1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{}
58: \shortauthors{de Mello et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{Searching for Star Formation Outside Galaxies: Multiwavelength Analysis of the Intragroup Medium of HCG100}
70:
71:
72: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
73: %% author and affiliation information.
74: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
75: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
76: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
77: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
78:
79: \author{D. F. de Mello\altaffilmark{1,2,3} }
80:
81: \author{S. Torres-Flores\altaffilmark{4}, \& C. Mendes de Oliveira\altaffilmark{4}}
82:
83: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
84: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
85: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
86: %% affiliation.
87:
88: \altaffiltext{1}{Observational Cosmology Laboratory, Code 665, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD
89: 20771}
90: \altaffiltext{2}{Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064}
91:
92: \altaffiltext{3}{Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218}
93:
94: \altaffiltext{4}{Universidade de S\~ao Paulo, Instituto de Astronomia, Geof\' isica e Ci\^encias Atmosf\'ericas, Departamento de
95: astronomia, S\~ao Paulo, Brazil}
96:
97: %%\altaffiltext{4}{C.N.R.S., Marseille France DOUBLE CHECK}
98: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
99: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
100: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
101: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
102: %% editorial office after submission.
103:
104: \begin{abstract}
105:
106: We used multiwavelength data (H{\sc i}, FUV, NUV, R) to search for evidence
107: of star formation in the intragroup medium of the Hickson Compact Group 100.
108: We find that young star-forming regions are located in the intergalactic H{\sc i} clouds of the
109: compact group which extend to over 130 kpc away from the main galaxies. A tidal dwarf galaxy candidate
110: is located in the densest region of the H{\sc i} tail, 61 kpc from the brightest group member and its age is
111: estimated to be only 3.3 Myr. Fifteen other intragroup H{\sc ii} regions and TDG candidates are detected in the GALEX FUV image and within a field
112: 10$'$$\times$10$'$ encompassing the H{\sc i} tail. They have ages $<$200 Myr,
113: H{\sc i} masses of 10$^{9.2-10.4}$ M$_{\odot}$,
114: 0.001$<$ SFR $<$0.01 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$, and stellar masses 10$^{4.3}$--10$^{6.5}$ M$_{\odot}$. The H{\sc i} clouds to
115: which many of them are associated have column densities about one order
116: of magnitude lower than N(H{\sc i})$\sim$10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$.
117:
118:
119: \end{abstract}
120:
121: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
122: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
123: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
124: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
125:
126: \keywords{groups of galaxies: general --- compact groups of galaxies: individual(HCG100)}
127:
128: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
129: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
130: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
131: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
132: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
133: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
134: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
135: %% each reference.
136:
137:
138: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
139: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
140: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
141: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
142: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
143: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
144: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
145: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
146: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
147: %%
148: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
149: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
150: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
151: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
152:
153: \section{Introduction}
154:
155: The environment of galaxies play an important role on determining their overall properties.
156: One of the most interesting environmental effects is seen in interacting systems which contain
157: stripped H{\sc i} gas in the intragroup/intergalactic medium, instead of around galaxies.
158: Three independent studies, Mendes de Oliveira et al. (2004, for the
159: Stephan's Quintet), Mendes de Oliveira et al. (2006, for HCG 31), Ryan-Weber et al. (2004, for NGC 1533, HCG 16, ESO
160: 149-G003) and Oosterloo et al. (2004, for the loose group around NGC 1490) have surveyed systems
161: with H{\sc i} intergalactic clouds and
162: have shown that these are associated with actively star forming
163: regions, the so-called {\it intergalactic H{\sc ii} regions}. These objects seem to
164: be similar to the H{\sc ii} regions in our Milky Way, but are located
165: in the intragroup medium and have high metallicities (close
166: to solar in most cases). The fate of these types of objects and their importance in galaxy
167: formation and evolution, enrichment of the intergalactic medium and
168: globular cluster formation is still debatable. In order to better address these issues, we
169: embarked on a multiwavelength analysis of the environment of interacting systems and present here
170: the results based on FUV, NUV, optical, and H{\sc i} data of a Hickson compact group, HCG100.
171:
172: The last group in Hickson's catalog of compact groups of galaxies (Hickson 1982) is at v$_{\rm R}$ = 5336 km/s (z=0.0178, Hickson et al. 1992) and
173: it is formed by four late-type galaxies with accordant redshifts: a bright central
174: Sb galaxy (HCG100a), an irregular galaxy with an optical tidal tail (HCG100b), a late-type barred spiral (HCG100c)
175: with central H$\alpha$ emission (Vilchez \& Iglesias-P\'aramo 1998)
176: and a late-type edge-on spiral (HCG100d). HCG100a, b and c show strong evidence of interaction, demonstrated
177: not only by peculiarities in their morphologies but also in their velocity fields (Plana et al. 2003).
178: H100b shows a tidal tail connecting with a faint galaxy not originally classified as a member of the group by
179: Hickson. Past encounters are also confirmed by an
180: extended H{\sc i} tail (Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2006).
181: Therefore, the well-advanced dynamical state of HCG100 makes it an ideal target for searching for intergalactic H{\sc ii} regions that
182: might have been triggered by tidal interaction.
183:
184: This paper is organized as follows: \S 2 describes the data, \S 3 discusses the age, masses and star formation rate estimates,
185: \S 3.1 and \S 3.2 compare the intragroup regions in HCG100 with other intergalactic H{\sc ii} regions and high$-z$ UV-luminous galaxies.
186: Finally, \S4 summarizes the main conclusions. Throughout this paper, we use a cosmology
187: with $\Omega_{\rm M}=0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$~and $h=0.7$.
188: Magnitudes are given in the AB-system and the adopted distance to HCG100 is 76.3 Mpc.
189:
190:
191: \section {The data}
192:
193: HCG100 was observed with the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) mission in the far and near ultraviolet (FUV $\lambda$$_{\rm eff}$=1528\AA, NUV $\lambda$$_{\rm eff}$=2271\AA)
194: as part of our Cycle 1 program (GI\#73) to observe compact groups of galaxies. In Fig. \ref{fuvhi_10arcmin} and Fig.\ref{nuvhi_10arcmin} we show a
195: cutout of a 10$'$$\times$ 10$'$ window of the FUV and NUV images
196: (GALEX field of view is 1$^{\circ}$.28 and 1$^{\circ}$.24 in FUV and NUV, respectively and pixel
197: scale is 1.5 arcsec pixel$^{-1}$) together with the distribution of atomic hydrogen H{\sc i} (PI Verdes-Montenegro).
198:
199: We have also obtained an R-band image with the CTIO Blanco 4m telescope and a mosaic II CCD imager. Three 300s images of the
200: group were taken, at a median seeing of 1.1$''$. Each frame covered a 40
201: arcmin field on a side, at a pixel scale of 0.27$''$/pixel, but we only used a 10
202: arcmin field around the object, given that this was the area of interest.
203: The data was bias subtracted and flat fielded using standard procedures
204: (using the package mscred in IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories,
205: which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research
206: in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
207: Science Foundation.}). A flatfield was constructed from
208: a combination of dark sky frames and twilight flats which worked well,
209: given that the background, after flatfielding was done, showed an rms
210: variation no greater than 1\% over the whole field. The night was not
211: photometric and therefore no calibration stars were observed. Instead, we
212: chose to use two galaxies previously observed by Rubin et al. (1991),
213: HCG 100c and HCG 100d, for obtaining the zero point of the photometry
214: (see below).
215:
216: \subsection{Flux Calibration}
217:
218: FUV and NUV fluxes were calculated using Morrissey et al. (2005) m$_{\lambda}$=-2.5 log[F$_{\lambda}$/a$_{\lambda}$] + b$_{\lambda}$,
219: where a$_{FUV}$ = 1.4 $\times$ 10$^{-15}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$,
220: a$_{NUV}$=2.06$\times$ 10$^{-16}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$, b$_{FUV}$=18.82 and b$_{NUV}$=20.08 for FUV and NUV, respectively. Fluxes were multiplied
221: by the effective filter bandpass ($\Delta$$\lambda$$_{FUV}$=269\AA\, and $\Delta$$\lambda$$_{NUV}$=616\AA) to give units of erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ and
222: luminosities were calculated for a distance D=76.3 Mpc.
223:
224: The R-band image was calibrated to match Rubin et al. (1991) magnitudes for galaxies HCG100c and HCG100d. Total integrated R magnitudes of these
225: objects are given in their Table 3 (no errors were quoted), and these were compared with the total
226: instrumental magnitudes we obtained for these galaxies using two methods:
227: (1) through aperture photometry in IRAF (using the task daophot.phot)
228: and (2) using the program SExtractor (Bertin and Arnouts et al. 1996).
229: The zero points obtained for each of these objects, and for each method,
230: agreed within 0.1 mag, and we used an average of the values as our final
231: zero point. The lack of a proper calibration, does not significantly change our results as shown in \S~3.
232:
233: The H{\sc i} data taken with the VLA (configuration D, PI Verdes-Montenegro) is not able to resolve the intragroup objects
234: since the beamwidth is 61.0$''$$\times$55.23$''$ (22.6~kpc $\times$ 20.4~kpc at 76.3~Mpc) and objects have sizes $<$16$''$. Therefore, our
235: measurements of the H{\sc i} fluxes were centered on the FUV detections but measured
236: within one beam. Fluxes were converted into mass by using the relation:
237:
238: \begin{equation}
239: M_{HI}=2.356 \times 10^5 F_{HI} D^2
240: \end{equation}
241:
242: where $D$ is the distance to the group in Mpc, $F_{HI}$ is the H{\sc i} flux in Jy km/s.
243:
244: Column Densities were calculated by applying the following relation
245: \begin{equation}
246: N_{HI}=1.82\times 10^{18} (\lambda ^2 / (2.65 \Theta ^2) F
247: \end{equation}
248:
249: where $\Theta$=beamwidth in arcmin$^{2}$, $\lambda$ is the wavelength (21cm) and F is the H{\sc i} flux density in Jy/beam km/s
250: (Rohlfs \& Wilson 2000).
251:
252:
253: \subsection{Source Detection}
254:
255: We used SExtractor (SE, Bertin \& Arnouts 1996) to detect sources in the FUV and matched that catalog with the
256: NUV and R-band catalogs. Therefore, only objects with FUV detections were included in our final catalog.
257: In this paper we concentrate on all objects which were detected in a region of 10$'$$\times$ 10$'$ centered on the H{\sc i}
258: tail (Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2006).
259:
260: We used SE's Kron elliptical apertures to measure magnitudes (mag$_{-}$auto) in FUV, NUV and R-bands. Although
261: mag$_{-}$auto is often used to measure total magnitudes in galaxy surveys (e.g. Bell et al. 2004, de Mello et al. 2006, Zucca et al. 2006),
262: high uncertainties might be expected at the faint magnitudes due to the assumption that the sky background has Gaussian random
263: noise without source confusion (Brown et al. 2007). However, since we are comparing data taken with different
264: resolutions and the fact that UV light does not necessarily peak at the same coordinate as the optical light, mag$_{-}$auto performs better
265: than the other SExtractor choices, as long as a careful match between the different catalogs is performed. We
266: matched the coordinates of the sources in the 3-bands within 1$''$ to 5$''$ and after visually checking each identification we chose 3$''$ as our
267: best matched catalog with FUV, NUV and R-detections. The cross-match in the three bands resulted not only in the four
268: most luminous members of HCG 100 (Table 1) but also 16 other objects, within the 10$'$$\times$10$'$ field (Table 2).
269:
270: Nine of these sources are within the H{\sc i} tail: \# 3 is the most distant object from the group (381 arcsec or 137.2 kpc from HCG100a) and is located in the
271: southern tip of the H{\sc i} tail, \#4 is far from all of the brightest members of the group and located in the densest H{\sc i} region, \#5 and
272: \#6 are close to HCG100c, \#8 is isolated and 150 arcsec (53.9 kpc) from HCG100a, \#9 is close to HCG100a,
273: \#13 is a small galaxy not originally classified as a member of the HCG100
274: and located in the optical tidal tail of HCG100b, \#14 and \#15 are also close to the tidal tail.
275: The other six objects have no H{\sc i} detection but are still within the chosen field.
276:
277: SE's magnitudes in FUV, NUV and R (mag$_{-}$auto) were corrected for foreground Galactic extinction using E(B-V)=0.081 and A$_{R}$=E(B-V)$\times$2.634
278: (Schlegel et al. 1998), A$_{FUV}$=E(B-V)$\times$8.29 and A$_{NUV}$=E(B-V)$\times$8.18 (Seibert et al. 2005).
279:
280: In Table 3 we list the H{\sc i} mass per beam in the vicinity of nine of the intragroup objects detected, the other
281: 7 objects are below the detection limit ($<1.7 \times 10^{8}$). However, it is important to note that, due to the low resolution of the
282: data, the HI masses of the objects near large galaxies are contaminated
283: by the HI masses of the latter. Only objects \#3, \#4 and \#8 are far
284: away from bright members of the group and this contamination could
285: be avoided. Objects \#13, \#14, \#15 besides being close to
286: H100b are within the same beam, therefore the HI masses listed in Table 3
287: are not the individual masses of each object but the total mass within one
288: beam centered in that region.
289:
290: As seen in Fig.\ref{fuvhi_10arcmin} most of the intragroup objects are located in the outskirts of the
291: H{\sc i} contours where column densities range from 7.5 $\times 10^{19}$ to 5$\times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$,
292: except for object \#4 which is located in a peak of H{\sc i} where NH{\sc i} is 1.2$\times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$.
293: Therefore, H{\sc i} clouds to which many of them are associated have column densities about one order
294: of magnitude lower than the N(HI)$\sim$10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$, value thought to be required for triggering star formation (e.g. Skillman et al. 1988).
295: Due to the low resolution of the HI data, all values are lower limits to the true HI column density.
296: %\clearpage
297:
298:
299: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}
300: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
301: %\rotate
302: \tablecaption{HCG100 Properties}
303: \tablewidth{0pt}
304: \tablehead{
305: \colhead{ID} &
306: \colhead{Morphology$^{\rm a}$} &
307: \colhead{Velocity$^{\rm b}$} &
308: \colhead{FUV$^{\rm c}$} &
309: \colhead{NUV} &
310: \colhead{R$^{\rm d}$} &
311: \colhead{FUV$_{\rm corr}$$^{\rm e}$} &
312: \colhead{NUV$_{\rm corr}$}
313: }
314: \startdata
315: HCG100 a & Sb & 5323 &17.30 & 16.78 & 12.5 & 16.12 & 16.63\\
316: HCG100 b & Sm & 5163 &17.49 & 17.10 & 14.1 & 16.44 & 16.82\\
317: HCG100 c & SBc& 5418 &18.46 & 17.91 & 14.7 & 17.25 & 17.79\\
318: HCG100 d & Scd& &19.08 & 18.65 & 15.5 & 17.99 & 18.41\\
319: \enddata
320: \tablenotetext{a}{Morphology from Plana et al. 2003}
321: \tablenotetext{b}{Systemic Velocity in kms$^{-1}$ from Plana et al. 2003}
322: \tablenotetext{c}{FUV and NUV magnitudes were obtained using IRAF task ellipse.}
323: \tablenotetext{d}{R-band magnitudes are from Rubin et al. 1991.}
324: \tablenotetext{e}{Extinction corrections using Seibert et al. (2005) for FUV and NUV.}
325: \end{deluxetable}
326:
327:
328:
329: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccrrrr}
330: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
331: %\rotate
332: \tablecaption{FUV sources within HCG100 $10' \times 10'$ field}
333: \tablewidth{0pt}
334: \tablehead{
335: \colhead{ID} &
336: \colhead{RA} &
337: \colhead{Dec} &
338: \colhead{R$^{\rm a}$} &
339: \colhead{NUV} &
340: \colhead{FUV} &
341: \colhead{FUV-R} &
342: \colhead{FUV-NUV}
343: }
344: \startdata
345: 1 & 0.2410& 13.0647& 18.80 $\pm$ 0.01& 20.56 $\pm$ 0.04& 20.44 $\pm$ 0.06& 1.64 $\pm$ 0.06 & -0.12 $\pm$ 0.07\\
346: 2 & 0.2526& 13.1161& 19.54 $\pm$ 0.01& 21.61 $\pm$ 0.08& 21.48 $\pm$ 0.10& 1.94 $\pm$ 0.10 & -0.13 $\pm$ 0.13\\
347: 3 & 0.2722& 13.0236& 19.09 $\pm$ 0.01& 21.61 $\pm$ 0.08& 21.21 $\pm$ 0.09& 2.12 $\pm$ 0.09 & -0.40 $\pm$ 0.12\\
348: 4 & 0.2929& 13.0859& 20.25 $\pm$ 0.04& 21.26 $\pm$ 0.07& 21.09 $\pm$ 0.09& 0.84 $\pm$ 0.10 & -0.17 $\pm$ 0.12\\
349: 5 & 0.2933& 13.1377& 19.42 $\pm$ 0.01& 22.43 $\pm$ 0.15& 22.79 $\pm$ 0.22& 3.37 $\pm$ 0.22 & 0.36 $\pm$ 0.27\\
350: 6 & 0.3076& 13.1630& 17.48 $\pm$ 0.00& 20.19 $\pm$ 0.03& 20.20 $\pm$ 0.05& 2.72 $\pm$ 0.05 & 0.01 $\pm$ 0.06\\
351: 7 & 0.3176& 13.0290& 18.43 $\pm$ 0.00& 22.85 $\pm$ 0.11& 21.70 $\pm$ 0.12& 3.27 $\pm$ 0.12 & -1.15 $\pm$ 0.16\\
352: 8 & 0.3188& 13.0724& 20.39 $\pm$ 0.01& 22.49 $\pm$ 0.13& 21.18 $\pm$ 0.11& 0.79 $\pm$ 0.11 & -1.31 $\pm$ 0.17\\
353: 9 & 0.3429& 13.1208& 20.35 $\pm$ 0.01& 22.24 $\pm$ 0.11& 22.10 $\pm$ 0.16& 1.75 $\pm$ 0.16 & -0.15 $\pm$ 0.19\\
354: 10& 0.3535& 13.0704& 19.75 $\pm$ 0.01& 21.92 $\pm$ 0.09& 21.66 $\pm$ 0.11& 1.91 $\pm$ 0.11 & -0.26 $\pm$ 0.14\\
355: 11& 0.3627& 13.0532& 19.42 $\pm$ 0.01& 21.63 $\pm$ 0.07& 21.62 $\pm$ 0.10& 2.20 $\pm$ 0.10 & -0.01 $\pm$ 0.12\\
356: 12& 0.3704& 13.1375& 18.88 $\pm$ 0.00& 22.15 $\pm$ 0.09& 21.98 $\pm$ 0.14& 3.10 $\pm$ 0.14 & -0.18 $\pm$ 0.17\\
357: 13$^{\rm b}$& 0.3735& 13.0986& 17.69 $\pm$ 0.00& 19.63 $\pm$ 0.02& 19.59 $\pm$ 0.04& 1.90 $\pm$ 0.04 & -0.04 $\pm$ 0.04\\
358: 13A& 0.3738& 13.0987& 17.83 $\pm$ 0.01& 19.78 $\pm$ 0.05& 19.81 $\pm$ 0.17& 1.98 $\pm$ 0.17 & 0.03 $\pm$ 0.18\\
359: 13B& 0.3719& 13.0984& 17.77 $\pm$ 0.01& 19.62 $\pm$ 0.04& 19.83 $\pm$ 0.04& 2.06 $\pm$ 0.04 & 0.22 $\pm$ 0.06\\
360: 14& 0.3773& 13.1041& 20.42 $\pm$ 0.01& 21.63 $\pm$ 0.08& 21.10 $\pm$ 0.09& 0.69 $\pm$ 0.09 & -0.53 $\pm$ 0.12\\
361: 15& 0.3796& 13.0950& 19.52 $\pm$ 0.01& 22.04 $\pm$ 0.12& 21.79 $\pm$ 0.14& 2.27 $\pm$ 0.14 & -0.25 $\pm$ 0.19\\
362: 16& 0.3816& 13.0817& 18.89 $\pm$ 0.00& 21.55 $\pm$ 0.06& 21.30 $\pm$ 0.11& 2.41 $\pm$ 0.11 & -0.24 $\pm$ 0.12\\
363: \enddata
364: \tablenotetext{a}{Magnitudes (AB) in all bands were obtained with SExtractor Mag$_{-}$auto. Galactic extinction corrections were done
365: using Schlegel et al. (1998) for R and Seibert et al. (2005) for FUV and NUV.}
366: \tablenotetext{b}{Object 13 was separated into two objects, A and B, using IRAF polyphot task.}
367: \end{deluxetable}
368:
369:
370:
371: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccccc}
372: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
373: %\rotate
374: \tablecaption{Derived Properties}
375: \tablewidth{0pt}
376: \tablehead{
377: \colhead{ID} &
378: \colhead{L$_{\rm FUV}$ (erg/s)$^{\rm a}$} &
379: \colhead{L$_{\rm NUV}$ (erg/s)} &
380: \colhead{age$^{\rm b}$} &
381: \colhead{SFR$_{\rm FUV}$ $^{\rm c}$} &
382: \colhead{SFR$_{\rm NUV}$} &
383: \colhead{log(M$_{\rm *}$)$^{\rm d}$} &
384: \colhead{log(M$_{\rm HI}$)$^{\rm e}$} &
385: \colhead{Sep$^{\rm f}$} &
386: \colhead{log I$_{1530}$$^{\rm g}$}
387: }
388: \startdata
389: 1 & 5.90E+040 & 5.70E+040 & 3.9 & 0.005& 0.007 & 5.0 & & 131.2 & 6.02 \\
390: 2 & 2.27E+040 & 2.16E+040 & 3.8 & 0.002& 0.003 & 4.6 & & 102.2 & 5.91 \\
391: 3 & 2.91E+040 & 2.17E+040 & $<$1 & 0.002& 0.003 & 4.7 & 9.6 & 137.2 & 5.90 \\
392: 4 & 3.25E+040 & 2.98E+040 & 3.3 & 0.003& 0.004 & 4.7 & 10.4 & 60.7 & 5.35 \\
393: 5 & 6.79E+039 & 1.02E+040 & 194.1 & 0.001& 0.001 & 6.5 & 9.9$\dagger$ & 61.2 & 4.99 \\
394: 6 & 7.41E+040 & 8.01E+040 & 26.9 & 0.006& 0.010 & 6.3 & 9.2$\dagger$ & 74.7 & 6.31 \\
395: 7 & 1.84E+040 & 6.90E+039 & $<$1 & 0.001& 0.001 & 4.5 & & 108.5 & 5.51 \\
396: 8 & 2.98E+040 & 9.62E+039 & $<$1 & 0.002& 0.001 & 4.7 & 10.0 & 53.9 & 5.31 \\
397: 9 & 1.28E+040 & 1.21E+040 & 3.5 & 0.001& 0.001 & 4.6 & 9.8$\dagger$ & 17.5 & 5.80 \\
398: 10 & 1.92E+040 & 1.63E+040 & 2.9 & 0.002& 0.002 & 4.4 & & 58.8 & 5.97 \\
399: 11 & 2.00E+040 & 2.13E+040 & 21.0 & 0.002& 0.003 & 5.6 & & 83.7 & 5.85 \\
400: 12 & 1.43E+040 & 1.31E+040 & 3.2 & 0.001& 0.002 & 4.3 & & 58.0 & 5.95 \\
401: 13 & 1.29E+041 & 1.35E+041 & 13.7 & 0.010& 0.016 & 6.2 & 9.5$\dagger$$\dagger$ & 53.3 & 6.67 \\
402: 13 A& 1.03E+041 & 1.36E+041 & 118.7 & 0.008& 0.017 & & & & 6.51 \\
403: 13 B& 1.06E+041 & 1.17E+041 & 33.8 & 0.008& 0.014 & & & & 6.50 \\
404: 14 & 3.22E+040 & 2.13E+040 & $<$1 & 0.003& 0.003 & 4.8 & 9.5$\dagger$$\dagger$ & 56.3 & 6.30 \\
405: 15 & 1.70E+040 & 1.46E+040 & 2.9 & 0.001& 0.002 & 4.3 & 9.5$\dagger$$\dagger$ & 62.1 & 5.07 \\
406: 16 & 2.67E+040 & 2.29E+040 & 2.9 & 0.002& 0.003 & 4.5 & & 72.0 & 5.26 \\
407: \enddata
408: \tablenotetext{a}{FUV and NUV luminosities are in erg/s, divide by the FUV and NUV bandwidths (269\AA\ and 616\AA, respectively) to obtain in L erg/s/\AA.}
409: \tablenotetext{b}{Age (Myr) from FUV-NUV using Thilker et al. (2007) assuming a Milky Way internal extinction (E(B-V)=0.2).}
410: \tablenotetext{c}{SFR (M$_{\odot}$/yr) from Iglesias-P\'aramo et al. (2006) using FUV and NUV without correcting for internal extinction.}
411: \tablenotetext{d}{Stellar mass (M$_{\odot}$) obtained from Starburst99 using ages (column 4) and L$_{\rm 1530}$ (erg/s/\AA).}
412: \tablenotetext{e}{MHI (M$_{\odot}$) was calculated using 2.36 $\times$ 10$^{5}$ F$_{\rm HI}$ D$^{2}$, where D is in Mpc and F$_{\rm HI}$ in Jy Km/s. F$_{\rm HI}$ was measured within one
413: beam size 61.0$''$ $\times$ 55.23$''$ and reflects the HI mass in the vicinity of each object.}
414: \tablenotetext{f}{Distance (kpc) between each object and HCG100a.}
415: \tablenotetext{g}{FUV surface brightness (L$_{\odot}$ kpc$^{-2}$) is defined following Hoopes at al. (2007).}
416: \tablenotetext{\dagger}{HI masses of Objects \#5, \#6, and \#9 should be taken with caution due to contamination by large galaxies in the vicinity.}
417: \tablenotetext{\dagger\dagger}{HI masses of Objects \#13, \#14, and \#15 are not individual masses of each object but the total mass within one
418: beam centered in that region. Contamination from H100b mass is also possible.}
419: \end{deluxetable}
420:
421:
422: %% In a manner similar to \objectname authors can provide links to dataset
423: %% hosted at participating data centers via the \dataset{} command. The
424: %% second curly bracket argument is printed in the text while the first
425: %% parentheses argument serves as the valid data set identifier. Large
426: %% lists of data set are best provided in a table (see Table 3 for an example).
427: %% Valid data set identifiers should be obtained from the data center that
428: %% is currently hosting the data.
429: %%
430: %% Note that AASTeX interprets everything between the curly braces in the
431: %% macro as regular text, so any special characters, e.g. "#" or "_," must be
432: %% preceded by a backslash. Otherwise, you will get a LaTeX error when you
433: %% compile your manuscript. Special characters do not
434: %% need to be escaped in the optional, square-bracket argument.
435:
436:
437: %% In this section, we use the \subsection command to set off
438: %% a subsection. \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.
439:
440: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label
441: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the
442: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.
443: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of
444: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.
445: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will
446: %% automatically renumber them.
447:
448: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments
449: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.
450:
451:
452: \section{Analysis}
453:
454: We used the broad-band colors generated from stellar populations models by Thilker et al. (2007)
455: to estimate the ages of the intragroup sources. Thilker et al. models are optimized for
456: GALEX filters transmission curves and have been extensively tested using GALEX data (Bianchi et al. 2007).
457:
458: In Fig.\ref{colorsfuvnuvthilker} we plot FUV--NUV colors of our sample and
459: FUV--NUV color predictions as a function of age assuming a Milky Way internal extinction, (E(B-V)=0.2) and
460: without any extinction correction (Thilker et al. 2007). It is clear that all intragroup
461: objects are younger than $\sim$ 200 Myr. Four objects are not included in the logarithmic scale of Fig.\ref{colorsfuvnuvthilker},
462: they have ages $<$ 1~Myr old and are probably more affected by extinction since the first 2 Myrs after the stellar birth are strongly affected by
463: dust obscuration. In Table 3
464: we list their ages, assuming a Milky Way internal extinction (E(B-V)=0.2) for all objects. However, for many of them the internal extinction is higher
465: than the Milky Way value, as seen in the color-color plot shown in Fig.\ref{colorsfuvnuvfuvr}. We have not attempted to estimate the
466: intrinsic extinction individually since the three colors we have are either too close to each other (FUV and NUV) or too far apart (NUV and R).
467: In any case, the ages of all objects are $<$ 200 Myr and will not reach older ages even if assuming extinction values such as A$_{\rm FUV}$=2.03,
468: A$_{\rm NUV}$=1.46 used to age-dating Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) galaxies detected with GALEX (Salim et al. 2005). The
469: UV-detection of these objects suggests that the energetic O-star winds have blown out the natal cocoon veiling most of the massive stars (Leitherer
470: 2005). In Fig.\ref{colorsfuvnuvfuvr} we also plot FUV-R colors assuming an error of 0.2 magnitudes in the R-band magnitudes (triangles and squares)
471: confirming that an object 0.2 magnitudes brighter or fainter in R have slightly higher or lower predicted ages if we had used FUV-R as an
472: age indicator. Since we used FUV-NUV as an age indicator our results are not affected by errors in the photometry of the R-band image.
473:
474: As discussed in Kennicutt (1998) the broadband optical luminosity by itself is a poor tracer of the star formation rate (SFR)
475: and the UV wavelengths where the integrated spectrum is dominated by young stars gives a better estimate of the SFR. In
476: Table 3 we list the SFRs which were derived following Iglesias-P\'aramo et al. (2006)\footnote{SFRs are derived using
477: Starburst99 models (solar metallicity, Salpeter IMF from 0.1 to 100 M$_{\odot}$) adapted to the GALEX bands.} without applying internal
478: extinction correction to the UV flux.
479: The SFR using FUV and NUV are similar except for objects \#6 and \#13. This could be due to the fact that
480: the latter object has double nuclei and is probably a merger of two small objects, whereas the former object is the largest
481: object in the sample and probably a dwarf galaxy. Therefore, the instantaneous star-formation law used to derive the SFR might not be suited
482: to their stellar populations. If they have had several bursts of star-formation in the recent past, the FUV gives a more
483: robust indicator of SFR than NUV since it is not contaminated by previous star formation. As shown in Salim et al. (2005) the NUV-R is a good tracer of the
484: star formation
485: history of a galaxy, i.e. it is proportional to the ratio between the current SFR over the past-average SFR. If we assume Salim et al. average value
486: of extinction (A$_{\rm NUV}$=1.46), all objects in our sample have NUV-R typical of galaxies undergoing a burst.
487:
488: We have also calculated SFR$_{\rm FUV}$ using Calzetti (2001) values of extinction for starburst galaxies. The average SFR$_{\rm FUV}$ of the intragroup
489: objects is as low as 0.01~M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$, and as high as 0.4~M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$, if we use the A$_{1500}$ = 1.6 (Calzetti's UV-selected starbursts)
490: and A$_{1500}$ = 4.1 (Calzetti's average dust-rich starbursts), respectively. Therefore, the SFR of the intragroup objects is modest even if a high
491: extinction correction is applied.
492:
493: We used the ages obtained from Thilker et al. and the FUV luminosity to estimate the stellar masses with Starburst99 models (Leitherer et al. 1999).
494: The stellar masses were obtained from Starburst99's monochromatic luminosity, L$_{1530}$, for an instantaneous burst, Salpeter IMF, solar metallicity, and
495: standard input parameters are listed in Table 3. We chose an instantaneous burst instead of continuous star-formation, since we are estimating the
496: mass from the FUV luminosity which is dominated by the young and massive stars. Therefore, low mass stars were not taken into consideration in the stellar mass
497: calculation.
498:
499:
500: \subsection{Comparison with Intergalactic HII Regions and TDGs}
501:
502: Tidal dwarf galaxies (TDGs) are found in the tip of the optical tails as well as along tidal features
503: (e.g. Duc et al. 1997, Weilbacher et al. 2000, Knierman, et al. 2003, Bornaud et al. 2004).
504: More recently, they have been identified in ongoing galaxy mergers where the FUV emission is seen to be associated with the H{\sc i} tidal
505: tails (Hibbard et al. 2005), extending
506: large distances beyond the optical extent (Neff et al. 2005). One of our objects,
507: \#4, is similar to Neff et al.'s TDGs. It is located in the H{\sc i} tail and where the H{\sc i} column density peaks.
508: It has an H{\sc i} mass 10$^{10.4}$ M$_{\odot}$/beam in the vicinity and
509: age 3.3~Myr. What is interesting for this object and also object \#3, is their location with respect to the
510: group members;
511: object \#4 is 61 kpc away from HCG100a and object \#3 is at the very tip of the HI tail, 137 kpc away from HCG100a.
512:
513: The TDG-candidate found in HCG100 (object \#4) described above and other TDGs found in other systems with H{\sc i} tails are located far away from the
514: group members and have young ages. For instance, the triplet formed by
515: NGC7771, NGC7770 and NGC7769 observed with GALEX has a 3~Myr old TDG candidate within the 100~kpc H{\sc i} tail (Neff et al 2005).
516: Another compact group, HCG31 has a TDG 40 kpc away from the parent galaxy (Mendes de Oliveira et al. 2006) and is also located in a peak of H{\sc i} in the gas tail .
517:
518: The tidal material in interacting systems is expected to remain bound to the system. Some of it will fall back onto the remnant and some
519: will stay detached ($\sim$20\% of NGC7252 tidal material will stay detached, according to Hibbard \& Mihos 1995) for as long as a Hubble
520: time. According to Verdes-Montenegro et al.'s (2005) proposed evolutionary scenario for compact groups, HCG100 is in phase 2, when multiple tidal tails form
521: and a large amount of atomic gas is found in the intragroup medium. In phase 3 of the evolutionary path, galaxies will lose H{\sc i}
522: gas and an H{\sc i} deficient group will be produced (Sulentic et al. 2001, Williams et al. 2002).
523: Based on our results we suggest that at least a fraction of the tidal gas is used to form intragroup objects such as the ones within the H{\sc i} tail.
524:
525: Moreover, considering the distance between the star forming regions and the group members and the young ages of the stellar population, we are witnessing the in ``situ"
526: star-formation within the H{\sc i} tidal tail and can rule out the possibility of formation in
527: the outskirts of the group galaxies and later ejection to the intragroup medium.
528:
529: As shown in the R-band images (Fig.\ref{all_obj}), objects \#3 and \#4 resemble low surface brightness galaxies,
530: whereas the others are either small round objects (\#8, \#9, \#10, and \#15), but larger than the images' PSF,
531: or have morphologies similar to objects found in the tail region
532: of Stephan's Quintet (Mendes de Oliveira et al. 2004). We cannot rule out the possibility that these objects
533: are not related to the group and only with spectroscopy we will be
534: able to tell whether they are group members or not. However, if found to be bound to HCG100, as the intergalactic H{\sc ii} regions
535: in Stephan's Quintet are, the intragroup medium of HCG100 is actively forming stars as far as 137 kpc away from the galaxies. The SFRs are modest,
536: 0.001--0.02~M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$, but similar to IH{\sc ii} regions found by Ryan-Weber et al. (2004) at distances up to 33 kpc from NGC~1533 and
537: by Sakai et al. (2002) at distances of 155 kpc in the A1367 cluster.
538:
539: The stellar masses of our sources (Table 3) range between 10$^{4.3}$--10$^{6.5}$ M$_{\odot}$. The large spread in masses can be interpreted as a
540: sign of evolution or different population of objects. In the first scenario, some of the objects are still in the process of formation and have not converted
541: all the gas supply into stars as Duc \& Mirabel (1997) suggested for TDGs. In the second scenario, we are detecting two populations of
542: objects: TDGs and IH{\sc ii} regions. The low--mass objects are the IH{\sc ii} regions and high--mass objects are TDGs.
543: One caveat to keep in mind is the fact that the stellar masses can be higher than what we obtained, since the intrinsic extinction for some objects
544: is probably higher than the Milky Way value used to estimate their age. Higher extinction correction would make them more UV luminous
545: and therefore more massive.
546:
547: \subsection{Comparison with high-z galaxies}
548:
549: Since the intragroup objects were UV-selected, we have compared them with a class of objects which is also
550: selected by their UV emission but are at high redshifts, the Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs, Steidel et al. 1995). LBGs are star-forming
551: galaxies at $z=2-4$, they are relatively small (r$_{h}$=1-3 kpc),
552: have relatively low mass (10$^{9.5-11}$M$_\odot$) and low extinction. LBGs are thought to be the building blocks of larger
553: systems proposed by the hierarchical clustering scenario of galaxy formation and evolution (Kauffmann et al. 1993). The fate
554: of intragroup objects might be similar, since at least some are likely to be accreted by the larger galaxies in the group. HCG100a, for instance,
555: may have already suffered a major accretion event, given its very peculiar velocity field (Plana et al. 2003).
556:
557: Recently, Hoopes et al. (2007) identified a sample of the local equivalents of LBGs using images from the UV satellite GALEX and
558: spectroscopy from the SDSS. Among the UV-luminous galaxy (UVLGs) population, they
559: found a subset of supercompact galaxies that are similar to LBGs. As shown in Table 4, the intragroup objects in HCG100 are not as UV-luminous
560: as UVLGs and LBGs and also form stars in a much lower rate than those. This might be an evolutionary effect suggesting that objects in the
561: intragroup medium are less efficient in forming stars than LBGs and UVLGs.
562:
563: \section{Conclusions}
564:
565: We have analyzed the UV and optical light in combination with the H{\sc i} gas within the compact group of galaxies HCG100 and
566: identified 16 star-forming regions in the intragroup region.
567: The young age ($<200$~Myr) of these objects and the proximity to the
568: tidal tail connects
569: the OB stars formation time scale ($\sim$10$^{8}$ yr) with the dynamic time scale of the tidal features.
570: Moreover, the H{\sc i} clouds to which many of them are associated have column densities about one order
571: of magnitude lower than the N(HI)$\sim$10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$
572: thought to be required for triggering star formation. So,
573: in these cases, we have a strong indication that the H{\sc i} clouds
574: must have suffered recent collisions which could have then triggered
575: the star formation process. Based on their ages, stellar masses and H{\sc i} masses in their vicinities, we conclude that some of these objects are tidal dwarf
576: galaxies with ongoing star formation and some are intergalactic HII regions or conglomeration of stellar clusters.
577:
578:
579: Although we have an estimate of the amount of neutral gas in these objects, the main ingredient in the star-formation process, the
580: molecular gas, is unknown for these objects. From CO observations of tidal dwarf galaxies (TDGs), Braine et al. (2001) provided strong
581: evidence that TDGs are self-gravitating entities with large amounts of atomic gas which will transform into molecular gas and subsequently
582: form stars. CO observations together with spectroscopy of these objects will be of great value in understanding their nature.
583: For instance, we cannot exclude the possibility that some of these objects are not associated with HCG100,
584: but at least those falling within HI density peaks are likely to be associated with the group. Moreover,
585: we will be able to estimate metallicity of these newly formed regions and evaluate the enrichment level of the processed
586: gas in the intragroup medium.
587:
588:
589: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
590: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
591: %\rotate
592: \tablecaption{Comparison of Galaxy Properties}
593: \tablewidth{0pt}
594: \tablehead{
595: \colhead{Parameter$^{\rm a}$} &
596: \colhead{Large UVLGs} &
597: \colhead{Compact UVLGs} &
598: \colhead{LBGs} &
599: \colhead{HCG100 IGs}
600: }
601: \startdata
602: log L$_{1530}$ (L$_{\odot}$) & 10.3 to 11.2 & 10.3 to 11.0 & 10.3 to 10.9 & 8 to 9 \\
603: log I$_{1530}$ (L$_{\odot}$ kpc$^{-2}$) $^{\rm b}$& 6.0 to 8.0 & 8.0 to 10.3 & 9.0 to 10.3 & 5.6 to 8.3 \\
604: log SFR (M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$) $^{\rm c}$ & 0 to 1.5 & 0.2 to 2.0 & 0.5 to 2.0 & -2 to -0.4 \\
605: FUV-R $^{\rm d}$ & 1.0 to 3.5 & 0.2 to 2.8 & 0.2 to 1.7 & 0.7 to 3.4 $^{\rm f}$ \\
606: \enddata
607: \tablenotetext{a}{Parameters for UVLGS and LBGs are from Hoopes et al. (2007). The lowest value for HCG100 intragroup objects was
608: calculated using average values A$_{1500}$=1.6 and the highest value using A$_{1500}$=4.1 from Calzetti (2001).}
609: \tablenotetext{b}{I$_{1530}$ is the FUV surface brightness as described in Hoopes et al. (2007), except for HCG100 intragroup objects where we used
610: R as the FUV petrosian radius.}
611: \tablenotetext{c}{SFR for the HCG intragroup objects using FUV equation from Iglesias-P\'aramo et al. (2006).}
612: \tablenotetext{d}{r magnitudes are from SDSS and corrected for extinction, except for HCG100 which is the same as in Table 1 (Cousin R magnitude) and is not
613: corrected for extinction.}
614: \tablenotetext{e}{FUV-R shown is not corrected for internal extinction. Using Calzetti (2001) A$_{1500}$=1.6 and A$_{r}$=0.48 FUV-R=-0.3 to 2.2.}
615: \end{deluxetable}
616:
617: \clearpage
618:
619: \begin{figure}
620: \plotone{f1.eps}
621: \caption{GALEX FUV image 10$'$$\times$10$'$ with H{\sc i} contours. Four HCG100 members are marked as `a, b, c and d'. Intragroup objects are circled (radius=8$''$) and numbered. VLA NH{\sc i} contours are
622: 0.6, 1.2, 2.1, 3.6, 4.4, 5.1, 5.9, 6.6, 7.4 $\times$10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$, beam size (61.0$''$$\times$55.23$''$) is shown on left corner. North is
623: to the top and East to the left.
624: \label{fuvhi_10arcmin}}
625: \end{figure}
626:
627: \begin{figure}
628: \plotone{f2.eps}
629: \caption{GALEX NUV image 10$'$$\times$10$'$ with H{\sc i} contours. Intragroup objects are circled (radius=8$''$) and numbered. VLA NH{\sc i} contours are
630: 0.6, 1.2, 2.1, 3.6, 4.4, 5.1, 5.9, 6.6, 7.4 $\times$10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$. Beam size (61.0$''$$\times$55.23$''$) is
631: shown in Fig.\ref{fuvhi_10arcmin}. North is
632: to the top and East to the left.
633: \label{nuvhi_10arcmin}}
634: \end{figure}
635:
636:
637: \begin{figure}
638: \plotone{f3.eps}
639: \caption{GALEX FUV-NUV versus age from Thilker et al. models (2007) are shown as solid line (no extinction
640: correction) and dotted line (internal extinction of the Milky Way E(B-V)=0.2). 4 objects are not included, they have ages $<$ 1~Myr old.
641: \label{colorsfuvnuvthilker}}
642: \end{figure}
643:
644:
645: \begin{figure}
646: \plotone{f4.eps}
647: \caption{GALEX FUV-NUV versus FUV-R of the intragroup objects. Squares and triangles are FUV--R colors assuming an error of 0.2 magnitudes in the R-magnitude.
648: Models from Thilker et al. 2007 are shown as solid line (no extinction correction) and dotted line (internal extinction of the Milky Way E(B-V)=0.2). Crosses mark ages 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 Myr, from the
649: bottom left to the top right.
650: \label{colorsfuvnuvfuvr}}
651: \end{figure}
652:
653: \begin{figure}
654: \plotone{f5.eps}
655: \caption{R images of all intragroup objects, circle has radius=8$''$, each cutout is 1$'$$\times$1$'$. NH{\sc i} contours (white) are the same as in Fig.\ref{fuvhi_10arcmin}.
656: \label{all_obj}}
657: \end{figure}
658:
659: \clearpage
660:
661: \acknowledgments
662:
663: We are grateful to L. Verdes-Montenegro for making the reduced VLA data available, to GALEX and NOAO staff, and to the anonymous referee for helping improving the
664: paper. DFdM was funded by Nasa Research Grants NNG06GG45G and NNG06GG59G, ST-F was a CNPq MSc student fellow at IAG/USP and currently is a CAPES PhD
665: student fellow at IAG/USP.
666: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
667: California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
668: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
669: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
670: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
671: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
672: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
673: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
674: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
675: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
676:
677: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
678: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
679: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
680: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
681: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
682:
683: {\it Facilities:} \facility{Galex}, \facility{CTIO}.
684:
685: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
686: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
687: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
688:
689: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
690: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
691: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
692:
693: \begin{thebibliography}{}
694:
695: \bibitem[]{644} Bell, E.F., et al. 2004, ApJ, 608, 752
696:
697: \bibitem[Bertin et al.(1996)]{ber96} Bertin, E., \& Arnouts, S. 1996, \aaps, 117, 393
698:
699: \bibitem[]{648} Bianchi, L. et al. (2007), ApJS in press (GALEX special issue), astro-ph/0611926
700:
701: \bibitem[]{650} Bournaud, F., Duc, P.-A., Amram, P., Combes, F., \& Gach, J.-L. 2004, A\&A, 425, 813
702:
703: \bibitem[]{652} Braine, J. Duc, P-A., Lisenfeld, U., et al. 2001, A\&A, 378, 51
704:
705: \bibitem[]{654} Brown, M.J.I., et al. 2007, ApJ, 654, 858
706:
707: %\bibitem[]{656} Bruzual, G., \& Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000
708:
709: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2001)]{cal01} Calzetti, D. 2001, PASP, 113, 1449
710:
711: \bibitem[]{660} de Mello, D.F., Dahlen, T., Gardner, J.P., Grogin, N.A. 2006, AJ, 132, 2014
712:
713: \bibitem[]{662} Duc, P-A., \& Mirabel, I.F. 1997, The Messenger 89, 14
714:
715: \bibitem[]{664} Hibbard, J.E., \& Mihos, J.C. 1995, AJ, 110, 140
716:
717: \bibitem[]{666} Hibbard, J.E., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L87
718:
719: \bibitem[]{668} Hickson, P., Mendes de Oliveira, C., Huchra, J.P. \& Palumbo, G.G. 1992, ApJ, 399, 353
720:
721: \bibitem[]{670} Hoopes, C.G., et al. 2007, submitted astro-ph0609415
722:
723: \bibitem[]{672} Iglesias-P\'aramo, J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 164, 38
724:
725: \bibitem[Kauffmann et al.(1993)]{kau93} Kauffmann, G., White, S. D. M., \& Guiderdoni, B. 1993, MNRAS, 264, 201
726:
727: \bibitem[]{676} Knierman, K.A., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 1227
728:
729: \bibitem[]{678} Kennicutt, R.C. 1998, ARA\&A, 36, 189
730:
731: %\bibitem[]{720} Khochfar, S. \& Silk, J. 2006, ApJ, 648, 21
732:
733: \bibitem[]{680} Leitherer, C. et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3
734:
735: \bibitem[]{682} Leitherer, C. 2005 in The Spectral Energy Distribution of Gas Rich Galaxies, ed. C. C. Popescu \& R. J. Tuffs (Melville: AIP), 39
736:
737: \bibitem[]{684} Mendes de Oliveira, C., Cypriano, E.S., \& Sodr\'e,L. Jr, Balkowski, C. 2004, ApJ, L17
738:
739: \bibitem[]{686} Mendes de Oliveira, C., Temporin S., Cypriano, E.S., Plana, H., Amram, P., \& Sodr\'e,L. Jr, Balkowski, C. 2006, AJ, 132, 570
740:
741: \bibitem[]{690} Neff, S.G., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L91
742:
743: \bibitem[Oosterloo et al. (2004)]{692} Oosterloo, R., et al. 2004 in `Recycling Intergalactic and Interstellar Matter' IAUS 217. Eds.,
744: P-A Duc, J. Braine, \& E. Brinks, 486, 492
745:
746: \bibitem[]{695} Plana, H., Amram, P., Mendes de Oliveira, C., Balkowski, C., \& Boulesteix, J. 2003, AJ, 125, 1736
747:
748:
749: \bibitem[]{698} Rohlfs, K., \& Wilson, T.L. 2000 Tools of Radio Astronomy. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York.
750:
751:
752: \bibitem[Rubin et al.(1991)]{rub96} Rubin, V.C., Hunter, D.A., \& Fordk, W.K.J. 1991, ApJSS, 76, 153
753:
754: \bibitem[RyanWeber et al.(2004)]{703} Ryan-Weber, E.V., Meuerer,G.R., Freeman, K.C., Putman, M.E., \& Webster, R.L. 2004,
755: AJ, 127, 1431
756:
757: \bibitem[]{706} Salim, S., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L39
758:
759: \bibitem[]{748} Sakai, S., Kennicutt, R.C., van der Huls, J.M., \& Moss, C. 2002, ApJ, 578, 842
760:
761: \bibitem[]{708} Schelegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P., \& Davis, M. 1998, ApJ 500, 525
762:
763: \bibitem[Seibert et al.(2005)]{Sei05} Seibert et al. 2005, ApJ 619, L55
764:
765: \bibitem[]{712} Skillman, E.D., Terlevich, R., Teuben, P.J., \& van Woerden, H. 1988, A\&A, 198, 33
766:
767: \bibitem[Steidel (1995)]{Ste95} Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., \& Hamilton, D. 1995, AJ, 119, 2519
768:
769: \bibitem[]{716} Sulentic, J.W., Rosado, M., Dultzn-Hacyan, D., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2993
770:
771: \bibitem[]{718} Thilker et al. 2007, submitted
772:
773: \bibitem[]{720} Verdes-Montenegro, L., Del Olmo, A., Yun, M.S., \& Perea, J. 2005, A\&A, 443, 464
774:
775: \bibitem[]{722} Verdes-Montenegro, L., Yun, M.S., \& Borthakur, S. 2006, in `Galaxy Evolution Across the Hubble Time' IAUS 235, \#399
776:
777: \bibitem[]{724} Vilchez, J.M., \& Iglesias-P\'aramo, J. 1998, ApJS, 117, 1
778:
779: \bibitem[]{726} Weilbacher, P. M., Duc, P.-A., Fritze v. Alvensleben, U., Martin, P., \& Fricke, K. J. 200, A\&A, 358, 819
780:
781: \bibitem[]{728} Williams, B.A., Yun, M.S., \& Verdes-Montenegro, L. 2002, AJ, 123, 2417
782:
783: \bibitem[]{730} Zucca, E., et al. 2006, A\&A, 455, 879
784:
785: \end{thebibliography}
786:
787: \end{document}
788:
789:
790: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
791: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
792: %% To embed the sample graphics in
793: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
794: %% \includegraphics commands
795: %%
796: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
797: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
798: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
799: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
800: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
801: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
802: %%
803: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
804: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
805: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
806: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
807: %% journal to journal.
808:
809: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
810: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
811: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
812: %% available in the electronic journal.
813:
814: \end{document}
815: