1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
3: %%% some locally defined commands %%%
4: \newcommand{\HI}{H~{\sc i}}
5: \newcommand{\HII}{H~{\sc ii}}
6: \newcommand{\kms}{${\rm km~s^{-1}}$}
7: \newcommand{\version}{4.1}
8: % Version 1.2: first NMM-G mods
9: % 2.1: includes comments from LS-S and FJL
10: % 2.2: shortened by 3 (preprint) pages to meet ApJ Letters page limit
11: % 3.1: includes all comments, major changes regarding
12: % interaction velocity at 90 - 100 \kms\, shell accelerated to
13: % 120 \kms\, quantitative deceleration
14: % 4.0: re-worked by Jay, shortened and l-v figure added
15: % 4.1: tidied up and submitted version
16: % 4.2: revised following referee's comments and distributed
17: % for comment
18: % 5.1: revised following author comments, ready to submit
19: \slugcomment{{\em To appear in Astrophysical Journal Letters}}
20: \shortauthors{McCLURE-GRIFFITHS ET AL.}
21: \shorttitle{}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \title{An Interaction of a Magellanic Leading Arm High Velocity Cloud with the Milky
26: Way Disk}
27:
28: \author{N.\ M.\ McClure-Griffiths,\altaffilmark{1} L.\
29: Staveley-Smith,\altaffilmark{2} Felix J.\ Lockman,\altaffilmark{3} M.\
30: R.\ Calabretta,\altaffilmark{1} H.\ Alyson Ford,\altaffilmark{1,4} P.\ M.\
31: W.\ Kalberla,\altaffilmark{5} T. Murphy,\altaffilmark{6,7}
32: H. Nakanishi,\altaffilmark{1,8} D.\ J.\ Pisano\altaffilmark{3} }
33:
34: \altaffiltext{1}{Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO,
35: Marsfield NSW 2122, Australia; naomi.mcclure-griffiths@csiro.au,
36: mark.calabretta@csiro.au}
37:
38: \altaffiltext{2}{School of Physics, University of Western Australia,
39: Crawley WA 6009, Australia; lister.staveley-smith@uwa.edu.au}
40:
41: \altaffiltext{3}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Green
42: Bank, WV 24944; jlockman@nrao.edu, dpisano@nrao.edu}
43:
44: \altaffiltext{4}{Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne
45: University of Technology, Hawthorn VIC 3122, Australia;
46: alyson@astro.swin.edu.au}
47:
48: \altaffiltext{5}{Argelander-Institut f\"ur Astronomie, Universit\"at
49: Bonn, 53121 Bonn, Germany; pkalberla@astro.uni-bonn.de}
50:
51: \altaffiltext{6}{School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006,
52: Australia; tara@physics.usyd.edu.au}
53:
54: \altaffiltext{7}{School of Information Technologies, University of
55: Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia}
56:
57: \altaffiltext{8}{Present address: Faculty of Science, Kagoshima
58: University, Kagoshima 890-0068, Japan; hnakanis@sci.kagoshima-u.ac.jp}
59:
60: %--------------------------------------------
61: \begin{abstract}
62: %-------------------------------------------
63: The Leading Arm of the Magellanic System is a tidally formed \HI\
64: feature extending $\sim 60\arcdeg$ from the Magellanic Clouds ahead
65: of their direction of motion. Using atomic hydrogen (\HI) data from
66: the Galactic All Sky-Survey (GASS), supplemented with data from the
67: Australia Telescope Compact Array, we have found evidence for an
68: interaction between a cloud in the Leading Arm and the Galactic disk
69: where the Leading Arm crosses the Galactic plane. The interaction
70: occurs at velocities permitted by Galactic rotation, which allows us
71: to derive a kinematic distance to the cloud of 21 kpc, suggesting
72: that the Leading Arm crosses the Galactic Plane at a Galactic radius
73: of $R\approx 17$ kpc.
74: \end{abstract}
75:
76: \keywords{galaxies: interactions --- Galaxy: structure --- Magellanic Clouds}
77: %----------------------------------------------------------
78: \section{Introduction}
79: \label{sec:intro}
80: %----------------------------------------------------------
81: The Magellanic System is engaged in a complicated interaction with the
82: Milky Way, which has created a trailing ``Magellanic Stream''
83: \citep{wannier72}, and a tidal ``Leading Arm'' of \HI. The Leading
84: Arm has a metallicity similar to that of the Magellanic Clouds and a
85: consistent velocity structure from its origin in the Clouds at $b
86: \lesssim -25\arcdeg$, through the Galactic equator, to $ b \approx
87: +30\arcdeg$ \citep{mathewson74, putman98, lu98, bruens05}. Model
88: orbits for the Magellanic Clouds \citep{yoshizawa03, connors06} have
89: predicted that the Leading Arm should cross the Milky Way disk some 30
90: - 60 kpc from the Sun, but there are no observational constraints on
91: this distance. New proper motion measurements suggest that the
92: Magellanic Clouds may be moving faster than previously thought,
93: implying a larger crossing distance for the Leading Arm than earlier
94: models \citep{kallivayalil06a,kallivayalil06b}.
95:
96: High velocity cloud HVC 306-2+230, centered at $(l,b,v)=(305\fdg7,\,\,
97: -0\fdg8, \, \, 220$ \kms), is one of the many clouds that make up the
98: Magellanic Leading Arm \citep{mathewson79,bruens05} and is of
99: particular interest because it is one of two that cross the Galactic
100: equator. \citet{bruens05} suggested that this HVC shows evidence of a
101: ram-pressure interaction with the Galactic disk. Using new \HI\ data
102: from the Galactic All-Sky Survey (McClure-Griffiths et al. 2006;
103: McClure-Griffiths et al. 2007, in prep)\nocite{mcgriff06a}, together
104: with high resolution \HI\ data from the Australia Telescope Compact
105: Array (ATCA), we present evidence of interaction between HVC 306-2+230
106: and the disk of the Milky Way (\S \ref{sec:hvcimpact}). We use the
107: interaction to derive a kinematic distance to the Leading Arm where it
108: crosses the Galactic Plane (\S \ref{subsec:dist}). Finally, in \S
109: \ref{sec:orbit} we discuss the implications the distance places on the
110: orbit of the Magellanic Clouds.
111: %----------------------------------------------------------
112: \section{Data}
113: \label{sec:data}
114: %----------------------------------------------------------
115: The \HI\ data discussed here were obtained as part of the Galactic
116: All-Sky Survey (GASS; McClure-Griffiths et al. 2006; McClure-Griffiths
117: et al. 2007, in prep), which used the 21cm multibeam receiver on the
118: Parkes Radio Telescope to map Galactic and Magellanic \HI\ emission
119: over the entire sky south of Declination $\delta=0\arcdeg$. The
120: project will be described in full detail in a separate paper. For the
121: purposes of the current paper, the techniques for data-taking and
122: analysis are the same as in \citet{mcgriff06a}. Since the 2006 paper,
123: the full dataset has been obtained and is used for this analysis, with
124: an angular resolution of 15\arcmin, channel spacing of $0.8$ \kms, and
125: an rms brightness temperature 1-$\sigma$ noise of $\sim 60$ mK.
126:
127: We also make use of high resolution \HI\ data from the Australia
128: Telescope Compact Array (ATCA). We have combined archival data from
129: the Southern Galactic Plane Survey \citep[SGPS;][]{mcgriff05} together
130: with a new 10 hr ATCA observation with the hybrid array configuration,
131: H168. The SGPS data consist of observations obtained with the 375,
132: 750A, B, C, and D array configurations of the ATCA. The
133: multi-pointing ATCA data were jointly imaged using natural weighting,
134: deconvolved, and restored with a synthesised beam of $100\arcsec$, and
135: combined with the low resolution data from GASS for sensitivity to
136: angular scales from $100\arcsec$ to several degrees. The ATCA data
137: are limited to Galactic latitudes $|b|<1.0\arcdeg$ and have an rms
138: brightness temperature 1-$\sigma$ noise of $\sim 1.3$ K.
139:
140: %----------------------------------------------------------
141: \section{Evidence of a High Velocity Cloud Impact with the Galactic Disk}
142: \label{sec:hvcimpact}
143: % ----------------------------------------------------------
144: We have used \HI\ data from GASS to search for any indication of
145: interaction between HVC 306-2+230 and the Milky Way disk. Figure
146: \ref{fig:LA_lb} shows Galactic \HI\ emission at $v_{LSR}=91$ \kms\ and
147: $v_{LSR}=122$ \kms, overlaid with the column density contours of HVC
148: 306-2+230. There is a morphological match between the Galactic \HI\
149: emission and the HVC. At $v_{LSR}=91$ \kms\ the Galactic \HI\ traces
150: the bottom and sides of the HVC, while at $v_{LSR}=122$ \kms\ a ridge
151: of Galactic \HI\ wraps around the head of the cloud. The high
152: resolution data show that the ridge is very thin, only $3 -5$
153: arcminutes, and seems to be cold. Spectra taken through the ridge
154: ($b=1.2\arcdeg)$, the head of the HVC ($b=0.5\arcdeg$) and its tail
155: ($b=-0.2\arcdeg$) are shown in Figure \ref{fig:spec}. All show a
156: strong, broad feature at $v\approx 100$ \kms, but towards the ridge
157: there is an additional narrow feature at $v=122$ \kms. The \HI\
158: linewidth in the ridge is $\Delta v \sim 4$ \kms\ (FWHM), implying a
159: temperature of $T\leq350$ K. There is evidence for the development of
160: the 122 \kms\ feature near the head of the HVC at a latitude of
161: $b=0.5\arcdeg$.
162:
163: The context of the interaction is shown in Figure 3, in a
164: longitude-velocity cut through the data at $b=0.37\arcdeg$, near the tip
165: of the cloud. The \HI\ around 120 \kms, which forms the ridge in
166: Figure 1({\em b}), is seen to be confined to longitudes between HVC
167: 306-2+230 and a second Leading Arm cloud at $l=312\arcdeg$. The data
168: thus suggest that the HVCs are interacting with gas originally at
169: $v_{LSR} \approx 90$ \kms\ to produce the ridge near $v_{LSR}=122$
170: \kms\ around the head of the HVC.
171:
172: HVC 306-2+230 itself shows evidence of interaction. The
173: high-resolution ATCA data of Figure~\ref{fig:LA_sgps} show that it has
174: a very bright, $T_b =15-20$ K, narrow bow-shaped ridge of emission
175: along the head of the cloud with dense clumps along the bent tail.
176: The column density along the bright ridge is N$_{\rm HI}\sim 10^{20}$
177: cm$^{-2}$. Spectra toward the head of the cloud have a two
178: velocity-component structure; one very narrow component of FWHM
179: $\Delta v=4.9 $ \kms\ and a second, broader component of width $\Delta
180: v= 16.9$ \kms. This is consistent with a two-phase structure of the
181: cloud, where one component has $T\leq 600$ K and the other $T\leq
182: 6000$ K. The velocity width of the spectra increases with distance
183: along the tail; spectra at $b=-1.6\arcdeg$ and $b=-2.4\arcdeg$ have
184: FWHM of $\Delta v=21.6$, and $27.8$ \kms, respectively.
185:
186: The structure of the disk emission and the HVC resemble simulations of
187: HVCs impacting the Galactic disk which predict that a moderately dense
188: HVC travelling at $\sim 100$ \kms\ with respect to the disk, will form
189: a hemispherical shell of cool, dense \HI\ ahead of it
190: \citep{tenorio87, comeron92}. The newly formed shell will be
191: accelerated by the interaction. High resolution simulations of HVCs
192: moving through uniform media show that a very thin, bow-shaped
193: structure develops along the leading edge of the cloud
194: \citep{quilis01,konz02,agertz07}, much like the high resolution
195: structure of the HVC shown in Figure \ref{fig:LA_sgps}. HVC disk
196: impact simulations also predict that there should be a layer of hot,
197: ionized gas between the neutral HVC and the neutral disk. Although
198: ionized gas around HVC 306-2+230 would not be detectable in H$\alpha$
199: or soft X-ray emission because of absorption by foreground gas in the
200: Galactic plane, there is a significant offset between the head of the
201: HVC and the Galactic \HI\ at $v_{LSR}= 122$ \kms, which is consistent
202: with the presence of a layer of ionized gas. The separation between
203: the HVC head and \HI\ ridge in the high resolution ATCA data is $\sim
204: 0.6\arcdeg$, or $\sim 200$ pc at $d=21$ kpc. The agreement between
205: the observations and simulations of HVC cloud impacts is additional
206: evidence that HVC 306-2+230 is interacting with the Milky Way disk.
207: %----------------------------------------------------------
208: \subsection{Distance to the HVC}
209: \label{subsec:dist}
210: %----------------------------------------------------------
211: The data presented here suggest that the HVC interacts with gas
212: initially at $v_{LSR} \approx 90$ \kms, which implies that the
213: interaction takes place well into the outer Galaxy. We can use the
214: velocity of the interaction region to estimate a kinematic distance to
215: the HVC. Because the HVCs are at a more positive velocity than disk
216: gas, any transfer of momentum from the HVC to the disk will result in
217: a more positive velocity for the disk gas, erroneously increasing the
218: kinematic distance. Our distance estimates are thus upper limits.
219: Assuming a flat rotation curve, where $\Theta(R)=\Theta_0=220$ \kms\
220: and a Sun-Galactic Center distance of $R_0=8.5$ kpc, we estimate that
221: the emission is at a Galactocentric radius of $R\approx17$ kpc and a
222: heliocentric distance of $d\approx 21$ kpc. Use of a different
223: rotation curve or Sun-center distance (e.g., 8.0 kpc) changes these
224: values by no more than 20\%.
225:
226: That we observe neutral gas with which the HVC is interacting also
227: provides an upper limit to the distance by placing it within the
228: detectable \HI\ disk of the Galaxy. Although the exact extent of the
229: Galactic \HI\ disk is uncertain, estimates are that by 50 kpc radius
230: the \HI\ surface density is less than $10^{-2}~{\rm
231: M_{\odot}~pc^{-2}}$ \citep{knapp78} and the majority of the \HI\ is
232: within 30 kpc \citep{nakanishi03,levine06b}. The ridge of \HI\ at 120
233: \kms, if interpreted as material swept-up by the HVC, can give some
234: information on the environment the HVC is encountering. The ridge has
235: $N_{\rm HI} = 7- 10 \times 10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$ so if its line-of-sight
236: extent is similar to its transverse extent ($\approx 60\arcmin$) then
237: the column density in the $z$-direction ($< 15\arcmin$, perpendicular
238: to the motion of the HVC) is independent of distance and simply the
239: observed N$_{\rm HI}$ scaled by the ratio of widths, $15/60$. Given
240: the maximum vertical extent of the ridge, the column density
241: perpendicular to the line of sight is $N_H< 2 - 4 \times 10^{19}$
242: cm$^{-2}$, equivalent to $1-3 \times 10^{-1}~{\rm M_{\odot}~pc^{-2}}$.
243: This is an incomplete accounting of the disk gas the HVC would
244: encounter, neglecting inhomogeneities in the medium and the mass of
245: ionized and molecular material, but nonetheless indicates that
246: the upper limit on the HVC distance is $R<30$ kpc.
247:
248: %----------------------------------------------------------
249: \subsection{HVC Drag Interaction}
250: %----------------------------------------------------------
251: Figure~\ref{fig:LA_bv} is a latitude-velocity slice taken at
252: $l=305.6\arcdeg$ through the center of HVC 306-2+230. The cloud shows a
253: velocity gradient of about -30 \kms\ between $b=-4.4\arcdeg$, where
254: the central velocity is $v_{LSR}\approx252$ \kms, and $b=-1.5\arcdeg$,
255: where $v_{LSR}\approx223$ \kms. The gradient is large and in the
256: wrong sense to arise from either the projection effects of the Sun's
257: motion or the upward (toward positive latitudes) motion of the HVC as
258: implied by its head-tail morphology and the expected trajectory of the
259: Leading Arm. The gradient must be intrinsic to the HVC, and may arise
260: from a deceleration as the HVC goes through the disk of the Milky Way.
261: \citet{benjamin97} showed that drag forces should slow a cloud as it
262: nears the Galactic plane. We cannot measure the $z$ velocity of the
263: HVC, but we can estimate the change in velocity with height if the
264: cloud were falling at the terminal velocity; given in equation 2 of
265: \citet{benjamin97}. For a cloud of column density $\sim
266: 2\times10^{19}~{\rm cm^{-2}}$, approaching a Gaussian disk with a
267: midplane density $n=0.04~{\rm cm^{-3}}$ and a scale height of 1 kpc,
268: the difference in terminal velocity between $z=1400$ pc and $z=200$ pc
269: is $\sim 30$ \kms, which matches the observed velocity variation along
270: the length of the cloud. This adds further support to the evidence
271: that the HVC is interacting with the Galactic disk; at very large
272: Galactic radii there would be insufficient gas to cause significant
273: drag.
274:
275: %--------------------------------
276: \section{Discussion of the Magellanic Orbits}
277: \label{sec:orbit}
278: %--------------------------------
279: Many simulations of the Magellanic System have attributed the origin
280: of the Leading Arm to a close pass between the SMC and the Milky Way
281: which stripped gas from the SMC that was eventually pulled into a
282: leading tidal feature \citep[e.g.][]{connors06,yoshizawa03}.
283: Alternative theories give the Leading Arm an LMC origin
284: \citep[e.g.][]{mastropietro05}. All of these simulations, however,
285: rely on a past close encounter between the Magellanic Clouds and the
286: Milky Way. From this encounter the \citet{connors06} and
287: \citet{yoshizawa03} simulations have predicted that the Leading Arm
288: crosses the Galactic plane at a distance of $30 - 60$ kpc from the
289: Sun. Our newly derived distance of 21 kpc is smaller than the lower
290: limit of these predictions.
291:
292: These models do not take into account recently revised measurements of
293: the proper motions of the LMC and SMC, which have shown that the
294: Magellanic Clouds have much higher tangential velocities than previous
295: thought \citep{vandermarel02,kallivayalil06a}. Re-calculation of the
296: LMC orbit based on these proper motions and new mass models for the
297: Milky Way suggest that the LMC may be on its first pass and currently
298: at perigalacticon \citep{besla07}. If true, and the SMC has a similar
299: orbit, this would have profound implications on the formation models
300: for the Leading Arm. Rather than relying on close past interactions
301: with the Milky Way to strip LMC/SMC gas, these orbits would require an
302: alternative method of extracting gas from the galaxies, such as the
303: blowout model suggested by \citet{nidever07}.
304:
305: \citet{besla07} do not predict the future orbit of the LMC, but we can
306: make a very simple estimate of where the LMC will cross the Galactic
307: plane by extrapolating from the current position, assuming a constant
308: LMC space velocity and neglecting Milky Way gravity. In a Cartesian
309: system centred on the Galactic center where the LMC is at
310: $(x_0,y_0,z_0)=(-1,-41,-27)~{\rm kpc}$, with a velocity vector
311: $(v_x,v_y,v_z)=(-86,-268,+252)$ \kms\ \citep{kallivayalil06a},
312: assuming that the time to reach the Galactic plane is $t=-z_0/v_z$,
313: its position at $t$ will be $(-10,-70,0)$ kpc or $R \sim 71$
314: kpc. Because we have excluded the gravitational effect of the Milky
315: Way this estimate will be an upper limit. Finally, it has been shown
316: that tidal features can deviate significantly from the orbits of their
317: parent satellites \citep{connors06,choi07}, which may also help
318: reconcile the new proper motions with our Leading Arm crossing
319: distance.
320: % ---------------------------------------------
321: \section{Summary}
322: \label{sec:summary}
323: %---------------------------------------------
324: We have found evidence for an interaction between one of the Leading
325: Arm High Velocity Clouds, HVC 306-2+230, and the Milky Way disk. As
326: the Leading Arm crosses the Galactic equator it produces a ridge of
327: \HI\ at a velocity of $v_{LSR}=122$ \kms. Further evidence for the
328: interaction is given by the head-tail structure of the HVC itself, its
329: varying velocity width, the deceleration of the cloud head, and the
330: agreement between simulations of HVC impacts and the morphology of the
331: HVC and the disk gas. As a rare example of an HVC caught interacting
332: with the disk, HVC 306-2+230 offers a unique opportunity to compare in
333: detail observations with simulations of HVC impacts; this will be the
334: topic of a future paper. The interaction with \HI\ at Galactic
335: velocities has allowed us to estimate a kinematic distance to the
336: Leading Arm of $d\approx21$ kpc from the Sun or a Galactocentric
337: radius of $R\approx17$ kpc, with an upper limit of $R<30$ kpc. This
338: distance is close to that predicted by the \citet{connors06} and
339: \citet{yoshizawa03} models of the Magellanic system, and smaller than
340: might be expected from the \citet{kallivayalil06a} LMC proper motion
341: measurements. Our new Leading Arm distance will provide an important
342: constraint to future models of the Magellanic System as they take into
343: account revised LMC and SMC proper motions.
344:
345: %--------------------------------------------
346: \acknowledgements The Parkes Radio Telescope and the Australia
347: Telescope Compact Array are part of the Australia Telescope which is
348: funded by the Commonwealth of Australia for operation as a National
349: Facility managed by CSIRO. We are grateful to P.\ Edwards for
350: the allocation of Director's Time at the ATCA to image this HVC and to
351: an anonymous referee for helpful comments.
352:
353:
354:
355: %--------------------------------------------
356: %Bibliography
357: %--------------------------------------------
358: \bibliographystyle{apj}
359: \begin{thebibliography}{26}
360: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
361:
362: \bibitem[{{Agertz} {et~al.}(2007){Agertz}, {Moore}, {Stadel}, {Potter},
363: {Miniati}, {Read}, {Mayer}, {Gawryszczak}, {Kravtsov}, {Nordlund}, {Pearce},
364: {Quilis}, {Rudd}, {Springel}, {Stone}, {Tasker}, {Teyssier}, {Wadsley}, \&
365: {Walder}}]{agertz07}
366: {Agertz}, O., {Moore}, B., {Stadel}, J., {Potter}, D., {Miniati}, F., {Read},
367: J., {Mayer}, L., {Gawryszczak}, A., {Kravtsov}, A., {Nordlund}, {\AA}.,
368: {Pearce}, F., {Quilis}, V., {Rudd}, D., {Springel}, V., {Stone}, J.,
369: {Tasker}, E., {Teyssier}, R., {Wadsley}, J., \& {Walder}, R. 2007, \mnras,
370: 380, 963
371:
372: \bibitem[{{Benjamin} \& {Danly}(1997)}]{benjamin97}
373: {Benjamin}, R.~A. \& {Danly}, L. 1997, \apj, 481, 764
374:
375: \bibitem[{{Besla} {et~al.}(2007){Besla}, {Kallivayalil}, {Hernquist},
376: {Robertson}, {Cox}, {van der Marel}, \& {Alcock}}]{besla07}
377: {Besla}, G., {Kallivayalil}, N., {Hernquist}, L., {Robertson}, B., {Cox},
378: T.~J., {van der Marel}, R.~P., \& {Alcock}, C. 2007, \apj, 668, 949
379:
380: \bibitem[{{Br{\"u}ns} {et~al.}(2005){Br{\"u}ns}, {Kerp}, {Staveley-Smith},
381: {Mebold}, {Putman}, {Haynes}, {Kalberla}, {Muller}, \&
382: {Filipovic}}]{bruens05}
383: {Br{\"u}ns}, C., {Kerp}, J., {Staveley-Smith}, L., {Mebold}, U., {Putman},
384: M.~E., {Haynes}, R.~F., {Kalberla}, P. M.~W., {Muller}, E., \& {Filipovic},
385: M.~D. 2005, \aap, 432, 45
386:
387: \bibitem[{{Choi} {et~al.}(2007){Choi}, {Weinberg}, \& {Katz}}]{choi07}
388: {Choi}, J.-H., {Weinberg}, M.~D., \& {Katz}, N. 2007, \mnras, 381, 987
389:
390: \bibitem[{{Comeron} \& {Torra}(1992)}]{comeron92}
391: {Comeron}, F. \& {Torra}, J. 1992, \aap, 261, 94
392:
393: \bibitem[{{Connors} {et~al.}(2006){Connors}, {Kawata}, \& {Gibson}}]{connors06}
394: {Connors}, T.~W., {Kawata}, D., \& {Gibson}, B.~K. 2006, \mnras, 371, 108
395:
396: \bibitem[{{Kallivayalil} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{a}}){Kallivayalil}, {van der
397: Marel}, \& {Alcock}}]{kallivayalil06b}
398: {Kallivayalil}, N., {van der Marel}, R.~P., \& {Alcock}, C. 2006{\natexlab{a}},
399: \apj, 652, 1213
400:
401: \bibitem[{{Kallivayalil} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{b}}){Kallivayalil}, {van der
402: Marel}, {Alcock}, {Axelrod}, {Cook}, {Drake}, \& {Geha}}]{kallivayalil06a}
403: {Kallivayalil}, N., {van der Marel}, R.~P., {Alcock}, C., {Axelrod}, T.,
404: {Cook}, K.~H., {Drake}, A.~J., \& {Geha}, M. 2006{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 638,
405: 772
406:
407: \bibitem[{{Knapp} {et~al.}(1978){Knapp}, {Tremaine}, \& {Gunn}}]{knapp78}
408: {Knapp}, G.~R., {Tremaine}, S.~D., \& {Gunn}, J.~E. 1978, \aj, 83, 1585
409:
410: \bibitem[{{Konz} {et~al.}(2002){Konz}, {Br{\"u}ns}, \& {Birk}}]{konz02}
411: {Konz}, C., {Br{\"u}ns}, C., \& {Birk}, G.~T. 2002, \aap, 391, 713
412:
413: \bibitem[{{Levine} {et~al.}(2006){Levine}, {Blitz}, \& {Heiles}}]{levine06b}
414: {Levine}, E.~S., {Blitz}, L., \& {Heiles}, C. 2006, Science, 312, 1773
415:
416: \bibitem[{{Lu} {et~al.}(1998){Lu}, {Sargent}, {Savage}, {Wakker}, {Sembach}, \&
417: {Oosterloo}}]{lu98}
418: {Lu}, L., {Sargent}, W. L.~W., {Savage}, B.~D., {Wakker}, B.~P., {Sembach},
419: K.~R., \& {Oosterloo}, T.~A. 1998, \aj, 115, 162
420:
421: \bibitem[{{Mastropietro} {et~al.}(2005){Mastropietro}, {Moore}, {Mayer},
422: {Wadsley}, \& {Stadel}}]{mastropietro05}
423: {Mastropietro}, C., {Moore}, B., {Mayer}, L., {Wadsley}, J., \& {Stadel}, J.
424: 2005, \mnras, 363, 509
425:
426: \bibitem[{{Mathewson} {et~al.}(1974){Mathewson}, {Cleary}, \&
427: {Murray}}]{mathewson74}
428: {Mathewson}, D.~S., {Cleary}, M.~N., \& {Murray}, J.~D. 1974, \apj, 190, 291
429:
430: \bibitem[{{Mathewson} {et~al.}(1979){Mathewson}, {Ford}, {Schwarz}, \&
431: {Murray}}]{mathewson79}
432: {Mathewson}, D.~S., {Ford}, V.~L., {Schwarz}, M.~P., \& {Murray}, J.~D. 1979,
433: in IAU Symposium, Vol.~84, The Large-Scale Characteristics of the Galaxy, ed.
434: W.~B. {Burton}, 547--556
435:
436: \bibitem[{{McClure-Griffiths} {et~al.}(2005){McClure-Griffiths}, {Dickey},
437: {Gaensler}, {Green}, Haverkorn, \& Strasser}]{mcgriff05}
438: {McClure-Griffiths}, N.~M., {Dickey}, J.~M., {Gaensler}, B.~M., {Green}, A.~J.,
439: Haverkorn, M., \& Strasser, S. 2005, \apjs, 158, 178
440:
441: \bibitem[{{McClure-Griffiths} {et~al.}(2006){McClure-Griffiths}, Ford, Pisano,
442: Gibson, Staveley-Smith, Calabretta, Kalberla, \& Dedes}]{mcgriff06a}
443: {McClure-Griffiths}, N.~M., Ford, A., Pisano, D.~J., Gibson, B.~K.,
444: Staveley-Smith, L., Calabretta, M.~R., Kalberla, P. M.~W., \& Dedes, L. 2006,
445: \apj, 638, 196
446:
447: \bibitem[{{Nakanishi} \& {Sofue}(2003)}]{nakanishi03}
448: {Nakanishi}, H. \& {Sofue}, Y. 2003, \pasj, 55, 191
449:
450: \bibitem[{{Nidever} {et~al.}(2007){Nidever}, {Majewski}, \& {Butler
451: Burton}}]{nidever07}
452: {Nidever}, D.~L., {Majewski}, S.~R., \& {Butler Burton}, W. 2007, ArXiv
453: e-prints, 706
454:
455: \bibitem[{{Putman} {et~al.}(1998){Putman}, {Gibson}, {Staveley-Smith}, {Banks},
456: {Barnes}, {Bhatal}, {Disney}, {Ekers}, {Freeman}, {Haynes}, {Henning},
457: {Jerjen}, {Kilborn}, {Koribalski}, {Knezek}, {Malin}, {Mould}, {Oosterloo},
458: {Price}, {Ryder}, {Sadler}, {Stewart}, {Stootman}, {Vaile}, {Webster}, \&
459: {Wright}}]{putman98}
460: {Putman}, M.~E., {Gibson}, B.~K., {Staveley-Smith}, L., {Banks}, G., {Barnes},
461: D.~G., {Bhatal}, R., {Disney}, M.~J., {Ekers}, R.~D., {Freeman}, K.~C.,
462: {Haynes}, R.~F., {Henning}, P., {Jerjen}, H., {Kilborn}, V., {Koribalski},
463: B., {Knezek}, P., {Malin}, D.~F., {Mould}, J.~R., {Oosterloo}, T., {Price},
464: R.~M., {Ryder}, S.~D., {Sadler}, E.~M., {Stewart}, I., {Stootman}, F.,
465: {Vaile}, R.~A., {Webster}, R.~L., \& {Wright}, A.~E. 1998, \nat, 394, 752
466:
467: \bibitem[{{Quilis} \& {Moore}(2001)}]{quilis01}
468: {Quilis}, V. \& {Moore}, B. 2001, \apjl, 555, L95
469:
470: \bibitem[{{Tenorio-Tagle} {et~al.}(1987){Tenorio-Tagle}, {Franco},
471: {Bodenheimer}, \& {Rozyczka}}]{tenorio87}
472: {Tenorio-Tagle}, G., {Franco}, J., {Bodenheimer}, P., \& {Rozyczka}, M. 1987,
473: \aap, 179, 219
474:
475: \bibitem[{{van der Marel} {et~al.}(2002){van der Marel}, {Alves}, {Hardy}, \&
476: {Suntzeff}}]{vandermarel02}
477: {van der Marel}, R.~P., {Alves}, D.~R., {Hardy}, E., \& {Suntzeff}, N.~B. 2002,
478: \aj, 124, 2639
479:
480: \bibitem[{{Wannier} \& {Wrixon}(1972)}]{wannier72}
481: {Wannier}, P. \& {Wrixon}, G.~T. 1972, \apjl, 173, L119
482:
483: \bibitem[{{Yoshizawa} \& {Noguchi}(2003)}]{yoshizawa03}
484: {Yoshizawa}, A.~M. \& {Noguchi}, M. 2003, \mnras, 339, 1135
485:
486: \end{thebibliography}
487: %\bibliography{references} %~mcg/tex/references.bib, bibtex file
488:
489: %---------------------------------------------
490: % Figures
491: %---------------------------------------------
492: \clearpage
493: \begin{figure}
494:
495: \centering
496: \includegraphics[width=6.5in]{f1_a.eps}
497: \caption[]{ \HI\ emission from the Galactic disk (greyscale) overlaid with
498: column density, $N_H$, contours of HVC 306-2+230 showing evidence for the interaction between the HVC and the Galactic disk. ({\em a}) \HI\
499: emission at $v=91$ \kms\ and ({\em b}) $v=122$ \kms. The HVC
500: includes all emission over the velocity range
501: $200 - 324$ \kms\ and contours are displayed from $2-14\times10^{19}~{\rm cm^{-2}}$ in intervals of $2\times10^{19}~{\rm cm^{-2}}$. The greyscales are linear with the ranges shown in the wedges at the right of each panel.
502: \label{fig:LA_lb}}
503: \end{figure}
504:
505: \begin{figure}
506: \centering
507: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=4in]{f2.eps}
508: \caption[]{\HI\ spectra at $l=305.8\arcdeg$ towards $b=-0.2\arcdeg$ (solid line),
509: $b=0.5\arcdeg$ (dashed line), and $b=1.2\arcdeg$ (dotted line),
510: through the HVC tail, the HVC head and the ridge off the dense end
511: of the HVC, respectively. All
512: spectra show a peak at $v_{LSR}\sim 100$ \kms, but the spectra
513: towards the cap and the head of the HVC show an additional feature
514: near $v_{LSR}\sim 120$ \kms, which seems to have a spatial
515: correlation with the HVC and which we interpret as arising from Galactic
516: disk gass swept up by the HVC.
517: \label{fig:spec}}
518: \end{figure}
519:
520: \begin{figure}
521: \centering
522: \includegraphics[height=4in]{f3_a.eps}
523: \caption[]{Longitude-velocity ($l$,$v$) display of the GASS \HI\
524: data showing the ridge of disk \HI\ at $V_{LSR} \approx 120$ km
525: s$^{-1}$ coincident with HVC 306-2+230. This longitude cut was
526: taken through the head of the HVC at $b=0.37\arcdeg$. The ridge is localized between HVC 306-2+230 and another Leading Arm cloud, HVC
527: 312+1+180. The
528: greyscale is linear between -0.2 and 10 K.
529: \label{fig:vellong}}
530: \end{figure}
531:
532: \begin{figure}
533: \centering
534: \includegraphics[height=3.5in]{f4_a.eps}
535: \caption[]{High resolution \HI\ image of HVC 306-2+230. The image is
536: of \HI\ peak brightness temperature in the velocity range 175 - 300
537: \kms, which covers the HVC only. The greyscale is linear between 2 and 20 K. The image has an angular
538: resolution of 100\arcsec\ and a rms brightness temperature
539: noise of $\sim 1.3$ K. The cloud shows a very narrow ridge of
540: emission around the head of the cloud, consistent with a
541: bow-shock morphology.
542: \label{fig:LA_sgps}}
543: \end{figure}
544:
545: \begin{figure}
546: \centering
547: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f5_a.eps}
548: \caption[]{Latitude-velocity image of \HI\ emission at $l=306\arcdeg$
549: showing the velocity of HVC 306-2+230 changing from 223 \kms\ at
550: $b=-1.5\arcdeg$ to 252 \kms\ at $b=-4.4\arcdeg$. The
551: greyscale has a power law scaling of $-0.5$ and goes between $0-2$
552: K. \HI\ emission brighter than 5 K is displayed only in contours.
553: We interpret the velocity gradient in the HVC as arising from drag caused by
554: its encounter with the Galactic disk.
555: \label{fig:LA_bv}}
556: \end{figure}
557:
558: \end{document}
559:
560:
561:
562:
563:
564:
565: