1: %\documentclass[referee]{aa} % for a referee version
2: \documentclass{aa}
3: %\input psfig.sty
4: \topmargin=-0pt
5: \begin{document}
6: \title{The Distance of the SNR Kes 75 and PWN PSR J1846-0258 System}
7:
8: \author{D.A. Leahy \inst{1}
9: \and
10: W.W. Tian \inst{1,2}}
11: \authorrunning{Leahy \& Tian}
12: \titlerunning{The Distance of Kes 75/PWN PSR J1846-0258}
13: \offprints{tww@iras.ucalgary.ca. DAL and WWT give equal contributions to paper}
14: \institute{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada;\\
15: \and
16: National Astronomical Observatories, CAS, Beijing 100012, China}
17: \date{Received 27 Nov. 2007/Accepted 24 Jan. 2007}
18:
19: \abstract{The supernova remnant (SNR) Kes 75/PSR J1846-0258 association can be regarded as a certainty due to the accurate
20: location of young PSR J1846-0258 at the center of Kes 75 and the detected bright radio/X-ray
21: synchrotron nebula surrounding the pulsar.
22: We provide a new distance estimate to the SNR/pulsar system by analyzing the HI and $^{13}$CO maps,
23: the HI emission and absorption spectra, and the $^{13}$CO emission spectrum of Kes 75.
24: That there are no absorption features at negative velocities strongly argues against the widely-used
25: large distance of 19 to 21 kpc for Kes 75, and shows that Kes 75 is within the Solar circle,
26: i.e. a distance $d<$13.2 kpc. Kes 75 is likely at a distance of 5.1 to 7.5 kpc because the
27: highest HI absorption velocity is at 95 km/s, and no absorption is associated with a
28: nearby HI emission peak at 102 km/s in the direction of Kes 75.
29: This distance to Kes 75 gives a reasonable luminosity of PSR J1846-0258 and its PWN and also leads to a much
30: smaller radius for Kes 75, so the age of the SNR is consistent with the
31: spin-down age of PSR J1846-0258, confirming this pulsar as the second-youngest in
32: the Galaxy.
33:
34: \keywords{(ISM:) supernova remnants:individual (Kes 75)- pulsars: individual (PSR J1846-0258 -galaxies-ISM: molecular: observations-radio lines: galaxies }
35: }
36: \maketitle
37:
38:
39: \section{Introduction}
40: The supernova remnant (SNR) Kes 75 (G29.7-0.3) is one of a few examples of a shell-type
41: remnant harboring an extremely young pulsar that powers an extended radio/X-ray synchrotron
42: nebula. Ever since the young energetic X-ray pulsar, PSR J1846-0258, was discovered by Gotthelf
43: et al. (2000) using the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer, many observations of this system at different wave-bands have been executed (Sugizaki et al. 2001, Mereghetti et al. 2002, Bock \& Gaensler 2005, Djannati-Ata\"i 2007, McBride et al. 2008).
44: These observations strongly support the SNR/pulsar association
45: because of both the position of PSR J1846-0258 at the geometrical centers of the SNR shell and
46: the bright radio/X-ray nebula within the SNR.
47:
48: A young pulsar usually favors a small radius of the associated SNR, but Kes 75 had an
49: estimated radius of 10 pc based on the previously estimated 19 kpc distance.
50: Caswell et al. (1975) employed the Parkes HI-line interferometer to find the most distant
51: reliable absorption feature at velocity of $\sim$ 90 km/s in the direction of Kes 75, and
52: suggested the lower-limit distance of 6.6 kpc (assuming Solar - Galactic center distance R$_{0}$= 10 kpc). This drops to
53: 5.0 kpc using a recent measurement of R$_{0}$= 7.6$\pm$0.3 kpc (Eisenhauer et al 2005). Subsequent distance estimates
54: of 19 to 21 kpc for Kes 75 were obtained.
55: Becker \& Helfand (1984) suggested $\sim$ 21 kpc using VLA (D array) HI absorption spectrum observations with features at negative velocity.
56: Based on d=19 to 21 kpc, the extremely high X-ray luminosities for Kes 75
57: ($\sim$ 4$\times10^{37}$ ergs s$^{-1}$), the pulsar, and the PWN require a highly implausible
58: explosion energy ($\sim$ 10$^{53}$ erg), leading to several progenitor evolutionary scenarios
59: (Morton et al. 2007, Helfand et al. 2003). The most likely one of the scenarios points to a
60: large error in the distance estimate of $\sim$ 19 kpc (Morton et al. 2007).
61:
62: The 21 cm neutral hydrogen absorption measurements to the Galactic objects can generally provide a
63: distance estimate with an uncertainty of $<$1 kpc. Recently we used HI+$^{13}$CO
64: observations to measure and revise distances to a few SNRs with high precision
65: (Leahy \& Tian 2008, Tian et al. 2007, Tian \& Leahy 2008). In this paper, we significantly revise the
66: distance to Kes 75 using these methods.
67: The radio data come from 1420 MHz continuum plus
68: HI-line observations of the VLA Galactic Plane Survey (VGPS) and the $^{13}$CO-line (J = 1-0)
69: observations of the Galactic ring survey
70: (Stil et al. 2006, Jackson et al. 2006).
71:
72:
73: \begin{figure*}
74: \vspace{50mm}
75: \begin{picture}(50,50)
76: \put(-80,230){\special{psfile=f1a.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=40 vscale=40 angle=-90}}
77: \put(240,-20){\special{psfile=f1b.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=48 vscale=48 angle=0}}
78: \end{picture}
79: \caption{The 1420 MHz continuum image (left) and HI image (right) of Kes 75 from a single channel. The HI map has superimposed contours (28, 40, 60, 100 K) of the 1420 MHz continuum emission to show the SNR.}
80: \end{figure*}
81:
82: \begin{figure*}
83: \vspace{160mm}
84: \begin{picture}(160,160)
85: \put(-55,645){\special{psfile=f2a.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=39 vscale=33 angle=-90}}
86: \put(230,375){\special{psfile=f2a1.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=46 vscale=41 angle=0}}
87: \put(-20,308){\special{psfile=f2b.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=40 vscale=31 angle=0}}
88: \put(230,478){\special{psfile=f2b1.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=31 vscale=30 angle=-90}}
89: \put(-20,155){\special{psfile=f2c.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=40 vscale=31 angle=0}}
90: \put(230,325){\special{psfile=f2c1.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=31 vscale=30 angle=-90}}
91: \put(-20,-10){\special{psfile=f2d.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=40 vscale=31 angle=0}}
92: \put(200,180){\special{psfile=f2d1.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=40 vscale=34 angle=-90}}
93: \end{picture}
94: \caption{Two channel HI images of Kes 75 (top row). The second and third rows show the HI spectra (left) and the CO emission spectra (right), extracted from boxes 1 and 2 shown in Fig. 1. The bottom row shows an additional HI spectra(left) with the source spectrum from box 1 and background spectrum from the area at $\l$[29.705, 29.725],$b$[-0.285, -0.310], and one-channel CO image (right). Both the HI and CO maps have superimposed the same contours as Fig. 1.}
95: \end{figure*}
96:
97: \section{Analysis and results}
98:
99: In Fig. 1, the VGPS 1420 MHz continuum and one-channel HI images of Kes 75 are given in Galactic coordinates,
100: showing the two emission peaks from the SNR shell. The shell is shown at higher resolution
101: using VLA in B, C, and D array by Helfand et al. (2006).
102: Figure 2 shows two HI-channel maps, one CO-channel map, and the HI absorption/emission and CO emission spectra.
103: The HI spectra do not show any absorption at negative velocities, so Kes 75 must lie within
104: the Solar circle, which is at d$\simeq$ 13.2 kpc at $l=29.7^\circ$.
105: This result
106: significantly revises the previously widely-used value of 19 to 21 kpc for Kes 75.
107: Here we use a circular rotation model with R$_{0}$=7.6 kpc and constant circular velocity V$_{0}$=220 km/s (1985 IAU standard value), yielding a tangent point velocity at $l=29.7^\circ$ of 111 km/s. This is consistent with the observation value in the direction of Kes 75 of $\sim$ 110 km/s from Fig. 2.
108: We have also examined the HI channel images in the negative velocity range where Becker \& Helfand (1984) find the absorption features, and found no evidence of absorption.
109:
110: Further information on the distance of Kes 75 can be obtained by examining the absorption
111: spectra and HI and CO channel images. At 95 km/s there is clear absorption seen in the
112: HI channel map (Fig. 1, right panel) and in the absorption spectra of both continuum peaks (boxes 1 and 2 in Fig. 2) of Kes 75.
113: To verify our method of using annulus background, we calculated an HI absorption spectrum of box 1 using an alternate background (see Fig. 2 lower left panel) and obtain almost identical spectra. Ninety-five km/s is the highest velocity of prominent HI absorption appearing in the spectra (or channel images) of Kes 75, and
114: it corresponds to a minimum distance of 5.1 kpc.
115: Also, there is no absorption in the HI channel map (Fig. 2 top right panel)
116: or in the HI absorption spectra
117: for the HI emission peak at 102 km/s in the direction of Kes 75.
118: Thus Kes 75 is nearer than this emission peak,
119: which could be at either the near side or the far side of the tangent point.
120: If this gas is on the near side, the upper limit for the distance of Kes 75 is 5.5 kpc;
121: in the case that HI is on the far side, the upper limit is 7.5 kpc.
122: We used the latter in the absence of evidence that this emission peak is on the near side of the tangent point.
123: The CO emission spectra in the direction of boxes 1 and 2 both show a high
124: brightness-temperature cloud component at a velocity of 102 km/s.
125: Since there is no strong respective HI absorption in the spectra of Kes 75, the CO cloud
126: should be behind Kes 75 and is probably
127: associated with the HI-emission peak at 102 km/s.
128: Thus both HI and CO observations show that Kes 75 is nearer than the interstellar
129: gas at 102 km/s and confirm an upper distance limit of 7.5 kpc.
130:
131: There is one puzzling feature that seems to be caused by true absorption at $\sim$112
132: km/s in the direction of box 1, but not in the direction of box 2 (Fig. 2, HI channel map, HI and CO spectra).
133: This cannot be due to diffuse HI, or else it would appear in absorption against both continuum
134: peaks of Kes 75. This feature is probably caused by a compact HI cloud at 112 km/s velocity.
135: Since the cloud is compact, it could either be at the tangent point or it could be moving at a peculiar velocity, and elsewhere along the line-of-sight.
136: If the cloud has no peculiar velocity it provides a lower limit to the
137: distance to Kes 75 of the tangent point distance (6.6 kpc) and also confirms that the
138: HI at 102 km/s is on the far side of the tangent point. If it does have a peculiar
139: velocity, then this cloud gives no useful distance information.
140:
141: In summary, Kes 75 should be in the distance range of 5.1 to 7.5 kpc because of the
142: absorption at 95 km/s and absence of absorption at 102 km/s.
143:
144:
145: \section{Discussion}
146:
147: We find strong evidence about the distance to Kes 75, and if disagrees with what is given
148: by Becker \& Helfand et al (1984).
149: By testing different background regions, we
150: were not able to obtain similar HI absorption spectra to those
151: shown in that study.
152: The VGPS data used here is superior to their data in
153: sensitivity, and it also includes single-dish observations from the 100 m Green Bank telescope,
154: yielding the large-scale HI
155: and continuum emission in addition to small-scale emission.
156: This is probably one reason we get a different, better, result.
157:
158: Next we discuss implications of the shorter distance to Kes 75.
159: The new distance gives a much smaller radius for Kes 75: the radio and X-ray sizes nearly
160: match (Morton et al. 2007) and give a radius of 1.60 arcmin. Our new distance range
161: gives a physical radius range of 2.37 to 3.49 pc. We write the distance to
162: Kes 75 as $d=d_6 \times$6 kpc, so the radius is 2.80$d_6$ pc.
163: As estimate of the age of the SNR, we use the spin-down age of 723 years for PSR J1846-0258
164: from Gotthelf et al (2000).
165: Livingstone et al (2006) use measurements of braking index of PSR J1846-0258
166: to put an upper limit on age of 884 yr, confirming the spin-down age estimate.
167: Assuming free expansion, the derived expansion velocity is then 3800$d_6$ km/s
168: with this spin-down age and a radius of 2.80$d_6$ pc.
169: If the SNR is expanding according to Sedov evolution, the current Sedov shock velocity is
170: 0.4 times the average expansion velocity, giving a shock velocity of 1500$d_6$ km/s.
171: For the more realistic case, the initial phases
172: will be dominated by free-expansion, so the current shock velocity will be higher than
173: the Sedov estimate and lower than the free expansion estimate.
174: However, we note that Helfand et al. (2006) estimate the expansion velocity
175: of Kes 75 using the Si X-ray line width to obtain $\sim$3700 km/s.
176: This indicates that Kes 75 is probably closer to the free-expansion phase.
177:
178: The electron temperature of the high-temperature component
179: in the X-ray spectrum is 1.4-1.5 keV (Morton et al. 2007), which corresponds to a
180: shock velocity (for electron-ion equilibration) of 1200 km/s. Since the minimum shock
181: velocity is 1500$d_6$ km/s, there must not be full electron-ion equilibration:
182: one finds a maximum electron-to-ion temperature ratio of 0.64.
183: The shock velocity derived from the electron temperature increases in this case. For
184: an electron-to-ion temperature ratio of 0.1, one obtains a shock velocity of 3800 km/s.
185: Thus the electron-to-on temperature ratio is restricted to the range
186: of 0.10 to 0.64 for Kes 75.
187:
188: Morton et al (2007) give X-ray emitting gas masses in hot (1.4 keV) and cool (0.23 keV) components. For our new distance, the masses are reduced to reasonable values: $5.3 f_1^{1/2}d_6^{5/2}M_{\odot}$ for the cool component and
189: $0.84 f_1^{1/2}d_6^{5/2}M_{\odot}$ for the hot component with $f_1$ the filling factor.
190: They interpret the cool component as shocked interstellar medium (ISM) or circumstellar
191: material (CSM) and the hot component as reverse-shocked ejecta.
192: That two temperature components are seen is clear evidence that the ejecta has
193: not fully entered the Sedov phase.
194: The shocked-ejecta mass is likely to be smaller than the ISM/CSM shocked mass since only
195: a small part of the ejecta has been shocked so far.
196: The expansion should have already slowed down somewhat from the initial ejection velocity,
197: so the current shock velocity and electron-to-ion temperature ratio should be somewhere between the Sedov estimates (1500$d_6$ km/s and 0.64) and the free-expansion values (3800$d_6$ km/s and 0.10).
198:
199: Using the Sedov model and age of 723 yr, the observed outer shock radius yields
200: an estimate of the explosion energy ($E_0$) divided by interstellar density ($n_0$):
201: $E_0/n_0=0.69d_6^5\times10^{50}$erg. The x-ray spectral fitting yields an estimate
202: of the density for the shocked CSM/ISM component of $n=100f_1^{-1/2}d_6^{-1/2}$cm$^{-3}$
203: and $n=64f_1^{-1/2}d_6^{-1/2}$cm$^{-3}$ for the SE and SW limbs of Kes 75, respectively.
204: From the inferred X-ray post-shock density ($n$) and using a compression rate of 3 (from the observed radio spectral index of 0.7, see Droge et al. 1987), we obtain a preshock density $n_0=n/3\simeq 27 f_1^{-1/2}d_6^{-1/2}$ cm$^{-3}$ and
205: an explosion energy of $E_0=1.9d_6^{9/2}f_1^{-1/2}\times10^{51}$erg. This is entirely
206: consistent with what is expected for a core-collapse explosion now, contrary to the problems
207: caused by having a large distance to Kes 75.
208:
209: For PSR J1846-0258, the pulsar-plus-nebular luminosity in the 3-10 keV band is
210: $7.8 \times 10^{34} d_6^2$erg s$^{-1}$, so the pulsar-plus-nebula luminosity to spin-down
211: luminosity has a slightly lower ratio (0.6$d_6^2$) than for the Crab, rather than
212: the previously inferred, much higher ratio.
213:
214: In summary, we find observational evidence that the distance to Kes 75 is about 6 kpc and that it has a normal explosion energy and harbors a Crab-like rotation powered pulsar
215: and pulsar wind nebula. This is unusual in that the pulsar has a high value for magnetic field ($5\times10^{13}$ Gauss), and it is very young. It also exploded in a somewhat high-density environment: $n_0\simeq$27 cm$^{-3}$.
216:
217: We can estimate the absorbing column density to Kes 75 $N_{HI}$ from the HI absorption spectrum (Fig. 2) by $N_{HI}$=1.9$\times$10$^{18}$$\tau$$\Delta{\it{v}}$$T_{s}$ cm$^{-2}$ (Dickey \& Lockman 1990). Assuming HI spin temperature $T_{s}$ of 50K, we sum over the absorption features to obtain $N_{HI}$ of $\sim$ $3\times$10$^{22}$ and $\sim$ $4\times$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ in front of regions 1 and 2, respectively. These values agree with that of $N_{H}$=4$\times$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ derived from X-ray observations to Kes 75.
218: Given the high column density to Kes 75, the
219: derived extinction is $A_V \sim 21$mag, which would explain why no historical SN has been observed
220: associated with Kes 75 around the time of explosion in 1300 A.D.
221:
222:
223: \begin{acknowledgements}
224: DAL and WWT acknowledge support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. WWT acknowledges support from the Natural Science Foundation of China.
225: This publication makes use of molecular line data from the Boston University-FCRAO Galactic Ring Survey. The NRAO is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.
226: \end{acknowledgements}
227:
228: \begin{thebibliography}{}
229: \bibitem[1984]{Beket84}Becker, R.H., Helfand, D.J. 1984, ApJ, 283, 154
230: \bibitem[2005]{Bocet05}Bock, D.C.J., Gaensler, B.M. 2005, ApJ, 626, 343
231: \bibitem[1975]{Caset75}Caswell, J.L. Murray, J.D. Roger, R.S. 1975, A\&A, 45, 239
232: \bibitem[1990]{Dicet90}Dickey, J.M., Lockman, F. J. 1990, Annu. Rev. A\&A, 28, 215
233: \bibitem[1990]{Dicet90}Djannati-Ata\"i, A. for the HESS Collaboration, 2007, in 30th ICRC, Merida, Mexico, arXiv:0710.2247
234: \bibitem[1987]{Droet87}Droge, W., Lerche, I., Shlickeiser, R. 1987, A\&A, 178, 252
235: \bibitem[2005]{Eiset05}Eisenhauer, F., Genzel, R., Alexander, T. et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, 246
236: \bibitem[2000]{Gotet20}Gotthelf, E.V., Vasisht, G., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Torii, K. 2000, ApJL, 542, 37
237: \bibitem[2003]{Helet03}Helfand, D.J., Collins, B. F., \& Gotthelf, E.V. 2003, ApJ, 582, 783
238: \bibitem[2006]{Helet06}Helfand, D.J., Becker, R.H., White, R.L., Fallon, A, Tuttle, S. 2006, AJ, 131, 2525
239: \bibitem[2006]{Jaket06}Jackson, J.M., Rathborne, J.M., Shah, R.H. et al. 2006, ApJ Suppl., 163, 145
240: \bibitem[2007]{Leaet07}Leahy, D.A., Tian, W.W. 2008, AJ, 135, 167
241: \bibitem[2006]{Livet06}Livingstone, M.A., Kaspi, V.M., Gotthelf, E.V., Kuiper, L. 2006, ApJ, 647, 1286
242: \bibitem[2007]{McBet07}McBride, V.A., Dean, A.J., Bazzano, A. 2008, A\&A, 477, 249
243: \bibitem[2002]{Meret02}Mereghetti, S., Bandiera, R., Bocchino, F., Israel, G.L. 2002, ApJ, 574, 873
244: \bibitem[2007]{Moret07}Morton, T.D., Slane, P., Borkowski, K.J 2007, ApJ, 667,219
245: \bibitem[2006]{Stiet06}Stil, J.M., Taylor, A.R., Dickey, J.M. et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1158
246: \bibitem[2001]{Suget01}Sugizaki, M. et al. 2001, ApJS, 134, 77
247: \bibitem[2007]{Tiaet07}Tian, W.W., Leahy, D.A., Wang, Q.D. 2007, A\&A, 474, 541
248: \bibitem[2008]{Leaet08}Tian, W.W., Leahy, D.A 2008, ApJ, dol:10.1086/529120
249: \end{thebibliography}
250:
251: \end{document}
252: