1: \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
2:
3: \documentclass{iaus}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5:
6: \title[Extrasolar Habitable Planet Formation] %% give here short title %%
7: {Habitable Planet Formation in Extreme Planetary Systems: Systems
8: with Multiple Stars and/or Multiple Planets}
9:
10: \author[N. Haghighipour] %% give here short author list %%
11: {Nader Haghighipour}
12:
13: \affiliation{Institute for Astronomy and NASA Astrobiology Institute,\\
14: University of Hawaii-Manoa, Honolulu, HI}
15:
16:
17: \pubyear{2008}
18: \volume{IAU249} %% insert here IAU Symposium No.
19: \pagerange{}
20: % \date{?? and in revised form ??}
21: \setcounter{page}{1}
22: \jname{Exoplanets: Detection, Formation and Dynamics}
23: \editors{}
24: \begin{document}
25:
26: \maketitle
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29:
30: Understanding the formation and dynamical evolution of habitable
31: planets in extrasolar planetary systems is a challenging task.
32: %More than 10\% of the currently known extrasolar planet-hosting stars
33: %are host to multiple planets, and approximately 20\% of extrasolar planets
34: %are in binary star systems.
35: In this respect, systems with multiple giant
36: planets and/or multiple stars present special complications.
37: %These systems present a great deal of complications in applying the current
38: %theories of terrestrial planet formation to the formation of similar
39: %objects around their host stars.
40: The formation of habitable planets in these environments
41: is strongly affected by the dynamics of their giant planets
42: and/or their stellar companions. These objects have
43: profound effects on the structure of the disk of planetesimals and
44: protoplanetary objects in which terrestrial-class planets are formed.
45: To what extent the current theories of planet formation can be applied
46: to such {\it "extreme"} planetary systems depends on the dynamical
47: characteristics of their planets and/or their binary stars.
48: In this paper, I present the results of a study of the possibility of the
49: existence of Earth-like objects in
50: systems with multiple giant planets (namely $\upsilon$ Andromedae,
51: 47 UMa, GJ 876, and 55 Cnc) and discuss the dynamics of the newly
52: discovered Neptune-size object in 55 Cnc system.
53: I will also review habitable planet formation in binary systems
54: and present the results of a systematic search of the parameter-space
55: for which Earth-like objects can form and maintain long-term stable orbits
56: in the habitable zones of binary stars.
57:
58:
59: \keywords{(stars:) planetary systems: formation, celestial mechanics,
60: methods: numerical}
61:
62: \end{abstract}
63:
64: \firstsection % if your document starts with a section,
65: % remove some space above using this command.
66:
67: \section{Introduction}
68:
69: The discovery of extrasolar planets during the past decade has confronted
70: astronomers with many new challenges. The diverse and surprising dynamical
71: characteristics of many of these objects have made scientists wonder to
72: what extent the current theories of planet formation can be applied to
73: other planetary systems. A major challenge of planetary science is now to
74: explain how such planets were formed, how they acquired their unfamiliar
75: dynamical state, and whether they can be habitable.
76:
77: Among the unfamiliar characteristics of the currently known extrasolar
78: planetary systems, the existence of systems with multiple planets
79: in which Jovian-type bodies are in eccentric and
80: close-in orbits, and the existence of Jupiter-like planets in
81: multi-star systems are particularly interesting.
82: As shown in figure 1, at the present, 26 extrasolar planetary systems
83: contain more than one giant planet. Also, as shown in Table 1, more than
84: 20\% of planet-hosting stars are members of binary systems. The formation
85: of terrestrial-class objects in such planetary systems, and the possibility
86: of their long-term stability in the habitable zones of their host stars
87: are strongly affected by the dynamical perturbations of the giant planets
88: and/or the stellar companions. Whether such {\it ``extreme''}
89: planetary environments can be potential hosts to habitable planets
90: is the subject of this paper. I will review the possibility of the long-term
91: stability of terrestrial-class objects in some of multi-planet systems,
92: and review the current status of research on planet formation in
93: dual-star environments.
94:
95: \begin{figure}
96: %% \vspace*{-2.0 cm}
97: \begin{center}
98: \includegraphics[width=5in]{multi_chart_big.eps}
99: \end{center}
100: \vspace*{-0.5 cm}
101: \caption{Currently known multi-planet extrasolar planetary systems
102: (California-Carnegie Planet Search).
103: \label{fig1}}
104: %%\end{center}
105: \end{figure}
106:
107:
108: \section{Habitability of Extrasolar Multi-planet Systems}
109:
110: In order for a planetary system to be habitable, an
111: Earth-like planet has to maintain its
112: orbit in the habitable zone (HZ) of the system's central star for a long time.
113: This condition requires that the orbital eccentricity of a habitable planet to
114: be close to zero and its interactions with other bodies of the system
115: do not disturb
116: its long-term stability. In a multi-planet system, these conditions may not be
117: easily satisfied. The dynamics of an object in such systems
118: is strongly affected by other planets and the habitability of a terrestrial
119: planet may be influenced by the perturbations from giant bodies.
120: The latter is more
121: significant in systems where the orbits of giant planets are close to the
122: habitable zone. The planetary systems of
123: $\upsilon$ Andromedae (HZ=1.68-2 AU), 47 UMa (HZ=1.16-1.41 AU),
124: GJ 876 (HZ=0.1-0.13 AU), and 55 Cancri (HZ=0.72-0.87 AU)
125: are of this kind. In a recent article
126: \cite[(Rivera \& Haghighipour, 2007)]{Rivera07}, we studied the stability of
127: terrestrial-class objects in these systems by numerically integrating
128: the orbits of several hundred test particles, uniformly distributed
129: along the $x$-axis, in initial circular orbits.
130: Figure 2 shows the graphs of the lifetimes of these particles for 10 Myr.
131: As shown here, unlike the stable orbit of the
132: newly discovered Earth-like planet of GJ 876
133: \cite[(Rivera et al., 2005)]{Rivera05},
134: the orbit of the small close-in planet of 55 Cnc, as reported by
135: \cite[McArthur et al. (2004)]{McArthur04} is unstable.
136: Our results also indicate that it is unlikely that $\upsilon$ Andromedae
137: and GJ 876 harbor habitable planets. This has also been confirmed
138: by the direct integration of the orbit of an Earth-sized object
139: in the habitable zone of the system by
140: \cite[Dove \& Haghighipour (2006)]{dove06}.
141: The two systems of 47 UMa and 55 Cnc, however, have stable habitable zones,
142: although direct integrations of actual Earth-like objects in these systems
143: are necessary to confirm their habitability.
144: The results of our test particle simulations also indicated the
145: capability of 55 Cnc system in harboring stable planet(s) in the
146: region between 0.7 AU and 2.2 AU. As shown by
147: \cite[Fischer et al. (2007)]{Fischer07}
148: and as in figure 2, the newly discovered Neptune-sized planet of this system is
149: located in this region.
150:
151: \begin{table}
152: \begin{center}
153: \vspace*{1.0 cm}
154: \caption{Extrasolar Planet-Hosting Stars in Binary Systems
155: \cite[(Haghighipour 2006)]{Hagh06}}
156: \label{tab1}
157: {\scriptsize
158: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline
159: {\bf Star} & {\bf Star} & {\bf Star} & {\bf Star} \\ \hline
160: HD142 (GJ 9002) &
161: HD3651 &
162: HD9826 ($\upsilon$ And) &
163: HD13445 (GJ 86) \\
164: HD19994 &
165: HD22049 ($\epsilon$ Eri) &
166: HD27442 &
167: HD40979 \\
168: HD41004 &
169: HD75732 (55 Cnc) &
170: HD80606 &
171: HD89744 \\
172: HD114762 &
173: HD117176 (70 Vir) &
174: HD120136 ($\tau$ Boo) &
175: HD121504 \\
176: HD137759 &
177: HD143761 ($\rho$ Crb) &
178: HD178911 &
179: HD186472 (16 Cyg) \\
180: HD190360 (GJ 777A) &
181: HD192263 &
182: HD195019 &
183: HD213240 \\
184: HD217107 &
185: HD219449 &
186: HD219542 &
187: HD222404 ($\gamma$ Cephei) \\
188: HD178911 &
189: HD202206 &
190: PSR B1257-20 &
191: PSR B1620-26 \\
192: \hline
193: \end{tabular}}
194: \end{center}
195: \end{table}
196:
197: \begin{figure}
198: \vspace*{0.7 cm}
199: \begin{center}
200: %\includegraphics[width=2.6in]{f2a.eps}
201: \includegraphics[width=2.6in]{UpsAnd.eps}
202: \includegraphics[width=2.6in]{GJ876.eps}
203: %\includegraphics[width=2.6in]{f2b.eps}
204: %\includegraphics[width=2.6in]{f2c.eps}
205: \includegraphics[width=2.6in]{47UMa.eps}
206: \includegraphics[width=2.6in]{55Cnc.eps}
207: %\includegraphics[width=2.6in]{f2d.eps}
208: \end{center}
209: \vspace*{1.0 cm}
210: \caption{Graphs of the lifetimes of test particles in $\upsilon$ Andromedae
211: (top left, HZ=1.68-2 AU), GJ 876 (top right, HZ=0.1-0.3 AU),
212: 47 UMa (bottom left, HZ=1.16-1.41), and 55 Cnc (bottom right-0.72-0.87 AU).
213: The graphs and habitable zones are from
214: \cite[Rivera \& Haghighipour (2007)]{Rivera07}.
215: The islands of stability and instability, with their corresponding
216: mean-motion resonances
217: with the inner and/or outer planet are also shown. As shown here,
218: the habitable zones of
219: $\upsilon$ Andromedae and GJ 876 are unstable implying that the
220: planetary systems
221: of these stars will not be habitable. The habitable zones of
222: 47 UMa and 55 Cnc,
223: on the other hand, are stable. Also as shown here,
224: the recently detected Earth-like planet of GJ 876
225: \cite[(Rivera et al. 2005)]{Rivera05},
226: and the newly discovered fifth planet of 55 Cnc
227: \cite[(Fischer et al. 2007)]{Fischer07} are in stable orbits.
228: \label{fig2}}
229: %\end{center}
230: \end{figure}
231:
232:
233: \section{Habitability of Multiple Star Systems}
234:
235: As shown in Table 1, more than 20\% of currently known planet-hosting
236: stars are members of binary systems \cite[(Haghighipour 2006)]{Hagh06}.
237: Many of these systems are wide
238: with separations ranging from 200 AU to 6000 AU. In such systems,
239: the perturbative
240: effect of the stellar companion is negligible and planet formation
241: around the other
242: star may proceed in the similar fashion as around a single star.
243: There are, however,
244: three binary systems, namely, GL 86 \cite[(Els et al 2001)]{Els01},
245: $\gamma$ Cephei \cite[(Hatzes et al 2003)]{Hatzes03},
246: and HD 41004 \cite[(Zucker et al 2004, Raghavan et al 2006)]{Zucker04,Ragh06},
247: in which the primary star is host to a Jovian-type
248: planet and the binary separation is smaller than 20 AU. How
249: these planets were formed,
250: and whether such {\it binary-planetary} systems can be habitable
251: are now among major
252: theoretical challenges of planetary dynamics.
253:
254: Planet formation in close binary systems is strongly affected
255: by the perturbation of the
256: binary companion. This star may remove planet-forming material
257: by truncating the primary's
258: circumstellar disk \cite[(Artymowicz \& Lubow 1994)]{Artymowicz94} and
259: destabilizing the regions where planetesimals and protoplanets
260: may under go collisional growth \cite[(Th\'ebault et al 2004)]{Thebault04}.
261: In binary systems where the primary hosts a giant planet,
262: the perturbative effect of the planetary companion will also
263: affect the growth of protoplanetary
264: objects. However, as shown by numerical integrations of the orbits of
265: Earth-sized planets in
266: $\gamma$ Cephei system \cite[(Haghighipour 2006)]{Hagh06},
267: it is possible for a terrestrial-class body to maintain
268: a long-term stable orbit at distances close to the primary star
269: and outside the giant planet's
270: influence zone. Figure 3 shows the graph of the lifetime of
271: an Earth-sized object in
272: the system of $\gamma$ Cephei.
273: As shown here, the HZ of the system is unstable. However,
274: an Earth-like planet can main a stable orbit close
275: to the primary star.
276:
277: \begin{figure}
278: \vspace*{0.5 cm}
279: \begin{center}
280: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f3.eps}
281: \end{center}
282: %\vspace*{0.05 cm}
283: \caption{Lifetime of an Earth-size planet in $\gamma$ Cephei system.
284: The giant planet of the system (1.67 Jupiter-mass) is at 2.13 AU
285: with an eccentricity of 0.12. As shown here, the HZ of the system
286: is unstable. However,
287: a terrestrial-class object can maintain a long-term orbit at close distances
288: to the primary star \cite[(Haghighipour 2006)]{Hagh06}.
289: \label{fig3}}
290: %%\end{center}
291: \end{figure}
292:
293:
294: \begin{figure}
295: \vspace*{0.5 cm}
296: \begin{center}
297: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f4.eps}
298: \end{center}
299: %\vspace*{0.05 cm}
300: \caption{Habitable planet formation in binary-planetary systems
301: with 0.5 and 1.5
302: stellar mass-ratios. As shown here, binaries with moderate
303: periastron distances
304: are more favorable for the formation of terrestrial-class planets with
305: considerable amount of water \cite[(Haghighipour \& Raymond 2007)]{Hagh07}.
306: \label{fig4}}
307: %%\end{center}
308: \end{figure}
309:
310:
311: Based on the results of the simulations shown in figure 3, we recently
312: studied habitable planet formation in moderately closed binary star systems
313: that host giant planets \cite[(Haghighipour \& Raymond 2007)]{Hagh07}.
314: We simulated the late stage of terrestrial planet formation
315: for different values of the semimajor axis and orbital eccentricity of
316: the binary,
317: as well as different binary mass-ratios. Our system consisted of a Sun-like
318: star as the primary, a disk of protoplanetary bodies with 120 Moon-
319: to Mars-sized
320: objects distributed randomly between 0.5 AU and 4 AU, and a
321: Jupiter-sized planet at 5 AU.
322: To study the effect of the orbital dynamics of the secondary star
323: on the formation
324: of planets in the HZ of the primary and their water contents, we considered
325: the orbit of the giant planet to be circular and assumed that the
326: distribution of water in
327: the protoplanetary disk is similar to those of the primitive asteroids in
328: the asteroid belt. Figure 4 shows some of the results for binary mass-ratios
329: ${\mu_b}=0.5, 1.5$. As shown here, it is possible
330: to form Earth-like objects with substantial amount of water
331: in the HZ of the primary
332: star. The sizes of these planets and their water contents
333: vary with the semimajor axis and eccentricity of the stellar companion.
334: In binaries where the secondary star has a small periastron, the interaction
335: between this object and the giant planet of the system, which transfers
336: angular momentum
337: to the disk of planetary embryos, causes many of these bodies to be ejected
338: from the system. As a result, in closer and
339: eccentric binaries, the final planets are
340: smaller and contain less or no water. Figure 5 shows the relation between
341: the periastron of the binary $(q_b)$ and the
342: semimajor axis of the outermost terrestrial planet $(a_{out})$.
343: As shown in the left graph of figure 5, similar to
344: \cite[Quintana et al (2007)]{Quintana07},
345: simulations with no giant planets favor regions interior to
346: $0.19{q_b}$ for the formation of terrestrial objects.
347: That means, around a Sun-like star, where the inner edge of the
348: habitable zone is at $\sim 0.9$ AU,
349: a stellar companion with a perihelion distance smaller than
350: 0.9/0.19 = 4.7 AU would not allow habitable planet formation.
351: In simulations with
352: giant planets, on the other hand, figure 5 shows that
353: terrestrial planets form
354: closer-in. The ratio ${a_{out}}/{q_b}$ in these systems is between
355: 0.06 and 0.13.
356: A detailed analysis of our simulations also indicate
357: that the systems, in which habitable planets were formed, have
358: large periastra. The right graph of figure 5 shows this
359: for simulations
360: in a binary with equal-mass Sun-like stars. The circles in this
361: figure represent systems with habitable planets.
362: The numbers on the top of the circles show the mean
363: eccentricity of the giant planet. For comparison, systems
364: with unstable giant planets have also been marked. Since at the
365: beginning of each
366: simulation, the orbit of the giant planet was considered to be
367: circular, a non-zero
368: eccentricity is indicative of the interaction of this body with
369: the secondary star.
370: As shown here, Earth-like objects are formed in systems where
371: the interaction
372: between the giant planet and the secondary star is weak
373: and the average eccentricity of the giant planet is small.
374: That implies,
375: habitable planet formation is more favorable in binaries with
376: moderate to large
377: perihelia, and with giant planets on low eccentricity orbits.
378:
379:
380:
381:
382: \begin{figure}
383: \vspace*{0.5 cm}
384: \begin{center}
385: \includegraphics[width=2.5in]{f5a.eps}
386: \includegraphics[width=2.5in]{f5b.eps}
387: \end{center}
388: %\vspace*{0.05 cm}
389: \caption{The graph on the left shows the relation between the periastron
390: of an equal-mass binary and the location of its
391: outermost terrestrial planet.
392: The graph on the right shows the region of the $({e_b},{a_b})$ space
393: for a habitable binary-planetary system
394: \cite[(Haghighipour \& Raymond 2007)]{Hagh07}.
395: \label{fig5}}
396: %%\end{center}
397: \end{figure}
398:
399:
400: \acknowledgements
401: Support by the NASA Astrobiology Institute under Cooperative Agreement
402: NNA04CC08A with the Institute for Astronomy at the University of
403: Hawaii-Manoa is acknowledged.
404:
405: \vspace*{-0.1 cm}
406: \begin{thebibliography}{}
407:
408: \bibitem[Artumowicz \& Lubow (1994)]{Artymowicz94}
409: {Artymowicz, P., \& Lubow, S. H.} 1994, \textit{ApJ}, 421, 651
410:
411: \bibitem[Dove \& Haghighipour (2006)]{dove06}
412: {Dove, A., \& Haghighipour, N.} 2006, \textit{BAAS}, 37, 1284
413:
414: \bibitem[Els et al. (2001)]{Els01}
415: {Els, S. G., Sterzik, M. F., Marchis, F., Pantin, E., Endl, M.,
416: Kruster, M.} 2001, \textit{A\&A}, 370, L1
417:
418: \bibitem[Fischer et al (2007)]{Fischer07}
419: {Fischer, D. A., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., Vogt, S. S., Laughlin, G.,
420: Henry, G. W., Abouav, D., Peek, K. M. G., Wright, J. T., Johnson, J. A.,
421: McCarthy, C., \& Isaacson, H.} 2007, \textit{ApJ}, in press.
422:
423: \bibitem[Haghighipour (2006)]{Hagh06}
424: {Haghighipour, N.} 2006, \textit{ApJ}, 644, 543
425:
426: \bibitem[McArthur et al. (2004)]{McArthur04}
427: {McArthur, B. E., Endl, M., Cochran, W. D., Benedict, G. F., Fischer, D. A.,
428: Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., Naef, D., Mayor, M., Queloz, D., Udry, S., \&
429: Harrison, T. E.} 2004, \textit{ApJ}, 614, L81
430:
431: \bibitem[Quintana et al. (2007)]{Quintana07}
432: {Quintana, E. V., Adams, F. C., Lissauer, J. J. \& Chambers, J. E.} 2007,
433: \textit{ApJ}, 660, 807
434:
435: \bibitem[Raghavan et al. (2006)]{Ragh06}
436: {Raghavan, D., Henry, T. J., Mason, B. D., Subasavage, J. P.,
437: Jao, W. C, B, T. D.\& Hambly, N. C.} 2006, \textit{ApJ}, 646, 523
438:
439: \bibitem[Rivera et al (2005)]{Rivera05}
440: {Rivera, E. J., Lissauer, J. J., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Vogt, S. S.,
441: Fischer, D. A., Brown, T. M., Laughlin, G., Henry, G. W.} 2005,
442: \textit{ApJ}, 634, 625
443:
444: \bibitem[Rivera \& Haghighipour (2007)]{Rivera07}
445: {Rivera, E., \& Haghighipour, N.} 2007, \textit{MNRAS}, 374, 599
446:
447: \bibitem[Th\'ebault et al. (2004)]{Thebault04}
448: {Th\'ebault, P., Marzari, F., Scholl, H., Turrini, D. \& Barbieri, M.}
449: 2004, \textit{A\&A}, 427, 1097
450:
451: \bibitem[Zucker et al. (2004)]{Zucker04}
452: {Zucker, S., Mazeh, T., Santos, N. C., Udry, S., \& Mayor, M.} 2004,
453: \textit{A\&A}, 426, 695
454:
455:
456:
457: \end{thebibliography}
458:
459: \end{document}
460:
461: