1:
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: \documentclass[]{emulateapj}
5: \usepackage{graphicx}
6: \usepackage{latexsym}
7: \usepackage{natbib}
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9:
10:
11:
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15:
16: \title{Millihertz Oscillation Frequency Drift Predicts the Occurrence
17: of Type I X-ray Bursts}
18:
19:
20: \author{D. Altamirano\altaffilmark{1},
21: M. van der Klis\altaffilmark{1},
22: R. Wijnands\altaffilmark{1}
23: A. Cumming\altaffilmark{2}}
24:
25: \email{diego@science.uva.nl}
26:
27:
28:
29: \altaffiltext{1}{Astronomical Institute, ``Anton Pannekoek'',
30: University of Amsterdam, and Center for High Energy Astrophysics,
31: Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.}
32:
33: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics, McGill University,
34: 3600 rue University, Montreal, QC, H3A 2T8, Canada}
35:
36:
37:
38:
39:
40: \begin{abstract}
41:
42: Millihertz quasi-periodic oscillations reported in three neutron-star
43: low mass X-ray binaries have been suggested to be a mode of marginally
44: stable nuclear burning on the neutron star surface. In this Letter, we
45: show that close to the transition between the island and the banana
46: state, 4U~1636--53 shows mHz QPOs whose frequency systematically
47: decreases with time until the oscillations disappear and a Type I X-ray
48: burst occurs.
49: %
50: There is a strong correlation between the QPO frequency $\nu$ and the
51: occurrence of X-ray bursts: when $\nu\gtrsim9$~mHz no bursts occur,
52: while $\nu\lesssim9$~mHz does allow the occurrence of bursts.
53: %
54: The mHz QPO frequency constitutes the first identified observable that
55: can be used to predict the occurrence of X-ray bursts. If a
56: systematic frequency drift occurs, then a burst happens within a few
57: kilo-seconds after $\nu$ drops below 9~mHz. This observational result
58: confirms that the mHz QPO phenomenon is intimately related with the
59: processes that lead to a thermonuclear burst.
60:
61:
62:
63:
64:
65: \end{abstract}
66: \date{\today}
67: \keywords{X-rays: bursts, X-rays: individual (4U 1636--53, 4U 1608-52, Aql X-1)}
68: \maketitle
69:
70:
71: \section{Introduction}
72: \label{sec:intro}
73:
74:
75:
76: \citet{Revnivtsev01} discovered a new class of low frequency
77: quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) in three neutron star X-ray binary
78: sources (Aql X-1, 4U~1608--52 and 4U~1636--53). This new QPO has
79: frequencies between 7 and 9 $\times 10^{-3}$ Hz, i.e. it is in the
80: milli-Hertz range, and its other properties also differ from those of
81: the other QPOs found in the neutron star systems
82: \citep[e.g. energy dependence, see][]{Vanderklis06}.
83: %
84: Although \citet{Revnivtsev01} could not discard an interpretation
85: related with disk instabilities, they concluded that
86: the mHz QPO is likely due to a special mode of nuclear
87: burning on the neutron star surface.
88: %
89: This interpretation was strengthened by the results of \citet{Yu02},
90: who showed that the kHz QPO frequency is anti-correlated with the
91: luminosity variations during the mHz oscillation, suggesting that the
92: inner edge of the disk slightly moves outward as the luminosity
93: increases during each mHz cycle due to stresses generated by radiation
94: coming from the the neutron star surface.
95: %
96: This is contrary to the correlation observed between X-ray luminosity
97: ($L_x$) and kHz QPO frequency, where the inner disk edge is thought to
98: move in, as the accretion rate and hence $L_x$, increases \citep[][and
99: references within]{Vanderklis06}.
100:
101: The properties of the mHz QPOs as observed up to now can be summarized
102: as follows:
103: %
104: %
105: \textit{(1)} the fractional rms amplitude strongly decreases with
106: energy, from $\approx2$\% at 2.5 keV, down to an almost undetectable $ <
107: 0.2$\% at $\approx5$ keV;
108: %
109: \textit{(2)} mHz QPOs occur only in a particular range of X-ray
110: luminosity: $L_{2-20~keV} \approx 5-11 \times 10^{36}$ erg/s;
111: %
112: %
113: \textit{(3)} the frequency of the mHz QPOs is between 7 and
114: 9 mHz;
115: %
116: \textit{(4)} the mHz QPOs disappear with the occurrence of a type I X-ray burst;
117: %
118: %
119: \textit{(5)} as noted above, the kHz QPO frequency is approximately
120: anti-correlated with the $2-5$ keV count rate variations that constitute the
121: mHz oscillation.
122:
123:
124:
125: \citet{Heger07} suggested that the mHz QPOs could be explained as the
126: consequence of marginally stable nuclear burning on the neutron star
127: surface. They found an oscillatory mode of burning, with a period
128: $P_{osc}$ close to the geometric mean of the
129: %
130: thermal\footnote{The thermal timescale is defined as $t_{thermal}=c_p
131: T / \epsilon$ where $c_p$, $T$ and $\epsilon$ are the heat capacity at
132: constant pressure , the temperature and the nuclear energy generation
133: rate, respectively}
134: %
135: and accretion\footnote{The accretion timescale is defined as
136: $t_{accr}=y /\dot{m}$ where $y$ and $\dot{m}$ are the column depth
137: of the burning layer and local accretion rate, respectively.}
138: %
139: timescales of the burning layer. For typical parameters,
140: $P_{osc}\equiv\sqrt{t_{thermal} \cdot t_{accr}}\approx2$ minutes, in
141: accordance with the characteristic frequency of the mHz QPOs. The
142: burning is oscillatory only close to the boundary between stable
143: burning and unstable burning (in Type I X-ray bursts), explaining the
144: observation that the mHz QPOs were seen within a narrow range of
145: luminosities.
146:
147:
148: Two of the three sources in which \citet{Revnivtsev01} found the mHz
149: QPOs are transient atoll sources (Aql X-1 and 4U~1608--52) while the
150: third one, 4U~1636--53, is a persistent atoll source
151: \citep{Hasinger89}. The object of our current study, 4U~1636--53, has
152: an orbital period of $\approx3.8$ hours \citep{Vanparadijs90} and a
153: companion star with a mass of $\approx0.4 \ M_{\odot}$ \citep[assuming a
154: NS of 1.4~$M_{\odot}$; ][]{Giles02}. 4U~1636--53 is an X-ray burst
155: source \citep{Hoffman77} showing asymptotic burst oscillation
156: frequencies of $\approx581$~Hz \citep[][]{Zhang97,Strohmayer02}. The
157: aperiodic timing behavior of 4U~1636--53 has been studied with the
158: EXOSAT Medium Energy instrument \citep[][]{Prins97} and with the Rossi
159: X-ray Timing Explorer \citep[RXTE, e.g.][]{Wijnands97,Disalvo03,Altamirano07}.
160: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
161:
162:
163:
164: \begin{figure}[t]
165: \center
166: \resizebox{1\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{./f1.eps}}}
167: \caption{Color-color diagram as \citet{Altamirano07}. Each data point
168: represents the average of an observation ($\approx2$ to
169: $\approx30$~ksec). The ellipse marks the region in which mHz QPOs with
170: decreasing frequency were found. The labels A, B and C correspond to
171: those in Figure~\ref{fig:lc}.
172: }
173: \label{fig:ccd}
174: \end{figure}
175:
176: \begin{figure}[t]
177: \center
178: \resizebox{1\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{./f2.eps}}}
179: \caption{Dynamical power spectrum smoothed with a 750 seconds sliding
180: window with steps of 200 seconds, showing the mHz QPOs during the last
181: 12~ksec before the X-ray burst occurs. This sequence corresponds to
182: case B in Figures~\ref{fig:lc}~\&~\ref{fig:ccd} -- ObsId:
183: 60032-05-02-00. The three black vertical lines correspond to the times
184: of occurrence of the X-ray bursts. For clarity, we plot only powers
185: above 10 which correspond to $\gtrsim2\sigma$ (single trial per 750
186: seconds window but normalized to the number of possible frequencies in
187: the range 0--0.5~Hz).}
188: \label{fig:dynspec}
189: \end{figure}
190:
191:
192: \begin{figure*}[t]
193: \center
194: \resizebox{2\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{./f3.eps}}}
195: \caption{2--60~keV PCA light curve of observations
196: 60032-05-01,02,03 and 04. $A$, $B$ and $C$ indicate intervals in which the
197: mHz QPOs are detected. In all three cases, the frequency of the mHz
198: QPO decreases with time until the appearance of an X-ray burst. }
199: \label{fig:lc}
200: \end{figure*}
201:
202:
203:
204: 4U~1636-53 is a reference source for studying nuclear burning on the
205: surface of a neutron star since it shows the full range of burst
206: behavior: single and multi-peaked Type I X-ray bursts, superbursts,
207: burst oscillations, photospheric radius expansion, regular and
208: irregular burst sequences \citep[e.g.][]{Galloway06} and mHz QPOs. As
209: such, it is an ideal source to understand the relation between these
210: different observational manifestations of nuclear burning.
211:
212: Recently, \citet{Shih05} reported that 4U~1636--53 has shown a
213: significant decrease in its persistent $L_x$ during the years 2000 and
214: 2001. \citet{Altamirano07} show that during the low $L_x$ period,
215: 4U~1636--53 is observed in its (hard) island states. This provides an
216: opportunity to study the mHz QPOs in harder and lower luminosity
217: states than was possible up to now.
218:
219:
220:
221:
222:
223: \section{DATA ANALYSIS \& RESULTS}
224: \label{sec:dataanalysis}
225:
226: We used data from the RXTE Proportional Counter Array and the High
227: Energy X-ray Timing Experiment \citep[PCA and HEXTE, respectively; for
228: instrument information see][]{Jahoda06,Gruber96}. Up to June, 2006,
229: there were 338 public pointed observations. An observation covers 1 to
230: 5 consecutive 90-min satellite orbits. Usually, an orbit contains
231: between 1 and 5 ksec of useful data separated by 1--4 ksec data gaps;
232: on rare occasions the visibility windows were such that RXTE
233: continuously observed the source for up to 27~ksec. In total there
234: were 649 gap-free data segments of length 0.3 to 27 ksec.
235:
236: We produced energy spectra for each observation using Standard data
237: modes and fitted them in the $2-25$~keV and $20-150$~keV bands for
238: PCA and HEXTE, respectively. The interstellar absorption $N_H$ was
239: fixed at $3.75\times10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$
240: \citep[see][]{Schulz99,Fiocchi06}. We used 1-sec resolution event
241: mode PCA light curves in the $\approx2-5$~keV range (where the mHz QPOs
242: are strongest) and searched for periodicities in each of the 649
243: segments separately using Lomb-Scargle periodograms
244: \citep{Lomb76,Scargle82,Numerical-Recipes}. Segments in which one or
245: more Type I X-ray bursts were detected were searched for
246: periodicities before, in between, and after the bursts.
247: %
248: We find that the oscillations in the $\approx2-5$~keV range are
249: evident from the light curves \citep[see for example figure 1
250: in][]{Revnivtsev01}. The significance as estimated from our
251: Lomb-Scargle periodograms \citep[][]{Numerical-Recipes} confirm that
252: the oscillations are all above the $3\sigma$ level. We estimated the
253: uncertainties in the measured frequencies by fitting a sinusoid to
254: 1000~sec data segments to minimize frequency-drift effects. The
255: typical errors on the frequency are of the order of $2-6 \times
256: 10^{-5}$~Hz (or $2-6 \times 10^{-2}$~mHz).
257:
258: We detected mHz QPOs in 124 of the 649 segments. Most occur in
259: segments with less than 4~ksec of useful data and sometimes the QPOs
260: cover only part of a segment.
261: \citet{Revnivtsev01} reported the characteristics of the mHz QPOs
262: between March 1996 and February 1999. Using the X-ray colors averaged
263: per observation as reported by \citet{Altamirano07}, we find that
264: their data sample the region at hard colors $\lesssim0.7$ and soft
265: colors $\gtrsim1$ (see Figure~\ref{fig:ccd}), which represents the so
266: called banana state \citep{Vanderklis06}.
267: %
268: Some of the later observations also sample the banana state. We
269: re-analyzed all the data in this region of the color-color diagram and
270: found results which are consistent with those reported by
271: \citet{Revnivtsev01}: the frequency of the QPOs varies randomly
272: between $6$ and $9$~mHz.
273:
274:
275: In the harder state close to the transition between the island and
276: banana state and marked with the ellipse drawn in Figure~\ref{fig:ccd},
277: we found 22 segments with significant mHz QPOs;
278: %
279: in these observations, the (2--150~keV) luminosity was
280: $6-10\times10^{36} (d/(6 kpc))^2 \ $erg s$^{-1}$, while for the other
281: cases, corresponding to the banana state, it was higher
282: ($10-35\times10^{36} (d/(6 kpc))^2 \ $erg s$^{-1}$).
283:
284:
285:
286: Among the 22 segments, we distinguish two groups based on segment
287: length: the first consisting of 4 segments each with more than 14
288: ksec of uninterrupted data, and the second consisting of 18 segments
289: each corresponding to one orbit with less than $\approx4$~ksec of useful
290: data.
291: %
292: For all four segments in the first group, we measure a systematic
293: decrease of frequency from between $10.7$ and $12.5$~mHz down to less
294: than $9$~mHz over a time interval of 8 to 12 ksec, after which an
295: X-ray burst occurs and the QPOs disappear (the QPOs become
296: much less than $3\sigma$ significant).
297: %
298: Figure~\ref{fig:dynspec} shows a representative dynamical power spectrum
299: corresponding to one of these segments (interval B in Figure~\ref{fig:lc}).
300: %
301: The QPO is present $\approx12$~ksec seconds before the burst and its
302: frequency systematically decreases with time from $\approx10.7$~mHz down
303: to $\approx7.6$~mHz. Then the X-ray burst occurs and the QPO disappears.
304: %
305: In the second group, 16 of the 18 segments of $<4$~ksec show the mHz
306: QPO frequency to decrease either within a segment, or between 2 or 3
307: consecutive orbits (with 2--4 ksec data gaps in between) at rates
308: consistent with those seen in the 4 long segments.
309: %
310: The two remaining segments are too short and isolated to constrain
311: the frequency drift well.
312:
313:
314:
315: To illustrate the interplay between this very systematic behavior of
316: the mHz QPOs and our data structure, in Figure~\ref{fig:lc} we show a
317: representative lightcurve.
318: A, B and C mark three intervals in which the mHz QPOs were detected
319: and that each terminate with an X-ray burst. As can be seen, we have
320: data in which mHz QPOs are detected and followed through consecutive
321: segments (case A), and data in which the oscillations are detected and
322: disappear within one segment (cases B \& C). Furthermore, we have data
323: in which the oscillations are present from the start of the
324: observation (case B) as well as data in which the mHz QPOs appear
325: during an observation (case A \& C).
326: %
327:
328:
329: Among our 22 segments, the frequency of the oscillations
330: varies in the range $7-14.3$~mHz with directly observed onset
331: frequencies between $10.7$ and $14.3$~mHz.
332: %
333: Interpolating through gaps, the QPOs last for 7.5 to 16
334: ksec. Over such intervals, the frequency is always consistent
335: with decreasing at average rates from $0.07$ to $0.15$ mHz
336: ksec$^{-1}$, and
337: %
338: the frequency had always dropped to $\lesssim9$~mHz just before an
339: X-ray burst (as estimated from the last 750 seconds before the
340: burst). Interestingly, this last result applies to all cases in which
341: we detect the mHz QPOs before an X-ray burst, including the cases that
342: occur in the banana state: it seems that independent of the spectral
343: state of the source, no X-ray burst will occur if the mHz QPOs are
344: present at a frequency higher than $\approx9$~mHz (bursts do occur in
345: both states that are not preceded by detectable mHz QPOs).
346:
347:
348: No relation between the 2--60~keV count rate and frequency was found:
349: in two of the four long segments the count rate decreased about 10\%
350: during the time the mHz QPOs were present, while in the other two
351: cases the count rate increased by approximately the same amount. No
352: clear relation was found between frequency range covered and duration
353: of the oscillation; perhaps this is related to the fact that, as shown
354: in Figure~\ref{fig:dynspec}, the frequency does not decrease smoothly
355: but has short periods in which it is consistent with being
356: constant.
357:
358:
359:
360:
361:
362:
363: When 4U~1636--53 is observed close to its island--banana state
364: transition, the mHz QPOs disappear \textit{only} when an X-ray burst
365: occurs. However, this is not the case for the banana state, in which
366: we found also observations in which the oscillation disappear below
367: detectable levels without the occurrence of an X-ray burst.
368: %
369: The interval of time required to
370: again detect the oscillations after a burst occurred is variable.
371: %
372: The two extreme cases are
373: %
374: (i) observation 60032-01-06-000 where no mHz QPOs were detected
375: during the $\approx15$~ksec of uninterrupted data following an X-ray
376: burst and
377: %
378: (ii) observation 40028-01-06-00, where mHz QPOs are detected again
379: $\approx6000$ seconds after an X-ray burst occurred.
380: %
381: We note that in the first case, the source was close to the transition
382: between island and banana state while in the second case, the source
383: was in the banana state. Nevertheless, no clear relation between this
384: waiting time and the source state (island or banana state) was found.
385: %
386: As bursts may be missed due to data gaps, a time interval of
387: $\approx1000$ seconds between a (missed) X-ray burst and onset of the
388: QPOs cannot in some cases be excluded (e.g. case A in
389: Figure~\ref{fig:lc}).
390:
391:
392:
393:
394:
395:
396:
397:
398: \section{Discussion}\label{sec:discussion}
399:
400:
401:
402: We have shown that close to the transition between the island and the
403: banana state 4U~1636--53 exhibits mHz QPOs whose frequency
404: systematically decreases with time until the oscillations disappear
405: with the occurrence of a Type I X-ray burst. The mHz QPO frequency
406: $\nu$ constitutes the first identified observable that can be used to
407: predict the occurrence of X-ray bursts: when $\nu\gtrsim9$~mHz no
408: bursts occur, while $\nu\lesssim9$~mHz does allow the occurrence of
409: bursts. If a systematic frequency drift occurs, then a burst happens
410: within a few kilo-seconds after $\nu$ drops below 9~mHz. This
411: observational result confirms that the mHz QPO phenomenon is
412: intimately related with the processes that lead to a thermonuclear
413: burst.
414: %
415:
416: The fact that the observation of a systematic frequency decrease with
417: time implies the occurrence of a future X-ray burst, strongly suggests
418: that the frequency of the mHz QPOs is related to the burning processes
419: on the neutron star surface. One possibility is that the frequency of
420: the QPO is somehow a measurement of the accumulation of fresh fuel on
421: the neutron star surface which will be available for a future
422: thermonuclear burst.
423: %
424: %
425: To our knowledge, there has been only one attempt to theoretically
426: explain the mHz QPOs phenomena \citep{Heger07}. In this model the
427: frequency of the QPO depends, among others, on the amount of available
428: fresh fuel, on the local accretion rate and the composition of the
429: material. It is beyond the scope of this Letter to perform
430: numerical simulations as those reported by \citet{Heger07}.
431: %
432: In the rest of this discussion we briefly compare these authors' model
433: predictions with our observations and propose some more complex
434: scenarios.
435:
436: Analytical and numerical results based on the simplified one-zone
437: model of \citet{Paczynski83} in the \citet{Heger07} marginally stable
438: burning model (see Section~\ref{sec:intro}) predict that
439: %
440: (i) close to the boundary between stable and unstable burning, the NS
441: surface will show temperature fluctuations with constant frequency
442: $\nu$ if the local accretion rate $\dot{m}$ remains constant;
443: %
444: (ii) this marginally stable burning regime will occur at $\dot{m}$ near
445: Eddington, hence accretion must be confined to a surface area $S_A$
446: that is much smaller that the total area of the NS;
447: %
448: (iii) $\nu$ correlates with $\dot{m}$ \citep[see figure 4
449: in ][]{Heger07} and
450: %
451: (iv) thermonuclear bursts and mHz QPOs should not be observed at the same
452: luminosity and therefore presumably at the same $\dot{m}$.
453: %
454:
455: In this paper, we show that for constant luminosity the QPO frequency
456: can systematically decrease in time
457: %
458: and that instantaneously measured frequencies can be the same for
459: different luminosities.
460: % and that when no frequency drift is observed,
461: % the frequency measured is consistent with being the same for
462: % different \textbf{banana state} luminosities.
463: We also show that mHz QPOs and thermonuclear bursts do in fact occur
464: at the same luminosity and that both phenomena are clearly related.
465: %
466: This means that we are dealing with a more complex scenario than that
467: introduced by \citet{Heger07}.
468: %
469:
470: The amount of time between the preceding X-ray burst and the onset of
471: mHz QPOs is variable ($>6$ksec) and apparently independent of source
472: state.
473: %
474: If the system is locally accreting at $\dot{m}\simeq\dot{m}_{Edd}$
475: %\simeq8\cdot10^4$ g~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$
476: and if none of the accreting fuel is burnt, only $\approx1000$~seconds
477: are required to accrete a fuel layer of column depth $y_f$
478: capable of undergoing marginally stable burning
479: \citep[$y_f\approx10^8$~g~cm$^{-2}$ and $\dot{m}\approx8\cdot10^4$
480: g~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$ -- see e.g.][]{Heger07}. One possible explanation
481: for the observed longer intervals between burst and onset of
482: oscillations, is that a large fraction of the accreted fuel is burnt
483: as it is accreted on the neutron star surface.
484: %
485: Of course the burning fraction could vary in time, and this estimate
486: is assuming that all the fuel was burnt during the last X-ray burst,
487: which is not always true \citep{Bildsten98}.
488: %
489: Interestingly, if this interpretation is correct and low partial
490: burning fractions can occur, under certain conditions the mHz QPOs
491: could appear in much less than a 1000 seconds after an X-ray
492: burst.
493:
494:
495: %
496: The fact that the amount of time between the preceding X-ray burst and
497: the onset of mHz QPOs is variable may be also an indication that not
498: all the accreted fuel is burnt nor available to participate in the
499: marginally stable burning.
500: %
501: For example, accretion could occur onto an equatorial region occupying
502: less than 10\% of the surface area of the star \citep{Heger07}. A
503: possibility is that part of the fresh fuel burns stably at a rate
504: $B(t)$ per unit area while the other part leaks away from this region
505: at a rate $R(t)$. While the material accumulated at a rate $R(t)$
506: would serve as fuel for a thermonuclear burst, marginally stably
507: burning of the matter on the equatorial belt is (in principle) still
508: possible.
509: %
510: Although such scenario cannot explain the frequency drifts we observe,
511: it can explain why mHz QPO and X-ray bursts do occur at the same $\dot
512: m$. If mHz QPOs can only occur at a certain local accretion rate
513: $\dot{m}$ ($\simeq\dot{m}_{Edd}$), a small change in effective local
514: accretion rate will lead to an absence of mHz QPOs. This might explain
515: why the mHz QPOs are not always present between X-ray bursts.
516:
517: Another possibility (which is not taken into account in
518: \citet{Heger07}'s model) is that there is a significant heat flux from
519: deeper in the star that heats the region undergoing marginally stable
520: burning.
521: %
522: For example, changes in heat flux due to energy that is first
523: conducted into deeper layers during an X-ray burst and then slowly
524: outwards towards the surface might be possible.
525: %
526: Such a change in the heat flux could affect the conditions of the
527: burning layer (e.g. temperature or burning rate $B(t)$) and therefore
528: could affect the characteristics of the burning processes on the
529: neutron star surface.
530:
531:
532:
533:
534: Other aspects of the observations offer further challenges for
535: theoretical models that explain burning processes on the neutron star
536: surface as well those which explain atoll sources states.
537: %
538: In particular,
539: %
540: (i) why the systematic frequency drifts are observed close to the
541: transition between the island and the banana state while the
542: frequencies are approximately constant in the banana state. This may
543: be another indication that the disk geometry of the system is changing during
544: the state transition \citep[see e.g. ][]{Gierlinski02};
545: %
546: (ii) why in the transition between island and banana state the
547: oscillations disappear \textit{only} when an X-ray burst occurs, while
548: in the banana state they can also disappear without an X-ray burst
549: (see Section~\ref{sec:dataanalysis}).
550: %
551: Clearly, further theoretical work is needed. More observational work
552: on the interactions between mHz QPOs and X-ray bursts is in progress
553: and will provide further clues for theoretical models.
554: %
555:
556:
557:
558:
559:
560:
561:
562: { \footnotesize
563: {
564: \hspace{0.03cm} \textbf{Acknowledgments:} DA wants to thank
565: A. Patruno, P. Casella, P. Uttley, M. Linares for very helpful
566: discussions. This work was supported by the ``Nederlandse
567: Onderzoekschool Voor Astronomie'' (NOVA), i.e., the ``Netherlands
568: Research School for Astronomy'', and it has made use of data
569: obtained through the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive
570: Research Center Online Service, provided by the NASA/Goddard Space
571: Flight Center. AC is grateful for support from NSERC, Le Fonds
572: Qu\'eb\'ecois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies, the
573: Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, and as an Alfred P.~Sloan
574: Research Fellow.} }
575:
576:
577: %\clearpage
578: %\bibliographystyle{aa}
579: %\bibliography{biblio}
580: \begin{thebibliography}{26}
581: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
582: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
583: \def\url#1{{\tt #1}}\fi
584: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
585:
586: \bibitem[{{Altamirano} et~al.(2007){Altamirano}, {van der Klis}, {M{\'e}ndez}
587: et~al.}]{Altamirano07}
588: {Altamirano} D., {van der Klis} M., {M{\'e}ndez} M., et~al., 2007, Submitted to
589: \apj
590:
591: \bibitem[{{Bildsten}(1998)}]{Bildsten98}
592: {Bildsten} L., 1998, In: {Buccheri} R., {van Paradijs} J., {Alpar} A. (eds.)
593: NATO ASIC Proc. 515: The Many Faces of Neutron Stars., 419--+
594:
595: \bibitem[{{Di Salvo} et~al.(2003){Di Salvo}, {M{\' e}ndez}, \& {van der
596: Klis}}]{Disalvo03}
597: {Di Salvo} T., {M{\' e}ndez} M., {van der Klis} M., 2003, \aap, 406, 177
598:
599: \bibitem[{{Fiocchi} et~al.(2006){Fiocchi}, {Bazzano}, {Ubertini}, \&
600: {federici}}]{Fiocchi06}
601: {Fiocchi} M., {Bazzano} A., {Ubertini} P., {federici} M., 2006, ArXiv
602: Astrophysics e-prints
603:
604: \bibitem[{{Galloway} et~al.(2006){Galloway}, {Muno}, {Hartman}
605: et~al.}]{Galloway06}
606: {Galloway} D.K., {Muno} M.P., {Hartman} J.M., et~al., 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics
607: e-prints
608:
609: \bibitem[{{Gierli{\'n}ski} \& {Done}(2002)}]{Gierlinski02}
610: {Gierli{\'n}ski} M., {Done} C., Dec. 2002, \mnras, 337, 1373
611:
612: \bibitem[{{Giles} et~al.(2002){Giles}, {Hill}, {Strohmayer}, \&
613: {Cummings}}]{Giles02}
614: {Giles} A.B., {Hill} K.M., {Strohmayer} T.E., {Cummings} N., 2002, \apj, 568,
615: 279
616:
617: \bibitem[{{Gruber} et~al.(1996){Gruber}, {Blanco}, {Heindl} et~al.}]{Gruber96}
618: {Gruber} D.E., {Blanco} P.R., {Heindl} W.A., et~al., 1996, \aaps, 120, C641+
619:
620: \bibitem[{{Hasinger} \& {van der Klis}(1989)}]{Hasinger89}
621: {Hasinger} G., {van der Klis} M., 1989, \aap, 79--96
622:
623: \bibitem[{{Heger} et~al.(2007){Heger}, {Cumming}, \& {Woosley}}]{Heger07}
624: {Heger} A., {Cumming} A., {Woosley} S.E., Aug. 2007, \apj, 665, 1311
625:
626: \bibitem[{{Hoffman} et~al.(1977){Hoffman}, {Lewin}, \& {Doty}}]{Hoffman77}
627: {Hoffman} J.A., {Lewin} W.H.G., {Doty} J., 1977, \apjl, 217, L23
628:
629: \bibitem[{{Jahoda} et~al.(2006){Jahoda}, {Markwardt}, {Radeva}
630: et~al.}]{Jahoda06}
631: {Jahoda} K., {Markwardt} C.B., {Radeva} Y., et~al., 2006, \apjs, 163, 401
632:
633: \bibitem[{{Lomb}(1976)}]{Lomb76}
634: {Lomb} N.R., 1976, \apss, 39, 447
635:
636: \bibitem[{{Paczynski}(1983)}]{Paczynski83}
637: {Paczynski} B., 1983, \apj, 264, 282
638:
639: \bibitem[{{Press et al.}(1992)}]{Numerical-Recipes}
640: {Press et al.}, 1992, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing,
641: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK) and New York, 2nd edn.
642:
643: \bibitem[{{Prins} \& {van der Klis}(1997)}]{Prins97}
644: {Prins} S., {van der Klis} M., 1997, \aap, 319, 498
645:
646: \bibitem[{{Revnivtsev} et~al.(2001){Revnivtsev}, {Churazov}, {Gilfanov}, \&
647: {Sunyaev}}]{Revnivtsev01}
648: {Revnivtsev} M., {Churazov} E., {Gilfanov} M., {Sunyaev} R., 2001, \aap, 372,
649: 138
650:
651: \bibitem[{{Scargle}(1982)}]{Scargle82}
652: {Scargle} J.D., 1982, \apj, 263, 835
653:
654: \bibitem[{{Schulz}(1999)}]{Schulz99}
655: {Schulz} N.S., 1999, \apj, 511, 304
656:
657: \bibitem[{{Shih} et~al.(2005){Shih}, {Bird}, {Charles}, {Cornelisse}, \&
658: {Tiramani}}]{Shih05}
659: {Shih} I.C., {Bird} A.J., {Charles} P.A., {Cornelisse} R., {Tiramani} D., 2005,
660: \mnras, 361, 602
661:
662: \bibitem[{{Strohmayer} \& {Markwardt}(2002)}]{Strohmayer02}
663: {Strohmayer} T.E., {Markwardt} C.B., 2002, \apj, 577, 337
664:
665: \bibitem[{{van der Klis}(2006)}]{Vanderklis06}
666: {van der Klis} M., 2006, in Compact Stellar X-Ray Sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin
667: \& M. van der Klis (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), in press
668:
669: \bibitem[{{van Paradijs} et~al.(1990){van Paradijs}, {van der Klis}, {van
670: Amerongen} et~al.}]{Vanparadijs90}
671: {van Paradijs} J., {van der Klis} M., {van Amerongen} S., et~al., 1990, \aap,
672: 234, 181
673:
674: \bibitem[{{Wijnands} et~al.(1997){Wijnands}, {van der Klis}, {van Paradijs}
675: et~al.}]{Wijnands97}
676: {Wijnands} R.A.D., {van der Klis} M., {van Paradijs} J., et~al., 1997, \apjl,
677: 479, L141+
678:
679: \bibitem[{{Yu} \& {van der Klis}(2002)}]{Yu02}
680: {Yu} W., {van der Klis} M., 2002, \apjl, 567, L67
681:
682: \bibitem[{{Zhang} et~al.(1997){Zhang}, {Lapidus}, {Swank}, {White}, \&
683: {Titarchuk}}]{Zhang97}
684: {Zhang} W., {Lapidus} I., {Swank} J.H., {White} N.E., {Titarchuk} L., 1997,
685: \iaucirc, 6541, 1
686:
687: \end{thebibliography}
688:
689:
690: \end{document}
691:
692:
693:
694:
695: