1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: %\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{SHARC-II observations of z$\geq$5 Quasars}
58: \shortauthors{Wang et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{SHARC-II 350$\mu$m Observations of Thermal Emission from Warm Dust in z$\geq$5 Quasars}
70:
71: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
72: %% author and affiliation information.
73: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
74: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
75: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
76: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
77:
78: \author{Ran Wang\altaffilmark{1,2},
79: Jeff Wagg\altaffilmark{2},
80: Chris L. Carilli\altaffilmark{2},
81: Dominic J. Benford\altaffilmark{3},
82: C. Darren Dowell\altaffilmark{4},
83: Frank Bertoldi\altaffilmark{5},
84: Fabian Walter\altaffilmark{6},
85: Karl M. Menten\altaffilmark{7},
86: Alain Omont\altaffilmark{8},
87: Pierre Cox\altaffilmark{9},
88: Michael A. Strauss\altaffilmark{10},
89: Xiaohui Fan\altaffilmark{11},
90: Linhua Jiang\altaffilmark{11}}
91: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China}
92: \altaffiltext{2}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box 0, Socorro, NM, USA 87801}
93: \altaffiltext{3}{NASA / Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 665 - Observational Cosmology Lab, Greenbelt, MD, USA 20771}
94: \altaffiltext{4}{Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Code 169-506, Pasadena, CA, USA 91109}
95: \altaffiltext{5}{Argelander-Institut f$\rm \ddot u$r Astronomie, University of Bonn, Auf dem H$\rm \ddot u$gel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany}
96: \altaffiltext{6}{Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy, K$\rm \ddot o$nigsstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany}
97: \altaffiltext{7}{Max-Plank-Institute for Radioastronomie, Auf dem H$\rm \ddot u$gel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany}
98: \altaffiltext{8}{Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, CNRS and Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France}
99: \altaffiltext{9}{Institute de Radioastronomie Millimetrique, St. Martin d'Heres, F-38406, France}
100: \altaffiltext{10}{Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA, 08544}
101: \altaffiltext{11}{Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721}
102: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
103: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
104: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
105: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
106: %% editorial office after submission.
107:
108: \begin{abstract}
109:
110: We present observations of four $\rm z\ge5$ SDSS quasars
111: at 350$\,\mu$m with the SHARC-II bolometer camera on the
112: Caltech Submillimeter Observatory. These are among the
113: deepest observations that have been made by SHARC-II at 350$\,\mu$m,
114: and three quasars are
115: detected at $\rm \ge3\sigma$ significance, greatly
116: increasing the sample of 350$\,\mu$m (corresponds to rest
117: frame wavelengths of $\rm <60\,\mu m$ at $\rm z\ge5$),
118: detected high-redshift quasars. The derived rest frame far-infrared (FIR)
119: emission in the three detected sources is about five to ten times
120: stronger than that expected from the average SED of the local quasars
121: given the same $\rm 1450\,\AA$ luminosity. Combining the previous
122: submillimeter and millimeter observations at longer
123: wavelengths, the temperatures of the FIR-emitting warm dust
124: from the three quasar detections are estimated to be in
125: the range of $\rm 39$ to $\rm 52\,K$.
126: Additionally, the FIR-to-radio SEDs of the three
127: 350$\,\mu$m detections are consistent with the emission
128: from typical star forming galaxies.
129: The FIR luminosities are $\rm \sim10^{13}\,L_{\odot}$ and
130: the dust masses are $\rm \ge 10^{8}\,M_{\odot}$. These
131: results confirm that huge amounts of warm dust can exist in
132: the host galaxies of optically bright quasars as
133: early as z$\rm \sim$6. The universe is so young
134: at these epochs ($\rm \sim1\,Gyr$) that a rapid dust formation mechanism
135: is required. We estimate the size of the FIR dust
136: emission region to be about a few kpc, and further provide a comparison of the SEDs among
137: different kinds of dust emitting sources to investigate the dominant
138: dust heating mechanism.
139: %Thus it is likely
140: %that massive star formation is ongoing in these quasar hosts,
141: %co-eval with supermassive black hole accretion,
142: %and dominating the heating of the FIR emitting dust.
143:
144: \end{abstract}
145:
146: \keywords{galaxies: high-redshift --- galaxies: starburst --- infrared: galaxies
147: --- submillimeter --- quasars: individual (SDSS J033829.31+002156.3, SDSS
148: J075618.14+410408.6, SDSS J092721.82+200123.7, SDSS J104845.05+463718.3)}
149:
150: \section{Introduction}
151:
152: Quasars in the distant universe may be
153: studied as important probes of supermassive black hole
154: (SMBH) and host galaxy formation at early epochs.
155: Universal relationships between the supermassive
156: black holes (SMBHs) and their stellar bulges were
157: found in both active and normal galaxies locally,
158: indicating that the early evolution of the SMBH-bulge
159: systems is tightly correlated (eg. Marconi \& Hunt 2002;
160: Tremaine et al. 2002). How these relationships behaved
161: at an early galaxy evolution stage is a critical
162: question for the studies of the high-z universe. In particular,
163: if the SMBH forms prior to the stellar bulge, we may expect
164: to see massive star formation co-eval with rapid black hole
165: accretion in the quasar systems at the
166: highest redshifts.
167:
168: Observations at submillimeter and millimeter [(sub)mm]
169: wavelengths were preformed to study the thermal emission from warm
170: dust in the quasar host galaxies at high redshifts.
171: These studies yield important information on the mass
172: and temperature of the FIR-emitting dust, and thus provide key
173: constraints on the related galaxy evolution activities.
174: Samples of optically bright quasars from z$\sim$2 to 6
175: have been observed at (sub)mm wavelengths (Omont et al. 1996;
176: Omont et al. 2001; 2003, Carilli et al. 2001; Beelen et al. 2003;
177: Bertoldi et al. 2003a; Priddey et al. 2003a, Robson et al. 2004;
178: Wang et al. 2007), using the Max-Planck Millimeter
179: Bolometer (MAMBO) on the IRAM-30m Telescope and the
180: Submillimeter Common-User Bolometer Array (SCUBA) on the
181: James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. The detection rate is
182: about 30\% at mJy sensitivity for all these samples,
183: indicating the existence of a population of FIR luminous
184: objects within the high-z optically selected quasar sample.
185:
186: Important results were obtained from deep 350$\,\mu$m
187: observations of these strong (sub)mm quasars (Benford et al. 1999;
188: Beelen et al. 2006) made by the SHARC-II bolometer
189: camera (Dowell et al. 2003) on the Caltech Submillimeter
190: Observatory (CSO). The 350$\,\mu$m observations
191: confirm the existence, and constrain the properties of the warm
192: dust with a typical temperature of $\rm \sim50\,K$ in
193: the host galaxies of these quasars (Benford et al. 1999;
194: Beelen et al. 2006). Fits of the FIR (SEDs) imply
195: FIR luminosities of about $\rm \sim10^{13}\,L_{\odot}$ and
196: FIR-to-radio luminosity ratios following the trend defined
197: by star forming galaxies (Beelen et al. 2006).
198: These properties are all comparable to the FIR emission
199: found in the submillimeter detected galaxies (SMGs)
200: at z$\sim$1 to $\gtrsim$3, i.e. thermal emission from $>$10 K to 70 K
201: warm dust heated by star formation at a rate of a few
202: $\rm 10^{3}\,M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}$ (eg. Chapman et al. 2005; Kov$\rm \acute a$cs et al. 2006b).
203: The SHARC-II detected quasars also tend to have highly excited
204: molecular CO emission from the host galaxies
205: (i.e. peak at $\rm J=6-5$ or higher, Carilli et al. 2002, 2007;
206: Solomon \& Vanden Bout 2005), exhibiting FIR-to-CO
207: emission ratios similar to that of the star forming galaxies
208: at low and high redshifts (Solomon \& Vanden Bout 2005;
209: Riechers et al. 2006; Carilli et al. 2007).
210:
211: One instrumental finding among these observations is the SHARC-II
212: detection of SDSS J114816.64+525150.3 at z=6.42
213: (hereafter J1148+5251, Beelen et al. 2006). This is the
214: first 350$\,\mu$m dust continuum detection beyond $\rm z=5$.
215: The $\rm 4.5\times10^{8}\,M_{\odot}$ of $\rm \sim55K$ warm dust
216: discovered in this source implies a similar evolution stage as
217: was found in other (sub)mm detected quasars at lower
218: redshifts, but exist at an epoch when the age of the
219: universe is only $\sim$870 Myr. Probing the warm dust
220: emission at such an epoch is critical as it constrains
221: the time scale of dust formation in addition to the questions
222: of dust heating and black hole-bulge evolution.
223: The detection of J1148+5251 indicates a rapid
224: dust formation in these earliest galaxies (forming $\rm \ge10^{8}\,M_{\odot}$
225: of dust within $\le$1 Gyr), which requires confirmation
226: with more examples at similar redshifts.
227:
228: In this paper, we report our new 350$\,\mu$m SHARC-II
229: observations of four z$\ge$5 SDSS quasars.
230: These quasars are among the strongest MAMBO $\rm 1.2\,mm$ detections
231: at z$\ge$5 (Carilli et al. 2001; Petric et al. 2003; Priddey et al. 2003b;
232: Bertoldi et al. 2003a; Wang et al. 2007).
233: The observations presented in this work are among the most sensitive
234: ones that have been made by SHARC-II at 350$\,\mu$m, and are of critical
235: importance as they deliver a data point on the short wavelength
236: side or near the peak of the redshifted FIR emission spectrum.
237: Combining with measurements on the long wavelength side allows determination
238: of the dust temperature and, thus, the mass and the FIR luminosity.
239: We describe the SHARC-II observations
240: in Section 2, list the results in Section 3, and present
241: discussions in Section 4. We adopt a $\rm \Lambda$-model
242: cosmology with $\rm H_{0}=71km\ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}$, $\rm \Omega_{m}=0.27$
243: and $\rm \Omega_{\Lambda}=0.73$ (Spergel et al. 2007), throughout this paper.
244:
245: \section{Observations}
246:
247: The observations were carried out with SHARC-II on the 10.4 m telescope of the CSO during
248: 2007 January 13-18 UT. The SHARC-II
249: camera is a $\rm 12\times 32$ pixel array with a beam
250: size (FWHM) of $\rm 8.5''$ at 350$\,\mu$m. The field of view
251: is $\rm 2.6'\times1.0'$. We observed the four target
252: sources when the opacity at 225GHz ($\rm \tau_{225GHz}$)
253: was $\le$ 0.06, i.e. during the best weather conditions on Mauna Kea.
254: The CSO Dish Surface Optimization
255: System (DSOS, Leong 2005) was used to correct the surface
256: imperfections and gravitational deformations. Scans were
257: performed using a Lissajous pattern with amplitudes of $\rm \pm45''$
258: and $\rm \pm12''$ in azimuth and elevation respectively, resulting in
259: a uniform coverage of $\rm \sim65''\times34''$. We performed hourly pointing, focus,
260: and flux calibration with strong sources. We used Uranus as a
261: primary calibrator, and a number of sources, IRC10216, CRL618, CIT6,
262: OH231.8+4.2, GL490, and Arp220 were used as secondary calibrators. The uncertainties
263: of the final calibration were expected to be within 20\%, based on
264: repeated observations of the calibrators and the flux uncertainties
265: of the secondary calibrators. The $\rm 1\sigma$ pointing uncertainties, estimated
266: from repeated pointing on calibrators, is about $\rm 2.3''$.
267:
268: During standard observing, the position of the secondary mirror is
269: updated frequently to compensate for sag as the telescope elevation
270: changes. Unfortunately, a telescope configuration problem on the last
271: three nights resulted in only infrequent updates. The effects of
272: this problem are a drift in the focus and a small drift in pointing. We
273: carefully studied the effects of the mirror position errors on the data
274: using the position encoders and images of the calibrators. About half of
275: the data was dropped due to bad focus. For the remaining data, we made
276: small ($\rm <3''$) adjustments to the pointing with an uncertainty of $\rm <1''$.
277:
278: We completed data reduction using the SHARC-II data reduction
279: package CRUSH version 1.52 (Kov$\rm \grave a$cs 2006a). The total
280: integration time for each source is about 6 to 8 hours
281: after excluding the bad scans, and the rms noise level for the final
282: maps is about $\rm 5$ to $\rm 6\,mJy\,beam^{-1}$. The final
283: maps were smoothed to a FWHM of $\rm 12.4''$, for optimal
284: signal-to-noise in the case of point-source detection, and the peak surface
285: brightness is adopted as the total flux density of the source.
286:
287: \section{Results}
288:
289: Three out of the four z$\ge$5 quasars observed are detected
290: at the $\rm \gtrsim3\sigma$ level with SHARC-II. We list
291: basic information and previous (sub)mm and radio
292: continuum results of the four targets in Table 1,
293: and the results of the SHARC-II observations are presented
294: in the first four columns of Table 2, including the source
295: name, 350$\mu$m peak surface brightness,
296: peak offset from the optical quasar, and the integration time.
297: The final SHARC-II maps of all the
298: four targets are presented in Figure 1. The $\rm 1\sigma$
299: position uncertainty on the map is
300: $\rm \sigma_{pos}\sim\frac{FWHM}{SNR} \sim 4''$ for $\rm 3\sigma$
301: detections (considering the smoothed beam size of $\rm FWHM=12.4''$).
302: Thus the 350$\,\mu$m peak positions of the three detections are
303: consistent with the optical quasars given this position
304: uncertainty (See Column 3 in Table 2).
305: The details for the individual sources are presented in the following.
306:
307: {\bf J033829.31+002156.3} (hereafter J0338+0021) is a z=5.03 quasar discovered by Fan et al. (1999). It is one of
308: the strongest MAMBO detections among a sample of z$\rm \ge4$ SDSS quasars
309: from Carilli et al. (2001) with $\rm S_{\nu,1.2mm}=3.7\pm0.3\,mJy$. The dust
310: continuum is also detected by SCUBA at 850$\,\mu$m (Priddey et al. 2003b).
311: Moreover, Maiolino et al. (2007) detected CO(5-4) line emission in
312: this source, with a molecular gas mass of $\rm 2.4\times10^{10}\,M_{\odot}$.
313:
314: This source is detected by our SHARC-II observation at
315: the $\rm \sim4\sigma$ level, with a peak surface
316: brightness of $\rm S_{\nu,350\mu m}=17.7\pm4.4\,mJy\,beam^{-1}$ $\rm 3.8''$ away from the optical position.
317:
318: {\bf J075618.14+410408.6} (hereafter J0756+4104) was discovered by Anderson et al. (2001) with a redshift of z=5.09.
319: It is a strong MAMBO source with $\rm S_{\nu,1.2mm}=5.5\pm0.5\,mJy$
320: (Petric et al. 2003), and also is detected at 450$\,\mu$m and 850$\,\mu$m by
321: SCUBA (Priddey et al. 2003b; Priddey et al. 2007) and at 1.4GHz by the VLA (Petric et al. 2003).
322:
323: We detect a $\rm 3.3\sigma$ peak ($\rm S_{\nu,350\mu m}=17.1\pm5.2\,mJy\,beam^{-1}$)
324: on the SHARC-II map, $4.3''$ away from the position of the optical quasar.
325:
326: {\bf J092721.82+200123.7} (hereafter J0927+2001) is a SDSS quasar at z=5.77
327: (Fan et al. 2006b; Carilli et al. 2007). This source has a
328: MAMBO flux density of $\rm S_{\nu,1.2mm}=5.0\pm0.8\,mJy$, making it one of
329: the most luminous quasars at z$\sim$6 at FIR wavelengths (Wang et al. 2007).
330: The VLA radio continuum observation of this source
331: yields a $\rm 3\sigma$ detection of $\rm S_{1.4GHz}=45\pm14\,\mu Jy$ at 1.4GHz.
332: CO(5-4) and CO(6-5) line emission has also been detected in this source
333: very recently (Carilli et al. 2007). The CO luminosity
334: indicates molecular gas with a mass of $\rm 1.6\times10^{10}\,M_{\odot}$
335: in the host galaxy.
336: The CO observations are accompanied with a $\rm \sim3\sigma$
337: continuum measurement at $\rm 3.5\,mm$ of $\rm S_{\nu,3.5mm}=0.12\pm0.03\,mJy$.
338:
339: With SHARC-II we measure a brightness
340: for this source of $\rm S_{\nu,350\mu m}=17.7\pm5.7\,mJy\,beam^{-1}$ with a position
341: offset of $\rm 3.9''$ from the optical quasar. A second $\rm \sim3\sigma$ peak is seen in
342: the map of this source with $\rm S_{\nu,350\mu m}=17.5\pm5.6\,mJy\,beam^{-1}$, to
343: the southeast of the optical quasar position. The separation between the two
344: peaks is about $\rm 14.9''$.
345: However, there is no hint of extension towards the secondary peak
346: direction in the CO emission maps of J0927+2001 at $\rm 3\,mm$ of
347: Carilli et al. (2007). Further high resolution mapping
348: at (sub)mm wavelengths is required to understand the nature
349: of this secondary peak. The analysis below only considers the first peak
350: close to the optical quasar position.
351:
352: {\bf J104845.05+463718.3} (hereafter J1048+4637) is a broad absorption line quasar
353: at z=6.20 from Fan et al. (2003).
354: The MAMBO flux density for this source is $\rm S_{\nu,1.2mm}=3.0\pm0.4\,mJy$
355: (Bertoldi et al. 2003). However, it has not been detected by
356: SCUBA (Robson et al. 2004), or by the VLA (Wang et al. 2007).
357:
358: Our SHARC-II observation did not detect this source.
359: The pixel flux density value at the optical quasar position
360: is $\rm 5.3\,mJy\,beam^{-1}$, with a $\rm 1\sigma$ rms
361: of $\rm 5.8\,mJy\,beam^{-1}$ on the final map. Thus we adopt
362: $\rm 17.4\,mJy\,beam^{-1}$ ($\rm 3\sigma$ rms) as
363: an upper limit to the 350$\,\mu$m flux density.
364:
365: The optical-to-radio SEDs of
366: the four quasars are plotted in Figure 2, displaying the
367: photometric data listed in Table 1 and 2. Template SEDs of
368: local quasars from Elvis et al. (1994) and
369: Richards et al. (2006) are plotted for comparison,
370: normalized to $\rm 1450\AA$.
371: For J1048+4637, the measurements at submillimeter,
372: millimeter and radio wavelengths are all consistent with the
373: templates, i.e. the average SED emission of the typical
374: type-I quasar in the local universe. However, strong
375: FIR emission is seen in the other three sources, which
376: exceed the templates by nearly an order of magnitude.
377: This is similar to the FIR excess from warm dust shown
378: in the SED of J1148+5251 by Beelen et al. (2006).
379:
380: We fit the FIR bumps of the three sources with an
381: optically thin graybody, namely\\
382: \begin{equation}
383: \rm S_{\nu}=S_{0}\cdot\left(\frac{\nu}{1GHz}\right)^{3+\beta}\frac{1}{exp(h\nu/kT_{d})-1},\\
384: \end{equation}
385: where $\rm \beta$ is the emissivity index, $\rm T_d$ is the
386: dust temperature in K, $\rm S_{0}$ is the amplitude factor,
387: and $\rm S_{\nu}$ is the rest frame flux density in mJy.
388: Since there are only two or three data points
389: available for each source, we fix the $\rm \beta$ value
390: to 1.6 (Beelen et al. 2006), and then fit $\rm S_{0}$
391: and $\rm T_d$ for the three sources. A Levenberg-Marquardt
392: least-squares fit is performed with the IDL package MPFIT.
393: The best-fitting dust temperatures range from $\rm 39\ to\ 52\,K$
394: with $\rm 1\sigma$ fitting errors of 3 to 4 K. In Figure 2, we
395: also extended the fitted FIR SED to radio for the three detections,
396: using a radio spectral index of -0.75 and an average
397: FIR-to-radio emission ratio of $\rm q\equiv log(L_{FIR}/3.75
398: \times10^{12}\,W)-log(L_{\nu,1.4GHz}/W\,Hz^{-1})=2.34$ found
399: in typical star forming galaxies (Yun et al. 2001).
400: The observed radio emission/upper limit of the three objects
401: are all consistent with the model SED, i.e. within the range of
402: FIR-to-radio emission ratios five times
403: above or below the average value of star forming galaxies, but the detected
404: flux densities in J0756+4104 and J0927+2001 are 0.2 to 0.4 index higher
405: than the value derived with q=2.34.
406:
407: The FIR luminosity is calculated from the fitted
408: SED, integrating rest frame 42.5$\,\mu$m to 122.5$\,\mu$m, namely\\
409: \begin{equation}
410: \rm L_{FIR}=2.49\times10^{-11}\cdot4\pi D_{L}^{2}\int S_{\nu}d\nu\\
411: \end{equation}
412: where $\rm D_{L}$ is the luminosity distance in Mpc and $\rm L_{FIR}$ is in $\rm L_{\odot}$.
413: We calculate the dust masses following \\
414: \begin{equation}
415: \rm M_{dust}=\frac{L_{FIR}}{4\pi\int\kappa_{\nu}B_{\nu}d\nu}=8.33\times10^{14}\cdot\frac{S_{0}D_{L}^{2}}{\kappa_{0}}\ M_{\odot}\\
416: \end{equation}
417: where $\rm B_{\nu}$ is the planck function
418: and $\rm \kappa_{\nu}=\kappa_{0}(\nu/\nu_{0})^{\beta}$ is the dust
419: absorption coefficient. We adopt $\rm \kappa_{0}=18.75\,cm^2g^{-1}$
420: at 125$\,\mu$m (Hildebrand 1983).
421: The derived parameters for the three SHARC-II detected sources
422: are listed in the last four columns in Table 2.
423:
424: \section{Discussion}
425:
426: We have detected three high redshift quasars with
427: SHARC-II at 350$\,\mu$m. These are among
428: the most sensitive observations made by SHARC-II, and increase
429: the number of 350$\,\mu$m detected optical quasars
430: at z$\ge$5 to four. These quasars are all strong
431: detections in previous MAMBO and SCUBA observations
432: at longer wavelengths (Carilli et al. 2001;
433: Petric et al. 2003; Robson et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2007),
434: and the measurements given
435: by SHARC-II are close to the FIR emission peak
436: from warm dust. By sampling over the dust peak, we
437: provide reliable measurements of temperature, mass,
438: and FIR luminosity of the FIR-emitting warm dust.
439: As with J1148+5251, (Bertoldi et al. 2003; Beelen et al. 2006),
440: the three newly detected sources show that excess emission from huge amounts of warm
441: dust can exist in some optically
442: bright quasars at extreme redshifts.
443:
444: The derived dust masses are all $\rm \ge10^{8}\,M_{\odot}$.
445: This result confirms the high heavy element abundance and rapid dust
446: formation in massive quasar hosts at z$\ge$5
447: (Priddey et al. 2003b; Bertoldi et al. 2003a) when
448: the age of the universe was $\rm \lesssim1.2\,Gyr$. At this epoch,
449: the standard mechanism of ISM dust formation, i.e. stellar winds
450: from evolved low mass stars, is
451: inefficient as it requires very long time scales ($\rm >1\,Gyr$).
452: A process associated with the evolution of massive stars,
453: (with a much shorter time scale), is likely required
454: (eg. Morgan \& Edmunds 2003; Schneider et al. 2004; Maiolino et al. 2004).
455:
456: All of the SHARC-II detected z$\geq$5 quasars exhibit FIR luminosities
457: of $\rm \sim10^{13}\,L_{\odot}$. Under the optically
458: thin assumption (i.e. the optical depth $\rm \tau_{\nu}\ll1$ at FIR wavelengths),
459: the size of the dust emission region can be roughly estimated
460: as \\
461: \begin{equation}
462: \rm R_{dust}\sim[\frac{L_{FIR}}{(4\pi)(\pi\int\tau_{\nu}B_{v}(T_{d}\sim50K)\,d\nu)}]^{0.5}
463: \end{equation}
464: where the emissivity index $\rm \beta=1.6$, $\rm \tau_{\nu}=(\nu/\nu_{c})^{\beta}$, and $\rm \nu_{c}$ is
465: the critical frequency with $\rm \tau_{\nu_{c}}=1$. To satisfy the optically
466: thin assumption, we adopt $\rm \nu_{c}=30\,THz$ (i.e. $\rm \lambda_{c}=10\,\mu m$).
467: The derived $\rm R_{dust}$ is $\rm \sim5\,kpc$, which suggests the
468: FIR-emitting warm dust emission region is on kpc scales in
469: the quasar host. This is consistent with the scales of CO
470: emission and [C II] 158$\,\mu$m emission found in J1148+5251 (Walter, et al. 2004, 2007, in prep.).
471:
472: The dust temperatures derived from these z$\geq$5 quasars
473: are in the range from $\rm 39$ to $\rm55\,K$, which
474: is comparable to the values found in the bright (sub)mm
475: quasars at lower redshifts (Benford et al. 1999;
476: Beelen et al. 2006). They are also within the range of
477: about 11 to 72 K found in samples of submillimeter
478: selected galaxies at z$\sim$1 to 3.5, but a little higher
479: than the mean value of $\sim$35 K (Chapman et al. 2005; Kov$\rm \acute a$cs et al. 2006b).
480: We combine the infrared to radio data of all four SHARC-II
481: detected z$\geq$5 quasars and plot them in Figure 3.
482: The combined SED is compared to that of another two
483: sources, the z=3.9 quasar APM 08279+5255 (Irwin et al. 1998;
484: Lewis et al. 1998, 2002; Downes et al. 1999; Egami et al. 2000;
485: Beelen et al. 2006; Wagg et al. 2005; Wei$\rm \beta$ et al. 2007) and the
486: local starburst galaxy M82 (Telesco \& Harper 1980;
487: Klein et al. 1988; Hughes et al. 1990; Smith et al. 1990;
488: Kr$\rm \ddot u$gel et al. 1990). The FIR emission from
489: APM 08279+5255 is suggested to be dominated by a $\sim$200 K
490: dust component on scales of a few hundred pc,
491: i.e. a typical AGN heated hot dust torus
492: (Wei$\rm \beta$ et al. 2007), while the FIR emission
493: in the starburst galaxy M82 is clearly from starburst
494: heated warm dust with a temperature of $\sim$45 K
495: (Klein et al. 1998). The combined FIR-to-radio emission of the
496: four quasars can be probed by the SED of M82 very well, but
497: is quite different from the dusty AGN emission from
498: APM 08279+5255, which peaks at a shorter wavelength ($\rm \sim20\,\mu m$)
499: and shows a much steeper infrared slope. Among the four z$\geq$5
500: SHARC-II detections, only J1148+5251 have Spitzer measurements
501: at near-IR wavelengths (Charmandaris et al. 2004; Jiang et al. 2006), and the flux
502: densities are all much lower compared to the near-IR
503: emission of APM 08279+5255.
504:
505: The estimate of $\rm R_{dust}$ and the comparison of the
506: IR SEDs may suggest a starburst origin of the
507: strong FIR emission in these z$\ge$5 quasars detected by SHARC-II and
508: other (sub)mm detectors. If this is the case, the star
509: formation rates derived from the
510: FIR luminosities are all $\rm \gtrsim10^{3}\,M_{\odot}yr^{-1}$
511: (as listed in Col. (8), Table 2)\footnote{We estimate the star formation rate with
512: the empirical relationship from Kennicutt
513: (1998) assuming a standard initial mass function, i.e. $\rm SFR\sim 4.5L_{IR}\,M_{\odot}yr^{-1}$,
514: where $\rm L_{IR}$ is the infrared
515: luminosity (8-1000$\,\mu$m) in unit
516: of $\rm 10^{44}\,erg\,s^{-1}$, and
517: is $\rm\sim 1.5L_{FIR}$ for warm dust emission.}, indicating
518: an active bulge building in these quasar hosts.
519: We expect future observations with
520: Spitzer and the Herschel Space Observatory to
521: better constrain the dust emission SEDs of these
522: objects, and high resolution imaging
523: ($\rm \sim 1''$) with the Atacama Large Millimeter
524: Array (ALMA) to constrain the size of the dust emission region
525: These future observations will give a better understanding
526: of star formation and warm dust heating in these high-z
527: bright (sub)mm quasars.
528:
529: \acknowledgments
530:
531: We thank Jonathan Bird at the CSO for preparing the opacity data.
532: We thank Colin Borys for helpful advice on SHARC-II data reduction.
533: The CSO is supported by the NSF under AST-0540882.
534: We acknowledge support from the Max-Planck Society
535: and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation through the
536: Max-Planck-Forschungspreis 2005. The National Radio
537: Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National
538: Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement
539: by Associated Universities, Inc.
540:
541: {\it Facilities:} \facility{CSO (SHARC-II)}, \facility{IRAM (MAMBO)}, \facility{VLA}, \facility{SDSS}.
542:
543:
544: \begin{thebibliography}{}
545: \bibitem[]{562} Anderson, S. F. et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 503
546: \bibitem[]{563} Beelen, A., Cox, P., Benford, D. J., Dowell, C. D., Kov$\rm \acute{a}$cs, A., Bertoldi, F., Omont, A., \& Carilli, C. L. 2006, ApJ, 642, 694
547: ApJ, 450, 559
548: \bibitem[]{565} Bertoldi, F., Carilli, C. L., Cox, P., Fan, X., Strauss, M. A., Beelen, A., Omont, A., \& Zylka, R. 2003a, A\& A, 406, L55
549: \bibitem[]{566} Bertoldi, F. et al. 2003b, A\& A, 409, L47
550: \bibitem[]{568} Carilli, C. L. et al. 2001, ApJ, 555, 625
551: \bibitem[]{569} Carilli, C. L. et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 997
552: \bibitem[]{570} Carilli, C. L. et al. 2007, ApJL, in press, (astro-ph/0707.2339)
553: \bibitem[]{553} Chapman, S. C., Blain, A. W., Smail, I., \& Ivison, R. J. 2005, ApJ, 622, 772
554: \bibitem[]{} Charmandaris, V. et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 142
555: \bibitem[]{573} Dowell, C. D. et al. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4855, 73
556: \bibitem[]{555} Downes, D., Neri, R., Wiklind, T., Wilner, D. J., \& Shaver, P. A. 1999, ApJ, 513, L1
557: \bibitem[]{556} Egami, E., Neugebauer, G., Soifer, B. T. \& Matthews, K. 2000, ApJ, 535, 561
558: \bibitem[]{574} Elvis, M. et al. 1994, ApJS, 95, 1
559: \bibitem[]{575} Fan, X. et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 1
560: \bibitem[]{576} Fan, X. et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1649
561: \bibitem[]{577} Fan, X., Carilli, C. L., \& Keating, B. 2006a, ARA\&A, 44, 415
562: \bibitem[]{578} Fan, X. et al. 2006b, AJ, 131, 1203
563: \bibitem[]{579} Fritz, J., Franceschini, A., \& Hatziminaoglou, E. 2005, MNRAS, 366, 767
564: \bibitem[]{580} Helou, G., Soifer, B. T., \& Rowan-Robinson, M. 1985, ApJ, 298, L7
565: \bibitem[]{564} Hughes, D. H., Gear, W. K., \& Robson, E. I. 1990, MNRAS, 244, 759
566: \bibitem[]{565} Irwin, M. J., Ibeta, R. A., Lewis, G. F., \& Totten, E. J. 1998, ApJ, 505, 529
567: \bibitem[]{566} Jiang, L. et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 2127
568: \bibitem[]{} Kennicutt, R. C. 1998, ARA\&A, 36, 189
569: \bibitem[]{567} Klein, U., Wielebinski, R., \& Morsi, H. W. 1988 A\&A 190,41
570: \bibitem[]{568} Kr$\rm \ddot u$gel, E., Chini, R., Klein, U. et al. 1990, A\&A, 240, 232
571: \bibitem[]{583} Kov$\rm \acute a$cs, A. 2006a, PhD thesis, Caltech
572: \bibitem[]{570} Kov$\rm \acute a$cs, A., Chapman, S. C., Dowell, C. D., Blain, A. W., Ivison, R. J., Smail, I., \& Phillips, T. G., 2006b, ApJ, 650, 592
573: \bibitem[]{584} Leong M. M. 2005, URSI Conf. Sec., J3-J10, 426
574: \bibitem[]{572} Lewis, G. F., Chapman, S. C., Ibata, R. A., Irwin, M. J., \& Totten, E. J., 1998, ApJ, 505, L1
575: \bibitem[]{573} Lewis, G. F., Carilli, C., Papadopoulos, P., Ivison, R. J. 2002, MNRAS, 330, L15
576: \bibitem[]{585} Maiolino, R., Schneider, R., Oliva, E., Bianchi, S., Ferrara, A., Mannucci, F., Pedani, M., \& Roca, S. M. 2004, Nature,431,533
577: \bibitem[]{586} Maiolino, R. et al. 2007, A\&A, in press
578: \bibitem[]{587} Morgan, H. L., \& Edmunds, M. G., 2003, MNRAS, 343, 427
579: \bibitem[]{588} Omont, A., Cox, P., Bertoldi, F., Cox, P., Carilli, C. L., Priddey, R. S., McMahon, R. C., \& Isaak, K. G. 2001, A\&A, 374, 371
580: \bibitem[]{589} Omont, A., Beelen, A., Bertoldi, F., McMahon, R. G., Carilli, C. L., \& Isaak, K. G. 2003, A\&A, 398, 657
581: \bibitem[]{590} Petric, A. O., Carilli, C. L., Bertoldi, F., Fan, X., Cox, P., Strauss, M. A., Omont, A., \& Schneider, D. P. 2003, AJ, 126, 15
582: \bibitem[]{591} Priddey, R. S., Isaak, K. G., McMahon, R. G., \& Omont, A. 2003a, MNRAS, 339, 1183
583: \bibitem[]{592} Priddey, R. S., Isaak, K. G., McMahon, R. G., Roboson, E. I., \& Pearson, C. P. 2003b, MNRAS, 344, L74
584: \bibitem[]{} Priddey, R. S., Ivison, R. J., \& Isaak, K. G. 2007, MNRAS, submitted, (astro-ph/0709.0610)
585: \bibitem[]{593} Richards, G. T. et al. 2006, ApJS, 166, 470
586: \bibitem[]{594} Riechers, D. A. et al. 2006, ApJ, 650, 604
587: \bibitem[]{595} Robson, I., Priddey, R. S., Isaak, K. G., \& McMahon, R. G. 2004, MNRAS, 351, L29
588: \bibitem[]{596} Sanders, D. B., Phinney, E. S., Neugebauer, G., Soifer, B. T., \& Mattherws, K. 1989, ApJ, 347, 29
589: \bibitem[]{597} Schneider, R., Ferrara, A., \& Salvaterra, R. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1379
590: \bibitem[]{587} Smith, P. A., Brand, P. W. J. L., Puxley, P. J., Mountain, C. M., \& Nakai, N. 1990, MNRAS, 243, 97
591: \bibitem[]{598} Solomon, P. M., \& Vanden Bout, P. A. 2005, ARA\&A, 43, 677
592: \bibitem[]{599} Spergel, D. N. et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 377
593: \bibitem[]{590} Telesco, C. M., \& Harper, D. A. 1980, ApJ, 235, 392
594: \bibitem[]{591} Wagg, J., Wilner, D. J., Neri, R., Downew, D., \& Wiklind, T. 2005, ApJ, 634, L13
595: \bibitem[]{592} Walter, F., Carilli, C. L., Bertoldi, F., Menten, K., Cox, P.,Lo, K. Y., Fan, X., \& Strauss, M. A. 2004, ApJ, 615, L17
596: \bibitem[]{593} Walter, F. et al. 2007, in prep.
597: \bibitem[]{600} Wang, R. et al. 2007, AJ, 134, 617
598: \bibitem[]{595} Wei$\rm \beta$, A., Downes, D., Neri, R., Walter, F., Henkel, C., Wilner, D. J., Wagg, J., \& Wiklind, T. 2007, A\&A, 467, 955
599: \bibitem[]{601} Yun, M. S., Reddy, N. A., \& Condon, J. J. 2001, ApJ, 554, 803
600: \end{thebibliography}
601:
602: \clearpage
603:
604: \clearpage
605: \begin{table}
606: {\scriptsize
607: \begin{center}
608: \caption{Summary of the previous observations \label{tbl-1}}
609: \begin{tabular}{cccccccl}
610: \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
611: SDSS name&z&$m_{1450\AA}$ &$\rm S_{\nu,450\mu m}$&$\rm S_{\nu,850\mu m}$&$\rm S_{\nu,1.2mm}$& $S_{\nu,3.5mm}$ &$\rm S_{1.4GHz}$\\
612: & & & mJy & mJy & mJy& mJy & $\rm \mu$Jy\\
613: (1)&(2)&(3)&(4)&(5)&(6)&(7)&(8) \\
614: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
615: J033829.31+002156.3&5.03&20.01$^{a}$&5$\pm$16$^{b}$&11.9$\pm$2.0$^{b}$&3.7$\pm$0.3$^{c}$& ---&37$\pm$25$^{c}$\\
616: J075618.14+410408.6&5.09&20.15$^{d}$&16$\pm$5$^{l}$&13.4$\pm$1.0$^{l}$&5.5$\pm$0.5$^{e}$&---&65$\pm$17$^{e}$\\
617: J092721.82+200123.7&5.77&19.87$^{f}$&---&---&5.0$\pm$0.8$^{g}$&0.12$\pm$0.03$^{k}$&45$\pm$14$^{g}$\\
618: J104845.05+463718.3&6.20&19.25$^{h}$&7.6$\pm$11.7$^{i}$&2.3$\pm$2.2$^{i}$&3.0$\pm$0.4$^{j}$&---&6$\pm$11$^{g}$\\
619: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline
620: \end{tabular}\\
621: \end{center}
622: $^{a}$Fan et al. (1999). $^{b}$Priddey et al. (2003b).
623: $^{c}$Carilli et al. (2001). $^{d}$Anderson et al. (2001). $^{e}$Petric et al. (2004).
624: $^{f}$Fan et al. (2006). $^{g}$Wang et al. (2007). $^{h}$Fan et al. (2003).
625: $^{i}$Robson et al. (2004). $^{j}$Bertodi et al. (2003a). $^{k}$Carilli et al. (2007).
626: $^{l}$Priddey et al. (2007)
627: }\end{table}
628:
629: \begin{table}
630: {\scriptsize
631: \begin{center}
632: \caption{Results and derived parameters \label{tbl-2}}
633: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
634: \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
635: SDSS name& $\rm S_{\nu,350\mu m}^{a}$ & Offsets &Int. time & $\rm L_{FIR}$ & $\rm M_{dust}$ & $\rm T_{dust}$ & SFR\\
636: &$\rm mJy\,beam^{-1}$& $''$&hours & $\rm 10^{13}\,L_{\odot}$& $\rm 10^{8}\,M_{\odot}$&K & $\rm 10^{3}\,M_{\odot}yr^{-1}$\\
637: (1)&(2)&(3)&(4)&(5)&(6) & (7) & (8)\\
638: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
639: J033829.31+002156.3&17.7$\pm$4.4&3.8& 7.2 &0.92$\pm$0.17 &6.1 &45.6$\pm$3.2& 2.2 \\
640: J075618.14+410408.6&17.1$\pm$5.2&4.3& 6.3 &0.84$\pm$0.17 &12.1 &39.2$\pm$2.6& 1.9 \\
641: J092721.82+200123.7&17.7$\pm$5.7&3.9& 7.3 &1.21$\pm$0.28 &4.6 &51.1$\pm$4.2& 3.2 \\
642: J104845.05+463718.3& $\rm 5.3\pm5.8$&---& 8.0 &--- &--- &--- &--- \\
643: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline
644: \end{tabular}\\
645: \end{center}
646: $^{a}$ Note that the absolute calibration uncertainty of 20\% is not included in the rms.\\
647: We adopt an emissivity index of $\rm \beta=1.6$ here for all the calculations (Beelen et al. 2006).
648: }\end{table}
649:
650: \clearpage
651:
652: \begin{figure}
653: \epsscale{1.2}
654: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}\\
655: \plottwo{f1c.eps}{f1d.eps}\\
656: \figcaption{The SHARC-II maps of the
657: four z$\ge$5 quasars at 350$\,\mu$m, smoothing to a beam size
658: of $\rm FWHM=12.4''$. The contour levels are
659: $\rm (2,3,4)\times4.0\,mJy\,beam^{-1}$ for
660: each of the four maps. The crosses mark the positions
661: of the optical quasars. \label{fig1}}
662: \end{figure}
663:
664: \begin{figure}
665: \epsscale{1.2}
666: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}\\
667: \plottwo{f2c.eps}{f2d.eps}\\
668: \figcaption{Optical to radio SEDs for the four z$\ge$5 quasars.
669: The squares represent optical data at 1450$\rm \AA$,
670: SHARCII data at 350$\,\mu$m, SCUBA data at 450$\,\mu$m
671: and 850$\,\mu$m, MAMBO data at $\rm 1.2\,mm$, PdBI data at $\rm 3.5\,mm$, and VLA data at 1.4GHz.
672: Arrows denote $\rm 3\sigma$ upper limits for non-detections.
673: The dashed and solid lines represent the low-z quasar templates
674: from Elvis et al. (1994) and Richards et al. (2006), respectively.
675: All the templates are normalized to 1450$\rm \AA$. The hard solid
676: line is the best-fit warm dust model for the three SHARC-II
677: detections, extended to the radio band with the typical
678: radio-FIR correlation of star forming galaxies, i.e.
679: q=2.34 (Yun et al. 2001). The dotted lines denote factors
680: of 5 excesses above and below this typical q value defined by star forming galaxies.}
681: \end{figure}
682:
683: \begin{figure}
684: \epsscale{0.8}
685: \plotone{f3.eps}\\
686: \figcaption{Combined rest frame optical to radio SED of the four SHARC-II
687: detected z$\ge$5 quasars. The data of J1148+5251 are taken from
688: Jiang et al. (2006), Charmandaris et al. (2004), Beelen et al. (2006), Robson et al. (2004),
689: Bertoldi et al. (2003a), and Carilli et al. (2004).
690: The flux densities are normalized to
691: the 1450$\rm \AA$ emission of J1148+5251. The black lines are quasar
692: templates as described in Figure 2. The blue line is the SED of
693: the $\rm z=3.9$ quasar APM 08279+5255, scaling to the 1450$\rm \AA$
694: emission of J1148+5251, with data from Irwin et al. (1998),
695: Lewis et al. (1998, 2002), Downes et al. (1999), Egami et al. (2000),
696: Beelen et al. (2006), Wagg et al. (2005) and Wei$\rm \beta$ et al. (2007).
697: The red line is the SED of the central region of the starburst galaxy M82, scaling to the 0.5 mm
698: flux density of the combined SED, with data from Telesco \& Harper (1980),
699: Klein et al. (1988), Hughes et al. (1990), Smith et al. (1990),
700: and Kr$\rm \ddot u$gel et al. (1990). }
701: \end{figure}
702:
703:
704: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
705: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
706: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
707: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
708: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
709: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
710: %% to include it in this document.)
711:
712: %% \input{table}
713:
714: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
715: %% that appears after it.
716:
717: \end{document}
718:
719: %%
720: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
721: