1: \documentclass[prd,aps,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,superscriptaddress,twocolumn,floatfix]{revtex4}

2: \usepackage{alltt}

3: \usepackage{epsfig}

4: \usepackage{calc,rotating,xspace}

5: \usepackage{pifont}

6: \oddsidemargin  -0.10 in

7: \evensidemargin -0.10 in

8: \textwidth       6.60 in

9: \voffset         1.00 in

10: \textheight      8.70 in

11: 

12: 

13: %input{mycommands}: only ones we use:

14: \newcommand{\pt}{\ensuremath{p_{\rm T}}}

15: \newcommand{\met}  {\mbox{${\hbox{$E$\kern-0.6em\lower-.01ex\hbox{/}}}$}\ensuremath{_{\rm T}}}

16: 

17: \begin{document}

18: \clearpage

19: 

20: \title{\boldmath{Search for chargino-neutralino production in $\rm {p\bar p}$ collisions at $\sqrt s$ = 1.96 TeV with high-{\pt} leptons}}

21: %\input{July_2007_Authors_Visitors.tex}

22: \affiliation{Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, Republic of China} 

23: \affiliation{Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439} 

24: \affiliation{Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, E-08193, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain} 

25: \affiliation{Baylor University, Waco, Texas  76798} 

26: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Bologna, I-40127 Bologna, Italy} 

27: \affiliation{Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254} 

28: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616} 

29: \affiliation{University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California  90024} 

30: \affiliation{University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California  92093} 

31: \affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106} 

32: \affiliation{Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria, CSIC-University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain} 

33: \affiliation{Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA  15213} 

34: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637} 

35: \affiliation{Comenius University, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia; Institute of Experimental Physics, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia} 

36: \affiliation{Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia} 

37: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708} 

38: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510} 

39: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611} 

40: \affiliation{Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, I-00044 Frascati, Italy} 

41: \affiliation{University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland} 

42: \affiliation{Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom} 

43: \affiliation{Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138} 

44: \affiliation{Division of High Energy Physics, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland} 

45: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801} 

46: \affiliation{The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218} 

47: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany} 

48: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea} 

49: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720} 

50: \affiliation{University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom} 

51: \affiliation{University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom} 

52: \affiliation{Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, E-28040 Madrid, Spain} 

53: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139} 

54: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7} 

55: \affiliation{University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109} 

56: \affiliation{Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan  48824} 

57: \affiliation{University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131} 

58: \affiliation{Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois  60208} 

59: \affiliation{The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio  43210} 

60: \affiliation{Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan} 

61: \affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka 588, Japan} 

62: \affiliation{University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom} 

63: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy} 

64: \affiliation{LPNHE, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie/IN2P3-CNRS, UMR7585, Paris, F-75252 France} 

65: \affiliation{University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104} 

66: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy} 

67: \affiliation{University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260} 

68: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907} 

69: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627} 

70: \affiliation{The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021} 

71: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy} 

72: \affiliation{Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855} 

73: \affiliation{Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas 77843} 

74: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Trieste/\ Udine, Italy} 

75: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan} 

76: \affiliation{Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155} 

77: \affiliation{Waseda University, Tokyo 169, Japan} 

78: \affiliation{Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan  48201} 

79: \affiliation{University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706} 

80: \affiliation{Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520} 

81: \author{T.~Aaltonen}

82: \affiliation{Division of High Energy Physics, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland}

83: \author{J.~Adelman}

84: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

85: \author{T.~Akimoto}

86: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

87: \author{M.G.~Albrow}

88: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

89: \author{B.~\'{A}lvarez~Gonz\'{a}lez}

90: \affiliation{Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria, CSIC-University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain}

91: \author{S.~Amerio}

92: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

93: \author{D.~Amidei}

94: \affiliation{University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109}

95: \author{A.~Anastassov}

96: \affiliation{Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855}

97: \author{A.~Annovi}

98: \affiliation{Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, I-00044 Frascati, Italy}

99: \author{J.~Antos}

100: \affiliation{Comenius University, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia; Institute of Experimental Physics, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia}

101: \author{M.~Aoki}

102: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

103: \author{G.~Apollinari}

104: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

105: \author{A.~Apresyan}

106: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

107: \author{T.~Arisawa}

108: \affiliation{Waseda University, Tokyo 169, Japan}

109: \author{A.~Artikov}

110: \affiliation{Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia}

111: \author{W.~Ashmanskas}

112: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

113: \author{A.~Attal}

114: \affiliation{Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, E-08193, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain}

115: \author{A.~Aurisano}

116: \affiliation{Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas 77843}

117: \author{F.~Azfar}

118: \affiliation{University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom}

119: \author{P.~Azzi-Bacchetta}

120: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

121: \author{P.~Azzurri}

122: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

123: \author{N.~Bacchetta}

124: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

125: \author{W.~Badgett}

126: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

127: \author{A.~Barbaro-Galtieri}

128: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

129: \author{V.E.~Barnes}

130: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

131: \author{B.A.~Barnett}

132: \affiliation{The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218}

133: \author{S.~Baroiant}

134: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

135: \author{V.~Bartsch}

136: \affiliation{University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom}

137: \author{G.~Bauer}

138: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

139: \author{P.-H.~Beauchemin}

140: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

141: \author{F.~Bedeschi}

142: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

143: \author{P.~Bednar}

144: \affiliation{Comenius University, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia; Institute of Experimental Physics, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia}

145: \author{S.~Behari}

146: \affiliation{The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218}

147: \author{G.~Bellettini}

148: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

149: \author{J.~Bellinger}

150: \affiliation{University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706}

151: \author{A.~Belloni}

152: \affiliation{Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138}

153: \author{D.~Benjamin}

154: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

155: \author{A.~Beretvas}

156: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

157: \author{J.~Beringer}

158: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

159: \author{T.~Berry}

160: \affiliation{University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom}

161: \author{A.~Bhatti}

162: \affiliation{The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021}

163: \author{M.~Binkley}

164: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

165: \author{D.~Bisello}

166: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

167: \author{I.~Bizjak}

168: \affiliation{University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom}

169: \author{R.E.~Blair}

170: \affiliation{Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439}

171: \author{C.~Blocker}

172: \affiliation{Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254}

173: \author{B.~Blumenfeld}

174: \affiliation{The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218}

175: \author{A.~Bocci}

176: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

177: \author{A.~Bodek}

178: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

179: \author{V.~Boisvert}

180: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

181: \author{G.~Bolla}

182: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

183: \author{A.~Bolshov}

184: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

185: \author{D.~Bortoletto}

186: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

187: \author{J.~Boudreau}

188: \affiliation{University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260}

189: \author{A.~Boveia}

190: \affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106}

191: \author{B.~Brau}

192: \affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106}

193: \author{A.~Bridgeman}

194: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

195: \author{L.~Brigliadori}

196: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Bologna, I-40127 Bologna, Italy}

197: \author{C.~Bromberg}

198: \affiliation{Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan  48824}

199: \author{E.~Brubaker}

200: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

201: \author{J.~Budagov}

202: \affiliation{Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia}

203: \author{H.S.~Budd}

204: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

205: \author{S.~Budd}

206: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

207: \author{K.~Burkett}

208: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

209: \author{G.~Busetto}

210: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

211: \author{P.~Bussey}

212: \affiliation{Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom}

213: \author{A.~Buzatu}

214: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

215: \author{K.~L.~Byrum}

216: \affiliation{Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439}

217: \author{S.~Cabrera$^r$}

218: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

219: \author{M.~Campanelli}

220: \affiliation{Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan  48824}

221: \author{M.~Campbell}

222: \affiliation{University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109}

223: \author{F.~Canelli}

224: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

225: \author{A.~Canepa}

226: \affiliation{University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104}

227: \author{D.~Carlsmith}

228: \affiliation{University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706}

229: \author{R.~Carosi}

230: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

231: \author{S.~Carrillo$^l$}

232: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

233: \author{S.~Carron}

234: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

235: \author{B.~Casal}

236: \affiliation{Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria, CSIC-University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain}

237: \author{M.~Casarsa}

238: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

239: \author{A.~Castro}

240: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Bologna, I-40127 Bologna, Italy}

241: \author{P.~Catastini}

242: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

243: \author{D.~Cauz}

244: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Trieste/\ Udine, Italy}

245: \author{M.~Cavalli-Sforza}

246: \affiliation{Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, E-08193, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain}

247: \author{A.~Cerri}

248: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

249: \author{L.~Cerrito$^p$}

250: \affiliation{University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom}

251: \author{S.H.~Chang}

252: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

253: \author{Y.C.~Chen}

254: \affiliation{Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, Republic of China}

255: \author{M.~Chertok}

256: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

257: \author{G.~Chiarelli}

258: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

259: \author{G.~Chlachidze}

260: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

261: \author{F.~Chlebana}

262: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

263: \author{K.~Cho}

264: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

265: \author{D.~Chokheli}

266: \affiliation{Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia}

267: \author{J.P.~Chou}

268: \affiliation{Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138}

269: \author{G.~Choudalakis}

270: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

271: \author{S.H.~Chuang}

272: \affiliation{Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855}

273: \author{K.~Chung}

274: \affiliation{Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA  15213}

275: \author{W.H.~Chung}

276: \affiliation{University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706}

277: \author{Y.S.~Chung}

278: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

279: \author{C.I.~Ciobanu}

280: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

281: \author{M.A.~Ciocci}

282: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

283: \author{A.~Clark}

284: \affiliation{University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland}

285: \author{D.~Clark}

286: \affiliation{Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254}

287: \author{G.~Compostella}

288: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

289: \author{M.E.~Convery}

290: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

291: \author{J.~Conway}

292: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

293: \author{B.~Cooper}

294: \affiliation{University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom}

295: \author{K.~Copic}

296: \affiliation{University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109}

297: \author{M.~Cordelli}

298: \affiliation{Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, I-00044 Frascati, Italy}

299: \author{G.~Cortiana}

300: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

301: \author{F.~Crescioli}

302: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

303: \author{C.~Cuenca~Almenar$^r$}

304: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

305: \author{J.~Cuevas$^o$}

306: \affiliation{Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria, CSIC-University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain}

307: \author{R.~Culbertson}

308: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

309: \author{J.C.~Cully}

310: \affiliation{University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109}

311: \author{D.~Dagenhart}

312: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

313: \author{M.~Datta}

314: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

315: \author{T.~Davies}

316: \affiliation{Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom}

317: \author{P.~de~Barbaro}

318: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

319: \author{S.~De~Cecco}

320: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}

321: \author{A.~Deisher}

322: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

323: \author{G.~De~Lentdecker$^d$}

324: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

325: \author{G.~De~Lorenzo}

326: \affiliation{Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, E-08193, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain}

327: \author{M.~Dell'Orso}

328: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

329: \author{L.~Demortier}

330: \affiliation{The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021}

331: \author{J.~Deng}

332: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

333: \author{M.~Deninno}

334: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Bologna, I-40127 Bologna, Italy}

335: \author{D.~De~Pedis}

336: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}

337: \author{P.F.~Derwent}

338: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

339: \author{G.P.~Di~Giovanni}

340: \affiliation{LPNHE, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie/IN2P3-CNRS, UMR7585, Paris, F-75252 France}

341: \author{C.~Dionisi}

342: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}

343: \author{B.~Di~Ruzza}

344: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Trieste/\ Udine, Italy}

345: \author{J.R.~Dittmann}

346: \affiliation{Baylor University, Waco, Texas  76798}

347: \author{M.~D'Onofrio}

348: \affiliation{Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, E-08193, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain}

349: \author{S.~Donati}

350: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

351: \author{P.~Dong}

352: \affiliation{University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California  90024}

353: \author{J.~Donini}

354: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

355: \author{T.~Dorigo}

356: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

357: \author{S.~Dube}

358: \affiliation{Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855}

359: \author{J.~Efron}

360: \affiliation{The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio  43210}

361: \author{R.~Erbacher}

362: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

363: \author{D.~Errede}

364: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

365: \author{S.~Errede}

366: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

367: \author{R.~Eusebi}

368: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

369: \author{H.C.~Fang}

370: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

371: \author{S.~Farrington}

372: \affiliation{University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom}

373: \author{W.T.~Fedorko}

374: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

375: \author{R.G.~Feild}

376: \affiliation{Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520}

377: \author{M.~Feindt}

378: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

379: \author{J.P.~Fernandez}

380: \affiliation{Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, E-28040 Madrid, Spain}

381: \author{C.~Ferrazza}

382: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

383: \author{R.~Field}

384: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

385: \author{G.~Flanagan}

386: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

387: \author{R.~Forrest}

388: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

389: \author{S.~Forrester}

390: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

391: \author{M.~Franklin}

392: \affiliation{Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138}

393: \author{J.C.~Freeman}

394: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

395: \author{I.~Furic}

396: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

397: \author{M.~Gallinaro}

398: \affiliation{The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021}

399: \author{J.~Galyardt}

400: \affiliation{Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA  15213}

401: \author{F.~Garberson}

402: \affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106}

403: \author{J.E.~Garcia}

404: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

405: \author{A.F.~Garfinkel}

406: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

407: \author{K.~Genser}

408: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

409: \author{H.~Gerberich}

410: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

411: \author{D.~Gerdes}

412: \affiliation{University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109}

413: \author{S.~Giagu}

414: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}

415: \author{V.~Giakoumopolou$^a$}

416: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

417: \author{P.~Giannetti}

418: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

419: \author{K.~Gibson}

420: \affiliation{University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260}

421: \author{J.L.~Gimmell}

422: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

423: \author{C.M.~Ginsburg}

424: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

425: \author{N.~Giokaris$^a$}

426: \affiliation{Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia}

427: \author{M.~Giordani}

428: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Trieste/\ Udine, Italy}

429: \author{P.~Giromini}

430: \affiliation{Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, I-00044 Frascati, Italy}

431: \author{M.~Giunta}

432: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

433: \author{V.~Glagolev}

434: \affiliation{Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia}

435: \author{D.~Glenzinski}

436: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

437: \author{M.~Gold}

438: \affiliation{University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131}

439: \author{N.~Goldschmidt}

440: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

441: \author{A.~Golossanov}

442: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

443: \author{G.~Gomez}

444: \affiliation{Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria, CSIC-University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain}

445: \author{G.~Gomez-Ceballos}

446: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

447: \author{M.~Goncharov}

448: \affiliation{Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas 77843}

449: \author{O.~Gonz\'{a}lez}

450: \affiliation{Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, E-28040 Madrid, Spain}

451: \author{I.~Gorelov}

452: \affiliation{University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131}

453: \author{A.T.~Goshaw}

454: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

455: \author{K.~Goulianos}

456: \affiliation{The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021}

457: \author{A.~Gresele}

458: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

459: \author{S.~Grinstein}

460: \affiliation{Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138}

461: \author{C.~Grosso-Pilcher}

462: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

463: \author{R.C.~Group}

464: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

465: \author{U.~Grundler}

466: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

467: \author{J.~Guimaraes~da~Costa}

468: \affiliation{Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138}

469: \author{Z.~Gunay-Unalan}

470: \affiliation{Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan  48824}

471: \author{C.~Haber}

472: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

473: \author{K.~Hahn}

474: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

475: \author{S.R.~Hahn}

476: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

477: \author{E.~Halkiadakis}

478: \affiliation{Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855}

479: \author{A.~Hamilton}

480: \affiliation{University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland}

481: \author{B.-Y.~Han}

482: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

483: \author{J.Y.~Han}

484: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

485: \author{R.~Handler}

486: \affiliation{University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706}

487: \author{F.~Happacher}

488: \affiliation{Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, I-00044 Frascati, Italy}

489: \author{K.~Hara}

490: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

491: \author{D.~Hare}

492: \affiliation{Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855}

493: \author{M.~Hare}

494: \affiliation{Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155}

495: \author{S.~Harper}

496: \affiliation{University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom}

497: \author{R.F.~Harr}

498: \affiliation{Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan  48201}

499: \author{R.M.~Harris}

500: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

501: \author{M.~Hartz}

502: \affiliation{University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260}

503: \author{K.~Hatakeyama}

504: \affiliation{The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021}

505: \author{J.~Hauser}

506: \affiliation{University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California  90024}

507: \author{C.~Hays}

508: \affiliation{University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom}

509: \author{M.~Heck}

510: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

511: \author{A.~Heijboer}

512: \affiliation{University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104}

513: \author{B.~Heinemann}

514: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

515: \author{J.~Heinrich}

516: \affiliation{University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104}

517: \author{C.~Henderson}

518: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

519: \author{M.~Herndon}

520: \affiliation{University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706}

521: \author{J.~Heuser}

522: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

523: \author{S.~Hewamanage}

524: \affiliation{Baylor University, Waco, Texas  76798}

525: \author{D.~Hidas}

526: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

527: \author{C.S.~Hill$^c$}

528: \affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106}

529: \author{D.~Hirschbuehl}

530: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

531: \author{A.~Hocker}

532: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

533: \author{S.~Hou}

534: \affiliation{Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, Republic of China}

535: \author{M.~Houlden}

536: \affiliation{University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom}

537: \author{S.-C.~Hsu}

538: \affiliation{University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California  92093}

539: \author{B.T.~Huffman}

540: \affiliation{University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom}

541: \author{R.E.~Hughes}

542: \affiliation{The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio  43210}

543: \author{U.~Husemann}

544: \affiliation{Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520}

545: \author{J.~Huston}

546: \affiliation{Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan  48824}

547: \author{J.~Incandela}

548: \affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106}

549: \author{G.~Introzzi}

550: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

551: \author{M.~Iori}

552: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}

553: \author{A.~Ivanov}

554: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

555: \author{B.~Iyutin}

556: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

557: \author{E.~James}

558: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

559: \author{B.~Jayatilaka}

560: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

561: \author{D.~Jeans}

562: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}

563: \author{E.J.~Jeon}

564: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

565: \author{S.~Jindariani}

566: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

567: \author{W.~Johnson}

568: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

569: \author{M.~Jones}

570: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

571: \author{K.K.~Joo}

572: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

573: \author{S.Y.~Jun}

574: \affiliation{Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA  15213}

575: \author{J.E.~Jung}

576: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

577: \author{T.R.~Junk}

578: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

579: \author{T.~Kamon}

580: \affiliation{Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas 77843}

581: \author{D.~Kar}

582: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

583: \author{P.E.~Karchin}

584: \affiliation{Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan  48201}

585: \author{Y.~Kato}

586: \affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka 588, Japan}

587: \author{R.~Kephart}

588: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

589: \author{U.~Kerzel}

590: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

591: \author{V.~Khotilovich}

592: \affiliation{Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas 77843}

593: \author{B.~Kilminster}

594: \affiliation{The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio  43210}

595: \author{D.H.~Kim}

596: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

597: \author{H.S.~Kim}

598: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

599: \author{J.E.~Kim}

600: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

601: \author{M.J.~Kim}

602: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

603: \author{S.B.~Kim}

604: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

605: \author{S.H.~Kim}

606: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

607: \author{Y.K.~Kim}

608: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

609: \author{N.~Kimura}

610: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

611: \author{L.~Kirsch}

612: \affiliation{Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254}

613: \author{S.~Klimenko}

614: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

615: \author{M.~Klute}

616: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

617: \author{B.~Knuteson}

618: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

619: \author{B.R.~Ko}

620: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

621: \author{S.A.~Koay}

622: \affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106}

623: \author{K.~Kondo}

624: \affiliation{Waseda University, Tokyo 169, Japan}

625: \author{D.J.~Kong}

626: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

627: \author{J.~Konigsberg}

628: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

629: \author{A.~Korytov}

630: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

631: \author{A.V.~Kotwal}

632: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

633: \author{J.~Kraus}

634: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

635: \author{M.~Kreps}

636: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

637: \author{J.~Kroll}

638: \affiliation{University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104}

639: \author{N.~Krumnack}

640: \affiliation{Baylor University, Waco, Texas  76798}

641: \author{M.~Kruse}

642: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

643: \author{V.~Krutelyov}

644: \affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106}

645: \author{T.~Kubo}

646: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

647: \author{S.~E.~Kuhlmann}

648: \affiliation{Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439}

649: \author{T.~Kuhr}

650: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

651: \author{N.P.~Kulkarni}

652: \affiliation{Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan  48201}

653: \author{Y.~Kusakabe}

654: \affiliation{Waseda University, Tokyo 169, Japan}

655: \author{S.~Kwang}

656: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

657: \author{A.T.~Laasanen}

658: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

659: \author{S.~Lai}

660: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

661: \author{S.~Lami}

662: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

663: \author{S.~Lammel}

664: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

665: \author{M.~Lancaster}

666: \affiliation{University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom}

667: \author{R.L.~Lander}

668: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

669: \author{K.~Lannon}

670: \affiliation{The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio  43210}

671: \author{A.~Lath}

672: \affiliation{Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855}

673: \author{G.~Latino}

674: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

675: \author{I.~Lazzizzera}

676: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

677: \author{T.~LeCompte}

678: \affiliation{Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439}

679: \author{J.~Lee}

680: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

681: \author{J.~Lee}

682: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

683: \author{Y.J.~Lee}

684: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

685: \author{S.W.~Lee$^q$}

686: \affiliation{Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas 77843}

687: \author{R.~Lef\`{e}vre}

688: \affiliation{University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland}

689: \author{N.~Leonardo}

690: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

691: \author{S.~Leone}

692: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

693: \author{S.~Levy}

694: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

695: \author{J.D.~Lewis}

696: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

697: \author{C.~Lin}

698: \affiliation{Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520}

699: \author{C.S.~Lin}

700: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

701: \author{J.~Linacre}

702: \affiliation{University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom}

703: \author{M.~Lindgren}

704: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

705: \author{E.~Lipeles}

706: \affiliation{University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California  92093}

707: \author{A.~Lister}

708: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

709: \author{D.O.~Litvintsev}

710: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

711: \author{T.~Liu}

712: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

713: \author{N.S.~Lockyer}

714: \affiliation{University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104}

715: \author{A.~Loginov}

716: \affiliation{Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520}

717: \author{M.~Loreti}

718: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

719: \author{L.~Lovas}

720: \affiliation{Comenius University, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia; Institute of Experimental Physics, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia}

721: \author{R.-S.~Lu}

722: \affiliation{Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, Republic of China}

723: \author{D.~Lucchesi}

724: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

725: \author{J.~Lueck}

726: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

727: \author{C.~Luci}

728: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}

729: \author{P.~Lujan}

730: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

731: \author{P.~Lukens}

732: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

733: \author{G.~Lungu}

734: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

735: \author{L.~Lyons}

736: \affiliation{University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom}

737: \author{J.~Lys}

738: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

739: \author{R.~Lysak}

740: \affiliation{Comenius University, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia; Institute of Experimental Physics, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia}

741: \author{E.~Lytken}

742: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

743: \author{P.~Mack}

744: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

745: \author{D.~MacQueen}

746: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

747: \author{R.~Madrak}

748: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

749: \author{K.~Maeshima}

750: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

751: \author{K.~Makhoul}

752: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

753: \author{T.~Maki}

754: \affiliation{Division of High Energy Physics, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland}

755: \author{P.~Maksimovic}

756: \affiliation{The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218}

757: \author{S.~Malde}

758: \affiliation{University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom}

759: \author{S.~Malik}

760: \affiliation{University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom}

761: \author{G.~Manca}

762: \affiliation{University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom}

763: \author{A.~Manousakis$^a$}

764: \affiliation{Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia}

765: \author{F.~Margaroli}

766: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

767: \author{C.~Marino}

768: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

769: \author{C.P.~Marino}

770: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

771: \author{A.~Martin}

772: \affiliation{Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520}

773: \author{M.~Martin}

774: \affiliation{The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218}

775: \author{V.~Martin$^j$}

776: \affiliation{Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom}

777: \author{M.~Mart\'{\i}nez}

778: \affiliation{Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, E-08193, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain}

779: \author{R.~Mart\'{\i}nez-Ballar\'{\i}n}

780: \affiliation{Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, E-28040 Madrid, Spain}

781: \author{T.~Maruyama}

782: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

783: \author{P.~Mastrandrea}

784: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}

785: \author{T.~Masubuchi}

786: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

787: \author{M.E.~Mattson}

788: \affiliation{Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan  48201}

789: \author{P.~Mazzanti}

790: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Bologna, I-40127 Bologna, Italy}

791: \author{K.S.~McFarland}

792: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

793: \author{P.~McIntyre}

794: \affiliation{Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas 77843}

795: \author{R.~McNulty$^i$}

796: \affiliation{University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom}

797: \author{A.~Mehta}

798: \affiliation{University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom}

799: \author{P.~Mehtala}

800: \affiliation{Division of High Energy Physics, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland}

801: \author{S.~Menzemer$^k$}

802: \affiliation{Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria, CSIC-University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain}

803: \author{A.~Menzione}

804: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

805: \author{P.~Merkel}

806: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

807: \author{C.~Mesropian}

808: \affiliation{The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021}

809: \author{A.~Messina}

810: \affiliation{Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan  48824}

811: \author{T.~Miao}

812: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

813: \author{N.~Miladinovic}

814: \affiliation{Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254}

815: \author{J.~Miles}

816: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

817: \author{R.~Miller}

818: \affiliation{Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan  48824}

819: \author{C.~Mills}

820: \affiliation{Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138}

821: \author{M.~Milnik}

822: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

823: \author{A.~Mitra}

824: \affiliation{Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, Republic of China}

825: \author{G.~Mitselmakher}

826: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

827: \author{H.~Miyake}

828: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

829: \author{S.~Moed}

830: \affiliation{Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138}

831: \author{N.~Moggi}

832: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Bologna, I-40127 Bologna, Italy}

833: \author{C.S.~Moon}

834: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

835: \author{R.~Moore}

836: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

837: \author{M.~Morello}

838: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

839: \author{P.~Movilla~Fernandez}

840: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

841: \author{J.~M\"ulmenst\"adt}

842: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

843: \author{A.~Mukherjee}

844: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

845: \author{Th.~Muller}

846: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

847: \author{R.~Mumford}

848: \affiliation{The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218}

849: \author{P.~Murat}

850: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

851: \author{M.~Mussini}

852: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Bologna, I-40127 Bologna, Italy}

853: \author{J.~Nachtman}

854: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

855: \author{Y.~Nagai}

856: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

857: \author{A.~Nagano}

858: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

859: \author{J.~Naganoma}

860: \affiliation{Waseda University, Tokyo 169, Japan}

861: \author{K.~Nakamura}

862: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

863: \author{I.~Nakano}

864: \affiliation{Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan}

865: \author{A.~Napier}

866: \affiliation{Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155}

867: \author{V.~Necula}

868: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

869: \author{C.~Neu}

870: \affiliation{University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104}

871: \author{M.S.~Neubauer}

872: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

873: \author{J.~Nielsen$^f$}

874: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

875: \author{L.~Nodulman}

876: \affiliation{Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439}

877: \author{M.~Norman}

878: \affiliation{University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California  92093}

879: \author{O.~Norniella}

880: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

881: \author{E.~Nurse}

882: \affiliation{University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom}

883: \author{S.H.~Oh}

884: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

885: \author{Y.D.~Oh}

886: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

887: \author{I.~Oksuzian}

888: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

889: \author{T.~Okusawa}

890: \affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka 588, Japan}

891: \author{R.~Oldeman}

892: \affiliation{University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom}

893: \author{R.~Orava}

894: \affiliation{Division of High Energy Physics, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland}

895: \author{K.~Osterberg}

896: \affiliation{Division of High Energy Physics, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland}

897: \author{S.~Pagan~Griso}

898: \affiliation{University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy}

899: \author{C.~Pagliarone}

900: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

901: \author{E.~Palencia}

902: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

903: \author{V.~Papadimitriou}

904: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

905: \author{A.~Papaikonomou}

906: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

907: \author{A.A.~Paramonov}

908: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

909: \author{B.~Parks}

910: \affiliation{The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio  43210}

911: \author{S.~Pashapour}

912: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

913: \author{J.~Patrick}

914: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

915: \author{G.~Pauletta}

916: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Trieste/\ Udine, Italy}

917: \author{M.~Paulini}

918: \affiliation{Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA  15213}

919: \author{C.~Paus}

920: \affiliation{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139}

921: \author{D.E.~Pellett}

922: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

923: \author{A.~Penzo}

924: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Trieste/\ Udine, Italy}

925: \author{T.J.~Phillips}

926: \affiliation{Duke University, Durham, North Carolina  27708}

927: \author{G.~Piacentino}

928: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

929: \author{J.~Piedra}

930: \affiliation{LPNHE, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie/IN2P3-CNRS, UMR7585, Paris, F-75252 France}

931: \author{L.~Pinera}

932: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

933: \author{K.~Pitts}

934: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

935: \author{C.~Plager}

936: \affiliation{University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California  90024}

937: \author{L.~Pondrom}

938: \affiliation{University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706}

939: \author{X.~Portell}

940: \affiliation{Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, E-08193, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain}

941: \author{O.~Poukhov}

942: \affiliation{Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia}

943: \author{N.~Pounder}

944: \affiliation{University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom}

945: \author{F.~Prakoshyn}

946: \affiliation{Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia}

947: \author{A.~Pronko}

948: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

949: \author{J.~Proudfoot}

950: \affiliation{Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439}

951: \author{F.~Ptohos$^h$}

952: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

953: \author{G.~Punzi}

954: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

955: \author{J.~Pursley}

956: \affiliation{University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706}

957: \author{J.~Rademacker$^c$}

958: \affiliation{University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom}

959: \author{A.~Rahaman}

960: \affiliation{University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260}

961: \author{V.~Ramakrishnan}

962: \affiliation{University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706}

963: \author{N.~Ranjan}

964: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

965: \author{I.~Redondo}

966: \affiliation{Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, E-28040 Madrid, Spain}

967: \author{B.~Reisert}

968: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

969: \author{V.~Rekovic}

970: \affiliation{University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131}

971: \author{P.~Renton}

972: \affiliation{University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom}

973: \author{M.~Rescigno}

974: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}

975: \author{S.~Richter}

976: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

977: \author{F.~Rimondi}

978: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Bologna, I-40127 Bologna, Italy}

979: \author{L.~Ristori}

980: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

981: \author{A.~Robson}

982: \affiliation{Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom}

983: \author{T.~Rodrigo}

984: \affiliation{Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria, CSIC-University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain}

985: \author{E.~Rogers}

986: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

987: \author{S.~Rolli}

988: \affiliation{Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155}

989: \author{R.~Roser}

990: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

991: \author{M.~Rossi}

992: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Trieste/\ Udine, Italy}

993: \author{R.~Rossin}

994: \affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106}

995: \author{P.~Roy}

996: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

997: \author{A.~Ruiz}

998: \affiliation{Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria, CSIC-University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain}

999: \author{J.~Russ}

1000: \affiliation{Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA  15213}

1001: \author{V.~Rusu}

1002: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1003: \author{H.~Saarikko}

1004: \affiliation{Division of High Energy Physics, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland}

1005: \author{A.~Safonov}

1006: \affiliation{Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas 77843}

1007: \author{W.K.~Sakumoto}

1008: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

1009: \author{G.~Salamanna}

1010: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}

1011: \author{O.~Salt\'{o}}

1012: \affiliation{Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, E-08193, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain}

1013: \author{L.~Santi}

1014: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Trieste/\ Udine, Italy}

1015: \author{S.~Sarkar}

1016: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}

1017: \author{L.~Sartori}

1018: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

1019: \author{K.~Sato}

1020: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1021: \author{A.~Savoy-Navarro}

1022: \affiliation{LPNHE, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie/IN2P3-CNRS, UMR7585, Paris, F-75252 France}

1023: \author{T.~Scheidle}

1024: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

1025: \author{P.~Schlabach}

1026: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1027: \author{E.E.~Schmidt}

1028: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1029: \author{M.A.~Schmidt}

1030: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

1031: \author{M.P.~Schmidt}

1032: \affiliation{Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520}

1033: \author{M.~Schmitt}

1034: \affiliation{Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois  60208}

1035: \author{T.~Schwarz}

1036: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

1037: \author{L.~Scodellaro}

1038: \affiliation{Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria, CSIC-University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain}

1039: \author{A.L.~Scott}

1040: \affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106}

1041: \author{A.~Scribano}

1042: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

1043: \author{F.~Scuri}

1044: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

1045: \author{A.~Sedov}

1046: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

1047: \author{S.~Seidel}

1048: \affiliation{University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131}

1049: \author{Y.~Seiya}

1050: \affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka 588, Japan}

1051: \author{A.~Semenov}

1052: \affiliation{Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia}

1053: \author{L.~Sexton-Kennedy}

1054: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1055: \author{A.~Sfyria}

1056: \affiliation{University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland}

1057: \author{S.Z.~Shalhout}

1058: \affiliation{Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan  48201}

1059: \author{M.D.~Shapiro}

1060: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

1061: \author{T.~Shears}

1062: \affiliation{University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom}

1063: \author{P.F.~Shepard}

1064: \affiliation{University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260}

1065: \author{D.~Sherman}

1066: \affiliation{Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138}

1067: \author{M.~Shimojima$^n$}

1068: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

1069: \author{M.~Shochet}

1070: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

1071: \author{Y.~Shon}

1072: \affiliation{University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706}

1073: \author{I.~Shreyber}

1074: \affiliation{University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland}

1075: \author{A.~Sidoti}

1076: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

1077: \author{P.~Sinervo}

1078: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

1079: \author{A.~Sisakyan}

1080: \affiliation{Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia}

1081: \author{A.J.~Slaughter}

1082: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1083: \author{J.~Slaunwhite}

1084: \affiliation{The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio  43210}

1085: \author{K.~Sliwa}

1086: \affiliation{Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155}

1087: \author{J.R.~Smith}

1088: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

1089: \author{F.D.~Snider}

1090: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1091: \author{R.~Snihur}

1092: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

1093: \author{M.~Soderberg}

1094: \affiliation{University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109}

1095: \author{A.~Soha}

1096: \affiliation{University of California, Davis, Davis, California  95616}

1097: \author{S.~Somalwar}

1098: \affiliation{Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855}

1099: \author{V.~Sorin}

1100: \affiliation{Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan  48824}

1101: \author{J.~Spalding}

1102: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1103: \author{F.~Spinella}

1104: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

1105: \author{T.~Spreitzer}

1106: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

1107: \author{P.~Squillacioti}

1108: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

1109: \author{M.~Stanitzki}

1110: \affiliation{Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520}

1111: \author{R.~St.~Denis}

1112: \affiliation{Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom}

1113: \author{B.~Stelzer}

1114: \affiliation{University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California  90024}

1115: \author{O.~Stelzer-Chilton}

1116: \affiliation{University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom}

1117: \author{D.~Stentz}

1118: \affiliation{Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois  60208}

1119: \author{J.~Strologas}

1120: \affiliation{University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131}

1121: \author{D.~Stuart}

1122: \affiliation{University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106}

1123: \author{J.S.~Suh}

1124: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

1125: \author{A.~Sukhanov}

1126: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

1127: \author{H.~Sun}

1128: \affiliation{Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155}

1129: \author{I.~Suslov}

1130: \affiliation{Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia}

1131: \author{T.~Suzuki}

1132: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

1133: \author{A.~Taffard$^e$}

1134: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

1135: \author{R.~Takashima}

1136: \affiliation{Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan}

1137: \author{Y.~Takeuchi}

1138: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

1139: \author{R.~Tanaka}

1140: \affiliation{Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan}

1141: \author{M.~Tecchio}

1142: \affiliation{University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109}

1143: \author{P.K.~Teng}

1144: \affiliation{Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, Republic of China}

1145: \author{K.~Terashi}

1146: \affiliation{The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021}

1147: \author{J.~Thom$^g$}

1148: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1149: \author{A.S.~Thompson}

1150: \affiliation{Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom}

1151: \author{G.A.~Thompson}

1152: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

1153: \author{E.~Thomson}

1154: \affiliation{University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104}

1155: \author{P.~Tipton}

1156: \affiliation{Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520}

1157: \author{V.~Tiwari}

1158: \affiliation{Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA  15213}

1159: \author{S.~Tkaczyk}

1160: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1161: \author{D.~Toback}

1162: \affiliation{Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas 77843}

1163: \author{S.~Tokar}

1164: \affiliation{Comenius University, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia; Institute of Experimental Physics, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia}

1165: \author{K.~Tollefson}

1166: \affiliation{Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan  48824}

1167: \author{T.~Tomura}

1168: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

1169: \author{D.~Tonelli}

1170: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1171: \author{S.~Torre}

1172: \affiliation{Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, I-00044 Frascati, Italy}

1173: \author{D.~Torretta}

1174: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1175: \author{S.~Tourneur}

1176: \affiliation{LPNHE, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie/IN2P3-CNRS, UMR7585, Paris, F-75252 France}

1177: \author{W.~Trischuk}

1178: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

1179: \author{Y.~Tu}

1180: \affiliation{University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104}

1181: \author{N.~Turini}

1182: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

1183: \author{F.~Ukegawa}

1184: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

1185: \author{S.~Uozumi}

1186: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan}

1187: \author{S.~Vallecorsa}

1188: \affiliation{University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland}

1189: \author{N.~van~Remortel}

1190: \affiliation{Division of High Energy Physics, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland}

1191: \author{A.~Varganov}

1192: \affiliation{University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109}

1193: \author{E.~Vataga}

1194: \affiliation{University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131}

1195: \author{F.~V\'{a}zquez$^l$}

1196: \affiliation{University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida  32611}

1197: \author{G.~Velev}

1198: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1199: \author{C.~Vellidis$^a$}

1200: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

1201: \author{V.~Veszpremi}

1202: \affiliation{Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907}

1203: \author{M.~Vidal}

1204: \affiliation{Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, E-28040 Madrid, Spain}

1205: \author{R.~Vidal}

1206: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1207: \author{I.~Vila}

1208: \affiliation{Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria, CSIC-University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain}

1209: \author{R.~Vilar}

1210: \affiliation{Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria, CSIC-University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain}

1211: \author{T.~Vine}

1212: \affiliation{University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom}

1213: \author{M.~Vogel}

1214: \affiliation{University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131}

1215: \author{I.~Volobouev$^q$}

1216: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

1217: \author{G.~Volpi}

1218: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Universities of Pisa, Siena and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy}

1219: \author{F.~W\"urthwein}

1220: \affiliation{University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California  92093}

1221: \author{P.~Wagner}

1222: \affiliation{University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104}

1223: \author{R.G.~Wagner}

1224: \affiliation{Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439}

1225: \author{R.L.~Wagner}

1226: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1227: \author{J.~Wagner-Kuhr}

1228: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

1229: \author{W.~Wagner}

1230: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}

1231: \author{T.~Wakisaka}

1232: \affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka 588, Japan}

1233: \author{R.~Wallny}

1234: \affiliation{University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California  90024}

1235: \author{S.M.~Wang}

1236: \affiliation{Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, Republic of China}

1237: \author{A.~Warburton}

1238: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

1239: \author{D.~Waters}

1240: \affiliation{University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom}

1241: \author{M.~Weinberger}

1242: \affiliation{Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas 77843}

1243: \author{W.C.~Wester~III}

1244: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1245: \author{B.~Whitehouse}

1246: \affiliation{Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155}

1247: \author{D.~Whiteson$^e$}

1248: \affiliation{University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104}

1249: \author{A.B.~Wicklund}

1250: \affiliation{Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439}

1251: \author{E.~Wicklund}

1252: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1253: \author{G.~Williams}

1254: \affiliation{Institute of Particle Physics: McGill University, Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S~1A7}

1255: \author{H.H.~Williams}

1256: \affiliation{University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104}

1257: \author{P.~Wilson}

1258: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1259: \author{B.L.~Winer}

1260: \affiliation{The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio  43210}

1261: \author{P.~Wittich$^g$}

1262: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1263: \author{S.~Wolbers}

1264: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1265: \author{C.~Wolfe}

1266: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

1267: \author{T.~Wright}

1268: \affiliation{University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109}

1269: \author{X.~Wu}

1270: \affiliation{University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland}

1271: \author{S.M.~Wynne}

1272: \affiliation{University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom}

1273: \author{A.~Yagil}

1274: \affiliation{University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California  92093}

1275: \author{K.~Yamamoto}

1276: \affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka 588, Japan}

1277: \author{J.~Yamaoka}

1278: \affiliation{Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855}

1279: \author{T.~Yamashita}

1280: \affiliation{Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan}

1281: \author{C.~Yang}

1282: \affiliation{Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520}

1283: \author{U.K.~Yang$^m$}

1284: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

1285: \author{Y.C.~Yang}

1286: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

1287: \author{W.M.~Yao}

1288: \affiliation{Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720}

1289: \author{G.P.~Yeh}

1290: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1291: \author{J.~Yoh}

1292: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1293: \author{K.~Yorita}

1294: \affiliation{Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637}

1295: \author{T.~Yoshida}

1296: \affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka 588, Japan}

1297: \author{G.B.~Yu}

1298: \affiliation{University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627}

1299: \author{I.~Yu}

1300: \affiliation{Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea; Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea}

1301: \author{S.S.~Yu}

1302: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1303: \author{J.C.~Yun}

1304: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510}

1305: \author{L.~Zanello}

1306: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, University of Rome ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}

1307: \author{A.~Zanetti}

1308: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Trieste/\ Udine, Italy}

1309: \author{I.~Zaw}

1310: \affiliation{Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138}

1311: \author{X.~Zhang}

1312: \affiliation{University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801}

1313: \author{Y.~Zheng$^b$}

1314: \affiliation{University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California  90024}

1315: \author{S.~Zucchelli}

1316: \affiliation{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Bologna, I-40127 Bologna, Italy}

1317: \collaboration{CDF Collaboration\footnote{With visitors from $^a$University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece, 

1318: $^b$Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100864, China, 

1319: $^c$University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TL, United Kingdom, 

1320: $^d$University Libre de Bruxelles, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium, 

1321: $^e$University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA  92697, 

1322: $^f$University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA  95064, 

1323: $^g$Cornell University, Ithaca, NY  14853, 

1324: $^h$University of Cyprus, Nicosia CY-1678, Cyprus, 

1325: $^i$University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland, 

1326: $^j$University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, United Kingdom, 

1327: $^k$University of Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany, 

1328: $^l$Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico D.F., Mexico, 

1329: $^m$University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, England, 

1330: $^n$Nagasaki Institute of Applied Science, Nagasaki, Japan, 

1331: $^o$University de Oviedo, E-33007 Oviedo, Spain, 

1332: $^p$Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 4NS, England, 

1333: $^q$Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX  79409, 

1334: $^r$IFIC(CSIC-Universitat de Valencia), 46071 Valencia, Spain, 

1335: }}

1336: \noaffiliation

1337: 

1338: 

1339: 

1340: \date{\today}

1341: %\pacs{13.38.Be, 13.38.Dg, 14.70.Fm, 14.70.Hp, 13.85.Qk, 12.38.Qk, 12.15.Ji}

1342: 

1343: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1344: %\input{abstract}

1345: \begin{abstract}

1346: We present a search for the associated production of charginos

1347: and neutralinos in $\rm {p \bar p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 1.96 TeV. The data were collected at the Collider Detector at Fermilab (CDF II)

1348: and correspond to integrated luminosities between 0.7 and 1.0 fb$^{-1}$.

1349: We look for final states with one high-\pt\  electron or muon, and two additional leptons.

1350: Our results are consistent with the standard model expectations, and we

1351: set limits on the cross section as a function of the chargino mass  in 

1352: three different supersymmetric scenarios. For a specific MSSM scenario with no slepton mixing we 

1353: set a 95\% C.L. limit at 151 GeV/$c^2$.

1354: \end{abstract}

1355: 

1356: \maketitle

1357: \newpage

1358: 

1359: \section{Introduction}

1360: \label{intro}

1361: %\input{intro}

1362: \indent Supersymmetry~\cite{prl1, martin} (SUSY) is a proposed symmetry of 

1363: nature. 

1364: It predicts the existence of supersymmetric partners for the standard 

1365: model (SM) particles, called gauginos (higgsinos) for the gauge

1366: (Higgs) bosons, and squarks/sleptons for fermions. The lightest SUSY particle is

1367: referred to as the LSP.

1368: If SUSY is an exact symmetry, the supersymmetric and the 

1369: SM particles have the same mass, related couplings, and spin differing by 1/2.

1370: As a consequence of the non-observation of light SUSY particles, such as the selectron,

1371: %If SUSY were an exact symmetry, we would have already observed

1372: %several light SUSY particles (sparticles), such as the selectron. 

1373: %As a consequence of the non-observation of such particles, if 

1374: SUSY must be a broken symmetry, if realized.

1375: Several symmetry breaking models have been discussed in the past years.  %In the mSUGRA~\cite{mSUGRA} scenario

1376: The gravitational interactions are responsible for the symmetry breaking in the mSUGRA~\cite{mSUGRA} scenario, whereas 

1377: the ordinary gauge interactions are the source of SUSY breaking in the GMSB~\cite{martin} model.

1378: In broken SUSY, 

1379: gauginos and higgsinos combine to form mass eigenstates called charginos 

1380: ($\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1,2}$) and neutralinos 

1381: ($\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1, 2, 3, 4}$).

1382: The lightest neutralino, $\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$,

1383: can be the LSP. 

1384: SUSY is one of the most promising theories of physics beyond the 

1385: SM as it can accommodate gravity

1386: and unify the gauge interactions. %It also predicts a low-mass Higgs

1387: %boson in accord with the  electroweak fits~\cite{ewk}.

1388: In SUSY models where $R$-parity~\cite{rpv} is conserved, 

1389: the LSP is stable and only weakly interacting, 

1390: and thus is a viable  dark matter candidate. \\

1391: \indent 

1392: Experimental bounds on the gaugino masses are set by the LEP experiments

1393: at 103.5 GeV/$c^2$ for the lightest chargino, in scenarios with large sfermion masses~\cite{LEP}, and

1394: at 50.3 GeV/$c^2$ for the lightest neutralino in mSUGRA. %, a model in which 

1395: %gravity mediates the breaking of SUSY~\cite{mSUGRA}. 

1396: These constraints are very robust within mSUGRA-inspired SUSY models and do not depend on the chargino decay modes, except for a few pathological cases~\cite{LEP2}.

1397: %change much within mSUGRA-inspired SUSY models~\cite{LEP2}. 

1398: The DO collaboration excludes the chargino mass below 117 GeV/$c^2$ in a specific SUSY breaking scenario described in~\cite{D0},

1399: %In this mSUGRA-inspired model 

1400: where the standard mixing between the left and the right components in the third generation families is suppressed. \\

1401: \indent In this article we present a search for the associated production of 

1402: the lightest chargino $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}$ and the second-lightest neutralino $\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{2}$

1403: (shown in Fig.~\ref{fig::pro}), performed as a counting experiment in data collected by the CDF detector.

1404:  \begin{figure}[h]

1405: \begin{center}

1406: %original

1407: \includegraphics[width=0.20\textwidth]{schannel.eps}\hspace{0.6cm}

1408: \includegraphics[width=0.20\textwidth]{tchannel.eps}

1409: %\includegraphics[width=0.20\textwidth]{schannel}\hspace{0.5cm}

1410: %\includegraphics[width=0.20\textwidth]{tchannel}

1411: \caption{Leading-order Feynman diagrams for chargino and neutralino associated production. The interaction is mediated through virtual W (left) and

1412: squark ($\tilde{q}$, right). \label{fig::pro}}

1413: \end{center}

1414: \end{figure}

1415: Charginos and neutralinos can be among the lightest SUSY particles in the models we explore, with associated production 

1416: cross sections within the reach of the Tevatron collider~\cite{carenaXS}.

1417: If these sparticles decay leptonically within the detector, the final state is characterized

1418: by the presence of leptons and significant missing energy~\cite{metdesc}, \met, due to particles escaping detection. 

1419: While the process $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\rightarrow \ell\nu\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$  results in a final state with $\ell+$\met, which has a large inclusive $W$ background, the distinct signature of 

1420: $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{2}\rightarrow \ell\ell\ell\nu\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ 

1421: makes the search for the associated production of chargino $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}$ and

1422: neutralino $\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{2}$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig::decay}), one of the most powerful tests of SUSY at hadron colliders.

1423: \begin{figure}[h]

1424: \begin{center}

1425: \includegraphics[width=0.20\textwidth]{decay1.eps}\hspace{0.5cm}

1426: \includegraphics[width=0.20\textwidth]{decay2.eps}\vspace{0.5cm}

1427: \includegraphics[width=0.20\textwidth]{decay3.eps}\hspace{0.5cm}

1428: \includegraphics[width=0.20\textwidth]{decay4.eps}

1429: \caption{Chargino and neutralino decay modes. The $\tilde{\ell}$ and the

1430: $\tilde{\nu}$ are the SUSY counterparts of the lepton and the

1431: neutrino. \label{fig::decay}}

1432: \end{center}

1433: \end{figure}

1434: %This distinct signature and the very low backgrounds make the search for

1435: %the associated production of a chargino with a neutralino with leptonic

1436: %decays one of the most powerful tests of SUSY at hadron

1437: %colliders.

1438: 

1439: \indent The paper is organized as follows. 

1440: Section~\ref{cdf} contains a brief description of the CDF detector.

1441: Section~\ref{leptonid} presents the lepton identification procedure and measurement of misidentification rate.

1442: %whereas Sub-section~\ref{fake} the 

1443: %misidentification probability measurement. 

1444: %The major standard model backgrounds 

1445: %are diboson ($W\gamma$, $WZ/\gamma^*$, $ZZ/\gamma^*$), heavy quark pair, and Drell-Yan production

1446: %where a third lepton in the event originates from a photon radiated  

1447: %from the primary leptons. 

1448: %The search sample is also contaminated by hadrons misidentified as leptons.

1449: In  Section~\ref{dataSample} we discuss the backgrounds and in  Section~\ref{anaCuts} we 

1450: describe the event selection.

1451: In Section~\ref{sys} 

1452: we present the estimated systematic uncertainties, followed by the validation of the analysis procedure in Section~\ref{cr}.

1453: The searches presented in

1454: this paper

1455: are not targeted at a specific model, but rather are designed to cover a

1456: large

1457: range of possible new physics scenarios in which events with three leptons

1458: and significant missing transverse energy are predicted at rates larger

1459: than the SM predictions.

1460: Nevertheless, based on the results presented in Section~\ref{results},

1461: we set limits as a function of the chargino mass in several SUSY scenarios (Section~\ref{model}). The

1462: results of the analysis presented in this paper are combined with results of similar searches

1463: carried out at CDF to further improve the sensitivity~\cite{prl}.

1464: 

1465: 

1466: 

1467: \section{Experimental Apparatus}

1468: \label{cdf}

1469: %\input{cdf}

1470: The CDF II detector~\cite{cdf}

1471: is a general-purpose detector with approximate azimuthal and forward-backward 

1472: symmetry. CDF combines precision charged-particle tracking with projective

1473: calorimeter towers and muon detection.

1474: In the detector coordinate system, $\phi$ is the azimuthal angle around the beam axis and $\eta$ is the 

1475: pseudorapidity defined as $\eta = - \ln \tan(\theta/2)$, where $\theta$ is the polar angle from the beam axis. 

1476: The radial distance to the beam axis is referred to as $r$. \\

1477: \indent The tracking system is composed of an inner

1478: silicon detector ($1.5 < r < 29.0$ cm) and an outer drift chamber (COT, $40 < r < 140$ cm).

1479: %The innermost silicon layer consists of single-sided microstrip sensors, while the remaining seven layers 

1480: %consist of double-sided microstrip sensors.

1481: These detectors provide three-dimensional vertex measurement and  

1482: track reconstruction efficiency  above 90\%

1483: in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|<2.0$.

1484: For the leptons in our search, the resolution on the impact parameter is $\approx$ 40 $\mu$m, including

1485: $\approx$ 30 $\mu$m for the beam size.

1486: %The 96-layer drift chamber~\cite{cot} completes the tracking in the central region ($|\eta|<1.0$).

1487: Surrounding the tracking system is a solenoidal

1488: magnet which provides a 1.4~T field aligned parallel to the beam.

1489: From the curvature of a track in the magnetic field, we determine the

1490: transverse momentum \pt\ of charged particles. The momentum resolution of the outer tracking is $\sigma(p_{\rm T})/p_{\rm T}^2 = 0.0017$ $c$/GeV. \\

1491: \indent Two layers of sampling calorimeters, one for detecting electromagnetic particles and the other to measure the

1492: remaining hadronic energy, cover the range $|\eta|< 3.6$.

1493: The central electromagnetic calorimeter (CEM) surrounds the solenoid within $|\eta|< 1.1$. It consists of lead sheets separated 

1494: by polystyrene scintillator with an energy resolution of $13.5\%/\sqrt{E_{\rm T}} \oplus 1.5\%$, 

1495: where $E_{\rm T} = |E|\sin\theta$ is measured in GeV. 

1496: The CEM is segmented into 24 wedges per side; each wedge spans an angle of

1497: approximately 15 degrees in $\phi$ and is divided into ten towers of $\Delta\eta=0.11$. At

1498: normal incidence the total depth corresponds to about 18 radiation lengths ($X_0$). A proportional chamber (CES) is embedded in 

1499: each CEM wedge at the shower maximum and provides good spatial resolution and shower shape information used for electron and photon identification. 

1500: The central hadronic

1501: calorimeter (CHA), positioned outside the CEM, matches the CEM segmentation into 24 wedges but 

1502: uses steel absorbers interspersed with acrylic scintillators. There are

1503: 23 layers in the CHA and % each layer is

1504: %composed of two inches of steel and six millimeters of scintillator. 

1505: each layer is composed of one inch of steel and one

1506: centimeter of scintillator.

1507: The end wall 

1508: calorimeter and the end plug calorimeter complete the coverage in the regions 

1509: $0.8 < |\eta|< 1.2$ and $1.1 < |\eta|< 3.6$, respectively. The plug calorimeter

1510:  consists of a lead-scintillator electromagnetic section (PEM) and an iron-scintillator hadronic section (PHA).  The PEM resolution is $16\%/\sqrt{E_{\rm T}} \oplus 1\%$.

1511: The PEM also contains a shower maximum detector (PES). \\

1512: \indent The muon system is installed outside the calorimeters. The innermost four-layer

1513: drift chamber system (CMU) can detect minimum ionizing particles with transverse momenta larger than 1.4 GeV/$c$. An additional four-layer drift chamber (CMP) is located

1514: outside the magnet return yoke and detects particles with \pt\ $ > $ 2.0 GeV/$c$. The 

1515: CMU-CMP coverage ($|\eta|< 0.6$) is extended up to $|\eta|< 1.0$ by the central 

1516: muon extension chambers (CMX). Outside the CMP and CMX chambers are scintillator detectors providing additional timing measurements. The last set of muon detectors (IMU) covers the region $1.0 < |\eta|< 1.5$. 

1517: The information from the IMU chambers is not used in this analysis. \\ 

1518: \indent The luminosity is measured from the total inelastic $\rm{p}\bar{\rm{p}}$ cross-section 

1519: using Cherenkov counters located in the $3.7 <|\eta|< 4.7$ region.\\

1520: \indent The CDF trigger has a three-level architecture.

1521: The first level (L1) is a custom-designed hardware trigger 

1522: which  makes a fast trigger decision based on

1523: preliminary information from the tracking, calorimeter, and muon systems with

1524: an average accept rate of 25 kHz.

1525: The second level (L2) uses both custom hardware and a software-based event reconstruction

1526: with an accept rate of 750 Hz. The third level (L3) uses the offline

1527: reconstruction  software and selects events for storage with a rate of up to 85 Hz~\cite{runIIb}.

1528: 

1529: \section{Lepton Identification}

1530: \label{leptonid}

1531: %\input{leptonid}

1532: \subsection{Lepton identification probability}

1533: We use different constraints on identification variables for high-\pt\ (\pt\ $>$ 20 GeV/$c$) and low-\pt\ (\pt\ $<$ 20 GeV/$c$) leptons due to  different detection characteristics  and   also due to the trigger requirements. These identification criteria are described below and are summarized in Tables~\ref{tab:tracks} through~\ref{tab:muons}.\\

1534: \indent Reconstructed central tracks must have at least  five hits out of 12 possible in at least 

1535: three (two) out of four axial (stereo) COT super layers, to ensure high reconstruction efficiency and purity. We accept only tracks originating within $\pm$60 cm from the center of the detector, 

1536: %within $\pm$60 cm of the interaction point along $z$,

1537:  and we apply a cut on the impact parameter ($d_0$, see Table~\ref{tab:tracks}) to suppress cosmic rays and secondary vertices. The impact parameter 

1538: is the radial distance of closest approach between the track and the beam line. 

1539: For each beam-constrained COT track, we place a requirement  on the fit quality 

1540:  $\chi^2$ normalized by the number of degrees of freedom in the track fitting.

1541: The efficiency of reconstructing a track is measured separately in calorimeter triggered  $W \rightarrow e \nu$  events as described in~\cite{trackeff}.\\ 

1542: % The efficiency of reconstructing a track is measured separately in $W \rightarrow e \nu$ events as described in~\cite{trackeff}.\\

1543: \indent A candidate electron in the central region is a track pointing to an electromagnetic calorimeter cluster. 

1544: If the ratio of the energy measured in the hadronic calorimeter to that measured in the electromagnetic calorimeter is small,

1545: we define it as a ``loose'' electron. 

1546: %It is also checked whether the associated track is consistent with coming from a $\gamma \rightarrow e^+ e^-$ conversion, in which case it is not included as a candidate electron. Details on how this is measured and corrected for can be found in Section~\ref{conversion}.

1547: %

1548: Additional requirements

1549: on the shower shape and the energy to momentum ratio are imposed

1550:  to select high purity, ``tight'' electrons. One such requirement, the lateral shower sharing profile ($L_{\rm{shr}}$) compares the energy sharing between neighboring CEM towers to the expectation from test beam data. We also restrict the matching between the shower and the track, both the distance in the $r$-$\phi$ plane (Q$\cdot \Delta x$, where $Q$ is the lepton charge), and in the r-z plane ($|\Delta z|$). In addition we also restrict the $\chi^2$ of the fit to the shower profile in the CES, and to test beam data. A similar procedure based on the $\chi^2$ from comparing the tower energy distribution is applied to

1551:   electrons reconstructed in the plug calorimeter. In this case only tracks within $|\eta|<2$ and with silicon hits are accepted. The collimation of the shower shape in the PES is also restricted, by requiring that the energy in the middle five strips of a PES cluster should be more than 65\% of the energy in all nine strips. 

1552: %Candidate CMUP (CMX) muons are tracks with small energy deposits in the calorimeters and

1553: %matched stubs~\cite{stubfootnote} in the CMU and CMP (CMX) muon chambers. The matching between the extrapolated track and the 

1554: If the track associated to the candidate electron is consistent with coming from a $\gamma \rightarrow e^+ e^-$ conversion, the candidate electron

1555: is rejected. The photon conversion identification algorithm defines an electron as originating from a conversion if the

1556:  azimuthal separation of the electron candidate and any oppositely-charged track 

1557: at the tangency point ($D_{xy}=R\times\Delta\phi$ where $R$ is the conversion radius) is less than 

1558:  0.2 cm 

1559: and the difference in polar angle ($\Delta\cot\theta$)

1560:  is smaller than 0.04. The measurement of the conversion identification efficiency is described in Section~\ref{conversion}. \\

1561: \indent Tracks with small energy deposits in the calorimeters and matched stubs~\cite{stubfootnote} in the CMU and CMP (or CMX only) muon chambers are candidates for the CMUP (CMX)  muon category. The matching between the extrapolated track and the 

1562: stub in the chamber ($|\Delta x|$, where $x$ is the local linear coordinate in the transverse plane) 

1563: has to be within a certain range (refer to Table~\ref{tab:muons}). If a track has \pt\ less than 20 GeV/$c$, the effect of multiple scattering is enhanced and thus we set a less stringent requirement.

1564: %we also accept matches outside the range, provided the deviation in $\Delta x$ can be explained by multiple scattering. 

1565: For CMX muons we restrict our selection to tracks that pass through all eight super layers of the COT. The efficiency of finding a stub in the first place is measured separately and combined with the other identification measurements.\\

1566: \indent %The trigger decision for

1567: %the muon data sample is based on CMUP or CMX muons with \pt\ larger than 18 GeV/c. %muon candidates from these two categories.

1568: Other muons in an event are also included if they fall in the muon category called 

1569: ``central minimum ionizing objects'' (CMIO's). This category is composed of tracks with \pt\ greater than 10 GeV/$c$ for which the track does not

1570: extrapolate to the fiducial region of the CMU and CMP or CMX chambers~\cite{cmio}.

1571: In this case we constrain the selection to muon

1572: candidate tracks with a non-zero calorimeter energy deposit to suppress tracks entering uninstrumented parts.

1573: This extends the muon coverage to $|\eta|<1.5$, with lower efficiency and lower purity for $|\eta|>1.2$.\\

1574: \indent Since leptons from $\tilde\chi_1^{\pm}$ and $\tilde\chi_2^0$ decays are

1575: expected to be well separated from each other and from other objects in the event,~\cite{tevIIreport},

1576: we restrict our studies to isolated electrons and muons. To decide whether a lepton is isolated or not we sum up the calorimeter transverse energy ($E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{cone}}$) in a cone of $\Delta R = \sqrt{\Delta \eta^2 + \Delta \phi^2}<$ 0.4 around, but not including, the energy deposited by the lepton. 

1577: We require  $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{cone}}$ to be less than 2 GeV for the loose CMUP and CMX muons.

1578: The $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{cone}}$ is required to be smaller 

1579: than  10\% of the muon {\pt} (electron $E_{\rm T}$) for other lepton categories, or if the muon~\pt\ (electron $E_{\rm T}$) is above 20 GeV/$c$ (GeV). 

1580: %If the muon {\pt}, or electron $E_{\rm T}$,

1581: % is above 20 GeV we require $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{cone}}$/{\pt} for muons and $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{cone}}$/$E_{\rm T}$ for electrons to be 

1582: %less than 10\%. Otherwise we have an additional selection, where we require that $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{cone}}$ be less than 2 GeV.\\

1583: \begin{table}[h]

1584: \begin{center}

1585: \caption{Requirements for central tracks}

1586: \begin{tabular}{lr} \hline  \hline

1587: Variable & Cut \\ \hline

1588: no. axial COT super layers & \hspace{1cm} $\geq$ 3 with $\geq$ 5 hits\\ 

1589: no. stereo COT super layers & $\geq$ 2 with $\geq$ 5 hits\\ 

1590: $|z_0|$ & $<$ 60 cm \\

1591: $|d_0|$ (no silicon hits)& $<$ 0.2 cm \\

1592: $|d_0|$ (silicon hits)& $<$ 0.02 cm \\ \hline

1593: Muon tracks: & \\

1594: COT exit radius (CMX) & $>$ 140 cm \\

1595: $\chi^2$ (first 350 pb$^{-1}$) & $<$ 2.8  \\

1596: $\chi^2$ (otherwise) & $<$ 2.3 \\ \hline\hline

1597: %$\chi^2/N_{DoF}$ (first 350 pb$^{-1}$) & $<$ 2.8  \\

1598: %$\chi^2/N_{DoF}$ (otherwise) & $<$ 2.3 \\ \hline\hline

1599: \end{tabular}

1600: \label{tab:tracks}

1601: \end{center}

1602: \end{table}

1603: 

1604: \begin{table}[h]

1605: \begin{center}

1606: \caption{Electron selection criteria}

1607: \begin{tabular}{lr} \hline  \hline

1608: Variable & Cut \\ \hline

1609: \bf{Loose electron:} & \\

1610: Central track & \\

1611: Not conversion & \\

1612: $|\eta|$ & $<$ 1 \\

1613: $E_{\rm {Had}}$/$E_{\rm {EM}}$ & $<$ 0.055+0.00045$\cdot$ $E_{\rm{EM}}$ GeV\\ 

1614: $E_{\rm{T}}^{cone}$/$E_{\rm T}$ & $<$ 0.1 \\ \hline

1615: \bf{Tight electron:} & \\

1616: As electron1 except & \\

1617: $E/p$ ($p_{\rm{T}} <$ 50 GeV/c) & $<$ 2 \\

1618: $L_{\rm {shr}}$ & $<$ 0.2 \\

1619: $\chi^2_{strips}$ & $<$ 10 \\

1620: $Q\cdot \Delta x $ & $>$ -3.0,  $<$ 1.5 cm \\

1621: $| \Delta z |$ & $<$ 3.0 cm \\ \hline

1622: \bf{Plug electron:} & \\

1623: Track with Silicon hits& \\

1624: Not conversion & \\

1625: $|\eta|$ & $>$ 1.2 $<$ 2.0 \\

1626: $E_{\rm{Had}}$/$E_{\rm{EM}}$ & $<$ 0.055 GeV\\

1627: $E_{\rm{T}}^{\rm {cone}}$/$E_{\rm{T}}$ & $<$ 0.1 \\ 

1628: $E/p$  & $<$ 3 \\

1629: PES 5/9 (see text) & $>$ 0.65 \\

1630: $\chi^2_{\rm{PEM}}$ & $<$ 10 \\ \hline \hline

1631: \end{tabular}

1632: \label{tab:electrons}

1633: \end{center}

1634: \end{table}

1635: 

1636: \begin{table}[h]

1637: \begin{center}

1638: \caption{Muon selection criteria}

1639: \begin{tabular}{lr} \hline  \hline

1640: Variable & Cut \\ \hline

1641: \bf{Base muon:} & \\

1642: Central track & \\ 

1643: $E_{\rm{EM}}$ & $<$ 2 GeV\\

1644: $E_{\rm{Had}}$ ($p_{\rm{T}} \geq$ 20 GeV/c) & $<$ 6 GeV  \\

1645: $E_{\rm{Had}}$ (p$_T <$ 20 GeV/c) & $<$ 3.5 + p$_T$/8 GeV  \\ \hline \hline

1646: \bf{Tight CMUP/CMX muon:} & \\

1647:  Base muon & \\

1648: $E_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{cone}}$/$p_{\rm{T}}$ & $<$ 0.1 \\

1649: $|\Delta x_{CMU}|$ (CMUP) & $<$ 7 cm or $\chi^2<$ 9\\

1650: $|\Delta x_{CMP}|$ (CMUP) & $<$ 5 cm or $\chi^2<$ 9\\

1651: $|\Delta x_{CMX}|$ (CMX) & $<$ 6 cm or $\chi^2<$ 9\\ \hline

1652: \bf{Loose CMUP/CMX muon:} & \\

1653: As muon1 except: & \\

1654: $E_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{cone}}$ ($p_{\rm{T}} <$ 20 GeV/c) & $<$ 2 GeV  \\ \hline

1655: 

1656: \bf{CMIO muon:} & \\

1657: Base muon & \\

1658: Not fiducial to CMUP, CMX& \\

1659: $p_{\rm{T}}$ & $\geq$ 10 GeV/$c$  \\

1660: $E_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{cone}}$/$p_{\rm{T}}$ & $<$ 0.1 \\

1661: $E_{\rm{EM}}$ + $E_{\rm{Had}}$ & $>$ 0.1 GeV\\ \hline \hline

1662: \end{tabular}

1663: \label{tab:muons}

1664: \end{center}

1665: \end{table}

1666: \indent The primary data sample used to measure trigger and identification efficiencies for leptons with \pt\ ($E_{\rm{T}}$) $>$ 20 GeV/$c$ (GeV) is the single-electron or single-muon triggered sample with a \pt\ ($E_{\rm{T}}$) threshold of 18 GeV/c (GeV) used for the analysis itself, as described in Section~\ref{dataSample}. 

1667: Samples of simulated events needed in this study are also presented in 

1668: Section~\ref{dataSample}.

1669:   Additional data samples are used to measure 

1670:     efficiencies and misidentification probabilities for lower-energy

1671:     leptons. These include samples collected with single-lepton

1672:     trigger thresholds of 8 GeV/$c$ for muon \pt\ and 8 GeV for electron $E_{\rm{T}}$, 

1673:     and inclusive central jet samples collected

1674:     with jet trigger thresholds at $E_{\rm{T}} >$ 20, 50, 70, and 100 GeV.

1675: 

1676: For high-\pt\ leptons, we measure the identification efficiencies using

1677: same-flavor, oppositely-charged dilepton candidate events in the invariant mass window from 76 to 106 GeV/$c^2$. We require that at least one of those candidate leptons fulfills all the tight electron or tight CMUP/CMX criteria, defined in Tables~\ref{tab:electrons} and \ref{tab:muons} respectively, and satisfying the trigger requirements. We then measure the efficiencies of our identification criteria on the other candidate lepton. In the case of $Z\rightarrow e^+e^-$ candidates we subtract background using same-charge dilepton events in the mass window. The effect of background subtraction is found to be negligible in the $Z\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^-$ sample~\cite{lepplusjet}.\\ 

1678: \indent The efficiency of low-\pt\ leptons is measured in

1679: Drell-Yan candidate events requiring same-flavor, oppositely-charged leptons with $\Delta\phi (\ell_1

1680: \ell_2)>160^\circ$. %Dimuon events with significant \met\ are probably residual cosmic ray events and are rejected.

1681: In order to reject events in which a cosmic ray is reconstructed as a pair of muons, we require the timing of the track hits

1682: in the tracking system to be consistent with particles originating from the center of the detector and moving outwards, and reject

1683: events with significant \met. 

1684: At least one lepton candidate must pass all the identification criteria (to

1685: reduce instrumental and non-prompt background) and must satisfy the 8 GeV/$c$ 

1686: trigger requirements. We then measure the efficiency of the identification variables on

1687: the second lepton candidate in the event. In events in which both leptons pass the trigger requirements, we use both

1688: to determine the efficiency. The remaining background to be subtracted is estimated in events with lepton candidates of the same electric charge. As part of the cross checks and systematic uncertainties evaluation, we also verify the results using $J/\psi$ and $\Upsilon$ candidate events and sideband subtraction, except for the isolation cut, as only the Drell-Yan selection gives well-isolated, prompt leptons with good statistics in the full \pt\ range. The resulting total identification efficiency ranges between 75\% for

1689:  forward electrons and 80\% for central electrons to 90\% for most muon categories.\\

1690: \indent In both observed events and Monte Carlo (MC) simulated events, we check for possible dependence of the efficiency of identifying leptons on additional factors: the number of primary vertices, the geometry of the detector, and changes in the detector performance and/or configuration over time. We include deviations as part of the uncertainty on lepton identification efficiency measurements. 

1691: Fig.~\ref{fig:electronidet} and Fig.~\ref{fig:muonidet}  

1692: show examples of $E_{\rm T}$ (\pt) dependence in observed and simulated events.

1693: The dependence is mainly caused by photons radiated by the leptons; due to the \pt\ spectrum of Drell-Yan events this effect is most visible in the 20-30 GeV range with our selection. The presence of extra photons means the isolation requirement (and for the muons, also the $E_{\rm{EM}}$ requirement) is not fully efficient in that \pt-range for Drell-Yan events. This effect is adequately described by the Drell-Yan simulation. For very high \pt\ electrons the efficiency measured in  observed events is lower than the one measured in Drell-Yan simulated events due to the $E/p$ cut becoming inefficient. %For the CMUP identification efficiency we see an almost constant observed events versus simulated events difference. The ratio is mainly caused by differences between

1694: %multiple scattering in observed and in simulated events. 

1695: For CMUP muons the efficiency measured in observed events and in simulated events shows the same dependency with respect to the muon transverse momentum. The efficiency measured in observed

1696: events is lower than the one measured in simulated ones because of mismodelling of multiple scattering.

1697: %This is due to an inefficiency in the data for reconstructing stubs in the CMU chambers, likely because of multiple scattering.

1698:  Discrepancies at the low-\pt\ end are caused by non-isolated, non-prompt background. 

1699: \begin{figure}\begin{center}\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{sourabhs2.eps}\caption{The identification 

1700: efficiency of tight electrons as a function of $E_{\rm T}$ using the Drell-Yan selection.}\label{fig:electronidet}\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{muonidplot2.eps}\caption{The identification efficiency (including stub finding efficiency) of CMUP muons as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ using the Drell-Yan selection.}\label{fig:muonidet}\end{center}\end{figure}

1701: Because the MC does not completely reproduce the identification efficiency found in the observed events,

1702:  we define a scale factor ($S_{ID}$) as the ratio of the identification efficiency measured in the  observed events to the identification efficiency 

1703: found in the simulated samples. Typical scale factors applied to the MC predictions lie between 0.9 and 1.0 and are \pt\ and $E_{\rm T}$ dependent.

1704: 

1705: \subsection{Probability of hadrons to be misidentified as leptons}

1706: \label{fake}

1707: 

1708: A jet %~\cite{jetAlgo}

1709: of hadrons is defined as a cluster of energy in the calorimeter and reconstructed using a 

1710: fixed cone algorithm ($\Delta R$ = 0.4). A jet 

1711: can be misidentified as an electron if it consists of an energetic track

1712: pointing to a large energy deposit in the electromagnetic calorimeter.

1713: Charged kaons and pions with a late shower in the hadronic calorimeter, or those that decay in flight, can also mimic muons. \\

1714: \indent We use reconstructed jets to estimate the probability to misidentify

1715: them as electrons. %In the case of muons, 

1716: In the study of misidentified muons, we use tracks with $E_{\rm T}^{\rm cone} <$ 4 GeV (called ``isolated tracks''). The isolation is required to reduce the dependence on the sample composition.

1717: In the following we will refer to these jets and tracks as ``fakeable

1718: objects''.

1719: Since such fakeable objects originate from hadrons, we use the four data samples

1720: collected with jet-based triggers to measure their

1721: misidentification probability. We expect only a negligible contribution from inclusive $W$ 

1722: and $Z$ production with the gauge bosons decaying into leptons and do not apply any corrections. To avoid a trigger-induced bias, 

1723: we remove the highest $E_{\rm T}$ jet from the collection of fakeable objects.\\

1724: \indent The misidentification probability, or fake rate, is calculated

1725: as the ratio of the number of identified lepton candidates over the number of fakeable objects. It is

1726:  parametrized as a function of the transverse energy (transverse momentum) of the jet (isolated track)

1727: and averaged over the four jet data samples. The results for one of the electron and muon categories are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:fakeTCE} and Fig.~\ref{fig:fakeCMUP} respectively.

1728: The  probability for misidentifying hadrons as muons is higher than that for electrons since the muon-type fakeable object 

1729: is based on an isolated track and thus more likely to pass our identification cuts. The application of these rates in the analysis is described in the next section.

1730: \begin{figure}[h]

1731: \begin{center}

1732: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{eloose-fake_bw.eps}

1733: \caption{Fake rate of loose central electrons. The solid line represents the linear fit to the average and the dotted lines are

1734: $\pm$ 50$\%$.\label{fig:fakeTCE}}

1735: \end{center}

1736: \end{figure}

1737: \begin{figure}[h]

1738: \begin{center}

1739: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{cmup-fake_bw.eps}

1740: \caption{Fake rate of CMUP muons. The solid line represents the linear fit to the average and the dotted lines are

1741: $\pm$ 50$\%$. \label{fig:fakeCMUP}}

1742: \end{center}

1743: \end{figure}

1744: An uncertainty of 50\% is assessed from the variation

1745: in the fake rates measured in the different jet data samples.

1746: 

1747: 

1748: 

1749: \section{Samples of observed and simulated events}

1750: \label{dataSample}

1751: %\input{dataSample}

1752: \subsection{ Sample of observed events}

1753: The data used in this analysis were collected between March 2002 and February 2006 via electron-based  

1754: and muon-based triggers. The former requires one central ($|\eta|<1$) electron with $E_{\rm T} >$ 18 GeV,

1755: whereas the latter requires one \pt\ $ >18 $ GeV/$c$ central muon with a stub

1756: in both the CMU and CMP or in the CMX chambers.

1757: The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb$^{-1}$ and 0.7 

1758: fb$^{-1}$ for the samples based on the electron 

1759: and muon triggers, respectively. 

1760: \subsection{Background Samples}

1761:  In the search based on three leptons and

1762: missing transverse energy the SM backgrounds  

1763: are 

1764:  $W\gamma$, $WZ/\gamma^*$, $ZZ/\gamma^*$, 

1765: $t\bar{t}$ and Drell-Yan production, along with hadrons misidentified 

1766: as leptons. The $b\bar{b}$ contamination is suppressed

1767: because the soft and typically non-isolated leptons from $B$ 

1768: decays are rejected by our lepton selection.

1769:  The first set of backgrounds are estimated using a  Monte Carlo technique,

1770: whereas the contribution from misidentified hadrons is measured using observed events (Section~\ref{leptonid}).

1771: \indent The simulated samples are generated using \textsc{pythia}~\cite{pythia}

1772: version 6.216 with the underlying event model tuned to the CDF observed events ~\cite{tunea}. 

1773: %In case 

1774: %of the $WZ$ sample, \textsc{pythia} is

1775: %used only for the  parton showering and hadronization of events generated with 

1776: %the leading-order matrix element program \textsc{madevent}~\cite{madgraph}. \\

1777: In the case of the $WZ$ sample, \textsc{pythia} 

1778: is used only for the parton showering and the hadronization of events that are 

1779: generated with the leading-order matrix element program \textsc{madevent}~\cite{madgraph}. \\

1780: \noindent All simulated background samples were run through the full CDF detector simulation,

1781:  which is based on the

1782: \textsc{geant}~\cite{geant} framework, 

1783: and the same reconstruction algorithm~\cite{cdfsim} that is used for the observed events. 

1784: %Leptons in the simulated events are verified to originate

1785: %from the hard interaction (this does not apply to the $t\bar{t}$ background

1786: %where we only ask for three electrons or muons). 

1787: %The background due to hadrons misidentified as leptons is measured in observed events as 

1788: % discussed in Section~\ref{FAKE}. Since 

1789: %simulated events can contain hadrons misidentified as leptons as well, we require each identified 

1790: %lepton in such events to originate from the hard interaction (this does not apply to the $t\bar{t}$ background

1791: %where we only ask for three electrons or muons). Without this requirement the background due to hadrons misidentified

1792: %as leptons would be overestimated.

1793: %This requirement

1794: %prevents us from overestimating the 

1795: %misidentifying hadrons in the simulated event

1796: %as leptons. 

1797: All simulation-driven background estimates are corrected for the different trigger efficiency (see for instance~\cite{trackeff}) and 

1798: identification efficiency measured in observed events

1799: with respect to the one in simulated events (Section \ref{leptonid}).

1800: An additional correction factor ($S_{\rm conv}$) is needed

1801: for the Drell-Yan production, as explained in the next section.\\

1802: %We also correct the simulated background for the trigger efficiencies measured in data, see for instance~\cite{trackeff}.

1803:  To avoid overestimation of the background due to hadrons misidentified

1804: as leptons,  we require each identified 

1805: lepton in simulated events to originate from the hard interaction (this does not apply to the $t\bar{t}$ background

1806: where we only ask for three electrons or muons). 

1807: 

1808: \subsubsection{Drell-Yan}

1809: \label{conversion}

1810: %In the Drell-Yan simulation sample we select events in which one of the decay

1811: %products radiates a photon, which converts into an $e^+e^-$ pair.

1812: %Each electron in these events is then run through

1813: %the same photon conversion identification algorithm as the observed events: 

1814: %it uses the azimuthal separation at the tangency point 

1815: %($D_{xy}=R\times\Delta\phi$ where $R$ is the conversion radius) and the difference in polar angle ($\Delta\cot\theta$)

1816: %of the electron and any oppositely-charged track. If $D_{xy} <$ 0.2 cm or $\Delta\cot\theta <$ 0.04, the 

1817: %electron

1818: %is tagged as originating from a photon conversion and it is rejected from our collection.\\

1819: Events from $Z/\gamma*\rightarrow \ell\ell$ constitute a background to our search if an additional lepton is present

1820: in the event. In this section we present the estimate of this background contribution when the third lepton comes from

1821: a photon radiated from one of the primary leptons, and has converted into an $e^+e^-$ pair.

1822: \indent 

1823: %The efficiency to identify an electron originating from a conversion is measured in the observed events, and

1824: %then the simulation is corrected to match.

1825: In order to measure the efficiency of the conversion identification 

1826: algorithm described in Section \ref{leptonid} we collect a pure sample of candidate conversions using a calorimeter based approach which

1827: does not rely on tracking information.

1828: The sample consists of identified electrons with {\pt} larger than 8 GeV/$c$ 

1829: (called ``seed electrons'') accompanied by an additional cluster found in 

1830: the shower max detector.

1831: Since photons convert into oppositely-charged electrons \cite{positrons}, 

1832: we can predict the possible $\phi$ location of the cluster based on the charge of the seed electron. 

1833: In Fig.~\ref{fig:convex} 

1834: the ``correct'' and ``incorrect'' sides with respect to the seed electron are defined. 

1835: Furthermore the electrons from $\gamma$ conversions are expected to have the same $z$ coordinate at the CES, since the 

1836: magnetic field $B$ is along the $z$ direction.

1837: Based on this, a candidate photon conversion is a seed electron accompanied by a CES cluster located 

1838: on the ``correct'' side and having $|\Delta z_{\mathrm{seed,cluster}}|< $ 

1839: 20 cm.

1840: \begin{figure}[h]

1841: \begin{center}

1842: \includegraphics[width=5cm,angle=270,clip=]{select_conv1.eps}

1843: \caption{Sketch of the r$-\rm{\phi}$ view of a photon conversion signature with CES clusters locations.

1844: The magnetic field $B$ is along the $z$ direction.}

1845: \label{fig:convex}

1846: \end{center}

1847: \end{figure}

1848:  In order to improve the purity of the sample of candidate conversions, we reject events in which the seed electron 

1849: comes from a $W$ and is accompanied by a bremsstrahlung photon  

1850: by requiring {\met} to be less than 10 GeV. Furthermore, if the

1851: invariant mass of the seed electron and a second

1852: same-flavor lepton in the event falls in the range from 50 to 106 GeV/$c^2$, the event is considered non-conversion background ($Z$ + bremsstrahlung photon) and rejected. 

1853: Events in which the bremsstrahlung  photon converts are

1854: suppressed by rejecting electrons

1855: having the sum of the measured energy deposit in the electromagnetic calorimeter larger

1856: than the  corresponding

1857: track momentum.

1858: Several other backgrounds mimic the conversion candidate signature,

1859: such as electrons accompanied by a $\pi^{0}$ (decaying into $\gamma\gamma$) or a $K^{\pm}$ (decaying in the detector and producing a shower in the electromagnetic calorimeter as well as in the hadronic calorimeter), or photons from extra interactions

1860: and jets. These components of the background are expected to contribute equally to the ``correct''

1861: and ``incorrect'' sides. Consequently, they can be estimated  by the number of events with clusters

1862: on the ``incorrect'' side. We measure the remaining background in the incorrect side through a fit and  subtract it from the signal.\\ 

1863: %We fit the remaining background determined in 

1864: %the incorrect side and subtract it from the signal.\\ 

1865: \indent The results of the measurement 

1866: performed on the observed and simulated events are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:conv}.

1867: \begin{figure}[htb]

1868: \begin{center}

1869: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{EffForPRD.eps}}

1870: \caption{Conversion identification efficiency as a function of the seed electron $E_{\rm T}$.}

1871: \label{fig:conv}

1872: \end{center}

1873: \end{figure}

1874: The sources of inefficiency are mainly track reconstruction inefficiency in the region 

1875: of low \pt, given the asymmetric nature of conversions, and rejections 

1876: due to the thresholds on $D_{xy}$ and $\Delta\cot\theta$. 

1877: Several systematic uncertainties affect the measurement of the conversion 

1878: identification

1879: efficiency, the most significant being the 

1880: uncertainty on the normalization of the background and $\eta$ 

1881: dependence of the efficiency. The total uncertainty is 30$\%$ \cite{alon}. \\

1882: \indent The conversion identification efficiency is lower in observed

1883: than in simulated events. To take this effect into account, we rescale

1884: the contribution of simulated events by $S_{conv}$, the ratio of 

1885: the conversion identification inefficiency in observed events over the inefficiency in

1886: simulated events. We use the inefficiency rather than the efficiency since 

1887:  $S_{conv}(E_{\rm T})$, is applied to electrons

1888: originating from a non-identified conversion in $Z/\gamma^* \rightarrow \ell\ell\ \gamma \rightarrow \ell\ell\ e^{+}e^{-}$. Only electrons

1889: for which the partner track \pt\ is larger than 0.7 GeV/$c$ are corrected.

1890: 

1891: \subsubsection{Background due to hadrons misidentified as leptons\label{FAKE}}

1892: In order to estimate the background  contribution from events with two leptons and a misidentified lepton~\cite{useFake},

1893: %in the search data sample (Section~\ref{dataSample}), 

1894: we use the search data sample itself. We select dilepton events with 

1895: at least one additional fakeable object separated from either identified leptons by $\Delta R > 0.4$.

1896: The number of observed events containing two identified leptons and one  fakeable object is then scaled by the probability 

1897: for the fakeable object to be misidentified as a lepton. 

1898: %Such probability depends on the energy of the fakeable object 

1899: %and its measurement is described in Section~\ref{fake}.

1900: %for each given event to mimic a three-lepton event, computed  

1901: % from the fake rate of the fakeable object found in the event. 

1902: We take into account the fact that  there may be multiple fakeable objects per event. 

1903: %\subsection{SUSY samples generation}

1904: %The SUSY model point used for the optimization of the analysis,

1905: %referred to as the benchmark point, is the mSUGRA model point

1906: %characterized by $m_{1/2}$ = 180 GeV/$c^2$,

1907: %$m_{0}$ = 100 GeV/$c^2$, $A_{0}$ = 0, $\tan\beta$ = 5, and $\mu >$ 0.

1908: %$m_{1/2}$ and $m_{0}$ indicate the unified 

1909: %gaugino and scalar masses, whereas  $A_{0}$ is the unified trilinear coupling of the theory,

1910: % $\tan\beta$ the ratio of the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs doublet coupling to the

1911: %up-generation over the one of the Higgs doublet coupling to the

1912: %down-generation; $\mu >$ is the higgsino coupling. 

1913: % The SUSY simulation sample 

1914: %is generated with \textsc{pythia} version 6.216.

1915: %In this mode, \textsc{pythia} obtains 

1916: % the masses at the

1917: % electroweak scale from \textsc{isasugra} (\textsc{isajet}~\cite{isajet} version

1918: % 7.51). The chargino

1919: %mass for this point is 113 GeV/$c^2$ and the lightest stau ($\tilde{\tau_1}$) mass is 125 

1920: %GeV/$c^2$. \\

1921: %The results of the search will be interpreted in two additional

1922: %scenarios described in Section~\ref{model}. The modeling of those is done by using \textsc{softsusy} 2.0.7~\cite{softsusy} as the input to \textsc{pythia} 6.325, using the SUSY Les Houches Accord~\cite{slha} framework. This is necessary to be able to specify non-standard SUSY models.

1923: %%In this case we use \textsc{pythia} 6.325 in the framework of 

1924: %%the SUSY Les Houches Accord~\cite{slha}, . \\

1925: % We obtain the NLO cross 

1926: %sections 

1927: % $\sigma(p\bar{p}\rightarrow \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{2}) $

1928: %  using \textsc{prospino 2.0}~\cite{prospino}. For our benchmark point 

1929: %$\sigma = 0.64\pm0.06$ pb and the branching ratio into three leptons is 25$\%$, 

1930: %as calculated using 

1931: %\textsc{pythia}. \\

1932: %The SUSY contribution

1933: %is corrected to take into account the different identification efficiency 

1934: %measured in observed and simulated events,

1935: %the same way as for the backgrounds. 

1936: \subsection{SUSY samples generation}

1937: The chargino-neutralino cross section depends on the squark mass as can be inferred from Fig.~\ref{fig::pro}, whereas

1938: the branching ratio into three leptons and \met\ depends on the slepton masses. The chargino-neutralino

1939: scenario adopted to guide %and tune 

1940: this trilepton analysis is taken from an mSUGRA model (referred to as the 

1941: benchmark point). The benchmark point is characterized by $m_{1/2}$ = 180 GeV/$c^2$,

1942: $m_{0}$ = 100 GeV/$c^2$, $A_{0}$ = 0, $\tan\beta$ = 5, and $\mu >$ 0. The parameters  

1943: $m_{1/2}$ and $m_{0}$ indicate the unified 

1944: gaugino and scalar masses, $A_{0}$ is the unified trilinear coupling of the theory,

1945:  $\tan\beta$ the ratio of the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs doublet coupling to the

1946: up-generation over the one of the Higgs doublet coupling to the

1947: down-generation, and  $\mu$ is the higgsino coupling. 

1948: This benchmark point yields a typical mass spectrum above the LEP chargino mass limit, with charginos of 113 GeV/$c^2$, an LSP of 65 GeV/$c^2$, and 

1949: the lightest stau ($\tilde{\tau_1}$) of 125 GeV/$c^2$. The NLO production

1950: cross section calculated using  \textsc{prospino 2.0}~\cite{prospino} is $\sigma = 0.64\pm0.06$ pb 

1951: and the branching ratio into three leptons is 25$\%$, 

1952: as obtained from \textsc{pythia}. 

1953:  The SUSY simulation sample 

1954: is generated with \textsc{pythia} version 6.216.

1955: In this mode, \textsc{pythia} obtains 

1956:  the masses at the

1957:  electroweak scale from the routine \textsc{isasugra} (\textsc{isajet}~\cite{isajet} version

1958:  7.51). \\

1959: While the benchmark point is used to study the event kinematics of chargino-neutralino associated production,

1960: three additional scenarios are used to fix squark and slepton masses and to interpret the results of  our search.

1961: The modeling of the non-mSUGRA models is done by using \textsc{softsusy} 2.0.7~\cite{softsusy} as the input to \textsc{pythia} 6.325, 

1962: using the SUSY Les Houches Accord~\cite{slha} framework.    

1963: The SUSY contribution

1964: is corrected to take into account the different identification efficiency 

1965: measured in observed and simulated events,

1966: the same way as for the backgrounds.

1967: 

1968: \section{Event Selection}

1969: \label{anaCuts}

1970: %\input{anaCuts}

1971: The samples of observed and simulated events are divided into four non-exclusive channels:  $ee\ell$, $e\mu\ell$, $\mu\mu\ell$, and $\mu e\ell$, in which

1972: the first lepton listed is the one which passed the trigger requirements, and $\ell$ is an electron or muon. The lepton selection accepts also $\tau$ leptons, when they decay to electrons or muons.\\

1973: \indent In the  $ee\ell$ and $e\mu\ell$ subsets, each event

1974: must contain at least one tight central electron with $E_{\rm T} > $ 20 GeV, consistent

1975: with the trigger object. The second lepton listed is either a loose electron or a plug electron 

1976: with $E_{\rm T}$ $ > $ 8 GeV, or a muon with \pt\ $ > $ 8 GeV/$c$ (10 

1977: GeV/$c$

1978: for CMIO's). In the  $\mu\mu\ell$ and 

1979: $\mu e\ell$ subsets \cite{anadi}, at least one lepton

1980: must be a   CMUP or CMX muon with \pt\ $ > $ 20 GeV/$c$, and the second

1981: lepton can be either a loose central or plug electron with $E_{\rm T} > $ 8 GeV, or a muon with \pt\ $ > $ 5 GeV/$c$ (10 GeV/$c$ for CMIO's). The third lepton listed can

1982: be from any of the above categories with a common \pt\

1983: ($E_{\rm T}$) threshold of 5 GeV/$c$ (5 GeV), except for CMIO's for which we always

1984: require \pt\ $ > $ 10 GeV/$c$. 

1985: %decaying into $e\bar{\nu}_{e}\nu_{\tau}$ and $\mu\bar{\nu}_{\mu}\nu_{\tau}$.\\

1986: \subsection{Preselection}

1987: Based on the expected topology of chargino-neutralino events, 

1988: we  

1989: require all leptons to originate from the primary vertex, $|\Delta z (\ell_i,\mbox{primary vertex})|<$ 4 cm and $|\Delta z (\ell_i,\ell_j )|<$ 4 cm, 

1990: %within 4 cm in $z$ of 

1991: %the primary vertex and from each other and 

1992: and to be separate in $\eta$-$\phi$ space with $\Delta R >$ 0.4.\\

1993: \indent

1994: The energy of candidate jets with $E_{\rm T} >$ 5 GeV and 

1995: within $|\eta|<2.5$ is corrected to take into account

1996: the geometry of the calorimeters and the nonlinearity of their 

1997: response~\cite{florencia}. %We only consider candidate jets with the ratio 

1998: %of electromagnetic to total energy less 

1999: %than 0.9. Each candidate jet in the event is then required to be 

2000: We do not include candidate jets that have a high electromagnetic to total energy ratio, consistent with being electrons. Each candidate jet is required to be far from all identified leptons in the event ($\Delta R > $ 0.4). In the particular case of the $e\mu\ell$ channel,

2001:  we reject events in which either the second or the third

2002: lepton is within 20 degrees from the jet axis. \\

2003: \indent The missing transverse energy, reconstructed from

2004: calorimeter towers with transverse energy larger than 0.1 GeV within

2005: $|\eta|<3.6$, is corrected for muons because muons 

2006: leave only small deposits of energy in the calorimeter. In the \met\  calculation, we take this 

2007: effect into account by

2008: subtracting the transverse momenta of identified muon tracks

2009: from the \met, after adding the average muon energy measured in 

2010: the calorimeter and projected into the transverse plane.

2011: We suppress events with mis-measured \met\ by requiring the \met\ to

2012: be separated by at least 2 degrees in azimuth 

2013: from the vectorial sum of the transverse momenta of the two highest-\pt\ leptons,

2014: in events in which the second lepton is a muon. 

2015: This selection is designed to 

2016: reject potentially problematic Drell-Yan events where the leptons 

2017: %reject  nearly all of the Drell-Yan events where the leptons %have $\Delta\phi are aligned 

2018: and the lepton energy is  mis-measured, producing

2019:  missing transverse energy along its direction.

2020: The underestimation or overestimation of the energy of a jet causes a spurious energy

2021: imbalance in the event which affects the value of missing 

2022: transverse energy.

2023: In order to remove such events, we require the smallest 

2024: angle between \met\ and the axis of any candidate jet to be $\Delta \phi 

2025: > 20$ degrees in the $\mu\mu\ell$ and $e\mu\ell$ channels. \\

2026: %More details on selection studies for the $\mu\mu\ell$ and $\mu e \ell$ channels are described in~\cite{anadi}. 

2027: \indent In observed events with muons, cosmic rays are 

2028: identified (and rejected) as two tracks aligned in the

2029: transverse plane satisfying quality and matching requirements. 

2030: To reduce further the cosmic background in the $\mu\mu\ell$

2031: and $\mu e\ell$ channels, 

2032: we veto events in which the two 

2033: highest \pt\

2034: muons exhibit a three-dimensional angular separation larger than 178 degrees.\\

2035: 

2036: \subsection{Kinematic selection}

2037: In order to achieve the best sensitivity, several event

2038: selection criteria are applied to reject the backgrounds.\\

2039: \indent An important discriminating variable is the invariant mass of same-flavor, oppositely-charged leptons.

2040: The on-shell component of the $Z$ production is suppressed 

2041: by rejecting 

2042: events with two leptons of the same flavor with a combined invariant mass 

2043: in the window  of 76 to 106 $\mbox{GeV}/c^2$. This selection also 

2044: reduces the 

2045: otherwise indistinguishable $WZ$ background.

2046: Similarly, the low mass resonances such as $J/\psi$ and $\Upsilon$

2047: are removed by requiring a dilepton invariant mass larger than

2048: 15 $\mbox{GeV}/c^2$. The latter value is raised to 20 $\mbox{GeV}/c^2$ for

2049: $ee\ell$ and $e\mu\ell$ events. Fig.~\ref{fig:CRtri} shows the invariant 

2050: mass of muons pairs in trilepton

2051: events. \\

2052: \begin{figure}

2053: \begin{center}

2054: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{mass0_prd_newStack.eps}

2055: \caption{Invariant mass of same flavor, oppositely charged leptons in $\mu\mu\ell$ events. The SM backgrounds are stacked while the

2056: benchmark SUSY signal is superimposed. Observed events are shown as points with error bars indicating the statistical uncertainty.}

2057: \label{fig:CRtri}\end{center}\end{figure}

2058: \indent In chargino-neutralino events in which the supersymmetric particles decay

2059: into leptons, we expect jet activity to come only from initial state

2060: radiation. On the other hand, $t\bar{t}$ events always contain jets, a feature

2061:  which distinguishes them from chargino-neutralino signal events. The  $t\bar{t}$

2062: background is reduced by rejecting events with more than one jet with  

2063: $E_{\rm T} > 20$ GeV.\\

2064: \indent Finally,  SUSY events are characterized by significant

2065: missing transverse energy from the LSP's and the neutrinos. This pattern

2066: differs from Drell-Yan production of charged leptons, where only the $Z\rightarrow \tau\tau$ background exhibits real missing transverse energy. 

2067:  We require \met$ >$ 15 GeV in order to remove the Drell-Yan events outside the $Z$ mass window.\\

2068: \indent The resulting predictions of the signal yields in the benchmark point ($S$)

2069:  and the

2070: accompanying SM backgrounds ($B$) after all cuts are given in Table~\ref{tab:all}.

2071: Typically the dominant background is due to real trilepton processes, while

2072: the $t\bar{t}$ contribution is negligible. 

2073: The $\mu\mu\ell$ channel displays the highest sensitivity defined as $S/\sqrt{B}$. \\

2074: It can be inferred from the table that the prediction of Drell-Yan + $\gamma$ is limited by the available number of simulated Drell-Yan events. This is due to a very high rejection factor for this background, and the resulting large uncertainty is taken into account in the limit calculation.

2075: \begin{table}[h]

2076: \begin{center}

2077: \caption{Expected background and predicted signal for the mSUGRA benchmark point for all channels. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. }\label{tab:all}

2078: \begin{tabular}{ccccc} \hline \hline

2079: & $\mu\mu \ell$    &  $\mu e \ell$                  &   $ee\ell$           & $e\mu \ell$ \\ \hline

2080: Diboson            &  0.20$\pm$0.02         &   0.44$\pm$0.04      &  0.29$\pm$0.02  &  0.17$\pm$0.02\\

2081: Drell-Yan +$\gamma$        &  0.22$\pm$0.11         &   0.14$\pm$0.06      &  0.14$\pm$0.02  &  0.04$\pm$0.04\\

2082: Fake leptons        &  0.20$\pm$0.02         &   0.17$\pm$0.02      &  0.11$\pm$0.01  &  0.05$\pm$0.01\\

2083: $t\bar t$          &  0.01$\pm$0.01         &   0.02$\pm$0.01      &  0.02$\pm$0.01  &  0.02$\pm$0.01\\ \hline

2084: %changed to have enough space: 

2085: %Total background   &  0.64$\pm$0.11         &   0.78$\pm$0.08      &  0.56$\pm$0.03  &  0.28$\pm$0.05 \\ \hline 

2086:    Total SM.  &  0.64$\pm$0.11         &   0.78$\pm$0.08      &  0.56$\pm$0.03  &  0.28$\pm$0.05 \\ \hline 

2087: Signal             &  1.60$\pm$0.11         &   1.03$\pm$0.06      &  1.22$\pm$0.08  &  0.84$\pm$0.07\\ \hline \hline

2088: \end{tabular}

2089: \end{center}

2090: \end{table}

2091: 

2092: 

2093: \section{Systematic Uncertainties}

2094: \label{sys}

2095: %\input{sys}

2096: There are several systematic uncertainties which

2097: affect the numbers of predicted events and, consequently, the interpretation of the search result. 

2098: The relative contributions vary from channel to channel and from signal to background. In case of the background estimate,

2099: the largest uncertainty originates from the 

2100:   statistical uncertainty on the number of

2101: predicted events.  These uncertainties are not negligible (up to 29\%)

2102: due to the 

2103:  finite sample sizes and are 

2104: included as independent sources of systematic uncertainty in the

2105: limit calculation described in Section~\ref{model}. The  uncertainty from the

2106: background due to  misidentified leptons is determined from the precision of the fake rate measurement and it can be as large as 16\%. 

2107: For most lepton categories the systematic uncertainty due to the scale factors of the identification

2108: efficiency  is a few percent,  except for low-$E_{\rm{T}}$ plug electrons which have a 14\%\ uncertainty.

2109:   The jet energy scale~\cite{florencia} is varied within

2110: its uncertainty to estimate the impact on the jet multiplicity

2111: and on the correction of the missing transverse energy. The effect is between 2\% and 7\% depending on the channel. 

2112:  The integrated luminosity is measured with an accuracy of 6\%~\cite{lumi} and it is used to normalize the  contributions from simulated events.  

2113: The initial state radiation 

2114: (ISR) and final state radiation (FSR) are modeled in the

2115: simulated samples and are subject to the uncertainty of the parton

2116: shower model. The effects of these uncertainties are determined from samples simulated 

2117: with different ISR/FSR content~\cite{topmasspaper}, resulting in variations of up to 4\%\ in selection acceptance. The cross sections and the event kinematics

2118: depend on the momenta of the incoming partons, whose spectra

2119: are parametrized by parton distribution functions (PDF's) obtained from a fit to the data from a number of experiments. 

2120: We calculate the uncertainties on 

2121: background rates by adding in quadrature the differences between each of the 40 CTEQ6~\cite{cteq6m} systematic-variation

2122: eigenvectors and the nominal predictions. The effects on the cross

2123: sections and the acceptances are included.  The resulting uncertainty on

2124: the background rates is 2\%.\\

2125: \indent We also estimate the effect of the uncertainty 

2126: in the theoretical cross section predictions for diboson production (7\%)~\cite{diboson}, and $t\bar t $ production (10\%)~\cite{ttbar}. \\

2127: % and the signal (10\%)~\cite{prospino}.\\

2128: %\indent

2129: The individual contributions for background and SUSY signal are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:sys}, and the total systematic uncertainties for each channel are listed in Table~\ref{tab:systot}. 

2130: \begin{table}[h]

2131: \begin{center}

2132: \caption{Summary of systematic uncertainties.}

2133: \begin{tabular}{crr} \hline  \hline  

2134:   & \multicolumn{2}{c} {Resulting variation in}  \\

2135: Source & Signal & Background  \\ \hline

2136: Monte Carlo statistics & 6-10\% & 12-29\%\\ \hline

2137: Hadron misidentification efficiency & - & 9-16\%\\

2138:  Lepton identification efficiency & 2-7\% & 2-14\%\\

2139:  Jet energy scale & 0.3-3\% & 2-7\%\\

2140: Luminosity & 6\% & 4-5\%\\

2141: ISR/FSR & 2-12 \% & 3-4\%\\

2142:  PDF's & 1\% & 2-3\%\\

2143:  Theoretical $\sigma$ uncertainty & 10\% & 4-8\%\\ \hline \hline  

2144: \end{tabular}

2145: \label{tab:sys}

2146: \end{center}

2147: \end{table}

2148: 

2149: \begin{table}[h]

2150: \begin{center}

2151: \caption{Combination of all systematic uncertainties in Table~\ref{tab:sys} for signal and background for each channel.}

2152: \begin{tabular}{ccccc} \hline \hline  

2153: Systematic uncertainties & $\mu\mu \ell$&  $\mu e \ell$  &  $ee\ell$  &  $e\mu \ell$ \\ \hline

2154: Background & 28\% & 22\%  & 20\% & 31\%\\ 

2155: Signal & 13\% & 16\%  & 14\%  & 14\% \\ \hline   \hline  

2156: \end{tabular}

2157: \label{tab:systot}

2158: \end{center}

2159: \end{table}

2160: 

2161: \section{Control Samples}

2162: \label{cr}

2163: %\input{cr}

2164: We test the SM predictions against the observed events by defining control samples 

2165: in which we expect negligible contributions from SUSY events predicted by 

2166: the benchmark point. We classify each event according to the missing transverse energy, the number of jets, the number of leptons, and, for $ee$ and $\mu\mu$ events, the invariant mass of same-flavor, oppositely-charged leptons. In particular, the subsample of events with 

2167: two leptons is referred to as the ``dilepton control region'', and 

2168: the subsample of events which contain three leptons is referred to as the 

2169: ``trilepton control region''. \\

2170: \indent The normalization of the inclusive mass spectra for $ee$ and $\mu\mu$ events, presented in

2171: Fig.~\ref{fig:mass} with the benchmark SUSY signal superimposed, demonstrates good understanding of the

2172: trigger and identification efficiencies along with the measurement of the integrated luminosity.  The quality of the track and jet

2173: reconstruction can be assessed by comparing the missing transverse energy distributions in the observed and in the simulated events,

2174: as illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:metmu} and Fig.~\ref{fig:mete}. 

2175: Same-flavor dilepton events are mainly DY~$\mu^+\mu^-$ and DY~$e^+e^-$ as indicated by

2176: the softer \met\ spectrum. In the $\mu e$ and $e\mu $ channels, the broader \met\ spectrum originates from the

2177: leptonic decay of DY~$\tau^+\tau^-$. Only for \met $>$ 40 GeV do other processes become important.

2178: The good agreement between the observed and simulated events shows that the \met\ resolution is simulated well.

2179: The jet multiplicity in  DY~$e^+e^-$ candidate events is compared

2180: to the  predictions based on initial-state radiation

2181: and extra interactions in Fig.~\ref{fig:CRZ}. The event generator \textsc{pythia} reproduces the observed data spectrum well in the region of our interest at low jet multiplicity, whereas for large jet multiplicity 

2182: a NLO simulator with proper parton shower would be needed. 

2183: \begin{figure}

2184: \begin{center}

2185: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{mass_dimuon.eps}

2186: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{ee_mass.eps}

2187: \caption{Invariant mass of same-flavor lepton pairs. The SM backgrounds are stacked while the

2188: benchmark SUSY signal is superimposed. Observed events are shown as points with error bars indicating the statistical uncertainty (overflows are added to the last bin).}

2189: \label{fig:mass}\end{center}\end{figure}

2190: \begin{figure}

2191: \begin{center}

2192: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{met_dimuon.eps}

2193: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{ee_met.eps}

2194: \caption{Missing transverse energy in $\mu\mu$ and $ee$ events. The SM backgrounds are stacked while the

2195: benchmark SUSY signal is superimposed. Observed events are shown as points with error bars indicating the statistical uncertainty (overflows are added to the last bin).}

2196: \label{fig:metmu}\end{center}\end{figure}

2197: \begin{figure} 

2198: \begin{center}

2199: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{me_met_swap_prd.eps}

2200: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{em_met.eps}

2201: \caption{Missing transverse energy in $\mu e$ and $e\mu$ events.

2202: The SM backgrounds are stacked while the the benchmark SUSY signal superimposed.  Observed events are shown as points with error bars indicating the statistical uncertainty (overflows are added to the last bin).

2203: The expected benchmark SUSY signal in the $\mu$e and e$\mu$ channels is $\sim$ 3 and $\sim$ 6 events, respectively.

2204: }

2205: \label{fig:mete}\end{center}\end{figure}

2206: %The jet multiplicity in  DY~$e^+e^-$ candidate events is compared

2207: %to the  predictions based on initial-state radiation

2208: %a NLO simulator with proper parton shower would be needed. \\ 

2209: %and extra interactions in Fig.~\ref{fig:CRZ}. The event generator \textsc{pythia} reproduces the observed data spectrum well in the region of our interest at low jet multiplicity, whereas for large jet multiplicity 

2210: \indent In  Table \ref{tab:CR} we present examples of 

2211: the numerical comparison between the  observed events and the

2212: total

2213: expected background in 12 of the control samples we investigated: 

2214: \begin{description}

2215:   \item (I) dielectron events

2216: with invariant mass outside the $Z$ window and \met\ $\leq$ 10 GeV,

2217:   \item (II) dielectron events with invariant mass in the $Z$ window and

2218: \met\ $\geq$ 15 GeV,

2219: \item (III) dimuon events in the $Z$ mass window and \met\ $\leq$ 10 GeV,

2220: \item (IV) dimuon events in the $Z$ mass window with at least two jets and \met\ $\geq$ 15 GeV,

2221: \item(V) $\mu e$ events with at least two jets and \met\ $\geq$ 15 GeV,

2222: \item (VI) $\mu e$ events with \met\ $\geq$ 15 GeV,

2223: \item (VII) $e\mu$ events with \met\ $\geq$  15 GeV and $\Delta\phi_{e, \mu}\leq$170$^o$,

2224: \item (VIII) $e\mu$ events with \met\ $\leq$ 10 GeV,

2225: \item (IX) $\mu\mu\ell$ events with \met\ $\leq$ 10 GeV,

2226: \item (X) $\mu\mu\ell$ events in the $Z$ mass window with \met\ $\geq$ 15 GeV,

2227: \item (XI) $ee\ell$ events with \met\ $\leq$ 10 GeV,

2228: \item (XII) $ee\ell$ events in the $Z$ mass window with \met\ $\geq$ 15 GeV and at least two jets.

2229: \end{description}

2230: 

2231: The trilepton control samples are particularly useful to verify the background from diboson production and misidentified hadrons.

2232: No significant discrepancies are seen between the predictions and the observations.

2233: \begin{table}[h]

2234: \begin{center}

2235: \caption{Examples of control samples as listed in Section~\ref{cr}.

2236: The error on the number of events expected from SM backgrounds includes statistical and systematic

2237: uncertainties. \label{tab:CR}}

2238: \begin{small}

2239: \begin{tabular}{cccccr} \hline \hline

2240:         & \footnotesize Drell-Yan    & \footnotesize Diboson,        & \footnotesize Misid.    & \footnotesize Tot.    & \footnotesize  Observed \\ %\hline

2241: % \multicolumn{2}{c} {\bf\footnotesize 2 leptons:} &&&&\\ 

2242:   & \footnotesize     & \footnotesize $t\bar{t}$         & \footnotesize hadrons    & \footnotesize  background   & \footnotesize  \\ \hline

2243:  \multicolumn{2}{c} {\bf\footnotesize 2 leptons:} &&&&\\ 

2244: %dileptons, same flavor

2245: I       &  2359  &   1.9   &  33        &   $2394\pm314$   & 2422\\ %ee G

2246: II      &  656   &   9.2   &  3.2       &   $669\pm159$    & 638 \\ %ee E

2247: III     &   15587  &   1.5   &  $<$4.5   &   $15588\pm2044$     & 15366\\ %mumu I

2248: IV      &   29     &   2.0   &  $<$4.5   &   $31\pm4$        & 31 \\ %mumu F

2249: %mixed flavor

2250: V       &  1.6  &    9.1   &  1.0       & 11.7  $\pm$   2.1   & 7 \\ %mue A2+F 

2251: VI      &  76   &   49   &  12.5      & 138  $\pm$  22  & 151 \\ %mue A+E, central+plug

2252: VII     &  22   &    16   &  1.2     & 38  $\pm$ 6     & 44 \\  %emu A+Dphi+E

2253: VIII    &  67  &     1.9  &  5.7     & 74  $\pm$ 9     & 62 \\  %emu G+I

2254: \hline

2255:  \multicolumn{2}{c} {\bf\footnotesize 3 leptons:} &&&&\\ 

2256: %trileptons, same flavor

2257: IX     &  3.9  &   0.1  &  0.3       & 4.3  $\pm$  1.3   & 4 \\ %mumul G

2258: X      &  0.5  &   1.1   &  0.5       & 2.1  $\pm$  0.5   & 2 \\ %mumul E

2259: XI     &  3.3  &   0.2   &  0.4       & 3.9  $\pm$  0.6   & 4 \\  %ccl G

2260: XII    &  0.01 &   0.01  &  0.04      & 0.06  $\pm$ 0.02  & 0 \\  %ccl F

2261: \hline \hline

2262: \end{tabular}

2263: \end{small}

2264: \end{center}

2265: \end{table}

2266: \begin{figure} 

2267: \begin{center}

2268: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{ee_Z_njets.eps}

2269: \caption{Number of jets in $ee$ events with

2270: invariant mass between 76 and 106 GeV/$c^2$. The SM backgrounds are stacked while the

2271: benchmark SUSY signal is superimposed. Observed events are shown as points with error bars indicating the statistical uncertainty.\label{fig:CRZ}}

2272: \end{center}

2273: \end{figure}

2274: 

2275: 

2276: \section{Results}

2277: \label{results}

2278: %\input{results}

2279: In Fig.~\ref{fig:muons} and Fig.~\ref{fig:electrons} 

2280: we illustrate the \met\ in trilepton events satisfying

2281:  the invariant mass and jet requirements. 

2282: %The discontinuity in the Drell-Yan prediction for the

2283: %$\mu e\ell$ channel is due to the limited size of the simulated samples; the resulting large uncertainty

2284: %is taken into account in the limit calculation. \\

2285: After applying the final cut on \met\ we observe one event and this is compatible with the SM 

2286: predictions. The results, broken down by channels, are shown in Table 

2287: ~\ref{tab:result}.

2288:  \begin{figure}

2289: \begin{center}

2290: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{met2_prd_newStack.eps}

2291: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{mel_swap_prd.eps} 

2292: \caption{Missing transverse energy before the final cut of 15 GeV in $\mu\mu\ell$ and $\mu e\ell$. The SM backgrounds are stacked while the benchmark 

2293: SUSY signal is superimposed. Observed events are shown as points with error bars indicating the statistical uncertainty .}

2294: \label{fig:muons}\end{center}\end{figure}

2295: \begin{figure}

2296: \begin{center}

2297: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{eel.eps}

2298: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{eml.eps} 

2299: \caption{Missing transverse energy before the final cut of 20 GeV in $ee\ell$ and $e\mu\ell$. The SM backgrounds are stacked while the

2300: benchmark SUSY signal is superimposed. Observed events are shown as points with error bars indicating the statistical uncertainty .}

2301: \label{fig:electrons}\end{center}\end{figure}

2302: \begin{table}[h]

2303: \begin{center}

2304: \caption{Summary of results for all channels. For a breakdown of individual

2305: background components, see Table~\ref{tab:all}.}

2306: \begin{tabular}{ccccc} \hline \hline  

2307: & $\mu\mu \ell$& $\mu e\ell$  & $ee\ell$  & $e\mu \ell$ \\ \hline

2308: SM Expectation &  0.6$\pm$0.2 &   0.8$\pm$0.2  & 0.6$\pm$0.1 &  0.3$\pm$0.1\\ 

2309: Observed & 1 & 0  & 0 & 0 \\ \hline  \hline  

2310: \label{tab:result}

2311: \end{tabular}

2312: \end{center}

2313: \end{table}

2314: In the candidate event we reconstruct three muons originating from the same primary vertex. The highest-\pt\ muon is a 

2315: CMX muon which fired the trigger. The second muon (oppositely-charged, and at $\Delta\phi \sim 150$ degrees with respect to the leading muon) 

2316: is a CMIO muon entering a non-fiducial part of the CMU and CMP muon chambers. The dimuon system has an invariant mass of 72 GeV/$c^2$. The third lepton selected is a CMUP muon. 

2317: Besides the three muons, a jet originated in the same hard interaction. The missing transverse energy is just above 

2318: the threshold of our selection  (15 GeV) with a value of 15.5 GeV. An additional 4 GeV electron candidate is  reconstructed but it comes from a different vertex. Fig. \ref{fig::eventRPhi} shows the $r$-$\phi$ view of the event in the CDF detector.

2319: \begin{figure}[ht]

2320: \begin{center}

2321: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{eventBox5.eps}

2322: %\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{eventBox5} 

2323: \caption{The $r$-$\phi$ view of the $\mu\mu\mu$ candidate event in the CDF detector. Only tracks with  $p_{\rm T} \geq$ 1 GeV/$c$

2324: are shown in the central tracking detector. The three highlighted straight tracks are labeled with the muon category and momentum. The dotted black line shows the direction of the \met\ (MET). 

2325: The energy deposit is illustrated in the histograms around the tracking view. Innermost (light) towers show the electromagnetic energy in the calorimeter towers, outermost (dark) show the hadronic component of the energy.\label{fig::eventRPhi}}

2326: \end{center}

2327: \end{figure}

2328: 

2329: 

2330: \section{Interpretation}

2331: \label{model}

2332: %\input{model}

2333: We combine the four channels to obtain limits on chargino-neutralino production cross sections and masses in three SUSY models.

2334: The calculation of the upper limit is based on the

2335: CL$_{\mathrm{s}}$ method~\cite{tomjunk, alexread}

2336: and incorporates the effect of the systematic uncertainties

2337: and correlations

2338: between channels, and between the signal and the background expectation for a

2339: given channel.\\ 

2340: \indent In the combination process, each simulated event and each observed event are interpreted in at most one channel. 

2341: The overlap in the channels described above is removed by assigning shared 

2342: SUSY signal simulated events to the analysis with the 

2343: highest sensitivity. For a given channel the acceptance is defined as the ratio of the number of

2344: events in the SUSY simulated sample satisfying the analysis requirements 

2345: over the number of events where chargino $\tilde\chi_{1}^{\pm}$ and neutralino $\tilde\chi_{2}^{0}$ decay leptonically ($\tilde\chi_{1}^{\pm} \rightarrow \ell \nu \tilde\chi_{1}^{0}$, and $\tilde\chi_{2}^{0} \rightarrow \ell \ell \tilde\chi_{1}^{0}$, with $\ell = e, \mu, \tau$ ). %It is calculated taking into account the overlap.

2346: In the acceptance calculation the overlap is taken into account. 

2347: The exclusive 

2348: background is obtained by rescaling the inclusive background 

2349: by $\frac{A_{SUSY}^{excl}}{A_{SUSY}^{incl}}$, where $A_{SUSY}^{excl}$ ( $A_{SUSY}^{incl}$)

2350: is the exclusive (inclusive) acceptance for the SUSY signal. This procedure

2351: is adopted to simplify the combination with several other channels while ensuring no

2352: double counting. We have checked that this is equivalent to the background

2353: estimate obtained by excluding shared events within 3\%. No observed events are shared.\\

2354: \indent We first explore the upper limit on the signal cross section times branching ratio 

2355: in an mSUGRA scenario 

2356: defined by the following parameters: $m_{0}$ = 60 GeV/$c^2$, $A_{0}$ = 0, $\tan\beta$ = 3, $\mu >$ 0, 

2357: and $m_{1/2}$ varying between 162 and 230 GeV/$c^2$. These parameters were chosen %to maximize 

2358: %the signal yield for charginos whose

2359: %masses are not yet excluded. 

2360: to maximize chargino-neutralino trilepton production, $\sigma(\tilde\chi_1^{\pm}\tilde\chi_2^{0})\times BR(\tilde\chi_1^{\pm}\tilde\chi_2^{0}\rightarrow \ell\nu\tilde\chi_1^{0}\ell\ell\tilde\chi_1^{0}$).

2361: In this scenario the two-body decays of the charginos and neutralinos into sleptons are

2362: kinematically allowed.  \\

2363: \indent The second model we investigate is a generic MSSM model fully defined at the electroweak scale (MSSM-W/Z).

2364: Chargino and neutralino decays through virtual $W$ and $Z$ bosons dominate, 

2365: resulting in three-body decays and branching

2366: ratios similar to those of standard model $W$'s and $Z$'s~\cite{example}. In this case only the production cross section, but not the leptonic branching ratio, is dependent on the gaugino masses.\\

2367: \indent As done in previous analyses~\cite{D0}, we also investigate a scenario in which there is no slepton mixing and the selectron, smuon, and stau 

2368: have a degenerate mass ranging from 101 to 118 GeV/$c^2$ as $m_{1/2}$ varies between 162 and 230 GeV/$c^2$ (MSSM-no-mix). The important difference in branching ratios between scenarios mSUGRA and MSSM-no-mix is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:braandb}. 

2369: \begin{figure}

2370: \begin{center}

2371: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{neu2br.eps}

2372: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{char1br.eps}

2373: \caption{Branching ratios for neutralino  $\tilde \chi_2^{0}$ (top) and chargino  $\tilde \chi_1^{+}$ (bottom) in the mSUGRA  

2374: and MSSM-no-mix scenarios for different slepton flavors. The $\tilde \chi_1^{+}$ has BR($\ell\nu\tilde\chi^0_1$) 

2375: $\approx$ BR($\bar{d} u\tilde\chi^0_1$) = BR($\bar{s}c\tilde\chi^0_1$) in both scenarios.}

2376: \label{fig:braandb}

2377: \end{center}

2378: \end{figure}

2379: In addition to changing the mixing parameters we also increased 

2380: the mSUGRA parameter $m_0$ to 70 GeV/$c^2$, to delay the turn-on of the $\tilde \chi^{\pm}_1 \rightarrow \tilde \nu \ell$ decay modes as the chargino mass increases.\\

2381: \indent 

2382: The total acceptance of the channels

2383: described in this paper for the three scenarios is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:accall}

2384:  as a function of the chargino mass. 

2385: In the MSSM-W/Z scenario the

2386: acceptance is similar in shape but larger than the one evaluated in the

2387: mSUGRA.  Our

2388: sensitivity to the MSSM-W/Z is low due to the overall reduced leptonic branching ratio.

2389: The acceptance in the mSUGRA scenario is suppressed because

2390: of the high branching ratio into staus: the $\tilde{\tau_1}$ mass, which varies between 92 and 110 GeV/$c^2$

2391: as $m_{1/2}$ increases from 162 to 230 GeV/$c^2$, is smaller than the first and second

2392: generation slepton masses because of the mixing among the third-generation sleptons.

2393: The MSSM-no-mix is a more optimistic scenario for our selection as it increases the number of electrons and muons in the final state.\\  

2394: \begin{figure}\begin{center}\includegraphics[width=0.46\textwidth]{hpt1.eps}

2395: \caption{Total acceptance of the channels for the three scenarios considered.}\label{fig:accall}\end{center}\end{figure}

2396: 

2397: \indent  The observed and expected limits on the cross sections 

2398: times branching ratios are calculated at the 95$\%$ confidence level and the 

2399: mass limits in the different scenarios are 

2400: obtained by 

2401: including the 

2402: theory cross section uncertainty in the expected 

2403: and observed limit calculation, and taking the intersection between those 

2404: and the central theory curve. 

2405: \begin{figure}

2406: \begin{center}

2407: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{excl_mix_hpt_prd.eps}

2408: \caption{Exclusion limits for mSUGRA scenario. The bands indicate the range

2409: of expected limits given the possible outcomes that could have been

2410: observed if a signal were not there.}

2411: \label{fig:limita}

2412: \end{center}

2413: \end{figure}

2414: The 95\% C.L. limits for the mSUGRA scenario and MSSM-W/Z scenario are presented in Fig.~\ref{fig:limita}. 

2415: and Fig.~\ref{fig:limitb}.

2416: %is intended to be a reference scenario with no dependence on GUT scale parameters. 

2417: The analyses are not sensitive to chargino and neutralino production in these models. 

2418: For the MSSM-no-mix scenario we extend the current chargino mass limit up to 151 GeV/$c^2$ at 95\% C.L., consistent with the expected

2419: sensitivity of 148 GeV/$c^2$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:limitc}). %For chargino masses below $\sim$110 GeV/$c^2$, this analysis currently have no exclusion power, even in the case of no slepton-mixing. This mass range represents a transition to a region of the SUSY parameter space with three-body decays of $\tilde\chi_2^0$, giving rise to very low \pt\ leptons (on average below 2 GeV/c). \\

2420: Our analysis is not sensitive to chargino masses below $\sim$110 GeV/$c^2$. This mass range represents a transition to a region of the SUSY parameter space with three-body decays of $\tilde\chi_2^0$, giving rise to very low \pt\ leptons (on average below 2 GeV/c). \\

2421: \begin{figure}

2422: \begin{center}

2423: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{excl_new_wz_hpt_prd.eps}

2424: \caption{Exclusion limits for the MSSM-W/Z scenario. The bands indicate the range of expected limits given the possible outcomes that could have been

2425: observed if a signal were not there.}

2426: \label{fig:limitb}

2427: \end{center}

2428: \end{figure}

2429: \begin{figure}

2430: \begin{center}

2431: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{excl_new_hpt_prd.eps}

2432: \caption{Exclusion limits for the MSSM-no-mix scenario. The bands indicate the range of expected limits given the possible outcomes that could have been

2433: observed if a signal were not there.}

2434: \label{fig:limitc}

2435: \end{center}

2436: \end{figure}

2437: 

2438: \subsection{Projections for the CDF combined trilepton analysis}

2439:  The analyses presented in this paper have been combined with other CDF

2440: searches sensitive to associated chargino-neutralino production as reported in ~\cite{prl, likesign}. 

2441: %The different channels have quite different sensitivities to the models investigated earlier, for instance, in scenarios with very low \pt\ leptons the full CDF combination benefits from the like-sign dilepton channels. 

2442: %The high \pt\ channels as described in this paper have the dominant sensitivity for scenarios with abundant 

2443: %electrons or muons, or higher mass charginos. 

2444: The observed limits for the combination is less stringent than the one calculated for the high-\pt\ analysis due to slight excesses in the other channels.\\

2445: \indent To assess the future reach at CDF, we also 

2446: extrapolate the sensitivity of the combined analysis assuming larger data sets. Fig.~\ref{fig:proj1}, Fig.~\ref{fig:proj3}, and Fig.~\ref{fig:proj2} 

2447: are the projected expected limits in the three models with 2, 4, 8, and 16 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected, but assuming unchanged analyses. In the plots we also assume that the 

2448: systematic uncertainties will scale inversely with the luminosity. Using 4 fb$^{-1}$ of data, the CDF experiment has the potential to exclude chargino masses below ~140 GeV/c$^2$ and ~180 GeV/c$^2$ in the mSUGRA and MSSM-no-mix scenarios, respectively.

2449: \begin{figure} % MSUGRA lum

2450: \begin{center}

2451: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{FIG22_excl_new_mix_proj_log.eps}

2452: \caption{Projection of the current expected result with increased data size for the mSUGRA scenario assuming no signal is observed. Also shown is the current observed limit. (top full line).}

2453: \label{fig:proj1}

2454: \end{center}

2455: \end{figure}

2456: \begin{figure} % WZ lum

2457: \begin{center}

2458: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{excl_new_wz_proj_log.eps}

2459: \caption{Projection of the current expected result with increased data size for the MSSM-W/Z scenario assuming no signal is observed. Also shown is the current observed limit. (top full line).}

2460: \label{fig:proj3}

2461: \end{center}

2462: \end{figure}

2463: \begin{figure} % NOSLEPTONMIX lum

2464: \begin{center}

2465: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{FIG24_excl_new_nomix_proj_log.eps}

2466: \caption{Projection of the current expected result with increased data size for the MSSM-no-mix scenario assuming no signal is observed. Also shown is the current observed limit. (top full line).}

2467: \label{fig:proj2}

2468: \end{center}

2469: \end{figure}

2470: 

2471: \section{Summary}

2472: \label{summary}

2473: %\input{summary}

2474: We searched for the associated production of charginos and neutralinos in final states with one high-\pt\  electron or muon, and two additional leptons. 

2475: The observed data counts are consistent with

2476: the expectations from the standard model backgrounds and we set limits on the production cross section

2477: times branching ratio. 

2478: In the MSSM model with no slepton mixing and degenerate slepton masses, $m_0=70$ GeV/$c^2$, $\tan\beta=3$, and $\mu>0$, we set a  95\% C.L. limit on the chargino mass at 151 GeV/$c^2$.

2479: 

2480: \begin{acknowledgments}

2481: %new from June 7, 2007

2482: We thank the Fermilab staff and the technical staffs of the participating institutions for their vital contributions. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy and National Science Foundation; the Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan; the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; the National Science Council of the Republic of China; the Swiss National Science Foundation; the A.P. Sloan Foundation; the Bundesministerium f\"ur Bildung und Forschung, Germany; the Korean Science and Engineering Foundation and the Korean Research Foundation; the Science and Technology Facilities Council and the Royal Society, UK; the Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et Physique des Particules/CNRS; the Russian Foundation for Basic Research; the Comisi\'on Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnolog\'{\i}a, Spain; the European Community's Human Potential Programme; the Slovak R\&D Agency; and the Academy of Finland.

2483: \end{acknowledgments}

2484: 

2485: \clearpage

2486: 

2487: %\input{bib}

2488: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

2489: %1

2490: \bibitem{prl1} J.~Wess and B.~Zumino, Phys. Lett. B, {\bf 49}, 52 (1974).

2491: 

2492: %2

2493: \bibitem{martin} For review, see S.~P.~Martin, hep-ph/9709356.

2494: 

2495: %3 the ewk fits sentence, prelim out:

2496: %\bibitem{ewk} ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and OPAL Collaborations, and the LEP Electroweak Working Group, CERN-PH-EP/2006-042, 

2497: % hep-ex/0612034.

2498: 

2499: %3

2500: \bibitem{mSUGRA}D.~Z.~Freedman {\it et al.} , Phys. Rev. D {\bf 13}, 3214 (1976).

2501: 

2502: 

2503: %4

2504: \bibitem{rpv} $R$-parity is defined as 

2505: $R_{\rm P}=(-1)^{3(B-L)+2s}$, where $B$ is the baryon number, $L$ is the lepton number, and $s$ is the spin. A SM particle therefore carries $R_{\rm P}=+1$ and its SUSY partner $R_{\rm P}=-1$.

2506: 

2507: %5

2508: \bibitem{LEP} LEP Supersymmetry Working Group, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and OPAL experiments, note LEPSUSYWG/01-03.1 

2509: (http://lepsusy.web.cern.ch/lepsusy/Welcome.html).

2510: 

2511: %6

2512: \bibitem{LEP2} LEP Supersymmetry Working Group, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and OPAL experiments, note LEPSUSYWG/02-06.2 

2513: (http://lepsusy.web.cern.ch/lepsusy/Welcome.html).

2514: 

2515: %7

2516: \bibitem{D0} V.~Abazov {\it et al.} (DO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 95}, 151805 (2005).

2517: 

2518: %8

2519: \bibitem{carenaXS} M.~Carena {\it et al.}, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 71}, 937 (1999).

2520: 

2521: %9

2522: \bibitem{metdesc}  Missing transverse energy, \met, is defined as the magnitude of $-\sum_i E_T^i \hat{n_i}$, 

2523: where $\hat n_i$ is the unit vector in the azimuthal plane that points from the interaction point to the $i^{th}$ calorimeter tower, and $E_T^i$ the transverse energy in that tower.

2524: 

2525: %10

2526: \bibitem{prl} T.~Aaltonen {\it et al.}, (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 99}, 191806 (2007).

2527: 

2528: %%%% CDF DETECTOR

2529: 

2530: %11

2531: \bibitem{cdf} D.~Acosta {\it et al.} (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D {\bf 71}, 032001 (2005).

2532: 

2533: %13 taken out

2534: %\bibitem{cot} A.~Affolder {\it et al.} (CDF Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods A {\bf 526}, 249 (2004).

2535: 

2536: %12 taken out

2537: %\bibitem{ces} L.~Balka {\it et al.} (CDF Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods A {\bf 267}, 272 (1988).

2538: 

2539: %12

2540: %\bibitem{lumi} S.~Klimenko, J.~Konigsberg and T.~Liss, FERMILAB-FN-0741 (2003); D. Acosta {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A {\bf 494}, 57 (2002).

2541: 

2542: %13

2543: \bibitem{runIIb} P.~Lukens {\it et al.} (CDF Collaboration), FERMILAB-TM-2198 (2003).

2544: 

2545: %LEPTON ID

2546: 

2547: %14 WZprd  (but I think this is now published, not in prd, though? need to check

2548: \bibitem{trackeff} A. Abulencia {\it et al.} (CDF Collaboration), FERMILAB-PUB-05-360-E (2005), hep-ex/0508029.

2549: 

2550: %15

2551: \bibitem{stubfootnote} A pattern of hits in a muon chamber passing certain quality criteria is defined as a ``stub''.

2552: 

2553: %16

2554: \bibitem{cmio} This includes cases where there is a stub in the BMU, CMU, or CMP chambers only.

2555: 

2556: 

2557: %17

2558: \bibitem{tevIIreport} V.~Barger {\it et al.}, Report of the SUGRA Working Group for Run II of the Tevatron, hep-ph/0003154v1

2559: 

2560: %18

2561: \bibitem{lepplusjet} A.~Abulencia {\it et al.}, (CDF collaboration), Phys. Rev. D {\bf 74}, 072006 (2006).

2562: 

2563: %22 now in text:

2564: %\bibitem{jetAlgo} The jet algorithm reconstructs jets with a fixed cone algorithm; the cone aperture is 

2565: %    $\Delta R = \sqrt{\Delta \eta^{2}+\Delta \phi^{2}}$ = 0.4.

2566: 

2567: %% DATA AND SIMULATION SAMPLES

2568: 

2569: %19

2570: \bibitem{pythia} T.~Sj{\"o}strand {\it et al.}, J. High Energy Phys. {\bf 0605}, 026 (2006), LU TP 06-13, FERMILAB-PUB-06-052-CD-T, hep-ph/0603175 (2006).

2571: 

2572: %20

2573: \bibitem{tunea} M.~Dobbs {\it et al.}, The QCD/SM Working Group Summary Report, hep-ph/0403100.

2574: 

2575: %21

2576: %\bibitem{madgraph} F.~Maltoni, and T.~Stelzer, JHEP {\bf 0302}:027 (2003), hep-ph/0208156.

2577: \bibitem{madgraph} F.~Maltoni and T.~Stelzer, J.High Energy Phys. {\bf 0302}, 027 (2003), hep-ph/0208156.

2578: 

2579: %22

2580: \bibitem{geant} R.~Brun {\it et al.}, GEANT: Simulation Program for Particle Physics Experiments. User Guide and Reference Manual, CERN-DD-78-2-REV.

2581: 

2582: %23

2583: \bibitem{cdfsim} E.~Gerchtein and M.~Paulini, Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics, CHEP-2003-TUMT005 (2003).

2584: 

2585: %24

2586: \bibitem{positrons} We refer to both electrons and positrons as electrons.

2587: 

2588: %25

2589: \bibitem{alon} A.~Abulencia {\it et al.}, (CDF collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98}, 131804 (2007).

2590: %\bibitem{alon} Search for anomalous production of multi-lepton events in  $\rm{p\bar p}$ collisions at $\sqrt s$ = 1.96 TeV. PRL in preparation.

2591: 

2592: %26

2593: \bibitem{useFake} Given the small misidentification probability per fakeable object ($\mathcal{P} \sim 10^{-3}$), it is unlikely

2594: to find two misidentified leptons in the same event ($\mathcal{P} \sim 10^{-6}$).

2595: 

2596: %27

2597: \bibitem{prospino} W.~Beenakker {\it et al.},  Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83}, 3780 (1999), hep-ph/9906298.

2598: 

2599: %28

2600: \bibitem{isajet} H.~Baer {\it et al.}, {\textsc ISAJET} manual, hep-ph/0001086.

2601: 

2602: %29

2603: \bibitem{softsusy} B.~C. Allanach, Comput. Phys. Commun. {\bf 143}, 305 (2002), hep-ph/0104145.

2604: 

2605: %30

2606: %\bibitem{slha} P.~Z.~Skands {\it et al.}, JHEP {\bf 0407}:036 (2004), hep-ph/0311123.

2607: \bibitem{slha} P.~Z.~Skands {\it et al.}, J.High Energy Phys. {\bf 0407}, 036 (2004), hep-ph/0311123.

2608: 

2609: 

2610: %%%% EVENT SELECTION

2611: 

2612: %31

2613: \bibitem{anadi} A.~Canepa, Ph.D thesis, Purdue University, (2006), FERMILAB-THESIS-2006-49. 

2614: 

2615: %32

2616: \bibitem{florencia} A.~Bhatti {\it et al.}, Nucl.Instrum. Methods A {\bf 566},375 (2006).

2617: 

2618: %

2619: %\bibitem{lumi} S.~Klimenko {\it et al.}, FERMILAB-FN-0741 (2003).

2620: %\bibitem{lumi} S.~Klimenko, J.~Konigsberg and T.~Liss, FERMILAB-FN-0741 (2003); D. Acosta {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A {\bf 494}, 57 (2002).

2621: \bibitem{lumi} S.~Klimenko, J.~Konigsberg and T.~Liss, FERMILAB-FN-0741 (2003); D. Acosta {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A {\bf 494}, 57 (2002).

2622: 

2623: %%%% SYSTEMATICS

2624: 

2625: 

2626: %33

2627: \bibitem{topmasspaper} A.~Abulencia {\it et al.}, (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D {\bf 73}, 112006 (2006).

2628: 

2629: %34

2630: \bibitem{cteq6m} H.~L.~Lai {\it et al.}, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 12}, 375 (2000).

2631: 

2632: %35

2633: \bibitem{diboson} J.~M.~Campbell and R.~K.~Ellis, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60}, 113006, (1999), hep-ph/9905386. 

2634: 

2635: %36

2636: \bibitem{ttbar} R.~Bonciani {\it et al.}, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 529}, 424, (1998), hep-ph/9801375.

2637: 

2638: 

2639: %%% INTERPRETATION

2640: 

2641: %37

2642: \bibitem{tomjunk} T.~Junk, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A {\bf 434}, 435 (1999), hep-ex/9902006.

2643: 

2644: %38

2645: \bibitem{alexread} A.~L.~Read, J.~Phys. G {\bf 28}, 2693 (2002).

2646: 

2647: %39

2648: \bibitem{example} For instance, we set BR($\tilde \chi_1^+ \rightarrow \ell \nu \tilde \chi_1^0$) = BR($W\rightarrow\ell\nu$) and BR($\tilde\chi_2^0\rightarrow\ell\ell\tilde\chi_1^0 $) = BR($Z\rightarrow\ell\ell$).

2649: 

2650: %40 

2651: \bibitem{likesign} A.~Abulencia {\it et al.}, (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98}, 221803, (2007).

2652: 

2653: 

2654: \end{thebibliography}

2655: 

2656: 

2657: \clearpage

2658: \end{document}

2659: 

2660: