1: % Time-stamp: "2007-12-07 04:06:24 TK"
2:
3: % aas format: for submission -> preprint/aastex
4: %
5: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
6:
7: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
8: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
9: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
10: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
11:
12: % For astro-ph submission
13: %
14: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
15: %\documentclass[onecolumn]{emulateapj}
16: %
17: % 3 lines Below is for old emulateapj
18: %\documentclass{aastex}
19: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
20: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
21:
22: %\journalinfo{The Astronomical Journal, 2003 February, astro-ph/0210475}
23: %\journalinfo{Submitted to The Astronomical Journal, 2007 September 14}
24: %\journalinfo{Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal, 2003}
25: \slugcomment{Received 2007 September 14; accepted 2007 December 5}
26:
27: \shorttitle{Rich Molecular Gas in Two Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies}
28: \shortauthors{KAWAGUCHI et al.}
29:
30: % For the last version for aastex
31: %\received{2002 October 31}
32: %\accepted{2003 April 19}
33:
34:
35: %%% My own definitions %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36: % \frac with brackets
37: \def\brfrac#1#2{\left(\dfrac{#1}{#2}\right)}
38: \def\dfrac#1#2{{\displaystyle\frac{\mathstrut #1}{#2}}}
39: % \pa{T}{t} = Partial Derivative
40: \def\pa#1#2{\biggl( \dfrac{\partial #1}{\partial #2} \biggr)}
41: % \ea = et al.\
42: \def\ea{{\rm et~al.\ }}
43:
44: % USE lesssim \& gtrsim !
45: \def\ltsima{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}
46: \def\lesssim{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}
47: %\def\gtsima{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}
48: %\def\gtrsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}
49: %
50: \def\Mdot{{\dot{M}}}
51: \def\mdot{{\dot{m}}}
52: \def\Mbh{{M_{\rm BH}}}
53: \def\Mbulge{{M_{\rm bulge}}}
54: \def\MH2{{M(H_2)}}
55: \def\Msun{{M_\odot}}
56: \def\Lnu{{L_\nu}}
57: \def\Lsun{{L_\odot}}
58: \def\Ledd{{L_{\rm Edd}}}
59: \def\Fnu{{F_\nu}}
60: \def\Rg{{r_{\rm Sch}}}
61: \def\rs{{r_{\rm Sch}}}
62:
63: \def\Hb{{{\rm H} \beta}}
64: \def\Fe2{{{\rm Fe} \sc II}}
65: \def\Tcol{{T_{\rm in}}}
66: \def\Tin{{T_{\rm in}}}
67: %%%
68: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
69:
70:
71: \begin{document}
72: \title{
73: FIRST \ DETECTION \ OF \ ${}^{12}$CO ($1 \rightarrow 0$) \ EMISSION \
74: FROM \ TWO \ NARROW-LINE \ SEYFERT \ 1 \ GALAXIES}
75:
76: \author{Toshihiro Kawaguchi\altaffilmark{1},
77: Kouichiro Nakanishi\altaffilmark{2},
78: Kohtaro Kohno\altaffilmark{3},
79: Kouji Ohta\altaffilmark{4}
80: {\rm and} Kentaro Aoki\altaffilmark{5}}
81:
82: \email{kawaguti@phys.aoyama.ac.jp}
83:
84: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Mathematics,
85: Aoyama Gakuin University,
86: Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8558,
87: Japan}
88: \altaffiltext{2}{Nobeyama Radio Observatory, Minamimaki, Minamisaku,
89: Nagano 384-1305, Japan}
90: \altaffiltext{3}{Institute of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo,
91: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan}
92: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University,
93: Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}
94: \altaffiltext{5}{Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory
95: of Japan, 650 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA}
96:
97: % For emulateapj
98: %\centerline{e-mail: kawaguti@phys.aoyama.ac.jp}
99: % For submit (aastex)
100:
101:
102: \begin{abstract}
103: In order to investigate how the growth of galactic bulges
104: progresses with the growth of central black holes (BHs),
105: we observed molecular gas
106: (fuel for the coming star formation)
107: in possibly young active galaxies,
108: narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies (NLS1s).
109: We present the results of
110: radio observations of ${}^{12}$CO\,($1 \rightarrow 0$)
111: using the Nobeyama Millimeter Array (with 2--4 kpc spatial resolution)
112: for two FIR-bright NLS1s,
113: yielding the first detection of their CO emission.
114: Corresponding molecular--gas masses $\MH2$ of $(1-3) \times 10^9 \Msun$
115: are the 2nd and 4th largest ones among NLS1s.
116: By estimating dynamical masses and bulge masses $\Mbulge$
117: for these two NLS1s using
118: CO channel map and CO line widths,
119: we found $\MH2$ amount to 0.13--0.35 %0.45
120: of these masses.
121: Taking account the star formation efficiency ($\sim 0.1$),
122: the increase in $M_{\rm bulge}$ in those NLS1s in the near future
123: ($\lesssim 10^{7.5}$\,yr) is expected not to be a huge fraction
124: (1--5\,\% %8\,\%
125: of the preexisting stars).
126: Bulge growth may have finished before BH growth, or
127: bulge--BH coevolution may
128: proceed with many, occasional discrete
129: events, where one coevolution event produces only a small amount
130: of mass growth of BHs and of bulges.
131: We also discuss the ratios of
132: star-formation rate--to--gas accretion rate onto BHs,
133: finding that two NLS1s have very small ratios
134: ($\approx$\,1)
135: compared with
136: the $\Mbulge / \Mbh$ ratios found in active and inactive
137: galaxies ($\approx$\,700).
138: This huge difference
139: suggests either
140: the non-overlapped coevolution, long star formation duration
141: or temporarily high accretion rate during NLS1 phase.
142: \end{abstract}
143:
144: \keywords{galaxies: active --- galaxies: evolution ---
145: galaxies: individual (IRAS\,04312+4008, IRAS\,05262+4432)
146: -- ISM: molecules -- radio lines: ISM}
147:
148: \section{INTRODUCTION}
149:
150: %=== Coevolution ===\\
151: Mass of galactic spheroid component
152: (galactic bulge or elliptical galaxy itself) is tightly correlated
153: with mass of central black hole (BH) both in
154: normal and active galaxies
155: (Gebhardt et al.\ 2000; Ferrarese \& Merritt 2000; Nelson 2000).
156: Along with the lack of its cosmic evolution (Shields et al.\ 2003;
157: Kiuchi \ea 2006;
158: see however, Akiyama 2005, Woo et al.\ 2006, and Borys \ea 2005),
159: the tightness of the correlation
160: indicates that the growth of spheroid mass
161: and that of BH mass ($M_{\rm BH}$)
162: occur almost contemporarily.
163:
164: However,
165: no direct evidence for %(quasi-)
166: simultaneous coevolution has been found,
167: and thus its physical origin remains a great mystery.
168: Jet and/or outflow
169: from an Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN)
170: may govern the formation of spheroid (Silk \&
171: Rees 1998); i.e., BHs made before the bulges' growth.
172: On the contrary, radiation drag by massive stars during the
173: bulge formation may have controlled the BH growth
174: (Umemura 2001), resulting in bulges formed
175: prior to BHs' growth.
176:
177: Most numerical studies presume that cool, interstellar gas
178: drives coevolution (e.g., Kauffmann \& Haehnelt 2000).
179: For instance, semi--analytical approaches
180: assume a major merging of galaxies initiates the growth of
181: BHs and bulges, and
182: usually adopt
183: an AGN duration ($e$--folding accretion time scale) around
184: $10^{7.5}$\,yr and
185: a star formation duration of $\sim 10^8$\,yr
186: (Kauffmann, White \& Guiderdoni 1993; Kauffmann \& Haehnelt 2000).
187: Theoretically and observationally, it is unknown %highly uncertain
188: which growth phase precede another.
189: Now, let us simply assume that the
190: BH and bulge growth phases begin conjunctionally
191: and proceed with similar durations.
192: Then, we will see enough
193: molecular gas -- fuel for the coming star formation --
194: in the bulges
195: of AGNs in the early stage of BH growth
196: (e.g., in the first quarter of the AGN/star formation durations).
197: Old AGNs (e.g., in the last quarter of the durations)
198: that have spent long time since the
199: ignition of coevolution would have already consumed the gas
200: through the past star formation,
201: with only a tiny amount of leftover for further bulge growth.
202:
203: %=== About NLS1 ===\\
204: Here, we notice a subsample of AGNs,
205: narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy (NLS1),
206: as possibly young AGNs.
207: NLS1s are characterized (see Pogge 2000) by
208: (i)
209: narrower Balmer lines of hydrogen
210: (FWHM of $\Hb$ $\leq$ 2000 km s$^{-1}$), relative to
211: usual broad-line Seyfert 1 galaxies (BLS1s) and QSOs having
212: FWHM of $\Hb$ $\gtrsim$ 5000 km s$^{-1}$ (Osterbrock \& Pogge 1985).
213: (ii) They often emit strong optical
214: \Fe2 multiplets (e.g., Halpern \& Oke 1987), and show
215: (iii)
216: steep and luminous soft X-ray
217: excess (Pounds et al. 1995; Otani et al. 1996; Boller et al. 1996;
218: Wang \ea 1996; Laor et al. 1997; Leighly 1999b).
219: (iv) Rapid X-ray variability is another characteristic
220: of NLS1s (Otani et al. 1996; Boller et al. 1997;
221: Leighly 1999a; Hayashida 2000).
222: Characteristics in (ii)--(iv) indicate that NLS1s are non-obscured
223: objects, alike type 2 (i.e., obscured) AGNs.
224: Currently, the most promising picture of NLS1s
225: is that they contain
226: relatively less massive black holes (with $\Mbh \sim 10^{6-8}M_\odot$) and
227: higher $L/\Ledd$ ratio ($\sim 1$; e.g., Brandt \& Boller 1998;
228: Hayashida 2000; Mineshige \ea 2000),
229: where $L$ and $\Ledd$ are the AGN luminosity
230: and Eddington luminosity, respectively.
231: NLS1s occupy 10--30\% among type 1 AGNs in the local universe
232: (see Kawaguchi \ea 2004b).
233:
234: High $L/\Ledd$ ratios of NLS1s imply that
235: their BHs are now growing rapidly via super-Eddington
236: accretion (Rees 1992; Mathur 2000; Kawaguchi et al. 2004b).
237: Provided that a gas accretion rate onto the central BH,
238: $\Mdot$, during an AGN phase does not drastically change with time
239: (see Collin \& Kawaguchi 2004),
240: large $\Mdot / \Mbh$ ratios of NLS1s also mean that
241: the elapsed time since the ignition of an AGN activity
242: is shorter than that of BLS1s.
243: (If the gas accretion lasts long enough, then $\Mbh$ would not
244: be so small.)
245: Bulge luminosity
246: of NLS1s are smaller than those of BLS1s
247: in general (Botte et al. 2004).
248:
249: NLS1s are likely young active galactic nuclei
250: [during the first 10--30\% of the whole AGN lifetime
251: ($\sim 10^8$\,yr; see \S 6)],
252: in the process of coevolution of
253: supermassive BHs and bulges.
254: This is our working hypothesis in this study. We consider that
255: %Thus
256: they are the best and unique targets to explore how the BH-bulge
257: coevolution proceeds.
258: If the growth phases of BHs and bulges
259: are really overlapped,
260: bulges of NLS1s may also be rapidly growing with
261: a significant amount of
262: molecular gas accumulated in their bulges.
263: Do they show
264: large ratios of molecular-gas to bulge masses,
265: compared with BLS1s
266: (which are expected to be older than NLS1s,
267: based on their lower $\Mdot / \Mbh$ ratios)?
268: To examine these conjecture,
269: we need copious data for numerous NLS1s,
270: collected under the condition that
271: the spatial resolution is less than the bulge size
272: (typically in the order of 1\,kpc).
273:
274: However,
275: NLS1s are rare
276: %only 10--30\,\%
277: among Seyfert 1 galaxies, and
278: thus we do not have many NLS1s, whose CO emission are detected,
279: in the nearby universe.
280: Therefore,
281: observations to increase the number of CO-detected NLS1s
282: are fundamental for listing strong CO emitters, with an eye to
283: follow--up sub--kpc observations on them.
284: The $\Mbh$--bulge mass relation of NLS1s and its comparison
285: with the relation of inactive galaxies are subjects of debate
286: (Komossa \& Xu 2007, and references therein).
287: Our observations would also help to clarify if
288: NLS1s are really young AGNs.
289:
290: In this paper, we present
291: the observational results of
292: ${}^{12}$CO\,($1 \rightarrow 0$) line from
293: 2 NLS1s with 5--6'' (2--4 kpc at their distance) spatial resolution
294: using the Nobeyama Millimeter Array (NMA) at
295: the Nobeyama Radio Observatory.
296: %=== Structure of paper and Parameter ===\\
297: The next section outlines the targets selection, and
298: \S 3 describes the log and data reduction of our radio observations.
299: We then show the results in \S 4,
300: followed by discussions on bulge--mass to stellar--mass ratios
301: in \S 5.
302: The final section is devoted to discussions and summary.
303: Cosmological parameters adopted in this paper are
304: $H_0 = 70$\,km\,s$^{-1}$\,Mpc$^{-1}$,
305: $\Omega_M = 0.3$ and $\Omega_\Lambda = 0.7$.
306:
307:
308: \section{Selection of Targets}
309:
310: So far, there are only a few NLS1s
311: whose CO lines are detected in the nearby universe.
312: Intending to increase the number of such NLS1s,
313: we thus carried out the following
314: observations
315: (with beam size $\sim \,$6'') onto two NLS1s
316: with no CO observations reported.
317:
318: In order to select targets,
319: we investigated flux densities
320: at 100$\mu$m (measured with IRAS satellite), which roughly trace the
321: CO line flux (Solomon et al.\ 1997),
322: for all NLS1s at Decl.\ $> -25^{\circ}$ and
323: redshift $z \leq 0.067$ (the sample summarized by Ohta et al.\ 2007).
324:
325: For NGC~4051,
326: of the largest 100$\mu$m flux (24\,Jy), its CO emission line
327: is clearly detected (Young \ea 1995; Maiolino \ea 1997;
328: Kohno \ea 1999a,\,b).
329: Whereas only an upper-limit is obtained for the
330: second 100$\mu$m brightest (4.7\,Jy) object (Mrk~766 = NGC~4253),
331: with $M(H_2) < 10^{7.7} \Msun$ (Taniguchi \ea 1990).
332: It then turned out that the third and forth brightest
333: NLS1s ($\sim$\,4\,Jy)
334: have no radio observations made on their molecular gas.
335: We select these two SBb galaxies,
336: IRAS~04312+4008 ($z=$0.020) and
337: IRAS~05262+4432 ($z=$0.032), to observe.
338:
339: We regard these two NLS1s as the best targets to elucidate how bulge
340: growth is accompanied with BH growth:
341: By assuming a viliarized
342: Broad Line Region (Wandel et al.\ 1999; Kaspi et al.\ 2000),
343: $M_{\rm BH}$ is estimated with H$\beta$ width:
344: \begin{equation}
345: \Mbh = 4.82 \,\times \,10^6 \Msun
346: \left[\dfrac{{\rm FWHM (H}\beta)}{\rm 1000 \, km \,s^{-1}}\right]^{2}
347: \left[\dfrac{\nu L_\nu (5100 \AA)}{10^{44} \,
348: {\rm erg \, s^{-1}}}\right]^{0.7}.
349: \label{eq:bhmass}
350: \end{equation}
351: Although some improved equations in place of the equation above
352: are suggested by, e.g., Onken \ea (2004), Kaspi \ea (2005) and
353: Collin \ea (2006),
354: we adopt eq.~\ref{eq:bhmass} in this paper for simplicity.
355: %
356: The FWHM(H$\beta$), optical luminosity and estimated BH masses
357: for the two objects are
358: %(860\,km\,s$^{-1}$, 10$^{44.62}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$, 10$^{6.98} \Msun$)
359: (860\,km\,s$^{-1}$, 10$^{44.6}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$, 10$^{7.0} \Msun$)
360: and
361: %(740\,km\,s$^{-1}$, 10$^{45.22}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$, 10$^{7.28} \Msun$)
362: (740\,km\,s$^{-1}$, 10$^{45.2}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$, 10$^{7.3} \Msun$)
363: for IRAS\,04312 and IRAS\,05262, respectively (Ohta et al.\ 2007).
364: %
365: Based on the $\Mbh$--estimations in this way
366: and
367: our spectral models for $\Mdot$--evaluation (Kawaguchi 2003),
368: they have extremely small $M_{\rm BH} / \dot{M}$ ratios
369: ($< \,$2~Myr) even among NLS1s [all CO data for NLS1s
370: taken from our observations and from literatures
371: will be given in the forthcoming paper (Kawaguchi \ea in prep.)].
372: Thus, they probably have spent little time since each BH began to
373: grow.
374:
375: %Some supportive evidences for on-going star formation
376: %in the two objects are:
377: %(i) Our optical
378: %imaging data of their host galaxies (Ohta et al.\ 2007) show
379: %axis-asymmetric morphology (bars),
380: %implying recent star formation activities.
381: %(ii) IRAS~05262
382: %shows an extended narrow line emission with low
383: %[N\,II]/H$\alpha$ ratio, i.e.\ from H\,II regions
384: %(V\'{e}ron-Cetty \ea 2001).
385:
386:
387: \section{Observation and Data Reduction}
388:
389: In April--March 2006,
390: aperture synthesis observations toward 2 NLS1s were
391: carried out with the NMA D-configuration,
392: with the longest baseline of 82m.
393: The beam size ($\sim 5'' \times 6''$) corresponds to
394: 2--4\,kpc at their distances (see \S\,5 for
395: their bulge effective radii).
396: The NMA consists of six 10m antennas,
397: although one antenna was sometimes out of order
398: during our observations.
399:
400: In all observations,
401: \ensuremath{{\hfill12\atop\hfill} \mathrm{CO}} ($1 \rightarrow 0$)
402: ($\lambda_{\rm rest} = 2.6008$ mm or $\nu_{\rm rest} = 115.271$ GHz)
403: lines were
404: searched for, by setting the central frequency
405: of each observation to the redshifted frequency.
406: The backend we used was the Ultra-Wide-Band Correlator
407: (UWBC; Okumura et al. 2000),
408: which was set to cover 512MHz ($\sim$1300 km\,s$^{-1}$)
409: with 256 channels at 2 MHz resolution
410: (with $\sim$\,10\,km/s effective resolution after
411: the Hanning window function applied).
412: The quasar
413: 3C111
414: was used for phase and amplitude reference calibrations,
415: while 3C454.3 was used for bandpass calibration.
416: Total on-source integration time on each object
417: and beam size are summarized in Table~1. %\ref{tab:log}.
418: To calibrate absolute flux-scale,
419: Uranus was used.
420: The uncertainty in the absolute flux scale is typically
421: $ \sim$\,$10\%$.
422: Standard data reduction was performed
423: using the UVPROC-II software package developed at NRO
424: (Tsutsumi et al. 1997).
425: Some parts of data taken under a bad radio seeing condition were
426: removed from our analysis.
427: After clipping a small fraction of data with unusually high-amplitude,
428: the data were then imaged with natural UV weighting, and
429: CLEANed, with the NRAO AIPS package.
430: The absolute positional accuracy is less than $\sim$\,5\,\%
431: of the beam size.
432:
433:
434: \section{Results}
435:
436: The CO emission from the 2 IRAS galaxies was detected, for the first time,
437: by our observations.
438:
439:
440: \subsection{Distribution of Gas}
441:
442: To show the distribution of the molecular gas of the
443: two targets, we here show the CLEANed maps binned
444: over broad velocity ranges (320 or 190\,km\,s$^{-1}$)
445: in figures \ref{fig:ir043binmap}--\ref{fig:ir052binmap}.
446: Throughout, north is at the top and east to the left in maps.
447: The ranges integrated are shown in
448: figures \ref{fig:ir043spec}--\ref{fig:ir052spec} with labels ``map''.
449: In both objects, the peak flux densities amount up to $\sim 16 \sigma$
450: ($\sim 100$\,mJy per beam).
451: By looking at the 2MASS images, we find that
452: the peak of CO emission from each galaxy coincides
453: with the peak position of the NIR emission of each galaxy.
454: The peak position of the CO emission is marked with the
455: crosses, to refer the central position in each
456: channel map later (figures \ref{fig:ir043chanmap}--\ref{fig:ir052chanmap}).
457: Optical images taken at University--of--Hawaii 88 inch telescope
458: at $I$-band, taken under $\sim 0.6''$ (FWHM) image quality
459: (Ohta \ea 2007),
460: are also shown to present the morphology of the host galaxies.
461:
462: The gas distribution of IRAS~04312 is quite centrally concentrated
463: (fig. \ref{fig:ir043binmap}).
464: The FWHM of this signal is about 7.2'' $\times$ 6.8''.
465: Considering the beam size (5.8'' $\times$ 5.2''), the
466: spatial extent (in diameter) of the gas is estimated to be
467: $\sim$ 4.3'' $\times$ 4.4'' ($\sim$\,1.7--1.8\,kpc),
468: well smaller than the beam.
469: On the other hand,
470: the molecular gas of IRAS~05262 (fig. \ref{fig:ir052binmap}) seems
471: extended larger than the beam size (6.1'' $\times$ 5.2'').
472: The FWHM of its central CO emission, $\sim$\,8.3''$\times$10.7'',
473: suggests the actual size to be
474: $\sim$\,5.6''$\times$9.4'' (3.5$\times$5.9\,kpc),
475: elongated in the North--South direction.
476: In \S\,5,
477: these sizes are compared with their bulge effective radii,
478: estimated by a couple of methods,
479: to discuss how much fraction of the detected CO gas
480: are located within the bulge.
481:
482: Incidentally, an isolated CO emission is seen
483: $\sim$\,$7''$ ($\sim$\,4.4~kpc in projected distance) south
484: from the center of IRAS~05262, which seems to
485: arise from a star forming region evident
486: in the optical image.
487:
488:
489: \subsection{CO Spectra and Molecular-Gas Masses}
490:
491: Next, we present spectra of CO\,($1 \rightarrow 0$) line for the 2 NLS1s,
492: in figures \ref{fig:ir043spec} (IRAS~04312) and
493: \ref{fig:ir052spec} (IRAS~05262).
494: Spectrum of each central region shows a double--horned
495: shape, indicating a rotating molecular disk in origin.
496: The horizontal solid lines, labeled as ``map'', show the ranges
497: used in figures \ref{fig:ir043binmap}--\ref{fig:ir052binmap}
498: to draw the frequency--integrated maps.
499: Downward arrows
500: indicate the recession velocity of the targets.
501:
502: The CO--to--H$_2$ conversion factor
503: is estimated to be 0.8 and 2.9
504: $M_\odot$ (K km s$^{-1}$ pc$^2$)$^{-1}$ for
505: ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (Downes \& Solomon 1998)
506: and for our Galaxy (Dame \ea 2001), respectively.
507: When converting CO line flux to H$_2$ mass, $\MH2$,
508: the conversion factor = 1 $M_\odot$
509: (K km s$^{-1}$ pc$^2$)$^{-1}$ is assumed throughout this paper.
510: The same conversion factor is applied for
511: re-computations of
512: $\MH2$ for objects taken from literatures.
513:
514: The velocity--integrated flux from
515: IRAS~04312 measured over the same area used
516: to draw figure \ref{fig:ir043spec}, is
517: 57$\pm 3$\,Jy\,\,km\,s$^{-1}$,
518: meaning that $M(H_2) = (1.0 \pm 0.05) \times 10^9 \Msun$.
519: The velocity integration range is shown in figure \ref{fig:ir043spec}
520: with a label ``flux''.
521: While, the velocity--integrated flux from the central region of
522: IRAS~05262, measured in the box including the CO peak
523: (fig.\ref{fig:ir052binmap}), is
524: 62$\pm 3$\,Jy\,\,km\,s$^{-1}$,
525: corresponding to $M(H_2)$ of $(2.8 \pm 0.1) \times 10^9 \Msun$.
526: These molecular--gas masses are the 2nd and 4th largest masses
527: (to our best knowledge) among NLS1s,
528: with I\,Zw\,1 [$\MH2 = 10^{9.5} \Msun$ and $z=0.061$; Maiolino \ea 1997]
529: and PG\,1440+356 [$\MH2 = 10^{9.3} \Msun$ and $z=0.079$; Evans \ea 2001]
530: being the 1st and 3rd ones.
531: Summary of all NLS1s whose CO emission are detected
532: will be given in the forthcoming paper (Kawaguchi et al.\ in prep.).
533: If we restrict ourselves at $z \leq 0.05$ (where
534: $1''$ angular resolution
535: is equivalent to 1\,kpc spatial resolution),
536: these masses are the largest ones among NLS1s.
537:
538: In the bottom panel of figure \ref{fig:ir052spec},
539: the spectrum of the isolated CO emission
540: ($\sim$\,7'' south from the center) is also shown.
541: This quite narrow emission line has
542: a velocity--integrated flux of 21$\pm 1.4$\,Jy\,Km\,s$^{-1}$,
543: corresponding to $M(H_2) = (9.3 \pm 0.6) \times 10^8 \Msun$.
544: Translating this $H_2$ mass into a star formation rate (SFR)
545: by using equations \ref{eq:FIRMH2} and \ref{eq:SFRFIR} shown later,
546: we get an SFR of
547: 3.0 $\Msun$\,yr$^{-1}$.
548:
549:
550: \subsection{Kinematics}
551:
552: Figures \ref{fig:ir043chanmap} and \ref{fig:ir052chanmap}
553: show channel maps of the two IRAS galaxies.
554: Each map presents a map binned over 42\,km\,s$^{-1}$, and velocity
555: step between adjacent maps is 21\,km\,s$^{-1}$.
556: The cross drawn in each panel represents the peak position
557: of the full CO emission
558: (Figs.\ \ref{fig:ir043binmap} and \ref{fig:ir052binmap}).
559: In IRAS~05262, a molecular--gas clump at $\sim 7''$ south from the center
560: is evident.
561:
562:
563:
564: In both objects, rotating dynamics around each center (cross)
565: is clearly seen.
566: Position--velocity diagrams shown
567: in figures \ref{fig:ir043pv}--\ref{fig:ir052pv} also indicate
568: rotation.
569: The position angle used for each
570: diagram is determined as follows.
571: Two maps (of high S/N peaks) are chosen from each channel map.
572: Then, the peak positions in the two maps
573: (with two channels separated by $\sim 210$\,km\,s$^{-1}$)
574: are connected by a line.
575:
576: Now, we derive dynamical mass (i.e., enclosed mass) $M_{\rm dyn}$
577: from these position--velocity diagrams.
578: We estimate an inclination angle $i$ for each galaxy by measuring
579: the ellipticity of the {\it I}--band image (Ohta \ea 2007),
580: %assume of 60 deg,
581: where the inclination angle of 0 deg means face-on view on
582: a rotating CO gas disk:
583: $i=40^{\circ} \pm 1^{\circ}$ (IRAS\,04312) and
584: $i=53^{\circ} \pm 5^{\circ}$ (IRAS\,05262).
585: Then, the dynamical mass is evaluated as
586: \begin{equation}
587: M_{\rm dyn} = 5.8 %7.8
588: \times 10^8 \Msun \brfrac{\Delta V}{\rm 100\,km\,s^{-1}}^2
589: \brfrac{R}{\rm kpc} (\sin i)^{-2},
590: %\brfrac{\sin i}{\sqrt{3}/2}^{-2},
591: \end{equation}
592: where $\Delta V$ and $R$ are the velocity difference and
593: the separation.
594: Positional separations $R$ and velocity differences $\Delta V$
595: between two peaks in the position--velocity diagrams
596: are 2.7'' (1.1\,kpc in projected distance) and 164\,km\,s$^{-1}$
597: for IRAS~04312, and
598: 5.1'' (3.2\,kpc) and 165\,km\,s$^{-1}$ for IRAS~05262, respectively.
599: The enclosed mass $M_{\rm dyn}$ within the central region of IRAS~04312
600: is $4.1 \times 10^9 \Msun$. %$2.3 \times 10^9 \Msun$.
601: While for IRAS~05262,
602: $M_{\rm dyn} = 8.0 \times 10^{9} \Msun$.
603: %$M_{\rm dyn} = 6.8 \times 10^{9} \Msun$.
604: The peak-to-peak separations
605: represent the lower limits of their CO--gas sizes.
606: As we saw in \S\,4.1, the CO gas in IRAS~04312 is indeed
607: more concentrated than that in IRAS~05262.
608:
609:
610: \section{Sizes of CO Gas and Bulge \label{sec:size}}
611:
612: We here discuss the sizes of the CO gas in two NLS1s (\S\,4.1 and \S\,4.3),
613: and compare them with their bulge sizes.
614: The spatial extent (in diameter) of the CO gas in IRAS\,04312
615: is estimated to be
616: $\sim$\,4.3''$\times$4.4'' ($\sim$\,1.7--1.8\,kpc).
617: On the other hand,
618: IRAS\,05262 seems to have an extended and elongated CO gas at its center
619: with the size of
620: $\sim$\,5.6''$\times$9.4'' (3.5$\times$5.9\,kpc).
621: Peak-to-peak separations
622: in position--velocity diagrams
623: (Figs \ref{fig:ir043pv} and \ref{fig:ir052pv}),
624: 2.7'' (=\,1.1\,kpc) and 5.1'' (=\,3.2\,kpc)
625: for IRAS~04312 and IRAS~05262, respectively, also indicate
626: that the molecular gas of IRAS~05262 is more extended than
627: that of IRAS~04312.
628:
629: Now, let us estimate the bulge effective radius ($R_{\rm eff}$)
630: from [O III] width as follows.
631: The FWHM of [O III] emission lines of IRAS~04312
632: is 380\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (V\'{e}ron-Cetty \ea 2001).
633: Since [O III] widths and velocity dispersions ($\sigma_*$) are
634: nearly the same (Heckman \ea 1989; Nelson \& Whittle 1996),
635: $\sigma_*$ for this object is evaluated to be about 160\,km\,s$^{-1}$,
636: by dividing the [O III] FWHM width by 2.35.
637: Elliptical galaxies and bulges of disk galaxies obey
638: a canonical relation about their dynamics, size, etc (the fundamental plane).
639: The velocity dispersion can be translated into the
640: size (Guzman \ea 1993):
641: \begin{equation}
642: R_{\rm eff} = 0.56 \,\,{\rm kpc}
643: \brfrac{\sigma_*}{\rm 100 \,km\,s^{-1}}^{3.15}
644: \label{eq:Reff}
645: \end{equation}
646: Thus, the bulge effective radius of IRAS~04312 is estimated to be
647: about 2.6~kpc or 6.4'' at its distance.
648: However, the inferred bulge size (13'' in diameter)
649: is comparable to the length of the bar seen in the
650: optical image in the North--South direction.
651: Therefore, this method likely overestimates $R_{\rm eff}$ for
652: this object.
653: Adopting the same method to IRAS~05262
654: by taking its [O III] width (365\,km\,s$^{-1}$)
655: from V\'{e}ron-Cetty \ea (2001),
656: its $R_{\rm eff}$ is about
657: 2.3~kpc or 3.6'' at its distance.
658:
659: We note that there is a large scatter
660: about the regression equation (eq.~\ref{eq:Reff}).
661: Thus, $R_{\rm eff}$ estimation using eq.~\ref{eq:Reff} alone
662: should not be taken too much seriously.
663: For instance,
664: our visual investigations on the radial profile
665: of the two IRAS galaxies (data presented by Ohta \ea 2007)
666: lead us rough estimations of their $R_{\rm eff}$ to be
667: $\sim 0.7''$ and $3.1''$ for IRAS~04312 and IRAS~05262,
668: respectively.
669: Because of strong emission from the nuclei,
670: a large uncertainty of $R_{\rm eff}$ evaluated by
671: this method is also inevitable.
672:
673: For IRAS~04312, two methods above provide so different estimations
674: (13'' and 1.4'' in diameter).
675: Thus, it is premature to compare these with the size of the CO gas
676: ($\sim 4'' \times 4''$),
677: and to discuss how much fraction of the total CO flux comes
678: from its bulge region.
679: While, two values are consistent each other for IRAS~05262
680: (7'' and 6'' in diameter).
681: Since the spatial extent of the detected molecular gas
682: in IRAS~05262 ($\sim$\,5.6''$\times$9.4'')
683: seems a bit larger than the estimated bulge size,
684: the molecular gas harbored within the bugle would be
685: slightly smaller than the detected $\MH2$.
686: To the first order, the observed $\MH2$ well represents
687: the $\MH2$ of the bulge of IRAS\,05262.
688: It is unclear whether stars newly born from the
689: molecular gas belong to the bulge or to the galactic disk.
690: In this study, we regard star formation within $R_{\rm eff}$ as
691: bulge growth.
692:
693:
694: \section{Molecular Gas and Bulge Masses}
695:
696: Here, we compare the molecular--gas masses of these two IRAS galaxies
697: with the dynamical masses ($M_{\rm dyn}$) and
698: with the bulge masses ($M_{\rm bulge}$).
699: These masses are summarized in Table~2. %\ref{tab:mass}.
700:
701: The dynamical mass $M_{\rm dyn}$ is inferred
702: from the CO--gas kinematics.
703: We discuss the position--velocity diagrams
704: (figures \ref{fig:ir043pv} and \ref{fig:ir052pv}).
705: The enclosed mass $M_{\rm dyn}$ within the central region of IRAS~04312
706: is $4.1 \times 10^9 \Msun$, resulting in
707: a $M(H_2)/M_{\rm dyn}$ ratio of 0.25.
708: %is $2.3 \times 10^9 \Msun$, resulting in
709: %a $M(H_2)/M_{\rm dyn}$ ratio of 0.45.
710: While for IRAS~05262,
711: $M_{\rm dyn} = 8.0 \times 10^{9} \Msun$, and
712: the $M(H_2)/M_{\rm dyn}$ ratio is then 0.35.
713: %$M_{\rm dyn} = 6.8 \times 10^{9} \Msun$, and
714: %the $M(H_2)/M_{\rm dyn}$ ratio is then 0.41.
715: If we estimate the current stellar mass as
716: $M_{\rm dyn} - M(H_2)$,
717: the molecular gas masses for these two objects account to
718: 33\,\% and 54\,\% %81\,\% and 69\,\%
719: of the current stellar
720: masses\footnote{H\,I gas is normally negligible (compared to
721: H$_2$ masses) within several kpc (``molecular front'')
722: around galactic centers
723: (Sofue 1994; Sofue \& Nakai 1994).}.
724: However, all the molecular gas will not be consumed
725: by star formation during this star formation episode
726: (in $\sim 10^{7-8}$\,yr),
727: since a molecular cloud is to be destroyed by photoevapolation,
728: mass loss and supernova explosion (Williams \& McKee 1997).
729: Recycling of the remaining diffuse gas
730: %, which is converted into atomic and ionized forms,
731: may occur,
732: %after efficient radiative cooling,
733: but on a timescale much longer than the timescale we
734: are considering.
735: Since we are interested in the BH--bulge evolution during
736: one coevolution episode, we dot not go further upon the
737: recycling process (on a long timescale) in this study.
738: The fraction of a molecular gas mass that is converted
739: into stars in molecular clouds (efficiency of star formation)
740: ranges from a few percent (Myers et al.\ 1986;
741: Wilson \& Matthews 1995) to tens percent (Hillenbrand \& Hartmann 1998;
742: Lada \& Lada 2003).
743: Adopting a star formation efficiency of 0.1,
744: new stars with masses of $3-5 \%$ %$7-8 \%$
745: of the preexisting stars will be formed in the near future
746: (e.g., within the timescale of cloud--destruction,
747: $\sim 10^{7.5}$\,yr; Williams \& McKee 1997)
748: from the molecular gas.
749:
750: As we discussed in \S 5, the bulge size is not
751: definitively determined.
752: %Due to the uncertainty on the bulge size (\S~5),
753: %Since
754: Thus, we can not be completely sure that the dynamical mass
755: (or virial mass) equals to the bulge mass.
756: Therefore, we next try to have another
757: estimation of the bulge mass as a complementary measure.
758: The bulge mass, $M_{\rm bulge}$, can be estimated from kinematics
759: of stars/clouds embedded in the gravitational potential of
760: the bulge, in the form where $M_{\rm bulge} \propto ({\rm line \ width})^4$.
761: To determine the normalization in this relationship,
762: we refer to the $M-\sigma_*$ relationship found in normal galaxies.
763: If we adopt the two relations,
764: $M_{\rm BH} = 8 \times 10^6 \, \Msun
765: \, [{\rm \sigma_*} / ({\rm 100\,km\,s^{-1}})]^4$
766: and
767: $M_{\rm bulge} =710 \, \Mbh$
768: (e.g., Tremaine \ea 2002; Gebhardt \ea 2000; H\"{a}ring \& Rix 2004),
769: we obtain the following relationship:
770: \begin{equation}
771: M_{\rm bulge} = 5.7 \times 10^{9} \Msun
772: \brfrac{\sigma_*}{\rm 100\,km\,s^{-1}}^4.
773: \label{eq:bulmass}
774: \end{equation}
775: The scatter in $\Mbh$--$\sigma_*$ relation is about 0.3\,dex
776: (Gebhardt \ea 2000),
777: whereas the uncertainty in the $\Mbulge/\Mbh$ ratio is also
778: $\sim$\,0.3\,dex (e.g., Marconi \& Hunt 2003).
779: The uncertainty of the bulge masses evaluated in this way
780: would thus be about 0.4\,dex. % (e.g., Merritt \& Ferrarese 2001).
781:
782: CO widths might be useful to evaluate $\sigma_*$
783: and then bulge masses
784: (Shields \ea 2006; Ho 2007; see \S~\ref{COwidth}).
785: We here follow their procedure.
786: Assuming that the dispersion of CO emission line
787: $\sigma_{\rm CO}$ equals to
788: $\sigma_*$, as suggested by Shields et al.,
789: we adopt
790: $\sigma_{\rm CO}$ of 109 and 110\,km\,s$^{-1}$
791: for IRAS\,04312 and IRAS\,05262, respectively (see \S\ref{COwidth}).
792: With eq.~\ref{eq:bulmass},
793: bulge masses are estimated as
794: $\Mbulge = 8.0 \times 10^9 \Msun$ and
795: $8.4 \times 10^9 \Msun$,
796: resulting in $\MH2 / \Mbulge$ ratios of 0.13 and 0.33, respectively.
797: %
798: [If [O III] widths are used as surrogate for $\sigma_*$
799: in eq.~\ref{eq:bulmass},
800: $\MH2 / \Mbulge$ ratios decrease by a factor of 4 (see \S~7.2).]
801: %
802: %Thus,
803: Star formation will undergo with %$1.3-3 \%$
804: $1-3 \%$
805: of the masses
806: of the current stellar masses for the star formation efficiency of 0.1.
807: Even if we again estimate the mass of preexisting stars by
808: $\Mbulge - M(H_2)$ to account for the contribution of gas mass,
809: these numbers do not change dramatically.
810:
811: Let us now summarize this section.
812: Mass of new stars that will be formed
813: (within $\sim 10^{7.5}$\,yr from now on)
814: from the molecular gas
815: is not a huge fraction of the current stellar masses (1--5\,\%).
816: %(1--8\,\%).
817: Here, we conclude that the bulges of these two NLS1s
818: do not evolve so much in this timescale.
819: If newly born stars are to belong to the galactic disks
820: rather than the bulges, the conclusion (small growth in the bulge mass)
821: is enhanced.
822:
823: This result can be interpreted in some ways.
824: (1) Coevolution is not simultaneous at all:
825: bulges (and elliptical galaxies) were formed
826: in the early universe (Akiyama 2005; Woo \ea 2006),
827: while BH growth via accretion still happens today.
828: %Nevertheless,
829: (2) Alternatively,
830: coevolution of BHs and bulges can be
831: (quasi-) simultaneous with two growth episodes overlapped
832: or close in time.
833: (2-1) %If this is the case,
834: Our result indicates that the
835: bulge growth have finished prior to the BH growth (e.g., Umemura 2001).
836: (2-2) Or, coevolution may occur
837: intermittently through a number of episodic events.
838: Each coevolving AGN
839: could have very short durations of BH and bulge growth, with small
840: increases in $M_{\rm bulge}$ and in $\Mbh$,
841: resulting in a small fraction of molecular gas
842: associated with the AGN even in the early evolutionary stage
843: (NLS1s).
844: The total lifetime of an AGN is estimated as $\sim 10^8$~yr
845: (Martini 2004; Jakobsen et al. 2003).
846: While, a lower limit for the duration of an episodic event of an AGN
847: is about $10^4$ yr, based on the proximity effect (e.g., Bajtlik
848: et al. 1988) and the sizes of ionization-bounded
849: narrow-line regions (Bennert et al. 2002).
850: Therefore, BH--bulge coevolution
851: could be divided into
852: %, at most, $1000$
853: numerous shorter events.
854:
855:
856: \section{Discussions and Summary}
857:
858: \subsection{Star Formation Rates v.s. Accretion Rates\label{sec:SFRMdot}}
859:
860: Here, we discuss the relation between star formation rates
861: and accretion rates, and the $\Mbulge - \Mbh$ relation.
862:
863: From FIR luminosity or from molecular--gas mass,
864: the current star formation rate can be estimated.
865: The regression relation between 40--120$\mu$m FIR
866: luminosity\footnote{$L_{\rm FIR} = 0.65 \times\nu L_\nu(60 \mu {\rm m})
867: + 0.42 \times\nu L_\nu(100 \mu {\rm m})$ (Helou \ea 1985).}
868: and $\MH2$ is
869: typically (for galaxies similar to the Milky Way)
870: expressed as (see Kennicutt 1998; Tinney \ea 1990),
871: \begin{equation}
872: L_{\rm FIR} = 19 \,\Lsun \left[\frac{\MH2}{\Msun}\right].
873: \label{eq:FIRMH2}
874: \end{equation}
875: The scatter around this linear relation is about
876: $\pm 0.3$\,dex (Tinney \ea 1990).
877: (Again, the regression is re-normalized here by adopting the
878: same conversion factor as we used so far.)
879: Now, we estimate the FIR luminosity at each central region
880: (free from the contribution of AGNs)
881: for the two NLS1s, based on their molecular gas masses.
882: (On the other hand, observed FIR luminosity by IRAS, shown below,
883: includes the FIR emission from entire galaxy and from AGN.)
884: Inferred masses (\S\,4.2) indicate that their $L_{\rm FIR}$
885: are $1.9 \times 10^{10}$ $\Lsun$
886: and $5.3 \times 10^{10}$ $\Lsun$, respectively.
887:
888: By translating these FIR luminosities
889: to the star formation rate (SFR) by (Kennicutt 1998)
890: \begin{equation}
891: {\rm SFR} = 1.7 \,\Msun \,{\rm yr}^{-1} \brfrac{L_{\rm FIR}}{10^{10} L_\odot},
892: \label{eq:SFRFIR}
893: \end{equation}
894: their SFRs (at their central region)
895: are expected to be 3.3 and 9.2 $\Msun \,{\rm yr}^{-1}$, respectively.
896: Most of normalizations for eq.~\ref{eq:SFRFIR}
897: in literatures lie within $\pm\,30$\,\% for starbursts.
898: Disk galaxies, on average, may have a normalization a
899: factor of 1.8 higher than eq.~\ref{eq:SFRFIR} (Buat \& Xu 1996).
900: Taking all the uncertainties of normalizations in eqs.~\ref{eq:FIRMH2}
901: and ~\ref{eq:SFRFIR}, an error of SFR estimated from $\MH2$ would be
902: $\pm 0.3+0.3$\,dex.
903:
904: Incidentally, observed $L_{\rm FIR}$
905: of the 2 IRAS galaxies (measured via IRAS,
906: including contributions from entire host galaxy
907: and from nuclei) are
908: 2.7 $\times$ 10$^{10} \, L_\odot$ (IRAS~04312) and
909: 6.3 $\times$ 10$^{10} \, L_\odot$ (IRAS~05262).
910: If these $L_{\rm FIR}$ are used instead,
911: their SFRs are evaluated to be 5 and 11 $\Msun {\rm yr}^{-1}$, respectively.
912: Since these values likely overestimate the central $L_{\rm FIR}$ and
913: thus central SFRs,
914: we hereafter refer the SFRs estimated in the previous paragraph.
915:
916: Next, we evaluate the accretion rates onto their central BHs $\Mdot$,
917: by adopting
918: two simplified methods.
919: Firstly,
920: we estimate $\Mdot$ based on bolometric luminosities,
921: with an assumption of
922: a constant radiation efficiency.
923: Bolometric luminosity is assumed to be 10 times the optical
924: luminosity, $\nu L_\nu (5100 \AA)$ (e.g., Elvis et al.\ 1994).
925: [We note that up to $\sim 50\%$ of the optical luminosity
926: may originate in the host galaxies (Surace \ea 2001; Bentz \ea 2006).
927: Thus, discussions below overestimate $\Mdot$ by up to
928: a factor of $\sim 2$.]
929: The radiation efficiency (with respect to the rest--mass energy
930: of the infalling gas) is set to be 0.05
931: (e.g., Shakura \& Sunyaev 1973; Novikov \& Thorne 1973).
932: Then, $\Mdot$ are estimated to be 1.3 and 5.2\,$\Msun/$yr,
933: resulting in the SFR/$\Mdot$ ratios of
934: 2.5 and 1.8 for IRAS~04312 and IRAS~05262, respectively.
935:
936: When $\Mdot$
937: exceeds the Eddington limit ($\sim 16 \, \Ledd / c^2$), however,
938: the radiation efficiency drops
939: due to the onset of photon trapping (Begelman 1978; Abramowicz \ea 1988).
940: Thus, estimates using
941: accretion disk models are more adequate than those using
942: a constant efficiency
943: (see e.g., Kawaguchi 2003; Collin \& Kawaguchi 2004).
944: Here, $\Mdot$ is then estimated based
945: on optical luminosity and the (standard) accretion disk model
946: with a face-on disk geometry assumed (e.g.,
947: Bechtold \ea 1987)\footnote{The photon trapping effect takes place
948: only in the inner part of the disk where UV and soft X-ray photons
949: emerge.
950: In outer region
951: of the disk which radiates optical continuum emission,
952: self-gravity (rather than the gravity from
953: the central BH) governs the disk dynamics (Kawaguchi \ea 2004a).
954: Although the standard accretion disk model (Shakura \& Sunyaev 1973)
955: works only inside the self-gravity radius,
956: we here adopt the standard disk model beyond the self-gravity radius
957: for the sake of its simplicity.}:
958: \begin{eqnarray*}
959: \brfrac{\Mdot}{\Msun \, {\rm yr}^{-1}} = \hspace*{6cm}
960: \end{eqnarray*}
961: \vspace{-3mm}
962: \begin{equation}
963: 2.1 \, \brfrac{\Mbh}{10^7 \Msun}^{-1}
964: \, \left[
965: \frac{\nu L_\nu (5100 \AA)}{10^{44}\, {\rm erg \, s^{-1}}}
966: \right]^{1.5}.
967: \label{eq:Mdot}
968: \end{equation}
969: With this equation, we get 19 and 76\,$\Msun\,{\rm yr}^{-1}$ for
970: IRAS~04312 and IRAS~05262, respectively.
971: Here, we obtain yet smaller SFR/$\Mdot$ ratios of
972: 0.17 and 0.12,
973: respectively.
974:
975: Then, let us discuss these ratios in the context of
976: $\Mbulge - \Mbh$ relation.
977: The ratio of bulge masses to BH masses in galaxies is
978: about 700 (H\"{a}ring \& Rix 2004).
979: This number is considerably larger than
980: the SFR--to--$\Mdot$ ratios for
981: the two NLS1s ($\sim 1$) estimated above.
982: What does this huge difference mean then?
983:
984: Our result (the SFR--to--$\Mdot$ ratios $\approx$
985: 1 for the two NLS1s) can indicate that $\Mdot$ in NLS1s
986: is temporarily large.
987: To compensate the intense BH growth during the NLS1s,
988: a short-term, intense starburst (with much higher SFR than the
989: current SFR) happens before or in the future (i.e.,
990: bulge growth and BH growth phases appear without an overlapped period).
991: If the duration of star formation is much
992: longer than the duration of AGN phase instead,
993: such an intense starburst is not required.
994:
995:
996: \subsection{CO Width as Surrogate for $\sigma_*$? \label{COwidth}}
997:
998: Heckman \ea (1989) showed that CO and [O III] lines
999: have similar widths.
1000: While, [O III] line widths are now often used as surrogate for
1001: bulge stellar dispersion $\sigma_*$ of AGNs (Nelson \& Whittle 1996;
1002: Nelson 2000; Shields \ea 2003; Boroson 2003).
1003: Then, Shields \ea (2006) proposed CO width as surrogate for
1004: $\sigma_*$ (see also Ho 2007),
1005: although they found a systematic difference
1006: ($\sigma_{\rm [O III]} / \sigma_{\rm CO} \approx 0.15$\,dex, on average,
1007: for the seven PG quasars they looked at).
1008: By using the CO width for high redshift quasars,
1009: they examined the evolution of $M - \sigma_*$ relation
1010: at $z > 3$, arguing that high-$z$ quasars have
1011: smaller $M_{\rm bulge} / \Mbh$ ratios than
1012: quasars at $z < 3$.
1013:
1014: Here, we compare CO width and [O III] width using our
1015: results, in order to assess the relation
1016: between CO width and [O III] width for NLS1s.
1017: Full-Width at Zero-Intensity (FWZI),
1018: evaluated with the ranges drawn in
1019: figures \ref{fig:ir043spec}--\ref{fig:ir052spec} with
1020: ``flux'' labels, for the two
1021: NLS1s are 384\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (IRAS~04312) and 388\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (IRAS~05262).
1022: Following Shields \ea (2006), we also
1023: assume that FWHM(CO) $\approx \frac{2}{3}$\,FWZI.
1024: Then,
1025: FWHM(CO) for these two IRAS galaxies are %expected to be
1026: about 260\,km\,s$^{-1}$, which is
1027: less than their ${\rm FWHM([O III])}$ widths
1028: (380\,km\,s$^{-1}$ and 365\,km\,s$^{-1}$, respectively).
1029: This is the same trend that Shields \ea (2006) presented
1030: for PG quasars.
1031: Therefore, usage of CO width to estimate $\sigma_*$
1032: can lead a systematic error upon $\Mbulge$ for NLS1s as well.
1033: The difference between the CO and [O III] widths are
1034: $0.15-0.17$\,dex for the two NLS1s, providing
1035: a factor of 4 less $\Mbulge$ for CO-based mass.
1036: %If [O III] widths are used as surrogate for $\sigma_*$
1037: %in eq.~\ref{eq:bulmass},
1038: %$\MH2 / \Mbulge$ ratios discussed in \S~6 decrease by
1039: %a factor of 4.
1040:
1041:
1042: \subsection{Summary}
1043:
1044: The tight correlation between mass of central BHs
1045: and mass of galactic spheroid components
1046: (galactic bulge or elliptical galaxy itself)
1047: in galaxies and AGNs indicates
1048: contemporaneous coevolution of the two massive systems.
1049: However, no direct evidence for simultaneous growth has been found.
1050: We aim to reveal whether
1051: BH growth and bulge growth take place
1052: (quasi-) simultaneously,
1053: by determining the amount and distribution of molecular gas
1054: (fuel for the coming star formation) in young AGNs.
1055:
1056: NLS1s are characterized by relatively small BH masses
1057: and high Eddington ratios.
1058: Larger $\Mdot / \Mbh$ ratios of NLS1s than those of BLS1s
1059: indicate that BHs in NLS1s are now growing rapidly,
1060: and that NLS1s are younger than BLS1s.
1061: If the growth phases of BHs and bulges
1062: are really overlapped,
1063: bulges of NLS1s may also be rapidly growing with
1064: a significant amount of
1065: molecular gas accumulated in their bulges.
1066: However, NLS1s are only 10--30\,\% among Seyfert 1 galaxies, and
1067: thus we do not have many NLS1s, whose CO emission is detected,
1068: in the nearby universe.
1069: In order to
1070: investigate the nature of molecular gas in NLS1s in general,
1071: it is fundamental to increase
1072: the number of nearby NLS1s with their CO emission lines detected.
1073:
1074: Thus, we performed
1075: ${}^{12}$CO ($1 \rightarrow 0$) observations
1076: using the NMA D-configuration
1077: for two FIR-bright NLS1s located at $z = 0.020 - 0.032$
1078: with 5--6'' (2--4 kpc at their distance) resolution.
1079: We detect their CO emission for the first time,
1080: with $\MH2$ of $(1-3) \times 10^9 \Msun$.
1081: These molecular--gas masses are the 2nd and 4th largest masses
1082: among NLS1s.
1083:
1084: By estimating $M_{\rm dyn}$ and $\Mbulge$ with
1085: the CO channel maps and CO line widths,
1086: we get
1087: $\MH2 / M_{\rm dyn}$ and
1088: $\MH2 / \Mbulge$ ratios of 0.25--0.35 %0.41--0.45
1089: and 0.13--0.33, respectively.
1090: Taking account the star formation efficiency ($\sim 0.1$),
1091: the increase in $M_{\rm bulge}$ in those NLS1s in the near future
1092: is expected not to be a huge fraction (1--5\,\% %(1--8\,\%
1093: of the mass of the preexisting stars).
1094: This result can be interpreted in some ways.
1095: Coevolution may not be simultaneous at all:
1096: bulges (and elliptical galaxies) were formed
1097: in the early universe,
1098: while BH growth via accretion still happens today.
1099: Or, the bulge growth may have finished prior to the BH growth.
1100: Alternatively, coevolution may
1101: proceed with many, occasional discrete
1102: events, where one coevolution event produces only a small amount
1103: of mass growth of BHs and of bulges.
1104:
1105: We further discuss the relation between star formation rates
1106: and accretion rates, in the context of the
1107: $\Mbh$--$\Mbulge$ correlation.
1108: The two NLS1s turned out to have
1109: much smaller SFR/$\Mdot$ ratios ($\approx$\,1) than
1110: the $\Mbulge / \Mbh$ ratios of normal and active galaxies.
1111: This huge difference can indicate either that
1112: bulge growth and BH growth phases appear without an overlapped period,
1113: or that the duration of star formation is much
1114: larger than the duration of AGN phase.
1115:
1116: For the two NLS1s, CO widths are less than their [O III] widths
1117: (by 0.15--0.17 dex),
1118: which is the same trend that Shields \ea (2006) presented
1119: for several PG quasars.
1120: Therefore, usage of CO width to estimate $\sigma_*$
1121: can lead a systematic error
1122: (a factor of 4 less masses)
1123: upon $\Mbulge$ for NLS1s as well.
1124:
1125:
1126: \acknowledgements
1127: We thank the NMA staff for helping observations.
1128: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)
1129: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
1130: California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National
1131: Aeronautics and Space Administration.
1132: T.K.\ thanks the financial supports
1133: from a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of JSPS (18840038)
1134: and from The Research Institute of Aoyama Gakuin University.
1135: The Nobeyama Radio Observatory is a branch of
1136: the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
1137: the National Institutes of Natural Sciences (NINS).
1138:
1139: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1140: \bibitem[]{1916}
1141: Abramowicz M.A., Czerny B., Lasota J.P. \& Szuszkiewicz E., 1988. ApJ,
1142: 332, 646
1143:
1144: \bibitem[Akiyama(2005)]{2005ApJ...629...72A}
1145: Akiyama, M.\ 2005, \apj, 629, 72
1146:
1147: \bibitem[Bechtold et al.(1987)]{1987ApJ...314..699B}
1148: Bechtold, J., Czerny, B., Elvis, M.,
1149: Fabbiano, G., \& Green, R.~F.\ 1987, \apj, 314, 699
1150:
1151: \bibitem[]{1027}
1152: Begelman M.C., 1978, MNRAS, 184, 53
1153:
1154: \bibitem[Bentz et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...644..133B}
1155: Bentz, M.~C., Peterson, B.~M., Pogge, R.~W.,
1156: Vestergaard, M., \& Onken, C.~A.\ 2006, \apj, 644, 133
1157:
1158: \bibitem[]{1931}
1159: Boller Th., Brandt W.N., Fink H.H. 1996, A\&A 305, 53
1160: \bibitem[]{1933}
1161: Boller Th., Brandt W.N., Fabian A.C., Fink H.H. 1997, MNRAS 289, 393
1162:
1163: \bibitem[]{1039}
1164: Boroson, T. A., 2003, ApJ, 585, 647
1165:
1166: \bibitem[]{1042}
1167: Borys, C., Smail, I., Chapman, S. C., Blain, A. W., Alexander, D. M.,
1168: \& Ivison, R. J. 2005, ApJ, 635, 853
1169:
1170: \bibitem[Botte et al.(2004)]{2004AJ....127.3168B}
1171: Botte, V., Ciroi, S.,
1172: Rafanelli, P., \& Di Mille, F.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 3168
1173:
1174: \bibitem[Brandt \& Boller(1998)]{1998AIPC..431..191B}
1175: Brandt, W.~N., \& Boller, T.\ 1998,
1176: American Institute of Physics Conference Series, 431, 191
1177:
1178: \bibitem[Buat \& Xu(1996)]{1996A&A...306...61B}
1179: Buat, V., \& Xu, C.\ 1996, \aap, 306, 61
1180:
1181: \bibitem[Collin and Kawaguchi 2004]{1054}
1182: Collin, S., \& Kawaguchi, T. 2004, \aap, 426, 797
1183:
1184: \bibitem[Collin et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...456...75C}
1185: Collin, S., Kawaguchi, T., Peterson, B.~M., \&
1186: Vestergaard, M.\ 2006, \aap, 456, 75
1187:
1188: \bibitem[Dame et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...547..792D}
1189: Dame, T.~M., Hartmann, D., \& Thaddeus, P.\ 2001, \apj, 547, 792
1190:
1191: \bibitem[Downes \& Solomon(1998)]{1998ApJ...507..615D}
1192: Downes, D., \& Solomon, P.~M.\ 1998, \apj, 507, 615
1193:
1194: \bibitem[Elvis et al.(1994)]{1994ApJS...95....1E}
1195: Elvis, M., et al.\ 1994, \apjs, 95, 1
1196:
1197: \bibitem[]{1067}
1198: Evans, A. S., Frayer, D. T., Surace, J. A., \& Sanders, D. B. 2001,
1199: AJ, 121, 3285
1200:
1201: \bibitem[]{1961}
1202: Ferrarese L. \& Merritt D. 2000, ApJ, 539, L9
1203:
1204: \bibitem[]{1967}
1205: Gebhardt K. et al.\ 2000, ApJ, 539, L13
1206:
1207: \bibitem[Guzman et al.(1993)]{1993MNRAS.265..731G}
1208: Guzman, R., Lucey, J.~R., \& Bower, R.~G.\ 1993, \mnras, 265, 731
1209:
1210: \bibitem[]{1992}
1211: Halpern, J. P., \& Oke, J. B. 1987, ApJ 312, 91
1212:
1213: \bibitem[H{\"a}ring \& Rix(2004)]{2004ApJ...604L..89H}
1214: H{\"a}ring, N., \& Rix, H.-W.\ 2004, \apjl, 604, L89
1215:
1216: \bibitem[]{1994}
1217: Hayashida, K. 2000, New Astron. Rev., 44, 419
1218:
1219: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(1989)]{1989ApJ...342..735H}
1220: Heckman, T.~M., Blitz, L., Wilson, A.~S.,
1221: Armus, L., \& Miley, G.~K.\ 1989, \apj, 342, 735
1222:
1223: \bibitem[Helou et al.(1985)]{1985ApJ...298L...7H}
1224: Helou, G., Soifer, B.~T.,
1225: \& Rowan-Robinson, M.\ 1985, \apjl, 298, L7
1226:
1227: \bibitem[Hillenbrand \& Hartmann(1998)]{1998ApJ...492..540H}
1228: Hillenbrand, L.~A., \& Hartmann, L.~W.\ 1998, \apj, 492, 540
1229:
1230: \bibitem[]{}
1231: Ho L.C., 2007, to appear in ApJ, astro-ph/0707.3436
1232:
1233: \bibitem[]{2008}
1234: Kaspi S., Smith P.S., Netzer H., Maoz D., Jannuzi B.T. \& Giveon U.
1235: 2000, ApJ, 533, 631
1236:
1237: \bibitem[Kaspi et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...629...61K}
1238: Kaspi, S., Maoz, D., Netzer, H., Peterson, B.~M.,
1239: Vestergaard, M., \& Jannuzi, B.~T.\ 2005, \apj, 629, 61
1240:
1241: \bibitem[Kauffmann \& Haehnelt(2000)]{2000MNRAS.311..576K}
1242: Kauffmann, G., \& Haehnelt, M.\ 2000, \mnras, 311, 576
1243:
1244: \bibitem[Kauffmann et al.(1993)]{1993MNRAS.264..201K}
1245: Kauffmann, G., White, S.~D.~M., \& Guiderdoni, B.\ 1993, \mnras, 264, 201
1246:
1247: \bibitem[Kawaguchi 2003]{1108}
1248: Kawaguchi, T. 2003, \apj, 593, 69
1249:
1250: \bibitem[]{1111}
1251: Kawaguchi, T., Pierens, A., \& Hur\'{e}, J.-M. 2004a, A\&A, 415, 47
1252:
1253: \bibitem[Kawaguchi et al. 2004]{1114}
1254: Kawaguchi, T., Aoki, K., Ohta, K., \& Collin, S. 2004b, \aap, 420, L23
1255:
1256: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{1998ARA&A..36..189K}
1257: Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1998, \araa, 36, 189
1258:
1259: \bibitem[Kiuchi et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...647..892K}
1260: Kiuchi, G., Ohta, K., Akiyama, M., Aoki, K., \& Ueda, Y.\ 2006, \apj, 647, 892
1261:
1262: \bibitem[Kohno et al.(1999)]{1999AdSpR..23.1011K}
1263: Kohno, K., Kawabe, R., Ishizuki, S., \& Vila-Vilar{\'o}, B.\ 1999a,
1264: Advances in Space Research, 23, 1011
1265:
1266: \bibitem[Kohno et al.(1999)]{1999pcim.conf...34K}
1267: Kohno, K., Kawabe, R., \& Vila-Vilar{\'o}, B.\ 1999b,
1268: in ``The Physics and Chemistry of the Interstellar Medium'',
1269: Eds.: V.~Ossenkopf, J.~Stutzki, and G.~Winnewisser, (astro-ph/9902251)
1270:
1271: \bibitem[Komossa \& Xu(2007)]{2007ApJ...667L..33K}
1272: Komossa, S., \& Xu, D.\ 2007, \apjl, 667, L33
1273:
1274: \bibitem[Lada \& Lada(2003)]{2003ARA&A..41...57L}
1275: Lada, C.~J., \& Lada, E.~A.\ 2003, \araa, 41, 57
1276:
1277: \bibitem[]{2031}
1278: Laor A., Fiore F., Elvis M., Wikes B. J. \& McDowell J. C. 1997,
1279: ApJ, 477, 93
1280:
1281: \bibitem[]{2036}
1282: Leighly, K. M. 1999a, ApJS, 125, 297% temporal analysis
1283: \bibitem[]{2038}
1284: Leighly, K. M. 1999b, ApJS, 125, 317% spectral analysis
1285:
1286: \bibitem[Maiolino et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...485..552M}
1287: Maiolino, R., Ruiz, M., Rieke, G.~H., \& Papadopoulos, P.\ 1997,
1288: \apj, 485, 552
1289:
1290: \bibitem[Marconi \& Hunt(2003)]{2003ApJ...589L..21M}
1291: Marconi, A., \& Hunt, L.~K.\ 2003, \apjl, 589, L21
1292:
1293: \bibitem[]{2056}
1294: Mathur S., 2000, MNRAS, 314, L17
1295:
1296: %\bibitem[Merritt \& Ferrarese(2001)]{2001MNRAS.320L..30M}
1297: % Merritt, D., \& Ferrarese, L.\ 2001, \mnras, 320, L30
1298:
1299: \bibitem[]{2068}
1300: Mineshige S., Kawaguchi T., Takeuchi M. \& Hayashida K. 2000,
1301: PASJ, 52, 499
1302:
1303: \bibitem[Myers et al.(1986)]{1986ApJ...301..398M}
1304: Myers, P.~C., Dame, T.~M., Thaddeus, P., Cohen, R.~S., Silverberg,
1305: R.~F., Dwek, E., \& Hauser, M.~G.\ 1986, \apj, 301, 398
1306:
1307: \bibitem[Nelson \& Whittle(1996)]{1996ApJ...465...96N}
1308: Nelson, C.~H., \& Whittle, M.\ 1996, \apj, 465, 96
1309:
1310: \bibitem[]{2083}
1311: Nelson C.H. 2000, ApJL, 544, L91
1312:
1313: \bibitem[]{1161}
1314: Novikov, I.D., \& Thorne, K.S. 1973, in Black Holes,
1315: eds. C. De Witt \& B. De Witt (New York: Gordon \& Breach), 343
1316:
1317: \bibitem[Ohta et al.(2007)]{2007ApJS..169....1O}
1318: Ohta, K., Aoki, K., Kawaguchi, T., \& Kiuchi, G.\ 2007, \apjs, 169, 1
1319:
1320: \bibitem[Okumura et al.(2000)]{2000PASJ...52..393O}
1321: Okumura, S.~K., et al.\ 2000, \pasj, 52, 393
1322:
1323: \bibitem[Onken et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...615..645O}
1324: Onken, C.~A., Ferrarese,
1325: L., Merritt, D., Peterson, B.~M., Pogge, R.~W., Vestergaard, M.,
1326: \& Wandel, A.\ 2004, \apj, 615, 645
1327:
1328: \bibitem[]{2092}
1329: Osterbrock D.E., \& Pogge R.W.\ 1985, ApJ, 297, 166
1330:
1331: \bibitem[]{2087}
1332: Otani C., Kii T., Miya K. 1996
1333: in R\"{o}ntgenstrahlung from the Universe
1334: (MPE Report 263), ed H.U. Zimmermann, J.E. Tr\"umper, H. Yorke
1335: (MPE Press, Garching) p491
1336:
1337: \bibitem[Paturel et al.(2003)]{2003A&A...412...57P}
1338: Paturel, G., Theureau, G., Bottinelli, L., Gouguenheim, L.,
1339: Coudreau-Durand, N., Hallet, N., \& Petit, C.\ 2003, \aap, 412, 57
1340:
1341: \bibitem[]{2102}
1342: Pogge R.W.\ 2000, New Astronomy Reviews, 44, 381
1343:
1344: \bibitem[]{2104}
1345: Pounds K.A., Done C., Osborne J. 1995, MNRAS 277, L5
1346:
1347: \bibitem[Rees(1992)]{1992pagn.conf..662R}
1348: Rees, M.~J.\ 1992, Physics of Active Galactic Nuclei, 662
1349:
1350: \bibitem[]{1198}
1351: Shakura, N.~I., \& Sunyaev, R.~A. 1973, A\&A, 24, 337
1352:
1353: \bibitem[Shields et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...583..124S}
1354: Shields, G.~A.,
1355: Gebhardt, K., Salviander, S., Wills, B.~J., Xie, B., Brotherton, M.~S.,
1356: Yuan, J., \& Dietrich, M.\ 2003, \apj, 583, 124
1357:
1358: \bibitem[Shields et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...641..683S}
1359: Shields, G.~A., Menezes, K.~L., Massart, C.~A., \&
1360: Vanden Bout, P.\ 2006, \apj, 641, 683
1361:
1362: \bibitem[]{2123}
1363: Silk J. \& Rees M., 1998, A\&A, 331, L1
1364:
1365: \bibitem[Sofue(1994)]{1994PASJ...46..173S}
1366: Sofue, Y.\ 1994, \pasj, 46, 173
1367:
1368: \bibitem[Sofue \& Nakai(1994)]{1994PASJ...46..147S}
1369: Sofue, Y., \& Nakai, N.\ 1994, \pasj, 46, 147
1370:
1371: \bibitem[Solomon et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...478..144S}
1372: Solomon, P.~M., Downes, D., Radford, S.~J.~E.,
1373: \& Barrett, J.~W.\ 1997, \apj, 478, 144
1374:
1375: \bibitem[Surace et al.(2001)]{2001AJ....122.2791S}
1376: Surace, J.~A., Sanders, D.~B., \& Evans, A.~S.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 2791
1377:
1378: \bibitem[Taniguchi et al.(1990)]{1990ApJ...358..132T}
1379: Taniguchi, Y., Kameya, O., Nakai, N.,
1380: \& Kawara, K.\ 1990, \apj, 358, 132
1381:
1382: \bibitem[Tinney et al.(1990)]{1990ApJ...362..473T}
1383: Tinney, C.~G., Scoville, N.~Z., Sanders, D.~B.,
1384: \& Soifer, B.~T.\ 1990, \apj, 362, 473
1385:
1386: \bibitem[Tremaine et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...574..740T}
1387: Tremaine, S., et al.\ 2002, \apj, 574, 740
1388:
1389: \bibitem[Tsutsumi et al.(1997)]{1997ASPC..125...50T}
1390: Tsutsumi, T., Morita, K.-I., \& Umeyama, S.\ 1997,
1391: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VI, 125, 50
1392:
1393: \bibitem[]{2139}
1394: Umemura M., 2001, ApJ, 560, L29
1395:
1396: \bibitem[]{2146}
1397: V\'{e}ron-Cetty M.P., V\'{e}ron P. \& Gon\c{c}alves A.C., 2001, A\&A, 372, 730
1398:
1399: \bibitem[]{2154}
1400: Wandel A., Peterson B.M. \& Malkan M.A. 1999, ApJ, 526, 579
1401:
1402: \bibitem[]{2158}
1403: Wang T., Brinkmann W. \& Bergeron J. 1996, A\&A, 309, 81
1404:
1405: \bibitem[Williams \& McKee(1997)]{1997ApJ...476..166W}
1406: Williams, J.~P., \& McKee, C.~F.\ 1997, \apj, 476, 166
1407:
1408: \bibitem[Wilson \& Matthews(1995)]{1995ApJ...455..125W}
1409: Wilson, C.~D., \& Matthews, B.~C.\ 1995, \apj, 455, 125
1410:
1411: \bibitem[Woo et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...645..900W}
1412: Woo, J.-H., Treu, T., Malkan, M.~A., \& Blandford, R.~D.\ 2006,
1413: \apj, 645, 900
1414:
1415: \bibitem[Young et al.(1995)]{1995ApJS...98..219Y}
1416: Young, J.~S., et al.\ 1995, \apjs, 98, 219
1417:
1418: \end{thebibliography}
1419:
1420:
1421: \clearpage
1422: \clearpage
1423: %% -------------------- Table for apj style
1424: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
1425: \tablecolumns{5}
1426: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1427: % \scriptsize
1428: % \tablewidth{33pc}
1429: \tablewidth{0pc}
1430: % \tablenum{1}
1431: \tablecaption{Log of Observations}
1432: \label{tab:log}
1433: \tablehead{
1434: \colhead{\ \ \ \ \ Target \ \ \ \ \ \ \ } &
1435: \colhead{redshift} &
1436: \colhead{Integration Time} &
1437: \colhead{Beam Size} &
1438: \colhead{Scale} \\
1439: \colhead{ } &
1440: \colhead{ } &
1441: \colhead{[hours]} &
1442: \colhead{[$'' \times ''$]} &
1443: \colhead{[kpc/1$''$]} }
1444: \startdata
1445: IRAS~04312\dotfill
1446: & 0.020 & 6.6 & $5.8 \times 5.2$ & 0.40 \\
1447: IRAS~05262\dotfill
1448: & 0.032 & 7.7 & $6.1 \times 5.2$ & 0.63 \\
1449: \enddata
1450: \end{deluxetable}
1451: %------------------------------
1452: %
1453:
1454: \clearpage
1455: \clearpage
1456: %% -------------------- Table for apj style
1457: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
1458: \tablecolumns{6}
1459: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1460: \tablewidth{0pc}
1461: % \tablenum{2}
1462: \tablecaption{Summary of Various Masses}
1463: \label{tab:mass}
1464: \tablehead{
1465: \colhead{\ \ \ \ \ Object \ \ \ \ \ \ \ } &
1466: \colhead{$\MH2$} &
1467: \colhead{$M_{\rm dyn}$} &
1468: \colhead{Ratio$^a$} &
1469: \colhead{$\Mbulge$} &
1470: \colhead{Ratio$^a$} \\
1471: \colhead{ } &
1472: \colhead{[$10^9\,\Msun$]} &
1473: \colhead{[$10^9\,\Msun$]} &
1474: \colhead{ } &
1475: \colhead{[$10^9\,\Msun$]} &
1476: \colhead{ } }
1477: \startdata
1478: %IRAS~04312\dotfill & 1.0 & 2.3 & 0.45 \ \ & \ \ 8.0 & 0.13 \\
1479: %IRAS~05262\dotfill & 2.8 & 6.8 & 0.41 \ \ & \ \ 8.4 & 0.33 \\
1480: IRAS~04312\dotfill & 1.0 & 4.1 & 0.25 \ \ & \ \ 8.0 & 0.13 \\
1481: IRAS~05262\dotfill & 2.8 & 8.0 & 0.35 \ \ & \ \ 8.4 & 0.33 \\
1482: \enddata
1483: \tablenotetext{a}{Ratio of the molecular gas masses $\MH2$ with
1484: respect to the dynamical masses $M_{\rm dyn}$ or bulge masses $\Mbulge$.}
1485: \end{deluxetable}
1486: %------------------------------
1487: %
1488:
1489:
1490: \clearpage
1491:
1492: % Figures: captions -> figures at the end of draft: for submission (aastex)
1493: % figure+caption : for emulateapj
1494: % width: 8.5cm or \textwidth
1495:
1496: %% Figure ; IR043, binned map
1497: % For submission (aastex)
1498: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f1.eps}}
1499: % For wide figures in emulateapj style
1500: \begin{figure*}[tb]
1501: % For emulateapj
1502: %\vspace*{0.5cm}
1503: %\figurenum{1}
1504: %\centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=8.5cm]{IR0431-CL2.ICLN.superimposed.eps}}
1505: \plotone{f1.eps}
1506: %\plotone{f1.pdf}
1507: \caption{
1508: CLEANed contour map of CO\,($1 \rightarrow 0$) emission line
1509: from IRAS~04312 binned in frequency over 320\,km\,s$^{-1}$,
1510: on top of the optical image (Ohta et al.\ 2007).
1511: Contour levels show $-2$, 2, 4, $\ldots 14, \, 16\ \sigma$, with
1512: $1 \sigma = 2.0$\,Jy\,beam$^{-1}$\,km\,s$^{-1}$.
1513: The 4''$\times$4'' cross represents the peak position of the CO distribution.
1514: At the left-bottom corner, the beam size (5.8'' $\times$ 5.2'')
1515: is shown.
1516: \label{fig:ir043binmap}}
1517: \end{figure*}
1518: % For submission (aastex)
1519: %\medskip
1520:
1521: \clearpage
1522: %% Figure ; IR052, binned map
1523: % For submission (aastex)
1524: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{**.epsi}}
1525: % For wide figures in emulateapj style
1526: \begin{figure*}[tb]
1527: % For emulateapj
1528: %\vspace*{0.5cm}
1529: %\figurenum{2}
1530: %\centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=8.5cm]{IR0526-CL2.ICLN.superimposed.eps}}
1531: \plotone{f2.eps}
1532: %\plotone{f2.pdf}
1533: \caption{
1534: The same as figure \ref{fig:ir043binmap}, but for IRAS~05262.
1535: Larger square including the galactic center
1536: and another square,
1537: south from the center,
1538: indicate the areas over which the
1539: spectra (figure \ref{fig:ir052spec}) are integrated.
1540: The contour map shows the CO emission integrated over
1541: 190\,km\,s$^{-1}$, with
1542: $1 \sigma = 1.2$\,Jy\,beam$^{-1}$\,km\,s$^{-1}$.
1543: The beam size is 6.1'' $\times$ 5.2''.
1544: \label{fig:ir052binmap}}
1545: \end{figure*}
1546: % For submission (aastex)
1547: %\medskip
1548:
1549: \clearpage
1550: %% Figure ; IR043, spectrum
1551: % For submission (aastex)
1552: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{**.epsi}}
1553: % For wide figures in emulateapj style
1554: \begin{figure*}[tb]
1555: % For emulateapj
1556: %\vspace*{0.5cm}
1557: %\figurenum{3}
1558: %\centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=6.5cm]{IR043-CL0-R.MCUBE.2.spec2.eps}}
1559: \plotone{f3.eps}
1560: %\plotone{f3.pdf}
1561: %
1562: \caption{
1563: The CO\,($1 \rightarrow 0$) spectrum
1564: of the central region of IRAS~04312, integrated over
1565: 12''$\times$12'' box centered on
1566: the peak of the CO emission.
1567: (Hereafter, velocity notation is based on optical convention.)
1568: The bin--width and frequency--step are the same as
1569: those for the channel maps (fig.\ref{fig:ir043chanmap}).
1570: Downward arrow indicates
1571: the recession velocity of the galaxy,
1572: measured with H~I gas (Paturel et al. 2003).
1573: The horizontal solid line indicates the range
1574: used in figure \ref{fig:ir043binmap}
1575: to draw the frequency--integrated map.
1576: Another horizontal line with a label ``flux'' indicates
1577: the range for measuring the velocity--integrated flux.
1578: \label{fig:ir043spec}}
1579: \end{figure*}
1580: % For submission (aastex)
1581: %\medskip
1582:
1583: \clearpage
1584: %% Figure ; IR052, spectra
1585: % For submission (aastex)
1586: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{**.epsi}}
1587: % For wide figures in emulateapj style
1588: \begin{figure*}[tb]
1589: % For emulateapj
1590: %\vspace*{0.5cm}
1591: %\figurenum{4}
1592: %\centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=6.5cm]{IR052-CL0-R.MCUBE.1.spec.eps}}
1593: \plotone{f4.eps}
1594: %\plotone{f4.pdf}
1595: %
1596: \caption{
1597: The same as figure \ref{fig:ir043spec}, but for IRAS~05262.
1598: Top panel shows the spectrum of the central CO gas, while
1599: the bottom presents the spectrum of the
1600: H~II region $\sim 7''$ south from the center.
1601: \label{fig:ir052spec}}
1602: \end{figure*}
1603: % For submission (aastex)
1604: %\medskip
1605:
1606: \clearpage
1607: %% Figure ; IR043, channel map
1608: % For submission (aastex)
1609: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{**.epsi}}
1610: % For wide figures in emulateapj style
1611: \begin{figure*}[tb]
1612: % For emulateapj
1613: %\vspace*{0.5cm}
1614: %\figurenum{5}
1615: %\centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,height=6.5cm]{IR043-CL0-R.MCUBE.2.eps}}
1616: \plotone{f5.eps}
1617: %\plotone{f5.pdf}
1618: %
1619: \caption{
1620: CLEANed channel map of CO\,($1 \rightarrow 0$)
1621: emission line around IRAS~04312 over $30'' \times 30''$.
1622: Each map is binned in frequency over 42\,km\,s$^{-1}$,
1623: showing (-3, -2, 2, 3, 4, 5 $\ldots) \times \sigma$
1624: with $1 \sigma = 19$\,mJy per beam,
1625: and drawn every 21\,km\,s$^{-1}$ step.
1626: Crosses represent the peak position of the full CO emission %$\pm 2''$
1627: (Fig.\ \ref{fig:ir043binmap}).
1628: Number at upper-right corner of each panel represents the
1629: velocity offset (in km\,s$^{-1}$) from the recession velocity of the galaxy
1630: (6145\,km\,s$^{-1}$).
1631: \label{fig:ir043chanmap}}
1632: \end{figure*}
1633: % For submission (aastex)
1634: %\medskip
1635:
1636: \clearpage
1637: %% Figure ; IR052, channel map
1638: % For submission (aastex)
1639: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{**.epsi}}
1640: % For wide figures in emulateapj style
1641: \begin{figure*}[tb]
1642: % For emulateapj
1643: %\vspace*{0.5cm}
1644: %\figurenum{6}
1645: %\centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,height=6.5cm]{IR052-CL0-R.MCUBE.1.eps}}
1646: \plotone{f6.eps}
1647: %\plotone{f6.pdf}
1648: %
1649: \caption{
1650: The same as figure \ref{fig:ir043chanmap}, but for IRAS~05262
1651: (with a recession velocity of 9646\,km\,s$^{-1}$).
1652: Here, $1 \sigma = 14$\,mJy per beam.
1653: \label{fig:ir052chanmap}}
1654: \end{figure*}
1655: % For submission (aastex)
1656: %\medskip
1657:
1658: \clearpage
1659: %% Figure ; IR043, PV diagram
1660: % For submission (aastex)
1661: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{**.epsi}}
1662: \begin{figure*}[tb]
1663: % For emulateapj
1664: %\vspace*{0.5cm}
1665: %\figurenum{7}
1666: %\centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,height=6.5cm]{IR043-CL0PV.AVD.eps}}
1667: \plotone{f7.eps}
1668: %\plotone{f7.pdf}
1669: %
1670: \caption{
1671: Position--Velocity diagram of ${}^{12}$CO\,($1 \rightarrow 0$)
1672: emission from IRAS~04312
1673: along the position angle of 108$^{\circ}$.
1674: The abscissa is the angular distance from the CO emission peak.
1675: The contour levels drawn
1676: are the same as those of the channel map
1677: for the same object (fig.\ref{fig:ir043chanmap}).
1678: \label{fig:ir043pv}}
1679: \end{figure*}
1680: % For submission (aastex)
1681: %\medskip
1682:
1683: \clearpage
1684: %% Figure ; IR052, PV diagram
1685: % For submission (aastex)
1686: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{**.epsi}}
1687: \begin{figure*}[tb]
1688: % For emulateapj
1689: %\vspace*{0.5cm}
1690: %\figurenum{8}
1691: %\centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,height=6.5cm]{IR052-CL0PV.AVD.eps}}
1692: \plotone{f8.eps}
1693: %\plotone{f8.pdf}
1694: %
1695: \caption{
1696: The same as figure \ref{fig:ir043pv}, but for IRAS~05262
1697: (with the position angle of 97$^{\circ}$).
1698: \label{fig:ir052pv}}
1699: \end{figure*}
1700: % For submission (aastex)
1701: %\medskip
1702:
1703: %
1704: %%%UCP%%%
1705: %\clearpage
1706: %\plotone{f1.eps}
1707: %\clearpage
1708: %\plotone{f2.eps}
1709: %\clearpage
1710: %\plotone{f3.eps}
1711: %\clearpage
1712: %\plotone{f4.eps}
1713: %\clearpage
1714: %\plotone{f5.eps}
1715: %\clearpage
1716: %\plotone{f6.eps}
1717: %\clearpage
1718: %\plotone{f7.eps}
1719: %\clearpage
1720: %\plotone{f8.eps}
1721: %
1722:
1723: \end{document}
1724: