1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\usepackage{natbib}
3:
4: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
5: \newcommand{\myemail}{as110@st-andrews.ac.uk}
6:
7: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
8:
9: \slugcomment{To appear in ApJL}
10:
11: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
12: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
13: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
14: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
15: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
16: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
17:
18: \shorttitle{Dusty disks at the bottom of the IMF}
19: \shortauthors{Scholz \& Jayawardhana}
20:
21: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
22: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
23:
24: \begin{document}
25: \bibliographystyle{apj}
26:
27: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
28: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
29: %% you desire.
30:
31: \title{Dusty disks at the bottom of the IMF}
32:
33: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
34: %% author and affiliation information.
35: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
36: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
37: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
38: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
39:
40: \author{Alexander Scholz}
41: \affil{SUPA, School of Physics \& Astronomy, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews,
42: KY16 9SS, United Kingdom}
43: \email{as110@st-andrews.ac.uk}
44: \author{Ray Jayawardhana}
45: \affil{Department of Astronomy \& Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto,
46: ON M5S 3H4, Canada}
47: \email{rayjay@astro.utoronto.ca}
48:
49: \begin{abstract}
50: 'Isolated planetary mass objects' (IPMOs) have masses close to or below the Deuterium-burning
51: mass limit ($\sim 15\,M_\mathrm{Jup}$) -- at {\it the bottom of the stellar initial mass function}.
52: We present an exploratory survey for disks in this mass regime, based on a dedicated
53: observing campaign with the Spitzer Space Telescope. Our targets include the full sample of
54: spectroscopically confirmed IPMOs in the $\sigma$\,Orionis cluster, a total of 18 sources. In the
55: mass range $8\ldots 20\,M_\mathrm{Jup}$, we identify 4 objects with $>3\sigma$ colour excess at a
56: wavelength of 8.0$\,\mu m$, interpreted as emission from dusty disks. We thus establish that a substantial
57: fraction of IPMOs harbour disks with lifetimes of at least 2-4\,Myr (the likely age of the cluster),
58: indicating an origin from core collapse and fragmentation processes. The disk frequency in the IPMO
59: sample is $29\pm ^{16}_{13}$\% at 8.0\,$\mu m$, very similar
60: to what has been found for stars and brown dwarfs ($\sim 30$\%).
61: The object SOri\,70, a candidate $3\,M_\mathrm{Jup}$ object in this cluster, shows IRAC colours
62: in excess of the typical values for field T dwarfs (on a 2$\sigma$ level), possibly due to disk
63: emission or low gravity. This is a new indication for youth and thus an extremely low mass for
64: SOri\,70.
65:
66: \end{abstract}
67:
68: \keywords{stars: circumstellar matter, formation, low-mass, brown dwarfs -- planetary systems}
69:
70:
71: \section{Introduction}
72: \label{intro}
73:
74: Over the past five years, it has been firmly established that the evolution of brown
75: dwarfs from 1-10\,Myr follows the blueprint known from T Tauri stars: They show evidence
76: for ongoing gas accretion and outflows \citep[e.g.][]{2005ApJ...625..906M,2005ApJ...626..498M}, and
77: harbour circum-sub-stellar disks with lifetimes of 5-10\,Myr
78: \citep[e.g.][]{2003AJ....126.1515J,2007ApJ...660.1517S}, not vastly different
79: from stars. This has often been interpreted as an indication for a common origin of stars and brown
80: dwarfs -- sub-stellar objects as the natural extension of the stellar initial mass function (IMF) and
81: the lowest-mass outcome of core collapse and fragmentation processes
82: \citep[see review by][and references therein]{2007prpl.conf..443L}. At the same time, ongoing
83: deep surveys have pushed the sensitivity limits down to masses below the Deuterium burning
84: limit at $\sim 15\,M_{\mathrm{Jup}}$, finding evidence for a cluster population with masses comparable
85: to giant planets \citep{2000Sci...290..103Z,2000MNRAS.314..858L}. These objects {\it at the bottom
86: of the IMF} are inconsistently called planemos, sub-brown dwarfs, cluster
87: planets, or isolated planetary mass objects in the literature; in the absence of a definite
88: nomenclature, we will use the latter term (abbreviated IPMO) in the following.
89:
90: The nature and origin of IPMOs have been debated intensely in recent years. Most of the problems
91: raised in the discussions about the formation of brown dwarfs apply even more acutely
92: to IPMOs \citep[see review by][]{2007prpl.conf..459W}. For example, it is under debate whether
93: IPMOs can form directly from the collapse of ultra-low mass cores; instead, they may be giant
94: planets ejected from circumstellar disks or stellar embryos ejected from mini-clusters or
95: decaying multiple systems.
96:
97: As of today, the observational constraints on the nature of IPMOs are very limited. Evidence for
98: accretion or disks has been reported for a few young sources with masses around the Deuterium
99: burning limit \citep{2002A&A...393..597N,2002ApJ...569L..99Z,2005ApJ...635L..93L,2006ApJ...644..364A,2006ApJ...647L.167J}.
100: The next step is clearly to establish frequency and lifetimes of IPMO disks, and to push the mass limits
101: of disk surveys towards the least massive objects in star forming regions. Here we present a Spitzer survey
102: for disks around IPMOs in the $\sigma$\,Orionis cluster, which harbours the largest IPMO population identified
103: thus far. With a well-explored stellar and brown dwarf population \citep{2001ApJ...556..830B,2007A&A...470..903C}
104: and a likely age of 2-4\,Myr \citep{2002A&A...384..937Z,2004AJ....128.2316S}, $\sigma$\,Ori is ideal for probing the disk
105: frequency as a function of mass as well as the longevity of IPMO disks.
106:
107: \section{Observations and photometry}
108: \label{irac}
109:
110: As part of the Spitzer program \#30395 (PI: A. Scholz), we obtained deep IRAC images in the four channels centered
111: at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0$\,\mu m$ for 18 objects in the $\sigma$\,Ori cluster with estimated masses below
112: $20\,M_{\mathrm{Jup}}$. All targets have been identified initially in deep photometric surveys \citep{2000Sci...290..103Z,2002ApJ...578..536Z,2007A&A...470..903C}
113: With one exception, all objects have been confirmed as likely ultra-low mass young cluster members with
114: low-resolution spectroscopy; however, given the low signal-to-noise of the spectra, this should not be
115: taken as a definite membership confirmation. In particular, the membership is under debate for SOri\,70 (see
116: Sect. \ref{sori70}) and SOri\,47 \citep{2004ApJ...600.1020M}. See Table \ref{targets_so} for more
117: information and references for the target properties.
118:
119: The objects, covered with 13 IRAC fields, were observed in a 12 position dither pattern with the medium scale
120: and 100\,sec integration time per position. In total, this gives 1200\,sec on-source time per target in each
121: channel, a factor 10 deeper (in signal-to-noise ratio) than the GTO/IRAC survey of this cluster (program \#37,
122: PI: G. Fazio, see \citet{2007ApJ...662.1067H}). For the analysis, we made use of the post-BCD mosaics provided by
123: the IRAC pipeline version S15.3.0. While parts of some images are affected by saturation effects and straylight from
124: bright stars, in the regions where our targets are located the image quality is in most cases excellent.
125:
126: All objects are detected in channels 1 and 2; two are not detected in channel 3 while four are invisible in channel 4.
127: For the object SOri\,54, we used the publicly available GTO survey data to measure fluxes in channels 1 and 2,
128: because in our deep images the source is 'drowned' in the emission from a nearby extended object and
129: two nearby point-sources (all within 8"). The object SOri\,66 is located on a dark row in our IRAC1 and 2
130: images; again we obtained fluxes for this object from the GTO data.
131:
132: Fluxes were measured by aperture photometry with relatively small apertures (3-5\,pixels) using routines
133: in {\it daophot}. For all objects, the aperture is free from visible neighbours. Aperture corrections were
134: applied, as given in the IRAC data handbook (V3.0). Fluxes were converted to magnitudes
135: using the recommmended zeropoints quoted in the data handbook. All IRAC magnitudes for
136: the IPMOs are reported in Table \ref{targets_so}.
137:
138: The dominant error source is background uncertainty. To get a realistic estimate, we measured the flux
139: in empty regions in our images using the same method as for the targets ($>$50 measurements in IRAC1 and 2,
140: $>$80 in IRAC3 and 4). As expected, these values scatter around zero; their rms defines the uncertainty in
141: flux measurements due to background noise and small-scale fluctuations, and thus gives a conservative
142: estimate on the photometric error for faint sources. We obtain 1.8, 2.2, 12.7, 20.3$\,\mu$Jy in channels
143: 1-4, respectively. Note that these values do not correspond to the detection limits, which are better
144: defined using the peak count rate of the PSF in comparison with the background scatter in the sky annulus.
145: All objects for which fluxes are given in the tables are detected with a signal-to-noise-ratio of at least 4.
146:
147: The total errors quoted in Tables \ref{targets_so} are comprised of photometric errors
148: and systematics. The latter ones are the combination of uncertainties in calibration (5\%) and
149: aperture correction (1-2\%, from the IRAC data handbook). No colour correction was carried out;
150: instead we added a small contribution (0-2\%) to the error budget. The upper limits quoted in Tables
151: \ref{targets_so} correspond to three times the photometric errors. In channels 1 and 2, our fluxes
152: are in excellent agreement (within 0.2\,mag) with the values reported recently by \citet{2007A&A...472L...9Z} for
153: a subsample of our targets. In channels 3 and 4, the magnitude differences between our work and
154: \citet{2007A&A...472L...9Z} typically remain within 0.6\,mag, still within the 1$\sigma$ errorbars. We note,
155: however, that in these two bands our fluxes are in most cases substantially lower than the values given by
156: \citet{2007A&A...472L...9Z}.
157:
158: \section{Disk Frequency in the Planetary Mass Regime}
159: \label{diskfreq}
160:
161: We search for mid-infrared emission from dusty disks in our sample by comparing the measured IRAC
162: colours with published values for (disk-less) field objects in the same $T_\mathrm{eff}$ range
163: \citep{2006ApJ...651..502P}. The main discriminators to distinguish between the photospheric contribution
164: and the disk excess are the fluxes in the IRAC channels 3 and 4; at shorter wavelength the contrast between
165: the photosphere and a possible disk is difficult to detect. In Fig. \ref{f1} we plot IRAC colours (I1-I4 and I1-I3)
166: for all targets (except SOri\,70, see Sect. \ref{sori70}). As abscissa in these plots we use the $I-J$
167: colour, which can be assumed to be purely photometric and thus represents a proxy for $T_\mathrm{eff}$,
168: which in turn correlates with mass for coeval objects. The plot covers a mass range from $\sim 20$
169: to $\sim 8\,M_{\mathrm{Jup}}$. IPMOs are shown as crosses; the solid lines
170: are linear fits to the colours of the field objects and thus delineate the photospheric level in these
171: figures.
172:
173: As can be seen in this plot, the majority of the IPMOs have IRAC colours indistinguishable from the
174: photospheric values and can thus be assumed to have either no disk or only small amounts of
175: dust in the inner disk. Sources that lack excess in our data include
176: SOri\,54, SOri\,55, SOri\,56 for which \citet{2007A&A...472L...9Z} reported disk detections
177: based on the shallow GTO IRAC images. If we use the IRAC3 colour as disk criterion (upper panel), we find
178: that four objects -- SOri\,71, SOri\,60, SOri\,66, SOri\,58 -- show excess at the 3$\sigma$ level, i.e.
179: 4 out of 17 or $24\pm ^{13}_{11}$\%. Since disk excesses may appear only beyond 5.8$\,\mu m$, the result
180: from IRAC3 should be considered to be a lower limit.
181:
182: Based on the IRAC4 colour (lower panel), we find four sources -- SOri\,71, SOri\,J053949.5-023130, SOri\,60,
183: and SOri\,65 -- with $>3\sigma$ colour excesses, which we consider to be primary disk detections.\footnote{The
184: object SOri\,66, albeit having a high I1-I4 colour of $1.88$\,mag, is not counted here, because it has a large
185: errorbar in IRAC4. A particular case may be the object SOri\,58, which does have excess in IRAC3, but appears
186: below the photospheric level in IRAC4. This object has been identified to have a disk by \citet{2007A&A...472L...9Z},
187: based on a IRAC4 flux which is significantly higher than our measurement. Possible reasons for these ambiguous
188: findings include significant background variations in that area, which might hamper accurate photometry.}
189: In all four cases the excess increases significantly in IRAC channel 4 compared with channel
190: 3, indicating rising flux levels towards longer wavelengths, a clear signature of disk emission.
191: With the exception of SOri\,65, these objects have been published previously as disk-bearing very
192: low mass sources \citep{2007A&A...470..903C, 2007A&A...472L...9Z}. This gives a disk fraction of 4
193: out of 14 or $29\pm ^{16}_{13}$\%. Here we do not count the three objects with upper limits well-above
194: the photospheric level, for which we cannot decide if they have disk excess or not. Disk frequencies
195: derived from IRAC3 and IRAC4 are thus consistent; since the value determined from IRAC4 is likely
196: to be more robust, we put more emphasis on this result. We note that the disk fraction in our sample
197: might still be somewhat higher than given here, due to the combined effects of photometric uncertainties
198: and contaminating field objects \citep[see the dicussion in][]{2007A&A...470..903C}.
199:
200: We now compare our disk detection rate with previous results for more massive objects in $\sigma$\,Ori,
201: as given by \citet{2007ApJ...662.1067H} based on IRAC data: 15\% for HAeBe stars, 27\% for intermediate-mass
202: T Tauri stars, 36\% for T Tauri stars, 33\% for brown dwarfs. The value for brown dwarfs is in agreement with
203: the disk fraction of 33\% derived by \citet{2003AJ....126.1515J} from ground-based L'-band imaging. A higher
204: brown dwarf disk fraction of 47\% has been published by \citet{2007A&A...470..903C}. For the IMPO range
205: (objects with $M\lesssim 20\,M_{\mathrm{Jup}}$), we now derive a disk fraction of 29\%, which is compatible
206: with the values for T Tauri stars and brown dwarfs within the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties. We do not see a trend to
207: higher disk frequencies in the IPMO range, as claimed by \citet{2007A&A...472L...9Z}, instead the evidence points
208: to comparable disk fractions for planetary mass objects, brown dwarfs, and T Tauri stars, i.e. over more than
209: two orders of magnitude in object mass ($0.008\ldots 2\,M_{\odot}$).
210:
211: We note that two of the objects with disk excess, SOri\,66 and SOri\,71, stand out from the rest of the
212: sample, as they show excessively strong H$\alpha$ emission with equivalent widths of $\sim 100$ and
213: $\sim 700$\AA, respectively \citep{2001A&A...377L...9B,2002A&A...393L..85B}. This indicates that the
214: presence of a dusty disks is likely accompanied by ongoing gas accretion, causing intense H$\alpha$
215: emission, as observed in T Tauri stars and brown dwarfs.
216:
217: \section{The case of SOri\,70}
218: \label{sori70}
219:
220: The faintest target in our sample, SOri\,70, has been reported originally as a $\sim 3\,M_{\mathrm{Jup}}$
221: IPMO with tentative spectral type T5.5 \citep{2002ApJ...578..536Z} . If confirmed, it would be the lowest
222: mass free-floating object found to date. Its mass would put it close to or even beyond the predicted opacity
223: limit for fragmentation \citep[see][and references therein]{2007prpl.conf..149B}, and thus poses a challenge
224: for star formation theory. However, \citet{2004ApJ...604..827B} have questioned the cluster membership (and
225: thus the extremely low mass) of SOri\,70, and argue that its near-infrared spectrum is perfectly consistent
226: with a foreground dwarf with spectral type $\sim$T6-7. In response, \citet{2004astro.ph.10678M} reinterated
227: the claim for cluster membership and youth mainly based on the $(H-K)$ colour of SOri\,70, which is unusually
228: high for a T dwarf, and is interpreted as evidence for low surface gravity. To date, the nature of this object
229: remains unclear. Our deep IRAC images now allow a re-investigation of the issue.
230:
231: SOri\,70 is clearly detected in IRAC channels 1 and 2. In addition, it is detected in IRAC3,
232: with a $\sim 4\sigma$ significance (peak countrate over background noise). The IRAC3 flux uncertainty
233: has been derived based on the very fact that the object is just detected -- if it were $\gtrsim 25$\%
234: fainter than the estimated 17.2\,mag, we would not be able to see it. In \ref{f2} we plot
235: its IRAC colours vs. spectral type in comparison with measurements for field T dwarfs, taken from
236: \citet{2006ApJ...651..502P}. SOri\,70 is tentatively plotted spectral type T6 (average of the two
237: available literature estimates).
238:
239: As can be seen in this figure, the field T dwarfs form a clear
240: sequence, whereas SOri\,70 stands out: In both IRAC colours, it appears to have some excess. Compared
241: with the mean trend for the field T dwarfs, the significance of this excess is $\sim 2\sigma$
242: in both IRAC2 and IRAC3. This excess cannot be accounted for by uncertainties in the spectral
243: type, since the $3.6-5.8\,\mu m$ colour saturates in the late T dwarf regime and reaches maximum values
244: of $\sim 1.2$ -- compared with 1.6 for SOri\,70. It should also be pointed out that SOri\,70 is
245: brighter than the more massive L5 dwarf SOri\,67 in IRAC2 and 3, again indicating an unusual SED for
246: this object.
247:
248: There are two possible origins for a mid-infrared colour excess in SOri\,70: a) As reported by \citet{2007ApJ...655.1079L},
249: gravity affects the near/mid-infrared colours of mid/late T dwarfs in the sense that it can produce
250: a significant excess at 2-6$\mu m$ for low-gravity objects. b) Similarly to the L type IPMOs in $\sigma$\,Ori,
251: SOri\,70 might harbour a dusty disk, which produces the IRAC excess. Both possibilities provide
252: additional evidence for youth, and thus the mid-infrared excess bolsters the claim that it is the lowest mass
253: free-floating object identified thus far. In case the mid-infrared excess is due to a dusty disk, this can be
254: interpreted as evidence for a star-like infancy. While the uncertainties in the IRAC fluxes are too large at this
255: stage for a definitive answer, these new findings certainly motivate further follow-up work on this
256: target.
257:
258: \section{Summary}
259: \label{sum}
260:
261: We have conducted a disk survey for isolated planetary mass objects, based on deep observations with
262: the Spitzer Space Telescope. Our targets comprise the full sample of spectroscopically
263: confirmed IPMOs in the $\sigma$\,Orionis cluster. As a pioneering study, the results presented here
264: are not intended to be the last word on the subject. Instead, we intend this Letter to serve as an
265: important step towards a more profound understanding of the nature and origin of the lowest mass
266: objects found in isolation.
267:
268: A substantial fraction of our targets exhibits mid-infrared excess emission indicative for the existence
269: of a dusty disk.
270: From our IRAC data, we derive a disk fraction of $29\pm ^{16}_{13}$\% (4/14) at 8.0\,$\mu m$. A similar
271: value is found at 5.8\,$\mu m$. These results
272: are fully consistent with the disk frequencies derived for T Tauri stars and brown dwarfs in the same cluster.
273: The detection of dusty disks around IPMOs in $\sigma$\,Ori is another firm evidence for their nature
274: as lowest mass members of this young cluster. The finding clearly establishes that objects at the
275: bottom of the IMF can harbour dusty disks with lifetimes of at least 2-4\,Myr, the most likely age of the
276: $\sigma$\,Ori. Thus, our results fit into previous claims for a T Tauri-like phase in the planetary mass regime
277: \citep{2002A&A...393..597N,2005ApJ...635L..93L,2006ApJ...644..364A,2006ApJ...647L.167J}. Disk fractions and
278: thus lifetimes are similar for objects spanning more two orders of magnitude in mass (0.008 to 2$\,M_{\odot}$),
279: possibly indicating that stars, brown dwarfs, and IPMOs share a common origin. Star formation
280: theory thus has to account for a number of objects with masses below the Deuterium burning limit.
281:
282: Our sample includes SOri\,70, the faintest candidate member so far in $\sigma$\,Ori, which is detected
283: in our IRAC images from 3.6 to 5.8$\,\mu m$. Compared with field T dwarfs, the source stands out based
284: on the IRAC colours, with excesses at 4.5 and and 5.8$\,\mu m$ at a $2\sigma$ level. This may be an indication
285: for youth and possibly disk occurence for an object with an estimated mass of 3$\,M_\mathrm{Jup}$
286: \citep{2002ApJ...578..536Z}. Uncertainties are large, though, meaning that this should be seen as motivation
287: for further follow-up rather than a definite confirmation of the 'cluster planet' nature of this object.
288:
289: \acknowledgments
290: This work was supported in part by an NSERC grant to RJ.
291:
292:
293: %\bibliography{ms}
294:
295: \begin{thebibliography}{26}
296: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
297:
298: \bibitem[{{Allers} {et~al.}(2006){Allers}, {Kessler-Silacci}, {Cieza}, \&
299: {Jaffe}}]{2006ApJ...644..364A}
300: {Allers}, K.~N., {Kessler-Silacci}, J.~E., {Cieza}, L.~A., \& {Jaffe}, D.~T.
301: 2006, \apj, 644, 364
302:
303: \bibitem[{{Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s} {et~al.}(2001){Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s},
304: {Zapatero Osorio}, {B{\'e}jar}, {Rebolo}, {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, {Mundt}, \&
305: {Bailer-Jones}}]{2001A&A...377L...9B}
306: {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, D., {Zapatero Osorio}, M.~R., {B{\'e}jar}, V.~J.~S.,
307: {Rebolo}, R., {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, E.~L., {Mundt}, R., \& {Bailer-Jones},
308: C.~A.~L. 2001, \aap, 377, L9
309:
310: \bibitem[{{Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s} {et~al.}(2002){Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s},
311: {Zapatero Osorio}, {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, {B{\'e}jar}, {Rebolo}, \&
312: {Mundt}}]{2002A&A...393L..85B}
313: {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, D., {Zapatero Osorio}, M.~R., {Mart{\'{\i}}n},
314: E.~L., {B{\'e}jar}, V.~J.~S., {Rebolo}, R., \& {Mundt}, R. 2002, \aap, 393,
315: L85
316:
317: \bibitem[{{B{\'e}jar} {et~al.}(2001){B{\'e}jar}, {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, {Zapatero
318: Osorio}, {Rebolo}, {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, {Bailer-Jones}, {Mundt},
319: {Baraffe}, {Chabrier}, \& {Allard}}]{2001ApJ...556..830B}
320: {B{\'e}jar}, V.~J.~S., {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, E.~L., {Zapatero Osorio}, M.~R.,
321: {Rebolo}, R., {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, D., {Bailer-Jones}, C.~A.~L.,
322: {Mundt}, R., {Baraffe}, I., {Chabrier}, C., \& {Allard}, F. 2001, \apj, 556,
323: 830
324:
325: \bibitem[{{Bonnell} {et~al.}(2007){Bonnell}, {Larson}, \&
326: {Zinnecker}}]{2007prpl.conf..149B}
327: {Bonnell}, I.~A., {Larson}, R.~B., \& {Zinnecker}, H. 2007, Protostars and
328: Planets V, 149
329:
330: \bibitem[{{Burgasser} {et~al.}(2004){Burgasser}, {Kirkpatrick}, {McGovern},
331: {McLean}, {Prato}, \& {Reid}}]{2004ApJ...604..827B}
332: {Burgasser}, A.~J., {Kirkpatrick}, J.~D., {McGovern}, M.~R., {McLean}, I.~S.,
333: {Prato}, L., \& {Reid}, I.~N. 2004, \apj, 604, 827
334:
335: \bibitem[{{Caballero} {et~al.}(2007){Caballero}, {B{\'e}jar}, {Rebolo},
336: {Eisl{\"o}ffel}, {Zapatero Osorio}, {Mundt}, {Barrado Y Navascu{\'e}s},
337: {Bihain}, {Bailer-Jones}, {Forveille}, \&
338: {Mart{\'{\i}}n}}]{2007A&A...470..903C}
339: {Caballero}, J.~A., {B{\'e}jar}, V.~J.~S., {Rebolo}, R., {Eisl{\"o}ffel}, J.,
340: {Zapatero Osorio}, M.~R., {Mundt}, R., {Barrado Y Navascu{\'e}s}, D.,
341: {Bihain}, G., {Bailer-Jones}, C.~A.~L., {Forveille}, T., \& {Mart{\'{\i}}n},
342: E.~L. 2007, \aap, 470, 903
343:
344: \bibitem[{{Hern{\'a}ndez} {et~al.}(2007){Hern{\'a}ndez}, {Hartmann}, {Megeath},
345: {Gutermuth}, {Muzerolle}, {Calvet}, {Vivas}, {Brice{\~n}o}, {Allen},
346: {Stauffer}, {Young}, \& {Fazio}}]{2007ApJ...662.1067H}
347: {Hern{\'a}ndez}, J., {Hartmann}, L., {Megeath}, T., {Gutermuth}, R.,
348: {Muzerolle}, J., {Calvet}, N., {Vivas}, A.~K., {Brice{\~n}o}, C., {Allen},
349: L., {Stauffer}, J., {Young}, E., \& {Fazio}, G. 2007, \apj, 662, 1067
350:
351: \bibitem[{{Jayawardhana} {et~al.}(2003){Jayawardhana}, {Ardila}, {Stelzer}, \&
352: {Haisch}}]{2003AJ....126.1515J}
353: {Jayawardhana}, R., {Ardila}, D.~R., {Stelzer}, B., \& {Haisch}, K.~E. 2003,
354: \aj, 126, 1515
355:
356: \bibitem[{{Jayawardhana} \& {Ivanov}(2006)}]{2006ApJ...647L.167J}
357: {Jayawardhana}, R., \& {Ivanov}, V.~D. 2006, \apjl, 647, L167
358:
359: \bibitem[Leggett et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...655.1079L} Leggett, S.~K., Saumon,
360: D., Marley, M.~S., Geballe, T.~R., Golimowski, D.~A., Stephens, D., \& Fan,
361: X.\ 2007, \apj, 655, 1079
362:
363: \bibitem[{{Lucas} \& {Roche}(2000)}]{2000MNRAS.314..858L}
364: {Lucas}, P.~W., \& {Roche}, P.~F. 2000, \mnras, 314, 858
365:
366: \bibitem[{{Luhman} {et~al.}(2005){Luhman}, {Adame}, {D'Alessio}, {Calvet},
367: {Hartmann}, {Megeath}, \& {Fazio}}]{2005ApJ...635L..93L}
368: {Luhman}, K.~L., {Adame}, L., {D'Alessio}, P., {Calvet}, N., {Hartmann}, L.,
369: {Megeath}, S.~T., \& {Fazio}, G.~G. 2005, \apjl, 635, L93
370:
371: \bibitem[{{Luhman} {et~al.}(2007){Luhman}, {Joergens}, {Lada}, {Muzerolle},
372: {Pascucci}, \& {White}}]{2007prpl.conf..443L}
373: {Luhman}, K.~L., {Joergens}, V., {Lada}, C., {Muzerolle}, J., {Pascucci}, I.,
374: \& {White}, R. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 443
375:
376: \bibitem[{{Mart{\'{\i}}n}(2004)}]{2004astro.ph.10678M}
377: {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, E.~L. 2004, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints
378:
379: \bibitem[{{Mart{\'{\i}}n} {et~al.}(2001){Mart{\'{\i}}n}, {Zapatero Osorio},
380: {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, {B{\'e}jar}, \& {Rebolo}}]{2001ApJ...558L.117M}
381: {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, E.~L., {Zapatero Osorio}, M.~R., {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s},
382: D., {B{\'e}jar}, V.~J.~S., \& {Rebolo}, R. 2001, \apjl, 558, L117
383:
384: \bibitem[McGovern et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...600.1020M} McGovern, M.~R.,
385: Kirkpatrick, J.~D., McLean, I.~S., Burgasser, A.~J., Prato, L., \&
386: Lowrance, P.~J.\ 2004, \apj, 600, 1020
387:
388: \bibitem[{{Mohanty} {et~al.}(2005){Mohanty}, {Jayawardhana}, \&
389: {Basri}}]{2005ApJ...626..498M}
390: {Mohanty}, S., {Jayawardhana}, R., \& {Basri}, G. 2005, \apj, 626, 498
391:
392: \bibitem[{{Muzerolle} {et~al.}(2005){Muzerolle}, {Luhman}, {Brice{\~n}o},
393: {Hartmann}, \& {Calvet}}]{2005ApJ...625..906M}
394: {Muzerolle}, J., {Luhman}, K.~L., {Brice{\~n}o}, C., {Hartmann}, L., \&
395: {Calvet}, N. 2005, \apj, 625, 906
396:
397: \bibitem[{{Natta} {et~al.}(2002){Natta}, {Testi}, {Comer{\'o}n}, {Oliva},
398: {D'Antona}, {Baffa}, {Comoretto}, \& {Gennari}}]{2002A&A...393..597N}
399: {Natta}, A., {Testi}, L., {Comer{\'o}n}, F., {Oliva}, E., {D'Antona}, F.,
400: {Baffa}, C., {Comoretto}, G., \& {Gennari}, S. 2002, \aap, 393, 597
401:
402: \bibitem[{{Patten} {et~al.}(2006){Patten}, {Stauffer}, {Burrows}, {Marengo},
403: {Hora}, {Luhman}, {Sonnett}, {Henry}, {Raghavan}, {Megeath}, {Liebert}, \&
404: {Fazio}}]{2006ApJ...651..502P}
405: {Patten}, B.~M., {Stauffer}, J.~R., {Burrows}, A., {Marengo}, M., {Hora},
406: J.~L., {Luhman}, K.~L., {Sonnett}, S.~M., {Henry}, T.~J., {Raghavan}, D.,
407: {Megeath}, S.~T., {Liebert}, J., \& {Fazio}, G.~G. 2006, \apj, 651, 502
408:
409: \bibitem[{{Scholz} {et~al.}(2007){Scholz}, {Jayawardhana}, {Wood}, {Meeus},
410: {Stelzer}, {Walker}, \& {O'Sullivan}}]{2007ApJ...660.1517S}
411: {Scholz}, A., {Jayawardhana}, R., {Wood}, K., {Meeus}, G., {Stelzer}, B.,
412: {Walker}, C., \& {O'Sullivan}, M. 2007, \apj, 660, 1517
413:
414: \bibitem[Sherry et al. (2004)]{2004AJ....128.2316S} Sherry, W.~H., Walter,
415: F.~M., \& Wolk, S.~J.\ 2004, \aj, 128, 2316
416:
417: \bibitem[{{Whitworth} {et~al.}(2007){Whitworth}, {Bate}, {Nordlund},
418: {Reipurth}, \& {Zinnecker}}]{2007prpl.conf..459W}
419: {Whitworth}, A., {Bate}, M.~R., {Nordlund}, {\AA}., {Reipurth}, B., \&
420: {Zinnecker}, H. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 459
421:
422: \bibitem[{{Zapatero Osorio} {et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{a}}){Zapatero Osorio},
423: {B{\'e}jar}, {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, \&
424: {Rebolo}}]{2002ApJ...569L..99Z}
425: {Zapatero Osorio}, M.~R., {B{\'e}jar}, V.~J.~S., {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, E.~L.,
426: {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, D., \& {Rebolo}, R. 2002{\natexlab{a}}, \apjl,
427: 569, L99
428:
429: \bibitem[{{Zapatero Osorio} {et~al.}(2000){Zapatero Osorio}, {B{\'e}jar},
430: {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, {Rebolo}, {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, {Bailer-Jones}, \&
431: {Mundt}}]{2000Sci...290..103Z}
432: {Zapatero Osorio}, M.~R., {B{\'e}jar}, V.~J.~S., {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, E.~L.,
433: {Rebolo}, R., {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, D., {Bailer-Jones}, C.~A.~L., \&
434: {Mundt}, R. 2000, Science, 290, 103
435:
436: \bibitem[{{Zapatero Osorio} {et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{b}}){Zapatero Osorio},
437: {B{\'e}jar}, {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, {Rebolo}, {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, {Mundt},
438: {Eisl{\"o}ffel}, \& {Caballero}}]{2002ApJ...578..536Z}
439: {Zapatero Osorio}, M.~R., {B{\'e}jar}, V.~J.~S., {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, E.~L.,
440: {Rebolo}, R., {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, D., {Mundt}, R., {Eisl{\"o}ffel},
441: J., \& {Caballero}, J.~A. 2002{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 578, 536
442:
443: \bibitem[{{Zapatero Osorio} {et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{c}}){Zapatero Osorio},
444: {B{\'e}jar}, {Pavlenko}, {Rebolo}, {Allende Prieto}, {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, \&
445: {Garc{\'{\i}}a L{\'o}pez}}]{2002A&A...384..937Z}
446: {Zapatero Osorio}, M.~R., {B{\'e}jar}, V.~J.~S., {Pavlenko}, Y., {Rebolo}, R.,
447: {Allende Prieto}, C., {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, E.~L., \& {Garc{\'{\i}}a L{\'o}pez},
448: R.~J. 2002{\natexlab{c}}, \aap, 384, 937
449:
450: \bibitem[{{Zapatero Osorio} {et~al.}(2007){Zapatero Osorio}, {Caballero},
451: {B{\'e}jar}, {Rebolo}, {Barrado Y Navascu{\'e}s}, {Bihain}, {Eisl{\"o}ffel},
452: {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, {Bailer-Jones}, {Mundt}, {Forveille}, \&
453: {Bouy}}]{2007A&A...472L...9Z}
454: {Zapatero Osorio}, M.~R., {Caballero}, J.~A., {B{\'e}jar}, V.~J.~S., {Rebolo},
455: R., {Barrado Y Navascu{\'e}s}, D., {Bihain}, G., {Eisl{\"o}ffel}, J.,
456: {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, E.~L., {Bailer-Jones}, C.~A.~L., {Mundt}, R., {Forveille},
457: T., \& {Bouy}, H. 2007, \aap, 472, L9
458:
459: \end{thebibliography}
460:
461: \clearpage
462: \newpage
463:
464: \begin{deluxetable}{llccccccl}
465: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
466: \tablecaption{Targets and Spitzer photometry in the $\sigma$\,Ori cluster\label{targets_so}}
467: \tablewidth{0pt}
468: \tablehead{
469: \colhead{Name} & \colhead{SpT\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{I\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{I-J\tablenotemark{b}} &
470: \colhead{3.6\,$\mu$} & \colhead{4.5\,$\mu$} & \colhead{5.8\,$\mu$} & \colhead{8.0\,$\mu$} &\colhead{comment} \\
471: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(mag)} &\colhead{(mag)} &
472: \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)} &\\}
473: \tablecolumns{7}
474: \startdata
475: SOri71 & L0 & 20.02 & 2.88 & $15.24\pm 0.06$ & $14.83\pm 0.06$ & $14.29\pm 0.08$ & $13.84\pm 0.13$ & disk\\ % 05 39 00.2 -02 37 06
476: SOri47 & L1.5 & 20.53 & 3.15 & $14.87\pm 0.06$ & $14.91\pm 0.06$ & $14.77\pm 0.11$ & $14.90\pm 0.33$ &\\ % 05 38 14.5 -02 40 16
477: SOri50 & M9 & 20.66 & 3.12 & $15.66\pm 0.06$ & $15.64\pm 0.06$ & $15.95\pm 0.30$ & $15.63\pm 0.70$ &\\ % 05 39 10.8 -02 37 15
478: SOri51 & M9 & 20.71 & 3.50 & $15.42\pm 0.06$ & $15.30\pm 0.06$ & $15.19\pm 0.15$ & $15.35\pm 0.51$ &\\ % 05 39 03.2 -02 30 20
479: SOri53 & M9 & 21.17 & 3.28 & $16.02\pm 0.06$ & $15.84\pm 0.06$ & $16.69\pm 0.63$ & $15.47\pm 0.58$ &\\ % 05 38 25.1 -02 48 03
480: SOri54 & M9.5 & 21.29 & 3.30 & $15.8\pm 0.1$\tablenotemark{c} & $\sim 15.6$\tablenotemark{c,d} & $\sim 15.3$\tablenotemark{d} & $>15.1$ \\ % 05 38 33.3 -02 21 00
481: SOri55 & M9 & 21.32 & 3.10 & $16.41\pm 0.06$ & $16.19\pm 0.07$ & $16.18\pm 0.37$ & $15.83\pm 0.90$ &\\ % 05 37 25.9 -02 34 32
482: SOri56 & L0.5 & 21.74 & 3.30 & $16.12\pm 0.06$ & $15.79\pm 0.06$ & $15.62\pm 0.22$ & $15.27\pm 0.48$ &\\ % 05 39 00.9 -02 21 42
483: SOri58 & L0 & 21.90 & 3.30 & $16.43\pm 0.06$ & $16.19\pm 0.07$ & $15.52\pm 0.20$ & $\sim 16.7$\tablenotemark{d} & disk?\\ % 05 39 03.6 -02 25 36
484: SOri\,J053949.5-023130 &NA & 22.04 & 3.15 & $16.49\pm 0.06$ & $16.32\pm 0.07$ & $15.73\pm 0.25$ & $15.05\pm 0.38$ & disk\\
485: SOri60 & L2 & 22.75 & 3.58 & $16.61\pm 0.06$ & $16.34\pm 0.07$ & $15.34\pm 0.18$ & $14.34\pm 0.20$ & disk\\ % 05 39 37.5 -02 30 42
486: SOri62 & L2 & 23.03 & 3.59 & $16.50\pm 0.06$ & $16.36\pm 0.07$ & $16.02\pm 0.32$ & $\sim 17.2$\tablenotemark{d} &\\ % 05 39 42.1 -02 30 31
487: SOri65 & L3.5 & 23.23 & 3.33 & $16.72\pm 0.07$ & $16.60\pm 0.08$ & $16.05\pm 0.33$ & $15.05\pm 0.38$ & disk\\ % 05 38 26.1 -02 23 05
488: SOri66 & L3.5 & 23.23 & 3.40 & $17.41\pm 0.1$\tablenotemark{c} & $16.87\pm 0.1$\tablenotemark{c} & $16.05\pm 0.33$ & $15.53\pm 0.62$ & disk?\\ % 05 37 24.7 -02 31 52
489: SOri67 & L5 & 23.40 & 3.49 & $17.75\pm 0.10$ & $17.64\pm 0.16$ & $\sim 17.6\tablenotemark{d} $ & $>15.1$ &\\ % 05 38 12.6 -02 21 38
490: SOri68 & L5 & 23.77 & 3.59 & $16.49\pm 0.06$ & $16.39\pm 0.07$ & $>16.2$ & $>15.1$ & \\ % 05 38 39.1 -02 28 05
491: SOri69 & T0 & 23.89 & 3.64 & $16.87\pm 0.07$ & $17.14\pm 0.12$ & $>16.2$ & $>15.1$ & \\ % 05 39 18.1 -02 28 55
492: SOri70 & T & 25.03 & 4.75 & $18.83\pm 0.25$ & $17.14\pm 0.11$ & $\sim 17.2$\tablenotemark{d} & $>15.1$ & \\ % 05 38 10.1 -02 36 26
493: \enddata
494: \tablenotetext{a}{spectral types from \citet{2001ApJ...558L.117M,2001A&A...377L...9B,2002ApJ...578..536Z,2002A&A...393L..85B}}
495: \tablenotetext{b}{optica/NIR photometry from \citet{2000Sci...290..103Z,2002ApJ...578..536Z,2007A&A...470..903C}}
496: \tablenotetext{c}{fluxes measured in GTO images}
497: \tablenotetext{d}{uncertainty is approximately $\pm 0.5$\,mag}
498: \end{deluxetable}
499:
500:
501: \clearpage
502:
503: \begin{figure}
504: \center
505: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=10cm]{f1b.ps}\\
506: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=10cm]{f1a.ps}
507: \caption{IRAC colours for IMPOs in $\sigma$\,Ori (crosses) in comparison with field M/L dwarfs
508: \citep[][solid line]{2006ApJ...651..502P}. Objects with $>3\sigma$ excess with respect to the
509: field dwarfs are marked with squares.
510: \label{f1}}
511: \end{figure}
512:
513: \clearpage
514: \newpage
515:
516: \begin{figure}
517: \center
518: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=10cm]{f2a.ps}\\
519: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=10cm]{f2b.ps}
520: \caption{The IRAC colours of SOri\,70 (square) compared with field T dwarfs \citep[][small crosses]{2006ApJ...651..502P}.
521: \label{f2}}
522: \end{figure}
523:
524: \end{document}
525:
526:
527: