction in $L_X/L_{\rm bol}$ at very rapid rotation rates (e.g.,
729: \citealt{jjj+00}).
730:
731: It is instructive to study whether the X-ray emission of ultracool
732: dwarfs exhibits saturation and/or super-saturation, and if so, which
733: of the mechanisms described above is responsible for these effects.
734: The values of $L_X/L_{\rm bol}$ as a function of rotation period
735: presented here and in Paper I, as well as in the literature, are
736: summarized in Figure~\ref{fig:lxrot}. Two trends are clear. In the
737: range of rotation periods of $\sim 0.4-1$ d, in which F--M6 stars
738: exhibit saturated emission, $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\sim 10^{-4}$ for the
739: ultracool dwarfs is a few times smaller than the saturated value of
740: the F--M6 stars. This points to generally weaker coronae in ultracool
741: dwarfs compared to higher mass stars, although in one case an
742: unusually bright flare with $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\sim 0.1$ was detected
743: \citep{ssm+06}. On the other hand, ultracool dwarfs with periods of
744: $\lesssim 0.2$ d ($v{\rm sin}i\gtrsim 25$ km s$^{-1}$) exhibit much
745: lower values of $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\lesssim 10^{-5}$. These include our
746: targets \lsr\ and \tvlm. The reduction in X-ray activity at high
747: rotation velocities is reminiscent of the super-saturation phenomenon.
748:
749: In the context of centrifugal stripping, an ultracool dwarf with
750: $M\sim 0.1$ M$_\odot$ and $R\sim 0.1$ R$_\odot$ has a corotation
751: radius that is smaller than the coronal radius ($\sim R_*$ above the
752: photosphere) when $P\lesssim 1$ hr. This is a factor of two times
753: smaller than the fastest rotators in the sample, with $v{\rm
754: sin}i\approx 60$ km s$^{-1}$. This indicates that centrifugal
755: stripping may play a role in reducing $L_X/L_{\rm bol}$ for fast
756: rotators only if the the magnetic field is generally dominated by
757: extended loops with $R\sim (2-3)R_*$, which may indeed be the relevant
758: scale for M dwarfs (e.g., \citealt{lpl+00}). In the case of \lsr,
759: \tvlm\ (Paper I), and 2MASS\,J00361617+1821104 \citep{brr+05} we
760: inferred from our radio observations a magnetic field scale of $\sim
761: (1-{\rm few})\times 10^{10}$ cm, in the rough range required for
762: efficient centrifugal stripping.
763:
764: Thus, to the extent that existing observations of ultracool dwarfs
765: reveal possible super-saturation in the X-rays, it is presently
766: unclear whether this is due to intrinsic dynamo effects or to the
767: secondary effect of centrifugal stripping. The proposed mechanism of
768: centrifugal clearing of the equatorial plane in rapid rotators
769: \citep{ssv01} is not likely to play a role since the persistent radio
770: emission on $\gtrsim {\rm year}$ timescales in several ultracool
771: dwarfs points to fields with order unity covering fractions.
772:
773: An alternative possibility for the drop in $L_X/L_{\rm bol}$ is that
774: the source of coronal heating is different, and much less efficient,
775: than in higher mass stars. This scenario may explain the lower values
776: of $L_X/L_{\rm bol}$ in the regime where F--M6 stars are saturated.
777: However, it is unclear why such a scenario should depend on rotation,
778: particularly since the radio emission (i.e., particle acceleration)
779: does not diminish in fast rotators (see \S\ref{sec:radio}).
780:
781: We caution that the possibility of super-saturation in the X-rays is
782: based on a small number of objects, and moreover that the effect of
783: centrifugal stripping depends on the magnetic field configuration.
784: Future X-ray observations of additional late M and L dwarfs, as well
785: as the determination of rotation velocities for a larger sample of
786: ultracool dwarfs will reveal whether, and at what rotation velocity,
787: super-saturation may set in present. If confirmed, the value of
788: $v{\rm sin}i$ at which super-saturation occurs may hold a clue to the
789: nature of the dynamo or the dominant physical scale of coronal
790: magnetic loops.
791:
792:
793: \subsection{Radio Activity}
794: \label{sec:radio}
795:
796: Since radio emission is arguably a more robust tracer of magnetic
797: activity than X-ray emission, we repeat the same exercise for
798: $L_R/L_{\rm bol}$ as a function of rotation period and velocity.
799: \citet{ber02} noted a possible correlation between radio activity and
800: rotation based on a small sample of ultracool dwarfs, and we re-visit
801: this investigation here. In Figure~\ref{fig:lrrot} we plot radio
802: detections and upper limits for objects with a known rotation velocity
803: and period. We find that for objects with spectral type $>{\rm M7}$
804: those with $v{\rm sin}i\lesssim 30$ km s$^{-1}$, or $P\gtrsim 4$ hr,
805: exhibit a typical quiescent radio activity, $\nu L_{\rm \nu ,R}/L_{\rm
806: bol}\sim 10^{-7.5}$. On the other hand, those with $v{\rm
807: sin}i\gtrsim 30$ km s$^{-1}$ have $\nu L_{\rm \nu ,R}/L_{\rm bol}\sim
808: 10^{-6.8}$, nearly an order of magnitude larger. If we include
809: objects earlier than M7, the increase in radio activity with rotation
810: velocity becomes even more pronounced, with a typical level of $\nu
811: L_{\rm \nu ,R}/L_{\rm bol}\lesssim 10^{-8}$ for $v{\rm sin}i\lesssim
812: 30$ km s$^{-1}$.
813:
814: The majority of the ultracool dwarfs with a known rotation velocity
815: remain undetected in VLA observations with a typical duration of $\sim
816: 2$ hr, mostly as a result of the decrease in $L_{\rm bol}$ for L and T
817: dwarfs (Figure~\ref{fig:lrrot} and \citealt{ber06}). Still, it
818: appears that with the present sample, there is possible evidence for a
819: radio rotation-activity relation, with no evidence for either
820: saturation or super-saturation. This is contrary to the apparent
821: decrease in $L_X/L_{\rm bol}$ at $v{\rm sin}i\sim 25$ km s$^{-1}$
822: (\S\ref{sec:xr}). If confirmed with future observations, the most
823: likely explanation is that the dynamo mechanism is at least partially
824: driven by rotation (even in the presence of full convection), with no
825: apparent saturation at very low Rossby numbers (${\rm Ro}\lesssim
826: 10^{-3}$), contrary to the trend in F--M6 stars.
827:
828: Regardless of the exact dynamo mechanism there is a clear discrepancy
829: between the radio and X-ray observations in terms of a possible
830: activity-rotation relation and its super-saturation. The lack of
831: clear saturation or super-saturation in the radio indicates that the
832: dynamo itself is not likely to saturate even at high rotation
833: velocities. The possible decline in X-ray activity at $v{\rm
834: sin}i\gtrsim 25$ km s$^{-1}$ may thus be the result of secondary
835: effects such as inefficient heating of the plasma to coronal
836: temperatures, or centrifugal stripping of the most extended magnetic
837: loops, with $R\sim {\rm few}\times R_*$. The former scenario is
838: supported by the observed ratio $L_{\rm H\alpha}/L_X\gtrsim 1$ in the
839: quiescent emission from \lsr\ and \tvlm, which points to heating of
840: chromospheric plasma by a process other than coronal X-ray emission.
841:
842: The difference in trends between radio and X-ray activity as a
843: function of rotation velocity may also underlie the violation of the
844: radio/X-ray correlation in ultracool dwarfs (Figure~\ref{fig:gb}). In
845: Figure~\ref{fig:bgrot} we plot $L_{\nu,R}/L_X$ relative to its
846: standard value in F--M6 stars ($\approx 10^{-15.5}$; \citealt{gb93})
847: as a function of rotation velocity. We find that objects with $v{\rm
848: sin}i\gtrsim 30$ km s$^{-1}$ exhibit a significantly more severe
849: violation of the radio/X-ray correlation than those with slower
850: rotation. It is important to note, however, that rotation alone may
851: not fully account for the excess ratios since even objects with $v{\rm
852: sin}i\lesssim 10$ km s$^{-1}$ may exceed the value of $10^{-15.5}$ by
853: an order of magnitude or more. Still, it appears that faster rotators
854: generally violate the radio/X-ray correlation by a larger factor.
855:
856:
857: \section{Discussion and Summary}
858: \label{sec:conc}
859:
860: We presented simultaneous multi-wavelength observations of two late M
861: dwarfs to trace the magnetic activity in their outer atmospheres. In
862: the case of \lsr\ (M8.5) we detect persistent radio emission and
863: highly variable H$\alpha$ emission. No excess UV emission is
864: detected. Similarly, we detect no X-ray emission to a deep limit of
865: $L_X/L_{\rm bol}\lesssim 10^{-5.7}$. The ratio of radio to X-ray flux
866: exceeds the average value measured in a wide range of active stars by
867: more than 4 orders of magnitude. Similarly, the ratio $L_{\rm
868: H\alpha}/L_X\gtrsim 10$ exceeds the values measured for M0--M6 dwarfs
869: by at least an order of magnitude, and rules out heating of the
870: quiescent chromosphere by coronal emission.
871:
872: Temporally, we find no correspondence between the radio and H$\alpha$
873: light curves. This indicates that even if the source of chromospheric
874: heating is magnetic reconnection, it occurs on sufficiently small
875: scales that the overall radio emission does not change by more than
876: $\sim 10\%$. Alternatively, the radio emission produced in
877: conjunction with the H$\alpha$ variability may peak at a lower
878: frequency than our 8.5 GHz observations. In the former scenario, our
879: limit on the radio variability during the brightest H$\alpha$ episode
880: can be interpreted as a limit of $\lesssim 10\%$ on the chromospheric
881: volume involved in the variable H$\alpha$ emission. In the latter
882: scenario, it is possible that the coincident radio emission is
883: dominated by coherent emission at $\nu\approx 2.8\times 10^6\,B$, with
884: $B\lesssim 3$ kG.
885:
886: With our measured rotation velocity of $v{\rm sin}i\approx 50$ km
887: s$^{-1}$ for \lsr, the radio observations sample nearly 4 full
888: rotations. The stability of the radio emission thus requires a
889: large-scale and uniform magnetic field, with an inferred strength of
890: $\sim 10$ G. The similarity in flux to a past observation suggests
891: that the field is stable on year timescales. This may be expected
892: given the long convective turnover time for ultracool dwarfs, on the
893: order of several years.
894:
895: \vb, on the other hand, exhibits bright and variable X-ray and UV
896: emission, including a pair of flares and quiescent emission. The
897: behavior in both bands, which trace the corona and transition region,
898: respectively, is highly correlated. From the X-ray spectrum we infer
899: a coronal temperature of about $3\times 10^6$ K, with a possible
900: second component at $\sim 10^7$ K. The optical emission lines exhibit
901: a similar amplitude and timescale of variability to the X-rays and UV,
902: with two distinct states of gradual and impulsive flaring. The lack
903: of causal relation between the two states points to emission from
904: distinct plasma environments. Moreover, the shallow Balmer decrement
905: and \ion{He}{1} emission in the impulsive Flare state require
906: significantly denser and hotter plasma.
907:
908: Our detailed study of \lsr, \vb, and \tvlm\ reveals mixed patterns of
909: of behavior compared to the magnetic activity in F-M6 stars, and thus
910: points to a transition in the atmospheric structure and heating
911: process in the late M dwarf regime. In particular, stellar-scale
912: magnetic fields are present, as evidence by quiescent and uniform
913: radio emission, but the coronae are generally weaker than in early M
914: dwarfs. The chromospheric activity declines less rapidly, and all
915: three targets exhibit a similar range of highly variable H$\alpha$
916: emission, $L_{\rm H\alpha}/L_{\rm bol}\sim 10^{-5}-10^{-4.5}$. This
917: range is about an order of magnitude less that the saturated value of
918: mid M dwarfs.
919:
920: In the standard picture of solar and stellar magnetic flares, the
921: release of magnetic energy through processes such as reconnection
922: leads to acceleration of electrons, and subsequently heating of the
923: chromosphere, transition region, and corona through evaporation of the
924: lower atmosphere. In quiescence, the chromospheres of M0--M6 dwarfs
925: may instead be heated by coronal X-ray emission \citep{cra82}, as
926: evidenced by the typical observed ratios of $L_{\rm H\alpha}/L_X\sim
927: 1/3$ \citep{cra82,hgr96}. Such a mechanism is clearly not at play in
928: the case of \lsr, and most likely \tvlm, since the chromospheric
929: emission is significantly more energetic than the non-detected corona.
930:
931: It is possible instead that the source of chromospheric heating is
932: continuous micro-flaring activity, leading to replenishment of
933: chromospheric and transition region plasma by evaporation. In this
934: scenario the weak or absent coronal emission may be due to a limited
935: temperature enhancement of $\lesssim 10^5$ K, which is sufficient to
936: produce chromospheric emission, but no significant soft X-ray
937: emission. The continuously variable H$\alpha$ emission in \lsr\
938: appears to support this idea, and along with the lack of corresponding
939: radio variability points to heating on scales much smaller than the
940: stellar photosphere.
941:
942: As we noted in \S\ref{sec:rot}, it is also possible that rapid
943: rotation in ultracool dwarfs suppresses the X-ray emission through
944: centrifugal stripping. The apparent increase in radio activity with
945: rotation indicates that the dynamo itself does not saturate, at least
946: up to $v{\rm sin}i\sim 60$ km s$^{-1}$, which is roughly $1/3$ of the
947: break-up velocity. The effects leading to the apparent
948: super-saturation in the X-rays may also underlie the severe violation
949: of the radio/X-ray correlation since the level of violation appears to
950: be correlated with rotation velocity (Figure~\ref{fig:bgrot}). We
951: stress that the role of rotation is still speculative due to the small
952: number of objects with X-ray, radio, and rotation measurements. It is
953: therefore crucial to increase the sample of ultracool dwarfs for which
954: these quantities are measured.
955:
956: To summarize, we conclude that late M dwarfs mark a change in the
957: properties of the magnetic field and its dissipation, as well as the
958: generation of high temperature plasma in the outer atmosphere. The
959: weak X-ray emission, both in relation to $L_{\rm bol}$ and $L_{\rm
960: H\alpha}$, points to inefficient heating of plasma to coronal
961: temperatures, or alternatively to stripping of the most extended
962: magnetic loops. The lack of temporal correlation between the radio
963: and H$\alpha$ activity, however, indicates that even if atmospheric
964: evaporation is taking place, it occurs on smaller physical scale than
965: the overall magnetic field structure.
966:
967: We end by noting that the use of simultaneous, multi-wavelength, and
968: long duration observations to probe the magnetic activity of
969: individual ultracool dwarfs provides a crucial complement to large
970: single-band surveys. In particular, the long duration and high time
971: resolution data elucidate the range of timescales and amplitudes of
972: gradual and impulsive flares, and can moreover uncover
973: rotationally-induced modulations, as in the case of \tvlm\ (Paper I).
974: In addition, the existence or absence of correlations between the
975: various activity indicators (as in \lsr\ and \tvlm), and their
976: implications for the magnetic field and its dissipation, could not
977: have been inferred from existing observations. In the upcoming
978: Chandra cycle we will expand our analysis with observations of several
979: L0--L3 dwarfs. These observations will reveal whether the transition
980: in magnetic activity patterns seen in the late M dwarfs continues to
981: lower mass objects, some of which are bona-fide brown dwarfs.
982:
983:
984: \acknowledgements We thank the Chandra, Gemini, VLA, and Swift
985: schedulers for their invaluable help in coordinating these
986: observations. This work has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated
987: at CDS, Strasbourg, France. It is based in part on observations
988: obtained at the Gemini Observatory, which is operated by the
989: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a
990: cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini
991: partnership: the National Science Foundation (United States), the
992: Science and Technology Facilities Council (United Kingdom), the
993: National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the Australian
994: Research Council (Australia), CNPq (Brazil) and CONICET (Argentina).
995: Data from the UVOT instrument on Swift were used in this work. Swift
996: is an international observatory developed and operated in the US, UK
997: and Italy, and managed by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center with
998: operations center at Penn State University. Support for this work was
999: provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration through
1000: Chandra Award Number G07-8014A issued by the Chandra X-ray Observatory
1001: Center, which is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
1002: for and on behalf of the National Aeronautics Space Administration
1003: under contract NAS8-03060.
1004:
1005:
1006: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1007:
1008: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Allard} et~al.}{{Allard}
1009: et~al.}{2001}]{aha+01}
1010: {Allard}, F., {Hauschildt}, P.~H., {Alexander}, D.~R., {Tamanai}, A., \&
1011: {Schweitzer}, A. 2001, \apj, 556, 357
1012:
1013: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Allred} et~al.}{{Allred}
1014: et~al.}{2006}]{aha+06}
1015: {Allred}, J.~C., {Hawley}, S.~L., {Abbett}, W.~P., \& {Carlsson}, M. 2006,
1016: \apj, 644, 484
1017:
1018: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Antonova} et~al.}{{Antonova}
1019: et~al.}{2007}]{adh+07}
1020: {Antonova}, A., {Doyle}, J.~G., {Hallinan}, G., {Golden}, A., \& {Koen}, C.
1021: 2007, astro-ph/0707.0634
1022:
1023: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Aschwanden} et~al.}{{Aschwanden}
1024: et~al.}{2001}]{apr01}
1025: {Aschwanden}, M.~J., {Poland}, A.~I., \& {Rabin}, D.~M. 2001, \araa,
1026: 39, 175
1027:
1028: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Audard} et~al.}{{Audard}
1029: et~al.}{2007}]{aob+07}
1030: {Audard}, M., {Osten}, R.~A., {Brown}, A., {Briggs}, K.~R., {Guedel}, M.,
1031: {Hodges-Kluck}, E., \& {Gizis}, J.~E. 2007, astro-ph/0707.1882
1032:
1033: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Benz} \& {Guedel}}{{Benz} \&
1034: {Guedel}}{1994}]{bg94}
1035: {Benz}, A.~O., \& {Guedel}, M., 285, 621
1036:
1037: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Berger}}{{Berger}}{2002}]{ber02}
1038: {Berger}, E. 2002, \apj, 572, 503
1039:
1040: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Berger}}{{Berger}}{2006}]{ber06}
1041: {Berger}, E. 2006, \apj, 648, 629
1042:
1043: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Berger} et~al.}{{Berger}
1044: et~al.}{2001}]{bbb+01}
1045: {Berger}, E., et~al. 2001, \nat, 410, 338
1046:
1047: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Berger} et~al.}{{Berger}
1048: et~al.}{2007}]{bgg+07}
1049: {Berger}, E., et~al. 2007, astro-ph/0708.1511 (Paper I)
1050:
1051: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Berger} et~al.}{{Berger}
1052: et~al.}{2005}]{brr+05}
1053: {Berger}, E., et~al. 2005, \apj, 627, 960
1054:
1055: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Burgasser} \& {Putman}}{{Burgasser} \&
1056: {Putman}}{2005}]{bp05}
1057: {Burgasser}, A.~J., \& {Putman}, M.~E. 2005, \apj, 626, 486
1058:
1059: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Cram}}{{Cram}}{1982}]{cra82}
1060: {Cram}, L.~E. 1982, \apj, 253, 768
1061:
1062: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Dulk} \& {Marsh}}{{Dulk} \&
1063: {Marsh}}{1982}]{dm82}
1064: {Dulk}, G.~A., \& {Marsh}, K.~A. 1982, \apj, 259, 350
1065:
1066: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Fleming}, {Giampapa}, \& {Garza}}{{Fleming}
1067: et~al.}{2003}]{fgg03}
1068: {Fleming}, T.~A., {Giampapa}, M.~S., \& {Garza}, D. 2003, \apj, 594, 982
1069:
1070: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Fleming}, {Giampapa}, \& {Schmitt}}{{Fleming}
1071: et~al.}{2000}]{fgs00}
1072: {Fleming}, T.~A., {Giampapa}, M.~S., \& {Schmitt}, J.~H.~M.~M. 2000, \apj,
1073: 533, 372
1074:
1075: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gizis} et~al.}{{Gizis} et~al.}{2000}]{gmr+00}
1076: {Gizis}, J.~E., {Monet}, D.~G., {Reid}, I.~N., {Kirkpatrick}, J.~D., {Liebert},
1077: J., \& {Williams}, R.~J. 2000, \aj, 120, 1085
1078:
1079: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{G{\"u}del}}{{G{\"u}del}}{2002}]{gud02}
1080: {G{\"u}del}, M. 2002, \araa, 40, 217
1081:
1082: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{G{\"u}del}}{{G{\"u}del}}{2004}]{gud04}
1083: {G{\"u}del}, M. 2004, \aapr, 12, 71
1084:
1085: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Guedel} \& {Benz}}{{Guedel} \&
1086: {Benz}}{1993}]{gb93}
1087: {Guedel}, M., \& {Benz}, A.~O. 1993, ApJ, 405, L63
1088:
1089: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Hallinan} et~al.}{{Hallinan}
1090: et~al.}{2007}]{hbl+07}
1091: {Hallinan}, G., et~al. 2007, \apjl, 663, L25
1092:
1093: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Hawley}, {Gizis}, \& {Reid}}{{Hawley}
1094: et~al.}{1996}]{hgr96}
1095: {Hawley}, S.~L., {Gizis}, J.~E., \& {Reid}, I.~N. 1996, \aj, 112, 2799
1096:
1097: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Hawley} \& {Johns-Krull}}{{Hawley} \&
1098: {Johns-Krull}}{2003}]{hj03}
1099: {Hawley}, S.~L., \& {Johns-Krull}, C.~M. 2003, \apjl, 588, L109
1100:
1101: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Hook} et~al.}{{Hook} et~al.}{2004}]{hja+04}
1102: {Hook}, I.~M., {J{\o}rgensen}, I., {Allington-Smith}, J.~R., {Davies}, R.~L.,
1103: {Metcalfe}, N., {Murowinski}, R.~G., \& {Crampton}, D. 2004, \pasp, 116, 425
1104:
1105: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{James} et~al.}{{James} et~al.}{2000}]{jjj+00}
1106: {James}, D.~J., {Jardine}, M.~M., {Jeffries}, R.~D., {Randich}, S., {Collier
1107: Cameron}, A., \& {Ferreira}, M. 2000, \mnras, 318, 1217
1108:
1109: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Jardine} \& {Unruh}}{{Jardine} \&
1110: {Unruh}}{1999}]{ju99}
1111: {Jardine}, M., \& {Unruh}, Y.~C. 1999, \aap, 346, 883
1112:
1113: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kraft}}{{Kraft}}{1967}]{kra67}
1114: {Kraft}, R.~P. 1967, \apj, 150, 551
1115:
1116: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Krishnamurthi}, {Leto}, \&
1117: {Linsky}}{{Krishnamurthi} et~al.}{1999}]{kll99}
1118: {Krishnamurthi}, A., {Leto}, G., \& {Linsky}, J.~L. 1999, \aj, 118, 1369
1119:
1120: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Leto} et~al.}{{Leto} et~al.}{2000}]{lpl+00}
1121: {Leto}, G., {Pagano}, I., {Linsky}, J.~L., {Rodon{\`o}}, M., \& {Umana}, G.
1122: 2000, \aap, 359, 1035
1123:
1124: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Liebert} et~al.}{{Liebert}
1125: et~al.}{2003}]{lkc+03}
1126: {Liebert}, J., {Kirkpatrick}, J.~D., {Cruz}, K.~L., {Reid}, I.~N., {Burgasser},
1127: A., {Tinney}, C.~G., \& {Gizis}, J.~E. 2003, \aj, 125, 343
1128:
1129: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Linsky} et~al.}{{Linsky}
1130: et~al.}{1995}]{lwb+95}
1131: {Linsky}, J.~L., {Wood}, B.~E., {Brown}, A., {Giampapa}, M.~S., \&
1132: {Ambruster}, C. 1995, \apj, 455, 670
1133:
1134: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Mart{\'{\i}}n} et~al.}{{Mart{\'{\i}}n}
1135: et~al.}{1999}]{mdb+99}
1136: {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, E.~L., {Delfosse}, X., {Basri}, G., {Goldman}, B.,
1137: {Forveille}, T., \& {Zapatero Osorio}, M.~R. 1999, \aj, 118, 2466
1138:
1139: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Mohanty} \& {Basri}}{{Mohanty} \&
1140: {Basri}}{2003}]{mb03}
1141: {Mohanty}, S., \& {Basri}, G. 2003, \apj, 583, 451
1142:
1143: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Narain} \& {Ulmschneider}}{{Narain}
1144: \& {Ulmschneider}}{1996}]{nu96}
1145: {Narain}, U., \& {Ulmschneider}, P. 1996, Space Sci.~Rev., 75, 453
1146:
1147: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Neupert}}{{Neupert}}{1968}]{neu68}
1148: {Neupert}, W.~M. 1968, \apjl, 153, L59
1149:
1150: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Osten} et~al.}{{Osten}
1151: et~al.}{2006a}]{oha+06}
1152: {Osten}, R.~A., {Hawley}, S.~L., {Allred}, J., {Johns-Krull}, C.~M., {Brown},
1153: A., \& {Harper}, G.~M. 2006a, \apj, 647, 1349
1154:
1155: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Osten} et~al.}{{Osten}
1156: et~al.}{2006b}]{ohb+06}
1157: {Osten}, R.~A., {Hawley}, S.~L., {Bastian}, T.~S., \& {Reid}, I.~N. 2006b,
1158: \apj, 637, 518
1159:
1160: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Pallavicini} et~al.}{{Pallavicini}
1161: et~al.}{1981}]{pgr+81}
1162: {Pallavicini}, R., {Golub}, L., {Rosner}, R., {Vaiana}, G.~S., {Ayres}, T., \&
1163: {Linsky}, J.~L. 1981, \apj, 248, 279
1164:
1165: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Parker}}{{Parker}}{1955}]{par55}
1166: {Parker}, E.~N. 1955, \apj, 122, 293
1167:
1168: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Patten} et~al.}{{Patten}
1169: et~al.}{2006}]{psb+06}
1170: {Patten}, B.~M., et~al. 2006, \apj, 651, 502
1171:
1172: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Phan-Bao} et~al.}{{Phan-Bao}
1173: et~al.}{2007}]{pol+07}
1174: {Phan-Bao}, N., {Osten}, R.~A., {Lim}, J., {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, E.~L., \& {Ho},
1175: P.~T.~P. 2007, \apj, 658, 553
1176:
1177: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Pizzolato} et~al.}{{Pizzolato}
1178: et~al.}{2003}]{pmm+03}
1179: {Pizzolato}, N., {Maggio}, A., {Micela}, G., {Sciortino}, S., \& {Ventura}, P.
1180: 2003, \aap, 397, 147
1181:
1182: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Reid} et~al.}{{Reid} et~al.}{2003}]{rcl+03}
1183: {Reid}, I.~N., et~al. 2003, \aj, 125, 354
1184:
1185: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Reid} et~al.}{{Reid} et~al.}{1999}]{rkg+99}
1186: {Reid}, I.~N., {Kirkpatrick}, J.~D., {Gizis}, J.~E., \& {Liebert}, J. 1999,
1187: \apjl, 527, L105
1188:
1189: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Reiners} \& {Basri}}{{Reiners} \&
1190: {Basri}}{2007}]{rb07}
1191: {Reiners}, A., \& {Basri}, G. 2007, \apj, 656, 1121
1192:
1193: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Rutledge} et~al.}{{Rutledge}
1194: et~al.}{2000}]{rbm+00}
1195: {Rutledge}, R.~E., {Basri}, G., {Mart{\'i}n}, E.~L., \& {Bildsten}, L. 2000,
1196: ApJ, 538, L141
1197:
1198: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{St{\c e}pie{\'n}}, {Schmitt}, \&
1199: {Voges}}{{St{\c e}pie{\'n}} et~al.}{2001}]{ssv01}
1200: {St{\c e}pie{\'n}}, K., {Schmitt}, J.~H.~M.~M., \& {Voges}, W. 2001, \aap,
1201: 370, 157
1202:
1203: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Stelzer} et~al.}{{Stelzer}
1204: et~al.}{2006}]{ssm+06}
1205: {Stelzer}, B., {Schmitt}, J.~H.~M.~M., {Micela}, G., \& {Liefke}, C. 2006,
1206: \aap, 460, L35
1207:
1208: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Stewart} et~al.}{{Stewart}
1209: et~al.}{1988}]{sis+88}
1210: {Stewart}, R.~T., {Innis}, J.~L., {Slee}, O.~B., {Nelson}, G.~J., \& {Wright},
1211: A.~E. 1988, \aj, 96, 371
1212:
1213: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Tinney}}{{Tinney}}{1996}]{tin96}
1214: {Tinney}, C.~G. 1996, \mnras, 281, 644
1215:
1216: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{van den Besselaar} et~al.}{{van den
1217: Besselaar} et~al.}{2003}]{vrm+03}
1218: {van den Besselaar}, E.~J.~M., {Raassen}, A.~J.~J., {Mewe}, R., {van der Meer},
1219: R.~L.~J., {G{\"u}del}, M., \& {Audard}, M. 2003, \aap, 411, 587
1220:
1221: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Vilhu}}{{Vilhu}}{1984}]{vil84}
1222: {Vilhu}, O. 1984, \aap, 133, 117
1223:
1224: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Vilhu} \& {Walter}}{{Vilhu} \&
1225: {Walter}}{1987}]{vw87}
1226: {Vilhu}, O., \& {Walter}, F.~M. 1987, \apj, 321, 958
1227:
1228: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Walkowicz}, {Hawley}, \& {West}}{{Walkowicz}
1229: et~al.}{2004}]{whw04}
1230: {Walkowicz}, L.~M., {Hawley}, S.~L., \& {West}, A.~A. 2004, \pasp, 116, 1105
1231:
1232: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{West} et~al.}{{West} et~al.}{2004}]{whw+04}
1233: {West}, A.~A., et~al. 2004, \aj, 128, 426
1234:
1235: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{White}, {Jackson}, \& {Kundu}}{{White}
1236: et~al.}{1989}]{wjk89}
1237: {White}, S.~M., {Jackson}, P.~D., \& {Kundu}, M.~R. 1989, \apjs, 71, 895
1238:
1239:
1240: \end{thebibliography}
1241:
1242:
1243:
1244: \clearpage
1245: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
1246: \tablecolumns{3}
1247: \tabcolsep0.1in\footnotesize
1248: \tablewidth{0pc}
1249: \tablecaption{UVOT/UVW1 magnitudes of \vb\
1250: \label{tab:vb10uvot}}
1251: \tablehead{
1252: \colhead{Exposure} &
1253: \colhead{UT Time} &
1254: \colhead{AB Mag$^a$} \\
1255: }
1256: \startdata
1257: 1 & 11:08:22--11:31:00 & $19.91\pm 0.12$ \\
1258: 2 & 12:32:23--12:49:00 & $20.45\pm 0.21$ \\
1259: 3 & 14:08:27--14:36:00 & $<21.47$ \\
1260: 4 & 15:44:28--16:12:00 & $<21.40$ \\
1261: 5 & 17:21:27--17:49:00 & $<21.40$ \\
1262: 3--5 & 14:08:27--17:49:00 & $21.57\pm 0.24$ \\
1263: 6 & 18:57:27--19:15:00 & $21.07\pm 0.35$
1264: \enddata
1265: \tablecomments{$^a$ Limits are $3\sigma$.}
1266: \end{deluxetable}
1267:
1268:
1269:
1270: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccc}
1271: \tablecolumns{10}
1272: \tabcolsep0.1in\footnotesize
1273: \tablewidth{0pc}
1274: \tablecaption{Emission Line Properties of \vb\
1275: \label{tab:vb10spec}}
1276: \tablehead{
1277: \colhead {} &
1278: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Low} &
1279: \multicolumn{3}{c}{High} &
1280: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Flare} \\\cline{2-4}\cline{5-7}\cline{8-10}
1281: \colhead{Line} &
1282: \colhead{EW$^a$} &
1283: \colhead{Flux$^b$} &
1284: \colhead{${\rm log}(L/L_{\rm bol})$} &
1285: \colhead{EW} &
1286: \colhead{Flux} &
1287: \colhead{${\rm log}(L/L_{\rm bol})$} &
1288: \colhead{EW} &
1289: \colhead{Flux} &
1290: \colhead{${\rm log}(L/L_{\rm bol})$}
1291: }
1292: \startdata
1293: H$\alpha$ & 4.3 & 5.2 & $-4.9$ & 8.6 & 13.3 & $-4.5$ & 9.0 & 15.1 & $-4.4$ \\
1294: H$\beta$ & 4.8 & 0.5 & $-5.9$ & 17 & 2.8 & $-5.1$ & 33 & 8.7 & $-4.6$ \\
1295: H$\gamma$ & 9.3 & 0.2 & $-6.3$ & 31 & 1.6 & $-5.4$ & 75 & 8.7 & $-4.6$ \\
1296: H$\delta$ & \nod & \nod & \nod & 31 & 1.0 & $-5.6$ & 95 & 8.0 & $-4.7$ \\
1297: H$\epsilon$+\ion{Ca}{2}\,H & 8.5 & 0.2 & $-6.3$ & 111 & 1.8 & $-5.3$ & 83 & 7.8 & $-4.7$ \\
1298: H$\xi$ & \nod & \nod & \nod & 9.1 & 0.3 & $-6.1$ & 44 & 4.8 & $-4.9$ \\
1299: \ion{Ca}{2}\,K & 15 & 0.2 & $-6.3$ & 39 & 1.2 & $-5.5$ & 26 & 2.5 & $-5.2$ \\
1300: \ion{He}{1}\,$\lambda 5877$ & \nod & \nod & \nod & \nod & \nod & \nod & 2.8 & 1.1 & $-5.6$ \\
1301: \ion{He}{1}\,$\lambda 4473$ & \nod & \nod & \nod & \nod & \nod & \nod & 5.3 & 0.9 & $-5.6$ \\
1302: \ion{He}{1}\,$\lambda 4027$ & \nod & \nod & \nod & \nod & \nod & \nod & 5.4 & 0.5 & $-5.9$
1303: \enddata
1304: \tablecomments{Emission line fluxes, equivalent widths, and ratios
1305: relative to the bolometric luminosity for the three spectral states
1306: identified in \vb\ (Figures~\ref{fig:vb10balmer} and
1307: \ref{fig:vb10spec}).\\
1308: $^a$ In units of \AA.\\
1309: $^b$ In units of $10^{-15}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-1}$.}
1310: \end{deluxetable}
1311:
1312:
1313:
1314:
1315: \clearpage
1316: \begin{figure}
1317: %\epsscale{0.9}
1318: %\plotone{lsr_all.ps}
1319: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig1.ps,width=6.0in}}
1320: \caption{Radio, H$\alpha$, UV, and X-ray observations of \lsr. No
1321: X-ray emission is detected, and we find a UV source only in the
1322: combined 9.4 ks observation with $m_{\rm AB}=23.7\pm 0.3$ mag. The
1323: radio total intensity (I) and circular polarization (V) light curves
1324: (black lines) are shown at 30-sec (black lines) and 30-min (gray
1325: lines) resolution (the intrinsic time resolution is 5 s). One
1326: possible weak radio flare is detected (08:05 UT), but the overall
1327: level of variability is less than a factor of two. The H$\alpha$ line
1328: exhibits significant variability on timescales of $0.5-2$ hr. We find
1329: no correlation between the H$\alpha$ and radio light curves.
1330: \label{fig:lsrall}}
1331: \end{figure}
1332:
1333:
1334: \clearpage
1335: \begin{figure}
1336: %\epsscale{0.9}
1337: %\plotone{vb10_all.ps}
1338: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig2.ps,width=6.0in}}
1339: \caption{X-ray and UV observations of \vb. We show the X-ray photon
1340: arrival times (black dots), as well as light curves with time binning
1341: of 600 and 2400 s. The light curve is clearly composed of a flare
1342: with a duration of about 2 hrs, followed by quiescent emission and a
1343: second weaker and shorter flare. The UV light curve clearly tracks
1344: the X-ray emission.
1345: \label{fig:vb10all}}
1346: \end{figure}
1347:
1348:
1349: \clearpage
1350: \begin{figure}
1351: %\epsscale{0.6}
1352: %\plotone{vb10_xray_spec1.ps}
1353: \begin{minipage}{9cm}
1354: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=3.65in]{fig3a.ps}
1355: \end{minipage} \hfill
1356: \begin{minipage}{9cm}
1357: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=3.65in]{fig3b.ps}
1358: \end{minipage}
1359: \caption{X-ray spectrum of \vb\ (data with error bard) fit with {\it
1360: Left:} a single temperature Raymond-Smith model with $kT\approx 0.3$
1361: keV ($\chi^2_r=1.4$ for 9 d.o.f), and {\it Right:} a two-component
1362: Raymond-Smith model with $kT_1\approx 0.26$ keV and $kT_2\approx 1.3$
1363: keV ($\chi^2_r=0.3$ for 7 d.o.f). The single-temperature model leaves
1364: significant residuals, which are largely eliminated by the addition of
1365: hotter component.
1366: \label{fig:vb10xspec}}
1367: \end{figure}
1368:
1369:
1370: \clearpage
1371: \begin{figure}
1372: %\epsscale{0.8}
1373: %\plotone{sample_spec_flux_lsr.ps}
1374: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig4.ps,width=6.0in}}
1375: \caption{Spectra of \lsr\ in the High and Low emission lines states,
1376: corresponding, respectively, to the peak (13:40 UT) and lowest point
1377: (13:00 UT) of the H$\alpha$ light curve (Figure~\ref{fig:lsrall}).
1378: The High state is marked by strong Balmer and \ion{Ca}{2} H\&K lines.
1379: \label{fig:lsrspec}}
1380: \end{figure}
1381:
1382:
1383: \clearpage
1384: \begin{figure}
1385: %\epsscale{0.8}
1386: %\plotone{balmer_ew_vb10.ps}
1387: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig5.ps,width=6.0in}}
1388: \caption{Light curves of the Balmer line equivalent widths in the
1389: spectra of \vb. Each spectrum has a duration of 300 s. The same
1390: behavior is clear in all four lines, with significant variability
1391: ranging in duration from a single exposure to a broad brightening with
1392: a duration of about 2.5 hr. We designate three spectral states ---
1393: Flare, High, and Low --- whose spectra are shown in
1394: Figure~\ref{fig:vb10spec}. The flare state is more distinct in the
1395: higher order Balmer lines, suggesting that the plasma densities and
1396: temperatures are higher compared to the High and Low states.
1397: \label{fig:vb10balmer}}
1398: \end{figure}
1399:
1400:
1401: \clearpage
1402: \begin{figure}
1403: %\epsscale{0.8}
1404: %\plotone{sample_spec_flux_vb10.ps}
1405: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig6.ps,width=6.0in}}
1406: \caption{Spectra of \vb\ in the three states designated in
1407: Figure~\ref{fig:vb10balmer}: Flare, High, and Low. The flare spectrum
1408: exhibits significantly stronger emission in the higher-order Balmer
1409: lines than the high state spectrum, stronger \ion{Ca}{2} lines, and
1410: \ion{He}{1} lines which are completely absent in the High state
1411: spectrum. These properties point to higher chromospheric densities
1412: and temperatures in the impulsive Flare state ($\lesssim 300$ s) than
1413: during the broad brightenings (High state). The Low state spectrum
1414: is simply a weaker version of the High state spectrum.
1415: \label{fig:vb10spec}}
1416: \end{figure}
1417:
1418:
1419: \clearpage
1420: \begin{figure}
1421: %\epsscale{0.9}
1422: %\plotone{lsr_rotvel.eps}
1423: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig7.eps,width=6.0in}}
1424: \caption{A portion of our Keck/HIRES echelle spectrum of \lsr\ (thick
1425: line). A comparison to the rotationally-broadened spectrum of the
1426: slowly-rotating M6 dwarf CN Leo (thin line; shifted downward for
1427: clarity) indicates a rotation velocity for \lsr\ of $v{\rm sin}i=50
1428: \pm 5$ km s$^{-1}$.
1429: \label{fig:lsrrot}}
1430: \end{figure}
1431:
1432:
1433: \clearpage
1434: \begin{figure}
1435: %\epsscale{0.9}
1436: %\plotone{lsr_sed.ps}
1437: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig8.ps,width=6.0in}}
1438: \caption{UV to IR spectral energy distribution of \lsr\ from DSS,
1439: 2MASS, and Spitzer observations. The gray curve is an AMES-Cond
1440: atmospheric model of a 2400 K, ${\rm log}g=5.5$ dwarf star, which
1441: provides an excellent fit to the optical, NIR, and IR data.
1442: Convolution of the atmospheric model with the UVOT/UVW1 filter
1443: curve (dashed line) indicates an expected flux (grey square) that
1444: is in good agreement with the observed flux.
1445: \label{fig:lsrsed}}
1446: \end{figure}
1447:
1448:
1449: \clearpage
1450: \begin{figure}
1451: %\epsscale{0.9}
1452: %\plotone{gb.ps}
1453: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig9.ps,width=6.0in}}
1454: \caption{Radio versus X-ray luminosity for stars exhibiting coronal
1455: activity. Data for late M and L dwarfs are from \citet{rbm+00},
1456: \citet{bbb+01}, \citet{ber02}, \citet{brr+05}, \citet{bp05},
1457: \citet{ber06}, \citet{aob+07}, and Paper I, while data for other stars
1458: and the Sun are taken from \citet{gud02} and references therein.
1459: Solar data include impulsive and gradual flares, as well as
1460: microflares. The strong correlation between $L_R$ and $L_X$ is
1461: evident, but it breaks down around spectral type M7 (see inset).
1462: Of our three targets, \tvlm\ and \lsr\ clearly violate the
1463: correlation by about four orders of magnitude, while for \vb\
1464: the upper limit on excess radio emission is less than three
1465: orders of magnitude.
1466: \label{fig:gb}}
1467: \end{figure}
1468:
1469:
1470: \clearpage
1471: \begin{figure}
1472: %\epsscale{0.9}
1473: %\plotone{lxlbol_vs_rot.ps}
1474: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig10.ps,width=6.0in}}
1475: \caption{Ratio of X-ray to bolometric luminosity as a function of
1476: rotation period for stars of spectral type F--M6 (gray circles), and
1477: $>{\rm M7}$ (black symbols). Data are from \citet{jjj+00},
1478: \citet{pmm+03}, \citet{rb07}, \citet{aob+07} and references therein,
1479: and this paper. The rotation-activity relation and saturation in the
1480: F--M6 stars are clearly seen (gray lines). The X-ray activity of
1481: ultracool dwarfs is generally weaker than in early type stars, and in
1482: addition appears to {\it decrease} at higher rotation velocity.
1483: This serves as possible evidence for super-saturation. The shaded
1484: region marks the rotation period below which the corotation radius is
1485: smaller than the coronal radius (assumed to extend $\sim R_*$ above
1486: the stellar surface), leading to possible stripping of coronal
1487: material by centrifugal ejection.
1488: \label{fig:lxrot}}
1489: \end{figure}
1490:
1491:
1492: \clearpage
1493: \begin{figure}
1494: %\epsscale{0.9}
1495: %\plotone{lrlbol_vs_rot.ps}
1496: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=6.8in]{fig11.ps}
1497: %\centerline{\psfig{file=fig11.ps,width=6.0in}}
1498: \caption{Ratio of radio to bolometric luminosity as a function of
1499: rotation period ({\it Left}) and rotation velocity ({\it Right}).
1500: Data are from \citet{wjk89}, \citet{ber02}, \citet{ber06} and
1501: references therein, and this paper. There is an apparent
1502: correlation between radio activity and rotation, with no clear
1503: sign of saturation or super-saturation.
1504: \label{fig:lrrot}}
1505: \end{figure}
1506:
1507:
1508: \clearpage
1509: \begin{figure}
1510: %\epsscale{0.9}
1511: %\plotone{rot_vs_gb.ps}
1512: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig12.ps,width=6.0in}}
1513: \caption{Ratio of radio to X-ray luminosity normalized to the typical
1514: value observed in F--M6 stars ($L_{\rm \nu,R}/L_X\approx 10^{-15.5}$;
1515: Figure~\ref{fig:gb}) as a function of rotation velocity. Shown are
1516: objects with spectral type $>{\rm M7}$. It appears that the most
1517: severe violators of the radio/X-ray correlation are those with the
1518: highest rotation velocity.
1519: \label{fig:bgrot}}
1520: \end{figure}
1521:
1522:
1523: \end{document}
1524: