1: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3:
4: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
5: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
6: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
7: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
8:
9: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
10: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
11: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
12: %\usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
13:
14:
15:
16: %\preprint{APS/123-QED}
17: %\makeatletter
18:
19: \begin{document}
20:
21:
22: \title{Upper limit for $\gamma$-ray emission above $140\,\mathrm{GeV}$
23: from the dwarf spheroidal galaxy Draco}% Force line breaks with \\
24:
25: % authors 06 November 2007 Format ApJ (rkb)
26: %
27: \author{
28: J.~Albert\altaffilmark{a},
29: E.~Aliu\altaffilmark{b},
30: H.~Anderhub\altaffilmark{c},
31: P.~Antoranz\altaffilmark{d},
32: M.~Backes\altaffilmark{h},
33: C.~Baixeras\altaffilmark{e},
34: J.~A.~Barrio\altaffilmark{d},
35: H.~Bartko\altaffilmark{f},
36: D.~Bastieri\altaffilmark{g},
37: J.~K.~Becker\altaffilmark{h},
38: W.~Bednarek\altaffilmark{i},
39: K.~Berger\altaffilmark{a},
40: C.~Bigongiari\altaffilmark{g},
41: A.~Biland\altaffilmark{c},
42: R.~K.~Bock\altaffilmark{f,}\altaffilmark{g},
43: P.~Bordas\altaffilmark{j},
44: V.~Bosch-Ramon\altaffilmark{j},
45: T.~Bretz\altaffilmark{a},
46: I.~Britvitch\altaffilmark{c},
47: M.~Camara\altaffilmark{d},
48: E.~Carmona\altaffilmark{f},
49: A.~Chilingarian\altaffilmark{k},
50: S.~Commichau\altaffilmark{c},
51: J.~L.~Contreras\altaffilmark{d},
52: J.~Cortina\altaffilmark{b},
53: M.T.~Costado\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{v},
54: V.~Curtef\altaffilmark{h},
55: V.~Danielyan\altaffilmark{k},
56: F.~Dazzi\altaffilmark{g},
57: A.~De Angelis\altaffilmark{n},
58: C.~Delgado\altaffilmark{m},
59: R.~de~los~Reyes\altaffilmark{d},
60: B.~De Lotto\altaffilmark{n},
61: M.~De Maria\altaffilmark{n},
62: F.~De Sabata\altaffilmark{n},
63: D.~Dorner\altaffilmark{a},
64: M.~Doro\altaffilmark{g},
65: M.~Errando\altaffilmark{b},
66: M.~Fagiolini\altaffilmark{o},
67: D.~Ferenc\altaffilmark{p},
68: E.~Fern\'andez\altaffilmark{b},
69: R.~Firpo\altaffilmark{b},
70: M.~V.~Fonseca\altaffilmark{d},
71: L.~Font\altaffilmark{e},
72: M.~Fuchs\altaffilmark{f},
73: N.~Galante\altaffilmark{f},
74: R.J.~Garc\'{\i}a-L\'opez\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{v},
75: M.~Garczarczyk\altaffilmark{f},
76: M.~Gaug\altaffilmark{m},
77: F.~Goebel\altaffilmark{f},
78: D.~Hakobyan\altaffilmark{k},
79: M.~Hayashida\altaffilmark{f},
80: T.~Hengstebeck\altaffilmark{q},
81: A.~Herrero\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{v},
82: D.~H\"ohne\altaffilmark{a},
83: J.~Hose\altaffilmark{f},
84: S.~Huber\altaffilmark{a},
85: C.~C.~Hsu\altaffilmark{f},
86: P.~Jacon\altaffilmark{i},
87: T.~Jogler\altaffilmark{f},
88: R.~Kosyra\altaffilmark{f},
89: D.~Kranich\altaffilmark{c},
90: A.~Laille\altaffilmark{p},
91: E.~Lindfors\altaffilmark{l},
92: S.~Lombardi\altaffilmark{g},
93: F.~Longo\altaffilmark{n},
94: M.~L\'opez\altaffilmark{d},
95: E.~Lorenz\altaffilmark{c,}\altaffilmark{f},
96: P.~Majumdar\altaffilmark{f},
97: G.~Maneva\altaffilmark{r},
98: N.~Mankuzhiyil\altaffilmark{n},
99: K.~Mannheim\altaffilmark{a},
100: M.~Mariotti\altaffilmark{g},
101: M.~Mart\'\i nez\altaffilmark{b},
102: D.~Mazin\altaffilmark{b},
103: C.~Merck\altaffilmark{f},
104: M.~Meucci\altaffilmark{o},
105: M.~Meyer\altaffilmark{a},
106: J.~M.~Miranda\altaffilmark{d},
107: R.~Mirzoyan\altaffilmark{f},
108: S.~Mizobuchi\altaffilmark{f},
109: M.~Moles\altaffilmark{w},
110: A.~Moralejo\altaffilmark{b},
111: D.~Nieto\altaffilmark{d},
112: K.~Nilsson\altaffilmark{l},
113: J.~Ninkovic\altaffilmark{f},
114: E.~O\~na-Wilhelmi\altaffilmark{b},
115: N.~Otte\altaffilmark{f,}\altaffilmark{q},
116: I.~Oya\altaffilmark{d},
117: M.~Panniello\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{x},
118: R.~Paoletti\altaffilmark{o},
119: J.~M.~Paredes\altaffilmark{j},
120: M.~Pasanen\altaffilmark{l},
121: D.~Pascoli\altaffilmark{g},
122: F.~Pauss\altaffilmark{c},
123: R.~Pegna\altaffilmark{o},
124: M.~A.~P\'erez-Torres\altaffilmark{w},
125: M.~Persic\altaffilmark{n,}\altaffilmark{s},
126: L.~Peruzzo\altaffilmark{g},
127: A.~Piccioli\altaffilmark{o},
128: F.~Prada\altaffilmark{w},
129: E.~Prandini\altaffilmark{g},
130: N.~Puchades\altaffilmark{b},
131: A.~Raymers\altaffilmark{k},
132: W.~Rhode\altaffilmark{h},
133: M.~Rib\'o\altaffilmark{j},
134: J.~Rico\altaffilmark{b},
135: M.~Rissi\altaffilmark{c,}\altaffilmark{*},
136: A.~Robert\altaffilmark{e},
137: S.~R\"ugamer\altaffilmark{a},
138: A.~Saggion\altaffilmark{g},
139: T.~Y.~Saito\altaffilmark{f},
140: A.~S\'anchez\altaffilmark{e},
141: M.~S\'anchez-Conde\altaffilmark{w},
142: P.~Sartori\altaffilmark{g},
143: V.~Scalzotto\altaffilmark{g},
144: V.~Scapin\altaffilmark{n},
145: R.~Schmitt\altaffilmark{a},
146: T.~Schweizer\altaffilmark{f},
147: M.~Shayduk\altaffilmark{q,}\altaffilmark{f},
148: K.~Shinozaki\altaffilmark{f},
149: S.~N.~Shore\altaffilmark{t},
150: N.~Sidro\altaffilmark{b},
151: A.~Sillanp\"a\"a\altaffilmark{l},
152: D.~Sobczynska\altaffilmark{i},
153: F.~Spanier\altaffilmark{a},
154: A.~Stamerra\altaffilmark{o},
155: L.~S.~Stark\altaffilmark{c,}\altaffilmark{*},
156: L.~Takalo\altaffilmark{l},
157: P.~Temnikov\altaffilmark{r},
158: D.~Tescaro\altaffilmark{b},
159: M.~Teshima\altaffilmark{f},
160: D.~F.~Torres\altaffilmark{u},
161: N.~Turini\altaffilmark{o},
162: H.~Vankov\altaffilmark{r},
163: A.~Venturini\altaffilmark{g},
164: V.~Vitale\altaffilmark{n},
165: R.~M.~Wagner\altaffilmark{f},
166: W.~Wittek\altaffilmark{f},
167: F.~Zandanel\altaffilmark{g},
168: R.~Zanin\altaffilmark{b},
169: J.~Zapatero\altaffilmark{e}
170: }
171: \altaffiltext{a} {Universit\"at W\"urzburg, D-97074 W\"urzburg, Germany}
172: \altaffiltext{b} {IFAE, Edifici Cn., E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain}
173: \altaffiltext{c} {ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Switzerland}
174: \altaffiltext{d} {Universidad Complutense, E-28040 Madrid, Spain}
175: \altaffiltext{e} {Universitat Aut\`onoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
176: \altaffiltext{f} {Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Physik, D-80805 M\"unchen, Germany}
177: \altaffiltext{g} {Universit\`a di Padova and INFN, I-35131 Padova, Italy}
178: \altaffiltext{h} {Universit\"at Dortmund, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany}
179: \altaffiltext{i} {University of \L\'od\'z, PL-90236 Lodz, Poland}
180: \altaffiltext{j} {Universitat de Barcelona, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain}
181: \altaffiltext{k} {Yerevan Physics Institute, AM-375036 Yerevan, Armenia}
182: \altaffiltext{l} {Tuorla Observatory, Turku University, FI-21500 Piikki\"o, Finland}
183: \altaffiltext{m} {Inst. de Astrofisica de Canarias, E-38200, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain}
184: \altaffiltext{n} {Universit\`a di Udine, and INFN Trieste, I-33100 Udine, Italy}
185: \altaffiltext{o} {Universit\`a di Siena, and INFN Pisa, I-53100 Siena, Italy}
186: \altaffiltext{p} {University of California, Davis, CA-95616-8677, USA}
187: \altaffiltext{q} {Humboldt-Universit\"at zu Berlin, D-12489 Berlin, Germany}
188: \altaffiltext{r} {Inst. for Nucl. Research and Nucl. Energy, BG-1784 Sofia, Bulgaria}
189: \altaffiltext{s} {INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico and INFN, I-34131 Trieste, Italy}
190: \altaffiltext{t} {Universit\`a di Pisa, and INFN Pisa, I-56126 Pisa, Italy}
191: \altaffiltext{u} {ICREA \& Institut de Cienci\`es de l'Espai (IEEC-CSIC), E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
192: \altaffiltext{v} {Depto. de Astrofisica, Universidad, E-38206 La Laguna,
193: Tenerife, Spain}
194: \altaffiltext{w} {Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (CSIC), E-18008 Granada, Spain}
195: \altaffiltext{x} {deceased}
196:
197:
198: \altaffiltext{*} {corresponding authors: L.~S.~Stark, lstark@phys.ethz.ch, M.~Rissi, rissim@phys.ethz.ch}
199:
200:
201: \begin{abstract}
202: The nearby dwarf spheroidal galaxy Draco with its high mass to light ratio
203: is one of the most auspicious targets for indirect dark matter (DM)
204: searches. Annihilation of hypothetical DM particles can result in
205: high-energy $\gamma$-rays, e.g. from
206: neutralino annihilation in the supersymmetric framework.\\
207: With the MAGIC telescope a search for a possible DM signal originating from
208: Draco was performed during 2007. The analysis of the data results in a
209: flux upper limit ($2\sigma$) of $1.1~\times~10^{-11}~\mathrm{photons}~\mathrm{cm}^{-2}~\mathrm{sec}^{-1}$
210: for photon energies above $140\,$GeV, assuming a point like
211: source. Furthermore, a comparison with predictions from supersymmetric models
212: is given. While our results do not constrain the mSUGRA phase parameter space,
213: a very high flux enhancement can be ruled out.
214: \end{abstract}
215:
216: \keywords{dark matter --- gamma rays: observations --- galaxies: dwarf --- galaxies: individual (Draco) }
217:
218: %\maketitle
219: \section{Introduction}
220: Astronomical observations provide strong evidence for the existence
221: of a new type of non-luminous, non-baryonic matter,
222: contributing to the total energy density of the universe about six times more
223: than baryonic matter \citep{Spergel2007}.
224: This so-called Dark Matter (DM) makes its presence known through
225: gravitational
226: effects, and could be made of so-far undetected relic
227: particles from the Big Bang. Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMP)
228: are candidates for DM, with the lightest supersymmetric particle (neutralino)
229: being one of the most favored candidates in the list of possible WIMPs.
230: Stable neutralinos are predicted in many supersymmetric (SUSY) extensions of the
231: Standard Model of Particle Physics~\citep{Jungman1995}.
232: Since the neutralinos are Majorana particles, pairs of neutralinos can
233: annihilate and produce Standard Model particles. Direct annihilations
234: into $\gamma\gamma$ or Z$\gamma$ produce a sharp line spectrum with a photon
235: energy depending on the neutralino mass. Unfortunately, these processes are
236: loop-suppressed and therefore very rare.
237: Neutralinos can also annihilate to pairs of $\tau$ or quarks, leading
238: in subsequent processes to $\pi^0$-decays, resulting in a continuous photon spectrum.\\
239: Draco is a dwarf spheroidal galaxy accompanying the Milky Way at a galactocentric
240: distance of about $82\,$kpc. It is characterized by a high mass to light ratio
241: $M/L > 200$, implying a high DM concentration~\citep{Mayer2007,Hooper2006} so complying
242: with the trend generally deduced for low-luminosity galaxies (e.g. \citet{Persic1996}).
243: \section{Expected $\gamma$-Ray Flux From Neutralino Self-Annihilation}
244: %\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
245:
246: The expected $\gamma$-ray flux depends on details of the supersymmetric (SUSY) model as well as
247: on the density distribution of the DM in the observed
248: source. In general, the DM is assumed to be distributed in an extended halo
249: around spheroidal galaxies. The radial profile of the DM distribution in the
250: halo is modeled by a power law, $\rho_{\mathrm{DM}}(r)=Cr^{-\epsilon}$, where the
251: parameter $\epsilon\ge 0$ describes the shape of the DM
252: distribution in the crucial innermost region. $\epsilon=0$ results in a so-called {\it
253: core model} with a central flat region, whereas profiles with
254: $0.7<\epsilon < 1.2$ denote the so-called {\it cusp profiles}.
255: In addition, we chose an exponential cut-off as proposed by~\citet{Kazantzidis2004}:
256: \[\rho_{\mathrm{DM}}=Cr^{-\epsilon}\exp\left(-\frac{r}{r_b}\right)\]
257: with the values for $r_b$, $C$ and $\epsilon$ given in table 1 for a
258: cusp and a core profile for Draco. With the present angular resolution of the
259: MAGIC telescope ($0.1^\circ$), the two models
260: are indistinguishable due to the limited angular resolution of the
261: telescope which smears the determination of the profile (see figure \ref{Draco_figJPsi}).
262: From this figure we can see that the two profiles are discriminated at an
263: angular distance of $0.4^\circ$, where the intrinsic flux is already decreased by
264: a factor 20.
265: Depending on SUSY model parameters,
266: the annihilation cross section, the average number of photons produced per annihilation and the
267: shape of the $\gamma$ spectrum can drastically change. Also a change in
268: the shape of
269: the DM density distribution along the line of sight can significantly change
270: the $\gamma$-ray flux. Formula~(1) describes the expected $\gamma$-ray flux
271: above an energy $E_0$ from neutralino self-annihilation within Draco.
272: $\begin{array}[h]{lclr}
273: \Phi_{\gamma} (E>E_{0}) &=& \frac{1}{4\pi} f_{\mathrm{SUSY}}<J(\Psi)>_{\Delta\Omega}&(1)\\
274: \mathrm{where:}\\
275: f_\mathrm{SUSY}&=&\frac{N_{\gamma}(E>E_0)\left<\sigma v\right>}{2 m_{\chi}^{2}}\\
276: %$<J(\Psi)>_{\Delta\Omega}$&=&$\int\limits_\Omega\int\limits_{\textrm{los}}{\rho^2(\Psi,\Omega,s)\cdotB(\Omega)\,ds\,d\Omega}\\
277: \rho(r) & &\textrm{DM density profile derived for Draco}\\
278: N_{\gamma} & &\textrm{photon yield per annihilation with } E >E_{0} \\
279: m_{\chi}& &\textrm{neutralino mass}\\
280: \left<\sigma v\right>& &\textrm{thermally averaged annihilation cross-section} \\
281: B(\Omega)& &\textrm{Point Spread Function (PSF) of the telescope}\\
282: \Psi& &\textrm{Pointing angle. } (\Psi=0\textrm{ for the center of Draco})\\
283: \Omega& &\textrm{solid angle of the telescope's resolution}\\
284: \textrm{los} & & \textrm{the line of sight}
285: \end{array}
286: $
287:
288:
289:
290:
291:
292: The factor $<J(\Psi)>_\Omega$ is shown for the cusp and the core model in figure \ref{Draco_figJPsi}. Even
293: though this factor converges for both models for small pointing angles $\Psi$
294: to the same value $<J(0)>_\Omega$,
295: there is an uncertainty in the distribution of the DM by
296: the existence of a hypothetical central black hole or a clumpy distribution of
297: the DM~\citep{Strigari2007,Colafrancesco2006}, which could lead to a
298: significant flux enhancement.\\
299: Due to the high predictive power of the mSUGRA framework, where the SUSY breaking effects are transmitted from
300: the high energy scale to the electroweak scale by the graviton,~\citep{Chamseddine1982, Inoue1982b, Inoue1982a, Inoue1983}
301: we simulated several million models
302: using the following parameters: $m_0\le6$~TeV,
303: $m_{1/2}\le4$~TeV,
304: -4~TeV $\le A_0 \le$ 4~TeV, tan$\beta\le 50$ and $\mu > 0$
305: \citep{Stark2005, Gondolo2000}. Figure \ref{Draco_fig1} summarizes the resulting
306: thermally averaged neutralino annihilation cross sections for all
307: models not violating any observational
308: constraints as well as
309: resulting in a total DM relic density $\Omega_{\mathrm{DM}}h^2$ in agreement with the $2\sigma$ upper limit
310: (u.l.) of 0.113 as derived from combined data from SPSS and
311: WMAP~\citep{Tegmark2006}.
312: The yellow points correspond to models with $m_0 \le$ 2 TeV (as favored by particle
313: physics), and the blue points represent $m_0 >$ 2 TeV.
314: Models resulting in a relic density below the lower WMAP-limit of 0.097
315: are included, since neutralinos could contribute only
316: a fraction to the total DM in the universe. For these models (shown as
317: dark blue points and dark yellow points in figure \ref{Draco_fig1}), a scale
318: factor of $\kappa =\left (\frac{\Omega_\chi h^2}{\Omega_{\mathrm{WMAP}}h^2}\right
319: )^2$ is applied to adjust for the DM relic density.\\
320:
321:
322:
323: %\label{dm_flux}
324: %\end{table}
325:
326:
327:
328:
329: \section{Observation of Draco and Analysis}
330: Among all Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescopes in operation, MAGIC is the largest single-dish
331: facility (see e.g. \citep{MAGIC-commissioning, Cortina2005} for a
332: detailed description) and has the lowest energy threshold. MAGIC is located on the Canary
333: Island La Palma ($28.8^\circ$N, $17.8^\circ$W, 2200~m a.s.l.). The field of
334: view (FOV) of the 576-pixel photomultiplier camera is $3.5^\circ$. The angular resolution is $\sim0.1^\circ$ and the energy resolution
335: above 150~GeV is about 25\%. MAGIC has a trigger threshold of $\sim$60~GeV for small zenith
336: angles (ZA), which increases for larger ZAs. \\
337: Data were taken in the false-source tracking (wobble) mode \citep{Fomin1994} with
338: two pointing directions at 24' distance and opposite sides of the source
339: direction in
340: May 2007 for a total observation time of 7.8~hours. Even though the source is
341: expected to be extended, the wobble mode is
342: justified, as at a distance of 24' of the center of Draco the expected flux
343: from this direction is less than 5\% of the flux coming from the center of Draco for
344: both the cusp and the core model (see figure \ref{Draco_figJPsi}). The ZA ranges
345: between $29^\circ$ and $42^\circ$. \\
346:
347:
348: %\begin{table}
349: % \fontsize{10}{11} \selectfont
350: %\begin{center}
351: %\begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|} \hline
352: %designation & abbr. & energy range \\
353: %\hline
354:
355:
356: %\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.09}
357:
358: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1. }
359: Firstly, the calibration
360: of the data~\citep{Gaug2005} was performed. The arrival times
361: of the photons in core pixels ($>6$~photoelectrons (phe)) are required to be within a time window of 4.5~ns
362: and for boundary pixels ($>3$~phe) within a time window of 1.5~ns of a neighboring core pixel. The
363: next step includes the Hillas parameterization of the shower images
364: \citep{Hillas1985}. Two additional parameters, namely the time gradient along the
365: main shower axis and the time spread of the shower pixels, were computed \citep{Tescaro2007}.
366: Hadronic background suppression was achieved using the Random Forest (RF)
367: method~\citep{Breiman2001, Bock2007}, where for each
368: event the so-called \textsc{Hadronness} is computed, based on the Hillas
369: and the time parameters. $\gamma$/hadron separation is realized by a cut in \textsc{Hadronness}, derived
370: from a $\gamma$ Monte Carlo (MC) test sample \citep{Heck1998,Majumdar2005}, requiring a
371: $\gamma$-cut efficiency of 70\%. Moreover, the RF method was also
372: used for the energy estimation. \\
373:
374:
375:
376:
377:
378:
379: \section{Results}
380: We searched for a steady $\gamma$-ray emission from the direction of
381: the dwarf spheroidal galaxy Draco. The analysis energy threshold defined as
382: the peak of the energy distribution of MC generated $\gamma$ events after
383: cuts is 140~GeV. Images of
384: air showers initiated by $\gamma$-rays coming from the center of Draco are characterized by a
385: small
386: $\alpha$ image parameter, which is the angle between the main axis of the
387: shower image and the connecting line between the center of gravity of the
388: shower and the source position in the camera.
389: The distribution of
390: $\alpha$ is shown in figure \ref{alpha} for all events after cuts. No significant excess was
391: found. The $2\sigma$
392: u.l. on the number of excess events was calculated using the method of
393: \citet{Rolke2005}, applying a systematic error of 30\%. The number of excess
394: events were converted into an integral flux u.l.,
395: depending on the assumed underlying spectrum. For a power law with spectral
396: index $-1.5$, typical for a DM annihilation spectrum, and assuming a point
397: like source, the $2\sigma$ u.l. is:
398: \[\Phi_{2\sigma}(E>140~\mathrm{GeV}) = 1.1\times 10^{-11}\,\mathrm{photons}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}.\]
399:
400: For different mSUGRA model parameters using the benchmark points defined in
401: \citep{Battaglia2003} and for other models, we computed the
402: $\gamma$-ray spectra expected from neutralino annihilations.
403: Assuming these underlying spectra, the u.l. on the integrated flux above 140~GeV
404: is computed. Using formula (1) and assuming a DM distribution following
405: the profiles according to table 1, the flux u.l. is displayed in the units of a thermally averaged
406: cross section in table 2 and in figure \ref{Draco_fig1}:
407: \begin{eqnarray*}
408: \begin{array}{rl}
409:
410: F_{2\sigma}=& \frac{\Phi_{2\sigma}(E>E_{0})}{\Phi_{\gamma} (E>E_{0})}<\sigma v>
411: \end{array}
412: \label{eq:flux}
413: \end{eqnarray*}
414: As can be seen, the measured flux u.l. is several orders of magnitude larger
415: than predicted for the smooth DM distribution.
416: But a high clumpy structure of the DM distribution or a central black
417: hole could provide a significant flux enhancement \citep{Strigari2007,Colafrancesco2006}, which would
418: decrease $F_{2\sigma}$. The analysis
419: presented here can set a limit on the flux enhancement depending on the mSUGRA
420: input parameters. For the benchmark models the
421: values for $\kappa <\sigma v>$ and $F_{2\sigma}$ are displayed in table 2 and in
422: figure \ref{Draco_fig1}. For these models, the u.l. on the
423: flux enhancement is around $O(10^3~-~10^9)$.
424:
425: \section{Conclusions}
426: We present the first search for $\gamma$-rays from the direction of Draco
427: using an Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescope (IACT). No signal was detected.
428: The $2\sigma$ u.l. on a steady $\gamma$-ray emission above $140\,\mathrm{GeV}$ originating from Draco does not
429: exceed $1.1\times 10^{-11}\,\mathrm{photons}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ if
430: the underlying spectrum follows a power law with spectral index -1.5.\\
431: For the mSUGRA benchmark models defined in \citep{Battaglia2003} and assuming
432: a smooth DM density distribution for Draco as given in
433: \citep{Sanchez-Conde2007}, our flux upper limits are O($10^3$ - $10^9$) above
434: the predicted values. It is therefore not possible to constrain the mSUGRA
435: phase space by these results, but a very high flux enhancement can be
436: excluded. \\
437: Even though an indirect DM detection by measuring $\gamma$-rays from neutralino
438: annihilation within the halo of Draco seems for present IACTs out of reach,
439: future satellite telescopes like GLAST with lower energy thresholds might be sensitive
440: enough to reach the mSUGRA parameter space.
441:
442:
443: \section{Acknowledgments}
444:
445: We would
446: like to thank the IAC for the excellent working conditions at the
447: Observatory de los Muchachos in La Palma. The support of the
448: German BMBF and MPG, the Italian INFN and the Spanish CICYT is
449: gratefully acknowledged. This work was also supported by ETH
450: Research Grant TH~34/04~3 and the Polish MNiI Grant 1P03D01028.
451:
452: \clearpage
453:
454: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
455: %\bibliography{ms}
456: %This in the bibtex style, is ok.
457:
458: \begin{thebibliography}{28}
459: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
460:
461: \bibitem[{{Albert} {et~al.}(2007)}]{Bock2007}
462: {Albert}, J. {et~al.} 2007, astro-ph/0709.3719
463:
464: \bibitem[{Baixeras {et~al.}(2004)}]{MAGIC-commissioning}
465: Baixeras, C. {et~al.} 2004, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., A518, 188
466:
467: \bibitem[{Battaglia {et~al.}(2004)}]{Battaglia2003}
468: Battaglia, M. {et~al.} 2004, Eur. Phys. J., C33, 273
469:
470: \bibitem[{{Bergstr{\"o}m} \& {Hooper}(2006)}]{Hooper2006}
471: {Bergstr{\"o}m}, L. \& {Hooper}, D. 2006, \prd, 73, 063510
472:
473: \bibitem[{Breiman(2001)}]{Breiman2001}
474: Breiman, L. 2001, Machine Learning, 45, 5
475:
476: \bibitem[{Chamseddine {et~al.}(1982)Chamseddine, Arnowitt, \&
477: Nath}]{Chamseddine1982}
478: Chamseddine, A.~H., Arnowitt, R., \& Nath, P. 1982, Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 970
479:
480: \bibitem[{{Colafrancesco} {et~al.}(2007){Colafrancesco}, {Profumo}, \&
481: {Ullio}}]{Colafrancesco2006}
482: {Colafrancesco}, S., {Profumo}, S., \& {Ullio}, P. 2007, \prd, 75, 023513
483:
484: \bibitem[{Cortina {et~al.}(2005)}]{Cortina2005}
485: Cortina, J. {et~al.} 2005, 5, 359, proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India
486:
487: \bibitem[{Fomin {et~al.}(1994)Fomin, Stepanian, A., Lamb, Lewis, Punch, \&
488: Weekes}]{Fomin1994}
489: Fomin, V.~P., Stepanian, A., A., Lamb, R.~C., Lewis, D.~A., Punch, M., \&
490: Weekes, T.~C. 1994, Astroparticle Physics, 2, 137
491:
492: \bibitem[{Gaug(2005)}]{Gaug2005}
493: Gaug, M. 2005, proc. of the 7th Workshop on Towards a Network of Atmospheric
494: Cherenkov Detectors 2005, Palaiseau, France, 27-29 Apr 2005
495:
496: \bibitem[{Gondolo {et~al.}(2000)Gondolo, Edsjo, Bergstrom, Ullio, \&
497: Baltz}]{Gondolo2000}
498: Gondolo, P., Edsjo, J., Bergstrom, L., Ullio, P., \& Baltz, E.~A. 2000,
499: astro-ph/0012234
500:
501: \bibitem[{Heck {et~al.}(1998)Heck, Schatz, Thouw, Knapp, \&
502: Capdevielle}]{Heck1998}
503: Heck, D., Schatz, G., Thouw, T., Knapp, J., \& Capdevielle, J.~N. 1998,
504: fZKA-6019
505:
506: \bibitem[{Hillas(1985)}]{Hillas1985}
507: Hillas, A.~M. 1985, proc. of the 19th ICRC, La Jolla, 3, 445
508:
509: \bibitem[{Inoue {et~al.}(1982{\natexlab{a}})Inoue, Kakuto, Komatsu, \&
510: Takeshita}]{Inoue1982b}
511: Inoue, K., Kakuto, A., Komatsu, H., \& Takeshita, S. 1982{\natexlab{a}}, Prog.
512: Theor. Phys., 68, 927
513:
514: \bibitem[{Inoue {et~al.}(1982{\natexlab{b}})Inoue, Kakuto, Komatsu, \&
515: Takeshita}]{Inoue1982a}
516: ---. 1982{\natexlab{b}}, Prog. Theor. Phys., 67, 1889
517:
518: \bibitem[{Inoue {et~al.}(1984)Inoue, Kakuto, Komatsu, \& Takeshita}]{Inoue1983}
519: ---. 1984, Prog. Theor. Phys., 71, 413
520:
521: \bibitem[{Jungman \& Kamionkowski(1995)}]{Jungman1995}
522: Jungman, G. \& Kamionkowski, M. 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 3121
523:
524: \bibitem[{{Kazantzidis} {et~al.}(2004){Kazantzidis}, {Mayer}, {Mastropietro},
525: {Diemand}, {Stadel}, \& {Moore}}]{Kazantzidis2004}
526: {Kazantzidis}, S., {Mayer}, L., {Mastropietro}, C., {Diemand}, J., {Stadel},
527: J., \& {Moore}, B. 2004, \apj, 608, 663
528:
529: \bibitem[{Majumdar {et~al.}(2005)Majumdar, Moralejo, Bigongiari, Blanch, \&
530: Sobczynska}]{Majumdar2005}
531: Majumdar, P., Moralejo, A., Bigongiari, C., Blanch, O., \& Sobczynska, D. 2005,
532: 5, 203, proc. of the 29th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2005),
533: Pune, India, 3-11 Aug 2005
534:
535: \bibitem[{Mayer {et~al.}(2007)Mayer, Kazantzidis, Mastropietro, \&
536: Wadsley}]{Mayer2007}
537: Mayer, L., Kazantzidis, S., Mastropietro, C., \& Wadsley, J. 2007, Nature, 445,
538: 738
539:
540: \bibitem[{{Persic} {et~al.}(1996){Persic}, {Salucci}, \& {Stel}}]{Persic1996}
541: {Persic}, M., {Salucci}, P., \& {Stel}, F. 1996, \mnras, 281, 27
542:
543: \bibitem[{Rolke {et~al.}(2005)Rolke, L\'opez, \& Conrad}]{Rolke2005}
544: Rolke, W.~A., L\'opez, A.~M., \& Conrad, J. 2005, Nucl. Instrum. and Meth.,
545: A551, 493
546:
547: \bibitem[{Sanchez-Conde {et~al.}(2007)}]{Sanchez-Conde2007}
548: Sanchez-Conde, M.~A. {et~al.} 2007, Phys. Rev. D 76, 123509
549:
550: \bibitem[{{Spergel} {et~al.}(2007){Spergel}, {Bean}, {Dor{\'e}}, {Nolta},
551: {Bennett}, {Dunkley}, {Hinshaw}, {Jarosik}, {Komatsu}, {Page}, {Peiris},
552: {Verde}, {Halpern}, {Hill}, {Kogut}, {Limon}, {Meyer}, {Odegard}, {Tucker},
553: {Weiland}, {Wollack}, \& {Wright}}]{Spergel2007}
554: {Spergel}, D.~N., {Bean}, R., {Dor{\'e}}, O., {Nolta}, M.~R., {Bennett}, C.~L.,
555: {Dunkley}, J., {Hinshaw}, G., {Jarosik}, N., {Komatsu}, E., {Page}, L.,
556: {Peiris}, H.~V., {Verde}, L., {Halpern}, M., {Hill}, R.~S., {Kogut}, A.,
557: {Limon}, M., {Meyer}, S.~S., {Odegard}, N., {Tucker}, G.~S., {Weiland},
558: J.~L., {Wollack}, E., \& {Wright}, E.~L. 2007, \apjs, 170, 377
559:
560: \bibitem[{Stark {et~al.}(2005)Stark, H{\"a}fliger, Biland, \&
561: Pauss}]{Stark2005}
562: Stark, L.~S., H{\"a}fliger, P., Biland, A., \& Pauss, F. 2005, JHEP, 08, 059
563:
564: \bibitem[{{Strigari} {et~al.}(2007){Strigari}, {Koushiappas}, {Bullock}, \&
565: {Kaplinghat}}]{Strigari2007}
566: {Strigari}, L.~E., {Koushiappas}, S.~M., {Bullock}, J.~S., \& {Kaplinghat}, M.
567: 2007, \prd, 75, 083526
568:
569: \bibitem[{{Tegmark} {et~al.}(2006)}]{Tegmark2006}
570: {Tegmark}, M. {et~al.} 2006, \prd, 74, 123507
571:
572: \bibitem[{Tescaro {et~al.}(2007)}]{Tescaro2007}
573: Tescaro, D. {et~al.} 2007, proc. of the 30th ICRC, Merida, Mexico
574:
575: \end{thebibliography}
576:
577:
578:
579:
580: \begin{center}
581: \begin{table}[h]{\small\center
582: \begin{tabular}{l c c c}
583: \hline
584: profile &$ \epsilon$& $C$ & $r_b (\mathrm{kpc})$ \\
585: \hline
586: %\vspace{-0.2cm}\\
587: %\vspace{0.2cm}
588: cusp &1& $3.1 \times 10^7\,M_{\odot}\,\mathrm{kpc}^{-2}$ &1.189 \\
589: core &0& $3.6 \times 10^8\,M_{\odot}\,\mathrm{kpc}^{-3}$ & 0.238\\
590: \hline
591: \end{tabular}}
592: \label{dm_profile}
593: \caption{Parameters considered for cusp and core DM
594: density profiles~\citep{Sanchez-Conde2007}.}
595: \end{table}
596: \end{center}
597:
598: \clearpage
599:
600: \begin{table*}%{\small\center
601: \rotate{
602: \fontsize{7}{10} \selectfont
603: \begin{tabular}{c| c c c c c c c cccccc }
604: \hline
605: model: & A' & B' & C' & D' & E' & F' & G'&H'
606: \\
607: \hline
608: $m_0$ [GeV] & 107 & 57 & 80 & 101 & 1532 & 3440 & 113 & 244\\
609: $A_0$ [GeV] & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
610: $m_{1/2}$ [GeV] & 600 & 250 & 400 & 525 & 300 & 1000 & 375 & 935\\
611: $\tan\beta$ & 5 & 10 & 10 & 10 & 10 & 10 & 20 & 20\\
612: $m_\chi$ [GeV] & 243 & 95 & 158 & 212 & 121 & 428 & 148 & 389\\
613: \hline
614: \begin{tabular}{c}
615: $\kappa<\sigma v>$\\
616: $[\mathrm{cm}^3\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}]$
617: \end{tabular}
618: & $5.55\cdot 10^{-29}$ & $6.83\cdot 10^{-28}$ & $1.42\cdot 10^{-28}$ & $6.05\cdot 10^{-29}$ & $3.74\cdot 10^{-30}$ & $3.65\cdot 10^{-30}$ & $7.18\cdot 10^{-28}$ & $2.87\cdot 10^{-29}$\\
619: \begin{tabular}{c}
620: $F_{2\sigma}$\\
621: $[\mathrm{cm}^3\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}]$
622: \end{tabular}
623:
624: & $1.63\cdot 10^{-21}$ & $1.79\cdot 10^{-21}$ & $1.00\cdot 10^{-22}$ & $1.15\cdot 10^{-23}$ & $4.82\cdot 10^{-21}$ & $1.42\cdot 10^{-22}$ & $1.11\cdot 10^{-22}$ & $3.92\cdot 10^{-23}$\\
625: \hline
626: \begin{tabular}{l}
627: ul on flux \\
628: enhancement
629: \end{tabular}
630: & $2.9\cdot 10^{7}$& $2.6\cdot 10^{6}$& $7.0\cdot 10^{5}$& $1.9\cdot 10^{5}$& $1.3\cdot 10^{9}$& $3.9\cdot 10^{7}$& $1.5\cdot 10^{5}$& $1.4\cdot 10^{6}$\\
631: \hline
632: \end{tabular}
633:
634:
635: \begin{tabular}{c| c c c c c c c cccccc }
636: \hline
637: model: & I' & J' & K' & L' & $\alpha$ & $\beta$ & $\gamma$ & $\delta$\\
638: \hline
639: $m_0$ [GeV]& 181 & 299 & 1001 & 303&5980 & 180 & 1140 & 4540\\
640: $A_0$ [GeV] & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0&-300 & -2800 & -1800 & 300\\
641: $m_{1/2}$ [GeV]& 350 & 750 & 1300 & 450&680 & 720 & 1120 & 300\\
642: $\tan\beta$ & 35 & 35 & 46 & 47& 50 & 5 & 50 & 35\\
643: $m_\chi$ [GeV]& 138 & 309 & 554 & 181&277 & 301 & 479 & 109\\
644: \hline
645: \begin{tabular}{c}
646: $\kappa<\sigma v>$\\
647: $[\mathrm{cm}^3\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}]$
648: \end{tabular}
649: & $3.17\cdot 10^{-27}$ & $1.67\cdot 10^{-28}$ & $2.22\cdot 10^{-27}$ & $3.85\cdot 10^{-27}$&$2.27\cdot 10^{-26}$ & $9.75\cdot 10^{-28}$ & $9.43\cdot 10^{-29}$ & $1.79\cdot 10^{-26}$\\
650: \begin{tabular}{c}
651: $F_{2\sigma}$\\
652: $[\mathrm{cm}^3\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}]$
653: \end{tabular}
654:
655: & $1.08\cdot 10^{-21}$ & $9.02\cdot 10^{-23}$ & $1.44\cdot 10^{-23}$ & $1.91\cdot 10^{-21}$&$7.22\cdot 10^{-22}$ & $4.78\cdot 10^{-22}$ & $2.97\cdot 10^{-23}$ & $4.39\cdot 10^{-20}$\\
656: \hline
657: \begin{tabular}{l}
658: ul on flux \\
659: enhancement
660: \end{tabular}
661: & $3.4\cdot 10^{5}$& $5.4\cdot 10^{5}$& $6.5\cdot 10^{3}$& $4.9\cdot 10^{5}$&$3.2\cdot 10^{4}$& $4.9\cdot 10^{5}$& $3.1\cdot 10^{5}$& $2.4\cdot 10^{6}$\\
662: \hline
663: \end{tabular}
664: \caption{Thermally averaged neutralino annihilation cross section $<\sigma
665: v>$, the u.l. on the flux $F_{2\sigma}$, displayed in units of $<\sigma v>$,
666: and the $2\sigma$ u.l. on the flux enhancement. Models A' - L' correspond to
667: the benchmark models given by \citep{Battaglia2003}. Models $\alpha$ -
668: $\delta$ are typical models chosen by the authors with $A_0\neq 0$.}}
669: \end{table*}
670:
671: \clearpage
672:
673: \begin{figure}[!hb] \centering
674: \plotone{f1.eps}
675: \caption{The factor $<J(\Psi)>_{\Delta\Omega}$ for the cusp (red)
676: and the core (blue) profile. $\Psi=0$
677: corresponds to the center of Draco. At an angular distance of $0.4^\circ$
678: of the center of Draco,$<J(\Psi)>_{\Delta\Omega}$ is reduced by a factor of around 20
679: for both models. }
680: \label{Draco_figJPsi}
681: \end{figure}
682:
683: \begin{figure}[!hb] \centering
684: \plotone{f2.eps}
685: \caption{Thermally averaged neutralino annihilation cross section as a
686: function of the neutralino mass
687: for mSUGRA models after renormalization to the relic density, as
688: described in the text. The red dots marked with roman letters indicate benchmark models by
689: \citep{Battaglia2003}. The ones marked with greek letters are models chosen
690: by the authors. The red boxes indicate the flux upper limit, displayed in units of
691: $<\sigma v>$, assuming a smooth DM halo as given in table 1. See text for details.}
692:
693:
694: \label{Draco_fig1}
695: \end{figure}
696:
697: \begin{figure}[t] \centering
698: \plotone{f3.eps}
699: \caption{Distribution of the $\alpha$ parameter for $\gamma$-ray candidates coming
700: from the center of Draco (black marker) and background
701: (grey markers) for data taken between 05/09/2007 - 05/20/2007.
702: The energy threshold is 140~GeV. For the signal region ($\alpha<12^\circ$),
703: are the number of ON events: 10883 and the number of OFF
704: events: 10996. With the method of \citep{Rolke2005}, the $2\sigma$ upper limit
705: on excess events is 231.}
706: \label{alpha}
707: \end{figure}
708:
709: \end{document}
710: