1:
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3:
4: \begin{table*}
5: \label{tab:sample}
6: \centering
7: \begin{minipage}{170mm}
8: \caption{SHBs sample properties.}
9: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccc}
10: \hline
11: & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Putative host} & & Angular & & Projected & & \\
12: {\ \ \ \ GRB\ \ \ \ \ \ }& T$_{90}$ & $z$ & $R$ & P$_{\rm chance}$ & Afterglow & offset & Error & offset & Error & Refs. \\
13: & (s) & & (mag) & & & (arcsec) & (arcsec) & (kpc) & (kpc) & \\
14: (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10) & (11) \\
15: \hline
16: 050509B\dotfill & 0.03 [0.01] & 0.225 & 16.8 & 5.0\ee{-3} & X\, --\, -- & 17.87 & 3.40 & 64 & 12 & 1--3 \\
17: 050709\dotfill & 130 [7]\,\footnote{{\it Hete-2} trigger. The duration is given in the 2-25 keV energy band.}
18: & 0.161 & 21.2 & 2.0\ee{-3} & X,O\, -- & 1.30 & 0.10 & 3.57 & 0.27 & 4--6 \\
19: 050724\dotfill & 152 [9] & 0.258 & 19.8 & 1.0\ee{-5} & X,O,R & 0.64 & 0.02 & 2.57 & 0.08 & 7--9 \\
20: 051210\dotfill & 1.4 [0.2] & $>$1.4 & 23.8 & 1.0\ee{-1} & X\, --\, -- & 2.80 & 2.90 & $<$50 & -- & 3, 10, 11 \\
21: 051221A\dotfill & 1.27 [0.05] & 0.546 & 22.0 & 2.4\ee{-4} & X,O,R & 0.12 & 0.04 & 0.76 & 0.25 & 12, 13 \\
22: 051227\dotfill & 110 [10]%\,\footnote{ \citet{gcn4400} found T$_{90}$=8$\pm$1~s, based on the analysis of the partial BAT data set.
23: %Here is given the duration derived from the analysis of the full data set.}
24: & -- & 25.6 & 2.0\ee{-4} & X,O\, -- & 0.05 & 0.02 & $<$0.7 & -- & 11, 14 \\
25: 060121\dotfill & 1.97 [0.06]\,\footnote{{\it Hete-2} trigger. The duration is given in the 30-400 keV energy band.
26: \citet{donaghy06} detected a faint and long-lasting soft bump of emission at a significance level of $\sim$4.5$\sigma$.}
27:
28: & $>$1.7 & 26.6 & 1.3\ee{-2} & X,O\, -- & 0.32%\,\footnote{The host centroid position is \RA{09}{09}{52.00}, \decl{45}{39}{45.3} (A. Levan, private communication)}
29: & 0.10 & $<$4 & -- & 15--17 \\
30: 060313\dotfill & 0.7 [0.1] & $<$1.1 & 25.0 & 4.0\ee{-3} & X,O\, -- & 0.40 & 0.56 & $<$8 & -- & 11, 18 \\
31: 060502B\dotfill & 0.09 [0.02] & 0.287\,?\,\footnote{A faint ($R$=26 mag) object (S2 in \citealt{bloom07}) has been proposed as the high
32: redshift host galaxy. The measured angular offset is 4.2$\pm$3.7 arcsec (P$_{\rm chance}$$\sim$70\%), corresponding to 34$\pm$30\,kpc at $z\sim1$.}
33: & 18.7 & $<$5.0\ee{-2} & X\, --\, -- & 16.33 & 3.70 & 70 & 16 & 3, 19 \\
34: 060505\dotfill & 4 [1] & 0.089 & 17.9 & 1.0\ee{-4} & X,O\, -- & 4.53 & 0.32 & 7.45 & 0.53 & 20, 21 \\
35: 060614\dotfill & 103 [5] & 0.125 & 22.5 & 6.0\ee{-6} & X,O\, -- & 0.50 & -- & 1.10 & -- & 22--24 \\
36: 060801\dotfill & 0.5 [0.1] & 1.131 & 23.0 & 4.1\ee{-2} & X\, --\, -- & 2.39 & 2.40 & 19.7 & 19.8 & 3, 11 \\
37: 061006\dotfill & 130 [10] & 0.438 & 23.7 & 1.8\ee{-3} & X,O\, -- & 0.32 & 0.50 & 1.8 & 2.8 & 11, 26 \\
38: 061201\dotfill & 0.8 [0.1] & 0.111 & 19.0 & 3.8\ee{-2} & X,O\, -- & 17.00 & 0.20 & 33.9 & 0.4 & 27 \\
39: 061210\dotfill & 85 [5] & 0.410 & 21.1 & 4.7\ee{-3} & X\, --\, -- & 1.99 & 1.80 & 10.7 & 9.7 & 3, 11, 28 \\
40: 061217\dotfill & 0.30 [0.05] & 0.827 & 23.4 & 3.9\ee{-1} & X\, --\, -- & 7.41 & 3.80 & 55 & 28 & 3, 11, 29 \\
41: 070724A\dotfill & 0.40 [0.04] & 0.457 & $\sim$21\,\footnote{We assume $R-I\sim1$}
42: & $\sim$5\ee{-3} & X\, --\, -- & 0.72 & 2.10 & 4 & 12 & 3, 30 \\
43:
44: \hline
45: \end{tabular} \\
46:
47: {\sc Notes :} Col. (1): GRB name; Col. (2): T$_{90}$ duration and its error in the 15-350~keV energy band;
48: Col.~(3): Redshift of the putative host galaxy; Col.~(4): Observed $R$ magnitude of the putative host galaxy;
49: Col. (5): Probability that the association is a chance of coincidence; Col. (6): Detection of the GRB counterpart in
50: different energy band (X - X-ray; O - optical; R - radio);
51: Col. (7)-(8): Angular offset between the afterglow position and the associated galaxy centroid, and its
52: error, respectively;
53: Col. (9) and (10): Projected physical offset and its error, respectively;
54: Col. (11): Reference to publications of the presented data.\\
55:
56: {\sc Refs.:} (1)~\citealt{gehrels05}; (2)~\citealt{bloom06}; (3)~\citealt{butler07}
57: (4)~\citealt{hjort05}; (5)~\citealt{fox05}; (6)~\citealt{villasenor05};
58: (7)~\citealt{campana06}; (8)~\citealt{berger05}; (9)~\citealt{prochaska06};
59: (10)~\citealt{laparola06}; (11)~\citealt{berger07}; (12)~\citealt{burrows06}; (13)~\citealt{soderberg06};
60: (14)~\citealt{taka07}; (15)~\citealt{donaghy06}; (16)~\citealt{postigo06}; (17)~\citealt{levan06}; (18)~\citealt{roming06};
61: (19)~\citealt{bloom07}; (20)~\citealt{ofek07}; (21)~\citealt{levesque07};
62: (22)~\citealt{galyam06}; (23)~\citealt{gehrels06}; (24)~\citealt{mangano07};
63: (25)~\citealt{gcn5381}; (26)~\citealt{gcn5718};
64: (27)~\citealt{gcnr061201}; (28)~\citealt{gcnr061210}; (29)~\citealt{gcnr061217};
65: (30)~\citealt{gcnr070724}.
66: \end{minipage}
67: \end{table*}
68:
69: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
70: