1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: \usepackage{apjfonts}
3:
4: \begin{document}
5: \slugcomment{Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, ACCEPTED}
6:
7: \shorttitle{THE PRODUCTION AND EMPLOYMENT OF ASTRONOMERS}
8: \shortauthors{METCALFE}
9:
10: \title{The Production Rate and Employment of Ph.D.\ Astronomers}
11:
12: \author{Travis~S. Metcalfe}
13:
14: \affil{High Altitude Observatory and Scientific Computing Division,\\
15: National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O.\ Box 3000, Boulder, CO
16: 80307 USA}
17: \email{travis@hao.ucar.edu}
18:
19: \begin{abstract}
20: In an effort to encourage self-regulation of the astronomy job market,
21: I examine the supply of, and demand for, astronomers over time. On the
22: supply side, I document the production rate of Ph.D.\ astronomers from
23: 1970 to 2006 using the UMI Dissertation Abstracts database, along with
24: data from other independent sources. I compare the long-term trends in
25: Ph.D.\ production with federal astronomy research funding over the same
26: time period, and I demonstrate that additional funding is correlated with
27: higher subsequent Ph.D.\ production. On the demand side, I monitor the
28: changing patterns of employment using statistics about the number and
29: types of jobs advertised in the AAS Job Register from 1984 to 2006.
30: Finally, I assess the sustainability of the job market by normalizing this
31: demand by the annual Ph.D.\ production. The most recent data suggest that
32: there are now annual advertisements for about one postdoctoral job, half a
33: faculty job, and half a research/support position for every new domestic
34: Ph.D.\ recipient in astronomy and astrophysics. The average new astronomer
35: might expect to hold up to 3 jobs before finding a steady position.
36: \end{abstract}
37:
38: \keywords{sociology of astronomy}
39:
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41: \section{Background}
42:
43: From 1982 to 1992, federal funding for astronomy research increased by
44: more than 80\%, fueled primarily by NASA funding related to the Hubble
45: Space Telescope. Trailing this trend by several years, the annual
46: production of new Ph.D.\ astronomers more than doubled. Meanwhile, the
47: total number of jobs advertised in the American Astronomical Society (AAS)
48: Job Register remained fairly constant. Responsible undergraduate programs
49: began to lecture incoming astronomy majors about this imbalance in the job
50: market, comparing the statistical odds of a long-term career in astronomy
51: to the chances of becoming a professional athlete. The faculty in some
52: graduate programs started to debate the idea of limiting the number of
53: incoming students (``birth control''), and they made efforts to track and
54: publicize the long-term career progress of their Ph.D.\ recipients (e.g.,
55: see Dinerstein 1996).
56:
57: It was in this atmosphere that Thronson (1991) devised a model to describe
58: the surplus production of new astronomers. He observed that overproduction
59: appears to be built into the system, making the mathematical formulation
60: of the problem similar to that of industrial pollution---an unintended
61: side effect of the process. He calculated the future astronomer surplus
62: under a variety of possible circumstances, including expected retirement
63: rates and increased research funding. The most likely of the scenarios
64: predicted a short-lived reduction in the astronomer surplus over a decade
65: or so, followed by continued growth in the overproduction rate.
66:
67: A few years later, Harris (1994) identified some reliable sources of data
68: to evaluate the astronomy job market over time. He looked at the number of
69: dissertations published in the subject area of astronomy and astrophysics
70: using the UMI Dissertation Abstracts database (UMI) to track new Ph.D.\
71: recipients. He noted that the American Institute of Physics (AIP)
72: tabulates the number of degrees awarded by astronomy departments annually,
73: but astronomers who receive their degrees from physics departments have
74: not been tracked until the past few years. To quantify the number of
75: long-term jobs available each year, Harris examined advertisements in the
76: AAS Job Register. This has some inherent limitations, but it is still the
77: best source available.
78:
79: Thanks to the Internet, most of these data sources are now much more
80: accessible, and we can easily examine the trends in Ph.D.\ production and
81: job availability over an extended time baseline. Further data on the
82: trends in astronomy research funding are also available, allowing us to
83: investigate the possible connection with Ph.D.\ production predicted by
84: Thronson (1991). In section~\ref{DATA}, I document the sources of these
85: data for future reference and I present tables that can be updated
86: annually as new statistics become available. I examine the historical
87: trends of both the supply and demand in section~\ref{RESULTS}, and I
88: discuss the results in section~\ref{DISC}.
89:
90: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
91: \section{Data Sources\label{DATA}}
92:
93: The Statistical Research Center of the AIP has been surveying every
94: astronomy Ph.D.\ program in the U.S.\ since 1972. An archive of their
95: annual reports beginning in 1980 is available online\footnote{
96: http://aip.org/statistics/trends/archives/astrorost.htm}, and the most
97: recent ``Roster of Astronomy Departments'' (Nicholson \& Mulvey 2007)
98: appears on a separate
99: page\footnote{http://aip.org/statistics/trends/gradtrends.html}. I
100: received the complete set of data on astronomy Ph.D.\ production from AIP
101: staff (P.~Mulvey, personal communication), which is listed under the
102: heading ``AIP'' in Table~\ref{tab1}. These totals do not include degrees
103: that were conferred by physics departments to Ph.D.\ recipients who
104: complete a dissertation in a subject related to astrophysics, even though
105: this is the most popular subfield among domestic first year physics
106: graduate students (Mulvey \& Tesfaye 2006).
107:
108: % TABLE 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
109: \begin{table}[t]
110: \begin{center}
111: \caption{Ph.D.\ Production and Research Funding.\label{tab1}}
112: \begin{tabular}{lrrrrrr}
113: \hline\hline
114: & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Ph.D.s} &
115: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Research Funding (M\$)} \\
116: Year & AIP & SED & UMI & Total & NASA & NSF \\
117: \hline
118: 1970 &$\cdots$& 111 & 141 & 136.455 & 100.875 & 19.922 \\
119: 1971 &$\cdots$& 113 & 119 & 126.852 & 90.688 & 23.236 \\
120: 1972 & 75 & 129 & 173 & 136.405 & 89.859 & 25.608 \\
121: 1973 & 80 & 131 & 147 & 123.085 & 82.020 & 27.080 \\
122: 1974 & 97 & 133 & 172 & 136.030 & 91.564 & 30.283 \\
123: 1975 & 76 & 131 & 162 & 168.319 & 122.002 & 29.093 \\
124: 1976 & 93 & 150 & 186 & 163.093 & 116.575 & 31.754 \\
125: 1977 & 96 & 120 & 164 & 197.305 & 140.702 & 41.585 \\
126: 1978 & 93 & 138 & 173 & 213.601 & 148.603 & 46.614 \\
127: 1979 & 90 & 115 & 152 & 284.429 & 213.272 & 51.064 \\
128: 1980 & 106 & 121 & 133 & 285.671 & 229.724 & 34.512 \\
129: 1981 & 82 & 109 & 144 & 281.027 & 198.674 & 59.146 \\
130: 1982 & 70 & 102 & 121 & 275.784 & 184.630 & 65.411 \\
131: 1983 & 81 & 115 & 129 & 357.416 & 265.687 & 64.638 \\
132: 1984 & 74 & 98 & 120 & 382.292 & 277.013 & 77.534 \\
133: 1985 & 66 & 100 & 150 & 414.743 & 310.668 & 76.554 \\
134: 1986 & 86 & 109 & 132 & 468.160 & 362.547 & 77.808 \\
135: 1987 & 72 & 100 & 166 & 522.187 & 410.651 & 76.789 \\
136: 1988 & 94 & 130 & 171 & 470.838 & 364.730 & 77.638 \\
137: 1989 & 94 & 113 & 223 & 541.939 & 428.963 & 83.373 \\
138: 1990 & 89 & 128 & 240 & 597.154 & 462.320 & 104.613 \\
139: 1991 & 73 & 125 & 233 & 631.657 & 501.766 & 101.712 \\
140: 1992 & 93 & 134 & 254 & 739.057 & 584.504 & 116.126 \\
141: 1993 & 119 & 145 & 256 & 686.281 & 520.184 & 109.711 \\
142: 1994 & 117 & 144 & 271 & 747.590 & 562.962 & 122.065 \\
143: 1995 & 133 & 173 & 321 & 764.458 & 593.089 & 126.225 \\
144: 1996 & 126 & 192 & 303 & 728.958 & 570.450 & 119.946 \\
145: 1997 & 117 & 198 & 320 & 774.740 & 621.324 & 115.212 \\
146: 1998 & 116 & 206 & 310 & 732.150 & 575.093 & 113.248 \\
147: 1999 & 88 & 159 & 267 & 757.859 & 578.973 & 124.395 \\
148: 2000 & 139 & 185 & 291 & 880.267 & 710.006 & 130.702 \\
149: 2001 & 101 & 186 & 253 & 759.195 & 559.539 & 153.919 \\
150: 2002 & 102 & 141 & 251 & 751.527 & 540.243 & 167.921 \\
151: 2003 & 88 & 167 & 254 & 871.757 & 639.761 & 192.179 \\
152: 2004 & 116 & 165 & 297 & 920.763 & 678.304 & 202.092 \\
153: 2005 & 91 & 186 & 269 &$\cdots$ &$\cdots$ &$\cdots$ \\
154: 2006 & 119 &$\cdots$& 284 &$\cdots$ &$\cdots$ &$\cdots$ \\
155: \hline\hline
156: \end{tabular}
157: \tablecomments{Degree data for astronomy departments from the
158: American Institute of Physics (AIP), for astronomy and physics
159: departments from the Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED), and for
160: all astrophysics related dissertations from the UMI Dissertation
161: Abstracts database (UMI). Funding data for all R\&D (Total) with
162: the contributions from NASA and the NSF, reported as actual
163: dollar amounts (not adjusted for inflation).}
164: \end{center}
165: \end{table}
166: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
167:
168: The NSF Division of Science Resources Statistics has documented the annual
169: number of astronomy and astrophysics Ph.D.\ recipients through the Survey
170: of Earned Doctorates (SED), a voluntary program administered by graduate
171: deans at accredited universities. Over the past decade, more than 90\% of
172: new doctorates have participated in this survey---at many institutions, it
173: is now a requirement for graduation. Historical data from this survey were
174: compiled in a recent NSF report (Thurgood et al.~2006), while data from
175: the past decade appeared in a separate publication (Hill 2007). The data
176: from 1970 to 2005, which include degrees conferred by both astronomy and
177: physics departments, are listed under the heading ``SED'' in
178: Table~\ref{tab1}.
179:
180: % TABLE 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
181: \begin{table}[t]
182: \begin{center}
183: \caption{Number of AAS Job Register Ads.\label{tab2}}
184: \begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrrc}
185: \hline\hline
186: Year & All & PV & TT & NT & R & RS & MO & F \\
187: \hline
188: 1984 & 275 & 77 & 66 &$\cdots$& 72 &$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$\\
189: 1985 & 338 & 149 & 81 &$\cdots$& 118 &$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$\\
190: 1986 & 257 &$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$\\
191: 1987 & 240 &$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$\\
192: 1988 & 321 & 157 &$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$\\
193: 1989 & 351 &$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$\\
194: 1990 & 240 & 120 & 32 &$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$\\
195: 1991 & 304 & 137 & 30 &$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$&$\cdots$\\
196: 1992 & 327 & 127 & 40 & 13 & 63 & 57 & 21 & 0.140 \\
197: 1993 & 315 & 66 & 59 & 12 & 42 & 60 & 23 & 0.160 \\
198: 1994 & 318 & 140 & 44 & 15 & 14 & 76 & 24 & 0.233 \\
199: 1995 & 425 & 200 & 54 & 23 & 73 & 52 & 17 & 0.268 \\
200: 1996 & 426 & 210 & 63 & 15 & 65 & 56 & 15 & 0.211 \\
201: 1997 & 469 & 208 & 74 & 9 & 55 & 49 & 65 & 0.230 \\
202: 1998 & 569 & 224 & 77 & 23 & 112 & 68 & 51 & 0.210 \\
203: 1999 & 623 & 206 & 94 & 43 & 130 & 38 & 67 & 0.230 \\
204: 2000 & 739 & 277 & 108 & 39 & 132 & 66 & 63 & 0.264 \\
205: 2001 & 715 & 310 & 93 & 59 & 93 & 56 & 78 & 0.288 \\
206: 2002 & 716 & 370 & 117 & 29 & 109 & 3 & 46 & 0.198 \\
207: 2003 & 722 & 389 & 119 & 22 & 78 & 29 & 85 & 0.072 \\
208: 2004 & 714 & 333 & 113 & 22 & 117 & 28 & 101 & 0.251 \\
209: 2005 & 673 & 334 & 111 & 14 & 88 & 19 & 102 & 0.276 \\
210: 2006 & 738 & 388 & 129 & 22 & 87 & 19 & 93 & 0.276 \\
211: \hline\hline
212: \end{tabular}
213: \tablecomments{The total number of AAS Job Register ads (All) along with
214: the number of Postdoctoral and Visitor (PV), Tenure-Track (TT), Non-Tenure
215: track (NT), Research (R), Research Support (RS), Management and Other (MO)
216: positions advertised, and the fraction of ads for Foreign (F) jobs.}
217: \end{center}
218: \end{table}
219: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
220:
221: Although the SED data represent a substantially complete survey, they do
222: not include dissertations that are relevant to astronomy and astrophysics
223: but were completed in another primary field. Following Harris (1994), I
224: used the online version of the UMI Dissertation Abstracts
225: database\footnote{http://proquest.umi.com/login} to obtain an independent
226: estimate of the number of dissertations related to astronomy and
227: astrophysics that were published annually from 1970 to 2006. For each
228: calendar year, I queried the ``Dissertations \& Theses'' database for
229: doctoral dissertations with a subject code of astronomy or astrophysics
230: that were written in English and awarded a Ph.D.\ by a domestic
231: university. The results are shown in Table~\ref{tab1} under the heading
232: ``UMI''. Since these queries included dissertations with primary subject
233: codes in other fields (e.g., mathematics or chemistry) the net effect is
234: to slightly inflate the supply of Ph.D.\ recipients, leading to a worst
235: case scenario for job seekers. While the normalization of job market
236: numbers to assess sustainability may be sensitive to the choice of degree
237: data, the overall {\it trends} should be similar.
238:
239: In addition to degree data, the NSF Division of Science Resources
240: Statistics also documents the trends in federal funding for research and
241: development. One of their recent reports provides a breakdown of federal
242: funding from 1970 to 2003 by both agency and the detailed field of science
243: and engineering (Meeks 2004). I obtained data for the most recent years
244: from several additional NSF reports (Meeks 2005, 2006; Jankowski 2007).
245: Table~\ref{tab1} includes the total research funding, along with the
246: amounts contributed by NASA and the NSF, reported as the actual dollar
247: values (in millions) for each year\footnote{The specific programs included
248: in these totals were determined by each agency in their response to the
249: annual Survey of Federal Funds for Research and Development}. To correct
250: these values for inflation, I used the composite outlay deflators for
251: ``other grants'' from the FY\,2006 U.S.\
252: budget\footnote{http://gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy06/sheets/hist10z1.xls},
253: which normalizes all values to constant FY\,2000 dollars. Unfortunately,
254: even the historical values of the inflation indices adopted by the
255: government appear to change slightly from one budget to the next. So, any
256: future updates to the research funding data in Table~\ref{tab1} should
257: re-adjust the historical numbers using deflators from the most recent
258: federal budget.
259:
260: % FIGURE 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
261: \begin{figure}[t]
262: \includegraphics[height=\linewidth, angle=-90]{f1.eps}
263: \caption{Left axis: Total federal funding for astronomy research and
264: development in millions of FY\,2000 dollars (upper solid line), including
265: the annual totals from NASA (upper dashed line) and the NSF (lower dotted
266: line). Right axis: Historical Ph.D.\ production from AIP surveys of
267: astronomy departments (upper dotted line), from the NSF Survey of Earned
268: Doctorates (SED; lower dashed line) and from all dissertations included in
269: the UMI Dissertation Abstracts database and categorized in the subject
270: area of astronomy and astrophysics (lower solid line).\label{fig1}}
271: \end{figure}
272: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
273:
274: The total number of jobs advertised in the Job Register from 1984 to 2006
275: is available from the AAS Annual Reports, published each year in the BAAS
276: (e.g., Marvel 2007). A detailed breakdown by advertiser-specified job type
277: has been compiled consistently since 1992, including the following
278: categories: postdoctoral and visitor (PV), tenure-track (TT),
279: non-tenure-track (NT), research (R), research support (RS), management and
280: other (MO). The available data for each of these categories are listed in
281: Table~\ref{tab2}. Note that the total number of jobs advertised in each
282: year (shown under the heading ``All'') is not exactly equal to the sum of
283: the six categories listed. The total also includes jobs categorized as
284: predoctoral, which are omitted from Table~\ref{tab2} because they are not
285: relevant to this study. Statistics about the type of institution offering
286: the jobs are also compiled, including whether it is in a foreign country.
287: To evaluate this contribution to the demand for astronomers, the final
288: column of Table~\ref{tab2} lists the fraction of jobs that were classified
289: as foreign (F). The primary limitation of the Job Register data is that
290: they provide no way of evaluating which advertised positions are {\it
291: new}, i.e. which jobs arise from retirement or death as opposed to faculty
292: shuffle. This limitation is generally not relevant to shorter-term
293: postdoctoral jobs, and assuming a reasonably constant number of faculty
294: shuffles over time it will affect the normalization but not the trends in
295: longer-term positions. This may partially offset the impact of adopting
296: the slightly inflated degree data from UMI.
297:
298: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
299:
300: \section{Results\label{RESULTS}}
301:
302: Using these data, drawn from reliable and accessible sources that are
303: likely to be updated annually, we can evaluate the current state of the
304: astronomy job market and how it has changed over time.
305:
306: % FIGURE 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
307: \begin{figure}[t]
308: \includegraphics[height=\linewidth, angle=-90]{f2.eps}
309: \caption{The correlation between inflation-adjusted federal research
310: funding and Ph.D.\ production related to astronomy and astrophysics 4
311: years later. The best linear fit (solid line) suggests that an increase of
312: \$100 million in federal funding ultimately leads to the production of
313: 40-50 additional Ph.D.\ recipients.\label{fig2}}
314: \end{figure}
315: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
316:
317: \subsection{Supply of Astronomers}
318:
319: The data from Table~\ref{tab1} on the supply of astronomers, and the
320: inflation-corrected federal research funding that might be one of its
321: primary drivers, are shown in Figure~\ref{fig1}. The left axis shows
322: funding levels in millions of FY\,2000 dollars for the total federal
323: investment (upper solid line), and for the contributions from NASA (upper
324: dashed line) and the NSF (lower dotted line). The most striking thing
325: about these data is how NASA dominates the total federal funding for
326: astronomy research, and how it is responsible for nearly all of the
327: volatility. By contrast, astronomy funding from the NSF has shown fairly
328: steady growth, nearly doubling its real value over the last 35 years.
329: Between 1982 and 1992, NASA funding for astronomy more than doubled. This
330: expansion was driven primarily by preparations for the Hubble Space
331: Telescope, but also by the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory and other
332: missions (E.~Suckow, personal communication).
333:
334: The right axis of Figure~\ref{fig1} shows the total number of Ph.D.\
335: recipients each year in astronomy and astrophysics from UMI (lower solid
336: line) and SED (lower dashed line), as well as the subset of those coming
337: from pure astronomy departments (upper dotted line). The correlation
338: between the trend in Ph.D.\ recipients and the trend in federal funding is
339: apparent, though there may be a delay of several years between the two
340: curves. Degrees from astronomy departments account for about 25\% of the
341: observed increase in Ph.D.\ recipients between the mid-1980's and
342: mid-1990's, while most of the new degrees came from other departments.
343:
344: To examine the relationship between federal funding and Ph.D.\ production
345: more quantitatively, Figure~\ref{fig2} shows the correlation between
346: inflation-adjusted research funding in a given year and the number of new
347: degrees related to astronomy and astrophysics 4 years later (from UMI).
348: Similar correlations were produced for time delays ranging from 0 to 5
349: years, but a 4 year delay minimized the fractional errors on the fit
350: parameters (formally, all of the fits were statistically equivalent). The
351: best linear fit is shown as a solid line, with the $\pm1\sigma$ limits on
352: the fit parameters indicated with dotted lines. The correlation suggests
353: that an incremental increase of \$100 million in federal funding may lead
354: to the production of 40-50 additional Ph.D.\ recipients in subsequent
355: years (4 years is the median time to Ph.D.\ after the initial 2 years of
356: coursework).
357:
358: % FIGURE 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
359: \begin{figure}[t]
360: \includegraphics[height=\linewidth, angle=-90]{f3.eps}
361: \caption{The number of jobs advertised in the AAS Job Register from 1984
362: to 2006 (upper solid line). A detailed breakdown by advertiser-specified
363: job type is available beginning in the early 1990's, and is shown for
364: positions categorized as postdoctoral and visitor (dotted line), research
365: and research support (dashed line), tenure-track (lower solid line),
366: non-tenure-track (long dashed line), along with management and other
367: positions (dot-dashed line).\label{fig3}}
368: \end{figure}
369: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
370:
371: \subsection{Demand for Astronomers}
372:
373: The data from Table~\ref{tab2} on the demand for astronomers from 1984 to
374: 2006 are shown in Figure~\ref{fig3}. The total number of jobs advertised
375: (upper solid line) is shown along with the numbers of postdoctoral and
376: visitor positions (dotted line), research and research support jobs
377: (dashed line), as well as tenure-track (lower solid line),
378: non-tenure-track (long dashed line), management and other (dash-dot line)
379: advertisements. The growth in the total number of jobs advertised
380: throughout the 1990's is remarkable, and is dominated by an increase in
381: the number of postdoctoral positions, though all job categories
382: experienced some growth during this period. The most recent data show some
383: anti-correlated trends after the year 2000, suggesting a possible shift
384: from research and support positions to postdocs, and from non-tenure-track
385: to tenure-track jobs.
386:
387: To assess the relative sustainability of the job market, we can normalize
388: these job advertisements by the number of new Ph.D.\ recipients in each
389: year (from UMI). These data are shown in Figure~\ref{fig4} for all
390: advertised jobs (upper solid line), postdoctoral and visitor positions
391: (dotted line), research and research support jobs (dashed line),
392: tenure-track and non-tenure-track positions (lower solid line), as well as
393: management and other advertisements (dash-dot line). By normalizing in
394: this way, the vertical axis can be thought of as a relative probability of
395: obtaining a given type of position for each class of Ph.D.\ recipients. It
396: is not exactly a probability, since the number of foreign Ph.D.\
397: recipients competing for some jobs may exceed the number of foreign jobs
398: advertised, and because some Ph.D.\ recipients from previous years will be
399: competing for some jobs while others will eventually choose to work
400: outside the field or in a foreign country.
401:
402: % FIGURE 4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
403: \begin{figure}[t]
404: \includegraphics[height=\linewidth, angle=-90]{f4.eps}
405: \caption{Job advertisements in several categories, normalized by the UMI
406: measure of astronomy and astrophysics Ph.D.\ production from 1990 to 2006.
407: There is now more than one postdoctoral or visitor position (dotted line),
408: about half a tenure-track or non-tenure-track job (lower solid line) and
409: half a research or research support position (dashed line) advertised for
410: each new Ph.D.\ recipient. If all advertised jobs (upper solid line) are
411: filled each year, then the average new Ph.D.\ might expect to hold between
412: 2 and 3 of them before finding a stable position.\label{fig4}}
413: \end{figure}
414: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
415:
416: There now appears to be more than one postdoctoral position advertised for
417: every new domestic Ph.D.\ recipient related to astronomy and astrophysics.
418: This surge in the relative probability of obtaining a postdoc position can
419: be traced to both a slightly declining population of new Ph.D.\ recipients
420: since a peak in the mid-1990's (Figure~\ref{fig1}), as well as the larger
421: number of postdoc positions advertised---possibly at the expense of
422: longer-term research jobs (Figure~\ref{fig3}). At best, half of all recent
423: Ph.D.\ recipients might expect to obtain a faculty position, while the
424: other half will likely end up in a research or support position. While
425: this situation may not be ideal for job seekers who prefer to remain in
426: academia, it was much more competitive a decade ago with nearly 6 new
427: Ph.D.\ astronomers in 1995 for every new tenure-track job. If we assume
428: that all advertised jobs are eventually filled by someone in a related
429: field, then the upper solid line in Figure~\ref{fig4} suggests that the
430: average new Ph.D.\ might expect to hold between 2 and 3 jobs before
431: finding a more permanent position.
432:
433: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
434:
435: \section{Discussion\label{DISC}}
436:
437: We are now in a position to evaluate the predictions of Thronson (1991),
438: who made 20 year projections of several models for the production of
439: astronomers over time. His definition of the ``astronomer surplus'' was
440: the annual ratio of new astronomy Ph.D.\ recipients tabulated by the AIP
441: relative to new tenure-track faculty positions advertised in the AAS Job
442: Register, which he calculated to be around 2.5 in 1991. Regardless of the
443: absolute level of overproduction, his most realistic models included the
444: competing effects of increased research funding (which leads to growth in
445: the surplus), and retirement (which briefly absorbs some of the surplus).
446: These models predicted a gradual decline in the astronomer surplus over
447: about 10 years, followed by continued overproduction:{\it ``A momentary
448: abundance of jobs will be subsequently compensated for by training of new
449: graduate students by a new cohort of young professors''}. Indeed, the
450: anticipated impact of increased research funding on Ph.D.\ production has
451: now been quantified in Figure~\ref{fig2}. Furthermore, the slowly evolving
452: ratio of faculty positions to new Ph.D.\ recipients in Figure~\ref{fig4}
453: shows exactly the predicted behavior---peaking in 2001, and gradually
454: leveling off or declining in more recent years.
455:
456: Despite the accuracy of Thronson's predictions, a broader definition of
457: sustainability may now be necessary, since the character of the astronomy
458: job market appears to have shifted in the meantime. Astronomy research is
459: increasingly moving towards automation and large collaborations where
460: service positions are becoming more important (Sage 2001). This cultural
461: shift might be reflected in the surge of new research and support
462: positions between 1997 and 2002, which may have absorbed some of the
463: astronomer surplus generated during the more competitive conditions of the
464: early 1990's. More recently, as the new cadre of young faculty have
465: attempted to recruit a limited supply of graduate students, some may have
466: turned to postdocs to maintain their research productivity. This could be
467: responsible for the unprecedented expansion of postdoctoral jobs after
468: 1999---but as startup funds are depleted and external research funding
469: stays relatively constant, these ``holding pattern'' positions could
470: evaporate. The most recent data show the first signs of a possible
471: slowdown.
472:
473: The most important aspect of the ongoing cultural shift in the astronomy
474: job market is the persistent gap between expectations and reality. When
475: first year graduate students are surveyed by the AIP, fully 87\% of those
476: in astronomy departments say they would like to end up in an academic
477: position, while only 8\% express a desire to work in a national lab or
478: research position (Mulvey \& Tesfaye 2006). By contrast, Figure~\ref{fig4}
479: suggests that less than 50\% will ultimately obtain academic
480: positions---and probably fewer, since the turnover at universities appears
481: to be episodic. Graduate programs in astronomy should prepare their
482: students for this reality.
483:
484: Having documented the historical trends in the astronomy job market and
485: the forces that help shape it, it should be straightforward to update the
486: analysis periodically as new data emerge. In the future, I hope to make
487: such updates available through the Career Services section of the AAS
488: website\footnote{http://aas.org/career/}, and disseminate them through
489: {\tt astro-ph}. With such information readily available, incoming graduate
490: students can make informed decisions about their long-term career
491: prospects, and faculty can nurture appropriate skills in the next
492: generation of astronomers.
493:
494:
495: \acknowledgements
496: This work was motivated by my involvement with the AAS Employment
497: Committee, which is charged with facilitating the professional development
498: and employment of astronomers at all career stages and on all career
499: paths, and promoting balance and fairness in the job market. The National
500: Center for Atmospheric Research is a federally funded research and
501: development center sponsored by the National Science Foundation.
502:
503: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
504:
505: \begin{thebibliography}{}
506:
507: \bibitem[Dinerstein(1996)]{din96} Dinerstein, H.\ 1996, BAAS, 28, 1277
508:
509: \bibitem[Harris(1994)]{har94} Harris, H.~C.\ 1994, ASP Conf., 57, 12
510:
511: \bibitem[Hill(2007)]{hill07} Hill, S.~T.\ 2007, NSF Report 07-305,
512: (www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf07305/)
513:
514: \bibitem[Jankowski(2007)]{jan07} Jankowski, J.~E.\ 2007, NSF Report 07-323,
515: (www.nsf.gov/statistics/ nsf07323/)
516:
517: \bibitem[Marvel(2007)]{mar07} Marvel, K.\ 2007, BAAS, 39, 283
518:
519: \bibitem[Meeks(2004)]{meeks04} Meeks, R.~L.\ 2004, NSF Report 04-335,
520: (www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf04335/)
521:
522: \bibitem[Meeks(2005)]{meeks05} Meeks, R.~L.\ 2005, NSF Report 05-307,
523: (www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf05307/)
524:
525: \bibitem[Meeks(2006)]{meeks06} Meeks, R.~L.\ 2006, NSF Report 06-313,
526: (www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf06313/)
527:
528: \bibitem[Mulvey \& Tesfaye(2006)]{mt06} Mulvey, P.~J. \& Tesfaye, C.~L.\
529: 2006, AIP Report R-207.35
530:
531: \bibitem[Mulvey(2007)]{mul07} Mulvey, P.\ 2007, personal communication
532:
533: \bibitem[Sage(2001)]{sag01} Sage, L.\ 2001, \nat, 414, 4
534:
535: \bibitem[Suckow(2007)]{suc07} Suckow, E.\ 2007, personal communication
536:
537: \bibitem[Thronson(1991)]{thr91} Thronson, H.~A., Jr.\ 1991, \pasp, 103, 90
538:
539: \bibitem[Thurgood et al.(2006)]{tgh06} Thurgood, L., Golladay, M.~J. \&
540: Hill, S.~T.\ 2006, NSF Report 06-319, (www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf06319/)
541:
542: \end{thebibliography}
543:
544: \end{document}
545: