1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex} %%Dec 11, Nov 21, 2007
2: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
5: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
6: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
7: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
8: %% use the longabstract style option.
9: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
10:
11: %%%%% AUTHORS - PLACE YOUR OWN MACROS HERE %%%%%
12: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
13: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
14: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
15: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
16: \newcommand{\ud}{\mathrm{d}}
17: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
18: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
19: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
20: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
21: %% for information.
22:
23: %\slugcomment{Last updated: \today}
24: \shorttitle{Galaxy Orbits for Galaxy Clusters} % in SDSS and 2dFGRS}
25: \shortauthors{Hwang \& Lee}
26:
27: \begin{document}
28:
29: \title{Galaxy Orbits for Galaxy Clusters in Sloan Digital Sky
30: Survey and 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey}
31:
32: \author{Ho Seong Hwang\altaffilmark{1,2} and Myung Gyoon Lee\altaffilmark{1}}
33: \altaffiltext{1}{Astronomy Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy,
34: Seoul National University, 56-1 Sillim 9-dong, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Korea}
35: \altaffiltext{2}{School of Physics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul 130-722, Korea}
36: \email{hshwang@kias.re.kr, mglee@astro.snu.ac.kr}
37:
38: \begin{abstract}
39: We present the results of a study for galaxy orbits in galaxy
40: clusters using a spectroscopic sample of galaxies in Sloan Digital
41: Sky Survey (SDSS) and 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS).
42: We have determined the member galaxies of Abell clusters covered
43: by these surveys using the galaxies' redshift and positional data.
44: We have selected 10 clusters using three criteria:
45: the number of member galaxies is greater than or equal to 40,
46: the spatial coverage is complete, and
47: X-ray mass profile is available in the literature.
48: We derive the radial profile of the galaxy number density and
49: velocity dispersion using all, early-type, and late-type galaxies
50: for each cluster.
51: We have investigated the galaxy orbits for our sample clusters with
52: constant and variable velocity anisotropies over the clustercentric
53: distance using Jeans equation.
54: Using all member galaxies,
55: the galaxy orbits are found to be isotropic within the uncertainty for most of sample clusters,
56: although it is difficult to conclude strongly for some clusters
57: due the large errors and the variation as a function of the clustercentric distance
58: in the calculated velocity anisotropies.
59: We investigated the orbital difference between early-type and late-type galaxies
60: for four sample clusters,
61: and found no significant difference between them.
62: % and are different depending on clusters.
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
66: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
67: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
68: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
69:
70: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: general -- galaxies: clusters:
71: individual (A85, A779, A1650, A1651, A1795, A1800, A2034, A2199,
72: A2670, and A2734) -- galaxies: kinematics and dynamics}
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75:
76: The mass estimate of a galaxy cluster, the largest gravitationally bounded system in the universe,
77: was given for the first time by \citet{zwi33},
78: which showed an indication of the existence of dark matter.
79: In general, the cluster mass
80: ranges from $10^{13}M_\odot$ for small groups to $10^{15} M_\odot$ for rich clusters,
81: which is in the form of galaxies ($1-2\%$ of the total mass, e.g., \citealt{lin03}),
82: hot X-ray emitting gas ($5-15\%$, e.g., \citealt{vik06}),
83: %Remaining mass in galaxy clusters is in the form of
84: dark matter ($80-90\%$) that affects the galaxy cluster through the gravitation only.
85:
86: To determine the amount and distribution of underlying dark matter in clusters,
87: Jeans analysis using the positional and velocity data of cluster galaxies
88: has been usually adopted among several mass estimation methods \citep{kbm04,biv06}.
89: However, previous studies had to assume the galaxy orbit in prior to derive
90: the mass profile of galaxy clusters, due to the `mass-orbit'
91: degeneracy in the velocity dispersion profile (VDP) (e.g., \citealt{mer87}).
92: This degeneracy can be broken
93: by an orbit analysis with an independent mass determination
94: based on X-ray or lensing studies,
95: or by an analysis of higher order moments of velocity distribution :
96: velocity dispersion and kurtosis (e.g., \citealt{lm03,lok06}),
97: Gauss-Hermite moments (e.g., \citealt{van00,kbm04}).
98:
99: The analysis of galaxy orbits for clusters was made for the
100: Coma cluster for the first time by \citet{kg82} who used about 300 galaxy velocities.
101: They showed that the galaxy orbits in Coma can not be primarily
102: radial, and a significant fraction of kinetic energy must be in
103: tangential direction even at large radii.
104: With an aid of large redshift surveys for cluster galaxies such as
105: Canadian Network for Observational Cosmology (CNOC; \citealt{yee96}),
106: ESO Nearby Abell Cluster Survey (ENACS; \citealt{kat96}), and
107: Cluster and Infall Region Nearby Survey (CAIRNS; \citealt{rines03}),
108: extensive analysis for galaxy orbits in clusters has been performed.
109: \citet{car97a,car97b} analyzed 14 CNOC clusters at $z=0.17-0.54$,
110: and found that the galaxy orbits are isotropic or modest radial.
111: \citet{van00}, using the same CNOC data, concluded that their
112: best-fit model is close to isotropic. \citet{rines03} secured
113: 15,000 galaxies in CAIRNS data, and concluded that the galaxy
114: orbits in their ensemble cluster are also consistent with being isotropic.
115:
116: On the other hand, the difference in galaxy orbits and in galaxy
117: velocity dispersions among galaxy types provide important clues to
118: understand the formation history of the cluster \citep{bk04,goto05}.
119: \citet{biv97} studied kinematic difference
120: between emission-line galaxies (ELGs) and non-ELGs using ENACS data,
121: and found that the VDP of ELGs is consistent with being radial,
122: while that of non-ELGs is not.
123: \citet{abm98}, based on simple modelling of observed VDP for about 2000 galaxies
124: in 40 regular clusters, reported that the orbits of ellipticals are
125: mostly tangential in the cluster core and are nearly isotropic outside,
126: while those of spirals are predominantly radial.
127: \citet{mah99} analyzed a sample of 20 galaxy groups from Center
128: for Astrophysics redshift survey.
129: They found that star-forming galaxies or ELGs have moderately radial orbits,
130: while old or absorption-line galaxies isotropic orbits within the errors.
131: Recently, \citet{bk04}, using the ENACS data,
132: studied the galaxy orbits of all galaxy classes
133: (the brightest ellipticals, other ellipticals together with S0,
134: early-type spirals, late-type spirals, and irregulars) for the first time.
135: They reported that
136: the brightest ellipticals do not yield equilibrium solution,
137: other ellipticals together with S0 have isotropic orbits as given in \citet{kbm04},
138: and early spirals are consistent with isotropic orbits,
139: while late spirals prefer radial orbits to isotropic orbits.
140: In contrast, \citet{rd98}, using nearby ($z<0.055$) Abell clusters,
141: concluded that the orbits of elliptical galaxies in clusters are close to radial,
142: while those of spirals more tangential or isotropic.
143: For nine intermediate ($z\sim0.1-0.4$) CNOC cluster,
144: \citet{rds00} obtained similar results to those of \citet{rd98}:
145: bulge-dominated galaxies have more eccentric orbits than disk-dominated galaxies do.
146: The cause for the different results of Ram{\'{\i}}rez et al. compared with other studies is discussed
147: in detail in \citet{van00} and \citet{biv02}.
148:
149: Above results of galaxy orbits are based on a composite
150: clusters prepared by combining data for disparate clusters that might have different formation histories.
151: Although it is helpful to make the composite cluster in order to overcome problems of
152: 1) a limited number of measured galaxy velocities per cluster and 2) an application of spherical Jeans
153: equation to an asymmetric cluster, the composite cluster might be significantly different from any real cluster.
154: In addition, previous studies were not based on the independent measurements
155: of cluster mass profiles, but based on the optical galaxy data.
156: These problems can be overcome. \citet{nk96} demonstrated the galaxy orbits can be constrained
157: using an independently determined mass profile. For A2218, they
158: used mass estimates derived by combining strong and weak lensing effects,
159: and found evidence for an anisotropic core.
160: Later, \citet{ben06} extended the study of galaxy orbits to five clusters
161: using mass estimates from X-ray data.
162: They reported that the galaxies in five clusters have diverse orbits,
163: and the orbital profiles in observed and simulated clusters appear to be different:
164: simulated clusters show preferentially tangential orbits.
165: However, they did not divide the galaxy sample into different types
166: to investigate the orbital properties of different galaxy types.
167:
168: Recently, galaxy redshift surveys such as the Sloan Digital
169: Sky Survey (SDSS; \citealt{york00}) and the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey
170: (2dFGRS; \citealt{col01}) have provided redshift data for large samples of
171: galaxies. In addition, X-ray mass profiles for numerous clusters
172: become available \citep{rb02,san03,dem03,bm06,vik06,vf06}.
173: By identifying member galaxies in clusters using these redshift and positional data
174: and adopting X-ray mass profiles,
175: we can investigate the galaxy orbits in clusters for a large sample of galaxy clusters
176: without making the composite cluster.
177: We can also investigate the orbital properties for different galaxy types.
178:
179: In this paper, we present the results of a study for the orbits of galaxies in galaxy clusters,
180: using a spectroscopic sample of galaxies in SDSS and 2dFGRS and X-ray mass profiles in the literature.
181: Section \ref{data} describes the sample of galaxies and clusters used in this study.
182: Radial profiles of galaxy number density and velocity dispersion are derived in \S \ref{property}.
183: Analysis of the galaxy orbits and global kinematics are given in \S \ref{result} and \S \ref{global}, respectively.
184: %A detailed property of individual cluster is represented in Appendix A.
185: Discussion and summary are given in \S \ref{discuss} and \S \ref{sum}, respectively.
186: Throughout, we adopt
187: cosmological parameters $h=0.7$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$, and
188: $\Omega_{M}=0.3$.
189:
190: \section{Data}\label{data}
191: \subsection {Galaxy Sample}\label{gal}
192: We used data from the spectroscopic sample of galaxies in the
193: Legacy survey of SDSS Sixth Data Release\footnote{Access to Data
194: Release 6 can be found on the SDSS Web site
195: (http://www.sdss.org/dr6).} \citep{str07},
196: and in the 2dFGRS Final Data Release \citep{col01}.
197: SDSS is one of the largest imaging and spectroscopic survey, which covers more
198: than a quarter of the sky \citep{york00} using a dedicated,
199: 2.5-meter telescope \citep{gunn06} at Apache Point Observatory,
200: New Mexico. The telescope is equipped with
201: a wide-field drift-scanning mosaic CCD camera
202: that can image 1.5 deg$^2$ of sky at a time for imaging survey \citep{gunn98}, and
203: a pair of fiber-fed spectrographs
204: that can measure spectra more than 600 objects in a single observation
205: with 3$^\circ$ field of view \citep{uom99,cas01,bla03}.
206: Extensive description of SDSS data products is given by
207: \citet{york00} and \citet{sto02}, and we only give a brief summary
208: of the SDSS data. The imaging survey is carried out with five
209: broad bands ({\it ugriz})
210: centered at 3551, 4686, 6166, 7480, and 8932 \AA ~\citep{fuk96}.
211: The magnitude limits of five bands for point sources
212: are 22.0, 22.2, 22.2, 21.3, and 20.5, respectively.
213: The calibration of data products from imaging survey
214: is given by several authors: data reduction and photometry \citep{lup02},
215: photometric calibration \citep{hogg01,smi02,ive04,tuc06}, and
216: astrometric calibration \citep{pier03}. The spectroscopic survey
217: obtains spectra covering 3800$-$9200 \AA, with a wavelength
218: resolution, $\lambda /\delta \lambda\sim$ 1800.
219: There are three kinds of spectroscopic targets: main galaxy sample,
220: luminous red galaxies (LRG), and quasar.
221: The main galaxy sample consists of the galaxies
222: with $r$-band Petrosian magnitude $r_{\rm pet}\le17.77$, which are corrected
223: for Galactic foreground reddening using \citet{sfd98}.
224: The galaxies with $r$-band Petrosian half-light surface brightness $\mu_{50}>24.5$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$
225: are rejected; the number ratio of rejected galaxies to all galaxies is only $\sim1\%$.
226: In addition, the galaxies with 3$\arcsec$ fiber magnitudes
227: brighter than
228: 15 magnitude in $g$ or $r$, or brighter than 14.5 magnitude in $i$ are rejected
229: to avoid the problems of saturation and cross-talk in the spectrographs.
230: A detailed description for main galaxy sample is presented in \citet{str02}.
231: %LRGs are selected by their color and magnitude,
232: % to be a roughly volume limited sample at $z\leq0.4$ and a flux limited sample at $z>0.4$ \citep{eis01}.
233: %Quasars are selected by their color and by radio detection in the
234: %FIRST survey catalog,
235: % and detailed description is given by \citet{ric01}.
236:
237: %Data Release 6 of SDSS Legacy survey contains five-band ({\it ugriz}) photometric
238: %data for 300 million objects over 8500 deg$^2$ and optical spectroscopic
239: %data for 1 million galaxies, quasars, and stars over 6800 deg$^2$.
240: We used the main galaxy sample of 528,000 galaxies with measured
241: velocities for this study. The median redshift for this
242: spectroscopic sample is 0.11. The uncertainties of the redshift
243: measurements are $\sim$30 km s$^{-1}$. A redshift confidence
244: parameter (zConf) is assigned from 0 to 1 in the SDSS catalogs. We
245: used only those galaxies with zConf $\ge$ 0.65.
246:
247: 2dFGRS is a spectroscopic survey for nearly 246,000 galaxies
248: selected in the photographic $b_{\rm J}$ band from the APM galaxy
249: catalog \citep{col01}. The survey uses the Two-degree Field (2dF)
250: multifibre spectrograph on the Anglo-Australian Telescope, which
251: measure spectra about 400 objects
252: in a single observation with 2$^\circ$ field of view \citep{lew02}.
253: The wavelength coverage of the spectra is 3600$-$8000 \AA~
254: with a resolution of 9 \AA.
255: The spectroscopic targets are the galaxies with extinction
256: corrected magnitude $b_{\rm J}<19.45$. The survey coverage
257: consists of two delination stripes and 100 random fields, which
258: cover in total over 2000 deg$^2$. The median redshift for the sample of
259: galaxies is similar to that of SDSS.
260: %The 2dFGRS contains spectra for nearly 246,000 galaxies
261: %selected in the photographic $b_{\rm J}$ band from the APM galaxy
262: %catalog. The survey covers over 2000 deg$^2$, and the median redshift for the sample of galaxies
263: %is similar to that of SDSS.
264: %The uncertainties of the redshift measurements are
265: %The redshift measurements are from the spectra %covering 3600$-$8000 \AA,
266: A redshift quality parameter Q is assigned in the range 1$-$5. The
267: redshift measurements with Q$\ge$3 are 98.4\% reliable, and have
268: an overall rms uncertainty of $\sim$85 km s$^{-1}$. We used only
269: the galaxies with Q$\ge$3 in this study.
270:
271: Since some galaxies are covered in both SDSS and 2dFGRS, we
272: matched the galaxies found in SDSS with those in 2dFGRS to make a
273: master catalog. The mean difference in radial velocity $\Delta v$
274: ($=v_{\rm SDSS}-v_{\rm 2dFGRS}$) between the SDSS and 2dFGRS
275: measurements for the 29,200 matched galaxies is estimated to be $\sim13$ km
276: s$^{-1}$. We corrected the SDSS velocities by this mean
277: difference, and used the average value of the velocities measured
278: in SDSS and in 2dFGRS for further analysis.
279:
280: To investigate the difference of galaxy orbits among subsamples,
281: we divide the galaxies into early-type and late-type galaxies
282: using spectroscopic parameters provided by each survey.
283: For 2dFGRS galaxies, $\eta$ parameter, which is a linear combination
284: of emission and absorption components within the spectrum
285: derived from the Principal Component Analysis,
286: is assigned to each galaxy \citep{mad02}.
287: This parameter denotes the ratio of the
288: present to the past star-formation activity in each galaxy.
289: \citet{mad02} showed that the $\eta$ parameter correlates well with galaxy morphology
290: using the Kennicutt Atlas \citep{ken92} (see their Fig. 4).
291: They reported that the galaxies with $\eta<-1.4$ are corresponding to E/S0 and Sa
292: and those with $\eta>-1.4$ to Sb and Scd.
293: Similarly, for SDSS galaxies, \texttt{eclass} parameter, which is
294: a projection of the first three principal components of the spectrum,
295: is assigned to each galaxy.
296: This parameter has values from about $-0.35$ (corresponding to early-type galaxies)
297: to 0.5 (late-types), which was used to classify SDSS galaxies (e.g., \citealt{ber03,ber06}).
298: In Figure \ref{fig-spcl},
299: we plot the \texttt{eclass} parameter in SDSS versus the $\eta$ parameter in 2dFGRS
300: in order to determine the \texttt{eclass} value corresponding to the division value of $\eta=-1.4$.
301: It is seen that two parameters correlate well and the majority of galaxies are
302: located around ($\eta$, \texttt{eclass})=($-2.65$,$-0.135$).
303: We determined the relation equation between two parameters
304: using the ordinary least-square bisector method \citep{iso90}.
305: The fit was done for the galaxies with $\eta<1.1$ and \texttt{eclass}$<0.09$.
306: \begin{equation}
307: {\rm \texttt{eclass}}_{\rm SDSS} = 0.0631 (\pm0.0004)~{\eta}_{\rm 2dFGRS}+0.0244 (\pm0.0008) \label{eq-trans}
308: \end{equation}
309:
310: This relation indicates that the division value of $\eta=-1.4$ in 2dFGRS is equivalent
311: to that of \texttt{eclass}=$-0.0640$ in SDSS.
312: Therefore, we classified the galaxies into early-type galaxies if
313: (i) $\eta<-1.4$ when the galaxy is surveyed only in 2dFGRS,
314: (ii) \texttt{eclass}$<-0.0640$ when the galaxy is surveyed only in SDSS, and
315: (iii) \texttt{eclass}$<-0.0640$ and $\eta<-1.4$ when the galaxy is surveyed both in SDSS and 2dFGRS.
316: The rest were classified into late-type galaxies.
317: Some galaxies without estimation of $\eta$ parameter ($\eta=-99.9$)
318: were not used for the analysis of subsamples.
319:
320: \subsection {Cluster Sample and Galaxy Membership in Clusters}\label{mem}
321: %\subsection {Cluster Sample}
322: We used the Abell catalog of galaxy clusters \citep{aco89} to
323: identify cluster galaxies in the survey data. Among the Abell
324: clusters, we selected those that have known spectroscopic
325: redshifts in the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED). Finally,
326: we selected 731 and 230 clusters located within the survey regions
327: of SDSS and 2dFGRS, respectively, as a sample of clusters for
328: further analysis.
329:
330: In order to determine the membership of galaxies in a cluster, we used
331: the ``shifting gapper'' method of \citet{fadda96} as used also for
332: the study of global rotation of galaxy clusters \citep{hl07}.
333: In the plot of radial velocity versus clustercentric distance of galaxies for a
334: given cluster, we selected the member galaxies using a
335: velocity gap of 950 km s$^{-1}$ and a distance bin of 0.2 Mpc
336: shifting along the distance from the cluster center.
337: We used a larger bin width if the number of galaxies in a
338: bin was less than 15. We applied this method to the galaxies within
339: the radius at which the distance between adjacent galaxies is
340: larger than 0.1 Mpc. If there are no adjacent galaxies
341: with $>0.1$ Mpc, we stopped the procedure at the radius of 3.5 Mpc.
342: We iterated the procedure until the number of
343: cluster members is converged. Finally, we selected 113 galaxy
344: clusters in which the number of member galaxies is greater than or
345: equal to 40 for further analysis.
346:
347: Since it is necessary to determine the galaxy orbits
348: using cluster mass profiles from X-ray data, we selected 21 galaxy clusters
349: whose X-ray mass profiles are available in the literature (e.g., \citealt{rb02,san03,dem03,bm06}).
350: Then, we rejected 9 clusters (A1775, 2052, 2063, 2142, 2147, 2244, 2255, 4038, and 4059)
351: that appear to be in the stage of interacting or merging
352: in the plot of galaxy velocity versus clustercentric distance,
353: and 2 clusters (A119 and A1656) whose survey coverages are not complete.
354: Although A85 was partially surveyed, we included it into our sample
355: since the uncovered region is only the small outer region of the entire cluster.
356: Finally, we obtained a sample of 10 clusters
357: that will be used for investigating the galaxy orbits.
358:
359: Table \ref{tab-cand} lists our sample clusters with Abell identification, right ascension and declination,
360: Bautz-Morgan (B-M) type, the survey in which the cluster is covered,
361: the redshift derived in this study (the biweight location of \citealt{beers90}),
362: the physical extent corresponding to one arcmin,
363: and the velocity dispersion (the biweight scale of \citealt{beers90}) and
364: the number of galaxies for all, early-type, and late-type galaxies.
365: Our sample clusters are found from $z=0.023$ to $z=0.113$ and have 78$-$754 member galaxies.
366: The number of early-types is usually larger than that of late-types in clusters,
367: and eight clusters have B-M type of I or II.
368: Figure \ref{fig-member} shows plots of radial velocity as a function of clustercentric distance of galaxies
369: and the velocity distributions for the 10 clusters.
370: In Figure \ref{fig-spvel}, we show the spatial distribution of cluster galaxies
371: with measured velocities.
372: For most clusters, early-types are centrally concentrated, while late-types are not.
373:
374: Since the presence of substructure in clusters can affect
375: the determination of the VDPs and the galaxy number density profiles,
376: it is necessary to secure the galaxy sample outside the substructure
377: in order to determine the galaxy orbits properly.
378: Therefore, we show, for our sample cluster, the distribution of $\delta$ that indicates
379: local deviations from the systemic velocity ($v_{\rm sys}$) and dispersion ($\sigma_p$) of
380: the entire cluster in Figure \ref{fig-delta} (see \S \ref{sub} for the explanation of $\delta$ in detail).
381: We selected the galaxies with $\delta\leq2.0$ that
382: are regarded as the galaxies in the cluster main body for the orbit analysis,
383: and compared the results for the different choice of $\delta$ value in \S \ref{galsample}.
384:
385: %\subsection {Galaxy Membership in Clusters}
386: \section{Observed Properties of Galaxy Clusters}\label{property}
387: \subsection {X-ray Mass Profile}\label{xmass}
388:
389: We present X-ray mass profiles for our sample clusters in Figure \ref{fig-mass}.
390: It appears that mass profiles from various references agree well as a whole in each cluster.
391: In Table \ref{tab-xray}, we list the X-ray luminosity and the parameters for
392: the X-ray mass profile.
393: The first and second columns give Abell identification and the X-ray luminosity, respectively.
394: The third and fourth columns are $\beta$ parameter and core radius ($r_c$)
395: derived from the standard $\beta$-model of cluster gas density profile, respectively (e.g., \citealt{cf76}).
396: The fifth and sixth columns are isothermal gas temperature ($T_X$) in \citet{rb02}, and
397: central gas temperature [$T(0)$] in \citet{san03}, respectively.
398: The seventh column gives the polytropic index ($\gamma$) used in equation (\ref{eq-temp}), and
399: final column gives the reference of these parameters adopted in this study.
400: Then, the gravitational cluster mass $M_{\mathrm {tot}}(r)$ is determined
401: under the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium through the equation,
402: \begin{equation}
403: M_{\mathrm {tot}}(r) = - {{k T(r) r} \over {G \mu m_p}} \left(
404: {{{\mathrm {d~ln} \rho (r)} \over {\mathrm {d~ln} r}} + {{\mathrm {d~ln} T(r)} \over {\mathrm {d~ln} r}}} \right),
405: \label{eq-mass}
406: \end{equation}
407: %\begin{equation}
408: %M_{\mathrm {tot}}(r) = {3{k T_X r^3 \beta} \over {G \mu m_p}} \left(
409: %{1 \over {r^2 + r_c^2}} \right),
410: %\label{eq-mass}
411: %\end{equation}
412:
413: where $k$ is the Boltzmann constant,
414: $G$ is the gravitational constant,
415: $\mu$ ($=0.61$) is the mean molecular weight,
416: $m_p$ is the proton mass.
417: The gas density profile is given by,
418: \begin{equation}
419: \rho(r)=\rho(0)\left[1+\left(\frac{r}{r_{c}}\right)^{2}\right]^
420: {-\frac{3}{2}\beta}.
421: \label{eq-gasden}
422: \end{equation}
423:
424: For the clusters in \citet{rb02},
425: we use isothermal gas temperature ($T_X$) as $T(r)$.
426: For the clusters in \citet{san03}, we use non-isothermal gas temperature profile
427: that is linked to the gas density via a polytropic equation of state,
428: \begin{equation}
429: T(r)=T(0)\left[1+\left(\frac{r}{r_{c}}\right)^{2}\right]^
430: {-\frac{3}{2}\beta \left(\gamma - 1\right)},
431: \label{eq-temp}
432: \end{equation}
433: where $\gamma$ is the polytropic index and $r_c$ and $\beta$ are as defined previously.
434: For A2034, the X-ray mass profile is available in \citet{dem03}.
435: However, they present a different form of gas density profile from the standard $\beta$-model,
436: so those parameters were not included in Table \ref{tab-xray}.
437:
438: It is worth noting that the X-ray mass profiles may not be well determined
439: outside the outer significance radius of the cluster, $r_X$,
440: because the X-ray source count drops below the Poissonian $1\sigma$ error at $r>r_X$ \citep{rb02}.
441: It is also noted that the Jeans equation may not be applicable
442: beyond a radius of $r_{200}$ (usually called virial radius),
443: because the dynamical equilibrium of the cluster is not guaranteed at this region.
444: Therefore, careful interpretation is needed beyond $r_X$ and $r_{200}$.
445: We draw the vertical lines at the radius of $r_X$ and $r_{200}$ in Figures \ref{fig-mass},
446: \ref{fig-orbit1}, \ref{fig-orbit2}, \ref{fig-orbit3}, \ref{fig-orbitab}, and \ref{fig-orbitem}.
447: The radius $r_{200}$ that contains an overdensity 200$\rho_{\rm c}$
448: where $\rho_{\rm c}$ is the critical density of the Universe,
449: is computed for each cluster using the equation in \citet{car97a}:
450: \begin{equation}
451: r_{200}= \frac{3^{1/2}\sigma_{\rm cl}}{10 H(z)},
452: \end{equation}
453: where $\sigma_{\rm cl}$ is a velocity dispersion of the cluster and
454: the Hubble parameter at $z$ is
455: $H^2(z)=H^2_0 [\Omega_M(1+z)^3 +\Omega_k(1+z)^2+\Omega_\Lambda]$ \citep{pee93}.
456: $\Omega_M$, $\Omega_k$, and $\Omega_\Lambda$ are dimensionless density parameters.
457:
458: \subsection {Galaxy Number Density Profile}
459:
460: We derived the galaxy number density profile for each cluster
461: using the member galaxies with $\delta\leq2.0$ selected in \S \ref{mem}.
462: Since SDSS and 2dFGRS are magnitude limit surveys ($r_{\rm pet}<17.77$ for SDSS
463: and ${\rm b_J}<19.45$ for 2dFGRS) and the spectroscopic sample of galaxies are
464: nearly complete within the magnitude limit,
465: we can derive the galaxy number density profile for each cluster
466: using spectroscopically selected member galaxies.
467:
468: We display the galaxy number density profiles of all, early-type, and
469: late-type galaxies for each cluster in Figures \ref{fig-numden1} and
470: \ref{fig-numden2}.
471: We de-projected the observed number
472: density using the method in \citet{mcl99}, and fitted the de-projected
473: density profile with those of \citet[NFW]{nfw97}
474: and \citet{her90}, which are represented by,
475: \begin{equation}\label{eq-den}
476: \nu_{\rm g} (r)=\nu_0(r/r_s)^{-1}(1+r/r_s)^{-\alpha},
477: \end{equation}
478:
479: where $\nu_{\rm g}(r)$ is a three dimensional density profile of the cluster galaxies,
480: $r_s$ is a scale radius, and $\alpha=2$ for the NFW profile
481: and $\alpha=3$ for the Hernquist profile.
482: We also fitted the de-projected density profile with that of
483: \citet[KEK05]{kek05}, which is derived from the isotropic and isothermal galaxy
484: orbits in clusters under the NFW distribution of dark matter.
485: It is represented by,
486: \begin{equation}\label{eq-den2}
487: \nu_{\rm g} (r)=\nu_0 \left[ \frac{(1+r/r_s)^{(r_s/r)}}{e}\right]^{\eta_g}
488: \end{equation}
489: where the dimensionless parameter $\eta_g$ is defined by
490: \begin{equation}\label{eq-eta}
491: \eta_g \equiv \frac{2G M_0}{r_s\sigma_r^2}.
492: \end{equation}
493:
494: We used as a characteristic mass $M_0$,
495: X-ray mass estimate shown in Figure \ref{fig-mass} at a radius of $r_{200}$,
496: and used as a one-dimensional velocity dispersion $\sigma_r$,
497: observed velocity dispersion $\sigma_p$ shown in Table \ref{tab-cand}.
498:
499: The solid, dashed, and dot-dashed
500: lines represent the projected best fit curves of the NFW,
501: Hernquist, and KEK05 profiles, respectively. We did not fit the profiles that
502: give unstable de-projection, and did not include them in Figures \ref{fig-numden1} and \ref{fig-numden2}.
503: For the clusters (A1650, 1651, and 2670) surveyed in both SDSS and 2dFGRS, we used
504: one data set (2dFGRS for A1650 and A1651, SDSS for A2670) for deriving number density profile
505: since the spatial coverage of SDSS or 2dFGRS is not complete depending on clusters.
506: For A85, the fit was done using only the galaxies in the
507: inner region ($R<26\arcmin$) because of incomplete coverage
508: (see Fig. \ref{fig-spvel}).
509:
510: The fitting results for our sample are summarized in Table \ref{tab-numden}.
511: It is found that the scale radius $r_s$ of late-types
512: in all profiles %both NFW and Hernquist profiles
513: is larger than that of the early-types,
514: showing that the latter is more concentrated toward
515: the cluster center than the former.
516: The steeper density profile of early-types compared with late-types is a clear indication of the
517: morphology-density relation (e.g., \citealt{dre80}).
518:
519: %%\subsection{Color-Magnitude Relation}\label{cmr}
520: To test the effect of the incompleteness of spectroscopic sample
521: on the galaxy number density profiles,
522: we investigate the color magnitude diagram of the galaxies
523: in the photometric and spectroscopic samples.
524: It is well known that optical colors of early-type galaxies are
525: strongly correlate with absolute magnitudes (color-magnitude relation, CMR),
526: in the sense that the brighter galaxies are likely to be redder
527: than the fainter galaxies \citep{baum59,faber73,vs77}.
528: In Figure \ref{fig-cmr},
529: we plot the $g-r$ versus $r$ for the SDSS cluster galaxies and the $B_J-R_F$ versus $R_F$
530: for the 2dFGRS cluster galaxies.
531: The cluster galaxies within the $R_{max}$/2 from the cluster center
532: selected in \S \ref{mem} are shown in company with
533: the photometric sample of galaxies without measured velocities in the same region.
534: $R_{max}$ is the largest clustercentric distance of the member galaxies,
535: and varies depending on clusters.
536: It shows that the colors correlate well with the observed magnitudes.
537: The linear fits derived from repeated one sigma clipping using early-type galaxies
538: selected in \S \ref{gal} are overlaid.
539: The average of the CMR slopes for our sample clusters is found to be
540: $-0.019\pm0.006$ for SDSS clusters and $-0.037\pm0.024$ for
541: 2dFGRS clusters,
542: which is consistent with the results of previous studies
543: based on the same data \citep{prop04,hogg04,gal06,agu07}.
544: It appears that most bright ($r<14$ mag) galaxies following the CMR
545: in the photometric sample are selected as member galaxies,
546: implying that the incompleteness of spectroscopic sample in the cluster center
547: does not affect the determination of
548: the projected galaxy number density in Figures \ref{fig-numden1} and \ref{fig-numden2}.
549:
550: \subsection {Velocity Dispersion Profile}\label{vdp}
551: We present, in Figures \ref{fig-disp1} and \ref{fig-disp2},
552: the VDPs for all, early-type, and late-type galaxies with $\delta\leq2.0$
553: in each cluster.
554: We computed the velocity dispersion of the
555: galaxies lying within a bin with fixed radial width,
556: $\Delta R = R_{max}/15$ for all galaxies and $\Delta R = R_{max}/5$
557: for the early-type and late-type galaxies as increasing the bin center by a fixed step width,
558: $\delta R = R_{max}/40$.
559: We stopped the calculation when the number of galaxies
560: in a bin is less than 9, and used larger bin size if the number
561: of computed dispersions in a cluster is less than five.
562: We do not present the profiles for the subsample of the cluster whose final number
563: of computed dispersions is less than five.
564: The velocity dispersions for our sample cluster are not similar,
565: but show diverse features. In addition, they are not always constant
566: throughout the radius.
567:
568:
569: \section{Galaxy Orbits in Clusters}\label{result}
570: If we assume spherical symmetry of a collisionless galaxy cluster, we
571: can apply the Jeans equation in the absence of rotation to the
572: dynamical analysis of the cluster. The spherical Jeans equation is
573:
574: \begin{equation}
575: {d\over{dr}}\, \left( \nu_{\rm g}(r) \sigma_r^2(r) \right)
576: + {{2\,\beta_{\rm orb}(r)}\over{r}}\, \nu_{\rm g}(r) \sigma_r^2(r)
577: = - \nu_{\rm g}(r)\,{{G M_{\rm tot}(r)}\over{r^2}}\ , \label{jeans}
578: \end{equation}
579:
580: where
581: $\sigma_r(r)$ is the radial component of velocity dispersion,
582: $\beta_{\rm orb}(r)\equiv 1-\sigma_\theta^2(r)/\sigma_r^2(r)$ is
583: the velocity anisotropy\footnote{It is noted that $\beta_{\rm orb}(r)$ is velocity anisotropy,
584: while $\beta$ is a parameter used for X-ray mass profile in \S \ref{xmass}.},
585: $G$ is the gravitational constant,
586: and $M_{\rm tot}(r)$ is the total gravitating mass contained
587: within a sphere of radius $r$ (e.g. \citealt{bt87}).
588: $\sigma_\theta(r)$ is the tangential component of velocity dispersion that is
589: equal to the azimuthal component, $\sigma_\phi(r)$,
590: in the absence of cluster rotation. However, cluster rotation is not negligible
591: in some clusters \citep{hl07}.
592:
593: With an aid of independent determination of the cluster mass profile
594: using X-ray data,
595: we determine the velocity anisotropy (orbits) of cluster galaxies using two methods:
596: (1) from the comparison of the calculated VDP using the Jeans equation with the
597: measured VDP (e.g., \citealt{cote01,hwang07}), and
598: (2) to calculate directly $\beta_{\rm orb}(r)$
599: using the Jeans equation (e.g., \citealt{nk96,ben06}).
600:
601: \subsection {Method 1}\label{method1}
602:
603: Our strategy to determine the velocity anisotropy of cluster galaxies is as
604: follows: (1) With the galaxy number density profile, $\nu_{\rm g}(r)$,
605: of all, early-type, and late-type galaxies and the mass profile, $M_{\rm tot} (r)$, in hand,
606: assuming constant velocity anisotropy, $\beta_{\rm orb}$, over the radius in prior,
607: we compute the theoretical projected VDP,
608: $\sigma_p(R)$ and theoretical
609: projected aperture VDP, $\sigma_{ap}(\le R)$,
610: using the Jeans equation; (2) From the comparison of these calculated
611: VDPs with measured VDPs, we
612: determine the velocity anisotropy of cluster galaxies.
613:
614: We begin by deriving the theoretical projected dispersion
615: profiles. The equation (\ref{jeans}), spherical Jeans equation can
616: be solved for the radial component of velocity dispersion,
617: $\sigma_r(r)$:
618:
619: \begin{equation}
620: \sigma_r^2(r)
621: ={1\over{\nu_{\rm g}(r)}}\,
622: \exp\left( -\int {{2\beta_{\rm orb}}\over{r}}\,dr \right)\,
623: \left[ \int_r^{\infty} \nu_{\rm g}\,{{GM_{\rm tot}}\over{x^2}}\,
624: \exp\left( \int {{2\beta_{\rm orb}}\over{x}}\,dx \right)\, dx \right]\ .
625: \label{eq5}
626: \end{equation}
627:
628: Then the projected VDP, $\sigma_p(R)$ can
629: be derived by
630:
631: \begin{equation}
632: \sigma_p^2(R)
633: = {2\over{\Sigma_{\rm g}(R)}}\,
634: \int_R^{\infty} \nu_{\rm g} \sigma_r^2(r)
635: \left(1 - \beta_{\rm orb}\,{{R^2}\over{r^2}} \right)\, {{r\,dr}\over{\sqrt{r^2 - R^2}}}, \label{eq-vdisp}
636: \end{equation}
637:
638: where $R$ is the projected clustercentric distance,
639: and $\Sigma_{\rm g}(R)$ is the projected density profile
640: that is a projection of the three-dimensional density profile $\nu_{\rm g}(r)$:
641:
642: \begin{equation}
643: \Sigma_{\rm g}(R) = 2\int_{R}^{\infty} \nu_{\rm g}(r)
644: {{r\,dr}\over{\sqrt{r^2-R^2}}}\ . \label{eq7}
645: \end{equation}
646:
647: The projected aperture dispersion profile, $\sigma_{ap}(\le R)$, which
648: is the velocity dispersion of all objects interior to a given
649: projected radius $R$, can be computed by
650:
651: \begin{equation}
652: \sigma_{\rm ap}^2(\le R) =
653: \left[ \int_{R_{\rm min}}^R \Sigma_{\rm g}(R^\prime) \sigma_p^2(R^\prime)\,
654: R^\prime\,dR^\prime \right]\,
655: \left[\int_{R_{\rm min}}^R \Sigma_{\rm g}(R^\prime)\,R^\prime\,dR^\prime
656: \right]^{-1}\ ,
657: \label{eq8}
658: \end{equation}
659:
660: where $R_{\rm min}$ is the projected clustercentric distance of the
661: innermost data point for the cluster galaxies.
662:
663: For all galaxies in a cluster,
664: we present the measured VDP compared with the
665: calculated VDP for different velocity anisotropies
666: in Figures \ref{fig-orbit1}, \ref{fig-orbit2}, and \ref{fig-orbit3}.
667: The top panels show the projected VDPs, and the middle panels show the projected
668: aperture VDPs.
669: The measured dispersion data taken from
670: Figures \ref{fig-disp1} and \ref{fig-disp2} are
671: shown by filled circles along with their confidence intervals.
672: The projected aperture dispersion profiles are
673: plotted using a similar fashion to the case of the top panel.
674: Although it is difficult to distinguish the velocity anisotropy
675: clearly in the top panel (the middle panels show more stable result),
676: it appears that the galaxy orbits in clusters show diverse patterns.
677: Three results based on NFW, Hernquist, and KEK05 profiles of galaxy number density
678: appear to be similar for a cluster.
679: In Figures \ref{fig-orbitab} and \ref{fig-orbitem},
680: we show the results of similar analysis for early-type and late-type galaxies, respectively.
681: The difference between subsamples in a cluster is not
682: clearly seen at this stage, and we discuss in detail the individual cluster in Appendix A.
683:
684: \subsection {Method 2}\label{method2}
685:
686: We combine the equation (\ref{jeans}), spherical Jeans equation
687: with the equation (\ref{eq-vdisp}) that defines
688: the projected VDP
689: in order to compute $\beta_{\rm orb}(r)$ as a function of the radius directly.
690:
691: Replacing $\beta_{\rm orb}$ in equation (\ref{eq-vdisp}) with that in equation (\ref{jeans}),
692: we get,
693:
694: \begin{eqnarray}
695: \frac{1}{2} \left[\,\, \Sigma_{g}(R) \ \sigma_{p}^{2}(R) - \,
696: {R^2}{\int_{R}^{\infty}}{\frac {G M_{\rm tot} (r) \nu_{g}}{r^{2} {\sqrt{{r^2} - {R^{2}}}}}} \,dr \right]
697: \nonumber \\ = \,\, \,\,
698: {\int_{R}^{\infty}}{\frac {r \nu_{g} \sigma_{r}^{2} dr}{{\sqrt{{r^2} - {R^{2}}}}}} +
699: {\frac {R^{2}}{2}}{\int_{R}^{\infty}}{\frac {d (\nu_{g} \sigma_{r}^{2})}{dr}}{\frac {dr}{{\sqrt{{r^2} - {R^{2}}}}}}.
700: \end{eqnarray}
701:
702: This equation can be reduced by integrating the second term on the right-hand side by parts \citep{bm82},
703:
704: \begin{eqnarray}
705: \frac{1}{2} \left[\Sigma_{g}(R) \sigma_{p}^{2}(R)
706: - {R^{2}{\int_{R}^{\infty}} \frac {G M_{\rm tot} (r) \nu_{g}}
707: {r^{2} {\sqrt{{r^2} - {R^{2}}}}}} dr \right]\nonumber \\
708: = \int_{R}^{\infty} \frac {(\frac {3 R^{2}}{2} - r^{2})}{{\sqrt{{r^2} - {R^{2}}}}}\frac { d ( \nu_{g} \sigma_{r}^{2})}{dr} \,dr.
709: \end{eqnarray}
710:
711: Then, $\nu_{g} \sigma_{r}^{2}$ can be expressed as a sum of four integrals (see \citealt{bic89} for detail),
712:
713: \begin{equation}
714: \nu_g(r) \sigma_r^2 = {\rm I_1(r)} - {\rm I_2}(r) + {\rm I_3}(r) - {\rm I_4}(r),
715: \end{equation}
716:
717: \begin{equation}
718: {\rm I_1}(r) = \frac{1}{3} \int_r^{\infty} \frac{G M_{\rm tot}(r) \nu_g}{r^2} \ud r,
719: \end{equation}
720:
721: \begin{equation}
722: {\rm I_2}(r) = \frac{2}{3r^3} \int_0^r G M_{\rm tot}(r) \nu_g r \ud r,
723: \end{equation}
724:
725: \begin{equation}
726: {\rm I_3}(r) = \frac{1}{r^3} \int_0^r R \Sigma_g(R) \sigma_{p}^2(R) \ud R,
727: \end{equation}
728:
729: \begin{eqnarray}
730: {\rm I_4}(r) = \frac{2}{\pi r^3} \int_r^{\infty} R \Sigma_g(R) \sigma_{p}^2(R)
731: \Big( \frac{r}{\sqrt{R^2-r^2}} - \sin^{-1} \frac{r}{R} \Big) \ud R.
732: \end{eqnarray}
733:
734: After computing $\nu_{g} \sigma_{r}^{2}$, we finally obtain $\beta_{\rm orb}(r)$ from the
735: Jeans equation,
736:
737: \be
738: \beta_{\rm orb}(r) = - \frac{r}{2 \nu_g \sigma_r^2}
739: \Big[ \frac {G M_{\rm tot}(r) \nu_g}{r^2} + \frac{\ud}{\ud r} (\nu_g \sigma_r^2)
740: \Big].
741: \ee
742:
743: Practically, all integrations up to infinity were performed using a large radius,
744: $R_t=1.5R_{max}$ at which both $\nu_{\rm g} \sigma_{r}^{2}$ and $\Sigma_{\rm g}(R)$
745: approach to zero.
746: In addition, input VDPs derived in \S \ref{vdp} were smoothed for stable computation.
747: We compute $\beta_{\rm orb}$ using the above equation, and
748: present the results in the bottom panels of Figures \ref{fig-orbit1}, \ref{fig-orbit2}, and \ref{fig-orbit3}.
749: The errors of $\beta_{\rm orb}$ are computed using the upper and lower confidence intervals
750: of the VDPs shown in Figures \ref{fig-disp1} and \ref{fig-disp2}.
751: The behavior of $\beta_{\rm orb}$ computed in this Section is
752: similar to that in \S \ref{method1}.
753: It is noted that the calculated $\beta_{\rm orb}$ may not be reliable in the very inner region
754: where the observed VDPs are not available (interpolation of the observed VDPs in the outer region is used)
755: and X-ray mass profiles are not properly determined due to the low resolution of X-ray instrument.
756: Three results based on NFW, Hernquist, and KEK05 profiles of galaxy number density
757: are also similar for a cluster.
758: We also show the results of similar analysis for early-type and late-type galaxies
759: in Figures~\ref{fig-orbitab} and \ref{fig-orbitem}, respectively.
760: Detailed discussion of the individual cluster is given in Appendix A.
761:
762:
763: \section{Global Cluster Properties}\label{global}
764: \subsection {Cluster Morphology}\label{morph}
765:
766: In order to investigate the connection between cluster morphology and cluster dynamics,
767: it is useful to determine the ellipticity and orientation of a cluster
768: using the spatial distribution of the member galaxies.
769: To determine the cluster shape, we employ the dispersion ellipse of the
770: bivariate normal frequency function of position vectors (see, e.g., \citealt{trumpler53,carter80,bur04,hl07}).
771: The dispersion ellipse is defined by \citet{trumpler53} as the contour at which the density is 0.61 times the maximum density
772: of a set of points distributed normally with respect to two correlated variables, although
773: the points need not be distributed normally in order to determine the proper cluster shape.
774: From the first five moments of the spatial distribution,
775:
776: \begin{mathletters}
777: \begin{equation}
778: \mu_{10} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N X_i, ~~
779: \mu_{01} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N Y_i
780: \end{equation}
781: \begin{equation}
782: \mu_{20} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N X^2_i - \left( \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N X_i \right)^2
783: \end{equation}
784: \begin{equation}
785: \mu_{11} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N X_iY_i - \frac{1}{N^2}\sum_{i=1}^N X_i\sum_{i=1}^N Y_i
786: \end{equation}
787: \begin{equation}
788: \mu_{02} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N Y^2_i - \left( \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N Y_i \right)^2 \; \; \mbox{,}
789: \end{equation}
790: \end{mathletters}
791:
792: where X and Y are clustercentric distances in the direction of right ascension
793: and declination, respectively, the semimajor and semiminor axes of the ellipse, $\Gamma_A$ and $\Gamma_B$,
794: are derived by solving the equation
795: \begin{equation}
796: \left| \begin{array}{cc}
797: \mu_{20}-\Gamma^2 & \mu_{11} \\
798: \mu_{11} & \mu_{02}-\Gamma^2 \\
799: \end{array} \right|
800: = 0 \; \; \mbox{.}
801: \end{equation}
802:
803: The position angle of the major axis, measured from north to east, is given by
804: \begin{equation}
805: \Theta_2 = \cot^{-1}\left( -\frac{\mu_{02} - \Gamma_A^2}{\mu_{11}}\right) + \frac{\pi}{2} \; \; \mbox{,}
806: \end{equation}
807: and the ellipticity is defined by
808: \begin{equation}
809: \epsilon = 1 - \frac{\Gamma_B}{\Gamma_A} \; \; \mbox{.}
810: \end{equation}
811:
812: The major and minor axes, position angles, and ellipticities derived
813: for our sample clusters are listed in Table \ref{tab-mor},
814: and the dispersion ellipse is shown in Figure \ref{fig-spvel}.
815: The ellipticities are in the range $\epsilon=0.15-0.36$, indicating no strong elongation.
816:
817: \subsection {Analysis of Substructure} \label{sub}
818: The analysis of substructure is a useful diagnostic tool for
819: understanding the dynamical state of galaxy clusters. A useful
820: discussion of several substructure tests is given in
821: \citet{pin96}. As described in \citet{hl07}, we derived number
822: density maps using the spatial position (two-dimensional; 2D) of
823: member galaxies, and performed one-dimensional (1D) and
824: three-dimensional (3D) substructure tests for our sample clusters.
825:
826: The majority of 1D (velocity histogram) substructure tests are normality tests.
827: We present the results of five 1D tests in Table \ref{tab-sub}.
828: The values of the I-test \citep{tea90} are shown in
829: the second and the third column; $I_{90}$ is the critical value
830: for rejecting the Gaussian hypothesis at 90\% confidence.
831: Therefore, a velocity distribution is considered to be
832: non-Gaussian if $I>I_{90}$.
833: We find that four of the sample clusters
834: (A779, 1650, 1651, and 2199) do not satisfy the
835: Gaussian hypothesis using the I test.
836:
837: The skewness, which is a measure of the degree of asymmetry of a distribution, and the
838: confidence level at which it rejects normality are given in the fourth and the fifth columns of Table \ref{tab-sub}.
839: Positive or negative skewness indicates that the distribution is skewed to the right or left, respectively,
840: with a longer tail to one side of the distribution maximum.
841: The kurtosis, which is the degree to which a distribution is peaked, and the
842: confidence level at which it rejects normality are given in the sixth and the seventh columns.
843: Positive values indicate pointed or peaked distributions,
844: while negative values indicate flattened or non peaked distributions.
845: The skewness test rejects a Gaussian distribution with a confidence of over $90\%$ for A85, 1651, and 2199.
846: The kurtosis test rejects the hypothesis of Gaussianity for A779, 1650, 1651, 2034, and 2199
847: with confidence of over $90\%$.
848:
849: From the eighth to the eleventh column of Table \ref{tab-sub},
850: we present the asymmetry index (AI) and the tail index (TI)
851: introduced by \citet{bb93} along with their confidence levels.
852: The AI measures the symmetry in a population by comparing gaps in the data on the
853: left and right sides of the sample median, and TI compares the spread of the data at the $90\%$
854: level with the spread at the $75\%$ level.
855: The Gaussian hypothesis for A779, 1800, and 2199 are rejected by the AI test,
856: and that for A85, 1650, 2199 by the TI test with a confidence level of over $90\%$.
857:
858: We have constructed number density contours for the clusters
859: using different bin sizes of $0.25 R' \times 0.25 R' ~\rm{Mpc^2}$ depending on
860: the cluster size [$R'=4(\Gamma_A \Gamma_B)^{1/2}/1.5$].
861: $\Gamma_A$ and $\Gamma_B$ are in units of Mpc, 4 is an arbitrary constant,
862: and 1.5 (Mpc) is a normalization constant.
863: We have smoothed the contours
864: using a cubic convolution interpolation method. The contour interval,
865: (max density in cluster)$/6$, is also
866: determined according to the maximum number density of the clusters.
867: We plot the number density contour map in the first and third columns of Figure \ref{fig-sub}.
868:
869: Using the velocity data and positional information on the
870: galaxies, we have performed a $\Delta$-test \citep{ds88}, which
871: computes local deviations from the systemic velocity ($v_{\rm
872: sys}$) and dispersion ($\sigma_p$) of the entire cluster. For each
873: galaxy, the deviation is defined by
874:
875: \begin{equation}
876: \delta^2 = \frac{N_{nn}}{\sigma_p^2} \left[ (v_{\rm local}-v_{\rm sys})^2 +
877: (\sigma_{\rm local}-\sigma_p)^2 \right] \; \; \mbox{,}
878: \end{equation}
879:
880: where $N_{nn}$ is the number of galaxies that defines the local environment, taken
881: to be $\sim {N_{gal}}^{1/2}$ in this study. The sum of $\delta$ over all galaxies
882: in a cluster, $\Delta$,
883: is used to quantify the presence of substructure.
884: It is approximately equal to the total number
885: of galaxies in a cluster in the case of no substructure, while it is larger
886: than the total number of galaxies in a cluster in the presence of substructure.
887:
888: The statistical significance of the deviation is computed by Monte Carlo
889: simulations. Velocities are randomly
890: assigned to the galaxies at their observed positions, and $\Delta_{\rm sim}$ is
891: computed for each simulated cluster. We construct 1000 simulated clusters and
892: compute $\Delta_{\rm sim}$ for each simulation. We present $\Delta_{\rm obs}$
893: which is computed using real data and the fraction of simulated clusters with
894: $\Delta_{\rm sim}>\Delta_{\rm obs}$ in the final two columns of Table \ref{tab-sub}.
895: Small values of $f(\Delta_{\rm sim}>\Delta_{\rm obs})$ indicate statistically
896: significant substructure.
897: A779, 1795, 2199, and 2734 have much smaller values than other clusters,
898: indicating significant substructures.
899:
900: We plot the positions of cluster galaxies, represented by circles with
901: radii proportional to $e^{\delta}$, in the second and the fourth columns of Figure \ref{fig-sub}.
902: A large circle denotes a galaxy that is deviant in either velocity or
903: dispersion compared with nearby galaxies; therefore, groups of large circles indicate
904: the presence of substructure.
905: No strong substructures in A85, 1650, 1651, 1800, 2034, and 2670 were found
906: with the $f(\Delta_{\rm sim}>\Delta_{\rm obs})$ test, as confirmed in Figure \ref{fig-sub}.
907: In the number density contour maps of Figure \ref{fig-sub},
908: we present the galaxies with $\delta\leq2.0$ that were used for orbit analysis ({\it dots})
909: and those with $\delta>2.0$ in the substructure ({\it crosses}) separately,
910: in order to show the usefulness of $\delta$ parameter to identify the substructure.
911:
912: \subsection{Dynamical Status of the Clusters}\label{status}
913:
914: A study of the dynamical state for our sample clusters is useful for interpreting the galaxy orbits in clusters.
915: It is expected from self-similar models that a relationship $L_{\rm x}\propto \sigma_p^4$
916: between the X-ray luminosity and the velocity dispersion of the clusters will exist (e.g. \citealt{qm82}).
917: For galaxy clusters in SDSS, \citet{popesso05} found $L_{\rm x}\propto \sigma_p^{3.68\pm0.25}$.
918: For galaxy clusters in 2dFGRS, \citet{hilton05} found
919: a relation $L_{\rm x}\propto \sigma_p^{4.8\pm0.7}$ and
920: suggested that high-$L_{\rm x}$ clusters are more dynamically evolved systems than the low-$L_{\rm x}$ clusters.
921: In Figure \ref{fig-xray},
922: we plot the X-ray luminosity as a function of velocity dispersion and virial mass
923: for our sample clusters ({\it filled circles})
924: for which X-ray luminosities are available in the literature,
925: compared with other clusters ({\it open circles}) out of the 113 selected clusters.
926: We plot the X-ray luminosities from different literature sources separately.
927: It shows that $L_{\rm x}$ correlates well with $\sigma_p$ and $M_{\rm vir}$.
928: The power-law slopes are found to be in the range $3.7-4.9$ depending on X-ray references,
929: which is consistent with the results of previous studies.
930: Our sample clusters except for A779 are usually X-ray bright compared with the other clusters,
931: because it is easy to derive X-ray mass profiles for the X-ray bright clusters.
932: Interestingly, A779 and A1795 show a significant deviation from the relation
933: $L_{\rm x}$-$\sigma_p$ and $L_{\rm x}$-$M_{\rm vir}$.
934:
935: The dynamics of the brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) or cD galaxies in galaxy clusters
936: are also useful for understanding the
937: formation history of the clusters (see, e.g., \citealt{oh01}).
938: In particular, the peculiar velocity of the BCG, defined
939: by $v_p = v_{BCG}-v_{\rm cl}$, where $v_{BCG}$ is the observed velocity of BCGs
940: and $v_{\rm cl}$ is the mean velocity of the cluster,
941: is a useful indicator of the dynamical state of a cluster \citep{oh01}.
942: To estimate the peculiar velocities of BCGs in clusters,
943: we first identified the BCGs that have the brightest
944: $b_{\rm J}$ magnitudes in the catalog of member galaxies for the 113 selected galaxy clusters.
945: Then we conducted a visual inspection of cluster images
946: to determine whether there are any galaxies brighter than the selected BCGs,
947: using the catalog of member galaxies.
948: Since some very bright galaxies in clusters were not covered
949: as a result of observational difficulties such as fiber collision and saturation,
950: we finally selected 24 galaxy clusters for which the BCGs in the catalog agree with those in the images.
951: Using this sample of 24 galaxy clusters, we plot, in Figure \ref{fig-pec},
952: the cluster velocity dispersion as a function of the absolute value of the BCG peculiar velocity,
953: the absolute value of the BCG peculiar velocity as a function of clustercentric distance,
954: and the redshift of the clusters as a function of the BCG absolute magnitude in the $b_{\rm J}$ band.
955:
956: It appears that the absolute values of the peculiar velocities of the BCGs are in the range 5$-$802 km s$^{-1}$
957: and that the median value of the peculiar velocities is 165 km s$^{-1}$.
958: The mean uncertainty on the values of the peculiar velocities is 117 km s$^{-1}$.
959: In addition, the clustercentric distances of the BCGs are in the range 0$-$350 kpc,
960: and the median value of the clustercentric distances is 75 kpc.
961: Interestingly, the BCG peculiar velocities for two (A1651 and A2670) clusters
962: are larger than that median value, indicating dynamical non-equilibrium.
963:
964: \section{Discussion}\label{discuss}
965:
966: We summarize the global kinematic properties for our sample clusters in Table \ref{tab-sum}.
967: The first column gives the Abell identification. The second through fourth columns list
968: the existence of substructure as indicated by the 1D, 2D, and 3D tests, respectively :
969: ``Yes'' is assigned
970: if three of five tests indicate the presence of substructure for 1D test,
971: if the substructure at the contour level of 2$\times$(max density in cluster)/6 is seen for 2D test, and
972: if f($\Delta_{sim}>\Delta_{obs}$)$<0.1$ for 3D test.
973: The cluster morphology determined in \S \ref{morph}
974: is given in the fifth column: ``spherical'' for ellipticity less than $0.2$ and ``elongated''
975: for ellipticity greater than $0.2$.
976: ``?'' is given for A85 since the spatial coverage is incomplete.
977: The dynamical status determined in \S \ref{status} is given in the sixth and seventh columns.
978: For the scaling relation between the X-ray luminosity and the velocity dispersion or the virial mass,
979: ``No'' is assigned if the deviation of X-ray luminosities from the scaling relations derived in this study
980: is larger than one standard deviation in at least four out of eight panels in Figure \ref{fig-xray}.
981: For the peculiar velocities of the BCGs,
982: ``No'' is assigned if the significance of the peculiar velocity of the BCG,
983: $S$ [$\equiv|v_p|/(\epsilon_{\rm BCG}+\epsilon_{\rm cl}^2)^{1/2}$], is larger than 3.
984: $\epsilon_{\rm BCG}$ is the measurement error of the BCG velocity
985: and $\epsilon_{\rm cl}$ is defined by $\epsilon_{\rm cl}\equiv\sigma_{\rm cl}^2/N_{gal}$,
986: where $\sigma_{\rm cl}$ is the velocity dispersion of the cluster.
987: The description on the result for the individual cluster is given Appendix A.
988: %The galaxy orbits according to galaxy types are listed in eighth through tenth columns.
989:
990: \subsection{Effects of Different X-ray Mass Profiles}
991: Since we used one X-ray mass profile per one cluster among several X-ray mass profiles,
992: it is important to examine the results using different mass profiles.
993: Moreover, the mass profile of \citet{rb02} that we used in \S \ref{xmass},
994: adopted a constant gas temperature model to derive X-ray mass profile,
995: but recent X-ray observations showed that gas temperature
996: is not constant over the clustercentric distance \citep{mar98,dm02,pra07}.
997: The isothermal model is known to
998: make the mass profile steeper than that of non-isothermal models,
999: leading to underestimate the cluster mass at small radii
1000: and overestimate at large radii.
1001: \citet{mar98} showed that the isothermal model leads to
1002: underestimate the cluster mass by a factor of 0.74 of the non-isothermal model at one core radius
1003: and overestimate by a factor of 1.43 of the non-isothermal model at six core radius.
1004: To investigate the effects of different mass profiles on the determination of galaxy orbits,
1005: we compute $\beta_{\rm orb}$ in each cluster with various mass profiles, and
1006: present the results in Figure \ref{fig-masscomp}.
1007: The overestimation of the cluster mass from the isothermal model of \citet{rb02}
1008: is expected to give larger value of calculated VDP than the true value,
1009: and the value of $\beta_{\rm orb}$ would decrease.
1010: Indeed it is seen that the cluster masses of the isothermal model in \citet{rb02}
1011: are larger than those of non-isothermal model in \citet{san03} at $r\sim r_{200}$ for A1651 and A2199
1012: (Fig. \ref{fig-mass}).
1013: Therefore, the calculated $\beta_{\rm orb}$ with the isothermal model in \citet{rb02}
1014: are smaller than those with the non-isothermal model \citet{san03} [Fig. \ref{fig-masscomp} (b) and (c)].
1015: However, the orbit determination does not significantly change,
1016: because these values of $\beta_{\rm orb}$ with various mass profiles are not much different
1017: and accord within the uncertainty.
1018: It is noted that the galaxy orbits can be determined differently
1019: as seen in the case of A2199 (isotropic orbit for \citealt{san03}, but tangential orbit for \citealt{mar99}
1020: at $r\sim0.35$ Mpc; see Appendix \ref{a2199}).
1021:
1022: The effect of the most accurate mass profile obtained with {\it Chandra} is seen in (d), (e), and (f).
1023: Since the {\it Chandra} mass profile is available for only A1795 and the discrepancy
1024: among the mass profiles in A1795 is not large,
1025: the calculated $\beta_{\rm orb}$ with {\it Chandra} mass profile appears to
1026: accord with those from other mass profiles within the uncertainty.
1027: The discrepancy becomes larger at large radius ($r>r_X$),
1028: but the reliability at this region is low
1029: because the mass profile is determined from the extrapolation of that for the inner region.
1030:
1031: \subsection{Effects of Different Galaxy Samples}\label{galsample}
1032: Since significant fractions ($40-70\%$) of the clusters show substructures,
1033: indicating that they are in the process of merging \citep{jf99,ram07},
1034: it is important to study the effect of the presence of substructure
1035: on the determination of galaxy orbits.
1036: It is expected that the presence of substructure leads to
1037: an increase of the observed VDP and
1038: the change of the galaxy number density profile.
1039: As a result, the orbit determination can be different
1040: depending on the degree of inclusion of the galaxies in the substructure.
1041: Previously, \citet{bk04} showed that the galaxies in the substructure
1042: appear to have tangential orbit as a whole.
1043: Therefore, the orbit analysis including the galaxies in the substructure
1044: may make $\beta_{\rm orb}$ have low values.
1045:
1046: Figure \ref{fig-masscomp2} shows the effect of the presence of substructure on
1047: the determination of galaxy orbits.
1048: As seen in (b)$-$(e),
1049: the calculated $\beta_{\rm orb}$ including the galaxies in the substructure ({\it dotted lines})
1050: tends to be lower values than those excluding the galaxies in the substructure ({\it solid and dashed lines}),
1051: being compatible with the results of \citet{bk04}.
1052: However, A85 [Fig. \ref{fig-masscomp2} (a)] and late-type galaxies in A1795 [Fig. \ref{fig-masscomp2} (f)]
1053: do not show similar behavior to other cases,
1054: since the changes in observed VDPs and in galaxy number density profiles are not similar to other clusters.
1055: In conclusion, the orbit determination can be changed significantly [e.g., Fig \ref{fig-masscomp2} (f)],
1056: depending on the degree and the location of subclustering,
1057: but is not much changed for our sample clusters.
1058:
1059: %If the substructures are found in the outer region of the cluster,
1060: % the galaxy number density profile with the galaxies in the cluster main body is steeper
1061: % than that with all member galaxies including the substructure.
1062: %Therefore, excluding the galaxies in the substructure
1063: % make the calculated VDPs for isotropic and radial orbits decrease
1064: % as seen in the comparison between early-type and late-type galaxies (Figs. \ref{fig-orbitab} and \ref{fig-orbitem}).
1065: %The observed VDPs also decrease if we reject the galaxies in the substructure,
1066: % therefore, the galaxy orbits change according to the changes in observed VDPs and
1067: % in galaxy number density profiles.
1068:
1069: %In contrast, if the substructure is in the inner region of the cluster,
1070: % then rejecting the galaxies in the substructure may make the galaxy number density profile shallower.
1071: %Therefore, calculated $\beta_{\rm orb}$ cna become smaller
1072: % because the observed VDPs decrease and the calculated VDPs may increase.
1073:
1074: \subsection{Comparison with the Previous Studies}
1075: For 10 Abell clusters,
1076: %we have found that the orbits of galaxies in six clusters (A85, 779, 1651, 2199, 2670, and 2734)
1077: we have found that the orbits of galaxies
1078: are consistent with isotropic orbits in most clusters,
1079: although it is difficult to conclude strongly for some clusters
1080: due to the large errors (e.g., A779, A1650)
1081: and the variation as a function of clustercentric distance (e.g., A1795, A1800, A1795, A2199)
1082: in calculated $\beta_{\rm orb}$.
1083: Isotropic galaxy orbits for majority of our sample clusters,
1084: are consistent with
1085: those for composite clusters in the previous large cluster surveys
1086: (e.g., \citealt{car97a,car97b,van00,rines03}).
1087: Existence of anisotropic galaxy orbits is also reported
1088: in other studies. For A2218, \citet{nk96}
1089: found that the galaxy orbits are tangential at small radii
1090: ($R\leq400$ kpc) and are radial at large radii.
1091: \citet{ben06} analyzed the galaxy orbits for five clusters up to $r\sim r_{200}$,
1092: and reported that A2199 and A496 are consistent with tangential orbits,
1093: while A2390 radial orbits. Two clusters (MS1358 and A576)
1094: appear to have radial orbits, but these clusters may not be in
1095: hydrostatic equilibrium.
1096:
1097: Numerical simulations showed that cluster
1098: galaxies are likely to follow isotropic orbits as seen in many
1099: clusters (e.g., \citealt{ghi98}).
1100: In detail, isotropic orbits are
1101: preferred in the inner region, and radial orbits in the outer region,
1102: indicating existence of accreting galaxies from the cluster outskirt
1103: \citep{crone94,cl96,tor97,tho98,ckk00,fal05}.
1104: However, tangential galaxy orbits found in the observational data, are not
1105: commonly seen in simulation data \citep{tor97,tho98}.
1106: Interestingly, \citet{ben06} reported an offset in orbital profile
1107: for their observed and simulated clusters in the sense that the
1108: simulated clusters show preferentially tangential orbits.
1109:
1110: For the orbital difference between early-type and late-type galaxies,
1111: the previous studies using the composite cluster, led to the conclusion
1112: that early-types have quasi-isotropic orbits and late-types radial orbits
1113: \citep{biv97,mah99,bk04}.
1114: Interestingly, the clusters in which orbital difference
1115: among subsamples were studied in this study,
1116: show no significant difference between them.
1117: In order to investigate the origin of difference between this study
1118: and the previous studies,
1119: we show VDPs and projected galaxy number density profiles
1120: for several composite clusters in Figure \ref{fig-comp}.
1121: We construct the composite clusters for three different samples:
1122: Sample A - using four clusters in which orbital properties for subsamples
1123: are studied (A779, 1650, 1795, and 2199),
1124: Sample B - using six clusters in which orbital properties among subsamples
1125: are not studied (A85, 1651, 1800, 2034, 2670, and 2734),
1126: and Sample C - using 62 clusters without definite merging evidence, selected in \S \ref{mem}.
1127: All samples are constructed using the galaxies outside the substructure ($\delta\leq2.0$).
1128:
1129: The VDP for the composite cluster is derived
1130: in the combined distribution of velocity relative to the cluster
1131: mean and normalized by the velocity dispersion of each cluster.
1132: It is known that the shape of VDP provides some hints for the galaxy
1133: orbits in clusters, and varies depending on clusters
1134: \citep{dHK96,mah99,mur02,agu07}: flat, decaying, or rising VDP.
1135: It appears that the differences in VDPs and in projected galaxy number density profiles
1136: between early-type and late-type galaxies for Sample A
1137: are not significant at $0.3<R/r_{200}<0.8$ where the VDPs are available,
1138: while those in Sample B are large.
1139: In Sample C, the difference is significant with small errors:
1140: the values of velocity dispersion for late-types are larger than those for early-types,
1141: and the VDP for late-types is decreasing along the
1142: radius while that for early-types is nearly flat.
1143: Sample C is comparable to the composite cluster based on ENACS data used in
1144: \citet{bk04}, and our results for Sample C are similar to theirs.
1145: Thus, if we adopt the result of \citet{kbm04} that
1146: early-types have isotropic orbits, then the orbits for late-types
1147: in our composite cluster (Sample C) can be regarded as radial orbits,
1148: which is consistent with the results of the previous studies.
1149: Similarly, since not only VDPs but also projected galaxy number density profiles
1150: are not distinguishable in Sample A at $0.3<R/r_{200}<0.8$,
1151: it is expected that the orbital difference
1152: between early-type and late-type galaxies in Sample A is not significant.
1153: If we use the galaxies with lower probability of belonging to the substructure (e.g., $\delta\leq1.4$),
1154: the results change little, indicating the effects of the galaxies substructure
1155: is not significant.
1156: Therefore, no orbital difference between early-type and late-type galaxies in Sample A
1157: can be interpreted as their own characteristics of individual clusters.
1158: Previously, \citet{rines05} also reported that the VDP of ELG is not
1159: different from the non-ELG for CAIRNS clusters,
1160: but their spatial distributions are different.
1161: In numerical simulations,
1162: \citet{dia01} found that there is no significant difference in
1163: orbital properties between red and blue galaxies : both red and
1164: blue galaxies are close to being isotropic.
1165: Thus, it is necessary to study what makes the diversity of galaxy orbits
1166: using more observational and simulation results.
1167: %Although there are few previous observational and simulation results of tangential orbits
1168: % for late-type galaxies, above examples imply that these galaxies
1169: % do not always have radial orbits.
1170: % are necessary to identify the origin of the
1171: % tangential orbits for late-type galaxies.
1172:
1173: \section{Summary}\label{sum}
1174:
1175: We present the results of a study for the galaxy orbits in galaxy
1176: clusters using a spectroscopic sample of galaxies in SDSS and
1177: 2dFGRS. Our results are summarized as follows:
1178:
1179: \begin{enumerate}
1180:
1181: \item We have determined the member galaxies of 731 and 230 Abell clusters
1182: covered in SDSS and 2dFGRS, respectively.
1183: We have selected 10 clusters using three criteria :
1184: the number of member galaxies is greater than or equal to 40,
1185: the spatial coverage is complete,
1186: and X-ray mass profile is available in the literature.
1187:
1188: \item For the selected 10 clusters,
1189: we derived the radial profile of the galaxy number density and
1190: velocity dispersion for all, early-type, and late-type galaxies
1191: outside the substructure ($\delta\leq2.0$).
1192:
1193: \item We have investigated the galaxy orbits for our sample
1194: clusters with constant and variable $\beta_{\rm orb}$ through the
1195: clustercentric radius using Jeans equation.
1196: The resulting galaxy orbits based on two methods appear to be consistent.
1197:
1198: \item Using all member galaxies,
1199: most of our sample clusters are found to be have isotropic orbits,
1200: although it is difficult to conclude strongly for some clusters
1201: due to the large errors (e.g., A779, A1650)
1202: and the variation as a function of clustercentric distance (e.g., A1795, A1800, A1795, A2199)
1203: in calculated $\beta_{\rm orb}$.
1204: For four clusters (A779, 1650, 1795, and 2199)
1205: the orbital difference between early-type and late-type galaxies
1206: appears not to be significant.
1207:
1208: \item We have determined the cluster morphology
1209: using the dispersion-ellipse method,
1210: and have found the ellipticity in the range of $0.15-0.36$,
1211: indicating no strong elongation for our sample clusters.
1212:
1213: \item We have investigated dynamical status for our sample
1214: clusters using substructure (1D, 2D, and 3D) tests, the relation
1215: between X-ray luminosity and the velocity dispersion or the virial mass,
1216: and peculiar velocity of BCGs. It is found that the majority of
1217: our sample clusters are dynamically relaxed system.
1218:
1219: \end{enumerate}
1220:
1221: \acknowledgments
1222: %We would like to thank anonymous for useful comments.
1223: We thank the referee, A. Biviano, for useful comments that improved
1224: significantly the original manuscript.
1225: We also thank Woong-Tae Kim for useful comments on the galaxy number density profiles
1226: of clusters.
1227: We thank A.J.R. Sanderson and M. Markevitch for kindly providing us the central gas
1228: temperature data of our sample clusters.
1229: We also would like to thank all the people involved in creating
1230: the SDSS, 2dFGRS and NED. Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has
1231: been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating
1232: Institutions, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department
1233: of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the
1234: Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck Society, and the Higher
1235: Education Funding Council for England. The SDSS Web Site is
1236: http://www.sdss.org. The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical
1237: Research Consortium for the Participating Institutions. The
1238: Participating Institutions are the American Museum of Natural
1239: History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, the University of Basel,
1240: the University of Cambridge, Case Western Reserve University, the
1241: University of Chicago, Drexel University, Fermilab, the Institute
1242: for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, Johns Hopkins
1243: University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the
1244: Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the
1245: Korean Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST),
1246: Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Max Planck Institute for
1247: Astronomy, the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, New Mexico
1248: State University, Ohio State University, the University of
1249: Pittsburgh, the University of Portsmouth, Princeton University,
1250: the US Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington. This
1251: research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database
1252: (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
1253: California Institute of Technology, under contract with the
1254: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
1255: This work was supported in part by grant R01-2004-000-10490-0 and
1256: R01-2007-000-20336-0 from the
1257: Basic Research Program of the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation.
1258:
1259: \appendix
1260:
1261: \section{Properties of Individual Clusters}
1262:
1263: \subsection{Abell 85}
1264: A85 was covered in SDSS, but the outer region ($R>26\arcmin$) was
1265: not surveyed (see Fig. \ref{fig-spvel}).
1266: This cluster is in the complex of clusters Abell 85/87/89, and the member galaxies
1267: selected in this study include only Abell 85/87. The structure of
1268: this cluster is well studied by several authors
1269: \citep{lima02,dur98,kem02,dur05}: a southern blob (or group) that
1270: is merging from south ($\sim10\arcmin$ from the cluster center), a
1271: subcluster that is merging from southwest ($\sim4\arcmin$ from the
1272: cluster center), an extended 4 Mpc X-ray filament that is probably
1273: made of groups falling onto the main cluster. Interestingly, X-ray
1274: studies based on recent {\it Chandra} and XMM-Newton data (e.g.,
1275: \citealt{kem02,dur05}), provided an evidence of past and present
1276: merger activity for this cluster.
1277: Our galaxy data showed that only A87 ($\sim30\arcmin$, or 1.9 Mpc
1278: from the southwest of the main cluster) is detected as a substructure,
1279: but some of the galaxies in A87 with $\delta\leq2.0$ were removed for the orbit analysis.
1280: In addition, a small deviation from the scaling relation between X-ray and optical data
1281: and a small peculiar velocity of the BCG do not imply dynamical non-equilibrium.
1282: The galaxy orbits are consistent with
1283: isotropic orbits within the error at $0.3<r<1.5$ Mpc.
1284: Therefore, it appears that main cluster of A85 is stabilized at present, although it
1285: experienced a merging in the past, and is not disturbed significantly
1286: by the current merging event.
1287: We also find that the determined
1288: galaxy orbits do not change significantly, if we use different
1289: X-ray mass profiles as seen in Figure \ref{fig-masscomp}.
1290:
1291: % (but could not be determined at $R>1.5$ Mpc
1292: % because the observed VDP exceeds the upper envelope of the computed one. % due to the contamination of Abell 87.
1293:
1294: \subsection{Abell 779}
1295: A779 is one of the nearest (z$\sim$0.023) clusters and
1296: shows the faintest X-ray luminosity in our sample.
1297: The velocity dispersion is the smallest ($\sigma_p=491^{+40}_{-36}$ km s$^{-1}$) among our sample, and
1298: the number of late-types ($N_{gal}=78$) is larger than that of early-types ($N_{gal}=67$).
1299: This cluster has a cD galaxy, NGC 2832, which is known to be at rest in cluster potential \citep{oh01},
1300: but was not included in the spectroscopic sample of SDSS.
1301: The VDP using all member galaxies with $\delta\leq2.0$ declines at $R\lesssim0.8$ Mpc (see Fig. \ref{fig-disp1}),
1302: which is consistent with the results of the previous studies \citep{mah99,rd06}.
1303: The galaxy orbits using all members appear to be consistent with radial or isotropic orbit within the uncertainty
1304: up to $r\sim r_{200}$, but it is difficult to conclude strongly
1305: due to the large error of calculated $\beta_{\rm orb}$.
1306: The orbits of early-types appear to be consistent with being radial or isotropic within the uncertainty
1307: through the radius,
1308: but strong conclusion is difficult due to the large error of calculated $\beta_{\rm orb}$.
1309: The orbits of late-types are consistent with being radial in the inner region ($r<0.1$ Mpc) where the observed VDPs
1310: are not available,
1311: but with being isotropic within the error at $r<1$ Mpc and become tangential at outer region.
1312:
1313: \subsection{Abell 1650}
1314: A1650 was included in both SDSS and 2dFGRS.
1315: A recent XMM-Newton observation showed no evidence
1316: for spatial temperature variation and surface brightness irregularity,
1317: indicating a relaxed system \citep{ty03}.
1318: Similarly, we found no strong evidence for non-equilibrium (see Table \ref{tab-sum}).
1319: Figure \ref{fig-cmr} shows that ${\rm B_J-R_F}$ color of the BCG
1320: in this cluster is $\sim0.8$ redder than the color expected from the CMR.
1321: However, this color deviation of the BCG in this cluster
1322: is not seen in other studies \citep{md00,pim06}.
1323: Therefore, the ${\rm B_J-R_F}$ color of the BCG given in 2dFGRS needs further investigation.
1324: The galaxy orbits for all member galaxies are found to be
1325: isotropic within the uncertainty or tangential at $r>0.1$ Mpc.
1326: Interestingly, the orbits for early-type and late-type galaxies
1327: appear to be tangential at $r>0.3$ Mpc.
1328:
1329: \subsection{Abell 1651}
1330: A1651 is included in both SDSS and 2dFGRS.
1331: This cluster is known to be a dynamically relaxed system:
1332: regular shape in the {\it ROSAT} PSPC image and
1333: symmetric temperature profile from {\it ASCA} data \citep{mar98}.
1334: Interestingly, a large peculiar velocity ($v_p=350$ km s$^{-1}$) of the BCG
1335: is found in this study (see Fig. \ref{fig-pec}),
1336: indicating a dynamically unrelaxed system.
1337: \citet{oh01} already identified a peculiar velocity of the BCG ($252-258$ km s$^{-1}$),
1338: but they concluded that the peculiar velocity is not large since a significance,
1339: $S$ is less than 3.
1340: They obtained $S\sim1.3$ with 39 member galaxies.
1341: However, we obtain $S=3.46$ with a large number of member galaxies
1342: ($N_{gal}=258$) and small velocity error, indicating a significant
1343: ($S>3$) measured peculiar velocity.
1344: If we use the galaxies outside the substructure with $\delta\leq2.0$,
1345: the result change little.
1346: This cluster was included in Las Campanas/Anglo-Australian Telescope Rich Cluster Survey
1347: (LARCS; \citealt{pim06}), where a recession velocity of the cluster
1348: and the cD galaxy was determined to be $25466\pm57$ and $25571\pm27$ km s$^{-1}$, respectively.
1349: However, we obtain the mean velocity of the cluster (biweight location used in this study),
1350: $v_{\rm cl}=25278\pm95$ km s$^{-1}$ using their data, confirming
1351: significant peculiar velocity, $v_p=293$ km s$^{-1}$.
1352: In contrast, the galaxy orbits are found to be isotropic
1353: within the uncertainty through the radius (see Fig. \ref{fig-orbit1}),
1354: which means that the galaxies are in
1355: equilibrium with the cluster potential, being consistent with the result from X-ray data.
1356: Therefore, it would be interesting to
1357: investigate what makes the large peculiar velocity of the BCG.
1358:
1359: \subsection{Abell 1795}
1360: A1795 is the most X-ray-luminous cluster in our sample.
1361: A cD galaxy in this cluster was not included in the spectroscopic sample of SDSS.
1362: A large peculiar velocity ($365$ km s$^{-1}$) of the cD galaxy was found
1363: by \citet{hill88}, but later \citet{oh94,oh01} reported the peculiar
1364: velocity is not large ($150-180$ km s$^{-1}$) and its significance
1365: is less than 3. Although detailed {\it Chandra} data showed that
1366: the central core of this cluster is not relaxed (e.g., \citealt{mar01,ett02,fab01}),
1367: other wide-field X-ray data indicate that the cluster is close to
1368: being dynamically relaxed \citep{bh96,bt96,tam01}.
1369: We found that the galaxy orbits derived from all member galaxies with $\delta\leq2.0$ are
1370: consistent with being tangential at $0.3<r<1.2$ Mpc,
1371: but being isotropic within the uncertainty in the outer region.
1372: Interestingly, the orbits of early-types appear to be tangential at $r>0.3$ Mpc,
1373: while those of late-types to be tangential or isotropic within the error.
1374: The results with different mass profiles are shown in Figure \ref{fig-masscomp}.
1375:
1376: \subsection{Abell 1800}
1377: A1800 is one of the member clusters in the Bootes supercluster \citep{ein01},
1378: and has a relatively small number ratio ($\sim 0.16)$ of late-types to early-types
1379: among our sample clusters.
1380: There is no strong evidence of dynamically non-equilibrium
1381: from the substructure tests and the scaling relation between X-ray and optical data.
1382: The galaxy orbits change from radial ($r<0.2$ Mpc),
1383: to isotropic ($0.2<r<0.8$ Mpc) within the error and to tangential ($0.8<r<1.8$) Mpc.
1384:
1385: \subsection{Abell 2034}
1386: A2034 is the most distant cluster (z$\sim0.113$),
1387: and has the largest velocity dispersion ($1208_{-76}^{+80}$ km s$^{-1}$)
1388: in our sample clusters.
1389: Interestingly, there are only four late-types out of 78 member galaxies.
1390: Since the observed VDP is
1391: larger than the upper envelope ($\beta_{\rm orb}=0.99$) of the computed one over the radius,
1392: it is difficult to conclude using top and middle panels.
1393: However, the bottom panel indicates that the galaxy orbits
1394: are radial in the outer region ($r>1$ Mpc), and those are consistent with isotropic orbits
1395: within the uncertainty at $0.2<r<1$ Mpc.
1396:
1397: Larger values of observed VDP than the strong radial orbit can be interpreted as non-equilibrium of this cluster,
1398: although substructure tests and the scaling relation between X-ray
1399: and optical data in this study imply no strong substructure.
1400: However, other studies showed direct evidence of dynamical non-equilibrium.
1401: For example, detailed analysis of {\it Chandra} data revealed
1402: evidence for an ongoing merger \citep{kem03}: northern cold front that is a
1403: discontinuity of the surface brightness on the northeast edge of
1404: the cluster, large concentration of galaxies including a cD galaxy
1405: just ahead of the cold front, and excess of emission to the south of cluster.
1406: In addition, a cD galaxy in the main cluster is offset
1407: $\sim1\arcmin$ from the X-ray centroid.
1408: Unfortunately, the cD galaxy is not included in the spectroscopic sample of SDSS.
1409: If we adopt a receding velocity ($v_p=33445\pm35$ km s$^{-1}$) of the cD
1410: galaxy in \citet{mil02}, then the peculiar velocity for this
1411: galaxy is $477\pm163$ km s$^{-1}$ with the significance of $S=3.378$.
1412: This large peculiar velocity becomes larger if
1413: we use recession velocity ($v_{\rm cl}=34373$ km s$^{-1}$) of the
1414: cluster determined in the same reference.
1415: %In conclusion, the dynamics of cD galaxy and X-ray data imply that
1416: % this cluster is out of equilibrium, being consistent with orbit analysis.
1417: %thus Jeans analysis
1418: % with an assumption of dynamical equilibrium does not yield meaningful result.
1419:
1420: \subsection{Abell 2199} \label{a2199}
1421: The number of member galaxies ($N_{gal}=754$) in A2199 is the
1422: largest among our sample clusters, and the number ($N_{gal}=372$)
1423: of early-types is comparable to that ($N_{gal}=382$) of
1424: late-types.
1425: A2199 is known to be one of the richest, regular
1426: cluster \citep{mar99}, and contains several infalling bound
1427: subclusters \citep{rines01}. \citet{rines02} derived the VDP
1428: up to 8 Mpc using $\sim300$ member galaxies in
1429: A2199, and found that the observed profile is consistent with an
1430: isotropic orbit based on the caustic mass profile.
1431: \citet{lok06}, using 180 member galaxies within $R\sim1.1$ Mpc, determined
1432: $\beta_{\rm orb}=-0.55^{+1.05}_{-2.75}$ based on the joint analysis of
1433: velocity dispersion and kurtosis, which is consistent with a
1434: tangential or isotropic orbit.
1435: We found, using an independent X-ray mass profile and a smoothed velocity profile, that
1436: the galaxy orbits are isotropic at $0.1<r<0.7$ Mpc within the error,
1437: and are radial in the outer region.
1438: However, \citet{ben06} found that A2199 has tangentially anisotropic orbit
1439: in the inner region ($R<1.1$ Mpc), using an X-ray mass profile of
1440: \citet{mar99} and polynomial fit of VDP.
1441: %%HHS revision
1442: This discrepancy is demonstrated in Figure \ref{fig-masscomp} (c),
1443: and is because the mass profile of \citet{mar99} they used
1444: is larger than that we used \citep{san03} (see \S \ref{discuss} for more detail).
1445: We also investigated the orbital difference between early-type and
1446: late-type galaxies in A2199.
1447: Interestingly, both subsamples appear
1448: to have radial through the radius, indicating they infall from the outer region.
1449:
1450: \subsection{Abell 2670}
1451: Abell 2670 was included in both SDSS and 2dFGRS.
1452: We found no strong evidence of substructure from the substructure tests,
1453: but identified a large peculiar velocity of the BCG, which
1454: was already found by \citet{bird94a}.
1455: Although X-ray morphology seen by {\it ROSAT} is regular,
1456: indicating a relaxed system (\citealt{hw97}),
1457: \citet{bird94b} concluded that this cluster may consist of
1458: four subclusters that are merging along the line of sight,
1459: using $\sim230$ galaxies in \citet{seg88} catalog.
1460: \citet{hw97} also suggested a merging activity
1461: since the observed VDP is much greater
1462: than that expected from the X-ray mass profile.
1463: In contrast, we found isotropic galaxy orbits, which imply
1464: a relaxed system. The observed dispersion profile in
1465: this study is not significantly different from that in \citet{hw97}.
1466: However, X-ray mass profiles adopted in this study are larger than that
1467: used in \citet{hw97}, thus the value of expected dispersion
1468: is larger than that in \citet{hw97}. Therefore,
1469: other evidence (e.g., irregular gas temperature map)
1470: is needed to confirm the merging activity of this cluster.
1471:
1472: \subsection{Abell 2734}
1473: \citet{bur04} found no strong substructure using 125 velocity data
1474: from the 2dFGRS data.
1475: Similar results were found by other authors: \citet{sol99} and \citet{bivet02}
1476: identified no substructure using 45 and 77 member galaxies in
1477: ENACS data, respectively.
1478: However, our 3D substructure test resulted in a
1479: strong substructure in this cluster.
1480: It is due to the larger spatial coverage than previous studies,
1481: therefore, the substructure at $R\sim30\arcmin$ ($\sim2$ Mpc) to the south-east
1482: is included in this study.
1483: Comparison of {\it ROSAT} X-ray image
1484: with the optical one also shows a good agreement \citep{kol01}.
1485: \citet{dHK96} derived a flat VDP up to R$\sim1.5$ Mpc using 77
1486: velocity data in ENACS.
1487: %However, we obtained increasing dispersion profile up to R$\sim3$ Mpc
1488: % using 131 member galaxies, rejecting 61 galaxies in the substructure.
1489: The galaxy orbits appear to be isotropic within the uncertainty
1490: through the radius, indicating a dynamical equilibrium, which is consistent with the
1491: previous studies.
1492:
1493:
1494: \clearpage
1495: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1496: \bibitem [\protect\citeauthoryear{Abell et al.}{1989}]{aco89}
1497: Abell G. O., Corwin H. G., \& Olowin R. P., 1989, ApJS, 70, 1
1498:
1499: \bibitem[Adami et al.(1998)]{abm98} Adami, C., Biviano, A.,
1500: \& Mazure, A.\ 1998, \aap, 331, 439
1501:
1502: \bibitem[Aguerri et al.(2007)]{agu07} Aguerri, J.~A.~L.,
1503: S{\'a}nchez-Janssen, R., \& Mu{\~n}oz-Tu{\~n}{\'o}n, C.\ 2007, \aap, 471,
1504: 17
1505:
1506: \bibitem[Baum(1959)]{baum59} Baum, W.~A.\ 1959, \pasp, 71, 106
1507:
1508: \bibitem[Beers et al.(1990)]{beers90}
1509: Beers T. C., Flynn K., \& Gebhardt K., 1990, AJ, 100, 32
1510:
1511: \bibitem[Benatov et al.(2006)]{ben06} Benatov, L., Rines, K.,
1512: Natarajan, P., Kravtsov, A., \& Nagai, D.\ 2006, \mnras, 370, 427
1513:
1514: \bibitem[Bernardi et al.(2003)]{ber03} Bernardi, M., et al.\
1515: 2003, \aj, 125, 1817
1516:
1517: \bibitem[Bernardi et al.(2006)]{ber06} Bernardi, M., Nichol,
1518: R.~C., Sheth, R.~K., Miller, C.~J., \& Brinkmann, J.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 1288
1519:
1520: \bibitem[Bicknell et al.(1989)]{bic89} Bicknell, G.~V.,
1521: Bruce, T.~E.~G., Carter, D., \& Killeen, N.~E.~B.\ 1989, \apj, 336, 639
1522:
1523: \bibitem[Binney \& Mamon(1982)]{bm82} Binney, J., \& Mamon,
1524: G.~A.\ 1982, \mnras, 200, 361
1525:
1526: \bibitem[Binney \& Tremaine(1987)]{bt87}
1527: Binney, J., \& Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic Dynamics (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press)
1528:
1529: \bibitem[Bird \& Beers(1993)]{bb93}
1530: Bird C. M., \& Beers, T. C.\ 1993, AJ, 105, 1596
1531:
1532: \bibitem[Bird(1994a)]{bird94a} Bird, C.~M.\ 1994a, \aj, 107, 1637
1533:
1534: \bibitem[Bird(1994b)]{bird94b} Bird, C.\ 1994b, \apj, 422, 480
1535:
1536: \bibitem[Biviano et al.(1997)]{biv97} Biviano, A., Katgert,
1537: P., Mazure, A., Moles, M., den Hartog, R., Perea, J., \& Focardi, P.\ 1997,
1538: \aap, 321, 84
1539:
1540: \bibitem[Biviano(2002)]{biv02} Biviano, A.\ 2002, Tracing
1541: Cosmic Evolution with Galaxy Clusters, 268, 127
1542:
1543: \bibitem[Biviano et al.(2002)]{bivet02} Biviano, A., Katgert,
1544: P., Thomas, T., \& Adami, C.\ 2002, \aap, 387, 8
1545:
1546: \bibitem[Biviano \& Katgert(2004)]{bk04} Biviano, A., \&
1547: Katgert, P.\ 2004, \aap, 424, 779
1548:
1549: \bibitem[Biviano(2006)]{biv06} Biviano, A.\ 2006,
1550: XXVIth Astrophysics Moriond Meeting: "From dark halos to light",
1551: ed. L. Tresse, S. Maurogordato and J. Tran Thanh Van, (astro-ph/0607040)
1552:
1553: \bibitem[Blanton et al.(2003)]{bla03} Blanton, M.~R., Lin,
1554: H., Lupton, R.~H., Maley, F.~M., Young, N., Zehavi, I., \&
1555: Loveday, J.\ 2003, \aj, 125, 2276
1556:
1557: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{B\"ohringer et al.}{2000}]{boh00}
1558: B\"ohringer H., et al., 2000, ApJS, 129, 435
1559:
1560: \bibitem[B\"ohringer et al.(2004)]{boh04}
1561: B\"ohringer H., et al., 2004, A\&A, 425, 367
1562:
1563: \bibitem[Briel \& Henry(1996)]{bh96} Briel, U.~G., \& Henry,
1564: J.~P.\ 1996, \apj, 472, 131
1565:
1566: \bibitem[Brownstein \& Moffat(2006)]{bm06} Brownstein,
1567: J.~R., \& Moffat, J.~W.\ 2006, \mnras, 367, 527
1568:
1569: \bibitem[Buote \& Tsai(1996)]{bt96} Buote, D.~A., \& Tsai,
1570: J.~C.\ 1996, \apj, 458, 27
1571:
1572: \bibitem[Burgett et al.(2004)]{bur04}
1573: Burgett W. S., et al., 2004, MNRAS, 352, 605
1574:
1575: \bibitem[Carlberg et al.(1997a)]{car97a} Carlberg, R.~G., Yee,
1576: H.~K.~C., \& Ellingson, E.\ 1997a, \apj, 478, 462
1577:
1578: \bibitem[Carlberg et al.(1997b)]{car97b} Carlberg, R.~G., et
1579: al.\ 1997b, \apjl, 485, L13
1580:
1581: \bibitem [\protect\citeauthoryear{Carter \& Metcalfe}{1980}]{carter80}
1582: Carter D., \& Metcalfe N., 1980, MNRAS, 191, 325
1583:
1584: \bibitem[Castander et al.(2001)]{cas01} Castander, F.~J., et
1585: al.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 2331
1586:
1587: \bibitem[Cavaliere \& Fusco-Femiano(1976)]{cf76} Cavaliere,
1588: A., \& Fusco-Femiano, R.\ 1976, \aap, 49, 137
1589:
1590: \bibitem [\protect\citeauthoryear{Colless et al.}{2001}]{col01}
1591: Colless M. et al., 2001, MNRAS, 328, 1039
1592:
1593: \bibitem[Cole \& Lacey(1996)]{cl96} Cole, S., \& Lacey, C.\
1594: 1996, \mnras, 281, 716
1595:
1596: \bibitem[Col{\'{\i}}n et al.(2000)]{ckk00} Col{\'{\i}}n, P.,
1597: Klypin, A.~A., \& Kravtsov, A.~V.\ 2000, \apj, 539, 561
1598:
1599: \bibitem[C\^ot\'e et al.(2001)]{cote01} C\^ot\'e, P., et al. 2001, \apj, 559, 828
1600:
1601: \bibitem[Crone et al.(1994)]{crone94} Crone, M.~M., Evrard,
1602: A.~E., \& Richstone, D.~O.\ 1994, \apj, 434, 402
1603:
1604: \bibitem[De Grandi \& Molendi(2002)]{dm02} De Grandi, S., \&
1605: Molendi, S.\ 2002, \apj, 567, 163
1606:
1607: \bibitem[De Propris et al.(2004)]{prop04} De Propris, R., et
1608: al.\ 2004, \mnras, 351, 125
1609:
1610: \bibitem[Demarco et al.(2003)]{dem03} Demarco, R., Magnard,
1611: F., Durret, F., \& M{\'a}rquez, I.\ 2003, \aap, 407, 437
1612:
1613: \bibitem[den Hartog \& Katgert(1996)]{dHK96}
1614: den Hartog R., \& Katgert P., 1996, MNRAS, 279, 349
1615:
1616: \bibitem[Diaferio et al.(2001)]{dia01} Diaferio, A.,
1617: Kauffmann, G., Balogh, M.~L., White, S.~D.~M., Schade, D., \& Ellingson,
1618: E.\ 2001, \mnras, 323, 999
1619:
1620: \bibitem[Dressler(1980)]{dre80} Dressler, A.\ 1980, \apj, 236, 351
1621:
1622: \bibitem[Dressler \& Shectman(1988)]{ds88}
1623: Dressler A., \& Shectman S. A., 1988, AJ, 95, 985
1624:
1625: \bibitem[Durret et al.(1998)]{dur98} Durret, F., Forman, W.,
1626: Gerbal, D., Jones, C., \& Vikhlinin, A.\ 1998, \aap, 335, 41
1627:
1628: \bibitem[Durret et al.(2005)]{dur05} Durret, F., Lima Neto,
1629: G.~B., \& Forman, W.\ 2005, \aap, 432, 809
1630:
1631: \bibitem[Ebeling et al.(1998)]{ebe98} Ebeling, H., Edge,
1632: A.~C., Bohringer, H., Allen, S.~W., Crawford, C.~S., Fabian, A.~C., Voges,
1633: W., \& Huchra, J.~P.\ 1998, \mnras, 301, 881
1634:
1635: \bibitem[Ebeling et al.(2000)]{ebe00}
1636: Ebeling H., Edge A. C., Allen S. W., Crawford C. S., Fabian A. C., \& Huchra J. P., 2000, MNRAS, 318, 333
1637:
1638: \bibitem[Einasto et al.(2001)]{ein01}
1639: Einasto M., Einasto J., Tago E., M{\"u}ller V., \& Andernach, H., 2001, AJ, 122, 2222
1640:
1641: %\bibitem[Eisenstein et al.(2001)]{eis01} Eisenstein, D.~J.,
1642: %et al.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 2267
1643:
1644: \bibitem[Ettori et al.(2002)]{ett02} Ettori, S., Fabian,
1645: A.~C., Allen, S.~W., \& Johnstone, R.~M.\ 2002, \mnras, 331, 635
1646:
1647: \bibitem[Faber(1973)]{faber73} Faber, S.~M.\ 1973, \apj, 179, 731
1648:
1649: \bibitem[Fabian et al.(2001)]{fab01} Fabian, A.~C., Sanders,
1650: J.~S., Ettori, S., Taylor, G.~B., Allen, S.~W., Crawford, C.~S., Iwasawa,
1651: K., \& Johnstone, R.~M.\ 2001, \mnras, 321, L33
1652:
1653: \bibitem[Fadda et al.(1996)]{fadda96}
1654: Fadda D., Girardi M., Giuricin G., Mardirossian F., \& Mezzetti M., ApJ, 473, 670
1655:
1656: \bibitem[Faltenbacher et al.(2005)]{fal05} Faltenbacher, A.,
1657: Kravtsov, A.~V., Nagai, D., \& Gottl{\"o}ber, S.\ 2005, \mnras, 358, 139
1658:
1659: %\bibitem[Finoguenov et al.(2001)]{fin01} Finoguenov, A., Reiprich, T.~H., B\"ohringer, H.\ 2001, \aap, 368, 749
1660:
1661: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(1996)]{fuk96} Fukugita, M.,
1662: Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J.~E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., \& Schneider,
1663: D.~P.\ 1996, \aj, 111, 1748
1664:
1665: \bibitem[Gallazzi et al.(2006)]{gal06} Gallazzi, A., Charlot,
1666: S., Brinchmann, J., \& White, S.~D.~M.\ 2006, \mnras, 370, 1106
1667:
1668: \bibitem[Ghigna et al.(1998)]{ghi98} Ghigna, S., Moore, B.,
1669: Governato, F., Lake, G., Quinn, T., \& Stadel, J.\ 1998, \mnras,
1670: 300, 146
1671:
1672: %\bibitem[Girardi et al.(1997)]{gir97} Girardi, M., Escalera,
1673: %E., Fadda, D., Giuricin, G., Mardirossian, F., \& Mezzetti, M.\ 1997, \apj,
1674: %482, 41
1675:
1676: \bibitem[Goto(2005)]{goto05} Goto, T.\ 2005, \mnras, 359, 1415
1677:
1678: \bibitem[Gunn et al.(1998)]{gunn98} Gunn, J.~E., et al.\ 1998,
1679: \aj, 116, 3040
1680:
1681: \bibitem[Gunn et al.(2006)]{gunn06} Gunn, J.~E., et al.\ 2006,
1682: \aj, 131, 2332
1683:
1684: \bibitem[Hilton et al.(2005)]{hilton05} Hilton, M., et al.\ 2005, \mnras, 363, 661
1685:
1686: \bibitem[Hernquist(1990)]{her90} Hernquist, L.\ 1990, \apj, 356, 359
1687:
1688: \bibitem[Hill et al.(1988)]{hill88} Hill, J.~M., Hintzen, P.,
1689: Oegerle, W.~R., Romanishin, W., Lesser, M.~P., Eisenhamer, J.~D., \&
1690: Batuski, D.~J.\ 1988, \apjl, 332, L23
1691:
1692: \bibitem[Hobbs \& Willmore(1997)]{hw97} Hobbs, I.~S., \&
1693: Willmore, A.~P.\ 1997, \mnras, 289, 685
1694:
1695: \bibitem[Hogg et al.(2001)]{hogg01} Hogg, D.~W., Finkbeiner,
1696: D.~P., Schlegel, D.~J., \& Gunn, J.~E.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 2129
1697:
1698: \bibitem[Hogg et al.(2004)]{hogg04} Hogg, D.~W., et al.\ 2004,
1699: \apjl, 601, L29
1700:
1701: %\bibitem[Horner et al.(1999)]{hor99} Horner, D.~J.,
1702: %Mushotzky, R.~F., \& Scharf, C.~A.\ 1999, \apj, 520, 78
1703:
1704: \bibitem[Hwang \& Lee(2007)]{hl07} Hwang, H.~S., \& Lee,
1705: M.~G.\ 2007, \apj, 662, 236
1706:
1707: \bibitem[Hwang et al.(2007)]{hwang07} Hwang, H.~S., et al. 2007,
1708: \apj, in press (astro-ph/0709.4309)
1709:
1710: \bibitem[Isobe et al.(1990)]{iso90} Isobe, T., Feigelson,
1711: E.~D., Akritas, M.~G., \& Babu, G.~J.\ 1990, \apj, 364, 104
1712:
1713: \bibitem[Ivezi{\'c} et al.(2004)]{ive04} Ivezi{\'c}, {\v Z}.,
1714: et al.\ 2004, Astronomische Nachrichten, 325, 583
1715:
1716: \bibitem[Jones \& Forman(1999)]{jf99} Jones C., \& Forman W., 1999, ApJ, 511, 65
1717:
1718: \bibitem[Katgert et al.(1996)]{kat96} Katgert, P., et al.\
1719: 1996, \aap, 310, 8
1720:
1721: \bibitem[Katgert et al.(2004)]{kbm04} Katgert, P., Biviano,
1722: A., \& Mazure, A.\ 2004, \apj, 600, 657
1723:
1724: \bibitem[Kempner et al.(2002)]{kem02} Kempner, J.~C.,
1725: Sarazin, C.~L., \& Ricker, P.~M.\ 2002, \apj, 579, 236
1726:
1727: \bibitem[Kempner et al.(2003)]{kem03} Kempner, J.~C.,
1728: Sarazin, C.~L., \& Markevitch, M.\ 2003, \apj, 593, 291
1729:
1730: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1992)]{ken92} Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1992,
1731: \apjs, 79, 255
1732:
1733: \bibitem[Kent \& Gunn(1982)]{kg82} Kent, S.~M., \& Gunn,
1734: J.~E.\ 1982, \aj, 87, 945
1735:
1736: \bibitem[Kim et al.(2005)]{kek05} Kim, W.-T., El-Zant, A.~A.,
1737: \& Kamionkowski, M.\ 2005, \apj, 632, 157
1738:
1739: \bibitem[Kolokotronis et al.(2001)]{kol01} Kolokotronis, V.,
1740: Basilakos, S., Plionis, M., \& Georgantopoulos, I.\ 2001, \mnras, 320, 49
1741:
1742: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ledlow et al.}{2003}]{ledlow03}
1743: Ledlow M. J., Voges W., Owen F. N., \& Burns J. O., 2003, AJ, 126, 2740
1744:
1745: \bibitem[Lewis et al.(2002)]{lew02} Lewis, I.~J., et al.\
1746: 2002, \mnras, 333, 279
1747:
1748: \bibitem[Lima Neto et al.(2001)]{lima02} Lima Neto, G.~B.,
1749: Pislar, V., \& Bagchi, J.\ 2001, \aap, 368, 440
1750:
1751: \bibitem[Lin et al.(2003)]{lin03} Lin, Y.-T., Mohr, J.~J., \&
1752: Stanford, S.~A.\ 2003, \apj, 591, 749
1753:
1754: \bibitem[{\L}okas \& Mamon(2003)]{lm03} {\L}okas, E.~L., \&
1755: Mamon, G.~A.\ 2003, \mnras, 343, 401
1756:
1757: \bibitem[{\L}okas et al.(2006)]{lok06} {\L}okas, E.~L.,
1758: Wojtak, R., Gottl{\"o}ber, S., Mamon, G.~A., \& Prada, F.\ 2006, \mnras,
1759: 367, 1463
1760:
1761: \bibitem[Lupton et al.(2002)]{lup02} Lupton, R.~H., Ivezic,
1762: Z., Gunn, J.~E., Knapp, G., Strauss, M.~A., \& Yasuda, N.\ 2002,
1763: \procspie, 4836, 350
1764:
1765: \bibitem[Madgwick et al.(2002)]{mad02} Madgwick, D.~S., et
1766: al.\ 2002, \mnras, 333, 133
1767:
1768: \bibitem[Mahdavi et al.(1999)]{mah99} Mahdavi, A., Geller,
1769: M.~J., B{\"o}hringer, H., Kurtz, M.~J., \& Ramella, M.\ 1999, \apj, 518, 69
1770:
1771: \bibitem[Margoniner \& de Carvalho(2000)]{md00} Margoniner,
1772: V.~E., \& de Carvalho, R.~R.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 1562
1773:
1774: \bibitem[Markevitch et al.(1998)]{mar98} Markevitch, M.,
1775: Forman, W.~R., Sarazin, C.~L., \& Vikhlinin, A.\ 1998, \apj, 503, 77
1776:
1777: \bibitem[Markevitch et al.(1999)]{mar99} Markevitch, M.,
1778: Vikhlinin, A., Forman, W.~R., \& Sarazin, C.~L.\ 1999, \apj, 527, 545
1779:
1780: \bibitem[Markevitch et al.(2001)]{mar01} Markevitch, M.,
1781: Vikhlinin, A., \& Mazzotta, P.\ 2001, \apjl, 562, L153
1782:
1783: \bibitem[McLaughlin(1999)]{mcl99} McLaughlin, D.~E.\ 1999,
1784: \aj, 117, 2398
1785:
1786: \bibitem[Merritt(1987)]{mer87} Merritt, D.\ 1987, \apj, 313, 121
1787:
1788: \bibitem[Miller et al.(2002)]{mil02} Miller, C.~J., Krughoff,
1789: K.~S., Batuski, D.~J., \& Hill, J.~M.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 1918
1790:
1791: \bibitem[Muriel et al.(2002)]{mur02} Muriel, H., Quintana,
1792: H., Infante, L., Lambas, D.~G., \& Way, M.~J.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 1934
1793:
1794: \bibitem[Natarajan \& Kneib(1996)]{nk96} Natarajan, P., \&
1795: Kneib, J.-P.\ 1996, \mnras, 283, 1031
1796:
1797: \bibitem[Navarro et al.(1997)]{nfw97} Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., \& White, S. D. M. 1997, \apj, 490, 493
1798:
1799: %\bibitem[Neumann \& Arnaud(1999)]{na99} Neumann, D.~M., \& Arnaud, M.\ 1999, \aap, 348, 711
1800:
1801: \bibitem[Oegerle \& Hill(1994)]{oh94} Oegerle, W.~R., \& Hill, J.~M.\ 1994, \aj, 107, 857
1802:
1803: \bibitem[Oegerle \& Hill(2001)]{oh01} Oegerle, W.~R., \& Hill, J.~M.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 2858
1804:
1805: \bibitem[Peebles(1993)]{pee93} Peebles, P.~J.~E.\ 1993,
1806: Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
1807:
1808: \bibitem[Pier et al.(2003)]{pier03} Pier, J.~R., Munn, J.~A.,
1809: Hindsley, R.~B., Hennessy, G.~S., Kent, S.~M., Lupton, R.~H., \&
1810: Ivezi{\'c}, {\v Z}.\ 2003, \aj, 125, 1559
1811:
1812: \bibitem[Pimbblet et al.(2006)]{pim06} Pimbblet, K.~A.,
1813: Smail, I., Edge, A.~C., O'Hely, E., Couch, W.~J., \& Zabludoff, A.~I.\
1814: 2006, \mnras, 366, 645
1815:
1816: \bibitem[Pinkney et al.(1996)]{pin96}
1817: Pinkney J., Roettiger K., Burns J. O., \& Bird C. M., 1996, ApJS, 104, 1
1818:
1819: \bibitem[Popesso et al.(2005)]{popesso05} Popesso, P., Biviano,
1820: A., B{\"o}hringer, H., Romaniello, M., \& Voges, W.\ 2005, \aap, 433, 431
1821:
1822: \bibitem[Pratt et al.(2007)]{pra07} Pratt, G.~W.,
1823: B{\"o}hringer, H., Croston, J.~H., Arnaud, M., Borgani, S., Finoguenov, A.,
1824: \& Temple, R.~F.\ 2007, \aap, 461, 71
1825:
1826: \bibitem[Quintana \& Melnick(1982)]{qm82} Quintana, H., \&
1827: Melnick, J.\ 1982, \aj, 87, 972
1828:
1829: \bibitem[Ramella et al.(2007)]{ram07} Ramella, M., et al.\
1830: 2007, \aap, 470, 39
1831:
1832: \bibitem[Ramirez \& de Souza(1998)]{rd98} Ramirez, A.~C., \&
1833: de Souza, R.~E.\ 1998, \apj, 496, 693
1834:
1835: \bibitem[Ram{\'{\i}}rez et al.(2000)]{rds00} Ram{\'{\i}}rez,
1836: A.~C., de Souza, R.~E., \& Schade, D.\ 2000, \apj, 533, 62
1837:
1838: \bibitem[Reiprich \& B\"ohringer(2002)]{rb02} Reiprich, T.~H., B\"ohringer, H.\ 2002, \apj, 567, 716
1839:
1840: %\bibitem[Richards et al.(2001)]{ric01} Richards, G.~T., et
1841: %al.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 2308
1842:
1843: \bibitem[Rines et al.(2001)]{rines01} Rines, K., Mahdavi, A.,
1844: Geller, M.~J., Diaferio, A., Mohr, J.~J., \& Wegner, G.\ 2001, \apj, 555,
1845: 558
1846:
1847: \bibitem[Rines et al.(2002)]{rines02} Rines, K., Geller, M.~J.,
1848: Diaferio, A., Mahdavi, A., Mohr, J.~J., \& Wegner, G.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 1266
1849:
1850: \bibitem[Rines et al.(2003)]{rines03} Rines, K., Geller, M.~J.,
1851: Kurtz, M.~J., \& Diaferio, A.\ 2003, \aj, 126, 2152
1852:
1853: \bibitem[Rines et al.(2005)]{rines05} Rines, K., Geller, M.~J.,
1854: Kurtz, M.~J., \& Diaferio, A.\ 2005, \aj, 130, 1482
1855:
1856: \bibitem[Rines \& Diaferio(2006)]{rd06} Rines, K., \&
1857: Diaferio, A.\ 2006, \aj, 132, 1275
1858:
1859: \bibitem[Sanderson et al.(2003)]{san03} Sanderson, A.~J.~R.,
1860: Ponman, T.~J., Finoguenov, A., Lloyd-Davies, E.~J., \& Markevitch, M.\
1861: 2003, \mnras, 340, 989
1862:
1863: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{sfd98} Schlegel, D.~J.,
1864: Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525
1865:
1866: \bibitem[Sharples et al.(1988)]{seg88} Sharples, R.~M.,
1867: Ellis, R.~S., \& Gray, P.~M.\ 1988, \mnras, 231, 479
1868:
1869: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2002)]{smi02} Smith, J.~A., et al.\
1870: 2002, \aj, 123, 2121
1871:
1872: \bibitem[Solanes et al.(1999)]{sol99} Solanes, J.~M.,
1873: Salvador-Sol{\'e}, E., \& Gonz{\'a}lez-Casado, G.\ 1999, \aap, 343, 733
1874:
1875: \bibitem[Stoughton et al.(2002)]{sto02} Stoughton, C., et
1876: al.\ 2002, \aj, 123, 485
1877:
1878: \bibitem[Strauss et al.(2002)]{str02} Strauss, M.~A., et al.\
1879: 2002, \aj, 124, 1810
1880:
1881: \bibitem[Strauss et al.(2007)]{str07} Strauss, M.~A., et al.\
1882: 2007, \apj, in press
1883:
1884: \bibitem[Takahashi \& Yamashita(2003)]{ty03} Takahashi, S.,
1885: \& Yamashita, K.\ 2003, \pasj, 55, 1105
1886:
1887: \bibitem[Tamura et al.(2001)]{tam01} Tamura, T., et al.\
1888: 2001, \aap, 365, L87
1889:
1890: \bibitem[Teague et al.(1990)]{tea90}
1891: Teague P. F., Carter D., \& Gray P. M., 1990, ApJS, 72, 715
1892:
1893: \bibitem[Thomas et al.(1998)]{tho98} Thomas, P.~A., et al.\
1894: 1998, \mnras, 296, 1061
1895:
1896: \bibitem[Tormen et al.(1997)]{tor97} Tormen, G., Bouchet,
1897: F.~R., \& White, S.~D.~M.\ 1997, \mnras, 286, 865
1898:
1899: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Trumpler \& Weaver}{1953}]{trumpler53}
1900: Trumpler R. J., \& Weaver H. F., 1953, Statistical Astronomy (Univ. California Press, Berkeley)
1901:
1902: \bibitem[Tucker et al.(2006)]{tuc06} Tucker, D.~L., et al.\
1903: 2006, Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 821
1904:
1905: \bibitem[Uomoto et al.(1999)]{uom99} Uomoto, A., et al.\
1906: 1999, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 31, 1501
1907:
1908: \bibitem[van der Marel et al.(2000)]{van00} van der Marel,
1909: R.~P., Magorrian, J., Carlberg, R.~G., Yee, H.~K.~C., \& Ellingson, E.\
1910: 2000, \aj, 119, 2038
1911:
1912: \bibitem[Vikhlinin et al.(2006)]{vik06} Vikhlinin, A.,
1913: Kravtsov, A., Forman, W., Jones, C., Markevitch, M., Murray, S.~S., \& Van
1914: Speybroeck, L.\ 2006, \apj, 640, 691
1915:
1916: \bibitem[Visvanathan \& Sandage(1977)]{vs77} Visvanathan,
1917: N., \& Sandage, A.\ 1977, \apj, 216, 214
1918:
1919: \bibitem[Voigt \& Fabian(2006)]{vf06} Voigt, L.~M., \&
1920: Fabian, A.~C.\ 2006, \mnras, 368, 518
1921:
1922: \bibitem[Yee et al.(1996)]{yee96} Yee, H.~K.~C., Ellingson,
1923: E., \& Carlberg, R.~G.\ 1996, \apjs, 102, 269
1924:
1925: \bibitem [\protect\citeauthoryear{York et al.}{2000}]{york00}
1926: York D. G. et al., 2000, AJ, 120, 1579
1927:
1928: \bibitem[Zwicky(1933)]{zwi33} Zwicky, F.\ 1933, Helvetica
1929: Physica Acta, 6, 110
1930:
1931: \end{thebibliography}
1932:
1933: \clearpage
1934:
1935:
1936: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1937: % Table 1
1938: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1939: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccrcrccrccr}
1940: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \rotate
1941: \tablewidth{0pc} %\tablenum{2}
1942: \tablecaption{The Sample of Galaxy Clusters\label{tab-cand}}
1943:
1944: \tablehead{
1945: & & & & & & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{All} && \multicolumn{2}{c}{Early-types} && \multicolumn{2}{c}{Late-types}\\
1946: \cline{8-9} \cline{11-12} \cline{14-15}
1947: & R.A. & Decl. & B-M & & $\overline{cz}$& & $\sigma_{p}$ & $N_{gal}$ && $\sigma_{p}$ & $N_{gal}$ && $\sigma_{p}$ & $N_{gal}$ \\
1948: Cluster& (J2000) & (J2000) & Type &Survey\tablenotemark{a}& (km s$^{-1}$) &kpc/arcmin & (km s$^{-1}$)& && (km s$^{-1}$) & && (km s$^{-1}$) & \\
1949: }
1950:
1951: \startdata
1952:
1953: A0085 & 00~41~50.09 & $-$09~18~06.8 & I &S & $ 16545_{- 64}^{+ 65}$ &$ 64.3$ & $ 926_{- 51}^{+ 57}$ & 208 && $ 804_{- 54}^{+ 61}$ & 170 && $ 1114_{- 109}^{+ 108}$ & 38 \\
1954: A0779 & 09~19~41.28 & +33~45~46.8 & I-II &S,2 & $ 6947_{- 39}^{+ 41}$ &$ 28.1$ & $ 491_{- 36}^{+ 40}$ & 145 && $ 471_{- 68}^{+ 73}$ & 67 && $ 479_{- 40}^{+ 47}$ & 78 \\
1955: A1650 & 12~58~41.09 & $-$01~45~24.8 & I-II &S,2 & $ 25187_{- 46}^{+ 46}$ &$ 94.7$ & $ 762_{- 39}^{+ 39}$ & 258 && $ 722_{- 49}^{+ 51}$ & 168 && $ 829_{- 60}^{+ 65}$ & 89 \\
1956: A1651 & 12~59~21.50 & $-$04~11~40.9 & I-II &S & $ 25222_{- 55}^{+ 55}$ &$ 94.8$ & $ 881_{- 44}^{+ 46}$ & 258 && $ 828_{- 51}^{+ 56}$ & 169 && $ 996_{- 79}^{+ 90}$ & 84 \\
1957: A1795 & 13~48~52.97 & +26~35~44.2 & I &S & $ 18775_{- 62}^{+ 67}$ &$ 72.4$ & $ 755_{- 39}^{+ 43}$ & 163 && $ 729_{- 45}^{+ 49}$ & 127 && $ 806_{- 80}^{+ 70}$ & 36 \\
1958: A1800 & 13~49~21.65 & +28~06~13.0 & II &S & $ 22660_{- 85}^{+ 87}$ &$ 86.0$ & $ 762_{- 45}^{+ 49}$ & 93 && $ 722_{- 45}^{+ 45}$ & 80 && $ 786_{- 196}^{+ 184}$ & 13 \\
1959: A2034 & 15~10~11.74 & +33~30~52.9 & II-III &S & $ 33922_{- 156}^{+ 160}$ &$ 123.3$ & $ 1208_{- 76}^{+ 80}$ & 78 && $ 1185_{- 69}^{+ 67}$ & 74 && $ 1746_{-1006}^{+ 742}$ & 4 \\
1960: A2199 & 16~28~37.97 & +39~32~55.3 & I &S & $ 9221_{- 29}^{+ 28}$ &$ 36.9$ & $ 726_{- 20}^{+ 22}$ & 754 && $ 703_{- 29}^{+ 30}$ & 372 && $ 750_{- 30}^{+ 31}$ & 382 \\
1961: A2670 & 23~54~13.39 & $-$10~24~46.1 & I-II &S,2 & $ 22837_{- 82}^{+ 84}$ &$ 86.6$ & $ 844_{- 49}^{+ 51}$ & 106 && $ 840_{- 56}^{+ 59}$ & 82 && $ 870_{- 104}^{+ 100}$ & 24 \\
1962: A2734 & 00~11~20.71 & $-$28~51~18.0 & III &2 & $ 18256_{- 76}^{+ 81}$ &$ 70.5$ & $ 1001_{- 51}^{+ 52}$ & 192 && $ 831_{- 67}^{+ 70}$ & 120 && $ 1175_{- 79}^{+ 82}$ & 68 \\
1963:
1964: \enddata
1965: \tablenotetext{a~}{`S' is covered by SDSS and `2' by 2dFGRS.}
1966: \end{deluxetable}
1967: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1968:
1969:
1970: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1971: % Table 2
1972: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1973: \begin{table}
1974: \centering
1975: %\begin{minipage}{70mm}
1976: \caption{X-ray Properties for Our Sample Clusters\label{tab-xray}}
1977: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
1978: \hline\hline
1979: & $L_{\rm x}$(0.1$-$2.4 keV)\tablenotemark{a} & $\beta$ & $r_c$ & $T_X$ & $T(0)$ & $\gamma$ & \\
1980: Cluster & ($10^{44}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$) & & (kpc) & (keV) & (keV) & &Ref.\tablenotemark{b} \\
1981: \hline
1982:
1983: %A0085 & ~9.789 & 0.532 & ~59.3 & 6.90 & R02 \\
1984: %A1650 & ~7.308 & 0.704 & 200.7 & 6.70 & R02 \\
1985: %A1651 & ~8.000 & 0.643 & 129.3 & 6.10 & R02 \\
1986: %A1795 & 10.124 & 0.596 & ~55.7 & 7.80 & R02 \\
1987: %A1800 & ~2.840 & 0.766 & 280.0 & 4.02 & R02 \\
1988: %A2034 & ~6.850 & ... & ... & ... & D03 \\
1989: %A2199 & ~4.165 & 0.655 & ~99.3 & 4.10 & R02 \\
1990: %A2734 & ~2.365 & 0.624 & 151.4 & 3.85 & R02 \\
1991:
1992: A0085 & ~9.789 & 0.76 & 293.8 & ... & 10.97 & 1.32 & S03 \\
1993: A0779 & ~0.090 & 0.34 & ~39.4 & ... & ~3.66 & 1.02 & S03 \\
1994: A1650 & ~7.308 & 0.78 & 214.2 & ... & ~9.73 & 1.19 & S03 \\
1995: A1651 & ~8.000 & 0.70 & 192.5 & ... & ~6.87 & 1.10 & S03 \\
1996: A1795 & 10.124 & 0.83 & 288.4 & ... & ~9.98 & 1.17 & S03 \\
1997: A1800 & ~2.840 & 0.77 & 280.0 & 4.02 & ... & ... & R02 \\
1998: A2034 & ~6.850 & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & D03 \\
1999: A2199 & ~4.165 & 0.60 & ~76.9 & ... & ~4.17 & 1.15 & S03 \\
2000: A2670 & ~1.469 & 0.55 & ~83.8 & ... & ~5.99 & 1.04 & S03 \\
2001: A2734 & ~2.365 & 0.62 & 151.4 & 3.85 & ... & ... & R02 \\
2002:
2003: \hline
2004: \end{tabular}
2005: \begin{flushleft}
2006: $^{\mathrm a}$ A0779 \citep{ebe00}, A2034 \citep{ebe98}, A2670 \citep{boh04}, \& other clusters \citep{rb02}. \\
2007: $^{\mathrm b}$ R02 \citep{rb02}, S03 \citep{san03}, and D03 \citep{dem03}.
2008: \end{flushleft}
2009: %\end{minipage}
2010: \end{table}
2011: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2012:
2013: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2014: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% table 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2015: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2016: \begin{deluxetable}{crrrrrrrrrrrrrr}
2017: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} %\rotate
2018: \tablewidth{0pc} %\tablenum{2}
2019: \tablecaption{Galaxy Number Density Profile for the
2020: Clusters\label{tab-numden}}
2021:
2022: \tablehead{
2023: & $\nu_{0,\rm NFW}$ & $r_{s,\rm NFW}$& $\nu_{0,\rm Her}$ & $r_{s,\rm Her}$&
2024: $\nu_{0,\rm KEK05}$ & $r_{s,\rm KEK05}$& $\eta_{g,\rm KEK05}$ \\
2025: Cluster& (arcmin$^{-3}$) & (arcmin)& (arcmin$^{-3}$) & (arcmin)& (arcmin$^{-3}$) & (arcmin)& }
2026:
2027: \startdata
2028:
2029: \multicolumn{8}{c}{All Galaxies} \\
2030: \hline
2031: A0085 & $ 1.34E-3$ & $ 30.2 $ & $ 6.85E-4$ & $ 54.6 $ & $ 1.79E-2$ & $ 15.6$ & $ 9.0 $ \\
2032: A0779 & $ 8.82E-3$ & $ 7.4 $ & $ 8.01E-4$ & $ 29.1 $ & $ 2.05E-2$ & $ 16.0$ & $ 12.7 $ \\
2033: A1650 & $ 4.33E-3$ & $ 15.3 $ & $ 1.59E-3$ & $ 33.6 $ & $ 4.14E-2$ & $ 13.0$ & $ 10.7 $ \\
2034: A1651 & $ 3.95E-3$ & $ 15.3 $ & $ 1.86E-3$ & $ 30.1 $ & $ 4.67E-2$ & $ 10.4$ & $ 10.1 $ \\
2035: A1795 & $ 3.88E-3$ & $ 13.7 $ & $ 1.69E-3$ & $ 28.4 $ & $ 2.83E-2$ & $ 16.4$ & $ 11.8 $ \\
2036: A1800 & $ 7.88E-3$ & $ 8.0 $ & $ 2.99E-3$ & $ 17.6 $ & $ 5.96E-2$ & $ 9.0$ & $ 11.5 $ \\
2037: A2034 & $ 1.88E-2$ & $ 6.3 $ & $ 6.89E-3$ & $ 14.0 $ & $ 1.47E-1$ & $ 6.3$ & $ 11.1 $ \\
2038: A2199 & $ 5.33E-4$ & $ 40.5 $ & $ 1.56E-4$ & $ 98.1 $ & $ 8.07E-3$ & $ 23.3$ & $ 9.9 $ \\
2039: A2670 & $ 3.43E-3$ & $ 15.6 $ & $ 1.61E-3$ & $ 29.7 $ & $ 2.66E-2$ & $ 10.9$ & $ 9.1 $ \\
2040: A2734 & $ 2.35E-2$ & $ 5.6 $ & $ 6.81E-3$ & $ 14.4 $ & $ 1.52E-1$ & $ 6.6$ & $ 11.7 $ \\
2041: \hline
2042: \multicolumn{8}{c}{Early-type Galaxies} \\
2043: \hline
2044: A0779 & $ 7.73E-2$ & $ 2.3 $ & $ 1.26E-3$ & $ 17.3 $ & $ 1.22E-2$ & $ 16.1$ & $ 13.6 $ \\
2045: A1650 & $ 9.18E-3$ & $ 9.1 $ & $ 2.56E-3$ & $ 22.9 $ & $ 3.91E-2$ & $ 13.2$ & $ 11.7 $ \\
2046: A1795 & $ 3.03E-2$ & $ 5.2 $ & $ 5.66E-3$ & $ 15.6 $ & $ 4.47E-2$ & $ 15.4$ & $ 13.4 $ \\
2047: A2199 & $ 5.60E-2$ & $ 4.7 $ & $ 2.37E-3$ & $ 24.5 $ & $ 3.29E-2$ & $ 18.6$ & $ 13.2 $ \\
2048: \hline
2049: \multicolumn{8}{c}{Late-type Galaxies} \\
2050: \hline
2051: A0779 & $ 8.96E-6$ & $ 124.4 $ & $ 5.29E-6$ & $ 208.0 $ & $ 2.41E-4$ & $ 28.8$ & $ 7.4 $ \\
2052: A1650 & $ 4.38E-5$ & $ 119.6 $ & $ 2.54E-5$ & $ 200.1 $ & $ 2.09E-3$ & $ 17.0$ & $ 6.9 $ \\
2053: A1795 & $ 2.16E-3$ & $ 9.9 $ & $ 2.90E-4$ & $ 32.9 $ & $ 7.82E-3$ & $ 14.8$ & $ 11.4 $ \\
2054: A2199 & $ 4.12E-5$ & $ 105.8 $ & $ 2.19E-5$ & $ 189.8 $ & $ 1.20E-3$ & $ 26.7$ & $ 8.1 $ \\
2055:
2056: \enddata
2057: \end{deluxetable}
2058: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2059:
2060: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2061: % Table 4
2062: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2063: \begin{table}
2064: \centering
2065: %\begin{minipage}{70mm}
2066: \caption{Morphological Parameters of the Clusters\label{tab-mor}}
2067: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
2068: \hline\hline
2069:
2070: Cluster & $\Gamma_A$ & $\Gamma_B$ & $\Theta_2$ & $\epsilon$ \\
2071: & (kpc) & (kpc) & (deg) & \\
2072: % & (arcmin) & (arcmin) & (deg) & \\
2073: \hline
2074:
2075: A0085 & $ 1358_{- 52}^{+ 52}$ & $ 868_{- 51}^{+ 53}$ & $ 154_{- 4}^{+ 5}$ & $ 0.36_{- 0.05}^{+ 0.05}$ \\
2076: A0779 & $ 1169_{- 55}^{+ 57}$ & $ 829_{- 65}^{+ 71}$ & $ 161_{- 8}^{+ 8}$ & $ 0.29_{- 0.07}^{+ 0.06}$ \\
2077: A1650 & $ 2162_{- 81}^{+ 85}$ & $ 1420_{- 88}^{+ 88}$ & $ 123_{- 4}^{+ 4}$ & $ 0.34_{- 0.05}^{+ 0.05}$ \\
2078: A1651 & $ 2119_{- 80}^{+ 75}$ & $ 1798_{- 76}^{+ 83}$ & $ 52_{- 12}^{+ 11}$ & $ 0.15_{- 0.05}^{+ 0.05}$ \\
2079: A1795 & $ 1365_{- 65}^{+ 69}$ & $ 1151_{- 61}^{+ 65}$ & $ 47_{- 16}^{+ 14}$ & $ 0.16_{- 0.06}^{+ 0.06}$ \\
2080: A1800 & $ 1084_{- 54}^{+ 57}$ & $ 910_{- 59}^{+ 63}$ & $ 63_{- 17}^{+ 18}$ & $ 0.16_{- 0.06}^{+ 0.06}$ \\
2081: A2034 & $ 1237_{- 82}^{+ 85}$ & $ 902_{- 87}^{+ 81}$ & $ 23_{- 10}^{+ 10}$ & $ 0.27_{- 0.08}^{+ 0.09}$ \\
2082: A2199 & $ 2182_{- 50}^{+ 53}$ & $ 1646_{- 46}^{+ 52}$ & $ 20_{- 3}^{+ 3}$ & $ 0.25_{- 0.03}^{+ 0.03}$ \\
2083: A2670 & $ 744_{- 41}^{+ 41}$ & $ 591_{- 37}^{+ 39}$ & $ 40_{- 10}^{+ 13}$ & $ 0.21_{- 0.06}^{+ 0.07}$ \\
2084: A2734 & $ 1413_{- 60}^{+ 62}$ & $ 1152_{- 57}^{+ 61}$ & $ 84_{- 9}^{+ 11}$ & $ 0.18_{- 0.05}^{+ 0.05}$ \\
2085:
2086: \hline
2087: \end{tabular}
2088: %\end{minipage}
2089: \end{table}
2090: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2091:
2092: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2093: % Table 5
2094: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2095: \begin{table}
2096: \tiny \centering
2097: %\begin{minipage}{70mm}
2098: \caption{Parameters for Testing the Presence of Substructure\label{tab-sub}}
2099: \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrrrrrrrc}
2100: \hline\hline
2101: Cluster & $I$ & $I_{90}$ & Skewness & clRej & Kurtosis & clRej & AI & clRej & TI & clRej & $\Delta_{obs}$ & f($\Delta_{sim}>\Delta_{obs}$) \\
2102: \hline
2103:
2104: A0085 & 1.03 & 1.03 & $ -0.30$ & 93.0 & $ 0.38 $ & 81.4 & $ -0.22 $ & 31.0 & 1.18 & 96.8 & 251 & 0.304 \\
2105: A0779 & 1.09 & 1.04 & $ 0.08$ & 35.6 & $ 0.84 $ & 95.2 & $ -1.01 $ & 95.6 & 1.16 & 89.2 & 245 & 0.000 \\
2106: A1650 & 1.04 & 1.02 & $ 0.15$ & 71.4 & $ 0.53 $ & 91.2 & $ -0.43 $ & 58.6 & 1.21 & 99.2 & 326 & 0.156 \\
2107: A1651 & 1.05 & 1.02 & $ -0.31$ & 96.4 & $ 0.66 $ & 95.2 & $ -0.61 $ & 77.4 & 0.99 & 7.2 & 345 & 0.075 \\
2108: A1795 & 0.96 & 1.03 & $ -0.04$ & 16.0 & $ -0.34 $ & 51.4 & $ -0.17 $ & 24.4 & 1.03 & 28.2 & 246 & 0.001 \\
2109: A1800 & 0.97 & 1.05 & $ 0.29$ & 77.2 & $ -0.54 $ & 66.6 & $ 0.87 $ & 90.6 & 0.87 & 84.0 & 118 & 0.034 \\
2110: A2034 & 0.95 & 1.06 & $ 0.18$ & 53.0 & $ -0.82 $ & 93.0 & $ 0.34 $ & 52.8 & 0.95 & 29.2 & 94 & 0.059 \\
2111: A2199 & 1.04 & 1.01 & $ 0.44$ & 99.8 & $ 0.37 $ & 92.2 & $ 1.45 $ & 99.2 & 0.93 & 92.6 & 1456 & 0.000 \\
2112: A2670 & 0.94 & 1.05 & $ -0.01$ & 3.4 & $ -0.66 $ & 86.0 & $ -0.15 $ & 21.0 & 0.94 & 46.6 & 102 & 0.729 \\
2113: A2734 & 0.97 & 1.03 & $ -0.07$ & 29.4 & $ -0.37 $ & 65.8 & $ 0.39 $ & 58.8 & 1.07 & 62.2 & 341 & 0.000 \\
2114:
2115: \hline
2116: \end{tabular}
2117: %\end{minipage}
2118: \normalsize
2119: \end{table}
2120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2121:
2122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2123: % Table 6
2124: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2125: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
2126: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} %\rotate
2127: \tablewidth{0pc} %\tablenum{2}
2128: \tablecaption{Summary of Global Kinematic Properties for the Clusters\label{tab-sum}}
2129:
2130: \tablehead{
2131: & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Substructure?}& & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Equilibrium?} \\
2132: \cline{2-4} \cline{6-7} %\cline{9-11}
2133: Cluster& 1D & 2D & 3D & Morphology & X-Ray & $v_{pec}$ }
2134:
2135: \startdata
2136:
2137: A0085 & No & Yes & No & Elongated? & Yes & Yes \\
2138: A0779 & Yes & No & Yes & Elongated & No & ... \\
2139: A1650 & Yes & Yes & No & Elongated & Yes & Yes \\
2140: A1651 & Yes & Yes & Yes & Spherical & Yes & No \\
2141: A1795 & No & No & Yes & Spherical & No & ... \\
2142: A1800 & No & Yes & Yes & Spherical & Yes & ... \\
2143: A2034 & No & No & Yes & Elongated & Yes & ... \\
2144: A2199 & Yes & Yes & Yes & Elongated & Yes & ... \\
2145: A2670 & No & Yes & No & Elongated & Yes & No \\
2146: A2734 & No & Yes & Yes & Spherical & Yes & ... \\
2147:
2148: \enddata
2149: %\tablenotetext{a~}{Galaxy orbits could not be determined.}
2150: \end{deluxetable}
2151: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2152:
2153:
2154: \clearpage
2155:
2156: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2157: % Figure 1
2158: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2159: \begin{figure}
2160: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f1.eps}
2161: \centering
2162: \caption{(a) Comparison of \texttt{eclass} parameter in SDSS with $\eta$
2163: parameter in 2dFGRS,
2164: (b) histogram for $\eta$ parameter, and
2165: (c) histogram for \texttt{eclass} parameter.
2166: Solid line indicates the best linear fit for \texttt{eclass} ($<0.09$) and $\eta$ ($<1.1$).
2167: The dotted vertical line denotes the division value $\eta=-1.4$ in 2dFGRS
2168: for galaxy subsamples, and dotted horizontal line indicates
2169: \texttt{eclass}=$-0.0640$ in SDSS, which is equivalent to the division value $\eta=-1.4$ in 2dFGRS.
2170: }\label{fig-spcl}
2171: \end{figure}
2172: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2173: \clearpage
2174:
2175: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2176: % Figure 2
2177: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2178: \begin{figure}
2179: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f2.eps}
2180: \centering
2181: \caption{Radial velocity vs. clustercentric distance of galaxies
2182: and the velocity distribution for our sample clusters. Filled circles
2183: indicate the galaxies selected as cluster members, while open
2184: circles the galaxies not selected as cluster members.\ The
2185: horizontal dot-dashed lines indicate the systemic velocity of the
2186: clusters determined in Table \ref{tab-cand}. The velocity
2187: distributions for the member galaxies are shown by hatched
2188: histograms, and those for all of the observed galaxies by open
2189: histograms.} \label{fig-member}
2190: \end{figure}
2191: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2192: \clearpage
2193:
2194: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2195: % Figure 3
2196: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2197: \begin{figure}
2198: \centering
2199: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f3.eps}
2200: \caption{Spatial distribution of cluster galaxies with measured
2201: velocities for our sample clusters. Early-type galaxies
2202: are plotted with crosses, while late-type galaxies are
2203: with open circles. All the observed
2204: galaxies are represented by dots. The ellipses indicate the
2205: (twice enlarged) dispersion ellipse, and solid lines denote the
2206: major and minor axis of the dispersion ellipse.
2207: }\label{fig-spvel}
2208: \end{figure}
2209: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2210: \clearpage
2211:
2212:
2213: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2214: % Figure 4
2215: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2216: \begin{figure}
2217: \centering
2218: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f4.eps}
2219: \caption{Distribution of the substructure parameter $\delta$ for our sample clusters.
2220: The dotted vertical lines indicate the selection criteria for the galaxies
2221: in the cluster main body.
2222: }
2223: \label{fig-delta}
2224: \end{figure}
2225: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2226:
2227:
2228: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2229: % Figure 5
2230: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2231: \begin{figure}
2232: \centering
2233: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f5.eps}
2234: \caption{Total mass profiles for our sample clusters.
2235: Dot-dashed lines from \citet[R02]{rb02},
2236: solid lines are from \citet[S03]{san03},
2237: dotted lines from \citet[D03]{dem03},
2238: dashed lines from \citet[V06]{vik06}, and
2239: dot-dot-dashed lines from \citet[M99]{mar99}.
2240: The vertical dot-dashed and solid lines indicate the outer significance radius, $r_X$,
2241: in \citet{rb02} and $r_{200}$ radius computed in this study, respectively.
2242: }
2243: \label{fig-mass}
2244: \end{figure}
2245: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2246: %\clearpage
2247:
2248: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2249: % Figure 6
2250: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2251: \begin{figure}
2252: \centering
2253: \includegraphics [width=125mm]{f6.eps}
2254: \caption{Projected number density profiles of all (top panel),
2255: early-type (middle panel), and late-type (bottom panel) galaxies with $\delta\leq2.0$
2256: for A85, 779, 1650, 1651, 1795, and 1800. The solid, dashed, and dot-dashed
2257: lines indicate the projection of the best fits using NFW,
2258: Hernquist, and KEK05 profiles, respectively, for each sample.
2259: }\label{fig-numden1}
2260: \end{figure}
2261: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2262:
2263: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2264: % Figure 7
2265: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2266: \begin{figure}
2267: \centering
2268: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f7.eps}
2269: \caption{Same as Fig. \ref{fig-numden1}, but for A2034, 2199,
2270: 2670, and 2734. }\label{fig-numden2}
2271: \end{figure}
2272: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2273:
2274: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2275: % Figure 8
2276: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2277: \begin{figure}
2278: \centering
2279: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f8.eps}
2280: \caption{Color-magnitude diagrams for our sample clusters.
2281: Filled circles indicate the photometric sample of galaxies
2282: within the $R_{max}$/2 from the cluster center,
2283: while open circles the spectroscopically selected member galaxies in the same region.
2284: Solid lines indicate the best linear fit of the CMR for early-type galaxies.
2285: BCGs are marked by open squares.
2286: }\label{fig-cmr}
2287: \end{figure}
2288: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2289:
2290: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2291: % Figure 9
2292: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2293: \begin{figure}
2294: \centering
2295: \includegraphics [width=115mm]{f9.eps}
2296: \caption{Velocity dispersion profiles of all (top panel),
2297: early-type (middle panel), and late-type (bottom panel) galaxies with $\delta\leq2.0$
2298: for A85, 779, 1650, 1651, 1795, and 1800. Filled circles indicate
2299: the velocity dispersion ($\sigma_p$) at each point. The dispersion
2300: is calculated using the galaxies within the moving radial bin that
2301: is represented by a horizontal errorbar in each panel. The dotted
2302: lines denote 68\% confidence interval on the calculation of
2303: velocity dispersion. The dashed horizontal line indicates the
2304: global value of velocity dispersion using all galaxies in each
2305: cluster.}\label{fig-disp1}
2306: \end{figure}
2307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2308:
2309: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2310: % Figure 10
2311: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2312: \begin{figure}
2313: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f10.eps}
2314: \caption{Same as Fig \ref{fig-disp1}, but for A2034, 2199,
2315: 2670, and 2734. }\label{fig-disp2}
2316: \end{figure}
2317: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2318:
2319: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2320: % Figure 11
2321: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2322: \begin{figure}
2323: \centering
2324: \includegraphics [width=95mm]{f11.eps}
2325: \caption{Velocity dispersion profile (top panel) and the aperture
2326: VDP (middle panel), velocity anisotropy profile (bottom panel) for
2327: all galaxies of A85, 779, 1650, and 1651. Filled circles in top
2328: panels represent the measured VDP shown in Fig. \ref{fig-disp1},
2329: and those in middle panel denote the measured aperture VDP.
2330: Associated, dotted lines represent 68\% confidence interval on the
2331: calculation of velocity dispersion. Three smoothly curved lines in
2332: top and middle panels, from a radial anisotropy to the tangential
2333: one (from top to bottom, $\beta_{\rm orb}$= 0.99, 0, and $-$99),
2334: represent the calculated dispersion profiles using galaxy number
2335: density profile of NFW (solid lines), Hernquist (dashed lines), and KEK05 (dot-dashed lines).
2336: Velocity anisotropy profiles (VAPs) determined in \S \ref{method2} in the
2337: bottom panel are represented by solid (NFW), dashed (Herquinst),
2338: and dot-dashed line (KEK05).
2339: The errors of VAPs for NFW are shown by dotted lines.
2340: The vertical dot-dashed and solid lines indicate the outer significance radius, $r_X$,
2341: in \citet{rb02} and $r_{200}$ radius computed in this study, respectively.
2342: }\label{fig-orbit1}
2343: \end{figure}
2344: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2345:
2346: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2347: % Figure 12
2348: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2349: \begin{figure}
2350: \centering
2351: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f12.eps}
2352: \caption{Same as Fig. \ref{fig-orbit1}, but for A1795, 1800, 2034, and 2199.
2353: }\label{fig-orbit2}
2354: \end{figure}
2355: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2356:
2357: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2358: % Figure 13
2359: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2360: \begin{figure}
2361: \centering
2362: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f13.eps}
2363: \caption{Same as Fig. \ref{fig-orbit1}, but for A2670 and A2734. }\label{fig-orbit3}
2364: \end{figure}
2365: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2366:
2367: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2368: % Figure 14
2369: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2370: \begin{figure}
2371: \centering
2372: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f14.eps}
2373: \caption{Same as Fig. \ref{fig-orbit1}, but for early-type galaxies in
2374: A779, 1650, 1795, and 2199. }\label{fig-orbitab}
2375: \end{figure}
2376: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2377:
2378: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2379: % Figure 15
2380: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2381: \begin{figure}
2382: \centering
2383: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f15.eps}
2384: \caption{Same as Fig. \ref{fig-orbit1}, but for late-type galaxies in
2385: A779, 1650, 1795, and 2199.}\label{fig-orbitem}
2386: \end{figure}
2387: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2388:
2389: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2390: % Figure 16
2391: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2392: \begin{figure}
2393: \includegraphics [width=125mm]{f16.eps}
2394: \centering
2395: \caption{{\it Left panels}:
2396: Galaxy number density contour maps for our sample clusters.
2397: The member galaxies with $\delta\leq2.0$ and $\delta>2.0$ are represented by dots and crosses, respectively.
2398: The number density contours are overlaid. The plus signs indicate the
2399: cluster centroids, and the thick horizontal bars represent a
2400: physical extent of 1 Mpc. {\it Right panels}: Dressler-Shectman
2401: plots for the same clusters. Each galaxy is plotted by a circle
2402: with diameter proportional to $e^\delta$. North is up, and east is
2403: to the left.}\label{fig-sub}
2404: \end{figure}
2405: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2406:
2407: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2408: % Figure 17
2409: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2410: \begin{figure}
2411: \centering
2412: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f17.eps}
2413: \caption{X-ray luminosity $L_{\rm x}$ (0.1$-$2.4 keV) vs. the
2414: velocity dispersion and virial mass for the our sample
2415: clusters (filled circles) compared with the other clusters (open circles)
2416: for the 113 selected clusters.
2417: X-ray luminosities in (a) and (b) are from \citet{boh00},
2418: those in (c) and (d) from \citet{ebe98,ebe00}, those in
2419: (e) and (f) from \citet{boh04}, and those (0.5$-$2.0 keV) in
2420: (g) and (h) from \citet{ledlow03}. The solid lines indicate the
2421: best fit for each panel. }\label{fig-xray}
2422: \end{figure}
2423: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2424:
2425: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2426: % Figure 18
2427: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2428: \begin{figure}
2429: \centering
2430: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f18.eps}
2431: \caption{(a) Velocity dispersion as a function of the absolute value
2432: of the peculiar velocities of the BCGs,
2433: (b) absolute value of peculiar velocity as a function of the clustercentric
2434: distances of the BCGs, and
2435: (c) redshift as a function of the absolute magnitudes of the BCGs
2436: in the $b_{\rm J}$ band for our sample clusters (filled circles)
2437: compared with the other clusters (open circles) among the 113 selected
2438: galaxy clusters.
2439: Histograms of the peculiar velocities (d),
2440: the clustercentric distances (e), and the absolute magnitudes in
2441: the $b_{\rm J}$ band (f) of the BCGs are also
2442: shown for the clusters including our sample clusters.
2443: The clusters in our sample are marked by
2444: filled circles in (d), (e), and (f). }\label{fig-pec}
2445: \end{figure}
2446: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2447:
2448:
2449: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2450: % Figure 19
2451: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2452: \begin{figure}
2453: \centering
2454: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f19.eps}
2455: \caption{VAPs for all galaxies of A85 (a), A1651 (b), A2199 (c),
2456: and those for all (d), early-type (e), late-type galaxies (f)
2457: of A1795 determined in \S \ref{method2} using the NFW profile,
2458: but based on several mass profiles:
2459: \citet[thick solid]{san03}, \citet[thick dotted]{dem03},
2460: \citet[thick dot-dashed]{rb02},
2461: \citet[thick dot-dot-dashed]{mar99}, and \citet[thick dashed]{vik06}.
2462: The errors of VAPs using the mass profile of \citet{san03} are shown by thin solid lines.
2463: The vertical dot-dashed and solid lines indicate the outer significance radius, $r_X$,
2464: in \citet{rb02} and $r_{200}$ radius computed in this study, respectively.
2465: }\label{fig-masscomp}
2466: \end{figure}
2467: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2468:
2469: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2470: % Figure 20
2471: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2472: \begin{figure}
2473: \centering
2474: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f20.eps}
2475: \caption{VAPs for all galaxies of A85 (a), A1651 (b), A2199 (c),
2476: and those for all (d), early-type (e), late-type galaxies (f)
2477: of A1795 determined in \S \ref{method2} using the NFW profile,
2478: but based on several galaxy samples:
2479: galaxies with $\delta\leq2.0$ (thick solid),
2480: galaxies with $\delta\leq1.8$ (thick dashed), and
2481: galaxies with $\delta\geq0$ (thick dotted).
2482: The errors of VAPs based on the galaxies with $\delta\leq2.0$ are shown by thin solid lines.
2483: The vertical dot-dashed and solid lines indicate the outer significance radius, $r_X$,
2484: in \citet{rb02} and $r_{200}$ radius computed in this study, respectively.
2485: }\label{fig-masscomp2}
2486: \end{figure}
2487: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2488:
2489: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2490: % Figure 21
2491: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2492: \begin{figure}
2493: \centering
2494: \includegraphics [width=135mm]{f21.eps}
2495: \caption{(a) VDPs and (b) projected galaxy number density profiles for the clusters in Sample A;
2496: (c,d) those in Sample B; and (e,f) those in Sample C.
2497: Filled circles, crosses, and open circles denote all, early-type, and
2498: late-type galaxies, respectively. Typical errors of dispersion
2499: profiles are shown by errorbars according to the subsamples.
2500: }\label{fig-comp}
2501: \end{figure}
2502: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2503:
2504: \end{document}
2505: