1: 

2: %% manuscript [12pt, preprint] produces a one-column, single-spaced document:

3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

4: 

5: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

6: \newcommand{\Bamb}{B_{amb}^{}}

7: \newcommand{\rhotop}{\rho_{top}^{}}

8: \newcommand{\myemail}{fmi@iac.es}

9: \newcommand{\degree}{\ensuremath{^\circ}}

10: 

11: \slugcomment{Submitted to ApJ Letters, 9th Nov 2007}

12: 

13: \shorttitle{Jets in coronal holes: observations and modelling}

14: \shortauthors{Moreno-Insertis et al.}

15: 

16: 

17: \begin{document}

18: 

19: \title{Jets in coronal holes: Hinode observations and 

20:   3D computer modelling}

21: 

22: \author{F. Moreno-Insertis\altaffilmark{1},  K. Galsgaard\altaffilmark{2},

23:   I. Ugarte-Urra\altaffilmark{3}} 

24: 

25: \altaffiltext{1}{Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias (IAC), 38200 La Laguna

26:   (Tenerife), Spain; fmi@iac.es}

27: 

28: \altaffiltext{2}{Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen,

29:   Denmark; kg@astro.ku.dk}

30: 

31: \altaffiltext{3}{Space Science Division, Naval

32:   Research Laboratory,   Washington DC 20375, USA; iugarte@ssd5.nrl.navy.mil}

33: 

34: 

35: \begin{abstract}

36: Recent observations of coronal hole areas with the XRT and EIS instruments

37: onboard the {\it Hinode} satellite have shown with unprecedented detail the

38: launching of fast, hot jets away from the solar surface. In some cases these

39: events coincide with episodes of flux emergence from beneath the

40: photosphere. In this letter we show results of a 3D numerical experiment of

41: flux emergence from the solar interior into a coronal hole and compare them

42: with simultaneous XRT and EIS observations of a jet-launching event that

43: accompanied the appearance of a bipolar region in MDI magnetograms.  The

44: magnetic skeleton and topology that result in the experiment bear a strong

45: resemblance to linear force-fee extrapolations of the {\it SOHO}/MDI

46: magnetograms. A thin current sheet is formed at the boundary of the emerging

47: plasma. A jet is launched upward along the open reconnected field lines with

48: values of temperature, density and velocity in agreement with the XRT and EIS

49: observations. Below the jet, a split-vault structure results with two

50: chambers: a shrinking one containing the emerged field loops and a growing

51: one with loops produced by the reconnection.  The ongoing reconnection leads

52: to a horizontal drift of the vault-and-jet structure. The timescales,

53: velocities, and other plasma properties in the experiment are consistent with

54: recent statistical studies of this type of events made with {\it Hinode} data.

55: \end{abstract}

56: 

57: 

58: \keywords{Sun: X-rays --- Sun: Magnetic fields --- Sun: Corona}

59: 

60: 

61: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:introduction}

62: 

63: X-ray jets in coronal holes are being observed with unprecedented quality by

64: the instruments onboard the {\it Hinode} satellite, in particular the X-Ray

65: Telescope (XRT) \citep{golub2007} and the Extreme UV Imaging Spectrometer

66: (EIS) \citep{culhane2007}.  With their enhanced sensitivity and spatial

67: resolution, those instruments have revealed that the frequency of jet

68: formation is at least an order of magnitude greater than was thought

69: previously \citep{cirtain2007}. The new observations are leading to an

70: in-depth revision of the statistics of jet properties \citep{Shimojo+ea96,

71: savcheva2007}.  Sometimes, the formation of the jet is seen to occur

72: simultaneously with an episode of flux emergence from the solar interior

73: (e.g., \citealt{canfield1996, jiang2007}).  In many XRT events, a brightening

74: close to the surface is followed by enhanced emission in a region with an

75: {\it inverted-Y} shape above the former (Fig.~\ref{fig:polarjet}). The {\it

76:   tail} of the inverted {\it Y} coincides with a fast jet.

77: 

78: This kind of jets is most probably a consequence of the field line reconnection

79: between the upcoming magnetic system and the open

80: ambient field in the coronal hole, as originally suggested by theory and 2D

81: numerical experiments \citep{heyvaertsetal77, yokoyama_shibata_96}.  In this

82: letter, we analyze XRT and EIS observations of a jet in a coronal hole

83: cospatial with a simultaneous flux emergence event observed with {\it

84:   SOHO}-MDI (Sec.~\ref{sec:observations}).  We study the magnetic topology

85: using linear force-free extrapolations from the MDI data. We then present 

86: the results of a three-dimensional experiment of flux emergence into a region

87: in the atmosphere with temperature, density and magnetic field values akin to

88: those in a coronal hole (Sec.~\ref{sec:num_exp}). We explain the resulting three-dimensional

89: structure (geometry, topology, dynamics) and show the excellent overall

90: agreement with the observations. 

91: 

92: 

93: \section{Observations}\label{sec:observations}

94: A large coronal hole was observed near disk center on March 10, 2007 by the

95: {\it Hinode} satellite \citep{kosugi2007}. We present EIS and XRT observations of a

96: jet that appeared at 06:20 UTC at solar coordinates ($-25\arcsec,

97: -115\arcsec$) within the equatorial hole, at the same time as a magnetic

98: bipole emerged at the photosphere (Fig.~\ref{fig:equatorialjet}). A

99: low-latitude event was chosen to facilitate the extrapolation and radial

100: velocity measurement.  The evolution of the jet was inspected using XRT

101: $512\times512$ pixel images taken in the Open/Ti\_poly filter combination at

102: a cadence of 70 s. Spatial sampling is 1$\arcsec$ per pixel.  The EIS

103: observations consisted of 30 s exposures in sit-and-stare mode with the

104: $1\arcsec\times512\arcsec$ slit.  Standard routines were used in the data

105: processing.  The alignment between both instruments was done via

106: cross-correlation of North-South cross-sections of the X-ray images with the

107: \ion{Fe}{12} emission along the EIS slit.  Accuracy is down to between

108: $1\arcsec$ and $2\arcsec$ in the N-S direction and less than 5$\arcsec$ in

109: the E-W.  For the analysis of the magnetic flux density we used full disk

110: magnetograms from {\it SOHO}-MDI \citep[Michelson Doppler

111:   Imager,][]{scherrer1995}. Only magnetograms with a 96-min cadence were

112: available at the time of the jet. The closest one in time (06:27 UTC) shows a

113: newly emerged bipole under the location where the jet is formed. The magnetic

114: flux density of the emerged polarities is in the range (-70, 88) Mx cm$^{-2}$

115: [i.e., $(-7,\, 8.8)\,10^{-7}$ Wb m$^{-2}$] with total fluxes of $\approx

116: 1\times10^{19}$ Mx $= 1\times10^{11}$ Wb.  The magnetic

117: topology was determined with a linear force-free extrapolation method

118: \citep[see details in][]{ugarte-urra2007} and reveals the existence of a

119: coronal null point and a separatrix dome that encloses the connectivity

120: domain of the newly emerged flux.

121: 

122: 

123: 

124: In the XRT images (as, e.g., in the top-left panel of

125: Fig.~\ref{fig:equatorialjet}), we first see the appearance of small coronal

126: loops that connect the pre-existing dominant ambient positive flux to the

127: newly emerged negative polarity. This is followed immediately by the

128: formation of the jet, oppositely oriented and rooted in the positive flux,

129: with the footpoints most likely located where the separatrix surface

130: intersects the photosphere. The top-right panel of the figure shows the

131: relationship of the loops and jet to the magnetic topology from the

132: extrapolation.  The bottom right panel shows a side view of the topology with

133: four labeled connectivity domains.  In region 1 lie the magnetic connections

134: between the two newly emerged polarities. The loops on the XRT image

135: correspond to region 3. A natural explanation for this configuration is that

136: the emerging flux (region 1) is merging with flux from region 2 yielding two

137: reconnected-line regions (3 and 4). The jet must be in an open-field region,

138: so it must be in region 4, and close to the separatrix (dark-blue field

139: lines). This is consistent with what the projected extrapolation and the XRT

140: image suggest and is also in agreement with the results of the numerical

141: simulation presented in Sec.~\ref{sec:num_exp}.  At least two consecutive jet

142: events can be identified in the XRT movie before the loops grow and finally

143: populate the whole enclosed domain.  The initial and most impulsive phase

144: lasts around $12$ min.

145: 

146: 

147: The EIS slit crosses the jet structure at about 15$\arcsec$ to the East

148: side of its origin.  EIS's unique combination of high spatial, spectral

149: and temporal resolution can provide diagnostics for the density and

150: velocity (for an in-depth discussion of previous EUV spectroscopic

151: observations of jets see \citealt{wilhelm2002, ko2005,

152: pike_harrison_1997} and references therein).  On the jet we measured

153: (Fig.~\ref{fig:equatorialjet}, bottom-left panel) a line-of-sight

154: blue-shifted velocity of up to $240$ km s$^{-1}$ in the \ion{Fe}{12}

155: 195.12-\AA\ line. The zero value is given by an average profile in the

156: quiet coronal hole.  After averaging two pixels along the slit and two

157: exposures, to increase the signal-to-noise ratio, and subtracting the

158: background emission, we also obtained an estimate for the electron

159: density through the line ratio \ion{Fe}{12} 195.1/186.9:

160: $5.5\times10^9\rm{cm}^{-3}$. The density estimate is consistent with a

161: filling factor of $\approx\hskip -2pt 0.2$ for the \ion{Fe}{12}

162: 195.1\AA\ column emission measure, assuming photospheric abundance

163: \citep{grevesse2007}, a temperature corresponding to the maximum in the

164: ionization fractions \citep{mazzotta1998} and a column depth of $4.7$

165: Mm, equal to the jet's measured width.  We used CHIANTI v5.2

166: \citep{landi2006} for the calculations.

167: 

168: 

169: \section{Numerical experiment}\label{sec:num_exp}

170: 

171: The numerical results were obtained for a three-dimensional domain of size

172: $34 \hbox{\ Mm} \times 38 \hbox{\ Mm}$ in the horizontal directions and $33$

173: Mm in the vertical direction, $z$, $29$ Mm of which are above the

174: photosphere. For the unmagnetized hydrostatic background at time $t=0$ we

175: chose an adiabatic stratification in the solar interior and a domain at

176: photospheric temperature in the first $2$ Mm above the surface; above it, we

177: have a steep temperature gradient mimicking the transition region and,

178: finally, an isothermal ($T=1.1\times10^6$ K) corona in the topmost $25$ Mm

179: (as in Fig.~1 of \citealt{archontis_etal_04}, but with a much larger vertical

180: domain).  In the main experiment described here, $\rhotop$, the initial

181: coronal density at the top of the box, was $5 \times10^{-16}$ g cm$^{-3}$, 

182: equivalent to an atom number density of $\approx 2\times10^{8}$ cm$^{-3}$. The

183: domain is endowed at time $t=0$ with a uniform magnetic field contained in

184: the $xz$ plane of strength $\Bamb = 10$ G $= 10$ mT and pointing $25\degree$

185: away from the vertical.  This field is dynamically dominant in the corona

186: [$\beta \approx \hbox{O}(10^{-2})$], whereas it is very weak ($\beta \gg 1$)

187: in the solar interior. Density and field strength are adequate to simulate

188: coronal holes (see \citealt{wilhelm06, harvey_recely_2002}).  To explore the

189: parameter space, experiments have also been carried out for $\Bamb$ equal to

190: $25$ G and $5$ G, for $\rhotop = 1.5\times 10^{-14}$ g cm$^{-3}$, and for

191: inclinations of $15\degree$ and $0\degree$ to the vertical. We solve the MHD

192: equations and assume an

193: ideal gas law, no radiation cooling, and no heat conduction. The

194: system is solved using the staggered-grid MHD code of our previous

195: experiments (\citealt{nordlund+galsgaard97}; see

196: \citealt{archontis_etal_04}). The numerical grid is non-uniform in the

197: vertical direction, with minimum resolution of $5.3$ points per scale height

198: (pps) in the photosphere ($65$ pps in the corona), and has $350 \times 322

199: \times 320$ nodes in the $(x,y,z)$ directions.

200: 

201: 

202: The emergence process is initiated by including a twisted magnetic flux tube

203: with axis along the $y$ coordinate direction located $1.7$ Mm below the

204: photosphere and with maximum field strength $3.8$ kG.  The tube is endowed

205: with buoyancy in its central part so that it rises and reaches the surface in

206: about $15$ min. The main features of these initial phases are as

207: described in our previous experiments (e.g., \citealt{archontis_etal_04,

208: archontis_etal_05}).  Once in the atmosphere, the rising plasma has a

209: considerable magnetic pressure excess and expands in all directions, albeit

210: preferentially horizontally, whereby it adopts a {\it helmet} shape

211: protruding from the solar interior. The pressure of the ambient coronal field

212: opposes the expansion and the emerged volume reaches

213: a maximum size of about $8$ Mm in height, $11$ Mm in the $x$

214: direction (i.e., transverse to the original tube axis) and $17$ Mm in the $y$

215: direction. 

216: 

217: 

218: The expansion just described firmly presses against each other the magnetic

219: field in the emerged volume and the ambient corona. The field in the rising

220: plasma is twisted around the tube axis; hence, it is almost counteraligned

221: with the coronal field on one of the sides of the emerging volume.  A thin,

222: elongated current sheet is thereby formed (blue isosurface in Fig.~\ref{fig:3D_plots})

223: that embraces that side of the volume, resembling those obtained by

224: \citet{archontis_etal_05}.  Seen in a vertical cut, the sheet appears as a

225: thin stripe (in red in Fig.~\ref{fig:2D_plots}, top panel) of Syrovatskii

226: type. Reconnection takes place across the current sheet: the arch-like loops

227: next to it inside the {\it helmet} merge with the open loops coming in from

228: the other side of the sheet. Two regions of reconnected field result;

229: at the thin edge at the top of the current sheet, a set of open field lines

230: are ejected: that region is visible in Fig.~\ref{fig:2D_plots} (top panel) as

231: a vertical band of diffuse current perturbations.  At the lower edge, closed

232: coronal loops ensue. 

233: 

234: High velocity outflows are ejected from the upper and lower edge of the

235: current sheet.  The outflow at the upper edge (Fig.~\ref{fig:2D_plots},

236: center) is roughly horizontal and reaches peak speeds around $400$ km

237: s$^{-1}$ (of order the local Alfv\'en speed). Shortly after leaving the

238: reconnection site, it is deflected into two secondary jets propagating upward

239: and downward along the field lines, basically as described in 2D by

240: \citet{yokoyama_shibata_96}.  The upgoing branch attains vertical velocities

241: above $200$ km s$^{-1}$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:2D_plots}, center).  High temperature

242: values are reached in the jets and in the reconnection site itself. At the

243: peak of activity (Figs.~\ref{fig:3D_plots} and \ref{fig:2D_plots}), the

244: $6.5\times10^{6}$ K isosurface (in pink in Fig.~\ref{fig:3D_plots}) extends

245: over the current sheet and into the jet.  Values as high as $3\times10^7$ K

246: (reconnection site) and slightly above $10^7$ K (jet) are reached

247: (Fig.~\ref{fig:2D_plots}, bottom).  The high-T regions have the shape

248: of an inverted-Y on top of the emerged material (Figs.~\ref{fig:3D_plots} and

249: \ref{fig:2D_plots}), not unlike those observed by {\it Hinode}

250: (Fig.~\ref{fig:polarjet}).  The density of the jet at the peak of activity is

251: about $10$ times the density of the unperturbed corona.

252: 

253: 

254: 

255: 

256: As reconnection proceeds, a {\it double-chambered vault} structure of closed

257: loops develops below the jet, visible below the blue stripe in

258: Figs.~\ref{fig:3D_plots} and \ref{fig:2D_plots} (center and bottom panels):

259: in one of the chambers ({\it the emerged chamber}), coronal loops with the

260: original connectivity are still present; in the other ({\it the reconnected

261: chamber}), the new set of closed, high-T coronal loops are being stored. The

262: whole system strongly resembles the topology obtained in

263: Sect.~\ref{sec:observations} through extrapolation from MDI data. As time

264: proceeds, the {\it emerged chamber} decreases in transverse size while the

265: {\it reconnected chamber} grows to a size 

266: similar to the original emerged volume.  There results an

267: apparent sideways {\it drift} of the vault and of the jet in the direction

268: toward the reconnected loops, with roughly $10$ km s$^{-1}$ drift speed.

269: This may correspond to the drift discussed by \citet{savcheva2007}.

270: 

271: The main phase of reconnection with jet speeds above $100$ km s$^{-1}$

272: lasts around $7$ min, followed by an extended phase with lower temperature

273: and jet velocities, for a total duration of some $20$ min. In the early

274: stages of reconnection, in turn, we observe  cool and dense plasma

275: being ejected from the reconnection site. At that stage, the high-density

276: shell that covers the emerging plasma is being merged with the

277: ambient coronal field.  The resulting reconnected open field lines become

278: loaded with high-density [$\rho \approx \hbox{O}(10^2 \rhotop)$], low-T

279: [O($10^5$) K] material (visible to the left of the hot jet in

280: Fig.~\ref{fig:2D_plots}, bottom panel).

281: 

282: 

283: \section{Discussion}\label{sec:discussion}

284: 

285: In this letter we have shown that the inverted-Y shaped jets recently

286: observed by {\it Hinode}/XRT in coronal holes are a natural consequence of the

287: emergence of magnetic flux from below the surface and its interaction with

288: the preexisting open field in the coronal hole. Flux emergence is a prime

289: candidate to trigger reconnection and the consequent launching of jets along

290: field lines in the corona, as proposed through theoretical or 2D numerical

291: results \citep{heyvaertsetal77, yokoyama_shibata_96} and through 3D

292: experiments of jet formation in a horizontally magnetized atmosphere

293: \citep{archontis_etal_05, galsgaardetal07}. Our present 3D experiments had a

294: field configuration and stratification parameters akin to those in a coronal

295: hole. The match we obtain between the X-Ray, EUV and magnetogram data and the

296: numerical results is highly satisfactory concerning overall geometry,

297: topology of the magnetic field, and density, temperature and velocity of the

298: plasma. Various basic features obtained through 2D vertical cuts in our

299: experiments agree qualitatively with the results of

300: \citet{yokoyama_shibata_96}, in spite of the differences in parameter values.

301: Beyond all that, our experiments permit discerning for the first

302: time the 3D geometry of this type of events.  

303: 

304: A number of refinements must be implemented for a better test of the match of

305: the present numerical results with the observations, like heat conduction or

306: radiative cooling.  Those improvements are being included into this research

307: at present.

308: 

309: 

310: \acknowledgments

311:  Financial support by the European Commission through the SOLAIRE

312: Network (MTRN-CT-2006-035484) and by the Spanish Ministery of Education

313: through project AYA2007-66502 is gratefully acknowledged, as are the

314: computer resources, technical expertise and assistance provided by the

315: MareNostrum (BSC/CNS, Spain) and LaPalma (IAC/RES, Spain)

316: supercomputer installations. Support from the NASA/{\it Hinode} program and from

317: the Velux foundation is also acknowledged.  {\it Hinode} is a Japanese mission

318: developed and launched by ISAS/JAXA, with NAOJ, NASA and STFC as partners, and

319: co-operated with ESA and NSC. {\it SOHO} is a project of cooperation between ESA

320: and NASA.

321: 

322: 

323: 

324: \begin{thebibliography}{24}

325: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi

326: 

327: \bibitem[{{Archontis} {et~al.}(2005){Archontis}, {Moreno-Insertis},

328:   {Galsgaard}, \& {Hood}}]{archontis_etal_05}

329: {Archontis}, V., {Moreno-Insertis}, F., {Galsgaard}, K., \& {Hood}, A. 2005,

330:   \apj, 635, 1299

331: 

332: \bibitem[{{Archontis} {et~al.}(2004){Archontis}, {Moreno-Insertis},

333:   {Galsgaard}, {Hood}, \& {O'Shea}}]{archontis_etal_04}

334: {Archontis}, V., {Moreno-Insertis}, F., {Galsgaard}, K., {Hood}, A., \&

335:   {O'Shea}, E. 2004, \aap, 426, 1047

336: 

337: \bibitem[{{Canfield} {et~al.}(1996){Canfield}, {Reardon}, {Leka}, {Shibata},

338:   {Yokoyama}, \& {Shimojo}}]{canfield1996}

339: {Canfield}, R.~C., {Reardon}, K.~P., {Leka}, K.~D., {Shibata}, K., {Yokoyama},

340:   T., \& {Shimojo}, M. 1996, \apj, 464, 1016

341: 

342: \bibitem[{{Cirtain} {et~al.}(2007){Cirtain}, {Golub}, {Lundquist}, \&

343:   {et~al.}}]{cirtain2007}

344: {Cirtain}, J.~W., {Golub}, L., {Lundquist}, L., \& {et~al.} 2007, Science, in

345:   press

346: 

347: \bibitem[{{Culhane} {et~al.}(2007){Culhane}, {Harra}, {James}, \& {et

348:   al.}}]{culhane2007}

349: {Culhane}, J.~L., {Harra}, L.~K., {James}, A.~M., \& {et al.} 2007, \solphys,

350:   243, 19

351: 

352: \bibitem[{{Galsgaard} {et~al.}(2007){Galsgaard}, {Archontis},

353:   {Moreno-Insertis}, \& {Hood}}]{galsgaardetal07}

354: {Galsgaard}, K., {Archontis}, V., {Moreno-Insertis}, F., \& {Hood}, A. 2007,

355:   \apj, 666, 516

356: 

357: \bibitem[{{Golub} {et~al.}(2007){Golub}, {Deluca}, {Austin}, \&

358:   {et~al.}}]{golub2007}

359: {Golub}, L., {Deluca}, E., {Austin}, G., \& {et~al.} 2007, \solphys, 243, 63

360: 

361: \bibitem[{{Grevesse} {et~al.}(2007){Grevesse}, {Asplund}, \&

362:   {Sauval}}]{grevesse2007}

363: {Grevesse}, N., {Asplund}, M., \& {Sauval}, A.~J. 2007, Space Science Reviews,

364:   130, 105

365: 

366: \bibitem[{{Harvey} \& {Recely}(2002)}]{harvey_recely_2002}

367: {Harvey}, K.~L. \& {Recely}, F. 2002, \solphys, 211, 31

368: 

369: \bibitem[{Heyvaerts {et~al.}(1977)Heyvaerts, Priest, \& Rust}]{heyvaertsetal77}

370: Heyvaerts, J., Priest, E.~R., \& Rust, D.~M. 1977, \apj, 216, 123

371: 

372: \bibitem[{{Jiang} {et~al.}(2007){Jiang}, {Chen}, {Li}, {Shen}, \&

373:   {Yang}}]{jiang2007}

374: {Jiang}, Y.~C., {Chen}, H.~D., {Li}, K.~J., {Shen}, Y.~D., \& {Yang}, L.~H.

375:   2007, \aap, 469, 331

376: 

377: \bibitem[{{Ko} {et~al.}(2005){Ko}, {Raymond}, {Gibson}, \& {et~al.}}]{ko2005}

378: {Ko}, Y.-K., {Raymond}, J.~C., {Gibson}, S.~E., \& {et~al.} 2005, \apj, 623,

379:   519

380: 

381: \bibitem[{{Kosugi} {et~al.}(2007){Kosugi}, {Matsuzaki}, {Sakao}, \&

382:   {et~al.}}]{kosugi2007}

383: {Kosugi}, T., {Matsuzaki}, K., {Sakao}, T., \& {et~al.} 2007, \solphys, 243, 3

384: 

385: \bibitem[{{Landi} {et~al.}(2006){Landi}, {Del Zanna}, {Young}, {Dere}, {Mason},

386:   \& {Landini}}]{landi2006}

387: {Landi}, E., {Del Zanna}, G., {Young}, P.~R., {Dere}, K.~P., {Mason}, H.~E., \&

388:   {Landini}, M. 2006, \apjs, 162, 261

389: 

390: \bibitem[{{Mazzotta} {et~al.}(1998){Mazzotta}, {Mazzitelli}, {Colafrancesco},

391:   \& {Vittorio}}]{mazzotta1998}

392: {Mazzotta}, P., {Mazzitelli}, G., {Colafrancesco}, S., \& {Vittorio}, N. 1998,

393:   \aaps, 133, 403

394: 

395: \bibitem[{{Nordlund} \& {Galsgaard}(1997)}]{nordlund+galsgaard97}

396: {Nordlund}, A. \& {Galsgaard}, K. 1997, {Tech. Rep., Astron. Observ.,

397:   Copenhagen Univ.}

398: 

399: \bibitem[{{Pike} \& {Harrison}(1997)}]{pike_harrison_1997}

400: {Pike}, C.~D. \& {Harrison}, R.~A. 1997, \solphys, 175, 457

401: 

402: \bibitem[{{Savcheva} {et~al.}(2007){Savcheva}, {Cirtain}, {DeLuca}, \&

403:   {et~al.}}]{savcheva2007}

404: {Savcheva}, A., {Cirtain}, J., {DeLuca}, E., \& {et~al.} 2007, Submitted to

405:   \pasj

406: 

407: \bibitem[{{Scherrer} {et~al.}(1995){Scherrer}, {Bogart}, {Bush}, \&

408:   {et~al.}}]{scherrer1995}

409: {Scherrer}, P.~H., {Bogart}, R.~S., {Bush}, R.~I., \& {et~al.} 1995, \solphys,

410:   162, 129

411: 

412: \bibitem[{{Shimojo} {et~al.}(1996){Shimojo}, {Hashimoto}, {Shibata},

413:   {Hirayama}, {Hudson}, \& {Acton}}]{Shimojo+ea96}

414: {Shimojo}, M., {Hashimoto}, S., {Shibata}, K., {Hirayama}, T., {Hudson}, H.~S.,

415:   \& {Acton}, L.~W. 1996, \pasj, 48, 123

416: 

417: \bibitem[{{Ugarte-Urra} {et~al.}(2007){Ugarte-Urra}, {Warren}, \&

418:   {Winebarger}}]{ugarte-urra2007}

419: {Ugarte-Urra}, I., {Warren}, H.~P., \& {Winebarger}, A.~R. 2007, \apj, 662,

420:   1293

421: 

422: \bibitem[{{Wilhelm}(2006)}]{wilhelm06}

423: {Wilhelm}, K. 2006, \aap, 455, 697

424: 

425: \bibitem[{{Wilhelm} {et~al.}(2002){Wilhelm}, {Dammasch}, \&

426:   {Hassler}}]{wilhelm2002}

427: {Wilhelm}, K., {Dammasch}, I.~E., \& {Hassler}, D.~M. 2002, \apss, 282, 189

428: 

429: \bibitem[{{Yokoyama} \& {Shibata}(1996)}]{yokoyama_shibata_96}

430: {Yokoyama}, T. \& {Shibata}, K. 1996, \pasj, 48, 353

431: 

432: \end{thebibliography}

433: 

434: 

435: 

436: 

437: \clearpage

438: 

439: 

440: 

441: \begin{figure}[htbp!]

442: \centering

443:  \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f1.eps}

444: %

445: \caption{Polar coronal jet observed with XRT Al\_poly/Open filter combination

446: on the South coronal hole on January 20 2007.  Color scale is reversed.}

447: \label{fig:polarjet}

448: \end{figure}

449: 

450: 

451: \begin{figure}[htbp!]

452: \centering

453: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=10cm]{f2.eps}

454: %

455: \vskip 4mm

456: \caption{Coronal jet observed in an equatorial coronal hole on March 10 2007.

457: Top left panel: difference XRT Open/Ti\_poly image of the jet; the dashed

458: line indicates the EIS slit position.  Top right: MDI magnetogram and linear

459: force free magnetic field extrapolation ($\alpha=-0.007$ Mm$^{-1}$); the

460: color code is: a) dark blue: field lines near the apparent magnetic null

461: and the separatrices; b) light blue: field lines with two foot-points in the

462: photosphere; c) red lines: open field lines. Bottom right: side view as

463: indicated by the black arrow in the panel above. Numbers indicate

464: connectivity regions. Bottom left: 

465: \ion{Fe}{12} 195.1 \AA\ spectral profile at the jet location (thick line) at

466: 06:21 

467: UT. The thin line corresponds to an average profile elsewhere in the coronal

468: hole. }

469: \label{fig:equatorialjet}

470: \end{figure}

471: 

472: 

473: 

474: \begin{figure}[htbp!]

475: \centering

476: \includegraphics[width=8.6cm,height=18.75cm]{f3.eps}

477: \caption{Three-dimensional view of the emerged region, the reconnection site

478:     and the jet at the time of peak reconnection activity (top: side

479:     view; bottom: view from below). The isosurface of $j/B$ (in blue)

480:     delineates the collapsed current sheet on the side of the emerged volume.

481:     The temperature isosurface ($T=6.5\times10^{6}$ K; in red) encompasses

482:     both the reconnection site and the jet volume. Underlying the jet and

483:     current sheet, a double set of current loops (emerged and reconnected,

484:     with field lines in orange and green, respectively) is visible, giving a

485:     'double-chambered' vault shape to the region below the jet.  }

486: \label{fig:3D_plots}

487: \end{figure}

488: 

489: 

490: 

491: \begin{figure}[htbp!]

492: \centering

493: \includegraphics[width=8.7cm,height=14.6cm]{f4.eps}

494: %

495: \caption{Vertical cuts at different stages of the evolution. Top: $j / B $

496:   distribution and field line projection at an early stage. A thin current

497:   sheet is situated to the top-right of the emerged coronal loops. The

498:   diffuse, elongated current perturbations to the top and left of the emerged

499:   volume correspond to previously reconnected field lines. Center: total

500:   velocity map and field line projection at the peak activity phase of the

501:   jet, occuring about $7$ min later than the top panel. The double-chambered

502:   structure below the jet is clearly visible. Bottom: temperature

503:   distribution for the same snapshot as the central panel.  An inverted-Y

504:   structure appears prominently, with $T\hskip -3pt \approx \hskip -3pt 3\,10^7$

505:    K (reconnection site) and $\approx\hskip -3pt 10^7$ K (upward

506:   pointing jet). }

507: \label{fig:2D_plots}

508: \end{figure}

509: 

510: 

511: 

512: 

513: \end{document}

514: 

515: