1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{}
58: \shortauthors{de Mello et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{Star-formation in the HI bridge between M81 and M82\altaffilmark{1}}
70:
71:
72: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
73: %% author and affiliation information.
74: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
75: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
76: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
77: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
78:
79: \author{D. F. de Mello\altaffilmark{2,3,4} }
80: \author{L. J. Smith\altaffilmark{5,6,7}, E. Sabbi\altaffilmark{5}, J.S. Gallagher\altaffilmark{8}, M. Mountain\altaffilmark{5} \& D.R. Harbeck\altaffilmark{8}}
81:
82: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
83: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
84: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
85: %% affiliation.
86: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations with the NASA/ESA {\it Hubble
87: Space Telescope}, obtained from the Data Archive at the Space Telescope Science
88: Institute, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under NASA contract
89: NAS5--26555. These observations are associated with program \#10915.}
90: \altaffiltext{2}{Observational Cosmology Laboratory, Code 665, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD
91: 20771}
92: \altaffiltext{3}{Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064}
93:
94: \altaffiltext{4}{Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218}
95:
96: \altaffiltext{5}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr., Baltimore, MD 21218}
97:
98: \altaffiltext{6}{ESA Space Telescope Operations Division}
99:
100: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E
101: 6BT, UK}
102:
103: \altaffiltext{8}{Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 475 North Charter Street,
104: Madison, WI 53706}
105:
106: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
107: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
108: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
109: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
110: %% editorial office after submission.
111:
112: \begin{abstract}
113: We present multi-wavelength observations of stellar features in the H\,{\sc i} tidal bridge connecting M81 and M82 in
114: the region called Arp's Loop. We identify eight young star-forming regions from Galaxy Evolution Explorer ultraviolet observations.
115: Four of these objects are also detected at H$\alpha$. We determine the basic star formation history of Arp's Loop using F475W and F814W
116: images obtained with the Advanced Camera for Surveys on board the Hubble Space Telescope. We find both a young ($<$ 10 Myr) and an old ($>1$ Gyr)
117: stellar population with a similar spatial distribution and a metallicity $Z\sim0.004$.
118: We suggest that the old stellar population
119: was formed in the stellar disk of M82 and/or M81 and ejected into the intergalactic medium during a
120: tidal passage ($\sim$ 200--300 Myr ago), whereas the young UV-bright stars have formed in the tidal debris. The UV luminosities of the eight
121: objects are modest and typical of small clusters or OB associations.
122: The tidal bridge between M81--M82 therefore appears to be intermediate between the very low levels
123: of star formation seen in the Magellanic bridge and actively star-forming tidal tails associated with major galaxy mergers.
124: \end{abstract}
125:
126: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
127: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
128: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
129: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
130:
131: \keywords{galaxies: general --- galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: interactions --- galaxies: individual (M81, M82)}
132:
133: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
134: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
135: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
136: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
137: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
138: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
139: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
140: %% each reference.
141:
142:
143: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
144: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
145: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
146: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
147: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
148: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
149: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
150: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
151: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
152: %%
153: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
154: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
155: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
156: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
157:
158: \section{Introduction}
159:
160: The M81 group contains three major closely interacting galaxies: M81, M82 and NGC 3077. Studies of this triple system at radio wavelengths have shown an extremely disturbed H{\sc i} distribution with tidal bridges connecting the three galaxies (e.g. Gottesman \& Weliachew 1975;
161: van der Hulst 1979; Appleton, Davies \& Stephenson 1981; Yun, Ho \& Lo 1994). Within the tidal bridges, H{\sc i} knots with optical counterparts are seen. The most prominent of these to the east/north-east of M81 are Holmberg IX
162: and Arp's Loop or A0952$+$69 (Arp 1965). It has been suggested (e.g. Boyce et al. 2001) that these are forming tidal dwarf galaxies. Numerical simulations of the system by Yun (1999) can successfully reproduce the
163: the H{\sc i} tidal debris if the closest approaches of M82 and NGC 3077 to M81 took place 220 and 280 Myr ago respectively. Arp's loop, the topic of this paper, occurs at the intersection of the three tidal streamers in
164: the simulation of Yun (1999) who gives an H{\sc i} mass of $2.6 \times 10^8$ M$_\odot$. Sun et al. (2005) present very deep wide-field optical continuum images of the M81/M82 galaxy group, and show that groups of young stars are distributed across the entire region between the two galaxies.
165:
166: Although tidal tails usually have blue optical colors (e.g. Schombert et al. 1990), it is not clear whether these colors are due to tidally-disrupted stellar disk material or active star formation in the tails.
167: Recently, ultraviolet (UV) imaging obtained with the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) satellite has shown that regions of bright UV emission, containing recently formed stars, correlate well with regions of high H{\sc i} column density in tidal tails (e.g. Hibbard et al. 2005; Neff et al. 2005). These findings suggest that the combination of UV and H{\sc i} data provides a powerful technique for identifying and studying star formation in the intergalactic medium (IGM) between interacting galaxies. This topic is of importance for earlier epochs in the universe because galaxy interactions, and thus tidal tails were more common, leading to a higher star formation rate in the IGM. This may well have implications for the enrichment of the IGM; Ryan-Weber et al. (2004) have shown that stars forming in the IGM offer a viable alternative to galactic wind enrichment on large scales.
168:
169: We have thus started a study of star formation in the IGM of the M81 galaxy group with the overall aim of elucidating the importance of this mode of
170: star formation. We present results for Arp's loop in this paper and for
171: Holmberg IX in Sabbi et al. (2007). Arp's loop is located 17 arcmin north-east of M81 and its composition was first discussed by Efremov et al. (1986). They resolved the ring-like structure into blue diffuse and star-like objects
172: which they interpreted as young star clusters and associations. Makarova et al. (2002) investigated the stellar population of Arp's loop using photometry obtained with the Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) on board the
173: Hubble Space Telescope (HST). They were unable to clarify the evolutionary nature of Arp's loop because of photometric limitations and WFPC2's small field of view.
174: They find evidence for: enhanced star formation between 20 and 200 Myr ago, coincident with the likely epoch of tidal interactions in the M81 group; intermediate age stars
175: which were either formed prior to the interaction in the Arp's loop or were torn out of the massive galaxies during the interaction;
176: and also faint stars with ages $\ge$ 8 Gyr but which were too close to the detection limit for detailed analysis.
177: In this paper, we use multi-wavelength observations, including deep photometry obtained with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS), to resolve
178: the stellar population, and thus determine the evolutionary status of Arp's loop.
179:
180: \section {The Data}
181:
182: \subsection{GALEX, ACS, H{\sc i} and WIYN}
183:
184: The M81 group was observed with the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) mission in the far
185: (FUV: $\lambda$$_{\rm eff}$=1528\AA; $\Delta$$\lambda$$_{FUV}$=269\AA)
186: and near ultraviolet (NUV: $\lambda$$_{\rm eff}$=2271\AA; $\Delta$$\lambda$$_{NUV}$=616\AA). We obtained the data from the Multimission Archive at STScI (MAST) as
187: part of the team General Releases. The
188: GALEX field of view is 1$^{\circ}$.28 and 1$^{\circ}$.24 in the FUV and NUV bands, and the pixel scale is 1.5$''$/pixel. The exposure times were 3093s for each band.
189:
190: Fluxes were calculated using the equations of Morrissey et al. (2005): m$_{\lambda}=-2.5$ log[F$_{\lambda}$/a$_{\lambda}$] + b$_{\lambda}$,
191: where a$_{FUV}$ = 1.4 $\times$ 10$^{-15}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$,
192: a$_{NUV}$=2.06$\times$ 10$^{-16}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$, b$_{FUV}$=18.82 and b$_{NUV}$=20.08 for FUV and NUV, respectively. Fluxes were multiplied
193: by the effective filter bandpass ($\Delta$$\lambda$$_{FUV}$=269\AA\, and $\Delta$$\lambda$$_{NUV}$=616\AA) to give units of erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ and
194: luminosities were calculated for a distance of 3.6~Mpc (Freedman et al. 1994).
195:
196:
197: Figure \ref{m81m82hi} shows the distribution of the atomic hydrogen in the M81 group of galaxies (Yun, Ho \& Lo
198: 1994) on top of the GALEX FUV image. We have identified 8 FUV objects (Fig.~\ref{nuv_feet}, Table 1) inside the H{\sc i} cloud located on the northeast side of
199: the bridge between M81 and M82 and north of Holmberg~IX. This region, called concentration~II by Yun et al., is the brightest
200: H{\sc i} complex in the tidal bridge. It includes Arp's loop, and may not be a single cohesive feature, containing tidally stripped gas from M81 and
201: M82. Makarova et al. (2002) found 250 stars in the HST/WFPC2 F606W/F814W images of Arp's loop. However, the WFPC2 observations were centered on the H{\sc i}
202: concentration and cover only objects \#7 and \#8, missing
203: the other FUV objects. We searched the HST archive at MAST and found new pointings of the same area but taken with the Wide Field Channel (WFC) of ACS using the F475W and F814W filters and covering a larger field of view (GO 10915: PI Dalcanton). Fig.~\ref{acs_feet} shows the ACS F475W image where we have plotted the WFPC2 footprint, the
204: GALEX contours, and marked the 8 FUV objects. The high resolution of ACS (0.05$''$) resolves the FUV objects into hundreds of starlike objects as can be seen in
205: Fig.~\ref{blobszoom}. However,
206: the ACS pointing misses two of the FUV objects (\#3 and \#4) and part of another object (\#1).
207:
208: We have also obtained an H$\alpha$ image of Arp's loop with the OPTIC
209: imager at the WIYN{\footnote {The WIYN Observatory is a joint facility of the University of
210: Wisconsin-Madison, Indiana University, Yale University, and the
211: National Optical Astronomy Observatories.}}
212: 3.5m telescope. The observations were taken with
213: WIYN filter \# 13 ($\Delta$$\lambda$ = 47 \AA) and a standard Johnson $R$
214: filter for continuum subtraction. OPTIC is a
215: mosaic of two 2kx4k orthorgonal transfer CCDs, resulting in a field
216: of view of 9.5$'$$\times$9.5$'$. In Fig.~\ref{wiyn} we present only an image of chip \#2 which was bias-corrected and flat-fielded using IRAF{\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}}
217: The two images taken in each filter were combined with cosmic-ray rejection,
218: and the resulting scaled $R$-band image was subtracted from the
219: combined H$\alpha$ image to remove the continuum signal. Our data confirm Karachentsev \& Kaisin's (2007)
220: detection of objects \#1, \#8, \#7, and \#3, with \#1 being the brightest and \#3 the faintest object (see fig.1 in Karachentsev \& Kaisin).
221: As shown in Fig.~\ref{wiyn}, although we have detected the faintest object,
222: we have not detected two of their H$\alpha$ sources which are marked as squares in Fig.~\ref{wiyn}.
223: This could be due to the different bandwidths, since Karachentsev \& Kaisin used
224: a broader filter ($\Delta$$\lambda$ = 75 \AA) than ours. H$\alpha$ detections of the FUV sources
225: suggest that these are small H{\sc ii} regions where hot, blue OB stars are emitting ultraviolet radiation.
226:
227: \section{Color-Magnitude Diagram}
228:
229: In order to investigate the stellar content of the FUV objects, we have performed photometry on the two ACS/WFC images.
230: The total exposure times for the
231: fully reduced and multidrizzled images are 2250 s in the F475W ($\sim B$) band and
232: 2265 s in the F814W ($\sim I$) band respectively. Each image covers an area of $200
233: \arcsec \times 200\arcsec$, which corresponds to $3.5\times 3.5\,
234: {\rm kpc}$ for the distance of M81.
235: The images were reduced using the standard STScI ACS pipeline {\sc calacs}
236: (Pavlovsky et al. 2004) to remove bias, dark current and flat--field
237: response signatures. The dithered images were combined using the
238: MultiDrizzle package, which removes cosmic rays, and corrects the
239: images for geometric distortion.
240:
241: Photometry was performed on the drizzled images using the DAOPHOT package
242: within IRAF. Stars were automatically detected with DAOFIND in the F475W
243: band, with the detection threshold set at 4 $\sigma$ above the local
244: background level; the detections were then forced on the $I$ band image.
245: The instrumental magnitude of each object in each filter was
246: estimated via a PSF--fitting technique. A spatially variable PSF was
247: computed for both the F475W and F814W images, using $\sim 180$ isolated stars
248: in different positions on the images.
249:
250: Selection criteria based on the shape of the objects have been
251: applied to the photometric catalog to remove as many spurious detections,
252: blended and/or extended objects as possible. We have
253: considered the DAOPHOT ``sharpness'' parameter, which sets the intrinsic angular size
254: of the objects, and selected only those with $-0.5 < {\rm sharpness} <
255: 0.5$ in both filters. These sharpness values allow us to reject spurious and extended objects without
256: eliminating the bright stars. We emphasize that the FUV objects are
257: only partially resolved in the ACS data: one WFC/ACS pixel corresponds
258: to 0.05$''$, which is $\sim$1.5 pc at the distance of M81.
259: Our final photometry is calibrated on the ACS {\sc vegamag} photometric
260: system, with zero points adopted from Sirianni et al. (2005).
261:
262: We have also measured the optical integrated flux at $V$ of the FUV objects detected by GALEX
263: by averaging the F475W and F814W images, and using the {\sc polyphot} routine in IRAF with the GALEX FUV contours,
264: to determine $V$ magnitudes in the AB system. Although the $V$ magnitudes were measured in a pseudo $V$ image,
265: we included it in Table 1 since it is a standard magnitude provided in the literature.
266:
267: Figure~\ref{cmd} shows the $F814W$ versus $F475W-F814W$ ($\sim B-I$)
268: color--magnitude diagram (CMD) for
269: all stars measured in the ACS field of view. The CMD shows a
270: young and blue main sequence (MS) evolutionary phase, located at $F475W-F814W \sim -0.1$, with the brightest stars at $I\simeq 22.5$. A scarcely
271: populated red plume is visible at $B-I>1.5$ and extends up to $I
272: \sim21.0$. It is populated by red supergiants (RSGs) at the brighter
273: magnitudes, and asymptotic giant branch stars (AGBs) at fainter
274: luminosities. One of the most interesting features in the CMD is the diagonal
275: strip of stars extending through $F475W-F814W\simeq 0.5$, $F814W\simeq 23$ and
276: $F475W-F814W\simeq 1.5$, $F814W\simeq 27$. This strip is populated by stars at
277: the hot edge of the helium core-burning phase. The concentration of stars in the range of colors $2<F475W-F814W<3$
278: and magnitudes $24<F814W < 27$ corresponds to low mass ($M<2.2\,
279: {\rm M}_\odot$), older (age $> 1\, {\rm Gyr}$) stars in the red giant
280: branch (RGB) evolutionary phase.
281:
282: We used Padova isochrones for metallicity $Z=0.001, Z=0.004$ and $Z=0.019$
283: (Fagotto et al. 1994a,b) to enable us to interpret the features visible in the CMD.
284: Superimposed on Fig. 7 is the set of Padova isochrones for a metallicity $Z
285: =0.004$. We obtain this value for $Z$ from the following considerations. For the
286: old population, we can rule out metallicities as high as solar from the shape and
287: broadening of the RGB. For the same reasons, we find that $Z$ is unlikely to be $<
288: 0.004$. However we cannot exclude a slightly higher metallicity.
289: The color and morphology of the blue edge of the blue loop evolutionary phase
290: are sensitive to $Z$ and age. We find that the colors of this structure can only be
291: reproduced for $Z \approx 0.004$, assuming that star formation began $\sim 300$ Myr ago in Arp's Loop and is continuing to the present. We cannot put strong constraints
292: on $Z$ for the young stellar population because there are not enough stars, and
293: some of these stars may be multiple.
294:
295: The youngest stars are
296: concentrated where GALEX detected the FUV regions. We used GALEX
297: isophotal contours to select stars within the FUV regions. CMDs
298: corresponding to FUV objects \#1 \& \#2, \#5, \#6, and \#7 \& \#8 are
299: shown in Fig.~\ref{cmdblobs}. A comparison with Padova isochrones indicates that
300: the regions where the FUV objects are detected are mostly dominated by O and B stars
301: with ages younger than 30 Myr.
302:
303: Individual O stars are difficult to distinguish in CMDs based on optical filters because of their well known color degeneracy at these wavelengths. We also have the additional problem that any O stars in Arp's Loop may be multiple objects (one WFC/ACS pixel corresponds to $\sim$1.5 pc).
304: To estimate the number of O stars in Arp's Loop, we can use both the GALEX FUV fluxes and the nebular H$\alpha$ luminosity of Karachentsev \& Kaisin (2007). We measure a total FUV flux of
305: $2 \times 10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (Table 1) and, using standard numbers, this is equivalent to $\sim$ 50 O8V stars. This is an upper limit because we have neglected the contribution of B stars to the FUV flux. Karachentsev \& Kaisin (2007) measure a total H$\alpha$ flux of
306: $3.5 \times 10^{-14}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ giving $L$(H$\alpha) = 5.4 \times 10^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
307: Thus, assuming one O8V star has a photon ionizing luminosity $Q_0$ of $3 \times 10^{48}$ s$^{-1}$ in the Lyman continuum (Smith, Norris \& Crowther 2002), the observed
308: H$\alpha$ flux is equivalent to 13 O8V stars.
309: These rough estimates will increase if there is any internal extinction. Arp's Loop is then equivalent to $\sim 5$ Orion nebulae, if we assume that the Orion Nebula has an H$\alpha$ luminosity of $10^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
310:
311: Fig.\ref{spatial} shows the spatial distribution of the main sequence and the RGB stars in the ACS image. It is clear that
312: stars of both types are located in the same general areas of the image with only two exceptions, at (1400,1600) and (3400, 3400).
313: These regions of the image have many MS stars and only a couple of RGBs are seen. The first region is not among the GALEX sources, it is
314: close to the bright star on the south-east side of Fig.\ref{acs_feet} and the other region corresponds to object \#6.
315:
316: In summary, we find both an old and a young stellar population in Arp's Loop with a similar spatial distribution and a metallicity $Z \sim 0.004$.
317: It is likely that the old stellar population
318: was formed in the M82 and/or M81 galaxies and ejected into the intergalactic medium during a
319: tidal passage ($\sim$ 200--300 Myr ago), whereas the young stars detected by GALEX have formed since the encounter in the tidal debris.
320:
321: \section{Discussion}
322:
323: \subsection{Star Formation in Tidal Debris}
324: Observational evidence is accumulating that star formation often
325: occurs in low gas density environments. Examples include the outer
326: disks of galaxies (e.g. Ferguson et al. 1998, Thilker et al. 2005)
327: and tidal tails (e.g. Saviane, Hibbard, \& Rich 2004, Hibbard et al.
328: 2005). The nearest example is the H{\sc i} bridge between the
329: Magellanic Clouds (see Demers \& Battinelli 1998), located at a
330: distance of 50--60~kpc which allows very detailed investigations of
331: both its interstellar gas and stars. The bridge has a complex
332: structure in H{\sc i} with typical column densities of 10$^{20}$--10$^
333: {21}$~cm$^{-2}$ (Muller et al. 2003, 2004) and somewhat higher in smaller regions. The Harris
334: (2007) optical survey confirms that stars along the Magellanic bridge
335: not only formed in place but also formed in material that contains
336: very few old red giant stars. Molecular line surveys (Mizuno et al.
337: 2006) and follow-up searches for pre-main-sequence stars (Nishiyama et
338: al. 2007) demonstrate that despite overall low H{\sc i} column
339: densities, the conditions necessary for star formation and young
340: stellar candidates exist in some places along the western part of the bridge
341: that extends from the wing of the Small Magellanic Cloud. The more
342: diffuse Magellanic stream with $N$(H{\sc i}) $ \lesssim 3$--$5\times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$
343: (e.g. Br\"{u}ns et al. 2005), however, is not known to contain any
344: stars (Majewski et al. 1999).
345:
346: At the other extreme, relatively intense star formation is detected
347: in FUV images of more massive gas rich tidal tails
348: (e.g. Hibbard et al. 2005 for the Antennae, and Neff et al. 2005 for
349: NGC 7769/71, NGC 5713/19, Arp 295, and the NGC 520 system).
350: In these cases, large H{\sc ii} regions, OB associations, and even
351: super star clusters can form,
352: especially in situations where the H{\sc i} column densities are
353: $N$(H{\sc i}) $> 4 \times 10^{20}$~cm$^{-2}$ over large regions
354: (Maybhate et al. 2007). Thus the tidal bridge between M81--M82
355: where Arp's loop is located ($N$(H{\sc i}) $ \sim 5$--$30\times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$; Yun et al. 1994)
356: appears to support star formation at rates which are
357: intermediate between the extremely low levels
358: seen in an object like the Magellanic bridge and
359: very active tidal tails like those found in, for example, NGC4676
360: (``The Mice''; de Grijs et al. 2003). This suggests that the tidal
361: H{\sc i} streams in the M81 system sit near the low end of a continuum of
362: levels of star formation in gas-rich tidal matter.
363:
364: Star formation requires the production of gravitationally bound
365: molecular clouds. Since tidal streams normally are at most only
366: mildly gravitationally unstable on large spatial scales, star formation is not expected to
367: behave in the same way as in the inner disks of galaxies which exist
368: on the edge of large scale gravitational instability (Kennicutt
369: 1989). The possibility that collisions between gas clouds could lead
370: to star formation in low density but gas-rich environments such as
371: the Magellanic bridge was explored by Christodoulou et al. (1997). In
372: their model, compression to the densities required to make bound
373: molecular structures was accomplished through post-shock compression.
374: This picture gained support as observations improved; e.g. Muller \&
375: Parker (2007) make a case for the Magellanic bridge being a prime
376: example of star formation resulting from turbulence.
377:
378: More recent investigations, such as that of Bergin et al. (2004) and Heitsch et al. (2006),
379: include the effects of turbulence which can enhance density
380: perturbations more readily leading to molecular regions that can
381: collapse to make stars in lower velocity cloud collisions. In these models
382: sufficient columns of H{\sc i} must interact with speeds of $\geq$10~km~s$^{-1}$
383: to produce local regions with $N$(H{\sc i}) $\geq$ 10$^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$
384: that are required to readily shield molecular gas from radiative dissociation.
385: The basic idea of triggering star-formation by cloud collision in Arp's
386: Loop is consistent with the Yun (1999) model for this feature
387: being a stream crossing zone and with the H{\sc i} observations showing
388: comparatively high $N$(H{\sc i}) in a region with a substantial
389: $\sim$30~km~s$^{-1}$~kpc$^{-1}$ and complex
390: velocity field (Rots \& Shane 1975; Rots 1975; Yun et al. 1994).
391:
392: Ongoing star formation
393: in relatively diffuse structures, such as Arp's Loop, is consistent with expectations for
394: gas collisions and subsequent turbulence to lead to inefficient
395: conversion of gas into stars in low density systems such as tidal tails.
396: On the other hand, the younger star forming sites seem to be relatively normal
397: objects with properties similar to the Orion Nebula. Here we find support for the
398: expectation that once a gravitationally bound molecular cloud forms in a low
399: density environment, its subsequent evolution is largely controlled by factors that
400: only weakly depend on how the cloud was formed.
401:
402:
403:
404: \subsection{Connections with Intergalactic HII Regions and Tidal
405: Dwarf Galaxies}
406:
407: The ages and locations of objects containing young stars indicate
408: that self-gravitating substructures form within H{\sc i} tidal
409: material in a variety of interacting systems.
410: This tidal matter from interacting galaxies is expected to remain
411: bound to one of the galaxies. Much of it will relatively quickly fall
412: back into the galaxies, although some
413: matter may remain detached for as long as a Hubble time. For
414: example, according to Hibbard \& Mihos (1995) $\sim$20\% of the tidal
415: material of
416: NGC7252, a well-known merger remnant, is likely to remain in the
417: local intergalactic medium. Tidal optical features are also known to
418: host
419: ``tidal dwarf galaxies" (TDGs) (e.g. Duc et al. 1997; Weilbacher et
420: al. 2000; Knierman, et al. 2003; Bornaud et al. 2004). The eventual
421: fate of the TDGs and the stars and metals that they produce remains
422: unclear. For instance, the TDG-candidate found
423: in the compact group HCG100 (de Mello et al. 2007) observed with
424: GALEX has young ($<$5~Myr) stellar populations and is located $
425: \sim$100~kpc
426: away from the main galaxies. These systems therefore have the
427: possibility to remain as independent objects over time scales of $\geq$1~Gyr.
428:
429: The FUV objects in the M81 group are much closer to a large spiral than the HCG100 TDG, as
430: they are only $\sim$17 kpc in projected distance
431: from M81 (nucleus) and $\sim$15 kpc from the central region of the
432: TDG-candidate, Holmberg~IX. Besides being located closer to the
433: parent galaxies than a long-lived TDG-candidate, the 8 FUV objects
434: have much lower UV luminosities than the objects studied
435: by de Mello et al. (2007) and Neff et al. (2005). As discussed in Sect. 3, their
436: FUV luminosities are equivalent to $\sim$ 50 late O stars.
437: The fact that the M81 group is so close and that GALEX is sensitive to very low star-formation levels, 10$^{-3}$
438: M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ (Salim et al. 2005), makes it possible to detect the Arp's loop FUV objects. Are we then seeing
439: a more diffuse example of star formation, as may be the case in the
440: Magellanic bridge, or is the Arp's loop region in an earlier
441: evolutionary phase where star formation has not progressed far enough
442: to produce a denser region? Increasing the stellar density is critical for this object to become a TDG (Mizuno et al. 2006).
443: Better kinematic and baryonic mass
444: density information are required to address this question.
445:
446: It is also possible that the Arp's loop FUV regions are analogs to
447: the so-called `intergalactic H{\sc ii}' regions of Mendes de
448: Oliveira et al. (2004), Ryan-Weber et al. (2004) and Oosterloo et al.
449: (2004). These objects seem to be similar to the H{\sc ii} regions in
450: our Milky Way, but are located in regions with no optical connections
451: to nearby galaxies. The fate of these type of objects and their
452: importance in galaxy evolution and in the
453: enrichment of the intergalactic medium are still debatable. These star-
454: forming clumps can (1) remain as independent entities and grow to
455: become TDGs by accreting more gas and forming more stars, (2) make star
456: clusters that survive to live in the distant halos of their hosts or
457: even become intergalactic objects, or (3) dissolve and not remain
458: gravitationally bound yielding only very sparse star streams.
459:
460:
461: \section{Conclusions}
462:
463: We have analyzed the UV and optical light within the H{\sc i} bridge between M81 and M82 system and
464: identified 8 FUV regions in an area known as Arp's loop. Four of these objects were also
465: detected in H$\alpha$. High resolution ACS images show six of the regions in great detail and allow us to trace their star formation history.
466: The synthetic CMD modeling shows the presence of a young population ($<$ 10 Myr) together with an older component with
467: ages $>$ 1 Gyr. It is possible that these two populations are not related. In any case the young population
468: must have formed ``in situ" whereas the old population probably was formed in the M82 and/or M81 galaxies, and removed from their
469: disks during a tidal passage $\sim$ 200--300 Myr ago which also triggered star formation in the H{\sc i} debris.
470:
471: The FUV luminosities of the eight objects we detect are modest and typical of small clusters or associations of O and B stars.
472: It is likely that these young stars have condensed
473: recently from the tidally stripped gas from M81 and M82.
474: The tidal bridge between M81--M82 appears to be intermediate between the very low levels
475: of star formation seen in an object like the Magellanic bridge and
476: very active tidal tails like those found in interacting galaxies such as the Mice and the Antennae.
477: Ongoing star formation in relatively diffuse structures, such as Arp's Loop, is consistent with expectations for
478: gas collisions and subsequent turbulence to lead to inefficient conversion of gas into stars in low density systems
479: such as tidal tails.
480:
481: The fate of these star-forming clumps is not clear. They can grow to
482: become TDGs, or make star
483: clusters that survive to live in the distant halos of their hosts, or
484: even become intergalactic objects. Finally, they may dissolve and not remain
485: gravitationally bound, yielding only very sparse star streams. In any case, they will have a composite population of
486: old and young stars formed in very different environments such as the M81/M82 disks and the tidal bridge. More observations of
487: interacting systems similar to the M81 group will help establish the importance of these systems in galaxy evolution and in the
488: enrichment of the intergalactic medium.
489:
490: \acknowledgments
491: DFdM was funded by STScI grant-44185 and ES was funded by STScI GO grant-10248.07-A.
492: JSG thanks the University of Wisconsin for partial support of this research.
493:
494: GALEX is a NASA Small Explorer, launched in 2003 April. We gratefully acknowledge NASA's support for construction, operation, and science analysis for the GALEX mission, developed in cooperation with the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales of France and the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology.
495:
496:
497: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
498: California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
499:
500:
501:
502: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
503: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
504: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
505: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
506: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
507: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
508: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
509: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
510:
511: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
512: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
513: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
514: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
515: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
516:
517: {\it Facilities:} \facility{HST (ACS/WFC), \facility{GALEX}, \facility{WIYN}}.
518:
519: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
520: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
521: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
522:
523: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
524: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
525: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
526:
527: \begin{thebibliography}{}
528:
529: \bibitem[]{} Appleton, P.N., Davies, R.D., \& Stephenson, R.J. 1981,
530: MNRAS, 195, 327
531:
532: \bibitem[]{} Arp, H. 1965, Science, 148, 363
533:
534: \bibitem]{} Bergin, E.~A., Hartmann,
535: L.~W., Raymond, J.~C., \& Ballesteros-Paredes, J.\ 2004, \apj, 612, 921
536:
537: \bibitem[]{} Bertin, E., \& Arnouts, S. 1996, A\&AS, 117, 393
538:
539: \bibitem[]{} Bournaud, F., Duc, P.-A., Amram, P., Combes, F., \&
540: Gach, J.-L. 2004, A\&A, 425, 813
541:
542: \bibitem[]{} Boyce, P.J. et al. 2001, ApJ, 560, L127
543:
544: \bibitem[]{} Br{\"u}ns, C., et al.\ 2005, \aap, 432, 45
545:
546: \bibitem[]{} Christodoulou, D. M., Tohline, J. E., \& Keenan, F. P.
547: 1997, ApJ, 486, 810
548:
549: \bibitem[]{} de Grijs, R. et al. 2003, NewA, 8, 155
550:
551: \bibitem[]{} de Mello, D.F., Torres-Flores, S., \& Mendes de
552: Oliveira, C. 2007, AJ submitted
553:
554: \bibitem[]{} de Mello, D.F., Leitherer, C., \& Heckman, T.M. 2000, ApJ, 530, 251
555:
556: \bibitem[]{} Demers, S., \& Battinelli, P. 1998, AJ, 115, 154
557:
558: \bibitem[]{} Duc, P-A., \& Mirabel, I.F. 1997, The Messenger 89, 14
559:
560: \bibitem[]{} Efremov, Yu.N., Karachentsev, I.D., \& Karachentseva,
561: V.E. 1987, Sov. Astron. Lett., 12, 181
562:
563: \bibitem[]{}
564: Fagotto, F., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., \& Chiosi, C. 1994a, A\&AS, 104, 365
565:
566: \bibitem[]{}
567: Fagotto, F., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., \& Chiosi, C. 1994b, A\&AS, 105, 29
568:
569: \bibitem[]{} Ferguson, A.M.N., Wyse, R.F.G., Gallagher, J. S., \&
570: Hunter, D. A.
571: 1998, ApJ, 506, L19
572:
573: \bibitem[]{} Freedman, W.L., et al. 1994, ApJ, 427, 628
574:
575: \bibitem[]{} Gottesman, S.T., \& Weliachew, L. 1975, ApJ,195, 23
576:
577: \bibitem[]{} Harris, J. 2007, ApJ, 658, 345
578:
579: \bibitem[]{} Heitsch, F., Slyz, A. D., Devreindt, J. E. G., Hartmann,
580: L. W., \& Burkert, A. 2006, ApJ, 648, 1052
581:
582: \bibitem[]{} Hibbard, J.E., \& Mihos, J.C. 1995, AJ, 110, 140
583:
584: \bibitem[]{} Hibbard, J.E., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L87
585:
586: \bibitem[]{} Karachentsev, I.D., Kaisin, S.S. 2007, AJ, 133, 1883
587:
588: \bibitem[]{} Kennicutt, R. C. Jr. 1989, ApJ, 344, 685
589:
590: \bibitem[]{} Knierman, K.A., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 1227
591:
592: \bibitem[]{} Makarova, L.N. et al. 2002, A\&A, 396, 473
593:
594: \bibitem[]{} Majewski, S.~R.,
595: Ostheimer, J.~C., Kunkel, W.~E., Johnston, K.~V., Patterson, R.~J., \&
596: Palma, C.\ 1999, New Views of the Magellanic Clouds, 190, 508
597:
598: \bibitem[]{} Maybhate, A., et al. 2007 (arXiv:0707.3582)
599:
600: \bibitem[]{} Mendes de Oliveira, C., Cypriano, E.S., Sodr\'e,L. Jr, \& Balkowski, C. 2004, AJ, 132, 570
601:
602: \bibitem[]{} Mizuno, N., et al. 2006, ApJ, 643, 107
603:
604: \bibitem[]{} Morrissey, P., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L7
605:
606: \bibitem[]{} Muller, E., \& Parker, Q.~A.\ 2007, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia,
607: 24, 69
608:
609: \bibitem[]{} Muller, E.,Staveley-Smith, L., Zealey, W., \& Stanimirovi{\'c}, S.\ 2003,
610: \mnras, 339, 105
611:
612: \bibitem[]{} Muller, E., Stanimirovi{\'c}, S., Rosolowsky, E., \& Staveley-Smith, L.\ 2004, \apj,
613: 616, 845
614:
615: \bibitem[]{} Neff, S.G., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L91
616:
617: \bibitem[]{} Nishiyama, S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 658, 358
618:
619: \bibitem[Oosterloo et al. (2004)]{} Oosterloo, R., et al. 2004 in
620: `Recycling Intergalactic and Interstellar Matter' IAUS 217. Eds.,
621: P-A Duc, J. Braine, \& E. Brinks, 486, 492
622:
623: \bibitem[]{}
624: Pavlovsky C., et al. 2004, ``ACS Instrument Handbook'', Version 5.0,
625: (Baltimore: STScI)
626:
627: \bibitem[RyanWeber et al.(2004)]{} Ryan-Weber, E.V., Meuerer,G.R.,
628: Freeman, K.C., Putman, M.E., \& Webster, R.L. 2004,
629: AJ, 127, 1431
630:
631: \bibitem[]{} Rots, A.H., 1975, A\&A 45, 43
632:
633: \bibitem[]{} Rots, A.H., Shane, W.W., 1975, A\&A 45, 25
634:
635: \bibitem[]{} Sabbi, E., et al. 2007 in preparation
636:
637: \bibitem[]{} Salim, S., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L39
638:
639: \bibitem[]{} Saviane, I., Hibbard, J. E., \& Rich, R. M. 2004, AJ,
640: 127, 660
641:
642: \bibitem[]{} Schombert, J.M., Wallin, J.F. \& Struck-Marcell, C.
643: 1990, AJ, 99, 497
644:
645: \bibitem[Seibert et al.(2005)]{Sei05} Seibert et al. 2005, ApJ 619, L55
646:
647: \bibitem[]{} Sirianni et al. 2005, PASP, 117, 1049
648:
649: \bibitem[]{} Smith, L. J., Norris, R. P. F. \& Crowther, P. A. 2002. MNRAS, 337, 1309
650:
651: \bibitem[]{} Sun, W.-H., et al. 2005, ApJ, 630, L133
652:
653: \bibitem[]{} Thilker, D. A. et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L79
654:
655: \bibitem[]{} van der Hulst, J.M. 1979, A\&A, 75, 97
656:
657: \bibitem[]{} Yun, M.S., Ho, P.T.P., \& Lo, K.Y. 1994, Nature, 372, 530
658:
659: \bibitem[]{} Yun, M.S., 1999, in: IAU Symp. 186, Galaxy Interactions
660: at Low and High Redshift, ed.
661: J.E. Barnes \& D.B. Sanders (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 81
662:
663: \bibitem[]{} Weilbacher, P. M., Duc, P.-A., Fritze v. Alvensleben,
664: U., Martin, P., \& Fricke, K. J. 200, A\&A, 358, 819
665:
666: \end{thebibliography}
667:
668: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}
669: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
670: %\rotate
671: \tablecaption{FUV sources}
672: \tablewidth{0pt}
673: \tablehead{
674: \colhead{ID} &
675: \colhead{RA} &
676: \colhead{Dec} &
677: \colhead{m$_{V}$} &
678: \colhead{FUV} &
679: \colhead{L$_{\rm FUV}$ (erg/s)} &
680: \colhead{NUV} &
681: \colhead{L$_{\rm NUV}$ (erg/s)}
682: }
683: \startdata
684: 1+2 & 149.313562 & 69.278637 & 20.25$\pm$ 0.07 &18.17 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.09E+039 & 19.46 $\pm$ 0.02 & 6.48E+038\\
685: 3 & 149.304548 & 69.273482 & &19.77 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2.48E+038 & 21.17 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1.34E+038\\
686: 4 & 149.317475 & 69.273476 & &20.03 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1.94E+038 & 21.13 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1.40E+038\\
687: 5 & 149.328273 & 69.273482 & 21.23$\pm$0.05 &20.53 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1.23E+038 & 20.78 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1.92E+038\\
688: 6 & 149.374412 & 69.266872 & 21.52$\pm$0.08 &19.60 $\pm$ 0.04 & 2.90E+038 & 20.45 $\pm$ 0.04 & 2.61E+038\\
689: 7 & 149.393938 & 69.294389 & 22.33$\pm$0.07 &21.33 $\pm$ 0.1 & 5.91E+037 & 22.23 $\pm$ 0.09 & 5.06E+037\\
690: 8 & 149.390473 & 69.296530 & 22.68$\pm$0.09 &21.03 $\pm$ 0.09 & 7.80E+037 & 21.95 $\pm$ 0.08 & 6.52E+037\\
691: \enddata
692: \tablecomments
693: {FUV magnitudes were obtained with SExtractor (Bertin \& Arnouts 1996) Mag$_{-}$auto in the AB system. m$_{V}$ is the magnitude
694: within the FUV contour. Galactic extinction corrections were done using Seibert et al. (2005) for FUV and NUV. Objects 1 and 2 are not resolved with
695: GALEX and no deblending correction was applied.}
696: \end{deluxetable}
697:
698:
699: \clearpage
700:
701: \begin{figure}
702: \epsscale{.80}
703: \plotone{f1.eps}
704: \caption{GALEX FUV image of the M81 and M82 region where FUV objects are detected.
705: The contours in black are HI contours from Yun et al. (1994). FUV objects are numbered 1-8 and the general location of the region
706: called Arp's loop is marked. North is to the top and
707: East to the left, M81 is shown partially in the bottom of the image and M82 in the top of the image, Holmberg~IX is to the east of M81,
708: the cutout is 31.1$'$ $\times$ 42.6$'$. H{\sc i} contours adapted from
709: Yun, Ho \& Lo's Fig.~1 by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature, copyright (1994).\label{m81m82hi}}
710: \end{figure}
711:
712: \begin{figure}
713: \epsscale{1.0}
714: \plotone{f2.eps}
715: \caption{GALEX NUV image with FUV contours in black (contour levels are 0,
716: 0.0006, 0.009 and 0.001 counts).
717: The blue blobs numbered 1-8 in Fig.~\ref{m81m82hi}, the ACS footprint, and
718: WFPC2 region used in Makarova et al. (2002) are marked. The cutout is
719: 4.8$'$ $\times$ 3.2$'$. North is to the top and East to the left.
720: \label{nuv_feet}}
721: \end{figure}
722:
723:
724: \begin{figure}
725: \epsscale{1.0}
726: \plotone{f3.eps}
727: \caption{ACS/F475W image of the region where FUV objects are detected (4.5$'$ $\times$ 3.3$'$). GALEX FUV contours are shown in black.
728: WFPC2 region used in Makarova et al. (2002) is marked. North is to the top and
729: East to the left.
730: \label{acs_feet}}
731: \end{figure}
732:
733:
734: \begin{figure}
735: \plotone{f4.eps}
736: \caption{ACS/F475W image cutouts. Objects~\#1 and 2 are shown within a 16$''$ $\times$ 16$''$ box, objects\#3 and 4 are outside the ACS pointing, object~\#5 is shown
737: within a 10$''$ $\times$ 10$''$ box, object \#6 is shown within a 16$''$ $\times$ 16$''$ box, objects~\#7 and 8 are shown within a
738: 16$''$ $\times$ 16$''$ box. GALEX FUV contours are shown in cyan. North is to the top and
739: East to the left.
740: \label{blobszoom}}
741: \end{figure}
742:
743:
744: \begin{figure}
745: \epsscale{1.0}
746: \plotone{f5.eps}
747: \caption{WIYN 3.5m telescope H$\alpha$ continuum subtracted (smoothed with a 5$\times$ 5 median filter) image. The two boxes show the location of two objects detected by
748: Karachentsev \& Kaisin (2003) but not present in our data. GALEX FUV contours are shown in black. North is to the top and
749: East to the left.
750: \label{wiyn}}
751: \end{figure}
752:
753:
754:
755: \begin{figure}
756: \plotone{f6.eps}
757: \caption{Color-magnitude diagram, $F814W$ versus $F475W-F814W$ ($\sim I versus B--I$),
758: of all stars measured in the ACS field of view. Superimposed on the CMD are Padova isochrones
759: (Fagotto et al. 1994a,b), with a metallicity Z=0.004 and ages 7 Myr to 10 Gyr.
760: \label{cmd}}
761: \end{figure}
762:
763: \begin{figure}
764: \plotone{f7.eps}
765: \caption{Color-magnitude diagram,$F814W$ versus $F475W-F814W$ ($\sim I versus B--I$), of the FUV regions 1-8. Superimposed on the CMD are Padova isochrones
766: (Fagotto et al. 1994a,b), with a metallicity Z=0.004 and ages 10 (regions \# 1$+$ 2, and \# 7$+$8) 25 (region \# 6) and 30 Myr (region \# 5).
767: \label{cmdblobs}}
768: \end{figure}
769:
770:
771: \begin{figure}
772: %\epsscale{0.75}
773: \plotone{f8.eps}
774: \caption{Spatial distribution of main sequence stars (left) and RGB stars (right) in the ACS image. Orientation N-E is shown in each plot.
775: \label{spatial}}
776: \end{figure}
777:
778:
779:
780: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
781: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
782: %% To embed the sample graphics in
783: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
784: %% \includegraphics commands
785: %%
786: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
787: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
788: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
789: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
790: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
791: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
792: %%
793: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
794: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
795: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
796: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
797: %% journal to journal.
798:
799: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
800: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
801: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
802: %% available in the electronic journal.
803:
804: \end{document}
805:
806: Observational evidence is accumulating that star formation often
807: occurs in low gas density environments. Examples include the outer
808: disks of galaxies (e.g. Ferguson et al. 1998, Thilker et al. 2005)
809: and tidal tails (e.g. Saviane, Hibbard, \& Rich 2004, Hibbard et al.
810: 2005). The nearest example is the H{\sc i} bridge between the
811: Magellanic Clouds (see Demers \& Battinelli 1998), located at a
812: distance of 50--60~kpc which allows very detailed investigations of
813: both its interstellar gas and stars. The bridge has a complex
814: structure in H{\sc i} with typical column densities of 10$^{20}$--10$^
815: {21}$~cm$^{-2}$ (Muller et al. 2003) and somewhat higher in smaller regions. The Harris
816: (2007) optical survey confirms that stars along the Magellanic bridge
817: not only formed in place but also formed in material that contains
818: very few old red giant stars. Molecular line surveys (Mizuno et al.
819: 2006) and follow-up searches for pre-main-sequence stars (Nishiyama et
820: al. 2007) demonstrate that despite overall low H{\sc i} column
821: densities, the conditions necessary for star formation and young
822: stellar candidates exist in some places along the western part of the bridge
823: that extends from the wing of the Small Magellanic Cloud. The more
824: diffuse Magellanic stream {\bf with $N$(H{\sc i}) $ \lesssim 3$--$5\times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$}, however, is not known to contain any
825: stars (Majewski et al. 1999).
826:
827: At the other extreme, relatively intense star formation is detected
828: in FUV images of more massive gas rich tidal tails
829: (e.g. Hibbard et al. 2005 for the Antennae, and Neff et al. 2005 for NGC 7769/71, NGC 5713/19, Arp 295, and the NGC 520 system).
830: In these cases, large H{\sc ii} regions, OB associations, and even super star clusters can form,
831: especially in situations where the H{\sc i} column densities are high
832: (Maybhate et al. 2007). Thus the tidal bridge between M81--M82 where Arp's loop is located {\bf ($N$(H{\sc i}) $ \sim 5$--$30\times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$; Yun et al. 1994)}
833: appears to be intermediate between the very low levels
834: of star formation seen in an object like the Magellanic bridge and
835: very active tidal tails like those found in, for example, NGC4676
836: (``The Mice''; de Grijs et al. 2003). This suggests that the tidal
837: H{\sc i} streams in the M81 system sit near the low end of a continuum of
838: levels of star formation in tidal matter.
839:
840: Star formation requires the production of gravitationally bound
841: molecular clouds. Since tidal streams normally are at most only
842: mildly gravitationally unstable on large spatial scales, star formation is not expected to
843: behave in the same way as in the inner disks of galaxies which exist
844: on the edge of large scale gravitational instability (Kennicutt
845: 1989). The possibility that collisions between gas clouds could lead
846: to star formation in low density but gas-rich environments such as
847: the Magellanic bridge was explored by Christodoulou et al. (1997). In
848: their model, compression to the densities required to make bound
849: molecular structures was accomplished through post-shock compression.
850: More recent investigations, such as that of Heitsch et al. (2006),
851: include the effects of turbulence which can enhance density
852: perturbations more readily leading to molecular regions that can
853: collapse to make stars in lower velocity cloud collisions.
854:
855: The basic idea of triggering star-formation by cloud collision in Arp's
856: Loop is consistent with the Yun (1999) model for this feature
857: being a stream crossing zone and with the H{\sc i} observations showing a complex
858: velocity field (Rots \& Shane 1975; Rots 1975; Yun et al. 1994). Ongoing star formation
859: in relatively diffuse structures, such as Arp's Loop, is consistent with expectations for
860: gas collisions and subsequent turbulence to lead to inefficient
861: conversion of gas into stars in low density systems such as tidal tails.
862: On the other hand, the younger star forming sites seem to be relatively normal objects with properties similar to the Orion Nebula.
863: