1: %\documentclass[longnamesfirst,apjl]{emulateapj}
2: %\usepackage{apjfonts,natbib,epsfig}
3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: \usepackage{natbib,epsfig}
5: %\bibliographystyle{apj3}
6: \tighten
7:
8: \newcommand{\z}{{\it z}}
9: \newcommand{\zre}{{\it z$_{reion}$}}
10: \newcommand{\sst}{{\it Spitzer}}
11: \newcommand{\um}{$\mu$m}
12: \newcommand{\mun}{M$_{\sun}$~Mpc$^{-3}$}
13: \newcommand{\lun}{L$_{\sun}$~Mpc$^{-3}$}
14:
15: \slugcomment{To appear in the {\it Astrophysical Journal}}
16: \shorttitle{High Redshift Stellar IMF}
17: \shortauthors{Chary}
18:
19: \begin{document}
20:
21: \title{The Stellar Initial Mass Function at the Epoch of Reionization}
22:
23: \author{Ranga-Ram Chary\altaffilmark{1}}
24: \altaffiltext{1}{{\it Spitzer} Science Center MS220-6, California Institute of
25: Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; {\tt rchary@caltech.edu}}
26: %\altaffiltext{2}{Institute for Theory \& Computation, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, MS-51,
27: %60 Garden Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138}
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30:
31: I provide estimates of the ultraviolet and visible light luminosity density at $z\sim6$
32: after accounting for the contribution from
33: faint galaxies below the detection limit of deep {\it Hubble} and {\it Spitzer}
34: surveys. I find the rest-frame $V-$band luminosity density is a factor
35: of $\sim2-3$ below the ultraviolet luminosity density at $z\sim$6. This implies that the
36: maximal
37: age of the stellar population at $z\sim6$, for a Salpeter initial mass function, and a single,
38: passively evolving burst, must be $\lesssim$100 Myr.
39: If the stars in $z\sim6$ galaxies are remnants of the star-formation
40: that was responsible for ionizing the intergalactic medium, reionization must have been a brief
41: process that was completed at $z<7$. This
42: assumes the most current estimates of the clumping factor and escape fraction and
43: a Salpeter slope extending up to 200 M$_{\sun}$ for the stellar initial mass
44: function (IMF; dN/dM$\propto$M$^{\alpha}$, $\alpha=-2.3$).
45: Unless the ratio of the clumping factor to escape fraction is less than 60,
46: a Salpeter slope for the stellar IMF and reionization redshift higher than 7 is ruled out. In order to maintain an
47: ionized intergalactic medium from redshift 9 onwards, the stellar IMF must have a
48: slope of $\alpha=-1.65$ even if stars as massive as $\sim$200\,M$_{\sun}$ are formed. Correspondingly,
49: if the intergalactic medium was ionized from redshift 11 onwards, the IMF must have $\alpha\sim-1.5$.
50: The range of stellar mass densities at $z\sim6$ straddled by IMFs which result in reionization at $z>7$
51: is 1.3$\pm$0.4$\times$10$^{7}$~\mun.
52:
53: \end{abstract}
54:
55: \keywords{galaxies: stellar content --- galaxies: high-redshift ---
56: early universe}
57:
58: \section{Introduction}
59:
60: Deep optical/infrared imaging surveys with {\it Hubble} and {\it Spitzer} are providing an unprecedented
61: opportunity to study star-forming galaxies at high redshifts. It is increasingly clear that these
62: star-forming galaxies are responsible for reionizing the intergalactic medium (IGM), a process which seems to
63: complete by $z\sim6$ \citep{Becker:01, Fan:06}. The shape
64: of the luminosity function of
65: high redshift active galactic nuclei detected by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) indicates that ionizing
66: photons from supermassive
67: black holes fall many orders of magnitude short of the minimum required to ionize the IGM \citep{Fan:01}.
68: Even the current star-formation in Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs) at $z\sim6$ as measured by \citet{Bouwens06, Bouwens:07},
69: falls about a factor of $6-9$ below the minimum required
70: to maintain an ionized IGM for canonical estimates of two
71: key parameters, the clumping factor of the gas and the escape fraction, assuming a Salpeter initial mass function (IMF).
72: One possibility is that the contribution from star-formation
73: in faint galaxies, below the detection threshold of current surveys, is higher than has been estimated. This
74: translates to a faint end slope for the galaxy ultraviolet luminosity function of $-1.9$, a value
75: that is considerably steeper than the value of $-1.74$ that has currently been measured \citep{Bouwens:07}. Evidence
76: for such a steep slope is present in estimates of star-formation rate densities derived from the comoving gamma-ray
77: burst number density \citep{Chary:07a}. However, that measurement
78: has large uncertainties limited by the small number of high redshift GRBs currently known and the uncertain conversion
79: between GRB number density and star-formation rate density.
80:
81: An alternate possibility is that the star-formation rate in galaxies currently detected at $z\sim6$ was higher
82: in the past. This implies that the ultraviolet luminosity function of galaxies must show luminosity evolution
83: between $z\sim6$ and higher redshifts. Although constraints on the ultraviolet luminosity function at
84: higher redshift are difficult to obtain from existing data, the upper limits on bright Lyman-break galaxies
85: at $z>>6$, seem to rule out such an evolution \citep{Bouwens:04}. In fact, the upper limits seem to suggest a negative
86: evolution with increasing redshift, in the sense that galaxies
87: at the bright end of the UV luminosity function at $z\sim6$ were fainter at higher redshift in the ultraviolet. There
88: are no available constraints on the evolution of the faint end of the UV luminosity function at $z>6$.
89:
90: Measurement of the stellar mass density provides an alternate constraint
91: on the past history of star-formation. Deep
92: {\it Spitzer} surveys which detect the rest-frame visible light from high redshift galaxies allow the stellar
93: mass in galaxies at $z\sim6$ to be measured \citep{Yan:06, Stark:06, Eyles:05}. The galaxies which
94: are detected in rest-frame optical light, are primarily the brightest
95: galaxies in the ultraviolet. The stellar mass density directly inferred from the {\it Spitzer}
96: detections and stacking analysis are therefore, a lower limit.
97: By making reasonable assumptions for the rest-frame $V-$band luminosity of galaxies which are undetected in the {\it Spitzer}
98: data but seen in the ultraviolet,
99: it is possible to estimate the true co-moving stellar mass density at $z\sim6$.
100: Since the stars at $z\sim6$ are remnants of
101: star-formation at higher redshifts, we can use this stellar mass density estimate to
102: constrain the number of ionizing photons
103: produced by star-formation in the past
104: for comparison with the minimum number of photons required to keep the IGM ionized.
105:
106: At present, the exact redshift of reionization is not known. {\it Wilkinson} Microwave Anisotropy
107: Probe (WMAP) polarization measurements indicate
108: a large optical depth to scattering of microwave background photons suggesting that the
109: intergalactic medium (IGM) was ionized
110: at some time between redshifts of 7 and 14 \citep{Kogut:03, Spergel:07}.
111:
112: In this paper, we
113: estimate the optical and ultraviolet luminosity density at $z\sim6$ after correcting for faint galaxies
114: undetected by current surveys. We then calculate the stellar mass density and average age of the stellar population
115: in galaxies,
116: required to reproduce the luminosity density estimates for different shapes of the stellar IMF. We also quantify
117: the number of ionizing photons produced over the past history of the starburst
118: and assess if they are sufficient to ionize the IGM at $z>6$.
119: Finally, we constrain the stellar initial mass function at $z>6$ as a function of the
120: reionization history of the Universe.
121: A standard $\Omega_{\rm M}$=0.27, $\Omega_{\Lambda}$=0.73, H$_{\rm 0}$=71~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$ cosmology
122: is adopted throughout this paper.
123:
124: \section{Optical and Ultraviolet Luminosity Density at \z$\sim$6}
125:
126: Deep \sst\ imaging data which detects the rest-frame visible emission of $z>6$ galaxies has yielded the first constraints
127: on the stellar mass density at $z\sim6$. \citet{Yan:06} and \citet{Eyles:05} measured the IRAC
128: photometry of Lyman-break galaxies selected
129: using the $i-$dropout technique in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) fields. By fitting the multiband
130: photometry of each galaxy with population synthesis models and deriving the stellar mass of each galaxy, they
131: find a lower limit to the stellar mass density of $0.1-0.7\times10^{7}$~\mun,
132: assuming a Salpeter initial mass function.
133: The value is a lower limit since only the brightest galaxies in the ultraviolet are typically detected while many others
134: are blended with brighter foreground sources in the IRAC images.
135: At lower redshifts of $\z\sim5$, \citet{Stark:06} estimate the stellar mass density to be $0.6-1\times10^{7}$~\mun\ by combining
136: a spectroscopic and photometric redshift sample in GOODS-S. \citet{Chary} adopt an alternate technique where they fit for
137: the stellar masses of only a spectroscopic sample of galaxies at $5<z<6.5$ to derive a lower limit to the stellar mass density
138: of 0.3$-$1.1$\times10^{6}$~\mun\ at $z\sim6$. They adopt the ultraviolet luminosity function of \citet{Bouwens:07}
139: and make the assumption that the rest-frame
140: $UV/V-$band luminosity ratios of the {\it Spitzer} undetected galaxies at these
141: redshifts are the same as the detected galaxies.
142: The {\it Spitzer} detected galaxies have $\nu L_{\nu}$(1500\AA)$\gtrsim2\times$10$^{10}$~L$_{\sun}$ and
143: $\nu L_{\nu}$(5500\AA)$\gtrsim10^{10}$~L$_{\sun}$. The median visible to ultraviolet luminosity ratio for
144: the \sst\ detected galaxies is 0.5.
145: They then apply a completeness correction by scaling the UV luminosity density of their spectroscopic
146: sample to the total UV luminosity density of Lyman-break galaxies at $z\sim6$ as estimated by \citet{Bouwens:07}.
147: This completeness correction is a factor of 34 which results in a total stellar mass density
148: of $1-3.7\times10^{7}$~\mun\ at $z\sim6$ for a Salpeter IMF. The corresponding
149: UV and V-band luminosity densities derived by integrating
150: down to a UV luminosity of 10$^{7}$~L$_{\sun}$ is 1.4$\times$10$^{8}$~\lun\ and
151: 6.6$\times$10$^{7}$~\lun, respectively. We call this the ``high-V" case.
152: Integrating to zero luminosity results in only
153: a 10\% upward correction to these values. These values are in excellent agreement with
154: the stellar mass density at $z\sim6$ obtained in the hydrodynamic
155: simulations of \citet{Dave:06} but substantially lower than the value of 8.8$\times$10$^{7}$\,\mun\ derived
156: by \citet{Nagamine}.
157:
158: The assumption that the visible to ultraviolet luminosity ratios
159: of faint LBGs is similar to that of brighter LBGs
160: is subject to some uncertainty. Faint LBGs are predominantly in low mass halos. The
161: supernova feedback from the initial burst of star-formation might
162: be sufficient to inhibit or delay further star-formation. This would
163: suggest that UV faint galaxies have lower visible to ultraviolet luminosity ratios
164: than galaxies at the bright end of the UV luminosity function. This
165: trend between rest-frame optical-ultraviolet colors with ultraviolet luminosity
166: appears to be seen in semi-analytical
167: models \citep[][personal communication]{Somerville}. To assess
168: the dependence of the $z\sim6$ luminosity density on the optical luminosities of faint galaxies, we
169: assume that the $UV/V-$band luminosity ratios of faint {\it Spitzer} undetected galaxies follow the
170: correponding ratios seen in semi-analytical models. The ratio of the visible to ultraviolet luminosity
171: density in the models, for galaxies below the {\it Spitzer} detection threshold, is 0.28.
172: For the UV bright galaxies, some of which are
173: undetected due to blending, we adopt the $UV/V-$band luminosity ratios of the {\it Spitzer} detected sources
174: which are similar to the colors of UV bright galaxies in the semi-analytical models.
175: We find that the resultant V-band luminosity density under these assumptions, obtained by integrating
176: down to $\nu L_{\nu}$(1350\AA)$\sim$10$^{7}$~L$_{\sun}$ is 4.2$\times$10$^{7}$~\lun\ which is 30\%
177: smaller than the estimate of \citet{Chary}. We call this the ``low-V" case.
178:
179: More recently, massive, evolved stellar populations have been claimed in candidate high redshift galaxies
180: which would boost the derived $V-$band luminosity densities
181: and therefore the stellar mass densities, by factors
182: of several \citep{Wiklind:07, Panagia:05}. However, since a significant fraction of
183: such sources are detected at 24$\mu$m, a wavelength which traces the
184: dust emission from galaxies, the evidence is strongly against these objects being
185: at high redshifts \citep{Chary:07b}\footnote{The exception is a galaxy at z=5.554 which might have its
186: stellar mass estimate erroneously elevated due to the presence of H$\alpha$ in the \sst\ passbands. See source
187: ID44 in Chary et al. (2007) for details.}. Furthermore,
188: through mid-infrared photometric redshifts, it has been demonstrated that
189: the best candidate among these proposed high redshift galaxies is a dusty,
190: infrared luminous galaxies at $z\sim1.7$ \citep{Chary:07b}. We ignore this population of galaxies for the rest of the
191: discussion until there is any reliable evidence that they really are at $z>>5$.
192:
193: Typically, stellar mass densities are estimated by fitting the multi-wavelength spectral energy distribution of
194: individual galaxies with population synthesis models and integrating over the resultant stellar mass distribution.
195: However, the stellar mass density is sensitive to the choice of the stellar mass function,
196: which is one of the parameters we are trying to constrain.
197: Furthermore, since we do not have multiwavelength detections of faint galaxies, the only available approach
198: involves fitting a population synthesis model to the
199: integrated rest-frame UV and V-band luminosity density estimates at $z\sim6$ derived above.
200:
201: We adopt the Starburst99 set of models
202: which have the Padova tracks for the thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch stars (TP-AGB) incorporated
203: \citep{Leitherer:99, Vaz:05}. The variables in the models are the slope of the stellar IMF, metallicity,
204: age of the stellar population and stellar mass density.
205: We consider both 0.02$Z_{\sun}$ and 0.4$Z_{\sun}$ templates and single burst models.
206: We also convolve the templates with a model for the absorption by the Ly$-\alpha$ forest \citep{Madau:95}.
207: The fit to the luminosity density constrains the stellar mass density as well as the total number
208: of ionizing photons produced over the duration of the starburst.
209: Adopting a single burst model yields maximal ages
210: and stellar mass densities while the total number of ionizing
211: photons produced is insensitive to the time history of star-formation.
212:
213: If we adopt a Salpeter IMF with metallicity 0.02\,Z$_{\sun}$, we find that the optical and ultraviolet luminosity
214: density at $z\sim6$ are fit by a stellar population of age 100 Myr and with a stellar mass density
215: of 1.6$\times$10$^{7}$\,\mun\ (Figure 1).
216: If instead we consider the ``low-V" case,
217: we derive a maximal stellar age of 50 Myr and a total stellar
218: mass of 0.8$\times$10$^{7}$\,\mun.
219: The presence of extinction at $z\sim6$ would imply that reproducing
220: the observed optical to ultraviolet luminosity densities will require a bluer intrinsic stellar
221: population, corresponding to a younger age. Since the average extinction in star-forming regions at $z\sim6$ is unknown,
222: we do not attempt to obtain fits that include extinction.
223:
224: Changing the stellar initial mass function will change the derived stellar mass densities. Since we use
225: the optical and ultraviolet luminosity densities at $z\sim6$ as the overall constraint, and evolve a single star
226: burst of fixed mass, the true stellar mass density is the normalization factor for the fixed mass burst. Thus, for every stellar
227: IMF that we consider, we can derive the age, stellar mass density and number of ionizing photons produced by requiring
228: that the luminosity density estimates at $z\sim6$ are reproduced. We note that the age is not a strongly constrained
229: parameter since we are fitting to only observations at two wavelengths and the exact age would strongly
230: depend on the average time history of star-formation. By adopting a single burst model, we only derive maximal ages
231: for a single stellar population.
232:
233: The ultraviolet and optical luminosity density at $z\sim6$ are dominated by ongoing star-formation
234: and intermediate mass stars respectively, the latter depending on the age of the starburst. For a
235: particular IMF, the stars with lifetimes shorter than the age of the starburst at
236: that redshift would have presumably evolved to their end states i.e. neutron stars or black holes. They would still
237: be contributing to the total stellar mass density in the models as well as the total number of
238: ionizing photons produced by the starburst, even if they dont contribute to the ultraviolet/optical luminosities at $z\sim6$.
239:
240: An upper limit to the stellar mass density for each IMF can also be derived by adopting a two component
241: stellar population synthesis model (Figure 1, right panel). The young stellar
242: population, which dominates the UV luminosity
243: density is assumed to be $\sim$10 Myr old. An old, high mass-to-light ratio
244: stellar population is assumed to form in a single
245: burst at $z\sim20$ and evolve passively to $z\sim6$. This implies a stellar age of 770 Myr.
246: Naturally, a stellar IMF in which all stars have lifetimes younger than 770 Myr will yield unphysical
247: stellar masses and is represented with an ellipsis in Table 2. We note that such a two component
248: starburst has been considered previously by \citet{Chary} who showed that the number of ionizing photons
249: produced even in such an extreme scenario falls short of maintaining
250: an ionized IGM, assuming a Salpeter IMF.
251: Although concentrating all
252: the star-formation into a single $z\sim20$ burst increases the total number of ionizing photons produced
253: by factors of a few (see Table 1 and 2), the recombination rate increases as $(1+z)^3$ which implies
254: that a much larger number of ionizing photons are required to keep the Universe ionized at these redshifts.
255:
256: \section{Constraining Reionization}
257:
258: By fitting the measured optical and ultraviolet luminosity density at $z\sim6$ with a evolving, single burst model,
259: we can determine the age of the stellar population and the stellar mass density. Integration of the
260: number of photons produced shortward of the Lyman limit over the age of the population, yields the total number
261: of ionizing photons produced by a starburst template which fits the luminosity density values.
262: The integral constraint has the
263: advantage of being independent of the exact star-formation history which is likely to have a multitude of ages and
264: e-folding times. Since the vast majority of ionizing photons are produced in massive stars, the single burst model
265: also has the advantage that the time integral of the number of ionizing photons, for starburst ages larger than $\sim$10 Myr,
266: converges to a single value.
267:
268: The number of ionizing photons produced over the history of star-formation can be compared with the number of
269: ionizing photons required to ionize the IGM.
270: The number of photons required to initiate reionization is only
271: 1 photon per baryon. However, to account for recombination, the production rate of ionizing photons per baryon must be
272: $\sim$10 times higher. To quantify the rate of ionizing photons $\dot{N}(z)$ required to keep the IGM ionized at
273: any redshift, the rate of ionizing photons must be greater than or equal to the recombination rate.
274:
275: The recombination rate R is:
276: \begin{equation}
277: R=n_{{\rm e}}~n_{{\rm HII}}~\alpha_{B}~C~~{\rm s}^{-1} {\rm Mpc}^{-3}
278: \end{equation}
279: where $n_{{\rm e}}$ is the comoving electron
280: density, $n_{{\rm HII}}$ is the comoving ionized hydrogen density, $\alpha_{B}$ is the recombination coefficient
281: to excited states of hydrogen while C is the ionized hydrogen clumping factor defined as
282: $<n_{{\rm HII}}^2>$/$<n_{{\rm HII}}>^2$. Since HeII reionization takes place at much lower redshifts $z\sim3-4$
283: \citep{Sokasian:02}, the comoving electron density is:
284: \begin{equation}
285: n_{\rm e} = n_{{\rm HII}} + n_{{\rm HeII}}
286: \end{equation}
287: and not $n_{{\rm HII}}$+2$n_{{\rm He}}$ as has previously been adopted, although the difference is negligibly
288: small because of the small fractional number density of He.
289: We adopt $\alpha_{B}$=2.59$\times10^{-13}(1+z)^3$~cm$^{3}$~s$^{-1}$ for the comoving recombination coefficient (Case B), assuming
290: a gas temperature of 10$^{4}$\,K. So, the photon production rate per baryon to balance the recombination rate
291: at any redshift, is:
292: \begin{equation}
293: \dot{N}(z) = \frac{R}{n_{\rm b}}~~s^{-1}
294: \end{equation}
295: The number of photons per baryon to start reionization at any redshift $N_0(z)$ is simply the ionized hydrogen fraction at
296: that redshift.
297: \begin{equation}
298: N_0(z) = \frac{n_{\rm HII}}{n_{\rm b}}
299: \end{equation}
300: So, the total number of ionizing photons per baryon
301: required to maintain the increasing ionized fraction of the IGM between any redshift $z_0$
302: and redshift $z$, where $z_0>z$, is:
303: \begin{equation}
304: N(z) = N_0(z) + \int_{z'=z_0}^{z'=z} \dot{N}(z') \frac{dt}{dz'} dz'
305: \end{equation}
306: Reionization of hydrogen is complete by $z=6$ while reionization of helium is not. So,
307: $N_0(z=6)$ is the fractional volume density of hydrogen which is $0.93$. Equation 5 can be rewritten as:
308: \begin{equation}
309: N(z=6) = 0.93 + 6.475\times10^{-20}~\int_{z'=z_0}^{z'=6} C~\chi_{{\rm HII}}~\left ( \chi_{{\rm HII}} + \chi_{{\rm HeII}} \right ) ~(1+z')^3~\frac{dt}{dz'} dz'
310: \end{equation}
311: Since $\Omega_{b}h^{2}=0.0223$, the comoving baryon
312: volume density is 0.25 baryons~m$^{-3}$. $\chi_{{\rm HII}}$ and $\chi_{{\rm HeII}}$ are the volume averaged
313: gas fractions for
314: ionized hydrogen and ionized helium respectively. Care should be
315: taken that these are derived with respect to the number density of baryons.
316: Typical simulations provide ratios with respect to the number density of neutral hydrogen or neutral helium.
317: In that case, we have adopted $n_{\rm H}$=0.9268n$_{\rm b}$ and $n_{\rm He}$=0.073n$_{\rm b}$.
318:
319: If we neglect the small contribution to the electron density from Helium, Equation 6
320: can be simplified to:
321: \begin{equation}
322: N(z=6) \approx 0.93 + 6.475\times10^{-20}~\int_{z'=z_0}^{z'=6} C'~(1+z')^3~\frac{dt}{dz'} dz'
323: \end{equation}
324: where $C'$ is $<n_{{\rm HII}}^2>/<n_b>^2$, a quantity directly available from the \citet{Trac:07} simulations (See their Figure 12). However, their estimate of $C'$ is an average over the entire comoving volume. In practise, the
325: clumpiness of gas which is within the source-forming halos is already factored into the estimate of escape fraction.
326: So, the clumping factor should be a measure of the clumpiness of the IGM excluding halos with star-formation in them (Figure 2a).
327: Therefore, we use the exact relation as shown in Equation 6.
328:
329: We adopt the most current estimate for the reionization history, redshift dependent
330: clumping factor (Figure 2a), $n_{e}$, $n_{{\rm HII}}$ and $n_{{\rm HeII}}$
331: from the high resolution simulations of \citet{Trac:07}.
332: A comparison between the number of photons per baryon from these equations
333: compared with a similar relation derived for complete reionization by \citet{Madau:99} is shown in Figure 2b.
334: The number of ionizing photons required is sensitive to the reionization history since the recombination rate is proportional
335: to the square of the density. If reionization is completed earlier, the recombination rate is proportionately
336: higher than for a partially ionized medium. In that case, the number of photons per baryon needs to be higher to
337: maintain the ionized state of the IGM as shown by the triple dot dashed line in Figure 2b.
338:
339: We note that the reionization history of \citet{Trac:07} corresponds to the ``late'' reionization
340: history which would result in a WMAP optical depth to Thomson scattering close to the measured
341: value of $\tau\sim0.09\pm0.03$ \citep{Spergel:07}. As characterized in \citet{Greif_Bromm} and \citet{Wyithe},
342: shifting the process of reionization to $z\sim10$ would result in optical depth values which are
343: at the high end of the observed range.
344:
345: For each stellar initial mass function that we adopt, we obtain a library of template SED which are
346: a function of the age of the starburst. We
347: first determine the combination of age and mass which results in a best fit to the optical and ultraviolet
348: luminosity density. This yields the stellar mass density at $z=6$ for that IMF. The range of age and mass
349: values for a subset of IMFs considered here is shown in Table 1. As emphasized earlier this is a maximal age
350: for a single stellar population since we adopt a single instantaneous burst.
351:
352: The Starburst99 model yields the number of hydrogen ionizing photons produced as a function of age of the starburst.
353: The escape fraction is a measure of the number of ionizing photons escaping from star-forming regions
354: in galaxies, into the IGM. The escape fraction has been constrained to be
355: $\sim10-15$\% \citep{Siana:07, Shapley:06} in the Lyman-break galaxy population.
356: Thus, we adopt escape fractions of 0.1 and 0.15.
357: By integrating the number of ionizing photons over the derived stellar age,
358: we can estimate the total number of photons produced over the
359: lifetime of the evolving galaxies, multiply that with the escape fraction and compare the result
360: with the number of ionizing photons required to keep the IGM
361: ionized as determined from Equation 6.
362:
363: \subsection{Salpeter IMF}
364:
365: Figure 3a shows the total number of ionizing photons produced by a starburst for a
366: Salpeter IMF which is a power-law of the form dN/dM$\propto$M$^{\alpha}$, $\alpha=-2.3$. The
367: metallicity was 0.02 Z$_{\sun}$, escape fraction of 0.1 and clumping factor shown
368: by the solid black line in Figure 2a. The calculations corresponds to the ``high-V" case
369: Different lower mass cutoffs were adopted for the Salpeter IMF as shown
370: by the different colored lines while the upper mass cutoff was fixed at 200\,M$_{\sun}$. The black
371: line is the number of ionizing photons required to keep the IGM
372: ionized between $z<z'<6$. The point where the colored lines which denote the number of ionizing photons
373: escaping from the star-forming regions cross the black line is the epoch beyond which reionization was complete.
374:
375: For a Salpeter IMF extending down to 0.1\,M$_{\sun}$ i.e. with no low
376: mass cutoff, the IGM was ionized for only 60 Myr prior to
377: $z\sim6$. This is an unphysically small age and indicates that if the
378: IMF has a Salpeter shape in $z\sim6$ galaxies, reionization must have been an extremely inhomogeneous process.
379:
380: As the low mass cutoff increases from 0.1 to 10 M$_{\sun}$,
381: the optical luminosity density produced for a fixed age for the starburst decreases. So, as the
382: low mass cutoff increases, the age of the starburst needs to become younger to reproduce both the UV and optical
383: luminosity density. As a result, the number of ionizing photons produced over the duration of a starburst
384: by a Salpeter IMF with a mass cutoff at 10\,M$_{\sun}$ is lower than that with a mass cutoff at 0.1\,M$_{\sun}$.
385:
386: Even in the case where the low mass cutoff is at 5 M$_{\sun}$, which produces the largest number of ionizing
387: photons, the process of reionization has to be shorter than 140 Myr. This indicates that unless
388: the ratio of clumping factor to escape fraction is significantly lower than what the simulations seem to indicate,
389: a Salpeter IMF and \zre$>7$ is ruled out.
390:
391: The ``low-V" case, since it corresponds to a bluer, stellar population which has a younger age, would result
392: in fewer ionizing photons over the lifetime of the starburst, making the conclusions
393: derived above even more stringent. Thus, unless explicitly stated otherwise, our calculations below are done for the
394: ``high-V" case.
395:
396: \subsection{Modifications to the High Redshift Stellar IMF}
397:
398: Motivated by the WMAP results which suggest the possibility of
399: reionization as early as $z_{reion}\sim11$, we investigate a range
400: of initial mass functions which would produce sufficient ionizing photons to keep the IGM
401: ionized at $z>>7$.
402:
403: As shown in Figure 3a, changing the lower mass cutoff of a Salpeter IMF cannot increase \zre\ above redshift of 7.
404: It appears
405: necessary to change the value of the IMF slope $\alpha$. The flatter the IMF slope,
406: the larger the contribution of massive stars. Since most of the ionizing photons are produced
407: by massive stars, even a small increase in the slope results in a significant increase in the
408: number of ionizing photons produced.
409: Changing the low mass cutoff does not change the number of ionizing photons substantially except
410: for the renormalization by the total mass in the IMF.
411: If $\alpha=-2$, the IMF has equal mass in logarithmic mass bins.
412: So for a value of $\alpha\gtrsim -2$, \zre\ is relatively insensitive to a change in the low mass cutoff
413: in the IMF.
414:
415: Figure 3b shows the number of ionizing photons produced by an IMF which extends from $1-200$\,M$_{\sun}$
416: and has a range of slopes $\alpha$. For $\alpha=-2.3$, \zre\ falls between $6<z<7$ while for $\alpha=-2.0$,
417: sufficient ionizing photons are produced to initiate reionization at $z\sim11$ and complete the reionization process
418: by $z\sim6$. By comparing Figure 3b and Figure 4, it can be seen that \zre\ for $\alpha\gtrsim -2$
419: is insensitive to the low mass cutoff of the IMF. The resultant
420: stellar mass densities at $z\sim6$ for the IMFs considered here are shown in Table 1.
421:
422: If the formation of high mass stars is suppressed, the number of ionizing photons produced per baryon are reduced.
423: If the cutoff is at 50 M$_{\sun}$ instead of 200 M$_{\sun}$, the net effect is to increase the
424: value of $\alpha$.
425: For example, a stellar IMF with a mass range of 1-50 M$_{\sun}$, $\alpha=-1.7$ produces a similar number
426: of ionizing photons as an IMF extending between 1-200 M$_{\sun}$, $\alpha=-2.1$.
427:
428: The choice of metallicity in the models is also an important parameter.
429: For the calculations we present, the results are based on the 0.02\,Z$_{\sun}$ metallicity models
430: which are the lowest available metallicity in Starburst99, although
431: we also evaluated the results for the 0.4\,Z$_{\sun}$ metallicity templates as illustrated in Figure 3b.
432: Lower metallicity models
433: produce $\sim2-3$ times as many ionizing photons as higher metallicity models (Figure 3b).
434: However, we note that the number of ionizing photons produced
435: for zero metallicity single burst templates which have normal IMFs
436: as presented by \citet{Schaerer:03}, are very similar to the number of ionizing photons produced for 0.02\,Z$_{\sun}$
437: metallicity templates to within $\sim$10-20\%. This implies that a Salpeter IMF even with lower metallicity templates than our adopted ones
438: cannot produce sufficient ionizing photons. Thus, although the exact slope of the derived IMF
439: is sensitive to the metallicity of the gas collapsing into the stars, the fact that the metallicity enrichment from massive
440: stars is a relatively quick process and the metallicity of GRB hosts at $z>5$ which are presumably
441: star-forming galaxies, appear to be $\sim0.01-0.1$\,Z$_{\sun}$, leads us to conclude that
442: the choice of 0.02\,Z$_{\sun}$ metallicity templates is a reasonable approximation.
443:
444: \subsection{Dependence between Stellar IMF and \z$_{reion}$}
445:
446: We have generated template SEDs for a range of stellar initial mass function slopes and stellar mass ranges
447: which reproduce the observed optical and ultraviolet luminosity density at $z\sim6$. We consider two
448: cases, one in which the stellar IMF extends between $1-200$\,M$_{\sun}$ and a second in which
449: the mass range is $1-50$\,M$_{\sun}$.
450: As emphasized earlier, the choice of cutoff at the low mass end is insensitive to the result once $\alpha>-2$.
451: We assume that the metallicity is 0.02\,Z$_{\sun}$ in either case.
452: We consider a range of $-1>\alpha>-2.6$ and calculate the number of ionizing photons produced for each
453: scenario.
454: We then calculate the redshift at which the number of ionizing photons from the stellar
455: population exceed the minimum required to maintain the ionized state of hydrogen. It is important to note
456: that this is not simply a comparison with the solid black lines in Figure 3 and 4 which assume
457: the particular reionization history (and thereby clumping factor) from the simulations of \citet{Trac:07}.
458:
459: If reionization were complete at higher redshifts, the recombination rate
460: between the end of reionization and $z\sim6$ would be higher because of the larger values of $n_{\rm e}$
461: and $n_{\rm HII}$. To estimate this, we simply shift the reionization history and clumping factors of \citet{Trac:07}
462: to higher redshifts and assume that the clumping factors remained constant once the IGM was completely ionized.
463: The number of ionizing photons per baryon in the scenario where reionization is complete by $z\sim11$
464: is plotted as the triple dot dashed line in Figure 2. We note that this is a factor of $\sim$4 higher
465: than the ``late" reionization history which the models of \citet{Trac:07} provide.
466: Furthermore, even if the clumping factor were to increase after the IGM was completely reionized,
467: this would only increase the minimum number of photons per baryon required. Thus, our estimates are,
468: at worst, a lower limit to the number of photons per baryon required to maintain the ionized state of the IGM.
469:
470: We find that
471: as the redshift of reionization increases, the value of $\alpha$ needs to increase (Figure 5). This is not surprising
472: since a higher $z_{\rm reion}$ implies a larger number of ionizing photons which are preferentially
473: produced in more massive stars.
474: We also find that as the high mass end of the stellar IMF is cut, from 200 M$_{\sun}$ to 50 M$_{\sun}$,
475: the slope $\alpha$ needs to increase such that a larger fraction of massive stars make up
476: the shortfall in ionizing photons.
477:
478: The relation between \zre\ and IMF slope is also sensitive to the ratio of the clumping factor to the escape fraction.
479: Reduction in the clumping factor decreases the number of ionizing photons required since the recombination
480: rate is reduced. Similarly, a large escape fraction implies that a larger number of photons escape star-forming regions.
481: So, a fewer number of ionizing photons need to be produced to reionize the IGM. As a result, in Figure 5, we plot the
482: relation between \zre\ and $\alpha$ for different ratios of C/f$_{\rm esc}$. A redshift dependent
483: clumping factor such as that
484: shown in Figure 2a and an escape fraction of 0.1 is shown as the green lines. The red lines show the estimates
485: for a clumping factor of 30 and an escape fraction of 0.1. The blue line show the estimates for a clumping factor of 10
486: and an escape fraction of 0.15 while the cyan line is an extreme case with a clumping factor of 10 and escape fraction of 0.5.
487: A similar comparison between the redshift when reionization is complete and the IMF slope is shown in Figure 6
488: for the ``low-V" case.
489:
490: As can be seen for the ``high-V" case, with a Salpeter IMF ($\alpha=-2.3$), unless the ratio of clumping factor to escape fraction is
491: much smaller than 60, the stars in $z\sim6$ galaxies cannot be responsible for reionization at $z>7$.
492: For our best estimate of the clumping factor and escape fraction, if \zre$=9$, the slope $\alpha=-1.65$ while
493: if \zre$=11$, $\alpha=-1.5$. In either scenario, only 0.2\% of all baryons at $z\sim6$ are processed
494: through stars and are responsible for ionizing the IGM.
495:
496: Our conclusions are therefore broadly consistent with the results of \citet{Tum:04} who argue against the need for a very massive
497: star population at high redshift.
498: Their arguments are based on the metal abundance ratios
499: in metal-poor Galactic halo stars. However, we disagree with them in the sense that
500: a Salpeter IMF even with a low mass cutoff, is inadequate for producing sufficient ionizing photons to ionize
501: the IGM while fitting the observed ultraviolet and optical luminosity density at $z\sim6$ (Figure 3).
502:
503: Such a low mass turnover in the stellar IMF may indeed be present at $z<2$ as has been argued by
504: \citet{Dave} and \citet{PvD}. The former attempted to reconcile specific star-formation rate estimates
505: between models and observations while the latter fit the color evolution of massive early-type cluster
506: galaxies at $z<1$. We attempted to fit the observed luminosity densities at $z\sim6$ with the IMF
507: proposed by \citet{Dave}. We assumed that the $(1+z)^2$ evolution in the mass turnover
508: of the stellar IMF extends up to $z\sim4$,
509: similar to the evolution proposed by \citet{PvD}. Thus, the IMF was assumed to have a slope
510: of $-1.3$ at $0.1<$M$<12$\,M$_{\sun}$ and $-2.3$ at 200$>$M$>12$\,M$_{\sun}$. For the ``high-V" case,
511: I find that this IMF
512: produces 3.25 ionizing photons per baryon, an age of the stellar population of
513: 90 Myr and a stellar mass of 1.2$\times$10$^7$\,\mun. Unlike the Salpeter IMFs with a sharp cutoff
514: shown in Figure 3, such an IMF can account for the the ``late" reionization history of \citet{Trac:07}
515: and would maintain an ionized IGM at $z\lesssim 7$. However, for the ``low-V" case,
516: this IMF would produce only 1.0 ionizing photons per baryon, result in a stellar age of 45 Myr and
517: a stellar mass of 3.7$\times$10$^6$\,\mun, about a factor of 3 lower than the minimum
518: required to maintain an ionized IGM at $z<7$.
519:
520: \subsection{An Early Epoch of Reionization from Massive Stars ?}
521:
522: The fundamental assumption here is that the galaxies seen at $z\sim6$ are the remnants of star-formation responsible
523: for reionization. It is plausible that the $z\sim6$ galaxies that are seen in deep surveys
524: are actually comprised of Population II stars with a Salpeter IMF which are responsible for a second late epoch
525: of reionization. In that scenario, the earlier epochs would be entirely due to Population III
526: stars which do not contribute to the ultraviolet and visible light luminosity density at $z\sim6$,
527: a scenario that has been considered previously \citep[e.g][]{Cen:03, Furl:05}. These stars, which are more more massive than 8\,M$_{\sun}$
528: evolve into black holes within 30 Myr, i.e. by $z\sim6$.
529: The number of ionizing photons required to keep
530: the IGM ionized between $15<z<6$ is $\sim$11 photons/baryon. An IMF extending between
531: $10-100$\,M$_{\sun}$, with a Salpeter slope of $2.3$ provides a total of 1.38 photons per baryon for a stellar
532: mass density of 2.5$\times$10$^{6}$\,\mun. The stellar mass density in massive Population III stars must therefore
533: be 2$\times$10$^{7}$~\mun. Thus, if
534: reionization was initiated by massive stars which evolve into neutron stars and black holes by $z\sim6$,
535: there must be as much mass density in these remnants as in the stars that we detect in the galaxies.
536:
537: If in a contrived scenario,
538: the initial $z\sim13$ epoch of reionization from Population III stars was relatively brief,
539: lasting $\Delta z=2$ \citep[e.g.][]{Cen:03}, it would require
540: that the stellar mass density in the initial burst was $\sim$10$^{6}$\,\mun.
541: This corresponds to 10\% of baryons that are in stars at $z\sim6$.
542: Since the lifetime of 10\,M$_{\sun}$ stars
543: are $\sim$30 Myr while the interval between $13<z<15$ spans 60 Myr, the first epoch of reionization must be
544: relatively inhomogeneous and will depend on the exact
545: epoch at which star-formation in dark matter halos was initiated.
546: Furthermore, the truncation of Population III star-formation through feedback processes argues against
547: them being significant contributors to reionization \citep{Greif_Bromm}. Measuring the
548: distribution of Stromgren sphere size using high spatial resolution HI observations will reveal the true nature
549: of the reionization history at $z>10$.
550:
551: It should be noted that Population III star formation could potentially extend down to
552: lower redshifts, depending on the effect of feedback on the metallicity of
553: the star-forming environments. The rates of star-formation
554: in such stars
555: are however thought to be $3\times10^{-4}$ of the Population II star-formation rate and are inconsequential to
556: the ultraviolet luminosity density or the co-moving star-formation rate density \citep{Tornatore, Brook:07}.
557:
558: \section{Conclusions}
559:
560: I have utilized existing data from deep {\it Hubble} and {\it Spitzer} surveys to provide a measure
561: of the co-moving luminosity density at ultraviolet and optical wavelengths at $z\sim6$. In particular,
562: I provide a measure of the contribution to the optical luminosity density from faint galaxies which
563: are below the {\it Spitzer} detection limit. Even after accounting for faint galaxies, the optical
564: luminosity density is a factor of $2-3$ below the ultraviolet luminosity density. I fit the resultant
565: luminosity density estimates with a stellar population synthesis model to determine the maximal age and
566: stellar mass density at $z\sim6$. Assuming a Salpeter IMF, I find that the stellar mass density at $z\sim6$
567: is 1.6$\times$10$^{7}$\,\mun and the maximal age of a single stellar population is $\lesssim$100 Myr. By comparing
568: the number of ionizing photons per baryon produced over the age of the starburst with the number of ionizing photons
569: per baryon
570: required to keep the IGM ionized, I find that reionization must have been a brief
571: inhomogeneous process lasting $\lesssim$100 Myr and must have been completed as late as $z<7$ if the
572: stellar IMF had a Salpeter slope.
573:
574: Motivated by WMAP results which suggest an early epoch of reionization,
575: I investigate the form of the stellar IMF if reionization was a single continuous process at redshifts higher than 6.
576: If the past history of star-formation in $z\sim6$ galaxies was responsible for reionization,
577: I find that the the slope of the stellar IMF has to be non-Salpeter with a slope of $\alpha=-1.65$ if \zre=9
578: and $\alpha=-1.5$ if \zre=11 for an IMF extending up to 200 M$_{\sun}$. However, the exact
579: slope is sensitive to the ratio of the clumping factor to escape fraction, the metallicity of the stars
580: and the value of the visible luminosity density at $z\sim6$.
581:
582: On the other hand, the IGM could have been
583: ionized between $6<z<15$ by a population of massive stars between $10-100$\,M$_{\sun}$
584: which evolve into stellar
585: remnants like black holes by $z\sim6$. Such a population would not be constrained by the rest-frame visible
586: and ultraviolet luminosity density at $z\sim6$. The resultant comoving mass density of remnants at $z\sim6$ would
587: be $2\times10^{7}$\,\mun\ and would therefore be comparable to the stellar mass density that we see in $z\sim6$ galaxies.
588:
589: Finally, I consider the evolving stellar initial mass function that has been suggested by \citet{Dave}
590: and \citet{PvD} to account for the discrepancy in specific star-formation rate estimates and colors
591: of early-type galaxies at lower redshifts
592: respectively. This IMF if evolved out to $z\sim4$, would
593: result in a bottom-light IMF with a non-Salpeter slope at $M<12$\,M$_{\sun}$. Such an IMF could produce
594: sufficient ionizing photons to account for late reionization of the IGM at $z\lesssim7$
595: only if the visible light luminosity density was at the high end of our assumed range.
596:
597: {\it Acknowledgments:}
598: I would like to acknowledge Avi Loeb for stimulating discussions and guidance.
599: I would also like to thank Hy Trac for providing tabulated estimates of the ionized fraction and clumping factor
600: from his simulations and for helpful suggestions.
601: I am very grateful to Rachel Somerville for providing early results from her semi-analytical
602: models.
603: This research is partially supported by the Spitzer Space Telescope Theoretical Research Program which
604: was provided by NASA through a contract issued by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.
605:
606:
607: \begin{thebibliography}{74}
608: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
609:
610: \bibitem[{Becker {et~al.}(2001)}]{Becker:01}
611: Becker, R.~H. {et~al.} 2001, \aj, 122, 2850
612:
613: \bibitem[{Bouwens {et~al.}(2004)}]{Bouwens:04}
614: Bouwens, R.~J. {et~al.} 2004, \apj, 616, L79
615:
616: \bibitem[{Bouwens {et~al.}(2006)}]{Bouwens06}
617: Bouwens, R.~J. {et~al.} 2006, \apj, 653, 53
618:
619: \bibitem[{Bouwens {et~al.}(2007)}]{Bouwens:07}
620: Bouwens, R.~J. {et~al.} 2007, \apj, in press, astro-ph/0707.2080
621:
622: \bibitem[{Brook {et~al.}(2007)}]{Brook:07}
623: Brook, C. B. {et~al.} 2007, \apj, 661, 10
624:
625: \bibitem[Cen (2003)]{Cen:03}
626: Cen, R., 2003, ApJ, 591, 12
627:
628: \bibitem[{Chary {et~al.}(2007)}]{Chary}
629: Chary, R., et al., 2007, \apj, submitted
630:
631: \bibitem[{Chary {et~al.}(2007a)}]{Chary:07a}
632: Chary, R., et al., 2007, \apj, 671, 272
633:
634: \bibitem[{Chary {et~al.}(2007b)}]{Chary:07b}
635: Chary, R., et al., 2007, \apj, 665, 257
636:
637: \bibitem[Dav\'{e} {et~al.}(2006)]{Dave:06}
638: Dav\'{e}, R., Finlator, K., \& Oppenheimer, B. D., 2006, \mnras, 370, 273
639:
640: \bibitem[Dav\'{e} (2008)]{Dave}
641: Dav\'{e}, R., 2008, MNRAS, in press, astro-ph/0710.0381
642:
643: \bibitem[{Eyles {et~al.}(2005)Eyles, Bunker, Stanway, Lacy, Ellis, \&
644: Doherty}]{Eyles:05}
645: Eyles, L., Bunker, A., Stanway, E., Lacy, M., Ellis, R., \& Doherty, M. 2005,
646: \mnras, 364, 443
647:
648: \bibitem[{Fan {et~al.}(2001)}]{Fan:01}
649: Fan, X. {et~al.} 2001, \aj, 122, 2833
650:
651: \bibitem[{Fan {et~al.}(2006)}]{Fan:06}
652: Fan, X. {et~al.} 2006, ARA\&A, 44, 415
653:
654: \bibitem[Furlanetto \& Loeb (2005)]{Furl:05}
655: Furlanetto, S. R., \& Loeb, A., 2005, \apj, 634, 1
656:
657: \bibitem[Greif \& Bromm (2006)]{Greif_Bromm}
658: Greif, T. H. \& Bromm, V., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 128
659:
660: \bibitem[{Kogut {et~al.}(2003)}]{Kogut:03}
661: Kogut, A. {et~al.} 2003, \apjs, 148, 161
662:
663: \bibitem[Leitherer et al. (1999)]{Leitherer:99}
664: Leitherer, C., et al., 1999, \apjs, 123, 3
665:
666: \bibitem[Madau et al. (1995)]{Madau:95}
667: Madau, P., 1995, ApJ, 441, 18
668:
669: \bibitem[Madau et al. (1999)]{Madau:99}
670: Madau, P., Haardt, F., \& Rees, M., 1999, \apj, 514, 648
671:
672: \bibitem[Nagamine et al. (2008)]{Nagamine}
673: Nagamine, K., et al., 2008, astro-ph/0802.0228
674:
675: \bibitem[Panagia et al. (2005)]{Panagia:05}
676: Panagia, N., et al., 2005, ApJ, 633, L1
677:
678: \bibitem[Schaerer (2003)]{Schaerer:03}
679: Schaerer, D., 2003, A\&A, 397, 527
680:
681: \bibitem[Shapley et al. (2006)]{Shapley:06}
682: Shapley, A., et al., 2006, \apj, 651, 688
683:
684: \bibitem[Siana et al. (2007)]{Siana:07}
685: Siana, B., {et~al.} 2007, \apj, 668, 62
686:
687: \bibitem[Spergel et al. (2007)]{Spergel:07}
688: Spergel, D., {et~al.} 2007, \apjs, 170, 377
689:
690: \bibitem[Sokasian et al. (2002)]{Sokasian:02}
691: Sokasian, A., et al., 2002, \mnras, 332, 601
692:
693: \bibitem[Somerville {et~al.}(2001)]{Somerville}
694: Somerville, R., Primack, J. R., Faber, S. M., 2001, \mnras, 320, 504
695:
696: \bibitem[{Stark {et~al.}(2006)Stark, Bunker, Ellis, Eyles, \& Lacy}]{Stark:06}
697: Stark, D.~P., Bunker, A.~J., Ellis, R.~S., Eyles, L.~P., \& Lacy, M. 2006,
698: \apj, astro-ph/0604250
699:
700: \bibitem[Tornatore et al. (2007)]{Tornatore}
701: Tornatore, L., et al., 2007, MNRAS, 382, 945
702:
703: \bibitem[Trac \& Cen (2007)]{Trac:07}
704: Trac, H., \& Cen, R., 2007, ApJ, in press, astro-ph/0612406
705:
706: \bibitem[Tumlinson et al. (2004)]{Tum:04}
707: Tumlinson, J., et al., 2004, ApJ, 612, 602
708:
709: \bibitem[van Dokkum (2008)]{PvD}
710: van Dokkum, P. G., 2008, ApJ, 674, 29
711:
712: \bibitem[Vazquez \& Leitherer (2005)]{Vaz:05}
713: Vazquez, G., \& Leitherer, C., 2005, \apj, 621, 695
714:
715: \bibitem[Wiklind et al. (2008)]{Wiklind:07}
716: Wiklind, T., et al., 2008, ApJ, in press, astro-ph/07100406
717:
718: \bibitem[Wyithe \& Loeb (2003)]{Wyithe}
719: Wyithe, J. S. B., \& Loeb, A., 2003, 586, 693
720:
721: \bibitem[{Yan {et~al.}(2006)}]{Yan:06}
722: Yan, H. {et~al.} 2006, \apj, 651, 24
723:
724: \end{thebibliography}
725: \include{tab1}
726: \include{tab2}
727:
728: \begin{figure}
729: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
730: \caption{Left Panel: Solid circles show the rest-frame 1500\AA\ and 5500\AA\ luminosity density at $z\sim6$ after appropriate completeness corrections for
731: faint galaxies have been made. The faint galaxies have been assumed to have visible/ultraviolet luminosity ratios similar
732: to that of $z\sim6$ galaxies detected in {\it Spitzer}/GOODS observations (the ``high-V" case).
733: The solid black line shows the age and stellar mass density of the template SED which fits the luminosity densities
734: for a Salpeter stellar IMF with no dust extinction.
735: The age indicates that if the stellar mass function had been Salpeter, the stellar population that is seen in $z\sim6$
736: galaxies must have formed as late as 100 Myr earlier i.e. at $z\sim6.5$. If faint galaxies have lower visible to ultraviolet flux ratios compared to bright galaxies, the $V-$band luminosity density would be decreased by 30\% (the ``low-V" case).
737: The purple line is the spectral energy distribution which fits the luminosity density values in this
738: latter scenario. Right Panel: Maximal fits to the ``high-V" luminosity density at $z\sim6$ assuming two stellar components and a Salpeter IMF. The UV luminosity density is fit by a 10 Myr old burst while a 770 Myr old,
739: high mass to light ratio stellar component, is
740: the dominant contributor to the visible luminosity density.
741: }
742: \end{figure}
743:
744: \begin{figure}
745: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}
746: \caption{
747: {\it Left Panel:} Comparison between the clumping factors of neutral and ionized gas from the \citet{Trac:07}
748: simulations for their reionization history. The blue dotted line shows the clumping of neutral gas averaged over the simulation volume.
749: The green dashed line is the clumping of ionized gas averaged over the simulation volume.
750: The solid black line is the clumping of ionized gas after star-forming halos have been excluded.
751: The dot-dash red line is the clumping of ionized gas after all halos are excluded. Since, the clumpiness
752: of gas in the star-forming halos is already factored into the escape fraction, we use the solid black line
753: as the best estimate of the clumping factor.
754: {\it Right Panel:} The plot shows the number of ionizing photons per baryon required to ionize the IGM and account for recombinations.
755: The solid black line is the number of ionizing photons per baryon assuming the reionization history and redshift dependent
756: clumping factor of \citet{Trac:07} after source halos have been excluded (solid black line in the left
757: panel). The triple dot dashed line assumes that reionization was complete by $z\sim12$ and the clumping
758: factor and escape fraction remained constant at lower redshifts.
759: The solid red
760: line assumes the same reionization history but uses a constant
761: clumping factor of 30. The dot-dash blue line assumes a constant clumping factor of 10.
762: The dashed line is the
763: number of photons derived
764: using the parameteric solution of \citet{Madau:99} for complete hydrogen and helium reionization
765: and the redshift dependent clumping factor of \citet{Trac:07}.
766: The reionization history and properties of the IGM
767: are clearly important in determining the number of ionizing photons required.
768: }
769: \end{figure}
770:
771:
772: \begin{figure}
773: \plottwo{f3a.eps}{f3b.eps}
774: \caption{{\it Left Panel:} The solid black line shows the minimum number of ionizing photons per baryon required to
775: ionize the IGM and account for recombinations
776: between the plotted redshift and $z\sim6$ (Same as Figure 2). Overplotted as solid lines of different colors
777: are the number of ionizing photons per baryon
778: produced for a 0.02 Z$_{\sun}$ Salpeter IMF (dN/dM$\propto$M$^{-2.3}$) which reproduces
779: the observed ultraviolet and optical luminosity density at $z\sim6$. The different colors
780: correspond to different low mass cutoffs; 0.1, 1, 2, 5, 10 M$_{\sun}$.
781: The stellar mass
782: density at $z\sim6$ corresponding to these different IMFs are shown in Table 1.
783: Reionization would be complete from the time at which the colored lines cross the solid black line.
784: For the assumed clumping factor and escape fraction, a Salpeter IMF, even with a low mass cutoff,
785: would maintain the ionized state of the IGM only at $z<7$.
786: {\it Right Panel:} The solid green lines show the number of ionizing photons for a 0.02 Z$_{\sun}$
787: non-Salpeter IMF,
788: with stellar masses spanning 1-200 M$_{\sun}$ and different values of $\alpha$, the IMF slope. The dashed blue line
789: shows the number of ionizing photons for a 0.4 Z$_{\sun}$ model template with the same range of slopes. Clearly, metallicity
790: is an important parameter in constraining the IMF.
791: }
792: \end{figure}
793:
794: \begin{figure}
795: \plotone{f4.eps}
796: \caption{
797: Dependence between stellar IMF and number of ionizing photons produced, as a function of IMF parameters for
798: the reionization history of \citet{Trac:07}. For the ``late" reionization history considered by \citet{Trac:07},
799: either the ratio of clumping factor to escape fraction must be much lower than the best estimates
800: or the stellar IMF needs to have
801: a slope index of $\alpha\sim-2.1$ if the IMF extends up to 200\,M$_{\sun}$.
802: If the IMF has a high mass cutoff at $\sim$50\,M$_{\sun}$, the slope needs to be $\alpha\sim-1.65$.
803: In either scenario, this is substantially flatter than a Salpeter slope ($\alpha$=$-2.3$).
804: }
805: \end{figure}
806:
807: \begin{figure}
808: \plotone{f5.eps}
809: \caption{
810: Dependence between redshift of reionization and slope of the stellar initial mass function for the ``high-V"
811: case.
812: The solid lines show the case where the IMF extends between $1-200$~M$_{\sun}$ while the
813: dashed lines have the IMF extending between $1-50$~M$_{\sun}$. Four different values of C/f$_{\rm esc}$
814: are shown. The solid green lines are our best estimate which
815: assumes the redshift dependent clumping factor derived by the
816: simulations of \citet{Trac:07} and an escape fraction of 0.1. The blue lines assume a
817: redshift independent clumping factor of 10 and an escape fraction of 0.15. The red lines assume a constant
818: clumping factor of 30 and escape fraction of 0.1 while the cyan lines are an extreme case
819: assuming a clumping factor of 10 and an escape fraction of 0.5.
820: For our best estimate of the clumping factor and escape fraction,
821: the IMF must have a slope dN/dM$\propto{\rm M}^{-1.65}$ for reionization to
822: be complete by $z\sim9$ and dN/dM$\propto{\rm M}^{-1.5}$ for reionization to be complete by $z\sim11$.
823: }
824: \end{figure}
825:
826: \begin{figure}
827: \plotone{f6.eps}
828: \caption{
829: Similar to Figure 5 for the ``low-V" case where the V-band luminosity density is 30\% lower
830: as shown in Figure 1. Since a lower V-band luminosity density implies that fewer stars
831: have been produced, the slope of the stellar IMF has to be even flatter resulting in even more high mass stars
832: compared to Figure 5.
833: }
834: \end{figure}
835:
836: \end{document}
837: