0710.4522/ms.tex
1: \ProvidesFile{cimsmple.tex}
2:       [1999/12/01 v1.4c Il Nuovo Cimento]
3: \documentclass{cimento}
4: 
5: \usepackage{verbatim}
6: \usepackage{natbib}
7: \usepackage{amsmath}
8: \usepackage{amssymb}
9: \usepackage{amsbsy}
10: \usepackage{lscape}
11: \usepackage{graphicx}
12: 
13: \newcommand{\Lya}{\mbox{Ly$\alpha$}}
14: \newcommand{\Gbkg}{\mbox{$\Gamma^{bkg}$}}
15: \newcommand{\mnras}{MNRAS}
16: \newcommand{\apj}{ApJ}
17: \newcommand{\apjl}{ApJL}
18: \newcommand{\apjs}{ApJS}
19: \newcommand{\aj}{AJ}
20: \newcommand{\aap}{A\&A}
21: \newcommand{\nat}{Nature}
22: 
23: \title{A Direct Precision Measurement of the Intergalactic Lyman-$\alpha$ Opacity at $2\leq z\leq4.2$\thanks{Some of the data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck
24: Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the
25: California Institute of Technology, the University of California and the
26: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory was made
27: possible by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation.
28: Other data analyzed in this work were gathered with the 6.5 meter Magellan Telescopes located at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile.}}
29: \author{Claude-Andr\'e Faucher-Gigu\`ere\from{harvard_astro}\ETC,
30: Jason X. Prochaska\from{ucsc},
31: Adam Lidz\from{harvard_astro},
32: Lars Hernquist\from{harvard_astro} \atque
33: Matias Zaldarriaga\from{harvard_astro}}
34: \instlist{\inst{harvard_astro} Department of Astronomy, Harvard University, 60 Garden St, MS-10, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA; cgiguere@cfa.harvard.edu.  
35: \inst{ucsc} Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, UCO/Lick Observatory; University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.}
36: \PACSes{\PACSit{98.62.Ra, 98.54.Aj, 98.80.Es}{Intergalactic opacity, \Lya~forest, quasars}}
37: %\PACSit{---.---}{\ldots}}
38: \begin{document}
39: 
40: \maketitle
41: 
42: \begin{abstract}
43: We directly measure the evolution of the intergalactic Lyman-$\alpha$ effective optical depth, $\tau_{\rm eff}$, over the redshift range $2 \leq z \leq 4.2$ from a sample of 86 high-resolution, high-signal-to-noise quasar spectra obtained with Keck/ESI, Keck/HIRES, and Magellan/MIKE. 
44: We find that our estimates of the quasar continuum levels in the \Lya~forest obtained by spline fitting are systematically biased low, but that this bias can be accounted for using mock spectra.
45: The mean fractional error $\langle \Delta C/C_{\rm true} \rangle$ is $<1\%$ at $z=2$, 4\% at $z=3$, and 12\% at $z=4$.
46: %Previous measurements of $\tau_{\rm eff}$ at $z\gtrsim3$ based on directly fitting the quasar continua in the \Lya~forest, which have generally neglected this effect, are therefore likely biased low.
47: We provide estimates of the level of absorption arising from metals in the \Lya~forest based on both direct and statistical metal removal results in the literature, finding that this contribution is $\approx6-9\%$ at $z=3$ and decreases monotonically with redshift.
48: The high precision of our measurement indicates significant departures from the best-fit power-law redshift evolution, particularly near $z=3.2$.
49: \end{abstract}
50: 
51: \section{INTRODUCTION}
52: The evolution of the intergalactic medium (IGM) as traced by the \Lya~forest provides a powerful record of the thermal and radiative history of the Universe.
53: This power owes to our ability to measure the \Lya~opacity of the
54: IGM as a function of redshift, as well as to the relatively simple physics of the \Lya~forest.
55: In fact, cosmological simulations in which the forest arises from absorption by smooth density fluctuations imposed on the warm photoionized IGM as a natural consequence of hierarchical structure formation within cold dark matter models \citep[e.g.,][]{1996ApJ...457L..51H}, have been remarkably successful at reproducing the properties of the absorption observed in actual quasar spectra.
56: This synergy between theory and observations make the \Lya~forest a particularly compelling probe of the diffuse Universe.\\ \\
57: In this work, we present a direct precision measurement of the effective \Lya~optical depth and its evolution over the redshift range $2\leq z \leq4.2$ from a sample of 86 high-resolution, high signal-to-noise quasar spectra obtained obtained with Keck/ESI (16), Keck/HIRES (44), and with Magellan/MIKE (26).
58: The full details have been reported in \citep{2007arXiv0709.2382F}.
59: We assume a cosmology with $(\Omega_{m},~\Omega_{b},~\Omega_{\Lambda},~h,~\sigma_{8})=(0.27,~0.046,~0.73,~0.7,~0.8)$ \citep[][]{2007ApJS..170..377S}.
60: 
61: \section{ANALYSIS}
62: \subsection{Method}
63: Let $F_{\rm abs}(\lambda)$ be a quasar's absolute flux and $C(\lambda)$ be its continuum (unabsorbed) level as a function of observed wavelength $\lambda$.
64: The corresponding redshift of 
65: \Lya~absorption is just $z_{{\rm Ly}\alpha}\equiv \lambda/\lambda_{\Lya}-1$, where $\lambda_{\Lya}=1216$ \AA.
66: Dropping the \Lya~subscript on $z$, we define the transmission as $F(z)\equiv F_{\rm abs}(z)/C(z)$.
67: Letting $\langle F \rangle$ be the ensemble average over lines of sight, the effective optical depth is defined as $\tau_{\rm eff}(z) \equiv -\ln{\left[\langle F \rangle(z)\right]}$
68: The measurement consists of the following steps:
69: \begin{enumerate}
70: \item Estimate the continuum level in the \Lya~forest of each quasar spectrum by fitting a cubic spline through its transmission peaks and calculate the corresponding $F$;
71: \item apply masks to the data: quasar proximity regions, higher-order Lyman series forests, SLLS, DLAs, and associated metal lines;
72: \item bin the remaining \Lya~forest pixels in redshift intervals;
73: \item for each redshift bin, average the pixels to estimate $\langle F \rangle$ and calculate $\tau_{\rm eff}$;
74: \item correct this ``raw'' measurement for redshift-dependent continuum estimation error and, optionally, for metal absorption.
75: \end{enumerate}
76: 
77: \subsection{Continuum Correction}
78: As the redshift increases, the IGM density increases and, as a result, the transmission peaks reaching unity become increasingly rare, causing us to underestimate the continuum level more at higher redshifts. 
79: Mock spectra, with continua blindly estimated following the same procedure as with the actual data, are used to quantify the mean fractional difference between the true and estimated continua, $\langle \Delta C/C_{\rm true} \rangle$ (where $\Delta C = C_{\rm est}-C_{\rm true}$), as function of redshift.
80: We find that, for hydrogen background photoionization rates \Gbkg~taken from the literature, $\Delta C/C_{\rm true}\approx1.58\times10^{-5}(1+z)^{5.63}$ over the redshift range $2\leq z \leq4.5$.
81: This continuum correction, however, itself is subject to some systematic bias -- since it depends on assumptions (particularly regarding \Gbkg) used to generate the mock spectra - which is unaccounted for in our statistical error bars.
82: 
83: \subsection{Metal Absorption}
84: Metals also contribute to the total absorption in the \Lya~forest.
85: In general, $\tau_{\rm eff} = \tau_{{\rm eff},\alpha} + \sum_{m} \tau_{{\rm eff},m}$, where $\tau_{{\rm eff},\alpha}$ arises purely from \Lya~absorption and $\tau_{{\rm eff},m}$ is due to metal $m$.
86: Based on the published results of \cite{2003ApJ...596..768S} and \cite{2005MNRAS.360.1373K}, we find that metals make up $(13-21\%,~6-9\%,~2-5\%)$ of $\tau_{\rm eff}$ at $z=(2,~3,~4)$.
87: 
88: \section{RESULTS}
89: \begin{figure}
90: \begin{center}
91:   \includegraphics[height=.36\textheight]{measurements_all.eps}
92:   \caption{Comparison of our $\tau_{\rm eff}$ measurements with published results.
93: \emph{Left:} measurements in which the quasar continuum levels were estimated directly from high-resolution, high-signal-to-noise spectra, as in this work \citep{2003ApJ...596..768S, 2004AJ....127.2598S, 2005MNRAS.360.1373K, 2007ApJ...662...72B}.
94: \emph{Right:} estimates based extrapolating the quasar continuum from redward of \Lya~emission in low-resolution spectra \citep{1993ApJ...418..585P, 2003AJ....125...32B, 2005ApJ...635..761M}.
95: The solid black curves show the best-fit power law to our measurement corrected for continuum bias, but including metal absorption.
96: The dashed black curves indicate the best-fit power law to our measurement prior to correction for continuum bias.
97: Our measurement corrected for continuum bias is seen to trace the SDSS statistical measurement of \cite{2003AJ....125...32B}, who have first claimed detection of a feature at $z=3.2$, remarkably well.
98: This comparison is made quantitative in Figure \ref{compare us bernardi}.}
99: \label{measurements all}
100: \end{center}
101: \end{figure}
102: In Figure \ref{measurements all}, we compare our $\tau_{\rm eff}$ measurements with previously published measurements.
103: Our measurement corrected for continuum bias is seen to trace the SDSS statistical measurement of \cite{2003AJ....125...32B}, who have first claimed detection of a feature at $z=3.2$, remarkably well.
104: \begin{figure}
105: \begin{center}
106:   \includegraphics[height=.36\textheight]{compare_us_and_bernardi.eps}
107:   \caption{Comparison of our measurement of $\tau_{\rm eff}$ corrected for continuum bias (red circles) and of the \cite{2003AJ....125...32B} measurement (blue squares).
108: The \cite{2003AJ....125...32B} points were binned in the same $\Delta z=0.1$ redshift bins as our measurement.
109: The blue data points are centered on the same redshifts as the red ones, but have been slightly offset to the right for graphical clarity.
110: We have added a constant vertical offset in logarithmic space to the \cite{2003AJ....125...32B} points that minimizes the $\chi^{2}$ between the two data sets ($\Delta \log{\tau_{\rm eff}}=0.011$), since their statistical measurement may not be accurately normalized.
111: The resulting $\chi^{2}/dof=16.4/(14-1)=1.26$ indicates that the two data sets agree very well, with a $p$-value of 23\%.}
112: \label{compare us bernardi}
113: \end{center}
114: \end{figure}
115: 
116: \acknowledgments
117: CAFG is supported by a NSERC Postgraduate Fellowship.
118: JXP is supported by an NSF CAREER grant (AST-0548180) and by 
119: NSF grant AST-0709235.
120: This work was further supported in part by NSF grants ACI
121: 96-19019, AST 00-71019, AST 02-06299, AST 03-07690, and AST 05-06556, and NASA ATP grants NAG5-12140, NAG5-13292, NAG5-13381, and NNG-05GJ40G.
122: Additional support was provided by the David and Lucile Packard, the Alfred P. Sloan, and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundations.
123: 
124: \bibliographystyle{varenna}
125: \bibliography{references}
126: 
127: \end{document}
128: \endinput