1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4,flushrt]{article} % elec. submission version
2: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4,psfig]{article} %local ms version with figs
3: %\documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4,psfig,flushrt]{article} % local pp version
4: % with figs
5: %\documentstyle[times,emulateapj]{article} % local pp version
6: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7: %\documentclass{aastex}
8: \documentclass{emulateapj}
9: %\usepackage{emulateapj5,apjfonts}
10: %\doublespace
11: %\shorttitle{4U 0142+61}
12: %\shortauthors{WANG ET AL.}
13:
14: \newcommand{\axp}{1E~1048.1$-$5937}
15: \newcommand{\axpu}{4U~0142$+$61}
16: \newcommand{\spz}{\textit{Spitzer}}
17:
18: \begin{document}
19: \bibliographystyle{apj_noskip}
20:
21: %\submitted{Submitted to ApJ Letters}
22:
23: \title{Optical/Infrared Observations of the Anomalous X-ray Pulsar 1E~1048.1$-$5937 During Its 2007 X-Ray Flare}
24:
25: \author{Zhongxiang Wang\altaffilmark{1}, Cees Bassa\altaffilmark{1}, Victoria M. Kaspi\altaffilmark{1}, Julia J. Bryant\altaffilmark{2}, and Nidia Morrell\altaffilmark{3}}
26: %\affil{ }
27:
28: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics,
29: McGill University, QC H3A 2T8, Canada}
30: %%\email{wangzx, vkaspi@physics.mcgill.ca}
31:
32: \altaffiltext{2}{School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia}
33:
34: \altaffiltext{3}{Las Campanas Observatory, Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, La Serena, Chile}
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37: We report on optical and infrared observations of the anomalous X-ray
38: pulsar (AXP) \axp, made during its ongoing X-ray flare
39: which started in 2007 March. We detected the source in the optical $I$
40: and near-infrared $K_s$ bands in two ground-based observations
41: and obtained deep flux upper limits from four observations,
42: including one with the \textit{Spitzer Space Telescope} at 4.5 and
43: 8.0 $\mu$m. The detections indicate that the source was approximately
44: 1.3--1.6 magnitudes brighter than in 2003--2006,
45: when it was at the tail of a previous similar X-ray flare.
46: Similar related flux variations have been seen in two other AXPs during
47: their X-ray outbursts, suggesting common behavior for large X-ray flux
48: variation events in AXPs.
49: The \spz\ flux limits are sufficiently deep that we can exclude
50: mid-infrared emission similar to that from the AXP \axpu,
51: which has been interpreted as
52: arising from a dust disk around the AXP.
53: The optical/near-infrared emission from \axp\ probably has a magnetospheric
54: origin. The similarity in the flux spectra of \axp\ and \axpu\ challenges
55: the dust disk model proposed for the latter.
56:
57: \end{abstract}
58:
59: \keywords{stars: neutron --- pulsars: individual (1E 1048.1$-$5937) --- infrared: stars --- X-rays: stars}
60:
61: \section{INTRODUCTION}
62:
63: Supported by extensive observational studies over the past few years,
64: it is generally believed that anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) are
65: magnetars---young neutron stars possessing ultra-high $\sim$10$^{14}$~G
66: magnetic fields. While AXPs are primarily known as X-ray sources, exhibiting
67: a variety of variability behavior related to their magnetar
68: nature \citep{wt06,kas07}, we now know that 5 of 10 identified
69: AXPs---4U~0142+61, \axp,
70: 1RXS~J170849$-$400910, XTE~J1810$-$197, and 1E~2259+586---are bright
71: at near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths (\citealt{wt06};
72: McGill AXP online catalog\footnote{\url{www.physics.mcgill.ca/pulsar/magnetar/main.html}}). Among them, the AXP 4U 0142+61 is
73: detected from optical to mid-infrared (MIR) wavelengths, indicating
74: a spectral energy distribution (SED) that can be described by
75: a two-component model: one a power-law spectrum over optical $V\/RI$
76: and NIR $J$ bands, presumably arising from the magnetosphere,
77: and one thermal blackbody-like over the 2.2--8 $\mu$m range
78: \citep{wck06}, arising from a debris disk.
79: The discovery of such an optical/IR SED from the AXP was
80: unexpected, and the two-component model remains controversial
81: (e.g., \citealt{dv06d}).
82: Ideally, in order to understand the optical/IR emission mechanism for
83: AXPs and in particular determine whether the IR emission
84: from 4U 0142+61 is unusual or generic among AXPs, SEDs of other AXPs
85: must be observed.
86: However, most known AXPs are highly extincted in the optical range
87: and often extremely faint in the IR.
88:
89: Among the known AXPs, \axp\ is peculiar in that
90: it has exhibited two long-term X-ray flares \citep{gk04, tam+08} which
91: have not been seen from other AXPs thus far.
92: Monitored with the \textit{Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE)}, the first flare
93: was found to start in 2002 April and lasted approximately two years.
94: At the beginning of the flare, the NIR counterpart
95: was discovered \citep{wc02}, and in observations more than a year later,
96: the counterpart was found to be approximately 2 magnitudes dimmer in $JK_s$
97: \citep{dv05}, suggesting large flux variations associated with the flare.
98: Such flaring events thus provide an opportunity to study optical/IR
99: emission from an AXP other than 4U 0142+61.
100: In addition, during their X-ray outbursts, the AXPs 1E~2259+586 and
101: XTE J1810$-$197 both exhibited related NIR brightening.
102: In the first source, its NIR and X-ray flux changes were correlated
103: \citep{tam+04} while in the latter, its NIR flux did not exactly follow
104: the decline of the X-ray flux (\citealt{rea+04}; \citealt{cam+07}).
105: Optical/IR observations of \axp\ during another X-ray
106: flare would allow us to verify if
107: the source exhibits similar emission behavior.
108:
109: For these reasons, after a second flare started on 2007 March 24 \citep{dib+07},
110: we made multi-wavelength observations of \axp\ with large ground-based
111: telescopes and the \textit{Spitzer Space Telescope}.
112: In this paper, we report on our optical/IR observations
113: during this on-going X-ray flare.
114: %%Preliminary results of part of the observations have been reported \citep{wbk+07,wkb+07}.
115:
116: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION} % Section 2
117: \label{sec:obs}
118:
119: \subsection{Ground-Based Observations}
120:
121: \subsubsection{NIR Imaging}
122:
123: On 2007 April 04, we observed the \axp\ field in $K_s$ band
124: using Persson's Auxiliary Nasmyth Infrared Camera (PANIC; \citealt{mpm+04})
125: on the 6.5-m Baade Magellan Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory in Chile.
126: The detector is a Rockwell Hawaii 1024$\times$1024 HgCdTe array, having
127: a field of view (FOV) of 2\arcmin$\times$2\arcmin\
128: and a pixel scale of 0.125\arcsec/pixel. The total on-source exposure time was
129: 15 min. During the exposure, the telescope was dithered in a
130: 3$\times$3 grid with offsets of 10\arcsec\ to obtain a measurement of
131: the sky background. The observing conditions were good, with 0.5\arcsec\
132: seeing in $K_s$.
133:
134: On 2007 May 08, we observed the target field in the same band
135: with the same telescope and camera. The total on-source time was 18 min,
136: and the same observing
137: strategy was used. During the exposure, the conditions were not stable,
138: with $K_s$ seeing rapidly changing between 0.6\arcsec\ and 0.8\arcsec.
139:
140: \subsubsection{Optical Imaging}
141:
142: We observed the target field in the optical bands using
143: the 8.2-m Very Large Telescope (VLT; ANTU) at the European Southern
144: Observatory (ESO)
145: and the 8-m Gemini South Telescope at the Gemini Observatory. Both telescopes
146: are located in Chile.
147:
148: The VLT observation was made on 2007 May 07, the same night that the second
149: Magellan NIR image was obtained. The instrument used was the FOcal Reducer
150: and low dispersion Spectrograph (FORS2; \citealt{app+98}), which consists
151: of two 2k$\times$4k
152: MIT CCDs and has a FOV of 6.8\arcmin$\times$6.8\arcmin.
153: %%The standard resolution collimator (COL\_SR) was used for the observation,
154: The CCD detectors were 2$\times 2$ binned, having
155: a pixel scale of 0.25\arcsec/pixel. We obtained 15 3-min $I$-band
156: images of the field, resulting in a 45 min total exposure. The telescope
157: was dithered in a 3$\times$5 grid, with offsets of 5\arcsec$\times$2.5\arcsec.
158: The conditions were excellent, with 0.5\arcsec\ seeing.
159:
160: The Gemini imaging observations were made on 2007 June 24 and July 15.
161: The instrument was Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS; \citealt{hoo+04}).
162: The detector array of GMOS consists of three 2048$\times$4608 EEV CCDs.
163: The pixel scale is 0.073\arcsec/pixel, while we used a detector
164: binning of 2~pixels
165: for the observations. In the first observation, we obtained 8 $r'$ and 5 $i'$
166: images, with exposure times of 5 and 3 min, respectively. The telescope
167: was dithered for the exposures, with offsets of 10\arcsec.
168: The seeing was approximately 0.9\arcsec\ during the observations. In the latter observation,
169: we obtained 16 5-min $r'$ and 4 3-min $i'$ images, with the same
170: observing strategy. The seeing was approximately
171: 0.8\arcsec.
172:
173: \subsubsection{Data Reduction}
174:
175: We used the IRAF data analysis package for data reduction.
176: The images were bias-subtracted and flat-fielded.
177: In addition, because the Gemini GMOS detectors have significant fringing
178: in $i'$ band, a fringe frame provided by the Gemini Observatory was used
179: for subtraction of the fringes in our $i'$ images.
180: From each set of dithered images in one observation,
181: a sky image was made by filtering out stars. The sky image was
182: subtracted from the set of images, and then the sky-subtracted images
183: were shifted and combined into one final image of the target field.
184: A summary of the images we obtained is given in Table~\ref{tab:obs}.
185:
186: \subsection{\spz\ 4.5/8.0 $\mu$m Imaging}
187:
188: We also observed \axp\ on 2007 August 10 with the
189: \textit{Spitzer Space Telescope}.
190: The imaging instrument used was the Infrared Array
191: Camera (IRAC; \citealt{fha+04}). It operates in four channels
192: at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0 $\mu$m, while two adjacent fields are
193: simultaneously imaged in pairs (3.6 and 5.8 $\mu$m; 4.5 and 8.0 $\mu$m).
194: We observed our target in the 4.5 (bandwidth 1.0 $\mu$m) and
195: 8.0 $\mu$m (bandwidth 2.9 $\mu$m) channels.
196: The detectors at the short and long wavelengths are InSb
197: and Si:As devices, respectively, with 256$\times$256 pixels and a plate
198: scale of 1\farcs2/pixel. The field of view (FOV) is 5\farcm2$\times$5\farcm2.
199: The frame time was 100 s, with 96.8 and 93.6 s effective exposure time
200: per frame for the 4.5 and 8.0 $\mu$m data, respectively. The total exposure
201: times in each observation were 53.2 min at 4.5 $\mu$m and 51.5 min at
202: 8.0 $\mu$m.
203:
204: The raw image data were processed through the IRAC data pipelines
205: (version S16.1.0) at the {\em Spitzer} Science Center (SSC).
206: In the Basic Calibrated Data (BCD) pipeline, standard imaging data
207: reductions, such as removal of the electronic bias, dark sky subtraction,
208: flat-fielding, and linearization, are performed and individual flux-calibrated
209: BCD frames are produced. In the post-BCD (PBCD) pipeline, radiation hits
210: in BCD images are detected and excluded, and BCD frames are then
211: combined into final PBCD mosaics. The details of the data reduction
212: in the pipelines
213: can be found in the IRAC Data Handbook (version 3.0; \citealt{rsg+06}).
214:
215:
216: \section{RESULTS}
217: \label{sec:res}
218:
219: \subsection{Ground-based Observations}
220:
221: The counterpart to 1E 1048.1-5937 was detected in both NIR observations
222: made on 2007 April 04 and the optical observations made on 2007 May 07.
223: We performed PSF-fitting
224: photometry to measure the brightness of the source. The nearby field
225: star X5 was used for flux calibration in the $K_s$ and $I$ bands \citep{dv05}.
226: The source's magnitudes were $K_s=19.9\pm0.1$ and $I=24.9\pm0.2$.
227: We did not detect the source in the other observations. Using the X5 star for
228: flux calibration \citep{wc02}, we derived 3$\sigma$ limiting magnitudes
229: for the Magellan $K_s$ and Gemini $r'$ and $i'$ images.
230: The results are given in Table~\ref{tab:obs}.
231:
232: \subsection{\spz/IRAC Observations}
233:
234: We did not detect the source in the \spz\ IRAC 4.5 and 8.0 $\mu$m
235: images, and the derived 3$\sigma$ flux upper limits were
236: 5.2 and 21.8 $\mu$Jy, respectively.
237: The fluxes correspond to limiting magnitudes of 18.9 and 16.2 mag,
238: for the zero magnitude fluxes of 179.7 and 64.1 Jy \citep{reach+05}
239: at the \spz/IRAC 4.5 and 8.0 $\mu$m bands, respectively.
240: These results are also given in Table~\ref{tab:obs}.
241: The source region has been observed previously with IRAC at the
242: same wavelength bands in 2005, with no counterpart found either \citep{wkh07}.
243: Comparing to the previous results, our 2007 upper limits are approximately
244: 2 times deeper.
245:
246: \section{DISCUSSION}
247: \label{sec:disc}
248:
249: The optical/NIR counterpart of \axp\ was observed a few times during
250: 2003--2006 after the discovery of the counterpart, and the source's
251: brightness had been low
252: (e.g., $K_s\simeq 21.0$--21.5; see \citealt{tam+08} for details).
253: Compared to the flux measurements, particularly those obtained
254: in 2003 April and June when the counterpart was detected in
255: both the optical $I$ and NIR $JK_s$ bands (\citealt{dv05}; also see
256: Table~\ref{tab:mea}), our results clearly indicate an optical/NIR brightening
257: during the 2007 X-ray flare. Indeed, assuming $A_V= 5.4$ mag,
258: the unabsorbed optical/NIR--to--X-ray flux ratios for the 2003 and our
259: measurements are nearly identical (see Figure~\ref{fig:comp}).
260: In this comparison, the unabsorbed 2--10 keV X-ray fluxes at two epochs
261: given in Table~\ref{tab:mea} are used, and $A_V$ is
262: estimated from $N_{\rm H}=9.7\times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ (\citealt{tam+08})
263: by using the relation $A_V= N_{\rm H}/1.79\times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$
264: \citep{ps95}. Also we note that even though our
265: second $K_s$ measurement was an upper limit ($K_s>20.1$), it was
266: only 0.1~mag smaller than that obtained from a detection two days later
267: by \citet{isr+07}.
268: Thus in these two sets of observations, the optical/NIR
269: and X-ray fluxes appeared to be correlated.
270:
271: %\begin{figure}
272: \begin{center}
273: \includegraphics[scale=0.46]{f1.eps}
274: %\plotone{f1.eps}
275: \figcaption{Unabsorbed optical/IR flux and flux upper limits (diamonds) of
276: \axp\ measured in 2007 April--August, normalized by the unabsorbed 2--10 keV
277: X-ray flux obtained on 2007 April 28 (see Table~\ref{tab:mea}).
278: The dotted line indicates our two
279: nearly simultaneous observations in the $I$ and $K_s$ bands, and the dashed
280: line indicates the optical and NIR measurements obtained in 2003 April and June
281: \citep{dv05}.
282: For comparison, the unabsorbed optical/IR--to--X-ray flux ratios for
283: \axpu\ are also shown (squares; \citealt{dv06d,wk08}), with the vertical
284: and horizontal lengths of the bars indicating the flux
285: variation range and effective bandwidth at each band, respectively.
286: $A_V=3.5$ \citep{dv06a} is used for dereddening.
287: The unabsorbed 2--10 keV X-ray flux used for \axpu\ was 6.6$\times 10^{-11}$
288: ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \citep{gon+07}.
289: \label{fig:comp}
290: }
291: \end{center}
292: %\end{figure}
293:
294: However, as shown by \citet{tam+08}, the observed NIR brightening at
295: the beginning of the 2002 X-ray flare preceded the pulsed X-ray flux peak
296: by $\sim$2 months. If we assume that the relation between the pulsed
297: flux $F_{\rm p}$ and total flux $F_{\rm t}$,
298: $F_{\rm p} \propto F_{\rm t}^{0.54}$ \citep{tam+08}, is generally true
299: for this AXP, the 2--10 keV unabsorbed total flux derived at the NIR
300: observation time would have been $\simeq$$10^{-11}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$,
301: 3.6 times lower than the 2007 peak flux. As a result, the 2002
302: NIR--to--X-ray flux ratios would be approximately 6 times higher than
303: that shown in Figure~\ref{fig:comp} (note $K_s=19.4$ in the
304: 2002 detection). This would indicate that the NIR and X-ray fluxes were
305: not correlated all the time.
306: We note that since the $F_{\rm p}$ and $F_{\rm t}$ relation is mainly
307: based on the total flux measurements obtained during the 2007 flare and there
308: were not such measurements for the 2002 flare, it is possible
309: that the total flux was much larger at the start of the 2002 flare, and not
310: reflected in the \textit{RXTE} pulsed flux measurements.
311: In any case, we confirm that in this AXP, the large optical/NIR flux variations
312: were related to the X-ray flares. Similar related NIR brightening has been
313: seen in 1E~2259$+$586 and XTE~J1810$-$197 during their X-ray outbursts
314: \citep{tam+04,cam+07}, suggesting common behavior for emission from AXPs.
315: However for \axpu, while its X-ray flux
316: has been relatively stable \citep{gon+07}, its optical and NIR flux was found to
317: have large, rapid variations \citep{dv06d}. This limits the
318: related NIR/X-ray behavior to only large X-ray flux variation events.
319:
320: It is instructive to compare \axp\ to \axpu, since the latter has
321: well measured fluxes from the optical to MIR.
322: In Figure~\ref{fig:comp}, we compare the optical/IR fluxes and flux upper
323: limits of \axp\ to those of \axpu, with each set of data points
324: normalized by the approximately contemporaneous
325: unabsorbed 2--10 keV X-ray flux of each source. The optical $V\/RI$ and
326: NIR $JHK_s$ fluxes
327: for \axpu\ are from Durant \& van Kerkwijk (2006b; because
328: of relatively large
329: flux variations from the source, we show the range of the flux found
330: in each band in the figure), the two MIR data points at 4.5
331: and 8.0 $\mu$m are the 2005 flux measurements in Wang \& Kaspi (2008),
332: and the unabsorbed 2--10 keV X-ray flux
333: used is 6.6$\times 10^{-11}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, obtained
334: on 2004 July 24 \citep{gon+07}. As can be seen from the figure,
335: while the flux ratios of \axp\ are roughly two times larger than
336: those of \axpu, the deep limit at 4.5 $\mu$m
337: from our \spz\ IRAC observation is approximately 3 times lower than
338: the detection of \axpu. This strongly suggests that
339: our target does not have similar MIR emission.
340: This difference in the MIR is not very sensitive to
341: uncertainties on the reddening to the two sources, since MIR emission
342: is only weakly extincted by the interstellar medium.
343: The X-ray flux from \axpu\ has been stable \citep{gon+07}.
344: A possible explanation could be the non-simultaneous X-ray flux of \axp\
345: we use for the comparison. However, \textit{RXTE}
346: X-ray monitoring observations of the source have indicated that
347: the pulsed flux, which is found to trace the total
348: flux \citep{tam+08}, has remained stable and high during our observations
349: (Dib et al. 2008, in preparation). In order to raise the 4.5 $\mu$m
350: upper limit to the flux ratio of \axpu, the X-ray flux would have
351: had to have been
352: as low as 11$\times 10^{-12}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, only 40\% larger
353: than the average quiescent flux (7.7$\times 10^{-12}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$)
354: of the source and approximately one third of those obtained
355: in 2007 April \citep{tam+08}.
356:
357: The lack of MIR emission similar to that of \axpu\ from \axp\ seems robust.
358: In the dust disk model proposed for \axpu\ \citep{wck06},
359: the MIR flux, arising from X-ray irradiation of the disk, is
360: proportional to the X-ray flux of the pulsar.
361: Therefore, even though our deep 4.5 $\mu$m limit was obtained during
362: the X-ray flare, we can exclude the existence of a similar disk around \axp.
363: However, since a disk could be further away from the central source,
364: deep observations at longer wavelengths are needed in order to exclude
365: the existence of a disk more conclusively.
366: The MIR non-detection may suggest that debris disks are not
367: commonly found around AXPs and thus the putative disk in
368: \axpu\ is unique.
369: Two other AXPs have also been observed by \spz\ with no detection;
370: however, the derived upper limits are far above the MID--to--X-ray flux ratio
371: of \axpu\ \citep{wkh07}.
372:
373: The optical and NIR emission from \axp\ probably has a magnetospheric origin,
374: given that the flux spectrum is similar to that of \axpu\
375: (\citealt{wc02,dv05}). For the latter source, its optical
376: emission is known to be pulsed at the spin period and has a pulsed fraction
377: much higher than that in X-rays, excluding a
378: disk origin \citep{km02,dhi+05}.
379: Details of how optical and NIR emission is produced in the magnetosphere of a
380: magnetar are not known, though possible
381: radiation mechanisms have been suggested (e.g., \citealt{bt07}).
382: We note that in the disk model for \axpu\ \citep{wck06}, the $K$-band flux
383: primarily arises from the disk, not from the magnetosphere.
384: Therefore, the similarity in the $K$-band--to--X-ray flux ratios for
385: the AXPs \citep{dv05}, including \axp\ as confirmed by
386: our measurements, challenges the disk model.
387: The $K$-band emission thus should originate from the magnetosphere, which
388: may be supported by the fact that in the absence of X-ray variability,
389: strong $K$-band variability is seen in \axpu\ \citep{dv06d}.
390:
391: \acknowledgements
392: We thank ESO, the Gemini Observatory, and SSC for granting us the observations.
393: We thank F. Patat at the Users Support Department of ESO, M. Bergmann at
394: Gemini South, and N. Silbermann from SSC for helping with the observations.
395: We also thank R. Dib and C. Tam for sharing their unpublished results.
396: The Gemini data were taken under the program DD-2007A-DD-10-1.
397: The Gemini Observatory is operated by the Association of Universities
398: for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with
399: the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership: the National Science Foundation
400: (United States), the Science and Technology Facilities Council
401: (United Kingdom), the National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile),
402: the Australian Research Council (Australia), CNPq (Brazil), and CONICET
403: (Argentina).
404: This research was supported by NSERC via a Discovery Grant
405: and by the FQRNT and CIFAR. VMK holds a Canada Research Chair and
406: the Lorne Trottier Chair in Astrophysics \& Cosmology, and is a
407: R. Howard Webster Foundation Fellow of CIFAR.
408:
409: \bibliographystyle{apj}
410: %%\bibliography{axp}
411:
412: \begin{thebibliography}{29}
413: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
414:
415: \bibitem[{{Appenzeller} {et~al.}(1998)}]{app+98}
416: {Appenzeller}, I. {et~al.} 1998, The Messenger, 94, 1
417:
418: \bibitem[{{Beloborodov} \& {Thompson}(2007)}]{bt07}
419: {Beloborodov}, A.~M. \& {Thompson}, C. 2007, ApJ, 657, 967
420:
421: \bibitem[{{Camilo} {et~al.}(2007)}]{cam+07}
422: {Camilo}, F. {et~al.} 2007, \apj, 669, 561
423:
424: \bibitem[{{Dhillon} {et~al.}(2005){Dhillon}, {Marsh}, {Hulleman}, {van
425: Kerkwijk}, {Shearer}, {Littlefair}, {Gavriil}, \& {Kaspi}}]{dhi+05}
426: {Dhillon}, V.~S., {Marsh}, T.~R., {Hulleman}, F., {van Kerkwijk}, M.~H.,
427: {Shearer}, A., {Littlefair}, S.~P., {Gavriil}, F.~P., \& {Kaspi}, V.~M. 2005,
428: \mnras, 363, 609
429:
430: \bibitem[{{Dib} {et~al.}(2007){Dib}, {Kaspi}, {Gavriil}, \& {Woods}}]{dib+07}
431: {Dib}, R., {Kaspi}, V.~M., {Gavriil}, F.~P., \& {Woods}, P.~M. 2007, The
432: Astronomer's Telegram, 1041, 1
433:
434: \bibitem[{{Durant} \& {van Kerkwijk}(2005)}]{dv05}
435: {Durant}, M. \& {van Kerkwijk}, M.~H. 2005, \apj, 627, 376
436:
437: %%\bibitem[{{Durant} \& {van Kerkwijk}(2006{\natexlab{a}})}]{dv06b}
438: %%---. 2006{\natexlab{a}}, \apj, 650, 1082
439:
440: \bibitem[{{Durant} \& {van Kerkwijk}(2006{\natexlab{a}})}]{dv06a}
441: ---. 2006{\natexlab{a}}, \apj, 650, 1082
442:
443: \bibitem[{{Durant} \& {van Kerkwijk}(2006{\natexlab{b}})}]{dv06d}
444: ---. 2006{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 652, 576
445:
446: \bibitem[{{Fazio} {et~al.}(2004)}]{fha+04}
447: {Fazio}, G.~G. {et~al.} 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
448:
449: \bibitem[{{Gavriil} \& {Kaspi}(2004)}]{gk04}
450: {Gavriil}, F.~P. \& {Kaspi}, V.~M. 2004, \apjl, 609, L67
451:
452: \bibitem[{{Gonzalez} {et~al.}(2007){Gonzalez}, {Dib}, {Kaspi}, {Woods}, {Tam},
453: \& {Gavriil}}]{gon+07}
454: {Gonzalez}, M.~E., {Dib}, R., {Kaspi}, V.~M., {Woods}, P.~M., {Tam}, C.~R., \&
455: {Gavriil}, F.~P. 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 708, (astroph/0708.2756)
456:
457: \bibitem[{{Hook} {et~al.}(2004){Hook}, {J{\o}rgensen}, {Allington-Smith},
458: {Davies}, {Metcalfe}, {Murowinski}, \& {Crampton}}]{hoo+04}
459: {Hook}, I.~M., {J{\o}rgensen}, I., {Allington-Smith}, J.~R., {Davies}, R.~L.,
460: {Metcalfe}, N., {Murowinski}, R.~G., \& {Crampton}, D. 2004, \pasp, 116, 425
461:
462: \bibitem[{{Indebetouw} {et~al.}(2005)}]{imb+05}
463: {Indebetouw}, R. {et~al.} 2005, \apj, 619, 931
464:
465: \bibitem[{{Israel} {et~al.}(2007){Israel}, {Campana}, {Testa}, {Mereghetti},
466: {Zane}, {Rea}, {Curto}, \& {Stella}}]{isr+07}
467: {Israel}, G.~L., {Campana}, S., {Testa}, V., {Mereghetti}, S., {Zane}, S.,
468: {Rea}, N., {Curto}, G.~L., \& {Stella}, L. 2007, The Astronomer's Telegram,
469: 1077, 1
470:
471: %%\bibitem[{{Israel} {et~al.}(2004)}]{isr+04}
472: %%{Israel}, G.~L. {et~al.} 2004, \apjl, 603, L97
473:
474: \bibitem[{{Kaspi}(2007)}]{kas07}
475: {Kaspi}, V.~M. 2007, \apss, 308, 1
476:
477: \bibitem[{{Kern} \& {Martin}(2002)}]{km02}
478: {Kern}, B. \& {Martin}, C. 2002, \nat, 417, 527
479:
480: \bibitem[{Martini {et~al.}(2004)Martini, Persson, Murphy, Birk, Shectman,
481: Gunnels, \& Koch}]{mpm+04}
482: Martini, P., Persson, S.~E., Murphy, D.~C., Birk, C., Shectman, S.~A., Gunnels,
483: S.~M., \& Koch, E. 2004, \procspie, 5492, 1653, (astro-ph/0406666)
484:
485: \bibitem[{{Predehl} \& {Schmitt}(1995)}]{ps95}
486: {Predehl}, P. \& {Schmitt}, J.~H.~M.~M. 1995, A\&A, 293, 889
487:
488: \bibitem[{{Rea} {et~al.}(2004)}]{rea+04}
489: {Rea}, N. {et~al.} 2004, \aap, 425, L5
490:
491: \bibitem[{{Reach} {et~al.}(2005)}]{reach+05}
492: {Reach}, W.~T. {et~al.} 2005, \pasp, 117, 978
493:
494: \bibitem[{Reach {et~al.}(2006)}]{rsg+06}
495: Reach, W.~T. {et~al.} 2006, {I}nfrared {A}rray {C}amera {D}ata {H}andbook,
496: ver.~3.0 (Pasadena: Spitzer Science Center)
497:
498: \bibitem[{{Schlegel} {et~al.}(1998){Schlegel}, {Finkbeiner}, \&
499: {Davis}}]{sfd98}
500: {Schlegel}, D.~J., {Finkbeiner}, D.~P., \& {Davis}, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
501:
502: \bibitem[{{Tam} {et~al.}(2008){Tam}, {Gavriil}, {Dib}, {Kaspi}, {Woods}, \&
503: {Bassa}}]{tam+08}
504: {Tam}, C.~R., {Gavriil}, F.~P., {Dib}, R., {Kaspi}, V.~M., {Woods}, P.~M., \&
505: {Bassa}, C. 2007, ApJ, in press, (arXiv:0707.2093)
506:
507: \bibitem[{{Tam} {et~al.}(2004){Tam}, {Kaspi}, {van Kerkwijk}, \&
508: {Durant}}]{tam+04}
509: {Tam}, C.~R., {Kaspi}, V.~M., {van Kerkwijk}, M.~H., \& {Durant}, M. 2004,
510: \apjl, 617, L53
511:
512: \bibitem[{{Wang} \& {Chakrabarty}(2002)}]{wc02}
513: {Wang}, Z. \& {Chakrabarty}, D. 2002, \apjl, 579, L33
514:
515: \bibitem[{{Wang} {et~al.}(2006){Wang}, {Chakrabarty}, \& {Kaplan}}]{wck06}
516: {Wang}, Z., {Chakrabarty}, D., \& {Kaplan}, D.~L. 2006, \nat, 440, 772
517:
518: \bibitem[{{Wang} \& {Kaspi}(2008)}]{wk08}
519: {Wang}, Z. \& {Kaspi}, V.~M. 2008, \apj, in press
520:
521: \bibitem[{{Wang} {et~al.}(2007){Wang}, {Kaspi}, \& {Higdon}}]{wkh07}
522: {Wang}, Z., {Kaspi}, V.~M., \& {Higdon}, S.~J.~U. 2007, \apj, 665, 1292
523:
524: \bibitem[{Woods \& Thompson(2006)}]{wt06}
525: Woods, P.~M. \& Thompson, C. 2006, in Compact Stellar X-ray Sources, ed.
526: W.~H.~G. Lewin \& M.~{van der Klis} (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press),
527: 547--586
528:
529: \end{thebibliography}
530:
531: \clearpage
532:
533: \begin{deluxetable}{l c c c c c c c}
534: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
535: \tablewidth{0pt}
536: \tablecaption{Optical/IR Observations of \axp\label{tab:obs}}
537: \tablehead{
538: \colhead{Observation Start} & \colhead{MJD} & \colhead{Telescope/Instrument} & \colhead{Filter}
539: & \colhead{Exposure} & \colhead{Seeing\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{Magnitude\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{ $\nu F_{\nu}$\tablenotemark{c}/10$^{-14}$ } \\
540: \colhead{Time (UTC)} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{}
541: & \colhead{(min)} & \colhead{(arcsec)} & \colhead{} & \colhead{ (ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$) } }
542: \startdata
543: 2007-04-04 00:37 & 54194.0 &Magellan/PANIC & $K_s$ & 15 & 0.54 & 19.9$\pm$0.1 & 1.8 \\
544: 2007-05-07 23:24 & 54228.0 &VLT/FORS2 & $I$ & 45 & 0.55 & 24.9$\pm$0.2 & 1.9 \\
545: 2007-05-08 03:15 & 54228.1 &Magellan/PANIC & $K_s$ & 18 & 0.66 & $>$20.1 & $<$1.5 \\
546: 2007-06-24 01:18 & 54275.1 &Gemini-S/GMOS & $r'$ & 40 & 1.0 & $>$24.8 & \nodata \\
547: & & & $i'$ & 15 & 0.88 & $>$24.1 & \nodata \\
548: 2007-07-15 00:06 & 54296.0 &Gemini-S/GMOS & $r'$ & 80 & 0.92 & $>$25.6 & $<$6.6 \\
549: & & & $i'$ & 12 & 0.74 & $>$24.5 & $<$5.4 \\
550: 2007-08-10 10:04 & 54322.4 & Spitzer/IRAC & 4.5 $\mu$m & 53.2 & \nodata & $>18.9$ & $<$0.42 \\
551: & & & 8.0 $\mu$m & 51.5 & \nodata & $>16.2$ & $<$0.99 \\
552: \enddata
553: \tablenotetext{a}{Full width at half maximum.}
554: \tablenotetext{b}{The upper limits are 3$\sigma$ limiting magnitudes.}
555: %%\tablenotetext{c}{The zero magnitude flux for the \spz/IRAC 4.5 and 8.0 $\mu$m bands are 179.7 and 64.1 Jy, respectively \citep{reach+05}.}
556: \tablenotetext{c}{Flux is dereddened with $A_V= 5.4$, using the reddening laws
557: for the optical and NIR bands given in \citet{sfd98} and for the \spz/IRAC
558: data given in \citet{imb+05}.}
559: \end{deluxetable}
560:
561: %%\clearpage
562: \begin{deluxetable}{l c c c c }
563: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
564: \tablewidth{8cm}
565: \tablecaption{Flux measurements of \axp\ used in the comparison.
566: \label{tab:mea}
567: }
568: \tablehead{
569: \colhead{Epoch} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Optical/NIR} & \colhead{X-ray\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{Refs} \\
570: & \colhead{Magnitude} & \colhead{ $\nu F_{\nu}$\tablenotemark{b} } & &
571: }
572: \startdata
573: 2003 April 24 & $J=23.4$ & 6.6 & \nodata & 1 \\
574: 2003 June 6 & $I=26.2$ & 5.9 & \nodata & 1 \\
575: 2003 June 7 & $K_s=21.5$ & 4.9 & \nodata & 1 \\
576: 2003 July 16 & \nodata & \nodata & 11.5 & 2 \\[1ex]
577: 2007 April 28 & \nodata & \nodata & 36.1 & 2 \\
578: \enddata
579: \tablerefs{
580: (1) \citet{dv05};
581: (2) \citet{tam+08}.}
582: \tablenotetext{a}{X-ray flux is phase-averaged, unabsorbed, in the energy
583: range of 2--10 keV, and in units of 10$^{-12}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$.}
584: \tablenotetext{b}{Dereddened flux (assuming $A_V=5.4$; in units of 10$^{-15}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$) obtained at the tail of the first X-ray flare.}
585: \end{deluxetable}
586:
587:
588: \end{document}
589:
590:
591:
592: