1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3:
4: %\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
5: %\usepackage{emulateapj}
6: %%%%%%%%%%
7: \catcode`\@=11
8: \def\gapprox{\mathrel{\mathpalette\@versim>}}
9: \def\lapprox{\mathrel{\mathpalette\@versim<}}
10: \def\@versim#1#2{\lower2.45pt\vbox{\baselineskip0pt\lineskip0.9pt
11: \ialign{$\m@th#1\hfil##\hfil$\crcr#2\crcr\sim\crcr}}}
12: \def\HI{{\ion{H}{1}}}
13: \def\HII{{\ion{H}{2}}}
14:
15: \catcode`\@=12
16: %%%%%%%%%%%
17: \newcommand{\hi}{H\,{\sc i}}
18: \newcommand{\hii}{H\,{\sc ii}}
19: \newcommand{\neii}{Ne\,{\sc ii}}
20: \newcommand{\msolar}{\ensuremath{\mbox{M}_\odot}}
21: \newcommand{\lsolar}{\ensuremath{\mbox{L}_\odot}}
22: \newcommand{\OmM}{\ifmmode {\Omega_{\rm M}}\else $\Omega_{\rm M}$\fi}
23: \newcommand{\OmL}{\ifmmode {\Omega_{\Lambda}}\else $\Omega_{\Lambda}$\fi}
24: \newcommand{\kmps}{\ifmmode {\rm\,km~s^{-1}} \else ${\rm\,km\,s^{-1}}$\fi}
25: \newcommand{\pscm}{\ensuremath{\,\mbox{cm}^{-2}}}
26: \newcommand{\pccm}{\ensuremath{\,\mbox{cm}^{-3}}}
27: \newcommand{\mapiii}{MAPPINGS \textsc{iii}}
28: \newcommand{\fluxnu}{\ensuremath{\,\mbox{erg}\,\mbox{cm}^{-2}\mbox{s}^{-1}
29: \mbox{Hz}^{-1}\mbox{Sr}^{-1}}}
30: \newcommand{\flux}{\ensuremath{\,\mbox{erg}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}\,\mbox{cm}^{-2}}}
31: \newcommand{\ddt}{\ensuremath{\frac{d}{dt}}}
32: \newcommand{\Msunpyr}{\ensuremath{{\rm M}_{\odot}{\rm yr}^{-1}}}
33: \newcommand{\Cpar}{\ensuremath{{\cal C}}}
34: \newcommand{\mum}{\ensuremath{\mu\mbox{m}}}
35: \received{}
36: \begin{document}
37:
38: \title{Modelling the Pan-Spectral Energy Distribution of Starburst
39: Galaxies: IV.\\
40: The Controlling Parameters of the Starburst SED}
41:
42: \author{Brent Groves\altaffilmark{1}, Michael A. Dopita\altaffilmark{2},
43: Ralph S. Sutherland\altaffilmark{2}, Lisa J. Kewley\altaffilmark{3},
44: J\"{o}rg Fischera\altaffilmark{4}, Claus Leitherer\altaffilmark{5}, Bernhard Brandl\altaffilmark{1}, \& Wil van Breugel\altaffilmark{6}}
45: \altaffiltext{1}{Sterrewacht Leiden, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands}
46: \altaffiltext{2}{Research School of Astronomy \& Astrophysics,
47: The Australian National University, \\
48: Cotter Road, Weston Creek, ACT 2611, Australia}
49: \altaffiltext{3}{University of Hawai'i, Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI, 96822 USA}
50: \altaffiltext{4}{Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, Univ. of Toronto,
51: 60 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3H8, Canada}
52: \altaffiltext{5}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore MD21218, USA}
53: \altaffiltext{6}{U. Cal. at Merced, P.O. Box 2039, Merced, CA 95344, USA}
54: \email{brent@strw.leidenuniv.nl}
55:
56: %\doublespace
57:
58: \begin{abstract}
59: We combine the the stellar spectral synthesis code
60: Starburst99, the nebular modelling
61: code \mapiii\, and a 1-D dynamical evolution model of \hii\ regions
62: around massive clusters of young stars to generate improved models of
63: the spectral energy distribution (SED) of starburst galaxies. We
64: introduce a compactness parameter, \Cpar , which characterizes the
65: specific intensity of the radiation field at ionization fronts in \hii\
66: regions, and which controls the shape of the far-IR dust re-emission,
67: often referred to loosely as the dust ``temperature''. We also
68: investigate the effect of metallicity on the overall SED and in
69: particular, on the strength of the PAH features. We provide templates
70: for the mean emission produced by the young compact \hii\ regions, the
71: older ($10 - 100$\ Myr) stars and for the wavelength-dependent
72: attenuation produced by a foreground screen of the dust used in our
73: model. We demonstrate that these components may be combined to produce
74: a excellent fit to the observed SEDs of star formation dominated
75: galaxies which
76: are often used as templates (Arp 220 and NGC 6240). This fit extends
77: from the Lyman Limit to wavelengths of about one mm. The methods
78: presented in both this paper and in the previous papers of this series
79: allow the
80: extraction of the physical parameters of the starburst region (star
81: formation rates, star formation rate history, mean cluster mass,
82: metallicity, dust attenuation and pressure) from the analysis of the
83: pan-spectral SED.
84: \end{abstract}
85:
86: \keywords{ISM: dust---extinction, \hii---galaxies:general,star
87: formation rates,
88: starburst-infrared:galaxies---ultraviolet:galaxies}
89:
90: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
91:
92: By definition, the bolometric luminosity of a starburst galaxy is
93: dominated by the
94: young stars it contains. Thus regardless of how much or how little of
95: this luminosity is reprocessed through the dusty interstellar medium
96: either through thermal emission in the IR of dust grains, through
97: fluorescent processes, or through heating and re-emission in an ionized
98: medium, the pan-spectral SED encodes information about what the star
99: formation rate currently is, and what it has been in the recent
100: past. The first objective of pan-spectral SED modelling is therefore
101: to be able to reliably infer star formation rates in galaxies and to
102: provide likely error estimates using observational data sets which may
103: in practice be restricted to only certain emission lines or spectral
104: features. In principle, almost any part of the SED of a starburst can
105: be used as a star formation indicator, provided that the appropriate
106: bolometric correction to the absolute luminosity can be made, and
107: observational issues are accounted for. In practice, each wavelength
108: regime has a different level of sensitivity to the ongoing star
109: formation which is dependent upon these bolometric corrections,
110: with hydrogen
111: emission lines and the IR part of the SED being the most robust
112: indicators of the current star formation rate (SFR). These
113: bolometric corrections critically depend on the foreground dust
114: absorption (more properly called dust attenuation), and the geometry
115: of the embedded dusty molecular clouds, with respect to both the
116: ionizing stars and the older stellar population. The accurate
117: determination of such bolometric corrections is a major motivation of
118: our theoretical work of pan-spectral SED modelling.
119:
120: In order to correctly model the SEDs of starburst galaxies, we
121: first need to understand how the form of the SED is controlled by the
122: interstellar physics and the geometry of the stars with respect to the
123: gas. Once these are understood, we can then use our theoretical models
124: to attain the objectives of our second motivation for such SED
125: modelling; to gain insights into the physical parameters of starburst
126: galaxies. In particular, we can hope to quantify the stellar
127: populations, the atomic and molecular gas content, the star and
128: gas-phase metallicities, physical parameters of their interstellar
129: media such as the pressure or mean
130: density, and the nature of the
131: interstellar dust, both its composition and spatial distribution. The
132: physical parameters so derived on homogeneous samples of objects can
133: then help develop our insight into the physical processes which
134: control them.
135:
136: The dust grain temperature distribution, and therefore the shape and
137: peak of the far-IR feature, depends critically on the geometrical
138: relationship between the dust grains and the stellar heating sources
139: assumed in the model. Models with warmer far-IR colors will have a
140: more compact disposition of gas with respect to the stars. The
141: difficulty here is that, in any simple starburst model, these
142: geometrical relationships are not determined \emph{a priori}.
143:
144: In the semi-empirical modelling of Dale and his collaborators
145: \citep{Dale01, Dale02}, the SEDs of both disk and starburst galaxies
146: were suggested to form a one-parameter family in terms of dust
147: temperature. This suggested that starburst galaxies have hotter dust
148: temperatures. \cite{Lagache03} (again empirically) have suggested that
149: the absolute luminosity controls the form of the SED. Both of these
150: assertions may be true to some extent, since IR luminous galaxies
151: generally have greater rates of star formation than normal galaxies.
152:
153: The French group \citep{Galliano03} take the simplest approach of
154: approximating the starburst by a spherical \HII\ region and clumpy
155: dust shell around the central star forming region. A more advanced
156: approach is used by \citet{Siebenmorgen07} to model starbursts and
157: ULIRGs. While assuming a spherical geometry for the radiative
158: transfer, they also include the effect of the hot dust around young
159: OB-stars as well as the diffuse ISM dust surrounding the starburst and
160: older stellar population. The hot dust component is important as it
161: can dominate the mid-IR emission \citep{Krugel94}.
162:
163: Associated with the latter models is the approach by
164: \citet{Efstathiou00}. Likewise concentrating on starburst galaxies,
165: they modelled the starburst as a group of stars surrounded by thick
166: molecular clouds in a manner similar to our approach, and in addition,
167: also included a similar, simple description for the evolution of the
168: distance of the molecular clouds to the illuminating stars. With these
169: models they could explain the observed IRAS distributions and
170: reproduce several ISO observations.
171:
172: One of the more
173: sophisticated approaches is taken in the GRASIL code by the
174: Padova--Trieste group \citep{Silva98,Granato00}. Their
175: starburst model uses a spherical geometry with King profiles, and they
176: allow for the formation of clusters of stars in molecular complexes,
177: and their subsequent escape from these regions. This group has since
178: incorporated gas physics by use of the CLOUDY code
179: \citep{Ferland98,Abel05} to
180: provide emission line diagnostics as well as dust continuum
181: diagnostics \citep{Panuzzo03}.
182:
183: A similarly advanced approach was used by \citet{Piovan06a,Piovan06b},
184: who also assume a spherical geometry with King profiles and young
185: stars in molecular complexes.
186:
187: In the conceptually sophisticated models of
188: \citet{Takagi03a, Takagi03b}, a mass-radius relationship for the star
189: formation region of $r_i/{\rm kpc} = \Theta (M/{10^9 {\rm
190: \msolar}})^{1/2}$ is adopted along with a stellar density
191: distribution given by a generalized King profile. The parameter $
192: \Theta $ is a compactness parameter which expresses the degree of
193: matter concentration, and is related to the optical depth of the dust
194: through which the starburst region is seen. For a sample of
195: ultra-luminous starbursts, they find that, while most conform to a
196: constant surface brightness of order $10^{12}\lsolar$kpc$^{-2}$, there
197: are a few objects with surface brightnesses roughly ten times larger
198: than this, which they ascribe to post-merger systems. In this paper,
199: we will adopt a derivative version of this concept of a compactness
200: parameter as the factor which provides the main control on the shape
201: of the far-IR bump.
202:
203: All the fully theoretical (as opposed to semi-empirical) methods used
204: by other groups involve the calculation of essentially a single
205: spherical radiation transfer problem. Unfortunately, real starburst galaxies
206: have many separate clusters of many different ages distributed in a
207: complex spatial distribution.
208: However, gas column densities and
209: pressures can be extremely high, and as a consequence the size scale
210: of individual \HII\ region complexes can be extremely small in
211: comparison to the overall scale of the starburst. It is only when the
212: star forming complexes join up to produce large-scale collective
213: phenomena as in, for example, the outflow in M82, that we need to go
214: to a full 3-D radiative transfer model covering the whole galaxy.
215:
216: In the earlier papers in this series, we take advantage of the
217: localized radiative transfer approximation to construct our
218: pan-spectral SEDs. Instead of treating the starburst as a single \HII\
219: region complex covering the whole starburst region, we split the
220: starburst up into many individual \HII\ regions, each ionized by the UV
221: photons of the clusters within them, and each evolving in radius and
222: internal pressure according to the mechanical energy input of the
223: exciting stars through their stellar winds and supernova
224: explosions. The global SED is then the sum of the SEDs produced by
225: each of these \HII\ regions and their surrounding photo-dissociation
226: regions (PDRs) integrated over all cluster ages. Since the radiative
227: transfer problem in each \HII\ region is fully treated, in this
228: approach we stand a better chance of capturing the full range of
229: physical conditions encountered in a starburst region. This collective
230: approach is what can be found in many of the sophisticated modelling
231: codes such as that of \citet{Piovan06a} and GRASIL \citep{Silva98}. In
232: GRASIL for example, multiple core molecular cloud systems can be
233: included with
234: differing parameters for each, such as mass and optical depth.
235:
236: In paper I \citep{SED1}, we investigated the role that pressure alone
237: plays in changing the compactness of the \HII\ regions within the
238: starburst and hence in the controlling the shape of the far-IR dust
239: emission bump. However, a defect in these models is that they were
240: only run with a single value of mean cluster mass $\left<M_{\rm cl}
241: \right>$. A change in cluster mass directly affects the specific
242: intensity of the radiation field in the \HII\ region, and this will in
243: turn change the shape of the far-IR bump.
244:
245: In papers II \& III \citep{SED2, SED3}, we introduced the ${\cal
246: R}=\left<M_{\rm cl} \right>/P_{0}$
247: parameter which controls the absolute value of the ionization
248: parameter in the \HII\ region and its time evolution. The ionization
249: parameter is defined as the ratio of the ionizing photon density to
250: the particle density in the \HII\ region; ${\cal U} = L_{\rm UV}/4\pi
251: R_{\rm HII}^2nc$, where $L_{\rm UV}$ is the flux of ionizing UV
252: photons produced by the central cluster, $R_{\rm HII}$ is the mean
253: radius of the \HII\ region with particle density $n$, and $c$ is the
254: speed of light. All models having a given value of ${\cal R}$ and
255: metallicity $Z$ will show the same run of ionization parameter as a
256: function of cluster age and will therefore produce identical line
257: ratios at any given age.
258:
259: The shape of the dust feature or ``bump'' in the IR in starbursts is
260: controlled by the distribution of dust temperatures in the starburst
261: galaxy. Within a given \HII\ region, this distribution of temperatures
262: is controlled by the specific photon density, meaning that the mean dust
263: temperature of any individual grain is $\left<T_{\rm gr} \right> = f(L_{\rm
264: UV}/R_{\rm HII}^2)$. Thus denser and more compact \HII\
265: regions will produce hotter grain temperature distributions. In this
266: paper, we introduce, by analogy with the ${\cal R}$ parameter, a
267: ``Compactness Parameter'', ${\cal C}$. All models having a given value
268: of ${\cal C}$ and metallicity $Z$ will show the same run of grain
269: temperature distribution as a function of cluster age and will
270: therefore produce identical far-IR dust re-emission bumps at any given
271: age.
272:
273: In the following sections of this paper, we will discuss the details
274: of our modeling procedure, insofar as this is different from that used
275: in earlier papers in this series, introduce the Compactness Parameter
276: and show that this does indeed serve to characterize the far-IR bump
277: for \HII\ regions in the age range $0.5 - 10$\ Myr. We also investigate
278: the effects of varying metallicity on the form of the far-IR bump,
279: provide templates for the mean SED of compact \HII\ regions, and of
280: the older ($10 - 100$\ Myr) stars, and for the attenuation produced by a
281: dusty fractal foreground screen. Finally, we show how these components
282: can be combined to produce excellent fits to frequently-used starburst
283: templates such as Arp~220 or NGC~6240.
284:
285: \section{Models}
286:
287: The Starburst models calculated here follow the general form described
288: in the previous papers of this series \citep{SED1,SED2,SED3};
289: hereinafter SED1, SED2 and SED3, respectively. However, apart from
290: being updated to use the latest versions of the modelling codes
291: Starburst99 \citep{Leitherer99} and \mapiii\ \citep{Groves04}, the
292: models incorporate a number of changes or improvements that we here
293: describe in greater detail. To make this paper self-contained, we
294: briefly recapitulate on the techniques used in the earlier papers of
295: this series.
296:
297: \subsection{Stars and Stellar Clusters}\label{sec:stars}
298:
299: We have used the latest version (2006) of
300: Starburst99\footnote{http://www.stsci.edu/science/starburst99/}
301: to compute the spectral energy distribution of clusters of stars of
302: any given age. A
303: detailed description of latest stellar atmospheres and stellar
304: evolution physics used within the code are given in \citet{Smith02}
305: and \citet{Vazquez05}.
306:
307: In our Starburst99 models, we take an instantaneous burst of $M_{\rm
308: cl}=10^{6} M_{\odot}$, having a \citet{Kroupa02} broken power-law
309: IMF between 0.1 and 120 $M_{\odot}$. Within the code we use the
310: standard combination of the Geneva and Padova tracks for the stellar
311: evolution \citep{Vazquez05}, and these determine the total mechanical
312: luminosity, $L_{\rm mech}$. We use the theoretical ``high-mass-loss''
313: tracks for the treatment of the stellar wind. The supernova cutoff
314: mass is 8 $M_{\odot}$. However, since the \HII\ region evolution is
315: run up to only 10\ Myr, the exact choice of this cutoff mass is
316: unimportant to the modelling.
317:
318: We output the stellar spectra at 0.01\ Myr, 0.5\ Myrs and then
319: every 0.5\ Myrs after that up to an age of 10\ Myrs, by which effectively all
320: of the ionizing photons have been emitted (see SED2). Note that
321: the resolution of the starburst model is actually higher at 0.1\ Myrs,
322: which provides the fine-gridding needed to accurately track the
323: mechanical energy input used in the computation of the evolution of
324: the \HII\ regions. For completeness, this model was also extended to 1
325: Gyr, with spectra computed at longer intervals for older stellar
326: templates.
327:
328: To determine the parameters for clusters of any given mass, we assume
329: a simple scaling with cluster mass. Such a scaling should hold in
330: starbursting regions where many clusters are forming, as here
331: stochastic effects are generally small, and on average the IMF is well
332: sampled throughout the mass range. However, as a number of authors
333: have pointed out, several of whom are referenced in SED2, and
334: most recently by \citet{Weidner06}, such an assumption will not hold
335: for low cluster masses.
336:
337: \subsection{\hii\ Region Evolution}\label{sec:hiievol}
338:
339: The \HII\ regions are treated as 1-D mass-loss bubbles driven by the
340: mechanical energy input of their stars and supernovae
341: \citep{Castor75}. Their equation of motion is given by (SED1):
342:
343: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:Rdiff}
344: \ddt\left[R\ddt\left(R^{3}\dot{R}\right)\right] +
345: \frac{9}{2}R^{2}\dot{R}^{3} = \frac{3L_{\rm mech}(t)}{2\pi\rho_{0}},
346: \end{equation}
347: where the time dependent mechanical luminosity, $L_{\rm mech}(t)$, is
348: determined from the Starburst99 output.
349:
350: The pressure in the \hii\ region with radius $R$, expanding in an ISM
351: with density $\rho_{0}$ is then determined as,
352: \begin{eqnarray}
353: %\begin{array}{rcl}
354: P&=& n_{\rm HII}kT_{e}, \nonumber \\
355: &=& \frac{7}{(3850\pi)^{2/5}}\left(\frac{250}{308\pi}\right)^{4/15}
356: \left(\frac{L_{\rm mech}(t)}{\rho_{0}}\right)^{2/3}
357: \frac{\rho_{0}}{R^{4/3}(t)},
358: %\end{array}
359: \end{eqnarray}\label{eqn:hiiP}
360: where $n_{HII}$ is the density in the ionized gas, with electron
361: temperature $T_{e}$. This equation is derived from the
362: \citep{Oey97,Oey98} version of the \citet{Castor75} mass-loss bubble
363: formulae with the assumption that the \hii\ region has the same
364: pressure as the shocked stellar wind, and is confined to a thin shell
365: around the periphery of the wind-blown bubble. The ionizing flux at
366: the inner boundary of the \hii\ region is then $L_{UV}/4\pi R^2$ and
367: the density in the ionized region $n_{HII}$ is given by equation
368: \ref{eqn:hiiP}, from which the ionization parameter of the \HII\
369: region, $\cal{U}$, can be derived.
370:
371: \subsection{Nebular Abundances and Depletion Factors}\label{sec:abund}
372:
373: The abundance set and depletion factors used in these models are
374: unchanged from those presented in SED3 and are given in table
375: \ref{tab:abund}. The nebular abundance set follows \citet{Asplund05}.
376: As noted previously, the gas phase ``Solar'' abundance in the models
377: is somewhat offset from
378: the ``Solar'' abundance set used in Starburst99. While this has
379: been shown to have no significant effect on the models, it does result
380: in a small inconsistency in the models.
381:
382:
383: The exploration of metallicity effects within the models presented
384: here is limited to those metallicities computed in Starburst99;
385: $0.05Z_{\odot}$, $0.2Z_{\odot}$, $0.4Z_{\odot}$, $1.0 Z_{\odot}$, and
386: $2.0Z_{\odot}$. As in SED3, we simply scale the abundances with
387: metallicity, with the following exceptions. For helium we use the
388: empirical relationship to include the primordial component as well as
389: that from nucleosynthesis:
390: \begin{equation}
391: {\rm He}/{\rm H} = 0.0737 + 0.024(Z/Z_{\odot}).
392: \end{equation}
393: The elements carbon and nitrogen are both observed to have
394: a primary nucleosynthetic component and a secondary nucleosynthetic component at
395: higher metallicities. Thus for these elements we adopt the following
396: empirical relationships;
397: \begin{eqnarray}
398: {\rm C}/{\rm H} & = & 6.0\times10^{-5}(Z/Z_{\odot}) +
399: 2.0\times10^{-4}(Z/Z_{\odot})^2 \\
400: {\rm N}/{\rm H} & = & 1.1\times10^{-5}(Z/Z_{\odot}) +
401: 4.9\times10^{-5}(Z/Z_{\odot})^2
402: \end{eqnarray}
403:
404: The depletion factors used in the models
405: are based upon the observed depletion fractions in the local interstellar cloud
406: \citep{Kimura03}. These may not represent in reality those found in the
407: starburst environments, but currently we have no adequate way
408: of estimating these. We must also assume that the depletion pattern
409: does not vary with
410: metallicity, as there are currently no good models or observations for the
411: relationship between metallicity and depletion. However, in the
412: starbursting environments modelled here, such an assumption may be
413: adequate \citep{Draine07}. With this assumption the
414: dust-to-gas ratio is purely a function of metallicity.
415:
416: \subsection{Photoionization models}\label{sec:models}
417:
418: For the component \hii\ regions, we compute both the emission and
419: internal absorption of both gas (line
420: plus continuum) and dust (continuum including polycyclic aromatic
421: hydrocarbons) using
422: the \mapiii\ code, with the Starburst99 stellar cluster
423: spectra as input.
424:
425: Apart from the effects of burst age and metallicity, here we explore
426: three other parameters within the models; the ISM pressure, $P_{0}$,
427: the cloud covering fraction, $f_{\rm PDR}$, and the Compactness
428: Parameter, ${\cal C}$, described below, which is a
429: function both of $P_{0}$ and of the mean cluster mass, $\left< M_{\rm
430: cl} \right >$.
431:
432: For the models investigated here we examine five different thermal gas
433: pressures;
434: $P_{0}/k=10^4,~10^5,~10^6,~10^7,$ and $10^8$ K \pccm. These five
435: pressures cover the full range expected to be encountered in
436: starbursting galaxies, from regions of enhanced star formation in disc
437: galaxies, to the high pressure ULIRGs.
438:
439: For each parameter set we compute models at 21 starburst ages,
440: covering the timescale 0.01\ Myrs to 10\ Myrs in steps of 0.5\ Myrs.
441:
442: Finally, for each age we run two models. The first model is of the
443: \hii\ region alone; the region within which 99\% of the hydrogen line
444: emission arises, and within which almost all of the ionizing photons
445: are absorbed. It is within this region that the hottest dust emission
446: arises. The second model corresponds to the Photodissociation Region
447: (PDR) surrounding the \HII\ region. This region is the transition
448: layer between the \hii\ region and surrounding dense molecular cloud, from
449: which the stellar cluster is thought to have formed.
450: In the PDR, a large
451: fraction of the stellar light is absorbed and most of the PAH and dust
452: far-IR emission produced. We follow the radiative transfer beyond the
453: ionization front in the \HII\ region until a total hydrogen column
454: depth of $N({\rm HI})=10^{22}$\pscm\ is achieved. The column depth of
455: $10^{22}$\pscm\ is based upon both observations and upon theoretical
456: considerations. The observational data comes from measurements of
457: individual molecular clouds both within our galaxy \citep{Larson81,
458: Solomon87, Heyer01} and in neighbouring galaxies such as M33
459: \citep{Rosolowsky03} which all give hydrogen column densities of
460: $\sim10^{22}$\pscm\, independent of cloud radius. This value is not
461: unexpected, since it indicates that all giant molecular clouds are
462: marginally stable against gravitational collapse, provided that their
463: virial temperatures are a few tens of degrees K.
464:
465: These two models, \hii\ and PDR, are combined through our final
466: parameter, $f_{\rm PDR}$, the starburst cloud covering fraction. This
467: parameter is a simplified version of the clearing timescale introduced
468: in Paper I, and discussed in other dust models
469: \citep[eg][]{Silva98,Charlot00}. We introduce this parameter because a
470: starbursting system will be a conglomerate of bursts of different ages
471: and sizes, unlike a single molecular cloud around an individual
472: cluster. Thus, while the molecular cloud clearing timescale offers a
473: more physical picture for an individual cluster, the starburst cloud
474: covering fraction better represents what is likely to be encountered
475: in a starbursting system.
476:
477: The multiple star clusters forming in a starburst will be of all
478: possible masses, and, sampled at any instant in time, of all possible
479: ages. To account for this we compute the luminosity-weighted average
480: of
481: all twenty one ages computed between $0-10$\ Myr. In figure
482: \ref{fig:Hiiages} we show the SEDs of the 21 calculated ages
483: of an individual \hii\ region and
484: a \HII\ region with its PDR, along with the summed
485: final average SED for each. These figures clearly show the evolution
486: of both the stellar and nebular spectrum with age, and reveal the
487: decreasing cluster UV flux and cooling dust temperatures as the
488: clusters age and the \hii\ bubble expands.
489:
490: In all, we have computed a total 300 starburst \HII\ region models
491: covering 5 metallicities, 6 values of the ${\cal C}$ parameter
492: (described below), 5 values of the ISM pressure, and a separate \hii\
493: region and \HII\ region plus PDR model for each set of parameters
494: (corresponding to $f_{\rm PDR}=0$ and $1$, respectively). All models
495: are scaled in flux to correspond to a star formation rate of 1
496: \Msunpyr\ continued over the 10\ Myr lifetime of the \HII\ regions.
497:
498: \subsection{Dust Physics}\label{sec:dust}
499:
500: The treatment of dust within the photoionization code \mapiii\ was
501: discussed in SED1. Here, we concentrate only those areas where
502: changes have been made to the dust parameters within the code.
503:
504: In brief, our dust model consists of 3 components; Graphites, Silicates
505: and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. The optical data for each of
506: these comes from the series of work by Draine et
507: al.\footnote{http://www.astro.princeton.edu/$\sim$draine/dust/dust.diel.html
508: }\,\citep{Laor93,Li01}. The IR spectrum arising from dust, excluding the
509: effects of PAH emission, is
510: calculated self-consistently, including the effects of stochastic
511: heating in small grains \citep[all dust calculations are discussed in
512: detail in][]{Groves04}. The total dust-to-gas ratio within the code
513: is set by the fraction of metals depleted from the gas onto dust,
514: given in table \ref{tab:abund}.
515:
516: The heavy elements removed from the gas phase are distributed between
517: the two main types of dust, carbonaceous and siliceous, with the
518: carbonaceous dust being further divided into graphite and PAHs. The
519: graphite and silicate dust is distributed across a grain size
520: distribution arising from grain destruction processes (SED1);
521: \begin{equation}
522: dN(a)/da = k a^{-3.3}
523: \frac{e^{-(a/a_\mathrm{min})^{-3}}}{1+e^{(a/a_\mathrm{max})^3}},
524: \label{eqn:GSprof}
525: \end{equation}
526: with $k$ defined by the dust-to-gas ratio.
527:
528: The minimum grain size of graphite and silicates are $a_{\rm
529: min}=$20\AA\ and 40\AA\ respectively while the maximum grain size
530: is the same for both species at $a_{\rm max}=1600$\AA.
531:
532: \subsection{PAHs}
533: PAHs are treated somewhat separately to the other types of dust. They
534: are given a characteristic size and an opacity similar to coronene,
535: the best studied catacondensed PAH. We have constructed an
536: empirically-based IR emission spectrum described in more detail below.
537: The PAH-to-gas ratio is defined through the PAH-to-Carbon dust ratio,
538: which is set at 30\% in these models. While this may not be accurate
539: for all environments and metallicities \citep{Draine07}, it provides a
540: reasonable match to current observations of nearby starforming
541: galaxies. Differences between the template IR emission spectrum and
542: those actually observed will provide limits on parameters such as
543: de-hydrogenation, the relative abundance of cata-condensed and
544: peri-condensed species, and the degree of nitrogen substitution within
545: the carbon skeleton, which affects the 6.2 \mum\ C--C stretch feature
546: \citep{Peeters02}.
547:
548: There is now a great deal of observational evidence that PAHs are
549: destroyed within the ionized parts of the \hii\ region complexes, with
550: \emph{Spitzer} observations of galactic \hii\ regions showing clear
551: boundaries between the outer PDR PAH emitting zone and the inner
552: photoionized zone \citep[eg][]{Churchwell06,Povich07}. The exact
553: destruction mechanism is uncertain, but is likely to be
554: photo-destruction through stochastic heating and/or photoionization
555: and dissociation. To simulate this process
556: within the \mapiii\ code, we previously introduced the Habing
557: photodissociation parameter, ${\cal H}=F_{\rm FUV}/n_{\rm H}c$, a FUV
558: analogy of the standard dimensionless ionization parameter ${\cal U}$
559: (see eqn 17 and associated section in SED1). In a series of
560: test models, we found that for typical, solar metallicity starbursts,
561: ${\cal H}\sim 10^{-3}$ at the ionization front. Henceforth we assume
562: this value to be the destruction point for PAHs within our models. For
563: typical \hii\ densities of $10-100$\pccm, this implies a radiation
564: field $\sim2-20$ times the \citet{Habing68} local interstellar
565: radiation field, consistent with the range up to which PAHs are
566: observed to survive \citep{Compiegne07}.
567: At values of ${\cal H}< 10^{-3}$, PAHs exist in either neutral
568: or singly-charged states, are heated by the diffuse FUV/Optical
569: field and emit in the classic PAH mid-IR bands.
570:
571: This emission spectrum is determined by the natural modes of
572: vibration, bending and other deformations of the planar carbon
573: skeleton. This spectrum is dependent upon the size and the electric
574: charge state of the molecule, and is modified by the effect of
575: non-hydrogenic end groups, including simple dehydrogenation and
576: skeletal atomic substitution \citep{Peeters02}.
577:
578: Thanks to the advent of space borne IR observatories, the PAH emission
579: spectrum has
580: now been observed in many galaxies and situations, ranging from
581: beautiful maps of Galactic \hii\ regions \citep{Churchwell06} to
582: detailed mapping of the features in both Starburst galaxies
583: \citep{Beirao07} and QSOs \citep{Schweitzer06}
584:
585: Given the wide ranges of possible molecular forms, it is surprising
586: that the form of the PAH emission spectrum in the Mid-IR is so similar
587: between different regions and galaxies \citep{Brandl06}. Only small
588: variations in the relative strengths of the PAH features have been
589: observed within our own Galaxy and in nearby galaxies \citep{Smith07}.
590:
591: The accuracy of using a PAH template to represent the series of bands
592: in the mid-IR can be estimated from the study of the variation of
593: these bands in nearby galaxies by \citet{Smith07}. They find on
594: average variations of a factor of two around the mean ratios of the
595: different PAH bands (their table 7), with the most significant
596: differences occurring in galaxies hosting weak AGN (such as LINERs).
597: This suggests that our PAH template is accurate to about this factor,
598: with significant variations indicating differences such as PAH
599: ionization state, or correspondingly, the presence of a weak AGN in
600: the starburst galaxy. The differences between our models and the
601: observed PAH bands could therefore be used as diagnostics of ISM
602: physics, or host nuclear properties.
603:
604: As discussed in SED1, we parameterize the template using a sum of
605: Lorentzian profiles. The Lorentzian fits to the spectrum take the
606: form:
607: \begin{equation}
608: F_{\nu}\left( x\right) =\frac{f_{0}}{\left[ 1+\left(
609: x-x_{0}\right) ^{2}/\sigma ^{2}\right] }, \label{eqn:lorentz}
610: \end{equation}
611: where $x=1/\lambda $ cm$^{-1}$, the central wavenumber of the feature
612: is $x_{0}$, the $\mathrm{FWHM}=2\sigma$, and the peak value is
613: $f_{0}$ (\fluxnu).
614:
615: To derive the PAH emission spectrum template currently used in these
616: \mapiii\ models, we have fit Spitzer IRS observations of NGC4676 and
617: NGC7252. These two interacting galaxy pairs show strong, clear PAH
618: emission, making them good choices for a template spectrum. In both
619: objects we subtract
620: the underlying dust continuum assuming a combined power law and
621: exponential form to fit the PAH-free, long wavelength end of the
622: spectra. The combined, continuum-subtracted observed spectrum is shown
623: with our best fitting template in figure \ref{fig:PAHtemplate}. The
624: corresponding parameters for each of the Lorentzian profiles are given
625: in table \ref{tab:PAHparam}.
626:
627: As discussed in SED1, PAH emission within the \mapiii\ code is treated
628: as an energy conserving process. In equilibrium all the energy gained
629: by a PAH through the absorption of photons can be
630: either lost through photoelectric processes or IR emission. Once the
631: fraction of the energy lost through
632: photoelectric processes is determined using the photoelectric
633: cross-sections, the remaining energy fraction is re-emitted in the IR
634: according to our empirical template. This is not an exact treatment,
635: as the PAH molecules will likely undergo stochastic heating processes
636: and will lose some of their energy through IR continuum emission
637: instead of \emph{via} these fluorescent bands. However the code does
638: allow for the stochastic treatment of both very small graphite and
639: silicate grains.
640:
641: \section{The ${\cal C}$ Parameter}\label{sec:compact}
642:
643: We now deal with the parameter which controls predominantly the form
644: of the far-IR
645: continuum. Fundamentally, this continuum is a function of the
646: probability distribution of the grain temperatures throughout the
647: starburst. At any point within an \HII\ region or its surrounding PDR,
648: this is determined by the intensity and the spectral energy
649: distribution of the stellar radiation field. Thus, at radius $R$ in a
650: spherical nebula for any individual grain species, $s$:
651: \begin{equation}
652: \left < T_{\rm gr}(s) \right > = f \left( L_*/4 \pi R^2, \bar{\nu}\right),
653: \end{equation}
654:
655: where $\bar{\nu}$ is the mean photon energy of the radiation field,
656: which depends both upon the age of the cluster and the solution of the
657: radiative transfer problem out to radius $R$. Thus, if we wish to find
658: a variable in which \HII\ region models evolve along a unique grain
659: temperature distribution in time, $ \left < T_{\rm gr}(s,t) \right >
660: $, these models must also preserve the run of $L_*(t)/4 \pi
661: R(t)^2$. Then, because all models of this kind give a similar run of
662: grain temperature distributions, they will also produce very similar
663: global far-IR dust emission distributions. With a particular choice of
664: cluster luminosity, physically denser \HII\ region models have smaller
665: radii, and hence have hotter dust temperature distributions.
666:
667: We therefore define a \emph{Compactness Parameter}, $\cal C$, in the form:
668: \begin{equation}
669: {\cal C} \propto \frac{\left< L_{*}(t) \right>}{\left<
670: R(t)^2 \right>}.
671: \end{equation}
672: This variable is akin to the compactness factor found in the models of
673: \cite{Takagi03a} and \cite{Takagi03b}, in that it directly determines
674: the dust grain temperature distribution. The ratio on the right is also
675: comparable to the ratio
676: $m_{\rm mc}/r^2_{\rm mc}$ discussed in \citet{Silva98}, which controls
677: the SED of their molecular clouds and therefore the resulting hot dust
678: SED of their models.
679: The stellar luminosity
680: $L_*(t)$ scales with the cluster mass $M_{\rm cl}$, and the radius and
681: pressure at any instant scale according to the simple mass-loss bubble
682: approximation of \citep{Castor75};
683: \begin{eqnarray}
684: R&=&\left(\frac{250}{308\pi}\right)^{1/5}L_{\rm mech}^{1/5}
685: \rho_{0}^{-1/5}t^{3/5}\label{eqn:R_t}\\
686: P&=&\frac{7}{\left(3850\pi\right)^{2/5}}L_{\rm mech}^{2/5}
687: \rho_{0}^{3/5}t^{-4/5},\label{eqn:P_t}
688: \end{eqnarray}
689: where $L_{\rm mech}$ is the instantaneous mechanical luminosity of the
690: central stars of the burst (which can be assumed to scale as the mass
691: of the cluster) and $\rho_{0}$ the density of the ambient medium. Note
692: that the ambient number density is $n_{0}=\rho_{0}/(\mu m_{\rm H})$
693: and ambient pressure $P_{0}=n_{0}kT_{0}$.
694:
695: From these equations it follows that,
696: \begin{equation}
697: {\cal C} \propto \frac{\left< L_*(t) \right>}{\left< R(t)^2 \right>}
698: \propto \frac{L_{*}}{L_{\rm mech}^{2/5}P_0^{-2/5}}
699: \propto M_{\rm cl}^{3/5}P_{0}^{2/5}.
700: \end{equation}
701:
702: This product remains to be normalized. By analogy with the $\cal R$
703: parameter introduced in SED3, we choose to adopt the following
704: normalized definition of the Compactness Parameter;
705: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:Cparam}
706: \log{\cal C}=
707: \frac{3}{5}\log\left[ \frac{M_{\rm cl}}{M_{\odot}}\right] +
708: \frac{2}{5}\log\left[ \frac{P_{0}/k}{{\rm cm}^{-3}{\rm K}} \right]
709: \end{equation}
710: where $M_{\rm cl}$ should now be understood as the mean (luminosity
711: weighted) cluster mass in the starburst. The likely allowable physical
712: range on $\log{\cal C}$ in starburst environments is, roughly, 3 -
713: 7.5. These extremes correspond to $\log\left [ {{(P/k)} / {\pccm{\rm
714: K}}} \right ] \sim 4$ and $\log\left[ {{M_{\rm cl}}
715: / {M_{\odot}}}\right ] \sim 3.5$ and $\log\left [ {{(P/k)} /
716: {\pccm{\rm K}}} \right ] \sim 8$ and $\log\left[
717: {{M_{\rm cl}} / {M_{\odot}}}\right ] \sim 7$, respectively.
718:
719: In figure \ref{fig:fluxvstime}, we show the variation of
720: $L_{*}/R^{2}_{\rm HII}$ with time for six different \Cpar\
721: parameters. These display a strong decrease of the incident flux, and
722: therefore of dust temperature with time. The specific flux changes
723: several orders of magnitude over 10\ Myrs. This decrease is due to both
724: the increase of the \hii\ bubble radius with time (see fig.~1 in
725: SED1), and the decreasing cluster luminosity as the higher
726: mass stars die out. Note that, because of the underlying power-law
727: behavior of \Cpar, on this log scale the curves for different \Cpar\
728: parameters are offset from each other in proportion to the change in
729: $\log{\cal C}$.
730:
731: In order to demonstrate the constancy of the dust temperature
732: distribution at constant $\log {\cal C}$, in figure \ref{fig:sameC}
733: we show overplotted five SEDs for Solar metallicity photodissociation
734: regions, which all have the same compactness parameter of $\log{\cal
735: C} = 5.0$, but which have different pressures and stellar cluster
736: masses. Although these 5 SEDs appear indistinguishable, they are not
737: exactly the same, because their nebular excitation parameters ($\cal
738: R$; \emph{see} SED3) are quite different, and consequently their
739: nebular continuum and emission lines are different.
740:
741: Provided that we could independently determine $\cal R$ (from the
742: nebular spectrum) and $\cal C$ (from the form of the dust continuum)
743: then in principle we could solve independently for the mean pressure,
744: $P_0/k$ and mean cluster mass, ${M_{\rm cl}}$;
745:
746: \begin{eqnarray}
747: \log \left[ \frac{M_{\rm cl}}{M_{\odot}}\right] =
748: \log {\cal C} + \frac{2}{5} \log{\cal R} \\
749: \log \left[ \frac{P_{0}/k}{\pccm{\rm K}} \right] =
750: \log {\cal C} - \frac{3}{5} \log{\cal R}.
751: \end{eqnarray}
752:
753: In practice, the separation of these variables would be assisted by a
754: direct measurement of the gas pressure. For $P_{0}/k > 10^6$\pccm K
755: we can use the ratio of the [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda 6717,6731$\AA\ lines
756: for this purpose.
757:
758: To show the effect of varying \Cpar\ on the form of the far-IR SED, we
759: present in
760: figure \ref{fig:sameP} six model PDR SEDs having the same
761: metallicity ($1Z_{\odot}$) and pressure ($P/k=10^5$), with \Cpar\
762: varied by varying the cluster mass. In the optical and near-IR, the
763: model SEDs show stellar emission, and the extinction of all six SEDs
764: is the same, as they pass through the same column depth of dust and
765: gas. At longer wavelengths, the progression in the dust temperatures
766: with increasing \Cpar\ is obvious.
767:
768: \section{PDR Covering Fraction} \label{sec:fpdr}
769:
770: In the previous section, our figures \ref{fig:sameC} and
771: \ref{fig:sameP} corresponded to a complete covering fraction of
772: molecular clouds; $f_{\rm PDR}=1$. In this extreme, the molecular gas
773: and dust surrounding the \HII\ regions act as a dust bolometer,
774: absorbing essentially all of the stellar UV continuum, and
775: re-radiating it into the far-IR bump and the PAH features. However, in
776: the case of isolated \HII\ region complexes in both starburst and in
777: normal disk galaxies, the placental molecular cloud is quickly cleared
778: away by the stellar winds, and by photo-evaporation. In older
779: clusters, the disruption of the cluster by this gas ejection
780: will cause the exciting stars to
781: disperse away from the regions of high extinction, though the
782: timescale for this may be greater than the \hii\ region lifetime
783: \citep{Boily03a, Boily03b}. This process is
784: cutely referred to as ``infant mortality''.
785:
786: Previously in SED1 and SED2, we parameterized this uncovering of the
787: exciting stars by the introduction of a molecular cloud clearing or
788: dissipation timescale, $\tau_{\rm clear}$, where the covering fraction
789: of molecular cloud PDRs around a stellar cluster is given by;
790: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:tauclear}
791: f_{\rm PDR}=\exp(-t/\tau_{\rm clear}).
792: \end{equation}
793: In SED2, we found that, for Galactic star forming regions at least,
794: this timescale is quite short, on the order of $1-2$\ Myr. However, this
795: certainly does not represent all starforming regions, and is probably
796: far too short for ULIRGs which have an extremely generous sink of
797: molecular material. In these objects, the \HII\ regions of individual
798: clusters may merge, but the complex is still surrounded by molecular
799: gas.
800: Thus, the clearing timescale is likely to show a large range, and
801: will depend on the local environment. In addition, situations like the
802: commonly observed ``Blister \hii\ regions'', where the star formation
803: occurs on the edge of a molecular cloud, are not so well represented
804: by this formalism.
805:
806: To deal with this problem, we introduce here the much simpler system
807: of $f_{\rm PDR}$, which is defined as the time-averaged PDR covering
808: fraction during the \HII\ region lifetime. Starburst in which the PDRs
809: entirely surround their \HII\ regions have $f_{\rm PDR}=1$ while
810: uncovered \HII\ region complexes have $f_{\rm PDR}=0$.
811:
812: In figure \ref{fig:tauvsf} we show two series of SEDs to illustrate
813: the effect of a changing PDR covering fraction. Both represent a solar
814: metallicity starburst with a compactness $\Cpar=10^5$ and pressure
815: $P_{0}/k=10^5$ K\pccm, and are luminosity-weighted integrations scaled
816: to a star formation rate of 1.0 \Msunpyr. The upper set of SEDs show
817: the change in SED using $f_{\rm PDR}$, evolving from a pure \hii\
818: spectrum ($f_{\rm PDR}=0$) to a pure PDR spectrum ($f_{\rm
819: PDR}=1.0$). The \HII\ region-only SED (the same in both series) is
820: characterized by a strong
821: stellar UV continuum, absent or weak PAH features, and hot dust
822: emission from within the \HII\ region itself. By contrast, the \HII\
823: region plus PDR models show strongly attenuated
824: blue and UV continua ($A_{\rm V}\sim 0.8$ at $f_{\rm
825: PDR}=1.0$), strong PAH features and a broad, cool far-IR feature.
826:
827: As a comparison, the second plot shows a series in $\tau_{\rm clear}$,
828: going from $\tau_{\rm clear}=0$\ Myrs (pure \hii\ region) to $\tau_{\rm
829: clear}=32$\ Myrs. Clearly, these two formulations of the covering
830: factor are broadly equivalent. On close examination it is possible to
831: see some stronger older star
832: features in the $\tau_{\rm clear}$ spectra relative to a matching
833: $f_{\rm PDR}$ model, but these are small. Concurrent with this is the
834: slightly wider IR feature in the $f_{\rm PDR}$ models relative to the
835: $\tau_{\rm clear}$
836: models due to the stronger presence of dust heated by ``old'' ($\sim
837: 10$\ Myr) star cluster light.
838:
839: Note that, as we increase the covering factor, there is an increase in
840: the mid-IR from around 4\mum\ up to 15\mum\ caused by the increasing
841: contribution of PAHs. The far-IR dust re-emission feature
842: progressively increases and broadens as the contribution of cool dust
843: in the PDR becomes more important. The contribution of this cool dust
844: in the PDR can be traced at shorter wavelengths through the steepening
845: of the 20-35 \mum\ slope. This
846: spectral region has few emission lines and there are now available
847: many \emph{Spitzer} IRS spectra of Starbursts,
848: e.g. \citet{Brandl06}. Thus the 20-35 \mum\ slope may be a useful
849: diagnostic of the PDR fraction in starbursts. However, this region is
850: also affected by the contribution of ultra-compact \hii\ regions (\S
851: \ref{sec:UCHII}) and by attenuation at high $A_{\rm V}$ (\S \ref{sec:diffuse}).
852:
853: Note also the insensitivity of the SED to the covering factor in two
854: regions of the spectrum; the $1-4$ \mum\ region, and at around 20
855: \mum. The $1-4$ \mum\ emission is dominated by the older stars in the
856: starburst, and for these the PDR acting by itself is insufficient to
857: produce a significant dust attenuation. The constancy of flux in the
858: $\sim 20$\mum\ waveband is somewhat more interesting and is directly
859: related to the strong correlation between the 24\mum\ \emph{Spitzer}
860: flux and the SFR \citep{Calzetti05}. The models reveal that almost all
861: of the warm dust emission arises from the hot dust embedded within the
862: \hii\ region itself. The cooler dust in the surrounding PDR makes
863: little contribution to the global flux at these wavelengths.
864: This result agrees with the
865: spatially-resolved observations of nearby galaxies where the 24\mum\
866: emission peaks in \hii\ regions while the PAH emission is
867: much more diffuse. In NGC 5194 about 85\% of total galaxy 24\mum\
868: emission arises within the defined \hii\ regions, while only
869: $\sim$60\% of the 8\mum\ arises within these regions
870: \citep{Calzetti05}. This result is also in agreement with the earlier
871: theoretical calculations of \cite{Popescu00} for the edge-on galaxy
872: NGC~891. In this galaxy, the star forming disk \HII\ regions have to
873: be associated with a dominant hotter dust emission component.
874:
875: Our models also demonstrate that the relationship between SFR and
876: 24\mum\ emission is not one to one, because the warm dust continuum is
877: also sensitive to the compactness parameter, \Cpar\ , as is
878: demonstrated in figure \ref{fig:sameP}. This finding also agrees with
879: the observations, since variations of two or three in the ratio of the
880: 24\mum\ emission to the SFR have been observed between galaxies
881: \citep{Dale01,Calzetti05}.
882:
883: \section{Column Depth in the Photodissociation Region}
884:
885: As stated in section \ref{sec:models}, we use a hydrogen column density of
886: $\log N({\rm HI})=22.0 $ (cm$^{-2}$) to define the extent of the
887: photodissociation region. While this value is typical of molecular
888: clouds in our own galaxy, it is quite likely that those in starburst
889: regions cover a broader range in column depths. In figure
890: \ref{fig:column} we show the effect of varying the column density in
891: the model. For this exercise, we use our fiducial starburst model with
892: solar metallicity, compactness parameter of $\Cpar=10^5$, ISM
893: pressure of $P_{0}/k=10^5$K \pccm and test a range of PDR column
894: depths; $\log N({\rm HI})\sim 0$ (corresponding to the \hii\ region
895: spectrum), 21.5, 22.0 (our standard PDR model spectrum), 22.5, and
896: 23.0.
897:
898: Note that, as more of the UV and visible photons are absorbed, the
899: total flux in the far-IR bump becomes correspondingly greater, and the
900: feature also becomes wider as the contribution of the colder dust
901: heated by softer photons deep within the PDR becomes more
902: important. Note also that the contribution of the PAHs to the SED is
903: apparently almost complete by $\log N({\rm HI})=21.5$.
904:
905: In many respects, the effect of increasing the column depth of the PDR
906: is similar to that obtained by applying a diffuse dusty screen (see
907: the following section). As we increase in column depth the optical
908: depth increases (relative to the \hii\ model). The effective model
909: $A_{\rm V}$ for each model is 0.2, 0.8, 2.6, and 8.4 as $N({\rm HI})$
910: increases from 0 to 10$^{23}$ \pscm\ . At $N({\rm HI})=10^{23}$\pscm\
911: the IR starts to become optically thick, with a corresponding
912: steepening in the 20\mum\ to 30\mum\ slope. The increase in the
913: silicate feature depth, $\tau_{9.7 \mu{\rm m}}$, becomes obvious
914: somewhat earlier, at $N({\rm HI})=10^{22}$\pscm. Note that
915: differences in the dust composition and dust geometry ensure that the
916: attenuation law of the diffuse dust (shown in fig. \ref{fig:extcurve})
917: is slightly different to that experienced in the PDR, with the
918: silicate grains more prominent in the PDR (as seen by the stronger
919: silicate absorption feature and flatter extinction).
920:
921: The main difference in our model between the PDR region and a dusty
922: screen is the
923: inclusion of the self-consistent dust emission. By $\log
924: N({\rm HI})=22$ most of the UV-optical flux has been absorbed
925: and re-emitted as the strong FIR feature. At larger depths
926: the average temperature of the dust is quite cold ($\sim
927: 10-20$K) and emits only at long ($>100\mum$) wavelengths.
928: However in starburst regions such temperatures may not be reached, as
929: it is likely that neighboring clusters, as well
930: as the underlying diffuse population, would prevent the dust from
931: reaching such temperatures. Only in the largest molecular clouds, or
932: the most distant dust, would such temperatures be reached. It is for
933: this reason that we limit our photodissociation regions to $\log
934: N({\rm HI})=22.0$ and use the diffuse population to represent this
935: cool dust (\S \ref{sec:diffemiss}).
936:
937: \section{Other Components of the SED}
938:
939: \subsection{Ultra-Compact \HII\ Regions}\label{sec:UCHII}
940:
941: The modeling presented thus far assumes that the stars in
942: stellar clusters inflate a common \HII\ region, and that the cluster
943: can be treated as a single, centrally concentrated source of radiation
944: and mechanical luminosity. However, in the earliest stages of the
945: cluster lifetime ($\lapprox 10^6$ years after formation) the
946: individual stars composing the clusters are likely to be still buried
947: in their separate birth clouds. In addition, we know that the massive
948: stars start burning hydrogen even before they reach the main sequence
949: and while they are still accreting matter from their parental
950: molecular cloud \citep{Bernasconi96}. During this phase, the cluster
951: acts as an ensemble of Ultra-Compact \HII\ regions (UCHII), each
952: trapped at sub-parsec scales around their individual massive parent
953: stars \citep[see][ for a detailed review of UCHII
954: regions]{Churchwell02}. The period of time in which the winds of
955: cluster stars cannot operate collectively may occupy a significant
956: fraction of a massive star's lifetime \citep[][ and references
957: within]{Rigby04}. During this
958: UCHII region phase the optical emission will be totally obscured, with
959: $A_{\rm v} \sim 50$mag. As the UCHII region is so compact, it
960: also displays a hot IR emission \citep{Peeters02b}. This compactness
961: also ensures that the dust is very successful in competing against the
962: gas for the ionizing photons \citep{Dopita03}, which makes the region
963: still more compact and ensures that radiation pressure effects in the
964: ionized plasma are important. Thus, UCHII regions are qualitatively
965: different from normal cluster-driven \HII\ regions.
966:
967: The technique of modelling the SEDs of individual compact and
968: ultra-compact \HII\ regions was fully described in
969: \cite{Dopita05b}. Briefly, these use the \emph{TLUSTY} models
970: (available at http://tlusty.gsfc.nasa.gov) which were interpolated
971: and re-binned to the energy bins used in our code, \mapiii. On the
972: basis of the results presented by \cite{Morisset04}, we can expect the
973: SEDs we derive will be very similar to those using either the
974: \emph{WM-Basic} or the \emph{CMFGEN} models. Unlike the \emph{TLUSTY}
975: atmospheric models, these latter two are fully dynamical atmospheric
976: models. The \emph{TLUSTY} models used cover three abundances, 0.5, 1.0
977: and $2.0Z_{\odot}$. Here the definition of solar abundance is
978: effectively the same as used in the Starburst99 models.
979:
980: We made \mapiii\ photo-ionization models for the structure of
981: radiation-pressure dominated dusty \HII\ regions and their surrounding
982: photo-dissociation regions. The models are started close to the
983: central star (1\% of the computed (dust-free) Str\"omgren radius) so
984: that the ionized gas effectively fills the Str\"omgren sphere of
985: these models. We use the same dust model as for the cluster SED
986: computations. The models that we used here have fixed external
987: pressure $\log P/k = 9.0 $ K cm$^{-3}$, and are terminated at a \HI\ column
988: density of $\log N({\rm HI}) = 21.5$. The mass range of the central
989: stars is $16.7-106.9 M_{\odot}$. This corresponds to a stellar
990: effective temperature range of $32500 \leq T_{\rm eff} \leq 52500$K,
991: which is covered in bins each 2500K wide. The computed SEDs for
992: individual UCHII regions correspond to the zero age main sequence
993: (ZAMS) of the central stars.
994:
995: The starburst galaxy compact \HII\ region SED is constructed by
996: co-adding the SEDs computed for each stellar mass bin, luminosity
997: weighted to that corresponding to a Kroupa Initial Mass Function (over
998: the effective mass range $15-120 M_{\odot}$), and scaled to represent
999: a massive star formation rate of $ 1.0 \msolar$ yr$^{-1}$ continued
1000: over a period $0.0-1.0$\ Myr.
1001:
1002: The resulting SEDs for each metallicity are shown in figure
1003: \ref{fig:UCHII_SEDs}. The small changes in the apparent normalization
1004: of these spectra is due to the change of the stellar luminosity with
1005: abundance. Note that all the three spectra are very similar, with very
1006: weak PAH features, a hot dust far-IR continuum, similar line spectra
1007: and heavy (but abundance-dependent) obscuration at shorter
1008: wavelengths.
1009:
1010: Because the spectra are quite similar, it is clear that any one of
1011: them could be used as a UCHII template across the full metallicity
1012: range. However, for closest consistency, we recommend the use of the
1013: $2.0Z_{\odot}$ model with the $2.0Z_{\odot}$ Starburst99
1014: cluster templates, the $1.0Z_{\odot}$ model with the $1.0Z_{\odot}$
1015: Starburst99 cluster models and the $0.5Z_{\odot}$ model with
1016: the 0.05, 0.2 and 0.4$Z_{\odot}$ Starburst99 cluster models.
1017:
1018: As an example, in figure \ref{fig:addUCHII} we demonstrate how the
1019: inclusion of UCHII emission alters the starburst SED. We parameterize
1020: the addition of this emission to the SED by $f_{\rm UCHII}$,
1021: the scale of the UCHII
1022: contribution. A $f_{\rm UCHII}=1.0$ implies
1023: that 50\% of the massive stars younger than 1.0\ Myr are surrounded by
1024: ultra-compact \hii\ regions. As the UCHII regions emit predominantly
1025: in the mid-IR, this parameter affects both the mid-IR
1026: slope and PAH equivalent widths, as seen in figure \ref{fig:addUCHII}.
1027: The emission lines are also affected by the inclusion of the young
1028: \hii\ regions, with the contribution greater in the mid-IR than the
1029: optical due to the high optical depth of the UCHII regions.
1030:
1031: \subsection{The Older Stellar Contribution}\label{sec:oldstar}
1032:
1033: The discussion so far has concerned itself only with the stars younger
1034: than 10\ Myr. However, a typical starburst will continue for a dynamical
1035: timescale of a galaxy, typically $\sim10^8$~yr. Over this time period,
1036: most of the the young star clusters will have dispersed into the
1037: field, and away from the active star forming regions
1038: \citep{Whitmore07, Fall05}. As a consequence, the older ($>10$\ Myrs)
1039: stellar population may dominate the optical and UV parts of the
1040: SED, since it suffers much less extinction than the starburst itself,
1041: having long escaped its original molecular birth clouds
1042: \citep{Charlot00}.
1043: However, it is in the optical-UV range that most of the work has been
1044: done in constraining the star formation history (SFH) of galaxies,
1045: using features such as the 4000\AA\ break due to hydrogen and stellar
1046: absorption lines like the Lick indices to constrain the age and
1047: metallicity of the dominant stellar population, or even the evolution
1048: of star formation and metallicity \citep[eg][]{Panter07}.
1049:
1050: In order to represent this older stellar contribution in our starburst
1051: models we use a luminosity weighted sum of the 10-100\ Myr starburst
1052: spectra from Starburst99, having the same parameters as the
1053: models used to generate the \hii\ spectra. We generate the ``old''
1054: stellar spectra for each metallicity, and assume that the metallicity
1055: of the starburst the old population are the same. The resulting
1056: spectra for each metallicity are shown in figure \ref{fig:oldstar},
1057: scaled to a continuous star formation rate of 1.0\Msunpyr.
1058:
1059: The inferred ratio of the starburst fraction in the $< 10$\ Myr
1060: population to the fraction in the age range 10-100\ Myr can provide
1061: information about the progress of the starburst - whether the
1062: starburst activity is accelerating or decelerating in recent
1063: time. This fraction may be constrained by comparing the flux at some
1064: wavelength in the far-IR bump with the stellar continuum flux at any
1065: wavelength shorter than about 5\mum. In figure \ref{fig:hii+old} we
1066: demonstrate this sensitivity. Here we have added this old stellar
1067: contribution to a solar metallicity starburst with $\log \Cpar=5$ and
1068: log $P/k=5$. We have normalized the SED, assuming a continuous and
1069: constant star
1070: formation rate of 1 \Msunpyr\ up to the maximum starburst age of
1071: $10^8$yr. To emphasize the effect of the older population we have
1072: taken a totally obscured $<10$\ Myr starburst ($f_{\rm PDR}=1$), as
1073: shown in the lower curve, and added a completely unobscured
1074: contribution from the older stars to provide the upper curve.
1075:
1076: These models show how it is possible to produce a systematic
1077: difference between the dust attenuation in the UV and the dust
1078: attenuation of the \HII\ regions as measured by the Balmer
1079: Decrement. Such a systematic difference has long be known to exist
1080: from observations of starbursts \citep{Calzetti94, Calzetti01}, in the
1081: sense that the Balmer Decrements indicate greater attenuation than the
1082: UV and visible stellar continuum.
1083:
1084: Finally, the ratio of the two stellar components, young/old, is
1085: related to the $b$ parameter recently used by \citet{Kong04}, which is
1086: the ratio of the current versus past-averaged star formation
1087: rate. This parameter was introduced to help understand the
1088: relationship between the UV and IR, through concentrating in
1089: particular on the correlation of the UV slope and IR excess
1090: \citep{Meurer99}. In our case we parameterize the contribution of the
1091: old stellar population through the parameter $f_{\rm old}$.
1092: Figure \ref{fig:hii+old} presents a case of $f_{\rm old}=1$,
1093: with continuous star formation, and $f_{\rm old}$ greater and lower
1094: than one represents cases where the past average star formation
1095: history is greater and less than the current star formation
1096: respectively.
1097:
1098: \subsection{Diffuse Dust Attenuation}\label{sec:diffuse}
1099:
1100: The simple \hii\ region plus photodissociation region models presented
1101: in the previous sections provide a maximum attenuation of $A_{\rm
1102: V}\sim0.8$ for a solar metallicity starburst and $A_{\rm V}\sim2.5$
1103: for
1104: $2Z_{\odot}$. This is lower than observed in many ULIRGs
1105: \citep{Farrah07}. In order to properly account for the total
1106: attenuation, we need to include the attenuation produced by a by a
1107: foreground dusty screen associated with gas in the starburst host
1108: galaxy, but not necessarily partaking in the starburst, to account for
1109: these heavily obscured starbursts. This foreground screen will also
1110: attenuate the older stars associated with the starburst (discussed in
1111: the previous section).
1112:
1113: The properties of such a turbulent foreground attenuating screen were
1114: discussed in a series of papers by Fischera \&
1115: Dopita \citep{Fischera03, Fischera04, Fischera05}. They showed that
1116: turbulence which produces a log:normal distribution in local density
1117: will also, to a high level of approximation, produce a log:normal
1118: distribution in column density. They also showed that the resulting
1119: attenuation curve is unlike that of a normal extinction law, showing
1120: lower attenuation in the UV and larger attenuation in the IR, due to
1121: the spatially-varying extinction across the face of the dust-obscured
1122: object. Here we adopt the theoretical attenuation curve computed in
1123: those papers, which is shown in fig.~\ref{fig:extcurve} and which
1124: provides a close approximation to the empirically-derived Calzetti
1125: extinction law for starburst galaxies \citep{Calzetti01}. This curve
1126: does not allow for the possible destruction of PAHs in the diffuse
1127: medium, and the computed 2175 \AA\ absorption feature may be rather
1128: too strong to be applicable to starburst environments.
1129:
1130: In figure \ref{fig:atten} we show the effects of this dusty screen on
1131: a starburst with solar metallicity, compactness parameter of
1132: $\Cpar=10^5$, ISM pressure of $P_{0}/k=10^5$K \pccm, and covering
1133: fraction of $f_{\rm PDR}=0.5$. We show both low and high attenuation,
1134: with 10 SEDs plotted in figure \ref{fig:atten} with $A_{\rm V}$ of
1135: 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 10.0, 15.0, 30.0 and 40.0, with a clear
1136: depletion of the ultraviolet and optical flux as the $A_{\rm V}$
1137: increases. To emphasize the effects of the attenuation on the IR
1138: emission we do not include the diffuse cool-dust emission that would
1139: be expected with such attenuation. We note that beyond $\sim 60$\mum\
1140: there would be a contribution due to thermal emission from this cool
1141: dust, and care should be taken with any interpretations made beyond
1142: this wavelength. The effect of this emission is discussed in the
1143: following subsection.
1144:
1145: The attenuation and reddening of the underlying starlight at the
1146: optical and UV wavelengths is very evident. However, it is only at
1147: $A_{\rm V}\gapprox5$ that absorption in the 9.7 \mum\ and 18 \mum\
1148: silicate features becomes apparent. With $A_{\rm
1149: V}/\tau_{9.7\mum}\sim16.6$ \citep{Rieke85}
1150: this feature is weaker than the optical opacity, but it is observed to
1151: be visible or very strong in a large number of starburst galaxies,
1152: proving that a good deal of the starburst activity will be totally
1153: obscured in the visible thanks to large column densities in the
1154: surrounding molecular gas. Note also that at the highest $A_{\rm V}$
1155: even the 20-35\mum\ slope steepens to the ``reddening'' effect of the
1156: dust attenuation.
1157:
1158: The $A_{\rm V} > 20$mag.~dusty screen needed to provide the observed
1159: depth of the silicate absorption troughs seen in some ULIRGs has
1160: little effect on the global energy balance of the starburst. By an
1161: $A_{\rm V}$ of 1.0, most of the FUV-optical radiation from stars, almost 80\%,
1162: has been absorbed (or scattered) by dust. The
1163: decline in the luminous flux through the PDR, accompanied with the
1164: softening of the radiation field naturally produces the dust
1165: temperature gradient which \citet{Levenson07} believe is required in
1166: the obscuring material.
1167:
1168: \subsection{Diffuse Dust Emission \& Scattering}\label{sec:diffemiss}
1169: A complete model of a starburst environment should not neglect the
1170: contribution to the far-IR emission by diffuse cool dust. Some of this
1171: may well be the same dust that produces the foreground screen
1172: absorption. The optical photons that are absorbed by the diffuse
1173: galactic dust at high $A_{\rm V}$ are still capable of heating the
1174: dust in the diffuse ISM. In addition, the star forming regions may not
1175: be fully cocooned by its surrounding PDR cloud, so that some fraction
1176: of the cluster UV radiation may escape and heat this diffuse
1177: dust. This cool galactic dust will mostly contribute to the SED in the
1178: $>100$\mum\ to sub-mm region. A portion of this radiation may also be
1179: scattered into our sight-line, which mostly affects the far-UV SED. In
1180: our modeling we have not included this component due to our limited
1181: geometry.
1182:
1183: The exact temperature distribution of the grains will also depend upon
1184: the geometry of the starburst,
1185: pre-existing stellar population, and dust within the starbursting
1186: galaxy. Due to the limited geometry of our simple models, we are
1187: unable to model such distributions. Instead we follow the work of
1188: \citet{Dale01}, and calculate the diffuse cool dust emission in terms
1189: of the average interstellar radiation density. This allows us to model
1190: both distributed starbursts where the average radiation field is high,
1191: and nuclear starbursts, where the rest of the galactic scale dust is
1192: only weakly heated.
1193:
1194: To represent the average radiation field we have used the
1195: luminosity-weighted average of a Starburst99 cluster from
1196: $10-100$\ Myr discussed in the section \ref{sec:oldstar}. While this
1197: is
1198: younger than the average age of the pre-existing stars in a starburst
1199: host galaxy, these stars are nonetheless likely to provide the
1200: dominant dust-heating radiation field.
1201:
1202: We then calculate the cool dust emission using the \mapiii\ code,
1203: assuming the same dust properties as before and a column depth of
1204: $\log N(H)=22.5$ (\pscm). For the heating flux we scale the radiation field in
1205: terms of the local \citet{Habing68} interstellar radiation field
1206: (ISRF: FUV$\sim 1.6\times10^{-3}$\flux). We set the radiation field
1207: from 0.1 to 1000.0 times this value, in steps of 0.3 dex. The
1208: resulting IR emission is shown in figure \ref{fig:cool}. As expected,
1209: low ISRF leads to very cold dust, and the high ISRF has dust
1210: temperatures similar to those encountered in our PDRs.
1211:
1212: The actual contribution of this diffuse dust emission component to the
1213: global starburst SED is not constrained by these models. This would
1214: require a more sophisticated geometrical model of the starburst, its
1215: outflows, and any more extended disk or tidal structure around the
1216: starburst core.
1217:
1218: In Figure \ref{fig:adddiff} we show the effect of adding this diffuse
1219: dust emission component with a total intensity of 10\% of our
1220: fiducial model Starburst with solar metallicity. For clarity we add
1221: only four of
1222: the diffuse emission models, heated by a Habing radiation field, $G_{0}$
1223: of 1000.0, 100.0, 10.0, and 1.0 times the local interstellar radiation
1224: field (ISRF$_{\rm local}$), respectively. The attenuation associated
1225: with the diffuse dust emission is not included here.
1226:
1227: The model with 1000.0 times ISRF$_{\rm local}$ has hotter dust than the
1228: log \Cpar=5 PDR and is therefore likely to be unphysical. The
1229: 100.0 times ISRF$_{\rm local}$ model has a similar dust temperature as
1230: the PDRs, and so the diffuse field serves only to increase the
1231: total flux of the IR. This probably represents the extreme
1232: case for a starbursting galaxy, and may lead to the narrow and strong
1233: far-IR features seen in some ULIRGs.
1234:
1235: The cooler diffuse emission models, with $G_{0} <$ 10.0 times
1236: ISRF$_{\rm local}$,
1237: are both applicable to less energetic
1238: starburst galaxies. In such cases, the diffuse emission acts to
1239: broaden the IR feature, as well as shift the peak to longer
1240: wavelengths, while leaving the shorter wavelengths ($<60$\mum)
1241: relatively unaffected.
1242:
1243: \section{Starburst Metallicity}\label{sec:metal}
1244:
1245: The metallicity of a starburst affects the SED in several ways;
1246: through the intrinsic change in the stellar SED with metallicity,
1247: through the changing gas-phase abundances, which determine the
1248: temperature and the line emission of the \HII\ regions, through the
1249: opacity of the ISM in the dust, and through the metallicity-dependent
1250: change in grain composition. A full discussion of the effect of
1251: metallicity on the emission line spectra of the \HII\ regions was
1252: given in SED3. In this section we will systematically investigate the
1253: remaining effects.
1254:
1255:
1256: In figure \ref{fig:metal} we show our fiducial (\HII\ region \& PDR)
1257: starburst with log $\Cpar=5$ and log$P_{0}/k=5$ computed using the 5
1258: standard Starburst99 metallicities. As the PDR is defined
1259: through a constant column depth of hydrogen, lower metallicity leads
1260: to lower column of dust. This leads to a strong decrease in the
1261: optical-ultraviolet opacity as the metallicity is decreased.
1262:
1263: The metallicity-dependent effects on the \HII\ emission line
1264: spectrum have previously been remarked upon in SED3.
1265: As the metallicity decreases, the
1266: stellar spectrum becomes harder due to the decreasing opacity of the
1267: stellar atmospheres and winds. In addition, for a given size, a
1268: stellar cluster of lower metallicity has a
1269: higher ionizing luminosity and lower mechanical luminosity. This leads
1270: to more compact \HII\ regions, and higher ionization parameters in the
1271: surrounding \hii\ region. The fraction of radiation absorbed by the
1272: dust in the \HII\ region depends on the product of metallicity and
1273: ionization parameter \citep{Dopita03}. This product remains
1274: approximately constant with metallicity, ensuring that the flux under
1275: the far-IR bump remains approximately constant for the \HII\ region
1276: SEDs.
1277:
1278: In the PDRs, the UV to optical SEDs clearly shows the effect of
1279: increasing opacity with metallicity. The far-IR features change in
1280: several ways. First, there is a systematic increase in the relative
1281: strength of the PAH emission features with metallicity. This is a
1282: consequence of the increase in the C/O ratio with metallicity, which
1283: ensures that PAHs account for more absorption at higher metallicity
1284: relative to the silicates, combined with the higher mean dust
1285: temperatures which characterize lower metallicities. Another factor is
1286: the increased strength and hardness of the average radiation field in
1287: the constant column PDR with decreased
1288: metallicity. As a consequence, the Habing PAH survival criterion
1289: is only met deeper in the cloud, resulting in overall weaker PAH
1290: emission.
1291:
1292: Such a decrease in the PAH strength with decreasing metallicity has
1293: been observed with both the \emph{Spitzer} and ISO Space Observatories
1294: \citep{Engelbracht05, Rosenberg06, Wu06, Madden06, Jackson07}. However, the
1295: observed depletion of PAHs in the low-metallicity environments may be
1296: even greater than that computed in our models, and both \citet{Wu06}
1297: and \citet{Jackson07} implicate grain destruction processes as acting
1298: more efficiently in the lower metallicity environments. We would hope
1299: that our models, applied to these low-metallicity systems, would be
1300: able to better confirm and quantify this effect.
1301:
1302: In the PDRs, the IR flux can also be seen to increase and become
1303: broader with metallicity up till $Z\sim1.0Z_{\odot}$, after which it
1304: stays approximately constant. This is predominantly due to the
1305: increased dust column. The shift of the IR peak to longer wavelengths
1306: is also partly due to the increased dust column but is also due to the
1307: increasing mechanical luminosity of the starburst with metallicity,
1308: which results in larger \hii\ regions, with cooler average dust
1309: temperatures.
1310:
1311: \section{Comparison With Observations}\label{sec:Obs}
1312:
1313: \subsection{Data Sources}
1314:
1315: In order to compare the models with data, we require as close a
1316: homogeneous data-set as available, covering as wide a wavelength range as
1317: possible. For this purpose, we have selected a pair of popular
1318: template starburst galaxies, NGC~6240 and Arp~220 from the 41 ULIRGS
1319: observed with ISO by \citet{Klaas01}. This data set is ideal for our
1320: purpose because their SEDs are well sampled over the full wavelength
1321: regime 1--200\,\mum.
1322:
1323: Flux densities at other wavelengths were collected using the NASA/IPAC
1324: Extragalactic Database (NED) supplemented with a wide selection of
1325: on-line catalogues and papers. Generally, the UV/optical fluxes are
1326: taken from the third reference catalogue of bright galaxies v3.9
1327: \citep{deVaucouleurs91}. Many optical and near-IR fluxes were taken
1328: from \citet{Spinoglio95}, or from the APM and 2MASS databases.
1329:
1330: The majority of data points in the 1--1300\,\micron\ wavelength range
1331: come from \citet{Klaas97,Klaas01}. Additional data points were taken
1332: from \citet{Sanders88a}, \citet{Sanders88b}, \citet{Murphy96},
1333: \citet{Rigopoulou96}, \citet{Rigopoulou99}, \citet{SuraceSanders00},
1334: \citet{Lisenfeld00}, \citet{Dunne00,Dunne01}, \citet{Scoville00}, and
1335: \citet{Spoon04} and references therein.
1336:
1337: When available, the UV/optical and near-IR ($JHK$-band) points include
1338: aperture corrections to allow a direct comparison with the larger
1339: aperture mid- and far-IR fluxes (see, for example,
1340: \citet{Spinoglio95}). All UV to near-IR fluxes have been corrected for
1341: Galactic extinction using the E(B$-$V) values based upon IRAS
1342: 100\,$\mu$m cirrus emission maps \citep{Schlegel98} and extrapolating
1343: following \citet{Cardelli89}.
1344:
1345: For comparison of the models with a typical \emph{Spitzer} IRS
1346: spectrum of a starburst, we have used the latest (re-calibrated)
1347: version of the spectrum of NGC~7714 from \citet{Brandl06}.
1348:
1349: \subsection{Pan-Spectral Fitting}
1350: Our library of models contains the following elements:
1351: \begin{itemize}
1352: \item{ An ensemble of \HII\ regions surrounding young clusters with
1353: ages $<10$\ Myr characterized by mean compactness $\cal C$ and
1354: metallicity $Z$.}
1355: \item {A set of PDRs surrounding these \HII\ regions with a mean
1356: geometrical covering factor, $f_{\rm PDR}$.}
1357: \item{A population of young ($< 1.0$\ Myr) ultra-compact \HII\ regions
1358: and their PDRs surrounding individual massive stars, characterized
1359: by a fraction $f_{\rm UCHII}$, where $f_{\rm UCHII}=1.0$ would imply
1360: that 50\% of massive stars younger than 1.0\ Myr were surrounded by
1361: ultra-compact \HII\ regions.}
1362: \item{An older stellar population with ages $10 \leq t \leq
1363: 100$\ Myr. The flux of this component is scaled by a factor $f_{\rm
1364: old}$, where $f_{\rm old}=1$ would correspond to continuous star
1365: formation over a total period of 100\ Myr. }
1366: \item{A foreground turbulent attenuating dust screen, characterized by
1367: an optical depth in the V- band, $A_{\rm V}$.}
1368: \item{A re-emission component from the diffuse ISM, characterized by
1369: the mean Habing field intensity $G_{0}$ and scaled to a percentage
1370: of the total Bolometric Flux of the Starburst ($\leq 20$\%).}
1371: \end{itemize}
1372:
1373: Ideally, all of these elements should be fitted via a non-linear
1374: least-squares procedure. However, lacking this tool for the time
1375: being, we have elected to make hand-crafted fits to a few template
1376: objects. In addition, we have chosen to make the following simplifying
1377: assumptions:
1378: \begin{itemize}
1379: \item{We treat the $<10$\ Myr stellar population as an ensemble of
1380: \HII\ +PDR regions with $f_{\rm PDR}=1.0$. This approximation is
1381: justified by the observation that the global obscuration of a
1382: starburst increases with the absolute rate of star formation
1383: \cite{Buat99,Adelberger00,Dopita02,Vijh03}. This is a natural
1384: consequence of the \cite{Kennicutt98} star formation law,
1385: connecting the surface density of star formation to the surface
1386: density of gas; $\Sigma_{\rm SFR} \propto \Sigma_{\rm gas}^n$, with
1387: $n \sim 1.3-1.6$. Noting that $A_{\rm V} \propto \Sigma_{\rm gas}$,
1388: it follows that intense starbursts are highly dust-enshrouded.}
1389: \item{We ignore the contribution of the diffuse dust in the far-IR
1390: emission. As has already been noted in Section \ref{sec:diffuse},
1391: the contribution this makes is small, and significant only above 100
1392: \mum.}
1393: \end{itemize}
1394:
1395: With these assumptions, we show in figure \ref{fig:NGC6240} the fit we
1396: obtain for the galaxy NGC~6240. As can be seen, with five free
1397: parameters we obtain an excellent fit to the observations over nearly
1398: 3.5 decades of frequency. In this figure, the data have been scaled to
1399: a star formation rate of 1.0 \Msunpyr\ in order to make this SED
1400: comparable to the others in this paper. The scaling factor required
1401: indicates a total star formation rate of 120 \Msunpyr\ for this
1402: galaxy, a little higher than the value of 102 \Msunpyr\ derived from
1403: the IRAS far-IR luminosity by \citet{Dopita02}. However, the
1404: H$\alpha$ luminosity for this galaxy (also measured by by
1405: \citet{Dopita02}), which comes from the extended gas indicates a star
1406: formation of 14.6 \Msunpyr\ , provided that it is dominated by star
1407: formation, and not by an obscured active nucleus (see below). Since
1408: the far-IR comes from the obscured starburst, and the visible
1409: H$\alpha$ from the regions which are relatively unobscured, these
1410: figures suggest that the total star formation rate is indeed close to
1411: 120 \Msunpyr.
1412:
1413: As can be seen in figure \ref{fig:NGC6240}, with a model with only
1414: five free parameters we have obtained an excellent fit to the
1415: observations over nearly 3.5 decades of frequency. However, this
1416: quality of fit to a model which only includes elements of a starburst
1417: system is at first sight extraordinary. NGC~6240 has long been
1418: implicated with an active nucleus, and shows both a strong non-thermal
1419: radio excess, extended radio emission \citep{Gallimore04}, and X-ray
1420: emission associated with a highly dust-obscured AGN
1421: \citep[eg][]{Ikebe00,Risaliti00, Kewley00}. Recently \citet{Armus06}
1422: have directly detected the active nucleus via the [\ion{Ne}{5}] 14.3
1423: \mum\ line using the IRS on the \emph{Spitzer Space Telescope}. From
1424: this, they estimate that the AGN has a flux of $3-5$\% of the
1425: bolometric luminosity. At such low levels, it would account for the
1426: slight excess in the flux in the vicinity of the $6-14$\mum\ PAH
1427: features seen in the observations when compared to our model, but is
1428: not sufficient to compromise the rest of the fit.
1429:
1430: NGC~6240 has an unusually strong contribution from older stars,
1431: suggesting either that the starburst is rather old in this object, or
1432: that the current starburst is the second episode in this galaxy, or
1433: that there is an important contribution of stars older than $\sim
1434: 10^8$yrs. All of these hypotheses are consistent with the known status
1435: of NGC~6240 as a post-merger system.
1436:
1437: What about the uniqueness of this fit? Fortunately, the different
1438: parameters of the fit act on different parts of the pan-spectral SED,
1439: so it is fairly easy to separate them when we have data covering such
1440: a large range in wavelength. We have performed the test of varying
1441: each of the major parameters, excluding metallicity, systematically around
1442: the best-fit solution, and the result is shown in figure
1443: \ref{fig:sensfit}.
1444:
1445: The effect of varying metallicity is shown in figure \ref{fig:metal},
1446: and has perhaps the most profound effect on the spectrum. To summarize,
1447: the metallicity is most easily determined from the shape and
1448: absorption line intensities of the stellar continuum, and by the
1449: emission line techniques discussed in SED3. It also has an effect on
1450: both the strength of the PAH features and the width of the far-IR
1451: bump. High metallicity gives strong PAH features and wide far-R
1452: bump. In the fitting described in this section we have mostly relied
1453: upon these latter characteristics to estimate the abundance.
1454:
1455: For the remaining parameters, figure \ref{fig:sensfit} shows that
1456: each affects a different part of the SED. A change in $\log{\cal C}$
1457: only changes the far-IR bump, shifting it in peak wavelength without
1458: appreciable change in the total width. A change in $f_{\rm old}$
1459: simply scales the $0.091 - 5$\mum\ spectrum up and down, leaving the
1460: rest of the SED unchanged. A change in $A_{\rm V}$ affects the slope
1461: of the visible-UV spectrum. Note that, when $A_{\rm V}$ is higher than
1462: about $5-10$~mag, the 9.7 and 18.0\mum\ silicate absorption features
1463: appear and can be used to constrain the extinction when the the
1464: visible-UV part of the spectrum is too attenuated. The Ultra-Compact
1465: \HII\ region fraction $f_{\rm UCHII}$ mostly affects the $10-30$\mum\
1466: part of the spectrum. In figure \ref{fig:sensfit}, the apparent
1467: sensitivity of the SED to this parameter seems small, but this is
1468: because the inferred $\log{\cal C}$ for this galaxy is very
1469: high. Thus, the flux of the ordinary \HII\ regions is high in the
1470: $10-100$\mum\ region where the UCHII population is important, and the
1471: contribution of the UCHII regions is veiled. Galaxies with lower
1472: $\log{\cal C}$ show the UCHII contribution much more clearly (see
1473: fig.~\ref{fig:addUCHII}).
1474:
1475: As another example of a famous starburst, we present in
1476: figure \ref{fig:Arp220} our fit to Arp~220, the predominantly
1477: used template of starburst SEDs. This galaxy is characterized by a greater
1478: optical extinction, lower compactness parameter, and a lower
1479: contribution of the old star
1480: population than NGC~6240. In addition, a lower chemical abundance is
1481: indicated by the weaker PAH features, and the narrower, more sharply
1482: peaked far-IR bump.
1483:
1484: Arp~220, as the local ULIRG, has quite often been used as a testbed
1485: for SED modelling. Examples of these can be seen in \citet[][their
1486: figure 9]{Silva98}, \citet[][their figure 8]{Takagi03b} and
1487: \citet[][their figure 5]{Siebenmorgen07} to name a few. While all
1488: these models (including our own) can be seen to fit quite reasonably
1489: the available
1490: observations of Arp~220, they differ in their model parameters, making
1491: direct comparisons difficult. However the main physical conclusions
1492: drawn from the
1493: models are the same, and comparisons here can give insight into both
1494: the models and Arp~220 itself.
1495:
1496: All models suggest a star formation rate (SFR) for Arp~220
1497: of $\sim$300 \Msunpyr.
1498: We derive a star formation rate of 315 \Msunpyr,
1499: which can be compared with the 270 \Msunpyr\ obtained by
1500: \citet{Shioya01}, 260 \Msunpyr\ by \citet{Takagi03b} and 580 \Msunpyr\
1501: by \citet{Silva98}.
1502:
1503: In connection with this is the total luminosity of Arp~220, which is
1504: $\log L_{*}=12.16 (\lsolar)$ in our models, close to the value of 12.1
1505: of \citet{Takagi03b} and \citet{Siebenmorgen07}, and just below the 12.4
1506: from \citet{Silva98}. For the total stellar mass of Arp~220
1507: we obtain $\log M_{*}\sim$10.5 (\msolar), higher than the previous SED model
1508: estimates of 10.4 \citep{Silva98} and 10
1509: \citep{Takagi03b}, but due to the low mass-to-light ratio of our older
1510: stellar component (\S \ref{sec:oldstar}) this value is somewhat
1511: uncertain. All these values indicate that both our model and fit to
1512: Arp~220 are at least consistent with previous models, and suggest the
1513: true values for Arp~220.
1514:
1515: One well known detail of Arp~220 is its very high nuclear extinction;
1516: $A_{\rm V} \sim 30$ \citep{Shioya01, Spoon04} has been estimated and
1517: even higher estimates from models exist \citep{Siebenmorgen07}.
1518: This illustrates a
1519: limitation of our fitting procedure. The derived $A_{\rm V}$ is
1520: determined essentially from fitting the attenuation of the older
1521: stellar population, not the nuclear region. When both the 9.7 and
1522: 18.0\mum\ silicate absorption features are observed along with optical
1523: or near-IR stellar continuum, we could then modify our fitting
1524: procedure to first fit the $A_{\rm V}$ of a foreground screen for the
1525: \HII\ regions + PDRs implied by the depth of the silicate absorption,
1526: and then apply a second, more optically-thin foreground screen to
1527: match the extinction of the older stars seen in the visible-UV part of
1528: the spectrum.
1529:
1530: In order to test the effect on the fitting parameters we have made
1531: such a model, which we present in figure \ref{fig:Arp220_fit2}. This
1532: model, with $A_{\rm V}= 20$~mag for the starburst component and
1533: $A_{\rm V}= 2.2$ for the older stars certainly fits the region of the
1534: silicate absorption features better, and allows a much larger fraction
1535: of compact \HII\ regions; $f_{\rm UCHII} \sim 0.7$ - implying that
1536: $\sim 41$\% of all stars younger than 1.0\ Myr are found in compact
1537: \HII\ regions.
1538:
1539: The fact that we derive a lower $A_{\rm V}$ for the starburst than
1540: other authors is not surprising, since the attenuation law that we use
1541: provides greater attenuation in the IR and less in the UV than a
1542: standard extinction law, thanks to the patchy nature of the
1543: foreground screen. What is surprising is the reduction in the strength
1544: of the emission lines in the visible and UV regions of the
1545: spectrum. This is caused by the much larger nuclear attenuation, and
1546: shows that the equivalent widths of the IR emission lines compared
1547: with the visible or near IR emission lines may be used as a sensitive
1548: diagnostic of nuclear extinction.
1549:
1550: It should be noted that, while Arp~220 is one of the predominantly
1551: used starburst templates, there is increasing evidence that this
1552: object is not a good representative for high-$z$ starforming
1553: galaxies \citep[see eg.][]{Menendez07}. Rather, less extreme objects
1554: such as M82 or NGC 6240 are better local analogs of the high-$z$
1555: actively star-forming objects such as submillimeter galaxies.
1556:
1557: \subsection{Fitting Spitzer IRS Spectra}
1558:
1559: As a final example of the fitting process, we compare our fit with the
1560: detailed \emph{Spitzer Space Observatory} IRS low resolution spectra
1561: of NGC~7714 from \citet{Brandl06}. The fit is shown in figure
1562: \ref{fig:NGC7714}. Note that this object has a much lower star
1563: formation rate (8.0 \Msunpyr ) than the previous two examples. The
1564: star formation rate is very well constrained by the normalization
1565: process, and can be determined to an accuracy of better than 5\%,
1566: assuming that the IRS aperture integrates the full extent of the star
1567: forming region.
1568:
1569: For this object, the older stellar component is not well-constrained,
1570: as the IRS spectra do not quite extend to short enough wavelengths to
1571: measure it. Also, because the attenuation is not enough to produce
1572: appreciable 9.7\mum\ silicate absorption ($A_{\rm V}< 5$~mag.), we
1573: cannot measure $A_{\rm V}$ from these spectra, so it has been set
1574: equal to zero. Note that the line emission spectrum is quite well
1575: fitted by the model, except for the strength of both the [\ion{S}{4}]
1576: and the [\ion{Ar}{3}] lines in the vicinity of the 9.7\mum\ silicate
1577: absorption band. Again, this may indicate a rather higher obscuration
1578: of the young \HII\ regions than in the model.
1579:
1580: In this spectrum the abundance is fairly well constrained by the
1581: strength of the PAH features and the equivalent width of the emission
1582: lines, while the $20-35$\mum\ slope constrains the values of $\log {\cal
1583: C}$ and $f_{\rm UCHII}$. The rather steep slope in the continuum
1584: spectrum at about 16\mum\ is a characteristic signature of the
1585: presence of compact \HII\ regions.
1586:
1587: \section{Discussion \& Conclusions}
1588:
1589: In this paper we have described an extensive library of pan-spectral
1590: SED models applicable to starburst galaxies, and demonstrated the
1591: promise of these in deriving the physical parameters of
1592: starbursts. These models rely upon a local, rather than a global
1593: solution to the radiative transfer. Such an approach works because of
1594: the fact that, in starburst galaxies, the vast majority of the far-IR
1595: emission arises from absorption of the UV radiation field in a
1596: relatively thin dust layer, the classical photo-dissociation region
1597: (PDR). This region has a typical optical depth corresponding to $A_{\rm V} \sim
1598: 3$, and a thickness $\Delta R \sim 300/n_{\rm H}$ pc. In the molecular
1599: regions surrounding normal galactic \HII\ regions, hydrogen densities
1600: are typically $100 - 1000$ cm$^{-3}$, implying that much of the far-IR
1601: they produce comes from a layer of parsec or sub-parsec
1602: dimensions. In starburst galaxies, interstellar pressures may range up
1603: to a factor of 100 higher than this, producing correspondingly thinner
1604: PDR zones. In addition, the Str{\"o}mgren volume, the volume of the
1605: ionized gas in the \HII\ region surrounding the exciting star or
1606: cluster scales as $n_{\rm H}^{-2}$, making \HII\ regions much more
1607: compact as the pressure in the ISM is increased.
1608:
1609: By simplifying the radiative transfer problem to a local one
1610: connected with individual clusters and their \HII\ regions and PDRs,
1611: we can compute the SED as the sum of a set of effectively independent
1612: components. Our library of models provides the following ingredients
1613: to the pan-spectral SED of starbursts:
1614: \begin{itemize}
1615: \item{ An ensemble of \HII\ regions surrounding young clusters with
1616: ages $<10$\ Myr.}
1617: \item {A set of PDRs surrounding these \HII\ regions.}
1618: \item{A population of young ($< 1.0$\ Myr) ultra-compact \HII\ regions
1619: and their PDRs surrounding individual massive stars.}
1620: \item{An older stellar population with ages $10 \leq t \leq 100$\ Myr. }
1621: \item{A foreground turbulent attenuating dust screen. Separate screens
1622: may be used for the younger $<10$\ Myr population and the older
1623: stellar population. }
1624: \item{A re-emission component from the diffuse ISM.}
1625: \end{itemize}
1626:
1627: We have shown that the position of the far-IR dust re-emission peak is
1628: primarily controlled by Compactness Parameter $\cal C$ defined in
1629: section \ref{sec:compact}, although the position and shape of this
1630: feature is also influenced by the mean covering fraction of the PDRs
1631: surrounding the individual \HII\ regions, $f_{\rm PDR}$, investigated
1632: in Section \ref{sec:fpdr}, and by the metallicity discussed in Section
1633: \ref{sec:metal}. In addition we have investigated the effect of the
1634: column density in the PDRs surrounding the \HII\ regions, provided a
1635: global spectrum of an ensemble of compact \HII\ regions derived from
1636: our earlier work, and have investigated the effect of metallicity on
1637: the SED of the older stars with ages $10 \leq t \leq 100$\ Myr.
1638:
1639: Finally, we have provided the attenuation properties of a turbulent
1640: absorbing dusty screen, and have computed simple one-dimensional
1641: models of the thermal emission from the diffuse dust illuminated by
1642: the SED of the older ($>10$\ Myr) population. These models are
1643: characterized by the local diffuse radiation field intensity,
1644: expressed in units of the Habing field intensity, $G_{0}$, where
1645: $G_{0} = 1.0$ corresponds to the intensity of the diffuse radiation
1646: field in the vicinity of the sun.
1647:
1648: We have demonstrated how the far-IR to sub-mm SED is controlled by the
1649: Compactness parameter $\log {\cal C}$, and by the metallicity. This is
1650: of particular application to the high-redshift sub-mm galaxies. As
1651: shown by \cite{Blain04}, a modified Black-Body fit can be made to the
1652: long wavelength side of the far-IR peak in starburst galaxies to
1653: derive a ``dust temperature''. Although the concept of such a dust
1654: temperature is physically meaningless in the light of our models,
1655: which contain a wide distribution in dust temperatures, it is a useful
1656: way to characterize the slope and the position of the sub-mm SED, and
1657: may well be related to the minimum dust temperature in the starburst.
1658:
1659: \cite{Blain04} showed that, in ULIRGs, the ``dust temperature'' derived
1660: in this way is observed to correlate with the absolute luminosity (or
1661: equivalently, to the rate of star formation). In our interpretation we
1662: would conclude that for ULIRGs, the compactness parameter increases
1663: with increasing luminosity. This would be consistent with more
1664: luminous galaxies having greater surface densities of star formation
1665: and greater gas pressures and densities. This in turn is in accord
1666: with the empirical \citet{Kennicutt98} law of star formation;
1667: $\Sigma_{\rm SFR} \propto \Sigma_{\rm gas}^{1.4\pm0.1}$.
1668:
1669: However, the \cite{Blain04} work also showed that the high-redshift
1670: submillimeter selected galaxies (SMGs) provide a similar correlation,
1671: but shifted to higher luminosity. At a given luminosity, the dust
1672: ``temperature'' in SMGs is about 20K cooler than in ULIRGs in the local
1673: universe, and at a given dust temperature, the SMGs are typically 30
1674: times as luminous as their ULIRG counterparts. Given that we have no
1675: reason to suspect lower dust temperatures in sub-mm galaxies, we must
1676: conclude that the starbursts in these galaxies have similar
1677: compactness to local starbursts, but are typically 30 times more
1678: luminous and spatially-extended than local ULIRGs.
1679:
1680: \citet{Takagi03a,Takagi03b} had previously found that most ULIRGS have
1681: a constant surface brightness of order $10^{12}\lsolar$kpc$^{-2}$.
1682: These parameters probably characterize ``maximal'' star formation,
1683: above which gas is blown out into the halo of the galaxy and star
1684: formation quenched. In order to scale the star formation up to the
1685: rates inferred for SMGs ($ \sim 1000-5000 \msolar $yr$^{-1}$), we must
1686: involve a greater area of the galaxy in star formation, rather than
1687: trying to cram more star formation into the same volume. For a typical
1688: value of $10^{13}\lsolar$kpc$^{-2}$, we require ``maximal'' star
1689: formation over an area of $\sim 10$kpc$^{2}$, and the most luminous
1690: SMGs require star formation to be extended over an area of at order
1691: $\sim 100$kpc$^{2}$.
1692:
1693: From our library of models we have constructed synthetic pan-spectral
1694: SEDs composed of only the following components:
1695: \begin{itemize}
1696: \item{ The young \HII\ regions with ages $<10$\ Myr characterized by a
1697: mean compactness, $\cal C$ and metallicity.}
1698: \item {The PDRs surrounding these \HII\ regions with a mean
1699: geometrical covering factor, $f_{\rm PDR}$.}
1700: \item{A population of young ($< 1.0$\ Myr) ultra-compact \HII\ regions
1701: and their PDRs surrounding individual massive stars, characterized
1702: by a fraction $f_{\rm UCHII}$, where $f_{\rm UCHII}=1.0$ would imply
1703: that 50\% of massive stars younger than 1.0\ Myr were surrounded by
1704: ultra-compact \HII\ regions.}
1705: \item{The older stellar population with ages $10 \leq t \leq 100$\ Myr,
1706: scaled by a factor $f_{\rm old}$, where $f_{\rm old}=1$ corresponds
1707: to continuous star formation over the period of $10 \leq t \leq
1708: 100$\ Myr. }
1709: \item{A one- or two- component foreground turbulent attenuating dust screen.}
1710: \end{itemize}
1711:
1712: Together, these components allow us to construct theoretical
1713: pan-spectral SEDs which encompass the full richness and variety
1714: observed in the SEDs of real starburst galaxies. We note that
1715: different parts of the SED are sensitive in different ways to these
1716: various theoretical components. Therefore, given a sufficient spectral
1717: range in the observations, we can create fits to observed SEDs which
1718: are unique, and which allow us to extract each of the various physical
1719: parameters listed above for the individual starburst
1720: galaxies. Finally, the scaling of the bolometric flux of the
1721: theoretical SED to the observed bolometric flux of the starburst
1722: provides us with an accurate estimate of the total star formation rate
1723: $\dot{M}_*$, measured in \Msunpyr .
1724:
1725: We have demonstrated the utility of this method by fitting theoretical
1726: SEDs to a few famous template starbursts such as Arp~220 and
1727: NGC~6240. These fits have been ``hand-crafted'', and it remains to
1728: automate the process to a multi-variate least-squares fitting
1729: procedure, which we hope to present in a future paper.
1730:
1731: Although this paper has dealt exclusively with starbursts, we note
1732: that many Ultra-Luminous Infrared Galaxies (ULIRGs) are known to
1733: contain an active galactic nucleus. To deal with these cases, we need
1734: to add a further five components to the mix:
1735: \begin{itemize}
1736: \item{The UV-IR continuum emission of the AGN itself.}
1737: \item{Hot dust from the accretion disk around the AGN, emitting mostly
1738: in the $5-50$\mum\ waveband.}
1739: \item {The global emission from the extended Narrow Line Region (NLR)
1740: surrounding the AGN.}
1741: \item{A foreground dust screen surrounding the accretion disk, the so
1742: called ``dusty torus''}
1743: \item {Non-thermal radio synchrotron emission component or components.}
1744: \end{itemize}
1745:
1746: This will be the subject of a future paper in this series, but we note
1747: that many of the required components are already fairly well
1748: understood. The AGN itself is usually approximated by a power-law, or
1749: broken power law, and the NLR component has already been computed by
1750: \citet{Groves06}. The radiative transfer through a dusty torus around
1751: the nucleus is a much more complicated issue that has been dealt with
1752: by several authors. Originally pictured and modelled as a smooth
1753: distribution \citep{Pier92,Granato94,Efstathiou95}, more recent models
1754: assume a more clumpy structure to explain the observed distribution of
1755: the 10\mum\ silicate feature and width of the far-IR peak
1756: \citep{Nenkova02,Dullemond05,Honig06}. In any case, treatments of the
1757: various components of an AGN SED do exist, and must be considered when
1758: fitting the SEDs of ULIRGs and high-redshift luminous objects.
1759:
1760: The replacement the of semi-empirical approach by the new quantitative
1761: approach to SED fitting of starbursts presented here should greatly
1762: enhance the utility of existing and future surveys, by providing
1763: detailed estimates of the physical parameters of the starbursts. In
1764: this way, it should assist in the derivation of statistical
1765: parameters, demography and cosmic evolution of this class of object,
1766: and should cast light on the nature of starbursts in the high redshift
1767: universe, including sub-mm galaxies and the high-redshift radio
1768: galaxies, when today's massive ``red-and-dead'' Elliptical galaxies
1769: were in the process of assembly, and ULIRGs ruled the star formation
1770: rate density of the Universe.
1771:
1772: \begin{acknowledgements}
1773: M. Dopita acknowledges the support of both the Australian National
1774: University and of the Australian Research Council (ARC) through his
1775: (2002-2006) ARC Australian Federation Fellowship, and also under the
1776: ARC Discovery projects DP0208445, DP0342844 and DP0664434. WvB
1777: acknowledges support for radio and infrared galaxy studies
1778: with the Spitzer Space Telescope at UC Merced, including the work
1779: reported here,
1780: via NASA grants SST GO-1264353, GO-1265551, GO-1279182 and GO-1281587.
1781: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC
1782: Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion
1783: Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with
1784: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
1785: \end{acknowledgements}
1786:
1787:
1788:
1789: \begin{thebibliography}
1790:
1791: \bibitem[Adelberger \& Steidel(2000)]{Adelberger00} Adelberger,
1792: K.~L., \& Steidel, C.~C. 2000, \apj, 544, 218.
1793:
1794: \bibitem[Armus et al.(2006)]{Armus06}Armus, L, Bernard-Salas, J.,
1795: Spoon, H.~W.~W., Marshall, J. A., et al. 2006, \apj, 640, 204
1796:
1797: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(2005)]{Asplund05} Asplund, M., Grevesse,
1798: N., \& Sauval, A.~J.\ 2005, Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar
1799: Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, 336, 25
1800:
1801: \bibitem[Abel et al.(2005)]{Abel05} Abel, N.~P., Ferland,
1802: G.~J., Shaw, G., \& van Hoof, P.~A.~M.\ 2005, \apjs, 161, 65
1803:
1804: \bibitem[Brandl et al.(2006)]{Brandl06} Brandl, B.~R., et
1805: al.\ 2006, \apj, 653, 1129
1806:
1807: \bibitem[Beir\~{a}o et al.(2007)]{Beirao07} Beir\~{a}o, P., et al.\
1808: 2007, \apj, submitted
1809:
1810: \bibitem[Bernasconi \& Maeder(1996)]{Bernasconi96} Bernasconi,
1811: P.~A., \& Maeder, A.\ 1996, \aap, 307, 829
1812:
1813: \bibitem[Blain et al.(2004)]{Blain04}Blain, A.~W., Chapman, S.~C., Smail, I. \& Ivison, R. 2004, ApJ, 611, 52
1814:
1815: \bibitem[Boily \& Kroupa(2003a)]{Boily03a}Boily, C.~M., \& Kroupa, P. 2003a, \mnras, 338, 665
1816:
1817: \bibitem[Boily \& Kroupa(2003b)]{Boily03b}Boily, C.~M., \& Kroupa, P. 2003b, \mnras, 338, 673
1818:
1819: \bibitem[Boulanger et al.(1998)]{Boulanger98} Boulanger, F., Boissel, P.,
1820: Cesarsky, D., \& Ryter,C. 1998, \aap, 339, 194
1821:
1822: \bibitem[Buat et al.(1999)]{Buat99} Buat, V., Donas, J., Milliard, B. \& Xu, C. 1999, \aap, 352, 371.
1823:
1824: \bibitem[Calzetti(2001)]{Calzetti01} Calzetti, D.\ 2001, \pasp,
1825: 113, 1449
1826:
1827: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2005)]{Calzetti05} Calzetti, D., et al.\ 2005, \apj, 633, 871
1828:
1829: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(1994)]{Calzetti94}Calzetti, D. Kinney, A.~L. \& Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, \apj, 429, 582
1830:
1831: \bibitem[Cardelli et al(89)]{Cardelli89}Cardelli, J.~A., {Clayton}, G.~C., \& {Mathis}, J.~S. 1989, \apj, 345, 245
1832:
1833: \bibitem[Castor et al.(1975)]{Castor75} Castor, J., McCray, R.,
1834: \& Weaver, R.\ 1975, \apjl, 200, L107
1835:
1836: \bibitem[Charlot \& Fall(2000)]{Charlot00} Charlot, S., \& Fall,
1837: S.~M.\ 2000, \apj, 539, 718
1838:
1839: \bibitem[Churchwell(2002)]{Churchwell02} Churchwell, E.\ 2002,
1840: \araa, 40, 27
1841:
1842: \bibitem[Churchwell et al.(2006)]{Churchwell06} Churchwell, E., et
1843: al.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 759
1844:
1845: \bibitem[Compi{\`e}gne et al.(2007)]{Compiegne07} Compi{\`e}gne,
1846: M., Abergel, A., Verstraete, L., Reach, W.~T., Habart, E., Smith, J.~D.,
1847: Boulanger, F., \& Joblin, C.\ 2007, \aap, 471, 205
1848:
1849: \bibitem[Dale et al.(2001)]{Dale01} Dale, D.~A., Helou, G.,
1850: Contursi, A., Silbermann, N.~A., \& Kolhatkar, S.\ 2001, \apj, 549,
1851: 215
1852:
1853: \bibitem[Dale \& Helou(2002)]{Dale02} Dale, D.~A., \& Helou,
1854: G.\ 2002, \apj, 576, 159
1855:
1856: \bibitem[deVaucouleurs et al.(1991)]{deVaucouleurs91}de Vaucouleurs,
1857: G., de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin, H.~G., et~al. 1991, Third Reference
1858: Catalogue of Bright Galaxies, (Springer-Verlag:Berlin, Heidelberg \&
1859: New York)
1860:
1861: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(2002)]{Dopita02} Dopita, M.~A., Pereira, M.,
1862: Kewley, L.~J., \& Capaccioli 2002, \apjs, 143, 47
1863:
1864: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(2003)]{Dopita03} Dopita, M.~A.; Groves, B.~A.; Sutherland, R.~S.; Kewley, L.~J., 2003, \apj, 583, 727
1865:
1866: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(2005a)]{SED1} Dopita, M.~A., et al.\
1867: 2005a, \apj, 619, 755 (SED1)
1868:
1869: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(2005b)]{Dopita05b}Dopita, M.~A., Fischera, J.,
1870: Crowley, O., Sutherland, R.~S., Christiansen, J., Tuffs, R.~J.,
1871: Popescu, C.~C., Groves, B.~A., \& Kewley, L.~J. 2005b, \apj, 639, 788
1872:
1873: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(2006a)]{SED2} Dopita, M.~A., et al.\
1874: 2006a, \apj, 647, 244 (SED2)
1875:
1876: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(2006b)]{SED3} Dopita, M.~A., et al.\
1877: 2006b, \apjs, 167, 177 (SED3)
1878:
1879: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(2006c)]{Dopita06c} Dopita, M.~A., et al.\
1880: 2006c, \apj, 639, 788
1881:
1882: \bibitem[Draine et al.(2007)]{Draine07} Draine, B.~T., et al.\
1883: 2007, \apj, 663, 866
1884:
1885: \bibitem[Dullemond \& van Bemmel(2005)]{Dullemond05} Dullemond,
1886: C.~P., \& van Bemmel, I.~M.\ 2005, \aap, 436, 47
1887:
1888: \bibitem[Dunne et al.(2000)]{Dunne00}Dunne, L., Eales, S., Edmunds, M., {et~al.} 2000, \mnras, 315, 115
1889:
1890: \bibitem[Dunne \& Eales(2001)]{Dunne01}Dunne, L. \& {Eales}, S.~A. 2001, \mnras, 327, 697
1891:
1892: \bibitem[Efstathiou et al.(2000)]{Efstathiou00} Efstathiou, A.,
1893: Rowan-Robinson, M., \& Siebenmorgen, R.\ 2000, \mnras, 313, 734
1894:
1895: \bibitem[Efstathiou \& Rowan-Robinson(1995)]{Efstathiou95}
1896: Efstathiou, A., \& Rowan-Robinson, M.\ 1995, \mnras, 273, 649
1897:
1898: \bibitem[Engelbracht et al.(2005)]{Engelbracht05} Engelbracht, C.~W., Gordon, K.~D., Rieke, G.~H., Werner, M.~W., Dale, D.~A.,\& Latter, W.~B. 2005, \apj, 628, L29
1899:
1900: \bibitem[Fall, Chandar \& Whitmore(2005)]{Fall05}Fall, M. Chandar, R. \& Whitmore, B.~C. \apj, 631, 133
1901:
1902: \bibitem[Farrah et al.(2007)]{Farrah07} Farrah, D., et al.\
1903: 2007, \apj, 667, 149
1904:
1905: \bibitem[Ferland et al.(1998)]{Ferland98} Ferland, G.~J.,
1906: Korista, K.~T., Verner, D.~A., Ferguson, J.~W., Kingdon, J.~B., \&
1907: Verner, E.~M.\ 1998, \pasp, 110, 761
1908:
1909: \bibitem[Fischera \& Dopita(2003)]{Fischera03} Fischera, J., Dopita, M., \& Sutherland, R.~S. \ 2003, \apj, 599, L21
1910:
1911: \bibitem[Fischera \& Dopita(2004)]{Fischera04} Fischera, J., \& Dopita, M.\ 2004, \apj, 611, 919
1912:
1913: \bibitem[Fischera \& Dopita(2005)]{Fischera05} Fischera, J., \& Dopita, M.\ 2005, \apj, 619, 340
1914:
1915: \bibitem[Galliano et al.(2003)]{Galliano03}Galliano, F., Madden, S.~C., Jones,
1916: A.~P., et al. 2003, \aap, 407, 159.
1917:
1918: \bibitem[Gallimore \& Beswick(2004)]{Gallimore04}Gallimore, J.~F. \& Beswick, R. 2004, \aj, 127, 239
1919:
1920: \bibitem[Granato et al.(2000)]{Granato00} Granato, G.~L., Lacey,
1921: C.~G., Silva, L, Bressan, A., Baugh, C.~M., Cole, S. \& Frenk,
1922: C.~S. 2000, \apj, 542, 710
1923:
1924: \bibitem[Granato \& Danese(1994)]{Granato94} Granato, G.~L., \&
1925: Danese, L.\ 1994, \mnras, 268, 235
1926:
1927: \bibitem[Groves(2004)]{Groves04} Groves, B.~A. 2004, ``Dust in
1928: Photoionized Nebulae'', Ph.D.~Thesis, Australian National University,
1929: Australia
1930:
1931: \bibitem[Groves(2006)]{Groves06} Groves, B.~A., Dopita, M.~A., \& Sutherland, R.~S. 2006, \aap, 458, 405
1932:
1933: \bibitem[Habing(1968)]{Habing68} Habing, H.~J.\ 1968, \bain, 19,
1934: 421
1935:
1936: \bibitem[Heyer et al.(2001)]{Heyer01}Heyer, M. H., Carpenter, J.~M., \& Snell, R.~L. 2001, \apj, 551, 852
1937:
1938: \bibitem[H\"onig, et al.(2006)]{Honig06}H\"onig, S.~F., Beckert, T., Ohnaka, K. \& Weigelt, G. 2006, \aap, 452, 459
1939:
1940: \bibitem[Ikebe et al.(2000)]{Ikebe00} Ikebe, Y., Leighly, K., Tanaka, Y., Nakagawa, T., Terashima, Y., \& Komossa, S. 2000, \mnras, 316, 433
1941:
1942: \bibitem[Jackson et al.(2007)]{Jackson07}Jackson, D.~C., Cannon, J.~M., Skillman, E.~D., Lee, R., Gehrz, R.~D., Woodward, C.~E., \& Polomski, E. 2007, \apj, 646, 192
1943:
1944: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{Kennicutt98} Kennicutt, R.~C.~Jr. 1998,\araa, 36, 189.
1945:
1946: \bibitem[Kewley et al.(2000)]{Kewley00} Kewley, L. J., Heisler, C. A.,
1947: Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R., Norris, R., Reynolds, J., Lumsden, S. 2000,
1948: \apj, 530, 704
1949:
1950: \bibitem[Kimura et al.(2003)]{Kimura03} Kimura, H., Mann, I., \&
1951: Jessberger, E.~K.\ 2003, \apj, 583, 314
1952:
1953: \bibitem[Klaas et al.(1997)]{Klaas97}Klaas, U., Haas, M., Heinrichsen, I., \& Schulz, B. 1997, \aap, 325, L21
1954:
1955: \bibitem[Klaas et al.(2001)]{Klaas01}Klaas, U., Haas, M., M{\" u}ller, S.~A.~H., {et~al.} 2001, \aap, 379, 823
1956:
1957: \bibitem[Kong et al.(2004)]{Kong04} Kong, X., Charlot, S.,
1958: Brinchmann, J., \& Fall, S.~M.\ 2004, \mnras, 349, 769
1959:
1960: \bibitem[Kroupa(2002)]{Kroupa02} Kroupa, P.\ 2002, Science, 295,
1961: 82
1962:
1963: \bibitem[Kr{\"u}gel \& Siebenmorgen(1994)]{Krugel94} Kr{\"u}gel, E., \&
1964: Siebenmorgen, R.\ 1994, \aap, 282, 407
1965:
1966: \bibitem[Laor \& Draine(1993)]{Laor93} Laor, A.~\& Draine, B.~T.\
1967: 1993, \apj, 402, 441
1968:
1969: \bibitem[Larson(1981)]{Larson81}Larson, R.~B. 1981, \mnras, 194, 809
1970:
1971: \bibitem[Lagache, Dole \& Puget(2003)]{Lagache03}Lagache, G., Dole,
1972: H. \& Puget, J-L. 2003, MNRAS, 338, 555.
1973:
1974: \bibitem[Leitherer et al.(1999)]{Leitherer99} Leitherer, C.~et
1975: al.\ 1999, \apjs, 123, 3
1976:
1977: \bibitem[Levenson et al.(2007)]{Levenson07} Levenson, N.~A.,
1978: Sirocky, M.~M., Hao, L., Spoon, H.~W.~W., Marshall, J.~A.,
1979: Elitzur, M., \&
1980: Houck, J.~R.\ 2007, \apjl, 654, L45
1981:
1982: \bibitem[Li \& Draine(2001)]{Li01} Li, A.~\& Draine, B.~T. 2001,
1983: \apj, 554, 778
1984:
1985: \bibitem[Lisenfeld et al.(2000)]{Lisenfeld00}Lisenfeld, U., Isaak, K.~G., \& Hills, R. 2000, \mnras, 312, 433
1986:
1987: \bibitem[Madden et al.(2006)]{Madden06} Madden, S.~C., Galliano,
1988: F., Jones, A.~P., \& Sauvage, M.\ 2006, \aap, 446, 877
1989:
1990: \bibitem[Men{\'e}ndez-Delmestre et al.(2007)]{Menendez07}
1991: Men{\'e}ndez-Delmestre, K., et al.\ 2007, \apjl, 655, L65
1992:
1993: \bibitem[Meurer et al.(1999)]{Meurer99} Meurer, G.~R., Heckman,
1994: T.~M., \& Calzetti, D.\ 1999, \apj, 521, 64
1995:
1996:
1997: \bibitem[Morisset et al.(2004)]{Morisset04} Morisset, C., Schaerer, D., Bouret, J.-C. \& Martins, F. 2004, \aap, 415, 577
1998:
1999: \bibitem[Murphy et al.(1996)]{Murphy96}Murphy, T.~W., Armus, L., Matthews, K., {et~al.} 1996, \aj, 111, 1025
2000:
2001: \bibitem[Nenkova et al.(2002)]{Nenkova02} Nenkova, M.,
2002: Ivezi{\'c}, {\v Z}., \& Elitzur, M.\ 2002, \apjl, 570, L9
2003:
2004: \bibitem[Oey \& Clarke(1997)]{Oey97} Oey, M.~S., \& Clarke,
2005: C.~J.\ 1997, \mnras, 289, 570
2006:
2007: \bibitem[Oey \& Clarke(1998)]{Oey98} Oey, M.~S., \& Clarke,
2008: C.~J.\ 1998, \aj, 115, 1543
2009:
2010: \bibitem[Panter et al.(2007)]{Panter07} Panter, B., Jimenez, R.,
2011: Heavens, A.~F., \& Charlot, S.\ 2007, \mnras, 378, 1550
2012:
2013: \bibitem[Panuzzo et al.(2003)]{Panuzzo03} Panuzzo, P., Bressan, A., Granato, G.~L.,
2014: Silva, L. \& Danese, L. 2003, \aap, 409, 99
2015:
2016: \bibitem[Peeters(2002a)]{Peeters02}Peeters, E. 2002a, ``Polycyclic
2017: Aromatic Hydrocarbons and dust in regions of massive star
2018: formation'', Doctoral Thesis, Rijkuniversiteit Groeningen.
2019:
2020: \bibitem[Peeters(2002b)]{Peeters02b}Peeters, E., et al. 2002b, A\&A, 381, 571
2021:
2022: \bibitem[Pier \& Krolik(1992)]{Pier92} Pier, E.~A., \& Krolik,
2023: J.~H.\ 1992, \apj, 401, 99
2024:
2025: \bibitem[Piovan et al.(2006a)]{Piovan06a} Piovan, L., Tantalo, R.,
2026: \& Chiosi, C.\ 2006a, \mnras, 366, 923
2027:
2028: \bibitem[Piovan et al.(2006b)]{Piovan06b} Piovan, L., Tantalo, R.,
2029: \& Chiosi, C.\ 2006b, \mnras, 370, 1454
2030:
2031: \bibitem[Popescu et al.(2000)]{Popescu00}Popescu, C.~C., Misiriotis,
2032: A., Kylafis, N.~D., Tuffs, R.~J., \& Fischera, J. 2000, \aap, 362, 138
2033:
2034: \bibitem[Povich et al.(2007)]{Povich07} Povich, M.~S., et al.\
2035: 2007, \apj, 660, 346
2036:
2037: \bibitem[Rieke \& Lebofsky(1985)]{Rieke85} Rieke, G.~H., \&
2038: Lebofsky, M.~J.\ 1985, \apj, 288, 618
2039:
2040: \bibitem[Rigby \& Rieke(2004)]{Rigby04} Rigby, J.~R., \& Rieke,
2041: G.~H.\ 2004, \apj, 606, 237
2042:
2043: \bibitem[Rigopoulou et al.(1996)]{Rigopoulou96}Rigopoulou, D., Lawrence, A., \& Rowan-Robinson, M. 1996, \mnras, 278, 1049
2044:
2045: \bibitem[Rigopoulou et al.(1999)]{Rigopoulou99}Rigopoulou, D., Spoon, H.~W.~W., Genzel, R., {et~al.} 1999, \aj, 118, 2625
2046:
2047: \bibitem[Risaliti et al.(2000)]{Risaliti00} Risaliti, G., Gilli, R.,
2048: Maiolino, R., \& Salvati, M. 2000, \aap, 357, 13
2049:
2050: \bibitem[Rosenberg et al.(2006)]{Rosenberg06}Rosenberg, J.~L., Ashby, M.~L.~N., Salzer, J.~J., \& Huang, J.-S. 2006, \apj, 636, 742
2051:
2052: \bibitem[Rosolowsky et al.(2003)]{Rosolowsky03}Rosolowsky, E., Engargiola, G.,
2053: Plambeck, R. \& Blitz, L 2003, \apj, 599, 258
2054:
2055: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(1988a)]{Sanders88a}Sanders, D.~B., Soifer, B.~T., Elias, J.~H., {et~al.} 1988a, \apj, 325, 74
2056:
2057: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(1988b)]{Sanders88b}Sanders, D.~B., Soifer, B.~T., Elias, J.~H., Neugebauer, G., \& Matthews, K. 1988b, \apjl, 328, L35
2058:
2059: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{Schlegel98}Schlegel, D.~J., Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
2060:
2061: \bibitem[Schweitzer et al.(2006)]{Schweitzer06} Schweitzer, M., et
2062: al.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 79
2063:
2064: \bibitem[Scoville et al.(2000)]{Scoville00}Scoville, N.~Z., Evans, A.~S., Thompson, R., {et~al.} 2000, \aj, 119, 991
2065:
2066: \bibitem[Shioya, Trentham \& Taniguchi(2001)]{Shioya01}Shioya, Y.,
2067: Trentham, N., \& Taniguchi, Y. 2001, \apj, 548, 29
2068:
2069: \bibitem[Siebenmorgen \& Kr{\"u}gel(2007)]{Siebenmorgen07}
2070: Siebenmorgen, R., \& Kr{\"u}gel, E.\ 2007, \aap, 461, 445
2071:
2072: \bibitem[Silva et al.(1998)]{Silva98} Silva, L., Granato, G.~L., Bressan, A.,
2073: \& Danese, L. 1998, \apj, 509, 103.
2074:
2075: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2002)]{Smith02} Smith, L.~J., Norris,
2076: R.~P.~F., \& Crowther, P.~A.\ 2002, \mnras, 337, 1309
2077:
2078: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2007)]{Smith07} Smith, J.~D.~T., et al.\
2079: 2007, \apj, 656, 770
2080:
2081: \bibitem[Solomon et al.(1987)]{Solomon87}Solomon, P.~M., Rivolo, A.~R., Barrett, J., \& Yahil, A. 1987, \apj, 319, 730
2082:
2083: \bibitem[Spinoglio et al.(1995)]{Spinoglio95}Spinoglio, L., Malkan, M.~A., Rush, B., Carrasco, L., \& Recillas-Cruz, E. 1995, \apj, 453, 616
2084:
2085: \bibitem[Spoon et al.(2004)]{Spoon04}Spoon, H.~W.~W., Moorwood, A.~F.~M., Lutz, D., {et~al.} 2004, \aap, 414,
2086: 873
2087:
2088: \bibitem[Surace \& Sanders(2000)]{SuraceSanders00}Surace, J.~A. \& Sanders, D.~B. 2000, \aj, 120, 604
2089:
2090: \bibitem[Tagaki et al.(2003a)]{Takagi03a} Tagaki, T.,
2091: Vansevicius, V., \& Arimoto, N. 2003a, \pasj, 55, 385.
2092:
2093: \bibitem[Tagaki et al.(2003b)]{Takagi03b} Tagaki, T.,
2094: Arimoto, N. \& Hanami, H. 2003b, \mnras, 340, 813
2095:
2096: \bibitem[V{\'a}zquez \& Leitherer(2005)]{Vazquez05} V{\'a}zquez,
2097: G.~A., \& Leitherer, C.\ 2005, \apj, 621, 695
2098:
2099: \bibitem[Vijh et~al.(2003)]{Vijh03} Vijh, U.~P., Witt, A.~F. \& Gordon, K.~D. 2003, ApJ, 587, 533.
2100:
2101: \bibitem[Weidner \& Kroupa(2006)]{Weidner06} Weidner, C., \&
2102: Kroupa, P.\ 2006, \mnras, 365, 1333
2103:
2104: \bibitem[Weingartner \& Draine(2001a)]{Weingartner01a} Weingartner,
2105: J.~C.~\& Draine, B.~T.\ 2001a, \apj, 548, 296
2106:
2107: \bibitem[Weingartner \& Draine(2001b)]{Weingartner01b} Weingartner,
2108: J.~C.~\& Draine, B.~T.\ 2001b, \apjs, 134, 263
2109:
2110: \bibitem[Whitmore, Chandar \& Fall(2007)]{Whitmore07}Whitmore,
2111: B.~C.,Chandar, R. \& Fall, M. 2007, \aj, 133, 1067
2112:
2113: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2006)]{Wu06}Wu, Y., Charmandaris, V., Hao, L.,
2114: Brandl, B.~R., Bernard-Salas, J, Spoon, H.~W.~W. \& Houck,
2115: J.~R. 2006, \apj, 639, 157
2116: \end{thebibliography}
2117:
2118: \newpage
2119: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
2120: %\tablewidth{2.0in}
2121: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
2122: \tablecaption{ The Solar Abundance Set ($Z_{\odot}$) and
2123: logarithmic depletion factors log(D)
2124: adopted for each element.\label{tab:abund}}
2125: \tablehead{
2126: \colhead{Element}
2127: & \colhead{$\log({\rm Z_{\odot}})$}
2128: & \colhead{$\log({\rm D})$}\\
2129: }
2130: \startdata
2131: H & ~0.00 & ~0.00 \\
2132: He & -1.01 & ~0.00 \\
2133: C & -3.59 & -0.52 \\
2134: N & -4.20 & -0.22 \\
2135: O & -3.34 & -0.22 \\
2136: Ne & -3.91 & ~0.00 \\
2137: Na & -5.75 & -0.60 \\
2138: Mg & -4.42 & -0.70 \\
2139: Al & -5.61 & -1.70 \\
2140: Si & -4.49 & -1.00 \\
2141: S & -4.79 & -0.22 \\
2142: Cl & -6.40 & -0.30 \\
2143: Ar & -5.44 & ~0.00 \\
2144: Ca & -5.64 & -2.52 \\
2145: Fe & -4.55 & -2.00 \\
2146: Ni & -5.68 & -1.40 \\
2147: \enddata
2148: \end{deluxetable}
2149:
2150: \newpage
2151: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
2152: %\tablewidth{2.0in}
2153: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
2154: \tablecaption{Normalized Parameters of the Lorentzian Components of the PAH Emission Band
2155: \label{tab:PAHparam}}
2156: \tablehead{\colhead{$x_0$\tablenotemark{1}} & \colhead{$f_{0}$\tablenotemark{2}}
2157: & \colhead{$\sigma$\tablenotemark{1}}}
2158: \startdata
2159: 3040.3 & 1.006E-04 & 22.4\\
2160: 1897.0 & 1.000E-04 & 40.0\\
2161: 1754.0 & 1.000E-04 & 40.0\\
2162: 1608.5 & 3.420E-04 & 37.8\\
2163: 1608.5 & 4.600E-04 & 14.4\\
2164: 1593.9 & 2.140E-04 & 34.9\\
2165: 1490.0 & 5.000E-05 & 30.0\\
2166: 1400.0 & 3.420E-04 & 100.0\\
2167: 1313.0 & 1.200E-03 & 28.0\\
2168: 1270.0 & 1.280E-03 & 35.0\\
2169: 1200.0 & 3.200E-04 & 30.0\\
2170: 1163.1 & 8.900E-04 & 27.0\\
2171: 998.0 & 1.630E-04 & 129.1\\
2172: 940.0 & 1.600E-04 & 13.0\\
2173: 890.0 & 1.700E-03 & 4.0\\
2174: 883.0 & 1.800E-03 & 14.1\\
2175: 836.0 & 4.280E-04 & 14.1\\
2176: 813.0 & 2.000E-04 & 15.0\\
2177: 800.0 & 5.300E-04 & 70.7\\
2178: 788.0 & 1.200E-03 & 13.0\\
2179: 737.0 & 3.600E-04 & 18.2\\
2180: 702.0 & 2.570E-04 & 12.9\\
2181: 670.0 & 8.550E-05 & 18.3\\
2182: 635.0 & 1.710E-04 & 18.3\\
2183: 607.0 & 7.800E-04 & 7.5\\
2184: 588.0 & 8.300E-04 & 5.8\\
2185: 576.0 & 4.280E-04 & 4.0\\
2186: 571.0 & 2.140E-04 & 20.0\\
2187: 562.0 & 8.550E-05 & 3.8\\
2188: 530.0 & 1.450E-04 & 7.0\\
2189: \enddata
2190: \tablenotetext{1}{cm$^{-1}$}
2191: \tablenotetext{2}{in normalized units (\fluxnu)}
2192: \end{deluxetable}
2193:
2194: \begin{figure}
2195: \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize]{f1a.ps}
2196: \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize]{f1b.ps}
2197: \caption{The evolution of the spectral energy distribution with age (0
2198: - 10\ Myr, every 1\ Myr) for a $Z=1Z_{\odot}$, $\log {\cal C}=5.0$
2199: ($\log \left<M_{\rm cl}\right>=5$), $\log P/k=5.0$
2200: K\pccm\ \hii\ region-only model (top) and \hii\ region plus PDR
2201: model (bottom). In both diagrams, the final, integrated starburst SED is
2202: shown as the thick line at high luminosity.}\label{fig:Hiiages}
2203: \end{figure}
2204:
2205: \begin{figure}
2206: \plotone{f2.ps}
2207: \caption{PAH emission template. Crosses indicate the observed points,
2208: with the solid line indicating our template fit, and the underlying
2209: curves showing the individual Lorentzian components.}\label{fig:PAHtemplate}
2210: \end{figure}
2211:
2212: \begin{figure}
2213: \plotone{f3.ps}
2214: \caption{The time variation of the incident heating flux
2215: ($L_{*}/R^{2}_{\rm HII}$) entering the \hii\ region surrounding a
2216: solar metallicity starburst with $\log(P_{0}/k)=5$. Each curve
2217: represents a different $\Cpar$ ($M_{\rm cl}$), and reveals how the
2218: \Cpar\ parameterizes different $L_{*}/R^{2}_{\rm HII}$ at any given
2219: time.}\label{fig:fluxvstime}
2220: \end{figure}
2221:
2222: \begin{figure}
2223: \plotone{f4.ps}
2224: \caption{Five SEDs with Solar metallicity, $\log \Cpar=5.0$ and
2225: varying pressure ($\log P/k=4,~5,~6,~7$ and 8). The model SEDs are
2226: almost indistinguishable apart from their nebula emission features,
2227: such as the [\neii]12.8 \mum\ emission line. }\label{fig:sameC}
2228: \end{figure}
2229:
2230: \begin{figure}
2231: \plotone{f5.ps}
2232: \caption{Six model SEDs with Solar metallicity, $\log P_{0}/k=5.0$
2233: and varying compactness. The compactness parameter decreases from
2234: $\log \Cpar=6.5$ to $\log \Cpar=4.0$ as the far-IR dust emission
2235: feature moves to longer wavelengths.}\label{fig:sameP}
2236: \end{figure}
2237:
2238: \clearpage
2239:
2240: \begin{figure}
2241: \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize]{f6a.ps}
2242: \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize]{f6b.ps}
2243: \caption{SEDs for a Solar metallicity starburst with $\log P/k=5$,
2244: and $\log \Cpar=5$. The top panel has $f_{\rm PDR}$ ranging from 0.0
2245: to 1.0 in steps of 0.1. The bottom diagram shows the SEDs using
2246: the $\tau_{\rm clear}$ parameter introduced in SED1, with $\tau_{\rm
2247: clear}=0,~1,~2,~4,~8,~16,$ and 32\ Myr. It is clear that each of
2248: these two formulations of the PDR covering factor problem map to the
2249: other.}\label{fig:tauvsf}
2250: \end{figure}
2251:
2252: \begin{figure}
2253: \plotone{f7.ps}
2254: \caption{Spectra showing the effect of varying the PDR column depth on
2255: a solar metallicity starburst with $\log
2256: \Cpar=5$ and log$P/k=5$. Shown are a PDR free (\hii\ region) SED, and
2257: PDRs with \hi\ columns of $\log N({\rm HI})=21.5$, 22.0 (standard
2258: model), 22.5, and 23.0, as labelled.}\label{fig:column}
2259: \end{figure}
2260:
2261: \begin{figure}
2262: \plotone{f8.ps}
2263: \caption{The UCHII region templates for 0.5, 1.0 and $ 2.0Z_{\odot}
2264: $. These correspond to a Kroupa IMF and a star formation of $1.0
2265: \msolar$ yr$^{-1}$ continued over 1.0\ Myr. The small changes in the
2266: apparent normalization of these spectra is due to the intrinsic
2267: change of stellar luminosity with
2268: abundance. }\label{fig:UCHII_SEDs}
2269: \end{figure}
2270:
2271: \begin{figure}
2272: \plotone{f9.ps}
2273: \caption{Three SEDs of a solar metallicity starburst with $\log \Cpar=5$,
2274: log$P/k=5$ and $f_{\rm PDR}=1.0$. Shown is the effect of including the
2275: $1Z_{\odot}$ UCHII template with $f_{\rm UCHII}=0.0$, $0.5$,
2276: and $1.0$, with the mid-IR continuum increasing with increasing
2277: $f_{\rm UCHII}$.}\label{fig:addUCHII}
2278: \end{figure}
2279:
2280: \begin{figure}
2281: \plotone{f10.ps}
2282: \caption{Spectral Energy Distributions of our ``old'' stellar
2283: populations for the five starburst metallicities (as labelled) and
2284: scaled to a continuous SFR of 1\Msunpyr. }\label{fig:oldstar}
2285: \end{figure}
2286:
2287: \clearpage
2288:
2289: \begin{figure}
2290: \plotone{f11.ps}
2291: \caption{SED of a starburst with $1Z_{\odot}$, $\log \Cpar=5$,
2292: log$P/k=5$ and $f_{\rm PDR}=1.0$ (lower SED) and SED of the same
2293: starburst with our $1Z_{\odot}$ ``old'' stellar SED added (upper
2294: SED). We assume a constant SFR of 1\Msunpyr\ for the computation of
2295: both curves.}\label{fig:hii+old}
2296: \end{figure}
2297:
2298: \begin{figure}
2299: \plotone{f12.ps}
2300: \caption{Attenuation curve from \citet{Fischera05} with an $R_{\rm
2301: V}=A_{\rm V}/E_{\rm B-V}=3.1$. Note that the 2175 \AA\ carbon ring
2302: $\pi -$orbital resonance diffuse absorption feature is weak relative
2303: to the extinction curves measured in the Milky Way. Note also the
2304: silicate features at 9.7 and 18 \mum.} \label{fig:extcurve}
2305: \end{figure}
2306:
2307: \begin{figure}
2308: \plotone{f13.ps}
2309: \caption{The SED of a model starburst with solar metallicity, $\log
2310: \Cpar=5$, log$P/k=5$, and $f_{\rm PDR}=0.5$ showing the effects of
2311: increasing attenuation by diffuse dust. Applying the attenuation curve
2312: of figure \ref{fig:extcurve}, we show $A_{\rm V}$ of 0.0, 0.5, 1.0,
2313: 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 10.0, 15.0, 30.0 and 40.0 as labelled and seen by the
2314: decreasing UV and optical flux. Note that the
2315: diffuse dust emission associated with the attenuation has not been
2316: included.}\label{fig:atten}
2317: \end{figure}
2318:
2319: \begin{figure}
2320: \plotone{f14.ps}
2321: \caption{Cool dust emission for a Habing radiation field density,
2322: $G_{0}$, of 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, 100.0 times the Local Interstellar
2323: Radiation Field Density of \citet{Habing68}. The strength of the
2324: radiation field increases from bottom to top.}\label{fig:cool}
2325: \end{figure}
2326:
2327: \begin{figure}
2328: \plotone{f15.ps}
2329: \caption{Five SEDs demonstrating the effect of adding diffuse dust
2330: emission at 10\% of the
2331: Starburst luminosity to our fiducial model Starburst ($1Z_{\odot}$,
2332: $\log \Cpar=5$, log$P/k=5$, and $f_{\rm PDR}=0.5$). The SEDs show the
2333: original SED (thick line) and those with an added diffuse dust
2334: continuum heated by a young stellar continuum 100.0, 10.0, 1.0 and 0.1
2335: times that of the local ISRF.}\label{fig:adddiff}
2336: \end{figure}
2337: \begin{figure}
2338: \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize]{f16a.ps}
2339: \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize]{f16b.ps}
2340: \caption{The effects of changing metallicity on the \hii\ region
2341: spectra (top) and PDR spectra (bottom) of a log$\Cpar=5$, log$P/k=5$
2342: starburst. }\label{fig:metal}
2343: \end{figure}
2344:
2345: \clearpage
2346:
2347: \begin{figure}
2348: \plotone{f17.ps}
2349: \caption{The fit to the starburst galaxy NGC~6240. The errors in the
2350: observed fluxes are similar in magnitude to the height of the blue
2351: squares. The parameters of the fit are given on the label. Note
2352: that, although here $A_{\rm V}$ is estimated at 1.9~mag, this
2353: applies to the older stars. For the younger stars in the \hii\
2354: regions, $A_{\rm V} \sim 4.4$~mag in this model.}\label{fig:NGC6240}
2355: \end{figure}
2356:
2357: \begin{figure*}
2358: \plotone{f18.ps}
2359: \caption{The sensitivity of fit to the starburst galaxy NGC~6240 to
2360: the various parameters. As can be seen, for this galaxy, $\log {\cal
2361: C}$ is constrained within $\pm0.25$~dex, $A_{\rm V}$ to $\pm
2362: 0.3$~mag, and $f_{\rm old}$ to within 20\%. The fraction of UCHII
2363: regions, $f_{\rm UCHII}$ is not very well constrained in this
2364: galaxy, owing to its high compactness, but would be much better
2365: constrained in galaxies with $\log {\cal C} < 5$.
2366: }\label{fig:sensfit}
2367: \end{figure*}
2368:
2369: \begin{figure}
2370: \plotone{f19.ps}
2371: \caption{The standard fit to the starburst galaxy Arp~220.}\label{fig:Arp220}
2372: \end{figure}
2373:
2374: \begin{figure}
2375: \plotone{f20.ps}
2376: \caption{The double foreground dust screen fit to the starburst galaxy
2377: Arp~220. The screen around the starburst nucleus has $A_{\rm V}=
2378: 20$~mag and the diffuse older star component has an attenuation of
2379: $A_{\rm V}= 2.2$. The fit around the silicate absorption features is
2380: improved in this more complex model.}\label{fig:Arp220_fit2}
2381: \end{figure}
2382:
2383: \clearpage
2384:
2385: \begin{figure}
2386: \plotone{f21.ps}
2387: \caption{The fit to the \emph{Spitzer Space Observatory} IRS low
2388: resolution spectra of NGC~7714 from
2389: \citet{Brandl06}.}\label{fig:NGC7714}
2390: \end{figure}
2391:
2392: \end{document}
2393:
2394:
2395: