1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \begin{document}
3: \title{Discovery of the Spin Frequency of 4U 0614+09 with {\it Swift}/BAT}
4: \author{Tod E. Strohmayer} \affil{Astrophysics Science Division,
5: NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771; stroh@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov}
6: \author{Craig B. Markwardt} \affil{UMD/CRESST/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD
7: 20771; craigm@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov} \and \author{Erik Kuulkers}
8: \affil{ISOC, ESA/ESAC, Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, PO Box 50727,
9: 28080 Madrid, Spain; Erik.Kuulkers@esa.int}
10: \begin{abstract}
11:
12: We report the discovery of burst oscillations at 414.7 Hz during a
13: thermonuclear X-ray burst from the low mass X-ray binary (LMXB) 4U
14: 0614+091 with the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) onboard {\it Swift}.
15: %4U 0614+091 is one of the closest known LMXBs, and has historically been
16: %known to produce exceptionally bright X-ray bursts.
17: In a search of the BAT archive, we found two burst triggers consistent
18: with the position of 4U 0614+091.
19: %BAT triggers from known source positions do not initiate a spacecraft
20: %slew (the event is unlikely to be a GRB), but high time resolution event
21: %mode data is acquired around these events.
22: We searched both bursts for high frequency timing signatures, and
23: found a significant detection at 414.7 Hz during a 5 s interval in the
24: cooling tail of the brighter burst. This result establishes the spin
25: frequency of the neutron star in 4U 0614+091 as $\approx 415$ Hz. The
26: oscillation had an average amplitude (rms) of $14 \%$, These results
27: are consistent with those known for burst oscillations seen in other
28: LMXBs. The inferred ratio of the frequency difference between the twin
29: kHz QPOs, and the spin frequency, $\Delta\nu / \nu_s$, in this source
30: is strongly inconsistent with either 0.5 or 1, and tends to support
31: the recent suggestions by Yin et al., and Mendez \& Belloni, that the
32: kHz QPO frequency difference may not have a strong connection to the
33: neutron star spin frequency.
34:
35: \end{abstract}
36: \keywords{stars: neutron---stars: rotation---stars: oscillations---X-rays:
37: bursts---X-rays: binaries--X-rays: individual (4U 0614+091)}
38:
39:
40: \section{Introduction}
41:
42: The detection of spin modulation pulsations during thermonuclear X-ray
43: bursts, ``burst oscillations,'' has become an important method for
44: measuring the spin rates of neutron stars in accreting binary systems
45: (see Strohmayer \& Bildsten 2006 for a review). To date, almost all of
46: the {\it a priori} detections of burst oscillations have been made
47: with the Proportional Counter Array (PCA) onboard the {\it Rossi X-ray
48: Timing Explorer} (RXTE). Indeed, its combination of large collecting
49: area, low background, high time resolution, and high telemetry
50: capacity enabled the first detections of the phenomenon. Pulsations
51: during a bright burst from SAX J1808.4-3568 were detected with the
52: Wide Field Camera (WFC) on {\it BeppoSAX} at the $\approx 3\sigma$
53: level, but in this case the spin frequency was already known (in 't
54: Zand et al. 2003).
55:
56: The Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) onboard {\it Swift} has a combination
57: of large collecting area (5,200 cm$^2$) and high time resolution (100
58: $\mu$-sec) that should, in principle, make it sensitive to burst
59: oscillations from particularly bright X-ray bursts, although the BAT
60: does suffer a significant loss of sensitivity to such oscillations due
61: to its much larger background compared to the PCA. The BAT has a
62: sophisticated triggering system that identifies Gamma-ray bursts
63: (GRBS), and other fast transients, including thermonuclear bursts from
64: accreting neutron stars. When a trigger occurs, an estimate of the
65: source's position is derived onboard the {\it Swift} spacecraft, where
66: it is checked against an onboard catalog of known objects. If the
67: position is consistent with a source in the catalog, then the trigger
68: is deemed to not be a GRB, and {\it Swift} will not initiate a direct
69: slew to the position. However, high time resolution data is still
70: accumulated around the trigger time. These data can then be searched
71: for burst oscillations.
72:
73: Historically, some of the brightest X-ray bursts observed, with fluxes
74: of order $2 \times 10^{-7}$ ergs cm$^2$ s$^{-1}$, have been associated
75: with the low mass X-ray binary (LMXB) 4U 0614+091. Based on the
76: detection of a bright burst with {\it Watch}, and Eddington limit
77: arguments, Brandt et al. (1992) argued that the distance to 4U
78: 0614+091 is likely $< 3$ kpc. Several lines of evidence point to the
79: conclusion that 4U 0614+091 is an ultra-compact X-ray binary system.
80: Juett, Psaltis \& Chakrabarty (2001) inferred an enhanced neon to
81: oxygen ratio for the system, and based on a comparison of the ratio
82: with known ultra-compact systems, argued that 4U 0614+091 is a similar
83: system. Sensitive optical spectroscopy by Nelemans et al. (2005) found
84: carbon and oxygen emission lines, but no evidence for helium or
85: hydrogen, further strengthening the ultra-compact classification. The
86: optical counterpart to 4U 0614+091, V1055 Ori, is also intrinsically
87: faint, consistent with a compact orbit (Nelemans et al. 2005; van
88: Paradijs \& McClintock 1994). The faintness of its persistent X-ray
89: emission and nearby distance suggest a low accretion rate, again
90: consistent with an orbital period $< 1$ hr (Deloye \& Bildsten
91: 2003). Finally, we note that in 't Zand et al. (2007) cite a report by
92: O'Brien (2005) of a 50 min. optical modulation, that could represent
93: the orbital period.
94:
95: Although 4U 0614+091 has been extensively studied with RXTE, it has
96: not yet observed any X-ray bursts from the source. Ford et al. (1997)
97: reported the discovery of kHz quasiperiodic oscillations (QPOs) from
98: the source using RXTE data. They found a maximum QPO frequency of
99: $\approx 1,145$ Hz, and a mean frequency separation of $323 \pm 4$ Hz
100: between the upper and lower kHz oscillations (see van der Klis 2006,
101: for a review of kHz QPOs). Based on this frequency separation they
102: suggested a spin frequency of $\approx 323$ Hz. Recent studies,
103: however, have suggested that the frequency separation between the kHz
104: QPOs may be more or less independent of the neutron star spin
105: frequency (Yin et al. 2007; Mendez \& Belloni 2007).
106:
107: In this Letter we report the discovery of 415 Hz burst oscillations in
108: a burst from 4U 0614+091 observed with the BAT instrument onboard
109: {\it Swift}. In \S 2 we describe our timing study of bursts from 4U
110: 0614+091 with BAT and summarize their basic properties. In \S 3 we
111: discuss our results in the context of recent efforts to understand the
112: relationship (if any) between the kHz QPOs and the spin frequencies of
113: neutron stars in LMXBs.
114:
115: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
116:
117: We searched the BAT archives for triggered events consistent with the
118: position of 4U 0614+091, and found two; triggers 234849, and
119: 273106. These events ocurred on October 21, 2006 and March 30, 2007,
120: respectively. For imaging the BAT has a point spread function of 22
121: arcmin, but centroiding for source localization is typically accurate
122: to 1 - 6 arcmin, based on the detection significance. The BAT-derived
123: positions for each trigger were offset by 1.5 and 1.0 arcmin,
124: respectively, from the well known position of 4U 0614+091, confirming
125: it as the source of the bursts. The BAT data consist of X-ray event
126: times with 100 $\mu$-sec resolution as well as energy measurements for
127: 43 seconds around each burst. BAT's nominal energy band is 15 - 150
128: keV, and the bursts are not detected above about 30 keV, which is
129: consistent with a thermonuclear origin. Figure 1 shows mask-weighted
130: (background subtracted) lightcurves of each burst in the 12 - 25 keV
131: energy band. The 2006 October 21 burst was observed at $\approx
132: 20.6^{\circ}$ from the BAT pointing axis, so the source countrate was
133: substantially higher for this event than the 2007 March 30 burst,
134: which was at $51.3^{\circ}$. Indeed, the peak 12 - 20 keV raw
135: countrates were 4,100 and 2,620 s$^{-1}$ for the 2006 October and 2007
136: March bursts, respectively. Time resolved spectroscopy of these bursts
137: indicates that they both had peak fluxes of $\approx 2 \times 10^{-7}$
138: ergs cm$^2$ s$^{-1}$ (Kuulkers et al. 2007, in preparation). These
139: values are comparable to peak fluxes reported from earlier burst
140: observations (Brandt et al. 1992; Swank et al. 1978). There is no
141: strong indication for photospheric radius expansion in either burst.
142:
143: The signal to noise ratio, $n_{\sigma}$, in a timing signature (such
144: as a QPO) is proportional to $S^2 / (S + B)$, where $S$ and $B$ are
145: the source and background countrates, respectively. Thus, to search
146: most sensitively for an oscillation signal one should attempt to
147: minimize the background and maximize the source countrate. With the
148: present BAT data we do this by restricting our timing study to events
149: in the energy band from 13 - 20 keV. We selected this range because it
150: effectively maximized the ratio of burst countrate to total
151: countrate. That is, most of the events above 20 keV are not associated
152: with the thermal burst emission, and simply add background, while the
153: BAT does not have much effective area below about 15 keV. To search
154: for burst oscillations we computed power spectra for 10 second
155: intervals, and we stepped the interval by 2 seconds through each
156: burst. We searched in the frequency band from 1 - 2048 Hz, at
157: successive resolutions of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 Hz. We began our study
158: with the 2006 October burst since this burst had the higher observed
159: countrate of the two events.
160:
161: Our study revealed a significant signal at 415 Hz in the cooling tail
162: of the 2006 October burst. Figure 2 shows a power spectrum computed
163: from a 10 s interval beginning 24.5 s from the beginning of the event
164: data. The frequency resolution is 0.2 Hz, and a strong peak in the
165: power spectrum is present at 414.75 Hz. The single trial probability
166: to obtain a peak this strong (25.78) in this power spectrum is $1.7
167: \times 10^{-10}$. We searched 10,240 frequency bins in this power
168: spectrum (to 2048 Hz at 0.2 Hz resolution), and a total of 14 similar
169: power spectra through the burst tail. To account for the number of
170: trials searched we take the total number of power spectral bins in
171: each time interval, and at each resolution. This gives $10,240 \times
172: 14 \times (1 + 0.5 + 0.25) = 250,880$ trials, and yields a detection
173: significance of $4.3 \times 10^{-5}$, which is a 4$\sigma$
174: detection. We note that this is a conservative estimate of the
175: significance, since not all the bins at 0.4 and 0.8 Hz resolution are
176: independent of those in the 0.2 Hz spectrum. The pulsed amplitude
177: associated with the signal in this power spectrum is $12.3\%$ (rms).
178: This is the fractional modulation associated with the burst emission
179: only, under the assumption that the pre-burst level is a reasonable
180: indicator of the non-burst background.
181:
182: We next computed a dynamic power spectrum through the burst using the
183: $Z^2$ statistic (see Strohmayer \& Markwardt 2002, for a discussion of
184: the method). We used 4 s intervals, and stepped the intervals at 0.25
185: s. The dynamic spectrum is shown in Figure 3 and indicates that the
186: oscillation signal is present during an $\approx 5$ s interval
187: beginning about 22 s after the onset of the burst. The vertical dashed
188: lines in Figure 3 mark the interval used to compute the power spectrum
189: shown in Figure 2. The presence of oscillations after the burst peak,
190: during the cooling tail, is consistent with other burst oscillation
191: sources, and further supports the interpretation that we are seeing
192: burst oscillations in 4U 0614+091. The oscillation amplitude is also
193: within the characteristic range seen in other sources.
194:
195: We next searched the March 2007 burst in a manner similar to that
196: described above, however, having detected a signal in the October 2006
197: burst, we narrowed the search in frequency to within a few Hz on
198: either side of 415 Hz. We did not detect any significant signal. We
199: are not too suprised by this, however, since the peak burst countrate
200: is almost a factor of 3 lower in the March 2007 event than the October
201: 2006 burst. This greatly reduces the sensitivity to pulsations in this
202: burst. Quantitatively, $S^2 / (S + B)$ is reduced by a factor of $\sim
203: 5$, which would erase a $4\sigma$ detection, thus a non-detection is
204: not particularly surprising.
205:
206: \section{Discussion}
207:
208: We have found strong evidence for a burst oscillation at 414.75 Hz in
209: a thermonuclear burst from 4U 0614+091 with the BAT onboard {\it
210: Swift}. This is the first detection of burst oscillations with BAT and
211: demonstrates its potential in this regard, particularly for relatively
212: nearby (read bright) burst sources. This detection implies a spin
213: frequency of about 415 Hz for the neutron star in this system. Since
214: the discovery of kHz QPOs and burst oscillations, there has been a
215: suggested link between the neutron star spin frequency, $\nu_s$, (as
216: indicated by burst oscillation frequencies, or persistent pulsation
217: frequencies, or both) and the frequency difference of the twin kHz
218: QPOs, $\Delta\nu / \nu_s$. Initial discoveries suggested that the kHz
219: QPO frequency separation was consistent with the spin frequency, but
220: subsequent observations have revealed a more complex picture
221: (Strohmayer et al. 1996; van der Klis 2006). The tentative consensus
222: at present is that the frequency separation is related to the spin
223: frequency (at least in some sources), in the sense that $\Delta\nu /
224: \nu_s$ can be close to either 1 or 0.5. While this description fits
225: reasonably well with several of the observed systems, it is not
226: universally precise, in the sense that some objects show statistically
227: significant deviations from 1 or 0.5, and that the frequency
228: separation is known to vary in some objects. Recently, Mendez \&
229: Belloni (2007), and Yin et al. (2007) have re-examined the existing
230: measurements of neutron star spin frequencies and kHz QPO, and suggest
231: that there may be only a weak connection between the QPO frequency
232: difference and the spin frequency. Indeed, Mendez \& Belloni (2007)
233: hypothesize that the frequency difference may be more or less
234: constant, essentially independent of the spin frequency.
235:
236: With the detection of the spin frequency in 4U 0614+091 we now have an
237: additional source in which to closely evaluate the relationship
238: between kHz QPOs and spin. Interestingly, the burst oscillation
239: frequency we have found is very significantly different from the
240: frequency separation of $323 \pm 4$ Hz of the twin kHz QPOs reported
241: for the system (Ford et al. 1997). In this case the QPO difference
242: frequency was quite accurately determined, and since the spin
243: frequency is not thought to differ from observed burst oscillation
244: frequencies by more than a few Hz, this is a strong demonstration that
245: the kHz QPO difference frequency and spin frequency in 4U 0614+091 do
246: not follow the ``consensus'' model. Assuming that the spin frequency
247: is within 4 Hz of our measured burst oscillation frequency, then we
248: arrive at $\Delta\nu / \nu_s = 0.78 \pm 0.02$, which is inconsistent
249: with both 0.5 and 1 at very high confidence. Interestingly, this
250: value lies much closer to the two alternative relations suggested by
251: Yin et al. (2007, $\Delta\nu = 390 \; {\rm Hz} - 0.2\nu_s$), and
252: Mendez \& Belloni (2007, $\Delta\nu = 308 \; {\rm Hz}$), although it
253: stills fall about $2\sigma$ away from these as well. Since these
254: relations were derived and or suggested prior to our discovery, the
255: spin meausurement reported here can be thought of as an independent
256: check on those models, and it appears they provide a much better
257: description of the data than the ``consensus'' model, further
258: supporting the notion that it may be past time to re-think the
259: relationship between the kHz QPOs and neutron star spin, or to at
260: least adopt the working hypothesis that the relationship does not hold
261: for all sources, or at all times.
262:
263: \section{Summary}
264:
265: We have found the first evidence for burst oscillations in the LMXB 4U
266: 0614+091 at 414.75 Hz, the first such detection with the BAT
267: instrument onboard {\it Swift}. The inferred spin frequency of
268: $\approx 415$ Hz is fairly typical for such sources, but it is
269: inconsistent with the kHz QPO frequency separation, or half of that,
270: measured for the source by Ford et al. (1997).
271:
272:
273: %\acknowledgements
274:
275:
276:
277: \begin{thebibliography}{}
278:
279: \bibitem[Brandt et al.(1992)]{1992A&A...262L..15B} Brandt, S.,
280: Castro-Tirado, A.~J., Lund, N., Dremin, V., Lapshov, I., \& Syunyaev,
281: R.\ 1992, \aap, 262, L15
282:
283: \bibitem[Deloye \& Bildsten(2003)]{2003ApJ...598.1217D} Deloye, C.~J., \&
284: Bildsten, L.\ 2003, \apj, 598, 1217
285:
286: \bibitem[Ford et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...475L.123F} Ford, E., et al.\ 1997,
287: \apjl, 475, L123
288:
289: \bibitem[in't Zand et al.(2007)]{2007A&A...465..953I} in't Zand, J.~J.~M.,
290: Jonker, P.~G., \& Markwardt, C.~B.\ 2007, \aap, 465, 953
291:
292: \bibitem[in't Zand et al.(2001)]{2001A&A...372..916I} in't Zand, J.~J.~M.,
293: et al.\ 2001, \aap, 372, 916
294:
295: \bibitem[Juett et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...560L..59J} Juett, A.~M., Psaltis,
296: D., \& Chakrabarty, D.\ 2001, \apjl, 560, L59
297:
298: \bibitem[Kuulkers et al. (2007)]{2007arXivTBD.TBD} Kuulkers, E. et al. \
299: 2007, in preparation
300:
301: \bibitem[Mendez \& Belloni(2007)]{2007arXiv0708.0015M} Mendez, M., \&
302: Belloni, T.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 708, arXiv:0708.0015
303:
304: \bibitem[Nelemans et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.348L...7N} Nelemans, G., Jonker,
305: P.~G., Marsh, T.~R., \& van der Klis, M.\ 2004, \mnras, 348, L7
306:
307: \bibitem[O'Brien et al.(2005)]{2005privcomm} O'Brien, K. 2005,
308: presentation at symposium, ``A life With Stars,'' Amsterdam, the
309: Netherlands, August 2005
310:
311: \bibitem[Strohmayer \& Bildsten(2006)]{2006csxs.book..113S} Strohmayer, T.,
312: \& Bildsten, L.\ 2006, Compact stellar X-ray sources, 113
313:
314: \bibitem[Strohmayer \& Markwardt(2002)]{2002ApJ...577..337S} Strohmayer,
315: T.~E., \& Markwardt, C.~B.\ 2002, \apj, 577, 337
316:
317: \bibitem[Strohmayer et al.(1996)]{1996ApJ...469L...9S} Strohmayer, T.~E.,
318: Zhang, W., Swank, J.~H., Smale, A., Titarchuk, L., Day, C., \& Lee, U.\
319: 1996, \apjl, 469, L9
320:
321: \bibitem[Swank et al.(1978)]{1978MNRAS.182..349S} Swank, J.~H., Boldt,
322: E.~A., Holt, S.~S., Serlemitsos, P.~J., \& Becker, R.~H.\ 1978, \mnras,
323: 182, 349
324:
325: \bibitem[van der Klis(2006)]{2006csxs.book...39V} van der Klis, M.\ 2006,
326: Compact stellar X-ray sources, 39
327:
328: \bibitem[van Paradijs \& McClintock(1994)]{1994A&A...290..133V} van
329: Paradijs, J., \& McClintock, J.~E.\ 1994, \aap, 290, 133
330:
331: \bibitem[Yin et al.(2007)]{2007A&A...471..381Y} Yin, H.~X., Zhang, C.~M.,
332: Zhao, Y.~H., Lei, Y.~J., Qu, J.~L., Song, L.~M., \& Zhang, F.\ 2007, \aap,
333: 471, 381
334:
335:
336: \end{thebibliography}
337:
338: \pagebreak
339:
340: \begin{figure}
341: \begin{center}
342: \includegraphics[width=6in, height=6in]{f1.ps}
343: \end{center}
344: Figure 1: Mask-weighted light curves in the 12 - 25 keV band of the
345: two thermonuclear bursts observed by BAT from 4U 0614+091. The left
346: panel shows the burst from 2006 October (trigger \#234849), and the
347: right panel that from 2007 March (trigger \#273106). The time bin size
348: is 0.5 s. Mask-weighted BAT light curves have the background
349: subtracted, and are corrected approximately to the on-axis effective
350: count rate.
351: \end{figure}
352: \clearpage
353:
354: \begin{figure}
355: \begin{center}
356: \includegraphics[width=6in,height=6in]{f2.ps}
357: \end{center}
358: Figure 2: Power spectrum from the decaying tail of the 2006 October
359: burst. The spectrum was computed from a 10 s interval beginning 22.5 s
360: from the start of the data stream (time zero in Figures 2 and 3). For
361: this spectrum we used events in the 13 - 20 keV band, and the
362: frequency resolution is 0.2 Hz. The strong peak at $\approx 415$ Hz is
363: evident. See the text for a detailed discussion.
364: \end{figure}
365: \clearpage
366:
367: \begin{figure}
368: \begin{center}
369: \includegraphics[width=6in, height=6in]{f3.ps}
370: \end{center}
371: Figure 3: Dynamic $Z^2$ power spectrum of the burst from 2006
372: October. We computed $Z_1^2$ power spectra using 4 s intervals, and
373: stepped the intervals by 0.25 s. We used only events in the 13 - 20
374: keV range. Six $Z_1^2$ contour levels are plotted, starting at 16 and
375: spaced in steps of 4. The vertical dashed lines denote the time
376: interval used to compute the power spectrum displayed in Figure 2. The
377: burst light curve in the 13 - 20 keV band with 0.25 s time bins is also
378: superposed. The pulsation signal is evident in the cooling tail of the
379: burst.
380: \end{figure}
381: \clearpage
382:
383:
384: \end{document}
385:
386:
387:
388:
389: