1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2:
3: \newcommand{\ntwo}{N$_{2}$H$^{+}$}
4: \newcommand{\ntwoi}{N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1$_{01}$--0$_{12}$}
5: \newcommand{\hcop}{HCO$^{+}$}
6: \newcommand{\meth}{CH$_{3}$OH}
7: \newcommand{\cs}{C$^{34}$S}
8: \newcommand{\htcop}{H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$}
9: \newcommand{\hcn}{H$^{13}$CN}
10: \newcommand{\iras}{IRAS~23033}
11: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_{\odot}$}
12: \newcommand{\um}{$\mu$m}
13: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}$}
14: \newcommand{\sig}{$\sigma$}
15: \newcommand{\cmt}{cm$^{-3}$}
16: \newcommand{\cmtwo}{cm$^{-2}$}
17: \newcommand{\gcmt}{g~cm$^{-3}$}
18: \newcommand{\gcmtwo}{g~cm$^{-2}$}
19: \newcommand{\mjb}{mJy~beam$^{-1}$}
20: \newcommand{\mjbkms}{mJy~beam$^{-1}$~km~s$^{-1}$}
21:
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \title{Deconstructing the High-Mass Star-Forming Region IRAS 23033+5951}
26:
27: \author{Michael A. Reid}
28: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Submillimeter Array
29: Project, 645 North A'ohoku Pl., Hilo, HI, 96720, USA}
30:
31: \author{Brenda C. Matthews}
32: \affil{Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, National Research Council of
33: Canada, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada}
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36:
37: We report interferometric observations of the high-mass
38: star-forming object IRAS 23033+5951. Our observations reveal two massive
39: molecular cloud cores, designated IRAS 23033+5951-MMS1 and IRAS
40: 23033+5951-MMS2. MMS1 has already formed a massive protostar
41: and MMS2 appears to be on the verge of doing so. The latter
42: core may be an example of a massive analogue to a ``Class 0'' star-forming
43: object. The more evolved core shows some evidence of \ntwo\ destruction
44: near the protostar, consistent with similar findings in low-mass
45: star-forming objects. In addition to the already-known prominent \hcop\
46: outflow, our SiO 2--1, and \meth\ 2--1 maps show evidence for two more
47: candidate outflows, both presumably less powerful than the main one.
48: Both cores are embedded in an elongated feature whose major axis is
49: oriented almost exactly perpendicular to the axis of the most prominent
50: outflow in the region. Although it has many of the characteristics of a
51: disk, the 87,000~AU (0.42~pc) diameter of this structure suggests that
52: it is more likely to be the flattened, rotating remnant of the natal
53: molecular cloud fragment from which the star-forming cores condensed. We
54: conclude that IRAS
55: 23033+5951 is an excellent example of massive star formation proceeding in
56: relative isolation, perhaps by the method of monolithic collapse and disk
57: accretion.
58:
59: \end{abstract}
60:
61: \keywords{stars: formation --- ISM: individual (IRAS 23033+5951) --- ISM:
62: molecules --- ISM: kinematics and dynamics}
63:
64: \section{Introduction}
65:
66: Two theories of massive star formation dominate the literature
67: (see \citealt{mo07} for a recent comprehensive review).
68: According to the first, massive stars form by the gravitational collapse
69: of molecular cloud cores, which have masses of tens to hundreds of solar
70: masses. The molecular cloud cores are themselves produced by the
71: fragmentation of molecular cloud clumps, which have masses of hundreds to
72: thousands of solar masses. In this ``monolithic collapse'' model, massive
73: cores are envisioned to collapse to form single massive stars or small
74: multiple systems via a process schematically similar to that which forms
75: low-mass stars \citep{mt03,kmk05,k06}. The other prominent theory of
76: massive star formation, known as competitive accretion, holds that all
77: stars begin as low-mass protostars which then compete to accrete some
78: fraction of the mass of their parent molecular cloud clump, sometimes
79: coalescing in the process \citep{bbz98,b01a,b01b,bvb04}. In the
80: competitive accretion scenario, massive stars are simply those which
81: accrete most successfully. It is hard to imagine that competitive
82: accretion does not occur at some level in all clustered star-forming
83: regions. However, recent theoretical work suggests it is not the dominant
84: mode by which massive stars form \citep{kmk05}. Direct evidence capable
85: of distinguishing these modes of star formation remains elusive. To prove
86: that massive stars can form by the collapse of individual molecular cloud
87: cores would require several conditions to be verified by direct
88: observation: (a) a massive protostar forming inside a well-defined
89: molecular cloud core, (b) an infall signature in that molecular cloud core
90: which is consistent with a high rate of protostellar accretion, (c) a
91: massive circumstellar disk (whose properties are not yet well
92: constrained), and (d) a collimated outflow with a high entrained mass.
93:
94: Relatively few massive star-forming objects with most or all of
95: these characteristics have been identified. Perhaps the best example is
96: IRAS~20216+4104 \citep{ces97,ces99}, for which there is strong evidence of
97: a collapsing Keplerian disk around a massive protostar. Other examples,
98: such as Cepheus~A~HW2 \citep{patel05}, are hotly disputed. The
99: principal obstacle in the study of massive protostellar systems is lack of
100: spatial resolution. Because massive protostars typically lie several
101: kiloparsecs or more from the Sun, it is extremely challenging to spatially
102: resolve their accretion disks, even with modern millimeter and
103: submillimeter interferometers. Our inadequate understanding of the
104: chemistry of massive protostellar systems poses another significant
105: challenge, making it difficult to select appropriate molecular transitions
106: with which to study the kinematics of such systems.
107:
108:
109: IRAS 23033+5951 (\iras\ hereafter) is an active star-forming
110: region lying at a distance of 3.5~kpc in the Cepheus star-forming complex.
111: Evidence of ongoing massive star formation has been detected in the form
112: of compact radio continuum emission \citep{srid02,beu02b}, maser emission
113: \citep{beu02b}, and two discrete dust continuum sources at 1.2~mm
114: \citep{beu02}. However, in contrast to many high-mass star-forming
115: regions, relatively few discrete sources have been detected and there is
116: evidence for only one substantial outflow \citep{beu02c,mz03}. Thus,
117: \iras\ provides an attractive opportunity to study massive star formation
118: in a relatively quiescent, morphologically simple environment in which the
119: usual complicating factors---crowding, abundant contamination from radio
120: continuum emission, lack of spatial resolution---are mitigated.
121:
122: Our goal in studying \iras\ was to characterize its kinematics and
123: determine whether it is a candidate example of a massive star-forming by
124: monolithic collapse, as suggested by its simple morphology and known
125: kinematics. We observed \iras\ in several molecular transitions using the
126: Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland Association (BIMA) array. Each spectral line
127: was selected to probe a particular kinematic aspect of \iras\, including
128: outflows, rotation, infall, and turbulence. In \S\ref{sec:obs}, we
129: discuss the observations and the data reduction procedure. In
130: \S\ref{sec:morph}, we discuss the general morphology and evolutionary
131: state of \iras, as determined from both the continuum and molecular line
132: observations. In \S\ref{sec:spec}, we concentrate on the kinematic
133: results derived from the spectral line observations. Our results are
134: summarized in \S\ref{sec:summary}.
135:
136:
137: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
138: \label{sec:obs}
139:
140: \begin{deluxetable*}{llcccc}
141: \tablecaption{Molecular Lines Observed\label{tab:tunings}}
142: \tablewidth{0pt}
143: \tablehead{\colhead{Frequency} & \colhead{Molecular} & \colhead{Array} & \colhead{k$\lambda$} & \colhead{Velocity Res.} & \colhead{rms/channel}\\ \colhead{(GHz)} & \colhead{Line} & \colhead{Configurations} & \colhead{Range} & \colhead{(\kms)} & \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} }
144: \startdata
145: 86.243440 & SiO 2--1 & B, C & 2--69 & 0.337 & 0.13 \\
146: 86.340167 & \hcn\ 1--0 & B, C, D & 2--68 & 0.085 & 0.21\\
147: 86.754330 & \htcop\ 1--0 & B, C & 2--69 & 0.337 & 0.13 \\
148: 89.188526 & \hcop\ 1--0 & C, D & 2--25 & 0.041 & 0.75 \\
149: 93.173777 & \ntwo\ 1--0 & B, C & 2--74 & 0.079 & 0.079\\
150: 96.412961 & \cs\ 2--1 & B, C & 2--74 & 1.21 & 0.058 \\
151: 96.741377 & \meth\ 2--1 & B, C & 2--74 & 0.302 & 0.12\\
152: \enddata
153: \end{deluxetable*}
154:
155: Observations were made over 8 nights between 2003 October and 2004
156: May using the BIMA interferometer in Hat Creek, CA. All of the
157: observations were made using single pointings toward the position $\alpha
158: = 23^{\rm h}05^{\rm m}25\fs7$, $\delta = +60\degr08\arcmin08\arcsec$
159: (J2000). Tracks were obtained in the B, C, and D configurations of the
160: array and included tunings at 86, 89, and 93~GHz. Not all of the spectral
161: lines were observed with the same velocity resolution during every track.
162: Table~\ref{tab:tunings} provides a complete summary of the lines observed,
163: array configurations used, and the spectral line velocity resolutions used
164: in most of our analysis.
165:
166: The data were flagged, calibrated, CLEANed and analyzed using the
167: MIRIAD software package \citep{miriad}. Observations of the nearby
168: quasars 0102+584 and 2203+317 were made every 30 minutes during the
169: observations and were used to correct instrumental and atmospheric phase
170: and amplitude variations in the data. Absolute flux calibration was
171: performed using observations of Uranus taken during each track. Based on
172: the variations in the flux of the quasar from one epoch to the next, we
173: estimate the accuracy of our flux calibration to be approximately 30\%.
174: In order to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio of the data, we typically
175: used natural weighting of the visibilities in generating our images. Where
176: the analysis required higher spatial resolution than that provided by
177: natural weighting, some of the data were processed using a MIRIAD
178: ``robust'' parameter of 0.5, at the cost of a lower signal-to-noise ratio.
179:
180: Our 3~mm continuum map was produced by combining continuum data
181: from all of the different tunings around 3~mm. The resulting CLEANed,
182: naturally weighted image has a beam size of 5\farcs5$\times$4\farcs8 and
183: an rms sensitivity of 2.9~\mjb.
184:
185: \section{Morphology: Multiple Massive Cores}
186: \label{sec:morph}
187:
188: The initial millimeter continuum observations of \iras\ with the
189: IRAM 30~m telescope showed a singly peaked structure \citep{beu02}.
190: Subsequent BIMA array observations of the source at 2.6~mm showed two
191: continuum peaks \citep{beu02b}. Our BIMA array 3~mm continuum image,
192: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:contmodel}, reveals \iras\ to be composed of at
193: least three continuum peaks joined by contiguous emission, plus a weak
194: fourth peak visible to the east at the 3~\sig\ level. We designate these
195: three millimeter continuum peaks as IRAS~23033+5951-MMS1,
196: IRAS~23033+5951-MMS2, and IRAS~23033+5951-MMS3 (hereafter, MMS1, MMS2, and
197: MMS3) as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:contmodel}. We used a simple model to
198: determine the fraction of the continuum emission which is associated with
199: each of the continuum peaks. The model, which is shown in the middle
200: panel of Figure~\ref{fig:contmodel}, fits the two bright peaks (MMS1 and
201: MMS2) with an elliptical Gaussian and the third contiguous peak (MMS3)
202: with a point source. After model subtraction, the residuals in the region
203: of the three main peaks are below 2~\sig, as shown in the right panel of
204: Figure~\ref{fig:contmodel}.
205:
206: To compute the total masses of each of these continuum sources,
207: we follow the prescription of \citet{h83}:
208: \begin{equation}
209: \label{eq:fluxtomass}
210: {\rm M} =
211: \frac{S_{\rm int}d^{2}}{\kappa B_{\lambda}({\rm T}_{\rm dust})}~~,
212: \end{equation}
213: \noindent where M, d, $S_{\rm int}$, $\kappa$, ${\rm T}_{\rm dust}$ are
214: the
215: mass, distance,
216: integrated flux, dust opacity per unit mass column density, and dust
217: temperature of the source, respectively. $B_{\lambda}({\rm T}_{\rm
218: dust})$ is the Planck function at wavelength $\lambda$ and temperature ${\rm T}_{\rm dust}$. We assume ${\rm T}_{\rm dust}=30$~K, $d=3.5$~kpc
219: \citep{harju}, a dust emissivity index of
220: $\beta =1.5$,
221: $\kappa = 0.1(250.0~\mu{\rm m}/\lambda)^{\beta}$~g$^{-1}$~cm$^{2}$
222: \citep{h83}, and a gas-to-dust mass ratio of 100. Under these
223: assumptions, we derive total masses of 225~\msun\ for MMS1, 205~\msun\ for
224: MMS2, and 51~\msun\ for MMS3.
225:
226: \citet{wil04} observed \iras\ using the JCMT and measured 850~\um\
227: and 450~\um\ integrated fluxes of 10.4$\pm$0.2~Jy and 48.6$\pm$2.6~Jy,
228: respectively, for a region encompassing MMS1, MMS2, and MMS3. Using these
229: fluxes and assuming $\beta = 0.9$ and T$_{\rm dust}$ = 52~K, \citet{wil04}
230: compute masses of 237~\msun\ at 850~\um\ and 106~\msun\ at 450~\um\ for
231: the \iras\ complex. Similarly, using single-dish measurements at 1.2~mm,
232: \citet{beu02} derived a mass of 2327~\msun\ for \iras, assuming $\beta =2$
233: and T$_{\rm dust}$ = 52~K. The differences between the calculated masses
234: are caused by three factors: the differences in the measured fluxes, the
235: differences in the assumed dust opacities, and the differences in the
236: assumed dust temperatures. Our interferometric maps filter out much of
237: the flux visible in the single-dish maps. Because our measurements were
238: taken at a different wavelength than any of the single-dish measurements,
239: the computation of the exact amount of flux filtered out by the
240: interferometer is dependent on the assumed dust opacity and temperature.
241:
242: \begin{figure*}
243: \begin{center}
244: \includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth,angle=270]{f1.eps}
245: \caption{Continuum emission at 3~mm (\emph{left}), a model of the
246: continuum emission consisting of 2 elliptical gaussians and a point source
247: (\emph{middle}), and the residuals obtained after subtracting the model
248: from the data (\emph{right}). The contours start at 3$\sigma$ in the two
249: left panels and 2$\sigma$ in the right panel; the interval between
250: contours is 1$\sigma$ in all three panels, where $\sigma = 2.9$~\mjb.
251: The
252: ellipse in the lower right of the left panel shows
253: the size and orientation of the synthesized beam.
254: The star, triangle, and cross with error ellipse
255: indicate the positions of the MSX source, H$_{2}$O
256: maser \citep{beu02b}, and IRAS point source,
257: respectively. \label{fig:contmodel}}
258: \end{center} \end{figure*}
259:
260:
261: If we adopt the same flux-to-mass conversion prescription as
262: \citet{wil04} (namely, assuming T$_{\rm dust}$ = 52~K and using the
263: \citet{oss94} dust opacities extrapolated to 3.3~mm) we calculate masses
264: of 131~\msun, 120~\msun, and 29.5~\msun for MMS1, MMS2, and MMS3,
265: respectively. We note, however, that the \citet{oss94} opacities were not
266: originally tabulated for wavelengths as long as 3.3~mm, nor were they
267: specifically meant to apply to massive star-forming regions. Similarly,
268: if we use the prescription of \citet{beu02} for converting integrated flux
269: to mass, we find masses of 459~\msun, 419~\msun, and 103~\msun\ for MMS1,
270: MMS2, and MMS3, respectively. Clearly the mass uncertainties are quite
271: large. Nevertheless, even allowing for generous uncertainties in the
272: flux-to-mass conversion and in the star formation efficiency, at least
273: MMS1 and MMS2 appear to have enough mass to each form one or more massive
274: stars.
275:
276: Gravitationally bound cores capable of forming massive stars
277: typically have very high densities, $n \geq 10^5$~\cmt, and tend to have
278: virial ratios, $\alpha_{\rm vir} = M_{\rm vir}/M$, close to unity
279: \citep{p97,mt03}. Do either of the spatially resolved cores in \iras\
280: meet these criteria? We can compute the mean densities of the two
281: brightest cores using their total masses (assumed to be
282: 225~\msun\ for MMS1 and 205~\msun\ for MMS2, as computed above) and their
283: mean radii, defined as half of the mean of their major and minor axes, as
284: determined from the fits shown in Fig~\ref{fig:contmodel}. These mean
285: radii are $0.14\pm0.02$~pc for MMS1 and $0.15\pm0.03$~pc for MMS2. In
286: this way, we compute mean gas densities of ($3\pm1$)~$\times~10^6$~\cmt\
287: and ($2\pm1$)~$\times~10^6$~\cmt, for MMS1 and MMS2, respectively. Such
288: high gas densities again qualify both cores as potential sites of massive
289: star formation.
290:
291: Figure~\ref{fig:disklines} shows integrated intensity maps of
292: \iras\ in four molecular lines which principally trace dense gas: \ntwo\
293: 1--0, \htcop\ 1--0, \hcn\ 1--0, and \cs\ 2--1. These four dense gas
294: tracers peak at different locations. The best column density tracers
295: should be \ntwo\ 1--0 and dust, because both of these should be optically
296: thin and relatively (although perhaps not entirely) unaffected by the
297: complex carbon chemistry which can change the abundances of \htcop\ and
298: \hcn\. There is no indication in the \ntwoi\ line shape that this
299: transition is optically thick. Indeed, comparison of
300: Figure~\ref{fig:contmodel} and Figure~\ref{fig:disklines} shows that the
301: spatial distribution of \ntwo\ is very similar to the distribution of
302: dust. The peak positions of \ntwo\ and dust are separated by less than a
303: beam width in both MMS1 and MMS2 (see also Fig.~\ref{fig:peaks}). Hence,
304: we conclude that, as expected, \ntwo\ 1--0 and dust both trace the densest
305: gas in the region. We can therefore use the \ntwoi\ line widths and the
306: masses determined from the continuum emission to compute the virial ratios
307: for MMS1 and MMS2. We derive the \ntwo\ line widths from the isolated
308: (i.e. non-blended) hyperfine component of the \ntwo\ line. The \ntwoi\
309: line widths (full-width, half-power) in MMS1 and MMS2 are $2.5\pm0.3$ and
310: $2.4\pm0.2$ \kms, respectively. If we approximate the cores as spheres
311: with uniform densities equal to the mean densities stated above and assume
312: that the shape of the \ntwoi\ line is approximately Gaussian, then the
313: virial masses of the cores are given by
314:
315: \begin{equation}
316: M_{\rm vir} = \frac{5R(\Delta v)^{2}}{8{\rm G}\ln{2}}~~,
317: \label{eq:mvir}
318: \end{equation}
319:
320: \noindent where $R$ is the radius of the core and $\Delta v$ is the
321: observed \ntwo\ line width. By this prescription, the virial masses of
322: MMS1 and MMS2 are 178 and 184 \msun\ respectively. Hence, their virial
323: ratios are 0.79 and 0.90. The virial parameter can be interpreted as a
324: measure of a cloud's degree of gravitational binding, with values less
325: than 1 indicating a gravitationally bound cloud. Therefore, subject to
326: the uncertainties in determining both the virial and dust continuum masses
327: of the \iras\ cores, we conclude that they are both gravitationally bound.
328: This interpretation is consistent with the fact that MMS1 is clearly
329: forming at least one star. It also suggests that MMS2 might already be
330: forming a star, or may eventually do so.
331:
332: \begin{figure*}
333: \begin{center}
334: \includegraphics[angle=270]{f2.eps}
335: \caption{Integrated intensity of four lines in \iras. Counter-clockwise
336: from the top left panel, the lines are: \ntwo, \htcop, \cs, and \hcn. The
337: contours start at 3\sig\ in all panels
338: and increase by steps of 4, 1, 1, and 1\sig, respectively. The \ntwo\
339: intensity was integrated over all seven hyperfine components of the
340: line. The sizes and
341: orientations of the four beams are indicated by the ellipses in the lower
342: right corners of each panel. White crosses indicate the positions of the
343: 3~mm continuum peaks from Fig.~\ref{fig:contmodel}. The 1~\sig\ rms in
344: the panels are, from left to right, 290~\mjbkms, 210~\mjbkms, 150~\mjbkms,
345: and 320~\mjbkms.
346: \label{fig:disklines}}
347: \end{center}
348: \end{figure*}
349:
350: \begin{figure}
351: \includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth,angle=270]{f3_bw.eps}
352: \caption{Molecular line emission peaks (\emph{symbols}) overlaid on the
353: 3~mm continuum map (\emph{greyscale and contours}). The meaning of each
354: symbol is indicated in the legend. For simplicity, the
355: positional error bars are not shown; they are typically
356: $\pm$1--2\arcsec\ in each coordinate. The thin white contours underlying
357: the MSX point source are the VLA 3.6~cm radio continuum contours from
358: \citet{beu02b}, which have 0.7\arcsec\ resolution. The coincidence
359: of the continuum and \ntwo peaks in MMS2 suggests it is cold,
360: and may be a pre-stellar massive star-forming core.
361: The open ellipse in the lower left corner shows
362: the size and orientation of the synthesized beam of the 3~mm continuum
363: data.
364: \label{fig:peaks}}
365: \end{figure}
366:
367:
368:
369: Based on C$^{18}$O observations, \citet{on96} derived a mean
370: virial parameter of $\sim$0.6 for star-forming molecular cloud cores in
371: Taurus. Similarly, \citet{tach} derive a mean virial ratio of 0.9 for
372: C$^{18}$O cores in $\rho$~Oph, with smaller ratios being associated with
373: more actively star-forming cores. The C$^{18}$O cores in Taurus and
374: $\rho$~Oph have typical masses in the tens of solar masses and radii of
375: $\sim$0.2~pc. Despite the fact that these cores may have sufficient mass
376: to form high-mass stars, the evidence from their environments is that they
377: will instead form clusters of low-mass stars. The principal
378: distinguishing factor between the higher-mass cores in $\rho$~Oph and
379: those in \iras\ seems to be that the \iras\ cores have much higher surface
380: densities: $N_{\rm H_{2}} \sim 10^{21.5}$~\cmtwo\ in $\rho$~Oph
381: \citep{tach} vs. $N_{\rm H_{2}} \sim 10^{24}$~\cmtwo\ in \iras. The high
382: surface densities of the \iras\ cores are typical of those found in the
383: massive star-forming clumps surveyed in CS and C$^{34}$S by \citet{p97}.
384: Thus, very dense gas seems to be key requirement for the formation of a
385: massive star, as predicted by both the monolithic collapse and competitive
386: accretion scenarios.
387:
388: \subsection{Chemical Signatures of Evolutionary States}
389: \label{sec:chemistry}
390:
391: The rapid evolution of the physical conditions in massive
392: star-forming objects drives substantial chemical evolution in these
393: objects. The time evolution of the abundances of particular
394: molecules has not yet been well established for massive cores, but we can
395: take some cues from the chemical studies of low-mass star-forming cores.
396: In particular, we note that numerous studies have shown that, as a
397: collapsing low-mass core heats up, CO desorption from grain mantles causes
398: substantial destruction of \ntwo. The destruction of \ntwo\ lowers the
399: \ntwo\ abundance near the center of the core (e.g.
400: \citealt{lee04,dif04,ber02}). This drop in the \ntwo\ abundance has been
401: observed in the centres of several low-mass cores, such as L483
402: \citep{jor04} and Barnard 1c \citep{mat06}. \citet{pir07} have shown
403: that, in massive star-forming objects containing IRAS point sources, there
404: is a measurable decrease in the \ntwo\ abundance toward the column density
405: peaks, again likely indicative of \ntwo\ destruction in these evolved
406: sources.
407:
408: Although the sequence of chemical processes at work in high-mass
409: star formation likely differs from that in low-mass star formation, the
410: destruction of \ntwo\ by CO is likely to occur in both instances. In
411: \iras, the displacement between the dust and \ntwo\ emission peaks in
412: MMS1, although small, suggests that the destruction of \ntwo\ near the
413: massive protostar in MMS1 may already be underway.
414: Figure~\ref{fig:peaks}
415: shows our 3~mm continuum image overlaid with the peak positions of five of
416: the molecular species we observed, as well as the positions of the
417: H$_{2}$O maser (taken from Table~2 of \citealt{beu02b}), the MSX point
418: source, and contours of 3.6~cm VLA radio continuum
419: emission\footnote{The position of the MSX point source was taken from the
420: MSX point source catalog \citep{msxcat}. The 3.6~cm radio continuum data
421: were provided by H. Beuther.}. The coincidence of the radio continuum and
422: MSX emission with the dust peak in MMS1 suggests that a massive protostar
423: is forming there. The displacement between the dust and \ntwo\ peaks
424: suggests that heating by the massive protostar may have caused the
425: desorption of CO from dust grain mantles and the subsequent destruction of
426: \ntwo\ near the MMS1 peak. We emphasize, however, that the displacement
427: between the \ntwo\ and dust peaks in MMS1 is less than a beam width, and
428: may not be significant. It is merely suggestive of chemical evolution in
429: MMS1.
430:
431: Similarly, we can interpret the close correspondence of the dust
432: and \ntwo\ peaks in MMS2 as evidence that it is cold, chemically
433: unevolved, and presumably therefore also very young. Its mass and
434: apparent lack of chemical evolution suggests that MMS2 is a good candidate
435: pre-stellar massive star-forming object.
436:
437: Our interpretation of MMS1 as chemically and dynamically more
438: evolved than MMS2 is supported by the virial ratios of the two cores:
439: lower in MMS1, indicating more gravitational binding, and higher in MMS2,
440: indicating less binding and therefore perhaps an earlier evolutionary
441: state (see \S~\ref{sec:morph}).
442:
443: \section{Spectral Line Results: Kinematics}
444: \label{sec:spec}
445:
446: \subsection{Outflows}
447:
448: Several previous studies have demonstrated the presence of at least one
449: outflow in \iras. \citet{mz03} mapped the region in CO 3--2 using the
450: 10~m Heinrich Hertz Telescope telescope and found overlapping red- and
451: blue-shifted outflow lobes emanating from a point not precisely coincident
452: with the IRAS point source. Using BIMA array CO 2--1 observations,
453: \citet{b04} estimated the mass entrained in this outflow to be 119~\msun.
454: Among the lines we observed, three are known outflow tracers: \hcop\ 1--0,
455: \meth\ 2--1, and SiO 2--1. These three lines give strikingly different
456: pictures of the outflow activity in the \iras\ region.
457:
458: \subsubsection{\hcop and SiO}
459: \label{sec:hcopsio}
460:
461: Figure~\ref{fig:hcop_outflow} shows contours of red- and
462: blue-shifted \hcop\ from our BIMA array observations superimposed on the
463: 3~mm continuum map. This outflow clearly corresponds to the one seen by
464: previous authors \citep{mz03,b04}. The \hcop\ outflow is difficult to
465: image because there is a significant background of \hcop\ associated with
466: the underlying molecular cloud core, a source of confusion possibly
467: amplified by the limited spatial resolution of our \hcop\ observations.
468: In constructing Figure~\ref{fig:hcop_outflow}, we chose to display
469: emission originating only in those velocity ranges which best highlight
470: the outflow emission. Curiously, the SiO 2--1 emission in the region does
471: not appear to trace the same outflow as seen in \hcop, or at least not the
472: same part of it. Figure~\ref{fig:sio_outflow} shows the integrated
473: intensity of SiO 2--1 over two velocity ranges: one centered at the
474: systematic velocity and the other exactly matching that used to highlight
475: the red lobe of the \hcop\ outflow in Figure~\ref{fig:hcop_outflow}. We
476: did not detect any SiO 2--1 emission at the 3\sig\ level over the range of
477: velocities which define the blue lobe of the \hcop\ outflow. The only
478: suggestion of an association between the \hcop\ outflow and the SiO
479: emission is that they are both extended and collinear. However, the
480: velocity structures of the emission in the two molecules preclude their
481: interpretation as parts of the same outflow. A more likely scenario is
482: that the SiO peak at the systematic velocity is associated with hot and/or
483: shocked gas in the immediate vicinity of the massive protostar.
484: Figure~\ref{fig:sio_outflow} shows that the SiO emission peak at the
485: systematic velocity is spatially coincident with the H$_{2}$O maser
486: identified by \citet{beu02b}. The two red-shifted SiO emission peaks to
487: the northwest are harder to explain. These peaks may represent the red
488: lobe of a separate outflow from the one delineated by the \hcop\ emission,
489: or they may be entirely unrelated to outflow activity. If these SiO
490: emission peaks are
491: unrelated to outflow emission--if, say, they were associated with other
492: protostars--it is difficult to explain why they do not appear in other
493: tracers. If the SiO peaks are associated with outflow activity, we expect
494: that this outflow would be either weaker or chemically very different from
495: the prominent outflow seen clearly in \hcop.
496:
497: \begin{figure}
498: \begin{center}
499: \includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth,angle=270]{f4.eps}
500: \caption{Integrated intensity of high-velocity \hcop\ 1--0 emission
501: plotted over
502: continuum emission (\emph{greyscale and thin solid contours}). The blue
503: outflow lobe (\emph{dotted contours}) is integrated over the velocity
504: range $-61.2$ to $-63.3$ \kms\ and the red lobe (\emph{thick solid
505: contours})
506: is integrated over the range $-44.8$ to $-46.9$ \kms. Contours begin at
507: 6~\sig\ for the red lobe and 4~\sig\ for the blue lobe, where \sig\ =
508: 108~\mjbkms, and increase by steps of 1~\sig. The ellipse in the
509: lower right shows the size and orientation of the \hcop\ beam. The
510: blue-lobe \hcop\ emission prominently overlaps MMS1, though their peaks do
511: not coincide. The overlap of the red and blue
512: lobes is probably an indication that the outflow is strongly inclined to
513: the plane
514: of the sky. \label{fig:hcop_outflow}}
515: \end{center}
516: \end{figure}
517:
518: \begin{figure}
519: \begin{center}
520: \includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth,angle=270]{f5.eps}
521: \caption{Integrated intensity of SiO~2--1 plotted over 3~mm continuum
522: emission. The thick grey contours show the intensity of SiO 2--1
523: integrated over the same velocity range as the red lobe of the \hcop\ 1--0
524: outflow, namely $-44.8$ to $-46.9$ \kms\ (see
525: Fig.~\ref{fig:hcop_outflow}).
526: The black contours show the intensity of SiO 2--1 around the
527: systematic velocity, integrated from $-51$ to $-55$ \kms. No SiO emission
528: was detected over the velocity range corresponding to the blue lobe of
529: the \hcop\ outflow. The thin grey contours and grey scale represent the
530: continuum as in Fig.~\ref{fig:hcop_outflow}. All contours start at 3\sig\ and increase by
531: steps of 1\sig, where \sig\ = 120~\mjbkms\ for the red lobe and \sig\ =
532: 150~\mjbkms\ for the emission integrated around the systematic velocity.
533: The
534: white triangle indicates the
535: position of the water
536: maser, which is coincident with the local peak of the SiO emission. The
537: ellipse at the lower right
538: shows the size and orientation of the SiO beam. \label{fig:sio_outflow}}
539: \end{center}
540: \end{figure}
541:
542:
543: The identity of the driving source of the \hcop\ outflow is not
544: clear. There is no candidate protostellar source at the point where the
545: two outflow lobes overlap. The driving source is probably the MSX point
546: source, which is spatially coincident with the peak of MMS1 and the 3.6~cm
547: continuum emission. This source is presumably the principal massive
548: protostar in the region. Less clear, however, is whether the H$_{2}$O
549: maser and SiO emission are also associated with this massive protostar, or
550: whether they trace another source entirely. Just as the MSX source aligns
551: neatly with the continuum peak of MMS1, the H$_{2}$O maser aligns neatly
552: with the peak of the systematic-velocity SiO emission. Neither pair of
553: features coincides with the other. Hence, we speculate that there may be
554: two massive protostars within the MMS1 core, one situated at the
555: millimeter continuum peak and one displaced a few arcseconds to the south.
556:
557: There is no unambiguous evidence of an outflow emanating from
558: MMS2. The \hcop\ spectrum at the peak of MMS2 does show significant line
559: wings (see Fig.~\ref{fig:infall_spectra}), but these could be caused by
560: 'spill-over' from the \hcop\ outflow emanating from the vicinity of MMS1.
561: As can be seen in Figure~\ref{fig:hcop_outflow}, some of the \hcop\
562: emission which appears to be associated with the MMS1 outflow also
563: overlaps MMS2. There is some evidence in the \hcop\ data
564: cube of a second \hcop\ outflow in the region, but the spatial resolution
565: of the data make it difficult to associate it conclusively with either
566: MMS1 or MMS2. To determine conclusively whether there is an outflow
567: emanating from MMS2, we would require data with higher spatial resolution
568: and preferably in a transition which traces outflows more selectively
569: than does \hcop.
570:
571: \subsubsection{\meth}
572:
573: As in many other high-mass star-forming regions, the \meth\ 2--1 emission
574: in \iras\ is very complex. Figure~\ref{fig:meth_outflow} shows the total
575: integrated intensity of \meth\ in \iras. The \meth\ emission in \iras\ is
576: distributed widely in velocity and, in general, does not correlate neatly
577: in either velocity or position with other outflow features. The exception
578: is the elongated feature labeled `1' in Figure~\ref{fig:meth_outflow},
579: which is coincident both spatially and in velocity with the SiO peaks
580: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:sio_outflow}. A prominent bar of \meth\ emission
581: overlaps most, but not all, of the continuum-emitting region. The
582: emission peak of the \meth\ bar does not coincide with either continuum
583: peak.
584:
585:
586:
587: \begin{figure} \begin{center}
588: \includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth,angle=270]{f6.eps}
589: \caption{Integrated intensity of \meth\ 2--1 from -40.4 to -67.7 \kms,
590: plotted over 3~mm continuum emission. The black contours show the
591: intensity of \meth\ 2--1 integrated over the two brightest components of
592: the line, starting from 3\sig\ and increasing by increments of 2\sig,
593: where \sig\ = 355 \mjbkms.
594: The thin grey contours and greyscale represent the continuum as in
595: Fig.~\ref{fig:contmodel}. The size and orientation of the \meth\
596: synthesized beam are indicated by the ellipse in the lower right. The
597: features labeled in the diagram are (1) a possible \meth\ counterpart to
598: the SiO outflow, (2) a possible second outflow seen only in \meth, and
599: (3) a conical structure which may represent the edges of a conical cavity
600: carved out by a third outflow. Both of the outflows suggested by
601: features (2) and (3) appear to lie approximately in the plane of the
602: sky.\label{fig:meth_outflow}} \end{center} \end{figure}
603:
604:
605:
606: Although the \meth\ emission does not correlate well with the \hcop\
607: outflow, it can be interpreted as tracing several other possible outflows
608: in the region. For example, the dashed line labeled `2' in
609: Figure~\ref{fig:meth_outflow} connects the \meth\ peak at the eastern edge
610: of the image through a ridge of \meth\ emission to a second \meth\ peak
611: near the western edge of the image. In velocity, the \meth\ peaks at the
612: two extremes of line `2' are separated by only a few \kms\, but their
613: alignment suggests they may be part of an outflow lying nearly in the
614: plane of the sky. The lack of detected continuum emission at the position
615: of either \meth\ peak supports this interpretation. The driving source of
616: this possible outflow is not evident.
617:
618: The most prominent \meth\ emission feature is the large parabolic
619: structure, labeled `3', which dominates the southern half of the image.
620: This feature has no counterpart in any other tracer we observed. Its
621: velocity structure suggests it may be the conical cavity of an outflow
622: lying approximately in the plane of the sky. Again, the source of this
623: possible outflow is not evident, although the alignment of the feature is
624: consistent with a driving source within the MMS2 core. If the driving
625: source did lie within MMS2, the second outflow lobe could be confused with
626: the elongated bar of emission at the systematic velocity traced by the
627: continuum emission and in several of the lines.
628:
629: \subsection{A ``Flattened Rotating Object''}
630:
631: Four of the molecular transitions we observed have high critical
632: densities and are known to trace dense star-forming gas. These are the
633: transitions for which integrated intensity maps are shown in
634: Figure~\ref{fig:disklines}. All four transitions trace similar structures
635: in \iras: roughly elliptical distributions with long axes running from
636: northwest to southeast, encompassing regions of high column density as
637: traced by continuum emission (see Fig.~\ref{fig:contmodel}) The long axis
638: of this elongated structure runs perpendicular to the axis of the
639: prominent \hcop\ outflow. A fit to the \htcop\ integrated intensity map
640: shows that the position angle of the elongated feature is
641: 35$^{\circ}\pm$5$^{\circ}$ degrees, while that of the \hcop\ outflow is
642: approximately 130$^{\circ}$, meaning that the position angles of the two
643: features differ by about 95$^{\circ}$.
644:
645: As shown in Figure~\ref{fig:peaks}, the four dense gas tracers all
646: peak at slightly different locations. As we discussed in
647: \S~\ref{sec:morph}, \ntwo\ and dust both trace the regions of highest
648: column density. Our \cs\ detection is too weak to determine the peak
649: position accurately, except to say that it appears to correspond to the
650: peak of the MMS1 core. The peak of the \hcn\ emission matches that of the
651: SiO emission and the position of the H$_{2}$O maser which, as we described
652: in \S~\ref{sec:hcopsio}, is displaced by several arcseconds from the
653: coincident dust continuum, radio continuum, and MSX peaks. Notably,
654: however, the maser and the emission peaks of \hcn\, SiO, and \cs\ all lie
655: within one beam width of the MMS1 continuum peak, implying an association
656: with MMS1.
657:
658: The remaining dense gas tracer, \htcop, shows a distribution that
659: requires some explanation. \htcop\ peaks strongly at a point equidistant
660: between the MMS1 and MMS2 continuum peaks, in a region of substantially
661: lower column density as indicated by the dust emission. The position of
662: the \htcop\ peak does not match that of any other feature in the region
663: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:peaks}). It is unlikely that this peak is associated
664: with any coherent physical structure; it is probably an artifact of
665: depletion of \htcop\ onto dust grains at the column density peaks,
666: leaving a remnant ``peak'' where depletion effects are least pronounced.
667: Although \ntwo\ 1--0 and \htcop\ 1--0 peak at different locations, their
668: kinematics clearly reveal that they trace the same contiguous structure in
669: which the MMS1 and MMS2 peaks are embedded. The axis ratio of the
670: elongated structure seen in \htcop\ is 3.1. Figure~\ref{fig:pvplot} shows
671: position-velocity slices in \ntwoi\ and \htcop\ taken along the major axis
672: of the elongated structure, at a position angle of 35$^{\circ}$. As shown
673: in the right panel of Figure~\ref{fig:pvplot}, both transitions exhibit
674: the same velocity gradient, meaning that they trace the same large-scale
675: structure. Note that the signal-to-noise ratio of the \hcn\ and \cs\ data
676: is too low to permit a meaningful analysis of their velocity structures.
677:
678: \begin{figure*}
679: \begin{center}
680: \includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth,angle=270]{f7.eps}
681: \caption{Position-velocity slices taken along the long axis of the
682: elongated structure seen in \ntwoi\ (\emph{left}) and \htcop\ 1--0
683: (\emph{center}). The position angle of the position-velocity cut is
684: 35$^{\circ}$. Contours begin at 3\sig\ and increase by intervals of
685: 1\sig\ for \ntwoi\ and 2\sig\ for \htcop. The white triangles in the
686: left and center panels show the
687: position-centroided velocities of the emission in each channel. The right
688: panel plots the two position-velocity curves on the same scale,
689: illustrating the similarity between them.\label{fig:pvplot}}
690: \end{center}
691: \end{figure*}
692:
693:
694: On large spatial scales, the elongated structure seen in
695: Figure~\ref{fig:disklines} shares many characteristics in common with a
696: stellar accretion disk. For example, its long axis lies perpendicular to
697: at least one outflow, there is a velocity gradient along its major axis,
698: and it appears only in the continuum and emission from molecules which
699: trace dense, non-outflowing gas. However, the structure also has several
700: characteristics which preclude its interpretation as an accretion disk,
701: the first of which is its size. The major axis of the \htcop\ emission
702: over which there is a clear velocity gradient spans approximately
703: 25\arcsec, or about 87,000~AU at 3.5~kpc. By comparison, protostellar
704: accretion disks around low-mass stars typically have radii in the range
705: 50--500~AU \citep{dut96,kit02}. Little is known about the plausible range
706: of radii for accretion disks around massive protostars.
707: Table~\ref{tab:bigdisks} gives an (incomplete) summary of the reported
708: properties of candidate disks around massive protostars. In most cases,
709: the evidence that these objects are disks consists of three points: they
710: are elongated in either the continuum or a dense gas tracer, the axis of
711: elongation is approximately perpendicular to that of a detected outflow,
712: and there is a velocity gradient along the long axis of the object
713: observed in either molecular line or maser emission. We note, however,
714: that the range of reported physical properties of these disks is very
715: large. For example, their radii range over more than two orders of
716: magnitude. If we were to submit \iras\ as a candidate for this list based
717: on its outflow properties and the shape and kinematics of its dense gas
718: feature, it would only top out the list of an already very diverse sample.
719: We note also that, while the molecular gas distribution in \htcop\ and
720: possibly \ntwo\ could support the disk interpretation, the dust
721: distribution does not. The dust emission is better described as three
722: strong peaks whereas an accretion disk should produce a centrally peaked
723: distribution unless it had substantially fragmented.
724:
725: \begin{deluxetable*}{lcccl}
726: \tablecaption{Candidate Massive Protostellar Disks\label{tab:bigdisks}}
727: \tablewidth{0pt}
728: \tablehead{\colhead{Object} & \colhead{Distance} & \colhead{Radius} & \colhead{Disk Mass} & \colhead{Ref.} \\
729: \colhead{} & \colhead{(kpc)} & \colhead{(AU)} & \colhead{(\msun)} & \colhead{} }
730: \startdata
731: G192.16-3.82 & 2 & 130 & 3 & \citet{shep01} \\
732: Cepheus A HW2 & 0.73 & 330 & 1--8 & \citet{patel05} \\
733: Becklin-Neugebauer Object & 0.46 & 800 & \nodata & \citet{jia05} \\
734: AFGL 5142 & 1.8 & 900 & \nodata & \citet{zha02} \\
735: IRAS 18089-1732 & 3.6 & $\sim$1000 & $\sim$16 & \citet{beu05} \\
736: NGC~7538 IRS 1N & 2.8 & 1000 & \nodata & \citet{pes04} \\
737: IRAS 20126+4104 & 1.7 & 1700 & 10 & \citet{ces97,ces99} \\
738: G24.78 A1 & 7.7 & 4000 & 23 & \citet{bel04} \\
739: G24.78 A2 & 7.7 & 4000 & 23 & \citet{bel04} \\
740: G24.78 C & 7.7 & 8000 & 23 & \citet{bel04} \\
741: G31.41 & 7.9 & 8000 & 23 & \citet{bel04} \\
742: NGC~7538~S & 2.8 & 15,000 & 400 & \citet{san03} \\
743: \enddata
744: \end{deluxetable*}
745:
746: How, then, should we interpret the kinematics of \iras\ and, more
747: generally, of very large structures with rotation signatures surrounding
748: massive protostars? We suggest that the observations to date, including
749: those summarized in Table~\ref{tab:bigdisks}, are consistent with the
750: hypothesis that massive protostars may be fed by Keplerian accretion disks
751: (e.g. IRAS 20126+4104), but that these accretion disks are smoothly
752: connected to much larger, flattened, rotating structures. These
753: ``flattened rotating objects'' are likely simply the remnants of the
754: molecular cloud fragments from which the massive stars formed. Existing
755: observations, typically made with
756: single interferometer configurations, only reveal rotational motions on
757: the spatial scales visible with that interferometer configuration.
758: Confirmation of the hypothesis that these rotating structures may extend
759: from tens to thousands of AU would require multiple interferometric
760: observations of each source with different interferometer configurations.
761: Such observations exist in only a few cases. IRAS 20126+4104 is an
762: instructive example: \citet{ces99} detect apparently Keplerian rotation on
763: scales down to a few 100~AU using high-resolution CH$_{3}$CN observations
764: while \citet{zha98} detect rotation out to radii of 5,000~AU in NH$_{3}$.
765: We interpret our observations of \iras\ in a similar manner. The
766: optically thin \htcop\ line depicts a contiguous, flattened,
767: slowly-rotating structure with a radius as large as 40,000~AU.
768: \ntwo\ and dust continuum emission respectively reveal two and three
769: condensations of higher column density within this apparently contiguous
770: structure. The cores detected in \ntwo\ and dust continuum emission may
771: be fragmentation products of the original molecular cloud from which the
772: \iras\ complex formed.
773:
774:
775:
776:
777: It is also possible that the velocity gradient seen in \htcop\ and
778: \ntwo\ may simply indicate that the elongated structure is a sheared
779: filament. This hypothesis cannot be readily ruled out using the data in
780: hand.
781:
782: \subsection{Infall}
783:
784: \citet{zhou92} showed that, in a dense molecular cloud
785: core undergoing some form of inside-out collapse, optically thick lines
786: will be skewed to the blue by an amount which depends on the infall
787: velocity. The combination of a double-peaked, asymmetrically blue \hcop\
788: line whose self-absorption peak is centered at the velocity of the
789: optically thin \htcop\ line has been interpreted as an indicator of infall
790: in both low-mass \citep{gre00} and high-mass \citep{ful05} star-forming
791: cores. Figure~\ref{fig:infall_spectra} shows spectra of \hcop\ and
792: \htcop\ at the three continuum peaks seen in Figure~\ref{fig:contmodel}.
793: At the continuum peaks of both MMS1 and MMS2, the \hcop\ line appears
794: self-absorbed, indicating that it is optically thick. At the position of
795: MMS1, the line is slightly skewed to the red. We note, however, that
796: there is significant outflow contamination in the spectrum of the core at
797: this position. At the position of MMS2, the line profile is skewed to the
798: blue, suggesting it may be collapsing.
799:
800: \begin{figure}
801: \begin{center}
802: \includegraphics[width=1.3\columnwidth,angle=270]{f8.eps}
803: \caption{Spectra of \hcop\ (\emph{thick black lines}) and \htcop\
804: (\emph{thin black
805: lines}) at the positions of MMS1 (\emph{top}), MMS2 peak (\emph{middle}),
806: and MMS3
807: (\emph{bottom}). The vertical line in each plot indicates the fitted peak
808: of the \htcop\ spectrum, an indication of the systematic velocity at that
809: position.
810: \label{fig:infall_spectra}}
811: \end{center}
812: \end{figure}
813:
814:
815: Another possible interpretation of the double-peaked \hcop\ line
816: profiles is that there are two sources along the line of sight. This
817: possibility would seem to be ruled out by the fact that the optically thin
818: \htcop\ line is single-peaked throughout the region and it always peaks at
819: the velocity of the \hcop\ self-absorption feature. A third possible
820: interpretation for the double-peaked and asymmetrically blue line profiles
821: is that emission from the two cores is being blurred together in the
822: comparatively large ($\sim10$\arcsec) \hcop\ beam. To assess the
823: likelihood of this possibility, we smoothed the \htcop\ data cube so that
824: it had the same beam orientation and size as the \hcop\ beam. Even in the
825: smoothed data set, the \htcop\ line remains single-peaked at each
826: continuum peak, thereby eliminating resolution effects as a likely
827: explanation for the asymmetric line profiles. Hence, we conclude that
828: there is evidence for collapse in MMS2.
829:
830: \section{Summary}
831: \label{sec:summary}
832:
833: We used millimeter interferometry to study the structure and
834: kinematics of the massive star-forming region IRAS 23033+5951. We find
835: that the region resolves into at least three distinct cores, at least two
836: of which have sufficient mass to form one or more massive stars. There is
837: strong evidence from the spatial coincidence of strong radio continuum
838: emission, an MSX point source, and a 3~mm continuum peak that MMS1 is
839: forming a single massive star. This core also powers at least one outflow
840: seen in \hcop\ 1--0 emission and possibly a second outflow seen in SiO
841: 2--1 and \meth\ 2--1. The low virial ratio and moderately high density of
842: MMS1 suggest it could be forming a massive star by collapse and disk
843: accretion according to the ``monolithic collapse'' model. The
844: distribution of \ntwo\ in \iras\ strongly resembles that of the dust
845: emission, suggesting that \ntwo\ is tracing the locations of highest
846: column density. Conversely, the fact that \htcop\ peaks between
847: the column density peaks revealed by the dust and \ntwo\ emission probably
848: reflects the depletion of \htcop\ onto grain mantles in the dense regions.
849:
850: MMS2 appears to be quiescent: it harbors no maser or MSX sources
851: and has no unambiguous outflow signature. The spatial coincidence of its
852: \ntwo\ and dust continuum emission peaks suggest that it is a cold core in
853: an early stage of evolution. With an estimated total mass (dust and gas)
854: of 205~\msun, a virial ratio of 0.9, and a possible spectral signature of
855: collapse, MMS2 appears poised to form a massive star of its own. It may
856: be an example of a ``Class 0'' massive protostar.
857:
858: Both of the cores described above are embedded in a smooth
859: structure seen most clearly in the optically thin \htcop\ 1--0 line, but
860: also seen in \hcn\ 1--0 and \hcop\ 1--0. This structure has an axis ratio
861: of 3.1, and its long axis lies almost exactly perpendicular to that of the
862: \hcop\ outflow. The \htcop\ emission peak of the structure is
863: well-centered between the continuum peaks of the two bright cores. There
864: is a clear velocity gradient along the structure's long axis which is
865: suggestive of rotation, although the size of the structure precludes its
866: interpretation as a classical protostellar accretion disk. We suggest it
867: may either be the rotating, flattened remnant of the natal molecular cloud
868: from which the two current cores formed, or simply a sheared filament.
869:
870:
871: \acknowledgements
872:
873: M.~A. Reid is currently supported by a fellowship from the
874: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics but, at the time the data for
875: this paper were acquired, he was supported by a scholarship from the
876: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. B.~C.
877: Matthews is supported by the National Research Council of Canada. The
878: BIMA array was operated with support from the National Science Foundation
879: under grants AST 02-28963 to UC Berkeley, AST 02-28953 to U. Illinois, and
880: AST 02-28974 to U. Maryland. FCRAO is supported by NSF grant AST 02-28993.
881: The radio continuum data shown in Figure~\ref{fig:peaks} were generously
882: provided by H. Beuther.
883:
884:
885: \begin{thebibliography}{}
886: \bibitem[Beltr\'{a}n et al.(2004)]{bel04}Beltr\'{a}n, M.~T., et al. 2004, \apj, 601, L187
887: \bibitem[Bergin et al.(2002)]{ber02}Bergin, E.~A., Alves, J., Huard, T., \& Lada, C.~J. 2002, \apj, 570, L101
888: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2002a)]{beu02}Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Menten, K.~M., Motte, F., Sridharan, T.~K., \& Wyrowski, F., 2002a, \apj, 566, 945
889: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2002b)]{beu02b}Beuther, H., Walsh, A., Schilke, P., Sridharan, T.~K., Menten, K.~M., \& Wyrowski, F. 2002b, \aap, 390, 289
890: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2002c)]{beu02c}Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Sridharan, T.~K., Menten, K.~M., Walmsley, C.~M., \& Wyrowski, F. 2002c, \aap, 383, 892
891: \bibitem[Beuther, Schilke, \& Gueth(2004)]{b04}Beuther, H., Schilke, P., \& Gueth, F. 2004, \apj, 608, 330
892: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2005)]{beu05}Beuther, H., Zhang, Q., Sridharan, T.~K., \& Chen, Y. 2005, \apj, 628, 800
893: \bibitem[Bonnell, Bate, \& Zinnecker(1998)]{bbz98}Bonnell, I.~A., Bate, M.~R., \& Zinnecker, H. 1998, \mnras, 298, 93
894: \bibitem[Bonnell et al.(2001a)]{b01a}Bonnell, I.~A., Bate, M.~R., Clarke, C.~J., \& Pringle, J.~E. 2001, \mnras, 323, 785
895: \bibitem[Bonnell et al.(2001b)]{b01b}Bonnell, I.~A., Clarke, C.~J., Bate, M.~R., \& Pringle, J.~E. 2001, \mnras, 324, 573
896: \bibitem[Bonnell, Vine, \&(Bate(2004)]{bvb04}Bonnell, I.~A., Vine, S.~G., \& Bate, M.~R. 2004, \mnras, 349, 735
897: \bibitem[Cesaroni et al.(1997)]{ces97}Cesaroni, R., Felli, M., Testi, L., Walmsley, C.~M., \& Olmi, L. 1997, \aap, 325, 725
898: \bibitem[Cesaroni et al.(1999)]{ces99}Cesaroni, R., Felli, M., Jenness, T., Neri, R., Olmi, L., Robberto, M., Testi, L., \& Walmsley, C. M. 1999, \aap, 345, 949
899: \bibitem[Di Francesco, Andr\'e, \& Myers(2004)]{dif04}Di Francesco, J., Andr\'e, P., \& Myers, P.~C. 2004, \apj, 617, 425
900: \bibitem[Dutrey et al.(1996)]{dut96}Dutrey, A. et al. 1996, \aap, 309, 493
901: \bibitem[Egan et al.(2003)]{msxcat}Egan, M.~P. et al., 2003, in Air Force Research Laboratory Technical Report AFRL-VS-TR-2003-1589
902: \bibitem[Williams, Fuller, \& Sridharan(2004)]{wil04}Williams, S.~J., Fuller, G.~A., \& Sridharan, T.~K. 2004, \aap, 417, 115
903: \bibitem[Fuller, Williams, \& Sridharan(2005)]{ful05}Fuller, G.~A., Williams, S.~J., \& Sridharan, T.~K. 2005, \aap, 442, 949
904: \bibitem[Gregersen \& Evans(2000)]{gre00}Gregersen, E.~M. \& Evans, N.~J. 2000, \apj, 538, 260
905: \bibitem[Harju, Walmsley, \& Wouterloot(1993)]{harju}Harju, J., Walmsley, C.~M., \& Wouterloot, J.~G.~A. 1993, A\&AS, 98, 51
906: \bibitem[Hildebrand(1983)]{h83}Hildebrand, R.~H. 1983, QJRAS, 24, 267
907: \bibitem[Jiang(2005)]{jia05}Jiang, Z., et al. 2005, \nat, 437, 112
908: \bibitem[J{\o}rgensen(2004)]{jor04}J{\o}rgensen, J.~K. 2004, \aap, 424, 589
909: \bibitem[Kitamura et al.(2002)]{kit02}Kitamura, Y. et al. 2002, \apj, 581, 357
910: \bibitem[Krumholz, McKee, \& Klein(2005)]{kmk05}Krumholz, M.~R., McKee, C.~F., \& Klein, R.~I. 2005, \nat, 438, 332
911: \bibitem[Krumholz(2006)]{k06}Krumholz, M.~R. 2006, \apj, 641, L45
912: \bibitem[Lee, Bergin \& Evans(2004)]{lee04}Lee, J.-E., Bergin, E.~A., \& Evans, N.~J. 2004, \apj, 617, 360
913: \bibitem[Mao \& Zeng(2003)]{mz03}Mao, R.~Q., \& Zeng, Q. 2003, AcASn, 44, 61
914: \bibitem[Matthews et al.(2006)]{mat06}Matthews, B.~C., Hogerheijde, M.~R., J{\o}rgensen, J.~K., \& Bergin, E.~A. 2006, \apj, 652, 1374
915: \bibitem[McKee \& Ostriker(2007)]{mo07}McKee, C.~F., \& Ostriker, E.~C.
916: 2007, \araa, 45, 565
917: \bibitem[McKee \& Tan(2003)]{mt03}McKee, C.~F. \& Tan, J.~C. 2003, \apj, 585, 850
918: \bibitem[Onishi et al.(1996)]{on96}Onishi, T., Mizuno, A., Kawamura, A., Ogawa, H., \& Fukui, Y. 1996, \apj, 465, 815
919: \bibitem[Ossenkopf \& Henning(1994)]{oss94}Ossenkopf, V. \& Henning, Th. 1994, \aap, 291, 943
920: \bibitem[Patel et al.(2005)]{patel05}Patel, N., et al. 2005, \nat, 437, 109
921: \bibitem[Pestalozzi et al.(2004)]{pes04}Pestalozzi, M.~R., Elitzur, M., Conway, J.~E., \& Booth, R.~S. 2004, \apjl, 603, L113
922: \bibitem[Pirogov et al.(2007)]{pir07}Pirogov, L., Zinchenko, I., Caselli, P., \& Johansson, L.~E.~B. 2007, \aap, 461, 523
923: \bibitem[Plume et al.(1997)]{p97}Plume, R., Jaffe, D.~T., Evans, N.~J., Mart\'{i}n-Pintado, J., \& G\'{o}mez-Gonz\'{a}lez 1997, \apj, 476, 730
924: \bibitem[Sandell, Wright, \& Forster(2003)]{san03}Sandell, G., Wright, M., \& Forster, J.~R. 2003, \apj, 590, L45
925: \bibitem[Sault, Teuben, \& Wright(1995)]{miriad}Sault, R.~J., Teuben, P.~J., \& Wright, M.~C.~H. 1995, in ASP Conf. Ser. 77, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ed. R.~A.~Shaw, H.~E.~Payne, \& J.~J.~E.~Hayes (San Francisco: ASP), 433
926: \bibitem[Shepherd, Claussen, \& Kurtz(2001)]{shep01}Shepherd, D.~S., Claussen, M.~J., \& Kurtz, S.~E. 2001, Science, 292, 1513
927: \bibitem[Sridharan et al.(2002)]{srid02}Sridharan, T.~K., Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Menten, K.~M., \& Wyrowski, F. 2002, \apj, 566, 931
928: \bibitem[Tachihara, Mizuno, \& Fukui(2000)]{tach}Tachihara, K., Mizuno, A., \& Fukui, Y. 2000, \apj, 528, 817
929: \bibitem[Zhang, Hunter, \& Sridharan(1998)]{zha98}Zhang, Q., Hunter, T.~R., \& Sridharan, T.~K. 1998, \apj, 505, L151
930: \bibitem[Zhang et al.(2002)]{zha02}Zhang, Q., Hunter, T.~R., Sridharan, T.~K., \& Ho, P.~T.~P. 2002, \apj, 566, 982
931: \bibitem[Zhou(1992)]{zhou92}Zhou, S. 1992, \apj, 394, 204
932: \end{thebibliography}
933:
934:
935:
936:
937:
938:
939:
940: \end{document}
941: