1: %###############################################################################
2: %
3: % HEADER
4: %
5: %##############################################################################
6: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7: %\documentclass[preprint2]{emulateapj}
8: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex} % double-column, single-spaced document
9: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
10:
11: %% packages
12: \usepackage{mathptmx}
13: \usepackage{courier}
14: \usepackage{graphicx}
15: \usepackage{colordvi}
16: \usepackage{natbib}
17: \usepackage{color}
18:
19: %% definitions
20: \newcommand{\FeI}{\ion{Fe}{1}}
21: \newcommand{\CaII}{\ion{Ca}{2}}
22: \newcommand{\kms}{km$\,$s$^{-1}$}
23:
24: %% Where we out our figures
25: %%\newcommand{\figdir}[1]{#1} %%% Use when submitted
26: \newcommand{\figdir}[1]{/home/ali/tex/paper/apj/dlsp_ncp/images/#1}
27:
28: %% Our e-mail addresses
29:
30: \newcommand{\aliemail}{ali@nso.edu}
31: \newcommand{\mandyemail}{hagenaar@lmsal.com}
32: \newcommand{\rolfemail}{schliche@kis.uni-freiburg.de}
33: \newcommand{\danielemail}{dmueller@esa.nascom.nasa.gov}
34:
35: \shortauthors{Tritschler et al.}
36: \shorttitle{Penumbral Net-Circular Polarization}
37:
38: %%% Paper begins here
39:
40: \begin{document}
41:
42: %###################################################################
43: %
44: % OPENING
45: %
46: %###################################################################
47:
48: \title{The Fine-Structure of the Net-Circular Polarization in a Sunspot Penumbra}
49:
50: \author{A.~Tritschler\altaffilmark{1}, D.A.N.~M\"uller\altaffilmark{2}, R.~Schlichenmaier\altaffilmark{3} and H.J.~Hagenaar\altaffilmark{4}}
51: \altaffiltext{1}{National Solar Observatory/Sacramento Peak\footnote{Operated by the %
52: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (AURA), %
53: for the National Science Foundation},
54: P.O.~Box 62, Sunspot, NM-88349, U.S.A. ; \aliemail}
55:
56: \altaffiltext{2}{European Space Agency, c/o NASA
57: Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, U.S.A.; \danielemail}
58:
59: \altaffiltext{3}{Kiepenheuer Institut f\"ur Sonnenphysik,
60: Sch\"oneckstrasse 6, Freiburg, 79104, Germany; \rolfemail}
61:
62: \altaffiltext{4}{Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Org. ADBS, Bldg. 252,
63: 3251 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, CA 94304, U.S.A.; \mandyemail}
64:
65: %\date{Version \today}
66:
67: %###############################################################################
68: %
69: % ABSTRACT
70: %
71: %###############################################################################
72:
73: \begin{abstract}
74: We present novel evidence for a fine structure observed in the net-circular polarization (NCP) of
75: a sunspot penumbra based on spectropolarimetric measurements
76: utilizing the Zeeman sensitive \FeI\ 630.2\,nm line.
77: For the first time we detect a filamentary organized fine structure
78: of the NCP on spatial scales that are similar to the inhomogeneities found in the penumbral flow field.
79: We also observe an additional property of the visible NCP, a zero-crossing of the
80: NCP in the outer parts of the center-side penumbra, which has not been recognized before.
81: In order to interprete the observations we solve the radiative transfer equations
82: for polarized light in a model penumbra with embedded magnetic flux tubes.
83: We demonstrate that the observed zero-crossing of the NCP
84: can be explained by an increased magnetic field strength inside
85: magnetic flux tubes in the outer penumbra combined with a decreased magnetic field
86: strength in the background field. Our results strongly support the
87: concept of the uncombed penumbra.
88: \end{abstract}
89:
90: \keywords{Sun: sunspots --- magnetic fields --- photosphere}
91:
92:
93: %#####################################################################
94: %
95: % SECTION 1, Introduction
96: %
97: %#####################################################################
98:
99: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
100:
101: The asymmetry of the Stokes parameters with wavelength is a powerful diagnostic tool
102: to probe the relation between flows and the magnetic field in the atmosphere of sunspots.
103: Line asymmetries convey information about lateral (within one resolution element)
104: and the line-of-sight (LOS) gradients and discontinuities of physical parameters.
105: Since the first systematic characterization and interpretation of these asymmetries
106: and their spatial distribution throughout a sunspot
107: by \citet[and references therein]{sanchezalmeida+lites1992}
108: the complementary improvements achieved in both observational
109: techniques and theoretical modeling, have advanced
110: our understanding of particularly the penumbral inhomogeneities.
111: It is general consent that a combination of non-trivial
112: magnetic field and flow topologies along the LOS are the cause of the
113: observed penumbral Stokes asymmetries.
114: A simple and instructive way to characterize the asymmetry of Stokes V profiles
115: is through the net-circular polarization (NCP), defined as
116: $\mathcal{N}=\int V(\lambda) d\lambda$, where the
117: integral is performed over one spectral line only.
118: The sum of the NCP of individual lines than leads to the
119: well-known broad-band circular polarization (BBCP) first noticed by
120: \cite{illing+landmann+mickey1974a, illing+landmann+mickey1974b}.
121: The appearance of the NCP is very distinct in the penumbra
122: and shows a peculiar difference when between observations in the visible or
123: in the near infrared wavelength region: in the visible at \FeI\,630.2\,nm
124: the NCP maps tend to be symmetric about the disk center and sun center connection line
125: \citep{sanchezalmeida+lites1992, westendorp+etal2001b, mueller+etal2002}
126: while infrared NCP maps at \FeI\,1564.8\,nm reveal an antisymmetric distribution
127: \citep{schlichenmaier+collados2002, bellot+balthasar+collados2004}.
128: \cite{schlichenmaier+etal2002} and \cite{mueller+etal2002}
129: demonstrate that the uncombed penumbral atmosphere \citep{solanki+montavon1993}
130: mimicked by the \textsl{moving tube model} \citep{schlichenmaier+jahn+schmidt1998a}
131: reproduces the azimuthal behavior of the NCP and, furthermore, convincingly show that
132: the incisive discrepancy between the visible and the near infrared can be
133: understood when the effects of anomalous dispersion
134: \citep{landolfi+landi1996} are included.
135:
136: So far penumbral NCP maps of the \FeI\,630.2\,nm line have been only presented
137: before by \cite{sanchezalmeida+lites1992} (in form of a contour line map),
138: \cite{westendorp+etal2001b}, \cite{mueller+etal2002} and \cite{mueller+etal2006}.
139: These maps visualize very well the symmetric behaviour of the
140: NCP but lack the spatial resolution to reveal the presence of
141: any potential fine structure.
142:
143: In this Letter we focus on high-spatial resolution spectropolarimetric measurements of a
144: sunspot to investigate inhomogeneities in the penumbral magnetic field and flow field.
145: Instead of utilizing inversion techniques we calculate the NCP
146: and line-of-sight (LOS) velocities and elaborate on the properties of the same.
147: In order to interpret the observational results we use the
148: 3D geometric flux tube model VTUBE \citep{mueller+etal2006}
149: and perform subsequent radiative transfer calculations from which
150: NCP and Doppler maps can be synthesized.
151:
152: %The paper is organized as follows.
153: %In \S~\ref{sec:obs+data} the observations and the data processing is described.
154: %The observed NCP and Doppler maps are presented in \S~\ref{sec:results}. \S~\ref{sec:model}
155: %describes our theoretical approach.
156: %We discuss our findings and conclude in \S~\ref{sec:conclusions}.
157:
158: %###############################################################################
159: %
160: % SECTION 2
161: %
162: %###############################################################################
163:
164: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}\label{sec:obs+data}
165:
166: The spectropolarimetric observations were obtained on 2005 June 30,
167: with the Diffraction Limited Spectro-Polarimeter \citep[DLSP, ][]{sankar+etal2004}
168: \footnote{The DLSP was built in collaboration with the High-Altitude Observatory.}
169: located at the NSO Dunn Solar Telescope (DST), Sacramento Peak, New Mexico.
170: The DLSP was operated in its high-resolution mode
171: (0\farcs0893\,pixel$^{-1}$ along the slit) and in conjunction with the
172: high-order adaptive optics system \citep{rimmele2004}.
173: The slit width of 12\,microns is matched to the detector image
174: scale along the spectrograph slit. In spectral direction the instrument samples the
175: solar spectrum from 630.0\,nm to 630.4\,nm with 2.1\,pm\,pixel$^{-1}$.
176: A two-dimensional map was generated by moving the slit across the
177: leading sunspot (positive polarity) of AR NOAA 10781 located at $\mu=0.74$ (corresponding to a viewing
178: angle of 42$^{\circ}$) with a step size of 0\farcs089 covering
179: a total field-of-view of 58\farcs9 (660 steps).
180: The slit was oriented along solar North-South and the scan direction of the
181: DLSP was solar West-East. At each slit position 16 images of 30\,ms
182: exposure time each were accumulated
183: for each of the four individual modulation states leading to a total integration time
184: of 2\,sec. A full map is accomplished within 56\,min.
185: The measurements are compensated for polarization effects caused by the telescope and the
186: polarimeter following the calibration procedure developed by \cite{skumanich+etal1997}.
187: The very good seeing in conjunction with the
188: high-order AO system led to exceptional stable observing conditions
189: while scanning the solar image. We estimate our effective spatial resolution
190: in the DLSP map to be about 0\farcs4.
191:
192: We calculate maps of the net circular polarization by integrating the Stokes $V$ signal
193: over the \FeI\,630.25\,nm line.
194: %using a five-point Newton-Cotes integration
195: %formula implemented in IDL.
196: Because of its relatively minor contamination
197: by one of the two telluric lines the \FeI\,630.15\,nm line is used to derive
198: line-of-sight (LOS) Doppler velocities. We apply a Fourier phase method
199: \citep{schmidt+stix+woehl1999} to the $I+V$ and $I-V$ profile
200: of the \FeI\,630.15\,nm line to calculate line shifts.
201: An absolute velocity calibration is performed by taking advantage of the telluric O$_2$ lines
202: \citep[see e.g. ][]{martinezpillet+lites+skumanich1997} present in the recorded spectrum.
203: In contrast to the astrophysical convention we assign a negative
204: sign to redshifts and a positive sign to blueshifts: dark areas in the Dopplergram
205: move away from the observer, while bright areas move towards the observer.
206:
207: %###############################################################################
208: %
209: % SECTION 3
210: %
211: %###############################################################################
212: %
213: %-----------------------------------------------------
214: % Figure 4
215: %-----------------------------------------------------
216:
217:
218: \section{Results}\label{sec:results}
219:
220: Well-reported properties of the penumbral NCP
221: \citep[see][]{sanchezalmeida+lites1992, solanki+montavon1993}
222: are the sign change along azimuthal cuts centered around the spot center
223: and an increased magnitude on the limb side.
224: Based on spectropolarimetric data with much higher spatial
225: resolution than utilized before (Figure~\ref{fig:physmaps})
226: we additionally find (a) evidence for a fine-structure
227: in the NCP and (b) a sign-reversal of the NCP as a function of radial
228: distance from the spot center on the center-side penumbra which has not been recognized before.
229:
230: Confirming previous results we find that the NCP is symmetric in the
231: inner and middle penumbra w.r.t.\ the line that connects the disk center with the
232: spot center. The same property applies to the LOS velocity map
233: which indicates an intricate coupling between penumbral
234: flows and the sign of the NCP. This is corroborated by the
235: fine structure we detect in the NCP.
236:
237: The spatial distribution of the NCP reveals filamentary organized
238: inhomogeneities throughout the penumbra with very localized enhancements
239: of elongated shape on a spatial scale of 0\farcs3.
240: Although we detect these enhancements with no preferred location inside the
241: penumbra those with the largest value of the NCP appear on the
242: limb-side penumbra in proximity to where the magnetogram
243: (not shown) indicates an apparent neutral line.
244: They are related to anomalous (multi-lobe) Stokes V profiles
245: \citep[see also ][]{sanchezalmeida+lites1992} and thus do not necessarily show up in
246: the flow signal (Figure~\ref{fig:physmaps}, \textsl{right}).
247: Anomalously shaped Stokes V profiles indicate either spatially unresolved contributions to the
248: resolution element or LOS effects of at least two differently
249: inclined magnetic components with opposite polarity that are
250: shifted w.r.t.\ each other and viewed upon under an oblique angle.
251: The NCP on the center-side penumbra is correlated with
252: normal 2-lobe antisymmetric Stokes V profiles. On smaller spatial scales
253: related to the flow channels (Figure~\ref{fig:physmaps}, \textsl{right})
254: that carry most of the Evershed flow we are unable to
255: state conclusively that there is a good overall correlation
256: between the NCP and the flow signatures.
257: Figure~\ref{fig:azimuthal} exemplifies this statement along three azimuthal cuts
258: through the penumbra representative for three different radial
259: distances from spot center (as indicated by the ellipses
260: in Figure~\ref{fig:physmaps}, \textsl{left}).
261:
262: Furthermore, we detect for the first time a difference in the symmetry properties of the NCP
263: observed between the outer limb- and center-side penumbra, namely a sign reversal of the
264: NCP in the outer center-side penumbra. \footnote{Beyond the penumbra crossing
265: the visible boundary of the sunspot the NCP shows a motley behavior which we attribute
266: to the presence of moving magnetic features that are known
267: to show asymmetric Stokes profiles.} We verify the visual impression
268: of the NCP zero-crossing on the center-side penumbra in Figure~\ref{fig:radial}
269: by means of the radial dependence of the NCP when averaged over the
270: limb-side (90$^{\circ}$-270$^{\circ}$) and center-side
271: penumbra (270$^{\circ}$-90$^{\circ}$) separately. The limb-side segment
272: without penumbra does not contribute to the averaging.
273:
274: A comparison of the two curves clearly demonstrates the differences between
275: the NCP on the limb- and center-side penumbra in radial direction. On the limb side
276: the NCP has one sign only throughout the penumbra while on
277: the center side the NCP reverses its sign at a radial distance of $\sim$0.75$R$,
278: (where $R$ denotes the sunspots radius) peaks at 0.95$R$ and then falls
279: off outside the visible penumbra. It should be noted that the course
280: of the radial variation of the NCP and the exact location of
281: the zero-crossing point within the penumbra depends also on
282: the calibration for instrumental polarization, i.e. predominantly the crosstalk
283: from Stokes $I$ to $V$. We estimate that our calibration for this particular
284: crosstalk is better than 0.1\,\%. The NCP averaged over areas where we see
285: no significant Stokes $V$ signal is in the range of 1.5$\times$10$^{-2}$\,pm.
286: Significant changes of the radial variation of the NCP, however, take place
287: only if the residual crosstalk from $I$ to $V$ is in the range of 1\,\% and larger.
288:
289: %###############################################################################
290: %
291: % SECTION 4
292: %
293: %###############################################################################
294:
295: \section{Model Calculations}\label{sec:model}
296:
297: In order to understand the observed sign reversal of the NCP, we have
298: carried out radiative transfer calculations from which synthetic maps
299: of observable quantities are obtained. At first sight, one may
300: conjecture that the observed radial sign reversal of the NCP is caused
301: by downflows in the outer penumbra. While this is indeed a possible
302: solution that is compatible with the observed NCP maps, the Doppler
303: maps constrain the details of the model atmosphere even further.
304:
305: It turns out that a model atmosphere with strongly downwards inclined flux
306: tubes in the outer penumbra is not able to explain simultaneously both the observed
307: sign reversal of the NCP and the constant sign of the Doppler maps on
308: the spot's center side. However, we find that both features can be reproduced by magnetic flux
309: tubes that have a magnetic field strength that is stronger than the
310: background magnetic field in the outer penumbra while it is weaker in the inner part
311: as visualized in Figure~\ref{fig:synthetic} (\textsl{top left}).
312: The assumption is not unrealistic as two-component inversions of sunspots
313: indicate a higher field strength in
314: the tube component in the extreme outer penumbra
315: \citep[e.g.][]{bellot+balthasar+collados2004}.
316: %
317: %-----------------------------------------------------
318: % Figure 5
319: %-----------------------------------------------------
320:
321:
322: Figure~\ref{fig:synthetic} shows the synthetic
323: NCP (\textsl{middle}) and Doppler (\textsl{right})
324: maps for a penumbral atmosphere, calculated with the VTUBE model of
325: \cite{mueller+etal2006}. We adopt a very generic atmospheric
326: configuration with horizontal magnetic flux tubes of 50\, km radius
327: with a flow velocity of 10\,km/s, embedded in a radially symmetric
328: background field as in \cite{mueller+etal2006}.
329: We assume a magnetic field strength inside the flux tubes that
330: increases linearly from the inner penumbra (where it is 500\,G weaker
331: than the background field) to the outer penumbra (where it is 500\,G
332: stronger than the background field). It turns out that this
333: configuration is quite robust, and the details of the magnetic field
334: strength affect primarily the radial location of the zero-crossing of
335: the NCP. The axes of the flux tubes are placed at 30\,km above
336: $\tau_{500} = 1$. Raising the flux tubes mostly increases the absolute
337: value of the NCP and would require a lower filling factor to explain
338: the observed NCP values.
339:
340: The effect of a jump in the magnetic field strength along the LOS on
341: the NCP has been studied for a simpler atmospheric configuration by
342: \cite{landolfi+landi1996} who derived a sign rule for the NCP due to
343: this so-called $\Delta B$ effect. This expression is proportional to
344: the difference in the magnetic field strengths between the static
345: background and the part of the atmosphere containing the flow. As a consequence
346: the NCP changes sign when $\Delta B$ changes sign.
347: When comparing this rule with both observational data and more realistic models,
348: one should note that the $\Delta B$ effect is but one of several NCP
349: generating effects at work. Therefore, the locations of the sign
350: reversals of $\Delta B$ and the NCP do not necessarily coincide.
351: In particular the sum of the $\Delta B$ effect and changes in the inclination
352: ($\Delta\gamma$ effect) results in the different behaviour of the NCP
353: on the limb and center side: on the limbside
354: the NCP decreases with radial distance because of the increasing
355: $\Delta B$ effect but does not change the sign because
356: the $\Delta\gamma$ effect contributes positive to the NCP.
357: One should
358: also bear in mind the assumptions on which the findings of
359: \cite{landolfi+landi1996} are based. A discussion of the results
360: of \cite{landolfi+landi1996} in the context of flux tubes in the penumbra is
361: given by \cite{mueller2001} and \cite{mueller+etal2002}.
362:
363: Our model solution is in qualitative agreement with both the observed
364: NCP and the observed LOS velocity. It should be pointed out though that while
365: the simultaneous agreement between the NCP and Doppler maps places a strong
366: constraint on the possible atmospheric models our solution may not
367: necessarily be unique.
368:
369: %###############################################################################
370: %
371: % SECTION 5
372: %
373: %###############################################################################
374:
375: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}\label{sec:conclusions}
376:
377: In this paper, we have presented novel evidence for a spatial fine
378: structure in the visible NCP of the \FeI\,630.25\,nm line.
379: We find for the first time that the NCP is structured in radial filaments
380: very much alike maps of other line parameters, e.g. the intensity, equivalent width
381: and line width \citep[see e.g.][]{johannesson1993,
382: rimmele1995a, rimmele1995b, tritschler+etal2004}.
383: The spatial scales of the NCP filaments are similar to those found in the
384: observed LOS velocity map although we cannot find a good overall
385: correlation between the signals of the NCP and the LOS velocity.
386: We conjecture that higher spatial resolution is needed to
387: settle this issue. \cite{martinezpillet1997} find a correlation between the azimuthal variation of the
388: NCP and the magnetic field inclination on angular scales of $10^{\circ}$. Although
389: we cannot provide information about the inclination at this point
390: we find that our observations show azimuthal variations of the NCP
391: that are only of the order of $4^{\circ}$.
392:
393: Furthermore, we have observed a zero-crossing of the NCP
394: on the outer center-side penumbra and have
395: demonstrated that this signature can be explained by an
396: increased magnetic field strength inside magnetic flux tubes in the
397: outer penumbra, while the magnetic field strength is decreased in the background
398: field ($\Delta B$-effect). To this end, we have compared high-resolution
399: observations with maps of the NCP and the LOS velocity that have been
400: synthesized from a 3D geometric sunspot model that has been coupled
401: with a 1D radiative transfer code \citep[see][ for details]{mueller+etal2006}.
402: We point out that the space of possible atmospheric
403: models that can reproduce the observations is significantly
404: constrained by taking into account the information contained in
405: Doppler maps in addition to the NCP maps. This paper extends the work
406: by \cite{solanki+montavon1993}, \cite{martinezpillet2000}, \cite{mueller+etal2002}, and
407: \cite{mueller+etal2006} and clearly demonstrates the
408: need to model the "uncombed" penumbra of sunspots in greater
409: detail. This would include also taking into account the effect of field line
410: curvature around flux tubes as considered by \cite{borrero+bellot+mueller2007}.
411:
412: %Although our observations are at the limit of what can be achieved
413: %with ground-based contemporary grating polarimeters there is an obvious need
414: %for going beyond that limit to further study the potential correlation between the NCP and the
415: %penumbral flow field on spatial scales that are in the range of 0\farcs2 and below.
416: %In this perspective the use of two-dimensional spectropolarimeters
417: %can have great advantages for ground-based observations in particular
418: %for applications that do not require the spectral range and
419: %resolution usually provided by a grating instrument. The determination of
420: %physical properties of the solar atmosphere through analysis of
421: %the NCP is one of these applications.
422:
423: %###############################################################################
424: %
425: % FINISH
426: %
427: %###############################################################################
428:
429: %\acknowledgements
430: %This research has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System (ADS).
431:
432: %###############################################################################
433: %
434: % BIBLIOGRAPHY
435: %
436: %###############################################################################
437:
438: \begin{thebibliography}{26}
439: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
440:
441: \bibitem[{{Bellot Rubio} {et~al.}(2004){Bellot Rubio}, {Balthasar}, \&
442: {Collados}}]{bellot+balthasar+collados2004}
443: {Bellot Rubio}, L.~R., {Balthasar}, H., \& {Collados}, M. 2004, \aap, 427, 319
444:
445: \bibitem[{{Borrero} {et~al.}(2007){Borrero}, {Bellot Rubio}, \&
446: {Mueller}}]{borrero+bellot+mueller2007}
447: {Borrero}, J.~M., {Bellot Rubio}, L.~R., \& {Mueller}, D.~A.~N. 2007, ArXiv
448: e-prints, 707
449:
450: \bibitem[{{Illing} {et~al.}(1974{\natexlab{a}}){Illing}, {Landman}, \&
451: {Mickey}}]{illing+landmann+mickey1974a}
452: {Illing}, R.~M.~E., {Landman}, D.~A., \& {Mickey}, D.~L. 1974{\natexlab{a}},
453: \aap, 35, 327
454:
455: \bibitem[{{Illing} {et~al.}(1974{\natexlab{b}}){Illing}, {Landman}, \&
456: {Mickey}}]{illing+landmann+mickey1974b}
457: ---. 1974{\natexlab{b}}, \aap, 37, 97
458:
459: \bibitem[{{Johannesson}(1993)}]{johannesson1993}
460: {Johannesson}, A. 1993, \aap, 273, 633
461:
462: \bibitem[{{Landolfi} \& {Landi degl'Innocenti}(1996)}]{landolfi+landi1996}
463: {Landolfi}, M., \& {Landi degl'Innocenti}, E. 1996, \solphys, 164, 191
464:
465: \bibitem[{{Martinez Pillet}(1997)}]{martinezpillet1997}
466: {Martinez Pillet}, V. 1997, in ASP Conf. Ser. 118,
467: Advances in Physics of Sunspots, ed. B.~{Schmieder},
468: J.~C. {del Toro Iniesta}, \& M.~{Vazquez}, 212
469:
470: \bibitem[{{Mart{\'\i}nez Pillet}(2000)}]{martinezpillet2000}
471: {Mart{\'\i}nez Pillet}, V. 2000, A\&A, 361, 734
472:
473: \bibitem[{{Martinez Pillet} {et~al.}(1997){Martinez Pillet}, {Lites}, \&
474: {Skumanich}}]{martinezpillet+lites+skumanich1997}
475: {Martinez Pillet}, V., {Lites}, B.~W., \& {Skumanich}, A. 1997, \apj, 474, 810
476:
477: \bibitem[{{M\"uller}(2001)}]{mueller2001}
478: {M\"uller}, D. 2001, Polarisation von Linien im Spektrum einer
479: Sonnenfleckenpenumbra. Diploma Thesis, University of Freiburg
480:
481: \bibitem[{{M{\"u}ller} {et~al.}(2006){M{\"u}ller}, {Schlichenmaier}, {Fritz},
482: \& {Beck}}]{mueller+etal2006}
483: {M{\"u}ller}, D.~A.~N., {Schlichenmaier}, R., {Fritz}, G., \& {Beck}, C. 2006,
484: \aap, 460, 925
485:
486: \bibitem[{{M{\"u}ller} {et~al.}(2002){M{\"u}ller}, {Schlichenmaier}, {Steiner},
487: \& {Stix}}]{mueller+etal2002}
488: {M{\"u}ller}, D.~A.~N., {Schlichenmaier}, R., {Steiner}, O., \& {Stix}, M.
489: 2002, \aap, 393, 305
490:
491: \bibitem[{{Rimmele}(1995{\natexlab{a}})}]{rimmele1995a}
492: {Rimmele}, T.~R. 1995{\natexlab{a}}, \aap, 298, 260
493:
494: \bibitem[{{Rimmele}(1995{\natexlab{b}})}]{rimmele1995b}
495: ---. 1995{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 445, 511
496:
497: \bibitem[{{Rimmele}(2004)}]{rimmele2004}
498: ---. 2004, \apj, 604, 906
499:
500: \bibitem[{{S\'anchez Almeida} \& {Lites}(1992)}]{sanchezalmeida+lites1992}
501: {S\'anchez Almeida}, J., \& {Lites}, B.~W. 1992, ApJ, 398, 359
502:
503: \bibitem[{{Sankarasubramanian} {et~al.}(2004){Sankarasubramanian}, {Gullixson},
504: {Hegwer}, {Rimmele}, {Gregory}, {Spence}, {Fletcher}, {Richards}, {Rousset},
505: {Lites}, {Elmore}, {Streander}, \& {Sigwarth}}]{sankar+etal2004}
506: {Sankarasubramanian}, K., {Gullixson}, C., {Hegwer}, S., {Rimmele}, T.~R.,
507: {Gregory}, S., {Spence}, T., et al. 2004, Proceedings SPIE, 5171, 207-218
508:
509: \bibitem[{{Schlichenmaier} \& {Collados}(2002)}]{schlichenmaier+collados2002}
510: {Schlichenmaier}, R., \& {Collados}, M. 2002, \aap, 381, 668
511:
512: \bibitem[{{Schlichenmaier} {et~al.}(1998){Schlichenmaier}, {Jahn}, \&
513: {Schmidt}}]{schlichenmaier+jahn+schmidt1998a}
514: {Schlichenmaier}, R., {Jahn}, K., \& {Schmidt}, H.~U. 1998, \apjl, 493, L121
515:
516: \bibitem[{{Schlichenmaier} {et~al.}(2002){Schlichenmaier}, {M{\"u}ller},
517: {Steiner}, \& {Stix}}]{schlichenmaier+etal2002}
518: {Schlichenmaier}, R., {M{\"u}ller}, D.~A.~N., {Steiner}, O., \& {Stix}, M.
519: 2002, \aap, 381, L77
520:
521: \bibitem[{{Schmidt} {et~al.}(1999){Schmidt}, {Stix}, \&
522: {W{\"o}hl}}]{schmidt+stix+woehl1999}
523: {Schmidt}, W., {Stix}, M., \& {W{\"o}hl}, H. 1999, \aap, 346, 633
524:
525: \bibitem[{{Skumanich} {et~al.}(1997){Skumanich}, {Lites}, {Martinez Pillet}, \&
526: {Seagraves}}]{skumanich+etal1997}
527: {Skumanich}, A., {Lites}, B.~W., {Martinez Pillet}, V., \& {Seagraves}, P.
528: 1997, \apjs, 110, 357
529:
530: \bibitem[{{Solanki} \& {Montavon}(1993)}]{solanki+montavon1993}
531: {Solanki}, S.~K., \& {Montavon}, C. A.~P. 1993, \aap, 275, 283
532:
533: \bibitem[{{Tritschler} {et~al.}(2004){Tritschler}, {Schlichenmaier}, {Bellot
534: Rubio}, {the KAOS Team}, {Berkefeld}, \& {Schelenz}}]{tritschler+etal2004}
535: {Tritschler}, A., {Schlichenmaier}, R., {Bellot Rubio}, L.~R., {the KAOS Team},
536: {Berkefeld}, T., \& {Schelenz}, T. 2004, \aap, 415, 717
537:
538: \bibitem[{{Westendorp Plaza} {et~al.}(2001){Westendorp Plaza}, {del Toro
539: Iniesta}, {Ruiz Cobo}, {Mart{\'\i}nez Pillet}, {Lites}, \&
540: {Skumanich}}]{westendorp+etal2001b}
541: {Westendorp Plaza}, C., {del Toro Iniesta}, J.~C., {Ruiz Cobo}, B.,
542: {Mart{\'\i}nez Pillet}, V., {Lites}, B.~W., \& {Skumanich}, A. 2001, \apj,
543: 547, 1130
544:
545: \end{thebibliography}
546:
547: \clearpage
548:
549: %
550: %-----------------------------------------------------
551: % Figure 1
552: %-----------------------------------------------------
553: \begin{figure*}[t]
554: \epsscale{0.315}
555: \plotone{f1a_test.eps}\plotone{f1b_test.eps}\plotone{f1c_test.eps}
556: \caption{Continuum intensity (\textsl{left}), net circular polarization
557: (\textsl{middle}) and LOS velocity (\textsl{right}) of AR NOAA 10781
558: observed on June 30, 2005, between 14:24~UT and 15:03~UT with the DLSP.
559: The Dopplergram is calculated from the
560: \FeI\,630.15\,nm line while the NCP is
561: determined from the \FeI\,630.25\,nm line.
562: The arrow points towards disk center (DC).
563: The three ellipses indicate azimuthal cuts corresponding to radial distances
564: from the center of the umbra of $0.5R$, $0.7R$, and $0.9R$
565: in units of the spot radius, $R$.
566: The contour lines mark the inner and outer boundary of the
567: penumbra as determined from thresholding a smoothed version of the continuum map
568: at $0.70I_c$ and $0.96I_c$ in units of the continuum intensity
569: $I_c$ of the quiet sun.}
570: \label{fig:physmaps}
571: \epsscale{1.0}
572: \end{figure*}
573: %-----------------------------------------------------
574: %
575: %
576: %-----------------------------------------------------
577: % Figure 2
578: %-----------------------------------------------------
579: \begin{figure*}[th]
580: \epsscale{1.0}
581: \plotone{f2_test.eps}
582: \caption{Azimuthal variation of the NCP (\textsl{black}) and LOS velocity (\textsl{grey})
583: measured counterclockwise from disk center
584: direction for three different radial distances from spot center as
585: indicated in Figure~\ref{fig:physmaps} (\textsl{left}). The NCP is calculated from
586: the \FeI\,630.25\,nm line while the LOS velocity is derived from the
587: \FeI\,630.15\,nm line. The shaded areas where no data points are plotted
588: (141.5$^{\circ}$-225.0$^{\circ}$) mark the angle segment where the penumbra is missing.
589: Horizontal \textsl{dotted} lines indicate zero NCP and LOS velocity.}
590: \label{fig:azimuthal}
591: \epsscale{1.0}
592: \end{figure*}
593: %-----------------------------------------------------
594: %
595: %
596: %-----------------------------------------------------
597: % Figure 3
598: %-----------------------------------------------------
599: \begin{figure}[th]
600: \epsscale{1.0}
601: \plotone{f3_test.eps}
602: \caption{Radial dependence of the mean LOS velocity ($<v_{\rm LOS}>$) and
603: the NCP averaged over the limb-side ($<.>_{\rm LIMB}$) and
604: center-side ($<.>_{\rm CENTER}$), respectively. The penumbra
605: missing segment (141.5$^{\circ}$-225.0$^{\circ}$) is
606: not contributing in the averaging process. The vertical \textsl{dotted}
607: lines mark the inner and outer penumbral boundary.
608: Horizontal \textsl{dotted} lines indicate zero NCP and LOS velocity.
609: The radial distance is given with respect to the spot radius.}
610: \label{fig:radial}
611: \epsscale{1.0}
612: \end{figure}
613: %-----------------------------------------------------
614: %
615: %-----------------------------------------------------
616: % Figure 4
617: %-----------------------------------------------------
618: \begin{figure*}[th]
619: \epsscale{0.3}
620: \plotone{f4a.eps}\plotone{f4b_test.eps}\plotone{f4c_test.eps}
621: \caption{\textsl{Left}: Radial variation of the magnetic field strength inside the flux tube
622: and in the background field (\textsl{top}) and variation of the NCP
623: on the center- and limb-side penumbra (\textsl{bottom}).
624: Synthetic maps of the net circular polarization (\textsl {middle})
625: and LOS velocity (\textsl{right}) of the \FeI\,630.25\,nm line
626: for a sunspot at $\theta = 42^\circ$. To illustrate the filamentary
627: structure of the penumbra, we alternate between flux tubes
628: with a radial width of 2$^ \circ$ and "gaps" of stationary
629: background atmosphere of the same width.}
630: \label{fig:synthetic}
631: \epsscale{1.0}
632: \end{figure*}
633: %-----------------------------------------------------
634: %
635:
636: \end{document}
637: