1: %% Referee manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
2: %\documentclass[12pt,manuscript]{aastex}
3:
4: %% preprint produces a one-column, single-spaced document:
5: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
6: % preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
7: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
8:
9: %% Emulate ApJ document - for a nice 2 column compact form
10: \documentclass{emulateapj}
11:
12:
13: \usepackage{amssymb}
14: \usepackage{graphicx}
15:
16:
17: \slugcomment{Accepted by ApJ, November 27th, 2007}
18:
19:
20:
21: \newcommand{\degree}{\ensuremath{^\circ}}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25:
26: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
27: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
28: %% you desire.
29:
30: \title{Blue Compact Dwarf Galaxies with Spitzer: The Infrared/Radio Properties}
31:
32: \author{Yanling Wu\altaffilmark{1}, V. Charmandaris\altaffilmark{2,3}, J.~R. Houck\altaffilmark{1},
33: J. Bernard-Salas\altaffilmark{1},V. Lebouteiller\altaffilmark{1}, B.~R. Brandl\altaffilmark{4},
34: D. Farrah\altaffilmark{1}}
35:
36: \altaffiltext{1}{Astronomy Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
37: 14853}
38:
39: \altaffiltext{2}{University of Crete, Department of Physics, GR-71003,
40: Heraklion, Greece}
41:
42: \altaffiltext{3}{IESL/Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas,
43: GR-71110, Heraklion, Greece and Chercheur Associ\'e, Observatoire de
44: Paris, F-75014, Paris, France}
45:
46: \altaffiltext{4}{Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9513,
47: 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands}
48:
49: \email{wyl@astro.cornell.edu, vassilis@physics.uoc.gr,jrh13@cornell.edu,
50: jbs@isc.astro.cornell.edu,vianney@isc.astro.cornell.edu,
51: brandl@strw.leidenuniv.nl,duncan@isc.astro.cornell.edu}
52:
53:
54: \begin{abstract}
55: We study the correlation between the radio, mid-infrared and
56: far-infrared properties for a sample of 28 blue compact dwarf (BCD)
57: and low metallicity star-forming galaxies observed by {\em Spitzer}.
58: We find that these sources extend the same far-infrared to radio
59: correlation typical of star forming late type galaxies to lower
60: luminosities. In BCDs, the 24$\mu$m (or 22$\mu$m) mid-infrared to
61: radio correlation is similar to starburst galaxies, though there is
62: somewhat larger dispersion in their q$_{24}$ parameter compared to
63: their q$_{\rm FIR}$. No strong correlations between the q parameter
64: and galaxy metallicity or effective dust temperature have been
65: detected, though there is a hint of decreasing q$_{24}$ at low
66: metallicities. The two lowest metallicity dwarfs in our sample,
67: IZw18 and SBS0335-052E, despite their similar chemical abundance,
68: deviate from the average q$_{24}$ ratio in opposite manners,
69: displaying an apparent radio excess and dust excess respectively.
70:
71: \end{abstract}
72:
73: \keywords{
74: galaxies:starburst ---
75: galaxies: dwarf ---
76: infrared: galaxies ---
77: radio continuum: galaxies
78: }
79:
80: \section{Introduction}
81:
82: More than 35 years ago, a correlation between the 10$\mu$m
83: mid-infrared (mid-IR) and 1.4\,GHz luminosities in galactic nuclei was
84: first noticed by \citet{van71}. In 1983, the launch of the {\em
85: Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS)} brought a new era in
86: collecting large samples of data in the infrared, and sparked numerous
87: studies investigating the above mentioned correlation in star forming
88: galaxies. Both the radio and infrared emission are closely
89: related to star formation activities. The radio continuum is known to
90: originate from two processes: thermal free-free emission from ionized
91: gas in H{\sc ii} regions and non-thermal synchrotron radiation from
92: relativistic electrons that are accelerated in the supernovae remnants
93: (SNRs) \citep[see][ for a review]{Condon92}. The thermal emission
94: usually has a rather flat spectrum with
95: f$_{\nu}$\,$\propto$\,$\nu^{-0.1}$ while the non-thermal component
96: often has a much steeper spectral slope with
97: f$_{\nu}$\,$\propto$\,$\nu^{-0.8}$. In normal galaxies the relative
98: contribution of the two components varies with frequency and at
99: 1.4\,GHz the radio continuum is dominated (at nearly $\sim$90\%) by
100: the non-thermal component. The infrared emission is due to the thermal
101: re-radiation of starlight from dust surrounding H{\sc ii} regions
102: \citep{Harwit75}. Based mostly on {\em IRAS} data, it has been shown
103: that the far-infrared (FIR, 40-120\,$\mu$m) to radio correlation holds
104: well over a remarkably wide range of star forming galaxies, spanning
105: several orders of magnitude in luminosities \citep{Helou85, Dejong85,
106: Condon91,Yun01}. The availability of deep observations of distant
107: galaxies by the {\em Infrared Space Observatory (ISO)} and recently by
108: {\em Spitzer} \citep{Werner04} showed that the correlation between the
109: IR and radio emission is not limited to the local universe but also
110: extends in galaxies at higher redshifts \citep{Garrett02,Appleton04}.
111: It was also revealed that in addition to the FIR, the mid-IR emission
112: at $\sim$24$\mu$m correlates with the 20cm radio continuum, though
113: with more scatter \citep{Elbaz02,Gruppioni03,Appleton04,Wu05}. A
114: number of very deep {\em Spitzer} mid-IR and FIR surveys can now probe
115: a population of galaxies with low infrared luminosities for which
116: ancillary data, including deep radio imaging, are becoming available
117: \citep[e.g.][]{Jannuzi99,Sanders07,Rosenberg06}. This is particularly
118: interesting since in the near future $\sim20\mu$m is the longest
119: wavelength which will likely be probed by the James Web Space
120: Telescope. It is thus instructive to examine the mid-IR to radio
121: correlation in more detail in these low luminosity nearby systems, for
122: which little is known to date.
123:
124: As ubiquitous as the FIR/radio correlation appears to be, there are a
125: few significant deviations from it. Radio excess exists in
126: some instances, such as galaxies hosting an active galactic nucleus
127: (AGN). External magnetic field compression due to the interaction with
128: nearby galaxies could also produce extra emission in the radio
129: continuum \citep{Miller01}. Conversely, synchrotron deficiency has been
130: found in some nascent starburst galaxies studied by
131: \citet{Roussel03,Roussel06} which was attributed to the lack of time
132: for massive young stars to evolve into supernovae (SN) since these
133: galaxies are just at the onset of a starburst episode. On the other
134: hand, in the infrared, dust emission can be damped in an
135: optically-thin environment, because the ultraviolet (UV) and optical
136: light may not be fully reprocessed by the dust, as seen in low
137: luminosity dwarf galaxies.
138:
139:
140: Blue compact dwarf galaxies are a group of extra-galactic objects that
141: are characterized by their blue optical colors, small sizes
142: ($\le$1\,kpc) and low luminosities (M$_B>$-18). These galaxies do not
143: display any AGN signature\footnote{A possible exception among our
144: sources is CG0752 in which the high ionization lines
145: [NeV]$\lambda$14.3/24.3$\mu$m are detected \citep[see][]{Hao07}.} and
146: have recent bursts of star formation in a relatively unevolved
147: chemical environment. As such they have been proposed as nearby
148: analogs of star formation in young galaxies in the early universe. In
149: a metal poor environment, star forming regions are usually optically
150: thin and emit less in the infrared. However, \citet{Devereux89}
151: suggested that in a low luminosity galaxy, the radio emission also
152: decreases, and probably faster than the infrared. The deficiency in
153: both the non-thermal radio and FIR emission may counterbalance each
154: other and result in a similar FIR/radio ratio to the one observed in
155: normal spiral galaxies \citep{Klein91}. This was examined by a study
156: of star formation rates (SFRs) in BCDs performed by \citet{Hopkins02},
157: in which the authors found an excellent agreement between the SFRs
158: estimated from 1.4\,GHz and 60\,$\mu$m luminosities. As
159: \citet{Bell03} has pointed out though, the FIR/radio correlation is
160: almost linear, not because the IR and radio emission reflect the SFRs
161: correctly, but because in low luminosity galaxies they are both
162: underestimated by similar factors. This is in agreement with
163: \citet{Helou93}, who found from their modelling work in disk galaxies
164: that the transparency of the disk was about the same to both
165: re-emission processes. \citet{Hunt05a} in their analysis of the
166: spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of low metallicity BCDs, noticed
167: that these systems do not follow several of the usual correlations
168: between the mid-IR, FIR and radio emission and display a scatter of a
169: factor of $\sim$10.
170:
171: The {\em Spitzer} Space telescope has enabled us to
172: study the infrared properties of a large sample of BCDs, probing the
173: lower end of the luminosity and metallicity range. In this paper, the
174: fifth in a series \citep{Houck04b,Wu06,Wu07a,Wu07b}, we examine their
175: mid-IR and FIR to radio correlation extending the work of
176: \citet{Hopkins02}. We describe the sample selection and the observational
177: data in \S 2. A detailed study of mid-IR and FIR/radio correlation, as
178: well as its dependence with other parameters, such as metallicity and
179: dust temperature are presented in \S 3. We also discuss two extreme
180: cases, IZw18 and SBS0335-052 in \S 3. We summarize our conclusions
181: in \S 4.
182:
183:
184: \section{Observations}
185:
186: As part of the IRS\footnote{The IRS was a collaborative venture
187: between Cornell University and Ball Aerospace Corporation funded by
188: NASA through the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Ames Research
189: Center.} \citep{Houck04a} Guaranteed Time Observation (GTO) program
190: (PID: 85), we have compiled a sample of BCD candidates ($\sim$64)
191: selected from the Second Byurakan Survey (SBS), Bootes void galaxies
192: \citep{Kirshner81,Popescu00}, and other commonly studied BCDs. These
193: sources are known to have low metallicities ranging from
194: 0.03\,Z$_\odot$ to 0.5\,Z$_\odot$\footnote{Here we adopt the new
195: oxygen solar abundance of 12+log(O/H)=8.69 \citep{Prieto01}.
196: \citet{Wu07b} have derived neon and sulfur abundances for a sample
197: of BCDs using the infrared data, but these abundances are not
198: available for all of the sources in this study.}. Their 22\,$\mu$m
199: fluxes have been published in \citet{Wu06}. We also include 10
200: galaxies from \citet{Engelbracht05} (PID: 59), which are mostly BCDs
201: and starburst galaxies, and span a larger metallicity range
202: (0.03\,Z$_\odot$$\sim$1.5\,Z$_\odot$)\footnote{The galaxies in PID 59
203: partly overlap with the BCDs in PID 85. We have also excluded some
204: galaxies which the authors derived their 24\,$\mu$m fluxes by doing
205: a color correction to the {\em IRAS} 25\,$\mu$m fluxes because of
206: the aperture difference between these two band filters.}. For all
207: galaxies with 22\,(24)\,$\mu$m detections, we searched the literature
208: as well as the public archives (NVSS and FIRST) for 1.4GHz radio
209: continuum data. We restirct our sample to sources with both mid-IR and
210: radio detections which results in a sample of 23 galaxies. Finally, we
211: also include 5 galaxies that have 22\,$\mu$m detections and 1.4\,GHz
212: upper limits published by Hopkins et al. (2002) for comparison between
213: ours and Hopkins' samples. Note that the sample was not selected based
214: on infrared properties, but merely on BCD-type objects and the
215: availability of both infrared and radio data. As a result, our sample
216: is not complete, but the large number of sources that only became
217: detectable in the infrared with {\em Spitzer}, allows us to probe the
218: properties of low luminosity dwarf galaxies, and provide statistically
219: meaningful results. The observational information for this sample and
220: previously published data are presented in Table \ref{tab1}, which
221: includes the positions of the sources, their mid-IR, FIR and 1.4GHz
222: flux densities, as well as oxygen abundances of the ionized gas.
223:
224: All sources in this study have mid-IR flux measurements either at
225: 22$\mu$m with the IRS red peak-up camera and/or at 24\,$\mu$m with
226: MIPS \citep{Rieke04}. The photometric fluxes of these two bands differ
227: by less than 10\% for galaxies in the local universe. This was
228: confirmed by using a suite of $\sim$100 spectra of nearby
229: galaxies from our IRS/GTO database and calculating their synthetic 22
230: and 24$\mu$m fluxes after convolving the spectra with the
231: corresponding filter response curves. For consistency, in our analysis
232: we use the MIPS 24\,$\mu$m measurements, and the 22\,$\mu$m values are
233: only used when the 24\,$\mu$m values are not available. For sources
234: above the IRS 22$\mu$m and MIPS 24$\mu$m saturation limits we use the
235: IRS low resolution spectrum to estimate a synthetic 24\,$\mu$m flux.
236: We also obtained far-infrared fluxes for our sample from the archival
237: {\em IRAS} 60 and 100\,$\mu$m data \citep{Moshir90, Sanders03}.
238:
239: Most of the 1.4\,GHz radio continuum data are from the NRAO VLA Sky
240: Survey (NVSS) \citep{Condon98}, while one is from the Faint Images of
241: the Radio Sky at Twenty cm (FIRST) \citep{Becker95}, along with some
242: individual observations (references in Table \ref{tab1}). A total of
243: seven sources were too faint and were not included in the NVSS
244: catalogue. For those we used the values of \citet{Hopkins02} who
245: studied a similar BCD sample and remeasured the 1.4GHz fluxes using
246: the images from NVSS and FIRST, providing radio detections for 2
247: sources and better upper limits for another five sources that overlaps
248: with the galaxies in our sample.
249:
250: \begin{deluxetable*}{llrrrrrrccccc}
251: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
252: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.02in}
253: \tablecaption{Properties of the Sample\label{tab1}}
254: \tablewidth{0pc}
255: \tablehead{
256: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{Object Name} & \colhead{RA} & \colhead{Dec} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Flux (mJy)} &
257: \colhead{12+log(O/H)} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{References} \\
258: \cline{5-8}\cline{10-13}
259: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{J2000} & \colhead{J2000} & \colhead{1.4\,GHz} & \colhead{24(22)\,$\mu$m} &
260: \colhead{60\,$\mu$m} & \colhead{100\,$\mu$m} & \colhead{} & \colhead{1.4\,GHz} & \colhead{24\,$\mu$m} &
261: \colhead{IRAS} & \colhead{Z} \\
262: }
263: \startdata
264:
265: 1 & Haro11 & 00h36m52.5s & -33d33m19s & 26.8 & 1900 & 6880 & 5040 & 7.9 & (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) \\
266: 2 & NGC1140 & 02h54m33.6s & -10d01m40s & 23.6 & 316.6 & 3358 & 4922 & 8.5 & (1) & (5) & (6) & (7) \\
267: 3 & SBS0335-052E & 03h37m44.0s & -05d02m40s & 0.46 & 66 & \nodata& \nodata& 7.3 & (8) & (2) & & (9) \\
268: 4 & NGC1569 & 04h30m47.0s & +64d50m59s & 336.3 & 2991 & 54360 & 55290 & 8.2 & (1) & (2) & (3) &(10) \\
269: 5 & IIZw40 & 05h55m42.6s & +03d23m32s & 32.5 & 1500 & 6570 & 5270 & 8.1 & (1) & (2) & (3) & (7) \\
270: 6 & UGC4274 & 08h13m13.0s & +45d59m39s & 10.5 & 240 & 3236 & 6448 & 8.5 & (1) & (2) & (6) & \\
271: 7 & He2-10 & 08h36m15.2s & -26d24m34s & 83.8 & 4900 & \nodata& \nodata& 8.9 & (1) & (2) & &(11) \\
272: 8 & NGC2782 & 09h14m05.1s & +40d06m49s & 124.5 & 960 & 9170 & 13760 & 8.8 & (1) & (2) & (3) &(12) \\
273: 9 & NGC2903 & 09h32m10.1s & +21d30m03s & 444.5 & 2200 & 60540 & 130430 & 9.3 & (1) & (2) & (3) &(11) \\
274: 10 & IZw18 & 09h34m02.0s & +55d14m28s & 1.83 & 5.5 & \nodata& \nodata& 7.2 &(13) & (2) & & (9) \\
275: 11 & SBS0940+544 & 09h44m16.7s & +54d11m33s &$<$2.3 & 2.3 & \nodata& \nodata& 7.5 &(14) & (5) & &(15) \\
276: 12 & NGC3077 & 10h03m19.1s & +68d44m02s & 29.0 & 1500 & 15900 & 26530 & 8.6 & (1) & (2) & (3) &(16) \\
277: 13 & Mrk153 & 10h49m05.0s & +52d20m08s & 4.0 & 29 & 280 & $<$480 & 7.8 & (1) & (2) & (6) &(17) \\
278: 14 & VIIZw403 & 11h27m59.9s & +78d59m39s & 1.2 & 28 & \nodata& \nodata& 7.7 &(18) & (2) & & (9) \\
279: 15 & Mrk1450 & 11h38m35.6s & +57d52m27s &$<$2.0 & 48 & 279 & $<$575 & 8.0 &(14) & (2) & (6) & (7) \\
280: 16 & UM448 & 11h42m12.4s & +00d20m03s & 32.6 & 560 & 4139 & 4321 & 8.0 & (1) & (2) & (6) & (7) \\
281: 17 & UM461 & 11h51m33.3s & -02d22m22s &$<$2.6 & 30 & \nodata& \nodata& 7.8 &(14) & (2) & & (9) \\
282: 18 & UM462 & 11h52m37.3s & -02d28m10s & 5.8 & 110 & 944 & 896 & 8.0 & (1) & (2) & (6) & (9) \\
283: 19 & SBS1159+545 & 12h02m02.4s & +54d15m50s &$<$2.3 & 6.4 & \nodata& \nodata& 7.5 &(14) & (5) & &(19) \\
284: 20 & NGC4194 & 12h14m09.5s & +54d31m37s & 100.7 & 3100 & 23200 & 25160 & 8.8 & (1) & (2) & (3) &(16) \\
285: 21 & NGC4670 & 12h45m17.1s & +27d07m32s & 13.7 & 210 & 2634 & 4470 & 8.2 & (1) & (2) & (6) &(12) \\
286: 22 & SBS1415+437 & 14h17m01.4s & +43d30m05s & 4.3 & 19.6 & \nodata& \nodata& 7.6 &(14) & (5) & & (9) \\
287: 23 & Mrk475 & 14h39m05.4s & +36d48m21s &$<$2.7 & 10.8 & \nodata& \nodata& 7.9 &(14) & (5) & & (9) \\
288: 24 & CG0563 & 14h52m05.7s & +38d10m59s & 6.2 & 97.0 & 870 & 1900 & 8.7 & (1) & & (6) & \\
289: 25 & CG0752 & 15h31m21.3s & +47d01m24s & 4.8 & 138.9 & 837 & 1059 &\nodata& (1) & (5) & (6) & \\
290: 26 & SBS1533+574 & 15h34m13.8s & +57d17m06s & 4.2 & 53.4 & 257 & 405 & 8.1 &(14) & (5) & (6) & (9) \\
291: 27 & Mrk1499 & 16h35m21.1s & +52d12m53s & 1.5 & 33.8 & 256 & 617 & 8.1 &(20) & (5) & (6) &(21) \\
292: 28 & Mrk930 & 23h31m58.3s & +28d56m50s & 12.2 & 170 & 1245 &$<$2154 & 8.1 & (1) & (2) & (6) & (7) \\
293:
294: \enddata
295:
296: \tablerefs{(1) \citet{Condon98}, (2) \citet{Engelbracht05}, (3) \citet{Sanders03}, (4) \citet{Bergvall02},
297: (5) \citet{Wu06}, (6) \citet{Moshir90}, (7) \citet{Guseva00}, (8) \citet{Hunt04}, (9) \citet{Izotov99},
298: (10) \citet{Kobulnicky97}, (11) \citet{Kobulnicky99}, (12) \citet{Heckman98}, (13) \citet{Hunt05a},
299: (14) \citet{Hopkins02}, (15) \citet{Thuan05}, (16) \citet{Storchi94}, (17) \citet{Kunth85}, (18) \citet{Leroy05},
300: (19) \citet{Izotov98}, (20) FIRST catalog, (21) \citet{Shi05}}
301: \end{deluxetable*}
302:
303:
304:
305: Our final sample consists of 28 galaxies, all of which have {\em Spitzer}
306: mid-IR 24\,$\mu$m and/or 22\,$\mu$m flux measurements. Among these
307: galaxies, 23 sources have 1.4GHz radio continuum data and 5 have
308: measured upper limits. {\em IRAS} 60\,$\mu$m and 100\,$\mu$m fluxes
309: are available for 16 sources and 3 more are detected only at
310: 60\,$\mu$m. We list the photometry of our sources in Table \ref{tab1}.
311: The uncertainty in the 22\,$\mu$m or 24\,$\mu$m photometry is less
312: than 5\%. The {\em IRAS} 60\,$\mu$m and 100\,$\mu$m fluxes typically
313: have less than a few percent of error, but could go up to $\sim$15\%
314: for some of the fainter sources. The rms noise level for NVSS is
315: $\sim$0.5\,mJy\,beam$^{-1}$.
316:
317:
318: \section{Results}
319:
320: \subsection{Mid-IR and FIR to Radio Correlation in BCDs}
321:
322: The sensitivity and efficiency of the {\em Spitzer} Space Telescope
323: has allowed us to probe the correlation between the mid-IR and radio
324: luminosities for a large number of galaxies. Using the 24\,$\mu$m and
325: 70\,$\mu$m MIPS imaging data of the First Look Survey,
326: \citet{Appleton04} have demonstrated the first direct evidence for the
327: universality of the mid-IR/radio and FIR/radio correlation to
328: z$\sim$1. \citet{Wu05} have also studied the mid-IR/radio correlation
329: in a sample of star-forming galaxies and found that both the 8\,$\mu$m
330: and 24\,$\mu$m luminosity are clearly correlated with the 1.4GHz radio
331: luminosity. Their sample included only a few (3) dwarf galaxies and
332: suggested that there may be a slope change for dwarf galaxies,
333: which could be due to the lower dust-to-gas ratios and lower metallicities
334: of the dwarfs. A detailed analysis of the spatial distribution of the
335: infrared to radio correlation using {\em Spitzer} data on a sample of nearby
336: late type spiral galaxies has been performed by
337: \citet{Murphy06a,Murphy06b} in which the authors found that the ratio
338: of the mid-IR and FIR to radio emission does vary from one region to
339: the other. In general though, the dispersion is small and the ratio
340: decreases with surface brightness and galactocentric radius.
341:
342: \begin{figure}
343: \epsscale{1.2}
344: \plotone{f1.eps}
345: \caption{The FIR to 1.4\,GHz radio luminosity correlation for this
346: sample. Our data are presented with filled circles. The numbers
347: next to each symbol correspond to their IDs in Table \ref{tab1}.
348: The solid line is the best fit to this sample excluding the upper
349: limits. For comparison, we have also include the starburst
350: galaxies of \citet{Brandl06}, indicated with triangles.}
351: \label{fig:fig1}
352: \end{figure}
353:
354:
355: \begin{deluxetable*}{llrcccrr}
356: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
357: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.02in}
358: \tablecaption{Derived Quantities of the Sample\label{tab2}}
359: \tablewidth{0pc}
360: \tablehead{
361: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{Object Name} & \colhead{Distance\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{L$_{\rm 1.4GHz}$}
362: & \colhead{L$_{24\mu m}$} & \colhead{L$_{\rm FIR}$} & \colhead{q$_{24}$} & \colhead{q$_{\rm FIR}$} \\
363: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(Mpc)} & \colhead{($\times$10$^{20}$\,W\,Hz$^{-1}$)} &
364: \colhead{($\times$10$^8$L$_\odot$)} & \colhead{($\times$10$^8$L$_\odot$)} & \colhead{} & \colhead{}
365: }
366: \startdata
367:
368: 1 & Haro11 & 88 & 250.5 & 584.2 & 706.3 & 1.85 & 2.46 \\
369: 2 & NGC1140 & 21.2 & 12.8 & 5.6 & 24.4 & 1.13 & 2.29 \\
370: 3 & SBS0335-052E & 58 & 18.7 & 8.8 & \nodata & 2.16 &\nodata\\
371: 4 & NGC1569 & 2.0 & 1.6 & 0.5 & 3.1 & 0.95 & 2.29 \\
372: 5 & IIZw40 & 12.4 & 6.0 & 9.2 & 13.7 & 1.66 & 2.36 \\
373: 6 & UGC4274 & 6.9 & 0.6 & 0.5 & 2.8 & 1.36 & 2.68 \\
374: 7 & He2-10 & 12 & 15.6 & 29.9 & \nodata & 1.77 &\nodata\\
375: 8 & NGC2782 & 41.7 & 216.3 & 66.3 & 260.4 & 0.89 & 2.00 \\
376: 9 & NGC2903 & 8.9 & 42.5 & 6.9 & 90.9 & 0.69 & 2.34 \\
377: 10 & IZw18 & 18.2 & 0.7 & 0.07 & \nodata & 0.48 & 1.31\tablenotemark{b}\\
378: 11 & SBS0940+544 & 23 &$<$ 1.5 & 0.05 & \nodata &$>$0.00&\nodata\\
379: 12 & NGC3077 & 3.8 & 0.5 & 0.9 & 3.9 & 1.71 & 2.89 \\
380: 13 & Mrk153 & 40.5 & 7.9 & 1.9 & $<$7.9 & 0.86 &$<$2.00\\
381: 14 & VIIZw403 & 4.3 & 0.03 & 0.02 & \nodata & 1.37 &\nodata\\
382: 15 & Mrk1450 & 20.0 &$<$1.0 & 0.8 & $<$2.1 &$>$1.38&\nodata \\
383: 16 & UM448 & 87.4 & 300.6 & 188.9 & 458.6 & 1.23 & 2.19 \\
384: 17 & UM461 & 13.4 &$<$0.6 & 0.2 & \nodata &$>$1.06&\nodata\\
385: 18 & UM462 & 13.4 & 1.3 & 0.8 & 2.4 & 1.28 & 2.29 \\
386: 19 & SBS1159+545 & 50 &$<$7.0 & 0.6 & \nodata &$>$0.44&\nodata\\
387: 20 & NGC4194 & 41.5 & 209.3 & 212.0 & 586.0 & 1.49 & 2.45 \\
388: 21 & NGC4670 & 23.2 & 8.9 & 4.5 & 24.3 & 1.19 & 2.44 \\
389: 22 & SBS1415+437 & 8.7 & 0.4 & 0.06 & \nodata & 0.66 &\nodata\\
390: 23 & Mrk475 & 11.2 &$<$0.4 & 0.05 & \nodata &$>$0.60&\nodata\\
391: 24 & CG0563 & 139 & 144.6 & 74.4 & 320.5 & 1.19 & 2.35 \\
392: 25 & CG0752 & 90 & 47.3 & 45.1 & 105.3 & 1.46 & 2.35 \\
393: 26 & SBS1533+574 & 47 & 11.3 & 4.7 & 9.6 & 1.10 & 1.93 \\
394: 27 & Mrk1499 & 39 & 2.7 & 2.0 & 7.6 & 1.35 & 2.46 \\
395: 28 & Mrk930 & 77.5 & 88.4 & 40.5 & $<$129.0& 1.14 &$<$2.17\\
396:
397: \enddata
398:
399: \tablenotetext{a}{The distances to the galaxies of the sample are
400: adopted from \citet{Moustakas06} when available, while the rest of
401: the sources are calculated from the redshifts taken from NED,
402: assuming a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology with
403: H$_0$\,=\,70~km~s$^{-1}$\,Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_m$\,=\,0.3 and
404: $\Omega_{\lambda}\,=\,0.7$. For IZw18, we adopt the newly derived
405: distance by \citet{Aloisi07}. The average uncertainty in the
406: distances is $\sim$5\%, mainly due to the value of H$_0$.}
407: \tablenotetext{b}{This is calculated based on the ``equivalent'' {\em
408: IRAS} 60 and 100\,$\mu$m fluxes (see Section 3.4).}
409:
410: \end{deluxetable*}
411:
412: Using the data from this sample of low metallicity dwarf galaxies we
413: plot in Fig. 1 the radio luminosity of the sample as a function of the
414: FIR luminosity. The luminosities of the sources we study span nearly
415: 4 orders of magnitudes, but the correlation between the FIR and the
416: radio is remarkably tight. The scatter in the ratio of the FIR and
417: radio luminosities is 0.23 dex, i.e. less than a factor of 2. We
418: performed a least-squares bisector fit to the data and found:
419: log[L$_{\rm 1.4GHz}$(WHz$^{-1}$)]=1.09$\times$log(L$_{\rm
420: FIR}$/L$_\odot$)+10.75 . For comparison, we have included in the
421: plot the starburst galaxies from \citet{Brandl06} marked with
422: triangles, which has an identical slope (within 1$\sigma$). This
423: slope of 1.09$\pm$0.07 for the dwarf galaxy data agrees well with the
424: slope of 1.10$\pm$0.04 found by \citet{Bell03} for a sample of 162
425: galaxies, as well as the slope of 1.11$\pm$0.02 for the infrared
426: selected sources from the {\em IRAS} Bright Galaxy Sample (BGS)
427: \citep{Condon91}. This is also in agreement with \citet{Hopkins02}
428: and would suggest that globally our BCDs have a very similar FIR/radio
429: correlation to normal galaxies.
430:
431:
432:
433:
434: Another way to parameterize the IR/radio correlation is to calculate
435: the ratio of FIR to radio luminosity $q_{\rm FIR}$ according to the
436: \citet{Helou85} formula as well as the $q_{24}$ following the
437: definition of \citet{Appleton04}\footnote{We use q$_{\rm
438: FIR}$=log[1.26$\times 10^{-14}$ (2.58S$_{60\mu m}$+S$_{100\mu
439: m}$)/(3.75 $\times 10^{12}$ F$_{1.4 \rm GHz})$] where S$_{60\mu
440: m}$ and S$_{100\mu m}$ are in Jy and F$_{1.4 \rm GHz}$ is in
441: Wm$^{-2}$Hz$^{-1}$ \citep{Helou85}. We also define $q_{24}$= log
442: (S$_{24 \mu m}$/S$_{1.4 \rm GHz}$) where S$_{24 \mu m}$ and S$_{1.4
443: \rm GHz}$ are in Jy as in \citet{Appleton04}.}. We plot the
444: $q_{24}$ values for our sample as a function of the 24$\mu$m
445: luminosity of the galaxies in Fig. 2. For this sample we find that
446: $q_{\rm FIR}=$ 2.4$\pm$0.2, consistent with the value of normal
447: galaxies of $q_{\rm FIR}=$ 2.3$\pm$0.2 found by \citet{Condon92}. When
448: using the mid-IR 24$\mu$m data, we find that $q_{24}=$1.3$\pm$0.4 (see
449: Table \ref{tab2}). The standard deviation in $q_{24}$ is $\sim$twice
450: that of $q_{\rm FIR}$. This is not unexpected given that the spectrum
451: of star forming galaxies shows substantially larger variations in
452: spectral slope in the mid-IR \citep[see][]{Brandl06} than in the FIR
453: \citep{Dale06}. A small change in the geometry of the emitting regions
454: would affect F$_{\nu}$(24\,$\mu$m) and thus q$_{24}$ ratio much more
455: than the FIR emission and q$_{\rm FIR}$. A similar result has also
456: been noticed by \citet{Appleton04} and \citet{Murphy06a} who found a
457: larger dispersion in q$_{24}$ as compared to q$_{70}$\footnote{We
458: define q$_{70}$= log (S$_{70 \mu m}$/S$_{1.4 \rm GHz}$) where S$_{70
459: \mu m}$ and S$_{1.4 \rm GHz}$ are in Jy as in \citet{Appleton04}.}
460: and suggested that this is probably due to a larger intrinsic
461: dispersion in the IR/radio correlation at shorter wavelengths.
462: Interestingly, the \citet{Appleton04} values for q$_{24}=$
463: 0.84$\pm$0.28 or the k-corrected q$_{24}$ of 0.94$\pm$0.23 are
464: somewhat smaller than our results, though consistent within 2$\sigma$.
465: One possible explanation is that the dust temperature of low
466: luminosity dwarf galaxies tends to peak at shorter wavelength than
467: normal star forming galaxies, which would result in an elevated
468: 24\,$\mu$m based luminosity. An alternative explanation is that due to
469: the peculiar morphology of dwarf galaxies, more electrons escape from
470: the galaxy because of the cosmic ray diffusion. \citet{Boyle07} have
471: also found a high q$_{24}$=1.39$\pm$0.02 for the sources they studied,
472: and postulated that this may be due to a change in the mean q$_{24}$
473: ratio for objects with F$_\nu$(24\,$\mu$m) $<$1\,mJy, however, their
474: sources are much further away and may not be comparable to the low
475: metallicity star forming galaxies we study in the local universe.
476:
477: \begin{figure}
478: \epsscale{1.2}
479: \plotone{f2.eps}
480: \caption{The $q_{24}$ as a function of the the 24\,$\mu$m
481: monochromatic luminosity L$_{24}$. The symbols are
482: the same as in Fig. 1.}
483: \label{fig:fig2}
484: \end{figure}
485:
486:
487: \subsection{Metallicity and Dust Temperature Effects on q$_{IR}$}
488:
489: A number of physical parameters, such as the metallicity, dust grain
490: size distribution, and temperature may affect the shape of the
491: infrared SED. Consequently, we search for correlations between the q
492: ratios of the galaxies in our sample with those parameters. Our
493: sample covers a metallicity range of 7.2$\le$12+log(O/H)$\le$8.9. In
494: low metallicity galaxies, the dust content is usually low, even though
495: there are notable exceptions such as SBS0335-052E \citep{Houck04b},
496: thus the emission of UV light might not be fully reprocessed by the
497: dust and re-emitted at the infrared wavelengths. However, these
498: galaxies might have a quenched synchrotron radiation. This can be
499: attributed to various reasons including a lack of supernovae remnants
500: which accelate particles producing radio emission, the escape of fast
501: cosmic rays from the galaxy, etc. These two competing factors, dust
502: and radio emission, counter balance each other \citep[see][]{Bell03}.
503: BCDs though, are typically small, less than $\sim$1\,kpc in size, and
504: have fewer HII regions with massive stars (w.r.t. normal galaxies)
505: which heat the dust and go supernovae to produce cosmic rays. As a
506: result the averaging effects in the sampling of the properties of the
507: interstellar medium which result from the limited spatial resolution
508: in dense galactic disks is not so prominent in BCDs. Furthermore, the
509: small number of statistics may also contribute to the observed higher
510: dispersion in q$_{24}$ ratios in metal-poor dwarf galaxies. We
511: investigate how metallicity affects the q$_{24}$ ratios by dividing
512: the dwarf galaxies in our sample into two groups: a lower metallicity
513: group with 12+log(O/H)$\le$8.0 and a higher metallicity group with
514: 12+log(O/H)$>$8.0. This metallicity threshold was selected following
515: \citet{Rosenberg07} who noticed a change in the properties of the
516: star-forming dwarf galaxies they studied around this metallicity
517: value. We find a mean q$_{24}= $1.1$\pm$0.1\footnote{Here we use the
518: standard error of the mean (SEM) to quantify the dispersion in the
519: mean value.} for the first group and q$_{24}=$ 1.3$\pm$0.1 for the
520: second one.
521: %, which agree with each other within 2$\sigma$.
522: If we calculate the q$_{24}$ for the low
523: metallicity group without including SBS0335-052E, we find a much lower
524: q$_{24}=$ 0.9$\pm$0.1.
525: %This makes the difference in the mean q$_{24}$
526: %ratios between the low and high metallicity galaxies as much as
527: %4$\sigma$.
528: %This is still consistent with the mean q$_{24}$ within 2$\sigma$.
529: %In subsection 3.4, we discuss the two
530: %lowest metallicity sources in our sample, IZW18 and SBS033-052E, which
531: %display very different q$_{24}$ ratios.
532: We also notice that it appears q$_{24}$ generally decreases with
533: reduced metallicity for sources with 12+log(O/H)$<$8.0, with
534: SBS035-052E as a clear outlier, and the slope flattens out at
535: 12+log(O/H)$>$8.0 (see Fig. 3). This scatter in q$_{24}$ at higher
536: metallicities could be attributed to the more dispersion in the mid-IR
537: emission in these sources and is consistent with a number of other
538: studies that have found increased dispersion in the q ratios for very
539: high luminosity galaxies (which usually have higher metallicities)
540: \citep{Condon91, Yun01,Bell03}.
541:
542: \begin{figure}
543: \epsscale{1.2}
544: \plotone{f3.eps}
545: \caption{The q$_{24}$ ratio plotted as a function of the oxygen
546: abundance of the BCDs. The mean q$_{24}$ value for all the sources
547: is indicated by the solid line. A fit to the low metallicity
548: sources (12+log(O/H)$\le$8.0) is indicated by the dashed line;
549: while the dotted line is the same fit excluding SBS0335-052E. }
550: \label{fig:fig3}
551: \end{figure}
552:
553:
554:
555: \citet{Hummel88} have found evidence that, for a given galaxy, there
556: is a small decrease in F(100\,$\mu$m)/S(20\,cm) when the dust
557: temperature increases. The latter can be traced by the ratio of
558: F(60\,$\mu$m)/F(100\,$\mu$m). \citet{Roussel03} reached a similar
559: result for the starburst galaxies they studied, in which they detected
560: an anti-correlation of q$_{\rm FIR}$ with
561: F(60\,$\mu$m)/F(100\,$\mu$m). However, performing the same test for
562: the q$_{24}$ ratios on our dwarf galaxy sample which spans a
563: range of flux ratios -0.4 $<$log({\rm
564: F(60\,$\mu$m)/F(100\,$\mu$m)})$<$0.2 we find no such clear
565: trend. It is conceivable that this is partly because our sample is too
566: small to identify a trend due to the intrinsic scatter in q$_{24}$.
567:
568:
569: \subsection{Star Formation Rate Estimates}
570:
571: Both the radio and infrared emission can be used to estimate the star
572: formation rates (SFRs) in galaxies. However, these correlations depend
573: on a number of parameters including dust content, optical depth and
574: metallicity. This topic and potential caveats have been discussed
575: extensively in the literature \citep[see][ and references
576: therein]{Condon92,Kennicutt98}. For dwarf galaxies, the topic has
577: been addressed in detail by \citet{Hopkins02}. The recent wealth of
578: data from {\em Spitzer} has also provided sufficient motivation to
579: establish a calibration for the SFR using the infrared. \citet{Wu05}
580: and more recently \citet{Calzetti07} have explored this topic using a
581: large sample of star forming regions and nearby galaxies.
582:
583:
584:
585: In Fig. 4 we plot the IR estimated SFR for our sample using the
586: calibrations proposed by \citet{Wu05} and
587: \citet{Calzetti07} respectively:
588: \begin{equation}
589: {\rm SFR_{24}}(M_{\odot}yr^{-1})=\frac{\nu L_\nu(24 \mu m)}{6.66\times10^8L_\odot}
590: \end{equation}
591:
592:
593: \begin{equation}
594: {\rm SFR_{24}}(M_{\odot}yr^{-1})=1.27\times 10^{-38}[L_{24}(erg s^{-1})]^{0.885}
595: \end{equation}
596:
597: as a function of the well-known radio to SFR formula of
598: \citet{Condon92}:
599:
600: \begin{equation}
601: {\rm SFR_{1.4GHz}}=5.5\times\frac{L_{\rm 1.4GHz}}{4.6\times10^{21}(\rm{W Hz^{-1}})}
602: \end{equation}
603:
604:
605: The \citet{Wu05} work is based on a global correlation without
606: separating the low metallicity sources from metal rich galaxies. As
607: can be seen in Fig. 4, a good agreement exists between the radio and
608: IR estimated SFRs (indicated by diamonds). If we use the more recent
609: calibration by \citet{Calzetti07} on SFRs from 24\,$\mu$m
610: luminosities, we find that most of the mid-IR estimated SFRs (marked
611: as filled circles) are located below the 1:1 proportionality line, and
612: thus they are consistently lower than both the SFRs estimated from the
613: radio or from \citet{Wu05}. This is not unexpected since eq. 2 is
614: calibrated based on the high metallicity sources that have significant
615: 24\,$\mu$m emission, while most of our sources are metal-poor galaxies.
616: We should also note that \citet{Calzetti07} measure the SFR in
617: individual H{\sc ii} regions in apertures within disks and subtract a
618: ``disk background'', which could partly explain the deviations we see
619: from our analysis. These authors have also mentioned that the SFRs of
620: low metallicity galaxies would be underestimated by a factor of 2--4
621: depending on how metal-poor the galaxies are. This deviation from a
622: linear correlation is likely due to the lower opacities for decreasing
623: metal content \citep{Walter07}. When we fit the filled circles on
624: Fig. 4, we find that log(SFR[IR])=0.94$\times$log(SFR[1.4GHz]/3.98), which is
625: consistent with the metallicity correction factor suggested by
626: \citet{Calzetti07}. We should stress once more though that as
627: \citet{Bell03} has noted, the good agreement between the IR and radio
628: estimates of SFRs does not necessarily mean that these are the
629: ``true'' SFRs for the dwarf galaxies we study, but rather the
630: competition of the lower dust content and suppressed synchrotron
631: emission balances each other.
632:
633: \begin{figure}
634: \epsscale{1.2}
635: \plotone{f4.eps}
636: \caption{A plot of the SFR based on the 24\,$\mu$m luminosity as a
637: function of the corresponding SFR estimated from the 1.4\,GHz
638: radio continuum emission for each galaxy in our sample. The open
639: diamonds indicate the SFRs calculated using the 24\,$\mu$m fluxes
640: following \citet{Wu05} (eq.1), the filled circles are those using
641: eq.2 from \citet{Calzetti07}. The solid line is the 1:1
642: proportionality line. The dotted line is a fit to the filled
643: circles.}
644: \label{fig:fig4}
645: \end{figure}
646:
647:
648: \subsection{The Two Extremes: IZw18 and SBS0335-052E}
649:
650: Despite this overall agreement between the IR/radio correlation in our
651: dwarf sample and the corresponding values of normal galaxies, the two
652: lowest metallicity galaxies in our sample, IZw18 and SBS0335-052E,
653: deviate markedly from the correlations and in opposite directions (see
654: Fig. 3\footnote{In Fig. 2 the ``outlier'' status of SBS0335-052E does
655: not appear as prominent as in Fig. 3, because its high 24\,$\mu$m
656: luminosity places it in a region of the plot where other sources
657: with higher metallicity and higher luminosity are located.} ). As the
658: two most well-studied BCDs, it is interesting to inspect the IR/radio
659: properties of these two galaxies and a comparison of their physical
660: parameters can be found in Table \ref{tab3}.
661:
662:
663: \begin{deluxetable}{llcc}
664: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
665: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.2in}
666: \tablecaption{Comparison of SBS\,0335-052E and I\,Zw\,18\label{tab3}}
667: \tablewidth{0pc}
668: \tablehead{
669: \colhead{} & \colhead{SBS\,0335-052E} & \colhead{I\,Zw\,18} & \colhead{Ratio\tablenotemark{a}}\\
670: }
671: \startdata
672: 12+log(O/H) & 7.32 & 7.17 & 1.4 \\
673: D (Mpc) & 58 & 18 & 3 \\
674: R (pc) & 560\tablenotemark{b} & 870\tablenotemark{c} & $\sim$0.6 \\
675: SFR(M$_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$)& 7$\times$10$^{-1}$ & 5$\times$10$^{-2}$ & 14 \\
676: SNR(yr$^{-1}$) & 6$\times$10$^{-3}$ & 2$\times$10${-4}$ & 30 \\
677: L$_{\rm H\alpha}$(L$_\odot$) & 5.6$\times$10$^7$\tablenotemark{d} & 1.6$\times$10$^6$ & 35 \\
678: L$_{24\mu m}$(L$_\odot$) & 9$\times$10$^8$ & 7$\times$10$^6$ & 120 \\
679: L$_{\rm IR}$(L$_\odot$) & $\sim$4$\times$10$^9$ & $\sim$4$\times$10$^7$ & 100 \\
680: L$_{\rm 1.4GHz}$(W\,Hz$^{-1}$) & 2$\times$10$^{20}$ & 8$\times$10$^{19}$ & 2.5 \\
681: M(Ks)(mag) & -18.3 & -16.1 & $\sim$80\tablenotemark{e} \\
682:
683: \enddata
684: \tablenotetext{a}{Ratio of the relative quantities in SBS0335-052E to IZw18.}
685: \tablenotetext{b}{This is the size of the six super star clusters in SBS0335-052E,
686: which has a size of 2$\arcsec$ \citep{Thuan97}. At a distance of 58\,Mpc,
687: 1$\arcsec$ $\sim$280\,pc.}
688: \tablenotetext{c}{This indicate the largest projected linear extend of the total
689: star-forming regions in this galaxy \citep[$\sim$10$\arcsec$,][]{Hunt05b}. At
690: a distance of 18\,Mpc, 1$\arcsec$ $\sim$ 87\,pc.}.
691: \tablenotetext{d}{Flux in 1$\arcsec$ slit multiplied by a factor of 2 to correct for aperture effects.}
692: \tablenotetext{e}{This is the approximate mass ratio of the two sources assuming
693: that their mass scales with K-band luminosity and that both sources have the
694: same M/L$_{\rm Ks}$ \citep[see][]{Bell01}.}
695:
696:
697: \end{deluxetable}
698:
699:
700:
701: As indicated by the {\em Spitzer} IRS spectrum of SBS0335-052E
702: \citep{Houck04b}, the SED of the galaxy has an unusually flat mid-IR
703: slope that peaks at $\sim$28$\mu$m. \citet{Hunt05a} used {\em DUSTY}
704: models \citep{Ivezic99} to fit its SED and found a q$_{\rm FIR}$ value
705: of 2.0 for this galaxy, lower than the typical q$_{\rm FIR}$ of
706: $\sim$2.3 expected for late type systems. These calculations are based
707: on a 1.4GHz continuum flux of $\sim$0.46\,mJy, which corresponds to
708: the compact part (6\arcsec) of SBS0335-052E \citep{Dale01, Hunt04}.
709: Similarly, if we simply calculate the q ratio independent of any
710: modelling work and only use the observable parameters, we find a
711: q$_{70}=$ 2.1$\pm$0.1 \citep[assuming that the MIPS 70\,$\mu$m flux
712: density is 51.1$\pm$4.8\,mJy,][]{Engelbracht07}. This is in good
713: agreement with the q$_{70}=$ 2.16$\pm$0.17 for the sources in the
714: First Look Survey studied by \citet{Appleton04}.
715:
716: However, when we examine the q$_{24}$ for SBS0335-052E, adopting a
717: MIPS 24\,$\mu$m flux of 66\,mJy, we find a q$_{24}$ ratio of
718: 2.2$\pm$0.1. We see a 2$\sigma$ excess in the q parameter compared
719: with the mean q$_{24}$ of 1.3$\pm$0.4 in the dwarf sample. If this
720: excess is real, it would be consistent with the unique shape of the
721: SED of the galaxy, which suggests that the dust grain distribution is
722: dominated by small grains with temperatures of $\sim$150K and a total
723: dust mass of $\sim10^3$ M$_{\odot}$\citep{Houck04b}. Whether the
724: large grains were never created or they were destroyed by shocks is
725: unknown.
726: %It is the
727: %surprisingly strong 24$\mu$m emission from the SBS0335-052E that
728: %compensates for the shape of the SED and results in a normal q$_{70}$.
729: The elevated q$_{24}$ ratio could also be due to the lack of
730: synchrotron emission. \citet{Roussel03,Roussel06} have shown their
731: study of three starburst galaxies, all of which have q$_{\rm FIR}$
732: more than 3$\sigma$ higher the mean q$_{\rm FIR}$ and categorized them
733: to be nascent starbursts. SBS0335-052E though, could also be a
734: candidate of this group. It is based partly on the high q$_{24}$
735: value, as well as its low H$\alpha$ luminosity as compared to the
736: infrared or radio luminosities (see Table \ref{tab3}). Finally,
737: \citet{Hunt04} have shown the existence of free-free absorption in the
738: radio spectrum of SBS0335-052E, which is usually caused by young,
739: dense and heavily embedded clusters\footnote{Note, that if we could
740: properly account for the self-absorption of the radio continuum, the
741: intrinsic q ratio would decrease. However, the exact fraction for
742: absorption is not known and more data at $\nu<$1.5GHz would be
743: needed to determine that number.}.
744:
745: IZw18, despite its similar metallicity to SBS0335-052E
746: (12+log(O/H)=7.17 and 7.32 respectively), shows a rather different q
747: ratio. It also has an IR luminosity of L$_{\rm
748: IR}$$\sim$10$^7$L$_\odot$, just 1\% of the L$_{\rm IR}$ in
749: SBS0335-052E. In low luminosity galaxies, radio emission is known to
750: decrease faster than dust emission \citep{Devereux89}, and high
751: IR/radio ratios have been observed in low luminosity dwarf galaxies
752: \citep{Klein84}.
753: %, which can be attributed to
754: %synchrotron deficiency, optically thick free-free emission, or rapid
755: %CR escape.
756: In IZw18 though, we find a rather low infrared to radio ratio. The
757: q$_{24}$ is found to be 0.5$\pm$0.1, nearly 2$\sigma$ lower than the
758: average value of our sample. At longer wavelengths, IZw18 is faint and
759: no {\em IRAS} FIR data are available. However, as noted by
760: \citet{Wu07a} (see their Fig. 5), it has a very similar 5--38$\mu$m
761: continuum slope to the typical starburst galaxy NGC7714
762: \citep{Brandl04}. If we were to assume that this similarity extends
763: to the FIR and scale down the {\em IRAS} 60 and 100\,$\mu$m flux densities
764: of NGC7714 by a factor of 375 so that its corresponding 22\,$\mu$m
765: flux density matches the one of IZw18, we find its ``equivalent''{\em
766: IRAS} 60 and 100\,$\mu$m flux density to be 29.8 and 32.8\,mJy
767: respectively. This would result in q$_{\rm FIR}$ of 1.3 for the
768: galaxy, which deviates from the average q$_{\rm FIR}$ ratio of
769: 2.3$\pm$0.2 calibrated by \citet{Condon92} by nearly 5$\sigma$. If we
770: were to use the MIPS 70\,$\mu$m detection of 34\,mJy for IZw18
771: \citep{Engelbracht07} and calculate its q ratio, we would find
772: q$_{70}$=1.4, again 5$\sigma$ away from the average q$_{70}$ suggested
773: by \citet{Appleton04}.
774:
775: A number of plausible scenarios were considered to explain this
776: result, though none appears convincing. As discussed in \citet{Wu07a},
777: because the optical depth of IZw18 is small, it could be that a
778: significant fraction of the UV light has leaked out without being
779: absorbed by the dust, thus resulting in a damped 24\,$\mu$m emission.
780: Alternatively, IZw18 may simply have an unusually high radio
781: luminosity at 1.4\,GHz. Could it be that IZw18 is observed at a
782: special moment right after the explosion of a supernovae event? Radio
783: supernovae fade by more than a factor of 10 within $\sim$3\,yr
784: \citep{Chevalier82}. The radio continuum observations of IZw18 span
785: over a period of more than 5\,yrs \citep{Hunt05b,Cannon05} but show no
786: variation, thus this is not likely.
787:
788: The recent results by \citet{Murphy06b} provide another possible
789: scenario. These authors analyzed a sample of nearby spiral galaxies
790: and found that systems with higher disk-averaged SFRs ($\Sigma\,_{\rm
791: SFR}$) have usually experienced a recent episode of enhanced star
792: formation. As a result they contain a higher fraction of young cosmic ray
793: electrons that have traveled only a few hundred parsecs from their
794: acceleration sites in supernova remnants. This is perhaps the case
795: for IZw18. However, other sources in our sample also have elevated
796: $\Sigma\,_{\rm SFR}$ and show no radio excess. It could also be that
797: the extremely low metal abundance of IZw18, 0.15\,dex lower than that
798: of SBS0335-052E, is below a critical threshold. The newly formed
799: stars in the unpolluted interstellar medium may produce, and
800: subsequently heat, less dust than electrons which are accelerated and
801: contribute in the radio emission. We also note that the rate of SNR in
802: IZw18 is a factor of $\sim$30 lower than that in SBS0335-052E (see
803: Table \ref{tab3}) but its morphology is much more disturbed with
804: filamentary structure and outflows \citep[see][]{Izotov04}. If we were
805: to assume that both sources have similar mass-to-light ratios and
806: estimate their mass from their K-band luminosities, we find that the
807: mass of IZw18 is almost a factor of 80 less than that of SBS0335-052E.
808: Thus the rate of SNR normalized with mass in IZw18 would be $\sim$2.5
809: times that of SBS0335-052E. Could it be that the disturbed morphology
810: of IZw18 in addition to its low metal content that it created the
811: conditions in the interstellar medium for this abnormally high radio
812: flux? The question remains open.
813:
814:
815: \section{Conclusions}
816:
817: We have studied the mid-IR and FIR to radio correlation in a sample of
818: dwarf star-forming galaxies spanning a metallicity range from
819: 7.2$<$12+log(O/H)$<$8.9, using {\em Spitzer} IRS/MIPS, as well as radio
820: 1.4\,GHz data obtained from the literature. The BCD sample appears to
821: follow the same FIR/radio correlation as normal star forming galaxies.
822: The analysis based on mid-IR and radio data reveals a similar
823: correlation, though the scatter is larger, probably due to an
824: intrinsically higher variation in the 15-30$\mu$m SEDs of dwarf
825: galaxies. When comparing the q$_{24}$ ratios with metallicity or
826: effective dust temperature, we find no strong correlation, though there
827: is a general trend of lower q ratios at lower metallicity for
828: galaxies with 12+log(O/H)$<$8.0 and the correlation flattens out
829: toward higher metallicity. In general the SFRs estimated from the
830: radio 1.4\,GHz continuum and the mid-IR data are in good agreement.
831: Two extremely metal poor BCDs, IZw18 and SBS0335-052E appear to
832: deviate from the average q$_{24}$ by $\sim$2$\sigma$, with one
833: displaying a radio excess and the other an infrared excess.
834:
835:
836:
837:
838: \acknowledgments
839:
840: The authors would like to thank P. Appleton and D. Calzetti for
841: stimulating discussions. We would also like to thank G. Helou, L.K.
842: Hunt as well as an anonymous referee whose detailed comments and
843: insightful suggestions have helped to improve this manuscript. This
844: work is based in part on observations made with the {\em Spitzer} Space
845: Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
846: California Institute of Technology, under NASA contract 1407. Support
847: for this work was provided by NASA through Contract Number 1257184
848: issued by JPL/Caltech. VC would like to acknowledge the partial
849: support from the EU ToK grant 39965.
850:
851:
852: \begin{thebibliography}{}
853: \bibitem[Allende Prieto et al.(2001)]{Prieto01}
854: Allende Prieto, C., Lambert, D.~L., \& Asplund, M.\ 2001, \apjl, 556, L63
855:
856: \bibitem[Aloisi et al.(2007)]{Aloisi07}
857: Aloisi, A. et al.\ 2007, \apjl, 667, L151
858:
859: \bibitem[Appleton et al.(2004)]{Appleton04}
860: Appleton, P.~N., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 147
861:
862: \bibitem[Becker et al.(1995)]{Becker95}
863: Becker, R.~H., White, R.~L., \& Helfand, D.~J.\ 1995, \apj, 450, 559
864:
865: \bibitem[Bell \& de Jong(2001)]{Bell01}
866: Bell, E.~F., \& de Jong, R.~S.\ 2001, \apj, 550, 212
867:
868: \bibitem[Bell(2003)]{Bell03}
869: Bell, E.~F.\ 2003, \apj, 586, 794
870:
871: \bibitem[Bergvall \& \"{O}stlin(2002)]{Bergvall02}
872: Bergvall, N., \& \"{O}stlin, G.\ 2002, \aap, 390, 891
873:
874: \bibitem[Brandl et al.(2004)]{Brandl04}
875: Brandl, B.~R., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 188
876:
877: \bibitem[Brandl et al.(2006)]{Brandl06}
878: Brandl, B.~R., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 653, 1129
879:
880: \bibitem[Boyle et al.(2007)]{Boyle07}
881: Boyle, B.~J., Cornwell, T.~J., Middelberg, E., Norris, R.~P., Appleton, P.~N., \& Smail, I.\ 2007, \mnras, 376, 1182
882:
883: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2007)]{Calzetti07}
884: Calzetti, D., et al. \apj, 666,870
885:
886: \bibitem[Cannon et al.(2005)]{Cannon05}
887: Cannon, J.~M., Walter, F., Skillman, E.~D., \& van Zee, L.\ 2005, \apjl, 621, L21
888:
889: \bibitem[Chevalier(1982)]{Chevalier82}
890: Chevalier, R.~A.\ 1982, \apj, 258, 790
891:
892: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1991)]{Condon91}
893: Condon, J.~J., Anderson, M.~L., \& Helou, G.\ 1991, \apj, 376, 95
894:
895: \bibitem[Condon(1992)]{Condon92}
896: Condon, J.~J.\ 1992, \araa, 30, 575
897:
898: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1998)]{Condon98} Condon, J.~J., Cotton, W.~D.,
899: Greisen, E.~W., Yin, Q.~F., Perley, R.~A., Taylor, G.~B., \&
900: Broderick, J.~J.\ 1998, \aj, 115, 1693
901:
902: \bibitem[Dale et al.(2001)]{Dale01}
903: Dale, D.~A., Helou, G., Neugebauer, G., Soifer, B.~T., Frayer, D.~T., \& Condon, J.~J.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 1736
904:
905: \bibitem[Dale et al.(2006)]{Dale06}
906: Dale, D.~A., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 646, 161
907:
908: \bibitem[de Jong et al.(1985)]{Dejong85}
909: de Jong, T., Klein, U., Wielebinski, R., \& Wunderlich, E.\ 1985, \aap, 147, L6
910:
911: \bibitem[Devereux \& Eales(1989)]{Devereux89}
912: Devereux, N.~A., \& Eales, S.~A.\ 1989, \apj, 340, 708
913:
914:
915: \bibitem[Elbaz et al.(2002)]{Elbaz02}
916: Elbaz, D., Cesarsky, C.~J., Chanial, P., Aussel, H., Franceschini, A., Fadda, D., \& Chary, R.~R.\ 2002, \aap, 384, 848
917:
918: \bibitem[Engelbracht et al.(2005)]{Engelbracht05}
919: Engelbracht, C.~W., Gordon, K.~D., Rieke, G.~H., Werner, M.~W., Dale, D.~A., \& Latter, W.~B.\ 2005, \apjl, 628, L29
920:
921: \bibitem[Engelbracht et al.(2007)]{Engelbracht07}
922: Engelbracht, C.~W., et al.\ 2007, \apj, submitted
923:
924: \bibitem[Garrett(2002)]{Garrett02}
925: Garrett, M.~A.\ 2002, \aap, 384, L19
926:
927: \bibitem[Gruppioni et al.(2003)]{Gruppioni03}
928: Gruppioni, C., Pozzi, F., Zamorani, G., Ciliegi, P., Lari, C., Calabrese, E., La Franca, F., \& Matute, I.\ 2003, \mnras, 341, L1
929:
930: \bibitem[Guseva et al.(2000)]{Guseva00}
931: Guseva, N.~G., Izotov, Y.~I., \& Thuan, T.~X.\ 2000, \apj, 531, 776
932:
933: \bibitem[Hao et al.(2007)]{Hao07}
934: Hao, Lei, et al.,\ 2007, in preparation
935:
936: \bibitem[Harwit \& Pacini(1975)]{Harwit75}
937: Harwit, M., \& Pacini, F.\ 1975, \apjl, 200, L127
938:
939: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(1998)]{Heckman98}
940: Heckman, T.~M., Robert, C., Leitherer, C., Garnett, D.~R., \& van der Rydt, F.\ 1998, \apj, 503, 646
941:
942: \bibitem[Helou et al.(1985)]{Helou85}
943: Helou, G., Soifer, B.~T., \& Rowan-Robinson, M.\ 1985, \apjl, 298, L7
944:
945: \bibitem[Helou \& Bicay(1993)]{Helou93}
946: Helou, G., \& Bicay, M.~D.\ 1993, \apj, 415, 93
947:
948: \bibitem[Hopkins et al.(2002)]{Hopkins02}
949: Hopkins, A.~M., Schulte-Ladbeck, R.~E., \& Drozdovsky, I.~O.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 862
950:
951: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004a)]{Houck04a}
952: Houck, J.~R., et al.\ 2004a, \apjs, 154, 18
953:
954: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004b)]{Houck04b}
955: Houck, J.~R., et al.\ 2004b, \apjs, 154, 211
956:
957: \bibitem[Hummel et al.(1988)]{Hummel88}
958: Hummel, E., Davies, R.~D., Pedlar, A., Wolstencroft, R.~D., \& van der Hulst, J.~M.\ 1988, \aap, 199, 91
959:
960: \bibitem[Hunt et al.(2004)]{Hunt04}
961: Hunt, L.~K., Dyer, K.~K., Thuan, T.~X., \& Ulvestad, J.~S.\ 2004, \apj, 606, 853
962:
963: \bibitem[Hunt et al.(2005a)]{Hunt05a}
964: Hunt, L., Bianchi, S., \& Maiolino, R.\ 2005b, \aap, 434, 849
965:
966: \bibitem[Hunt et al.(2005b)]{Hunt05b}
967: Hunt, L.~K., Dyer, K.~K., \& Thuan, T.~X.\ 2005a, \aap, 436, 837
968:
969: \bibitem[Izotov \& Thuan(2004)]{Izotov04}
970: Izotov, Y.~I., \& Thuan, T.~X.\ 2004, \apj, 616, 768
971:
972:
973: \bibitem[Izotov \& Thuan(1998)]{Izotov98}
974: Izotov, Y.~I., \& Thuan, T.~X.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 188
975:
976: \bibitem[Izotov \& Thuan(1999)]{Izotov99}
977: Izotov, Y.~I., \& Thuan, T.~X.\ 1999, \apj, 511, 639
978:
979: \bibitem[Ivezi\'c et al.(1999)]{Ivezic99}
980: Ivezi\'c, Z., Nenkova, M., \& Elitzur,M. 1999, User Manual for {\em DUSTY},
981: University of Kentucky Internal Report,accessible at {\tt http://www.pa.uky.edu/~moshe/dusty}
982:
983: \bibitem[Jannuzi \& Dey(1999)]{Jannuzi99}
984: Jannuzi, B.~T.,~\& Dey, A.\ 1999, ASP Conf.~Ser.~191:
985: Photometric Redshifts and the Detection of High Redshift Galaxies, 111
986:
987: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{Kennicutt98}
988: Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1998, \araa, 36, 189
989:
990:
991: \bibitem[Kirshner et al.(1981)]{Kirshner81}
992: Kirshner, R.~P., Oemler, A., Jr., Schechter, P.~L., \& Shectman, S.~A.\ 1981, \apjl, 248, L57
993:
994: \bibitem[Klein et al.(1991)]{Klein91}
995: Klein, U., Weiland, H., \& Brinks, E.\ 1991, \aap, 246, 323
996:
997: \bibitem[Klein et al.(1984)]{Klein84}
998: Klein, U., Wielebinski, R., \& Thuan, T.~X.\ 1984, \aap, 141, 241
999:
1000: \bibitem[Kobulnicky \& Skillman(1997)]{Kobulnicky97}
1001: Kobulnicky, H.~A., \& Skillman, E.~D.\ 1997, \apj, 489, 636
1002:
1003: \bibitem[Kobulnicky \& Johnson(1999)]{Kobulnicky99}
1004: Kobulnicky, H.~A., \& Johnson, K.~E.\ 1999, \apj, 527, 154
1005:
1006: \bibitem[Kunth \& Joubert(1985)]{Kunth85}
1007: Kunth, D., \& Joubert, M.\ 1985, \aap, 142, 411
1008:
1009: \bibitem[Leroy et al.(2005)]{Leroy05}
1010: Leroy, A., Bolatto, A.~D., Simon, J.~D., \& Blitz, L.\ 2005, \apj, 625, 763
1011:
1012: \bibitem[Miller \& Owen(2001)]{Miller01}
1013: Miller, N.~A., \& Owen, F.~N.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 1903
1014:
1015: \bibitem[Moshir \& et al.(1990)]{Moshir90}
1016: Moshir, M., \& et al.\ 1990, IRAS Faint Source Catalogue, version 2.0 (1990)
1017:
1018: \bibitem[Moustakas \& Kennicutt(2006)]{Moustakas06}
1019: Moustakas, J., \& Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 2006, \apjs, 164, 81
1020:
1021: \bibitem[Murphy et al.(2006a)]{Murphy06a}
1022: Murphy, E.~J., et al.\ 2006a, \apj, 638, 157
1023:
1024: \bibitem[Murphy et al.(2006b)]{Murphy06b}
1025: Murphy, E.~J., et al.\ 2006b, \apjl, 651, L111
1026:
1027: \bibitem[Popescu \& Hopp(2000)]{Popescu00}
1028: Popescu, C.~C., \& Hopp, U.\ 2000, \aaps, 142, 247
1029:
1030: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{Rieke04}
1031: Rieke, G.~H., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
1032:
1033: \bibitem[Rosenberg et al.(2006)]{Rosenberg06}
1034: Rosenberg, J.~L., Ashby, M.~L.~N., Salzer, J.~J., \& Huang, J.-S.\
1035: 2006, \apj, 636, 742
1036:
1037: \bibitem[Rosenberg et al.(2007)]{Rosenberg07} Rosenberg, J.~L., Wu,
1038: Yanling, Le Floc'h, E., Charmandaris, V., Ashby, M.~L.~N., Houck,
1039: J.~R., Salzer, J.~J. Willner, S.P.\ 2008, \apj, in press, astro-ph/0710.5514
1040:
1041: \bibitem[Roussel et al.(2003)]{Roussel03}
1042: Roussel, H., Helou, G., Beck, R., Condon, J.~J., Bosma, A., Matthews, K., \& Jarrett, T.~H.\ 2003, \apj, 593, 733
1043:
1044: \bibitem[Roussel et al.(2006)]{Roussel06}
1045: Roussel, H., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 646, 841
1046:
1047: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(2003)]{Sanders03}
1048: Sanders, D.~B., Mazzarella, J.~M., Kim, D.-C., Surace, J.~A., \& Soifer, B.~T.\ 2003, \aj, 126, 1607
1049:
1050: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(2007)]{Sanders07}
1051: Sanders, D.~B., et al.\ 2007, \apjs, (in press arXiv:astro-ph/0701318)
1052:
1053: \bibitem[Shi et al.(2005)]{Shi05}
1054: Shi, F., Kong, X., Li, C., \& Cheng, F.~Z.\ 2005, \aap, 437, 849
1055:
1056: \bibitem[Storchi-Bergmann et al.(1994)]{Storchi94}
1057: Storchi-Bergmann, T., Calzetti, D., \& Kinney, A.~L.\ 1994, \apj, 429, 572
1058:
1059: \bibitem[Thuan \& Izotov(2005)]{Thuan05}
1060: Thuan, T.~X., \& Izotov, Y.~I.\ 2005, \apjs, 161, 240
1061:
1062: \bibitem[Thuan et al.(1997)]{Thuan97}
1063: Thuan, T.~X., Izotov, Y.~I., \& Lipovetsky, V.~A.\ 1997, \apj, 477, 661
1064:
1065: \bibitem[van der Kruit(1971)]{van71}
1066: van der Kruit, P.~C.\ 1971, \aap, 15, 110
1067:
1068:
1069: \bibitem[Walter et al.(2007)]{Walter07}
1070: Walter, F., et al.\ 2007, \apj, 661, 102
1071:
1072: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{Werner04}
1073: Werner, M.~W., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
1074:
1075: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2005)]{Wu05}
1076: Wu, H., Cao, C., Hao, C.-N., Liu, F.-S., Wang, J.-L., Xia, X.-Y., Deng, Z.-G., \& Young, C.~K.-S.\ 2005, \apjl, 632, L79
1077:
1078: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2006)]{Wu06}
1079: Wu, Y., Charmandaris, V., Hao, L., Brandl, B.~R.,
1080: Bernard-Salas, J., Spoon, H.~W.~W., \& Houck, J.~R.\ 2006, \apj,
1081: 639, 157
1082:
1083: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2007a)]{Wu07a}
1084: Wu, Y., et al., 2007a, \apj, 662, 952
1085:
1086: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2007b)]{Wu07b}
1087: Wu, Y., Bernard-Salas, J., Charmandaris,V. Lebouteiller, V., Hao,
1088: L., Brandl, B.R., Houck, J.R. \ 2007b, ApJ in press,
1089: astro-ph/0710.0003
1090:
1091: \bibitem[Yun et al.(2001)]{Yun01}
1092: Yun, M.~S., Reddy, N.~A., \& Condon, J.~J.\ 2001, \apj, 554, 803
1093:
1094: \end{thebibliography}
1095:
1096:
1097:
1098:
1099:
1100:
1101:
1102:
1103:
1104:
1105:
1106: \end{document}
1107:
1108:
1109: