1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: 

3: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

4: 

5: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

6: 

7: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

8: 

9: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

10: \documentclass{emulateapj}

11: 

12: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

13: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

14: %% the \begin{document} command.

15: %%

16: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

17: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

18: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

19: %% for information.

20: 

21: \newcommand{\myemail}{eduardo.gonzalez@uah.es}

22: \newcommand{\kms}{{\hbox {km\thinspace s$^{-1}$}}}

23: \newcommand{\Lsun}{{\hbox {L$_\odot$}}}

24: \newcommand{\Msun}{{\hbox {M$_\odot$}}}

25: \newcommand{\Mdot}{{\hbox {$\dot{M}$}}}

26: \newcommand{\arcmdot}{\rlap{.}'}

27: \newcommand{\arcsdot}{\rlap{.}''}

28: \newcommand{\cmt}{{\hbox {cm$^{-3}$}}}

29: \newcommand{\cmd}{{\hbox {cm$^{-2}$}}}

30: \newcommand{\hdo}{{\hbox {H$_{2}$O}}}

31: \newcommand{\nht}{{\hbox {NH$_{3}$}}}

32: \newcommand{\nhd}{{\hbox {NH$_{2}$}}}

33: \newcommand{\nhdos}{{\hbox {$n({\rm H}_{2})$}}}

34: \newcommand{\tk}{{\hbox {$T_{k}$}}}

35: \def\t#1#2#3#4#5#6{{\hbox {$#1_{#2#3}\!\rightarrow\!#4_{#5#6}$}}}

36: \def\13co{$^{13}$CO}

37: \def\c18o{C$^{18}$O}

38: 

39: 

40: 

41: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

42: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}

43: 

44: 

45: 

46: \shorttitle{High-excitation OH and H$_2$O lines in Mkn 231}

47: \shortauthors{Gonz\'alez-Alfonso et al.}

48: 

49: \begin{document}

50: 

51: 

52: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

53: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

54: %% you desire.

55: 

56: \title{High-excitation OH and H$_2$O lines in Markarian 231: the 

57: molecular signatures of compact far-infrared continuum 

58: sources\footnote{Based on 

59: observations with the Infrared Space Observatory, an ESA project with 

60: instruments funded 

61: by ESA Member States (especially the principal investigator countries: 

62: France, Germany, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom) and with the 

63: participation of ISAS and NASA.}}

64: 

65: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

66: %% author and affiliation information.

67: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

68: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

69: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

70: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.

71: 

72: %\author{The list}

73: 

74: \author{Eduardo Gonz\'alez-Alfonso}

75: \affil{Universidad de Alcal\'a de Henares, Departamento de F\'{\i}sica, 

76: Campus Universitario, E-28871 Alcal\'a de Henares, Madrid, Spain}

77: \email{\myemail}

78: 

79: 

80: \author{Howard A. Smith}

81: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,

82:     60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}

83: \email{hsmith@cfa.harvard.edu}

84: 

85: 

86: \author{Matthew L. N. Ashby}

87: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,

88:     60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}

89: \email{mashby@cfa.harvard.edu}

90: 

91: \author{Jacqueline Fischer}

92: \affil{Naval Research Laboratory, Remote Sensing Division, 

93: Washington, DC 20375, USA}

94: \email{jackie.fischer@nrl.navy.mil}

95: 

96: \author{Luigi Spinoglio}

97: \affil{Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario, CNR

98: via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, I-00133 Roma, Italy}

99: \email{luigi.spinoglio@ifsi-roma.inaf.it}

100: 

101: \and

102: 

103: 

104: \author{Timothy W. Grundy}

105: \affil{Space Science \& Technology Department, Rutherford Appleton 

106: Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QX, UK}

107: \email{t.w.grundy@rl.ac.uk}

108: 

109: 

110: 

111: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which

112: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name.  Specify alternate

113: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each

114: %% affiliation.

115: 

116: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for 

117: %Astrophysics,

118: %    60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138.}

119: %\altaffiltext{1}{Permanent address: Universidad de Alcal\'a de Henares, 

120: %Departamento de F\'{\i}sica, Campus Universitario, E-28871 Alcal\'a de 

121: %Henares, Madrid, Spain}

122: 

123: 

124: 

125: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

126: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

127: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

128: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

129: %% editorial office after submission.

130: 

131: 

132: \begin{abstract}

133: The ISO/LWS far-infrared spectrum of the ultraluminous galaxy Mkn 231 

134: shows OH and H$_2$O lines in absorption from energy levels up to 300 K

135: above the ground state, and emission in the [O I] 63 $\mu$m and [C II] 158

136: $\mu$m lines. Our analysis shows that OH and H$_2$O are radiatively pumped by

137: the far-infrared continuum emission of the galaxy. The absorptions in the 

138: high-excitation lines require high far-infrared radiation densities, allowing 

139: us to constrain the properties of the underlying continuum 

140: source. The bulk of the far-infrared continuum arises from a warm 

141: ($T_{{\rm dust}}=70-100$ K), optically thick ($\tau_{100\mu{\rm m}}=1-2$)

142: medium of effective diameter 200-400 pc. In our best-fit model of total

143: luminosity $L_{{\rm IR}}$, the observed OH and H$_2$O high-lying lines arise

144: from a  luminous ($L/L_{{\rm IR}}\sim0.56$) region with radius $\sim100$

145: pc. The high surface brightness of this component suggests that its infrared

146: emission is dominated by the AGN. The derived column densities

147: $N({\rm OH})\gtrsim10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$ and $N({\rm H_2O})\gtrsim6\times10^{16}$ 

148: cm$^{-2}$ may indicate XDR chemistry, although significant starburst chemistry 

149: cannot be ruled out. The lower-lying OH, [C II] 158 $\mu$m, and [O I] 63

150: $\mu$m lines arise from a more extended 

151: ($\sim350$ pc) starburst region. We show that the [C II] deficit in Mkn 231 is 

152: compatible with a high average abundance of C$^+$ because of an extreme 

153: overall luminosity to gas mass ratio. Therefore, a [C II] deficit may indicate

154: a significant contribution to the luminosity by an AGN, and/or by extremely

155: efficient star formation.

156: \end{abstract}

157: 

158: 

159: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented

160: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors

161: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine

162: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.

163: 

164: \keywords{galaxies: abundances --- galaxies: individual (Mkn 231) ---

165:  galaxies: ISM ---   galaxies: starburst 

166:  ---  infrared: galaxies ---  radiative transfer}

167: 

168: 

169: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.

170: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep

171: %% and \citet commands to identify citations.  The citations are

172: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds

173: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have

174: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus

175: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for

176: %% each reference.

177: 

178: \section{Introduction}

179: \label{sec:intro}

180: 

181: The peculiar ultraluminous infrared galaxy (ULIRG, 

182: $L_{{\rm IR}}\ge10^{12}$ \Lsun) Markarian 231 (Mkn 231, 

183: 12540+5708) is the most luminous infrared galaxy in the local universe, 

184: with a 8-1000 $\mu$m luminosity of $3.2\times10^{12}$ \Lsun\ \citep{san03}, 

185: and may be a representative example of the link between AGNs and 

186: nuclear starbursts \citep{sco04}. 

187: A QSO-like nucleus is evident from many observations:  optically it is 

188: classified as a Type 1 Seyfert \citep*{bok77,cut84,baa98},  it 

189: exhibits UV through IR polarization and broad absorption lines 

190: \citep{smi95}, it has compact X-ray emission 

191: \citep[e.g.,][]{gal02} and extremely compact 

192: mid-infrared emission \citep{soi00}, and in the radio it is 

193: variable and possesses a parsec scale jet \citep*{ulv99,tay99}.

194: Nevertheless, there is also evidence of a compact

195: starburst in these results as well as in 

196: VLA observations of H I 21 cm absorption \citep*{car98},

197: near-infrared observations \citep{tac02}, and

198: millimeter CO interferometry \citep[][hereafter DS98]{bry96,dow98}.

199: Estimates for the starburst luminosity 

200: range from 1/3 to 2/3 of the bolometric luminosity

201: \citep[][DS98]{dav04}. 

202: 

203: Molecular observations have provided important clues 

204: about the concentration and kinematics of the gas in Mkn 231. DS98 showed the

205: presence of an inner nuclear disk of radius $\sim460$ pc in CO (2-1), 

206: and a more extended disk with lower brightness. Most of the molecular 

207: gas has been found to be dense ($\sim10^4$ \cmt) and warm ($\sim70$ K)

208: from recent observations of CO and HCN submillimeter lines 

209: \citep*[][hereafter PIW07]{pap07}. 

210: \cite{lah07} have inferred embedded starburst chemistry in Mkn 231 and other

211: ULIRGs based on mid-IR Spitzer observations of ro-vibrational bands of

212: warm/hot HCN and C$_2$H$_2$, while \cite{gra06} and \cite{aal07} have inferred

213: XDR chemistry and/or radiative pumping based on 

214: anomalous intensity ratios of millimeter lines of HCN, HNC, and HCO$^+$. 

215: 

216: 

217: The bulk of the luminosity in ULIRGs is emitted at far-infrared (FIR)

218: wavelengths, where a number of molecular tracers are detected, mostly in

219: absorption. Prominent lines of OH and \hdo\ 

220: were detected using ISO/LWS in the FIR spectrum of Arp 220, 

221: along with absorption features by radicals such as NH and CH,

222: revealing a chemistry that may be indicative of

223: PDRs with plausible contribution by

224: shocks and hot cores \citep[][hereafter Paper I]{gon04}. 

225: However, those species are also expected to be enhanced in XDRs

226: \citep{mei05}, so that the dominant chemistry in the nuclear regions of ULIRGs

227: remains uncertain. In Paper I, the 

228: ISO/LWS FIR spectrum of Arp 220 was analyzed by means of 

229: radiative transfer calculations, which included a non-local treatment

230: of the molecular excitation by absorption of FIR photons. 

231: Paper I showed that the population of high-excitation OH and \hdo\ 

232: rotational levels, in evidence from absorption in high-lying lines, 

233: is pumped through absorption of FIR continuum photons, a process

234: that requires high FIR radiation densities. The detection of these 

235: lines thus not only reveals the chemical and excitation conditions 

236: in the absorbing regions, it also sheds light on the size and 

237: characteristics of the underlying continuum FIR source in spite 

238: of the low angular resolution currently available at these wavelengths. 

239: 

240: In this paper we extend our approach of Paper I to the ISO/LWS 

241: FIR spectrum of Mkn 231, and show that this galaxy spectrum 

242: presents striking similarities to that of Arp 220.  Specifically,

243: strong absorption in the high-excitation OH and \hdo\ lines is also seen in 

244: Mkn 231. Rotationally excited OH in Mkn 231 has been previously detected 

245: via the $^2\Pi_{1/2}\,\,\Lambda$-doublet transitions \citep*{hen87}. VLBI 

246: observations of the mega-maser OH emission at 18 cm wavelength trace an

247: inner torus or disk of size $\sim100$ pc around the AGN \citep*{klo03}, 

248: and MERLIN observations were able to map essentially the whole single-dish 

249: mega-maser OH emission with angular resolution of $\approx0.3''$ 

250: \citep{ric05}. We analyze here both the FIR continuum emission 

251: and the high-excitation OH and \hdo\ lines, as well as

252: the [C II] 158 $\mu$m and [O I] 63 $\mu$m emission lines. 

253: In \S\ref{sec:obser} we present the ISO spectroscopic observations of 

254: Mkn 231.  In \S\ref{sec:models} we first analyze simple models for the

255: FIR continuum emission from Mkn 231, and then examine how well

256: those models reproduce the observed FIR emission and absorption

257: lines.  \S\ref{sec:discussion} summarizes our results. 

258: We adopt a distance to Mkn 231 of 170 Mpc ($H_0=75$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ and

259: $z\approx0.042$).

260: 

261: 

262: 

263: \section{Observations and results} \label{sec:obser}

264: 

265: The full 43-197 $\mu$m spectrum of Mkn 231 \citep[first shown and discussed 

266: by][]{har99}, was obtained with the LWS spectrometer \citep{clegg96} on 

267: board ISO \citep{kes96}. In Fig.~\ref{fig:seds}, it is compared 

268: with that of Arp 220 (Paper I) re-scaled to the same distance (170 Mpc). 

269: The grating spectral resolution is $\sim$0.3 $\mu$m in the 43--93 

270: $\mu$m interval (detectors SW1--SW5), and $\sim$0.6 $\mu$m

271: in the 80--197 $\mu$m interval (detectors LW1--LW5), corresponding to

272: $\Delta v\gtrsim10^3$ \kms. The lines are thus unresolved in velocity space. 

273: The $\approx80''$ beam size ensures that all the FIR continuum 

274: and line emission/absorption from Mkn 231 (CO size $\sim4''$, DS98)

275: lie within the ISO/LWS aperture.

276: 

277: 

278: The data (TDT numbers 5100540, 18001306, and 60300241) were taken from

279: the highly-processed data product (HPDP) dataset (called 'Uniformly 

280: processed LWS01 data'), 

281: and reduced using version 10.1 of the Off Line Processing (OLP) 

282: Pipeline system \citep{swi96}. 

283: We performed subsequent data processing, including co-addition, scaling, 

284: and baseline removing, using the ISO Spectral Analysis Package 

285: \citep[ISAP;][]{sturm98} and our own routines. In order to obtain a smooth 

286: spectrum throughout the whole LWS range, the flux densities given by each 

287: detector were corrected by multiplicative scale factors. Corrections were 

288: less than 25\% except for detectors LW2 and LW3 (100--145 $\mu$m), for 

289: which the corrections were 30\%. We thus attribute an uncertainty

290: of 30\% to the overall continuum level, as well as for the line fluxes.

291: 

292: 

293: Figure~\ref{fig:seds} shows that the FIR spectra of Mkn 231 

294: and Arp 220 are similar in key aspects \citep[see also][]{fis99}, 

295: in particular the prominent molecular absorptions mostly 

296: due to OH doublets (that will be referred to hereafter as lines)

297: and the lack of strong fine-structure line emission typically seen 

298: in less luminous galaxies. A closer inspection of the pattern of line 

299: emission/absorption in both sources is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:spectra}, 

300: where the continuum-normalized spectra are compared.

301: Of particular interest are the

302: clear detections in both sources of the high-excitation OH 

303: $\Pi_{3/2}\,7/2-5/2$ 84 $\mu$m and $\Pi_{3/2}\,9/2-7/2$ 65 $\mu$m lines, 

304: with lower level energies of 120 and 290 K, respectively 

305: (see \S\ref{sec:models}). The \t330221\ and 

306: \t331220\ \hdo\ 66-67 $\mu$m lines, both with lower levels at 195 K, are 

307: also detected in Mkn 231, as well as the tentatively identified

308: \t220111\ line at 101 $\mu$m.

309: It is likely that the increased noise level 

310: at $\lambda\gtrsim160$ $\mu$m is responsible for the non-detection of the 

311: high-excitation $\Pi_{1/2}\,3/2-1/2$ OH line in Mkn 231, which is seen in 

312: strong emission in Arp 220. 

313: While the high-excitation OH and \hdo\ lines at 65-67 $\mu$m are of similar

314: strength in Mkn 231 and Arp 220, the \hdo\ lines at longer wavelengths are

315: undoubtly weaker in Mkn 231, as seen for the \t322211, \t220111\ and

316: \t221110\ \hdo\ lines at 90, 102, and 108 $\mu$m, respectively. 

317: The weakness of the latter lines in Mkn 231 suggests that the region

318:   where the high-lying \hdo\ lines are formed is relatively weak in the far-IR

319:   continuum at $\lambda=90-108$ $\mu$m. The Mkn 231

320: spectrum thus suggests that a warm component, with relatively weak 

321: contribution to the far-IR continuum at 

322: $\lambda\gtrsim80$ $\mu$m, is responsible for the observed high-excitation

323: absorptions (\S\ref{sec:molec}). 

324: Table~\ref{tab:flux} lists the line fluxes, continuum flux densities at the

325: corresponding wavelengths, and equivalent widths for the lines detected in Mkn

326: 231. 

327: 

328: 

329: 

330: In the case of Arp 220, we used high-spatial resolution continuum measurements 

331: available in the literature to infer that Arp 220 is optically 

332: thick even in the submillimeter continuum \citep[Paper I; see also][]{dow07}.

333: The steeper decrease of the flux density with increasing wavelength

334: in Mkn 231, however, suggests that it has lower FIR continuum 

335: opacities (Fig.~\ref{fig:seds}). This expectation is further reinforced

336: by the detection in Mkn 231 of the [N II] 122 $\mu$m line, a feature not

337: seen in Arp 220 (Fig.~\ref{fig:spectra}). 

338: Other notable differences between both sources are

339: that the [O I] 63 $\mu$m line is observed in emission in Mkn 231 but in

340: absorption in Arp 220, and that the ground-state 119, 53, and 79 $\mu$m OH 

341: lines are significantly weaker in Mkn 231 (Fig.~\ref{fig:spectra}). In 

342: modeling Arp 220, we were forced to invoke an absorbing ``halo'' to account 

343: for these lines; in Mkn 231, no such halo is required 

344: (\S\ref{sec:models}).

345: 

346: 

347: In the spectrum of Mkn 231,

348: the main 119.3 $\mu$m OH line appears to be slightly blue-shifted relative to

349: the expected position, an effect we attribute to the proximity of the

350: line to the edge of the LW3 detector. There is a nearby weaker red-shifted 

351: feature, at 120 $\mu$m, which coincides

352: with the expected position of the ground $\Pi_{3/2}\,5/2-3/2$ $^{18}$OH

353: line, and appears as a marginal feature in both the ``up'' and 

354: ``down'' grating scans. However, the limited signal-to-noise ratio 

355: ($(1.0\pm0.4)\times10^{-20}$ W cm$^{-2}$), the narrow appearance of the 

356: feature ($\approx0.42$ $\mu$m), and

357: the fact that it is not blue-shifted as the main line, make that assignment

358: only tentative. In Arp 220, the main OH line is not shifted because it does 

359: not fall so close to the edge of the detector, as a consequence of the 

360: lower red-shift of the source. In Arp 220, a red-shifted shoulder 

361: appears at 120 $\mu$m, suggesting the 

362: possibility that $^{18}$OH may be responsible for it (Paper I). 

363: We cannot however be certain that $^{18}$OH is detected in any of these 

364: sources, but given the high $^{16}$OH column densities we derive in some

365:   of our models below (\S\ref{sec:molec}) and the fact that values of the

366:   $^{16}$OH/$^{18}$OH ratios below the canonical value of 500 may be expected

367:   in regions where the ISM is highly processed by starbursts (Paper I), our

368:   tentative identification should be followed up with future Herschel Space

369:   Observatory observations with higher spectral resolution and sensitivity.

370: Finally, the spectrum of Mkn 231 shows a broad feature at the 

371: position of the $\Pi_{1/2}-\Pi_{3/2}\,3/2-3/2$ OH line (53 $\mu$m). We 

372: note that the blue-shifted side of this absorption is coincident with the OH 

373: $\Pi_{3/2}\,11/2-9/2$ line, with a lower level energy of 511 K; however, the 

374: proximity of this spectral feature to the edge of the SW2 detector 

375: precludes any definitive assignment.

376: 

377: 

378: The FIR detections of both NH and NH$_3$ in Arp 220 were reported in

379: Paper I. NH$_3$ was also detected via 

380: the 25 GHz inversion transitions by \cite{tak05}, who derived

381: a NH$_3$ column density six times higher than our value.  

382: The difference likely arises because of the high FIR 

383: continuum opacities in Arp 220, which cause the observed FIR 

384: absorptions to trace only a fraction of the total gas column. Since there are 

385: no such extinction effects at 25 GHz, the NH$_3$ inversion transitions are 

386: expected to trace higher NH$_3$ column densities.

387: Figure~\ref{fig:spectra} shows that, by contrast, the

388: NH$_3$ lines are not detected in Mkn 231, although the relatively 

389: high noise at 125 $\mu$m

390: does not rule out future detection of NH$_3$ with Herschel at a

391: level similar to that of Arp 220. 

392: 

393: There are two marginally-detected ($2.5\sigma$ level) spectral features 

394: seen at 153.0 and 152.3 $\mu$m, in the Mkn 231 spectrum 

395: (Fig.~\ref{fig:ohplus}).

396: Although close to the expected position of the main NH feature at 153.22 

397: $\mu$m, the 153.0 $\mu$m feature appears significantly shifted by 0.25 

398: $\mu$m from it, and better coincides with the position of the 

399: OH$^+$ $2_3-1_2$ line. Also, the 152.3 $\mu$m feature lies at 0.1 $\mu$m from

400: the expected position of the OH$^+$ $2_2-1_1$ line. In Paper I, we also

401: suggested that OH$^+$ could contribute to the spectrum of Arp 220 for two

402: reasons: $(i)$ our models were unable to 

403: reproduce, using NH and NH$_3$, the observed strong absorption at 

404: 102 $\mu$m, which coincides with the expected position of the

405: OH$^+$ $3_4-2_3$ line; $(ii)$ there was an absorption feature at 76.4 

406: $\mu$m that, if real, could be attributed to the OH$^+$ $4_4-3_3$

407: transition. 

408: Since OH$^+$ has never been detected in the galactic interstellar medium 

409: or that of any galaxy, here we only highlight the intriguing possibility 

410: of its detection in two ULIRGs. Sensitive, higher-resolution Herschel 

411: observations are needed to resolve this tantalizing speculation.

412: 

413: 

414: 

415: The luminosity of the [C II] $^2P_{3/2}-^2P_{1/2}$ fine-structure line 

416: at 158 $\mu$m is 2.5 times stronger in Mkn 231 than in Arp 220, but given 

417: the higher FIR luminosity of this source (Fig~\ref{fig:seds}), 

418: the [C II] to FIR luminosity ratios are rather similar, with 

419: values of $2.5\times10^{-4}$ and 

420: $2.1\times10^{-4}$ for Mkn 231 and Arp 220, 

421: respectively \citep{luh03}. These are among the lowest values found

422: in galaxies, illustrating the so-called ``[C II] deficit'' found in

423: ULIRGs. The [C II] line emission from Mkn 231

424: is analyzed in \S\ref{sec:cii}.

425: 

426: 

427: 

428: \section{Analysis} \label{sec:models}

429: 

430: \subsection{Models for the far-infrared continuum} \label{sec:continuum}

431: 

432: 

433: Figure~\ref{fig:cont} illustrates several ways that the FIR to 

434: millimeter continuum can be fit and interpreted.

435: We first modeled (model $A$ in Fig.~\ref{fig:cont}a) the far infrared 

436: source in Mkn 231 as an ensemble of identical dust clouds each of 

437: which is heated by its own single 

438: central luminosity source. The representative cloud is assumed to be 

439: spherical, with radius $R_c$, and is divided into concentric shells whose dust 

440: temperatures are computed from the balance of heating and cooling 

441: \citep{gon99}. We used a mixture of silicate and amorphous carbon grains 

442: with optical constants from \cite{pre93} and \cite{dra85}.

443: The stellar continuum was taken from \cite{lei99}, but results 

444: depend only weakly on this choice because the intrinsic continuum is  

445: absorbed by the dust and re-emitted at infrared wavelengths. Once the 

446: equilibrium temperatures are obtained for each shell, the resulting continuum 

447: emission from the cloud is computed, and multiplied by $N_c$, the 

448: number of clouds in the source required to match the absolute flux densities. 

449: This scaled spectrum is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:cont}a. 

450: The other three models ($B$, $C$, and $D$, shown in

451: Fig.~\ref{fig:cont}b-d)  use grey-bodies with uniform dust temperatures

452: $T_d$ to characterize the continuum emission \citep[e.g.,][]{roc93,arm07}.

453: 

454: 

455: Assuming that the individual clouds do not overlap along the line of

456: sight, our results do not depend particularly on the radius or 

457: luminosity adopted for the model individual cloud because identical results

458: are obtained if $R_c$ is multiplied by a factor of $\alpha$, the luminosity by

459: $\alpha^2$, $N_c$ by $\alpha^{-2}$, and the continuum opacity is kept constant

460: (see Paper I). The models are thus characterized by the luminosity of the

461: whole ensemble, the radial opacity of the clouds at a given wavelength (which 

462: we adopt to be 100 $\mu$m: $\tau_{100\mu{\rm m}}$), and the equivalent 

463: radius of the source, defined as $R_{eq}=N_c^{1/2} R_c$. These parameters are

464: listed in Table~\ref{tab:cont}. 

465:  

466: In model A, the individual clouds are optically thin so that some degree

467: of cloud overlap would yield a similar fit to the continuum while decreasing

468: the value of $R_{eq}$. For instance, if the clouds are

469: distributed in a spherical volume, $R_{eq}=N_c^{1/3} R_c$ giving

470: $R_{eq}=400$ pc for clouds with $R_c=20$ pc. However, the predicted opacity

471: through the modeled region, $N_c^{1/3}\tau_{100\mu{\rm m}}$, will be much

472: higher than that of an individual cloud, and this physical situation

473: is already described in models $B$-$C$ where higher opacities along the line

474: of sight and a more compact region of FIR emission are assumed. In order to

475: avoid this model redundancy, we 

476: choose our continuum models such that an individual ``cloud''

477: describes the characteristic continuum opacity ($\tau_{100\mu{\rm m}}$ in

478: Table~\ref{tab:cont}) and dust temperature through the whole region (disk),

479: so that the resulting extent of the FIR emission is $R_{eq}=N_c^{1/2} R_c$. 

480: 

481: 

482: The observed continuum can be reproduced from model $A$'s cloud ensemble 

483: that is optically thin in the FIR. Model $A$ also predicts that the starburst

484: dominates the continuum for $\lambda\gtrsim15$ $\mu$m, while 

485: the torus/disk around the AGN would then dominate the mid-infrared continuum,

486: in qualitative agreement with the models by \cite{far03}.

487: The equivalent radius of the starburst is slightly larger than the radius of 

488: the outer disk observed by DS98. Because $\tau_{100\mu{\rm m}}$ is low and 

489: $R_{eq}$ is high, this model predicts that the 

490: {\em FIR radiation density} is low, a prediction that is not 

491: consistent with our models of the observed OH line strengths 

492: (\S\ref{sec:eqw}).

493: 

494: 

495: As both $\tau_{100\mu{\rm m}}$ and $T_d$ are increased in models $B$ and $C$,

496: the radiation density increases and, therefore, the

497: equivalent size required to reproduce the observed emission becomes smaller.

498: As a consequence, models $B$ and $C$ predict increasing compactness of the

499: dust clouds responsible for the FIR emission, with $R_{eq}=400$ 

500: and 200 pc respectively. With a single-component model, however, 

501: $R_{eq}$ cannot be reduced more than in model $C$ without degrading the 

502: quality of the fit. However, a two-component model as shown in $D$ 

503: is able to reproduce the FIR emission, invoking a quite 

504: compact ($\sim100$ pc) and warm (100 K) component ($D_{{\rm warm}}$), and 

505: a colder and more extended one that dominates at $\lambda>80$ $\mu$m

506: ($D_{{\rm cold}}$). 

507: 

508: 

509: A convenient way to characterize the radiation density in the modeled

510: regions is to compute the radiation temperature at 100 $\mu$m from

511: \begin{equation}

512: T_{{\rm rad}}(100\,\mu{\rm m})=

513: \frac{h\nu}{k\,\ln\left[1+\frac{2h\nu^3\Omega}{c^2F_{100\,\mu{\rm m}}}

514:   \right]},

515: \end{equation}

516: where $\Omega=\pi N_c R_c^2/D^2$ is the solid angle subtended by the modeled 

517: source, $F_{100\,\mu{\rm m}}$ is the predicted flux density at 100 $\mu$m, 

518: and other symbols have their usual meaning.  $T_{{\rm rad}}(100\,\mu{\rm m})$ 

519: is also listed in Table~\ref{tab:cont}, together with the gas mass, 

520: luminosity, and fraction of the bolometric luminosity for each model. 

521: The calculated gas masses assume a gas-to-dust mass ratio of 100. 

522: In all cases, they are lower than the dynamical masses determined by DS98 

523: when $R_{eq}$ is identified with the radial 

524: extent of the source (and therefore compatible with the inferred 

525: rotation velocities in the disk). Our inferred masses are in models $B-D$

526: consistent with the mass inferred by PIW07, but are in all cases

527: higher, by at least a factor of two, than the gas masses 

528: obtained by DS98. This discrepancy may be explained in at least four possible, 

529: different ways: $(i)$ the physical radial extent

530: of the cloud ensemble, which accounts for cloud filling,

531: is given by $R_T=f^{-1/2}R_{eq}$, where $f$ is the area filling 

532: factor, so that $R_{eq}$ is a lower limit of $R_T$; $(ii)$ our 

533: calculated masses depend on the mass-absorption coefficient for dust, which 

534: we have assumed to be $\kappa_{1300\mu{\rm m}}=0.33$ cm$^2$ g$^{-1}$ based

535: on a mixture of silicate and amorphous carbon grains \citep{pre93,dra85}, but 

536: could be up to a factor $\sim6$ higher if the dust is mainly composed 

537: of fluffy aggregates \citep{kru94}; $(iii)$ the gas-to-dust mass ratio 

538: may depart significantly from the standard value of 100; $(iv)$ the masses 

539: derived by DS98 for Mkn 231 could be lower limits in the light of the 

540: submillimeter CO emission reported by PIW07. A combination of these factors

541: may explain our higher values.

542: 

543: The luminosities in Table~\ref{tab:cont} account for 50-80 \% of the observed

544: $8-1000$ $\mu$m infrared luminosity. Model $A$ implicitly assumes that the

545: calculated luminosity has a starburst origin; the luminosity from 

546: model $B$ and from the cold component of model $D$ are also attributable 

547: to the starburst in view of the spatial extent of the modeled source. 

548: Since model $C$ and the warm component of model $D$ are more compact, a

549: combination of AGN and starburst contributions is more plausible. 

550: The surface brightness in model $C$ is $4\times10^{12}$ \Lsun/kpc$^2$, 

551: a factor of 2 higher than the peak global value found

552: in starburst galaxies by \cite{meu97}, suggesting an important (but uncertain) 

553: contribution by the AGN to the observed FIR emission \citep{soi00}. 

554: Also, the luminosity-to-mass ratio of 500 \Lsun/\Msun\ coincides 

555: with the uppermost limit proposed by \cite{sco04} for a starburst. 

556: The very high surface brightness ($1.3\times10^{13}$ \Lsun/kpc$^2$) and 

557: luminosity-to-mass ratio ($\sim3300$ \Lsun/\Msun) of the warm component of 

558: model $D$ ($D_{{\rm warm}}$), as well as its compactness, persuasively 

559: indicate that this component is most probably dominated by the AGN. 

560: The most plausible relative contributions by the AGN and the starburst 

561: to $D_{{\rm warm}}$ are discussed in \S\ref{sec:discussion}.

562: 

563: 

564: In summary, different approaches can be used to successfully fit the observed

565: FIR continuum emission, with the properties of the clouds that

566: emit that radiation in these approaches spanning a wide range of possible

567: physical scenarios. But ISO/LWS has provided us with spectroscopic information,

568: and we show next how the observed high excitation OH and \hdo\ 

569: lines impose important constraints on these continuum models.

570: 

571: 

572: \subsection{Equivalent widths} \label{sec:eqw}

573: 

574: We analyze the OH equivalent widths assuming that the OH molecules 

575: form a screen in front of the IR source. The strengths of the 

576: $\Pi_{3/2}$ $7/2-5/2$ and $9/2-7/2$ OH doublets at 84 and 65 $\mu$m, 

577: enable us to conclude that the excited OH covers a 

578: substantial fraction of the FIR emission region. 

579: Assuming that each line of the 84 $\mu$m doublet absorbs all the background 

580: 84 $\mu$m continuum over a velocity range of 250 km s$^{-1}$ 

581: {\em along each line of sight}, and that there is no significant re-emission in

582: the line, the covering factor is $\sim50$\%. This value may be considered

583: a lower limit for the following reasons. The submillimeter CO line 

584: profiles shown by \cite{pap07} have FWHMs of 200-250 km s$^{-1}$, and the 

585: lines are expected to be broadened by velocity gradients and, in particular, 

586: by the disk rotation; therefore, the velocity range of 250 km s$^{-1}$ assumed

587: above is probably an upper limit. DS98 inferred local turbulent velocities 

588: of up to 60 km s$^{-1}$ at inner radii (100 pc) and decreasing as $r^{-0.3}$. 

589: If we adopt an intrinsic Gaussian line profile with

590: the highest value of the turbulent velocity, 

591: $\Delta V=60$ km s$^{-1}$, and saturate the 84 $\mu$m line to the degree

592: that an effective width\footnote{The effective width is defined here as

593: $\int (1-\exp\{-\tau_v\})dv$, where

594: $\tau_v=\tau_0\times\exp\{-(v/\Delta V)^2\}$ and $\tau_0$ is the line opacity

595: at line center.} of 250 km s$^{-1}$ is obtained for each component of

596: the doublet, the derived 84 $\mu$m foreground opacity at line center is

597: $\sim50$, but the high column density required for this opacity is 

598: hard to reconcile with that inferred from the

599: other observed OH line strengths (\S\ref{sec:molec}). Finally, 

600: some significant re-emission in the 84 $\mu$m OH line is expected because the  

601: $\Pi_{3/2}$ $9/2-7/2$ OH line at 65 $\mu$m that originates from its upper

602: level is detected in absorption. We therefore conclude

603: that the observed 84 $\mu$m OH absorption is widespread, and probably covers

604: the bulk of the 84 $\mu$m continuum emission regions. On the other hand, the 

605: opacities in the high-lying 65 $\mu$m line should only be moderate; 

606: for reference, if we adopt for each component an upper limit of 150 km

607: s$^{-1}$ on the effective velocity interval for the absorption at each sight

608: line, the minimum covering factor for this line is then 25\%. It is therefore

609: possible that the OH responsible for the 65 $\mu$m absorption does not entirely

610: coincide with that producing the 84 $\mu$m absorption but is only a

611: fraction of the latter, consistent with its lower energy level being at

612: nearly 300 K. Nevertheless, for the sake of simplicity, we 

613: assume in this Section that both lines arise in the same region --one that, 

614: on the basis of the 84 $\mu$m OH strength, covers the total FIR 

615: continuum. The derived OH column densities will be lower limits, and the

616: inferred properties of the continuum source will be associated with at least 

617: $\sim50$ \% of the observed FIR emission.

618: 

619: 

620: 

621: 

622: 

623: The equivalent widths $W$ are then given by

624: \begin{equation}

625: W=2\times \left[ 1-\frac{B_{\nu}(T_{ex})\Omega}{F_{\lambda}} \right]

626: \times \int (1-\exp\{-\tau_v\})\, dv,

627: \label{eq:w}

628: \end{equation}

629: where $B_{\nu}(T_{ex})$ is the blackbody emission at the excitation

630: temperature $T_{ex}$ of the line, $\Omega=\pi R_{eq}^2/D^2$ is the solid angle

631: subtended by the source, $F_{\lambda}$ is the observed continuum flux density

632: at the wavelength $\lambda$ of the line, $\tau_v$ is the line opacity at

633: velocity $v$, and the factor 2 accounts for the two lines that compose a

634: doublet. The values of $W$ are positive for absorption lines, and negative for

635: lines observed in emission.

636: Equation (\ref{eq:w}) applies both to optically thin and 

637: optically thick lines. For optically thin lines, $W$ is proportional to the

638: assumed column density; for very optically thick lines, 

639: $W$ becomes insensitive to 

640: the column density and scales linearly with the turbulent 

641: velocity.  Based on DS98, we have adopted $\Delta V=40$ km s$^{-1}$, 

642: which is probably accurate within 50\%. 

643: 

644: 

645: The fractional level populations and column densities 

646: (and hence the opacities), and 

647: blackbody temperatures required to obtain $W$ from eq.~(\ref{eq:w}) 

648: can be estimated from a given column density $N$(OH), and 

649: by assuming that {\em the excitation temperature $T_{ex}$ 

650: is the same for all OH transitions}. This assumption is certainly only an

651: approximation. The OH levels are pumped primarily 

652: through absorption of FIR photons; this is quite a general model 

653: result when both the ground and the excited OH rotational lines (except the 

654: 163 $\mu$m one) are observed in absorption \citep[see the similar conclusion 

655: in Paper I for the case of Arp 220, as well as the case of the \hdo\ lines 

656: at 25-45 $\mu$m in Orion/IRc2,][]{wri00}.

657: When radiative excitation dominates, the level populations tend toward 

658: equilibrium with the radiation field within the inner cloud, and the

659: excitation temperatures are similar for all transitions in those

660: regions. However, the observed absorptions are produced close to the 

661: cloud boundary where the OH molecules are illuminated from only one side and

662: $T_{ex}$ is less than the radiation temperature. Due to trapping

663: effects, the lines with the highest opacity (119 and 84 $\mu$m OH lines) 

664: remain more excited than the other lines at inner locations of the region, but 

665: their $T_{ex}$ decrease more steeply outwards and fall below the $T_{ex}$ of

666: other, thinner lines close to the cloud boundary. The detailed, non-local

667: radiative transfer models described in 

668: \S\ref{sec:molec} show that the assumption of

669: equal $T_{ex}$ is only approximately valid for the 119 and 84 $\mu$m 

670: lines, but for the other lines, and in particular for the 65 and 53 $\mu$m

671: lines, $T_{ex}$ may be higher or lower depending on position in the region. 

672: Nevertheless, the opacities of the 119, 84, 65, and 53 $\mu$m lines

673: are mostly determined by the $T_{ex}$ of the 119 and 84 $\mu$m lines. As a

674: result, the following analysis of the radiation 

675: density (or, equivalently, $R_{eq}$, required to account for the observed 

676: absorptions) is accurate, at least to a first approximation.

677: 

678: The three parameters now required to estimate $W$ from equation (\ref{eq:w}) 

679: are then $N$(OH), $R_{eq}$, and $T_{ex}$. Figure~\ref{fig:eqw} shows the 

680: expected values of $W$ for models $A$, $B$, and $C$ as a function

681: of $T_{ex}$ for the 119, 84, 65, and 53 $\mu$m lines, and compares them

682: with the observed values. Each panel assumes a value of $R_{eq}$ that

683: corresponds to the continuum models $A$, $B$, and $C$ described in

684: \S\ref{sec:continuum} (see also Table~\ref{tab:cont}). The values of

685: $N$(OH) used for each model are just reference values discussed below.

686: 

687: The spectral line analysis of Model $A$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:eqw}a) shows that 

688: this scenario can be ruled out as the main

689: source of FIR radiation from Mkn 231 (Fig.~\ref{fig:cont}a): 

690: the continuum model predicts low $T_{rad}$ (between 20 and 34 K for the 

691: different lines) but the observed absorption in the 65 $\mu$m line, with 

692: lower level energy of 290 K, requires a much higher $T_{ex}$. 

693: Furthermore, the 119 and 84 $\mu$m lines are expected to

694: be in emission ($W<0$) as soon as $T_{ex}$ becomes higher than 20 and 25 K

695: (which, on the other hand, is not possible for radiative excitation).

696: With such a low value of $T_{ex}$, $W_{65\mu{\rm m}}$ is negligible even 

697: with our adopted screen $N({\rm OH})=10^{18}$ cm$^{-2}$, a value that

698: overestimates $W_{53\mu{\rm m}}$ by more than a factor of two.

699: 

700: The above problems still remain to some extent in model $B$, 

701: when $R_{eq}$ is reduced to 400 pc (Fig.~\ref{fig:eqw}b). Here 

702: the dust radiation temperatures allow the lines to

703: be seen in absorption up to $T_{ex}\approx40$ K, however $W_{65\mu{\rm m}}$ is

704: underestimated by more than a factor of 2 for the adopted 

705: $N({\rm OH})=3\times10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$, yet this column density still 

706: overestimates the absorption of the 53 $\mu$m line. Although model $B$ cannot 

707: account for the 65 $\mu$m line strength, a region of similar size but 

708: lower $N({\rm OH})$ could contribute to the observed absorptions of the 

709: 119, 84 and 53 $\mu$m lines.

710: 

711: The single-component model that best accounts for the four observed 

712: OH lines is model $C$ with $R_{eq}=200$ pc (Fig.~\ref{fig:eqw}c). 

713: The corresponding continuum model (Fig.~\ref{fig:cont}c), with $T_d=74$ K, 

714: also fits rather well the overall FIR continuum emission. 

715: Significantly, our models in \S\ref{sec:molec} show that 

716: the excitation temperatures required to

717: reproduce the observed equivalent widths, 40-60 K, are those computed at the

718: cloud surface if the OH is excited by the infrared emission from a blackbody 

719: at $T_d=74$ K. Finally, the dust temperature and gas mass 

720: (Table~\ref{tab:cont}) in model $C$ are consistent with the gas 

721: temperature and H$_2$ mass derived 

722: by \cite{pap07} from the submillimeter CO and HCN emission. They 

723: found that this warm gas component hosts most of the molecular mass in 

724: the galaxy. The H$_2$ column density, $N({\rm H_2})\sim1.5\times10^{24}$ 

725: cm$^{-2}$, indicates high optical depths, as in the galactic Sgr B2 

726: molecular cloud, but Mkn 231 is much warmer. If the column density in Mkn 231

727: is concentrated in a face-on disk of thickness $H=23$ pc, 

728: as concluded by DS98, the expected density is $n({\rm H_2})\sim2\times10^4$ 

729: cm$^{-3}$, just the amount needed to account for the CO submillimeter lines 

730: \citep{pap07}. On the other hand, if this warm and dense component is 

731: identified with the inner disk of radius 460 pc reported by DS98, the 

732: area filling factor is $f\sim0.2$. In spite of the general agreement between

733: our model $C$ with other observations, a closer 

734: inspection of this model (\S\ref{sec:molec}) reveals some 

735: discrepancies with other OH and \hdo\ lines that suggest that a slightly 

736: modified scenario can better explain the overall observed absorption 

737: patterns.

738: 

739: \subsection{Models for OH and \hdo} \label{sec:molec}

740: 

741: Radiative transfer modeling of the observed OH and \hdo\ lines was done 

742: using the code described in \cite{gon97,gon99}, which computes the 

743: statistical equilibrium populations of a given molecule in spherical 

744: symmetry. Line broadening is assumed to be caused by microturbulence. Our code 

745: accounts for a non-local treatment of the radiative trapping in the 

746: molecular lines and of the excitation through absorption of photons emitted

747: by dust, as well as for collisional excitation. 

748: Both line and continuum opacities for photons emitted in both 

749: lines and continuum are taken into account. 

750: Collisional rates were taken from \citet*{offer94} and 

751: \citet*{green93} for OH and \hdo, respectively. As we also found for

752: Arp 220 (Paper I), the overall excitation is dominated by absorption of 

753: FIR continuum photons in all models. If shock conditions (high 

754: density and temperature) were assumed, only the absorption in the 

755: lowest-lying lines would be significantly affected. Once the continuum model is

756: fixed, our results only depend on the molecular column densities and 

757: turbulent velocity (see Paper I for a fuller description). 

758: 

759: As mentioned above (\S\ref{sec:eqw}), the observed absorption strengths

760: are not sensitive to the amounts of OH and \hdo\ in the inner regions of 

761: the modeled regions, but only to the amounts of OH and \hdo\ that are 

762: close to the cloud (or disk) boundary. For this reason, we calculate two 

763: values for the derived molecular column densities: $N^{{\rm scr}}(X)$ 

764: denotes the column density for a shell of species $X$ covering the infrared 

765: source (i.e., the screen case), whereas $N^{{\rm mix}}(X)$ is the inferred 

766: column density for models where $X$ and dust are evenly mixed (the mixed 

767: case). Evidently $N^{{\rm mix}}$ will be much higher than $N^{{\rm scr}}$, 

768: but from our data there are only a few, non-definitive ways to discriminate 

769: between the alternatives. The 163 $\mu$m OH and 120 $\mu$m $^{18}$OH lines are

770: stronger in the mixed case, but neither of these features is unambiguously

771: detected. Nevertheless, we do not find any strong arguments for thinking that

772: OH and \hdo\ are only present on the surface of the disk, and so the 

773: $N^{{\rm mix}}$ values may be considered somewhat more reliable. The 

774: abundances we derive below are based on this assumption; we revisit the 

775: ``mixed''case when we discuss models for the [C II] line.

776: 

777: 

778: Since model $C$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:cont}c, Fig.~\ref{fig:eqw}c,

779: Table~\ref{tab:cont}) gives the best single-component 

780: fit to most of the OH equivalent widths,

781: we first check if it can account for the observed OH and \hdo\ absorption 

782: features. Figure~\ref{fig:model} compares the observed continuum-subtracted 

783: spectrum and the modeled results (dashed spectrum, mixed case) for the 

784: wavelength ranges where the signal-to-noise ratio is adequate. 

785: Table~\ref{tab:model} lists the physical parameters obtained for this 

786: model. We have assumed a turbulent velocity $\Delta V$ of 40 km s$^{-1}$ 

787: (\S\ref{sec:eqw}; DS98). The model fits satisfactorily 

788: the OH 119, 84, 65, and 53 $\mu$m lines, thus demonstrating the 

789: approximate validity

790: of the simple method outlined in \S\ref{sec:eqw}. The value of

791: $N^{{\rm scr}}({\rm OH})=10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$ is also the same as estimated

792: from the equivalent widths. The \hdo\ column densities are determined by 

793: the strengths of the \t330221\ and \t331220\ lines at 66-67 $\mu$m. 

794: 

795: 

796: Some features of model $C$, however, are inconsistent 

797: with the data. The possible emission in the OH 163 $\mu$m line is not

798: reproduced, and the absorption in the 79 and 99 $\mu$m OH lines appears

799: excessive. The model also predicts too much absorption in the \t322211\ 

800: (90 $\mu$m), \t220111\ (101 $\mu$m), \t221110\ (108 $\mu$m), and \t414303\ 

801: (113 $\mu$m) \hdo\ lines. All these discrepancies suggest that the component 

802: that accounts for the absorption of the 65-68 $\mu$m OH and \hdo\ lines

803: is weaker than postulated in model $C$ at wavelengths longer than 80 $\mu$m.

804: 

805: 

806: These discrepancies may be resolved by invoking two different

807: components for the FIR continuum emission, as in model $D$ 

808: (Fig.~\ref{fig:cont}, Table~\ref{tab:cont}). The 

809: warm-compact component, responsible for the 65-68 $\mu$m OH and 

810: \hdo\ lines, will produce weak absorptions in the 80-120 $\mu$m range

811: as a consequence of the relatively weak continuum emission at these

812: wavelengths. The more extended component will contribute to the

813: observed absorptions in the 53, 84, and 119 $\mu$m OH lines. The compactness

814: of the warm component suggests that it is relatively close to the AGN, and

815: thus we have assumed $\Delta V=60$ \kms\ for $D_{{\rm warm}}$ 

816: (Table~\ref{tab:model}); this is the turbulent velocity found by DS98 

817: around the rotation curve turnover radius 

818: of 75 pc. For the extended component ($D_{{\rm cold}}$), 

819: $\Delta V=40$ \kms\ is assumed. 

820: Figure~\ref{fig:model} shows that a better fit to the overall spectrum is

821: indeed found with this composite model (grey line), with the lines in 

822: the 80-120 $\mu$m range brought down to levels compatible with observations. 

823: Also, the model predicts the 163 $\mu$m OH line to be in emission. The column 

824: densities in model $D$ are significantly lower than in $C$ and, to avoid 

825: the above mentioned \hdo\ absorptions at 90-120 $\mu$m, only an upper 

826: limit for the \hdo\ column density has been derived for the extended 

827: component. On the basis of this improved fit to the molecular

828: lines, we favor model $D$ over model $C$.

829: 

830: 

831: \subsection{Models for [C II] and [O I]} \label{sec:cii}

832: 

833: We now check if our preferred models for OH and \hdo\ are consistent 

834: with the observed [C II] 158 $\mu$m and [O I] 63 $\mu$m lines, 

835: and in particular if the version with OH and dust coexistent (the mixed 

836: case), which predicts high OH column densities (Table~\ref{tab:model}), 

837: is compatible with the low [C II] to FIR flux ratio seen and

838: previously reported in Mkn 231 \citep{luh03}. In Paper I we

839: assumed a C$^+$ to OH abundance ratio of 100 (based on standard gas-phase 

840: carbon abundance, and the abundance of OH 

841: found in the galactic center and Sgr B2), and found a remarkable agreement

842: between the predicted and observed [C II] line flux in Arp 220. 

843: In the present case we have

844: searched for the required C$^+$ and O$^0$ column densities in models $C$ and

845: $D$ (mixed case) that fit the observed [C II] and [O I] line fluxes, with 

846: the additional constraint that the [O I] 145 $\mu$m line is not detected 

847: to a limit of $4\times10^{-21}$ W cm$^{-2}$ \citep[see also][]{luh03}.

848: In model $D$, the C$^+$ abundance was assumed to be the same in both 

849: components. Both the [C II] and [O I] lines are expected to form within

850: $A_V\sim3$ mag of the surfaces of PDRs, and so we allowed the gas 

851: temperature to vary between 250 K and 700 K \citep[e.g.,][]{kau99}; 

852: the results for the [C II] line are not sensitive to $T_k$ as long as $T_k$

853: is sufficiently higher than the energy of the upper level,

854: $\approx90$ K. In the regions directly exposed to the FUV radiation field, 

855: all of the carbon and oxygen are expected to be in their ionized and atomic 

856: forms, respectively. 

857: Therefore an O$^0$ to C$^+$ abundance ratio of 2.1, corresponding

858: to O$^0$ and C$^+$ gas-phase abundances of $3\times10^{-4}$ and 

859: $1.4\times10^{-4}$ \citep{ss96}, is imposed. Using the collisional rates by

860: \cite{lau77a,lau77b} for carbon and oxygen, we then searched 

861: for the density $n({\rm H})$ and column densities $N^{{\rm mix}}({\rm C^+})$ 

862: and $N^{{\rm mix}}({\rm O^0})$ required to match the line strengths. 

863: The results for both models $C$ and $D$ are also in Fig.~\ref{fig:model}, 

864: and the calculated column densities are listed in Table~\ref{tab:model}.

865: 

866: We could not find any satisfactory fit to the three atomic lines with 

867: model $C$. Since

868: the continuum is optically thick at $\lambda<150$ $\mu$m, extinction effects 

869: are important in the [O I] 63 $\mu$m line, and densities higher than

870: $5\times10^3$ \cmt\ were required to account for it. On the other hand, high

871: column densities were also needed to fit the [C II] line, and the final result 

872: is that all combinations that fitted both the [C II] and the [O I] 63 

873: $\mu$m lines yielded more flux than the upper limit for the undetected [O I] 

874: 145 $\mu$m line. 

875: The model in Fig.~\ref{fig:model} shows the result 

876: for $n({\rm H})=8\times10^3$ \cmt\ and $T_k=400$ K. Only high densities 

877: ($\sim10^5$ \cmt) and relatively low temperatures ($\lesssim150$ K) can

878: approximately match both O$^0$ lines, but then the [C II] line is

879: underestimated by more than a factor of 2. 

880: 

881: In contrast, model $D$ allowed us to find a more 

882: satisfactory fit to the three 

883: lines. As we argue below, the compact-warm component is expected to

884: give negligible emission in the C$^+$ and O$^0$ lines. The 

885: extended component $D_{{\rm cold}}$, with its moderate dust temperature 

886: ($T_d=47$ K) and continuum opacity, can explain the [O I] 63 $\mu$m line with 

887: a density and column density lower than in model $C$, thereby predicting 

888: a weak 145 $\mu$m line. The model in Fig.~\ref{fig:model} uses for 

889: $D_{{\rm cold}}$ $n({\rm H})=5\times10^3$ \cmt\ and $T_k=400$ K. 

890: It is remarkable that when 

891: we generated the same model but excluded the effect of dust, we

892: found that the [O I] 63 $\mu$m line was stronger by a factor of 4.2. 

893: The dust has a small effect on the other two [O I] 145 $\mu$m and 

894: [C II] 158 $\mu$m lines, but can lower substantially the 

895: [O I] 63 $\mu$m line because the absorption of 63 $\mu$m 

896: line-emitted photons by dust grains (i.e., extinction) is more important 

897: than the additional pumping of O$^0$ atoms by 63 $\mu$m dust-emitted photons. 

898: Therefore,  the ratio of the [C II] 158 $\mu$m line to the [O I] 63 

899: $\mu$m line, observed of order unity, is reproduced with higher

900: densities and temperatures than in previous studies: Fig.~4 

901: of \cite{kau99} shows that

902: $I({\rm [O I] \,63 \mu m})/I({\rm [C II] \,158 \mu m})\approx1$ 

903: for $n({\rm H})=5\times10^3$ \cmt\ and $G_0\sim10^2$, corresponding to a

904: temperature somewhat higher than 100 K \citep[Fig. 1 of][]{kau99}. 

905: Including dust leads to a

906: similar intensity ratio for $T_k=400$ K, or $G_0\gtrsim10^3$. 

907: On the other hand, our model for $D_{{\rm cold}}$ yields

908: $I({\rm [C II] \,158 \mu m})/I({\rm [O I] \,145 \mu m})\approx7.5$, which

909: implies for the above density $G_0\sim10^3$ \citep[see Fig. 6 of][]{luh03}. 

910: These results suggest that the effect of extinction cannot be neglected when

911: modeling the [O I] 63 $\mu$m line in sources that are optically thick

912: at wavelengths shorter than 100 $\mu$m. Self-absorption by foreground

913: low-excitation clouds may also lower the flux of the [O I] 63 $\mu$m line and 

914: and to a lesser extent that of the [C II] line \citep[][Paper

915: I]{fis99,vas02,luh03}.

916: 

917: To compare our results for line intensity ratios involving 

918: the [O I] 63 $\mu$m line, with the corresponding plots

919: shown by \cite{luh03}, one should use the versions of our models that ignore

920: dust, because the intensities given in the models by \cite{kau99} are 

921: uncorrected for extinction. In our models that ignore 

922: dust, ${\rm [C\, II]/[O\,I]}\sim0.4$ and 

923: ${\rm ([C\, II]+[O\,I])/I_{FIR}}\sim2\times10^{-3}$. Here, the FIR flux

924: corresponds to that of component $D_{{\rm cold}}$ (Table~\ref{tab:cont}). 

925: Using these values in Fig. 4 of \cite{luh03}, one obtains 

926: $n({\rm H})={\rm a\,few}\times10^3$ \cmt\ 

927: and $G_0={\rm a\,few}\times10^3$, roughly consistent with our input model

928: parameters. 

929: 

930: 

931: The C$^+$ and O$^0$ column densities required to fit the lines in 

932: model $D_{{\rm cold}}$ are rather high. 

933: The averaged C$^+$ and O$^0$ abundances 

934: are $2.2\times10^{-5}$ and $4.6\times10^{-5}$ relative to H nuclei,

935: respectively. If the C$^+$ to OH abundance ratio is 100 (Paper I), 

936: the mixed column density of OH is overestimated by a factor of 3. 

937: In any case, the $N^{{\rm mix}}({\rm C^+})$ values 

938: indicate that an important fraction of C nuclei is in ionized form, 

939: $\gtrsim15$\% in model $D_{{\rm cold}}$ for a gas phase carbon abundance of 

940: $1.4\times10^{-4}$ \citep{ss96}. The corresponding 

941: mass of atomic gas is $8\times10^8$ \Msun, at least one order of magnitude

942: higher than the amount estimated in M82 and NGC 278 \citep{wol90,kau99}. 

943: As mentioned above, C$^+$ is expected to be abundant only in regions 

944: within $A_V\lesssim2$ mag from the surfaces of PDRs, and the relatively 

945: high fraction of C$^+$ derived above indicates 

946: that those regions must be widespread in the Mkn 231 disk. On the other 

947: hand, one possible interpretation of the high H$_2$ column densities 

948: required to generate the radiation 

949: field needed to account for the OH lines, is that we are viewing

950: a number of PDRs that overlap along the line of sight

951: (see also \S\ref{sec:discussion}).

952: 

953: 

954: We now check the possibility that a significant fraction of the [C II] 

955: 158 $\mu$m emission arises from a more extended region, like the outer 

956: disk found by DS98 in CO.

957: For an outer disk mass of $2\times10^9$  \Msun\ and density of $10^2$ cm$^{-3}$

958: (DS98), and using an upper limit for the C$^+$ abundance of 

959: $\leq10^{-4}$ and collisional rates at 250 K \citep[from][]{lau77a}, 

960: we calculate that $\lesssim1/4$ 

961: of the observed [C II] line arises from this extended region. 

962: Therefore we do not expect much contribution from it, unless the C$^+$ is 

963: concentrated in clumps of much higher density.

964: 

965: 

966: 

967: Our model results can be used to re-examine the issue of the 

968: [C II] line deficit found in ULIRGs. 

969: Contrary to what might be expected from the low [C II] to FIR

970: luminosity ratio in Mkn 231, relatively high average abundances of 

971: C$^+$ are required in $D_{{\rm cold}}$ 

972: to reproduce the [C II] line. Explanations based

973: on self-absorption effects, extinction by dust, effects of dust-bounded HII

974: regions, high $G_0/n$, and high-formation rate of CO at the expense 

975: of C$^+$ have been invoked to account for the [C II] deficit

976: \citep[][Paper I, and references therein]{luh98,luh03,mal01,pap07}. 

977: In our models for Mkn 231, the high abundance of C$^+$  

978: yields the observed low [C II] to FIR luminosity ratio

979: because of the high luminosity-to-gas-mass ratio ($L/M$)

980: of our continuum models. In both models $C$ and $D$, 

981: an overall $L/M\approx500$ \Lsun/\Msun\ is

982: derived (Table~\ref{tab:cont}), where the gas mass includes both the

983: atomic and molecular components. We argue that, if this extreme $L/M$ ratio 

984: applies to the whole region from which the FIR

985: emission arises, as appears to be 

986: the case for Mkn 231, the [C II] line strength relative to 

987: the infrared emission can never attain values in excess of 0.1\%. 

988: The [C II] luminosity emitted per unit of total gas mass is given by

989: \begin{equation}

990: \phi_{{\rm [C II]}}=\frac{1}{1+\frac{g_l}{g_u}\exp\{E_u/kT_{ex}\}}

991: \times n_{{\rm C^+}} A_{ul} h\nu,

992: \label{eq:cii}

993: \end{equation}

994: where $g_l$ and $g_u$ are the degeneracies of the lower and upper level,

995: $E_u$ is the upper level energy, $A_{ul}$ is the Einstein coefficient for

996: spontaneous emission, and $n_{{\rm C^+}}$ denotes the number of C$^+$ ions

997: per unit of total gas mass (including all components). 

998: It is assumed in eq.~(\ref{eq:cii}) that the line

999: is optically thin. In the limit $T_{ex}\gg E_u/k$ one obtains

1000: \begin{equation}

1001: \phi_{{\rm [C II]}}\approx 0.5 \times \frac{\chi({\rm C^+})}{10^{-4}} \,\,

1002: {\rm \frac{L_{\odot}}{M_{\odot}}, }

1003: \label{eq:ciib}

1004: \end{equation}

1005: where $\chi({\rm C^+})$ denotes the average C$^+$ abundance relative to total

1006: H nuclei. Therefore, the expected [C II]-to-IR emission is 

1007: \begin{equation}

1008: \frac{\phi_{{\rm [C II]}}}{L/M}\approx 10^{-3} \times

1009: \frac{\chi({\rm C^+})}{10^{-4}} 

1010: \label{eq:ciic}

1011: \end{equation}

1012: for $L/M=500$ \Lsun/\Msun\footnote{For simplicity, the luminosity

1013: accounts here for the total infrared emission as derived in our models,

1014: whereas in previous studies the FIR emission was defined between 40

1015: and 120 $\mu$m; the correction factor is less than 2 \citep[see][]{san96}.}.

1016: Hence, even assuming the highest nearly possible 

1017: $\chi({\rm C^+})\sim10^{-4}$, the [C II]-to-IR ratio is not expected to be 

1018: above $10^{-3}$ for such high values of $L/M$. The reason is simply the 

1019: limited reservoir of gas, and hence of C$^+$ ions, per unit of output 

1020: power. High $L/M$ values are in Mkn 231 primarily due to the contribution of

1021: the AGN, but could also be associated with high star formation efficiencies

1022: \citep[maybe extreme, see][]{sco04}: 

1023: if we attribute the total infrared luminosity to FUV heated grains in 

1024: PDRs and use the units of $G_0$ (i.e. the Habing Field of

1025: $1.6\times10^{-3}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$) to calculate the $L/M$ for a 

1026: PDR column density of $A_v = 10$ mag with the standard 

1027: gas-to-extinction conversion $N({\rm H+2H_2})/A_v \sim 2.5 \times 10^{21}$ 

1028: cm$^{-2}$ mag$^{-1}$ \citep[e.g.,][]{dic78}, we find that the value of $G_0$ 

1029: that corresponds to $L/M=500$ \Lsun/\Msun\ is $2.5\times10^4$, 

1030: which we express for the general case as

1031: \begin{equation}

1032: \frac{L}{M}= 500 \times \left(\frac{G_0}{2.5\times10^4}\right) 

1033: \times \left(\frac{10\,\,{\rm mag}}{A_v}\right)

1034: \,\, {\rm \frac{L_\odot}{M_\odot}},

1035: \label{eq:lm}

1036: \end{equation}

1037: so that high $L/M$ values would indicate high $G_0$ values.

1038: For PDRs with $G_0\sim2.5\times10^4$ and $A_v\sim10$ mag,

1039: the average C$^+$ abundance is $\sim2\times10^{-5}$ (i.e., carbon is 

1040: ionized within $\sim2$ mag of the surfaces of PDRs) and 

1041: $\phi_{{\rm [C II]}}/(L/M)$ will attain the lowest values observed 

1042: in ULIRGs. 

1043: 

1044: In our favored model $D$, the component 

1045: $D_{{\rm warm}}$ ($L/M=3270$ \Lsun/\Msun), which emits most of the IR 

1046: luminosity, could only account for the [C II] line if 

1047: {\em essentially all} gas-phase carbon 

1048: were in ionized form. However, this seems implausible, 

1049: as the C$^+$ abundance in XDRs is $\chi({\rm C^+})\sim {\rm a \,\, few \times}

1050: 10^{-5}$  \citep{mei05}, and FUV photons from stars are absorbed

1051: in thin shells of dust on the surfaces of PDRs. With the assumed column

1052: densities in Table~\ref{tab:model}, the calculated contribution from 

1053: $D_{{\rm warm}}$ to the observed [C II] emission is only 8\%, 

1054: the [O I] 145 $\mu$m flux is 15\% of the upper 

1055: limit, and the [O I] 63 $\mu$m is predicted in weak {\it absorption}

1056: against the continuum. (In this calculation, $T_k=10^3$ K and 

1057: $n=2\times10^3$ \cmt\ are assumed, so that the atomic region is in pressure

1058: equilibrium with the cooler molecular gas with $T_k\sim10^2$ K and 

1059: $n=2\times10^4$ \cmt.)

1060: It is therefore expected that the strongest source of infrared radiation 

1061: (the warm component) gives low [C II] and [O I] line emission even if one

1062: assumes relatively high averaged fractional abundances for C$^+$ and O$^0$. 

1063: As in \cite{luh03}, we then invoke a component that emits strongly in the 

1064: FIR but yields weak emission in the [C II] and [O I] lines. 

1065: In contrast to \cite{luh03}, however, we leave open 

1066: the possibility that $D_{{\rm warm}}$ has a relatively high 

1067: C$^+$ abundance, as expected from both XDR and PDR chemistry.

1068: In starburst and normal galaxies, the moderate star formation efficiencies 

1069: \citep*[e.g., $\sim15$ \Lsun/\Msun\ in NGC 1068;][]{pla91}, implying lower

1070: values of $G_0$, will not place such a strong limit on the C$^+$ cooling 

1071: rate relative to the infrared emission.

1072: We suggest, then, that the [C II] 158 $\mu$m line deficit found in ULIRGs

1073: may be associated with a high $L/M$ ratio that, allowing 

1074: a relatively high C$^+$ abundance, indicates an important contribution to

1075: the FIR emission by an AGN, and/or a high star-formation efficiency.

1076: 

1077: 

1078: 

1079: 

1080: 

1081: \section{Discussion and conclusions} \label{sec:discussion}

1082: 

1083: Simultaneous modeling of the FIR continuum and line absorptions is 

1084: the only consistent way to derive from FIR observations the physical 

1085: and chemical properties of bright-infrared galaxies, where due to 

1086: high radiation densities, the OH and \hdo\ lines are pumped through 

1087: absorption of continuum photons. 

1088: In Mkn 231, the high-lying 65-68 $\mu$m OH and \hdo\ lines indicate 

1089: the presence of a compact ($\sim100$ pc) and warm ($\sim100$ K) region, 

1090: presumably located around the AGN, with high continuum opacity 

1091: ($\tau_{{\rm 100\mu m}}\sim1$). The size of this region is comparable to

1092: (though somewhat larger than) the inner nuclear disk where the OH 

1093: mega-masers have been observed from VLBI observations \citep{klo03}, 

1094: and is similar to the spatial extent of the regions where the bulk 

1095: of the OH mega-maser emission is generated \citep[regions

1096: C, NE, and SW in Fig. 5 of][]{ric05}. This strongly suggests 

1097: that we are observing the FIR counterpart of the 18 cm OH 

1098: emission \citep[e.g.,][]{ski97}. 

1099: \cite{ric05} estimate $N({\rm OH})\sim1.5\times10^{15}$ \cmd\ in 1 pc clouds

1100: where $\Delta V\approx1.7$ \kms; therefore, $N({\rm OH})/\Delta V \sim

1101: 10^{15}$ \cmd/(\kms). In both the warm and cold components of model $D$, we

1102: have obtained 

1103: $N^{{\rm scr}}({\rm OH})/\Delta V \sim 1.5\times 10^{15}$ \cmd/(\kms), in rough

1104: agreement with the estimates by \cite{ric05}. The ``screen'' case is  

1105: most appropriate for comparison here because the OH megamasers amplify the

1106: background radio continuum emission. 

1107: 

1108: 

1109: The nuclear region is surrounded by a more extended ($R_{eq}\sim350$ pc) 

1110: and colder ($\sim45$ K) region, which produces the bulk of the [C II] and 

1111: [O I] line emissions and contributes to the low-lying OH lines. Allowing for

1112: an area filling factor of 0.6-0.7, the total extent 

1113: of the FIR emission is then comparable to the size of the CO (inner) disk 

1114: \citep[][DS98]{bry96}. The inferred densities ($n({\rm H_2})\sim10^4$ \cmt) 

1115: may explain the submillimeter CO emission detected by \cite{pap07}, and 

1116: somewhat lower densities (${\rm a \,\, few}\times10^3$ \cmt) can account for 

1117: the [O I] line emission. We do not however rule out the possibility that

1118: some of the FIR emission arises from a more extended region, as the outermost

1119: disk observed by DS98 in the millimeter CO lines or the much more extended

1120: region observed in soft X-rays \citep{gal02}.

1121: 

1122: 

1123: The FIR emission from $D_{{\rm warm}}$ is probably dominated by 

1124: the AGN, as pointed out in \S\ref{sec:continuum}. \cite{dav04} estimated

1125: that, within a radius of 330 pc, the starburst luminosity accounts for

1126: $(0.8-1.3)\times10^{12}$ \Lsun; since the luminosity for the component

1127: $D_{{\rm cold}}$ is $\approx7.5\times10^{11}$ \Lsun, the 

1128: starburst luminosity contribution from $D_{{\rm warm}}$ is most probably 

1129: $\lesssim6\times10^{11}$ \Lsun. \cite{dav04} also

1130: estimated that, within 100 pc of the AGN (the size of $D_{{\rm warm}}$), the 

1131: starburst contribution is $(3.2-4.7)\times10^{11}$ \Lsun, in agreement with 

1132: the afore mentioned upper limit. On the other hand, the extended 

1133: ($360\times260$ pc$^2$) radio continuum 1.4 GHz emission detected by 

1134: \cite{car98} is compatible with both the whole FIR emission arising

1135: from the starburst \citep[yielding an IR-to-radio flux density ratio of

1136: $Q\sim2.5$,][]{car98}, and only the $D_{{\rm cold}}$ FIR emission 

1137: arising the starburst (yielding $Q=2.1$). If one now assumes that the 

1138: starburst contribution to the FIR emission of $D_{{\rm warm}}$  

1139: is $3\times10^{11}$ \Lsun, 

1140: the resulting $Q$ is 2.3 \citep[in agreement with the median value of

1141: $Q=2.3\pm0.2$ in normal galaxies;][and references therein]{con92}. Also, the

1142: surface brightness and luminosity-to-mass ratio of $D_{{\rm warm}}$ 

1143: due to only the starburst component would then be 

1144: $2\times10^{12}$ \Lsun\ kpc$^{-2}$ and 550 

1145: \Lsun/\Msun, which are probably upper limits for a starburst. 

1146: In summary, our preferred model $D$ favors that $\sim2/3$ of the bolometric 

1147: luminosity from Mkn 231 is due to the AGN.

1148: 

1149: 

1150: 

1151: Although the chemistry of the extended starburst $D_{{\rm cold}}$

1152: component, where the lower-lying OH lines and the bulk of the [C II] 158

1153: $\mu$m and [O I] 63 $\mu$m lines are generated,

1154: appears to be dominated by PDRs, the dominant chemistry of the warm component

1155: may be of a different nature. Since the compactness of $D_{{\rm warm}}$

1156: suggests that its FIR emission is dominated by the AGN, and given the high

1157: X-ray intrinsic luminosity of the AGN ($\sim10^{44}$ erg s$^{-1}$) in the 2-10

1158: keV band \citep{bra04}, we consider the possibility

1159: that the derived OH and \hdo\ column densities can be better explained in

1160: terms of XDR chemistry. Calculations by \cite{mei05} show that,

1161: in dense XDRs with $N_{{\rm H}}\sim10^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$, the OH and \hdo\ column

1162: densities are expected to attain values of $\sim10^{18}$ cm$^{-2}$, similar to

1163: the values that we have derived in the mixed case. Furthermore, the

1164: Compton-thick screen with $N_{{\rm H}}\sim2\times10^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ required

1165: to block the primary X-ray emission \citep{bra04} could be partially

1166: identified with $D_{{\rm warm}}$, with similar column density. 

1167: Therefore an XDR may naturally explain the observations of

1168: high-lying OH and \hdo\ lines in Mkn 231. Nevertheless, both OH and \hdo\ are

1169: also tracers of starburst chemistry, and a number of PDRs

1170: and hot cores overlapping along the line of sight could in principle yield the

1171: column densities required to explain our observations at least in the screen

1172: case, and could then mimic an XDR. We conclude that further observations are

1173: still required to discern between XDR and starburst chemistry.

1174: 

1175: 

1176: 

1177: We suggest  

1178: that the [C II] 158 $\mu$m line deficit in Mkn 231, and also

1179: probably in Arp 220 (see Paper I), is primarily due to a component that 

1180: dominates the FIR emission but emits weakly in the [C II] line, 

1181: as previously suggested by \cite{luh03}. However, we also suggest that

1182: this component may still be rich in C$^+$, but with an extreme 

1183: luminosity-to-gas-mass ratio that limits the [C II] luminosity per unit of 

1184: luminous power in the continuum. Our derived luminosity to H$_2$ mass 

1185: ratio of 500 \Lsun/\Msun\ is high; future studies will indicate 

1186: whether it can be applied to other ULIRGs with similar [C II] deficits. 

1187: 

1188: 

1189: 

1190: Given the high C$^+$ column densities (a few $\times10^{19}$ \cmd) required to

1191: account for the [C II] 158 $\mu$m line emission, the H$_2$ columns derived

1192: toward the extended component are unlikely to be associated with 

1193: non-overlapping star-forming regions surrounded by optically thick 

1194: envelopes. A single PDR is not expected to have $N({\rm C^+})$ in excess 

1195: of ${\rm a \,\,few}\times10^{17}$ \cmd. A scenario with a crowded 

1196: population of PDRs overlapping along the line of sight is 

1197: therefore more plausible. 

1198: If a typical {\it single} OB stellar cluster emits up to 

1199: $10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$, the maximum value found by \cite{sco01} 

1200: in M51 and also the luminosity of W49, then the number of single clusters to

1201: produce the Mkn 231 starburst luminosity of $10^{12}$ \Lsun\ is 

1202: $\gtrsim4\times10^6$. If these

1203: clusters are concentrated in a disk of radius 460 pc and thickness 25 pc 

1204: (DS98), the mean distance between neighboor clusters is only $\lesssim1.5$

1205: pc \citep[see also][]{ket92}. Merging of PDRs may be compatible with 

1206: some area filling factor if, for example, some spiral 

1207: structure is invoked within the disk.

1208: 

1209: 

1210: In NGC 1068, \cite{spi05} observed the OH 119 $\mu$m line in emission 

1211: against the continuum. On the basis of a possible XDR chemistry, and given 

1212: the corresponding mass, density and temperature that 

1213: characterize the nuclear region, \cite{spi05} suggested that the OH 119 $\mu$m 

1214: emission line could be formed in that region. 

1215: This option also relied on the fact that relatively 

1216: weak FIR emission is expected to arise from the circumnuclear 

1217: disk of the Seyfert 2 galaxy, so that the OH 

1218: 119 $\mu$m line can be excited through collisions and emit above the

1219: continuum in these dense and warm environments. The situation

1220: is different for Mkn 231 and Arp 220. In these ULIRGs, the extremely high 

1221: luminosity arising from the nuclear region, together with the high

1222: concentrations of gas there, make the nuclear FIR 

1223: emission component very bright. Any possible emission 

1224: in the 119 $\mu$m line will be obscured by the strong absorption, 

1225: which in these objects is $\sim30$ times stronger than the emission 

1226: feature in NGC 1068. Also, the strong FIR 

1227: radiation density pumps higher-lying OH and \hdo\ levels, thus producing

1228: absorptions in the higher-excitation lines. The OH and \hdo\ molecules are,

1229: therefore, potentially powerful tracers of circumnuclear regions around 

1230: AGNs. Future Herschel observations of Mkn 231 and other sources will 

1231: allow us to apply the models developed in this paper to these sources, 

1232: refine them accordingly, and will certainly 

1233: give new insights into the physical and chemical conditions of 

1234: bright infrared galaxies.

1235: 

1236: 

1237: \acknowledgments

1238: E. G-A thanks the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics for its 

1239: hospitality. The authors would like to thank M. Wolfire for helpful

1240: discussions. Research was supported in part by NASA grant NAG5-10659 and 

1241: NASA grant NNX07AH49G. Basic research in infrared astronomy at the Naval 

1242: Research Laboratory is supported by 6.1 base funding.

1243: This research has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System.

1244: 

1245: 

1246: 

1247: 

1248: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1249: 

1250: \bibitem[Aalto et al.(2007)]{aal07} Aalto, S., Spaans, M., Wiedner, M.C., \&

1251:   H\"uttemeister, S. 2007, A\&A, 464, 193

1252: \bibitem[Armus et al.(2007)]{arm07} Armus, L., et al. 2007, \apj, 656, 148

1253: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Baan, Salzer, \& Lewinter}{Baan 

1254: et al.}{1998}]{baa98}Baan, W.A., Salzer, J.J., \& 

1255: Lewinter, R.D. 1998, \apj, 509, 633

1256: \bibitem[Boksenberg et al.(1977)]{bok77}Boksenberg, A., Carswell, R.F., 

1257: Allen, D.A., Fosbury, R.A.E., Penston, M.V., \& Sargent, W.L.W.

1258: 1977, \mnras, 178, 451

1259: \bibitem[Braito et al.(2004)]{bra04}Braito, V., et al. 2004, \aap, 420, 79  

1260: \bibitem[Bryant \& Scoville(1996)]{bry96} Bryant, P.M., \& Scoville, N.Z.

1261: 1996, \apj, 457, 678

1262: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Carilli, Wrobel, \& Ulvestad}{Carilli 

1263: et al.}{1998}]{car98}Carilli, C.L., Wrobel, J.M., \& Ulvestad, J.S. 

1264: 1998, \aj, 116, 1007

1265: \bibitem[Clegg et al.(1996)]{clegg96} Clegg, P.E., et al. 1996, \aap, 315, L38

1266: \bibitem[Condon(1992)]{con92} Condon, J.J. 1992, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrop.,

1267:   30, 575

1268: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cutri, Rieke, \& Lebofsky}{Cutri et 

1269: al.}{1984}]{cut84}Cutri, R.M., Rieke, G.H., \& Lebofsky, M.J. 

1270: 1984, \apj, 287, 566

1271: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Davies, Tacconi, \& Genzel}{Davies et al.}

1272: {2004}]{dav04}Davies, R.I., Tacconi, L.J., \& Genzel, R. 2004, \apj,

1273: 613, 781

1274: \bibitem[Dickman(1978)]{dic78} Dickman, R.L. 1978, \apjs, 37, 407

1275: \bibitem[Downes \& Eckart(2007)]{dow07} Downes, D., \& Eckart, A. 2007,\aap,

1276: 468, L57

1277: \bibitem[Downes \& Solomon(1998)]{dow98}Downes, D., \& Solomon, P.M. 1998,

1278: \apj, 507, 615 (DS98)

1279: \bibitem[Draine(1983)]{dra85}Draine, B.T. 1985, \apjs, 57, 587

1280: \bibitem[Farrah et al.(2003)]{far03}Farrah, D., Afonso, J., Efstathiou, A., 

1281: Rowan-Robinson, M., Fox, M., \& Clements, D. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 585

1282: \bibitem[Fischer et al.(1999)]{fis99}Fischer, J., et al. 1999, Ap\&SS,

1283: 266, 91

1284: \bibitem[Gallagher et al.(2002)]{gal02}Gallagher, S.C., Brandt, W.N., 

1285: Chartas, G., Garmire, G.P., \& Sambruna, R.M. 2002, \apj, 569, 655

1286: \bibitem[Gonz\'alez-Alfonso \& Cernicharo(1997)]{gon97}Gonz\'alez-Alfonso, E.,

1287: \& Cernicharo, J. 1997, A\&A, 322, 938

1288: \bibitem[Gonz\'alez-Alfonso \& Cernicharo(1999)]{gon99}Gonz\'alez-Alfonso, E.,

1289: \& Cernicharo, J. 1999, \apj, 525, 845

1290: \bibitem[Gonz\'alez-Alfonso et al.(2004)]{gon04}Gonz\'alez-Alfonso, E.,

1291: Smith, H.A., Fischer, J., \& Cernicharo, J. 2004, \apj, 613, 247 (Paper I)

1292: \bibitem[Graci\'a-Carpio et al.(2006)]{gra06}Graci\'a-Carpio, J.,

1293:   Garc\'{\i}a-Burillo, S., Planesas, P., \& Colina, L. 2006, ApJ, 640, L135

1294: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Green, Maluendes, \& McLean}

1295: {Green et al.}{1993}]{green93}Green, S., Maluendes, S., \& McLean, 

1296: A. D. 1993, \apjs, 85, 181

1297: \bibitem[Harvey et al(1999)]{har99}Harvey, V.I., et al. 1999, 

1298: in "The Universe as Seen by ISO", eds. P. Cox \& M. F. Kessler. ESA-SP 427, 889

1299: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Henkel, Guesten, \& Baan}{Henkel et 

1300: al.}{1987}]{hen87}Henkel, C., Guesten, R., \& Baan, W.A. 1987, \aap, 185, 14

1301: \bibitem[Kessler et al.(1996)]{kes96} Kessler, M.F., et al. 1996, \aap, 315,

1302: L27

1303: \bibitem[Kaufman et al.(1999)]{kau99}Kaufman, M.J., Wolfire, M.G., 

1304: Hollenbach, D.J., \& Luhman, M.L. 1999, \apj, 527, 795

1305: \bibitem[Keto et al.(1992)]{ket92}Keto, E., Ball, R., Arens, J., Jernigan, 

1306: G., \& Meixner, M. 1992, \apj, 387, L17

1307: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kl\"ockner, Baan, \& Garrett}{Kl\"ockner et 

1308: al.}{2003}]{klo03}Kl\"ockner, H.-R., Baan, W.A., \& Garrett, M.A.

1309: 2003, Nature, 421, 821

1310: \bibitem[Kruegel \& Siebenmorgen(1994)]{kru94}Kruegel, E., \& Siebenmorgen, 

1311: R. 1994, \aap, 288, 929

1312: \bibitem[Lahuis et al.(2007)]{lah07}Lahuis, F., et al. 2007, \apj, 659, 296

1313: \bibitem[Launay \& Roueff(1977a)]{lau77a} Launay, J.-M., \& Roueff, E. 1977,

1314: J. Phys. B, 10, 879

1315: \bibitem[Launay \& Roueff(1977b)]{lau77b} Launay, J.-M., \& Roueff, E. 1977,

1316: \aap, 56, 289

1317: \bibitem[Leitherer et al.(1999)]{lei99}Leitherer, C., et al. 1999, 

1318: \apjs, 123, 3

1319: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(1998)]{luh98}Luhman, M.L., Satyapal, S., Fischer, J., 

1320: Wolfire, M.G., Cox, P., Lord, S.D., Smith, H.A., Stacey, G.J., \& Unger, 

1321: S.J. 1998, \apj, 504, L11

1322: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2003)]{luh03} Luhman, M.L., Satyapal, S., Fischer,

1323: J., Wolfire, M.G., Sturm, E., Dudley, C.C., Lutz, D., \& Genzel, R. 2003,

1324: \apj, 594, 758

1325: \bibitem[Malhotra et al.(2001)]{mal01} Malhotra, S., et al. 2001, 

1326: \apj, 561, 766

1327: \bibitem[Matthews et al.(1987)]{mat87}Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., 

1328: McGill, J., \& Soifer, B.T. 1987, \aj, 94, 297

1329: \bibitem[Meijerink \& Spaans(2005)]{mei05} Meijerink, R., \& Spaans, M. 2005,

1330:   A\&A, 436, 397

1331: \bibitem[Meurer et al.(1997)]{meu97}Meurer, G.R., Heckman, T.M., Lehnert, 

1332: M.D., Leitherer, C., \& Lowenthal, J. 1997, \aj, 114, 54

1333: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Offer, van Hemert, \& van Dishoeck}

1334: {Offer et al.}{1994}]{offer94} Offer, A.R., van Hemert, M.C., \& 

1335: van Dishoeck, E.F. 1994, \jcp, 100, 362

1336: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Papadopoulos, Isaak, \& van der

1337:     Werf}{Papadopoulos et al.}{2007}]{pap07}Papadopoulos, P.P., Isaak, K.G., 

1338: \& van der Werf, P.P. 2007, in press (PIW07)

1339: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Planesas, Scoville, \& Myers}{Planesas 

1340: et al.}{1991}]{pla91}Planesas, P., Scoville, N., Myers, S.T. 1991,

1341: \apj, 369, 364

1342: \bibitem[Preibisch et al.(1993)]{pre93}Preibisch, Th., Ossenkopf, V., 

1343: Yorke, H.W., \& Henning, Th. 1993, \aap, 279, 577

1344: \bibitem[Richards et al.(2005)]{ric05}Richards, A.M.S., Knapen, J.H., 

1345: Yates, J.A., Cohen, R.J., Collett, J.L., Wright, M.M., Gray, M.D., 

1346: \& Field, D. 2005, \mnras, 364,353

1347: \bibitem[Rieke(1976)]{rie76}Rieke, G.H. 1976, \apj, 210, L5

1348: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Rigopoulou, Lawrence, \& 

1349: Rowan-Robinson}{Rigopoulou et al.}{1996}]{rig96}Rigopoulou, D., Lawrence, 

1350: A., \& Rowan-Robinson, M. 1996, MNRAS, 278, 1049

1351: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Roche, Aitken, \& Whitmore}{Roche 

1352: et al.}{1983}]{roc83}Roche, P.F., Aitken, D.K., \& Whitmore, B. 1983,

1353: MNRAS, 205, 21

1354: \bibitem[Roche \& Chandler(1993)]{roc93}Roche, P.F., \& Chandler, C.J. 1993,

1355: MNRAS, 265, 486

1356: \bibitem[Sanders \& Mirabel(1996)]{san96}Sanders, D.B., \& Mirabel, I.F.

1357: 1996, ARA\&A, 34, 749

1358: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(2003)]{san03} Sanders, D.B., Mazzarella, J.M.,

1359: Kim, D.-C., Surace, J.A., \& Soifer, B.T. 2003, \aj, 126, 1607

1360: \bibitem[Sembach \& Savage(1996)]{ss96} Sembach, K.R., \& Savage, B.D. 1996,

1361: \apj, 457, 211

1362: \bibitem[Scoville et al.(2001)]{sco01}Scoville, N.Z., Polletta, M., 

1363: Ewald, S., Stolovy, S.R., Thompson, R., \& Rieke, M. 2001, \aj, 122, 3017

1364: \bibitem[Scoville(2004)]{sco04}Scoville, N.Z. 2004, in The Neutral ISM in

1365:   Starburst Galaxies, eds. S. Aalto, S. H\"uttemeister, \& A. Pedlar, ASP

1366:   Conference Series 320, p. 253

1367: \bibitem[Skinner et al.(1997)]{ski97}Skinner, C.J., Smith, H.A., Sturm, E., 

1368: Barlow, M.J., Cohen, R.J., \& Stacey, G.J. 1997, Nature, 386, 472

1369: \bibitem[Smith et al.(1995)]{smi95}Smith, P.S., Schmidt, G.D., Allen, R.G., 

1370: \& Angel, J.R.P. 1995, \apj, 444, 146

1371: \bibitem[Soifer et al.(2000)]{soi00}Soifer, B.T., et al. 2000, \apj, 119, 509

1372: \bibitem[Spinoglio et al.(2005)]{spi05} Spinoglio, L., Malkan, M.A., 

1373: Smith, H.A., Gonz\'alez-Alfonso, E., Fischer, J. 2005, \apj, 623, 123

1374: \bibitem[Sternberg \& Dalgarno(1995)]{ste95} Sternberg, A., \& Dalgarno, 

1375: A., 1995, \apjs, 99, 565

1376: \bibitem[Sturm et al.(1998)]{sturm98} Sturm, E., et al. 1998, in 

1377: ASP Conf. Ser. 145, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VII, 

1378: ed. R. Albrecht, R. N. Hook, \& H. A. Bushouse (San Francisco: ASP), 161

1379: \bibitem[Swinyard et al(1996)]{swi96}Swinyard, B.M., et al. 1996, \aap,

1380: 315, L43

1381: \bibitem[Tacconi et al.(2002)]{tac02}Tacconi, L.J., Genzel, R., Lutz, D., 

1382: Rigopoulou, D., Baker, A.J., Iserlohe, C., \& Tecza, M. 2002, \apj, 580, 73

1383: \bibitem[Takano et al.(2005)]{tak05}Takano, S., Nakanishi, K., Nakai, N., 

1384: \& Takano, T. 2005, PASJ, 57, L29

1385: \bibitem[Taylor et al.(1999)]{tay99}Taylor, G.B., Silver, C.S., Ulvestad, 

1386: J.S., \& Carilli, C.L. 1999, \apj, 519, 185

1387: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ulvestad, Wrobel, \& Carilli}{Ulvestad 

1388: et al.}{1999}]{ulv99}Ulvestad, J.S., Wrobel, J.M., \&

1389: Carilli, C.L. 1999, \apj, 516, 127

1390: \bibitem[Vastel et al.(2002)]{vas02}Vastel, C., Polehampton, E.T., 

1391: Baluteau, J.-P., Swinyard, B.M., Caux, E., \& Cox, P. 2002, \apj, 581, 315

1392: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Wolfire, Tielens, \& Hollenbach}{Wolfire

1393: et al.}{1990}]{wol90}Wolfire, M.G., Tielens, A.G.G.M., \& Hollenbach, D. 1990,

1394: \apj, 358, 116

1395: \bibitem[Wright et al.(2000)]{wri00}Wright, C.M., van Dishoeck, E.F., Black,

1396:   J.H., Feuchtgruber, H., Cernicharo, J., Gonz\'alez-Alfonso, E., \& de 

1397: Graauw, Th. 2000, \aap, 358, 689

1398: \bibitem[Yang \& Phillips(2007)]{yan07}Yang, M., \& Phillips, T. 2007, 

1399: \apj, 662, 284

1400: \end{thebibliography}

1401: 

1402: 

1403: \clearpage

1404: 

1405: % Table 1

1406: 

1407: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}

1408: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1409: %\rotate

1410: \tablecaption{Line fluxes, continuum flux densities, and equivalent 

1411: widths for the lines detected in the ISO/LWS spectrum of Mkn 231 

1412: \label{tab:flux}}

1413: \tablewidth{0pt}

1414: \tablehead{

1415: \colhead{Species} & \colhead{Transition} & 

1416: \colhead{$\lambda_{{\rm rest}}$\tablenotemark{a}} &

1417: \colhead{Line flux\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{Continuum\tablenotemark{c}}  

1418: & \colhead{$W$\tablenotemark{d}} \\

1419: & & ($\mu$m) & ($10^{-20}$ W cm$^{-2}$) & 

1420: ($10^{-19}$ W cm$^{-2}$ $\mu$m$^{-1}$) & ($10^{-2}$ $\mu$m) }

1421: \startdata

1422: OH & $\Pi_{1/2}-\Pi_{3/2}\,\,3/2-3/2$ & 53.3 & $-7.0\pm2.0$ & 33.5 & $2.1\pm0.6$ \\

1423: ${\rm [O\,I]}$ & $^3P_1-^3P_2$ & 63.2 & $2.6\pm0.8$ & 25.0 & $-1.0\pm0.3$ \\

1424: OH & $\Pi_{3/2}\,\,9/2-7/2$ & 65.2 & $-4.1\pm0.6$ & 23.8 & $1.7\pm0.3$ \\

1425: \hdo\ & $3_{30}-2_{21}$ & 66.4 & $-3.3\pm0.9$ & 23.1 & $1.4\pm0.4$ \\

1426: \hdo\ & $3_{31}-2_{20}$ & 67.1 & $-2.2\pm0.9$ & 22.7 & $1.0\pm0.4$ \\

1427: OH & $\Pi_{3/2}\,\,7/2-5/2$ & 84.5 & $-8.6\pm0.7$ & 13.8 & $6.2\pm0.5$ \\

1428: \hdo\ & $2_{20}-1_{11}$ & 101 & $-1.3\pm0.3$ & 8.70 & $1.5\pm0.4$ \\

1429: OH & $\Pi_{3/2}\,\,5/2-3/2$ & 119.3 & $-3.6\pm0.3$ & 5.22 & $6.9\pm0.6$ \\

1430: ${\rm [N\,II]}$ & $^3P_{2}-^3P_{1}$ & 121.8 & $1.5\pm0.2$ & 4.72 & $-3.2\pm0.4$ \\

1431: ${\rm [C\,II]}$ & $^2P_{3/2}-^2P_{1/2}$ & 157.7 & $3.7\pm0.1$ & 1.73 & $-21.4\pm0.6$ \\

1432: \enddata

1433: \tablenotetext{a}{For OH doublets, an average for the two components is given.}

1434: \tablenotetext{b}{Errors do not include calibration uncertainties in the

1435:   continuum level. Negative (positive) values indicate that the line is

1436:   detected in absorption (emission).}

1437: \tablenotetext{c}{Uncertainties in the continuum level are less than 30\%.}

1438: \tablenotetext{d}{Equivalent widths are positive (negative) for lines observed 

1439: in absorption (emission).}

1440: \end{deluxetable}

1441: 

1442: 

1443: 

1444: 

1445: % Table 1

1446: 

1447: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccccc}

1448: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1449: %\rotate

1450: \tablecaption{Models for the continuum emission \label{tab:cont}}

1451: \tablewidth{0pt}

1452: \tablehead{

1453: \colhead{Model} & \colhead{Component}   & \colhead{$\tau_{{\rm 100\mu m}}$}   &

1454: \colhead{$R_{eq}$} & \colhead{$N({\rm H}_2)$\tablenotemark{a}}  

1455: & \colhead{$T_{{\rm d}}$} & \colhead{$T_{{\rm rad}}$} & \colhead{$M$} & 

1456: \colhead{$L$}  & \colhead{$L/L_{{\rm IR}}$} \\

1457:    & & & \colhead{(pc)} & \colhead{(\cmd)} & \colhead{(K)} & \colhead{(K)} &

1458: \colhead{(\Msun)} & \colhead{(\Lsun)} & }

1459: \startdata

1460: $A$ & - & $6.8\times10^{-2}$ & 1830 & $4.6\times10^{22}$   & variable\tablenotemark{b} 

1461: & 23 & $1.0\times10^{10}$ & $2.4\times10^{12}$ & 0.72 \\

1462: $B$ & - & $0.55$ & 400 & $3.7\times10^{23}$  & 55 & 44 & $4.0\times10^{9}$ 

1463: & $1.7\times10^{12}$ & 0.50 \\

1464: $C$ & - & $2.2$ & 200 & $1.5\times10^{24}$  & 74 & 71 & $4.0\times10^{9}$ 

1465: & $2.0\times10^{12}$ & 0.61 \\

1466: $D$ & warm & 1.1 & 106 & $7.2\times10^{23}$  & 100 & 85 & $5.5\times10^{8}$ 

1467: & $1.8\times10^{12}$ & 0.56 \\

1468: $D$ & cold & 0.97 & 350 & $6.5\times10^{23}$ & 47 & 42 & $5.3\times10^{9}$ 

1469: & $7.4\times10^{11}$ & 0.22 \\

1470: \enddata

1471: \tablenotetext{a}{A gas-to-dust mass ratio of 100 is assumed, together with a

1472:   mass-absorption coefficient for dust of 44 cm$^2$ g$^{-1}$ at 100 $\mu$m.}

1473: \tablenotetext{b}{The temperature is calculated from the 

1474: balance between heating and cooling; see text for details.}

1475: \end{deluxetable}

1476: 

1477: \clearpage

1478: 

1479: % Table 2

1480: 

1481: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}

1482: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1483: %\rotate

1484: \tablecaption{Models for molecules and atoms \label{tab:model}}

1485: \tablewidth{0pt}

1486: \tablehead{

1487: \colhead{Model\tablenotemark{a}$\rightarrow$} & \colhead{$C$} & 

1488: \colhead{$D$} & \colhead{$D$} \\

1489:  & & \colhead{(warm)} & \colhead{(cold)} }

1490: \startdata

1491: $N({\rm H_2})$ (\cmt) & $1.5\times10^{24}$ & $7.2\times10^{23}$ & $6.5\times10^{23}$   \\

1492: $\Delta V$ (km s$^{-1}$) & 40  & 60  & 40 \\

1493: $N^{{\rm scr}}({\rm OH})$\tablenotemark{b} (\cmd) & $1.0\times10^{17}$ & $9.2\times10^{16}$  & $6.1\times10^{16}$  \\

1494: $N^{{\rm mix}}({\rm OH})$\tablenotemark{b} (\cmd) & $4.5\times10^{18}$ & $1.4\times10^{18}$  & $9.7\times10^{17}$  \\

1495: $\chi$(OH)\tablenotemark{c}                          & $3.0\times10^{-6}$ & $2.0\times10^{-6}$  & $1.5\times10^{-6}$  \\

1496: $N^{{\rm scr}}({\rm H_2O})$ (\cmd) & $5.4\times10^{16}$ & $6.1\times10^{16}$  & $<5.0\times10^{15}$  \\

1497: $N^{{\rm mix}}({\rm H_2O})$ (\cmd) & $2.0\times10^{18}$ & $9.6\times10^{17}$ & $<1.0\times10^{17}$ 

1498: \\

1499: $\chi$(\hdo)\tablenotemark{c}        & $1.3\times10^{-6}$ & $1.3\times10^{-6}$  & $<1.5\times10^{-7}$ \\

1500: $N^{{\rm mix}}({\rm C^+})$\tablenotemark{d} (\cmd) & $2.3\times10^{20}$ & $3.1\times10^{19}$\tablenotemark{e} & $2.8\times10^{19}$\tablenotemark{e}   \\

1501: $N^{{\rm mix}}({\rm O})$\tablenotemark{d} (\cmd)  & $4.9\times10^{20}$ & $6.7\times10^{19}$\tablenotemark{e}  &  $6.0\times10^{19}$\tablenotemark{e}  \\

1502: \enddata

1503: \tablenotetext{a}{Models correspond to the continuum models listed in 

1504: Table~\ref{tab:cont} and shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:cont}c and d.}

1505: \tablenotetext{b}{$N^{{\rm scr}}(X)$ is the column density of a shell of

1506: species $X$ surrounding the continuum source, and $N^{{\rm mix}}(X)$ is the

1507: column density for the case that species $X$ is evenly mixed with the dust.}

1508: \tablenotetext{c}{Abundances are given relative to H$_2$ using the 

1509: $N^{{\rm mix}}(X)$ values.}

1510: \tablenotetext{d}{The column densities of C$^+$ and O are computed by assuming

1511:   gas at 400 K, and a O$^0$ to C$^+$ abundance ratio of 2.1.}

1512: \tablenotetext{e}{Equal averaged abundances are assumed in the warm and cold

1513: components of model $D$.}

1514: \end{deluxetable}

1515: 

1516: 

1517: 

1518: 

1519: 

1520: \clearpage

1521: 

1522: %Figure 1

1523: 

1524: \begin{figure}

1525: \epsscale{1}

1526: \plotone{f1.eps}

1527: \caption{Comparison between the FIR emission from Mkn 231 (black)

1528: and Arp 220 (grey). The spectrum of Arp 220 has been re-scaled to the

1529:   distance of Mkn 231 (170 Mpc).

1530: The position of the OH lines discussed in the text are indicated and labeled

1531: with their wavelengths. 

1532: \label{fig:seds}}

1533: \end{figure}

1534: 

1535: %Figure 2

1536: 

1537: 

1538: 

1539: \begin{figure}

1540: \epsscale{0.8}

1541: \plotone{f2.eps}

1542: \caption{Comparison between the continuum-normalized spectra of Mkn 231 (upper

1543:   spectra, solid lines) and Arp 220 (lower spectra, grey lines). 

1544: The positions of lines discussed in the text are indicated and labeled. 

1545: \label{fig:spectra}}

1546: \end{figure}

1547: 

1548: %Figure 3

1549: 

1550: \begin{figure}

1551: \epsscale{0.8}

1552: \plotone{f3.eps}

1553: \caption{Comparison between the spectra of Mkn 231 (upper

1554:   spectrum, histogram) and Arp 220 (lower spectrum, solid line)  

1555:   around 152 $\mu$m. The spectrum of Arp 220 has been re-scaled to the

1556:   distance of Mkn 231 (170 Mpc).

1557:   The position of the NH, CH, and OH$^+$ lines 

1558:   are indicated and labeled. 

1559: \label{fig:ohplus}}

1560: \end{figure}

1561: 

1562: 

1563: 

1564: 

1565: %Figure 4

1566: 

1567: \begin{figure}

1568: \epsscale{0.8}

1569: \plotone{f4.eps}

1570: \caption{Different models for the FIR continuum emission

1571: from Mkn 231. The whole set of parameters that characterize the models $A$,

1572: $B$, $C$, and $D$, are listed in Table~\ref{tab:cont}. Flux densities at 800

1573: and 1100 $\mu$m are taken from \cite[][corrected for non-thermal

1574: emission]{roc93}, at 450 $\mu$m from \cite*{rig96}, at 350 $\mu$m

1575: from \cite{yan07}, and at $\lambda<25$ $\mu$m from \cite{rie76}.

1576: \label{fig:cont}}

1577: \end{figure}

1578: 

1579: %Figure 5

1580: 

1581: \begin{figure}

1582: \epsscale{1}

1583: \plotone{f5.eps}

1584: \caption{Predicted equivalent widths ($W$) versus the OH excitation temperature

1585:   ($T_{ex}$) for the 119 (solid curves), 

1586:   84 (dotted), 65 (dashed-dotted), and 53 (dashed) $\mu$m OH doublets. Results

1587:   are shown for three assumed sizes of the continuum emission, corresponding 

1588:   to the continuum models $A$, $B$, and $C$ in Table~\ref{tab:cont}. 

1589:   The observed values are indicated with

1590:   horizontal lines. $N_{17}({\rm OH})$ is the assumed OH column density in

1591:   units of $10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$. The equivalent widths are positive if the

1592:   lines are in absorption; a drop in $W$ with increasing $T_{ex}$ thus 

1593:   indicates that the corresponding line is turning from absorption to emission.

1594: \label{fig:eqw}}

1595: \end{figure}

1596: 

1597: %Figure 6

1598: 

1599: \begin{figure}

1600: \epsscale{1}

1601: \plotone{f6.eps}

1602: \caption{Continuum-subtracted spectrum of Mkn 231 compared with two

1603: models for the OH, \hdo, [C II], and [O I] lines. The models are the

1604: single-component $C$ (black-dashed line), and the composite model $D$

1605: (grey-solid line) whose parameters are listed in Tables~\ref{tab:cont} 

1606: and \ref{tab:model}, and

1607: whose predicted continuum SEDs are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:cont}c-d. The

1608: lines that most contribute to the modeled spectra are labeled.

1609: \label{fig:model}}

1610: \end{figure}

1611: 

1612: 

1613: 

1614: 

1615: \end{document}

1616: 

1617: