1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \newcommand{\ee}[1]{\mbox{${} \times 10^{#1}$}}% scientific number format
4: \newcommand{\eten}[1]{\mbox{$10^{#1}$}}% power of ten
5: \newcommand{\hh}{\mbox{{\rm H}$_2$}}
6: \newcommand{\td}{\mbox{$T_d$} }
7: \newcommand{\msun}{\mbox{M$_\odot$}}% Msun
8: \newcommand{\Lsun}{\mbox{$L_{\odot}$}}
9:
10:
11: \shorttitle{Parameter Study of Dust and Gas Temperature}
12: \shortauthors{Urban et al.}
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \title{A Parameter Study of the Dust and Gas Temperature in a Field of Young Stars}
16:
17: \author{Andrea Urban\altaffilmark{1},
18: Neal J. Evans II\altaffilmark{1}, and Steven D. Doty \altaffilmark{2}}
19:
20: \altaffiltext{1}{aurban@astro.as.utexas.edu, nje@astro.as.utexas.edu.\\Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, Austin,
21: TX 78712, USA}
22:
23: \altaffiltext{2}{doty@denison.edu.\\
24: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Denison University, Granville, OH 43023, USA}
25:
26:
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29: We model the thermal effect of young stars on their
30: surrounding environment in order to understand clustered star formation.
31: We take radiative heating of dust, dust-gas collisional heating,
32: cosmic-ray heating, and molecular cooling into account.
33: Using Dusty, a spherical continuum radiative transfer code,
34: we model the dust temperature distribution around young stellar objects
35: with various luminosities and surrounding gas and dust density distributions.
36: We have created a grid of dust temperature models, based on our modeling with
37: Dusty, which we can use to calculate
38: the dust temperature in a field of stars with various parameters.
39: We then determine the gas temperature assuming energy balance.
40: Our models can be used to make large-scale simulations
41: of clustered star formation more realistic.
42:
43: \end{abstract}
44:
45: \keywords{Radiative Transfer; ISM: Structure; Methods: Numerical, Analytical; Stars: Formation}
46:
47:
48: \section{Introduction}
49: %(How stars form and important effects)
50: Most of the stars in our galaxy form in groups or clusters
51: \citep{lada}.
52: Therefore, in order to understand the star formation
53: history, the shape of the mass function,
54: and the formation of massive (M $\ga 5$ M$_{\odot}$) stars in our galaxy,
55: the star formation process must be studied in its most
56: common environment -- a cluster.
57: As stars form from their initial reservoir of gas
58: and dust, they
59: interact with their environment and heat the
60: surrounding material, thus affecting future star formation.
61: One of the first effects a protostar has on its environment
62: is radiative heating from the accretion luminosity and,
63: subsequently, nuclear fusion.
64: The radiation efficiently heats the dust, which in turn
65: heats the gas through collisions.
66: Young stars also affect their environment via strong
67: winds and ionization,
68: but this only occurs when they are very massive and have evolved past
69: the very early stages of star formation.
70: We assume that the massive stars in our sample are very young and
71: are accreting at very high rates
72: ($\dot{\rm{M}} \ga 1 \ee{-5} \msun / $yr).
73: This high accretion rate allows
74: the infalling mass to absorb all of the stellar UV photons \citep{Churchwell}.
75: %pg 34
76:
77: Many groups use large scale computer simulations to model clustered
78: star formation.
79: This is a complicated process requiring many assumptions in order to make the
80: problem tractable.
81: \cite{klessen} and
82: Martel, Evans, \& Shapiro (2006) assume that the gas is isothermal.
83: \citet{bbb} go beyond this assumption by using a barotropic equation of state.
84: However, until recently, no one has included the effect of radiatively
85: heating the dust and gas by the stars formed in the simulation.
86: \citet{krumholz} have included an approximate radiative
87: transfer method, which works well in optically thick regions.
88: Their method assumes that the gas temperature is
89: equal to the dust temperature throughout their simulation.
90: This approximation is only valid at high densities when the dust and gas are
91: collisionally coupled.
92: Here we develop a method that explores the effect of radiative heating and
93: the dust and gas energetics for a range of optical depths and densities.
94:
95:
96: % Affect of dust
97: In our method we include various heating and cooling processes
98: to calculate the dust and gas temperature.
99: Stars can heat dust grains more effectively than
100: the gas because dust grains have broad-band absorption
101: properties.
102: Although we will not be explicitly modeling the motion
103: or energy density of dust grains, we
104: assume the dust and gas are well-mixed and the dust grains
105: transfer energy to gas particles through collisions using
106: the energy transfer rate discussed in \citet{young}.
107: The gas is heated by collisions with hot dust
108: grains and cosmic rays.
109: It can cool through CO and other molecular line emission.
110:
111: In this paper, we calculate the dust and gas temperature
112: in a field of stars.
113: The dust temperature around a single source is calculated
114: using a look-up table which we develop here.
115: With this look-up table and an approximation
116: to the flux-temperature conversion, we calculate the dust
117: temperature in the field.
118: Our look-up table is needed since the calculation of a
119: single dust temperature distribution can take longer than a
120: minute on current desktops and would take a substantial
121: fraction of a large-scale simulation's computations.
122: Therefore we outline our method here which can be used to decrease
123: the time spent on the calculation of the dust temperature
124: in future studies of clustered star formation.
125:
126: With the calculated value of the dust temperature, we derive
127: the gas temperature field for a distribution of
128: stellar sources, as in a young stellar cluster.
129: The effect that protostars have on heating their environment using a
130: hydrodynamic and gravity simulation will be addressed in a future paper.
131: %We will assume that before stellar sources have formed or far from stellar sources, the gas is isothermal at about 5K.
132: %(This is done by other SF simulations. While it would be nice to make no assumptions about the cooling/heating of the gas at various densities and just add cosmic ray heating and CO cooling rates to the energy equation, as in Golanski \& Woolfson 2001, this would slow down the simulation too much because the timescales for these processes are very short.)
133: %Input parameters into the algorithm to determine gas temperature
134: %near stars are luminosity of nearby star(s), distance from star(s), local gas density, average column density, and a local velocity parameter.
135: %Figure 1 describes how stellar heating can be added to a
136: %gravo-hydro simulation which uses Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH).
137: %The heating of the dust and energy transfer to
138: %gas will be discussed below in detail in this paper.
139: In this paper, we first discuss the calculation of the dust temperature
140: for single and multiple sources (\S \ref{sec:analy}),
141: then we describe our gas temperature calculation (\S \ref{sec:gas}), and
142: finally, we show some dust and gas temperature distributions
143: when multiple sources are present (\S \ref{sec:multiple}).
144:
145:
146: \section{Dust Temperature Calculation}\label{sec:analy}
147: %Show calculation of overlapping dust temperature distributions in HM, NE, PS simulation Paper I. setup need for multiple source calculation.
148: We consider two methods of calculating the dust temperature when there are
149: multiple heating sources.
150: The first approach assumes radiative equilibrium after summing up the
151: flux of multiple sources
152: heating a dust grain.
153: This approach makes simplifying assumptions about the dust absorption
154: and emission properties.
155: The second approach uses the one-dimensional spherical
156: radiative transfer code Dusty (Nenkova, Ivezi{\'c}, \& Elitzur 2000),
157: to add up the energy density
158: contributed by multiple sources; the dust temperature distribution is calculated separately
159: for each source, then
160: the temperatures are converted to energy densities (assuming radiative equilibrium),
161: which are summed together and then
162: converted back to a temperature.
163: We first discuss the analytic
164: approach (\S \ref{sec:1}), then the numerical
165: approach to calculating the dust temperature (\S \ref{sec:2.2}),
166: and finally we compare and analyze the two approaches (\S \ref{sec:compare}).
167: %Finally, we compare both approaches for single (\ref{sec:single})
168: %and multiple sources (\ref{sec:multiple}).
169:
170: \subsection{Analytic Dust Temperature Calculation} \label{sec:1}
171: The rate of energy absorbed by a dust grain
172: in a field of $N$ stars is
173: \begin{equation}\label{eq:10}
174: \Bigg( \frac{dE}{dt}\Bigg)_{\rm{abs}} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \frac{R_{*i}^2}{(\Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}})^2}
175: \int S_{\nu i} \pi a^2 Q_a(\nu) d\nu,
176: \end{equation}
177: where
178: $R_{*i}$ is the radius of star $i$,
179: $S_{\nu i}$ is the flux density at the stellar surface of star $i$ (which we assume is a blackbody),
180: $Q_a$ is the dust grain's absorption efficiency
181: as a function of frequency,
182: $\pi a^2$ is the projected
183: surface area of the grain exposed to the star's light,
184: and the separation between the star $i$ and the dust grain is
185: \begin{displaymath}
186: \Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}}=|\mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}}-\mathbf{r}|,
187: \end{displaymath}
188: where
189: $\mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}}$ is the location of star $i$ and
190: $\mathbf{r}$ is the position of the dust grain.
191: Substituting in the Planck function for star $i$ at temperature $T_{*i}$
192: and assuming
193: \begin{equation}\label{eq:1}
194: Q_a (\nu)= Q_a(\nu _o) \Bigg(\frac{\nu}{\nu_o}\Bigg)^{\beta _a},
195: \end{equation}
196: equation (\ref{eq:10}) becomes
197: \begin{equation}
198: %\Bigg( \frac{dE}{dt}\Bigg)_{abs} &=& \sum_{i=1}^{N_{stars}}
199: %\frac{R_{*i}^2}{(\Delta \mathbf{r_{*i}})^2}
200: %\int \pi B_\nu(T_{*i}) \pi a^2 Q_a(\nu _o) \Bigg(\frac{\nu}{\nu_o}\Bigg)^{\beta _a} d\nu \\
201: %&=& \sum_{i=1}^{N_{stars}} \frac{R_{*i}^2}{(\Delta \mathbf{r_{*i}})^2} \pi^2 a^2
202: %\frac{Q_a(\nu _o)}{\nu_o^{\beta _a}}
203: %\int B_\nu(T_{*i}) (\nu)^{\beta _a} d\nu \\
204: %&=&
205: \Bigg( \frac{dE}{dt}\Bigg)_{\rm{abs}} =\sum_{i=1}^{N} \frac{R_{*i}^2}{(\mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}})^2} \pi^2 a^2
206: \frac{Q_a(\nu _o)}{\nu_o^{\beta _a}}
207: \frac{2h}{c^2}
208: \Bigg(\frac{kT_{*i}}{h}\Bigg)^{4+\beta_a}
209: I_{4+\beta_a},
210: \end{equation}
211: where
212: \begin{equation}
213: I_{4+\beta_a}=\Gamma(4+\beta_a) \zeta (4+\beta_a)
214: \end{equation}
215: and the functions $\Gamma(x)$ and $\zeta(x)$ are defined as the gamma and Riemann zeta
216: function.%, respectively (see equations (6.1.6, 23.2.7, and 23.2.16) in \cite{as}).
217:
218: %\begin{tabular}{c c| c c c }
219: %$\beta$ & $4+\beta$ & $\Gamma (4+\beta)$ & $\zeta (4+\beta)$ & $I_{4+\beta}$\\
220: %\hline
221: %0 & 4 & 3!=6 & 1.082 & 6.492\\
222: %1 & 5 & 4!=24 & 1.037 & 24.888\\
223: %\end{tabular}
224:
225: The same assumptions can be made about the emission of the grain
226: except that the grain emits in all directions
227: (i.e. $\pi a^2$ becomes $4 \pi a^2$),
228: the grain is emitting instead of the star
229: (i.e. $T_{*i}$ becomes $\td$),
230: and the dust grain's emission efficiency is
231: \begin{equation}\label{eq:be}
232: Q_e (\nu)= Q_e(\nu _o) \Bigg(\frac{\nu}{\nu_o}\Bigg)^{\beta _e}.
233: \end{equation}
234: These assumptions give
235: \begin{equation}
236: \Bigg( \frac{dE}{dt}\Bigg)_{\rm{emis}} = \sum_{i=1}^{N}
237: 4 \pi^2 a^2
238: \frac{Q_e(\nu _o)}{\nu_o^{\beta _e}}
239: \frac{2h}{c^2}
240: \Bigg(\frac{kT_{d}}{h}\Bigg)^{4+\beta_e}
241: I_{4+\beta_e}.
242: \end{equation}
243: Assuming radiative equilibrium and
244: removing the dependence on stellar radius with $L_*=4\pi R_*^2 \sigma T_*^4$,
245: $\td$ at position $\mathbf{r}$ is given by
246: \begin{equation}\label{eq:td}
247: \td(\mathbf{r}) = \Bigg[ \frac{1}{4} \frac{Q_a(\nu_o)}{Q_e(\nu_o)} \frac{\nu_o^{\beta_e}}{\nu_o^{\beta_a}}
248: \frac{I_{4+\beta_a}}{I_{4+\beta_e}}
249: \Big( \frac{k}{h} \Big)^{\beta_a - \beta_e}
250: \frac{1}{4\pi\sigma}
251: \sum_{i=1}^{N}
252: \frac{L_{*i}T_{*i}^{\beta_a}}{(\Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}})^2}
253: \Bigg]^{1/(4+\beta_e)}
254: \end{equation}
255:
256: If we assume that grains absorb like graybodies ($\beta_a=0$)
257: where stars emit most of their luminosity (UV), then
258: $Q_a (\nu)= Q_a(UV)$.
259: %\begin{equation}
260: %Q_a (\nu)= Q_a(UV) \Bigg(\frac{\nu}{\nu_o}\Bigg)^{0} =Q_a(UV) .
261: %\end{equation}
262: The value of $Q_e$ is given at $125 \mu$m with respect to $Q_a$.
263: Using this approximation, we obtain
264: \begin{equation}\label{eq:td}
265: \td(\mathbf{r}) = \Bigg[ 3.89\ee{10} \frac{Q_a(UV)}{Q_e(125\mu m)} \frac{115^{\beta_e}}{I_{4+\beta_e}}
266: \sum_{i=1}^{N}
267: \frac{L_{*i}/1L_{\bigodot}}{(\Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}}/1AU)^2}
268: \Bigg]^{1/(4+\beta_e)}
269: \end{equation}
270: Notice that the dependence on stellar temperature disappears in this case.
271:
272: The value of $Q_a(UV) / Q_e(125\mu m)$,
273: where the UV wavelength range is $0.15 \mu m - 0.30 \mu m$,
274: can be calculated from observations or from a dust grain model.
275: We compare various values from the literature to the value
276: derived from the dust we use in our models (see Table \ref{tab:a}).
277: Our dust model is a combination of OH5 dust \citep{oh5}
278: and \citet{pollack} dust as described in \citet{chad}.
279: For OH5 dust, we calculate the value of $Q_a(UV) / Q_e(125\mu m)$
280: assuming a $10,000$K blackbody.
281: $Q_{a}$ is the stellar flux weighted average absorption efficiency
282: of the dust and $\sigma _{\rm{abs}}(\lambda)$ is the absorption cross-section for a dust grain.
283: Therefore,
284: \begin{equation}
285: \frac{Q_a(UV) }{Q_e(125 \mu m)} = \Bigg( \frac{
286: \sum^{0.3 \mu m}_{\lambda = 0.15 \mu m} F_{\lambda} \sigma_{\rm{abs}}(\lambda) }
287: {\sum^{0.3 \mu m}_{\lambda = 0.15 \mu m} F_{\lambda} } \Bigg)
288: \Bigg/
289: {\sigma_{\rm{abs}}(125 \mu m)} = 253.
290: \end{equation}
291:
292: Now we consider the various dust models in Table \ref{tab:a}
293: and fix the value of $\beta_e$, the dust grain's emission efficiency exponent.
294: From equation (\ref{eq:td}), the form of the dust temperature profile becomes
295: \begin{equation}\label{eq:basic}
296: \td = K(\beta_e)
297: \Bigg[ \sum_{i=1}^{N}
298: \frac{L_{*i}/1L_{\odot}}{(\Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}}/1 AU)^2}
299: \Bigg]^{1 / (4+\beta_{e})},
300: \end{equation}
301: where $\beta_{e}$
302: is fixed and the values of $K(\beta_e)$ for each model
303: are given in Table \ref{tab:a}.
304: In Figure \ref{fig:sig} we compare OH5 dust to an analytic approximation
305: (see equation \ref{eq:be}) normalized at $125 \mu $m and vary the value
306: of $\beta_e$.
307: The line with $\beta_e=1.8$ fits well at
308: long wavelengths but not at shorter wavelengths.
309: The opposite is true for $\beta_e=1.0$.
310: Since we expect long wavelength emission to dominate these clouds, we adopt an
311: analytic approximation of OH5 dust with $\beta_e=1.8 $
312: as our ``Analytic Solution'' in the following sections.
313:
314: \subsection{Numerical Dust Temperature Calculation}\label{sec:2.2}
315: Another method of calculating the dust temperature around multiple sources uses
316: the code Dusty which we have set up with OH5 dust opacities \citep{oh5} using the
317: method described in \citet{chad}.
318: Dusty is a one-dimensional spherical radiative transfer code \citep{dusty}.
319: Once a dust temperature distribution is derived around a single source,
320: we use it to estimate the dust temperature around multiple
321: sources, using some of the assumptions in the previous method,
322: which we explain in more detail below.
323: Using Dusty to calculate the dust temperature around a young
324: star is the most accurate solution;
325: however, this program can take over 1 minute
326: to run for low optical depths with yet longer run times for larger $\tau$.
327: Therefore, we calculate the dust temperature profile for various
328: combinations of luminosity, outer radius, and density profile to
329: create a look-up table.
330: (The parameters we consider are discussed in \S \ref{sec:par}.)
331: We then assume that the dust temperature profile around a single
332: source is of the form given in equation (\ref{eq:td}), i.e.
333: \begin{equation}\label{eq:A}
334: \td (\Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}})= K_i \Bigg( \frac{L_{*i}}
335: {(\Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}})^2}\Bigg)^{1/(4+\beta_i)},
336: \end{equation}
337: where $K$ and $\beta$ are functions of the density profile and dust properties.
338:
339: This assumption is valid when the dust is optically thin. Although
340: the gas and dust are denser closer to the central source and likely to be optically thick,
341: we are mainly interested in the temperature distribution far from the central
342: source where the physical processes we consider are dominant
343: and the dust and gas are optically thin to the cloud exterior.
344: For example, close to a forming star [$r \la 1000$ AU \citep{mcC}]
345: there may be a disk, which is
346: not represented by our assumption of spherical symmetry. Therefore, it is not
347: useful to model the dust temperature close to the star because it will be
348: affected by the presence of a disk.
349: %Our goal is to use these results in a full hydrodynamic/gravity simulation to study the effects of stellar heating in a star forming environment.
350:
351:
352: For each set of parameters,
353: we run Dusty and solve for a value of $K$ and $\beta$
354: (see \S \ref{sec:par}).
355: Since we are only interested in the dust temperature far from the
356: source, we fit the outer 25\% of the dust temperature profile
357: in $\log T- \log r$ space using least-squares fitting
358: in order to determine the values of $\beta$ and $K$ in equation (\ref{eq:A}).
359: We call these values of $\beta$ and K our ``Fit Solution''.
360: In order to calculate the dust temperature of a region heated by more than one protostar,
361: we add up the flux at the region of interest using
362: \begin{equation}\label{eq:B}
363: F(\mathbf{r})=\sum^N_{i=1} \frac{L_{*i}}{4 \pi (\Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}})^2}
364: \end{equation}
365: Combining equations (\ref{eq:A}) and (\ref{eq:B}), we derive
366: \begin{equation}\label{eq:Q}
367: F(\mathbf{r})=\sum^N_{i=1} \frac{(\td(\Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}})/K_i)^{4+\beta_i}}{4 \pi }.
368: %= \frac{(\td(\mathbf{r}))^{4+\beta}}{4 \pi K}.
369: \end{equation}
370: In general, we assume
371: \begin{equation}\label{eq:R}
372: F(\mathbf{r})=\frac{(\td(\mathbf{r})/\bar{K})^{4+\bar{\beta}}}{4 \pi}
373: \end{equation}
374: where $\bar{K}$ and $\bar{\beta}$ are defined as the flux-weighted
375: averages of the $K$ and $\beta$ values that
376: contribute to the flux at point $\mathbf{r}$, i.e.
377: \begin{equation}
378: \bar{\beta} = \frac{\sum \beta_i L_{*i} / 4 \pi \Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}}^2}
379: {\sum L_{*i} / 4 \pi \Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}}^2}
380: \end{equation}
381: and
382: \begin{equation}
383: \bar{K} = \frac{\sum K_iL_{*i} / 4 \pi \Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}}^2}
384: {\sum L_{*i} / 4 \pi \Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}}^2},
385: \end{equation}
386: where the sums are from $i=1$ to the total number of stars, $N$.
387:
388: Therefore, equating (\ref{eq:Q}) and (\ref{eq:R})
389: and solving for $\td(\mathbf{r}$) gives,
390: \begin{equation}\label{eq:tdsum}
391: \td(\mathbf{r}) = \bar{K}\Bigg[
392: \sum^N_{i=1} \Bigg(\frac{T(\Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}})}
393: {K_i}\Bigg)^{4+\beta_i}\Bigg]^{1/ (4+ \bar{\beta})}.
394: \end{equation}
395: Using equation (\ref{eq:A}), we obtain
396: \begin{equation}\label{eq:tdsum1}
397: \td(\mathbf{r}) = \bar{K}\Bigg[
398: \sum^N_{i=1} \frac{L_{*i}}{\Delta \mathbf{r}_{*\it{i}}^2},
399: \Bigg]^{1/ (4+ \bar{\beta})}
400: \end{equation}
401: the equation we used to calculate the dust temperature in a field of sources.
402: %[We'd like to check this assumption by running simulations with similar initial conditions in a 3D code in the future, such as Sunrise (ref?)]
403:
404: %In regions near the luminosity source and at high densities, the optical depth becomes large and \td can no longer be approximated as a power law function of the form of Eq. \ref{eq:A}. Therefore, we model the temperature as a
405: %sum of exponentials in log-space.
406: %\begin{equation}\label{eq:exptd}
407: %log (\td(\Delta \mathbf{r_{*i}})) =
408: %A_i e^{-B_i log (\Delta \mathbf{r_{*i}})}+C_ie^{-D_i log(\Delta \mathbf{r_{*i}})}+F_i
409: %\end{equation}
410: % We choose the function using 3 constraints (i.e. $\td(r_{inner})$, $\td(r_{mid})$, $T'_{dust}(r_{mid})$)
411: %and fit to 2 variables, similar to the power-law function.
412: %
413: %Using this method, we can no longer model \td as a simple power-law,
414: %therefore we can not use Eq. \ref{eq:tdsum1}
415: %to calculate \td in the case of multiple heating sources.
416: %Therefore, we calculate \td using Eq. \ref{eq:tdsum1} and also using Eq. \ref{eq:exptd} for all nearby sources.
417: %Then we take the highest \td derived from both of the methods
418: %as the value of \td at that point.
419:
420: \subsubsection{Parameter Space}\label{sec:par}
421: We assume the dust and gas are well-mixed and have the same
422: density profile, offset only by the dust to gas mass ratio ($\eta_{dg}$)
423: described in \S \ref{sec:gas}, i.e.
424: $\rho_{\rm{dust}}=\eta_{dg} \rho_{\rm{gas}}$
425: We assume $N_{\rm{H}_2}/N_{\rm{He}}=5$, which gives $\mu=2.33$.
426: The density profile of the gas is parameterized with $n_o$ and $\alpha$ using
427: \begin{equation}
428: n_{gas}=n_o \bigg( \frac{r}{1000AU} \bigg)^{-\alpha}.
429: \end{equation}
430:
431: We choose an inner radius of the dust distribution to be fixed at $30$AU.
432: %which is half of the sink accretion radius in our SPH simulation.
433: %Need to check on accretion radius!!!!
434: %This allows us to model the dust physics occuring within the sink radius.
435: This number is smaller than the average sizes of more evolved disks
436: [i.e. \citet{mcC} find disk diameters of 50-1000 AU for disks in Orion],
437: which would be considered sub-grid physics in a simulation of
438: clustered star formation with moderate resolution.
439: However, we find that the choice of the inner radius does not greatly
440: affect the values of $\beta$ and $K$ for our models since we are not modeling
441: the increase in temperature where the dust becomes optically thick.
442:
443: The luminosity required to reach a dust destruction temperature of $1500$ K at
444: $30AU$ using the Analytic Solution is $9.58\ee{6} \Lsun$.
445: This is outside our sample range of luminosities;
446: therefore we can neglect the effects of dust destruction.
447: We also vary the outer radius, $r_{\rm{out}}$, to obtain a range of values.
448: We find that our values of $K$ and $\beta$ do not strongly depend on $r_{\rm{out}}$.
449:
450: %The Dusty model uses OH5 dust opacities \citep{oh5} .
451: In all cases, the stellar input spectrum is assumed to be a
452: blackbody with temperature $T_{*} = 10,000K$.
453: This value does not strongly influence the output temperature
454: distribution at outer radii since the light is
455: quickly reprocessed by the dust to longer wavelengths.
456:
457: We model the entire parameter space listed in Table \ref{tab:2par}
458: with two exceptions.
459: First, we limit the density at the inner radius to be less than
460: $10^{10}$cm$^{-3}$, because at
461: higher densities dynamical effects may become important since the
462: free-fall time becomes small as the density increases.
463: %(see Appendix on Timescales).
464: %Second, we impose the condition on the dust opacity that
465: %$\tau _{100 \mu m} \le 20$.
466: Second, we limit the mass of the envelope to be less than $\sim 1000$ $\msun$
467: since a larger envelope would likely produce a cluster of stars
468: (assuming a star formation efficiency of 10\% and a maximum stellar
469: mass of 100 $\msun$)
470: which would break the assumption of spherical symmetry.
471: Therefore, combinations of large $\alpha$ and
472: large $n_o$ may not be represented in our models.
473: Based on these restrictions, of the 5049 possible models in our
474: parameter space, we model 3231 or 64\% of them.
475: In Figure \ref{fig:mass} we show the luminosities
476: and masses modeled in our parameter space.
477: Figure \ref{fig:alpha} shows the relationship
478: between the values of $\tau$, $\alpha$ and $n_o$ for the models
479: in our parameter space.
480:
481:
482:
483: \subsection{Comparison of Dust Temperature Calculation Methods}\label{sec:compare}
484: Figures \ref{fig:fidno} and \ref{fig:fidL} compare the two methods of
485: calculating the dust temperature around a single source.
486: The Analytic Solution uses OH5 dust parameters with $\beta _e=1.8$ as described in
487: \S \ref{sec:1} which best matches the dust properties used in the
488: Dusty Solution in Figure \ref{fig:sig}.
489:
490: Figure \ref{fig:fidno} shows that the Analytic Solution captures the \emph{shape} of the
491: Dusty temperature profile, but at high $\tau$ it overestimates the \emph{magnitude}.
492: If we only vary the luminosity (see Figure \ref{fig:fidL})
493: the offset of the Analytic Solution to the Dusty Solution changes,
494: therefore a simple adjustment to the Analytic Solution based on
495: luminosity would not correct the Analytic Solution.
496: The Fit Solution described in \S \ref{sec:2.2} appears to be the best fit,
497: as shown in Figures \ref{fig:fidno} and \ref{fig:fidL}.
498:
499:
500:
501: Figure \ref{fig:Kbeta} shows histograms of $K$ and $\beta$ derived from our
502: Fit Solution for our parameter space.
503: While most models cluster around the Analytic
504: Solution, there is a spread that is dependent on some of the input
505: parameters.
506: In Figure \ref{fig:Kbetaalpha} we show how the values of
507: $K$ and $\beta$ depend
508: on the $\alpha$ parameter. Models that are far from the
509: Analytic Solution (i.e. $K=1000$, $\beta = 0$) tend to have
510: small values of $\alpha$.
511:
512: In Figures \ref{fig:Kall} and \ref{fig:betaall}, we show how different parameters
513: determine the values of $K$ and $\beta$.
514: Figure \ref{fig:Kall} shows that luminosity and the value of $K$ are
515: positively correlated.
516: Although we have explicitly
517: removed the luminosity dependence from equation (\ref{eq:A}), there is still some
518: dependence of $K$ on luminosity.
519: This can be understood in terms of radiative trapping.
520: For high luminosities, more photons at shorter
521: wavelengths exist farther from the star, which increases the size of the
522: region of high optical depth and therefore increases the value of K.
523: Also, as $\alpha$ increases, $K$ decreases. Increasing $\alpha$ shrinks the
524: size of the region of high optical depth due to the buildup of material
525: close to the star which absorbs the high energy photons.
526: Figure \ref{fig:betaall} shows that as $\alpha$ decreases and
527: luminosity increases,
528: $\beta$ moves farther from the Analytic Solution.
529: The drastic drop of $\beta$ at high luminosities can be understood by
530: comparing the two models shown in Figure \ref{fig:fidL}.
531: In the two models, the radius at which the dust temperature turns up
532: (i.e., when the material changes from optically thin to optically thick)
533: moves out in radius as the luminosity increases.
534: Since we model the value of $\beta$ using only the outer
535: 25\% of the material, we expect to be considering only the optically thin
536: material. However, as the luminosity increases, the radius at which the
537: transition from optically thick to optically thin material moves outward.
538: Therefore, at higher luminosities, our calculation of $\beta$ becomes
539: influenced by the optically thick region.
540: This is the reason $\beta$ moves away from the optically thin Analytic
541: Solution as luminosity increases.
542:
543:
544: In order to calculate values of $\beta$ and $K$ not modeled in our parameter
545: space, we interpolate between known values in our look-up table.
546: We use the method for interpolating in two or more dimensions described in
547: Chapter 3 of \citet{numrec}.
548: This method involves solving successive one-dimensional interpolations.
549: We modified the POLIN2 subroutine to interpolate in 4 dimensions.
550: The actual method of interpolation that we used was the polynomial
551: interpolation method over 3 known quantities
552: from the subroutine POLINT in \citet{numrec}.
553: We tested our interpolation method by calculating extra models, not
554: included in our model grid, and comparing the results between the
555: real solution and the interpolated value. The results are tabulated in Table
556: \ref{tab:interp}.
557: We have varied all of the parameters by different amounts and found that the largest percent difference
558: from the model to the interpolated value is $6.0\%$. The largest differences
559: occur at the extremes of the parameter-space at small $\alpha$ and large luminosity. Large errors at small values of $\alpha$ are likely due to the large scatter of values of $K$ and $\beta$ at small $\alpha$ (see Figures \ref{fig:Kall} and \ref{fig:betaall}).
560: The large differences at large luminosities are probably due to the rapid change of the value of $\beta$ with luminosity (see Figure \ref{fig:betaall}).
561: Although $K$ does not change as much as $\beta$,
562: the value of $K$ is dependent upon the value of $\beta$.
563:
564:
565: Based on the previous discussion in this section, we use
566: the Numerical Dust Temperature method
567: described in \S \ref{sec:2.2} to calculate the dust temperature
568: in the remainder of the paper.
569: Since we are primarily interested in the dust temperature far from
570: the luminosity source, we find that we can model
571: the \emph{shape} and \emph{magnitude} of the
572: dust temperature distribution most accurately with the Numerical Dust
573: Temperature method.
574: There might be some error in the calculation of $K$ and $\beta$
575: for models with large luminosities or small $\alpha$'s.
576: However, we don't expect very small values of $\alpha$ to be common
577: \citep{mueller}.
578: Also, stars that will eventually have high luminosities are rare
579: and will take awhile to reach this state, therefore we do not
580: expect many stars to have high luminosities during the early
581: stages of star formation which we model.
582:
583: %PAST WORK: We calculate the values of $\beta$ and $K$ of the outer density envelope when $T_{dust}=10K$ or at the outer edge if it doesn't reach $10K$.
584:
585:
586: %\section{Comparison with CM}
587: %[We are unable to use the formula supplied in CM because they calculate the dust temperature distribution which best predicts the far-IR SED based on physical conditions of the core. This is useful for observers, but in our simulations, we are interested in the outer dust temperature distribution. Therefore, we run Dusty models and fit the outer $T_d(r)$. The outer dust temperature distribution is then input in a simulation to model the dust around a sink particle.]
588:
589:
590:
591: \section{Gas Temperature Calculation}\label{sec:gas}
592: After the dust temperature as a function of distance from luminosity
593: sources is derived for positions near stars in a cluster using
594: the look-up table, the gas temperature can be calculated
595: assuming gas energetics balance.
596: We calculate the gas temperature using a
597: gas-dust energetics code %written by S. Doty
598: which includes energy transfer between gas and dust via collisions,
599: heating by cosmic rays,
600: and molecular cooling (see \citet{doty}
601: and the appendix in \citet{young} for a more detailed description).
602: We assume that the dust to gas mass ratio is $\eta_{dg}=4.86\ee{-3}$
603: \citep{hm}
604: and the grain cross-section per baryon is $6.09\ee{-22}$
605: \citep{young}.
606: The cosmic ray ionization rate is $3.00\ee{-17}$ s$^{-1}$ \citep{vans}
607: and the energy deposited per cosmic ray ionization is $2.00\ee{1}$ eV
608: \citep{goldsmith} in our models.
609: %Since we assume $\mu = 2.33$, then $\mu_b=2.8$, where $\mu_b$ is the
610: %ratio of number of baryons to number of H$_2$ molecules.
611: We take the fractional abundance of CO relative to H$_2$ to be $1.0\ee{-4}$
612: from Figure 8a of \citet{lee}.
613: We assume that the region we are studying is deep within a larger molecular cloud.
614: Therefore, there is no interstellar radiation field impinging on the outer
615: bounds of the cloud and the photoelectric effect on PAH's is
616: not present.
617:
618:
619: The model dependent input parameters are
620: T$_{dust}$, local density, column density, and local velocity dispersion (b).
621: T$_{dust}$ is calculated with the procedure described in \S \ref{sec:2.2}.
622: Local density and column density can be derived from our
623: input density profile.
624: The column density is calculated radially from the point of interest to the edge of the
625: system. The edge of the system is defined as either the point at which the density is lowest or some fiducial value (as discussed later in \S \ref{sec:multiple}).
626: The velocity-spread parameter, $b$, is defined for a Maxwellian velocity
627: distribution as $b=(2kT/m)^{1/2}$ \citep{spitzer}
628: and is assumed to be 1 km/s throughout this paper.
629:
630: %In a large-scale simulation, local density
631: %can be derived from the average local density.
632: %Column density can be calculated by taking a weighted mean value of density
633: %integrated along a few lines of sight out to a dust temperature of
634: %$\sim10-15K$.
635:
636: %See Table \ref{tab:4} for a range of expected values for the gas temperature calculation.
637:
638: Figure \ref{fig:compare} shows the variation of gas temperature with distance
639: from a stellar heating source for two values of X(CO).
640: Close to the source, the dust and gas temperature are coupled due to
641: collisional interactions of the dust with the gas.
642: As the density decreases, collisions between the dust and gas become less
643: frequent and the gas is able to cool via molecular (mainly CO)
644: rotational transitions.
645: Then as the density continues to drop
646: and there is less CO to cool the gas, cosmic
647: ray heating becomes the dominant heating source
648: and the gas temperature increases.
649: For a gas with less CO (X(CO)$=5\ee{-5}$), the cooling is not as efficient
650: and the temperature is larger.
651: As various other parameters change in our models,
652: different heating and cooling
653: terms dominate and the minimum and maximum temperatures vary.
654: We discuss this in more detail in the following section
655: (\S \ref{sec:multiple}).
656:
657:
658: As seen in Figure \ref{fig:compare},
659: the gas temperature falls below $10$K
660: when gas collisions are the dominant cooling method.
661: Our gas cooling rate calculations are based on the work of \citet{nk93} and
662: \citet{nlm95} which only extend down to 10K because the \hh-CO collisional
663: rates were not defined below 10K at the time of their work.
664: We expect the cooling rate to drop drastically as the temperature
665: approaches zero and we have attempted to adjust our cooling rate calculation
666: to account for this.
667: Our first attempt to calculate the cooling rate ($\Lambda$) below 10K
668: involved calculating the rate of change of log $\Lambda$ with log $T$
669: between 20K and 10K ($d$log$\Lambda$/$d$log$T$) and
670: applying it to temperatures below 10K.
671: This method has been used in \citet{young} successfully
672: when dust-gas collisions, rather than \hh-CO collisions,
673: are the dominant mode of energy transfer at low temperatures.
674: However, for our models, \hh-CO collisions dominate at low temperatures
675: and to take this into account we modify the method of
676: calculating $d$log$\Lambda$/$d$log$T$ using the
677: Large Velocity Gradient model (LVG).
678: Instead of extrapolating the cooling rate to low temperatures,
679: we extrapolate the CO rate coefficients from \citet{fl} from 10K to 5K.
680: Then we calculate $d$log$\Lambda$/$d$log$T$ between 10K and 5K
681: using the LVG model.
682: We apply the new values of $d$log$\Lambda$/$d$log$T$ between 10K and 5K
683: to our gas energetics model.
684: In Figure \ref{fig:compare}
685: we compare the temperature derived using the old and new
686: method of calculating the gas temperature. Our change increases
687: the temperature by approximately 1K at the minimum value.
688:
689: \section{Gas and Dust Temperature with Multiple Sources}\label{sec:multiple}
690:
691: \subsection{Two Sources}
692: In order to calculate the gas temperature between two sources, we must
693: first calculate the dust temperature. We do this using the formalism
694: discussed in \S \ref{sec:2.2}. Once we have determined the dust
695: temperature, we can use our energetics algorithm to calculate the
696: gas temperature.
697: Around each source we place a density profile. In order for this
698: to be realistic, we choose a density, $n_{eq}$ at which we have the
699: two density profiles meet.
700: The value of $n_{eq}$ sets the distance between the sources, i.e.
701: smaller values of $n_{eq}$ place the sources farther apart.
702:
703: Figure \ref{fig:two} shows the dust and gas temperature profile for
704: increasing values of $n_{eq}$, i.e. smaller separations.
705: An interesting feature of this plot is that if we only look at the region
706: between the two sources, we find a large variation in gas temperature.
707: This is due to the higher densities sampled as the sources move
708: closer together.
709: The top panel shows sources that are far apart and we see that the
710: maximum gas temperature between the two sources is $\sim 20$K and
711: the minimum gas temperature is $\sim 7$K.
712: Cosmic ray heating, though relatively weak,
713: can warm the material sufficiently far from luminous sources.
714: As the sources move closer together, cosmic rays become less important
715: until the temperature between the sources ceases to increase,
716: whereas dust heating becomes more important and the
717: gas is not able to cool efficiently and the minimum temperature
718: between the sources rises.
719:
720:
721: \subsection{Three Sources}\label{sec:three}
722: Here we calculate the gas and dust temperature distribution around three sources.
723: The three sources were placed on three of the
724: corners of a square with sides of length 1000AU.
725: The least luminous source was placed on the corner between the other two
726: sources.
727: The parameters assumed for each source are given in Table
728: \ref{tab:source} as well as the position of the sources in a 2000AU x 2000AU grid.
729: % L1 ------- L2
730: % |
731: % |
732: % |
733: % |
734: % L3
735: We calculate the dust temperature using the method
736: described in \S \ref{sec:2.2} and show the results in Figure \ref{fig:tdust3}.
737:
738:
739: In order to determine the gas temperature, we first calculate
740: the density ($\rho$) and column density ($N_{col}$)
741: at each point in the grid due to all three sources, individually.
742: Then, at each point we choose the source which gives
743: the highest value of $N_{col}$ and use that source to calculate $N_{col}$,
744: $\rho$, and the gas temperature.
745:
746: In order to calculate $N_{col}$,
747: we integrate from the point of interest to the ``edge''
748: in the direction radially away from the source.
749: We tested two methods of defining the ``edge.''
750: %Method 1
751: Our first method, the ``Length of Square Method,''
752: integrates from the point of interest to 2000AU from the source
753: (Figure \ref{fig:td32000con} and \ref{fig:td32000surf}).
754: The value of 2000 AU was chosen to equal the length of the side of the square
755: in which we place our sources.
756: %Method 2
757: Our second method, the ``Edge of Square Method,''
758: integrates from the point of interest to the edge of the region studied
759: (Figure \ref{fig:td3econ} and \ref{fig:td3esurf}).
760: Using this method, the integration length depends on the direction
761: of integration.
762: In both cases, we find that the gas and dust
763: temperature are not equal, unless we are in a
764: region of high density close to a luminosity
765: source as seen in Figures \ref{fig:td32000con} and
766: \ref{fig:td3econ}. In these high density regions, the dust and
767: gas temperature are coupled through collisions.
768: As the density decreases, the gas temperature drops rapidly,
769: compared to the dust temperature, due to the ability of the gas
770: to cool through molecular transitions.
771: Another interesting feature of these plots is the detectability
772: of Source 1, the dimmest object in the region,
773: even though it is close to Source 2, the brightest source
774: in the region.
775:
776:
777: Two differences between the two methods of calculating $N_{col}$
778: are evident in Figures \ref{fig:tdust3} - \ref{fig:td3econ}.
779: The first is the the square shape of the contours near the edges
780: when using the Edge of Square Method in Figure \ref{fig:td3econ}.
781: This is an artifact of a square region of interest.
782: The second difference is the gas temperature near Source 1.
783: It appears to be shifted in the direction of Source 2 for the Length of Square Method
784: (Figure \ref{fig:td32000con}) and
785: is shifted in the opposite direction for the Edge of Square Method
786: (Figure \ref{fig:td3econ}).
787: For both methods, the dust temperature and gas-dust collisional
788: heating is the same in this region.
789: Therefore, the molecular cooling rate
790: and the column density must be different.
791: For the Length of Square Method the calculation of $N_{col}$ is dominated by
792: Source 2 near Source 1.
793: This is the reason the gas temperature contour around Source 1 is shifted
794: toward Source 2.
795: The value of $N_{col}$ drops as we move across Source 1. This causes
796: a shift in the gas temperature toward Source 2 even though the
797: dust temperature on either side of Source 1 is symmetric.
798: For the Edge of Square Method, Source 1 is able to increase the value of $N_{col}$
799: on the side facing away from Source 2
800: over the value calculated from Source 2.
801: This increase in $N_{col}$ causes the gas temperature to increase as well.
802: Although neither of these methods is entirely correct,
803: we use the Length of Square Method (adjusted for the size of the square) in the following
804: figures due to the square edge effects of the Edge of Square Method.
805:
806: In Figure \ref{fig:z31}, we compare the gas and dust temperature far from the sources
807: when we replace the three sources
808: with a single source at the location of Source 2.
809: We use the same
810: parameters as Source 2 for our single source, however we have increased its
811: luminosity to 130$\Lsun$. This figure illustrates the difficulty in
812: determining the number of sources responsible for heating the gas and dust and
813: highlights the need for adequate spatial resolution.
814:
815: In Figure \ref{fig:zoomout}, we have zoomed out of the region of interest.
816: Notice that the dust temperature steadily decreases as the distance from the central three sources increases.
817: Yet, the gas temperature slowly begins to rise.
818: This is due to the decrease of effectiveness of CO cooling and the increase in
819: heating by cosmic rays as the density decreases.
820:
821: \section{Conclusion}
822: We have presented a method for calculating the dust and gas temperature
823: between stellar sources.
824: The analytic method that we investigated for calculating the dust temperature
825: was not accurate enough.
826: Instead, our chosen method of calculating the dust temperature uses
827: a simple radiative transfer code which we use to create a look-up table.
828: Once we have derived the dust temperature, we are able to calculate the
829: gas temperature by balancing various energy processes.
830: We include dust-gas collisional heating, molecular cooling, and
831: cosmic-ray heating.
832: When we have balanced the energies, we are able to derive the gas
833: temperature.
834: Other methods which set the gas temperature and dust
835: temperature equal assume the gas and dust are opaque everywhere, which
836: is not always true. In Figure \ref{fig:perdiff}, we show the percentage
837: difference between the gas and dust temperature, as well as the density,
838: for the distribution of sources discussed in \S \ref{sec:three}. These two
839: figures show that the largest percentage difference between the dust
840: and gas temperature occurs where the density is the lowest. Therefore, at
841: low densities ($n \la 10^{5}$cm$^{-3}$), assuming equal
842: dust and gas temperatures is not appropriate.
843:
844: We plan to use the method discussed in this paper to model a region
845: of clustered star formation with the three-dimensional hydrodynamics code
846: discussed in \cite{martel}.
847: Our method of calculating the gas and dust temperature distribution
848: in a field of young stars will enable us and others to more accurately model
849: clustered star formation observationally and in future simulations.
850:
851:
852: \section{Acknowledgments}
853: AU would like to thank the NASA GSRP for providing support and
854: Chad Young and Jeong-Eun Lee for help with DUSTY and the gas energetics code.
855: NE would like to thank the NSF for grants AST-0307250 and AST-0607793.
856: This work was partially supported by a grant from The Research Corporation (SDD).
857:
858: \newpage
859: \begin{thebibliography}{}
860:
861:
862: \bibitem[Bate, Bonnell, \& Bromm(2003)]{bbb} Bate, M.~R., Bonnell,
863: I.~A., \& Bromm, V.\ 2003, \mnras, 339, 577
864:
865: \bibitem[Churchwell(2002)]{Churchwell} Churchwell, E.\ 2002,
866: \araa, 40, 27
867:
868: \bibitem[Doty \& Neufeld(1997)]{doty} Doty, S.~D., \&
869: Neufeld, D.~A.\ 1997, \apj, 489, 122
870:
871: \bibitem[Flower \& Launay(1985)]{fl} Flower, D.~R., \&
872: Launay, J.~M.\ 1985, \mnras, 214, 271
873:
874: \bibitem[Goldsmith(2001)]{goldsmith} Goldsmith, P.~F.\ 2001,
875: \apj, 557, 736
876:
877: \bibitem[Hildebrand(1983)]{hilde} Hildebrand, R.~H.\ 1983,
878: \qjras, 24, 267
879:
880: \bibitem[Hollenbach \& McKee(1989)]{hm} Hollenbach, D., \&
881: McKee, C.~F.\ 1989, \apj, 342, 306
882:
883: \bibitem[Klessen, Burkert, \& Bate(1998)]{klessen} Klessen, R.~S.,
884: Burkert, A., \& Bate, M.~R.\ 1998, \apjl, 501, L205
885:
886: \bibitem[Krumholz, Klein, \& McKee(2007)]{krumholz} Krumholz, M.~R.,
887: Klein, R.~I., \& McKee, C.~F.\ 2007, \apj, 656, 959
888:
889: \bibitem[Lada \& Lada(2003)]{lada} Lada, C.~J., \& Lada,
890: E.~A.\ 2003, \araa, 41, 57
891:
892: \bibitem[Lee, Bergin, \& Evans(2004)]{lee} Lee, J.-E., Bergin, E.~A.,
893: \& Evans, N.~J., II 2004, \apj, 617, 360
894:
895: \bibitem[Makinen et al.(1985)]{makinen} Makinen, P., Harvey,
896: P.~M., Wilking, B.~A., \& Evans, N.~J., II.\ 1985, \apj, 299, 341
897:
898: \bibitem[Martel et al.(2006)]{martel}
899: Martel, H., Evans, N.~J., II, \& Shapiro, P.~R.\ 2006, \apjs, 163, 122
900:
901: \bibitem[McCaughrean \& O'dell(1996)]{mcC} McCaughrean,
902: M.~J., \& O'dell, C.~R.\ 1996, \aj, 111, 1977
903:
904: \bibitem[Mueller et al.(2002)]{mueller} Mueller, K.~E.,
905: Shirley, Y.~L., Evans, N.~J., II, \& Jacobson, H.~R.\ 2002, \apjs, 143, 469
906:
907: \bibitem[Nenkova et al.(2000)]{dusty} Nenkova, M.,
908: Ivezi{\'c}, {\v Z}., \& Elitzur, M.\ 2000, ASP Conf.~Ser.~196: Thermal
909: Emission Spectroscopy and Analysis of Dust, Disks, and Regoliths, 196, 77
910:
911: \bibitem[Neufeld \& Kaufman(1993)]{nk93} Neufeld, D.~A., \&
912: Kaufman, M.~J.\ 1993, \apj, 418, 263
913:
914: \bibitem[Neufeld, Lepp, \& Melnick(1995)]{nlm95} Neufeld, D.~A., Lepp,
915: S., \& Melnick, G.~J.\ 1995, \apjs, 100, 132
916:
917: \bibitem[Ossenkopf \& Henning(1994)]{oh5} Ossenkopf, V., \&
918: Henning, T.\ 1994, \aap, 291, 943
919:
920: \bibitem[Press et al.(1992)]{numrec} Press, W.~H., Teukolsky,
921: S.~A., Vetterling, W.~T., \& Flannery, B.~P.\ 1992, Cambridge: University
922: Press, |c1992, 2nd ed.,
923:
924: \bibitem[Pollack et al.(1994)]{pollack} Pollack, J.~B.,
925: Hollenbach, D., Beckwith, S., Simonelli, D.~P., Roush, T., \& Fong, W.\
926: 1994, \apj, 421, 615
927:
928: \bibitem[Spitzer(1998)]{spitzer} Spitzer, L.\ 1998, Physical
929: Processes in the Interstellar Medium, by Lyman Spitzer, Wiley-VCH,
930: May 1998.
931:
932: \bibitem[van der Tak \& van Dishoeck(2000)]{vans} van der
933: Tak, F.~F.~S., \& van Dishoeck, E.~F.\ 2000, \aap, 358, L79
934:
935: \bibitem[Young \& Evans(2005)]{chad} Young, C.~H., \& Evans,
936: N.~J.\ 2005, \apj, 627, 293
937:
938: \bibitem[Young et al.(2004)]{young} Young, K.~E., Lee, J.-E.,
939: Evans, N.~J., Goldsmith, P.~F., \& Doty, S.~D.\ 2004, \apj, 614, 252
940:
941: \end{thebibliography}
942:
943: \newpage
944:
945: \begin{deluxetable}{c | c | c c c }
946: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
947: \tablecaption{Dust Parameters}
948: \tablewidth{0pt}
949: \tablehead{
950: \colhead{Dust Type} & \colhead{$\frac{Q_a(UV)}{Q_e(125\mu m)}$}
951: & \colhead{$K(1)$}
952: & \colhead{$K(1.8)$}
953: & \colhead{$K(2)$}
954: }
955: \startdata
956: OH5 (our dust model) & 253 & 539.3 & 351.1 & 319.8\\
957: \citet{hilde} & 4000 & 936.6 & 565.1 & 506.6 \\
958: \citet{makinen} & 790 & 677.1 & 427.2 & 386.7
959: \enddata
960: %\tablecomments{}
961: \label{tab:a}
962: \end{deluxetable}
963:
964:
965: \begin{deluxetable}{c | c c c c}
966: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
967: \tablecaption{Dust Model Parameters}
968: \tablewidth{0pt}
969: \tablehead{
970: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Lower Limit} & \colhead{Upper Limit}& \colhead{$\Delta$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{ N\tablenotemark{b}}
971: }
972: \startdata
973: log (L/$\Lsun$) & -2 & 6 & 0.5 & 17\\
974: log ($n_o/1$cm$^{-3}$) & 2.5 & 7.5 & 0.5 & 11\\
975: %$1.14\ee{2.5}$ & $1.14\ee{7.5}$ & $10^{0.5}$ & 11\\
976: % see notes page 9/20/2006 for explanation of these numbers.
977: %$10^{2.5}$ & $10^{7.5}$ & $10^{0.5}$ & 11\\
978: $\alpha$ & 0 & 4 &0.5 & 9\\
979: log (r$_{out}$/1 pc) & -1 & 0 & 0.5 & 3
980: %B & 0.1 km/s & 3 km/s & log B & 5
981: \enddata
982: %\tablecomments{}
983: \tablenotetext{a}{Spacing of parameters}
984: \tablenotetext{b}{Number of parameters}
985: \label{tab:2par}
986: \end{deluxetable}
987:
988: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c c| c c c c c c}
989: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
990: \tablecaption{Dust Model Interpolation Results}
991: \tablewidth{0pt}
992: \tablehead{
993: \colhead{L($\Lsun$)} & \colhead{n$_o$ (cm$^{-3}$)} & \colhead{$\alpha$}& \colhead{$r_{out}$ (pc)}
994: & \colhead{K$^{model}$} & \colhead{K$^{poly-interp}$}& \colhead{K$^{\%-diff}$}
995: & \colhead{$\beta^{model}$} & \colhead{$\beta^{poly-interp}$} & \colhead{$\beta^{\%-diff}$}}
996: \startdata
997: 1.8$\ee{-2}$&5.62$\ee{2}$ & 1.75 & 0.177 & 302.1 & 300.8 & 0.4& 1.82 & 1.82 & 0.0\\
998: 1.0$\ee{0}$ &5.00$\ee{3}$ & 2.75 & 0.194 & 214.8 & 213.9 & 0.4& 1.81 & 1.81 & 0.0 \\
999: 1.0$\ee{0}$ &5.00$\ee{3}$ & 1.75 & 0.194 & 295.6 & 295.1 & 0.2& 1.78 & 1.78 & 0.0 \\
1000: 1.0$\ee{0}$& 5.00$\ee{2}$ & 0.80 & 0.194 & 322.4 & 310.0 & 3.8& 1.68 & 1.78 & 6.0 \\
1001: 1.0$\ee{0}$ & 5.50$\ee{5}$ & 2.00 & 0.194 & 161.5 & 157.6 & 2.4& 1.82 & 1.81 & 0.5 \\
1002: 1.5$\ee{5}$ & 5.00$\ee{2}$ & 2.00 & 0.194 & 355.8 & 356.5 & 0.2& 1.37 & 1.36 & 0.7 \\
1003: \enddata
1004: \label{tab:interp}
1005: \end{deluxetable}
1006:
1007:
1008: \begin{deluxetable}{c | c c c c | c c | c c}
1009: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1010: \tablecaption{Source Parameters}
1011: \tablewidth{0pt}
1012: \tablehead{
1013: \colhead{Source} & \colhead{Luminosity ($\Lsun$)}
1014: & \colhead{$n_o$(cm${^{-3}}$})
1015: & \colhead{$\alpha$}
1016: & \colhead{r$_{out}$ (pc)}
1017: &{K} & {$\beta$} & x (AU) & y (AU)
1018: }
1019: \startdata
1020: 1 & 1 & $10^3$ & 2 & 0.1 & 302.60 & 1.7875 & 500 & 1500\\
1021: 2 & 100 & $10^5$ & 2 & 0.1 & 215.89 & 1.7623& 1500 & 1500\\
1022: 3 & 10 & $10^4$ & 2 & 0.1 & 263.22 & 1.7817 & 500 & 500\\
1023: \enddata
1024: %\tablecomments{}
1025: \label{tab:source}
1026: \end{deluxetable}
1027: %Source L n_o alpha r_out Model K beta
1028: %1 1 10^3 2 0.1 2406 302.60 1.7875
1029: %2 100 10^5 2 0.1 4926 215.89 1.7623
1030: %3 10 10^4 2 0.1 3666 263.22 1.7817
1031:
1032:
1033:
1034: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1035: \epsscale {1.0}
1036: %\plotone{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/K_OH5DUST/oh5.sigabs.ps}
1037: \plotone{f1.eps}
1038: \caption{OH5 dust properties. Dashed line shows the variation of
1039: cross-section with wavelength for OH5 dust.
1040: The solid lines show the different values of
1041: $\beta_e$ normalized at $125 \mu $m that we consider
1042: in Table \ref{tab:a}.
1043: % of $-1$, $-2$, and $-1.8$
1044: \label{fig:sig}}
1045: \end{figure}
1046:
1047: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1048: \epsscale{1.2}
1049: %\plottwo{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/PLOTS/MASS.hist/hist.mass.ps}{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/PLOTS/FIX.Mass.L/mass.L.ps}
1050: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}
1051: \caption{Masses and luminosities of models in our parameter space.
1052: Figure on the left shows a histogram of the masses of the clouds surrounding
1053: a source. On the right, the relationship between the mass and luminosity of
1054: all our models is plotted.
1055: For every density distribution in our sample, we have models which correspond
1056: to all of the luminosity values in our parameter space.
1057: \label{fig:mass}}
1058: \end{figure}
1059:
1060: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1061: \epsscale{1.2}
1062: \plottwo{f3a.eps}{f3b.eps}
1063: \caption{Relationship between $\alpha$, $\tau$, and $n_o$.
1064: The figure on the left shows the relationship between $\alpha$ and $n_o$
1065: for all our models. Some models at low $\alpha$ with high values of
1066: $n_o$ are not in our sample due to the maximum mass criterion.
1067: Models missing in the top right corner of the figure at high $n_o$ and high
1068: $\alpha$ are missing due to the criterion which sets the maximum density at
1069: the inner radius.
1070: On the right, we show how $\tau$ varies with
1071: $\alpha$, $n_o$, and $r_{out}$ for our models.
1072: At a fixed value of $n_o$, as $\alpha$ increases (and $\alpha > 1$),
1073: $\tau$ increases as well due to the sharp density increase in the profile.
1074: For lower values of $\alpha$ ($\alpha < 1$), $\tau$ begins to increase
1075: again, but this increase depends on amount of material included in the
1076: profile at the edge, i.e. the value of $r_{out}$.
1077: %For very low values of $r_{out}$ (not considered in our parameter space
1078: %due to being physically unlikely), the value of
1079: \label{fig:alpha}}
1080: \end{figure}
1081:
1082: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1083: \epsscale{1.2}
1084: \plottwo{f4a.eps}{f4b.eps}
1085: %\plottwo{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/Models/Model2363/Model2363.logtlogr.ps}{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/Models/Model2633/Model2633.logtlogr.ps}
1086: \caption{Comparison between temperature distributions for two different models with a low and high fiducial density.
1087: For both models, $L=1\Lsun$, $\alpha = 2$, and $r_{out} = 1$ pc.
1088: The figure on the left has log $n_o=2.5$ and $\tau = 2.894\ee{-4}$.
1089: The fit parameters are $K=300.79$ and $\beta =1.822$.
1090: The figure on the right has log $n_o=5.5$ and $\tau = 2.894\ee{-1}$ with
1091: $K=169.5$ and $\beta =1.799$ .
1092: Although both of these models are optically thin, as assumed in the
1093: Analytic Solution, it is clear that it is not a good description of
1094: the dust temperature. If we were to change the value of $K$ assumed
1095: in the Analytic Solution, we might be able to fit the exact
1096: solution provided by Dusty for one model, but it would then not fit
1097: for another model.
1098: \label{fig:fidno}}
1099: \end{figure}
1100:
1101: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1102: \epsscale{1.2}
1103: \plottwo{f5a.eps}{f5b.eps}
1104: %\plottwo{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/Models/Model1201/Model1201.logtlogr.ps}{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/Models/Model5881/Model5881.logtlogr.BW.scale.ps}
1105: \caption{Comparison between temperature distributions for two
1106: different models with a low and high luminosity.
1107: For both models, $\alpha = 3$, and $r_{out} = 0.1$ pc, log $n_o=2.5$.
1108: The figure on the left has log $L/\Lsun=-1$.
1109: The fit parameters are $K=276.23$ and $\beta =1.802$
1110: The figure on the right has log $L/\Lsun=3$ with
1111: $K=297.5$ and $\beta =1.658$.
1112: These models show how increasing the luminosity
1113: increases the overall dust temperature as well as making the
1114: optically thick region near the center extend farther out.
1115: \label{fig:fidL}}
1116: \end{figure}
1117:
1118: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1119: \epsscale {1.2}
1120: \plottwo{f6a.eps}{f6b.eps}
1121: %\plottwo{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/PLOTS/hist.K.sample.complete.ps}{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/PLOTS/hist.beta.sample.complete.ps}
1122: \caption{Figures shows the range of K and $\beta$ for the chosen
1123: parameters in Table \ref{tab:2par}. The vertical line marks the values of $K$ and
1124: $\beta_e$ in the Analytic Solution.
1125: \label{fig:Kbeta}}
1126: \end{figure}
1127:
1128: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1129: \epsscale {1.2}
1130: \plottwo{f7a.eps}{f7b.eps}
1131: %\plottwo{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/PLOTS/hist.K.sample.complete.alpha.binned.ps}{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/PLOTS/hist.beta.sample.complete.alpha.binned.ps}
1132: \caption{The range of K and $\beta$ for the chosen
1133: parameters in Table \ref{tab:2par} as a function of $\alpha$. The vertical line marks the values of $K$ and $\beta_e$ in the Analytic Solution. Histograms for $\alpha = 0$ have been multiplied by $2$ for clarity.
1134: \label{fig:Kbetaalpha}}
1135: \end{figure}
1136:
1137: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1138: \epsscale {1.0}
1139: \plotone{f8.eps}
1140: %\plotone{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/PLOTS/FIX.L.no/fix.L.alpha.all.K.50to500.no.ps}
1141: \caption{The horizontal line marks the value of $K$ in the Analytic Solution.
1142: Individual models are plotted as circles of various sizes. The size of the
1143: circle indicates the value of the $\alpha$ parameter as noted in the top of the
1144: plot.
1145: The nine separate plots each show $K$ as a function of $n_o$ for nine
1146: different luminosity regimes.
1147: In the top-left box, log $L/\Lsun$ is $-2$ or $-1.5$,
1148: as indicated at the top-right corner in the box.
1149: The bottom-right box shows models with the highest luminosities.
1150: \label{fig:Kall}}
1151: \end{figure}
1152:
1153: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1154: \epsscale {1.0}
1155: \plotone{f9.eps}
1156: %\plotone{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/PLOTS/FIX.L.no/fix.L.alpha.all.beta.1.8.no.ps}
1157: \caption{The horizontal line marks the value of $\beta_e$ in the Analytic Solution. Same plot details as Figure \ref{fig:Kall} except $\beta$ is
1158: plotted rather than $K$.
1159: \label{fig:betaall}}
1160: \end{figure}
1161:
1162: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1163: \epsscale{1.}
1164: \plotone{f10.eps}
1165: %\plotone{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Sep05Models/Models/Model3717/COMPARE.gasplot.2.4.7.5.8/compare.old.new.ps}
1166: \caption{Gas temperature distribution and comparison of old and new cooling rates.
1167: Solid line shows Fit Solution to dust temperature.
1168: The model parameters are log ($L/\Lsun=1$), log $(r_{out}/1pc)=-0.5$,
1169: log $n_o= 4.5$, and $\alpha=2.5$.
1170: Dashed and dotted line show gas temperature for X(CO)=$1\ee{-4}$ and
1171: X(CO)=$5\ee{-5}$, respectively.
1172: Old and new cooling rates are shown in the thin and thick lines, respectively.
1173: \label{fig:compare}}
1174: \end{figure}
1175:
1176: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1177: \epsscale{1.0}
1178: \plotone{f11.eps}
1179: %\plotone{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/CompDust/combine.ps}
1180: \caption{Gas temperature distribution between two sources.
1181: Plots show dust (thick line) and gas (thin line)
1182: temperature as a function of distance between two stellar
1183: sources.
1184: From top to bottom, distance between sources is decreasing,
1185: such that the gas density surrounding the two sources
1186: agrees with the value, $n_{eq}$ quoted on the left.
1187: The source on the left (1) has the parameters $L=1\Lsun$, $n_o=10^3$,
1188: and $\alpha=2$.
1189: The right source (2) has $L=10^2\Lsun$, $n_o=10^5$, and $\alpha=2$.
1190: The three horizontal plots for the different values of $n_{eq}$
1191: show the same data from different perspectives. The large plot
1192: on the left is plotted on a linear scale from Source 1. The two smaller
1193: plots on the right are plotted on a logarithmic scale, from the
1194: perspective of Source 1 (middle) and Source 2 (right).
1195: This is done to show structure close to the individual sources.
1196: \label{fig:two}}
1197: \end{figure}
1198:
1199: \clearpage
1200:
1201: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1202: \epsscale{1.1}
1203: \plottwo{f12a.eps}{f12b.eps}
1204: %\plottwo{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.1000/TD3.surf.dust.1.ps}{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.1000/TD3.surf.dust.2.ps}
1205: \caption{Surface plots of dust temperature. Sources are labeled according to the parameters listed in Table \ref{tab:source}. The first figure shows the full range of dust temperatures and the second figure shows a smaller range of dust temperatures.
1206: \label{fig:tdust3}}
1207: \end{figure}
1208:
1209: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1210: \epsscale{1.1}
1211: \plotone{f13.eps}
1212: %\plotone{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.1000/TD3.BW.ps}
1213: \caption{Contour plots of dust and gas temperature using the Length of Square Method.
1214: Sources are labeled according to the parameters listed in Table \ref{tab:source}.
1215: \label{fig:td32000con}}
1216: \end{figure}
1217:
1218: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1219: \epsscale{1.1}
1220: \plottwo{f14a.eps}{f14b.eps}
1221: %\plottwo{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.1000/TD3.surf.gas.1.ps}{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.1000/TD3.surf.gas.2.ps}
1222: \caption{Surface plots of gas temperature using the Length of Square Method.
1223: The same data is shown in both plots with a smaller range of gas temperature
1224: shown in the second plot.
1225: \label{fig:td32000surf}}
1226: \end{figure}
1227:
1228:
1229: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1230: \epsscale{1.0}
1231: \plotone{f15.eps}
1232: %\plotone{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.1000/TD3.BW.edge.ps}
1233: \caption{Contour plots of dust and gas temperature using the Edge of Square Method.
1234: Sources are labeled according to the parameters listed in Table \ref{tab:source}.
1235: \label{fig:td3econ}}
1236: \end{figure}
1237:
1238: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1239: \epsscale{1.1}
1240: \plottwo{f16a.eps}{f16b.eps}
1241: %\plottwo{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.1000/TD3.surf.gas.edge.1.ps}{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.1000/TD3.surf.gas.edge.2.ps}
1242: \caption{Surface plots of gas temperature using the Edge of Square Method.
1243: The same data is shown in both plots with a smaller range of gas temperature
1244: shown in the second plot.
1245: \label{fig:td3esurf}}
1246: \end{figure}
1247:
1248: \newpage
1249:
1250: \begin{figure}
1251: \epsscale{1.25}
1252: \plottwo{f17a.eps}{f17b.eps}
1253: %\plottwo{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.out.3/TD3.10000.ps}{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.out.1/TD.10000.ps}
1254: \caption{Contour plots of dust and gas temperature with three sources and one source.
1255: \label{fig:z31}}
1256: \end{figure}
1257:
1258: \begin{figure}
1259: \epsscale{1.1}
1260: \plotone{f18.eps}
1261: %\plotone{/data3/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.1000.big/TD3.surf.ps}
1262: \caption{Surface plots of dust and gas temperature. Top plots show dust temperature. Bottom plots show gas temperature.
1263: Plot on top left show complete sample of dust temperatures. Top right plot
1264: shows a smaller range in dust temperatures.
1265: Bottom right and bottom left show same data from two different orientations.
1266: Area sampled is 50000 x 50000 AU. The Length of Square Method is used here.
1267: \label{fig:zoomout}}
1268: \end{figure}
1269:
1270: \newpage
1271: \begin{figure}
1272: \plottwo{f19a.eps}{f19b.eps}
1273: %\plottwo{/data14/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.1000/PercentDiff/TD3.PD.surf.ps}{/data14/aurban/dustandgas/Contour/D.1000/PercentDiff/N.PD.surf.ps}
1274: \caption{Percentage difference between gas and dust temperature and density. The same
1275: data and method as seen in Figures \ref{fig:tdust3} - \ref{fig:td32000surf}.
1276: First figure shows percentage difference of dust and gas. Second figure shows
1277: density.
1278: \label{fig:perdiff}}
1279: \end{figure}
1280:
1281:
1282:
1283:
1284:
1285: \end{document}
1286: