1: %%
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: \documentclass{emulateapj}
4:
5: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
6: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
7:
8: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
9:
10: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
11:
12:
13: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
14: \newcommand{\myemail}{kalas@astron.berkeley.edu}
15:
16: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
17:
18: \slugcomment{In press for ApJ Letters, December 20, 2007}
19: \shorttitle{HD 15745 debris disk}
20: \shortauthors{Kalas et al.}
21:
22: \begin{document}
23:
24: \title{Discovery of an extended debris disk around the F2V star HD 15745}
25:
26:
27: \author{Paul Kalas\altaffilmark{1,2}, Gaspard Duchene \altaffilmark{1,3},
28: Michael P. Fitzgerald\altaffilmark{2,4,5}, James R. Graham\altaffilmark{1,2}}
29: \affil{}
30:
31: \altaffiltext{1}{Astronomy Department and Radio Astronomy Laboratory,
32: 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720}
33: \altaffiltext{2}{National Science Foundation Center for Adaptive Optics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064}
34: \altaffiltext{3}{Laboratoire
35: d'Astrophysique de Grenoble, Universit\'e Joseph Fourier, BP 53, 38041
36: Grenoble cedex 9, FRANCE}
37: \altaffiltext{4}{Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
38: 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94551}
39: \altaffiltext{5}{Michelson Fellow}
40:
41:
42: \begin{abstract}
43: Using the Advanced Camera for Surveys aboard the {\it Hubble Space Telescope},
44: we have discovered dust-scattered light from the debris disk surrounding
45: the F2V star HD 15745. The circumstellar disk is detected between 2.0$\arcsec$ and
46: 7.5$\arcsec$ radius, corresponding to 128$-$480 AU radius.
47: The circumstellar disk morphology is asymmetric about the star, resembling a
48: fan, and consistent with forward scattering grains in an optically thin
49: disk with an inclination of $\sim$67$\degr$ to our line of sight. The spectral
50: energy distribution and scattered light morphology can be approximated
51: with a model disk composed of silicate grains between 60 and 450 AU radius,
52: with a total dust mass of $10^{-7}~M_\odot$ (0.03 M$_\earth$) representing
53: a narrow grain size distribution (1$-$10 $\mu$m).
54: Galactic space motions are similar to the Castor Moving
55: Group with an age of $\sim$10$^{8}$ yr, although future work is required to determine
56: the age of HD 15745 using other indicators.
57: \end{abstract}
58: \keywords{stars: individual(\objectname{HD 15745}) - circumstellar matter}
59:
60: \section{Introduction}
61: The collisional debris from solid bodies orbiting main sequence stars results in circumstellar dust
62: disks that produce excess emission at thermal infrared wavelengths \citep{bap93}.
63: Excess thermal emission may also arise from a star
64: heating interstellar dust \citep[e.g.,][]{kalas02} and therefore obtaining
65: images of dust-scattered light is a key method for constraining the origin of dust. Furthermore,
66: direct images of dust-scattered light may be used to obtain the color and polarization properties
67: of the grains, which depend on their size distribution, composition and structure \citep[e.g.][]{graham07}.
68: The overall geometry of a debris disk may also reveal sources of dynamical perturbations, such as those
69: from stellar and sub-stellar companions \citep[e.g.][]{roques94, liou99, moro02}.
70:
71: Here we show the first scattered-light images of a debris disk surrounding HD 15745,
72: an F2V star at 64 pc. \citet{silverstone00} first reported HD 15745 as
73: a debris disk candidate star based on excess thermal emission
74: $L_{IR}/L_{\star} = 1.8\times10^{-3}$ using $IRAS$ data, and
75: $L_{IR}/L_{\star} = 1.3\times10^{-3}$ using $ISO$ data. \citet{zuck04} modeled
76: the spectral energy distribution (SED) with a single temperature dust
77: belt at 27 AU radius with $L_{IR}/L_{\star} = 1.2 \times 10^{-3}$.
78:
79:
80: \section{Observations \& Data Analysis}
81: We observed HD 15745 on 2006 July 17 with the {\it Hubble Space Telescope (HST)}
82: Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) High Resolution Channel (HRC) coronagraph.
83: The star was acquired behind the 1.8$\arcsec$ diameter occulting spot and three 700 second
84: integrations with the F606W ($\lambda_c$= 591 nm, $\Delta\lambda$ = 234 nm)
85: broadband filter were obtained at a fixed position angle.
86: The three frames were median combined for cosmic ray rejection.
87: The point spread function (PSF) was then subtracted using images from
88: the HST archive of five F stars obtained with the ACS coronagraph
89: at the same wavelength and comparable integration times.
90: All five versions of a PSF-subtracted image of HD 15745 show the
91: fan-shaped circumstellar nebulosity. The five versions
92: were then median combined to produce a final image that
93: was then corrected for geometric distortion.
94: We also detected HD 15745 from Gemini North with the MICHELLE
95: camera on 2006 September 20 using the N$^\prime$ filter.
96: We measure a flux of N$^\prime$= 74.7$\pm$2.9 mJy within a 1.4$\arcsec$ radius
97: aperture, with an aperture correction based on near-contemporaneous
98: images of the photometric standard star (HD 20893).
99:
100: \section{Results}
101: The PSF-subtracted HST data reveal a fan-shaped nebulosity surrounding HD 15745 in the
102: approximate region between P.A.=190$\degr$ and P.A.=10$\degr$ (Fig. 1).
103: %Given that the system is most likely optically thin
104: %from analysis of the spectral energy distribution (below)
105: %and the lack of reddening toward the star,
106: We interpret the nebulosity as
107: an azimuthally symmetric circumstellar disk inclined
108: to our line of sight and composed of dust that has an asymmetric scattering
109: phase function that produces a fan-like appearance \citep{kalas96}.
110: Another possibility $-$ asymmetric grain erosion and blowback by encounters with
111: the interstellar medium \citep{arty97}$-$ is less likely given that the southeastward proper
112: motion ($\mu_\alpha$=46 mas/yr, $\mu_\delta$=-47 mas/yr) and location of the star well
113: within the local interstellar bubble \citep{kalas02}, although at least one exception has been
114: found for the latter point \citep{gaspar07}.
115:
116: In principle the detection
117: limit for the inner radius of the nebulosity is set by the occulting spot radius (0.9$\arcsec$), but
118: the presence of quasi-static speckles produce significant PSF subtraction
119: artifacts, limiting the inner detection radius to $\sim$2$\arcsec$ (128 AU) radius. The
120: outer radius of the disk is a sensitivity-limited value. In data that have been binned 8$\times$8
121: pixels (0.2$\arcsec\times0.2\arcsec$), the disk is detected as far as $\sim$7.5$\arcsec$ (480 AU) radius.
122: The 23.0 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ surface brightness isophote (Fig. 2) shows a relatively symmetric fan-like
123: morphology. The radial surface brightness profiles (Fig. 3) are monotonic and can be
124: approximated by power laws with an index of $-3.3\pm0.1$.
125:
126:
127: \section{Disk models}
128:
129: We model the SED and scattered light appearance of the HD 15745 disk
130: using a Monte Carlo radiation transfer code (MCFOST; Pinte et
131: al. 2006) in which a star radiates isotropically in space and illuminates
132: an azimuthally-symmetric parameterized disk. In a first step, we
133: determine the stellar parameters by fitting the SED up to 11\,$\mu$m (Fig. 4).
134: Using NextGen models \citep{baraffe98} for the
135: stellar photosphere, we find that the best fit model has
136: $T_{eff}=6800$\,K and $R_\star=1.31R_\odot$.
137:
138: We then proceed to fit the entire SED of HD 15745 to determine the
139: disk properties. In order to consider as few free parameters as
140: possible, we adopt a $\rho(r,z) \propto r^\alpha \exp(-z^2/2\sigma_z^2)$
141: number density distribution, with $\alpha=-1$ and a constant
142: $\sigma_z=2$\,AU, that extends from $R_{in}$ to $R_{out}=450$\,AU and
143: sums up to a total disk mass $M_d$. The choice of $\sigma_z=2$\,AU
144: is consistent with disk heights inferred from the edge-on debris
145: disks $\beta$ Pic and AU Mic \citep{kalas95, krist05}, and does
146: not significantly influence our results for values $\sigma_z\geq1$\,AU
147: (which is required to keep the disk optically thin to starlight).
148: The $r^{-1}$ number density profile
149: fits the observed slope of the surface brightness (see
150: below). We also fix the dust grain properties to be a collection of
151: compact spherical silicate grains from \citet{draine84}, with size
152: distribution $N(a)\propto a^{-3.5}$ from $a_{min}$ to
153: $a_{max}=10a_{min}$. Because the disk is assumed to be gas-free, each
154: grain size has its own temperature: smaller grains are hotter than
155: larger at a given distance from the star. Therefore, for each value of
156: $a_{min}$, we need to adjust $R_{in}$ to obtain a maximum dust
157: temperature in the range 60--80\,K, i.e., a peak dust emission around
158: 40--50\,$\mu$m (Fig. 4). Once this is set, we can adjust the total dust mass to
159: fit the SED. For values of $a_{min}$ ranging from 0.125 to 8\,$\mu$m
160: (with a factor of 2 increment), we perform this 2-parameter adjustment
161: using a grid of 9 regularly-sampled values of $R_{in}$ and $M_d$ and
162: compute the associated $\chi^2$ value.
163: The narrowness of the
164: disk thermal emission peak requires $a_{max}\lesssim10\,\mu$m (hence
165: $a_{min}\lesssim1\,\mu$m). Larger grains deviate from the
166: Rayleigh regime in the mid-infrared and result in a much broader
167: emission peak than is observed. By allowing a smaller value of $a_{min}$
168: and larger values of $a_{max}/a_{min}$, we do not find
169: a lower limit to $a_{min}$ from the analysis of the SED alone, down to at
170: least 0.1\,$\mu$m. Provided $R_{in}$ and $M_d$ are adjusted
171: accordingly, we always find satisfying fits to the SED.
172:
173:
174: %We find that
175: %$a_{min}\leq1\,\mu$m is needed to correctly fit the SED: larger values
176: %of $a_{min}$ result in broader peak for the disk emission because of
177: %the presence of grains comparable to the peak emission
178: %wavelength, i.e., out of the Rayleigh regime.
179: %In effect, the narrowness of the disk thermal emission peaks requires
180: %$a_{max} \lesssim 10 \mu$m
181: %From the SED alone we do not find a lower
182: %limit to $a_{min}$: all values in the 0.125--1\,$\mu$m range yield
183: %equally satisfying SED fits, provided $R_{in}$ and $M_d$ are adjusted
184: %accordingly. Similarly, assuming larger $a_{max}/a_{min}$ ratios yield
185: %poorer SED fits, which is why we choose to use a value of 10 in our
186: %models.
187:
188: We then explore the disk surface brightness in order to better
189: constrain $a_{min}$. Indeed, assuming $a_{max}/a_{min}$=10,
190: the scattering properties of the dust
191: populations considered here vary strongly with $a_{min}$. The albedo
192: at 0.606\,$\mu$m decreases from 0.82 to 0.65 as $a_{min}$ increases
193: from 0.125\,$\mu$m to 1\,$\mu$m, because of the depletion of the
194: highly reflective small grains. At the same time, the scattering
195: asymmetry parameter, $g = \langle \cos \theta \rangle$, increases from 0.65 to 0.89 because large
196: grains scatter preferentially forward. As a consequence, the models
197: with small values of $a_{min}$ can be rejected based on our ACS image:
198: simulated images of the disk with $a_{min}=0.125\,\mu$m are
199: $\sim$4 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ too bright compared to our
200: observations. Furthermore, with such a dust population, the predicted
201: flux ratio between the front and back side is low enough,
202: independently of the inclination, that it should have been detected in
203: our data set. To fit both the surface brightness of the disk and the
204: apparent front/back asymmetry, our model indicates that
205: $a_{min}>0.5\,\mu$m, implying a narrow grain size distribution
206: and justifying $a$ $posteriori$ our assumption of $a_{max}/a_{min}$ = 10
207:
208: Figure\,\ref{fig4} illustrates our best fitting
209: model, which has $a_{min}=1\,\mu$m, $a_{max}=10\,\mu$m,
210: $R_{in}=60$\,AU, $M_d=10^{-7}
211: M_\odot$ and $L_{IR}/L_{\star}$=2.2$\times$10$^{-3}$. Assuming a
212: disk inclination $i=65-70\degr$, a power law fit to the modeled surface brightness profiles
213: results in a $\sim$-3.5 index and the observed front/back intensity
214: ratio at 2\farcs3 along the disk semi-minor axis is $\gtrsim10$. Both
215: figures are consistent with the observations. Subsequent models were
216: calculated with $a_{min}=0.75$ and 1.25\,$\mu$m to better constrain
217: this parameter. We obtained marginally acceptable surface brightness
218: fits in both cases and we conclude that $0.75\,\mu\mathrm{m} \leq
219: a_{min} \leq 1.25\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ in the disk surrounding HD 15745.
220: This result is consistent with a grain blowout size of $\sim$1 $\mu$m
221: calculated for silicate grains.
222: Associated uncertainties on the disk inner radius and total disk mass
223: are on the order of 10\%.
224: Our quantitative estimates of $a_{min}$ and $a_{max}$ depend on
225: the assumptions we made, but the overall conclusion (order of
226: magnitudes for grain sizes, hence inner radius and total dust mass,
227: and the need for a narrow size distribution) are robust.
228:
229: %Our quantitative conclusions regarding the disk and dust parameters
230: %presumably depend on some of our assumptions such as the disk
231: %geometry, the dust composition and the $a_{max}/a_{min}$ ratio. It is
232: %beyond the scope of this paper to explore thoroughly the parameter
233: %space. However, we are confident that much smaller/larger values of
234: %$a_{min}$ can be excluded because of the combination of three key
235: %empirical facts. First, the very narrow peak of the disk emission in
236: %the SED requires small grains emitting in the Rayleigh regime beyond
237: %20$\,\mu$m. Second, the strong front/back asymmetry observed in the
238: %disk requires both a relatively high inclination, around 70$\degr$
239: %considering the shape of the isophotal contours, and large grains, whose
240: %phase function is strongly biased towards small angle
241: %scattering. Finally, considering the disk mass required to fit the
242: %SED, the observed disk surface brightness can only be matched if
243: %grains smaller than 1$\mu$m represent a minor constituent of the disk.
244:
245:
246:
247: \section{Discussion}
248: HD 15745 is now the fifth main sequence F star with
249: a debris disk resolved in scattered light. Three of these
250: have ring-like structure, whereas HD 15745 shares a
251: wide-disk architecture with HD 15115 \citep[F2V;][]{kalas07}.
252: The three ring-like architectures are found
253: around HD 139664 \citep[F5V;][]{kalas06},
254: HD 181327 \citep[F5/F6;][]{schneider06},
255: and HD 10647 \citep[F9V;][]{ krs07}.
256: At the present time, the dust properties have been modeled
257: only for HD 181327, with a Henyey-Greenstein scattering asymmetry parameter
258: $g=0.3\pm0.03$ \citep{schneider06}. For debris disks
259: around stars of other spectral types, AU Mic (M1V) has a scattering asymmetry
260: parameter similar to that of HD 15745 \citep{graham07},
261: whereas most other debris disk, such as Fomalhaut \citep[A3V;][]{kalas05}
262: and HD 107146 \citep[G5V;][]{ardila04} have a low scattering asymmetry,
263: comparable to that of HD 181327. Our present model suggests
264: a concentration of dust grains in the range 1$-$10 $\mu$m, which is consistent with
265: a wavy grain size distribution \citep[departure from a simple
266: power law; e.g.][]{campo94, thebault07}. Small
267: grains do not exist in sufficient quantity to counteract the highly asymmetric
268: scattering phase function of the larger grains, whereas in other
269: debris disk systems the collisional cascade may be robust to the
270: smallest sizes, producing relatively symmetric scattering.
271: Further refinements for the properties of dust around HD 15745 and
272: other debris disks requires resolved imaging observations at other
273: wavelengths and with polarization. Ultimately the explanation for
274: why one debris disk has a particular grain size distribution may
275: depend on differences in disk dynamical properties and the
276: composition of grains (e.g., volatile vs. refractory elements).
277:
278: Among the F stars discussed above, HD 15115 and HD 181327 may belong
279: to the Beta Pic Moving Group, with age $\sim$12 Myr \citep{zuck01}. HD 15745, on the
280: other hand, may be a member of the Castor moving group based on its
281: Galactic space motion. \citet{moor06} calculate
282: ($U,V,W$) = ($-16.5\pm1.1,-10.8\pm1.3, -10.7\pm0.7$) km s$^{-1}$
283: for HD 15745, consistent with
284: ($U,V,W$) = ($-10.7\pm3.5, -8.0\pm2.4, -9.7\pm0.7$) km s$^{-1}$ given for
285: the Castor Moving Group \citep[CMG;][]{byn98}. Among the CMG members,
286: %listed by \citet{byn98},
287: HD 38678 ($\zeta$ Lep), another
288: well-known debris disk star has
289: a Galactic space velocity ($U,V,W$) = ($-14.4\pm3.6, -11.1\pm3.0, -8.4\pm1.8$) km s$^{-1}$
290: that is closest to that of HD 15745. \citet{byn98} estimate that the
291: CMG has an age of 200$\pm$100 Myr, although \citet{zuck04} estimate
292: a younger age for HD 15745 (``30?'' Myr) based on its location on an A-star
293: H$-$R diagram and the relatively large dust optical depth.
294: \citet{moor06} similarly conclude that nearly all stars
295: with $L_{IR}/L_{\star}>5\times$10$^{-4}$ are younger
296: than 10$^8$ yr. The infrared excess for HD 15745 is an order of magnitude greater
297: than that of CMG members Fomalhaut, Vega, and $\zeta$ Lep.
298: From the five CMG candidates that are F-stars, two
299: have have been detected at far-infrared wavelengths. HD 119124 (F7.7V) has
300: $L_{IR}/L_{\star} = 3-$6$\times10^{-5}$, comparable to that of
301: Fomalhaut and Vega \citep{trilling07}. HD 130819 (F3V) has
302: $L_{IR}/L_{\star}=3\times10^{-4}$ \citep{chen05}, which is still a
303: factor of seven less than that of HD 15745.
304:
305: Recent work demonstrates a large spread in dust optical depths
306: at a given age \citep{rhee07} which may be a consequence of the spread of initial
307: disk masses \citep{wyatt07}. Therefore the high
308: optical depth of HD 15745 cannot uniquely discriminate
309: between a $\sim$10 Myr or a $\sim$100 Myr age.
310: Assuming steady-state evolution, the dust optical depth
311: of HD 15745 could arise from a 10 Myr-old debris disk
312: that started with $\sim$10 M$_\earth$ of solid material,
313: or a 100 Myr-old disk that started with $\sim$100 M$_\earth$
314: of solid material. The ambiguity is augmented by allowing
315: stochastic spikes in dust production that may occur in
316: a few per cent of debris disks. \citep[e.g.][]{beichman06}.
317: A more precise age for HD 15745 therefore requires further
318: input using stellar properties.
319: However, we note that the large geometric vertical
320: optical depth of our model ($\tau = 5.8\times10^{-3}$ at 60 AU radius)
321: implies a fiducial collisional destruction
322: timescale $t_\mathrm{c} \sim 1 / \Omega \tau \sim 10^5$\,yr at
323: 60\,AU. This is significantly shorter than the age estimates for HD 15745,
324: implying that the circumstellar dust is collisionally
325: evolved. Moreover,
326: the rapid collision timescale indicates that the radius
327: of the inner disk hole approximates the location of
328: the planetesimal belt that regenerates the observed dust,
329: instead of signifying the radius where grains inspiraling
330: from Poynting Robertson drag are trapped in resonances with planetary
331: bodies \citep{wyatt05}.
332:
333:
334: \section{Summary}
335:
336: Using the $HST$ ACS coronagraph, we present the first images
337: of dust-scattered light from a debris disk surrounding the F2V star
338: HD 15745. The fan-shaped morphology is consistent with
339: an azimuthally symmetric disk with asymmetric isophotes due
340: to an asymmetric dust scattering phase function combined with a 67$\degr$
341: inclination to the line of sight. HD 15745 belongs in a category
342: of wide disks with a sensitivity-limited outer extent near 500 AU. Our silicate grain
343: models for the SED and the disk surface brightness suggest an
344: inner disk radius of 60 AU, a somewhat narrow grain size distribution
345: between 1 and 10 $\mu$m, and a total disk mass of 10$^{-7}~M_{\odot}$.
346: Future observations should determine the optical and near-infrared
347: colors, as well as polarization, to further constrain grain properties.
348: High-resolution imaging of the inner part of the disk should reveal
349: the inner hole that in the model presented here has radius 60 AU, or 0.5$\arcsec$)
350: radius from the star projected on the sky. Due to the asymmetric scattering
351: phase function, the inner boundary of the disk hole should appear
352: as a 1$\arcsec\times2\arcsec$ elliptical feature. Our silicate-grain disk model predicts
353: a peak $V$-band and $H$-band surface brightnesses of 14.8 and 12.7 mag arcsec$^{-2}$,
354: respectively, or about 1 magnitude redder than the star itself. Near-infrared data
355: would thereby test our present disk model that is dominated by
356: relatively large grains ($>$1 $\mu$m), where the albedo is not significantly diminished in the
357: near-infrared, yet the near-infrared scattering is more isotropic
358: ($g$=0.57 in $H$ vs. 0.89 in $V$) as the observing wavelength
359: approaches the grain size.
360:
361: \acknowledgements
362: {\small
363: {\bf Acknowledgements:} Support for GO-10896 was provided by
364: NASA through a grant from STScI
365: under NASA contract NAS5-26555.
366: We used the Gemini Observatory,
367: operated by AURA, under agreement with the NSF.
368: This work was supported by the NSF Science and Technology Center for Adaptive Optics,
369: managed by UCSC under agreement AST - 9876783, and by the Michelson Fellowship Program.
370: }
371:
372: \begin{thebibliography}{}
373:
374: \bibitem[Ardila et al.(2004)]{ardila04}
375: Ardila, D.R., Golimowski, D.A., Krist, J.R., et al., \apj, 617, L147.
376:
377: \bibitem[Artymowicz \& Clampin(1997)]{arty97}
378: Artymowicz, P. \& Clampin, M. 1997, \aj, 490, 863.
379:
380: \bibitem[Backman \& Paresce(1993)]{bap93}
381: Backman, D. E. \& Paresce, F. 1993, in {\it Protostars and Planets III},
382: eds. E. H. Levy \& J. I. Lunine, (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), p. 1253
383:
384: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{baraffe98}
385: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, \aap, 337, 403
386:
387: \bibitem[Barrado y Navascues(1998)]{byn98}
388: Barrado y Navascues, D. 1998, \aap, 339, 831
389:
390: \bibitem[Beichman et al.(2006)]{beichman06}
391: Beichman, C. A., Tanner, A., Bryden, G. et al. 2006, \apj, 639, 1166
392:
393: \bibitem[Campo Bagatin et al.(1994)]{campo94}
394: Campo Bagatin, A., Cellino, A., Davis, D. R., Farinella, P. \& Paolicchi, P.
395: 1994, Planet. Space Sci., 42, 1079
396:
397: \bibitem[Chen et al. (2005)]{chen05}
398: Chen, C. H., Patten, B. M., Werner, M. W., et al. 2005, \apj, 634, 1372
399:
400: %\bibitem[Chereul et al. (1999)]{che99}
401: %Chereul, E., Creze, M. \& Bienayme, O. 1998, \aaps, 340, 384
402:
403: \bibitem[Draine \& Lee(1984)]{draine84}
404: Draine, B.T. \& Lee, H.M. 1984, \apj, 285, 89
405:
406: \bibitem[Fitzgerald et al.(2007)]{fitz07}
407: Fitzgerald, M. P., Kalas, P., Duchene, G., Pinte, C., \& Graham, J. R. 2007, \apj, in press.
408:
409: \bibitem[G{\'a}sp{\'a}r et al.(2007)]{gaspar07}
410: G{\'a}sp{\'a}r, A., Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., Balog, Z., Kamp, I., Mart{\'i}nez-Galarza, \& Stapelfeldt, K.
411: 2007, \apj, in press.
412:
413: %\bibitem[Golimowski et al.(2006)]{goli06}
414: %Golimowski, D.A., Ardila, D.R., Krist, J.R., et al., \aj, 131, 3109.
415:
416: \bibitem[Graham et al.(2007)]{graham07}
417: Graham. J.R., Kalas, P. \& Matthews, B. 2007, \apj, 654, 595
418:
419: \bibitem[Kalas \& Jewitt(1995)]{kalas95}
420: Kalas, P. \& Jewitt, D. 1995, \aj,110, 794
421:
422: \bibitem[Kalas \& Jewitt(1996)]{kalas96}
423: Kalas, P. \& Jewitt, D. 1996, \aj, 111, 1347
424:
425: %\bibitem[Kalas et al.(2001)]{kalas01}
426: %Kalas, P. , Deltorn, J.-M. and Larwood, J. 2001, \apj, 533, 410
427:
428: \bibitem[Kalas et al.(2002)]{kalas02}
429: Kalas, P., Graham, J.R., Beckwith, S.V.W., Jewitt, D.C. \& Lloyd, J.P. , 2002, \apj, 567, 999
430:
431: %\bibitem[Kalas et al.(2004)]{kalas04}
432: %Kalas, P. Liu, M. \& Matthews, B. 2004, Science, 303, 1990
433:
434: \bibitem[Kalas et al.(2005)]{kalas05}
435: Kalas, P., Graham. J.R. \& Clampin, M.C. 2005, Nature, 435, 1067
436:
437: \bibitem[Kalas et al.(2007)]{kalas07}
438: Kalas, P., Fitzgerald, M. P., \& Graham. J.R. 2007, /apj, 661, L85
439:
440: \bibitem[Kalas et al.(2006)]{kalas06}
441: Kalas, P., Graham. J.R., Clampin, M. C. \& Fitzgerald, M. P. 2006, \apj, 637, L57
442:
443: \bibitem[Krist et al.(2005)]{krist05}
444: Krist, J. E., Ardila, D. R., Golimowski, D. A., et al. 2005, \apj, 129, 1008
445:
446: \bibitem[Liou \& Zook(1999)]{liou99}
447: Liou, J. -C. \& Zook, H. A. 1999, \aj, 118, 580
448:
449: \bibitem[Mo{\'o}r et al.(2006)]{moor06}
450: Mo{\'o}r, A., Abraham, A., Derekas, A. 2006, \apj, 644, 525
451:
452: \bibitem[Moro-Martin \& Malhotra(2002)]{moro02}
453: Moro-Martin, A. \& Malhotra, R. 2002, \aj, 124, 2305
454:
455: \bibitem[Pinte et al(2006)]{pinte06}
456: Pinte, C., Menard, F., Duchene, G. \& Bastien, P. 2006, \aap, 459, 797
457:
458: \bibitem[Rhee et al(2007)]{rhee07}
459: Rhee, J. H., Song, I., Zuckerman, B. \& McElwain, M. 2007, \apj, 660, 1556
460:
461: \bibitem[Roques et al.(1994)]{roques94}
462: Roques, F. , Scholl, H., Sicardy, B. \& Smith, B.A. 1994, Icarus, 108, 37
463:
464: \bibitem[Schneider et al.(2006)]{schneider06}
465: Schneider, G., Silverstone, M. D., Hines, D. C., et al. 2006, \apj, 650, 414
466:
467: \bibitem[Silverstone(2000)]{silverstone00}
468: Silverstone, M.D., 2000, Ph.D. thesis
469:
470: \bibitem[Stapelfeldt et al.(2007)]{krs07}
471: Stapelfeldt, K. R., Krist, J., Bryden, G., \& Chen, C. 2007, in {\it
472: In the Spirit of Bernard Lyot:
473: The Direct Detection of Planets and Circumstellar Disks in the 21st Century.},
474: ed. Paul Kalas, (Berkeley: Univ. of California), 47
475:
476: \bibitem[Thebault \& Augereau(2007)]{thebault07}
477: Thebault, P. \& Augereau, J. -C. 2007, \aap, 472, 169
478:
479: \bibitem[Trilling et al.(2007)]{trilling07}
480: Trilling, D. E., Stansberry, J. A., Stapelfeldt, K. R., et al. 2007, \apj, 658, 1289
481:
482: \bibitem[Wyatt et al.(2005)]{wyatt05}
483: Wyatt, M. C. 2005, \aap, 433, 1007
484:
485: \bibitem[Wyatt et al.(2007)]{wyatt07}
486: Wyatt, M. C., Smith, R., Su, K. Y. L., et al..
487: 2007, \apj, 663, 365
488:
489: \bibitem[Zuckerman et al.(2001)]{zuck01}
490: Zuckerman, B., Song, I., Bessel, M. S., \& Webb, R. A. 2001, \apj, 562, L87
491:
492: \bibitem[Zuckerman \& Song(2004)]{zuck04}
493: Zuckerman, B. \& Song, I. 2004, \apj, 603, 738
494:
495: \end{thebibliography}
496:
497:
498: \clearpage
499:
500: \begin{figure}
501: \epsscale{0.5}
502: \plotone{f1.eps}
503: \caption{
504: False-color, PSF-subtracted image of HD 15745. North is up, east is left.
505: Observations were made using the F606W filter and the Advanced
506: Camera for Surveys High Resolution Channel.
507: Gray fields cover the focal-plane masks in the ACS HRC. The axis
508: of symmetry for the nebulosity is PA$\simeq$280$\degr$.
509: \label{fig1}}
510: \end{figure}
511:
512: \begin{figure}
513: \epsscale{0.5}
514: \plotone{f2.eps}
515: \caption{
516: Surface brightness isocontours for the HD 15745 debris disk converted from F606W to
517: Johnson V-band (derived using STSDAS/SYNPHOT with a Kurucz model atmosphere and
518: the appropriate observatory parameters).
519: North is up and east is left. The outermost contour is 23.0 mag arcsec$^{-2}$,
520: with a contour interval of 0.5 mag arcsec$^{-2}$.
521: \label{fig2}}
522: \end{figure}
523:
524:
525: \begin{figure}
526: \epsscale{0.75}
527: \plotone{f3.eps}
528: \caption{
529: $V$-band radial surface brightness cuts between 2.5$\arcsec$ and 7.0$\arcsec$ radius
530: along the northern (PA=360$\degr$) and southern (PA=210$\degr$)
531: portions of the HD 15745 nebulosity. We extracted photometry in boxes with sizes of 0.1$\arcsec$ (along
532: the radial direction) by 0.5$\arcsec$, and we plot the median value from the five subtractions of
533: the HD 15745 PSF. Representative error bars show the standard deviation of these five values
534: for each box. The noise due to PSF subtraction artifacts is greater for the south side of
535: the disk, as evidenced by the rippled form of the radial profile on scales of a few tenths of an arcsecond
536: and the larger error bars. In some radial regions the south side of the disk may be fainter
537: than the north side by $\sim$0.4 mag arcsec$^{-2}$,
538: but these surface brightness asymmetries should be verified
539: in future data that have a higher signal-to-noise ratio.
540: \label{fig3} }
541: \end{figure}
542:
543: \begin{figure}
544: \epsscale{0.75}
545: \plotone{f4.eps}
546: \caption{
547: Observed SED of HD 15745 along with our best-fitting model (see text for model parameters).
548: Our new N$^\prime$ ($\lambda_{c}$=11.2 $\mu$m, $\Delta\lambda$=2.4$\mu$m) Gemini measurement is indicated with a diamond (Gemini program ID: GN-2006B-C-12).
549: HD 15745 is unresolved with a
550: full-width at half-maximum of 0.3$\arcsec$ in the N-S direction,
551: and 0.5$\arcsec$ in the E-W direction. Photometric calibration
552: was accomplished by observing HD 20893 in N$^\prime$ and
553: assuming an extinction of 0.172 magnitude per air mass. The
554: 24 $-$ 90 $\mu$m data represent the $IRAS$ and $ISO$ values given
555: by \citet{moor06}.
556: The dotted and dashed curves represent the stellar and disk emission, respectively.
557: The inset is a log-stretch image of our best-fit model, observed with an inclination of 67$\degr$
558: and rotated so as to match the orientation of the disk in Fig. 1. The white circle represents the 2$\arcsec$
559: radius region that is hidden in Fig. 1 and 2.
560: \label{fig4} }
561: \end{figure}
562:
563: %
564: \clearpage
565: %
566:
567: \end{document}
568:
569: