1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % Gregory Dobler (started July 6, 2007) %
3: % %
4: % Halpha-correlated spinning dust %
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6:
7:
8: %
9: % Classes, packages, and comments
10: %
11: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{emulateapj}
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13: %\slugcomment{Draft --- July 25, 2007}
14:
15: %
16: % Comments
17: %
18:
19:
20: %
21: % Equations, figures, tables, and references
22: %
23: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
24: \newcommand{\bel}[1]{\be\label{eq:#1}}
25: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
26: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}
27: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}
28: \newcommand\bp{\begin{figure}}
29: \newcommand\ep{\end{figure}}
30: \newcommand\bpm{\begin{figure*}}
31: \newcommand\epm{\end{figure*}}
32: \newcommand{\btab}{\begin{tabular}}
33: \newcommand{\etab}{\end{tabular}}
34: \newcommand{\bt}{\begin{table}}
35: \newcommand{\et}{\end{table}}
36: \newcommand{\ben}{\begin{enumerate}}
37: \newcommand{\een}{\end{enumerate}}
38: \newcommand\reffig[1]{Figure \ref{fig:#1}}
39: \newcommand\refeq[1]{Equation \ref{eq:#1}}
40: \newcommand\refsec[1]{\S \ref{sec:#1}}
41: \newcommand\reftbl[1]{Table \ref{tbl:#1}}
42: \newcommand{\cm}{\rm{cm}}
43: \newcommand{\pc}{\rm{pc}}
44: \newcommand{\Ray}{\rm{R}}
45: \newcommand{\kjysr}{~\rm{kJy\,sr}^{-1}}
46:
47: %
48: % Alignment
49: %
50: \newcommand{\bcn}{\begin{center}}
51: \newcommand{\ecn}{\end{center}}
52:
53:
54: %
55: % Symbols
56: %
57: \newcommand{\delnu}{\Delta\nu_{\rm p}}
58: \newcommand{\nup}{\nu_{\rm p}}
59: \newcommand{\hal}{H$\alpha$}
60:
61:
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: \title{Identification of Spinning Dust in H$\alpha$--Correlated Microwave
66: Emission}
67:
68:
69: \author{Gregory Dobler\altaffilmark{1,2} \& Douglas P. Finkbeiner\altaffilmark{1,3}}
70:
71: \altaffiltext{1}{
72: Institute for Theory and Computation,
73: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, MS-51,
74: Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
75: }
76: \altaffiltext{2}{gdobler@cfa.harvard.edu}
77: \altaffiltext{3}{dfinkbeiner@cfa.harvard.edu}
78:
79:
80: \begin{abstract}
81: CMB experiments commonly use maps of H$\alpha$ intensity as a spatial
82: template for Galactic free--free emission, assuming a power law
83: $I_{\nu} \propto \nu^{-0.15}$ for the spectrum. Any departure from
84: the assumed free--free spectrum could have a detrimental effect on
85: determination of the primary CMB anisotropy. We show that the
86: H$\alpha$-correlated emission spectrum in the diffuse WIM is
87: \emph{not} the expected free--free spectrum at WMAP frequencies.
88: Instead, there is a broad bump in the spectrum at $\sim$ 50 GHz which
89: is consistent with emission from spinning dust grains. Spectra from
90: both the full sky and smaller regions of interest are well fit
91: by a superposition of a free--free and ``warm ionized medium'' Draine
92: \& Lazarian (1998) spinning dust model, shifted in frequency.
93: The spinning dust emission is $\sim$
94: 5 times weaker than the free--free component at 50 GHz, with the null
95: hypothesis that the H$\alpha$-correlated spectrum is pure free--free,
96: ruled out at $\geq
97: 8\sigma$ in all regions and $>100\sigma$ for the full sky fit.
98: \end{abstract}
99: \keywords{
100: diffuse radiation ---
101: dust, extinction ---
102: ISM: clouds ---
103: radiation mechanisms: non-thermal ---
104: radio continuum: ISM
105: }
106:
107: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
108: % SECTION: Introduction
109: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
110: \section{Introduction}
111:
112: During the course of measuring the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
113: anisotropy, the \emph{Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe} (WMAP) has
114: produced the most detailed and sensitive maps of interstellar medium
115: (ISM) emission between 20 and 100 GHz taken to date. The quality of
116: the data has profoundly influenced our understanding of the four main
117: ISM continuum emission mechanisms in this frequency range
118: \citep{bennett03,finkbeiner03,hinshaw07,DF07}. At the highest WMAP
119: frequencies, the Galaxy is dominated by thermal dust emission, traced
120: by far IR maps \citep{finkbeiner99}. At lower
121: frequencies, synchrotron radiation from supernova shock accelerated
122: electrons spiraling in the Galactic magnetic field makes up the
123: majority of the emission. In the inner Galaxy, the synchrotron
124: emission is brighter relative to low-frequency maps, and has a harder
125: spectrum.\footnote{\citet{finkbeiner04} has previously interpreted this as a
126: separate component, the synchrotron ``haze'', but this interpretation is
127: controversial \citep{finkbeiner04,DF07}. This haze component is
128: spatially orthogonal to the other templates by construction, and
129: though we include it in our fits below, its existence has negligible
130: effect on the \hal-correlated spectrum.} Next, free--free emission
131: from unbound electrons interacting with ions in $\sim 10^4$K ionized
132: gas has a harder spectrum than synchrotron, and is detectable in all bands.
133: Finally, there is a bump in the spectrum of dust-correlated emission
134: at $\sim 20$ GHz, sometimes called ``Foreground X'' \citep{deO02}.
135: Over the last decade, it has been recognized that this could be
136: electric dipole emission from rapidly rotating dust grains \cite[``spinning
137: dust'';][]{DL98b}.
138:
139: \subsection{Foreground X: spinning dust?}
140: Spinning dust is the electric dipole emission from the smallest dust
141: grains which have a non-zero electric dipole moment and are spun
142: up by several different interactions with the interstellar medium
143: \citep[e.g., ion collisions, the interstellar radiation field, etc.; see][]{DL98b}.
144: Spinning dust was considered as a potential source of
145: radio and microwave emission in other contexts \citep{erickson57,ferrara94}.
146: Because the model depends on the grain size
147: distribution, ionization fraction, electric dipole moments, etc., the
148: peak frequency can be anywhere from $10-50$ GHz, but is usually in the
149: $20-40$ GHz range. This
150: dependence of the spectrum on the ISM parameters has made spinning
151: dust difficult to definitively identify, but may provide the qualitative
152: behaviors necessary to make a fool-proof detection.
153:
154: In the COBE/DMR data, \citet{kogut96} found that the dust-correlated
155: emission does not simply fall off monotonically with decreasing
156: frequency as would be expected for a thermal dust tail, but instead was greater at
157: 31 GHz than at 53 GHz. This behavior
158: was confirmed by the Saskatoon CMB experiment \citep{deO97},
159: the 14.5 and 32 GHz OVRO data \citep{leitch97},
160: the Cottingham \& Boughn 19.2 GHz survey \citep{deO98},
161: the Tenerife 10 \& 15 GHz survey \citep{deO99}, and the
162: QMAP 30 GHz data \citep{deO00}.
163: A small survey of dust clouds with the Green Bank 42m telescope at 5,
164: 8, \& 10 GHz \citep{F02} revealed two candidates for spinning dust
165: clouds: L1622, later
166: confirmed \citep{finkbeiner04}; and LPH~201.663+1.643, which turned
167: out to be incorrect \citep{dickinson06}.
168:
169: Given this evidence, it was already clear prior to the WMAP data
170: release in early 2003, that there was some non-standard emission
171: mechanism, but it was unclear whether this mechanism was spinning dust
172: \citep{DL98b} or some other process.
173:
174: WMAP \citep{bennett03} found that the dust-correlated emission falls
175: from 94 to 61 GHz and then rises steadily to 23 GHz. The fact that
176: synchrotron typically dominates at lower frequencies led \citet{bennett03} to
177: interpret the low frequency rise as ``dust-correlated synchrotron''.
178: The reasoning was that because dusty regions correlate with regions of
179: star formation activity, electrons in the vicinity could be
180: accelerated by supernova shocks leading to synchrotron emission.
181: \citet{finkbeiner04} pointed out that WMAP is also consistent with
182: \citet{DL98b} if their model could be shifted down in frequency a bit.
183:
184: Because the WMAP frequency coverage ($23-94$ GHz) coincides with the
185: range where the spinning dust and synchrotron spectra are similar,
186: data at lower frequencies, where the spectra diverge, have been used to
187: test the dust-correlated synchrotron hypothesis. The WMAP ``synchrotron''
188: template has a much weaker cross-correlation at $10-15$ GHz than
189: expected for actual synchrotron \citep{deO04}. Also, 8 \& 14 GHz data from
190: the Green Bank Galactic Plane Survey \citep{langston00} show a rising
191: spectrum consistent with spinning dust but not synchrotron
192: \citep{gb04} and implying that the majority of dust-correlated
193: emission at 23 GHz is Foreground X. Comparing the Cottingham \&
194: Boughn survey to WMAP also shows a rise from 19 to 23 GHz
195: \citep{boughn07}. The polarization properties \citep{page07,hinshaw07} in the
196: 3-yr WMAP data also favor the spinning dust hypothesis.
197:
198: In spite of all this evidence, there are weaknesses in each of these
199: arguments. Some use only low-latitude data and may not apply to the
200: diffuse ISM \citep{gb04}. Others apply to only one cloud \citep{F02},
201: have poor signal to noise \citep{deO04}, or a short lever arm in
202: frequency \citep{boughn07}. However, taken together, they are very
203: strong evidence against the dust-correlated synchrotron hypothesis,
204: but they are not specifically evidence \emph{for} spinning dust.
205: Other mechanisms such as magnetic dipole dust emission, caused by the
206: thermal fluctuation of the magnetization in the dust grains
207: \citep{DL99}, could conceivably explain all these results. This
208: ambiguity motivated our search for further clues in the WMAP 3-yr
209: data.
210:
211: \subsection{WMAP Multilinear Regression}
212: In \citet[hereafter, DF07]{DF07} we describe our method for
213: determining the spectral shape of each of the four primary WMAP
214: foreground components: free--free, dust, soft synchrotron, and hard synchrotron
215: \citep[termed the ``haze'' by][]{finkbeiner04} emission. We model the WMAP data
216: as a linear combination of the CMB
217: and the 4 foregrounds, each described by a specific spatial template.
218: For free--free emission
219: we use the \hal\ map described in \refsec{halpha-em}, for dust (thermal
220: and spinning) emission we use the \citet{schlegel98} dust map
221: evaluated at 94 GHz by \citet{finkbeiner99}, for soft synchrotron we
222: use the \citet{haslam82} 408 MHz map, and for the haze we use a simple
223: $1/r$ template where $r$ is the distance from the Galactic center.
224: The individual WMAP bands were completely decoupled in our fit, and we
225: assumed \emph{nothing} about the spectrum of each foreground, only
226: that its morphology was traced by the template in all bands. We
227: performed our fits over both the (nearly) full sky and also on smaller
228: regions of interest. Point sources and regions where dust extinction
229: makes the \hal\ map unreliable (where $A(\mbox{\hal}) =
230: 2.65\,E(B-V) > 1\mbox{ mag}$) were masked out from the fits.
231:
232: We showed that the spectrum of \hal-correlated emission is
233: \emph{not} the usual free--free spectrum. Rather, there is
234: a bump around $\nu \sim 50$ GHz. In \refsec{sdust-em} we explain why
235: the \hal\ map should actually trace spinning dust excited by
236: collisions with ions. In \refsec{spectra} we present \hal-correlated
237: emission spectra for both the (nearly) full sky as well as smaller
238: regions of interest and show that, indeed, the spectra are well
239: characterized as a superposition of free--free and spinning dust type
240: spectra. We summarize this work and discuss implications for future
241: observations in \refsec{discussion}.
242:
243: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
244: % SECTION: EM as a tracer of spinning dust
245: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
246: \section{Emission measure as a tracer of spinning dust}
247:
248:
249: In this section we argue that in fully ionized environments, the emissivity
250: density ($j_\nu$) of spinning dust emission is proportional to dust density times
251: some excitation function related to the ion density. The emission comes from the
252: very smallest grains, which are spun up by a collision with an ion and spin down
253: as they radiate. In the limit where the spin down time is small compared to the
254: time between collisions, the rotation is episodic and the emissivity also scales
255: linearly with the ion number density. In \S \ref{sec:spinem}, we assume the episodic limit in order to build some intuition about how WIM-correlated spinning dust might behave.
256:
257:
258: \subsection{Free--free emission measure}
259: \label{sec:halpha-em}
260:
261: The map assembled by \citet{finkbeiner03} from the VTSS
262: \citep{dennison98}, SHASSA \citep{gaustad01}, and WHAM
263: \citep{haffner03} surveys, traces the \hal\ recombination line
264: emission from hot interstellar gas. At WMAP frequencies, this \hal\
265: map\footnote{available at \texttt{http://www.skymaps.info}} is used to
266: estimate the thermal bremsstrahlung, or free--free emission, resulting
267: from the interaction of the electrons and protons from ionized
268: hydrogen \citep{bennett03,finkbeiner04,hinshaw07}. The \hal\ map is
269: corrected for dust absorption using the prescription given by Finkbeiner
270: (2003; but see Dickinson et al. 2003 for an alternative). In this
271: frequency range the free--free specific intensity $I_\nu$ (in Jy/sr) is
272: often approximated as a power law, \bel{ff-spec} I_{\nu} \propto
273: \nu^{\alpha}, \ee with $\alpha \approx -0.15$. Although this is a
274: good approximation, in our analysis we use the expression given by
275: \citet{spitzer} for the free--free spectrum.
276:
277: Recombination line emission is a two particle process (involving the
278: capture of free electrons by a proton nucleus) and so the emissivity
279: is proportional to $n_e n_i$, which for fully ionized H is simply the
280: square of the number density of gas particles, $j_{\mbox{\hal}}\propto
281: n^2$. Therefore, the \hal\ intensity corresponds to an \emph{emission
282: measure} (EM) defined as $E_m \equiv \int n^2 dl$ where the integral
283: is taken along the line of sight. The \hal\ intensity is usually
284: measured in Rayleighs (1 R $\equiv 10^6/4\pi$ photons s$^{-1}$
285: cm$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$) with an EM of 1 cm$^{-6}$pc $\approx 0.6$ R for
286: gas at $\sim 8000$ K.
287:
288:
289: \subsection{Spinning dust emission measure}
290: \label{sec:spinem}
291:
292: \citet[hereafter, DL98]{DL98b} present a model for spinning dust
293: emission in which tiny dust grains with non-negligible electric dipole
294: moment are spun up by ion collisions; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
295: generally have a non-zero dipole, because perfect symmetry is rare in large
296: molecules. DL98 estimated the astronomical value of this parameter (actually the
297: electric dipole moment per root mass) from measured electric dipole moments for
298: dozens of known PAH molecules. In the limit where ion interactions provide the
299: dominant spin-up mechanism (see DL98 for details) and assuming full ionization,
300: constant gas/dust ratio, and the same grain size distribution everywhere, the
301: resulting \emph{total} spinning dust emission is $I \equiv \int I_{\nu} d\nu
302: \propto \int n_i n_d dl \propto \int n_i^2$.
303: With the additional assumption that the emission is episodic, the spectrum of the emission does not vary with $n_i$, but the amplitude does.
304: That is, the spinning dust emission
305: should look like an EM, and be traced by \hal. This approximation is relevant
306: where the collisional excitation is primarily due to ions (at least for the smallest grains), e.g. for the ``warm ionized medium'' (WIM) parameters used by DL98.
307:
308: The WIM-correlated emission claimed here augments the ``usual''
309: spinning dust emission in the ``cold neutral medium'' (CNM) which has
310: a temperature $T_{\rm CNM} \sim 100$ K and is traced by the
311: \citet{schlegel98} dust map evaluated at 94 GHz by
312: \citet{finkbeiner99} (FSD99).
313:
314:
315: \subsection{Estimating the specific intensity}
316: \label{sec:sdust-em}
317:
318: For a spherical dust grain of size $a$, rotating with angular frequency $\omega$,
319: and with a dipole moment $p_0$, the rotational energy is,
320: \bel{rotenergy}
321: E = \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2 = \frac{1}{5} m a^2 \omega^2,
322: \ee
323: where $m$ is the grain mass. The energy loss rate is the total power emitted by
324: the grain,
325: \be
326: \dot{E} = \frac{1}{12\pi}\frac{\mu_0}{c} p_0^2 \omega^4
327: \ee
328: and the spin down time is,
329: \be
330: \tau_s \equiv E/\dot{E} \propto a^2 p_0^{-2} \omega^{-2}.
331: \ee
332: The time between collisions is just,
333: \be
334: \tau_c \sim \lambda/v \propto a^{-2} n_H^{-1}
335: \ee
336: where $v$ is the thermal velocity of the ion and $\lambda=(\pi a^2
337: n_H)^{-1}$ is the mean free path.
338:
339: In the limit where the spin down time is much \emph{smaller} than the time between
340: collisions ($r \equiv \tau_s/\tau_c \ll 1$), the excitation is episodic. For the
341: WIM parameters in DL98, this ratio is in fact $\sim 1$; however, we point out that
342: \be
343: r = \tau_s/\tau_c \propto a^4 n_H p_0^{-2} \omega^{-2}
344: \ee
345: so that very small changes to the grain size distribution can substantially affect
346: the spin down time compared to the time between collisions. In fact, if each ion
347: collision imparts equal energy, then from \refeq{rotenergy}, $\omega \propto
348: a^{-2}$. Since $p_0 \propto N^{1/2} \propto a^{3/2}$ (see DL98)
349: then in this case, $1/r$ diverges as $a^{-5}$. The bottom line is that the
350: episodic approximation is sensitively dependent on the ion density, the dipole
351: moment, and
352: \emph{especially} the grain size distribution. For the purposes of estimating a
353: specific intensity, we will now assume the episodic approximation with the caveat
354: that it may break down in dense environments, \citep[e.g., HII
355: regions. In fact,][find no evidence for spinning dust at 14.2 and 17.9
356: GHZ in 16 Galactic HII regions]{scaife07} or for very small dipole moments.
357: We emphasize that this does not affect the fact the the \emph{total intensity} $I$
358: should be proportional to $\int n_d n_H d\ell$ so that spinning dust emission
359: should be traced by an EM map.
360:
361: Draine \& Lazarian evaluate $j_\nu/n_H$ for parameters representative
362: of various interstellar environments. In the limit that $j_\nu/n_H$
363: is a constant with $n_H$, then it equals $I_\nu/N(H)$. However, in
364: our case it is not. As a reference model, we take the DL98 WIM model
365: evaluated for $n_H=0.1~\cm^{-3}$ which peaks near 25 GHz with a
366: peak emissivity\footnote{The units of the ordinate, $j_\nu/n_H$,
367: of Figs. 9-11 in DL98 is incorrectly labeled (Jy sr$^{-1}$)
368: rather than (Jy cm$^2$\,sr$^{-1}$), an error propagated by Finkbeiner
369: et al. (2002).}
370: of $j_{p, {\rm ref}}/n_H = 5\times 10^{-21} \kjysr \cm^2$
371: or $j_{p, {\rm ref}} = 5\times10^{-22} \kjysr \cm^{-1}$.
372: Multiplying the dependence on dust and gas density we have\footnote{
373: Again, the dependence on $n_H$ in \refeq{episod} is only strictly correct in the
374: episodic limit, though in reality the deviation is likely small.
375: }
376: \bel{episod}
377: j_{p} = j_{p, {\rm ref}} \left(\frac{n_H}{n_{H,{\rm ref}}}\right)
378: \left(\frac{n_d}{n_{d,{\rm ref}}}\right)
379: \ee
380: where $n_{H,{\rm ref}}$ and $n_{d,{\rm ref}}$ are the density of H and small dust
381: grains, respectively, used in the reference model. For full
382: ionization of H ($n_H = n_i$) and constant gas/dust ratio
383: ($n_H/n_{H,{\rm ref}} = n_d/n_{d,{\rm ref}}$) we have
384: \begin{eqnarray}
385: j_{p} = j_{p, {\rm ref}} \left(\frac{n_H}{0.1\,\cm^{-3}}\right)^2 \\
386: =5\times10^{-20} n_H^2 \kjysr \cm^5 \\
387: =0.15 n_H^2 \kjysr \cm^6\pc^{-1}
388: \end{eqnarray}
389: and the peak specific intensity is then
390: \begin{equation}
391: I_{p}=\int j_{p} dl = 0.15 \kjysr \left(\frac{E_m}{1\,\cm^{-6}\pc}\right)
392: \end{equation}
393: or
394: \begin{equation}
395: I_{\rm p}/I_{\mbox{\hal}} = 0.09\,\kjysr\,\Ray^{-1},
396: \end{equation}
397: where $I_{\mbox{\hal}}$ is measured in R. For comparison, the ratio
398: of free--free to \hal\ for a temperature of $T_e\sim 8000$K at 41 GHz
399: (WMAP Q-band) is $I_{41}/I_{\mbox{\hal}} \sim
400: 0.15\,\kjysr\,\Ray^{-1}$.
401:
402: Although this is a rough estimate, it suggests that the intensity of
403: the free--free emission at 41 GHz and the peak of the spinning dust
404: emission should be of the same order of magnitude.
405: Throughout this discussion we make the assumption that the DL98 WIM
406: spectrum can be shifted by a factor of 2 in frequency. A more
407: thorough analysis would require that the DL98 model be evaluated for
408: some set of parameters (ion density, electric dipole moment per root
409: mass, etc.) that give the actual spectrum observed. For our purposes
410: this naive shift is adequate.
411:
412: \bp
413: \begin{center}
414: \includegraphics[width=0.375\textwidth]{f1a.eps}
415: \includegraphics[width=0.375\textwidth]{f1b.eps}
416: \includegraphics[width=0.375\textwidth]{f1c.eps}
417: \caption{
418: \emph{Top panel:} The best $F+D+C$ (free--free plus spinning dust plus CMB)
419: model fit to the \hal-correlated emission over the full sky. The peak frequency
420: is fixed to $\nu_{\rm peak} = 50$ GHz. This two component plus CMB
421: contamination model works surprisingly well with a spinning dust component that
422: is 6.23 times weaker than the free--free (see \reftbl{fit-res}). \emph{Middle
423: panel:} $\Delta\chi^2$ contours for the best fit free--free coefficient in the
424: spinning dust/CMB plane. The null hypothesis that the \hal-correlated emission
425: can be well fit by only a $F+C$ model (i.e., $D_0 = 0$) is ruled at very high
426: confidence ($335\sigma$). \emph{Bottom panel:} $\chi^2$ contours in the
427: spinning dust/$\nu_{\rm peak}$ plane. Though the peak frequency is not very
428: well constrained, we can rule out $\nu_{\rm peak} < 40$ GHz and $\nu_{\rm peak}
429: > 60$ GHz at $>4\sigma$ confidence.
430: }\label{fig:hdc-fs}
431: \end{center}
432: \ep
433:
434:
435:
436: \bpm
437: \centerline{
438: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f2a.eps}
439: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f2b.eps}
440: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f2c.eps}
441: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f2d.eps}
442: }
443: \centerline{
444: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f2e.eps}
445: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f2f.eps}
446: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f2g.eps}
447: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f2h.eps}
448: }
449: \centerline{
450: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f2i.eps}
451: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f2j.eps}
452: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f2k.eps}
453: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f2l.eps}
454: }
455: \caption{
456: The same as \reffig{hdc-fs} except for the four regions of the Gum Nebula (see
457: \reftbl{fit-res}). Although the peak frequency is only loosely constrained, the
458: $D_0=0$ null hypothesis is ruled out at $\geq 12\sigma$ in all regions.
459: }\label{fig:hdc-rg}
460: \epm
461:
462:
463:
464:
465: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
466: % SECTION: Spectrum
467: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
468: \section{Spectrum of \hal-correlated emission}
469: \label{sec:spectra}
470:
471: As noted above, in DF07 we showed that the spectrum of \hal-correlated
472: emission in the WMAP data has a bump around $\nu \sim 50$ GHz that we now argue
473: is consistent with a spinning dust contamination of the familiar \refeq{ff-spec}
474: free--free spectrum. We also point out in DF07 that any measurement of a
475: foreground spectrum is necessarily contaminated by a component which has the
476: frequency dependence of the CMB due to imperfect foreground removal when
477: constructing a CMB template.\footnote{Throughout this paper, we will work with
478: the results found using our CMB5 estimator for the CMB -- see DF07 for details.}
479: However, as we will show shortly, this contamination is incapable of producing
480: the observed bump.
481:
482: \reffig{hdc-fs} shows our full sky fit for \hal-correlated emission. Our
483: hypothesis is that this spectrum can be well fit by a linear combination of
484: free--free, spinning dust, and CMB spectra. Thus, our model spectrum is
485: \bel{mod}
486: I_{\nu}^{\rm mod} = F + D + C,
487: \ee
488: where
489: \bel{ff-comp}
490: F = F_0 \left(\frac{\nu}{23\mbox{ GHz}}\right)^{-0.15},
491: \ee
492: \bel{sd-comp}
493: D = D_0 \times \mbox{ (DL98 WIM model with $\nu_{p} = 50$ GHz)},
494: \ee
495: and
496: \bel{cmb-comp}
497: C = C_0 \left(\frac{\nu}{23\mbox{ GHz}}\right)^2.
498: \ee
499: We minimize $\chi^2 = \sum_{i} (I_{\nu_i}^{\rm mod} - I_{\nu_i})^2/\sigma_i^2$
500: over the parameters $F_0$, $D_0$, and $C_0$ which are scaled to be of order
501: unity. Here $\sigma_i$ are the formal errors in band $i$ of the spectrum from
502: our DF07 template fit, and we have one degree of freedom.
503:
504: As shown in \reffig{hdc-fs}, the spectral model in \refeq{mod} fits the data
505: astonishingly well. The free--free and spinning dust amplitudes are comparable
506: while the contamination from the CMB is minimal. The very low value of
507: $\chi^2=1.84$ reflects the quality of the fit. \reffig{hdc-fs} also shows
508: $\Delta\chi^2=$ 1,2,3,4, and 5 contours in the $D_0$-$C_0$ plane minimizing
509: $\chi^2$ over $F_0$ at each point, and holding $\nup$ fixed at 50 GHz. The
510: null hypothesis that only a free--free plus CMB spectrum (i.e., $D_0 = 0$) fit
511: the data is ruled out to a very high significance. Thus, either free--free
512: emission does not follow \refeq{ff-spec}, or the \hal\ map is tracing
513: an additional emission component. This other emission component seems
514: to be well fit by a shifted WIM spinning dust spectrum.
515:
516: Lastly, the $\chi^2$ contours in the $D_0$-$\nu_{\rm peak}$ plane in the bottom
517: panel of \reffig{hdc-fs} indicate that, although the peak frequency of the
518: spinning dust is not very well constrained, values of $\sim 45-55$ GHz are
519: consistent with the data. Peak frequencies less than 40 GHz and greater than
520: 60 GHz are ruled out at $4\sigma$.
521:
522: \bp
523: \centerline{
524: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f3a.eps}
525: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f3b.eps}
526: }
527: \centerline{
528: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f3c.eps}
529: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f3d.eps}
530: }
531: \centerline{
532: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f3e.eps}
533: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{f3f.eps}
534: }
535: \caption{
536: The same as \reffig{hdc-fs} except for a region which encloses the Ophiuchus
537: Complex (left column) and one which is near the Orion Nebula (right column).
538: See \reftbl{fit-res} for details.
539: }\label{fig:hdc-op-or}
540: \ep
541:
542: \begin{deluxetable*}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
543: \tablehead{
544: & Full sky & \multicolumn{4}{c|}{Gum Nebula} & Ophiuchus & Orion \\
545: & & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & &
546: }
547: \startdata
548: lrange & 0:360 & 235:256 & 256:280 & 235:256 & 256:280 & 334:13 & 195:230 \\
549: \hline
550: brange & -90:90 & -30:0 & -30:0 & 0:30 & 0:30 & 0:90 & -35:0 \\
551: \hline
552: $\chi^2$ & 1.84 & 0.17 & 1.10 & 1.08 & 0.26 & 0.17 & 1.52 \\
553: \hline
554: $\Delta\chi^2_{D=0}$ & 335.02 & 43.84 & 87.32 & 17.59 & 12.09 & 11.89 & 8.30 \\
555: \hline
556: $ I_{F}/I_{D} (\nu=\nu_{\rm peak}) $ & 6.23 & 4.70 & 6.07 & 5.38 & 6.80 & 4.75 & 12.22
557: \enddata
558: \tablecomments{
559: Region definitions (in Galactic coordinates $l$ and $b$) and results of the fits
560: presented in Figures \ref{fig:hdc-fs}-\ref{fig:hdc-op-or}. The very low values
561: of $\chi^2$ reflect both the quality of the fits and the small number of
562: constraints (number of degrees of freedom = 2). The $D_0=0$ null hypothesis is
563: ruled out at $> 8\sigma$ in \emph{all} regions, while the relative intensity of
564: free--free to spinning dust emission at $\nu_{\rm peak} = 50$ GHz is in the
565: range 4.7-12.2.
566: }\label{tbl:fit-res}
567: \end{deluxetable*}
568:
569: \bpm
570: \centerline{
571: \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{f4.eps}
572: }
573: \caption{
574: WMAP K band data (\emph{top}) and the \hal\ map (\emph{bottom}) with our different
575: fit regions shown as dotted boxes. In addition to the full sky fit, the regions
576: are the Gum Nebula (1,2,3,4), the Ophiuchus complex (5), and the Orion Nebula (6).
577: See \reftbl{fit-res} for details.
578: }\label{fig:regions}
579: \epm
580:
581: The next step is to consider smaller individual regions of the sky to show that
582: the signal persists. Figures \ref{fig:hdc-rg} and \ref{fig:hdc-op-or} show fits
583: for four different regions of the Gum Nebula, the north central Galactic sky
584: (including the Ophiuchus complex), and a region near the Orion Nebula (see
585: \reftbl{fit-res} and \reffig{regions} for details). Though the fits are
586: significantly noisier as a
587: result of the smaller number of pixels used, the bump in
588: the \hal-correlated emission remains in all regions, with the free--free
589: amplitude roughly 4-7
590: times larger than the spinning dust. Furthermore, the case of no spinning dust
591: $D_0 = 0$ is ruled out in \emph{all} regions at $\geq 8\sigma$. Although the
592: $\chi^2$ contours in the $D_0$-$\nu_{\rm peak}$ plane offer a tantalizing hint
593: that the peak frequency of the spinning dust is lower in the Orion Nebula region
594: than the others, the present data are simply too noisy to make a statistically
595: significant statement.
596:
597: \begin{deluxetable}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
598: \tablehead{
599: & H$\alpha$ & Dust & Haslam & Haze
600: }
601: \startdata
602: H$\alpha$ & 1.00 & 0.45 & 0.18 & 0.10 \\
603: Dust & 0.45 & 1.00 & 0.56 & 0.26 \\
604: Haslam & 0.18 & 0.56 & 1.00 & 0.58 \\
605: Haze & 0.10 & 0.26 & 0.58 & 1.00
606: \enddata
607: \tablecomments{
608: The correlation matrix for the templates presented in \citet{DF07}. These are
609: the templates that were used in the multi-linear regression fit which revealed
610: the bump in the \hal-correlated emission presented in Figures
611: \ref{fig:hdc-fs}-\ref{fig:hdc-op-or}.
612: }\label{tbl:corrmat}
613: \end{deluxetable}
614:
615: Lastly, we address the possibility that the bump in the \hal-correlated
616: emission represents a cross-correlation bias between the different templates
617: used in DF07. That is to say, perhaps the \hal\ spectrum is absorbing power from
618: other templates in the fit. Table \ref{tbl:corrmat} shows the correlation
619: matrix, defined as
620: \bel{corrmat}
621: \Gamma_{i,j} = \frac{\langle T_i T_j \rangle}
622: {\sqrt{\langle T_i^2 \rangle\langle T_j^2 \rangle}}
623: \ee
624: where $\Gamma_{i,j}$ is the correlation between the $i$th and $j$th template.
625: The correlation between the templates is rather small. In particular, the dust
626: map is the template which is most highly correlated with the \hal\ map, and even
627: then, the variance in the \hal-correlated emission can be at most
628: $\Gamma_{\mbox{\hal, dust}}^2 = 20\%$ due to correlation with dust.
629:
630: \bp
631: \centerline{
632: \includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{f5a.eps}
633: \includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{f5b.eps}
634: }
635: \centerline{
636: \includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{f5c.eps}
637: \includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{f5d.eps}
638: }
639: \caption{
640: The intensity of the emission correlated with the four templates presented in
641: \citet{DF07}. The solid lines indicate fits for which the \hal-correlated
642: emission was constrained to follow a $I_{ff} \propto \nu^{-0.15}$ (see
643: \refeq{ff-spec}) frequency dependence, while the dotted lines indicate that the
644: \hal-correlated spectrum was fit explicitly. Both the insensitivity of the
645: inferred dust, Haslam, and haze -correlated spectra to fixing the \hal\ spectrum
646: as well as the relatively low correlation among the templates (\reftbl{corrmat})
647: indicates that the spinning dust bump is indeed correlated primarily with \hal\
648: emission.
649: }\label{fig:corr-hal}
650: \ep
651:
652: In fact, \reffig{corr-hal} shows that the effects are much smaller. Here, the
653: solid lines show the resultant spectra for all foreground components both with
654: and without fitting the \hal\ spectrum. In the latter case the \hal\ emission was
655: assumed to follow the free--free spectrum in \refeq{ff-spec}. The features of
656: these spectra are discussed at length in DF07, but the important point is that
657: the other foregrounds are not significantly affected when the \hal\ spectrum is
658: fixed. This is strong evidence that the emission mechanism causing the bump in
659: the \hal\ spectrum is highly correlated with the \hal\ template.
660:
661:
662: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
663: % SECTION: Discussion
664: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
665: \section{Discussion}
666: \label{sec:discussion}
667:
668: In \citet{DF07} we identified a deviation from the classical
669: free--free (thermal bremsstrahlung) spectrum in the \hal-correlated
670: emission of the 3-year WMAP data. In this paper we have argued that
671: the spectral data are consistent with a superposition of free--free
672: and spinning dust emission from a ``warm ionized medium'' \citep[WIM;
673: see][]{DL98b}. Additionally, there is contamination by a component with the
674: spectrum of the CMB due to chance morphological correlation between the CMB and
675: the \hal\ map \citep[see][for details]{DF07}.
676:
677: Since the intensity of both free--free and WIM spinning dust emission scale
678: proportionately with the number density squared (free--free emission is
679: generated by the collision of free electrons with ions while the WIM spinning
680: dust emission comes from collision of ions with tiny dust grains), both should
681: be traced by an emission measure map like the \hal\ map.
682:
683: We have assumed throughout that the dust/gas ratio is constant and the
684: grain size distribution is the same everywhere, so that $I \propto \int
685: n_i n_d dl \propto \int n_i^2$.
686:
687: We have studied both the (nearly) full sky and smaller independent regions of
688: interest including the Gum Nebula, the Oph complex, and the Orion Nebula.
689: For all regions, the \hal-correlated emission is well fit by a linear
690: combination of an $I_{\nu} \propto \nu^{-0.15}$ power law for free--free and a
691: \citet{DL98b} WIM spinning dust model shifted in frequency by a factor of 2 and
692: with only a minimal adjustment in amplitude. Specifically, the spinning
693: dust component is $\sim$ 4-7 times weaker than the free--free component.
694:
695: The null hypothesis that a free--free only spectrum is consistent with the data
696: is ruled out at $\geq 8\sigma$ confidence for all regions considered here,
697: despite the substantial noise in the data. Furthermore, we have shown that
698: the bump in the \hal-correlated emission spectrum is \emph{not} due to chance
699: cross correlation between the \hal\ map and the additional foreground templates
700: presented in \citet{DF07}, indicating that it is indeed correlated primarily
701: with \hal\ emission.
702:
703: \citet{F02} listed a number of criteria by which the existence of
704: spinning dust could be established. Among them were that the peak
705: frequency must shift as a function of the environment in a way at
706: least qualitatively consistent with DL98. In this work we find in the
707: WMAP data a WIM-correlated component with a peak frequency of 50 GHz,
708: about a factor of two higher than the peak frequency of the spinning
709: dust component that is spatially correlated with thermal dust emission (i.e. WNM
710: or CNM spinning dust). That this
711: frequency is higher is in accordance with the DL98 models, strongly
712: supporting the spinning dust hypothesis. However, because the shift
713: is larger than expected, a careful assessment of the situation
714: requires that the reason for the size of the shift be determined. If,
715: for example, the WIM dust has smaller grains, then a correlated
716: measurement of $R_V\equiv A_V/E_{B-V}$ using e.g. background stars
717: would complete the case for spinning dust.
718:
719: In summary, there is clearly an additional foreground component
720: correlated with \hal\ emission and its spectral shape is consistent
721: with spinning dust, though at a somewhat higher frequency than
722: expected. However, the increased sensitivity, frequency coverage, and
723: finer spatial resolution of future missions like \emph{Planck} may provide the
724: necessary evidence.
725:
726: We acknowledge helpful discussions with Bruce Draine, Gary Hinshaw,
727: Joanna Dunkley, et al. Some of the results in this paper were derived
728: using HEALPix\footnote{The HEALPix web page is
729: \texttt{http://healpix.jpl.nasa.gov}} \citep{gorski05}.
730: This research made use of the NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS) and
731: the IDL Astronomy User's Library at Goddard\footnote{Available at
732: \texttt{http://idlastro.gsfc.nasa.gov}}. DPF and GD are supported in
733: part by NASA LTSA grant NAG5-12972.
734:
735: \begin{thebibliography}{}
736:
737: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bennett et al.}{2003}]{bennett03}
738: Bennett C.L. et al., 2003, ApJS, 148, 97
739:
740: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Boughn \& Pober}{2007}]{boughn07}
741: Boughn S. P.\& Pober J. C. 2007, ApJ, 661, 938
742:
743: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Broderick et al.}{2007}]{broderick07}
744: Broderick A.E., Finkbeiner D.P, Afshordi N., \& Dobler G., in preparation
745:
746: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{de Oliveira-Costa et al.}{1997}]{deO97}
747: de Oliveira-Costa A., Kogut A., Devlin M.J., Netterfield C.B., Page L.A., \&
748: Wollack E.J., 1997, ApJ, 482, L17
749:
750: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{de Oliveira-Costa et al.}{1998}]{deO98}
751: de Oliveira-Costa A., Tegmark M., Page L., \& Boughn S., 1998, ApJ, 509, L9
752:
753: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{de Oliveira-Costa et al.}{1999}]{deO99}
754: de Oliveira-Costa A. et al., 1999, ApJ, 527, L9
755:
756: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{de Oliveira-Costa et al.}{2000}]{deO00}
757: % ''Galactic Contamination in the QMAP Experiment''
758: de Oliveira-Costa A. et al., 2000, ApJ, 542, L5
759:
760: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{de Oliveira-Costa et al.}{2002}]{deO02}
761: de Oliveira-Costa A. et al., 2002, ApJ, 567, 363
762:
763: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{de Oliveira-Costa et al.}{2004}]{deO04}
764: de Oliveira-Costa A. et al., 2004, ApJ, 606, L89
765:
766: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dennison et al.}{1998}]{dennison98}
767: Dennison B., Simonetti J.H., \& Topasna G., 1998,
768: Publ. Astron. Soc. Australia, 15, 147
769:
770: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dickinson et al.}{2003}]{dickinson03}
771: % ``Towards a free--free template for CMB foregrounds''
772: Dickinson C., Davies R. D., \& Davis R. J. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 369
773:
774: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dickinson et al.}{2006}]{dickinson06}
775: Dickinson C., Casassus S., Pineda J. L., Pearson T. J.,
776: Readhead A. C. S., \& Davies, R. D. 2006, ApJ, 643, L111
777:
778: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dobler \& Finkbeiner}{2007}]{DF07}
779: Dobler G. \& Finkbeiner D.P, 2007, submitted to ApJ, arXiv:0712.1038
780:
781: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Draine \& Lazarian}{1998a}]{DL98a}
782: Draine B.T. \& Lazarian A., 1998a, ApJ, 494, L19
783:
784: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Draine \& Lazarian}{1998b}]{DL98b}
785: Draine B.T. \& Lazarian A., 1998b, ApJ, 508, 157
786:
787: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Draine \& Lazarian}{1999}]{DL99}
788: Draine B.T. \& Lazarian A., 1999, ApJ, 512, 740
789:
790: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Erickson}{1957}]{erickson57}
791: % ``A Mechanism of Non-Thermal Radio-Noise Origin''
792: Erickson W. C. 1957, \apj, 126, 480
793:
794: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ferrara \& Dettmar}{1994}]{ferrara94}
795: % ``Radio-emitting dust in the free electron layer of spiral galaxies:
796: % Testing the disk/halo interface''
797: Ferrara A., \& Dettmar R. -J. 1994, \apj, 427, 155
798:
799: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Finkbeiner et al.}{2002}]{F02}
800: Finkbeiner D.P., Schlegel D.J, Frank, C., \& Heiles C.,
801: 2002, ApJ, 566, 898
802:
803: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Finkbeiner}{2003}]{finkbeiner03}
804: Finkbeiner D.P., 2003, ApJS, 146, 407
805:
806: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Finkbeiner}{2004}]{finkbeiner04}
807: Finkbeiner D.P., 2004, ApJ, 614, 186
808:
809: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Finkbeiner et al.}{1999}]{finkbeiner99}
810: Finkbeiner D.P., Davis M., \& Schlegel D.J., 1999, ApJ, 524, 867
811:
812: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Finkbeiner, Langston, \& Minter}{2004}]{gb04}
813: % ``Microwave ISM Emission in the Green Bank Galactic Plane
814: % Survey: Evidence for Spinning Dust''
815: Finkbeiner D. P., Langston G. I., \& Minter A. H. 2004, ApJ, 617, 350
816:
817: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gaustad et al.}{2001}]{gaustad01}
818: Gaustad J.E., McCullough P.R., Rosing W., \& Van Buren D., 2001,
819: PASP, 113, 1326
820:
821: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{G\'{o}rski et al.}{2005}]{gorski05}
822: G\'{o}rski K.M. et al., 2005, ApJ, 622, 759
823:
824: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Haslam et al.}{1982}]{haslam82}
825: Haslam C.G.T., Stoffel H., Salter C.J., \& Wilson W.E., 1982, A\&AS, 47, 1
826:
827: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Haffner et al.}{2003}]{haffner03}
828: Haffner L.M., Reynolds R.J., Tufte S.L., Madsen G.J., Jaehnig K.P., \&
829: Percival J.W., 2003, ApJS, 149, 405
830:
831: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hinshaw et al.}{2007}]{hinshaw07}
832: Hinshaw G. et al., 2007, ApJS, 170, 288
833:
834: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hooper et al.}{2007}]{hooper07}
835: Hooper D., Finkbeiner D.P., \& Dobler G., 2007, arXiv:0705.3655
836:
837: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kogut et al.}{1996}]{kogut96}
838: Kogut A. et al., 1996, ApJ, 464, L5
839:
840: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Langston et al.}{2000}]{langston00}
841: % ``The First Galactic Plane Survey at 8.35 and 14.35 GHz''
842: Langston, G., Minter, A., D'Addario, L., Eberhardt, K., Koski, K., \&
843: Zuber, J. 2000, AJ, 119, 2801
844:
845: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Leitch et al.}{1997}]{leitch97}
846: % ``An Anomalous Component of Galactic Emission''
847: Leitch, E. M., Readhead, A. C. S., Pearson, T. J., \& Myers, S. T.
848: 1997, \apj, 486, L23
849:
850: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Page et al.}{2007}]{page07}
851: Page, L. 2007
852:
853: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Scaife et al.}{2007}]{scaife07}
854: Scaife A.M.M et al., 2007, arXiv:0711.3120
855:
856: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Schlegel et al.}{1998}]{schlegel98}
857: Schlegel D.J., Finkbeiner D.P., \& Davis M., 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
858:
859: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Spergel et al.}{2003}]{spergel03}
860: Spergel D.N. et al., 2003, ApJS, 148, 175
861:
862: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Spergel et al.}{2007}]{spergel07}
863: Spergel D.N. et al., 2007, ApJS, 170, 377
864:
865: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Spitzer}{1978}]{spitzer}
866: % ``Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium''
867: Spitzer, L. 1978, \emph{Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium},
868: Wiley, New York
869:
870:
871: \end{thebibliography}
872:
873: \end{document}
874: