1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %\usepackage{epsfig,emulateapj5,apjfonts}
4: %\usepackage{epsfig}
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% macro definitions %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6: \newcommand \Angstrom {\,{\rm \AA}}
7: \newcommand \AU {\,{\rm AU}}
8: \newcommand \cm {\,{\rm cm}}
9: \newcommand \mm {\,{\rm mm}}
10: \newcommand \erg {\,{\rm erg}}
11: \newcommand \eV {\,{\rm eV}}
12: \newcommand \g {\,{\rm g}}
13: \newcommand \K {\,{\rm K}}
14: \newcommand \pc {\,{\rm pc}}
15: \newcommand \kpc {\,{\rm kpc}}
16: \newcommand \s {\,{\rm s}}
17: \newcommand \sr {\,{\rm sr}}
18: \newcommand \yr {\,{\rm yr}}
19: \newcommand \yrs {\,{\rm yrs}}
20: \newcommand \Myr {\,{\rm Myr}}
21: \newcommand \Myrs {\,{\rm Myrs}}
22: \newcommand \Gyr {\,{\rm Gyr}}
23: \newcommand \nH {n_{\rm H}}
24: \newcommand \simlt {\lesssim}
25: \newcommand \simgt {\gtrsim}
26: \newcommand \gtsim {\gtrsim}
27: \newcommand \ltsim {\lesssim}
28: \newcommand \um {\mu{\rm m}}
29: \newcommand \mum {\,{\rm \mu m}}
30: \newcommand \ppm {\,{\rm ppm}}
31: \newcommand \Teff {T_{\rm eff}}
32: \newcommand \Msun {\,{M_\odot}}
33: \newcommand \Lsun {\,{L_\odot}}
34: \newcommand \mH {m_{\rm H}}
35: \newcommand \NH {N_{\rm H}}
36: \newcommand \simali {\sim\,}
37: %%
38: \newcommand \magni {\,{\rm mag}}
39: \newcommand \amin {\,{a_{\rm min}}}
40: \newcommand \amax {\,{a_{\rm max}}}
41: %%
42: \newcommand{\figwidth}{4.0in}
43: %\newcommand{\figwidth}{6.0in}
44: \newcommand{\btdnote}[1]{{\bf[#1]}}
45: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
46: %------- delete following for submission to ApJ --------
47: %\pagestyle{myheadings}
48: % today's date
49: %use number register 200 for "decade"
50: %\countdef\decade=200
51: %\decade=0
52: %\advance\decade by \year
53: %\advance\decade by -2000 %to suppress two leading digits of yearb
54: %\countdef\hours=201
55: %\hours=0
56: %\advance\hours by \time
57: %\divide\hours by 60
58: %\countdef\mins=202
59: %\mins=0
60: %\advance\mins by \hours
61: %\multiply\mins by 60
62: %\multiply\hours by 100
63: %\countdef\miltime=203
64: %\miltime=0
65: %\advance\miltime by \hours
66: %\advance\miltime by \time
67: %\advance\miltime by -\mins
68: %\def\today{\number\decade.\number\month.\number\day.\number\miltime}
69: %\markright{\today: DRAFT}
70:
71: \shorttitle{Dust Extinction of GRB Host Galaxies}
72:
73: %\received{2003 September 18}
74: \begin{document}
75: \title{
76: %------------- enable for labelling preprint ---------------------------
77: % \vspace*{-2.0em}
78: % {\normalsize\rm submitted to {\it The Astrophysical Journal Letters}}\\
79: % \vspace*{1.0em}
80: %A direct method to derive the extinction curves of Gamma-ray Burst
81: %host galaxies
82: Determining the Dust Extinction of Gamma-ray Burst Host Galaxies: A
83: Direct Method Based on Optical and X-ray Photometry
84: %\\{\small DRAFT: \today ~~}
85: }
86: \author{Y. Li\altaffilmark{1},
87: Aigen Li\altaffilmark{1,2},
88: and D.M. Wei\altaffilmark{1,3}}
89:
90: \altaffiltext{1}{Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of
91: Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; {\sf yli@pmo.ac.cn}}
92: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of
93: Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211; {\sf lia@missouri.edu}}
94: \altaffiltext{3}{Joint Center for Particle Nuclear Physics and
95: Cosmology of Purple Mountain Observatory --
96: Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China;
97: {\sf dmwei@pmo.ac.cn}}
98:
99: \begin{abstract}
100: The dust extinction of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) host galaxies,
101: containing important clues to the nature of GRB progenitors and
102: crucial for dereddening, is still poorly known.
103: %
104: Here we propose a straightforward method to determine the extinction
105: of GRB host galaxies by comparing the observed optical spectra to
106: the intrinsic ones extrapolated from the X-ray spectra.
107: %
108: The rationale for this method is from the standard fireball model:
109: if the optical flux decay index equals to that of the X-ray flux,
110: then there is no break frequency between the optical and X-ray
111: bands, therefore we can derive the intrinsic optical flux from the
112: X-ray spectra.
113: %
114: We apply this method to three GRBs of which the optical and X-ray
115: fluxes have the same decay indices and another one with inferred
116: cooling break frequency, and obtain the rest-frame extinction curves
117: of their host galaxies.
118: %
119: The derived extinction curves are gray and do not resemble any
120: extinction curves of local galaxies (e.g. the Milk Way, the
121: Small/Large Magellanic Clouds, or nearby starburst galaxies). The
122: amount of extinction is rather large (with visual extinction
123: $A_V$\,$\sim$\,1.6--3.4$\magni$).
124: %
125: We model the derived extinction curves in terms of the
126: silicate-graphite interstellar grain model. As expected from the
127: ``gray'' nature of the derived extinction curve, the dust size
128: distribution is skewed to large grains.
129: %
130: We determine, for the first time, the local dust-to-gas ratios of
131: GRB host galaxies using the model-derived dust parameters and the
132: hydrogen column densities determined from X-ray absorptions.
133: \end{abstract}
134:
135: \keywords{ISM-dust, extinction --- gamma-rays: bursts}
136:
137: \section{Introduction}
138: It is widely acknowledged that the long-duration gamma-ray burst
139: (GRB) is associated with the collapse of a massive star (Woosley
140: 1993). Observational evidence supporting this collapsar model
141: includes the underlying supernova components in the afterglow of
142: many GRBs (Zeh et al.\ 2004) and the observed location of GRBs in
143: star-forming galaxies and active star-forming regions within their
144: host galaxies (Paczy\'{n}ski 1998, Fruchter et al.\ 2006). In this
145: scenario, GRBs are born and explode inside dense, dusty
146: environments. The huge $\gamma$-ray energy emission of GRBs is
147: almost unaffected by absorptions, allowing them to be detected up to
148: rather high redshifts (e.g. see Tagliaferri et al.\ 2005).
149: Therefore, to study the dust and gas properties in the surrounding
150: vicinity of GRBs is of great significance in understanding the
151: interstellar medium (ISM) of star-forming galaxies throughout cosmic
152: history. In addition, an accurate apprehension of the dust and gas
153: immediate surrounding GRBs can also help (1) to reveal the nature of
154: so-called ``dark bursts''
155: (i.e., whether the non-detection of
156: some optical afterglow is due to
157: dust extinction
158: or the afterglow is intrinsically dark;
159: see Lazzati et al.\ 2002 and references therein),
160: (2) to detect the dust evolution with cosmic time, and (3) to
161: correct for the extinction of optical emission
162: in GRB afterglow analysis.
163:
164: The dust extinction of GRB host galaxies is traditionally modeled
165: using either the Milky Way (MW), the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC),
166: the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), or other presumed extinction
167: curves (e.g. see Stratta et al.\ 2004; Kann et al.\ 2006; Schady et
168: al.\ 2007; Starling et al.\ 2007; Tagliaferri et al.\ 2007).
169: Recently, Chen et al.\ (2006) made the first effort to determine the
170: extinction curves for GRB host galaxies without a priori assumption
171: of the extinction law. The derived extinction curves differ from any
172: known extinction laws of the Milky Way and external galaxies,
173: challenging the traditional method commonly used in determining the
174: extinction curves of GRB host galaxies.
175:
176: In this work we propose a novel, straightforward method to
177: determine the extinction of GRB host galaxies by comparing the
178: observed optical spectra to the intrinsic ones extrapolated from the
179: X-ray spectra. That such an analysis is possible follows from the
180: standard fireball model. Based on the multi-wavelength afterglow
181: photometry (including both the X-ray and optical data), we obtain
182: the extinction curves of four selected bursts. We then model the
183: size distribution and composition of the dust with the
184: silicate-graphite interstellar grain model and obtain the
185: dust-to-gas ratios in the local environment of GRBs.
186:
187: \section{Method}
188: %
189: The standard fireball model (Sari et al.\ 1998), which has been
190: successful in explaining the overall properties of GRB afterglow
191: (M\'{e}sz\'{a}aros \& Rees 1997), predicts that the afterglow
192: emission is produced by synchrotron radiation of electrons
193: accelerated by the forward shock. In this model, with typical
194: parameters, the optical to X-ray spectra can be described by a
195: broken power law with indices $\beta\,=\,\left(p-1\right)/2$ for
196: $\nu<\nu_c$ or $\beta\,=\,p/2$ for $\nu>\nu_c$, where $\nu_c$ is the
197: cooling frequency and $p$ is the electron energy distribution index.
198: In most cases, the cooling break position is hard to determine. If
199: the decay indices $\alpha$ of X-ray and optical bands are different,
200: the cooling frequency lies between them, making it difficult to
201: calculate the intrinsic optical flux from X-ray data. However, if
202: the decay indices $\alpha$ of X-ray and optical bands are the same,
203: then the optical and X-ray should lie on the same spectral segment,
204: rendering it possible to calculate the intrinsic flux density in any
205: optical band from
206: $F_\lambda=F_X\left(\lambda/\lambda_X\right)^{\beta-2}$, where
207: $\beta$ is the X-ray afterglow spectral index that we get from
208: fitting the X-ray spectrum, and $F_X$ is the X-ray flux density.
209: After corrected for the Galactic extinction using the reddening maps
210: of Schlegel et al.\ (1998), the observed spectral energy
211: distribution (SED) of GRB at redshift $z$ can be described as
212: $F_{\lambda\left(1+z\right)}=F_\lambda\exp\left(-A_\lambda/1.086\right)$.
213: Therefore, the extinction of the GRB host galaxy can be given by
214: \begin{equation}
215: A_\lambda\,=\,1.086\,\ln\,\frac{F_X\left(\lambda/\lambda_X\right)^{\beta-2}}{F_{\lambda\left(1+z\right)}}.
216: \end{equation}
217: With $A_V$ interpolated, we can obtain the extinction curves
218: (normalized to $V$ band) of the GRB host galaxies.
219:
220: We then fit the derived extinction curve $A_\lambda/A_V$ with the
221: standard silicate-graphite interstellar dust model which has
222: successfully reproduced the extinction and IR emission of the MW
223: galaxy, SMC and LMC (Weingartner \& Draine 2001; Li \& Draine 2001,
224: 2002). The grain size distribution for both silicate and graphite is
225: modeled with: $dn=N\left(a\right)da\varpropto
226: a^{-\eta}\,\exp(-a/a_c)\,da$, where $a$ is the grain radius (assumed
227: spherical), ranging from $\amin$\,=\,0.005$\mum$ to
228: $\amax$\,=\,2.5$\mum$, $a_c$ is the cut-off size. Note that it is
229: assumed that both silicate dust and graphitic dust have the same
230: size distribution. Let $f_{\rm gra}$ be the number fraction of
231: graphitic dust, the mass fraction of graphitic dust is $f_{\rm
232: gra}^{\prime} = f_{\rm gra}\rho_{\rm gra}/\left[f_{\rm gra}\rho_{\rm
233: gra}+\left(1-f_{\rm gra}\right)\,\rho_{\rm sil}\right]$, where
234: $\rho_{\rm sil}\approx 3.5\g\cm^{-3}$ is the mass density of
235: silicate material and $\rho_{\rm gra}\approx 2.24\g\cm^{-3}$ is that
236: of graphite.
237:
238: With the fitted dust parameters, we can estimate the dust-to-gas
239: ratio in each of the GRB host galaxies:
240: \begin{equation}
241: \frac{m_{\rm dust}}{m_{\rm gas}} =\frac{M_{\rm gra}+M_{\rm
242: sil}}{1.4\,N_{\rm H}\,\mu_{\rm H}} ,
243: \end{equation}
244: where $N_{\rm H}$ is the hydrogen column density in the host galaxy;
245: $\mu_{\rm H}$ is the atomic weight of H; the factor ``1.4'' accounts
246: for helium; $M_{\rm gra}$ and $M_{\rm sil}$ are the column mass
247: density of graphite and silicate material, respectively:
248: \begin{equation}
249: M_{\rm gra}=N_d\,\int_{\amin}^{\amax}
250: \frac{4}{3}\pi\,a^{3}
251: N\left(a\right)\rho_{\rm gra}f_{\rm gra}\,da ;
252: \end{equation}
253: \begin{equation}
254: M_{\rm sil}=N_d\,\int_{\amin}^{\amax}
255: \frac{4}{3}\pi\,a^{3}
256: N\left(a\right)\rho_{\rm sil}\left(1-f_{\rm
257: gra}\right)\,da .
258: \end{equation}
259: $N\left(a\right)$ is the normalized dust size distribution;
260: %$\rho_{\rm sil}\approx 3.5\g\cm^{-3}$ is the mass density of
261: %silicate material and $\rho_{\rm gra}\approx 2.24\g\cm^{-3}$
262: %is that of graphite.
263: The dust column density $N_d$ can be derived from
264: \begin{equation}
265: A_{\lambda}=1.086\int_{\amin}^{\amax}
266: N\left(a\right)\pi\,a^2\,[f_{\rm gra}\,Q_{\rm ext, \rm gra}(a,\lambda)+\left(1-f_{\rm gra}\right)\,
267: Q_{\rm ext, \rm sil}(a,\lambda)]\,da\,N_d ,
268: \end{equation}
269: where $Q_{\rm ext, \rm gra}(a,\lambda)$ and $Q_{\rm ext, \rm
270: sil}(a,\lambda)$ is the extinction efficiency of dust of radius $a$
271: at wavelength $\lambda$ for graphite and silicate material,
272: respectively.
273:
274: \section{Data}
275: We select four GRBs that have both optical and X-ray observations.
276: Photometric data are taken from literature (see Tabled 1,2). The
277: optical to X-ray spectra are extracted when the afterglow
278: light-curve are in a steady power-law state (e.g. see Panaitescu \&
279: Kumar 2001, Fan \& Piran 2006 for detailed analysis) to avoid
280: complex phases (i.e. X-ray flares or re-brightening when the optical
281: and X-ray emission are probably due to different components [Zhang
282: et al.\ 2006]; see Fig.\,1). For GRB 020405, GRB 030227 and GRB
283: 060729, we adopt the spectra obtained when the cooling frequency
284: $\nu_c$ falls below the optical band, indicating an intrinsic single
285: power law spectrum through optical and X-ray bands as discussed
286: above. The decay indices $\alpha$ are all taken from literature
287: except for GRB 060729 (around 0.35 day during plateau phase; for
288: which $\alpha$ is not available in literature) we derive by fitting
289: the afterglow light curve between 0.2--0.6\,day. For GRB 061126, the
290: decay indices of X-ray and optical bands are different, indicating a
291: break frequency lying between them. At $\sim30\,{\rm ks}$, the R
292: band afterglow shows a break (see Fig.\,1d), which can be
293: interpreted as the spectral break passing through the R
294: band,\footnote{We note, however, that this burst, like many other
295: Swift bursts, does not obey the closure relation in the standard
296: afterglow model (Perley et al.\ 2007), which adds uncertainties to
297: our analysis. But the uncertainty of break frequency does not appear
298: to affect the shape of the derived extinction curve -- as can be
299: seen in Figure 2, the extinction curve for the other three bursts
300: remains gray even if we ignore the GRB 061126 data.} allowing us to
301: calculate the intrinsic optical flux from
302: $F_\nu/F_X=(\nu/\nu_c)^{-\beta+0.5}(\nu_c/\nu_X)^{-\beta}$.
303:
304: \section{Results}
305: We present in Table 3 the derived $A_\lambda$ of the GRB host
306: galaxies at every observed optical band and in Table 4 the $V$-band
307: extinction versus hydrogen column density ($A_V/N_{\rm H}$) and the
308: dust-to-gas ratio. The errors of the X-ray spectrum can bring about
309: uncertainties on the extrapolated optical fluxes and thus on the
310: derived $A_\lambda$. We estimate the errors of $A_\lambda$ from
311: $\beta$ (the X-ray spectral index) through Eq.1. Larger errors of
312: the X-ray spectrum result in larger uncertainties in $A_\lambda$
313: (e.g. see Table 3 and Fig.\,2, GRB 020405). Most noticeably, the
314: derived extinction curves of the four bursts are rather ``gray''
315: (see Fig.\,2). Since all these extinction curves have very similar
316: slope, we put all the extinction data of the four bursts together to
317: fit them to the silicate-graphite grain model. The best fit
318: parameters are $\eta\approx 2.60$, $a_c\approx 2.0\mum$, and $f_{\rm
319: gra}\approx 0$, with $\chi^2 \equiv \sum_{\rm all\,\lambda}\sum_{\rm
320: all\,GRBs}\left[\left(A_\lambda/A_V\right)_{\rm mod}
321: - \left(A_\lambda/A_V\right)_{\rm obs}\right]^2/\sigma^2
322: \approx 0.12$ (obtained by summing up all wavebands and all GRBs,
323: where $\sigma$ is the uncertainty for a given GRB at a given band).
324: A prominent feature is the considerably small $\eta$ (the canonical
325: value of $\eta$ is 3.5), indicating a grain size distribution skewed
326: towards substantially large grains. The main reason for $f_{\rm
327: gra}\approx 0$ is the absence of the 2175$\Angstrom$ extinction bump
328: in the derived extinction curves which is generally attributed to
329: small graphitic grains or PAHs.
330:
331: \section{Discussion}
332:
333: %\subsection{Comparison to Previous Work}
334: Previous works concerning dust extinction of GRB host galaxies
335: mostly focused on fitting the observed photometry with the intrinsic
336: power-low spectrum reddened by certain ``standard'' extinction
337: curves inferred from the Milky Way or nearby galaxies (e.g. see
338: Starling et al.\ 2007). However, lacking a priori knowledge of the
339: dust properties in high redshift galaxies harboring GRBs, we have no
340: reason to assume that they are the same as in local universe (e.g.
341: see Stratta et al.\ 2007). Chen et al.\ (2006), for the first time,
342: derived the extinction curves of GRBs without a priori assumption of
343: the extinction law, but they only used the optical data. In this
344: work, with carefully selected afterglow data covering X-ray to
345: optical/near-infrared bands, we obtain the extinction curve of four
346: GRB host galaxies more directly and precisely, based only on the
347: standard fireball model.
348:
349: %\subsection{Large Amount of Dust}
350: The ``collapsar'' model predicts GRBs to occur in active
351: star-forming regions similar to Galactic molecular clouds (Jakobsson
352: et al.\ 2006) which are heavily enshrouded by dust (Trentham et al.\
353: 2002; Tanvir et al.\ 2004). A recent dust scattering model proposed
354: to account for the shallow-decay phase in Swift X-ray afterglow also
355: requires large quantities of dust surrounding the GRBs (Shao \& Dai
356: 2007). Observations supporting the existence of large amount of dust
357: include the emission and absorption features in some X-ray
358: afterglows (Antonelli et al.\ 2000; Piro et al.\ 1999), large column
359: densities of heavy elements revealed by optical spectroscopy studies
360: (Savaglio \& Fall 2004; Savaglio 2006), and the non-detection at
361: optical wavelengths for more than half the well-localized GRBs
362: (Jakobsson et al.\ 2004). In contradiction with these evidence,
363: traditional SED fitting often finds small extinction, primarily
364: because the best fit model in most cases is the SMC-type extinction
365: which, with a steep rise into the far ultraviolet (UV), often
366: requires a small $A_V$ to fit the spectrum (e.g. see Kann et al.\
367: 2006; Schady et al.\ 2007; Tagliaferri et al.\ 2007). Our work,
368: showing considerably large $A_V$ compared to that fitted with
369: traditional method, is more consistent with theoretical prediction
370: and observations. In addition, Rol et al.\ (2007) found that for GRB
371: 051022 a lower limit of $A_V\approx 4.4\magni$ was needed, which
372: implies that at least in some GRBs the extinction $A_V$ is rather
373: large.
374:
375: %\subsection{Gray Extinction and Large Grains}
376: The extinction curve derived in our work is flat, almost independent
377: of wavelength, and is even ``grayer'' than the gray type of
378: extinction curve obtained by Chen et al.\ (2006), similar to the
379: Calzetti et al.\ (1994) law suitable for local starburst galaxies.
380: This result is in good agreement with other works fitting the SEDs
381: of these bursts (e.g. Stratta et al.\ 2005; A. Li et al.\ 2007, in
382: preparation). In particular, Perley et al.\ (2007) found that for
383: GRB 061126 the extinction curve is gray. Gray extinction has also
384: been observed in Galactic dense clouds (Cardelli et al.\ 1988) and
385: in the circumnuclear region of some AGNs (see Li 2007 for a review).
386: Gray extinction is produced by a dust distribution biased towards
387: large grains (see \S4), which may form from (1) grain coagulation
388: naturally expected
389: in the dense circumstance near GRBs
390: (Maiolino et al.\ 2001a,b),
391: (2) the biased evaporation of smaller grains due to
392: the intense X-ray and UV radiation up to $\sim$\,20 parsecs
393: from the GRB (Waxman \& Draine 2000,
394: Fruchter et al.\ 2001, Savaglio et al.\ 2003), and
395: (3) preferential destruction of small grains by high energy ions
396: in fast shocks (Jones 2004).
397: Perna et al.\ (2003) computed the extinction curve that is obtained
398: if standard Galactic dust is exposed to a GRB lasting more than a
399: few tens of seconds (three of the four bursts in our sample meet
400: this requirement, see $T_{90}$ in Table 1) and found that the
401: extinction curve can be very flat, chiming with our result. We favor
402: the grain growth hypothesis since the preferential destruction of
403: small grains only occurs in the immediate GRB environment
404: ($\sim$10--20 pc from the burst).
405:
406: %\subsection{Destruction of Dust during GRB Afterglow}
407: It has long been proposed that GRB afterglow radiation, as well as
408: the prompt emission, can destroy dust grains and cause $A_V$ to
409: decrease with time (e.g. see Vreeswijk 1999). We test this effect
410: for GRB 060729, which is exceptionally bright in X-rays as well as
411: at UV/optical wavelengths showing an unusually long unanimous
412: plateau phase ($\thicksim 1$\,day). We derive $A_V\approx
413: 1.70\pm0.20\magni$ at $t=0.35$\,day (in the plateau phase) and
414: $A_V\approx 1.59\pm0.20\magni$ at $t=4.6$\,days (in normal decay
415: phase) respectively (see Tables 1, 4), showing no significant dust
416: destruction during this time. Detailed studies of dust destruction
417: by GRBs will be presented in a forthcoming paper (Z. Jin et al.\ in
418: preparation).
419: %We also notice that the inferred gray nature of dust extinction
420: %are similar at the two epoch.
421: %This implies that the X-ray and optical radiation
422: %during the plateau phase are unlikely from different
423: %components for this burst -- if the emitting regions for
424: %the optical and X-ray emission are spatially distinct
425: %or if there is additional radiation at one band
426: %during the plateau phase, the derived extinction
427: %would probably be different from that obtained
428: %during normal decay phase
429: %when the X-ray and optical emission are
430: %supposed to have the same origin}.
431:
432: %\subsection{Dust-to-Gas Ratio}
433: In accordance with previous works, we find that the average
434: $A_V/N_{\rm H}$ is
435: smaller than that in the Milky Way,\footnote{%
436: {An exception to this is GRB 060729, for which
437: the derived dust-to-gas ratio is $\simali$10 times
438: higher than that of the Milky Way (see Table 4).
439: We note that, in estimating the dust-to-gas ratios,
440: one uncertainty is the equivalent hydrogen column
441: densities $N_{\rm H}$ which is derived from the X-ray data
442: by assuming a solar metallicity. If we take a metallicity
443: of $\thicksim0.1Z_\odot$ for GRB 060729 which is typical
444: for GRB host galaxies
445: (e.g. Fynbo et al.\ 2006; Stanek et al.\ 2006),
446: the resulting dust-to-gas ratio of GRB 060729
447: (for which the current value seems to be too high,
448: see Table 4) would shrink by roughly an order of magnitude,
449: close to that in local galaxies. Besides, photoionization
450: of the gas in GRB vicinities by the intense X-ray
451: emission can result in a decrease of $N_{\rm H}$
452: (Lazzati \& Perna 2002). Richer observations combined
453: with more detailed absorption spectroscopic studies will
454: help clarify this issue in the near future.}
455: }
456: which is usually ascribed to a lower dust-to-gas ratio in
457: GRB vicinities (e.g. see Watson et al.\ 2006).
458: However, there is no obvious reason why the amount
459: of dust is low in the dense environment surrounding GRBs.
460: We note that the dust extinction is very sensitive to the dust
461: size distribution, for larger grains the extinction (on a per unit
462: mass basis) is low, but the amount of dust may be still high (e.g.
463: see Li 2007). In fact, based on the model fit dust parameters, the
464: dust-to-gas ratios for most bursts are larger than that in the Milky
465: Way. On the other hand, grain growth through coagulation in dense
466: molecular clouds enshrouding GRBs is expected and this would result
467: in a dust size distribution biased in favour of large grains, a flat
468: extinction curve, and a reduced $A_V/N_{\rm H}$.
469:
470: \acknowledgments We are grateful to the anonymous referee for
471: helpful comments and suggestions.
472: We thank S.L. Chen and S.L. Liang for helpful discussion.
473: D.M.W. is supported by the NSFC grants 10621303 and 10673034,
474: and the National Basic Research Program of China
475: (973 Program 2007CB815404). A.L. is supported in part by
476: a NASA/Swift Theory Program, a NASA/Chandra Theory Program,
477: and the NSFC Outstanding Oversea Young Scholarship.
478:
479: \begin{thebibliography}{}
480: \bibitem[]{}Antonelli L.A., et al.\ ApJ, 545, L39
481: \bibitem[]{}Berger, E. J., Soderberg, A. M., Frail, D. A.,
482: \& Kulkarni, S. R. 2003, ApJ, 587, L5
483: \bibitem[]{}Calzetti, D., Kinney, A.~L.,
484: \& Storchi-Bergmann, T.\ 1994, \apj, 429, 582
485: \bibitem[]{}Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C.,
486: \& Mathis, J. S. 1988, ApJ, 329, L33
487: \bibitem[]{}Castro-Tirado, A., et al.\ 2003,
488: A\&A, 411, L315
489: \bibitem[]{}Chen, S.L., Li, A., \& Wei, D.M.\
490: 2006, ApJ, 647, L13
491: \bibitem[]{}Dirk Grupe, et al.\ 2007, ApJ, 662, 443
492: \bibitem[]{}Fan, Y. Z. \& Wei, D. M. 2005, MNRAS, 364, L42
493: \bibitem[]{}Fan, Y. Z., \& Piran, T. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 197
494: \bibitem[]{}Fruchter, A., Krolik, J.~H., \& Rhoads, J.~E.\
495: 2001, \apj, 563, 597
496: \bibitem[]{}Fruchter, A., et al.\ 2006, Nature, 461, 443
497: \bibitem[]{}Fynbo J.P.U. et al.\ 2006, A\&A, 451, L47
498: \bibitem[]{}Jakobsson, P., et al.\ 2004, ApJ 617, L21
499: \bibitem[]{}Jakobsson, P., et al.\ 2006, A\&A, 460, L13
500: \bibitem[]{}Jones A. P.\ 2004, in Astrophysics of Dust,
501: eds. A.N. Witt, G.C. Clayton, \& B.T. Draine,
502: ASP Conf. Ser., 309, 347
503: \bibitem[]{}Kann, D.~A., Klose, S., \& Zeh, A.\
504: 2006, \apj, 641, 993
505: \bibitem[]{}Lazzati, D. \& Perna, R.\ 2002, MNRAS, 330, 383
506: \bibitem[]{}Lazzati, D., Covino, S.,
507: \& Ghisellini, G. 2002, MNRAS, 330, 583
508: \bibitem[]{}Li, A. 2007, in The Central Engine of
509: Active Galactic Nuclei,
510: eds. L.C. Ho, \& J.-M. Wang,
511: ASP Conf. Ser., 373, 561
512: \bibitem[]{}Li, A., \& Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 554, 778
513: \bibitem[]{}Li, A., \& Draine, B. T. 2002, ApJ, 576, 762
514: \bibitem[]{}Li, A., Liang, S.L., Kann, D.A., Klose, S.,
515: \& Wei, D.M.\ 2007, in preparation
516: \bibitem[]{}Maiolino, R., et al.\ 2001a, A\&A, 365, 28
517: \bibitem[]{}Maiolino, R., Marconi, A.,
518: \& Oliva, E.\ 2001b, A\&A, 365, 37
519: \bibitem[]{}Mereghetti, S., et al. 2003, \apj, 590, L73
520: \bibitem[]{}M\'{e}sz\'{a}aros, P. \& Rees, M.J.\
521: 1997, \apj, 476, 232
522: \bibitem[]{}Paczy\'{n}ski, B.\ 1998, ApJ, 494, L45
523: \bibitem[]{}Panaitescu, A., \& Kumar, P. 2001, \apj, 554, 667
524: \bibitem[]{}Perna, R., Lazzati, D., \& Fiore, F.\
525: 2003, \apj, 585, 775
526: \bibitem[]{}Perley, D.A., et al.\ 2007, \apj, in press
527: \bibitem[]{}Piro, L., et al.\ 1999, ApJ, 514, L73
528: \bibitem[]{}Ramirez-Ruiz, E., Trentham, N., \& Blain, A.W.\
529: 2002, \mnras, 329, 465
530: \bibitem[]{}Rol, E., et al.\ 2007, \apj, in press
531: \bibitem[]{}Sari, R., Piran, T., \& Narayan, R.\
532: 1998, \apj, 497, L17
533: \bibitem[]{}Savaglio, S., Fall, S.M., \& Fiore, F.\
534: 2003, \apj, 585, 638
535: \bibitem[]{}Savaglio, S., \& Fall, S.M.\ 2004, \apj, 614, 293
536: \bibitem[]{}Savaglio, S.\ 2006, New Journal of Phys., 8, 195
537: \bibitem[]{}Schady, P., et al.\ 2007, MNRAS, 377, 273
538: \bibitem[]{}Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M.\
539: 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
540: \bibitem[]{}Shao, L., \& Dai, Z.G.\ 2007, ApJ, 660, 1319
541: \bibitem[]{}Stanek, K.Z., et al.\ 2006, Acta Astronomica, 56, 333
542: \bibitem[]{}Starling, R.L.C., et al.\ 2007, \apj, 661, 787
543: \bibitem[]{}Stratta, G., Fiore, F., Antonelli, L.~A., Piro, L.,
544: \& De Pasquale, M.\ 2004, \apj, 608, 846
545: \bibitem[]{}Stratta, G., Perna, R., Lazzati, D., Fiore, F.,
546: Antonelli, L.~A., \& Conciatore, M.~L.\ 2005,
547: \aap, 441, 83
548: \bibitem[]{}Stratta, G., Maiolino, R., Fiore, F.,
549: \& D'Elia, V.\ 2007, ApJ, 661, L9
550: \bibitem[]{}Tagliaferri, G., et al.\ 2005, A\&A, 443, L1
551: \bibitem[]{}Tagliaferri, G., et al.\ 2007, astro-ph/0701591
552: \bibitem[]{}Tanvir, N.R., et al.\ 2004, MNRAS, 352, 1073
553: \bibitem[]{}Trentham, N., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., \& Blain, A.W.\
554: 2002, MNRAS, 334, 983
555: \bibitem[]{}Vreeswijk, P., et al.\ 1999, \apj, 523, 171
556: \bibitem[]{}Watson, D., et al.\ 2006, ApJ, 652, 1011
557: \bibitem[]{}Waxman, E., \& Draine, B.T.\
558: 2000, \apj, 537, 796
559: \bibitem[]{}Weingartner, J.C., \& Draine, B.T.\
560: 2001, ApJ, 548, 296
561: \bibitem[]{}Woosley, S.E.\ 1993, \apj, 405, 273
562: \bibitem[]{}Zeh, A., Klose, S. \& Hartmann, D.H.\
563: 2004, \apj, 609, 952
564: \bibitem[]{}Zhang, B., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 642, 354
565: \end{thebibliography}
566:
567:
568: \begin{figure}
569: \begin{center}
570: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth, bb=17 17 345 244]{f1}%
571: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth, bb=17 17 343 260]{f2}\\
572: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth, bb=18 17 343 260]{f3}%
573: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth, bb=17 17 348 264]{f4}
574: \end{center}
575: \caption{\footnotesize\label{fig:result} Light curves of the four
576: selected bursts. The first three panels (a, b and c) are bursts with
577: the same decay index in both X-ray and optical bands. The last panel
578: (d) is for GRB 061126, for which the X-ray and optical bands have
579: different decay indices and cooling frequency between them. Vertical
580: lines denote the time when the adopted GRB afterglow spectra were
581: obtained. }
582: \end{figure}
583:
584:
585: \begin{figure}
586: \begin{center}
587: \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{f5}
588: \end{center}
589: \caption{\footnotesize\label{fig:result} Rest-frame extinction
590: curves (normalized to the $V$ band) for 4 GRB host galaxies and the
591: best-fit extinction curve from the silicate-graphite model (thick
592: black line). Also shown are the Milky Way, SMC and LMC extinction
593: curves.}
594: \end{figure}
595:
596:
597:
598: \begin{table}
599: \caption[]{Observational Properties of the four
600: GRBs\label{tab:tbl1}} {\footnotesize
601: \begin{tabular}{cccccccccc}
602: \tableline GRB & $z$ & $\beta$ & $F_X$ ($\mu$Jy) & $t$ (days)& $T_{90}$ (s) & $\alpha_{o}$ & $\alpha_{X}$ & References\\
603: \tableline\tableline
604: 020405 &0.691 & $1.0\pm0.2$ &0.23 &1.98 & 60 & $1.54\pm0.06$ & $1.97\pm1.10$ & 1, 2 \\
605: 030227 &4 & $0.94\pm0.05$ &0.125 &0.87 & 18 & $0.95\pm0.16$ & $0.97\pm0.07$ & 3, 4\\
606: 060729 &0.54 & $1.06\pm0.01$ &0.2 &4.6 & 115 & $1.27\pm0.10$ & $1.29\pm0.03$ & 5 \\
607: 061126 &1.1588 & $0.5\pm0.07$ &40.5 &0.023& 191 & $0.75\pm0.06$ & $1.31\pm0.01$ & 6 \\
608: \tableline
609: 060729*$^1$&0.54& $1.06\pm0.01$ &3.46 &0.35 & 115 & $0.26\pm0.07$ & $0.35\pm0.15$ &5\\
610: \hline
611: \end{tabular}
612: \tablecomments{$z$ is the redshift of the burst; $\beta$ is the
613: intrinsic optical/UV to near-IR spectral index derived from the
614: standard afterglow model; $F_X$ is the X-ray flux density at 1\,keV;
615: $t$ is measured from the burst trigger time; $T_{90}$ is the
616: duration of the burst; $\alpha_{\rm o}$ and $\alpha_{X}$,
617: respectively the temporal decay index at optical and X-ray bands,
618: are all taken from literature except GRB 060729, for which we obtain
619: $\alpha_{\rm o}$ and $\alpha_{X}$ by fitting the the afterglow light
620: curve between 0.2--0.6\,day.} \tablerefs{(1) Berger et al.\ 2003;
621: (2) Stratta et al.\ 2005;
622: (3) Castro-Tirado et al.\ 2003;
623: (4) Mereghetti et al.\ 2003;
624: (5) Dirk Grupe et al.\ 2007;
625: (6) Perley et al.\ 2007.}}
626: \tablenotetext{1}{Data are taken during the plateau phase.
627: See \S5 for discussion}
628: \end{table}
629:
630: \begin{table}
631: \caption[]{Optical/UV to near-IR flux density \label{tab:tbl2}}
632: {\footnotesize
633: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccccccc}
634: \hline
635: GRB &\multicolumn{11}{c}{$F_\nu$ ($\mu$Jy)} \\
636: \cline{2-12}
637: & $UVW2$ & $UVM2$ & $UVW1$ & $U$ & $B$ & $V$ & $R$ & $I$ &$J$ &$H$ & $K$\\
638: \cline{2-12} \tableline\tableline
639:
640: 020405 &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &5.93 &7.18 &9.5 &10.9 &15.7 &28.6 &34.9 &42.5\\
641: 030227 &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &2.4 &\nodata &2.7 &\nodata &\nodata &10.2 &15 \\
642: 060729 &7.56 &10.18 &11.05 &21.98 & 23 &25.79 &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata \\
643: 061126 &\nodata &65.12 &54.66 &97.41 &120.18 &143.18 &173.6 &217.97 &309.38 &409.42 &523.16\\
644: \hline
645: 060729*&124.2 &170.1 &195.3 &313.1 &359.4 &455.1 &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata \\
646: \hline
647: \end{tabular}
648: \tablecomments{The flux densities $F_\nu$ measured in the observer
649: frame are taken at the time of the vertical lines reported in
650: Fig.\,1. All the data have been corrected for Galactic extinction} }
651: \end{table}
652:
653:
654: \begin{table}
655: \caption[]{Derived extinction in the observed wavelength $\lambda$.
656: \label{tab:tbl3}} {\tiny
657: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccccccccc}
658: \tableline
659: GRB &\multicolumn{11}{c}
660: {$A_\lambda$} \\
661: \cline{2-12}
662: & $UVW2$ & $UVM2$ & $UVW1$ & $U$ &$B$ & $V$ &$R$ & $I$ &$J$ &$H$ &$K$\\
663: \cline{2-12} \tableline \tableline
664: 020405 &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &$2.66\pm1.12$ &$2.65\pm1.16$ &$2.60\pm1.21$ &$2.70\pm1.26$ &$2.58\pm1.31$ &$2.29\pm1.39$ &$2.37\pm1.45$ &$2.47\pm1.51$ \\
665: 030227 &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &$2.88\pm0.26$ &\nodata &$3.16\pm0.28$ &\nodata &\nodata &$2.58\pm0.33$ &$2.54\pm0.35$ \\
666: 060729 &$1.91\pm0.05$&$1.71\pm0.05$ &$1.82\pm0.05$&$1.41\pm0.05$ &$1.62\pm0.06$ &$1.71\pm0.06$ &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata \\
667: 061126 &\nodata &$4.09\pm0.03$ &$4.38\pm0.03$&$3.93\pm0.04$ &$3.81\pm0.04$ &$3.74\pm0.04$ &$3.63\pm0.04$ &$3.49\pm0.04$ &$3.34\pm0.05$ &$3.19\pm0.05$ &$3.06\pm0.05$ \\
668: \hline
669: 060729*&$2.02\pm0.05$&$1.79\pm0.05$ &$1.84\pm0.05$&$1.67\pm0.05$ &$1.78\pm0.05$ &$1.74\pm0.05$ &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata &\nodata \\
670: \tableline
671: \end{tabular}}
672: \end{table}
673:
674:
675:
676: \begin{table}
677: \caption[]{$V$-band extinction and dust-to-gas ratio
678: in the rest frame of each burst.
679: \label{tab:tbl3}} {\tiny
680: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccccccccc}
681: \tableline GRB & $A_V$(mag) & $N_{\rm H}$$(10^{22}\cm^{-2})$&
682: $A_V/N_{\rm H}$$(10^{-22}\magni\cm^2)$ & $m_{\rm dust}/m_{\rm
683: gas}$$(10^{-2})$\\
684: \tableline\tableline
685: 020405 &$2.50\pm1.17$ &$0.8\pm0.2$ &$3.2\pm1.6$ &$0.99\pm0.52$\\
686: 030227 &$2.57\pm0.32$ &$6.8^{+1.8}_{-3.8}$ &$0.38^{+0.22}_{-0.11}$& $0.12^{+0.07}_{-0.03}$\\
687: 060729 &$1.59\pm0.20$ &$0.076\pm0.003$ & $20.9\pm2.8$ &$6.5\pm0.9$\\
688: 061126 &$3.35\pm0.43$ &$1.1\pm0.3$ &$3.0\pm0.9$ &$0.94\pm0.28$\\
689: \hline
690: 060729*&$1.70\pm0.20$ &$0.076\pm0.003$ &$22.4\pm2.8$ &$6.9\pm0.9$\\
691: \hline
692: \end{tabular}
693: \tablecomments{$A_V$ is the rest-frame $V$-band extinction of GRB
694: host galaxies; $N_{\rm H}$ is the rest-frame equivalent column
695: densities of hydrogen measured from X-ray absorption assuming a
696: solar metal abundance at the same time when the multi-band spectra
697: were taken (see \S2)}}
698: \end{table}
699: \end{document}
700: )
701: )
702: