1: %\documentstyle{jaa}
2: \documentstyle[psfig,times]{jaa}
3: %\usepackage{epsfig}
4: %\input{epsfig.sty}
5: %\input{psfig.sty}
6: \psfigurepath{dir:/home/sushant/CME/PRL/}
7: %
8: %================================
9: % Authors' macros will go here
10: %================================
11: \newcommand{\bibTeX}{{\sc Bib}\TeX\/}
12: %
13: \begin{document}
14: %\title{HELIOSEISMIC RING ANALYSIS OF CME SOURCE REGIONS}
15: \title{Helioseismic ring analysis of CME source regions}
16: \author[S.C. Tripathy {\it et al.}]%
17: {S. C. Tripathy$^1$\thanks{e-mail: stripathy@nso.edu},
18: S. de Wet$^{1,2}$, K. Jain$^1$, R. Clark$^1$, and F. Hill$^1$ \\
19: $^1$ National Solar Observatory
20: Tucson, AZ 85719, USA. \\
21: $^2$ Rice University, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.}
22: %\pubyear{1995}
23: %\volume{16}
24: %\pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}}
25: %\setcounter{page}{217}
26: %\date{Received 1996 June 20; accepted 2000 March 09}
27: \maketitle
28: \label{firstpage}
29: \begin{abstract}
30: We apply the
31: ring diagram technique to source regions of halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs)
32: to study changes in acoustic mode parameters
33: before, during, and after the onset
34: of CMEs. We find that CME
35: regions associated with a low value of magnetic flux have line widths smaller than the quiet regions
36: implying a longer life-time for the
37: oscillation modes. We suggest that this criterion may be used to forecast the active regions which may
38: trigger CMEs.
39: \end{abstract}
40:
41: \begin{keywords}
42: Sun -- coronal mass ejections -- oscillations -- magnetic field
43: \end{keywords}
44: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
45:
46: Using high-resolution Global Oscillation Network Group (GONG) Dopplergrams, we
47: have analysed the changes in oscillation mode properties in the source locations of
48: CMEs. This was undertaken to find out if the mode properties of the CME regions
49: are different from the active regions which did not
50: produce a CME. This may help to identify the regions on solar disk which may produce
51: CMEs.
52:
53: \section{Data and Analysis }\label{sec:data}
54: The location of the CMEs are taken from the catalogue of Zhou {\it et al}. (2006)
55: who have identified the source regions of 288 halo CMEs during the period of 1997-2003.
56: This data base lists the location, date, time of occurrence and
57: the classification of the region where the CMEs occured.
58: To infer the mode parameters, we use the ring-diagram analysis (Hill, 1988) and
59: compute power spectra of solar
60: oscillations over smaller patches of the solar surface corresponding to the CME regions.
61: The mode parameters are then
62: extracted by fitting the power spectrum with a
63: symmetric profile model which considers the peaks in the power
64: spectra to be Lorentzian (Haber {\it et al}., 2001).
65: \section{Results and Discussion}
66: In this analysis we examine source locations of
67: 48 CMEs during September 2001 -- December 2003 that occurred no more than 30 degrees in any of the four
68: cardinal directions from the solar disk center. These are further associated with flaring, active,
69: and filament regions. % (Tripathy {\it et al.} 2007).
70: The power spectra of these CME regions were calculated from an area covering 128 $\times$ 128 pixels
71: with the center coinciding with the position of the CME. The
72: area roughly corresponds to about 15 $\times$ 15 degrees in heliographic longitude and latitude.
73: Each region was tracked for 1664 minutes where the central time corresponds to
74: the onset time of the CME. In order to estimate the variation in mode parameters, we compare
75: each of the CME region with
76: a magnetically quiet region at the same latitude as the CME region within the same Carrington rotation.
77: The average magnetic flux ($B_{av}$) associated with each CME and quiet region is calculated from the
78: synoptic maps of Kitt Peak magnetograms (ftp://nsokp.nso.edu/kpvt/synoptic/mag/)
79: by averaging the unsigned magnetic flux inside the
80: same 15 $\times$ 15 degree box of the corresponding regions.
81: \begin{figure}[t] %%%%FIG 1
82: %\vspace{-0.2in}
83: \centering
84: \psfig{file=fig1.ps,angle=90,width=12cm,clip=}
85: \vspace{-0.2in}
86: \caption{Changes in (a) ratio of the peak power
87: and (b) ratio of the half-width between the CME region of December 19, 2002 ($B_{av}$ = 113 G)
88: and quiet region of December 12, 2002 ($B_{av}$ = 3 G) both located at N22W12. The {\it f}-modes
89: are represented by + and {\it p}-modes are
90: represented by diamonds, circles, and triangles for $p_1$ through $p_3$ respectively.
91: \label{fig1}}
92: \end{figure}
93:
94: As an example of the variation in mode parameters in CME regions, we have shown the
95: ratio of the peak power ($A$) between a CME and a quiet region in Figure~1a.
96: It is evident that {\it f} and {\it p}-modes in the CME region
97: have lower power than the quiet region and the variation is not a monotonic function of the frequency.
98: The maximum suppression seems to occur in the frequency range of about 3-3.5 mHz
99: and the suppression decreases with increasing radial order.
100: At high frequencies, the suppression tends to become small and in few cases,
101: we even note enhancement of power. In general, the results are
102: consistent with those related to active regions (Rajaguru, Basu, and Antia, 2001).
103:
104: The variation in half-width ($\Gamma$) between the same pair of CME and quiet region is shown in Figure~1b
105: as the ratio between the two.
106: For {\it f} and {\it $p_1$} modes, the half-widths are larger in higher end of the frequency range and smaller
107: in lower end of the frequency range. The widths of other {\it p}-modes are generally smaller than
108: those in quiet regions. Since, the lifetime of a mode is inversely proportional to its
109: half-width, the small width indicates that some modes live longer in regions where CMEs originate
110: and implies a slow damping process. This result is in contrast to the study of active regions
111: (Rajaguru, Basu, and Antia, 2001) where the
112: lifetime of the modes were found to be smaller compared to the quiet regions.
113:
114: \begin{figure} %%%%FIG 2
115: \centering
116: \hskip 0.1in
117: \psfig{file=fig2.ps,angle=90,width=8cm,clip=}
118: \vskip -0.2in
119: \caption{Frequency averaged ratio of half-widths for 48 CME regions as a function of magnetic flux.
120: The symbols have the same meaning as in Figure~1.
121: \label{fig2}}
122: \end{figure}
123:
124: Figure 2 shows the frequency averaged ratios of the half-width between the CME and quiet region for
125: 48 CMEs as a
126: function of average magnetic flux of the CME region. The widths are averaged over the frequency range of
127: 2550--2750 $\mu$Hz for {\it f}-modes and 3000--3500 $\mu$Hz for {\it p}-modes.
128: It is evident that the line width
129: depends on the strength of magnetic
130: field present in the region. Most of the CMEs
131: associated with low magnetic flux have a smaller width compared to the quiet region.
132: The width increases for higher magnetic flux values. However, there are exceptions in both the cases.
133:
134: \begin{figure}[t] %%%%FIG 3a
135: \vspace{-1.5in}
136: \centering
137: \psfig{file=fig3a.ps,angle=90,width=12cm,clip=}
138: \vskip -0.25in
139: \caption{The changes in half-width as a ratio between a CME and
140: quiet region for three consecutive days. Panel (b) refers to the day of onset of the CME
141: while panels (a) and (c)
142: refers to one day before and after the CME occured, respectively.
143: \label{fig3a}}
144: \end{figure}
145: We have also studied the evolution of the oscillation mode parameters of the CME region one day prior
146: and one day after the onset of the CME. As an example, we show the event of March 17, 2002 where the CME
147: is located at W10S0 and has an average flux of 14 G (Figure~3). The quiet region for this event corresponds
148: to the same position
149: on April 4, 2002 and has a magnetic flux of 6.4 G.
150: To compare, we also show the changes in half-width for three consecutive days
151: for the active region NOAA 9628
152: located at S22.5E15 on September 23, 2001 (Figure~4).
153: On comparing Figures~3 and 4, it is evident that in
154: the region where the CME is triggered, the line width is always less than the quiet region
155: while in case of active region, it is always higher than the quiet region. We propose
156: this characteristic property of the oscillation modes as the prime signal to identify an active
157: region which may produce a CME.
158:
159:
160: \begin{figure}[h]
161: \vspace{-1.7in} %%%%FIG 3b
162: \centering
163: \psfig{file=fig3b.ps,angle=90,width=12cm,clip=}
164: \vskip -0.4in
165: \caption{Same as Figure~2 but for the active region NOAA 9628. \label{fig3b}}
166: \end{figure}
167:
168: In summary, we find that the oscillation modes in the source
169: locations of CMEs with a low value of magnetic flux have a higher life time as compared to the quiet
170: regions. This indicates that damping process of the modes associated with CME regions
171: are slow as compared to the quiet regions.
172:
173:
174: %\acknowledgements
175: A part of this work is carried out through the National Solar Observatory
176: Research Experiences for Undergraduate (REU) site program.
177: This work utilizes data obtained by the Global Oscillation Network
178: Group program, managed by the National Solar Observatory, which
179: is operated by AURA, Inc. under a cooperative agreement with the
180: National Science Foundation. The data were acquired by instruments
181: operated by the Big Bear Solar Observatory, High Altitude Observatory,
182: Learmonth Solar Observatory, Udaipur Solar Observatory, Instituto de
183: Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias, and Cerro Tololo Interamerican
184: Observatory. NSO/Kitt Peak data used here are produced cooperatively by
185: NSF/NOAO, NASA/GSFC, and NOAA/SEL. This work is supported by NASA grant NNG 5-11703 and NNG 05HL41I.
186: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
187: \bibitem{haber02}
188: Haber, D., Hindman, B.W., Toomre, J., {\it et al.}, 2002, {\it Astrophys. J.}, {\bf 570}, 885.
189:
190: \bibitem{hill88}Hill, F., 1988, {\it Astrophys. J.}, {\bf 333}, 996.
191:
192: \bibitem{rba01}Rajaguru, S. P., Basu, S., and Antia, H. M., 2001, {\it Astrophys. J.}, {\bf 563}, 410.
193:
194: \bibitem{zhou06}Zhou, G. P., Wang, J. X., and Zhang, J., 2006, {\it Astron. Astrophys.}, {\bf 445}, 1133.
195: \end{thebibliography}
196:
197:
198: \label{lastpage}
199: \end{document}
200: