1: %% \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
5: \documentclass{emulateapj}
6:
7: \slugcomment{To appear in the {\em Astrophysical Journal}}
8: \shorttitle{Emission from Quiescent Massive Black Holes}
9: \shortauthors{Wrobel, Terashima \& Ho}
10: \begin{document}
11: \title{Outflow-Dominated Emission from the Quiescent Massive Black Holes
12: in NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697}
13: \author{J. M. Wrobel,\altaffilmark{1}
14: Y. Terashima,\altaffilmark{2}
15: and L. C. Ho\altaffilmark{3}}
16: \altaffiltext{1}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box O,
17: Socorro, NM 87801; jwrobel@nrao.edu}
18: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics, Faculty of Science,
19: Ehime University, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan;
20: terasima@astro.phys.sci.ehime-u.ac.jp}
21: \altaffiltext{3}{The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of
22: Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101;
23: lho@ociw.edu}
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26: The nearby elliptical galaxies NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697 each host a
27: supermassive black hole with $M_\bullet > 10^8 M_\odot$. Analysis of
28: archival {\em Chandra\/} data and new NRAO Very Large Array data shows
29: that each galaxy contains a low-luminosity active galactic nucleus
30: (LLAGN), identified as a faint, hard X-ray source that is
31: astrometrically coincident with a faint 8.5-GHz source. The latter
32: has a diameter less that 0.3\arcsec\, (26~pc for NGC\,4621, 17~pc for
33: NGC\,4697). The black holes energizing these LLAGNs have Eddington
34: ratios $L(2-10~keV) / L(Edd) \sim 10^{-9}$, placing them in the
35: so-called quiescent regime. The emission from these quiescent black
36: holes is radio-loud, with $log~R_X = log~\nu L_{\nu}(8.5~GHz) /
37: L(2-10~keV) \sim -2$, suggesting the presence of a radio outflow.
38: Also, application of the radio--X-ray--mass relation from Yuan \& Cui
39: for quiescent black holes predicts the observed radio luminosities
40: $\nu L_{\nu}(8.5~GHz)$ to within a factor of a few. Significantly,
41: that relation invokes X-ray emission from the outflow rather than from
42: an accretion flow. The faint, but detectable, emission from these two
43: massive black holes is therefore consistent with being
44: outflow-dominated. Observational tests of this finding are suggested.
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \keywords{galaxies: active ---
48: galaxies: individual (NGC\,4621, NGC\,4697) ---
49: galaxies: nuclei ---
50: radio continuum: galaxies --- X-rays: galaxies}
51:
52: \section{Motivation}
53:
54: Dynamical studies have established that supermassive black holes, with
55: masses $M_\bullet \sim 10^6 - 10^9 M_\odot$, occur in the nuclei of
56: most nearby galaxies with stellar bulges \citep[e.g.,][]{kor04}. Yet
57: few of these massive black holes are observed as luminous active
58: galactic nuclei (AGNs). Rather, the Palomar spectroscopic survey by
59: \citet{ho97} showed that the majority have either no AGN signatures or
60: only the weak AGN signatures that define them as low-luminosity AGNs
61: (LLAGNs; $L(H\alpha) \le 10^{40}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$). Also, Chandra
62: surveys of selected Palomar LLAGNs \citep{ho01,ter03} commonly find
63: X-ray nuclei with $L(2-10~keV) = 10^{38} - 10^{42}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$,
64: leading to $L(2-10~keV) < 10^{42}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$ as an X-ray
65: definition of a LLAGN. For the black hole masses involved, such
66: H$\alpha$ and X-ray luminosities are highly sub-Eddington, that is,
67: much less than the Eddington luminosity $L(Edd) = 1.3 \times 10^{38}
68: (M_\bullet / M_\odot )$~ergs~s$^{-1}$. Understanding the radiative
69: quiescence of these massive black holes has important implications for
70: accretion physics, fuelling and feedback mechanisms, and black-hole
71: growth over cosmic time \citep{ho04,pel05}.
72:
73: Early theoretical models for weakly-radiating massive black holes
74: invoked radiatively-inefficient inflows \citep[e.g.,][]{nar95},
75: jets/outflows \citep[e.g.,][]{fal00}, and combinations of the two
76: \citep[e.g.,][]{yua02a}. The models predicted that continuum emission
77: could emerge in the radio and hard X-ray regions. For LLAGNs, these
78: frequency regions offer strong tests of the models because they
79: benefit from high contrast against the stellar emission, little or no
80: obscuration, and subarcsecond angular resolution and astrometry.
81: Significantly, a study of Palomar LLAGNs using {\em Chandra\/}, the
82: Very Large Array (VLA), and the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), found
83: that the majority are radio loud, defined as $log~R_X = log~\nu
84: L_{\nu}(5~GHz) / L(2-10~keV) = -4.5$ or higher \citep{ter03}. Since
85: LLAGNs may possess radiatively-inefficient accretion flows
86: \citep[e.g.,][]{yua02b} and radio continuum emission is
87: outflow-dominated \citep[e.g.,][]{fal99,nag05}, this suggests that
88: such accretion flows can produce outflows more efficiently than
89: standard geometrically thin accretion disks \citep{liv99,mei01}.
90: Moreover, such radio continuum outflows might have sufficiently stable
91: ``astrometric footprints'' to constrain the proper motions of their
92: galaxy hosts in the extragalactic frame \citep[e.g.,][]{bie00},
93: especially for galaxy hosts which lack interstellar water masers.
94:
95: Building upon the work by \citet{ter03}, \citet{ho03b} and
96: \citet{ter05} searched in the radio and X-ray regions for LLAGN
97: signatures from the weakest accretors, namely nearby Palomar nuclei
98: showing no or very weak $H\alpha$ \citep{ho03a}. Those targets were
99: mainly disk galaxies and the new {\em Chandra\/} detections of them
100: correspond to X-ray nuclei with $L(2-10~keV) < 10^{38}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$
101: \citep{ho03b,ter05}. With their typical $M_\bullet < 10^8 M_\odot$,
102: these accretors are feeble emitters with Eddington ratios $L(2-10~keV)
103: / L(Edd) < 10^{-7}$. Still, \citet{ter05} obtained VLA detections of
104: radio nuclei at the levels predicted from the radio-loudness relation
105: \citep{ter03}, proving that the trait of radio loudness holds below
106: $L(2-10~keV) = 10^{38}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$ and continuing to emphasize the
107: potential importance of radio outflows from these modest-mass black
108: holes.
109:
110: Encouraged by these X-ray/radio trends, a next step is to search for
111: continuum signatures of LLAGNs in nearby elliptical galaxies, with
112: their typically higher $M_\bullet$. Archival and published data from
113: {\em Chandra\/} and the VLA are used in \S~\ref{data-old} to identify
114: two candidate LLAGNs in nearby elliptical galaxies. New
115: high-resolution observations of these candidates with the
116: VLA\footnote{Operated by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory,
117: which is a facility of the National Science Foundation, operated under
118: cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.} \citep{tho80}
119: are reported in \S~\ref{data-new}. The implications of the new VLA
120: imaging are explored in \S~\ref{astrometry} regarding the astrometry,
121: and in \S~\ref{photometry} regarding the photometry. \S~\ref{summary}
122: closes with a summary of this work and suggestions for future
123: directions.
124:
125: \section{Prior Data}\label{data-old}
126:
127: A Palomar elliptical galaxy \object{NGC\,4621} and a southern
128: elliptical galaxy \object{NGC\,4697} were selected. NGC\,4621 is an
129: absorption-line nucleus with an H$\alpha$ upper limit from
130: \citet{ho03a}. NGC\,4697 has modest LINER characteristics (Pinkney et
131: al. 2005; J. Pinkney, priv.\ comm.). For each galaxy, Table~1 lists
132: its surface-brightness-fluctuation distance and scale, as well the
133: mass and Eddington luminosity of its black hole. Table~2 gives the
134: centroid positions of the galaxies from NED/2MASS.
135:
136: \placetable{tab1}
137:
138: \placetable{tab2}
139:
140: \subsection{VLA}
141:
142: At the NED/2MASS centroid positions, the galaxies are neither confused
143: nor detected at 1.4~GHz, and thus are less than 2.5~mJy at 45\arcsec\,
144: resolution \citep{con98} and less than 1~mJy at 5\arcsec\, resolution
145: \citep{whi97}. From VLA data at 5~GHz and 5\arcsec\, resolution,
146: NGC\,4621 is less than 0.5~mJy \citep{wro91} and NGC\,4697 is less
147: than 0.6~mJy \citep{bir85}. From VLA data at 8.5~GHz and 10\arcsec\,
148: resolution, NGC\,4621 has a candidate LLAGN that is unresolved and has
149: a low-resolution flux density of 0.153$\pm$0.014~mJy \citep{wro00b}.
150: From VLA data at 8.5~GHz and about 3\arcsec\, resolution,
151: \citet{kra02} reported an upper limit for NGC\,4697; but the
152: sensitivity values claimed were not plausable given the exposure time
153: so the VLA archival data were analyzed following the strategies
154: outlined in \S~\ref{data-new} and leading to a 4 $\sigma$ upper limit
155: of 0.164~mJy for these low-resolution data.
156:
157: \subsection{Chandra}
158:
159: X-ray data for the galaxies were retrieved from the {\em Chandra\/}
160: archives. These galaxies were observed with the ACIS-S3
161: back-illuminated CCD chip. The data were reprocessed and then
162: analyzed with the CIAO version 3.2 software package. Background
163: levels were low and stable. The UT observation date and net exposure
164: times appear in Table~2. Corrections were made for known aspect
165: offsets\footnote{
166: http://cxc.harvard.edu/cal/ASPECT/fix\_offset/fix\_offset.cgi}.
167:
168: Figures~1 and 2 show the resulting images in the full (0.5-8~keV),
169: soft (0.5-2~keV) and hard (2-8~keV) energy ranges. Several X-ray
170: sources are seen in the central regions of each galaxy. This work
171: focuses on the nearest and brightest X-ray sources to the NED/2MASS
172: centroid positions marked in Figures~1 and 2. For those X-ray
173: sources, the WAVDETECT tool was used to measure their positions in the
174: full energy range; the parameters used in the detection procedure are
175: given in \citet{ter03}. The X-ray positions of these candidate LLAGNs
176: are given in Table~2 along with the diameter of the position error
177: circle, 1.2\arcsec\, at the 90\% confidence limit\footnote{
178: http://cxc.harvard.edu/cal/ASPECT/celmon}. These X-ray positions are
179: also marked in Figures~1 and 2.
180:
181: \placefigure{fig1}
182:
183: \placefigure{fig2}
184:
185: Spectra were extracted from circular regions centered at the X-ray
186: positions of the candidate LLAGNs. Extraction radii of 2.5 pixels
187: (1.2\arcsec) and 3 pixels (1.5\arcsec) were used for NGC\,4621 and
188: NGC\,4697, respectively, to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio and to
189: minimize the contribution from adjacent emission. Spectra of the
190: background were taken from an off-nuclear region in the same field of
191: view and subtracted from the source spectra. Each spectral bin
192: contains 12 and 10 counts for NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697, respectively.
193: Thus a Gaussian approximation of a Poisson distribution is not
194: appropriate and a chi-squared method cannot be used for parameter
195: estimation. Instead, the $C$ statistic, a likelihood defined by using
196: a Poisson distribution, was employed \citep{cas79}. Spectral fits
197: were performed by using XSPEC version 11.3. The spectra were fitted
198: with a power-law model modified by the total absorption along the line
199: of sight, thus including contributions both from the Galaxy and
200: intrinsic to the elliptical galaxies. The best-fit parameters and
201: errors appear in Table~1. Quoted errors are at the 90\% confidence
202: level for one parameter of interest. Table~1 also gives the $C$
203: statistic per number of spectral bins, an indicator of the quality of
204: the fit. The fitted absorption columns are consistent with the
205: Galactic values of 2.2 and 2.1 $\times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ for
206: NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697, respectively \citep{dic90}. The spectra and
207: best-fit models are shown in Figure~3.
208:
209: \placefigure{fig3}
210:
211: In addition to the candidate LLAGNs, Figures~1 and 2 show several
212: faint X-ray sources as well as hints of extended soft X-ray emission.
213: To provide further information about the extended emission and the
214: population of discrete sources in each galaxy, adaptively-smoothed
215: images were made over the central 3\arcmin\, in the soft (0.5-2~keV)
216: energy band. These images appear in Figure~4.
217:
218: \placefigure{fig4}
219:
220: \section{New Data}\label{data-new}
221:
222: Under proposal code AW671, the VLA was used in the A configuration to
223: observe NGC\,4621 at 8.5~GHz using phase calibrator J1254+1141 and
224: NGC\,4697 at 8.5~GHz using phase calibrator J1246-0730. Phase
225: calibrator positions were taken from the Goddard VLBI global solution
226: 2004 f,
227: \footnote{http://gemini.gsfc.nasa.gov/solutions/2004f\_astro/} and had
228: one-dimensional errors at 1 $\sigma$ better than 1 mas. The switching
229: time between a galaxy and its phase calibrator was 460~s, while
230: switching angles were about 3\arcdeg\, or less. The {\em a priori\/}
231: pointing positions for NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697 were taken from
232: \citet{wro00b} and \citet{sar01}, respectively. Data were acquired in
233: dual circular polarizations with a bandwidth of 100~MHz. Observations
234: were made assuming a coordinate equinox of 2000. The UT observation
235: date and net exposure times appear in Table~2. Observations of
236: 3C\,286 were used to set the amplitude scale to an accuracy of about
237: 3\%. Twenty-two of 27 antennas provided data of acceptable quality,
238: with most of the data loss attributable to EVLA retrofitting
239: activities. The data were calibrated using the 2006 December 31
240: release of the NRAO AIPS software. No self-calibrations were
241: performed. No polarization calibration was performed, as only upper
242: limits on the galaxies' linear polarization percentages were sought.
243:
244: The AIPS task {\tt imagr} was used to form and deconvolve images of
245: the Stokes $I\/$ emission at 8.5~GHz from each galaxy. The images,
246: made with natural weighting to obtain the lowest 1 $\sigma$ noise
247: levels, appear in Figures~1 and 2. Each galaxy image was searched
248: within the NED/2MASS error circle for emission above 4 $\sigma$,
249: leading to the detection of an unresolved source, with diameter less
250: that 0.3\arcsec. Quadratic fits in the image plane yielded the peak
251: flux densities appearing in Table~1, along with their errors that are
252: quadratic sums of the 3\% scale error and $\sigma$. Those fits also
253: yielded the radio positions listed in Table~2 along with their 90\%
254: position-errors obtained from the quadratic sum of a term due to the
255: signal-to-noise ratio of the detection and a term due to the
256: phase-referencing strategies, estimated to be $\sigma = 0.1\arcsec$
257: (the errors in the phase calibrator positions were negligible). The
258: radio positions are marked in Figures~1 and 2. {\tt imagr} was also
259: used to form naturally-weighted images of Stokes $Q\/$ and $U\/$ from
260: each galaxy. Those images showed the same values for $\sigma$ as
261: their Stokes $I\/$ counterparts but led to no detections.
262:
263: \section{Implications from the Astrometry}\label{astrometry}
264:
265: Each of these nearby elliptical galaxies have been detected in the new
266: high-resolution VLA images shown in Figures~1 and 2. Each
267: high-resolution radio detection occurs within the error circle for the
268: galaxy centroid position. Thus each galaxy harbors a bona fide LLAGN
269: that has been localized at radio frequencies with subarcsecond
270: accuracy. The position of the high-resolution radio detection of
271: NGC\,4621 is consistent with the previous radio detection at low
272: resolution, which was taken to mark a candidate LLAGN. NGC\,4697 has
273: no prior radio detection and thus no prior radio astrometry.
274:
275: Candidate LLAGNs have been identified in the high-resolution {\em
276: Chandra\/} images derived from archival data and shown in Figures~1
277: and 2. The position of the candidate LLAGN in NGC\,4697 is consistent
278: with that reported for Source 1 by \citet{sar01}. NGC\,4621 has no
279: prior X-ray astrometry. Formally, the X-ray positions of these two
280: candidate LLAGNs are consistent with the centroid positions of the
281: host galaxies from NED/2MASS.
282:
283: For NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697, the separations between the
284: high-resolution radio and X-ray positions are about 0.6\arcsec\, and
285: 0.5\arcsec, respectively. The quadratic sum of the 1 $\sigma$ error
286: in the radio astrometry (0.1\arcsec) and the X-ray astrometry
287: (0.3\arcsec) is about 0.32\arcsec, leading to normalized separations
288: of $0.6\arcsec / 0.32\arcsec \sim 1.9$ for NGC\,4621 and $0.5\arcsec /
289: 0.32\arcsec \sim 1.6$ for NGC\,4697. These normalized separations are
290: less than 3, implying valid radio/X-ray matches for both galaxies
291: \citep{con78}.
292:
293: Thus the X-ray positions of the candidate LLAGNs are consistent with
294: the positions of their high-resolution radio detections, meaning that
295: NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697 each host a bona fide LLAGN that has been
296: identified at both X-ray and radio frequencies. The X-ray sources are
297: therefore referred to as LLAGNs in Table~2 and Figure~3.
298:
299: \section{Implications from the Photometry}\label{photometry}
300:
301: \subsection{X-Ray Properties}
302:
303: From Table~1, the X-ray luminosities of the LLAGNs in NGC\,4621 and
304: NGC\,4697 conform to the luminosity limit of $L(2-10~keV) <
305: 10^{42}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$ for the X-ray definition of a LLAGN
306: \citep{ter03}. The tabulated photon indices conform to the range of
307: values, 1.6 to 2.0, shown by other LLAGNs \citep{ter03}. The X-ray
308: photometry given in Table~1 for the LLAGN in NGC\,4697 is consistent
309: with that reported for Source 1 by \citet{sar01} and \citet{sor06a}.
310: Also, the latter study analyses data from 2000 and from 2003-2004, and
311: finds no evidence for significant spectral or luminosity changes over
312: that long term.
313:
314: NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697 each host a supermassive black hole with
315: $M_\bullet > 10^8 M_\odot$, for which the characteristic Eddington
316: luminosity is $L(Edd) > 10^{46}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$ (Table~1). In stark
317: contrast, the observed X-ray luminosities are lower by about 9 orders
318: of magnitude, and using them as a proxy for a bolometric luminosity,
319: the black holes energizing the LLAGNs in NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697 are
320: found to have Eddington ratios $L(2-10~keV) / L(Edd) \sim 10^{-9}$
321: (Table~1). Such ratios are very sub-Eddington.
322:
323: \subsection{Radio and Circumnuclear Properties}
324:
325: For the LLAGN in NGC\,4621, the flux density at 8.5~GHz measured at a
326: resolution of about 10\arcsec\, (880~pc) in 1999 (\S~\ref{data-old})
327: is higher than that measured at a resolution of 0.3\arcsec\, (26~pc)
328: in 2006 (Table~1). This difference could arise from time variability
329: and/or from source resolution effects in NGC\,4621. Variability on
330: typical timescales of a few days has been established at 8.5~GHz for
331: other LLAGNs \citep{and05}. A difference due to source resolution
332: effects in NGC\,4621 could be linked to jet-like emission driven by
333: the LLAGN, or to the stellar substructures on scales of about
334: 2\arcsec\, (180~pc) that are traced either kinematically \citep{wer02}
335: or photometrically \citep{kra04}. But a stellar origin seems unlikely
336: for two reasons. First, the Palomar spectrum shows only an old
337: stellar population \citep{ho03a}. Second, if the flux-density
338: difference arises from star formation, then converting it to 1.4~GHz
339: with a spectral index of -0.7 implies a star-formation rate of about
340: 0.0045 $M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$ \citep{yun01}, for which the H$\alpha$
341: luminosity \citep{ken98} would be about 6 times higher than its
342: observed upper limit \citep{ho03a}. The left panel of Figure~4 shows
343: a population of discrete X-ray sources, presumably low-mass X-ray
344: binaries. There also appears to be soft X-ray emission on a scale of
345: a few kiloparsecs, but this faint emission may partly arise from
346: blends of discrete sources and, based on Figure~4, it will be
347: difficult to characterize the diffuse gas potentially available for
348: accretion onto the black hole.
349:
350: For the LLAGN in NGC\,4697, the flux-density upper limit at 8.5~GHz
351: measured at a resolution of about 3\arcsec\, (170~pc) in 2000
352: (\S~\ref{data-old}) is consistent with the detection at a resolution
353: of 0.3\arcsec\, (17~pc) in 2006 (Table~1). NGC\,4697 has a probable
354: stellar cluster centered on a dusty disk with a diameter of 7\arcsec\,
355: (400~pc) \citep{sor06a}. The right panel of Figure~4 shows evidence
356: for soft X-ray emission on a scale of a few kiloparsecs, consistent
357: with prior reports by \citet{sar01} and \citet{sor06a}. This diffuse
358: emission is characterized by a ``temperature'' of 0.33~keV and a
359: central gas density of 0.02~cm$^{-3}$; this gas, as well as the gas
360: released by the stellar populations, is potentially available for
361: accretion within the black hole's sphere of influence of diameter
362: 0.76\arcsec\, (44~pc) \citep{sor06a,sor06b}. The right panel of
363: Figure~4 also shows a population of discrete X-ray sources, identified
364: as low-mass X-ray binaries in prior studies \citep{sar01,sor06a}.
365:
366: \subsection{Radio Loudness}
367:
368: The study of Palomar LLAGNs using {\em Chandra\/}, the VLA, and the
369: VLBA found that the majority are radio loud, defined as $log~R_X =
370: log~\nu L_{\nu}(5~GHz) / L(2-10~keV) = -4.5$ or higher \citep{ter03}.
371: That study involved radio sources with flat or inverted spectra, so
372: the cited definition applies equally well at 8.5~GHz as at 5~GHz. As
373: shown in Table~1, the emission from the quiescent black holes in
374: NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697 is radio-loud, with $log~R_X = log~\nu
375: L_{\nu}(8.5~GHz) / L(2-10~keV) \sim -2$. Since radio continuum
376: emission is outflow-dominated \citep{nag05}, this suggests the
377: presence of a radio outflow on scales less that 26~pc in NGC\,4621 and
378: less than 17~pc in NGC\,4697 (\S~\ref{data-new}). Baring strong
379: projection effects, the length scale of the 8.5-GHz emission from
380: NGC\,4697 would place it inside the black hole's sphere of influence
381: \citep{sor06a,sor06b}.
382:
383: \subsection{The Radio--X-ray--Mass Relation}
384:
385: A relationship among radio luminosity, X-ray luminosity and black-hole
386: mass was discovered by \citet{mer03} and \citet{fal04} for
387: accretion-powered systems. For LLAGNs in particular this so-called
388: fundamental plane (FP) relation supports the idea that they are
389: massive analogs of black hole X-ray binaries in the low/hard state,
390: with Eddington ratios of about $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-3}$. Within this
391: framework, general models for the central engine of a LLAGN
392: \citep[e.g.,][]{yua02b} contain (1) a cool, optically-thick,
393: geometically-thin accretion disk with a truncated inner radius; (2) a
394: hot, radiatively-inefficient accretion flow (RIAF) interior to the
395: truncation radius; and (3) an outflow/jet. Application of such models
396: to black hole X-ray binaries in the low/hard state can lead to strong
397: tests involving both spectral and timing properties. For example, the
398: coupled accretion-jet model of \citet{yua05a} was successfully tested
399: in this way. The outflow emission in that model was treated using the
400: internal-shock picture widely applied to gamma-ray bursts. For the
401: low/hard binary tested, the outflow dominated the radio and infrared
402: emission, the thin disk dominated the UV emission, the hot RIAF
403: dominated the X-ray emission, and all three components contributed to
404: the optical emission. In addition, the \citet{yua05a} model was shown
405: to be consistent with the FP relation \citep{yua05b}. Cast in the
406: notation of Table~1, the FP relation of \citet{mer03} is $log \nu
407: L_\nu(5~GHz) = 0.60 log L(2-10 keV) + 0.78 log (M_\bullet/M_\odot) +
408: 7.33$, with a scatter of $\sigma = 0.88$. Given this large scatter,
409: the relation can be use to estimate the 8.5-GHz luminosity $\nu
410: L_\nu(8.5~GHz)$ expected for NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697 from their black
411: hole masses and X-ray luminosities (Table~1). These FP-based
412: predictions are $\nu L_\nu(8.5~GHz) \sim 4.0 \times 10^{36}$ ergs
413: s$^{-1}$ for NGC\,4621 and $\nu L_\nu(8.5~GHz) \sim 1.4 \times
414: 10^{36}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ for NGC\,4697. Although these predictions have
415: uncertainties of almost an order of magnitude, both are about that
416: amount below the galaxys' observed $\nu L_\nu(8.5~GHz)$ listed in
417: Table~1.
418:
419: The black holes in NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697 are very sub-Eddington,
420: featuring ratios of about $10^{-9}$ (Table~1). For other similar
421: systems, departures from the FP relation have been suggested
422: \citep[e.g.,][]{fen03,mar05}. Within the context of the coupled
423: accretion-jet model \citep{yua05a} described above, the very
424: sub-Eddington ratios for NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697 place them in the
425: model's so-called quiescent regime \citep{yua05b}. Moreover, the
426: black holes in NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697 are able to generate radio
427: emission which, as argued in the previous subsection, is plausibly
428: jet-like. Thus the ``if the jet persists'' caveat for the quiescent
429: regime seems to be fulfulled, and motivates application of the
430: radio--X-ray--mass relation for the quiescent regime \citep{yua05b}.
431: Cast in the notation of Table~1, that quiescent relation is $log \nu
432: L_\nu(8.5~GHz) = 1.23 log L(2-10 keV) + 0.25 log (M_\bullet/M_\odot) -
433: 13.45$, and the black hole masses and X-ray luminosities in Table~1
434: yield the predicted radio luminosities $\nu L_{\nu}(8.5~GHz)$
435: appearing in Table~1. Those predicted radio luminosities agree, to
436: within a factor of a few, with the observed radio luminosities, also
437: listed in Table~1. Significantly, the radio--X-ray--mass relation for
438: the quiescent regime invokes X-ray emission from the outflow rather
439: than from an accretion flow. Also, \citet{yua05b} note that their
440: index for the quiescent relation, 1.23, is in general agreement with
441: earlier pure outflow models \citep[e.g.,][]{hei04}.
442:
443: In the coupled accretion-jet model \citep{yua05a}, the outflow/jet
444: generates synchrotron emission which is optically-thick near 8.5~GHz
445: and optically-thin at hard X-rays. In the model's quiescent regime
446: \citep{yua05b}, the emission from the outflow dominates over that from
447: any thin disk and any hot RIAF. Specifically, the spectral energy
448: distribution of the outflow curves smoothly across the electromagnetic
449: spectrum, and photon indices near 2, like those observed (Table~1),
450: seem achievable in the hard X-rays \citep{yua05b}. For comparison,
451: Comptonization in a RIAF acts as a natural thermostat, limiting the
452: electron temperature to about 100~keV. At the very low accretion
453: rates associated with the quiescent regime, any feeble RIAF would
454: generate 100-keV bremsstrahlung emission which has a photon index of
455: 1.3 in the {\em Chandra\/} band. Such an index is not consistent with
456: the measured value for NGC\,4621 but is just consistent with the
457: measured value for NGC\,4697 (Table~1). In the latter case, some
458: bremsstrahlung contribution to the 2-10~keV luminosity could account
459: for the model's slight overprediction of the 8.5-GHz luminosity.
460:
461: \section{Summary and Future Directions}\label{summary}
462:
463: Analysis of {\em Chandra\/} data and VLA data shows that the nearby
464: elliptical galaxies NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697 each contain a
465: low-luminosity active galactic nucleus (LLAGN), identified as a faint,
466: hard X-ray source that is astrometrically coincident with a faint
467: 8.5-GHz source. These frequency regions benefit from high contrast
468: against the stellar emission, little or no obscuration, and
469: subarcsecond angular resolution and astrometry.
470:
471: The massive black holes energizing these LLAGNs have Eddington ratios
472: $L(2-10~keV) / L(Edd) \sim 10^{-9}$, placing them in the quiescent
473: regime. These quiescent black holes are radio-loud emitters,
474: suggesting the presence of a radio outflow. Application of the
475: radio--X-ray--mass relation from Yuan \& Cui for quiescent black holes
476: predicts the observed radio luminosiites $\nu L_{\nu}(8.5~GHz)$ to
477: within a factor of a few. Importantly, that relation invokes X-ray
478: emission from the outflow rather than from an accretion flow. In the
479: radio and X-ray regions, the faint, but detectable, emission from
480: these two massive black holes is therefore consistent with being
481: outflow-dominated.
482:
483: Clearly, the spectral energy distributions of the LLAGNs in NGC\,4621
484: and NGC\,4697 need to be measured across the electromagnetic spectrum.
485: Deep VLA observations at frequencies of 1-50 GHz would test the Yuan
486: \& Cui prediction of optically-thick emission from the LLAGNs, as well
487: as enable searches for faint, jet-like structures adjacent to the
488: LLAGNs. Also, short-term variability on timescales of a few days has
489: been found at 8.5~GHz for other LLAGNs \citep{and05}. For each of the
490: LLAGNs in NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697, evidence for short-term, correlated
491: variability between the radio source and the X-ray source would
492: strengthen the case for their common, outflow origin. Finally, more
493: cases like NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4697 are needed to better define the
494: population of quiescent LLAGNs, and the improved sensitivity of the
495: Expanded VLA will help enormously on this front \citep{ulv06}.
496:
497: \acknowledgments We acknowledge the valuable feedback from an
498: anonymous referee.
499:
500: {\it Facilities:} \facility{{\em Chandra}}, \facility{VLA}.
501:
502: \begin{thebibliography}{}
503: \bibitem[Anderson \& Ulvestad(2005)]{and05} Anderson, J. M., \&
504: Ulvestad, J. S. 2005, \apj, 627, 674
505: \bibitem[Bietenholz et al.(2000)]{bie00} Bietenholz, M. F., Bartel,
506: N., \& Rupen, M. P. 2000, \apj, 532, 895
507: \bibitem[Birkinshaw \& Davies(1985)]{bir85} Birkinshaw, M., \& Davies,
508: R. L. 1985, \apj, 291, 32
509: \bibitem[Cash(1979)]{cas79} Cash, W. 1979, \apj, 228, 939
510: \bibitem[Condon \& Dressel(1978)]{con78} Condon, J. J., \& Dressel,
511: L. L. 1978, \apj, 221, 456
512: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1998)]{con98} Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D.,
513: Greisen, E. W., Yin, Q. F., Perley, R. A., Taylor, G. B., \&
514: Broderick, J. J. 1998, \aj, 115, 1693
515: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{dic90} Dickey, J. M., \& Lockman,
516: F. J. 1990, \araa, 28, 215
517: \bibitem[Falcke \& Biermann(1999)]{fal99} Falcke, H., \& Biermann,
518: P. L. 1999, \aap, 342, 49
519: \bibitem[Falcke \& Markoff(2000)]{fal00} Falcke, H., \& Markoff, S.
520: 2000, \aap, 362, 113
521: \bibitem[Falcke et al.(2004)]{fal04} Falcke, H., Koerding, E., \&
522: Markoff, S. 2004, \aap, 414, 895
523: \bibitem[Fender et al.(2003)]{fen03} Fender, R. P., Gallo, E., \&
524: Jonker, P. G. 2003, \mnras, 343, L99
525: \bibitem[Heinz(2004)]{hei04} Heinz, S. 2004, \mnras, 355, 835
526: \bibitem[Ho(2004)]{ho04} Ho, L. C.. 2004, Coevolution of Black Holes
527: and Galaxies, ed. L. C. Ho (Cambridge: CUP), 292
528: \bibitem[Ho et al.(1997)]{ho97} Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V., \&
529: Sargent, W. L. W. 1997, \apjs, 112, 315
530: \bibitem[Ho et al.(2001)]{ho01} Ho, L. C., et al. 2001, \apj, 549, L51
531: \bibitem[Ho et al.(2003a)]{ho03a} Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V., \&
532: Sargent, W. L. W. 2003a, \apj, 583, 159
533: \bibitem[Ho et al.(2003b)]{ho03b} Ho, L. C., Terashima, Y., \&
534: Ulvestad, J. S. 2003b, \apj, 589, 783
535: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{ken98} Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. 1998, \araa,
536: 36, 189
537: \bibitem[Kormendy(2004)]{kor04} Kormendy, J. 2004, Coevolution of
538: Black Holes and Galaxies, ed. L. C. Ho (Cambridge: CUP), 1
539: \bibitem[Krajnovic \& Jaffe(2002)]{kra02} Krajnovic, D., \& Jaffe,
540: W. 2002, \aap, 390, 423
541: \bibitem[Krajnovic \& Jaffe(2004)]{kra04} Krajnovic, D., \& Jaffe,
542: W. 2004, \aap, 428, 877
543: \bibitem[Livio et al.(1999)]{liv99} Livio, M., Ogilvie, G. I., \&
544: Pringle, J. E. 1999, \apj, 512, 100
545: \bibitem[Markoff(2005)]{mar05} Markoff, S. 2005, \apj, 618, L103
546: \bibitem[Meier(2001)]{mei01} Meier, D. L. 2001, \apj, 548, L9
547: \bibitem[Merloni et al.(2003)]{mer03} Merloni, A., Heinz, S., \&
548: Di Matteo, T. 2003, \mnras, 345, 1057
549: \bibitem[Nagar et al.(2005)]{nag05} Nagar, N. M., Falcke, H., \& Wilson,
550: A. S. 2005, \aap, 435, 521
551: \bibitem[Narayan et al.(1995)]{nar95} Narayan, R., Yi, I., Mahadevan,
552: R. 1995, \nat, 374, 623
553: \bibitem[Pellegrini(2005)]{pel05} Pellegrini, S. 2005, \apj, 624,
554: 155
555: \bibitem[Pinkney et al.(2005)]{pin05} Pinkney, J., et al. 2005, \apj,
556: 596, 903
557: \bibitem[Ravindranath et al.(2002)]{rav02} Ravindranath, S., Ho,
558: L. C., \& Filippenko, A. V.\ 2002, \apj, 566, 801
559: \bibitem[Sarazin et al.(2001)]{sar01} Sarazin, C. L., Irwin, J. A., \&
560: Bregman, J. M. 2001, \apj, 556, 533
561: \bibitem[Soria et al.(2006a)]{sor06a} Soria, R., et al. 2006a, \apj,
562: 640, 126
563: \bibitem[Soria et al.(2006b)]{sor06b} Soria, R., et al. 2006b, \apj,
564: 640, 143
565: \bibitem[Terashima \& Wilson(2003)]{ter03} Terashima, Y., \& Wilson,
566: A. S. 2003, \apj, 583, 145
567: \bibitem[Terashima et al.(2005)]{ter05} Terashima, Y., Ho, L. C., \&
568: Ulvestad, J. S. 2005, The Interplay among Black Holes, Stars and ISM
569: in Galactic Nuclei, IAUS 222, eds. T. Storchi-Bergmann et al.
570: (Cambridge: CUP), 61
571: \bibitem[Thompson et al.(1980)]{tho80} Thompson, A. R., Clark, B. G.,
572: Wade, C. M., Napier, P. J., 1980, \apjs, 44, 151
573: \bibitem[Tremaine et al.(2002)]{tre02} Tremaine, S., et al. 2002,
574: \apj, 574, 740
575: \bibitem[Ulvestad et al.(2006)]{ulv06} Ulvestad, J. S., Perley, R. A.,
576: McKinnon, M. M., Owen, F. N., Dewdney, P. E., \& Rodriguez, L. F.
577: 2006, \baas, 38, 135
578: \bibitem[Wernli et al.(2002)]{wer02} Wernli, F., Emsellem, E., \&
579: Copin, Y. \aap, 396, 73
580: \bibitem[White et al.(1997)]{whi97} White, R. L., Becker, R. H.,
581: Helfand, D. J., \& Gregg, M. D. 1997, \apj, 475, 479
582: \bibitem[Wrobel \& Heeschen(1991)]{wro91} Wrobel, J. M., \& Heeschen,
583: D. S. 1991, \aj, 101, 148
584: \bibitem[Wrobel \& Herrnstein(2000)]{wro00b} Wrobel, J. M., \&
585: Herrnstein, J. R. 2000, \apj, 533, L111
586: \bibitem[Yuan et al.(2000a)]{yua02a} Yuan, F., Markoff, S., \& Falcke,
587: H. 2000a, \aap, 383, 854
588: \bibitem[Yuan et al.(2000b)]{yua02b} Yuan, F., Markoff, S., Falcke,
589: H., \& Biermann, P. L. 2000b, \aap, 391, 139
590: \bibitem[Yuan et al.(2005)]{yua05a} Yuan, F., Cui, W., \& Narayan, R.
591: 2005, \apj, 620, 905
592: \bibitem[Yuan \& Cui(2005)]{yua05b} Yuan, F. \& Cui, W. 2005, \apj,
593: 629, 408
594: \bibitem[Yun et al.(2001)]{yun01} Yun, M. S., Reddy, N. A., \& Condon,
595: J. J. 2001, \apj, 554, 803
596: \end{thebibliography}
597: \clearpage
598:
599: \begin{figure}
600: \plotone{f1.cps}
601: \caption{Images of the central 6\arcsec\, (530 pc) of NGC\,4621. The
602: symbols mark positions and their errors at the 90\% confidence level.
603: The NED/2MASS position of the galaxy centroid is marked with a circle,
604: while the octagon marks the {\em Chandra\/} position of the nearest
605: and brightest source to the NED/2MASS position. The high-resolution
606: VLA position from this work is marked with a cross with a gap. {\em
607: Top left:\/} {\em Chandra\/} image at 0.5-8 keV with a peak of 16
608: counts. {\em Top right:\/} {\em Chandra\/} image at 0.5-2 keV with a
609: peak of 12 counts. {\em Bottom left:\/} {\em Chandra\/} image at 2-8
610: keV with a peak of 5 counts. In the {\em Chandra\/} images, the
611: coordinate labels are relative to the aim point (to convey that
612: astrometric distortions should be negligible) and the logarithmic
613: color scale spans zero to the peak. {\em Bottom right:\/} VLA image
614: of Stokes $I\/$ emission at a frequency of 8.460~GHz. Coordinate
615: labels are relative to the pointing position. Natural weighting was
616: used, giving an rms noise of 0.018~mJy~beam$^{-1}$ (1 $\sigma$) and
617: beam dimensions at FWHM of 0.32\arcsec\, $\times$ 0.29\arcsec\, with
618: elongation PA = -30\arcdeg\, (hatched ellipse). Contours are at -6,
619: -4, -2, 2, 4, and 6 times 1 $\sigma$. Negative contours are dashed
620: and positive ones are solid. Linear color scale spans
621: -0.06~mJy~beam$^{-1}$ to 0.20~mJy~beam$^{-1}$.}\label{fig1}
622: \end{figure}
623: \clearpage
624:
625: \begin{figure}
626: \plotone{f2.cps}
627: \caption{Images of the central 6\arcsec\, (340 pc) of NGC\,4697. In
628: the {\em Chandra\/} images the peaks are 18 counts {\em (top left)},
629: 14 counts {\em (top right)\/} and 6 counts {\em (bottom left)}. In
630: the VLA image the noise is 0.017~mJy~beam$^{-1}$ (1 $\sigma$) and the
631: beam dimensions at FWHM are 0.37\arcsec\, $\times$ 0.28\arcsec\, with
632: elongation PA = -6\arcdeg\, {\em (bottom right)}. Otherwise as for
633: Figure~1.}\label{fig2}
634: \end{figure}
635: \clearpage
636:
637: \begin{figure}
638: \plotone{f3.eps}
639: \caption{{\em Chandra\/} spectra of the LLAGNs in NGC\,4621 {\em
640: (left)\/} and NGC\,4697 {\em (right)}. Each top panel shows crosses
641: for the data and a histogram for the model. Each bottom panel shows
642: the ratio of the data to the model, a preferred diagnostic when the
643: $C$-statistic is employed.}\label{fig3}
644: \end{figure}
645: \clearpage
646:
647: \begin{figure}
648: \plottwo{f4a.eps}{f4b.eps}
649: \caption{Adaptively-smoothed {\em Chandra\/} images at 0.5-2 keV with
650: contours spaced by factors of the square root of 2.
651: {\em Left:\/} Central 3\arcmin\, (16 kpc) of NGC\,4621. Lowest
652: contour is 0.007 and peak is 6.8, in units of smoothed counts.
653: {\em Right:\/} Central 3\arcmin\, (10 kpc) of NGC\,4697. Lowest
654: contour is 0.02 and peak is 39, in units of smoothed
655: counts.}\label{fig4}
656: \end{figure}
657: \clearpage
658:
659: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
660: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
661: \tablecolumns{5}
662: \tablewidth{0pc}
663: \tablecaption{Parameters of the LLAGNs}\label{tab1}
664: \tablehead{
665: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{NGC\,4621} & \colhead{Ref.} &
666: \colhead{NGC\,4697} & \colhead{Ref.}}
667: \startdata
668: $D$ (Mpc) & 18.2 & 1 & 11.7 & 2 \\
669: $s$ (pc arcsec$^{-1}$) & 88 & 1 & 57 & 2 \\
670: $M_\bullet$ ($10^8 M_\odot$) & 2.7 & 3 & 1.7 & 2 \\
671: $L(Edd)$ ($10^{46}$ ergs s$^{-1}$) & 3.5 & 3 & 2.2 & 2 \\
672: $N_{\rm H}$ ($10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$) & $<$18. & 4 & $<$8.4 & 4 \\
673: $\Gamma$ & 1.8$^{+0.8}_{-0.3}$ & 4 & 1.6$^{+0.5}_{-0.3}$ & 4 \\
674: $C$ statistic per number of spectral bins & 5/8 & 4 & 17/12 & 4 \\
675: $F(2-10~keV)$ ($10^{-14}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$) &
676: 2.1$^{+1.2}_{-1.0}$ & 4 & 1.7$\pm$0.7 & 4 \\
677: $L(2-10~keV)$ ($10^{37}$ ergs s$^{-1}$) & 6.6 & 4 & 2.2 & 4 \\
678: $L(2-10~keV) / L(Edd)$ ($10^{-9}$) & 1.9 & 4 & 1.0 & 4 \\
679: $S(8.5~GHz)$ (mJy) & 0.098$\pm$0.018 & 4 & 0.092$\pm$0.017 & 4 \\
680: Observed $\nu L_{\nu}(8.5~GHz)$ ($10^{35}$ ergs s$^{-1}$)
681: & 3.3 & 4 & 1.3 & 4 \\
682: $log~R_X=log~\nu L_{\nu}(8.5~GHz)/L(2-10~keV)$ & -2.3 & 4 & -2.2 & 4 \\
683: Predicted $\nu L_{\nu}(8.5~GHz)$ ($10^{35}$ ergs s$^{-1}$)
684: & 1.5 & 5 & 3.5 & 5 \\
685: \enddata
686: \tablecomments{
687: Row~(1): Surface-brightness-fluctuation distance.
688: Row~(2): Scale.
689: Row~(3): Mass of black hole.
690: Row~(4): Eddington luminosity of black hole.
691: Row~(5): Galactic plus intrinsic column density.
692: Row~(6): Photon index.
693: Row~(7): $C$ statistic (Cash 1979).
694: Row~(8): 2-10 keV flux.
695: Row~(9): 2-10 keV luminosity.
696: Row~(10): Eddington ratio.
697: Row~(11): 8.5~GHz flux density.
698: Row~(12): Observed radio luminosity.
699: Row~(13): Radio loudness.
700: Row~(14): Predicted radio luminosity.}
701: \tablerefs{(1) Ravindranath et al. 2002; (2) Pellegrini 2005; (3)
702: Tremaine et al. 2002; (4) this work; (5) Yuan \& Cui 2005}
703: \end{deluxetable}
704: \clearpage
705:
706: \begin{deluxetable}{llcllcccc}
707: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
708: \tablecolumns{9}
709: \tablewidth{0pc}
710: \tablecaption{Astrometry of the Galaxy Components}\label{tab2}
711: \tablehead{
712: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} &
713: \colhead{R.A.} & \colhead{Decl.} & \colhead{Error} &
714: \colhead{} & \colhead{Exposure} & \colhead{} \\
715: \colhead{Galaxy} & \colhead{Component} & \colhead{Region} &
716: \colhead{(J2000)} & \colhead{(J2000)} & \colhead{(\arcsec)} &
717: \colhead{Date} & \colhead{(s)} & \colhead{Ref.} \\
718: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} &
719: \colhead{(4)} & \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} &
720: \colhead{(7)} & \colhead{(8)} & \colhead{(9)} }
721: \startdata
722: NGC\,4621 ...
723: & Galaxy centroid
724: &K& 12 42 02.32 & 11 38 48.9 & 2.1 & \nodata & \nodata & 1\\
725: & LLAGN
726: &X& 12 42 02.25 & 11 38 49.5 & 1.2 & 2001 Aug 1 & 24837 & 2\\
727: & LLAGN
728: &R& 12 42 02.256 & 11 38 48.93 & 0.43 & 2006 Apr 21 & 6630 & 2\\
729: NGC\,4697 ...
730: & Galaxy centroid
731: &K& 12 48 35.91 & -05 48 03.1 & 2.1 & \nodata & \nodata & 1\\
732: & LLAGN
733: &X& 12 48 35.87 & -05 48 02.6 & 1.2 & 2000 Jan 15-16 & 39260 & 2\\
734: & LLAGN
735: &R& 12 48 35.897 & -05 48 02.38 & 0.43 & 2006 Apr 21 & 6060 & 2\\
736: \enddata
737: \tablecomments{
738: Col.~(1): Galaxy name.
739: Col.~(2): Nuclear component.
740: Col.~(3): Frequency region coded as K for near-infrared, R for radio
741: at 8.5~GHz and X for X-ray.
742: Cols.~(4) and (5): Component position. Units of right ascension are
743: hours, minutes, and seconds, and units of declination are degrees,
744: arcminutes, and arcseconds.
745: Col.~(6): Diameter of error circle at 90\% confidence level.
746: Col.~(7): UT observation date.
747: Col.~(8): Exposure time.
748: Col.~(9): Reference.}
749: \tablerefs{(1) NED/2MASS; (2) this work.}
750: \end{deluxetable}
751: \clearpage
752: \end{document}
753: