1: % Minor changes for future revisions?:
2: % Consistent use of
3: % Si\,IV : perhaps Si\,{\sc IV} would be better
4: % km~s$^{-1}$
5: % etc.
6: %
7: % Revisions by Bram Boroson, 7/3/07
8: %
9: % Now makes explicit which graphs should be inserted where
10: % Now makes ending less defensive
11: % Now allows for larger mass of compact object in discussion
12: % of Bondi-Hoyle
13: % Changing references to escape probability method to refer to
14: % SEI method
15: %
16: % Revisions by Bram Boroson, 6/28/07
17: % Now includes contour plots of Si IV,
18: % demonstration of how P Cygni lines change
19: % in response to a flare
20: %
21: % Revisions by Bram Boroson, 6/17/07
22: % Reference to parallel paper by Gies et al.
23: %
24: % Revisions by Bram Boroson, 6/12/07
25: % Discussion of Bondi-Hoyle-Littleton accretion
26: %
27: % Revisions by Bram Boroson, 5/22/07
28: % Filling in tables with best-fit values
29: %
30: % Revisions by Bram Boroson, 5/29/07
31: % Making text references to table parameters consistent
32: %
33: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
34: %%
35: %% Modified 03 Jan 01
36: %%
37: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
38: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
39:
40: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
41: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
42: %% any data that comes before this command.
43:
44: %% The command below calls the preprint style
45: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
46: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
47: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
48:
49: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
50:
51: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
52:
53: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
54:
55: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
56: \def\etal {{\it et~al.}}
57: \def\msun {M_{\odot}}
58: \def\rsun {R_{\odot}}
59: \def\mdot {\dot M}
60:
61: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
62:
63: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
64: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
65: %% the \begin{document} command.
66: %%
67: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
68: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
69: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
70: %% for information.
71: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
72: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
73:
74: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
75:
76: \slugcomment{Submitted to Astrophysical Journal}
77:
78: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
79: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
80: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
81: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
82: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
83: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
84:
85: \shorttitle{Cygnus X-1}
86: \shortauthors{Vrtilek et al.}
87:
88: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
89: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
90:
91: \begin{document}
92:
93: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
94: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
95: %% you desire.
96:
97: \title{
98: Ultraviolet observations of the X-ray photoionized wind of
99: Cygnus X-1 during X-ray soft/high state\altaffilmark{1}}
100:
101: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble
102: Space Telescope obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute,
103: which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research
104: in Astronomy, Incorporated, under NASA contract NAS5-26555.
105: These observations are associated with programs GO-9646 and GO-9840.}
106:
107: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
108: %% author and affiliation information.
109: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
110: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
111: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
112: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
113:
114: \author{S. D. Vrtilek$^2$, B.S. Boroson$^2$, A. Hunacek$^3$, D. Gies$^4$, C. T. Bolton$^5$}
115: \affil{$^1$Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
116: 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, $^2$Department of Physics, MIT,
117: 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, $^3$Center for High
118: Angular Resolution Astronomy, Department of Physics and
119: Astronomy, Georgia State University, P. O. Box 4106,
120: Atlanta, GA 30302-4106, $^4$ David Dunlap Observatory, University of Toronto, P.O. Box 360,
121: Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4C 4Y6; Canada}
122: \email{svrtilek@cfa.harvard.edu}
123:
124:
125: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
126: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
127: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
128: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
129: %% editorial office after submission.
130:
131: \begin{abstract}
132: High-resolution ultraviolet observations of the black hole X-ray binary
133: Cygnus X-1 were obtained using the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph
134: on the Hubble Space Telescope. Observations were taken at two epochs
135: roughly one year apart; orbital phase ranges around $\phi_{orb}$ = 0 and
136: 0.5 were covered at each epoch.
137: We detect P Cygni line features from high (N~V, C~IV, Si~IV)
138: and absorption lines from low
139: (Si~II, C~II)
140: ionization state material.
141: We analyze the characteristics of a
142: selection of P Cygni profiles and note, in particular, a strong dependence
143: on orbital phase for the high ionization material: the profiles show
144: strong, broad absorption components when the X-ray
145: source is behind the companion star and noticeably weaker absorption when
146: the X-ray source is between us and the companion star.
147:
148: We fit the P~Cygni profiles using the Sobolev with Exact
149: Integration
150: method applied to a spherically symmetric stellar wind subject to
151: X-ray photoionization from the black hole. Of the wind-formed lines, the
152: Si\,IV doublet provides
153: the most reliable estimates of the parameters of the wind and X-ray
154: illumination. The velocity $v$ increases with radius $r$ (normalized to
155: the stellar radius) according to $v=v_\infty(1-r_\star/r)^\beta$, with
156: $\beta\approx0.75$ and $v_\infty\approx1420$~km~s$^{-1}$.
157: The microturbulent velocity was $\approx160$~km~s$^{-1}$.
158: Our fit implies a ratio of X-ray luminosity (in units of
159: 10$^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$) to wind mass-loss rate
160: (in units of 10$^{-6} \msun~yr^{-1}$) of L$_{X,38}/\dot M_{-6}
161: \approx 0.33$, measured at
162: $\dot M_{-6}$ = 4.8.
163: The lines from the lower ionization species and the
164: He~II~$\lambda$1640 absorption are consistent with formation in the
165: photosphere of the
166: normal companion.
167:
168: Our models determine parameters that may be used to estimate the accretion
169: rate onto the black hole and independently predict the X-ray luminosity.
170: Our predicted L$_x$ matches that determined by contemporaneous RXTE ASM
171: remarkably well, but is a factor of 3 lower than the rate according to
172: Bondi-Hoyle-Littleton spherical wind accretion. We suggest that some of the
173: energy of accretion may go into powering a jet.
174:
175: \end{abstract}
176:
177: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
178: %% example has been keyed in apj style. See the instructions to authors
179: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
180: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
181:
182: \keywords{black holes binaries:
183: individual (Cyg X-1)---ultraviolet: stars---X-rays: winds}
184:
185: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
186: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
187: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
188: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
189: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
190: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
191: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
192: %% each reference.
193:
194: \section{Introduction}
195:
196:
197: Cygnus X-1, the only Galactic X-ray binary with a high mass companion
198: where existing
199: observations require a black hole for the compact object, was first
200: discovered in 1962
201: (Cowley 1992, and references therein).
202: In addition to the well-established high mass function found
203: with optical observations, the
204: X-ray data of Cyg X-1
205: display transitions from a high flux state in the 2-10 keV band
206: (where a strong soft component
207: dominates) to a low flux state (where the soft
208: component largely disappears)
209: that has been interpreted as characteristic of black hole systems.
210: It also displays highly broadened Fe K$\alpha$ emission (Miller~\etal~2002)
211: that is consistent
212: with models for X-ray reflection in Galactic black holes and AGNs. The
213: broad-line shape of Fe K$\alpha$ may be caused by
214: Doppler shifts and the gravitational field of the black hole.
215:
216: The Cyg X-1 system consists of a supergiant star and a compact object.
217: The mass of the compact object is in the range
218: 7-20 $\msun$ (Shaposhnikov \& Titarchuk 2007; Ziolkowski 2005)
219: the mass of the
220: visible star is in the range
221: 18-40$\msun$ (Ziolkowski 2005; Tarasov~\etal~2003; Brocksopp~\etal~1999).
222: The binary orbital period
223: is 5.6 days (Bolton 1972).
224: Miller~\etal~(2005) using Chandra/HETG observations
225: find that the X-ray spectrum of Cygnus X-1 at phase 0.76 is
226: dominated by absorption lines, in strong contrast to
227: spectra of other HMXBs such as Vela X-1 and Cen X-3.
228: Schulz~\etal~(2002) report marginal evidence for ionized
229: Fe transitions with P-Cygni
230: type profiles at orbital phase 0.93 whereas Marshall~\etal~(2001) find
231: no evidence for such line profiles at phase 0.84.
232: Miller~\etal~(2005)
233: suggest that, while the spectra of Cen X-3 can be modelled
234: by a spherically-symmetric wind (Wojdowski~\etal~2003), the X-ray
235: absorption spectrum of
236: Cyg X-1 requires dense material preferentially along the line of
237: sight; considered together, the Chandra spectra provide
238: evidence in X-rays for a focused wind in Cygnus X-1.
239:
240: Our Space Telescope Imaging Spectrometer (STIS) observations of Cygnus X-1
241: were obtained when Cyg X-1 was in its soft/high X-ray state and
242: show line profiles that change
243: significantly between orbital phases 0.0 and 0.5.
244: We interpret these changes in terms of models that
245: include the effects of X-ray photoionization
246: on the stellar wind of the normal companion or of a focused wind.
247: We test our model predictions with contemporaneous X-ray observations.
248: The observations and analysis are described in Section 2,
249: our models of the line profiles are presented in Section 3, and
250: our interpretation and conclusions are discussed in Section 4.
251: \\
252:
253: \section{Observations and Analysis}
254:
255: Cyg X-1 was observed with the STIS on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST)
256: when the X-ray source was behind the normal star and half an
257: orbit later on two separate epochs roughly one year apart.
258: Figure \ref{rxtehst} shows the times of our observations in comparison with
259: the 1 day--averaged light curves obtained from the all-sky monitor
260: on the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer (RXTE; Levine~\etal~1996).
261: The RXTE light
262: curves show that the HST observations were taken when the binary was at
263: relatively high X-ray flux which is associated with the X-ray soft/high
264: state.
265:
266: The STIS instrument design and in-orbit performance have been described
267: by Woodgate et al. (1998) and Kimble et al. (1998). The E140M grating
268: provided a resolving power of 6 km s$^{-1}$ in the wavelength range
269: 1150--1740$\AA$.
270: The data were processed through the standard HST/STIS
271: pipeline and further reduced using the STSDAS routines available through IRAF.
272:
273: Table 1 lists the HST observation identifier,
274: along with
275: the start dates, exposure length,
276: and orbital phase at the start of each observation. Phases were calculated using
277: an ephemeris that places phase zero at JD2441874.707$\pm$0.009,
278: with an orbital period of
279: 5.599829$\pm$0.000016 (Brocksopp~\etal, 1999).
280: Phase zero corresponds to
281: supergiant inferior conjunction.
282:
283: Figure \ref{cygx1hstall} shows the eight datasets in increasing orbital
284: phase order regardless of epoch. These data are not smoothed and not
285: corrected for reddening and no instrumental quality control has been
286: applied (i.e., removal of hot pixels, etc).
287: It is clear that the changes in high ionization
288: material line profiles are orbital
289: phase dependent, with stronger absorption near orbital phase 0.0.
290: The close-ups of the N~V, Si~IV, and C~IV regions in Figure 3 demonstrate
291: that this orbital phase dependence persists for observations taken a
292: year apart.
293:
294:
295: Figure \ref{cygx1lines} shows a spectrum taken at orbital phase 0.96,
296: with the stronger spectral lines labeled. Table 2 lists the
297: features identified using the program SpecView
298: \footnote{$http://www.stsci.edu/resources/software\_hardware/specview$}
299: and tables supplied by NIST
300: \footnote{$http://www.physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Handbook/index.html$}.
301: We note that some of the lines
302: are saturated and several are blended with other features.
303: Figures \ref{cygx1nv}-\ref{cygx1heii} show profiles of both
304: high (N~V, C~IV, Si~IV) and
305: low (Si~II, C~II) ionization state material in each of
306: two orbital phases at two epochs.
307: The low ionization material and He~II are likely to be from the stellar
308: surface rather than the wind.
309: \\
310:
311:
312: \section{Line Profile Models}
313: We have implemented a model that uses the Sobolev method with Exact
314: Integration (SEI; Lamers~\etal~1987) to predict the P Cygni line profiles
315: from a wind ionized by an embedded X-ray source. The details of the wind
316: ionization are identical to those given by Boroson~\etal~(1999; equations
317: 11-16). The SEI method extends the escape probability method of McCray
318: \etal~(1984) by including integration along the line of sight. This allows
319: scattering from a range of points around the ``resonant point", as will
320: result when there is small-scale turbulence (microturbulence). The SEI
321: method also allows a more exact treatment of interaction between P~Cygni
322: line doublet components.
323:
324: We take note of a complementary analysis of the same STIS observations by
325: Gies~\etal~(2007). Gies~\etal~also use the SEI method to
326: analyze the wind, but assume that the ions that form the P~Cygni lines
327: are {\it only} present in the region of the wind in which the primary
328: blocks X-ray ionization from the black hole.
329:
330: Following McCray \etal~(1984), we compute the local ionization fraction
331: by combining ambient photoionization (from shocks in the wind, etc.)
332: that would be present in an isolated O~star with the ionization rate
333: computed using the XSTAR code, assuming a local ionization parameter
334: $\xi=L_x/n r_x^2$ (with X-ray luminosity $L_x$, number density $n$, and
335: distance from the black hole $r_x$). We use the X-ray spectrum shape
336: modeled by Wilms~\etal~(2006) for observations taken near our HST
337: observations.
338: Where the O~star shadows the wind
339: from X-ray photoionization by the black hole, we assume only the ambient
340: photoionization rate, which gives optical depths in the line
341: parameterized by $\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_2$, or $\tau_{wind}$, often used
342: for winds of isolated OB stars (Lamers~\etal~1987). The XSTAR ionization
343: code is described in Bautista \&\ Kallman (2001).
344:
345: We fit the model, which includes adjustable free parameters, to the
346: spectra at phases near both superior and inferior conjunction of the
347: black hole. Thus, the fits are sensitive to both the blue-shifted
348: absorption trough and the red-shifted emission peak. Although the lines
349: are saturated, the optical depths of the lines in the absence of X-ray
350: photoionization still affect the resultant fits.
351:
352: We attribute the sharp features (velocity widths of order 30 km~s$^{-1}$)
353: to interstellar absorption lines, the narrow absorption lines (widths of
354: 94 km~s$^{-1}$) originate on the stellar photosphere, and the broadest
355: features come from the wind (terminal velocity from our model of 1420
356: km~s$^{-1}$). In addition, when we model the N\,V lines, we incorporate
357: narrow interstellar Mg\,II lines at $1239.925,1240.397$\AA. The SEI
358: calculation of the line profiles near the rest velocity can require
359: integration to start extremely close to the stellar surface in order to
360: agree with the results of comoving frame methods (Lamers~\etal~1987).
361: Hence we expect the P~Cygni line fits to be least reliable near the rest
362: wavelengths of the lines.
363:
364: We assumed fixed values for parameters describing the O~star and orbit as
365: given in Table 3.
366: Our results are not sensitive to the abundance values
367: used, except for the determination of $\dot{M}$.
368: The parameters describing the wind and X-ray
369: illumination are allowed to vary until a $\chi^2$ minimum is found through
370: the downhill simplex (``amoeba") method of Nelder \& Mead (1965).
371: The errors we quote are the rms variation in the final simplex, in which
372: the $\chi^2_\nu$ varies by less than 1\%. There may be other local
373: $\chi^2$ minima and some of the parameters may interact. For example,
374: different values of $\tau_{\rm wind}$, $\alpha_1$, $\alpha_2$ may produce
375: similar functions of optical depth versus radius in the wind.
376:
377: The Si\,IV doublet is generally the most reliable indicator of wind
378: behavior in stars of this spectral type (Lamers~\etal~1999), as the N\,V
379: and C\,IV lines are saturated. We show that the lines can be fit using a
380: wind acceleration law that is standard for OB stars:
381: $v=v_\infty(1-1/r)^{\beta}$, with $r$ the radius in the wind normalized to
382: the stellar radius, and $v_\infty$ and $\beta$ free parameters of our
383: model. (We note that our code used $v=0.01 v_\infty + 0.99*v_\infty(1-1/r)^{\beta}$ in
384: order to avoid singularities). The best-fit value of $\beta$ is $\approx0.75$, which is standard
385: for OB star winds. The best-fit value of $v_\infty\approx1420$~km~s$^{-1}$
386: is lower than the 2300~km~s$^{-1}$ found by Davis \& Hartmann (1983).
387: It is possible that the higher terminal velocity found
388: by Davis \& Hartmann was due to line blending on the blue side
389: of the feature that was hard to discern in the weak IUE spectrum.
390: We also note that Davis \& Hartmann used IUE data of mostly C~IV to determine
391: their terminal velocity whereas we use STIS data of Si~IV. Also we allow
392: for microturbulence.
393: For the C\,IV lines we fix $\beta$ to that found for the Si\,IV fits, and
394: then for N\,V, which has a lower signal to noise ratio, we fix also
395: $v_\infty$. The best-fit parameters for the fits shown in
396: Figures \ref{nvmod}-\ref{civmod} are given in Table 4.
397:
398: \section{Accretion Rate
399: and X-ray Luminosity}
400:
401: \subsection{Mass Accretion Rate}
402: The fits to the changing P~Cygni lines by a model of X-ray ionization
403: within a spherically symmetric wind determine parameters that may be
404: used to estimate the accretion rate onto the black hole. For accretion
405: purely through capture of stellar wind material, Bondi \&\ Hoyle (1944)
406: show that the rate at which mass is captured from a stellar wind by a
407: compact object ($\dot M_{\rm capture}$) is given by
408: \begin{equation}
409: \dot M_{\rm capture}=\frac{4 \pi G^2 M_{\rm bh}^2 \rho}{V_{\rm rel}^3}
410: \end{equation}
411: where $G$ is the gravitational constant, $M_{\rm bh}$ is the mass of the
412: compact
413: object, $\rho$ is the density of the undisturbed gas flow near the compact
414: object, and $V_{\rm rel}=(v_{\rm wind}^2+v_{\rm orbit}^2)^{1/2}$ is the
415: velocity of the wind relative to the compact object, which has velocity
416: $v_{\rm orbit}=2\pi R/P$ for orbital radius $R$ and period $P$ in a wind
417: we take to have $v_{\rm
418: wind}=v_\infty(1-R_*/R)^\beta$. From mass conservation we have
419: \begin{equation}
420: \rho=\frac{\dot{M}}{4 \pi R^2 v_{\rm wind}}
421: \end{equation}
422:
423: We can relate $\dot M_{\rm capture}$ to the X-ray luminosity if we assume
424: accretion releases energy with some efficiency $e\approx0.1$, so that
425: $L_x=e \dot M_{\rm capture} c^2$. For disk accretion, we expect $e=0.057$
426: for a nonrotating black hole and $e=0.42$ for a maximally rotating black
427: hole (Shapiro \&\ Teukolsky 1983, p. 429).
428:
429: Thus our best-fit values for $\dot{M}$, $\beta$, and $v_{\infty}$
430: provide an independent prediction of $L_x$. This prediction is based on
431: the idealization that the accretion proceeds entirely through the
432: gravitational capture of stellar wind material. The prediction also
433: depends on other uncertain parameters ($e$, $M_{\rm bh}$). Our
434: estimate, $L_x\approx8\times10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ depends sensitively on
435: the velocity of the stellar wind near the black hole. As $v_\infty$
436: varies from $1000$ to $2000$~km~s$^{-1}$, $L_x$ goes from
437: 3$\times10^{37}$ to $3\times10^{38}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.
438:
439: The model dependence on the properties of the
440: X-ray ionized region of the wind also leads to a determination
441: of
442: $L_x/\dot{M}$ and $\dot{M}$, which together give
443: $L_x=1.6\times10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ and
444: $\dot M = 4.8\times10^{-6}\msun~yr^{-1}$ in the fit to the Si\,IV
445: lines. The C\,IV and N\,V lines, which we expect to be less reliable,
446: give $L_x=1.8\times10^{38}$ and $L_x=8.0\times10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$,
447: respectively.
448:
449: We can compare these models for the X-ray luminosity with the observed
450: contemporaneous RXTE ASM count rate, $\approx80$~counts~s$^{-1}$
451: (Figure~\ref{rxtehst}). Schulz et al. (2002) observed Cygnus X-1 with
452: {\it Chandra} during a period in which the RXTE ASM showed flares. An
453: upper estimate for the ASM count rate during their observation,
454: $\approx50$~cts~s$^{-1}$, together with their measure of the 0.5-10 keV
455: X-ray luminosity as 1.6$\times10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ (for a distance of
456: 2.5 kpc), would imply an X-ray luminosity of $\ge
457: 2.6\times10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ during the STIS observations.
458:
459: \subsection{X-ray Luminosity}
460:
461: One further uncertainty in our model of the wind is that we assume a
462: constant X-ray luminosity whereas the X-rays from Cygnus X-1 often flare
463: and display a complex power spectrum. The saturated P~Cygni lines may
464: respond nonlinearly to flares, although light travel times may diminish
465: the response. In Figures~\ref{changlum1} and \ref{changlum2}, we
466: show how the P~Cygni lines may change in our model in response to a
467: change in X-ray luminosity. If the change were linear, the graph of the
468: model with best-fit value of $L_{\rm x}$ would be identical to the
469: average of the other two graphs.
470: Whereas we see a clear asymmetry.
471:
472: In Figures \ref{conplot1}, \ref{conplot2}, and
473: \ref{conplot3}, we show contours of constant values of
474: Log$_{10}(a_{\rm Si\,IV})$, where $a_{\rm Si\,IV}$ is the fraction of Si that is
475: in the form Si\,{\sc IV}. The lines extending radially from the center
476: of the O~star show the lines of sight at $\phi=0.55$ (extending to the
477: bottom) and $\phi=0.96$ (extending to the top), adjusted for orbital
478: inclination $i$ by the use of an effective phase $\phi^\prime$ such that
479: $\cos 2 \pi \phi^{\prime}=\cos 2 \pi \phi \sin i$.
480:
481:
482: Figures \ref{conplot1} through \ref{conplot3} show that the
483: black hole is very effective at removing the Si\,{\sc IV} ion from the
484: wind. However, it is difficult to see intuitively the optical depth in
485: the wind, given the ion fraction.
486: Therefore, we show in Figures~\ref{contau1} through
487: \ref{contau3} the radial optical depths of Si\,{\sc IV} in the wind,
488: given the same three X-ray luminosities, $L_x=(1/3, 1, 5/3)\times
489: 1.6\times 10^{37}$ erg~s$^{-1}$, with other parameters fixed to the
490: best-fit values. From these plots it should be apparent that the global
491: ionization in the wind is sensitive to the X-ray luminosity. This is
492: particularly true at the low end of the X-ray luminosity range. In that
493: case, a large region outside of the X-ray shadow remains at an optical depth
494: that causes noticable signatures in the line profiles, in spite of
495: X-rays from the black hole.
496:
497:
498: In these figures, we use our parameterization of the background optical
499: depth in terms of $\alpha_1$, $\alpha_2$, and $\tau_{\rm wind}$ to
500: determine the optical depth in the shadow region. The resulting contours
501: of constant optical depth are ellipsoidal, compacted towards the compact
502: object.
503:
504: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
505:
506: The Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph on Hubble provides the highest
507: resolution ultraviolet spectra taken of Cyg X-1 to date. Observations
508: were taken at two epochs roughly a year apart: at each epoch
509: orbital phases when the compact object is behind the stellar
510: companion and when
511: the compact object is in front of the companion star were covered.
512: We find P~Cygni profiles from high ionization (N\,V, C\,IV, Si\,IV) gas.
513: For both epochs the P~Cygni profiles
514: show significantly less absorption at phases when the compact object
515: is in the line of sight. RXTE observations indicate that the X-ray flux
516: of the system was at a similar level at each epoch. The observed
517: changes can be attributed entirely to orbital effects. We interpret
518: this to mean that X-rays from the compact object photoionize the
519: wind from the massive companion
520: resulting in reduced absorption by the wind material.
521:
522: P Cygni profiles of selected species are consistent with the
523: Hatchett-McCray effect, in which X-rays from the compact object
524: photoionize the stellar wind from the companion star, thereby reducing
525: absorption. This effect also appears in UV observations of LMC X-4 and SMC
526: X-1 (Boroson et al. 1999; Vrtilek et al. 1997; Treves et al. 1980).
527: SEI models can fit the observed P Cygni profiles and
528: provide measurements of the stellar wind parameters. The Si\,IV fits are
529: the most reliable and we use them to determine L$_x/\dot{M} =4.8 \pm0.3
530: \times 10^{42}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ M$_{\odot}^{-1}$ yr, where L$_{X}$ is
531: the X-ray luminosity and $\dot{M}$ is the mass-loss rate of the star. The
532: results from the C\,IV and N\,V lines are less reliable because they are
533: saturated and the
534: C\,IV fit does not match the data well. For these fits we fixed the
535: terminal velocity $\nu_{\infty}$ and the microturbulent velocity to those
536: given by our fits to Si\,IV.
537:
538: The best fit values for the optical depth in the ambient wind are high
539: ($\ge 10$). Once saturated, the OB star wind lines hardly change with
540: large optical depth, but when much of the wind is ionized by the black
541: hole, the ion fraction in the remaining regions can have a significant
542: effect on the line profile.
543:
544: The reduced absorption when the compact object is in the line of sight
545: is inconsistent with focusing of
546: the wind toward the compact object, as has been suggested by several
547: authors (e.g, Sowers~\etal~1998; Tarasov~\etal~2003; Miller~\etal~2005),
548: as then we would expect more absorbers in the line-of-sight and hence
549: increased P Cygni absorption.
550: Also, IUE observations taken at 8 orbital phases show a continuous
551: variation in the P Cygni profiles with maximum absorption at phase 0.0
552: and minimum at 0.5 (Treves~\etal~1980; van Loon~\etal~2001).
553: Further high spectral resolution ultraviolet observations of Cyg X-1 will
554: be necessary to
555: study the behavior of the P Cygni lines during different
556: X-ray states.
557:
558: In an analysis of 2 years of RXTE/ASM data
559: Wen~\etal~(1999) found
560: the 5.6 day orbital period of Cyg X-1 during the X-ray low/hard state,
561: but no evidence
562: of the orbital period during the high/soft state.
563: Wen \etal~suggest that absorption of X-rays by a stellar wind from the
564: companion star can reproduce the observed X-ray orbital modulations in
565: the hard state: The lack of modulation in the soft state could be due
566: either to a reduction of the wind density during the soft state or to
567: partial covering of a central hard X-ray emitting region by an
568: accretion stream.
569: Gies~\etal~(2003) used the results of a four year spectroscopic monitoring
570: program of the H$\alpha$ emission strength of
571: HDE226868, the normal companion to Cyg X-1, to argue that the
572: low/hard X-ray state occurs when there is a strong, fast wind and accretion
573: rate is low, while in the high/soft state a weaker, highly ionized
574: wind attains only a moderate velocity and the accretion rate increases.
575: The interpretations of both Wen~\etal~(1999) and Gies~\etal~(2003)
576: are inconsistent with the fact that the {\it total} X-ray luminosity
577: from 1.3-200 keV remains constant during both the X-ray soft and hard
578: states (Wen~\etal~1999): the designation of X-ray high or X-ray low
579: during these states is
580: only applicable
581: for the
582: 1.5-12 keV ASM
583: band.
584: Since the 1.3-200 keV X-ray luminosity is unchanged from the hard to
585: soft state,
586: fluctuations in the narrow ASM band cannot be due to reduction in
587: accretion,
588: or obscuration of the X-ray source; rather it is a physical change that
589: causes the dominant emission mechnism to switch from thermal to power-law.
590:
591: We note that the orbital modulation observed by Wen~\etal~in the hard
592: state ($\pm 1.6$ ASM cts/sec around the average) is less than the errors on
593: the counts during the soft state ($\pm 3$ ASM cts/sec);
594: we suggest that the quality of the RXTE ASM is not sufficient
595: to detect this low level orbital modulation during the soft state.
596: Ultraviolet observations clearly show
597: orbital modulation during both X-ray hard and soft states (Gies~\etal~2007).
598: Our wind models explain both the X-ray and ultraviolet flux during the
599: soft/high state. We need high spectral resolution ultraviolet observations
600: during the hard/low state to determine if there is a change in wind
601: density between states.
602:
603: Our determination of the mass-accretion rate can be considered as a
604: positive check on the Hatchett-McCray
605: models, as the Si\,IV line gave $L_x=1.6\times10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$, and
606: the model is subject to systematic uncertainties. However, this value of
607: $L_x$ is a factor of 3 lower than the best estimate of the accretion
608: rate according to Bondi-Hoyle-Littleton spherical wind accretion.
609: We suggest that some of the energy of accretion may go into powering the jet.
610:
611: Our test of the dependence of our results on X-ray luminosity
612: confirms the utility of our models and
613: demonstrates that the wind outside the shadow zone is still sensitive to
614: X-ray illumination, an arrangement which allows us to fit $L_{\rm x}$ as
615: a free parameter in our model.
616:
617: In future observations of the time-variability of the wind lines, the
618: light travel-time effects may be used to advantage, as the wind may act
619: as a ``low-pass filter" to the X-ray observations, with the filter
620: cutoff indicating the size of the ionized region (Kallman, McCray, \&\
621: Voit 1987).
622:
623: \acknowledgments
624: AH would like to acknowledge support from the
625: REU program NSF grant 9731923 awarded to SAO. DG would like to
626: acknowledge support provided by NASA
627: through a grant (GO-9840) from the Space
628: Telescope Science Institute, which is
629: operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy,
630: Incorporated, under NASA contract NAS5-26555. The X-ray results were
631: provided by the ASM/RXTE teams at MIT and at the RXTE SOF and GOF at
632: NASA's GSFC. The contour graphs of ion fraction benefitted from the
633: programming of Corey Casto, who helped increase the resolution of the
634: contours.
635:
636:
637: \begin{references}
638:
639: \reference{} Bautista, M.A., \&\ Kallman, T.R. 2001, ApJS, 134, 139
640:
641: \reference{} Bolton, C.T. 1972, Nature phys. Sci., 240, 124
642:
643: \reference{} Bondi, H., \&\ Hoyle, F. 1944, MNRAS, 104, 273
644:
645: \reference{} Boroson, B.S., Kallman, T., Vrtilek, S.D., McCray, R.,
646: \& Raymond, J. 1999, ApJ, 519, 191
647:
648: \reference{} Brocksopp, C.~\etal~1999, A\&A, 343, 861
649:
650: \reference{} Cowley, A. 1992, ARA\&A, 30, 287
651:
652: \reference{} Davis, R., \& Hartmann, L. 1983 ApJ, 270, 67
653:
654: \reference{} Friend, D.B., \& Cassinelli, J.P. 1986, ApJ, 303, 292
655:
656: \reference{} Gies, D.R., \& Bolton, C.T. 1986, ApJ, 304, 371
657:
658: \reference{} Gies, D.R.~\etal~2003, ApJ, 583, 424
659:
660: \reference{} Gies, D.R.~\etal~
661: 2007, ApJ, submitted
662:
663: \reference{} Kallman, T.R., McCray, R., \&\ Voit, G.M. 1987, ApJ, 317, 746
664:
665: \reference{} Kimble, R.A.,~\etal~1998, SPIE, 3356, 188
666:
667: \reference{} Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., Cerruti-Sola, M., \& Perinotto, M. 1987, ApJ, 314, 726
668:
669: \reference{} Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., Haser, S., de Koter, A., \& Leitherer, C. 1999, ApJ, 516, 872
670:
671: \reference{} Levine, A. M.~\etal~1996, ApJL, 469, L33
672:
673: \reference{} Marshall, H.L.~\etal~2001, in Proc. Joint Workshop on X-ray Emission from Accretion onto Black Holes, ed. T. Yagoob, \& J. Krolik, preprint (astro-ph/0111464).
674:
675: \reference{} McCray, R., Kallman, T.R., Castor, J.I., \& Olson, G.L. 1984, ApJ, 282, 245
676:
677: \reference{} Miller, J.M.~\etal~2002, ApJ, 578, 348
678:
679: \reference{} Miller, J.M.~\etal~2005, ApJ, 620, 398
680:
681: \reference{} Nelder, J.A, \& Mead, R. 1965, Computer Journal, 7, 308
682:
683: \reference{} Ninkov, Z., Walker, G.A.H., \& Yang, S. 1987, ApJ, 321, 425
684:
685: \reference{} Schulz, N.S., Cui, W., Canizares, C.R., Marshall, H.L.,
686: Lee, J.C., Miller, J.M., Lewin, W. H. G. 2002, ApJ, 565, 1141
687:
688: \reference{} Shapiro, S.L., \&\ Teukolsky, S.A. 1983, Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact Objects (New York: John Wiley \&\ Sons)
689:
690: \reference{} Shaposhnikov,N. \& Titarchuk, L. 2007 ApJ, 663, 445
691:
692: \reference{} Sowers, J.W., Gies, D.R., Bagnuolo, W.G., Shafter, A.W., Wiemker, R.,
693: \& Wiggs, M.S. 1998, ApJ, 506, 424
694:
695: \reference{} Tarasov, A.E., Brocksopp, C., \& Lyuty, V.M. 2003, A\&A, 402, 237
696:
697: \reference{} Treves, A.~\etal~1980, ApJ, 242, 1114
698:
699: \reference{} van Loon, J. Th., Kaper, L. \& Hammerschlag-Hensberge, G. 2001, A\&A, 375 498
700:
701: \reference{} Verner, D.A., Barthel, P.D., \& Tytler, D. 1994, A\&AS, 108, 287
702:
703: \reference{} Vrtilek, S.D. Boroson, B.S., Cheng, F.H., McCray, R., \& Nagase, F.
704: 1997, ApJ, 490, 377
705:
706: \reference{} Wen, L., Cui, W., Levine, A.M., \& Bradt, H.V. 1999, ApJ, 525, 986
707:
708: \reference{} Wilms, J., Nowak, M. A.,
709: Pottschmidt, K., Pooley, G. G., \& Fritz, S. 2006, A\&A, 447, 245
710:
711: \reference{} Wojdowski, P.S., Liedahl, D.A., Sako, M., Kahn, S.M., \& Paerels, F.
712: 2003, ApJ, 582, 959
713:
714: \reference{} Woodgate, B.E.,~\etal~1998, PASP, 110, 1183
715:
716: \reference{} Ziolkowski, J. 2005 MNRAS, 358, 851
717:
718: \end{references}
719:
720: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
721: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
722: %% command.
723:
724: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
725: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
726: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
727: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
728: %% text to be printed in the second.
729:
730: \clearpage
731:
732: \input{tab1.tex}
733: \input{tab2.tex}
734: \input{tab3.tex}
735: \input{tab4.tex}
736:
737: \clearpage
738:
739: \begin{figure}
740: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f1.ps}
741: \caption{One day averages of the flux observed from Cyg X-1
742: with the All-Sky Monitor on board the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer.
743: Arrows indicate the times of the HST/STIS observations.}
744: \label{rxtehst}
745: \end{figure}
746:
747: \begin{figure}
748: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f2.ps}
749: \caption{Unsmoothed, raw, HST/STIS data of Cygnus X-1 stacked with
750: increasing orbital phase, regardless of epoch.}
751: \label{cygx1hstall}
752: \end{figure}
753: \clearpage
754: \begin{figure}
755: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f3.ps}
756: \caption{
757: STIS observations of Cyg X-1
758: taken roughly a year apart
759: showing enhanced absorption at orbital phases when the X-ray source is
760: behind the companion star (phase 0.0; solid lines) and illustrating the stability of the absorption
761: change as a function of orbital phase. Narrow features are interstellar. Black
762: dashed lines indicate the laboratory wavelengths of transitions identified in Table 2.
763: }
764: \label{cygx1pcygni}
765: \end{figure}
766:
767: \begin{figure}
768: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f4.ps}
769: \caption{A Cyg X-1 STIS spectrum at phase 0.96 with major
770: spectral features indicated. The data have been smoothed with a
771: 7-point boxcar function to better show the features of interest.
772: Sharp features are interstellar absorption lines.}
773: \label{cygx1lines}
774: \end{figure}
775:
776: \begin{figure}
777: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f5.ps}
778: \caption{Spectra of the N~V line at two different orbital phases and two diferent
779: epochs. The dashed lines indicate the laboratory wavelengths for transitions
780: listed in Table 2.}
781: \label{cygx1nv}
782: \end{figure}
783:
784: \begin{figure}
785: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f6.ps}
786: \caption{As in figure \ref{cygx1nv} for Si~II}
787: \label{cygx1siii}
788: \end{figure}
789:
790: \begin{figure}
791: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f7.ps}
792: \caption{As in figure \ref{cygx1nv} for C~II}
793: \label{cygx1cii}
794: \end{figure}
795:
796: \clearpage
797:
798: \begin{figure}
799: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f8.ps}
800: \caption{As in figure \ref{cygx1nv} for Si~IV}
801: \label{cygx1siiv}
802: \end{figure}
803:
804: \begin{figure}
805: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f9.ps}
806: \caption{As in figure \ref{cygx1nv} for C~IV}
807: \label{cygx1civ}
808: \end{figure}
809:
810: \begin{figure}
811: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f10.ps}
812: \caption{As in figure \ref{cygx1nv} for HeII}
813: \label{cygx1heii}
814: \end{figure}
815:
816: \clearpage
817:
818: \begin{figure}
819: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f11.ps}
820: \caption{Closeup of Cyg X-1 N~V line profiles.
821: The blue line depicts a model computed using the SEI
822: method (Lamers, Cerruti-Sola, \& Perinotto 1987),
823: using a wind
824: velocity law given by $v_\infty~(1-1/r)^{\beta}$.}
825: \label{nvmod}
826: \end{figure}
827:
828: \begin{figure}
829: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f12.ps}
830: \caption{As in Fig. \ref{nvmod} for Si~IV.}
831: \label{siivmod}
832: \end{figure}
833:
834: \clearpage
835:
836: \begin{figure}
837: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f13.ps}
838: \caption{As in Fig. \ref{nvmod} for C~IV.}
839: \label{civmod}
840: \end{figure}
841:
842: \begin{figure}
843: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f14.ps}
844: \caption{The response of the wind-formed P~Cygni lines to X-ray
845: luminosities of $1/3 L_x$, $L_x$, and $5/3 L_x$
846: (dotted, bold, and regular thickness, respectively).
847: All other parameters are as assumed for the best fit to the Si~IV lines.
848: This figure shows the model at $\phi$=0.55 and ignores the
849: effects of light travel-time, which
850: would tend to decrease the change in the line with
851: changing X-ray luminosity.}
852: \label{changlum1}
853: \end{figure}
854:
855: \begin{figure}
856: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f15.ps}
857: \caption{The response of the wind-formed P~Cygni lines to X-ray
858: luminosities of $1/3 L_x$, $L_x$, and $5/3 L_x$
859: (dotted, bold, and regular thickness, respectively). All other
860: parameters are as assumed for the best fit to the Si~IV lines. This
861: figure shows the model at $\phi$=0.96 and ignores the effects of light
862: travel-time, which would tend to decrease the change in the line with
863: changing X-ray luminosity.}
864: \label{changlum2}
865: \end{figure}
866:
867: \clearpage
868:
869: \begin{figure}
870: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f16.ps}
871: \vspace{-3in}
872: \caption{Contours of Log$_{10}$ of Si~{\sc IV} abundance outside of
873: the shadow region. We assume the X-ray luminosity is
874: $(1/3)1.6\times10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$, and that all other parameters have their
875: best-fit values. We include only ionization from the black hole and not
876: the ambient ionization of the wind.
877: The circle represents the supergiant
878: and the X the position of the compact source.}
879: \label{conplot1}
880: \end{figure}
881:
882: \begin{figure}
883: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f17.ps}
884: \vspace{-3in}
885: \caption{Contours of Log$_{10}$ of Si\,{\sc IV} abundance outside of
886: the shadow region. We assume the X-ray luminosity is
887: $1.6\times10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$, and that all other parameters have
888: their best-fit values. We include only ionization from the black hole
889: and not the ambient ionization of the wind.}
890: \label{conplot2}
891: \end{figure}
892:
893: \begin{figure}
894: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f18.ps}
895: \vspace{-3in}
896: \caption{Contours of Log$_{10}$ of Si\,{\sc IV} abundance outside of
897: the shadow region. We assume the X-ray luminosity is
898: $(5/3)1.6\times10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$, and that all other parameters have their
899: best-fit values. We include only ionization from the black hole and not
900: the ambient ionization of the wind.}
901: \label{conplot3}
902: \end{figure}
903:
904: \clearpage
905:
906: \begin{figure}
907: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f19.ps}
908: \vspace{-3in}
909: \caption{Contours of radial optical depth $\tau$, given
910: the X-ray luminosity is
911: $(1/3)1.6\times10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.}
912: \label{contau1}
913: \end{figure}
914:
915: \begin{figure}
916: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f20.ps}
917: \vspace{-3in}
918: \caption{Contours of radial optical depth $\tau$, given
919: the X-ray luminosity is
920: $1.6\times10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.}
921: \label{contau2}
922: \end{figure}
923:
924: \begin{figure}
925: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f21.ps}
926: \vspace{-3in}
927: \caption{Contours of radial optical depth $\tau$, given
928: the X-ray luminosity is
929: $(1/3)1.6\times10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.}
930: \label{contau3}
931: \end{figure}
932:
933: \end{document}
934: