1: \documentclass[print]{mn2e}
2: %%%%% THESE ARE MY OWN MACROS %%%%%
3: \newcommand{\mv}{\mbox{$M_{V}$}}
4: \newcommand{\mi}{\mbox{$M_{I}$}}
5: \newcommand{\mimax}{\mbox{$M_{I}^{\rm RC}$}}
6: \newcommand{\feh}{\mbox{[Fe/H]}}
7: \newcommand{\zh}{\mbox{[Z/H]}}
8: \newcommand{\afe}{\mbox{[$\alpha$/Fe]}}
9: \newcommand{\Msun}{\mbox{$M_{\odot}$}}
10: \newcommand{\sub}[1]{\mbox{$_{\rm #1}$}}
11: \newcommand{\Mi}{\mbox{$m\sub{i}$}}
12: \newcommand{\Teff}{\mbox{$T\sub{eff}$}}
13: \newcommand{\diff}{\mbox{d}}
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: \usepackage{graphicx}
16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
17: \title[Photometric properties of Local Volume dwarf galaxies]
18: {Photometric properties of Local Volume dwarf galaxies\thanks{Based on observations
19: with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute,
20: which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA),
21: Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555.}}
22: \author[M. E. Sharina et al.]
23: {M. E. Sharina$^{1}$\thanks{E-mail: sme@sao.ru (MES)},
24: I. D. Karachentsev$^{1}$, A. E. Dolphin$^{2}$, V. E. Karachentseva$^{3}$, \newauthor R. Brent Tully$^{4}$,
25: G. M. Karataeva$^{5}$, D. I. Makarov$^{1}$, L. N. Makarova$^{1}$, \newauthor
26: S. Sakai$^{6}$, E. J. Shaya$^{7}$, E. Yu. Nikolaev$^{8}$, A. N. Kuznetsov$^{5}$\\
27: $^{1}$Special Astrophysical Observatory, Russian Academy of Sciences, N.Arkhyz, KChR, 369167, Russia\\
28: $^{2}$Steward Observatory, 933 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA\\
29: $^{3}$Astronomical Observatory of Kiev University, Kiev 04053, Ukraine\\
30: $^{4}$Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA\\
31: $^{5}$Astronomical Institute, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskii pr. 28, St. Petersburg, 198504, Russia\\
32: $^{6}$Division of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1562, USA\\
33: $^{7}$Astronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20743, USA\\
34: $^{8}$Department of Astronomy, Kazan State University, Kremlevskaya Street 18, 420008 Kazan, Russia}
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \date{Accepted ---. Received ---}
38:
39: \pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{2007}
40:
41: \maketitle
42:
43: \label{firstpage}
44: \begin{abstract}
45: We present surface photometry and metallicity measurements
46: for 104 nearby dwarf galaxies imaged with the Advanced Camera for Surveys
47: and Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 aboard the Hubble Space Telescope.
48: In addition, we carried out photometry for 26 galaxies of the sample and for Sextans~B on images of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.
49: Our sample comprises dwarf spheroidal, irregular and transition type galaxies
50: located within $\sim$10 Mpc in the field and in nearby groups: M81, Centaurus~A,
51: Sculptor, and Canes Venatici I cloud.
52: It is found that the early-type galaxies have on average higher metallicity
53: at a given luminosity in comparison to the late-type objects.
54: Dwarf galaxies with $ M_B \geq -12 \div -13^m$ deviate toward larger scale lengths
55: from the scale length -- luminosity
56: relation common for spiral galaxies, $h \propto L^{0.5}_B$.
57: The following correlations between fundamental parameters of the
58: galaxies are consistent with expectations if there is pronounced gas-loss
59: through galactic winds:
60: 1) between the luminosity of early-type dwarf galaxies and the mean metallicity of
61: constituent red giant branch stars, $ Z \sim L^{0.4}$,
62: 2) between mean surface brightness within the 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$ isophote and
63: the corresponding absolute magnitude in the V and I bands, $ SB_{25} \sim 0.3 M_{25}$,
64: and 3) between the central surface brightness (or effective surface brightness) and
65: integrated absolute magnitude of galaxies in the V and I bands,
66: $ SB_{0} \sim 0.5 M_{L}$, $ SB_{e} \sim 0.5 M_{e}$.
67: The knowledge of basic photometric parameters for a large sample of dwarf galaxies is
68: essential for a better understanding of their evolution.
69: \end{abstract}
70:
71: \begin{keywords}
72: galaxies: general -- galaxies: fundamental parameters -- galaxies:
73: photometry -- galaxies: structure -- galaxies
74: \end{keywords}
75:
76: \section{Introduction}
77: Environmental density has been argued to be one of the main factors influencing the evolution of galaxies.
78: Our neighbourhood is predominantly populated by poor groups, made up of
79: 1 -- 2 massive galaxies and numerous dwarf satellites.
80: A well-known morphology-density relation between the local density in groups and clusters
81: and galaxy type (see e.g. Hubble \& Humason 1931, Einasto et al. 1974, Dressler 1980,
82: Binggeli 1994) is also valid for Local Volume low-mass galaxies.
83: The present day dwarf galaxies are supposed to be relics
84: of building blocks that form larger galaxies during the hierarchical merging history of the Universe (White \& Rees 1978).
85: Such objects with typical masses $< 10^8$M$\odot$ lose gas easily due to their shallow potential wells.
86: Thus, they are strongly influenced by the effects of morphological segregation.
87: \begin{figure}
88: %\includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig001.ps}
89: \caption{Distribution of our sample and the Local Group galaxies according to their projected distances from
90: the nearest massive galaxy. The data were taken from Karachentsev et al. 2004. Roughly 50\% dSphs are located
91: within the projected radius of ~300 kpc from the nearest massive galaxy.}
92: \label{morf_distr}
93: \end{figure}
94: Dwarf galaxies are usually divided into two main morphological classes depending on
95: their structure, age of stellar populations and gas content:
96: early-type (dwarf spheroidal, dSph, and elliptical, dE), and late-type (irregular, dIrr,
97: and blue compact galaxies, BCD) (Kormendy 1985, Karachentseva et al. 1985, Grebel 1999).
98: The majority of dSphs and dIrrs are low surface brightness (LSB) galaxies with
99: $(SB)_{0,B} \ge 22.5 \div 23^m\!/\sq \arcsec$, according to the definitions outlined by
100: Impey and co-authors (Impey \& Bothun 1997, Impey et al. 2001).
101: The prototypes of dSphs are Sculptor and Fornax dSphs in the Local group (LG).
102: There is no sharp difference between dEs and dSphs.
103: However, dSphs are supposed to have on average lower surface brightnesses and surface brightness
104: gradients than dEs (Karachentseva et al. 1985).
105: The Large and Small Magellanic Clouds can serve as representatives of the brightest dIrrs.
106: BCDs are systems dominated by very active star formation.
107: A list of the LG dwarf galaxies and a detailed description of their properties can be found in
108: a monograph by van den Bergh (2000) and a review by Mateo (1998).
109:
110: The distinction between different morphological classes is slightly blurred.
111: New observational data obtained at high spatial resolution and in different wavelength ranges
112: reveal some peculiar properties of dwarf galaxies.
113: For example, KDG61 in the M81 group classified as dSph (Karachentseva et al. 1985) contains
114: a bright HII region and some bright blue stars (Johnson et al. 1997).
115: Population gradients exist in the Local Group
116: dSphs (Harbeck et al. 2001) and
117: in the dwarf elliptical satellites of M31: NGC205, NGC185, É NGC147
118: (see e.g. Davidge 2005, Sharina et al. 2006 and references therein).
119: Since dIrrs and dSphs both have exponential surface brightness (SB) profiles,
120: they are considered to be the members of a common evolutionary sequence.
121: However, it should be noted that reliable and consistent SB measurements are
122: complicated for faint galaxies.
123: So-called transition type galaxies are probably
124: faded dIrrs, depleted of gas.
125:
126: In this paper we concentrate on the properties of dSphs and dIrrs.
127: The LV dSphs typically are found within the distance of $ \sim$300 kpc around massive
128: galaxies, while dIrrs are distributed more uniformly (see Fig.~1).
129: They occur in groups of galaxies and in the field
130: (see also Grebel et al. 2003, and Karachentsev et al. 2005).
131:
132: Many physical mechanisms are employed to explain the evolution of low-mass galaxies:
133: ram pressure stripping and stripping by the intergalactic medium,
134: tidal interactions in groups and clusters, gas blowout through supernova driven wind, etc.
135: (see e.g. Grebel et al. 2003, Boselli \& Gavazzi 2006, Gunn \& Gott 1972,
136: Zasov \& Karachentseva 1979, Gnedin 2003, Dekel \& Silk 1987, Ferrara \& Tolstoy, 2000).
137: Low-mass disks are particularly sensitive to harassment by galaxy encounters and
138: tidal interactions in high density environments.
139:
140: Good data that constrain fundamental parameters for
141: a representative sample of nearby dwarf galaxies would help toward
142: understanding how galaxies are formed and evolve.
143: The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) high resolution images represent the best material
144: for stellar photometry, and detailed studies of the internal structure of galaxies.
145: Accurate distances to $\sim 200$ objects in the LV were determined
146: in four snapshot programs (Karachentsev et al. 2001; 2002a, b, c; 2003a, b, c, d; 2006, 2007;
147: hereafter: K01-07).
148: These data provide us the means to study physical properties of a large sample of galaxies.
149: A main aim of our study is to elucidate basic scaling relations between fundamental parameters
150: of nearby LSB dwarf galaxies.
151: The paper is organised as follows. In Section~2 we describe our
152: approach to data reduction leading to the derivation of the metallicities
153: and SB profiles. In Section~3 we discuss
154: the resulting relations based on the derived fundamental
155: parameters of dwarf galaxies: the metallicity -- luminosity,
156: the scale length -- luminosity, and the SB --
157: luminosity relations. In section 4 we formulate our conclusions.
158:
159: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
160: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
161: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
162: \section{Data reduction and analysis}
163: Our sample (see Table~1) consists of 104 dwarf galaxies observed
164: with the Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2)
165: using the WF3-fix aperture (proposals GO 8192 and 8601),
166: and with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) (proposals 9771 and 10235).
167: All HST observations were carried out with the filters F606W and F814W, the response characteristics of which
168: can be transformed to the filters V and I in the Johnson-Cousins system (see Holtzman et al. 1995,
169: Sirianni et al. 2005 for more details).
170: The exposure times were 600 seconds in each filter for the WFPC2 sample.
171: The ACS images were taken with the exposure times of 900 and 1200 seconds
172: in the F606W and F814W filters, respectively.
173:
174: We select small galaxies, which are located almost entirely
175: within the corresponding WF3 WFPC2 frames.
176: Since the snapshot sample is restricted in the distance to galaxies,
177: this selection criterion naturally leads to a limitation in the
178: luminosity of the objects of study. About 70\% our sample galaxies are fainter
179: than $M_V \sim -15^m$ and have central SB in the B-band $(SB)_0 >22.0^m\!/\sq \arcsec$.
180:
181: Stellar photometry and artificial star tests were performed using the HST$\!$~PHOT and
182: DOLPHOT packages (Dolphin 2000a). A detailed description of all reduction steps can
183: be found in the corresponding manuals. Correction for charge transfer effects was made
184: using the prescriptions described in Dolphin (2000b).
185: Holtzman et al. (2006) tested different techniques of the point-spread function photometry
186: and concluded that the photometry produced by
187: the HST$\!$~PHOT package is the most accurate to date. The authors
188: describe the advantages of using the program,
189: one the most important of which is a better quality of aperture corrections.
190: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
191: \subsection{Determination of metallicity}
192: To determine metallicity of red giant branch (RGB) stars in our sample dwarf galaxies we use stellar
193: photometry results presented in a series of papers devoted to the investigation of the structure of the LV
194: by Karachentsev and co-authors published between 2002 and 2007 (K01-07) and by Tully et al. (2006).
195:
196: In these papers the distances were obtained with a typical accuracy better than 12\% using the method of
197: Da Costa \& Armandroff (1990) and Lee et al. (1993) from the tip of first-ascent
198: red giant branch stars. Metallicity of old stars was estimated for
199: some galaxies from a mean color of the RGB measured at an absolute
200: magnitude $M_I=-3\fm5$ (Lee et al., 1993): $$\feh = 12.64+12.6 \cdot (V-I)_{-3.5} - 3.3 \cdot(V-I)^2_{-3.5}.$$
201:
202: In this paper we extend the determination of metallicity in the same way to the larger
203: sample of objects. The measured metallicities with the corresponding random and
204: systematic errors are presented in Table~1.
205: It should be noted, that the exposure times, spatial resolution, and the resulting
206: photometric depth are different for ACS and WFPC2 images. So, the approaches to the
207: data reduction were different for these datasets.
208: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
209: \subsubsection{WFPC2}
210: According to our selection criterion, only small galaxies, completely covered by the WFPC2 WF3 chip
211: field of view were included in the analysis.
212: This circumstance naturally leads to the limitation of surface brightness, since
213: the sample of galaxies imaged in the snapshot programs with the WFPC2 is restricted in distance.
214: Artificial star experiments show that a 50\% stellar detection rate limit for
215: LSB dwarf galaxies imaged with the WFPC2 at exposure times of 600 seconds in each filter
216: is usually reached at $V \sim 26^m$ and $I \sim 25^m$.
217: In Fig.~2 we demonstrate completeness and mean photometric errors for KK~27 and NGC~3741,
218: which represent the most and least crowded images.
219:
220: \begin{figure*}
221: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig002a.ps}
222: \voffset=1cm
223: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig002b.ps}
224: \caption{V completeness and photometric errors for the most and least crowded WFPC2
225: images (left: KK27, right: NGC3741).
226: In the bottom panels, the line shows the mean output minus input magnitudes of artificial stars,
227: and the error bars show the 1$\sigma$ distribution.}
228: \label{complt}
229: \end{figure*}
230: \begin{figure*}
231: \voffset=-10cm
232: %\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{fig003.ps}
233: \caption{Real and artificial color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) for
234: E294-010 (Dist$=1.92$ Mpc) and KK27 (Dist$=3.98$ Mpc)
235: (see Section 2.1.1 for details).}
236: \label{cmds}
237: \end{figure*}
238: \begin{figure*}
239: \voffset=-10cm
240: %\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{fig004.ps}
241: \caption{Representative CMDs for metal-poor and metal-rich dwarf galaxies
242: imaged with the WFPC2 (top): E325-011, and KK217;
243: and the ACS (bottom): KKH6, and KK197 (see Sec.2.1.1 and Sec.2.1.2 for details).
244: Empirical loci of the red giant branch for Galactic globular clusters M15, M2, NGC1851, and 47 Tuc
245: (Lee et al. 1993) are overplotted.}
246: \label{cmds}
247: \end{figure*}
248: \begin{figure*}
249: %\includegraphics[width=0.56\textwidth]{fig005.ps}
250: \caption{Difference between metallicities obtained using the observed and artificial CMDs
251: versus the corresponding I-band magnitudes of the RGB tip for our sample dwarf galaxies
252: imaged with the WFPC2.}
253: \label{Fe_H_Itrgb}
254: \end{figure*}
255: \begin{figure*}
256: %\includegraphics[width=0.46\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig006.ps}
257: \caption{ Dispersion of RGB color measured at $M_I=-3.5$ versus absolute magnitude in the V-band (column 6, Table~1)
258: for dSphs (dots) and dIrrs (open circles).}
259: \label{VIspreads}
260: \end{figure*}
261: To study how the $\feh $ uncertainties grow with distance,
262: we use artificial star experiments
263: \footnote{Artificial RGBs are presented at anonymous ftp site:~ftp://ftp.sao.ru/pub/sme/DwGal/artRGBs/}
264: and the following procedure:
265:
266: 1. Selection of artificial stars with magnitudes and colors resembling those
267: of RGB stars in the studied galaxies;
268:
269: 2. Choice of input magnitudes and colors for recovered stars corresponding
270: to those of Galactic globular clusters: M15 (\feh$=2.17$ dex), M2 (\feh$=-1.58$ dex),
271: NGC1851 (\feh$=-1.29$ dex), and 47 Tuc (\feh$=-0.71$ dex) according to Lee et al. 1993;
272:
273: 3. Determination of the metallicity of the artificial RGBs using the method
274: of Lee et al. (1993).
275:
276: Note that we did not take into account luminosity functions.
277: Artificial stars are evenly distributed according to their magnitudes.
278: A scatter and a possible systematic difference between the color of an input RGB and that
279: constructed by recovered stars was used to study \feh\ uncertainties.
280: In Fig.~3 real and artificial color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) are shown for one of the most distant and the nearest
281: galaxies in our sample: KK27 ($I_{TRGB}=24.10$), and E294-010 ($I_{TRGB}=22.38$).
282: In Fig.~5 we plot the difference between metallicities obtained using the observed
283: and artificial CMDs versus the corresponding RGB tip magnitude for the galaxies imaged with the WFPC2.
284: It is seen that the difference is not larger than 0.15 dex for galaxies located
285: within 4.5 Mpc ($I_{TRGB} \sim 24.2$ mag). So, only the galaxies within this distance range were selected
286: for the proper determination of metallicity.
287:
288: Fig.~4 (top) shows representative CMDs for metal-poor and metal-rich dwarf galaxies
289: imaged with the WFPC2 (see also Karachentsev et al. 2002b).
290: E325-011 and KK217 are dIrr and dSph satellites of N5128, respectively. Both galaxies are
291: located at a distance of $\sim350$ kpc from the center of the Centaurus~A group
292: (Catalog of Neighbouring Galaxies by Karachentsev et al. 2004, hereafter: CNG).
293: E325-011 is a factor of twenty more luminous than KK217 ($Log L_B^{E325-011}=7.8 L_{\sun}$,
294: $Log L_B^{KK217}=6.5 L_{\sun}$).
295: However, it is a factor of $\sim$7 less metal rich ($\feh^{E325-011}=-2.2$ dex, $\feh^{KK217}=-1.2$ dex).
296: The correspondence between luminosity and metallicity of dwarf galaxies of different
297: morphological types will be discussed in Sec~3.1.
298: \begin{figure*}
299: %\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{fig07.ps}
300: %\vspace{-2.5cm}
301: \caption{Representative surface brightness profiles for dwarf galaxies KK65 and UGC4115,
302: obtained using three types of images: WFPC2, ACS, and SDSS. Internal photometric errors are overplotted.}
303: \label{test}
304: \end{figure*}
305: \begin{figure*}
306: %\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{fig008.ps}
307: %\vspace{-4.5cm}
308: \caption{Comparison of properties of dwarf galaxies obtained by us
309: using the HST images with the corresponding data from the literature (circles)
310: and our photometry on the SDSS images (see Table) ("s" -- signs).
311: Small symbols refer to the WFPC2 data, whereas the larger ones represent the ACS data.
312: Star-like symbols indicate cross-check between our results coming from the WFPC2 and ACS images.
313: In this case the ACS data are shown along the X axis.
314: The panels show the following data obtained using the images in the V and I bands:
315: integrated magnitudes, and colors (panels 1-3),
316: effective radii, and SBs (panels 4-7),
317: model exponential scale lengths and central SBs (panels 8-11),
318: mean SBs measured within the isophote of 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$,
319: the corresponding V-band radii, and integrated magnitudes (panels 12-16).
320: All magnitudes and SBs were corrected for Galactic extinction (Schlegel et al. 1998).}
321: \label{compar}
322: \end{figure*}
323: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
324: \subsubsection{ACS}
325: Completeness plots for the dwarf galaxies ESO~269-058 and KKs~55
326: represent typical most and least crowded fields
327: imaged with the ACS (see also Karachentsev et al. 2007).
328: These plots indicate that the 50\% photometric detection limit on the ACS images
329: is fainter than that of the WFPC2 images.
330: To avoid possible systematic errors in determination of metallicity we select galaxies
331: within $ \sim$6 Mpc ($I_{TRGB} \sim 25^m$) for metallicity determination with the ACS.
332:
333: In Fig.~4 (bottom) we show representative CMDs for metal-poor and metal-rich dwarf galaxies
334: imaged with the ACS. High-resolution HST images for these objects were presented by Karachentsev et al. 2006, 2007.
335: KKH6 is a very isolated metal-poor Irr in the outskirts of the Maffei group ($\feh=-2.4$ dex).
336: KK197 is an early-type satellite of NGC5128, situated very near to the center of the Centaurus~A group.
337: The CMD of KK197 shows a wide range of metallicities of RGB stars.
338: Probably, this is an indication of unusual evolutionary history.
339: The RGB is very populated, and the mean metallicity at the level $M_I=-3\fm5$ ($\feh=-1.2$ dex) is determined
340: with small random and systematic errors (Table~1). Both galaxies, KKH6 and KK197,
341: have similar luminosities $L_B \sim 10^7 L \sun$.
342: Discussion about the relation between
343: luminosity and metallicity of dwarf galaxies will be presented in Sec.~3.1.
344:
345: The dispersions of RGB colors at $M_I=-3.5^m$ were measured for 30 galaxies observed with the ACS camera.
346: The objects were chosen to be located roughly in the distance range $2.2 \div 5.6$ Mpc, so that the color
347: spreads could be confidently detected. Selection of more distant galaxies leads to a situation where
348: the dispersion of RGB colors is comparable with stellar photometry errors. Fluctuations of
349: RGB color dispersions become prominent for nearer low-mass galaxies. RGBs appear to be insufficiently
350: populated to measure the color spreads confidently.
351: The color spread is defined as the square root of the difference between the observed color dispersion
352: and the corresponding uncertainties of the color estimates taken in quadratures. The color measurement error
353: is the sum of V and I measurement uncertainties added in quadrature and scaled according to the transformations
354: from instrumental F606W, F814W to standard Johnson-Cousins system. Artificial star experiments allow us to
355: estimate how crowding influences the uncertainties of stellar magnitudes. Our experiments for the least and the most
356: crowded images show that the contribution from crowding is insignificant in the case of low surface brightness
357: dwarf galaxies, i.e. less then $0.03^m$. The resulting dispersions of RGB colors versus absolute $M_{V_0}$
358: magnitudes of the galaxies from Table~1
359: are shown in Fig.~6. The RGB color spread for the giant elliptical galaxy NGC5128 (Rejkuba et al. 2004) is shown versus its
360: absolute magnitude from HYPERLEDA (Paturel et al. 2003)~\footnote{http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr}.
361: The dependence is almost linear, and RGB color spreads
362: are larger for brighter galaxies. The dispersion of colors of RGB stars is influenced by age and metallicity effects.
363: Detailed inspection of age and metallicity spreads is outside the scope of our paper. However,
364: one may conclude from inspection of Fig.~6 that star formation events are more frequent and powerful in larger
365: galaxies, and probably larger galaxies evolve faster. All these facts may be a consequence of the Schmidt star
366: formation law (Schmidt 1959)
367: in the sense that average gas densities are higher in larger galaxies. Our noteworthy case is KK197.
368: This nearest dwarf spheroidal satellite of NGC5218 has
369: twice as high a RGB color dispersion for its luminosity. This is probably a signature of a significant mass loss.
370: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
371: \subsection{Surface photometry}
372: \subsubsection{Main recipe}
373: Excellent spatial resolution of HST images allows us to reject background and
374: foreground objects with high confidence and to obtain detailed data about the structure
375: of inner parts of dwarf galaxies. The surface photometry was made using
376: the SURFPHOT program in the MIDAS package developed by ESO.
377: Major photometry steps were the same for all type of images, and identical
378: to those used by Makarova (1999).
379: The background on the cosmic ray cleaned images were determined by
380: fitting a plane with the FIT/BACKGROUND program.
381: One of the most important tasks is finding galactic centers.
382: The centers were usually determined by the ellipse fitting routine FIT/ELL3.
383: This procedure is complicated for some galaxies, because their
384: irregular structure consists of multiple bright star-forming regions (for example, DDO53).
385: In these cases the centers of symmetry were used for the subsequent integration
386: of light within circular apertures.
387: Bright foreground stars and background objects were removed from the frames
388: before integrating the light. Elongated galaxies were processed using elliptical
389: isophotes.
390: The majority of our sample galaxies have regular elliptical isophotes and exponential SB profiles
391: extending to $\sim 27 \div 28^m\!/\sq \arcsec$ in the V-band.
392: Some galaxies have complex structure with a central depression of light.
393: Sometimes, bright star-forming regions twist SB profiles.
394:
395: We fit the surface brightness profiles of all our sample dwarf galaxies by
396: an exponential intensity law (de Vaucouleurs 1959) which implies a surface brightness distribution
397: $$ \mu(r) = \mu_0 +1.086 \cdot (r/h),$$
398: where $ \mu_0$ is the central surface brightness and h is the exponential scale length.
399:
400: Our photometric results are presented at an anonymous ftp site~\footnote{
401: ftp://ftp.sao.ru/pub/sme/DwGal/ACSsbProfiles, ftp://ftp.sao.ru/pub/sme/DwGal/WFPC2sbProfiles,
402: ftp://ftp.sao.ru/pub/sme/DwGal/SDSSsbProfiles}.
403: Fundamental photometric properties of our sample objects are listed in Table~1.
404:
405: Table~1 contains the following data:
406: {\bf (1)} Galaxy Name and morphological type (second line) from CNG in numerical code
407: according to de Vaucouleurs et al. (1991),
408: {\bf (2)} equatorial coordinates (J2000) from CNG,
409: {\bf (3)} distance modulus (first line), and Galactic extinction in V-band from Schlegel et al. (1998),
410: {\bf (4)} mean metallicity of the RGBs, {\bf and dispersion of RGB color, $\sigma (V-I)$, measured at $M_I=-3.5$ (first line)}
411: with random and systematic errors of mean metallicity of the RGBs separated by a comma (second line),
412: {\bf (5)} projected major axis from CNG and limiting diameter of our photometry,
413: {\bf (6)} apparent V and I magnitudes integrated within the diameter $D_{lim}$,
414: {\bf (7)} limiting V and I surface brightnesses (SB) taken at the distance D$_{lim}$/2 from centers of galaxies,
415: {\bf (8)} effective $(V\!-\!I)$ color and effective SB in the V-band (superscript "a" indicates an average color),
416: {\bf (9)} mean SB within the isophote of 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$ in the V and I bands,
417: {\bf (10)} apparent V and I magnitudes integrated within the isophote level 25 $^m\!/\sq \arcsec$.
418: {\bf (11)} projected major axis radius at the isophote level 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$ in the V and I bands
419: {\bf (12)} effective radius, and model exponential scale length,
420: {\bf (13)} best exponential fitting central SB in V and I bands and corresponding errors,
421: Superscripts near the galaxy names indicate the corresponding name of the HST
422: proposal: "1" refers to the proposals ID 9771 and 10235,
423: "2" refers to the proposal ID 10210, and "3" refers to the proposals ID 8192 and
424: 8601. Superscript "s" indicates, that SDSS images were used. The data listed in the columns (7)-(11),
425: (14) were not corrected for Galactic extinction.
426:
427: Representative SB profiles are shown in Fig.~7.
428: In the following we specify the WFPC2 and ACS reduction steps.
429: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
430: \subsubsection{WFPC2}
431: Surface photometry of galaxies on the WFPC2 HST images was carried out using the recipes
432: and transformations into the standard Johnson-Cousins system by Holtzman et al. (1995).
433: All frames were corrected for distortion.
434:
435: For our purpose we select galaxies with the CNG angular sizes less than the
436: corresponding CCD images.
437: In general, selection of small objects allows us to be sure that structural
438: and photometric parameters are determined correctly.
439: We list integrated magnitudes in Table~1 (column 6) only for galaxies located completely in their frames.
440: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
441: \subsubsection{ACS}
442: \begin{figure*}
443: %\hspace{-4mm}
444: %\includegraphics[width=0.55\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig009a.ps}
445: %\includegraphics[width=0.55\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig009b.ps}
446: \caption{ Luminosities of dwarf galaxies versus mean metallicities of their RGB stars.
447: \feh\ was estimated from the mean color of the RGB measured at an absolute magnitude$M_I=-3.5$
448: (Lee et al. 1993). The data for the LG dwarf galaxies were taken from Grebel et al. (2003).
449: The data shown for our sample galaxies are listed in Table~1 (Col.~4,~6), while luminosities in the B-band were taken from CNG.}
450: \label{Fe_H_Lb}
451: \end{figure*}
452: \setcounter{figure}{8}
453: \begin{figure*}
454: %\hspace{-4mm}
455: %\includegraphics[width=0.55\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig009c.ps}
456: \caption{continued.}
457: \label{Fe_H_Lb}
458: \end{figure*}
459: \begin{figure*}
460: %\includegraphics[width=0.92\textwidth]{fig0010.ps}
461: %\vspace{-2.5cm}
462: \caption{
463: Surface brightness -- luminosity relation in the V and I bands for our sample of dwarf galaxies:
464: {\bf top:} between mean SBs within the isophote of 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$
465: and the corresponding absolute magnitudes;
466: {\bf medium}: between central SBs and the absolute magnitudes integrated within the diameters $D_{lim}$
467: (column~6 of Table~1);
468: {\bf bottom}: between effective SBs and the corresponding absolute magnitudes.
469: All data were corrected for Galactic extinction using Schlegel et al. (1998) maps.
470: The top and bottom right plots translate to stellar mass from
471: the I band. The M/L ratios were estimated
472: using $(V-I)_0$ colors of the galaxies integrated within the effective radius and
473: the isophote $25^{m}\!/\sq \arcsec$ (Table~1), Bruzual \& Charlot (2003) SSP models,
474: and a Salpeter IMF (Bell \& de Jong, 2001). The symbols are the same as in Fig.~9.}
475: \label{SB}
476: \end{figure*}
477:
478: \begin{figure*}
479: %\hspace{-0.5cm}
480: %\includegraphics[width=0.55\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig011a.ps}
481: %\includegraphics[width=0.55\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig011b.ps}
482: \caption{Logarithm of the scale length
483: versus the absolute B (from CNG) and I magnitudes integrated within
484: the diameters $D_{lim}$ (column~6 of Table~1). The symbols for our sample galaxies
485: are the same as in Fig.~9. The data for disky galaxies from Vennik et al. (1996),
486: Binggeli \& Cameron (1993), and van der Kruit (1987) are shown by squares, plus-signs,
487: and crosses (x), correspondingly. I magnitudes for disky galaxies were taken from Springob et al. (2007).}
488: \label{SB0_L}
489: \end{figure*}
490: We employ the ACS images processed with the Dither
491: package\footnote{http://www.stsci.edu/hst/acs/proposing/dither}.
492: To transform our ACS surface photometry results into the standard Johnson-Cousins
493: system we use the zeropoints and calibration coefficients from Sirianni et al. (2005).
494: The 50 pixel inter-chip gap represents a difficulty for the ACS data analysis,
495: because it often projects onto the central parts of galaxies.
496: To solve the problem, we interpolate the image intensities within the gap.
497: Towards this aim we extract parallel strips from the image area
498: contiguous with the strip and insert them into the gap area.
499: To test the influence of the inter-chip gap on the derived SB profiles,
500: we compare our results with the literature data, and with our WFPC2 photometry
501: results available for some galaxies.
502: Additionally, we carried out surface photometry of our sample objects
503: on the Sloan Digital Survey (SDSS). We found SDSS images for
504: 22 galaxies from the ACS and WFPC2 samples.
505: The comparison of our ACS surface photometry results with those presented in the literature
506: and obtained by us using the WFPC2 and SDSS images shows that the fundamental parameters
507: obtained by us using different types of images are trustworthy (see Fig.~8).
508: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
509: \subsubsection{SDSS}
510: Large scale, well-calibrated, deep SDSS images provide an excellent homogeneous
511: material for high-quality photometry.
512: Surface photometry was made following the steps described in Section~2.2.1.
513: To transform our measurements into the standard Johnson-Cousins
514: system, the empirical color transformations by Jordi et al. (2006) were employed.
515: Extinction coefficients, airmasses, exposure times, and other important data
516: were taken for each galaxy from the corresponding field table entries.
517:
518: In Fig.~8 the comparison of the fundamental photometric parameters derived
519: using the ACS, WFPC2, and SDSS images is demonstrated.
520: It is seen, that the typical accuracies of the
521: V and I magnitudes integrated within the limiting diameter $D_{lim}$ (Table~1)
522: and isophote 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$, mean SBs within the isophote 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$, effective SBs,
523: and $(V\!-I)$ color are typically $\le 0\fm2$.
524: Exponential scale lengths and effective radii are obtained with typical
525: uncertainties of about 2$\arcsec$ for small galaxies ($R_e \leq 30\arcsec$).
526: For larger galaxies uncertainties of this model parameters can reach $\sim$30\%.
527: There are no systematical trends in estimation of the aforementioned
528: photometric parameters. We list apparent magnitudes integrated
529: within the limiting diameter $D_{lim}$ in Table~1 (column 6) only if the limiting diameter of our photometry
530: is greater or equal than the major axis of a galaxy from CNG. However, it would be incorrect to
531: interpret these magnitudes as total magnitudes. For many our sample galaxies a ratio between a limiting radius
532: from a center of a galaxy to a disk scale length is less than two. This means that if we assume exponential
533: surface brightness profiles for our sample galaxies, the
534: difference between the corresponding extrapolated total magnitude and an isophot limited magnitude
535: may be greater than $0.5^m$ according to an equation (7) from Tully et al. (1996): $\delta m = 2.5~log~[1 - (1+r/h) e^{-r/h}],$
536: where r is a limiting radius of surface photometry, and h is an exponential scale length.
537:
538: In Table~2 we present fundamental parameters for our HST-based sample
539: of dwarf galaxies imaged with the SDSS. Additionally, we include
540: in this table the data for the nearby dwarf irregular galaxy Sextans~B.
541: Successive columns contain the following data:
542: (1) Galaxy Name. (2) equatorial coordinates (J2000),
543: (3) projected major axis from CNG and limiting diameter of our photometry,
544: (4) apparent B and R magnitudes integrated within the limiting diameter,
545: (5) limiting B and R surface brightnesses (SB) taken at the distance D$_{lim}$/2 from center of galaxy,
546: (6) effective $(B\!-\!R)$ color and effective SB in the R-band,
547: (7) mean SB within the isophote of 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$ in the B and R bands,
548: (8) apparent B and R magnitudes integrated within the isophote level 25 $^m\!/\sq \arcsec$,
549: (9) projected major axis at the isophote level 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$ in the B and R bands,
550: (10) effective radius and model exponential scale length,
551: (11) central SB in B and R bands and corresponding errors.
552: The data were not corrected for Galactic extinction.
553: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
554: \subsubsection{The surface photometry errors}
555: The magnitude errors are usually divided into internal and external components.
556: We derived external photometric errors by the comparison of our measurements
557: with the literature data and by the cross-comparison of photometric
558: parameters obtained using different types of images.
559: It was shown in the previous section (see also Fig.~8) that the measured magnitudes
560: agree with the independently estimated ones typically within $0\fm2$.
561:
562: Internal components consist of random and systematical errors.
563: Random uncertainties are mainly defined by the accuracy of the background estimates.
564: The standard deviation of surface brightness in photons per unit area is $\sqrt{g \cdot I + r^2}$,
565: where I is the total object and background flux in ADU (analog-to-digital-units) in this area,
566: g is the gain in electrons per ADU, and r is readout noise in electrons.
567:
568: The systematic component includes the errors of transformations into the standard system
569: and uncertainties of internal extinction estimation.
570: The uncertainty of the WFPC2 photometric zero point is estimated to be within $0\fm05$
571: (Dolphin 2000b). The errors of empirical coefficients for the transformations from WFC to BVRI
572: do not exceed 0.08 for the filter F606W and 0.02 for F814W (Sirianni et al., 2005).
573: Given the similarity of our sample dSphs and dIrrs to the LG galaxies we estimate that
574: the correction for the internal reddening is $E_{(B-V)}\la 0\fm1$ James et al. (2005).
575:
576: Summing up the internal errors, we obtain the resulting errors of the integrated magnitude
577: and the surface brightness estimations to be consistent with the external errors
578: derived by the comparison of different measurements.
579: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
580: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
581: \section{Results}
582: \subsection{The luminosity -- metallicity relation}
583: In the top panel of Fig.~9 we show the dependence between B-band luminosities from CNG
584: and metallicities of RGB stars for our sample galaxies. In the next two panels of Fig.~9
585: the same metallicities are plotted versus luminosities in the V and I bands obtained in our study.
586: The errors of metallicity estimations are presented in Table~1, the photometry uncertainties
587: are discussed in Section~2.2.5.
588:
589: It has been shown by many authors that the more luminous dwarf galaxies are on average
590: the most metal rich (Mateo 1998, and references therein; van den Bergh 1999; Grebel et al. 2003).
591: The luminosity -- metallicity (Z -- L) dependency for the Local Group dwarf galaxies have been
592: quantified by Dekel \& Silk (1986). Caldwell et al. (1992) confirmed this relation using Mg$_2$
593: spectral line index for metallicity estimation, and showed that
594: the Z -- L dependency obtained using this method is steeper ($Z \sim L^{0.6}$) for more luminous E galaxies.
595: Thomas et al. (2003) found a unified relation $[Z/H]=-3.6-0.19 M_B$ for
596: early type dwarf galaxies and for giant ellipticals.
597: Grebel et al. (2003) stressed attention to the fact that the LG dSphs have a higher
598: mean metallicity of old stellar populations for a fixed optical luminosity in comparison with dIrrs.
599: Fig.~9 shows that a similar tendency holds for our sample of galaxies
600: situated in the nearby groups and in the field.
601:
602: There may be several reasons for the separation between dIrr and dSph in the Fig.~9
603: metallicity--luminosity plots (see also Grebel et al. 2003 and references therein).
604: First, perhaps the displacement being interpreted as a metallicity effect is
605: actually an age effect.
606: The average metallicity derived by
607: the method of Lee et al., 1993 is only valid for stellar populations with the ages
608: comparable to that of Galactic globular clusters. The age-metallicity degeneracy
609: problem has been discussed for a long time
610: (Worthey 1994, Saviane et al. 2000, Dolphin et al. 2003, Salaris \& Girardi 2005,
611: see also Zasov \& Sil'chenko 1983).
612: Fig.~5 from the paper by Dolphin et al. (2003) provides an exhaustive
613: explanation of this effect.
614: Probably, average ages of old stars in dIrrs differ from galaxy to galaxy and
615: are systematically less than those in dSphs.
616: The Z -- L relation for normal and dwarf elliptical galaxies
617: can also be skewed by the presence of a significant intermediate-age component.
618: However, this effect in dSph is not so pronounced as in the case of dwarf irregular galaxies.
619:
620: A second explanation for what is being seen in Fig.~9 may lie in the influence of
621: environments on the evolution
622: of dwarf galaxies. The metallicity of interstellar gas is dependent on three factors:
623: the rate of star formation, the degree of gas expulsion, and the influx of new gas.
624: It was shown by Shaya \& Tully (1984) that intergalactic material will not fall
625: into a galaxy once it is in a group.
626: Galaxies in isolation can continue to accrete fresh shells of low-metallicity intergalactic gas.
627: However, the cluster potential creates a Roche limit around an individual galaxy.
628: Gas envelopes lost by galaxies from violent star forming events are tidally stripped
629: and acquired by the group or cluster.
630: Shells of pristine interstellar gas that can fall into an isolated
631: dIrr and dilute its metal content are
632: prevented from falling into a dSph in the larger potential well of a
633: group or cluster.
634:
635: A third possibility is that the displacement between dIrr and dSph in Fig.~9 is
636: partially in luminosity. Passive evolution of dIrr galaxies leads to a fading of $ \sim 2^m$
637: of their integrated magnitude if they stop forming stars (Hunter \& Gallagher 1985).
638: Tidal mass loss by dwarf galaxies located near the centers of groups and clusters should not be ignored.
639: Low density galaxies entering a cluster may get completely disrupted
640: by tidal shocks over a time scale less than the Hubble time (e.g. Merritt 1984,
641: Moore at al. 1999. Mayer et al. 2001, Gnedin 2003, Koposov et al. 2007,
642: McConnachie et al. 2007).
643: However, it is difficult to accept that disruption and fading alone explains the observed offset.
644: The displacement of one to two orders of magnitude in luminosity implies
645: a loss of 90\% to 99\% of light for essentially all early-type dwarfs.
646: An ingredient might be added
647: if similar physical mechanisms worked at the stage of dSphs formation.
648: The difference in metallicity at the
649: same luminosity between dSph and dIrr may, at least partially be due to the earlier, faster transformation
650: of gas into stars in a denser environment (Hogg et al. 2003, Thomas et al. 2005)
651: and a subsequent fading after the exhaustion of gas and loss of stars.
652:
653: Five dwarf galaxies classified as dSphs have low metallicity values at a given luminosity that resemble
654: those of dIrrs (Fig.~9): NGC5237, KKs55, CenN, KK189, and KK27. They either
655: have a significant intermediate-age component, or have a gas recycling history similar to that of dIrrs,
656: perhaps because they are in transition from the dIrr to the dSph state.
657:
658: Several contradictory observational and theoretical studies regarding the existence of a correlation
659: between luminosity and metallicity of young stellar populations in dIrrs have been presented in the literature.
660: Note, that [O/H] abundance is often used as the indication of the metallicity of dIrrs.
661: For instance, McGaugh 1994, Richer \& McCall (1995), Hidalgo-Gamez et al. (2003) found a weak relationship with luminosity.
662: Other authors (e.g. van Zee et al. 1997, Skillman et al. 1989) established a strong correlation.
663: Saviane et al. (2005) interpreted the existence of near-infrared Z -- L relation for dIrrs following
664: the considerations by Skillman et al. (2003) and Pilugin \& Ferrini (2000).
665: In the evolutionary closed-box scenario the gas fraction decreases monotonically
666: as metal abundance increases. Larger galaxies evolve faster.
667: On the other hand, Hidalgo-Gamez et al. (2003) showed that the relationship between the metal content
668: of a galaxy and its mass fraction of gas is not always linear.
669: Those authors concluded that variations in the stellar mass-to-light ratio can contribute
670: significantly to the scatter in the Z -- L relation.
671:
672: According to the model of Dekel \& Silk (1986),
673: the formation of small, diffuse, metal-poor galaxies is mainly regulated by supernova-driven winds.
674: Galaxies with the virial velocity and mass below a critical value undergo substantial
675: gas loss as a result of a violent burst of star formation.
676: Luminosity is proportional to metallicity as $L \sim Z^{2.5}$ in this scenario.
677: One can see that our dependency for early-type dwarf galaxies lies close to the theoretical one.
678: This result suggests that the efficiency of star formation is regulated by similar mechanisms in
679: early-type dwarf galaxies of different luminosities. It increases with increasing mass
680: and potential well of the object. Smaller galaxies lose larger gas fractions through
681: galactic winds.
682: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
683: \subsection{The surface brightness -- luminosity relation}
684: The relation between the mean SB of galaxies within the isophote level of
685: 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$ corrected for Galactic extinction using maps by Schlegel et al.
686: (1998), and the corresponding absolute magnitude
687: integrated within the same isophote is shown in Fig.~10~(top).
688: The slope of the dependency is well defined: $SB_{V_{25}} \sim 0.33 M_{25}$.
689: Data drawn from the CNG give the correlation between a mean
690: SB and an absolute magnitude in the B-band, $SB_B \sim 1/3 M_B$,
691: for all neighbouring galaxies and imply a constancy of
692: galactic spatial density averaged within this isophote. In other words, $L \sim R_{25}^3$,
693: where $R_{25}$ is the radius of the galaxy within the isophote level 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$.
694: Our study shows that this conclusion is valid for SBs and luminosities measured in the V and I bands.
695: These findings imply that the mean luminosity density within $\sim$10 Mpc is
696: only weakly dependent on the mass of a galaxy and its environment.
697:
698: In distinction to the average SB, the central SB
699: shows a steeper dependence on the integrated luminosity (Table~1, column~6):
700: $SB_{0} \sim 0.5 M_{L}$ (see Fig.~10, medium panel).
701: This correlation is consistent with the luminosity -- radius relationship, $L \sim R^4$,
702: valid for the LG dwarf galaxies (Dekel \& Silk 1986).
703: It can be explained by a gas outflow model, first proposed by Larson (1974).
704: Vader (1986) and Dekel \& Silk (1986) applied it to dwarf galaxies.
705: A small galaxy loses an increased fraction of its mass through stellar winds.
706: This reinforces the decrease of its gravitational potential and, as a consequence, of the central
707: surface mass density.
708:
709: The mean SB inside the circular aperture enclosing one-half
710: the total flux seems to be sensitive to the mass lost in the same way.
711: The slope of the "effective SB -- effective absolute magnitude"
712: relation (Fig.~10, bottom) coincides with the previous one: $SB_{V_{e}} \sim 0.5 M_{e}$.
713:
714: The scatter in surface brightness at a given luminosity can be not only the result of
715: photometric errors and approximation uncertainties, but also may be influenced
716: by physical processes. For example, surface brightness can depend on angular momentum
717: (Dalcanton et al. 1997).
718: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
719: \subsection{The scale length -- luminosity relation}
720: Fig.~11 shows the exponential scale length -- luminosity relation (h -- L) for our sample
721: objects and for some brighter spiral galaxies. We use the integrated magnitudes from
722: the column~6 of Table~1 for calculation of the luminosities of dwarf galaxies in the I-band.
723: It is seen that scale length is proportional to luminosity as $h \sim L^{0.5}$
724: in the B and I bands for spiral galaxies brighter than $M_B \sim -12 \div -13^m$.
725: It is known since a pioneering work of Freeman (1970) that the central surface brightness
726: of spiral galaxies has a characteristic value, which means that the total luminosity of
727: the disk is $L_T = 2 \pi I_0 h^2 \propto h^2$, where $I_0$ is the central brightness.
728: It is still under debate whether this result is common for all disky galaxies (see e.g. O'Neil \& Bothun, 2000).
729: The slope of the h -- L relation is identical for our sample galaxies with absolute blue magnitudes
730: falling in the range of $M_B \sim -16 \div -13$ and for the spiral galaxies
731: from the samples of Vennik et al. (1996), Binggeli \& Cameron (1993), and van der Kruit (1987).
732: However, fainter objects deviate from this dependency towards larger scale lengths.
733: The different slope of the h -- L dependency for faint and bright galaxies is
734: caused by a prominent central surface brightness -- luminosity dependency
735: for dwarf galaxies shown above.
736: Passing from bright to faint, luminosities at first decrease with $I_0 \sim constant$
737: because h decreases, then continue to decrease because $I_0$ decreases with h
738: only weakly decreasing.
739: The change in the slope of the h -- L relation is presumably caused by the fact that
740: galaxies with masses below some transition mass lose their gas more efficiently.
741: It was shown theoretically by Mac Low \& Ferrara 1999, Ferrara \& Tolstoy 2000, Marcolini et al. 2006,
742: and Read et al. 2006 that this limit corresponds to a critical mass $M_{crit}\sim 10^8 M_{\sun}$
743: in the case of mass-loss through stellar winds. This limit roughly corresponds
744: $M_B \sim -12 \div -13^m$ (Bell \& de Jong, 2005).
745:
746: We have no means to quantify the weak h -- L dependency for faint galaxies.
747: First, our data are not sufficiently numerous.
748: Second, sizes and luminosities of dwarf galaxies may vary with the environmental density.
749: Gnedin (2003) used high-resolution cosmological simulations to explore
750: tidal heating of high and low-mass disks in clusters. He found that the possibility
751: that a galaxy entering a cluster will be completely disrupted by tidal shocks depends on
752: interplay between surface brightness of the object and its scale length
753: in the sense that more compact and luminous galaxies survive longer. Disks of large spiral galaxies
754: are expected to be thicken by a factor of 2 or 3 in dense environments. Disks of LSB dwarf galaxies
755: are even more affected by tidal heating.
756: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
757: \section{Conclusions}
758: In this paper we study the basic photometric properties of 104 dwarf galaxies situated
759: within 10 Mpc in the field and in nearby groups. Surface photometry and the
760: determination of mean metallicity of old stellar populations was made for
761: the majority of the galaxies for the first time. Scaling relations found by us are in line
762: with the model of dwarf galaxy formation as a result of supernova-driven winds.
763: We realize, that this interpretation is rather simplistic, and should be viewed with caution.
764:
765: Using our stellar and surface photometry results we obtain relations between metallicity,
766: structural, and photometric properties of LSB dwarf galaxies.
767: We suggest that effects theoretically predicted in the literature and observationally tested and
768: quantified in our paper: the "metallicity -- luminosity", the "scale length -- luminosity", and the
769: "surface brightness -- luminosity" relations, may be the consequences of
770: gas loss by dwarf galaxies through supernova-driven winds, which is dependent on the mass of galaxies
771: and their environments.
772:
773: The data on the luminosity and metallicity for our sample objects correspond well
774: with the known properties of the Local Group dwarf galaxies.
775: Apparently, the processes that govern the evolution of dwarf galaxies are similar within the LV,
776: populated mainly by poor groups. The $Z \sim L^{0.4}$ relation for our sample objects
777: is consistent with those predicted theoretically by Dekel \& Silk (1986) for dwarf galaxies, and with
778: the literature information on the faint end of the general relations for early-type galaxies of different masses.
779:
780: The dSphs have higher apparent metallicity RGB stars as determined using the method of Lee et al. (1993)
781: than dIrrs at a given luminosity. This fact is probably caused by younger ages of
782: evolved stellar populations in
783: dIrrs in comparison with dSphs, and by environmental differences in accretion rates
784: of pristine interstellar gas between dIrr and dSph
785: dwarf galaxies.
786:
787: The relation between the surface brightness averaged within the isophote of 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$ and luminosity
788: for our sample objects, $SB_{25} \sim0.33 M_{25}$, implies the constancy of this averaged spatial luminosity density
789: from giant to dwarf galaxies.
790:
791: The central and effective SB -- luminosity relations in the V and I bands, $SB_{0} \sim 0.5 M_{L}$ and
792: $SB_{e} \sim 0.5 M_{e}$, are consistent with the luminosity -- radius relation, $L \sim R^4$.
793: It was shown by Dekel \& Silk (1986) that a significant gas loss in a dominant dark matter halo with
794: upper halo circular velocity of $\sim 100$ km s$^{-1}$
795: had to take place to reproduce this observational result.
796:
797: We extend the observational scale length -- luminosity relation to faint magnitudes.
798: Galaxies fainter than $M_B \sim-13^m \div -12^m$ systematically deviate towards larger scale lengths
799: from the dependency $h \propto L^{0.5}$, valid for bright spiral galaxies.
800: We interpret this fact as a signature of the environmentally dependent mass-loss in small galaxies.
801: Galaxies less massive than $ 10^8 M_{\sun}$ lose their gas efficiently through galactic winds.
802: Tidal interactions between galaxies and the interaction with the intergalactic medium
803: additionally influence the structure of early-type dwarfs located near the centers of groups and clusters.
804: \section*{Acknowledgments}
805: Support associated with HST programs 8192, 8601, 9771, 10219, and 10235
806: was provided by NASA through a grant from the Space Telescope Science
807: Institute. Data was extracted from the
808: the SDSS Archive has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation,
809: the Participating Institutions, The NASA, NSF, DOE,
810: Japanese Monbukagakusho, and the Max Planck Society. We thank Mario Mateo for helpful comments.
811: MES, IDK, VEK, DIM, and LNM greatfully acknowledge a partial financial support of the grants: RFBR 07-02-00005
812: and DFG-RFBG06-02-04017. GMK acknowledges the RFBR grant 05-02-17548.
813: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
814: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bell \& de Jong}]{2001} Bell E.F., de Jong R.S., 2001, ApJ, 550, 212
815: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Binggeli \& Cameron}]{1993}
816: Binggeli B., Cameron L., 1993, A\&AS, 98, 297
817: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Binggeli94}]{1994} Binggeli B., 1994,
818: in Meylan G., Prugniel P., eds, ESO/OHP Workshop on Dwarf Galaxies,
819: ESO Garching, p.123
820: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Boselli}]{2006} Boselli A., Gavazzi G., 2006, PASP, 118, 517
821: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{bruzual03}]{2003} Bruzual G., Charlot S., 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000
822: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Burkert04}]{2004}
823: %Burkert A., Naab T., 2004, as part of the Carnegie Observatories Astrophysics Series, ed. L. C. Ho (Cambridge University Press), 421
824: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Caldwell}]{1992} Caldwell N., Armandroff T.E., Seitzer P., Da Costa G.S., 1992, AJ, 103, 840
825: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Da Costa \& Armandroff}]{1990}
826: Da Costa G.S., Armandroff T.E., 1990, AJ, 100, 162
827: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dalcanton}]{1997} Dalcanton J.J., Spergel D., Summers F., 1997, ApJ, 482, 659
828: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Davidge}{2005}]{da2005} Davidge T.J., 2005, AJ, 130, 2087
829: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{de Vaucouleurs}]{v1991} de Vaucouleurs G., de Vaucouleurs A., Corwin H., Jr., Buta R. J., Paturel G., \& Fouqué P. 1991, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies (New York: Springer)
830: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{de Vaucouleurs}]{v1959} de Vaucouleurs G., 1959, Handbuch der Physik 53, 275, Flugge S. (ed.). Springer, Berlin
831: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dekel \& Silk}]{1986}
832: Dekel A., Silk J., 1986, ApJ, 303, 39
833: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dolphin03}]{2003}
834: Dolphin A.E., Saha A., Skillman E.D., Dohm-Palmer R.C., Tolstoy E., Cole A.A.,
835: Gallagher J.S., Hoessel J.G., Mateo M., 2003, AJ, 126, 187
836: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dolphin}{2000}]{2000a} Dolphin~A.E.
837: 2000, PASP, 112, 1383
838: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dolphin}{2000}]{d2000b} Dolphin~A.E.
839: 2000, PASP, 112, 1397
840: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dressler80}]{1980} Dressler A., 1980, ApJ, 236, 351
841: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Einasto1974}]{1974} Einasto J., Saar E., Kaasik A., Chernin A. D., 1974, Nature, 252, 111
842: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ferrara00}]{1974} Ferrara A., Tolstoy E., 2000, MNRAS, 313, 291
843: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Geller89}]{1989} Geller M.J., Huchra J.P., 1989, Science, 246, No. 4932, 797
844: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gnedin03}]{2003} Gnedin O.Y., 2003, ApJ, 589, 752
845: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Grebel et al.}]{2003}
846: Grebel E.K., Gallagher III J.S., Harbeck D., 2003, AJ, 125, 1926
847: \bibitem[Grebel (1999)]{grebel99} Grebel E.K.\ 1999 IAU Symp. 192, eds. P. White
848: lock and R. Cannon ASP Conf. Ser., 17
849: \bibitem[Gunn \& Gott (1972)]{gunn72} Gunn J.E., Gott J.R.I., 1972, ApJ, 176, 1
850: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Harbeck et al.}{2001}]{h2001}
851: Harbeck D., Grebel E.K., Holtzman J., Guhathakurta P.,
852: Brandner W., Geisler D., Sarajedini A., Dolphin A., Hurley-Keller D.,
853: Mateo M., 2001, AJ, 122, 3092
854: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hidalgo-Gamez}]{2003} Hidalgo-Gamez A.M., Sanchez-Salcedo F.J.,
855: Olofsson K., 2003, A\&A, 399, 63
856: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hogg03}]{2003} Hogg D.W., Blanton M.R., Eisenstein D.J., et al., 2003, ApJ, 585L, 5
857: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Holtzman et al.}]{2006} Holtzman J.~A., Afonso C., Dolphin A., 2006, ApJS, 166, 534
858: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Holtzman et al.}]{1995}
859: Holtzman J.~A., Burrows C.~J., Casertano S., Hester J.~J., Trauger J.~T., Watson
860: A.~M., \& Worthey G., 1995, PASP, 107, 1065
861: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hubble31}]{1931} Hubble E., Humason M.L., 1931,
862: ApJ, 74, 43
863: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{hunter85}]{1985} Hunter D., Gallagher J.S.,1985, ApJS, 58, 533
864: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Larson74}]{1974} Larson R.B., 1974, MNRAS, 169, 229
865: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lee et al.}]{1993}
866: Lee M.G., Freedmann W.L., Madire B.F., 1993, ApJ, 417, 553
867: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{James et al.}{2005}]{james05} James, P.~A., Shane,
868: N.~S., Knapen, J.~H., Etherton, J., \& Percival, S.~M., 2005, A\&A, 429, 851
869: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Johnson et al.}{1997}]{j1997}
870: Johnson R.A., Lawrence A., Terlevich R., Carter D., 1997, MNRAS, 287, 333
871: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Jordi}]{2006}
872: Jordi K., Grebel E. K., Ammon K., 2006, A\&A, 460, 339
873: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Impey01}]{2001} Impey C.D., Burkholder V.,
874: Sprayberry D., 2001, AJ, 330, 634
875: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Impey97}]{1997} Impey C.D., Bothun G.D., 1997,
876: ARA\&A, 35, 267
877: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentsev et al.}]{2007}
878: Karachentsev I.D., Dolphin A., Tully R. Brent, Sharina M., Makarova L., Makarov
879: D., Sakai S., Shaya E.J., O.G. Kashibadze, Karachentseva V., Rizzi L., 2007,
880: AJ, 133, 504
881: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentsev et al.}]{2006}
882: Karachentsev I.D., Dolphin A., Tully R. Brent, Sharina M., Makarova L., Makarov
883: D., Karachentseva V., Sakai S., Shaya E.J.,
884: 2006, AJ, 131, 1361
885: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentsev et al.}]{2005}
886: Karachentsev I.D.,Karachentseva V.E., Sharina M.E., 2005
887: in Near-field Cosmology with Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies (IAU Colloqium No. 198)
888: H.Jerjen and B.Binggeli, eds., Cambridge Univ. Press, 105
889: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentsev et al. 2004}]{2004}
890: Karachentsev, I.~D., Karachentseva, V.~E., Huchtmeier, W.~K., Makarov D.~I., 2004
891: AJ, 127, 2031 (CNG)
892: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentsev et al. 2003}]{2003a} Karachentsev I.~D.,
893: Sharina M.E., Dolphin A.E., Grebel E.K., 2003, A\&A, 408, 111
894: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentsev et al. 2003}]{2003b} Karachentsev I.~D.,
895: Grebel E.K., Sharina M.E., Dolphin A.E., Geisler D., Guhathakurta P.,
896: Hodge P.W., Karachentseva V.~E., Sarajedini A., Seitzer P., 2003b, A\&A, 404, 93
897: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentsev et al. 2003}]{2003c} Karachentsev I.~D.,
898: Sharina M.E., Dolphin A.E., Grebel E.K., Geisler D., Guhathakurta P.,
899: Hodge P.W., Karachentseva V.~E., Sarajedini A., Seitzer P., 2003c, A\&A, 398, 467
900: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentsev et al. 2003}]{2003d} Karachentsev I.~D.,
901: Makarov D.I., Sharina M.E., Dolphin A.E., Grebel E.K., Geisler D., Guhathakurta P.,
902: Hodge P.W., Karachentseva V.~E., Sarajedini A., Seitzer P., 2003d, A\&A, 398, 479
903: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentsev et al. 2002}]{2002a} Karachentsev I.~D.,
904: Dolphin A.E., Geisler D., Grebel E.K., Guhathakurta P.,
905: Hodge P.W., Karachentseva V.~E., Sarajedini A., Seitzer P., 2002a, 383, 125
906: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentsev et al. 2002}]{2002b} Karachentsev I.~D.,
907: Sharina M.E., Dolphin A.E., Grebel E.K., Geisler D., Guhathakurta P.,
908: Hodge P.W., Karachentseva V.~E., Sarajedini A., Seitzer P., 2002b, A\&A, 385, 21
909: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentsev et al. 2002}]{2002c} Karachentsev I.~D.,
910: Sharina M.E., Makarov D.I., Dolphin A.E., Grebel E.K., Geisler D., Guhathakurta P.,
911: Hodge P.W., Karachentseva V.~E., Sarajedini A., Seitzer P., 2002c, A\&A, 389, 812
912: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentsev et al. 2001}]{2001} Karachentsev I.~D.,
913: Karachentseva V.~E., Dolphin A.E., Geisler D., Grebel E.K., Guhathakurta P., Hodge P.W.,
914: Sarajedini A., Seitzer P., Sharina M.E., 2001a, A\&A, 363, 117
915: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Karachentseva et al.}]{1985}
916: Karachentseva V.E., Karachentsev I.D., B$\ddot{o}$rngen F., 1985, A\&A Suppl.Ser., 60, 213
917: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Keres}]{2005} Kere$\check{s}$ D., Katz N., Weinberg D.H.,
918: %Dave R., 2005, MNRAS, 363, 2
919: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kormendy}]{1985} Kormendy J., 1985, ApJ, 295, 73
920: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{koposov}]{2007}
921: Koposov S., Belokurov V., Evans N. W., Hewett P. C., Irwin M. J., Gilmore G., Zucker D. B.,
922: Rix H. -W., Fellhauer M., Bell E. F., Glushkova E. V., 2007, ArXiv e-prints 0706, ArXiv:0706.2687
923: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lee93}]{1993} Lee M.G., Freedman W.L., Madore B.F., 1993, ApJ, 417, 553
924: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{MLF99}]{1999} Mac Low M., Ferrara A., 1999, ApJ, 513, 142
925: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{McConnachie07}]{2007} McConnachie A.W., Pe$\tilde{n}$arrubia J., Navarro J.F.,
926: 2007, MNRAS, 380, L75
927: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mateo}{1998}]{m1998} Mateo M., 1998, ARA\&A, 36, 435
928: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Makarova}]{1999} Makarova L.N., 1999, A\&AS, 139, 491
929: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Marcolini06}]{2006} Marcolini A., D'Ercole A., Brighenti F., 2006,
930: MNRAS, 371, 643
931: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mayer01}]{2001} Mayer L., Governato F., Colpi M., Moore B.,
932: Quinn T., Wadsley J., Stadel J., Lake G., 2001, ApJ, 559, 754
933: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{McGaugh}]{1994} McGaugh S.S., 1994, 426, 135
934: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{merrit84}]{1984} Merrit D., 1984, ApJ, 276, 26
935: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{moore99}]{1999} Moore B., Lake G., Quinn T., Stadel J., 1999,
936: MNRAS, 304, 465
937: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{oneil00}]{2000} O'Neil, K.; Bothun, G., 2000, ApJ, 529, 811
938: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{paturel03}]{2003} Paturel G., Petit C., Prugniel Ph., Theureau G., Rousseau J.,
939: Brouty M., Dubois P., Cambrésy L., 2003, A\&A, 412, 45
940: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Pilugin}]{2000} Pilugin L.S., Ferrini F., 2000, A\&A, 358, 72
941: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Read06}]{2006} Read J.I., Pontzen A.P., Viel M., 2006, MNRAS, 371, 885
942: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Rejkuba}]{2004} Rejkuba M., Greggio L., Zoccali M., 2004, A\&A, 415, 915
943: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Richer}]{1995} Richer M.G., McCall M.L., 1995, ApJ, 445, 642
944: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Salaris05}]{2005} Salaris M., Girardi L., 2005, MNRAS, 357, 669
945: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Saviane05}]{2005} Saviane I., Held E.V., Ivanov V., Alloin D.,
946: Bresolin F., Rich R.M., Rizzi L., Momany Y., 2005
947: in Near-field Cosmology with Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies (IAU Colloqium No. 198)
948: H.Jerjen and B.Binggeli, eds., Cambridge Univ. Press, 202
949: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Saviane}]{2000} Saviane I., Held E.V., Bertelli G., 2000, A\&A, 355, 56
950: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Schlegel et al.(1998)}]{1998} Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P,
951: Davis M., 1998, ApJ 500, 525
952: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Schmidt}]{1959} Schmidt, M. 1959, ApJ, 129, 243
953: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sharina06}]{2006} Sharina M. E., Afanasiev V. L., Puzia T. H., 2006,
954: MNRAS, 372, 1259
955: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Shaya84}]{1984} Shaya E.J., Tully R.B., 1984, ApJ, 281, 56
956: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sirianni et al.}]{2006}
957: Sirianni M., Jee M.J., Benitez N. et al., 2005, PASP, 117, 1049
958: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Skillman}]{2003} Skillman E.D., Cote S, Miller B.W., 2003,
959: AJ, 125, 610
960: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Skillman}]{1989} Skillman E.D., Kennicutt R.C.Jr., Hodge P., 1989
961: ApJ, 347, 875
962: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{thomas05}]{2005} Thomas, D., Maraston,
963: C., \& Bender, R., Mendes de Oliveira C., 2005, ApJ, 621, 673
964: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{thomas03}]{2003} Thomas, D.,
965: Bender R., Hopp U., Maraston C., Greggio L., 2003b, Ap\&SS, 284, 599
966: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Tully et al.}]{2006}
967: Tully, R. B., Rizzi, L., Dolphin A. E., Karachentsev I. D., Karachentseva V.
968: E., Makarov D. I., Makarova L., Sakai S., Shaya E. J.,
969: 2006, AJ, 132, 729
970: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Tully et al.}]{1996} Tully, R. B., Verheijen M. A. W., Pierce M. J., Huang J.-S., Wainscoat, R. J.
971: 1996, AJ, 112, 2471
972: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Tully et al.}]{2002}
973: %Tully, R. B., Somerville R.S., Trentham N., Verheijen M.A.W., 2002, ApJ, 569, 573
974: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Vader 1986}]{1986} Vader J.P., 1986, ApJ, 305, 669
975: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{van den Bergh}]{v2000} van den Bergh S.,
976: 2000, The Galaxies of the Local Group (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)
977: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{van den Bergh}]{1999} van den Bergh S., 1999, A\&ARv, 9, 273
978: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{van der Kruit}]{1987} van der Kruit P., 1987, A\&A, 173, 59
979: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{van Zee}]{1997} van Zee L., Haynes M.P., Salzer J.J., 1997, AJ, 114, 2497
980: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Vennik et al.}]{1996} Vennik J., Richter G., Thanert W., Biering C., 1996,
981: Astron. Nachr., 317, 289
982: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{White \& Rees}]{1978} White S.D.M., Rees M.J.,
983: 1978, MNRAS, 183, 341
984: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Worthey94}]{1994} Worthey G., 1994, ApJS, 95, 107
985: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Zasov}]{1983} Zasov A. V., Sil'chenko I. K., 1983, AZh, 60, 1063
986: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Zasov}]{1979} Zasov A. V., Karachentseva V.E., 1979, SvAL, 5, 137
987: \end{thebibliography}
988: \newpage
989: \begin{table*}
990: \begin{center}
991: \scriptsize
992: \caption{Properties of the Local Volume dwarf galaxies. Columns contain the following data:
993: {\bf (1)} Galaxy Name and morphological type (second line) from CNG in numerical code
994: according to de Vaucouleurs et al. (1991),
995: {\bf (2)} equatorial coordinates (J2000) from CNG,
996: {\bf (3)} distance modulus (first line), and Galactic extinction in V-band from Schlegel et al. (1998),
997: {\bf (4)} mean metallicity of the RGBs, $\sigma (V-I)$ of RGBs measured at $M_I=-3.5$ (first line)
998: with random and systematic errors of mean metallicity of the RGBs separated by a comma (second line),
999: {\bf (5)} projected major axis from CNG and limiting diameter of our photometry,
1000: {\bf (6)} apparent V and I magnitudes integrated within the diameter $D_{lim}$,
1001: {\bf (7)} limiting V and I surface brightnesses (SB) taken at the distance D$_{lim}$/2 from centers of galaxies,
1002: {\bf (8)} effective $(V\!-\!I)$ color and effective SB in the V-band (superscript "a" indicates an average color),
1003: {\bf (9)} mean SB within the isophote of 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$ in the V and I bands,
1004: {\bf (10)} apparent V and I magnitudes integrated within the isophote level 25 $^m\!/\sq \arcsec$.
1005: {\bf (11)} projected major axis radius at the isophote level 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$ in the V and I bands
1006: {\bf (12)} effective radius, degree of Sersic profile,
1007: {\bf (13)} best exponential fitting central SB in V and I bands and corresponding errors,
1008: Superscripts near the galaxy names indicate the corresponding name of the HST
1009: proposal: "1" refers to the proposals ID 9771 and 10235,
1010: "2" refers to the proposal ID 10210, and "3" refers to the proposals ID 8192 and
1011: 8601. Superscript "s" indicates, that SDSS images were used. The data listed in the columns (7)-(11),
1012: (14) were not corrected for Galactic extinction.
1013: }
1014: \vspace{-0.5cm}
1015: \begin{tabular}{lrrlccclccclc}\\ \hline \hline
1016: Name & RA(2000)& $\mu_0$& \feh,$\sigma_{VI}$ & Diam & V$_L$& $SBV_{L}$& $(V\!-\!I)_e$& $SBV_{25}$ & $V_{25}$ & $R_{V,25}$& $R_e$& $SBV_{C}$ \\
1017: T & DEC(2000) & $A_v$ & $ \sigma$\feh & $D_{lim}$& $I_L$& $SBI_{L}$ & $SBV_{e}$ & $SBI_{25}$ & $I_{25}$ & $R_{I,25}$& h & $SBI_{C}$ \\
1018: & & $^{m}$& dex,$^{m}$& $\arcmin$& $^{m}$& $^{m}\!/\sq \arcsec$& $^{m},^{m}\!/\sq \arcsec$& $^{m}\!/\sq \arcsec$& $^{m}$& $\arcsec$& $\arcsec$ & $^{m}\!/\sq \arcsec$\\
1019: (1) & (2)& (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10)& (11)& (12)& (13)\\
1020: \hline
1021: E349-031$^1$ & 00 08 13.3& 27.48& -1.76,0.07 & 1.10 & 15.42& 25.7 & 0.67 & 23.81 & 15.77 & 25.56 & 26& 23.03$\pm$0.06 \\
1022: 10 & -34 34 42.0& 0.04 & 0.03,0.14 & 1.28 & 14.71& 25.0 & 23.81 & 23.35 & 14.80 & 34.13 & 16 & 22.41$\pm$0.06 \\
1023: E410-005$^3$ & 00 15 31.4& 26.42& -1.93 & 1.30 & 14.88& 24.5 & 1.06 & & & & 30& 22.22$\pm$0.01 \\
1024: -1 & -32 10 48.0& 0.058& 0.05,0.15 & 1.12 & 13.93& 23.3 & 23.12 & & & & 18 & 21.43$\pm$0.01 \\
1025: Sc22$^3$ & 00 23 51.7& 28.12& & 0.90 & 17.47& 26.3 & 1.2 & 24.97 & 19.06 & 9.06 & 35& 24.72$\pm$0.02 \\
1026: -3 & -24 42 18.0& 0.05 & & 0.83 & 16.31& 24.9 & & 24.26 & 16.31 & 24.90 & 26 & 23.83$\pm$0.02 \\
1027: E294-010$^3$ & 00 26 33.3& 26.42& -1.48 & 1.10 & 15.29& 24.4 & 0.91 & & & & 25& 22.28$\pm$0.02 \\
1028: -3 & -41 51 20.0& 0.02 & 0.04,0.13 & 0.98 & 14.43& 23.5 & 23.34 & & & & 15 & 21.50$\pm$0.03 \\
1029: DDO226$^3$ & 00 43 03.8& 28.46& & 2.20 & & 23.7 & 0.84$^a$& & & & 38& 22.60$\pm$0.04 \\
1030: 10 & -22 15 01.0& 0.05 & & 1.01 & & 22.8 & & & & & 27 & 21.93$\pm$0.03 \\
1031: KDG2$^3$ & 00 49 21.1& 27.66& -1.75 & 1.20 & 16.12& 26.0 & 1.28 & 24.24 & 16.35 & 26.19 & 30& 23.37$\pm$0.01 \\
1032: -1 & -18 04 28.0& 0.08 & 0.06,0.15 & 1.14 & 15.00& 24.6 & 24.27 & 23.42 & 15.00 & 34.06 & 18 & 22.46$\pm$0.01 \\
1033: DDO6$^3$ & 00 49 49.3& 27.62& -2.11 & 1.70 & & 24.7 & 0.83$^a$& & & & 36& 23.13$\pm$0.04 \\
1034: 10 & -21 00 58.0& 0.06 & 0.07,0.16 & 0.99 & & 23.7 & & & & & 23 & 22.45$\pm$0.04 \\
1035: E540-032$^3$ & 00 50 24.3& 27.67& -1.45 & 1.30 & 16.10& 25.6 & 16.13 & 24.30 & 16.32 & 27.59 & 34& 23.54$\pm$0.01 \\
1036: -3 & -19 54 24.0& 0.07 & 0.06,0.13 & 1.14 & 14.99& 24.3 & 24.46 & 23.45 & 14.99 & 34.26 & 24 & 22.76$\pm$0.01 \\
1037: UGC685$^2$ & 01 07 22.3& 28.40& -1.54,0.17& 1.40 & 13.70& 25.3 & 0.86 & 23.22 & 13.74 & 48.15 & 24& 21.37$\pm$0.01 \\
1038: 9 & 16 41 02.0& 0.02 & 0.01,0.13 & 1.75 & 12.86& 24.4 & 22.25 & 22.52 & 12.86 & 52.45 & 15 & 20.66$\pm$0.01 \\
1039: KKH5$^3$ & 01 07 32.5& 28.15& & 0.60 & 17.05& 25.7 & 1.61 & 24.16 & 17.70 & 14.04 & 20 & 23.54$\pm$0.03 \\
1040: 10 & 51 26 25.0& 0.94 & & 0.83 & 15.72& 24.3 & 24.53 & 23.49 & 15.72 & 25.00 & 12 & 22.52$\pm$0.02 \\
1041: KKH6$^1$ & 01 34 51.6& 27.90& -2.38,0.13& 0.80 & 16.27& 25.8 & 1.26 & 24.08 & 16.47 & 19.81 & 20& 23.11$\pm$0.09 \\
1042: 10 & 52 05 30.0& 1.16 & 0.04,0.18 & 0.86 & 15.05& 24.4 & 24.04 & 23.08 & 15.05 & 25.94 & 12 & 22.07$\pm$0.07 \\
1043: KK16$^{2,3}$ & 01 55 20.6& 28.38& -1.66,0.11& 0.80 & 15.85& 27.3 & 0.93 & 23.95 & 16.31 & 21.20 & 17& 22.79$\pm$0.01 \\
1044: 10 & 27 57 15.0& 0.23 & 0.04,0.14 & 1.55 & 14.90& 26.1 & 23.70 & 23.48 & 15.16 & 29.05 & 11 & 22.07$\pm$0.01 \\
1045: KK17$^{2,3}$ & 02 00 09.9& 28.37& -1.75,0.10& 0.60 & 16.80& 27.8 & 1.04 & 24.46 & 17.99 & 11.50 & 18& 23.82$\pm$0.01 \\
1046: 10 & 28 49 57.0& 0.18 & 0.07,0.14 & 1.26 & 15.83& 26.4 & 24.77 & 23.96 & 16.28 & 20.40 & 11 & 22.98$\pm$0.01 \\
1047: KKH18$^3$ & 03 03 05.9& 28.23& & 0.70 & 16.17& 26.2 & 1.12 & 23.69 & 16.35 & 20.62 & 16 & 22.49$\pm$0.02 \\
1048: 10 & 33 41 40.0& 0.66 & & 0.99 & 15.13& 24.8 & 23.37 & 23.10 & 15.13 & 29.68 & 10 & 21.69$\pm$0.02 \\
1049: NGC1311$^2$ & 03 20 07.4& 28.70& -1.33 & 3.20 & & 24.0 & 0.78 & & & & 23& 20.45$\pm$0.01 \\
1050: 9 & -52 11 06.0& 0.07 & 0.01,0.11 & 1.55 & & 23.2 & 21.37 & & & & 14 & 19.82$\pm$0.01 \\
1051: KK27$^2$ & 03 21 05.7& 28.00& -1.72,0.10& 1.20 & 16.44& 27.2 & 0.96 & 24.66 & 17.77 & 13.65 & 25& 24.13$\pm$0.01 \\
1052: -3 & -66 19 22.0& 0.25 & 0.03,0.14 & 1.55 & 15.45& 26.6 & 25.01 & 24.11 & 16.02 & 25.10 & 15 & 23.27$\pm$0.01 \\
1053: IC1959$^2$ & 03 33 11.8& 29.03& -1.80 & 3.00 & 12.77& 27.6 & 0.80 & 22.85 & 12.89 & 58.70 & 26& 20.70$\pm$0.01 \\
1054: 9 & -50 24 38.0& 0.04 & 0.02,0.15 & 3.22 & 12.02& 26.6 & 21.60 & 22.65 & 12.06 & 74.55 & 16 & 20.00$\pm$0.01 \\
1055: UGCA92$^1$ & 04 32 00.3& 26.28& & 2.00 & 14.55& 26.8 & 1.78 & 24.71 & 15.54 & 38.95 & 70& 24.18$\pm$0.01 \\
1056: 10 & 63 36 50.0& 2.63 & & 3.03 & 12.87& 25.0 & 25.08 & 23.73 & 12.87 & 91.00 & 42 & 22.61$\pm$0.01 \\
1057: CamB$^3$ & 04 53 06.9& 27.52& & 2.20 & & 26.0 & 1.26$^a$& 24.43 & 17.45 & 25.64 & 29& 23.83$\pm$0.01 \\
1058: 10 & 67 05 57.0& 0.14 & & 0.89 & & 24.4 & 24.75 & 23.59 & 15.54 & 26.79 & 17 & 22.82$\pm$0.01 \\
1059: KKH34$^3$ & 05 59 41.2& 28.32& & 0.90 & 16.37& 25.3 & 0.69 & 24.05 & 16.56 & 21.51 & 22 & 23.22$\pm$0.01 \\
1060: 10 & 73 25 39.0& 0.83 & & 0.87 & 15.57& 24.7 & 24.13 & 23.46 & 15.57 & 26.19 & 13 & 22.27$\pm$0.02 \\
1061: E121-20$^1$ & 06 15 54.5& 28.86& -2.39 & 1.40 & 15.36& 27.3 & 0.69 & 23.87 & 15.65 & 26.90 & 19& 22.63$\pm$0.01 \\
1062: 10 & -57 43 35.0& 0.13 & 0.05,0.18 & 1.55 & 14.65& 26.5 & 23.57 & 23.53 & 14.78 & 34.10 & 12 & 22.08$\pm$0.02 \\
1063: E489-56$^3$ & 06 26 17.0& 28.49& & 0.60 & 15.49& 25.0 & 0.98 & 23.39 & 15.49 & 26.49 & 17& 21.94$\pm$0.02 \\
1064: 10 & -26 15 56.0& 0.21 & & 0.88 & 14.65& 23.9 & 22.86 & & & & 10 & 21.30$\pm$0.01 \\
1065: E490-17$^3$ & 06 37 56.6& 28.13& & 1.70 & & 23.4 & 0.90$^a$& & & & 34& 21.92$\pm$0.05 \\
1066: 10 & -25 59 59.0& 0.26 & & 0.98 & & 22.5 & & & & & 20 & 21.07$\pm$0.03 \\
1067: KKH37$^1$ & 06 47 45.8& 27.62& -1.80,0.08& 1.20 & 15.39& 28.4 & 0.88 & 23.74 & 15.74 & 24.55 & 17& 22.40$\pm$0.01 \\
1068: 10 & 80 07 26.0& 0.25 & 0.02,0.15 & 1.78 & 14.48& 27.4 & 23.34 & 23.28 & 14.61 & 33.25 & 10 & 21.50$\pm$0.01 \\
1069: UGC3755$^{2,3}$ & 07 13 51.8& 29.35& & 1.70 & 13.62& 25.0 & 0.98 & 22.49 & 13.62 & 58.97 & 25& 21.27$\pm$0.02 \\
1070: 10 & 10 31 19.0& 0.29 & & 1.97 & 12.75& 24.1 & 21.81 & 21.72 & 12.75 & 58.97 & 15 & 20.58$\pm$0.02 \\
1071: E059-01$^1$ & 07 31 19.3& 28.24& -1.52,0.18 & 2.10 & 13.69& 25.5 & 0.96 & 23.43 & 14.01 & 49.99 & 48& 22.72$\pm$0.05 \\
1072: 9 & -68 11 10.0& 0.49 & 0.01,0.13 & 2.80 & 12.70& 24.4 & 23.40 & 22.63 & 12.70 & 83.98 & 29 & 21.72$\pm$0.04 \\
1073: UGC3974$^{2,S}$ & 07 41 55.0& 28.57& & 3.10 & & 25.5 & 0.83 & 24.05 & 14.45 & 51.35 & 53& 23.16$\pm$0.01 \\
1074: 10 & 16 48 02.0& 0.11 & & 2.40 & & 24.8 & 24.08 & 23.63 & 13.28 & 71.95 & 32 & 22.44$\pm$0.02 \\
1075: KK65$^{2,3,S}$ & 07 42 31.2& 28.27& & 0.90 & 14.86& 26.1 & 0.77 & 23.50 & 15.09 & 30.20 & 19& 22.00$\pm$0.01 \\
1076: 10 & 16 33 40.0& 0.11 & & 1.54 & 14.10& 25.3 & 22.86 & 23.29 & 14.16 & 41.30 & 11 & 21.29$\pm$0.01 \\
1077: UGC4115$^{S,3,2}$& 07 57 01.8& 29.44& & 1.80 & 14.36& 25.1 & 0.88 & 23.53 & 14.41 & 40.79 & 27& 22.13$\pm$0.03 \\
1078: 10 & 14 23 27.0& 0.09 & & 1.36 & 13.57& 24.2 & 23.02 & 22.67 & 13.57 & 40.79 & 16 & 21.34$\pm$0.03 \\
1079: KDG52$^3$ & 08 23 56.0& 27.75& -1.90 & 1.30 & 16.67& 25.8 & 0.95$^a$& 24.78 & 17.23 & 20.62 & 48 & 24.42$\pm$0.02 \\
1080: 10 & 71 01 46.0& 0.07 & 0.09,0.15 & 1.06 & 15.72& 24.7 & & 24.10 & 15.72 & 31.67 & 29 & 23.69$\pm$0.01 \\
1081: DDO52$^{S,1}$ & 08 28 28.5& 30.03& & 2.00 & 14.86& 27.3 & 0.89 & 24.14 & 15.43 & 34.06 & 30& 23.07$\pm$0.02 \\
1082: 10 & 41 51 24.0& 0.12 & & 2.20 & 14.02& 26.7 & 24.03 & 23.70 & 14.15 & 49.50 & 18 & 22.11$\pm$0.03 \\
1083: \end{tabular}
1084: \end{center}
1085: \end{table*}
1086: \setcounter{table}{0}
1087: \begin{table*}
1088: \begin{center}
1089: \scriptsize
1090: \caption{Continued.}
1091: \begin{tabular}{lrrlccclccclc}\\ \hline \hline
1092: Name & RA(2000.0)& $\mu_0$& \feh,$\sigma_{VI}$ & Diam & V$_L$& $SBV_{L}$& $(V\!-\!I)_e$& $SBV_{25}$ & $V_{25}$ & $R_{V,25}$& $R_e$ & $SBV_{C}$ \\
1093: T & DEC(2000.) & $A_v$ & $ \sigma$\feh & $D_{lim}$& $I_L$& $SBI_{L}$ & $SBV_{e}$ & $SBI_{25}$ & $I_{25}$ & $R_{I,25}$& h & $SBI_{C}$ \\
1094: \hline
1095: DDO53$^3$ & 08 34 06.5& 27.76& -1.93 & 1.60 & & 24.6 & 0.63$^a$& & & & 73& 23.75$\pm$0.02 \\
1096: 10 & 66 10 45.0& 0.12 & 0.06,0.15 & 1.00 & & 23.7 & & & & & 44 & 23.29$\pm$0.01 \\
1097: D564-08$^{S,1}$ & 09 02 54.0& 29.61& & 0.70 & 16.58& 27.0 & 0.86 & 24.31 & 17.46 & 13.86 & 18& 23.61$\pm$0.03 \\
1098: 10 & 20 04 31.0& 0.10 & & 1.02 & 15.85& 25.6 & 24.51 & 23.89 & 16.08 & 22.57 & 11 & 22.81$\pm$0.04 \\
1099: D634-03$^1$ & 09 08 53.5& 29.90& & 0.40 & 17.21& 26.8 & 0.86 & 24.31 & 18.41 & 9.00 & 15& 23.82$\pm$0.01 \\
1100: 10 & 14 34 55.0& 0.13 & & 0.91 & 16.34& 26.1 & 24.77 & 23.99 & 16.65 & 18.25 & 9 & 22.83$\pm$0.01 \\
1101: D565-06$^{S,1}$ & 09 19 29.4& 29.79& & 0.70 & 16.63& 27.3 & 0.90 & 23.96 & 17.28 & 13.46 & 14& 23.13$\pm$0.04 \\
1102: 10 & 21 36 12.0& 0.13 & & 0.96 & 15.78& 25.5 & 24.03 & 23.70 & 15.96 & 22.18 & 8 & 22.29$\pm$0.04 \\
1103: FM1$^3$ & 09 45 10.0& 27.67& -1.20 & 0.90 & 16.83& 25.6 & 0.80 & 24.83 & 18.39 & 11.35 & 32 & 24.63$\pm$0.01 \\
1104: -3 & 68 45 54.0& 0.26 & 0.05,0.11 & 1.00 & 16.06& 25.5 & & 24.17 & 16.19 & 25.50 & 25 & 23.50$\pm$0.02 \\
1105: KK77$^3$ & 09 50 10.0& 27.71& & 2.40 & & 25.7 & 1.30$^a$& 24.79 & 19.93 & 5.48 & 31 & 24.62$\pm$0.01 \\
1106: -3 & 67 30 24.0& 0.48 & & 0.66 & & 24.1 & & 23.87 & 16.37 & 19.92 & 18 & 23.55$\pm$0.01 \\
1107: KDG61$^{S,3}$ & 09 57 02.7& 27.78& -1.51 & 2.40 & 14.98& 27.0 & 1.04 & 24.28 & 16.06 & 28.25 & 48& 24.00$\pm$0.06 \\
1108: -1 & 68 35 30.0& 0.24 & 0.04,0.13 & 2.69 & 13.92& 26.4 & 24.59 & 23.66 & 14.18 & 56.11 & 29 & 22.96$\pm$0.09 \\
1109: KKH57$^{S,3}$ & 10 00 16.0& 27.97& -1.37 & 0.60 & 17.73& 26.4 & 0.81 & 24.76 & 19.27 & 7.13 & 19& 24.38$\pm$0.03 \\
1110: -3 & 63 11 06.0& 0.08 & 0.03,0.12 & 0.74 & 16.90& 25.4 & 25.31 & 24.29 & 17.49 & 13.46 & 11 & 23.62$\pm$0.03 \\
1111: ANTLIA$^2$ & 10 04 04.0& 25.49& -1.81 & 2.00 & 14.70& 25.3 & 0.60$^a$& 24.45 & 14.92 & 49.05 & 66& 23.94$\pm$0.01 \\
1112: 10 & -27 19 55.0& 0.26 & 0.04,0.15 & 1.91 & 14.14& 25.0 & & 24.03 & 14.16 & 56.50 & 43 & 23.26$\pm$0.01 \\
1113: DDO71$^3$ & 10 05 07.3& 27.72& -1.17 & 1.70 & 16.46& 24.8 & 0.98$^a$& 24.13 & 16.46 & 21.41 & 59 & 23.80$\pm$0.01 \\
1114: -3 & 66 33 18.0& 0.32 & 0.04,0.10 & 0.71 & 15.48& 23.7 & & & & & 35 & 22.81$\pm$0.01 \\
1115: KK84$^3$ & 10 05 34.4& 29.93& & 1.30 & & 25.5 & 1.30 & 23.85 & 16.19 & 22.91 & 19& 22.72$\pm$0.02 \\
1116: -3 & -07 44 57.0& 0.16 & & 0.88 & & 24.0 & 23.62 & 22.78 & & & 12 & 21.66$\pm$0.02 \\
1117: KDG64$^3$ & 10 07 01.9& 27.84& -1.10 & 1.90 & & 25.2 & 1.06$^a$& 24.01 & 15.89 & 28.09 & 28& 23.07$\pm$0.01 \\
1118: -3 & 67 49 39.0& 0.18 & 0.04,0.11 & 1.00 & & 23.9 & 23.98 & & & & 17 & 22.11$\pm$0.01 \\
1119: HS117$^1$ & 10 21 25.2& 27.97& -1.87,0.08 & 1.50 & 16.16& 28.1 & 1.10 & 24.75 & 17.97 & 13.15 & 29& 24.32$\pm$0.01 \\
1120: 10 & 71 06 58.0& 0.38 & 0.03,0.15 & 2.08 & 15.15& 27.1 & 25.20 & 24.13 & 15.76 & 28.35 & 18 & 23.30$\pm$0.01 \\
1121: BK6N$^3$ & 10 34 31.9& 27.93& -1.36 & 1.10 & & 25.8 & 1.20$^a$& 24.90 & 18.26 & 13.15 & 40 & 24.61$\pm$0.02 \\
1122: -3 & 66 00 42.0& 0.04 & 0.08,0.12 & 0.76 & & 24.4 & & 23.95 & 16.13 & 22.81 & 28 & 23.55$\pm$0.02 \\
1123: E215-09$^1$ & 10 57 30.2& 28.60& -1.86 & 2.00 & & 26.0 & 1.26$^a$& 24.53 & 15.53 & 36.40 & 60 & 24.04$\pm$0.01 \\
1124: 10 & -48 10 44.0& 0.73 & 0.02,0.15 & 1.63 & & 24.9 & & 23.64 & 13.85 & 49.05 & 38 & 22.89$\pm$0.01 \\
1125: UGC6541$^{S,3}$ & 11 33 29.1& 27.95& -1.57 & 1.40 & 14.03& 26.0 & 0.46 & 23.22 & 14.17 & 35.07 & 18& 21.25$\pm$0.06 \\
1126: 10 & 49 14 17.0& 0.06 & 0.05,0.15 & 1.51 & 13.54& 24.9 & 22.59 & 22.68 & 13.54 & 45.39 & 11 & 20.75$\pm$0.03 \\
1127: NGC3741$^{S,3}$ & 11 36 06.4& 27.41& -1.74 & 2.00 & 14.04& 27.3 & 0.61 & 23.17 & 14.17 & 39.20 & 19& 21.28$\pm$0.02 \\
1128: 10 & 45 17 07.0& 0.09 & 0.06,0.15 & 2.01 & 13.42& 26.1 & 22.16 & 22.87 & 13.50 & 45.94 & 12 & 20.87$\pm$0.02 \\
1129: E320-14$^1$ & 11 37 53.4& 28.76& -2.28 & 1.40 & 15.49& 26.5 & 0.93 & 23.79 & 15.71 & 25.65 & 17& 22.37$\pm$0.01 \\
1130: 10 & -39 13 14.0& 0.47 & 0.08,0.18 & 1.24 & 14.58& 25.6 & 23.34 & 23.24 & 14.64 & 32.00 & 10 & 21.52$\pm$0.01 \\
1131: KK109$^{3,S}$ & 11 47 11.2& 28.27& & 0.60 & 17.77& 25.9 & 0.71 & 24.26 & 18.32 & 9.56 & 12& 23.48$\pm$0.02 \\
1132: 10 & 43 40 19.0& 0.06& & 0.60 & 17.06& 25.2 & 24.41 & 23.80 & 17.30 & 12.65 & 7 & 22.76$\pm$0.02 \\
1133: DDO99$^3$ & 11 50 53.0& 27.11& -2.13 & 4.10 & & 24.1 & 0.68$^a$& & & & 35 & 22.70$\pm$0.01 \\
1134: 10 & 38 52 50.0& 0.09 & 0.04,0.18 & 1.00 & & 23.4 & & & & & 21 & 22.06$\pm$0.01 \\
1135: E379-07$^3$ & 11 54 43.0& 28.59& & 1.10 & 16.41& 25.8 & 1.00$^a$& 24.21 & 16.82 & 20.82 & 27& 23.44$\pm$0.01 \\
1136: 10 & -33 33 29.0& 0.25 & & 1.03 & 15.39& 24.4 & 24.35 & 23.58 & 15.39 & 30.78 & 17 & 22.70$\pm$0.01 \\
1137: NGC4068$^{S,1}$ & 12 04 02.4& 28.16& & 3.20 & 12.56& 24.6 & 0.86 & 23.15 & 12.70 & 82.86 & 45& 21.72$\pm$0.03 \\
1138: 10 & 52 35 19.0& 0.07 & & 3.27 & 11.97& 25.9 & 22.55 & 22.41 & 11.97 & 98.13 & 27 & 21.06$\pm$0.02 \\
1139: NGC4163$^{S,1}$ & 12 12 08.9& 27.78& -1.65 & 1.90 & 12.96& 27.4 & 0.80 & 23.04 & 13.15 & 57.52 & 27& 21.09$\pm$0.04 \\
1140: 10 & 36 10 10.0& 0.06 & 0.01,0.14 & 2.70 & 12.16& 25.7 & 22.24 & 22.19 & 12.17 & 78.55 & 16 & 20.25$\pm$0.03 \\
1141: E321-014$^3$ & 12 13 49.6& 27.52& -2.28 & 1.40 & 16.06& 23.8 & 0.92$^a$& & & & 33 & 22.80$\pm$0.02 \\
1142: 10 & -38 13 53.0& 0.31 & 0.08,0.18 & 0.60 & 15.14& 22.9 & & & & & 20 & 21.97$\pm$0.02 \\
1143: UGC7242$^1$ & 12 14 07.4& 28.58& -1.49 & 1.90 & 13.87& 26.4 & 0.98 & 23.03 & 13.92 & 41.00 & 20& 21.06$\pm$0.01 \\
1144: 10 & 66 05 32.0& 0.06 & 0.02,0.13 & 1.64 & 12.97& 24.9 & 22.04 & 22.50 & 12.97 & 49.25 & 12 & 20.44$\pm$0.01 \\
1145: DDO113$^{S,3}$ & 12 14 57.9& 27.28& -1.99 & 1.50 & 15.41& 27.0 & 1.01 & 24.64 & 16.42 & 25.74 & 42& 24.05$\pm$0.03 \\
1146: 10 & 36 13 08.0& 0.07 & 0.05,0.16 & 2.14 & 14.39& 25.5 & 24.93 & 24.11 & 14.61 & 48.71 & 25 & 23.12$\pm$0.02 \\
1147: UGC7298$^{S,3}$ & 12 16 28.6& 28.12& & 1.10 & & 25.7 & 0.76 & 23.63 & 15.87 & 21.38 & 17& 22.40$\pm$0.05 \\
1148: 10 & 52 13 38.0& 0.08 & & 0.86 & & 24.7 & 23.28 & 23.28 & 15.15 & 25.74 & 10 & 22.02$\pm$0.04 \\
1149: UGC7369$^{S,1}$ & 12 19 38.7& 30.52& & 1.00 & 14.22& 26.6 & 1.07 & 22.71 & 14.34 & 34.62 & 15& 21.02$\pm$0.02 \\
1150: 10 & 29 52 59.0& 0.06 & & 1.51 & 13.14& 25.3 & 21.92 & 21.75 & 13.17 & 41.96 & 9 & 19.84$\pm$0.02 \\
1151: DDO125$^{S,3}$ & 12 27 41.8& 27.02& -1.73 & 4.30 & 12.51& 26.4 & 0.93 & 23.54 & 12.69 & 91.87 & 60 & 22.11$\pm$0.01 \\
1152: 10 & 43 29 38.0& 0.07 & 0.02,0.15 & 4.24 & 11.66& 25.1 & 23.03 & 23.18 & 11.66 & 126.3 & 37 & 21.42$\pm$0.01 \\
1153: UGC7605$^{S,3}$ & 12 28 39.0& 28.23& & 1.10 & 14.46& 26.4 & 0.56 & 23.49 & 14.66 & 36.04 & 22& 21.95$\pm$0.02 \\
1154: 10 & 35 43 05.0& 0.05 & & 1.76 & 13.88& 25.6 & 22.83 & 23.20 & 13.95 & 43.96 & 13 & 21.46$\pm$0.02 \\
1155: E381-018$^1$ & 12 44 42.7& 28.63& -2.06 & 1.20 & 15.28& 27.7 & 0.66 & 23.36 & 15.55 & 22.90 & 14& 21.91$\pm$0.01 \\
1156: 10 & -35 58 00.0& 0.21 & 0.04,0.16 & 1.48 & 14.55& 26.5 & 22.78 & 23.20 & 14.67 & 31.15 & 9 & 21.32$\pm$0.01 \\
1157: E381-20$^1$ & 12 46 00.4& 28.69& -2.34 & 3.00 & & 25.2 & 0.53 & 23.74 & 14.06 & 53.70 & 39& 22.55$\pm$0.01 \\
1158: 10 & -33 50 17.0& 0.21 & 0.03,0.18 & 2.02 & & 24.9 & 23.43 & 23.32 & 13.37 & 60.45 & 23 & 21.87$\pm$0.01 \\
1159: HIPASS1247-77$^1$& 12 47 32.6 &29.41 & & 0.80 & 17.49& 27.7 & 1.29 & 24.62 & 18.59 & 8.55 & 13& 23.93$\pm$0.02 \\
1160: 10 & -77 35 01.0& 2.48 & & 1.00 & 16.25& 26.5 & 24.88 & 23.94 & 16.55 & 17.50 & 8 & 22.70$\pm$0.01 \\
1161: KK166$^{2,3}$ & 12 49 13.3& 28.38& & 0.70 & 17.50& 25.9 & 1.20$^a$& 24.92 & 18.52 & 12.15 & 38 & 24.62$\pm$0.02 \\
1162: -3 & 35 36 45.0& 0.05 & & 0.81 & 16.22& 24.5 & & 23.98 & 16.22 & 24.40 & 26 & 23.51$\pm$0.02 \\
1163: E443-09$^1$ & 12 54 53.6& 28.81& -2.43 & 0.80 & 16.73& 27.0 & 0.79 & 24.35 & 17.65 & 12.60 & 20& 23.71$\pm$0.01 \\
1164: 10 & -28 20 27.0& 0.22 & 0.08,0.18 & 1.09 & 16.01& 25.9 & 24.64 & 24.17 & 16.47 & 20.80 & 12 & 23.32$\pm$0.01 \\
1165: E269-37$^3$ & 13 03 33.6& 27.71& & 0.80 & 16.10& 24.8 & 0.80$^a$& 23.95 & 16.10 & 26.19 & 25 & 23.04$\pm$0.02 \\
1166: -3 & -46 35 03.0& 0.44 & & 0.87 & 15.32& 24.2 & & 23.16 & 15.32 & 26.19 & 15 & 22.10$\pm$0.01 \\
1167: KK182$^1$ & 13 05 02.9& 28.85& -2.74 & 1.00 & 15.92& 27.6 & 0.93 & 23.97 & 16.18 & 22.20 & 15& 22.67$\pm$0.02 \\
1168: 10 & -40 04 58.0& 0.34 & 0.08,0.19 & 1.48 & 15.04& 26.4 & 23.62 & 23.41 & 15.27 & 26.05 & 9 & 22.05$\pm$0.01 \\
1169: UGC8215$^{1,S}$ & 13 08 03.6& 28.74& -1.67,0.11& 1.00 & 15.61& 26.4 & 0.62 & 23.75 & 15.86 & 23.10 & 16& 22.43$\pm$0.01 \\
1170: 10 & 46 49 41.0& 0.04 & 0.03,0.14 & 1.18 & 15.00& 25.9 & 23.36 & 23.40 & 15.12 & 27.60 & 10 & 21.91$\pm$0.01 \\
1171: \end{tabular}
1172: \end{center}
1173: \end{table*}
1174: \setcounter{table}{0}
1175: \begin{table*}
1176: \begin{center}
1177: \scriptsize
1178: \caption{Continued.}
1179: \begin{tabular}{lrrlccclccclc}\\ \hline \hline
1180: Name & RA(2000.0)& $\mu_0$& \feh,$\sigma_{VI}$ & Diam & V$_L$& $SBV_{L}$& $(V\!-\!I)_e$& $SBV_{25}$ & $V_{25}$ & $R_{V,25}$ & $R_e$ & $SBV_{C}$ \\
1181: T & DEC(2000.) & $A_v$ & $ \sigma$\feh & $D_{lim}$& $I_L$& $SBI_{L}$ & $SBV_{e}$ & $SBI_{25}$ & $I_{25}$ & $R_{I,25}$& h & $SBI_{C}$ \\
1182: \hline
1183: E269-58$^1$ & 13 10 32.9& 27.84& -1.43,0.23& 3.00 & 12.19& 25.3 & 1.13 & 22.81 & 12.21 & 82.00& 36 & 20.70$\pm$0.03 \\
1184: 10 & -46 59 27.0& 0.35 & 0.01,0.12 & 2.90 & 11.08& 24.0 & 21.63 & 21.83 & 11.08 & 86.95& 21 & 19.73$\pm$0.03 \\
1185: KK189$^1$ & 13 12 45.0& 28.12& -1.74,0.08 & 0.60 & 16.98& 25.8 & 1.20$^a$& 24.03 & 17.32 & 17.40& 20& 23.82$\pm$0.04 \\
1186: -3 & -41 49 55.0& 0.38 & 0.04,0.14 & 0.81 & 15.78& 24.5 & 24.19 & 23.30 & 15.95 & 21.23& 13 & 22.97$\pm$0.06 \\
1187: E269-66$^1$ & 13 13 09.2& 27.82& -1.22,0.19 & 1.40 & 13.74& 26.2 & 1.06 & 23.81 & 13.94 & 57.95& 40 & 22.52$\pm$0.01 \\
1188: -1 & -44 53 24.0& 0.31 & 0.01,0.11 & 2.57 & 12.65& 25.5 & 23.44 & 23.07 & 12.66 & 74.20& 24 & 21.38$\pm$0.01 \\
1189: DDO167$^{S,3}$ & 13 13 22.8& 28.11& & 1.10 & 15.08& 27.7 & 0.48 & 23.77 & 15.40 & 28.51& 21& 22.57$\pm$0.04 \\
1190: 10 & 46 19 11.0& 0.03 & & 1.50 & 14.63& 26.5 & 23.53 & 23.45 & 14.71 & 34.45& 12 & 22.03$\pm$0.07 \\
1191: KK196$^1$ & 13 21 47.1& 27.99& -1.96,0.10& 1.30 & 15.47& 27.0 & 1.09 & 23.94 & 16.02 & 23.15& 21& 22.84$\pm$0.01 \\
1192: 10 & -45 03 48.0& 0.28 & 0.03,0.15 & 1.50 & 14.41& 25.6 & 23.77 & 23.54 & 14.53 & 36.90& 13 & 22.07$\pm$0.01 \\
1193: KK197$^1$ & 13 22 01.8& 27.87& -1.19,0.24& 0.90 & 15.31& 26.1 & 1.27 & 24.15 & 16.50 & 19.69& 38& 23.78$\pm$0.03 \\
1194: -3 & -42 32 08.0& 0.51 & 0.02,0.10 & 1.70 & 14.04& 24.7 & 24.26 & 23.15 & 14.14 & 45.20& 23 & 22.55$\pm$0.03 \\
1195: KKs55$^1$ & 13 22 12.4& 27.98& -1.81,0.12& 0.80 & 15.53& 27.8 & 1.12 & 25.30 & 16.05 & 71.65& 50& 24.88$\pm$0.01 \\
1196: -3 & -42 43 51.0& 0.48 & 0.04,0.15 & 2.39 & 14.40& 26.4 & 25.74 & 24.30 & 14.91 & 42.55& 31 & 23.53$\pm$0.01 \\
1197: KK200$^3$ & 13 24 36.0& 28.33& & 1.30 & & 26.0 & 1.01 & 23.72 & 15.96 & 25.40& 19 & 22.42$\pm$0.02 \\
1198: 9 & -30 58 20.0& 0.23 & & 1.09 & & 24.7 & 23.31 & 23.18 & 14.88 & 32.77& 11 & 21.70$\pm$0.01 \\
1199: I4247$^1$ & 13 26 44.4& 28.48& -2.37,0.18 & 1.30 & 13.97& 26.7 & 0.68 & 22.90 & 14.09 & 35.55& 16 & 20.88$\pm$0.01 \\
1200: 10 & -30 21 45.0& 0.21 & 0.03,0.18 & 1.90 & 13.24& 26.3 & 21.73 & 22.56 & 13.29 & 42.95& 10 & 20.13$\pm$0.02 \\
1201: UGC8508$^{S,3}$ & 13 30 44.4& 27.04& -1.91 & 1.70 & 13.63& 27.1 & 0.72 & 23.25 & 13.77 & 48.31& 25& 21.50$\pm$0.02 \\
1202: 10 & 54 54 36.0& 0.05 & 0.04,0.15 & 2.42 & 12.94& 26.4 & 22.43 & 22.96 & 12.99 & 60.59& 15 & 20.90$\pm$0.02 \\
1203: E444-78$^1$ & 13 36 30.8& 28.56& -1.75,0.13 & 1.20 & 14.78& 27.5 & 0.85 & 23.79 & 15.22 & 31.95& 26 & 22.68$\pm$0.01 \\
1204: 10 & -29 14 11.0& 0.18 & 0.02,0.14 & 2.51 & 13.89& 26.9 & 23.56 & 23.44 & 14.10 & 45.75& 15 & 21.87$\pm$0.01 \\
1205: E444-84$^3$ & 13 37 20.2& 28.32& & 1.30 & 14.98& 24.8 & 0.77 & 23.48 & 14.98 & 35.56& 31 & 22.40$\pm$0.02 \\
1206: 10 & -28 02 46.0& 0.23 & & 1.19 & 14.26& 24.3 & 23.28 & 22.78 & 14.26 & 35.56& 18 & 21.76$\pm$0.02 \\
1207: NGC5237$^1$ & 13 37 38.9& 27.61& & 1.90 & 12.36& 25.6 & 1.01 & 22.75 & 12.38 & 70.70& 25 & 20.18$\pm$0.01 \\
1208: -3 & -42 50 51.0& 0.32 & & 2.59 & 11.31& 24.6 & 21.02 & 21.97 & 11.31 & 77.80& 15 & 19.20$\pm$0.01 \\
1209: UGC8638$^{1,S}$ & 13 39 19.4& 26.81& -1.64,0.16 & 1.20 & 13.85& 26.6 & 0.72 & 23.47 & 14.07 & 44.30& 29& 21.98$\pm$0.01 \\
1210: 10 & 24 46 33.0& 0.04 & 0.02,0.14 & 2.57 & 13.11& 25.7 & 22.88 & 23.17 & 13.22 & 59.10& 17 & 21.33$\pm$0.01 \\
1211: UGC8651$^{2,3}$ & 13 39 53.8& 27.39& -1.92, 0.11& 2.30 & & 24.6 & 0.64 & & & & 41& 22.70$\pm$0.01 \\
1212: 10 & 40 44 21.0& 0.02 & 0.02,0.15 & 1.57 & & 24.1 & 23.62 & 23.08 & & & 24 & 22.02$\pm$0.01 \\
1213: I4316$^3$ & 13 40 18.1& 28.22& & 1.60 & & 23.8 & 0.98 & & & & 21& 21.68$\pm$0.03 \\
1214: 10 & -28 53 40.0& 0.18 & & 0.81 & & 22.9 & 22.51 & & & & 12 & 20.98$\pm$0.02 \\
1215: KKs57$^1$ & 13 41 38.1& 27.89& -1.63, 0.08& 0.80 & 17.28& 27.0 & 1.60 & 24.67 & 18.77 & 8.30& 17 & 24.23$\pm$0.01 \\
1216: -3 & -42 34 55.0& 0.30 & 0.06,0.14 & 0.95 & 15.82& 25.9 & 25.10 & 23.97 & 16.11 & 18.80& 10 & 23.04$\pm$0.01 \\
1217: KK211$^3$ & 13 42 05.6& 27.77& -1.26 & 0.80 & 15.69& 25.2 & 1.14 & 23.91 & 15.75 & 30.68& 28& 22.91$\pm$0.03 \\
1218: -5 & -45 12 18.0& 0.37 & 0.05,0.12 & 1.09 & 14.56& 23.9 & 23.82 & & & & 17 & 21.78$\pm$0.03 \\
1219: KK213$^3$ & 13 43 35.8& 27.80& -1.62 & 0.60 & 17.70& 25.6 & 1.20$^a$& 24.20 & 17.92 & 16.43& 18& 23.31$\pm$0.02 \\
1220: -3 & -43 46 09.0& 0.32 & 0.09,0.14 & 0.68 & 16.50& 23.8 & 24.22 & & & & 11 & 22.27$\pm$0.02 \\
1221: E325-11$^3$ & 13 45 00.8& 27.66& -2.18 & 2.70 & 15.73& 24.2 & 0.96$^a$& & & & 40 & 23.16$\pm$0.02 \\
1222: 10 & -41 51 32.0& 0.24 & 0.05,0.17 & 0.88 & 14.77& 23.2 & & & & & 24 & 22.10$\pm$0.03 \\
1223: KK217$^3$ & 13 46 17.2& 27.92& -1.37 & 0.60 & 16.59& 25.9 & 1.23 & 23.70 & 16.75 & 22.71& 17& 22.45$\pm$0.01 \\
1224: -3 & -45 41 05.0& 0.40 & 0.07,0.13 & 1.00 & 15.46& 24.5 & 23.36 & 22.97 & 15.46 & 29.88& 10 & 21.47$\pm$0.01 \\
1225: CenN$^1$ & 13 48 09.2& 27.82& -1.74,0.10 & 0.90 & 16.42& 27.2 & 1.37 & 24.50 & 17.20 & 16.75& 25 & 23.90$\pm$0.01 \\
1226: -3 & -47 33 54.0& 0.47 & 0.03,0.14 & 1.21 & 15.12& 25.6 & 24.78 & 23.89 & 15.16 & 34.20& 15 & 22.80$\pm$0.01 \\
1227: HIPASS1348-37$^1$& 13 48 33.9& 28.78& -2.52 & 0.50 & 17.00& 25.9 & 0.60$^a$& 24.77 & 18.55 & 10.10& 33 & 24.53$\pm$0.01 \\
1228: 10 & -37 58 03.0& 0.26 & 0.06,0.19 & 0.91 & 16.45& 25.8 & & 24.50 & 16.65 & 22.45& 20 & 23.93$\pm$0.01 \\
1229: KK221$^3$ & 13 48 46.4& 28.00& & 1.50 & & 25.5 & 1.30$^a$& 24.82 & 17.51 & 17.83& & 24.67$\pm$0.02 \\
1230: -3 & -46 59 49.0& 0.46 & & 0.88 & & 24.2 & & 23.64 & 15.46 & 26.39& & 23.40$\pm$0.02 \\
1231: UGC8760$^{S,2}$ & 13 50 51.1& 28.54& -2.00,0.16 & 2.20 & 14.14& 27.9 & 0.82 & 23.79 & 14.36 & 49.50& 31& 22.32$\pm$0.03 \\
1232: 10 & 38 01 16.0& 0.05 & 0.03,0.16 & 3.00 & 13.40& 26.3 & 23.30 & 23.40 & 13.51 & 60.59& 18 & 21.74$\pm$0.02 \\
1233: HIPASS1351-47$^1$& 13 51 22.0& 28.63& & 0.50 & 16.51& 25.9 & 0.70$^a$& 24.65 & 17.70 & 14.20& 33 & 24.28$\pm$0.01 \\
1234: 10 & -47 00 00.0& 0.48 & & 1.03 & 15.83& 25.4 & & 24.26 & 16.15 & 23.85& 20 & 23.58$\pm$0.01 \\
1235: KKH86$^{S,3}$ & 13 54 33.6& 27.08& -2.33 & 0.70 & 16.55& 26.7 & 0.91 & 24.15 & 17.11 & 15.44& 17 & 23.24$\pm$0.03 \\
1236: 10 & 04 14 35.0& 0.09 & 0.11,0.18 & 0.82 & 15.86& 25.7 & 24.17 & 23.75 & 15.91 & 22.57& 10 & 22.60$\pm$0.02 \\
1237: UGC8833$^{2,S}$ & 13 54 48.7& 27.52& -2.03,0.07 & 0.90 & 14.86& 26.4 & 0.62 & 23.66 & 15.11 & 30.25& 22& 22.39$\pm$0.01 \\
1238: 10 & 35 50 15.0& 0.04 & 0.03,0.16 & 1.54 & 14.23& 25.8 & 23.30 & 23.39 & 14.31 & 39.45& 14 & 21.88$\pm$0.01 \\
1239: E384-016$^1$ & 13 57 01.6& 28.26& & 1.30 & 14.37& 26.7 & 1.00 & 23.37 & 14.65 & 34.00& 21 & 21.84$\pm$0.01 \\
1240: 10 & -35 20 02.0& 0.25 & & 2.04 & 13.39& 26.0 & 22.72 & 22.91 & 13.48 & 47.75& 13 & 20.89$\pm$0.01 \\
1241: KK230$^1$ & 14 07 10.7& 26.34& -2.02 & 0.60 & 16.31& 28.2 & 0.58 & 24.44 & 17.25 & 14.95& 21& 23.78$\pm$0.01 \\
1242: 10 & 35 03 37.0& 0.05& 0.09,0.16 & 1.73 & 15.68& 27.4 & 24.70 & 24.19 & 16.25 & 23.10& 13 & 23.28$\pm$0.01 \\
1243: UGC9128$^1$ & 14 15 56.5& 26.75& -2.33,0.08 & 1.70 & 14.38& 24.9 & 0.75 & 23.37 & 14.38 & 46.83& 38& 22.60$\pm$0.03 \\
1244: 10 & 23 03 19.0& 0.08 & 0.06,0.18 & 1.56 & 13.75& 24.1 & 23.10 & 22.78 & 13.75 & 46.83& 23 & 22.08$\pm$0.03 \\
1245: DDO190$^{S,3}$ & 14 24 43.5& 27.23& -2.09 & 1.80 & 13.13& 24.1 & 0.71 & 22.89 & 13.13 & 51.53& 38 & 21.45$\pm$0.04 \\
1246: 10 & 44 31 33.0& 0.04 & 0.04,0.17 & 1.85 & 12.39& 23.6 & 22.49 & 22.29 & 12.39 & 55.58& 23 & 20.85$\pm$0.04 \\
1247: E223-09$^1$ & 15 01 08.5& 28.95& & 2.60 & 12.83& 24.2 & 1.00 & & & & 64& 22.17$\pm$0.01 \\
1248: 10 & -48 17 33.0& 0.86 & & 2.32 & 11.77& 23.2 & 23.02 & & & & 38 & 21.03$\pm$0.01 \\
1249: E137-18$^1$ & 16 20 59.3& 29.01& & 3.20 & & 23.5 & 1.33 & & & & 34& 20.92$\pm$0.07 \\
1250: 9 & -60 29 15.0& 0.81 & & 1.96 & & 22.1 & 21.97 & & & & 21 & 19.67$\pm$0.08 \\
1251: IC4662$^1$ & 17 47 06.3& 26.90& -1.34,0.23 & 2.80 & 11.13& 25.5 & 0.57 & 22.28 & 11.14 & 88.80& 28& 19.24$\pm$0.01 \\
1252: 9 & -64 38 25.0& 0.23 & 0.01,0.12 & 3.17 & 10.47& 24.7 & 20.04 & 21.66 & 10.47 & 95.00& 17 & 18.74$\pm$0.01 \\
1253: KK246$^1$ & 20 03 57.4& 29.78& & 1.20 & 16.50& 27.4 & 1.37 & 24.21 & 17.37 & 14.15& 17& 23.40$\pm$0.01 \\
1254: 10 & -31 40 54.0& 0.98 & & 1.42 & 15.17& 26.1 & 24.33 & 23.61 & 15.39 & 27.30& 10 & 22.27$\pm$0.01 \\
1255: UGCA438$^3$ & 23 26 27.5& 26.59& -1.68 & 1.50 & & 23.6 & 0.81$^a$& & & & 50& 22.43$\pm$0.02 \\
1256: 10 & -32 23 26.0& 0.05 & 0.04,0.15 & 0.97 & & 22.8 & & & & & 30 & 21.79$\pm$0.03 \\
1257: KKH98$^3$ & 23 45 34.0& 26.95& -1.94 & 1.10 & 15.16& 24.2 & 0.60 & & & & 38& 22.81$\pm$0.01 \\
1258: 10 & 38 43 04.0& 0.41 & 0.09,0.16 & 1.07 & 14.61& 24.1 & & 22.91 & & & 23 & 21.98$\pm$0.02 \\
1259: \hline \hline
1260: \end{tabular}
1261: \end{center}
1262: \end{table*}
1263: \begin{table*}
1264: \begin{center}
1265: \scriptsize
1266: \caption{Fundamental photometric parameters of galaxies from Table~1 measured on the SDSS images in the g and r bands.
1267: The data were transformed into B and R bands of the Johnson-Cousins system using the transformations by Jordi et al. (2006).
1268: Columns contain the following data:
1269: {\bf (1)} Galaxy Name.
1270: {\bf (2)} equatorial coordinates (J2000),
1271: {\bf (3)} projected major axis from CNG and limiting diameter of our photometry,
1272: {\bf (4)} integrated apparent B and R magnitudes,
1273: {\bf (5)} limiting B and R surface brightnesses (SB) taken at the distance D$_{lim}$/2 from centers of galaxies,
1274: {\bf (6)} effective $(B\!-\!R)$ color and effective SB in the R-band,
1275: {\bf (7)} mean SB within the isophote of 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$ in the B and R bands,
1276: {\bf (8)} apparent B and R magnitudes integrated within the isophote level 25 $^m\!/\sq \arcsec$,
1277: {\bf (9)} projected major axis at the isophote level 25$^m\!/\sq \arcsec$ in the B and R bands,
1278: {\bf (10)} effective radius and model exponential scale length,
1279: {\bf (11)} central SB in B and R bands and the corresponding errors.
1280: The data were not corrected for Galactic extinction.}
1281: \begin{tabular}{lrcclcccccc}\\ \hline \hline
1282: Name & RA(2000)& diam & $B_L$& $SBB_L$& $(B-R)_e$& $SBB_{25}$& $B_{25}$& $R_{B,25}$& $R_e$& $SBB_C$ \\
1283: & DEC(2000)& D$_{lim}$& $R_L$& $SBR_L$& $SBR_e$& $SBR_{25}$& $R_{25}$& $R_{R,25}$& h & $SBI_C$ \\
1284: & & $\arcmin$& $^{m}$& $^{m}\!/\sq \arcsec$& $^{m},^{m}\!/\sq \arcsec$& $^{m}\!/\sq \arcsec$& $^{m}$& $\arcsec$& $\arcsec$& $^{m}\!/\sq \arcsec$\\
1285: (1) & (2)& (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & 10 & 11 \\
1286: \hline
1287: UGC3974 & 07 41 55.0& 3.10 & 14.61 & 25.35 & 0.77& 24.24& 15.06& 43.56& 54& 23.55$\pm$0.03 \\
1288: & 16 48 02.0& 1.97 & 13.88 & 24.66 & 23.67& 23.75& 13.88& 59.00& 32& 22.74$\pm$0.03 \\
1289: KK65 & 07 42 31.2& 0.90 & 15.46 & 25.71 & 0.87& 23.61& 15.76& 22.97& 17& 22.38$\pm$0.03 \\
1290: & 16 33 40.0& 1.10 & 14.64 & 24.86 & 22.42& 23.27& 14.64& 32.87& 10& 21.50$\pm$0.02 \\
1291: UGC4115 & 07 57 01.8& 1.80 & 14.84 & 25.48 & 0.84& 23.83& 14.99& 35.64& 27& 22.61$\pm$0.03 \\
1292: & 14 23 27.0& 1.36 & 14.06 & 24.62 & 22.68& 23.17& 14.06& 40.79& 16& 21.79$\pm$0.03 \\
1293: DDO52 & 08 28 28.5& 2.00 & 15.36 & 27.88 & 0.88& 24.36& 16.43& 23.76& 31& 23.63$\pm$0.03 \\
1294: & 41 51 24.0& 2.20 & 14.52 & 26.88 & 23.62& 23.90& 14.83& 41.58& 19& 22.68$\pm$0.02 \\
1295: D564-08& 09 02 54.0& 0.70 & 17.16 & 27.47 & 0.97& 24.66& 18.97& 7.92& 18& 24.11$\pm$0.04 \\
1296: & 20 04 31.0& 1.02 & 16.30 & 26.13 & 24.15& 24.15& 16.73& 18.61& 11& 23.24$\pm$0.03 \\
1297: D565-06& 09 19 29.4& 0.70 & 17.13 & 27.63 & 0.87& 24.09& 18.17& 9.11& 14& 23.62$\pm$0.05 \\
1298: & 21 36 12.0& 0.96 & 16.33 & 26.28 & 23.64& 23.81& 16.75& 15.84& 8& 22.72$\pm$0.03 \\
1299: KDG61 & 09 57 02.7& 2.40 & 15.66 & 27.69 & 1.18& 24.83& 18.94& 8.25& 49& 24.81$\pm$0.07 \\
1300: & 68 35 30.0& 2.69 & 14.50 & 26.64 & 24.17& 24.03& 14.78& 56.11& 29& 23.44$\pm$0.06 \\
1301: KKH57 & 10 00 16.0& 0.60 & 18.34 & 27.43 & 1.00& 0.00& 0.00& 0.00& 19& 24.97$\pm$0.04 \\
1302: & 68 35 30.0& 0.74 & 17.29 & 26.29 & 24.94& 24.54& 18.21& 10.69& 11& 24.01$\pm$0.02 \\
1303: UGC6541 & 11 33 29.1& 1.40 & 14.45 & 26.75 & 0.58& 23.63& 14.62& 30.00& 17& 21.50$\pm$0.07 \\
1304: & 49 14 17.0& 1.51 & 13.80 & 25.07 & 22.10& 22.79& 13.87& 38.85& 10& 20.92$\pm$0.03 \\
1305: NGC3741 & 11 36 06.4& 2.00 & 14.44 & 27.52 & 0.64& 23.29& 14.67& 32.87& 19& 21.66$\pm$0.04 \\
1306: & 45 17 07.0& 2.01 & 13.77 & 26.52 & 21.97& 23.02& 13.87& 41.58& 11& 21.05$\pm$0.02 \\
1307: KK109 & 11 47 11.2& 0.60 & 18.20 & 27.64 & 0.53& 24.49& 19.18& 6.73& 9& 23.78$\pm$0.05 \\
1308: & 43 40 19.0& 0.54 & 17.78 & 26.43 & 24.15& 24.18& 18.23& 9.11& 5& 23.26$\pm$0.06 \\
1309: NGC4068 & 12 04 02.4& 3.20 & 13.11 & 25.19 & 0.93& 23.42& 13.47& 68.00& 44& 22.09$\pm$0.03 \\
1310: & 52 35 19.0& 3.27 & 12.28 & 25.93 & 22.22& 22.80& 12.28& 98.13& 26& 21.46$\pm$0.02 \\
1311: NGC4163 & 12 12 08.9& 1.90 & 13.55 & 28.20 & 0.89& 23.41& 13.81& 47.07& 26& 21.60$\pm$0.05 \\
1312: & 36 10 10.0& 2.70 & 12.63 & 26.42 & 21.67& 22.55& 12.67& 69.52& 16& 20.64$\pm$0.03 \\
1313: DDO113 & 12 14 57.9& 1.50 & 16.15 & 27.96 & 1.35& 24.96& 19.13& 8.71& 40& 24.63$\pm$0.04 \\
1314: & 36 13 08.0& 2.14 & 14.89 & 26.29 & 24.53& 24.35& 15.51& 34.85& 24& 23.64$\pm$0.02 \\
1315: UGC7298 & 12 16 28.6& 1.10 & 16.05 & 26.06 & 0.70& 23.75& 16.28& 19.01& 16& 22.60$\pm$0.05 \\
1316: & 52 13 38.0& 0.86 & 15.51 & 25.12 & 23.15& 23.56& 15.55& 24.16& 9& 22.26$\pm$0.05 \\
1317: UGC7369 & 12 19 38.7& 1.00 & 14.98 & 27.42 & 1.24& 23.22& 15.26& 25.92& 15& 21.81$\pm$0.03 \\
1318: & 29 52 59.0& 1.51 & 13.72 & 25.99 & 21.38& 22.26& 13.76& 39.68& 9& 20.45$\pm$0.02 \\
1319: DDO125 & 12 27 41.8& 4.30 & 13.03 & 26.81 & 0.92& 23.83& 13.35& 77.22& 59& 22.62$\pm$0.01 \\
1320: & 43 29 38.0& 4.24 & 12.14 & 25.83 & 22.71& 23.37& 12.22& 108.5& 35& 21.79$\pm$0.01 \\
1321: UGC7605 & 12 28 39.0& 1.10 & 14.83 & 26.63 & 0.58& 23.64& 15.11& 31.28& 21& 22.25$\pm$0.03 \\
1322: & 35 43 05.0& 1.76 & 14.22 & 26.04 & 22.64& 23.38& 14.35& 39.60& 13& 21.73$\pm$0.01 \\
1323: UGC8215 & 13 08 03.6& 1.00 & 16.03 & 27.21 & 0.80& 23.94& 16.36& 19.24& 16& 22.59$\pm$0.02 \\
1324: & 46 49 41.0& 1.06 & 15.39 & 26.14 & 23.18& 23.68& 15.48& 26.68& 9& 22.22$\pm$0.02 \\
1325: DDO167 & 13 13 22.8& 1.10 & 15.46 & 28.08 & 0.69& 23.97& 15.86& 25.34& 21& 22.87$\pm$0.04 \\
1326: & 46 19 11.0& 1.50 & 14.88 & 26.31 & 23.34& 23.67& 15.06& 32.08& 13& 22.41$\pm$0.05 \\
1327: UGC8508 & 13 30 44.4& 1.70 & 14.07 & 27.56 & 0.73& 23.52& 14.27& 43.56& 25& 21.93$\pm$0.03 \\
1328: & 54 54 36.0& 2.42 & 13.33 & 26.53 & 22.17& 23.02& 13.44& 50.69& 15& 21.22$\pm$0.02 \\
1329: UGC8638 & 13 39 19.4& 1.20 & 14.49 & 27.25 & 0.85& 23.49& 14.80& 33.66& 25& 22.24$\pm$0.04 \\
1330: & 24 46 33.0& 2.35 & 13.61 & 26.36 & 22.44& 23.29& 13.75& 47.92& 15& 21.53$\pm$0.03 \\
1331: UGC8760 & 13 50 51.1& 2.20 & 14.58 & 28.68 & 0.85& 23.96& 15.00& 38.81& 30& 22.66$\pm$0.04 \\
1332: & 38 01 16.0& 3.00 & 13.80 & 26.95 & 23.06& 23.59& 14.02& 51.48& 18& 22.10$\pm$0.02 \\
1333: KKH86 & 13 54 33.6& 0.70 & 17.10 & 27.30 & 1.16& 24.43& 17.90& 12.28& 17& 23.63$\pm$0.04 \\
1334: & 04 14 35.0& 0.82 & 16.26 & 25.66 & 23.97& 24.02& 16.47& 19.80& 10& 23.04$\pm$0.02 \\
1335: U8833 & 13 54 48.7& 0.90 & 15.34 & 27.41 & 0.79& 23.71& 15.69& 24.95& 19& 22.42$\pm$0.03 \\
1336: & 35 50 15.0& 1.50 & 14.64 & 26.50 & 22.81& 23.44& 14.77& 33.66& 11& 21.88$\pm$0.03 \\
1337: DDO190 & 14 24 43.5& 1.80 & 13.55 & 24.66 & 0.79& 23.32& 13.55& 51.53& 36& 21.78$\pm$0.05 \\
1338: & 44 31 33.0& 1.85 & 12.77 & 23.96 & 22.26& 22.68& 12.77& 55.58& 22& 21.20$\pm$0.03 \\
1339: & & & & & & & & & & \\
1340: SexB & 10 00 00.1 & 5.10 & & 24.94 & 0.97 & 23.75& 12.98& 78.41& 64 & 22.60$\pm$0.10 \\
1341: & 05 19 56.0 & 2.50 & & 24.02 & 22.69& 22.75& 12.30& 75.24& 38 & 21.50$\pm$0.10 \\
1342: \hline \hline
1343: \end{tabular}
1344: \end{center}
1345: \end{table*}
1346: \end{document}
1347:
1348:
1349: