1: \documentclass{pasj00}
2: \draft
3:
4: %%% new commands %%%
5: \newcommand{\av}{\ensuremath{A_{V}}}
6: \newcommand{\ji}{\textit{J}}
7: \newcommand{\hi}{\textit{H}}
8: \newcommand{\ki}{\textit{K}}
9: \newcommand{\ksi}{\textit{K\ensuremath{_S}}}
10: \newcommand{\hii}{H\,$_{\rm{II}}$}
11: \newcommand{\kt}{\ensuremath{k_{\rm{B}}T}}
12: \newcommand{\lx}{\ensuremath{L_{\rm{X}}}}
13: \newcommand{\lbol}{\ensuremath{L_{\rm{bol}}}}
14: \newcommand{\fx}{\ensuremath{F_{\rm{X}}}}
15: \newcommand{\nh}{\ensuremath{N_{\rm H}}}
16:
17: \SetRunningHead{Y.~Hyodo et al.}{X-ray Spectrum of a Peculiar Star}
18: \Received{2007/6/12}
19: \Accepted{2007/8/31}
20: %platex ms.tex
21: %dvips -Ppdf -t a4 ms.dvi
22: \begin{document}
23: \title{Suzaku X-Ray Spectroscopy of a Peculiar Hot Star \\in the
24: Galactic Center Region}
25: \author{Yoshiaki \textsc{Hyodo},\altaffilmark{1}
26: Masahiro \textsc{Tsujimoto},\altaffilmark{2,3}\thanks{Chandra Fellow}
27: Katsuji \textsc{Koyama},\altaffilmark{1}
28: Shogo \textsc{Nishiyama},\altaffilmark{4}\\
29: Tetsuya \textsc{Nagata},\altaffilmark{5}
30: Itsuki \textsc{Sakon},\altaffilmark{6}
31: Hiroshi \textsc{Murakami},\altaffilmark{7}
32: and
33: Hironori \textsc{Matsumoto}\altaffilmark{1}
34: }
35: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science,
36: Kyoto University, \\Kita-shirakawa Oiwake-cho, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502}
37: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy \& Astrophysics, Pennsylvania
38: State University \\
39: 525 Davey Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA}
40: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, Rikkyo University, 3-34-1,
41: Nishi-Ikebukuro, Toshima, Tokyo 171-8501}
42: \altaffiltext{4}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1, Osawa,
43: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588}
44: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science,
45: Kyoto University, \\Kita-shirakawa Oiwake-cho, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502}
46: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy, School of Science,
47: the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033}
48: \altaffiltext{7}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 3-1-1,
49: Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 229-8510}
50: \email{hyodo@cr.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp}
51: \KeyWords{Galaxy: center --- stars: Wolf-Rayet ---
52: X-rays: individual (CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546, 2XMMp\,J174645.2--281547) ---
53: X-rays: stars --- X-rays: spectra}
54: \maketitle
55:
56: \begin{abstract}
57: We present the results of a Suzaku study of a bright point-like source
58: in the 6.7~keV intensity map of the Galactic center region.
59: We detected an intense Fe\emissiontype{XXV} 6.7~keV line with an
60: equivalent width of $\sim$\,1~keV as well as emission lines of
61: highly ionized Ar and Ca from a spectrum obtained by the X-ray
62: Imaging Spectrometer.
63: The overall spectrum is described very well by a heavily absorbed
64: ($\sim$\,2$\times$10$^{23}$~cm$^{-2}$) thin thermal plasma model
65: with a temperature of 3.8\,$\pm$\,0.6~keV and a luminosity
66: of $\sim$\,3$\times$10$^{34}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ (2.0--8.0~keV) at 8~kpc.
67: The absorption, temperature, luminosity, and the 6.7~keV line
68: intensity were confirmed with the archived XMM-Newton data.
69: The source has a very red ($J-K_{\rm s}=8.2$~mag) infrared
70: spectral energy distribution (SED), which was fitted by
71: a blackbody emission of $\sim$\,1000~K attenuated by a visual
72: extinction of $\sim$\,31~mag.
73: The high plasma temperature and the large X-ray luminosity
74: are consistent with a wind-wind colliding Wolf-Rayet binary.
75: The similarity of the SED to those of the eponymous Quintuplet
76: cluster members suggests that the source is a WC-type source.
77: \end{abstract}
78: \section{Introduction}
79: The distribution of the 6.7~keV X-ray emission line along the Galactic
80: plane is strongly peaked at the Galactic center \citep{koyama89}.
81: The line originates from a K$\alpha$ transition of highly
82: ionized iron. Together with its large penetrating power delving
83: through a $\approx$\,10$^{24}$~H~cm$^{-2}$ extinction, the emission is an
84: indispensable tool to trace the high-energy activity and to reveal the
85: X-ray source demographics in a heavily attenuated environment, such as
86: the Galactic center region, where the enormous
87: density of gas and dust, the strong magnetic fields, and the
88: existence of a super massive black hole influence every aspect of
89: the transmigration of energy and matter \citep{morris96}.
90:
91: Both the extended emission and the ensemble of numerous discrete
92: sources contribute to the 6.7~keV emission.
93: The nature of the extended emission was identified as a hot plasma
94: having a temperature of $\sim$\,6.5~keV, distributed across $\sim$\,250~pc
95: (\cite{koyama89}, \yearcite{koyama07c}).
96: For discrete sources, several different X-ray populations with
97: thermal emission play dominant roles.
98: %However, it is unclear which population accounts for
99: %what fraction of the integrated 6.7~keV line emission.
100:
101: Cataclysmic variables (CV), binaries of a white dwarf and
102: predominantly a late-type dwarf star,
103: are major contributors to the 6.7~keV line, considering its
104: large population and thermal plasma with emission lines
105: (\cite{ezuka99}; \cite{muno03}, \yearcite{muno04b}).
106: Low-mass young stellar objects (YSO) or pre--main-sequence late-type
107: sources are other types of candidates.
108: They have elevated X-ray activity compared to their main-sequence
109: phases, and show a hard
110: thermal X-ray emission with the 6.7~keV line both during the occasional flare
111: and quiescent phases \citep{koyama96a,tsuboi98,imanishi01,ozawa05}.
112: They are expected to be numerous in the Galactic center region,
113: where $\sim$\,10\% of the star formation of the entire Galaxy takes
114: place \citep{figer04}.
115:
116: In addition to these late-type populations, early-type sources are
117: also expected to contribute to the 6.7~keV emission.
118: Main-sequence field O-type stars do not show hard X-ray emission
119: with their plasma temperatures below $\sim$\,1~keV \citep{berghoefer97},
120: but recent observations reveal that some main-sequence
121: O-type stars in OB associations show hard thermal X-ray emissions of
122: $\gtsim$\,2~keV (\cite{tsujimoto07b} and references therein).
123: Intense 6.7~keV line emissions are confirmed from such sources
124: (\cite{albacete03}, \yearcite{albacete07}; \cite{broos07}; \cite{hyodo08}).
125: Early-type sources are extremely rare compared to
126: late-type sources in number, but their overwhelmingly large luminosity
127: can be comparable to the integrated luminosity of numerous late-type sources.
128: In the Orion Nebula Cluster,
129: for instance, an O6V star ($\theta^{1}$ Ori\,C) alone accounts for
130: $\sim$\,34\% of the total hard-band X-ray emission integrated over the
131: entire Chandra field of view containing $>$\,1000 YSOs \citep{feigelson05}
132:
133: Early-type stars become even brighter in X-rays when they evolve
134: off the main-sequence track.
135: Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars and Luminous Blue Variables
136: (LBVs) comprise the brightest X-ray population of thermal point-like
137: sources with a typical hard-band luminosity of
138: $\sim$\,10$^{34}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ and a plasma temperature of $\gtrsim$\,2~keV
139: \citep{koyama94,tsuboi97,portegies02b,wang06}.
140: In fact, the brightest stellar X-ray source not powered
141: by accretion reported to date in our Galaxy
142: is a WR star of a spectral type of WN7--8 in the Arches cluster
143: (A1\,S in \cite{yusef02, law04, wang06,tsujimoto07a}).
144: The source has the 0.2--10.0~keV luminosity exceeding
145: $\sim$\,10$^{35}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ with a conspicuous 6.7~keV
146: emission.
147: % \citep{yusef02,law04,wang06,tsujimoto07a}.
148: Moreover, the X-ray spectra of these stars commonly show strong metallic
149: emission lines against continuum including the 6.7~keV line, which is
150: a consequence of extreme hydrogen depletion caused by the mass loss
151: and hydrogen burning \citep{hucht1986}.
152:
153: \smallskip
154:
155: Although early-type stars known in the Galactic center region are
156: concentrated to the three massive young star clusters ---
157: the Arches \citep{nagata95, cotera96, serabyn98, figer99b},
158: the Quintuplet \citep{kobayashi83, okuda90, nagata90, figer99a},
159: and the Central cluster \citep{becklin68, krabbe95, ghez05} ---,
160: it is quite natural to expect that a much larger number of early-type
161: stars remain unidentified.
162: \citet{portegies01} claimed that the number of
163: young massive star clusters may exceed 50 in the Galactic center
164: region. The inconsistency with the observed value indicates that these
165: clusters are too obscured to be visible in the optical and infrared bands,
166: or that the cluster members are dissipated before
167: the earliest member reaches its end, or that that number is a
168: gross overestimate.
169: \citet{kim99} showed that the strong tidal disruption in
170: the Galactic center region makes massive star clusters become unbound on a
171: very short time scale comparable to the lifetime of an O star.
172: Isolated early-type stars may be distributed throughout the region, unlike
173: the other parts of the Galaxy where they are found in associations.
174:
175: \begin{table*}[t]
176: \begin{center}
177: \caption{Observation log.}
178: \label{tabl:obslog}
179: \begin{tabular}{ccccccr}
180: \hline
181: Start Date&Observatory&ObsID&R.\,A. & Decl.&$t_{\rm exp}$\footnotemark[$*$]&
182: $\theta$\footnotemark[$\dagger$]\\
183: &&&\multicolumn{2}{c}{(J2000.0)}&(ks)&(\arcmin)\\
184: \hline
185: 2000-09-23&XMM-Newton&0112970201&\timeform{17h47m21s}&--\timeform{28D09'02''}&11&11.7\\
186: 2000-10-27& Chandra& 1036 &\timeform{17h47m22s}&--\timeform{28D11'36''}&35&10.5\\
187: 2001-07-16& Chandra& 2271 &\timeform{17h47m28s}&--\timeform{28D16'29''}&10&9.5\\
188: 2001-07-16& Chandra& 2274 &\timeform{17h46m42s}&--\timeform{28D10'23''}&10&5.7\\
189: 2001-07-16& Chandra& 2285 &\timeform{17h46m18s}&--\timeform{28D20'23''}&10&7.9\\
190: 2003-03-12&XMM-Newton&0144220101&\timeform{17h47m23s}&--\timeform{28D09'15''}&34&10.4\\
191: 2006-09-21& Suzaku&501040010 &\timeform{17h46m46s}&--\timeform{28D22'51''}&70&7.4\\
192: 2006-09-24& Suzaku&501040020 &\timeform{17h46m46s}&--\timeform{28D22'51''}&50&7.4\\
193: \hline
194: \multicolumn{4}{@{}l@{}}{\hbox to 0pt{\parbox{135mm}{\footnotesize
195: \par\noindent
196: \footnotemark[$*$] Exposure time after removing periods with
197: high background level.
198: The exposure times for the XMM-Newton observations refer to
199: those obtained with the EPIC-pn camera.
200: \par\noindent
201: \footnotemark[$\dagger$] Angular distance of the source
202: from the optical axis.
203: }\hss}}
204: \end{tabular}
205: \end{center}
206: \end{table*}
207:
208: Some early attempts have been made to discover unidentified early-type
209: stars in the Galactic center region with the combination of X-ray and
210: infrared (IR) observations.
211: \citet{muno06a} made trailblazing observations of radio, IR, and X-ray
212: to reveal the population of young massive stars in the Galactic center region.
213: They detected strong Br$\gamma$ and He\emissiontype{I} lines from two
214: sources, and classified them as either Of or candidate LBV stars.
215: \citet{mauerhan07} also conducted
216: \textit{K}-band spectroscopy of six bright hard X-ray sources with
217: very red IR colors.
218: Two of them, with IR colors of
219: \textit{J}--\textit{K}$=4$--5~mag, show broad hydrogen and helium
220: emission lines characteristic of evolved O-type stars.
221: They are classified as a Wolf-Rayet star of a spectral type of WN6
222: and an O-type Ia supergiant.
223: Likewise, \citet{mikles06} performed infrared spectroscopy of
224: CXO\,J174536.1--285638, which is one of new Chandra sources discovered
225: by \citet{muno03}.
226: They detected P Cygni profiles of He\emissiontype{II} lines of
227: a 170~km~s$^{-1}$ wind.
228: The spectral features in the X-ray and IR bands are most consistent
229: with the colliding wind binary system $\eta$ Car.
230: This source is of particular interest in terms of a strong
231: Fe\emissiontype{XXV} emission line,
232: which is also prominent in our source, presented below.
233: We see a high prospect of these methods to find similar sources en masse.
234:
235: Near-IR spectroscopy may confront a challenge for even redder sources.
236: In addition to a $\sim$\,30~mag visual extinction ubiquitous
237: toward the Galactic center region \citep{catchpole90,schultheis99},
238: evolved early-type stars are behind
239: an additional local extinction by their own mass loss.
240: Photospheric emission is reprocessed into longer wavelength
241: radiation in the optically thick circumstellar matter.
242: The IR spectra turn out to be featureless by strong
243: veiling \citep{figer99a,crowther06}.
244: For such sources, the spectroscopy of the hard X-ray emission directly
245: from the vicinity of the star is the only practical tool.
246: These stars contribute to the 6.7~keV line emission,
247: and the diagnosis of the line emission helps to identify their nature.
248:
249: \medskip
250:
251: Here, we present the results of a Suzaku \citep{mitsuda07} study of an X-ray
252: point-like source located at a $\sim$\,100~pc projected distance from
253: the Galactic center.
254: The source is exceptionally bright in the 6.7~keV map of the region,
255: and is redder (\textit{J}--\textit{K}\,$>$\,8~mag) than those
256: studied in previous studies. Aided by the large effective area of Suzaku's
257: telescope to produce spectra having high photon statistics,
258: we conducted a detailed hard-band spectroscopy of this source
259: to identify its nature.
260:
261: \section{Observation and Data Reduction}
262:
263: As a part of the Suzaku mapping campaign of the Galactic center region,
264: a field containing the Sgr\,B2 molecular cloud was observed twice on 2006
265: September 21--23 and 24--25 with an aim point at
266: (RA, Dec)\,$=$\,(\timeform{17h46m46s}, --\timeform{28D22'51''}).
267: The observation log is given in table~\ref{tabl:obslog}.
268: Suzaku observations produce two simultaneous data sets using
269: the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS: \cite{koyama07a}) and
270: the Hard X-ray Detector (HXD: \cite{kokubun07,takahashi07}).
271: We concentrate on the former in this paper.
272:
273: The XIS is equipped with four X-ray charge coupled devices (CCDs)
274: at the foci of four X--Ray Telescopes (XRT: \cite{serlemitsos07}).
275: Each CCD chip has a format of 1024$\times$1024 pixels.
276: The four XRTs are aligned to observe the same field of
277: $\sim18\arcmin\times$18\arcmin\ with a half-power diameter (HPD) of
278: 1\farcm9--2\farcm3 and a pointing accuracy of up to $\sim$\,50\arcsec.
279: %$\sim$40\arcsec.
280: Three of the four chips (XIS0, 2, and 3) are front-illuminated (FI) CCDs
281: superior in the hard band response covering the 0.4--12~keV energy range.
282: The remaining one is a back-illuminated (BI) CCD superior in the soft band
283: covering 0.2--12~keV.
284: The total effective area is $\sim$\,550~cm$^2$ at 8~keV.
285:
286: The energy resolution, initially of $\sim$130 eV at 6~keV in the full width
287: at half maximum, is subject to degradation due to cosmic-ray
288: radiation in the orbit.
289: The XIS employs two techniques to calibrate and rejuvenate its spectral
290: capability.
291: One is standard radioactive sources.
292: Two \atom{Fe}{}{55} sources are installed to illuminate two corners of
293: each CCD to calibrate the absolute energy gain.
294: The other is the spaced-row charge injection (SCI).
295: Electrons are injected at one of every 54 rows, and are
296: transferred through columns to sacrificially fill in traps caused
297: by radiation.
298: This reduces the number of trapped charges by X-ray events throughout
299: the transfer, thus improving the energy resolution \citep{bautz04, koyama07a}.
300:
301: The observations were conducted using the normal clocking mode
302: with a frame time of 8~s. The SCI technique was used.
303: Data process version 1.2\footnote{See
304: http://www.astro.isas.jaxa.jp/suzaku/process/history/v1225.html.}
305: was retrieved and events were
306: removed during the South Atlantic Anomaly passages and at
307: earth elevation angles below 3~degrees.
308: After the filtering, the combined net integration time is $\sim$\,120~ks.
309:
310: Because the calibration database for SCI observations is not yet released
311: as of this writing, we used data obtained during the ground calibration
312: with a charge-transfer efficiency of 1.
313: Using the Mn K$\alpha$ line from the calibration sources
314: $\left(\atom{Fe}{}{55}\right)$,
315: we measured the systematic gain offset as the deviation from
316: the theoretical value at 5.8951 keV \citep{bearden67, krause79}.
317: The offsets were found to be within $\sim$\,10~eV for the FI
318: and $\sim$\,30~eV for the BI chips.
319:
320: \begin{table*}[!htb]
321: \begin{center}
322: \caption{Best-fit spectral parameters.\footnotemark[$*$]}
323: \label{tabl:apec}
324: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
325: \hline
326: Parameter&Unit&Suzaku&XMM-Newton\\
327: \hline
328: \nh&($10^{23}$~cm$^{-2}$)&2.4$^{+0.3}_{-0.2}$&2.3$^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$\\
329: \kt&(keV)&3.8$^{+0.5}_{-0.6}$&3.8$^{+0.7}_{-0.7}$\\
330: $Z_{\rm Ar}$& (solar)&8.7$^{+6.3}_{-4.9}$&2.9$^{+7.1}_{-2.9}$\\
331: $Z_{\rm Ca}$& (solar)&3.2$^{+2.3}_{-2.0}$&0.9$^{+2.8}_{-0.9}$\\
332: $Z_{\rm Fe}$& (solar)&0.8$^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$&0.9$^{+0.2}_{-0.2}$\\
333: \fx\footnotemark[$\dagger$]&($10^{-12}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$)&
334: 1.00$^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$&1.05$^{+0.07}_{-0.07}$\\
335: \lx\footnotemark[$\ddagger$]&($10^{34}$~erg~s$^{-1}$)&2.8&2.9\\
336: $\chi^2$/d.o.f.&&89.4/106&69.9/74\\
337: \hline
338: \multicolumn{2}{@{}l@{}}{\hbox to 0pt{\parbox{100mm}{\footnotesize
339: \par\noindent
340: \footnotemark[$*$] The uncertainty indicates the 90\% confidence
341: ranges of the fit.
342: \par\noindent
343: \footnotemark[$\dagger$] Energy flux in the 2.0--8.0~keV band.
344: \par\noindent
345: \footnotemark[$\ddagger$] Absorption-corrected luminosity
346: in the 2.0--8.0~keV band.
347: A distance of 8~kpc is assumed.
348: }\hss}}
349: \end{tabular}
350: \end{center}
351: \end{table*}
352:
353: \section{Analysis}
354: \subsection{Images}
355: \begin{figure*}[!htb]
356: \begin{center}
357: \FigureFile(85mm,85mm){figure1a.eps}
358: \FigureFile(85mm,85mm){figure1b.eps}
359: \end{center}
360: \caption{XIS images in the (a) 0.7--2.0 and (b) 2.0--7.0~keV bands.
361: The narrow-band intensity of 6.57--6.77~keV is shown in (a)
362: by contours.
363: The source and background regions are respectively shown by
364: a polygon and a dashed ellipse in (b).
365: Both images were processed (1) to mask calibration sources,
366: (2) to subtract non--X-ray background signals constructed from
367: night earth observations \citep{tawa08},
368: (3) to correct for the vignetting and the non-uniformity caused
369: by the contamination material on the optical blocking filter,
370: (4) to resample adaptively to achieve a signal-to-noise ratio of
371: $>$\,8 at each bin using the weighted Voronoi tessellation algorithm
372: (\cite{diehl06}, \cite{cappellari03}), and (5) to register the
373: coordinate using the Chandra counterpart of the point-like source.
374: }\label{fg:image}
375: \end{figure*}
376: Figure \ref{fg:image} shows XIS images of the study field
377: in the (a) 0.7--2.0 and (b) 2.0--7.0~keV bands.
378: The overlaid contours in (a) are the narrow-band intensity in 6.75--6.77~keV.
379: All four XIS images at the two observations are combined.
380: Several distinctive features can be found in the hard band.
381: Two extended sources are
382: Sgr\,B2 (\cite{koyama96b}, \cite{murakami00}, \yearcite{murakami01};
383: \cite{koyama07b})
384: and G0.61--0.01 \citep{koyama07b}.
385: The brightest source, which is the main topic of this paper,
386: is found close to the northern edge of the hard-band image.
387: The source is point-like and an exceptionally intense 6.7~keV emitter
388: in the image, and also in the vicinity found in the Suzaku wide-field map.
389:
390: \subsection{Spectra}
391: We extracted the source and background events from the polygonal and
392: elliptical regions, respectively (figure~\ref{fg:image}b).
393: The source was superimposed upon the intense diffuse emission ubiquitous in
394: the Galactic center region \citep{koyama96b}.
395: In order to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio against the
396: underlying emission,
397: we simulated point spread functions at the source position
398: with different enclosed energy fractions using a ray-tracing simulator
399: (\texttt{xissim}: \cite{ishisaki07}).
400: Consequently, a 60\% encircled energy polygon was chosen to
401: accumulate source photons.
402: The background region was selected from an ellipse adjacent to and
403: at a similar off-axis angle with the source region.
404:
405: \begin{figure}[!htb]
406: \begin{center}
407: \FigureFile(85mm,85mm){figure2.eps}
408: \end{center}
409: \caption{Background-subtracted XIS spectra. BI spectrum is
410: shown in red, while the merged FI spectrum is in black. The
411: upper panel shows the data with crosses and the best-fit APEC
412: models with solid lines, while the lower panel shows the residuals
413: to the best-fit. Conspicuous emission lines of He-like ions
414: (gray dash lines) and H-like ions (gray solid lines) are labeled.
415: }
416: \label{fg:bi3fispec}
417: \end{figure}
418:
419: Figure~\ref{fg:bi3fispec} shows the background-subtracted spectrum.
420: Here, we generated the telescope response files using
421: a ray-tracing simulator (\texttt{xissimarfgen}: \cite{ishisaki07}).
422: We used the detector response files as of 2005 August, which best describe
423: the spectral profiles of the calibration sources.
424:
425: The spectrum is characterized by several emission lines as well as a hard
426: continuum extending to $\sim$\,10~keV with a strong soft-band cut-off.
427: The lines are identified as K$\alpha$ emission from highly
428: ionized (He-like and H-like) ions of Ar, Ca, and Fe.
429: The spectrum was first fitted by a bremsstrahlung model with
430: Gaussian lines attenuated by interstellar extinction \citep{morrison83}.
431: The strongest line is He-like Fe K$\alpha$ at $6.66\pm0.01$~keV
432: with an energy flux of $(2.5\pm0.3)\times10^{-13}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$,
433: which corresponds to an equivalent width (EW) of $950\pm100$~eV.
434:
435: In contrast, the line feature at 6.4~keV, if present, is very weak.
436: We added a narrow Gaussian line at the energy and derived
437: %By adding a narrow Gaussian line at 6.4~keV, we found that the line is
438: %very weak; our measurement gives
439: a 90\% upper limit of
440: 1.5$\times10^{-14}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$, which corresponds to an
441: EW of 50~eV.
442: The temperature derived from the continuum and those from the
443: intensity ratios of He-like and H-like K$\alpha$ lines are consistent
444: with $\sim$\,4~keV, indicating that the emission is thermal plasma
445: in collisional equilibrium.
446:
447: We then fitted the spectrum with an optically-thin thermal plasma
448: model (APEC: \cite{smith01}) with interstellar
449: extinction \citep{morrison83}.
450: %The solar chemical composition is assumed \citep{anders89} in
451: %the model, and the abundance values of Ar, Ca, and Fe relative
452: %to solar were thawed.
453: %Other elements were fixed to 1~solar abundance.
454: The abundances of Ar, Ca, and Fe relative to solar were free parameters,
455: while the other elements were fixed to 1~solar abundance \citep{anders89}.
456: A single-temperature model yielded an acceptable fit with 3.8~keV
457: in plasma temperature ($k_{\rm{B}}T$),
458: $1.0\times10^{-12}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$ in X-ray flux ($F_{{\rm X}}$)
459: in the 2.0--8.0~keV band
460: and 2.4$\times10^{23}$~cm$^{-2}$ in hydrogen column extinction
461: ($N_{\rm{H}}$).
462: The best-fit model and values are shown in figure~\ref{fg:bi3fispec}
463: and table~\ref{tabl:apec}, respectively.
464: No systematic deviation was found in the single temperature fit,
465: requiring no extra components.
466:
467: To examine how the results are influenced by our choice of the
468: background region,
469: we repeated the same procedures with several different regions.
470: All the best-fit parameters are consistent with each other, except for the
471: X-ray flux, which suffers $\lesssim$\,10\% systematic uncertainty.
472:
473: \subsection{Chandra and XMM-Newton Counterparts}
474: We retrieved the archived Chandra \citep{weisskopf02} and
475: XMM-Newton \citep{jansen01} data to study the long-term behaviors of
476: the source, and to locate its position more precisely using telescopes
477: of smaller HPDs than that of Suzaku.
478: Four Chandra observations using the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer
479: (ACIS: \cite{garmire03}) and two XMM-Newton observations using the
480: European Photon Imaging Camera (EPIC: \cite{turner01, strueder01}), which is
481: comprised of two MOS and a PN, were found to cover
482: the Suzaku source (table~\ref{tabl:obslog}).
483:
484: Within the Suzaku positional uncertainty of 50\arcsec,
485: we found only one Chandra source (CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546) in \citet{muno06b}
486: and one XMM-Newton source (2XMMp\,J174645.2--281547) in the
487: Second XMM-Newton Serendipitous Source
488: Pre-release Catalogue, XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre (2006).
489: %Since the position accuracy of Chandra is the best, the astrometry of
490: %the Suzaku images in figure~\ref{fg:image} is reregistered using
491: %the Chandra position.
492: Also, hereafter we refer the Suzaku source as CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546.
493:
494: \begin{figure}[!htb]
495: \begin{center}
496: \FigureFile(85mm,85mm){figure3.eps}
497: \end{center}
498: \caption{Background-subtracted EPIC spectra.
499: The pn spectrum is shown in red,
500: while the merged MOS spectrum is in black.
501: The symbols follow figure~\ref{fg:bi3fispec}.}
502: \label{fg:epicspec}
503: \end{figure}
504:
505: Since no spectroscopic and temporal behaviors are presented for both of the
506: Chandra and XMM-Newton sources in the literature,
507: we analyzed the data and present the results here.
508: One of the two XMM-Newton observations showed a net exposure of $\sim$\,34~ks
509: after removing data during high background.
510: Spectra with high statistics were obtained from MOS and PN, for which
511: we conducted spectral fits in a similar manner as with the Suzaku spectrum.
512: The best-fit model and parameters are shown in figure~\ref{fg:epicspec}
513: and table~\ref{tabl:apec}, respectively.
514: Although the emission lines are less conspicuous in the XMM-Newton data,
515: the Suzaku and XMM-Newton results are consistent with each other.
516:
517: For the remaining one XMM-Newton and four Chandra observations,
518: the photon statistics were too poor for a detailed spectral analysis,
519: due to short exposures, chip gaps, and
520: large off-axis angles of the source position.
521: We therefore applied the best-fit Suzaku model to derive their flux.
522:
523: \begin{figure}[h]
524: \begin{center}
525: \FigureFile(80mm,80mm){figure4.eps}
526: \end{center}
527: \caption{Long-term trend of X-ray flux in the 2.0--8.0~keV using
528: XMM-Newton (squares), Chandra (circles), and Suzaku (a diamond).
529: Error bars on the data points are plotted at the 90\% confidence level.
530: }
531: \label{fg:long}
532: \end{figure}
533:
534: Figure~\ref{fg:long} shows a long-term flux variation,
535: which spans $\sim$\,6~years at seven different epochs.
536: Although no flux variation within each observation is found,
537: a long-term variation having a factor $\sim2$ is clearly found.
538:
539: \subsection{Longer Wavelength Data}
540: We retrieved other databases to characterize the multi-wavelength features
541: of CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546.
542: Because of the extreme extinction, the source is inaccessible in the
543: optical bands.
544: %We examined the data in the near-infrared (NIR) bands using
545: In the near-infrared (NIR) bands, we examined
546: the Two Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS: \cite{cutri03}; \cite{skrutskie06}) and
547: the NIR Galactic center survey \citep{nishiyama06} using
548: Simultaneous Infrared Imager for Unbiased Survey
549: (SIRIUS: \cite{nagashima99, nagayama03}) on the Infrared Survey Facility
550: (IRSF) telescope.
551: In the mid-infrared (MIR) bands, we
552: used the Midcourse Space Experiment (MSX: \cite{egan03}) and the Galactic
553: Legacy Infrared Mid-Plane Survey Extraordinaire program (GLIMPSE:
554: \cite{benjamin03}) using the Spitzer Space Telescope \citep{werner04}.
555:
556: \begin{figure}[h]
557: \begin{center}
558: \includegraphics[width=8cm,height=5.55cm]{figure5.eps}
559: \end{center}
560: \caption{NIR pseudo-color image using 2MASS $J$- (blue), $H$- (green),
561: and $K_{\rm s}$- (red) band images.
562: The source positions with the uncertainty
563: of Chandra and MSX are shown with a small and large circle, respectively.
564: }
565: \label{fg:irimage}
566: \end{figure}
567:
568: Figure~\ref{fg:irimage} shows an NIR pseudo-color image,
569: in which an isolated point-like source (2MASS J17464524--2815476 and
570: MSX C6 G000.7036$+$00.1375) is found in the 2MASS and MSX images
571: within the positional uncertainty range of the Chandra source.
572: The source is very bright and red with 2MASS magnitudes of
573: (\textit{J}, \textit{H}, \textit{K}$_{\rm{s}}$)\,$=$\,($>$\,15.4,
574: 10.0, $>$\,7.2) mag.
575: The \textit{J}- and \textit{K}$_{\rm{s}}$-band magnitudes are
576: upper limits due to nearby source contamination.
577: In the SIRIUS data, while the $K_{\rm s}$-band is unavailable due to
578: saturation, the magnitudes of (\textit{J}, \textit{H})\,$=$\,(15.53, 10.05)
579: were derived with photometric errors of $\sim$\,0.01~mag.
580:
581: In the MIR bands, the source is in the linearity range in the MSX photometry,
582: but is too bright in Spitzer images,
583: from which no meaningful photometry was obtained.
584: Figure~\ref{fg:nirsed} shows the spectral energy distribution (SED) in the
585: 1.2--30~$\mu$m band.
586: We fitted the data with a single-temperature blackbody and an
587: assumed extinction proportional to the inverse square of the wavelength.
588: We found a best-fit blackbody temperature ($T_{\rm{BB}}$) of
589: 980\,$\pm$\,20~K, with a visual extinction ($A_{\rm V}$) of 31\,$\pm$\,1~mag,
590: and a bolometric luminosity
591: ($L_{\rm{bol}}$) of (8.3\,$\pm$\,0.5)$\times10^4~\LO
592: \left(d/8.0~\rm{[kpc]}\right)^2$.
593:
594: \begin{figure}[!htb]
595: \begin{center}
596: \FigureFile(85mm,85mm){figure6.eps}
597: \end{center}
598: \caption{SED constructed from SIRIUS (open squares) and MSX
599: (open triangles) photometry.
600: The solid curve shows the best-fit blackbody model with
601: $T_{\rm BB}\,=\,980$~K, $A_{\rm{V}}\,=\,$31~mag and
602: $L_{\rm{bol}}\,=\,8.3\times10^4$~\LO.
603: SEDs of the eponymous Quintuplet cluster members \citep{okuda90, figer99a}
604: are also shown with colors for comparison.}
605: \label{fg:nirsed}
606: \end{figure}
607:
608: \section{Discussion}
609: \subsection{Location of Extinction Matter}
610: Adopting $N_{\rm H}/A_{\rm V}=1.79\times10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$~mag$^{-1}$
611: \citep{predehl95}, $A_{\rm V}=31$~mag is converted to
612: $N_{\rm H}\sim$\,5.6$\times10^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$.
613: This is far smaller than that determined with the X-ray of
614: $N_{\rm H}\sim$\,2.4$\times10^{23}$~cm$^{-2}$.
615: Since the visual extinction of 31~mag is the typical value toward the Galactic
616: center \citep{catchpole90}, the excess X-ray absorption is probably due
617: to local obscuring matter that radiates the detected IR emission.
618: If such an obscuring matter with solar abundance spherically surrounds
619: the X-ray source, the 6.4~keV line with an EW of $\sim200$~eV should be
620: detected \citep{inoue85}.
621: The lack of 6.4~keV line (EW\,$<$\,50~eV) requires either that the iron
622: abundance is $\lesssim0.25$~solar or that the local matter is concentrated
623: in front of the source along the line of sight.
624:
625: \subsection{Nature of the Source}
626: \subsubsection{WR Binary Origin}
627: The SED of CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546 in the IR bands is very similar to
628: those of the eponymous Quintuplet cluster members (figure~\ref{fg:nirsed}).
629: The five stars have cool ($T\sim$\,1000~K) spectra and are bright
630: ($\sim$\,7~mag in the $K$-band).
631: The deep absorption at $\sim\,$10~$\mu$m is due to interstellar silicate.
632: The lack of either emission lines or intrinsic absorption
633: features \citep{okuda89, figer99a} allows no spectral classification,
634: though their luminosity of $\sim$\,10$^5$~$\LO$
635: corresponds to those of supergiant stars.
636: These intriguing stars were recently spatially resolved \citep{tuthill06}.
637: Two (GCS\,3--2 and GCS\,4 of \cite{nagata90}, or Q2 and Q3 of \cite{moneti01})
638: out of five showed beautiful pinwheel nebulae of dust plume, which are
639: seen in a few WC (carbon rich Wolf-Rayet) stars \citep{tuthill99, monnier99}.
640: Circumstellar dust emission with temperatures of 700--1700~K is a
641: common character of WC stars \citep{williams87}.
642:
643: Interestingly, the two sources that exhibit the pinwheel morphology
644: are the brightest hard X-ray sources \citep{law04, wang06} among
645: the Quintuplet members.
646: Since both the pinwheel dust plumes and the hard X-ray emissions indicate
647: fast wind-wind collision \citep{tuthill99, monnier99, oskinova03},
648: this coincidence is not probably accidental.
649: The summed spectrum of three X-ray emitting sources
650: (GCS\,3-2, GCS\,4, and source D of \cite{nagata90}) in the Quintuplet
651: cluster is very hard ($kT\sim$\,9~keV) and shows a hint of iron K emission
652: line, but the luminosity is smaller by $\sim$\,2 orders of magnitude
653: (7.6$\times10^{32}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ in the 0.3--8.0~keV band; \cite{wang06})
654: than CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546.
655: In the colliding wind binary scenario, the X-ray luminosity scales as
656: $\lx\propto D^{-1}$ \citep{stevens92}, where $D$ is
657: the binary orbital separation.
658: The large X-ray luminosity of CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546 indicates the close
659: separation,
660: and the moderate flux variation having a factor of $\sim$\,2 can be
661: interpreted as the variation of the separation due to the orbital motion.
662:
663: Some of evolved massive~star+OB~star systems have very large X-ray luminosity
664: up to $\sim$10$^{35}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ in the 0.5--10.0~keV band with thermal
665: spectra with a temperature of $\gtrsim$\,2~keV and an iron abundance of 1--2
666: ($\eta$ Carinae: \cite{tsuboi97}, \cite{hamaguchi07}; WR\,140:
667: \cite{koyama94}, \cite{pollock05},
668: A1\,S, A1\,N, and A2 in the Arches cluster; \cite{wang06}).
669: The X-ray spectral property of CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546 coincides
670: with those of these massive star binaries, though near- and mid-IR
671: spectroscopy and high spatial resolution observation are essential for
672: further constraint.
673: Taking the discussion in \S4.1. into account, all of the observational results
674: are consistent with the idea that CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546 is a
675: WC star+massive star
676: binary near the Galactic center, which has local obscuring
677: matter (figure~\ref{fg:cartoon}).
678:
679: \begin{figure}[h]
680: \begin{center}
681: \FigureFile(85mm,85mm){figure7.eps}
682: \end{center}
683: \caption{Cartoon of the source system. Winds from the primary WC star and
684: the companion massive star collide to produce X-rays.
685: The obscuring material of $N_{\rm H}\sim$\,2$\times10^{23}$~cm$^{-2}$
686: around the binary system is heated to $T\sim$\,980~K by
687: photospheric emission to emit IR.
688: Whereas the IR emission suffers only interstellar medium (ISM) extinction,
689: the X-ray emission is subject to additional intrinsic absorption.
690: }
691: \label{fg:cartoon}
692: \end{figure}
693: Because the initial mass of a WR star exceeds $\sim\,$40~\MO\ and the age is
694: less than $\sim$6~Myr \citep{maeder87},
695: we naturally expect that WR stars are found in
696: large young star clusters, assuming a usual initial mass function.
697: Our source, however, seems to be isolated (figure~\ref{fg:irimage}).
698: \citet{muno06a} and \citet{mauerhan07} also recently discovered
699: such isolated massive stars in the Galactic center region.
700: One possibility is that these stars were formed initially in a cluster,
701: and the cluster dissipated due to the strong tidal force of the Galactic
702: center \citep{portegies02a}.
703: Future IR and X-ray observations with a higher spatial resolution and
704: sensitivity may reveal that either this source is really a cluster member,
705: or truly an isolated star.
706:
707: \subsubsection{Other Possible Origins}
708: The most popular class of hard X-ray sources that exhibits
709: iron K-shell emission lines is CV.
710: The X-ray luminosity of CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546 of
711: $3\times10^{34}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ is at the brightest end of CVs.
712: The bolometric luminosity of
713: $\sim10^5~\LO\left(d/8.0~\rm{[kpc]}\right)^2$ is, however far larger
714: than CVs, because most of the optical companions of CVs are late-type
715: main-sequence stars.
716: The spectra of CVs are characterized by hard continuum, with three
717: iron K-shell emission lines at 6.4~keV, 6.7~keV, and 6.97~keV.
718: The equivalent widths of both the 6.4~keV and 6.7~keV lines are, however,
719: around 100--200~eV, although in some cases that of the 6.7 keV line shows an
720: exceptionally high value possibly due to resonance scattering \citep{terada01}.
721: The 6.97~keV/6.7~keV flux ratio of CVs is larger than 0.1, indicating that
722: the ionization temperature is higher than $\sim\,$4~keV
723: \citep{ezuka99, hellier04, rana06}.
724: CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546 has a significantly larger equivalent width of
725: the 6.7~keV line ($\sim\,1\,$keV) and lower flux ratio of
726: the 6.97~keV/6.7~keV lines than those of CVs.
727: The upper limit of 50~eV for the 6.4~keV line, on the other hand,
728: can not give any constraint on the possibility of a CV.
729: Altogether, CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546 is very unlikely to be a CV.
730:
731: The X-ray spectra of YSOs are characterized by a thin thermal plasma
732: with a temperature of 1--5~keV and a metal abundance of around 0.3~solar
733: in the quiescent phase \citep{feigelson02, imanishi03, ozawa05}.
734: The CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546 iron abundance of 0.8\,$\pm$\,0.1~solar is higher
735: than the typical YSO value of 0.3~solar, but is not exceptional.
736: Although the ratio of the X-ray and bolometric luminosity
737: ($L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm bol}$) of $10^{-5}$ is in the range of low-mass YSOs
738: \citep{imanishi01, feigelson02},
739: the absolute luminosities are too high for a YSO if CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546
740: is located at 8~kpc.
741: The possibility still remains that CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546 is a
742: foreground YSO in a dense molecular cloud.
743: %a nearby YSO having dense molecular clouds
744: %in front is one remote possibility.
745:
746: \subsection{Contribution to the Galactic Center 6.7~keV Line}
747: The 6.7~keV line flux from CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546 is
748: $2.5\times10^{-13}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$.
749: The total flux of iron K-lines in the Galactic center region is
750: $\sim1.3\times10^{-10}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$ \citep{yamauchi90}.
751: Since this value includes the 6.4~keV and 6.97~keV lines,
752: it overestimates the 6.7 keV flux by a factor of 2--3.
753: The detected point sources account for $\sim10\%$ of the total flux of
754: the 6.7~keV line \citep{wang02, muno04a}.
755: Therefore, the 6.7~keV line of CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546 alone accounts for
756: $\sim4$\% of that of the detected point sources and $\sim0.4$\% of that of
757: the total diffuse flux.
758: Such X-ray sources would comprise a substantial fraction of 6.7~keV
759: line-emitting point sources in the Galactic center.
760:
761: \section{Summary}
762: \begin{enumerate}
763: \item We detected a strong 6.7~keV line with an equivalent width of
764: $\sim$\,1~keV from CXOGC\,J174645.3--281546.
765: The overall spectrum was very well fitted by a
766: heavily absorbed (\nh$\sim$\,2.4$\times10^{23}$~cm$^{-2}$)
767: 3.8~keV thermal plasma with an iron abundance of $\sim$\,0.8~solar
768: and a luminosity of $\sim$\, 3$\times10^{34}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ in the
769: 2.0--8.0keV band, assuming a distance of 8~kpc.
770: \item We also analyzed the archived data of Chandra and XMM-Newton, and
771: found that the X-ray flux spanning $\sim$\,6~years shows year-scale time
772: variability having a factor of $\sim$\,2.
773: \item The probable counterpart in the IR bands is very bright
774: ($L_{\rm bol}\sim$\,$10^{4.9}$~\LO~at 8~kpc), and has a cool
775: ($T_{\rm BB}\sim$\,1000~K) SED, which is similar to those of
776: the eponymous members of the Quintuplet cluster.
777: \item The X-ray spectral and temporal properties and the IR SED
778: are fully consistent with a WC~star+massive~star binary system.
779: \end{enumerate}
780: \bigskip
781:
782: Y.\,H. and M.\,T. acknowledge financial support
783: from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
784: The work is financially supported by the grants-in-aid for a
785: 21st century center of excellence program
786: ``Center for Diversity and Universality in Physics'' and No. 18204015
787: by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
788: of Japan.
789: This research has made use of data obtained from the Data ARchive and
790: Transmission System at ISAS/JAXA, the High Energy Astrophysics
791: Science Archive Research Center at the NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center,
792: and the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of
793: the University of
794: Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California
795: Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and
796: Space Administration and the National Science Foundation.
797: MSX was funded by the Ballistic
798: Missile Defense Organization with additional support from NASA
799: Office of Space Science. This research has also made use of the
800: NASA/ IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the
801: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
802: under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space
803: Administration.
804: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
805: % Bibliography
806: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
807: \begin{thebibliography}{}
808: \bibitem[Albacete Colombo~\etal(2003)]{albacete03} Albacete Colombo, J.~F.,
809: M{\'e}ndez, M., \& Morrell, N.~I.\ 2003, \mnras, 346, 704
810: \bibitem[Albacete Colombo~\etal(2007)]{albacete07} Albacete Colombo, J.~F.,
811: Flaccomio, E., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., \& Damiani, F.\ 2007,
812: \aap, 464, 211
813: \bibitem[Anders~\&~Grevesse(1989)]{anders89} Anders, E., \&
814: Grevesse, N.\ 1989, \gca, 53, 197
815: \bibitem[Bautz~\etal(2004)]{bautz04} Bautz, M.~W., Kissel, S.~E.,
816: Prigozhin, G.~Y., LaMarr, B., Burke, B.~E., \& Gregory, J.~A.\ 2004,
817: \procspie, 5501, 111
818: \bibitem[Bearden(1967)]{bearden67} Bearden, J.~A.\ 1967, Reviews
819: of Modern Physics, 39, 78
820: \bibitem[Becklin \& Neugebauer(1968)]{becklin68} Becklin, E.~E.,
821: \& Neugebauer, G.\ 1968, \apj, 151, 145
822: \bibitem[Benjamin~\etal(2003)]{benjamin03} Benjamin, R.~A., et
823: al.\ 2003, \pasp, 115, 953
824: \bibitem[Berghoefer~\etal(1997)]{berghoefer97} Berghoefer, T.~W., Schmitt,
825: J.~H.~M.~M., Danner, R., \& Cassinelli, J.~P.\ 1997, \aap, 322, 167
826: \bibitem[Broos~\etal(2007)]{broos07} Broos, P.~S., Feigelson,
827: E.~D., Townsley, L.~K., Getman, K.~V., Wang, J., Garmire, G.~P., Jiang, Z.,
828: \& Tsuboi, Y.\ 2007, \apjs, 169, 353
829: \bibitem[Cappellari~\etal(2003)]{cappellari03} Cappellari, M., \& Copin, Y.
830: 2003, MNRAS, 342, 345
831: \bibitem[Catchpole~\etal(1990)]{catchpole90} Catchpole, R.~M.,
832: Whitelock, P.~A., \& Glass, I.~S.\ 1990, \mnras, 247, 479
833: \bibitem[Cotera~\etal(1996)]{cotera96} Cotera, A.~S., Erickson, E.~F.,
834: Colgan, S.~W.~J., Simpson, J.~P., Allen, D.~A., \& Burton, M.~G.\ 1996,
835: \apj, 461, 750
836: \bibitem[Crowther~\etal(2006)]{crowther06} Crowther, P.~A., Hadfield, L.~J.,
837: Clark, J.~S., Negueruela, I., \& Vacca, W.~D.\ 2006, \mnras, 372, 1407
838: \bibitem[Cutri~\etal(2003)]{cutri03} Cutri, R.~M.,~\etal\
839: 2003, The IRSA 2MASS All-Sky Point Source Catalog, NASA/IPAC Infrared
840: Science Archive.~http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/Gator/,
841: \bibitem[Diehl~\etal(2006)]{diehl06} Diehl, S., \& Statler, T. S. 2006,
842: MNRAS, 368, 497
843: \bibitem[Egan~\etal(2003)]{egan03} Egan, M.~P.,~\etal\ 2003,
844: VizieR Online Data Catalog, 5114, 0
845: \bibitem[Ezuka~\&~Ishida(1999)]{ezuka99} Ezuka, H., \& Ishida,
846: M.\ 1999, \apjs, 120, 277
847: \bibitem[Feigelson~\etal(2002)]{feigelson02} Feigelson, E.~D.,
848: Broos, P., Gaffney, J.~A., III, Garmire, G., Hillenbrand, L.~A., Pravdo,
849: S.~H., Townsley, L., \& Tsuboi, Y.\ 2002, \apj, 574, 258
850: \bibitem[Feigelson~\etal(2005)]{feigelson05} Feigelson, E.~D.,~\etal \ 2005,
851: \apjs, 160, 379
852: \bibitem[Figer~\etal(1999a)]{figer99a} Figer, D.~F., McLean,
853: I.~S., \& Morris, M.\ 1999a, \apj, 514, 202
854: \bibitem[Figer~\etal(1999b)]{figer99b} Figer, D.~F., Kim, S.~S., Morris, M.,
855: Serabyn, E., Rich, R.~M., \& McLean, I.~S.\ 1999b, \apj, 525, 750
856: \bibitem[Figer~\etal(2004)]{figer04} Figer, D.~F., Rich,
857: R.~M., Kim, S.~S., Morris, M., \& Serabyn, E.\ 2004, \apj, 601, 319
858: \bibitem[Garmire~\etal(2003)]{garmire03} Garmire, G.~P., Bautz, M.~W., Ford,
859: P.~G., Nousek, J.~A., \& Ricker, G.~R., Jr.\ 2003, \procspie, 4851, 28
860: \bibitem[Ghez~\etal(2005)]{ghez05} Ghez, A.~M., Salim, S.,
861: Hornstein, S.~D., Tanner, A., Lu, J.~R., Morris, M., Becklin, E.~E., \&
862: Duch{\^e}ne, G.\ 2005, \apj, 620, 744
863: \bibitem[Hamaguchi~\etal(2007)]{hamaguchi07} Hamaguchi, K., et
864: al.\ 2007, \apj, 663, 522
865: \bibitem[Hellier~\&~Mukai(2004)]{hellier04} Hellier, C., \&
866: Mukai, K.\ 2004, \mnras, 352, 1037
867: \bibitem[Hyodo~\etal(2008)]{hyodo08} Hyodo, Y.,~\etal\ 2008,
868: \pasj, 60, \#3182
869: \bibitem[Imanishi~\etal(2001)]{imanishi01} Imanishi, K., Koyama,
870: K., \& Tsuboi, Y.\ 2001, \apj, 557, 747
871: \bibitem[Imanishi~\etal(2003)]{imanishi03} Imanishi, K., Nakajima, H.,
872: Tsujimoto, M., Koyama, K., \& Tsuboi, Y.\ 2003, \pasj, 55, 653
873: \bibitem[Inoue(1985)]{inoue85} Inoue, H.\ 1985, Space Science
874: Reviews, 40, 317
875: \bibitem[Ishisaki~\etal(2007)]{ishisaki07} Ishisaki, Y.,~\etal\
876: 2007, \pasj, 59, S113
877: \bibitem[Jansen~\etal(2001)]{jansen01} Jansen, F.,~\etal\
878: 2001, \aap, 365, L1
879: \bibitem[Kim~\etal(1999)]{kim99} Kim, S.~S., Morris, M., \&
880: Lee, H.~M.\ 1999, \apj, 525, 228
881: \bibitem[Kobayashi~\etal(1983)]{kobayashi83} Kobayashi, Y., Okuda,
882: H., Sato, S., Jugaku, J., \& Dyck, H.~M.\ 1983, \pasj, 35, 101
883: \bibitem[Kokubun~\etal(2007)]{kokubun07} Kokubun, M.,~\etal\
884: 2007, \pasj, 59, S53
885: \bibitem[Koyama~\etal(1989)]{koyama89} Koyama, K., Awaki, H., Kunieda, H.,
886: Takano, S., \& Tawara, Y.\ 1989, \nat, 339, 603
887: \bibitem[Koyama~\etal(1994)]{koyama94} Koyama, K., Maeda, Y.,
888: Tsuru, T., Nagase, F., \& Skinner, S.\ 1994, \pasj, 46, L93
889: \bibitem[Koyama~\etal(1996a)]{koyama96a} Koyama, K., Hamaguchi,
890: K., Ueno, S., Kobayashi, N., \& Feigelson, E.~D.\ 1996a, \pasj, 48, L87
891: \bibitem[Koyama~\etal(1996b)]{koyama96b} Koyama, K., Maeda, Y., Sonobe, T.,
892: Takeshima, T., Tanaka, Y., \& Yamauchi, S.\ 1996b, \pasj, 48, 249
893: \bibitem[Koyama~\etal(2007a)]{koyama07a} Koyama, K.,~\etal \
894: 2007a, \pasj, 59, S23
895: \bibitem[Koyama~\etal(2007b)]{koyama07b} Koyama, K.,~\etal\
896: 2007b, \pasj, 59, S221
897: \bibitem[Koyama~\etal(2007c)]{koyama07c} Koyama, K.,~\etal\
898: 2007c, \pasj, 59, S245
899: \bibitem[Krabbe~\etal(1995)]{krabbe95} Krabbe, A.,~\etal\
900: 1995, \apj, 447, L95
901: \bibitem[Krause \& Oliver(1979)]{krause79} Krause, M.~O., \& Oliver, J.~H.
902: \ 1979, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 8, 329
903: \bibitem[Law~\&~Yusef-Zadeh(2004)]{law04} Law, C., \&
904: Yusef-Zadeh, F.\ 2004, \apj, 611, 858
905: \bibitem[Maeder~\&~Meynet(1987)]{maeder87} Maeder, A., \& Meynet, G.\ 1987,
906: \aap, 182, 243
907: \bibitem[Mauerhan~\etal(2007)]{mauerhan07} Mauerhan, J.~C., Muno,
908: M.~P., \& Morris, M.\ 2007, \apj, 662, 574
909: \bibitem[Mikles~\etal(2006)]{mikles06} Mikles, V.~J., Eikenberry, S.~S.,
910: Muno, M.~P., Bandyopadhyay, R.~M., \& Patel, S.\ 2006, \apj, 651, 408
911: \bibitem[Mitsuda~\etal(2007)]{mitsuda07} Mitsuda, K.,~\etal\
912: 2007, \pasj, 59, S1
913: \bibitem[Moneti et al.(2001)]{moneti01} Moneti, A., Stolovy, S.,
914: Blommaert, J.~A.~D.~L., Figer, D.~F., \& Najarro, F.\ 2001, \aap, 366, 106
915: \bibitem[Monnier~\etal(1999)]{monnier99} Monnier, J.~D.,
916: Tuthill, P.~G., \& Danchi, W.~C.\ 1999, \apj, 525, L97
917: \bibitem[Morris~\&~Serabyn(1996)]{morris96} Morris, M., \& Serabyn, E.\ 1996,
918: \araa, 34, 645
919: \bibitem[Morrison \& McCammon(1983)]{morrison83} Morrison, R., \&
920: McCammon, D.\ 1983, \apj, 270, 119
921: \bibitem[Muno~\etal(2003)]{muno03} Muno, M.~P.,~\etal\ 2003,
922: \apj, 589, 225
923: \bibitem[Muno~\etal(2004a)]{muno04a} Muno, M.~P.,~\etal\ 2004a,
924: \apj, 613, 326
925: \bibitem[Muno~\etal(2004b)]{muno04b} Muno, M.~P.,~\etal\ 2004b,
926: \apj, 613, 1179
927: \bibitem[Muno~\etal(2006a)]{muno06a} Muno, M.~P., Bower, G.~C.,
928: Burgasser, A.~J., Baganoff, F.~K., Morris, M.~R., \& Brandt, W.~N.\ 2006a,
929: \apj, 638, 183
930: \bibitem[Muno~\etal(2006b)]{muno06b} Muno, M.~P., Bauer, F.~E.,
931: Bandyopadhyay, R.~M., \& Wang, Q.~D.\ 2006b, \apjs, 165, 173
932: \bibitem[Murakami~\etal(2000)]{murakami00} Murakami, H., Koyama,
933: K., Sakano, M., Tsujimoto, M., \& Maeda, Y.\ 2000, \apj, 534, 283
934: \bibitem[Murakami~\etal(2001)]{murakami01} Murakami, H., Koyama,
935: K., \& Maeda, Y.\ 2001, \apj, 558, 687
936: \bibitem[Nagashima~\etal(1999)]{nagashima99} Nagashima, C.,~\etal\ 1999,
937: Proceedings of Star Formation 1999, ed. T.~Nakamoto,
938: Nobeyama Radio Observatory, 397
939: \bibitem[Nagata~\etal(1990)]{nagata90} Nagata, T., Woodward,
940: C.~E., Shure, M., Pipher, J.~L., \& Okuda, H.\ 1990, \apj, 351, 83
941: \bibitem[Nagata~\etal(1995)]{nagata95} Nagata, T., Woodward,
942: C.~E., Shure, M., \& Kobayashi, N.\ 1995, \aj, 109, 1676
943: \bibitem[Nagayama~\etal(2003)]{nagayama03} Nagayama, T.,~\etal\
944: 2003, \procspie, 4841, 459
945: \bibitem[Nishiyama~\etal(2006)]{nishiyama06} Nishiyama, S., et
946: al.\ 2006, \apj, 638, 839
947: \bibitem[Okuda~\etal(1989)]{okuda89} Okuda, H.,~\etal\ 1989,
948: The Center of the Galaxy, 136, 281
949: \bibitem[Okuda~\etal(1990)]{okuda90} Okuda, H.,~\etal\ 1990, \apj, 351, 89
950: \bibitem[Oskinova~\etal(2003)]{oskinova03} Oskinova, L.~M., Ignace, R.,
951: Hamann, W.-R., Pollock, A.~M.~T., \& Brown, J.~C.\ 2003, \aap, 402, 755
952: \bibitem[Ozawa~\etal(2005)]{ozawa05} Ozawa, H., Grosso, N., \&
953: Montmerle, T.\ 2005, \aap, 438, 661
954: \bibitem[Pollock~\etal(2005)]{pollock05} Pollock, A.~M.~T.,
955: Corcoran, M.~F., Stevens, I.~R., \& Williams, P.~M.\ 2005, \apj, 629, 482
956: \bibitem[Portegies~Zwart~\etal(2001)]{portegies01} Portegies Zwart, S.~F.,
957: Makino, J., McMillan, S.~L.~W., \& Hut, P.\ 2001, \apj, 546, L101
958: \bibitem[Portegies~Zwart~\etal(2002a)]{portegies02a} Portegies Zwart, S.~F.,
959: Makino, J., McMillan, S.~L.~W., \& Hut, P.\ 2002a, \apj, 565, 265
960: \bibitem[Portegies~Zwart~\etal(2002b)]{portegies02b} Portegies Zwart, S.~F.,
961: Pooley, D., \& Lewin, W.~H.~G.\ 2002b, \apj, 574, 762
962: \bibitem[Predehl \& Schmitt(1995)]{predehl95} Predehl, P., \&
963: Schmitt, J.~H.~M.~M.\ 1995, \aap, 293, 889
964: \bibitem[Rana~\etal(2006)]{rana06} Rana, V.~R., Singh, K.~P.,
965: Schlegel, E.~M., \& Barrett, P.~E.\ 2006, \apj, 642, 1042
966: \bibitem[Schultheis~\etal(1999)]{schultheis99} Schultheis, M., et
967: al.\ 1999, \aap, 349, L69
968: \bibitem[Serabyn~\etal(1998)]{serabyn98} Serabyn, E., Shupe, D.,
969: \& Figer, D.~F.\ 1998, \nat, 394, 448
970: \bibitem[Serlemitsos~\etal(2007)]{serlemitsos07} Serlemitsos, P.,~\etal
971: \ 2007, \pasj, 59, S9
972: \bibitem[Skrutskie~\etal(2006)]{skrutskie06} Skrutskie, M.~F.,~\etal 2006,
973: \aj, 131, 1163
974: \bibitem[Smith~\etal(2001)]{smith01} Smith, R.~K., Brickhouse, N.~S.,
975: Liedahl, D.~A., \& Raymond, J.~C.\ 2001, \apj, 556, L91
976: \bibitem[Stevens~\etal(1992)]{stevens92} Stevens, I.~R.,
977: Blondin, J.~M., \& Pollock, A.~M.~T.\ 1992, \apj, 386, 265
978: \bibitem[Str{\"u}der~\etal(2001)]{strueder01} Str{\"u}der, L., et
979: al.\ 2001, \aap, 365, L18
980: \bibitem[Takahashi~\etal(2007)]{takahashi07} Takahashi, T., et
981: al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S35
982: \bibitem[Tawa~\etal(2008)]{tawa08} Tawa, N.,~\etal\ 2008,
983: \pasj, 60, \#3170
984: \bibitem[Terada~\etal(2001)]{terada01} Terada, Y., Ishida, M.,
985: Makishima, K., Imanari, T., Fujimoto, R., Matsuzaki, K., \& Kaneda, H.\
986: 2001, \mnras, 328, 112
987: \bibitem[Tsuboi~\etal(1997)]{tsuboi97} Tsuboi, Y., Koyama, K.,
988: Sakano, M., \& Petre, R.\ 1997, \pasj, 49, 85
989: \bibitem[Tsuboi~\etal(1998)]{tsuboi98} Tsuboi, Y., Koyama, K.,
990: Murakami, H., Hayashi, M., Skinner, S., \& Ueno, S.\ 1998, \apj, 503, 894
991: \bibitem[Tsujimoto~\etal(2007a)]{tsujimoto07a} Tsujimoto, M.,~\etal \ 2007a,
992: Proceedings of Suzaku Conference 2006, Progress of Theoretical Physics,
993: in press
994: \bibitem[Tsujimoto~\etal(2007b)]{tsujimoto07b} Tsujimoto, M., et al.\ 2007b,
995: \apj, 665, 719
996: \bibitem[Turner~\etal(2001)]{turner01} Turner, M.~J.~L., et
997: al.\ 2001, \aap, 365, L27
998: \bibitem[Tuthill~\etal(1999)]{tuthill99} Tuthill, P.~G.,
999: Monnier, J.~D., \& Danchi, W.~C.\ 1999, \nat, 398, 487
1000: \bibitem[Tuthill~\etal(2006)]{tuthill06} Tuthill, P., Monnier,
1001: J., Tanner, A., Figer, D., Ghez, A., \& Danchi, W.\ 2006, Science, 313, 935
1002: \bibitem[van der Hucht~\etal(1986)]{hucht1986} van der Hucht,
1003: K.~A., Cassinelli, J.~P., \& Williams, P.~M.\ 1986, \aap, 168, 111
1004: \bibitem[Wang~\etal(2002)]{wang02} Wang, Q.~D., Gotthelf,
1005: E.~V., \& Lang, C.~C.\ 2002, \nat, 415, 148
1006: \bibitem[Wang~\etal(2006)]{wang06} Wang, Q.~D., Dong, H., \&
1007: Lang, C.\ 2006, \mnras, 371, 38
1008: \bibitem[Weisskopf~\etal(2002)]{weisskopf02} Weisskopf, M.~C.,
1009: Brinkman, B., Canizares, C., Garmire, G., Murray, S., \& Van Speybroeck,
1010: L.~P.\ 2002, \pasp, 114, 1
1011: \bibitem[Werner~\etal(2004)]{werner04} Werner, M.~W.,~\etal\
1012: 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
1013: \bibitem[Williams~\etal(1987)]{williams87} Williams, P.~M., van
1014: der Hucht, K.~A., \& The, P.~S.\ 1987, \aap, 182, 91
1015: \bibitem[Yamauchi~\etal(1990)]{yamauchi90} Yamauchi, S., Kawada, M.,
1016: Koyama, K., Kunieda, H., \& Tawara, Y.\ 1990, \apj, 365, 532
1017: \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh~\etal(2002)]{yusef02} Yusef-Zadeh, F.,
1018: Law, C., Wardle, M., Wang, Q.~D., Fruscione, A., Lang, C.~C., \& Cotera,
1019: A.\ 2002, \apj, 570, 665
1020: \end{thebibliography}
1021: \end{document}
1022: