1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5: \usepackage{color}
6:
7: \newcommand {\about} {\mbox{$\sim$}}
8: \newcommand {\mic} {\mbox{$\mu$m}}
9: \newcommand {\tim} {\mbox{$\times$}}
10: \newcommand {\hh} {\mbox{H$_2$}}
11: \newcommand {\oo} {\mbox{O$_2$}}
12: \newcommand {\av} {\mbox{${\rm A_v}$}}
13: \newcommand {\hcop} {\mbox{HCO$^+$}}
14: \newcommand {\nndp} {\mbox{N$_2$D$^+$}}
15: \newcommand {\nnhp} {\mbox{N$_2$H$^+$}}
16: \newcommand {\hhhp} {\mbox{H$_3^+$}}
17: \newcommand {\hhdp} {\mbox{H$_2$D$^+$}}
18: \newcommand {\ddhp} {\mbox{D$_2$H$^+$}}
19: \newcommand {\nhhh} {\mbox{NH$_3$}}
20: \newcommand {\nddd} {\mbox{ND$_3$}}
21: \newcommand {\nddh} {\mbox{ND$_2$H}}
22: \newcommand {\nhhd} {\mbox{NH$_2$D}}
23: \newcommand {\ground} {\mbox{$J_K = 1_{0} \rightarrow 0_0$}}
24: \newcommand {\sa} {\mbox{$0s \rightarrow 0a$}}
25: \newcommand {\as} {\mbox{$0a \rightarrow 0s$}}
26: \newcommand {\hthcop}{\mbox{H$^{13}$CO$^+$}}
27: \newcommand {\hthcn} {\mbox{H$^{13}$CN}}
28: \newcommand {\hnthc} {\mbox{HN$^{13}$C}}
29: \newcommand {\dcop} {\mbox{DCO$^+$}}
30: \newcommand {\hho} {\mbox{H$_2$O}}
31: \newcommand {\hhco} {\mbox{H$_2$CO}}
32: \newcommand {\thco} {\mbox{$^{13}$CO}}
33: \newcommand {\twco} {\mbox{$^{12}$CO}}
34: \newcommand {\ceio} {\mbox{C$^{18}$O}}
35: \newcommand {\cths} {\mbox{C$^{34}$S}}
36: \newcommand {\cseo} {\mbox{C$^{17}$O}}
37: \newcommand {\meth} {\mbox{CH$_{3}$OH}}
38: \newcommand {\ci} {\mbox{C{\sc i}}}
39: \newcommand {\cii} {\mbox{C{\sc ii}}}
40: \newcommand {\oi} {\mbox{O{\sc i}}}
41: \newcommand {\oiii} {\mbox{O{\sc iii}}}
42: \newcommand {\hi} {\mbox{H{\sc i}}}
43: \newcommand {\hii} {\mbox{H{\sc ii}}}
44: \renewcommand {\deg} {\mbox{$^\circ$}}
45: \newcommand {\arcm} {\mbox{$^\prime$}}
46: \newcommand {\arcs} {\mbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}
47: \newcommand {\ps} {\mbox{s$^{-1}$}}
48: \newcommand {\pccm} {\mbox{cm$^{-3}$}}
49: \newcommand {\pscm} {\mbox{cm$^{-2}$}}
50: \newcommand {\kms} {\mbox{km\,s$^{-1}$}}
51: \renewcommand {\ga} {\mbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}
52: \renewcommand {\la} {\mbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}
53: \newcommand {\arcsper} {\mbox{\rlap{\hbox{\hbox{.}}}\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}}
54: \newcommand {\hr} {\mbox{$^{\rm h}$}}
55: \newcommand {\mt} {\mbox{$^{\rm m}$}}
56: \newcommand {\secper} {\mbox{\rlap{\hbox{\hbox{.}}}\hbox{$^{\rm s}$}}}
57: \newcommand {\solar} {\mbox{$_{\odot}$}}
58:
59: \received{4 May 2007}
60: \accepted{27 November 2007}
61:
62: %\journalid{337}{15 January 1989}
63:
64: %\articleid{11}{14}
65:
66: \slugcomment{To appear in The Astrophysical Journal}
67:
68: \shorttitle{HNC in Comets}
69: \shortauthors{Lis et~al.}
70:
71: \begin{document}
72:
73: \title{Hydrogen Isocyanide in Comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann (Fragment
74: B)}
75:
76: \author{D.C.~Lis\altaffilmark{1,4},
77: D.~Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan\altaffilmark{2}, J.~Boissier\altaffilmark{2},
78: J.~Crovisier\altaffilmark{2}, N.~Biver\altaffilmark{2}, and
79: S.B.~Charnley\altaffilmark{3}
80: }
81:
82: \altaffiltext{1}{California Institute of Technology, Downs Laboratory
83: of Physics 320-47, Pasadena, CA~91125; dcl@caltech.edu}
84:
85: \altaffiltext{2}{LESIA and UMR 8109 du CNRS, Observatoire de Paris, 5
86: place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France;
87: Dominique.Bockelee@obspm.fr, Jeremie.Boissier@obspm.fr,
88: Jacques.Crovisier@obspm.fr; Nicolas.Biver@obspm.fr}
89:
90: \altaffiltext{3}{Space Science and Astrobiology Division, MS 245--3,
91: NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, CA 94035;
92: charnley@dusty.arc.nasa.gov}
93:
94: \altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Scientist, LESIA, Observatoire de Paris}
95:
96:
97: \begin{abstract}
98: We present a sensitive 3-$\sigma$ upper limit of 1.1\% for the HNC/HCN
99: abundance ratio in comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann (Fragment B),
100: obtained on May 10--11, 2006 using Caltech Submillimeter Observatory
101: (CSO). This limit is a factor of \about 7 lower than the values
102: measured previously in moderately active comets at 1~AU from the Sun.
103: Comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann was depleted in most volatile species,
104: except of HCN. The low HNC/HCN ratio thus argues against HNC
105: production from polymers produced from HCN. However, thermal
106: degradation of macromolecules, or polymers, produced from ammonia and
107: carbon compounds, such as acetylene, methane, or ethane appears a
108: plausible explanation for the observed variations of the HNC/HCN ratio
109: in moderately active comets, including the very low ratio in comet
110: 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann reported here. Similar polymers have been
111: invoked previously to explain anomalous $^{14}$N/$^{15}$N ratios
112: measured in cometary CN.
113: %\vspace {5pt}
114: \end{abstract}
115:
116: \keywords{comets : individual (73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann) ---
117: molecular processes --- radio lines: solar system}
118:
119: \section{Introduction}
120:
121: Hydrogen isocyanide, HNC, a metastable isomer of HCN, was first
122: detected in the ISM over a third of a century ago as the unidentified
123: line U90.7 (\citealt{snyder72, zucker72}; the identification
124: subsequently confirmed in the laboratory by \citealt{black76}). The
125: interstellar HNC/HCN abundance ratio has been shown to be strongly
126: temperature dependent (e.g., \citealt{schilke92}; \citealt{hirota98},
127: and references therein). The current understanding of the HNC
128: chemistry in molecular hot cores is that in warm, dense gas HCN is
129: first produced efficiently by ion-molecule chemistry from ammonia and
130: C$^+$. HNC is subsequently produced by proton transfer to HCN to form
131: HCNH$^+$, followed by dissociative recombination or proton transfer to
132: ammonia (e.g., \citealt{rodgers01a, charnley02}). The temperature
133: dependence of the HNC/HCN abundance ratio is explained primarily by
134: proton transfer reactions cycling between the two isomers via the
135: HCNH$^+$ ion. However, additional HNC formation routes may be required
136: in dark clouds where the HNC/HCN ratio exceeds unity. These are
137: presumably neutral-neutral reactions (e.g., C+NH$_2$=HNC+H;
138: \citealt{herbst00}) and consequently are probably too slow to
139: efficiently form HNC in expanding cometary atmospheres.
140:
141: The initial detection of HNC in a cometary atmosphere was by
142: \cite{irvine96} in comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake). The measured HNC/HCN
143: abundance ratio, \about 6\%, was similar to that in interstellar
144: clouds with a temperature of order 50~K, suggesting that cometary HNC
145: may be unprocessed interstellar material incorporated into the comet's
146: nucleus. However, \cite{irvine96} argued that a number of alternative
147: processes may also explain the observed HNC/HCN ratio in comet
148: Hyakutake, including irradiation of icy matrix containing HCN,
149: non-equilibrium chemical processes in the solar nebula, gas-phase
150: processes in the coma itself, infrared relaxation of HCN from excited
151: vibrational levels of the ground electronic state, or
152: photo-dissociation of a heavier parent molecule.
153:
154: A strong variation of the HNC/HCN abundance ratio in comet C/1995 O1
155: (Hale-Bopp) with heliocentric distance (from \la 2\% at 2.9~AU to
156: \about 20\% near 1~AU; \citealt{biver97}; \citealt{irvine98})
157: questioned the interstellar origin of cometary HNC and suggested a
158: production mechanism in the coma itself as a more likely explanation.
159: \cite{rodgers98} presented a comprehensive model of the cometary coma
160: chemistry and suggested that in very active comets, such as comet
161: Hale-Bopp, the observed variation of the HNC abundance with the
162: heliocentric distance, as observed with single-dish telescopes, can be
163: explained by isomerization of HCN driven by the impact of fast
164: hydrogen atoms produced in photo-dissociation of parent molecules.
165: However, their model overproduced the HNC abundance at \about 3~AU by
166: about a factor of 2. In a subsequent paper \cite{rodgers01b} showed
167: that the same mechanism cannot reproduce observed HNC/HCN abundance
168: ratios in moderately active comets at \about 1~AU, such as comet
169: C/1999 H1 (Lee). The applicability of the model to very active comets
170: has also been questioned by interferometric observations of HNC and
171: HCN in comet Hale-Bopp \citep{bockel05, bockel07}, which show that the
172: HNC/HCN visibility ratio is almost flat as a function of baseline, and
173: equal to the single-dish flux ratio. This suggests that, contrary to
174: model predictions, HNC in comet Hale-Bopp was produced efficiently in
175: the inner coma (parent scale-length $\ll 2000$~km).
176:
177: Comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann is a short-period (5.34 years) comet of
178: the Jupiter family that likely originated from the trans-Neptunian
179: population in the outer Solar System. Narrow-band photometry and
180: spectroscopic observations during the 1990 apparition showed that this
181: comet is strongly depleted in C$_2$ and NH$_2$ relative to CN and OH,
182: placing it in the 21P/Giacobini-Zinner class of odd comets with
183: extreme depletions \citep{ahearn95,fink96}. During its 1995 perihelion
184: passage, comet 73P split into several fragments \citep{boeh02}. Its
185: 2006 apparition thus offered an exceptional opportunity to measure the
186: HNC/HCN ratio in fragments of a Jupiter-family comet of deviant
187: composition. Indeed, comet 73P made a very close approach to Earth in
188: May 2006 (at 0.067 and 0.079~AU for Fragments B and C, respectively),
189: that compensated for its moderate activity (water production rate of a
190: few $\times$ 10$^{28}$ s$^{-1}$ at perihelion) and allowing sensitive
191: investigations.
192:
193: In the present paper, we compile the existing measurements of the
194: HNC/HCN ratio in moderately active comets, including our
195: sensitive upper limit obtained in comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann and
196: discuss possible implications for the origin of HNC in cometary
197: atmospheres.
198:
199: \section{Observations}
200:
201: Observations of Comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann (Fragment B)
202: presented here were carried out on May 9--11, 2006 UT using the 10.4-m
203: Leighton telescope of Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO) on Mauna
204: Kea in Hawaii. The heliocentric and geocentric distances of the comet
205: at the time of the CSO observations were 1.02 and 0.072~AU,
206: respectively. We used the 345 GHz facility SIS receiver and
207: acousto-optical spectrometers with total bandwidths of 50 MHz and 1
208: GHz. The frequency scale of the spectrometers (the reference channel
209: and the channel width) was established by
210: %performing calibration scans (frequency combs).
211: injecting calibration signals from 10~MHz and 100~MHz frequency
212: comb generators, for the 50~MHz and 1~GHz AOS, respectively. The
213: effective frequency resolution of the high-resolution (50 MHz
214: bandwidth) spectrometer was 95 kHz (2 channels), corresponding to
215: \about 0.08~\kms. Pointing of the telescope, checked by performing
216: five-point continuum scans of Jupiter in the south, was determined to
217: drift by \la 5\arcs\ on time-scales of \about 3 hours at the time of
218: the observations (one fifth of the \about 25\arcs\ FWHM CSO beam
219: at 360 GHz). The accuracy of the cometary ephemeris, checked by
220: performing five-point scans of the HCN~$J$=4--3 transition in the
221: comet, was determined to be \about 7--9\arcs. The main beam
222: efficiency, determined from total-power observations of Jupiter,
223: Saturn and Mars, was measured to be \about 74\%. The absolute
224: calibration uncertainty of the individual measurements is \about 20\%.
225: However, since the HCN and HNC lines were observed almost
226: simultaneously, with the same receiver, we estimate the calibration
227: uncertainty of the HNC/HCN line ratio to be smaller, of order 15\%.
228:
229: \begin{figure}
230: \begin{center}
231: %\epsfig{file=hcn_bw.eps,width=6cm,angle=270}
232: \epsfig{file=f1.eps,width=6cm,angle=270}
233: \end{center}
234: \caption{\label{fig_hcn} HCN~$J$=4--3 spectra in comet
235: 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann (Fragment B) obtained on May 9--11 (left
236: to right, respectively). Gray curves in the two right panels
237: show the May 9 spectrum.}
238: \end{figure}
239:
240: HCN~$J$=4--3 spectra (rest frequency 354.50547 GHz) taken on May 9--11
241: UT are shown in Figure~\ref{fig_hcn} and the line intensities are
242: listed in Table~\ref{tab_int}, along with the corresponding
243: statistical uncertainties, as determined from the noise level
244: measured in the spectra. A significant decrease in the HCN intensity
245: (by a factor of 1.8) is seen over the period of our observations,
246: following an earlier outburst. The low-level pedestal, seen most
247: clearly in the May 9 spectrum, is due to the HCN hyperfine structure
248: (e.g., \citealt{lis97}). HNC~$J$=4--3 spectra (rest frequency
249: 362.63031 GHz) taken on May 10--11 UT are shown in
250: Figure~\ref{fig_hnc}. The HNC and HCN observations on these two
251: nights were interleaved in time to account for the time variability of
252: the outgassing. No HNC emission is detected (Table~\ref{tab_int}).
253:
254: \begin{figure}
255: \begin{center}
256: %\epsfig{file=hnc_bw.eps,width=6cm,angle=270}
257: \epsfig{file=f2.eps,width=6cm,angle=270}
258: \end{center}
259: \caption{\label{fig_hnc} HNC~$J$=4--3 spectra in comet
260: 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann obtained on May 10--11 (left and middle
261: panels, respectively). The right panel shows an uniformly weighted
262: average of the two data sets. Gray curves show HCN~$J$=4--3 spectra
263: on the corresponding days, scaled down by a factor of 50.}
264: \end{figure}
265:
266: \begin{table}
267: \begin{center}
268: \caption{HCN and HNC Line Intensities.}\vspace{1em}
269: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2}
270: \footnotesize
271: \begin{tabular}{lcc}
272: \hline
273: \hline
274: $UT Date$ & $I({\rm HCN})$ & $I({\rm HNC})$ \\
275: \hline
276: May \,~9, 2006 & $5.35 \pm 0.04$ & --- \\
277: May 10, 2006 & $4.21 \pm 0.08$ & $~~0.073 \pm 0.025$ \\
278: May 11, 2006 & $3.01 \pm 0.06$ & $-0.021 \pm 0.018$ \\
279: May 10--11, 2006 & $3.62 \pm 0.05$ & $~~0.026 \pm 0.015$ \\
280: \hline
281: \end{tabular}
282: \label{tab_int}
283: \end{center}
284:
285: Notes.---Integrated line intensities, $T_A^* dv$ (K\,\kms), computed
286: over the velocity range of --2 to 2 \kms\ (HCN; includes all hyperfine
287: components) and --1 to 1 \kms\ (HNC). The uncertainties listed are
288: 1-$\sigma$ statistical uncertainties, as determined from the
289: noise level measured in the spectra. The May 10--11 entry is a
290: uniformly weighted average of the two corresponding spectra.
291: \end{table}
292:
293: \begin{table*}[!ht]
294: \begin{center}
295: \caption{HCN and HNC Production Rates.}\vspace{1em}
296: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2}
297: \footnotesize
298: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
299: \hline
300: \hline
301: $UT Date$ & $Q({\rm HCN})$ & $Q({\rm HNC})$ & $Q({\rm
302: HCN})$/$Q({\rm HNC})$ \\
303: \hline
304: May 10, 2006 & $(4.85 \pm 0.09) \times 10^{25}$ &
305: $<0.7 \times 10^{24}$ & $<1.4\%$ \\
306: May 11, 2006 & $(3.05 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{25}$ &
307: $<0.5 \times 10^{24}$ & $<1.7\%$ \\
308: May 10--11, 2006 & $(3.90 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{25}$ &
309: $<0.4 \times 10^{24}$ & $<1.1\%$ \\
310: \hline
311: \end{tabular}
312: \label{tab_prod}
313: \end{center}
314:
315: Notes.---Productions rates (mol~s$^{-1}$) computed assuming a gas
316: temperature of 65~K and expansion velocities of 0.62 and 0.58 \kms,
317: on May 10 and 11, respectively. Average pointing offsets of 3\arcs\
318: and 4\arcs\ for HCN and HNC, respectively, have been assumed. Since
319: the HCN and HNC transitions studied here have similar rest frequencies
320: and line strengths, the derived Q(HNC)/Q(HCN) ratio is insensitive to
321: the detailed model assumptions.
322: \vspace{1em}
323: \end{table*}
324:
325: Fragment B of comet 73P underwent several outbursts during the
326: April--May 2006 apparition, shedding tens of fragments, as imaged for
327: example by the Hubble Space Telescope around 18 April (e.g.,
328: \citealt{toth06}). On 8.0 May UT fragment B entered a new outburst
329: phase, beginning as a strong brightness increase of its central
330: condensation. Visual magnitudes reported in \cite{icq06} showed a
331: fivefold increase in total brightness the following day and a 5 to 10
332: times increase in the water outgassing rate was seen in the Nan\c{c}ay
333: and Odin data between 7 and 10 of May \citep{crovi06, colom06}.
334:
335: Molecular production rates of HCN and HNC (3-$\sigma$ upper limits)
336: on May 10--11 are listed in Table 2. The resulting 3-$\sigma$ upper
337: limit for the HNC/HCN abundance ratio, based on the average of the May
338: 10 and May 11 data is 1.1\%. IRAM 30-m observations impose upper
339: limits of 2.9 and 3.8\% for the HNC/HCN ratio on May 14 and 18,
340: respectively \citep{biver06a}, consistent with the low value
341: presented here.
342:
343: \section{HNC/HCN Ratio in Comets}
344:
345: HNC has now been detected in 11 comets with water production rates in
346: the range $3 \times 10^{28}- 4 \times 10^{30}$~mol\,s$^{-1}$ (e.g.,
347: \citealt{irvine96}; \citealt{biver05}; \citealt{crovi05};
348: \citealt{biver06b}), not counting the very active comets Hale-Bopp and
349: C/2006 P1 (McNaught), where different chemical processes may be at
350: work. The observed HNC/HCN abundance ratio is plotted in
351: Figure~\ref{fig_prod} as a function of the water production rate. The
352: plot appears to show a distinction between comets with water
353: production rates above and below \about $4 \times
354: 10^{29}$~mol\,s$^{-1}$. More productive comets seem to display a
355: relatively high HNC/HCN ratio, \about 0.2, with little scatter. The
356: scatter increases significantly in weaker comets and no clear
357: dependence of the observed abundance ratio on the water production
358: rate is seen. Since water production rates in comets vary with the
359: heliocentric distance and the measurements included in our sample span
360: a wide range in $r_h$, we have outlined with gray circles in
361: Figure~\ref{fig_prod} the measurements with $r_h$ limited to a narrow
362: range of 0.5--0.8~AU. This sub-sample includes four comets, which
363: cover a wide range of water production rates. No
364: dependence of the HNC/HCN ratio on the water production rate is seen.
365: Therefore we conclude that, as explained below, the apparent
366: distinction between the more productive and weak comets in
367: Figure~\ref{fig_prod} is simply caused by selection effects, as
368: all active comets in our sample happened to be observed at small
369: heliocentric distances.
370:
371: \begin{figure}
372: \begin{center}
373: %\epsfig{file=hnc_qh2o_new.eps,width=6cm,angle=270}
374: \epsfig{file=f3.eps,width=6cm,angle=270}
375: \end{center}
376: \caption{\label{fig_prod} Observed HNC/HCN abundance ratio in comets
377: as a function of the water production rate, $Q_{\rm H_2O}$.
378: Measurements at the heliocentric distances between 0.5 and 0.8~AU
379: are surrounded by gray circles. References: C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake):
380: \citealt{irvine96}; C/1999 H1 (Lee): \citealt{biver00}; C/1999 S4
381: (LINEAR): \citealt{bockel01}; C/1999 T1 (McNaught-Hartley):
382: \citealt{biver06b}; C/2000 WM$_1$ (LINEAR): \citealt{biver06b},
383: \citealt{irvine03}; C/2001 A2 (LINEAR): \citealt{biver06b};
384: 153P/Ikeya--Zhang: \citealt{biver06b}, \citealt{irvine03}; C/2001 Q4
385: (NEAT), C/2002 T7 (LINEAR), C/2002 V1 (NEAT), C/2002 X5
386: (Kudo-Fujikawa), and C/2004 Q2 (Machholz): \cite{biver05},
387: \citealt{crovi05}; 21P/Giacobini--Zinner: \citealt{biver99};
388: 73P/Schwassmann--Wachmann: this work. The combined
389: uncertainties of the individual measurements in the figure are
390: assumed to be equal to the statistical uncertainties, as measured
391: from the individual spectra, plus a 15\% calibration uncertainty,
392: added in quadrature.}
393: \vspace{1em}
394: \end{figure}
395:
396: \begin{figure}
397: \begin{center}
398: %\epsfig{file=hnc_rh_new.eps,width=6cm,angle=270}
399: \epsfig{file=f4.eps,width=6cm,angle=270}
400: \end{center}
401: \caption{\label{fig_rh} Observed HNC/HCN abundance ratio in comets as
402: a function of the heliocentric distance, $r_h$. The dotted line
403: shows a linear fit to the data for $r_h$ between \about 0.5 and 1.2
404: AU. The fitted slope is $0.192 \pm 0.021$; the observed variation of
405: the HNC/HCN abundance ratio with $r_h$ is thus statistically
406: significant.}
407: \vspace{1em}
408: \end{figure}
409:
410: Figure~\ref{fig_rh} shows the dependence of the HNC/HCN ratio
411: on the heliocentric distance of the comet. A clear variation is seen
412: and, and for $r_h$ between \about 0.5 and 1.2~AU, the ratio is well
413: described by the linear relation
414: \begin{equation}
415: Q_{\rm HNC}/Q_{\rm HCN} = 0.26 - 0.19 ~ r_h ({\rm AU})~,
416: \end{equation}
417: \noindent shown as the dotted line in Figure~\ref{fig_rh}. The
418: formal $1\sigma$ uncertainties of the intercept and the slope are
419: 0.024 and 0.021, respectively. The two measurements at the smallest
420: heliocentric distances, $r_h$\about 0.1--0.2~AU (comets C/2002 X5 and
421: C/2002 V1, both with relatively high water production rates of \about
422: $4 \times 10^{30}$~mol\,s$^{-1}$), do fall slightly below the
423: best fit line. This may indicate that the dependence of the
424: HNC/HCN abundance ratio on the heliocentric distance flattens for $r_h
425: \la 0.5$~AU. The least squares fit given above is based on all
426: measurements in the 0.5--1.2~AU heliocentric distance range. However,
427: a similar $r_h$ dependence is obtained from measurements of comets
428: with the water production rates below $4 \times
429: 10^{29}$~mol\,s$^{-1}$, which restricts the $r_h$ range to
430: 0.75--1.2~AU (the slope given by the least squares fit is
431: $0.144\pm0.031$ vs. $0.191 \pm 0.021$ above; a \about 1.3$\sigma$
432: difference). The more productive comets in our sample thus
433: follow essentially the same HNC/HCN dependence on the heliocentric
434: distance, as derived for weak comets. The apparent distinction between
435: the two groups in Figure~\ref{fig_prod} is caused by the fact that all
436: more productive comets in our sample happened to be observed
437: preferentially close to the Sun.\footnote{Another way to separate
438: the dependence of the HNC/HCN abundance ratio on $r_h$ and $Q_{\rm
439: H_2O}$ is by fitting the data with a combined power-law in the form $R
440: = a r_h^b Q^c$, with $a$, $b$, and $c$ being free parameters. The
441: power-law fit diverges at small heliocentric distances, but in the
442: range of $r_h$ considered here, 0.5--1.2~AU, is a good representation
443: of the measurements. For $r_h$ in AU, and $Q$ in the units of
444: $10^{29}$~\ps, the best fit parameters are $a = 0.059 \pm 0.004$, $b =
445: -2.30\pm0.21$, and $c = -0.09 \pm 0.08$. This confirms the presence of
446: a strong dependence of the HNC/HCN ratio on the heliocentric distance
447: and no statistically significant trend with the water production
448: rate.} The observed variation in the HNC/HCN abundance ratio with the
449: heliocentric distance is likely related to the change in the
450: temperature of the grains in the coma, as the comet approaches the
451: Sun.
452:
453: The 3-$\sigma$ upper limit of 1.1\% for the HNC/HCN ratio in comet
454: 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann based on our observations is \about 7 times
455: lower than the typical value at 1~AU given by the least-squares fit to
456: the measurements in other comets (dotted line in Fig.~\ref{fig_rh}).
457: Given the small geocentric distance of comet 73P at the time of our
458: observations (0.072~AU), the HNC production rate could be
459: significantly underestimated if the emission originates from an
460: extended source in the coma. The production rates given above are
461: computed assuming a parent density distribution for both molecules
462: (direct release from the nucleus). The HNC production rate would
463: increase by a factor of 7 if a daughter density distribution with a
464: parent scale-length of \about 5000~km is assumed. The resulting
465: HNC/HCN abundance ratio in comet 73P would then be consistent with
466: other measurements in moderately active long-period comets at 1~AU.
467: Observations of comet Hale-Bopp with the Plateau de Bure
468: Interferometer imply an HNC parent scale-length $\ll 2000$~km
469: \citep{bockel05, bockel07}. The HNC parent scale-length has never been
470: constrained directly by interferometric observations in moderately
471: productive comets. However, observations of comet 153P/Ikeya-Zhang
472: presented by Biver et al. (2006b) suggest that the HNC parent
473: scale-length in this comet was less than 2500~km (equivalent to less
474: then 7500~km when scaled to 1~AU), with the best fit $L_p = 0$. To
475: further investigate the effects of a possible extended source of HNC
476: on the measured HNC/HCN abundance ratios, we plot in
477: Figure~\ref{fig_delta} the HNC/HCN ratio in the long-period comets
478: observed to date as a function of the telescope field of view (the
479: linear trend with the heliocentric distance given by eq. (1) has been
480: subtracted out). The formal linear fit is shown as a dotted line; no
481: statistically significant trend is seen. A combined power-law fit to
482: the HNC/HCN abundance ratio, as a function of the heliocentric
483: distance and the field of view, $\Phi$ (in the units of 5000 km), in
484: the form $R = a r_h^b \Phi^c$, gives $a=0.058 \pm 0.004$, $b = -2.03
485: \pm 0.21$, and $c = 0.10 \pm 0.12$. This confirms that no trend with
486: the field of view is apparent in the data. We note that other comets
487: in our sample, including comet Hyakutake, were observed with a
488: telescope field of view \about 2000~km. If the HNC parent scale-length
489: at 1~AU is indeed of order 5000~km, the HNC production rates and the
490: resulting HNC/HCN abundance ratios in these objects would scale up
491: accordingly. While only future sensitive interferometric observations
492: will be able to unequivocally constrain the HNC parent scale-length, a
493: possible extended source of HNC cannot explain the discrepancy between
494: the HNC/HCN ratio in comet 73P and the values measured in other
495: moderately active comets at 1~AU.
496:
497: \begin{figure}
498: \begin{center}
499: %\epsfig{file=hnc_delta_new.eps,width=6cm,angle=270}
500: \epsfig{file=f5.eps,width=6cm,angle=270}
501: \end{center}
502: \caption{\label{fig_delta} Deviation of the HNC/HCN abundance ratio
503: from the best fit line described in Fig.~4, in comets with $r_h$
504: between 0.5 and 1.2~AU, plotted as a function of the telescope field
505: of view (in the units of 5000 km). The dotted line shows a formal
506: least-squares fit to the data. The fitted slope is $0.0025 \pm
507: 0.0063$; no statistically significant trend is seen.}
508: \end{figure}
509:
510: Comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann is the first short-period
511: (Jupiter-family) comet in which a sensitive upper limit for the
512: HNC/HCN ratio has been obtained. Our observations might thus indicate
513: that HNC is depleted in Jupiter family comets, for example due to
514: evolutionary effects in the ices in the outer layers of the nucleus.
515: However, comet 73P was in the process of break-up and fragmentation,
516: with fresh unprocessed material exposed for the first time to solar
517: radiation. Infrared and radio observations \citep{dello07, biver06a}
518: show remarkable similarity in the composition of fragments B and C.
519: All measured volatiles, except HCN, were depleted with respect to
520: water in both fragments, compared to other comets. Furthermore, no
521: evidence of temporal variations in the compositions of the fragments
522: during and in-between outbursts was seen. The explanation of the low
523: HNC/HCN ratio in comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann as due to evolutionary
524: effects in the surface layers of the nucleus thus appears unlikely.
525:
526: A comparison of the HNC abundance in comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
527: with that measured in comet C/1999 S4 (LINEAR) is particularly
528: interesting, as both comets were in the process of break-up, with
529: fresh material exposed to the solar radiation. Based on their IR
530: measurements, \cite{dello07} argue that relative abundances of
531: parent volatiles in comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann (with the
532: exception of HCN) resemble those in C/1999 S4 and are in the depleted
533: range with respect to the majority of comets characterized to
534: date (see also \citealt{villa06}). HNC was detected in C/1999 S4 with
535: an abundance of \about 17\% with respect to HCN at a heliocentric
536: distance of 0.77~AU in a small field of view of 2600~km
537: \citep{bockel01}. Correcting for the difference in the heliocentric
538: distance, as given by eq. (1), this is a factor of \about 11 higher
539: than the 3-$\sigma$ upper limit in 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann. The HNC
540: abundance relative to water is also higher in C/1999 S4, by a factor
541: of \about 8--9; $1.7 \times 10^{-4}$ \citep{bockel01} vs. $\la
542: 2\times 10^{-5}$ (Biver et al. in prep.) We next consider coma
543: chemistry versus gas-grain processes as means of producing HNC.
544:
545: \section{Origin of Cometary HNC}
546:
547: \cite{rodgers01b} considered a wide range of possible explanations for
548: the origin of HNC in moderately active comets. They ruled out the
549: production by ion-molecule chemistry or by reactions of energetic
550: hydrogen atoms with HCN. They also ruled out photo-dissociation of
551: small organic molecules, such as CH$_2$NH, HNCO, and other N-bearing
552: compounds. This left large organic molecules or polymers as possible
553: parents of HNC. One possible candidate was hexamethylenetetramine
554: (HMT; C$_6$H$_{12}$N$_4$), produced by UV irradiation of simple ices
555: containing ammonia, water, formaldehyde and methanol. However this
556: compound was shown to be stable to thermal degradation \citep{fray05}
557: and therefore an unlikely parent of HNC. \cite{rodgers01b} also
558: suggested HCN polymers (or oligomers), produced from irradiated HCN
559: molecules in the nuclear or pre-cometary ices, as a possible parent of
560: HNC (once HCN tetrameters are formed, they can easily polymerize to
561: polyaminocyanomethylene (PACM; [-(NH$_2$)C(CN)-]$_{\rm n}$), which can
562: then undergo ring closure to form ladder polymers). If such polymers
563: are present in cometary nuclei, one would expect their abundance in
564: the coma to be correlated with that of HCN. The abundance of HCN in
565: comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann implied by IR and radio observations
566: \citep{biver06a, villa06, dello07} is near the high end of
567: measurements in \about 30 comets observed at radio wavelengths
568: \citep{biver02, biver06b}. PACM polymers should thus be quite abundant
569: in this particular comet and the low HNC abundance implied by our
570: measurements appears to argue against PACM as a source of cometary
571: HNC.
572:
573: A different class of HCN polymers, formed not from HCN molecules, but
574: instead from ammonia and acetylene, has been invoked to explain the
575: low $^{14}$N/$^{15}$N ratio observed in CN in several comets, a factor
576: of two below that measured in HCN in comet Hale-Bopp (e.g.,
577: \citealt{arpig02}). In this scenario, some CN is produced from
578: photo-dissociation of HCN, however a secondary, presumably
579: polymeric, source of CN is needed. In cold, dense interstellar
580: material, large $^{15}$N enhancements may be present in ammonia ices
581: \citep{charnley02b}. These ices could be precursors of cometary
582: material. Further energetic processing is required to incorporate this
583: nitrogen reservoir into organic material (e.g., addition of NH$_2$
584: side-groups to PAH molecules; \citealt{charnley02c}). The
585: secondary source of CN in cometary comae may thus be a polymer
586: produced from ammonia, since only interstellar ammonia can obtain
587: sufficiently low $^{14}$N/$^{15}$N ratios, and from carbon compounds,
588: such as acetylene, methane, or ethane.
589:
590: The initial analysis of the Stardust organic data \citep{sandford06}
591: indicates that a significant fraction of organic nitrogen is in a form
592: of aliphatic carbon, with methylamine (CH$_3$NH$_2$) and ethylamine
593: (CH$_3$CH$_2$NH$_2$) being the two major carriers identified, with
594: similar abundances. These species are very volatile and
595: \cite{sandford06} argue that they are likely present in the cometary
596: material in a form of an amine-rich organic polymer rather than as a
597: free primary amine. One may speculate that energetic processing of
598: ices containing ammonia, methane, and ethane could produce these
599: molecules, as well as perhaps some organic polymers. Laboratory
600: studies are urgently needed to test this idea. If such polymers are
601: also a source of cometary HNC, the low HNC abundance in comet
602: 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann appears consistent with the observed
603: depletion of ammonia and acetylene implied by IR observations
604: \citep{dello07}.
605: %One implication {\bf of this scenario for CN} that
606: %can be tested observationally is that the $^{15}$N enhancement in CN
607: %in comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann should have been smaller than that
608: %observed in other comets. As, with the polymeric source being
609: %depleted, the CN production should have been dominated by the
610: %photo-dissociation of HCN.
611: We note that the rotational spectrum of
612: methylamine in the 49--326~GHz frequency range has now been measured
613: in the laboratory \citep{ilyushin05}. It is thus feasible to search
614: for this species in relatively active comets.
615:
616: A comparison of the HNC/HCN ratio in comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
617: with measurements in other members of the 21P/Giacobini-Zinner
618: compositional class is of great interest. This class includes objects
619: with extreme C$_2$ and NH$_2$ depletions that are related to
620: C$_2$H$_2$ and NH$_3$ depletions in nuclear ices. We would expect a
621: low HNC/HCN ratio in these objects as well. So far, very few members
622: of this class have been identified \citep{fink96}. The upper limit for
623: the HNC/HCN ratio in Giacobini-Zinner obtained during its 1998
624: apparition ($<$ 11\%, \citealt{biver99}; Fig.~3) is not sensitive
625: enough to draw definitive conclusions. Comet 21P/Giacobini-Zinner will
626: make a favorable apparition in 2018 (at 0.4~AU from the Earth), during
627: which sensitive measurements will be possible using the Atacama Large
628: Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA).
629:
630: \section{Summary}
631:
632: Observations of hydrogen isocyanide in cometary atmospheres carried
633: out to date indicate that the HNC production has to be efficient in
634: the inner coma, just as the material leaves the nucleus. The process
635: has to be temperature dependent to explain the observed variation in
636: the HNC/HCN ratio with the heliocentric distance. Thermal degradation
637: of macromolecules or polymers produced from ammonia and carbon
638: compounds, such as acetylene, methane, or ethane appears consistent
639: with all existing data, including the very low HNC/HCN ratio in comet
640: 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann reported here. Such polymers have been
641: invoked previously to explain anomalous $^{14}$N/$^{15}$N ratios
642: measured in cometary CN.
643:
644: Additional interferometric observations of HNC in comets are needed to
645: provide constraints on the spatial distribution of this molecule in
646: the cometary comae. Such observations will soon be possible in
647: moderately productive comets with (sub)millimeter interferometers
648: (e.g., e-SMA). Measurements of the H$^{15}$NC/H$^{14}$NC isotopic
649: ratio would be instrumental in determining whether the HCN polymers
650: similar to those invoked to explain the enhanced $^{15}$N abundance in
651: CN may also be a source of cometary HNC. However, such measurements
652: will have to await the commissioning of ALMA.
653:
654: \acknowledgments This research has been supported by NSF grant
655: AST-0540882 to the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory. D.C.L.
656: acknowledges support from the Observatoire de Paris during his stay in
657: Meudon. S.B.C. acknowledges support from NASA's Planetary Atmospheres
658: Program. We thank N.~Fray for useful discussions and the referee, M.
659: DiSanti, for a thorough and helpful review of the manuscript.
660:
661: %\newpage
662:
663: \begin{thebibliography}{}
664:
665: \bibitem[A'Hearn et al. (1995)]{ahearn95} A'Hearn, M.F., Millis, R.L.,
666: Schleicher, D.G., Osip, D.J., \& Birch, P.V. 1995, Icarus 118, 223
667:
668: \bibitem[Biver et al. (2005)]{biver05} Biver, N., Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan,
669: D., Boissier, J., Colom, P., et al. 2005, in \emph{Asteroids,
670: Comets, and Meteors}, IAU Symp. No. 229 (Book of Abstracts), 43
671:
672:
673: \bibitem[Biver et al. (1997)]{biver97} Biver, N., Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan,
674: D., Colom, P., Crovisier, J., et al. 1997, Science
675: 275, 1915
676:
677: \bibitem[Biver et al. (2002)]{biver02} Biver, N., Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan,
678: D., Crovisier, J., Colom, P., Henry, F., Moreno, R., Paubert, G.,
679: Despois, D., \& Lis, D.C. 2002, EMP 90, 323
680:
681: \bibitem[Biver et al. (2000)]{biver00} Biver, N., Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan,
682: D., Crovisier, J., Henry, F., et al. 2000, AJ 120,
683: 1554
684:
685: \bibitem[Biver et al. (2006a)]{biver06a} Biver, N.,
686: Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan, D., Boissier, J., Colom, P., et al. 2006a, BAAS
687: 38, 484
688:
689: \bibitem[Biver et al. (2006b)]{biver06b} Biver, N., Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan,
690: D., Crovisier, J., Lis, D.C., et al. 2006b, A\&A 449, 1255
691:
692: \bibitem[Biver et al. (1999)]{biver99} Biver, N., Crovisier, J.,
693: Davis, J.K., Despois, D., et al.
694: 1999, in \emph{Asteroids, Comets, and Meteors 1999}, p. 50 (Book of
695: Abstracts)
696:
697: \bibitem[Blackman et al. (1976)]{black76} Blackman, G.L., Brown, R.D.,
698: Godfrey, P.D., \& Gunn, H.I. 1976, Nature 261, 395
699:
700: \bibitem[Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan et al. (2005)]{bockel05}
701: Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan, D., Gunnarsson, M., Biver, N., Charnley, S.,
702: Crovisier, J., Lis, D.C., Rodgers, S. 2005, in \emph{Asteroids,
703: Comets, and Meteors}, IAU Symp. No. 229 (Book of Abstracts), 111
704:
705: \bibitem[Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan (2007)]{bockel07} Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan, D.
706: 2007, A\&SS, in press (ALMA Symposium Madrid, Spain)
707:
708: \bibitem[Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan et al. (2001)]{bockel01}
709: Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan, D., Biver, N., Moreno, R., Colom, P.,
710: et al. 2001, Science 292, 1339
711:
712: \bibitem[Boehnhardt et al. (2002)]{boeh02} Boehnhardt, H., Holdstock,
713: S., Hainaut, O., et al. 2002, EP 90, 131
714:
715: \bibitem[Charnley (2002)]{charnley02c} Charnley, S.B. 2002, in
716: Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Exo/Astrobiology (ESA
717: SP-518), 33
718:
719: \bibitem[Charnley \& Rodgers (2002)]{charnley02b} Charnley, S.B., \&
720: Rodgers, S.D. 2002, ApJ 569, L113
721:
722: \bibitem[Charnley et al. (2002)]{charnley02} Charnley, S.B.,
723: Rodgers, S.D., Kuan, Y.-J., \& Huang, H.-C. 2002, ASR 30, 1419
724:
725: \bibitem[Colom et al. (2006)]{colom06} Colom, P., Crovisier, J.,
726: Biver, N., Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan, D., Boissier, J., \& Lecacheux, A.
727: 2006, in \emph{SF2A-2006: Semaine de l'Astrophysique Fran\c{c}aise},
728: ed. D. Barret et al., 389
729:
730: \bibitem[Crovisier et al. (2005)]{crovi05} Crovisier, J., Biver, N.,
731: Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan, D., Boissier, J., Colom, P. et al. 2005, BAAS
732: 37, 646
733:
734: \bibitem[Crovisier et al. (2006)]{crovi06} Crovisier, J., Biver, N.,
735: Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan, D., Boissier, et al. 2006, BAAS
736: 38, 485
737:
738: %\bibitem[Crovisier et al. (2006)]{crovi07} Crovisier, J., Biver, N.,
739: % Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan, D., Boissier, J., Colom, P. et al. 2006, DPS
740: % 38, 303
741:
742: \bibitem[Dello Russo et al. (2007)]{dello07} Dello Russo, N.,
743: Vervarck, R.J., Jr., Weaver, H.A., Biver, N., et al. 2007,
744: Nature, in press
745:
746: \bibitem[Fink \& Hicks (1996)]{fink96} Fink, U., \& Hicks, M.D. 1996,
747: ApJ 459, 729
748:
749: \bibitem[Fray (2004)]{fray05} Fray, N. 2004, Ph. Thesis, University of
750: Paris XII
751:
752: \bibitem[Herbst, Terzieva, \& Talbi (2000)]{herbst00} Herbst, E.,
753: Terzieva, R., \& Talbi, D. 2000, MNRAS 311, 869
754:
755: \bibitem[Hirota et al. (1998)]{hirota98} Hirota, T., Yamamoto, S.,
756: Mikami, H., \& Ohishi, M. 1998, ApJ 503, 717
757:
758: \bibitem[Ilyushin et al. (2005)]{ilyushin05} Ilyushin, V.V., Alekseev,
759: E.A., Dyubko, S.F., Motiyenko, R.A., \& Hougen, J.T. 2005, J. Mol.
760: Spec. 229, 170
761:
762: \bibitem[International Comet Quarterly (2006)]{icq06} International
763: Comet Quarterly 2006, Vol. 139, pp. 100, 116; Vol. 140, pp. 137,151,
764: 174
765:
766: \bibitem[Irvine et al. (1996)]{irvine96} Irvine, W.M.,
767: Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan, D., Lis, D.C., Matthews, H.E., Biver, N., et
768: al. 1996, Nature 383, 418
769:
770: \bibitem[Irvine et al. (1998)]{irvine98} Irvine, W.M., Bergin, E.A.,
771: Dickens, J.E., Jewitt, D., et al. 1998, Nature 393, 547
772:
773: \bibitem[Irvine et al. (2003)]{irvine03} Irvine, W.M., Bergman, P.,
774: Lowe, T.B., Matthews, H., et al. 2003, Origin of Life and Evolution
775: of Biosphere 33, 609
776:
777: \bibitem[Jehin et al. (2004)]{arpig02} Jehin, E., Manfroid, J.
778: Cochran, A.L., Arpigny, C., et al. 2004, ApJ 613, L161
779:
780: \bibitem[Lis et al. (1997)]{lis97} Lis, D.C., Keene, J., Young, K,
781: Phillips, T.G., Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan, D., et al. 1997, Icarus 130,
782: 355
783:
784: \bibitem[Rodgers \& Charnley (1998)]{rodgers98} Rodgers, S.D., \&
785: Charnley, S.B. 1998, ApJ 501, L227
786:
787: \bibitem[Rodgers \& Charnley (2001a)]{rodgers01a} Rodgers, S.D., \&
788: Charnley, S.B. 2001a, ApJ 546, 324
789:
790: \bibitem[Rodgers \& Charnley (2001b)]{rodgers01b} Rodgers, S.D., \&
791: Charnley, S.B. 2001b, MNRAS 323, 84
792:
793: \bibitem[Sandford et al. (2006)]{sandford06} Sandford, S.A.,
794: Al\'{e}on, J., Alexander, C. M. O'D., Araki, T., et al. 2006,
795: Science 314, 720
796:
797: \bibitem[Schilke et al. (1992)]{schilke92} Schilke, P., Walmsley, C.M.,
798: Pineau des For\^{e}ts, Roueff, E., Flower, D.R., \& Guilloteau, S.
799: 1992, A\&A 256, 595
800:
801: \bibitem[Snyder \& Buhl (1972)]{snyder72} Snyder, L.E., \& Buhl, D.
802: 1972, Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 194, 17
803:
804: \bibitem[Weaver et al. (2006)]{toth06} Weaver, H.A., Lisse, C.M.,
805: Mutchler, M.J., et al. 2006, BAAS 38, 490
806:
807: \bibitem[Villanueva et al. (2006)]{villa06} Villanueva, G.L., Bonev,
808: B.P., Mumma, M.J., et al. 2006, ApJ 650, L87
809:
810: \bibitem[Zuckerman et al. (1972)]{zucker72} Zuckerman, B., Morris,
811: M.P., Palmer, P., \& Turner, B.E. 1972, ApJ 173, L125
812:
813: \end{thebibliography}
814:
815: \end{document}
816:
817:
818: