1: 

2: \documentclass{eas}

3: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}

4: 

5: \begin{document}

6: 

7: \title{Soliton solutions in relativistic field theories and

8: gravitation}

9: 

10: \author{Joaquin Diaz-Alonso}

11: \address{LUTH, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Universit\'e Paris

12: Diderot. 5 Place Jules Janssen, 92190 Meudon, France}

13: \secondaddress{Departamento de Fisica, Universidad de Oviedo.

14: Avda. Calvo Sotelo 18, E-33007 Oviedo, Asturias, Spain}

15: \author{Diego Rubiera-Garcia}

16: \sameaddress{2}

17: 

18: \begin{abstract}

19: 

20: We report on some recent results on a class of relativistic

21: lagrangian field theories supporting non-topological soliton

22: solutions and their applications in the contexts of Gravitation

23: and Cosmology. We analyze one and many-components scalar fields

24: and gauge fields.

25: 

26: \end{abstract}

27: 

28: \maketitle

29: 

30: \section{Introduction}

31: 

32: The well-known Born-Infeld (BI) model (Born \& Infeld

33: \cite{borninfeld1934}) was historically proposed to remove the

34: divergence of the electron's self-energy in classical

35: electrodynamics. Aside from electrostatic soliton solutions in

36: three space dimensions, the model exhibits dyon and bidyon-like

37: solutions (Chernitskii \cite{chern1999}), electric-magnetic

38: duality (Gibbons \& Rasheed \cite{gibbons1995}) and special

39: properties of wave propagation, belonging to the class of

40: ``completely exceptional" theories (Boillat \cite{boillat1970}).

41: 

42: Recently there has been a renewed interest in BI theory

43: and its non-abelian extensions since they appear at different

44: levels of string theory (Gibbons \cite{gibbons1998}). However,

45: there are many other physical contexts where BI-like models have

46: been used, such as the description of dark energy in Cosmology (e.g.

47: F\"uzfa \& Alimi \cite{fuzfa2006a}) and the phenomenological

48: description of the nucleon structure (Deser et al

49: \cite{deser1976}; Pavlovski \cite{pavlovsky2002}).

50: 

51: On the other hand, many studies on generalized electromagnetic and

52: gauge field theories coupled with gravitation have been devoted to

53: the analysis of particle-like solutions. Although several theorems of the

54: 70's (Coleman \cite{coleman1977}) forbid the existence of static,

55: finite-energy solutions of the pure Yang-Mills theory, such

56: solutions were found in the Einstein-Yang-Mills system (Bartnick

57: \& McKinnon \cite{bartnick1988}). Later it was shown that similar

58: glueball solutions also exist in BI-like models in flat space

59: (Gal'tsov \& Kerner \cite{galtsov2000}) as well as in curved space

60: (e.g. Wirschins \emph{et al} \cite{wirschins2001}) (see Volkov \&

61: Gal'tsov (\cite{volkov1999}) for a review and references on

62: non-abelian solitons).

63: 

64: \section{The models}

65: 

66: The BI generalization of classical electrodynamics is by no means

67: unique and, from the point of view of soliton solutions, BI theory

68: is only a particular example of a large class, which has been

69: exhaustively determined in Diaz-Alonso \& Rubiera-Garcia

70: (\cite{dr2007b}). Here we deal with the generalized gauge field

71: problem, by considering gauge-invariant lagrangians which are

72: given functions $L=\varphi(X,Y)$ of the two quadratic field

73: invariants $X=-\frac{1}{2}\sum_aF_{\mu\nu}^aF^{\mu\nu a}

74: \hspace{2pt};\hspace{2pt} Y = -\frac{1}{2}

75: \sum_aF_{\mu\mu}^aF^{*\mu\nu a}$, defined in a domain ($\Omega

76: \subseteq \Re^{2}$) which is assumed to be open and connected and

77: including the vacuum ($X=Y=0$). In calculating the field

78: invariants we use the ordinary definition of the trace, although

79: other definitions are possible (Tseytlin \cite{tseytlin1997}). We

80: also require the condition $\varphi(X,Y)=\varphi(X,-Y)$ to be

81: satisfied, in order to preserve parity invariance. Moreover we

82: restrict our analysis to ``physically admissible theories", which

83: we define by the requirement of the vanishing of the vacuum energy

84: ($\varphi(0,0)=0$), as well as the positive definiteness of the

85: energy, which demands the minimal \emph{necessary and sufficient}

86: condition

87: 

88: \begin{eqnarray}\label{1}

89: \rho^s\geq \left(X+\sqrt{X^2+Y^2}\right)\frac{\partial

90: \varphi}{\partial X}+ Y\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial

91: Y}-\varphi(X,Y)\geq 0\hspace{2pt},\hspace{2pt}

92: \end{eqnarray}

93: to be satisfied in the entire domain of definition ($\Omega$). The field equations read

94: 

95: \begin{equation}\label{2}

96:     \sum_bD_{ab\mu}\left[\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial X}F^{\mu\nu b}+

97: \frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial Y}F^{*\mu\nu b}\right]=0\hspace{2pt},\hspace{2pt}

98: \end{equation}

99: where $D_{ab\mu}\equiv\delta_{ab}\partial_{\mu}

100: +g\sum_cC_{abc}A_{c\mu}$. We next consider the electrostatic

101: spherically symmetric solutions (ESS) ($\vec{E}_a(r)=

102: -\vec{\nabla}(\phi_a(r)) = -\phi'_a(r) \frac{\vec{r}}{r}

103: \hspace{1pt}; \hspace{1pt}\vec{H}_a=0$). When this substitution is

104: done in (\ref{2}) we get two sets of equations

105: 

106: \begin{eqnarray}\label{3}

107: \nu=0 \rightarrow \vec{\nabla}\left(\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial X}\vec{\nabla}\phi_a(r)\right)=0

108: \hspace{4pt};\hspace{4pt}

109: \nu=i=1,2,3 \rightarrow \sum_{bc}C_{abc}\phi_b(r)\phi'_c(r)=0\hspace{2pt}.\hspace{2pt}

110: \end{eqnarray}

111: The first set leads to the first integrals $r^2\frac{\partial

112: \varphi}{\partial X}\phi'(r) = Q_a$ ($Q_a$ being integration

113: constants, identified as \emph{color charges}) which coincide with

114: the set of first integrals of the field equations for static,

115: spherically symmetric solutions (SSS) of a multicomponent scalar

116: field theory with a lagrangian density given by

117: 

118: \begin{equation}\label{4}

119: L=f(\sum_a\partial_{\mu}\phi_a\partial^{\mu}\phi_a)\equiv f(X) =

120: -\varphi(-X,Y=0)\hspace{2pt}.\hspace{2pt}

121: \end{equation}

122: The solutions of  Eqs.(\ref{3}) for the multiscalar or gauge cases

123: take the form $\phi_a(r) = \frac{Q_a}{Q}\left(\phi(r,Q) +

124: \alpha_a\right)$, where $Q=\sqrt{Q_a^2}$ is the mean-square

125: (\emph{scalar} or \emph{color}) charge and $\alpha_a$ are

126: integration constants. The function $\phi(r,Q)$ is the solution of

127: the one-component scalar field theory resulting from the restricted

128: lagrangian $f(X=\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi)$. In the

129: gauge case the second set of equations (\ref{3}) restricts the

130: possible values of the integration constants

131: $\alpha_a=\frac{Q_a}{Q}\alpha$ and then the ESS solutions take the

132: form $\phi_a(r)=\frac{Q_a}{Q}\left(\phi(r,Q)+\alpha\right)$ where

133: now $Q$ is the mean-square \emph{color} charge.

134: 

135: Thus, the form of the ESS solutions of generalized gauge field

136: theories coincides with that of the SSS solutions of an

137: associated one-component scalar field theory. The energy of the

138: ESS solutions, when finite, is twofold the energy of the

139: associated SSS solutions, which reads

140: 

141: \begin{equation}\label{6}

142:     \varepsilon(Q)=-4\pi\int_0^{\infty}r^2f\left(-\phi^{'2}(r)\right)dr=

143: Q^{3/2}\varepsilon(Q=1).

144: \end{equation}

145: 

146: The requirement of convergence of this integral leads to a

147: classification of the admissible models according to the central

148: (\underline{A-cases}) and asymptotic (\underline{B-cases})

149: behaviors of the soliton field strength (see Fig.1). Cases

150: \emph{A-1} and \emph{A-2} correspond to infinite (but integrable) and finite

151: soliton field strengths, respectively. Cases \emph{B-1}, \emph{B-2} and

152: \emph{B-3} correspond to asymptotic dampings of the soliton field

153: strength which are slower than coulombian, coulombian, or faster

154: than coulombian, respectively (Diaz-Alonso \& Rubiera-Garcia \cite{dr2007a}).

155: \begin{figure}

156: \begin{center}

157: \includegraphics[width=6cm,height=4.05cm]{figure1.eps}

158: \caption{Different possible central and asymptotic behaviors of

159: the admissible models}

160: \end{center}

161: \end{figure}

162: 

163: For each admissible scalar model supporting finite-energy SSS

164: solutions there exists an infinite family of admissible gauge field

165: theories supporting similar finite-energy ESS solutions, obtained

166: from (\ref{4}) and the admissibility conditions (\ref{1}).

167: 

168: The linear stability of the SSS and ESS solutions requires the

169: energy (\ref{6}) to be a minimum against small charge-preserving

170: perturbations of the fields and potentials in the gauge and scalar

171: cases. In the latter we found that all finite-energy SSS solutions

172: of admissible models are always linearly stable while in the

173: former the following supplementary condition for stability must be

174: satisfied

175: 

176: \begin{equation}\label{7}

177:     \frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial X}-2X\frac{\partial^2 \varphi}{\partial Y^2}>0 \hspace{2pt},

178: \hspace{2pt} \forall(X,Y=0)\hspace{2pt}.\hspace{2pt}

179: \end{equation}

180: 

181: As a non-trivial example of this class of soliton-supporting

182: theories we introduce here the family of generalized

183: electromagnetic field models

184: 

185: \begin{equation}\label{8}

186: \varphi(X,Y)=X/2+\lambda X^a+\beta Y^2 (a>3/2

187: \hspace{2pt},\hspace{2pt}\beta>0),

188: \end{equation}

189: which is the simplest generalization of a family of scalar models

190: (defined from (\ref{8}) by setting $\beta=0$) supporting SSS

191: soliton solutions, which has been analyzed in Diaz-Alonso \&

192: Rubiera-Garcia (\cite{dr2007c}). This generalized electromagnetic

193: family fulfills the admissibility conditions (\ref{1}) and

194: supports ESS solitons. For certain values of the parameters in the

195: electromagnetic case ($\lambda<0$ , $a=2$) the non-linear term has

196: the form of the decoupled part of the four-vertex contribution to

197: the effective lagrangian of quantum electrodynamics.

198: 

199: \section{Conclusions and outlook}

200: 

201: In summary, we have analyzed scalar and generalized gauge field

202: theories supporting soliton solutions. Aside from BI-like models

203: which have been widely used during the last few years, other models have

204: also recently attracted attention in search of self-gravitating

205: scalar, electromagnetic and gauge field solitons as well as

206: regular charged solutions (Ayon-Beato \& Garcia \cite{ayonb}). The

207: class of models considered here can also be useful in

208: other physical contexts. For instance, in the extension of the

209: description of dark energy in Cosmology, as a non-canonical scalar

210: field (Armendariz-Picon \& Lim \cite{armendariz2005}) or as a

211: gauge field governed by generalized actions (Dyadichev et al

212: \cite{dyadichev2002}), in the phenomenological description of

213: nucleon structure, in generalized gauge theories in higher

214: dimensions, glueballs, etc.

215: 

216: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

217: \bibitem[2005]{armendariz2005} Armendariz-Picon, C. \& Lim, E.A. 2005, JCAP, 0508, 007.

218: 

219: \bibitem[1999]{ayonb} Ayon-Beato, E. \& Garcia, A. 1999, Gen. Rel. Grav., 31, 629.

220: 

221: \bibitem[1988]{bartnick1988} Bartnick, R. \& McKinnon, J. 1988, Phys. Rev. Lett., 61, 141.

222: 

223: \bibitem[1970]{boillat1970} Boillat, G. 1970, J. Math. Phys., 11, 941.

224: 

225: \bibitem[1934]{borninfeld1934} Born, M. \& Infeld, L. 1934, Proc. R. Soc. London. A, 144, 425.

226: 

227: \bibitem[1999]{chern1999} Chernitskii, A.A. 1999, J. High. Ener. Phys., 9912, 010.

228: 

229: \bibitem[1977]{coleman1977} Coleman, S. 1977, Comm. Math. Phys., 55, 113.

230: 

231: \bibitem[1976]{deser1976} Deser, S., Duff, M.J., \& Isham, C.J. 1976, Nucl. Phys. B, 114, 29

232: 

233: \bibitem[2007]{dr2007a} Diaz-Alonso, J. \& Rubiera-Garcia, D. 2007, Phys. Lett. B, 653, 445.

234: 

235: \bibitem[2007]{dr2007b} Diaz-Alonso, J. \& Rubiera-Garcia, D. 2007, Phys. Lett. B, 657, 257.

236: 

237: \bibitem[2007]{dr2007c} Diaz-Alonso, J. \& Rubiera-Garcia, D. ``A study on relativistic lagrangian field theories with non-topological soliton solutions", Preprint (2007). To be published.

238: 

239: \bibitem[2002]{dyadichev2002} Dyadichev, V., Gal'tsov, D., Zorin, A., \& Zotov, M. 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 084007.

240: 

241: \bibitem[2006]{fuzfa2006a} F\"uzfa, A. \& Alimi, J.-M. 2006, Phys. Rev. D, 73, 023520.

242: 

243: \bibitem[2000]{galtsov2000} Gal'tsov, D. \& Kerner, R. 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 5955.

244: 

245: \bibitem[1995]{gibbons1995} Gibbons, G.W. \& Rasheed, D.A. 1995, Nucl. Phys. B, 454, 185.

246: 

247: \bibitem[1998]{gibbons1998} Gibbons, G.W. 1998, Nucl. Phys. B, 514, 603.

248: 

249: \bibitem[2002]{pavlovsky2002} Pavlovskii, O.V. 2002, Phys. Lett. B, 538, 202.

250: 

251: \bibitem[1997]{tseytlin1997} Tseytlin, A. 1997, Nucl. Phys. B, 501, 41.

252: 

253: \bibitem[1999]{volkov1999} Volkov, M.S. \& Gal'tsov, D.V. 1999, Physics Reports, 319, 1.

254: 

255: \bibitem[2001]{wirschins2001} Wirschins, M., Sood, A., \& Kunz, J. 2001, Phys. Rev. D, 63, 084002.

256: 

257: \end{thebibliography}

258: 

259: \end{document}

260: