1: \documentclass{aa}
2: %\documentclass[referee]{aa}
3: %\documentclass[letter]{aa}
4: %\usepackage{psfig}
5:
6: \def\la{\;
7: \raise0.3ex\hbox{$<$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\; }
8: \def\ga{\;
9: \raise0.3ex\hbox{$>$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\; }
10:
11: \newcommand{\zabs}{$z_{\rm abs}\,$}
12: \newcommand{\zem}{$z_{\rm em}\,$}
13: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}\,$}
14: \newcommand{\ms}{m~s$^{-1}\,$}
15: \newcommand{\cm}{cm$^{-2}\,$}
16: \newcommand{\cmm}{cm$^{-3}\,$}
17: \newcommand{\daa}{$\Delta\alpha/\alpha\,$}
18: \newcommand{\dmm}{$\Delta\mu/\mu\,$}
19:
20: \begin{document}
21:
22: \title{A new approach for
23: testing variations of fundamental constants over cosmic epochs using FIR
24: fine-structure lines
25: }
26: \author{
27: S.~A.~Levshakov\inst{1}\thanks{On leave from the Ioffe
28: Physico-Technical Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia}
29: \and
30: D.~Reimers\inst{1}
31: \and
32: M.~G.~Kozlov\inst{2,1}
33: \and
34: S.~G.~Porsev\inst{2,1}
35: \and
36: P.~Molaro\inst{3}
37: }
38: \offprints{S.~A.~Levshakov
39: \protect \\lev@astro.ioffe.rssi.ru}
40: \institute{
41: Hamburger Sternwarte, Universit\"at Hamburg,
42: Gojenbergsweg 112, D-21029 Hamburg, Germany
43: \and
44: Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, 188300, Russia
45: \and
46: Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11,
47: 34131 Trieste, Italy
48: }
49:
50: \date{Received 00 / Accepted 00 }
51:
52: \abstract{}
53: {To obtain limits on the variation of the fine-structure constant
54: $\alpha$ and the electron-to-proton mass ratio $\mu$ over
55: different cosmological epochs.
56: }
57: {A new approach based on the comparison of redshifts of
58: far infrared (FIR) fine-structure lines
59: and low-lying rotational transitions in CO is proposed
60: which is in principle more sensitive by a factor of $\sim$10
61: compared to QSO metal absorption lines.
62: }
63: {Estimations of the quotient $F = \alpha^2/\mu$ obtained for two
64: distant quasars \object{J1148+5251}
65: ($z = 6.42$) and \object{BR 1202--0725} ($z = 4.69$)
66: provide
67: ${\Delta F}/{F} = (0.1\pm1.0)\times10^{-4}$ and
68: $(1.4\pm1.5)\times10^{-4}$, respectively.
69: The obtained limits are consistent with no variation of physical
70: constants at the level of $\sim$0.01\% over a period of 13 Gyr.
71: }
72: {Upcoming observations of quasars and
73: distant galaxies in FIR fine-structure lines of different species
74: and in CO low rotational lines at the
75: SOFIA, HSO, and ALMA
76: are expected to improve the current limit by, at least, an order
77: of magnitude.
78: }
79:
80: \keywords{Cosmology: observations -- Line: profiles --
81: Quasars: individual: \object{J1148+5251}, \object{BR 1202--0725} }
82:
83: \authorrunning{S. A. Levshakov et al.}
84: \titlerunning{A new approach for
85: testing variations of fundamental constants at high-$z$
86: }
87: \maketitle
88:
89:
90:
91: \section{Introduction}
92:
93: Possible time variation of coupling strengths and particle masses
94: is now being discussed
95: in regard to the accelerating expansion of the Universe.
96: Theoretical models imposing extra dimensions predict that dimensionless
97: quantities like the fine-structure constant,
98: $\alpha = {\rm e}^2/(\hbar c) \approx 1/137$,
99: the electron-to-proton
100: mass ratio, $\mu = m_{\rm e}/m_{\rm p}$, etc. depend on the scale length
101: of extra dimensions in Kaluza-Klein or superstring theories
102: (for a review, see
103: Garc\'ia-Berro et al. 2007).
104: This scale factor may vary with
105: cosmic time giving rise to variations of fundamental constants
106: which are defined in the combined 4D and extra-D space-time.
107: Very different patterns from linear and slow-rolling to
108: oscillating variations are considered in contemporary theoretical models
109: (e.g., Marciano 1984; Mota \& Barrow 2004; Fujii 2005).
110: But until now, the evidence for any changes in fundamental constants has
111: not been unambiguously asserted.
112:
113: For example, laboratory measurements do not show
114: variations of $\alpha$
115: at the level of $\dot{\alpha}/\alpha = (-2.6\pm3.9)\times10^{-16}$ yr$^{-1}$
116: (Peik et al. 2006).
117: A lower limit can be set by the fission product analysis of
118: a natural reactor in Oklo (in units of $10^{-17}$~yr$^{-1}$):
119: $-0.6 \leq \dot{\alpha}/\alpha \leq 1.2$
120: and
121: $-4 \leq \dot{\alpha}/\alpha \leq 3$ reported by
122: Gould et al. (2006) and Petrov et al. (2006), respectively,
123: which approximately corresponds
124: to the redshift $z \simeq$0.14.
125: At higher redshifts, molecular rotational and atomic resonance
126: transitions in combination with observations
127: of the \ion{H}{i} 21 cm hyperfine line were used to constrain
128: different combinations of physical constants (e.g., Varshalovich \&
129: Potekhin 1996; Drinkwater et al. 1998; Carilli et al. 2000;
130: Murphy et al. 2001; Kanekar et al. 2005; Tzanavaris et al. 2007).
131: A new constrain on
132: $\Delta\mu/\mu$ at $z = 0.68$,
133: \dmm~= $-0.6\pm1.9$ ppm (1$\sigma$ statistical error)
134: was recently reported by Flambaum \& Kozlov (2007) from the comparison
135: of absorption-line spectra of NH$_3$ with CO, HCO$^+$,
136: and HCN in radio frequency region\footnote{Note that
137: $\mu = m_{\rm p}/m_{\rm e}$\
138: in Flambaum \& Kozlov (2007).\\
139: 1 ppm $\equiv 10^{-6}$. }.
140: This value of $\Delta\mu/\mu$ being linear extrapolated to $z = 0$ corresponds
141: to $\dot{\mu}/\mu = (-1\pm3)\times10^{-16}$ yr$^{-1}$.
142: Here we adopt a cosmology with
143: $H_0 = 70$ km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_\Lambda = 0.7$,
144: and $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.3$
145: (look-back time $t_z = 6.3$ Gyr at $z = 0.68$).
146:
147: In optical spectra of QSOs, limits on \daa\ of comparable accuracy
148: can be obtained
149: from metal absorption line measurements.
150: Special observations aimed at
151: such measurements were performed at two different spectrographs~--
152: the HARPS at the ESO 3.6-m telescope (Chand et al. 2006) and
153: the UVES at the ESO 8-m telescope (Levshakov et al. 2007a).
154: The following values for \daa\ were obtained
155: (Levshakov et al. 2007b):
156: $-0.12\pm1.79$ ppm at $z = 1.15$
157: and
158: $5.66\pm2.67$ ppm at $z = 1.84$
159: ($1\sigma$ errors including statistical and systematic parts
160: are indicated).
161: Assuming linear variation with cosmic time,
162: one finds
163: $\dot{\alpha}/\alpha = (-0.1\pm2.1)\times10^{-16}$ yr$^{-1}$ and
164: $\dot{\alpha}/\alpha = (5.5\pm2.6)\times10^{-16}$ yr$^{-1}$, respectively.
165:
166: To test possible systematics in \daa\ measurements with the UVES spectrograph,
167: we performed additional control observations of asteroids (Molaro et al. 2007).
168: Asteroids provide
169: an accurate radial velocity reference at the level of 1 \ms, or 0.03 ppm
170: in units of \daa.
171: Since no systematic shifts larger than 1.5 ppm have been revealed,
172: the positive signal at $z = 1.84$
173: may be real or induced by other yet unknown systematics.
174:
175: At higher redshifts, $z \ga 3.5$, the changes in fundamental constants
176: can be probed through observations of distant galaxies and QSOs in
177: far infrared (FIR) and radio ranges.
178: Carbon, nitrogen and oxygen FIR fine-structure
179: lines were suggested
180: to probe the interstellar medium in galaxies at cosmological distances and
181: to search for
182: $z > 10$ objects (Petrosian et al. 1969; Loeb 1993; Stark 1997; Suginohara et al. 1999;
183: Blain et al. 2000; Boselli et al. 2002; Papadopoulos et al. 2004; Schaeres \& Pell\'o 2005;
184: Nagamine et al. 2006).
185:
186: In this paper
187: we report on the limits on $\alpha^2/\mu$ estimated
188: for the first time from the
189: [\ion{C}{ii}] 158 $\mu$m line combined with CO rotational lines
190: detected in the spectra of the most distant quasar
191: \object{J1148+5251} at a redshift $z = 6.42$
192: (Maiolino et al. 2005)
193: and in the northern component of a pair of AGN hosts
194: \object{BR 1202--0725} at $z = 4.69$ (Iono et al. 2006).
195: The corresponding look-back time is
196: $t_z = 12.9$ Gyr and $12.5$ Gyr
197: which is, respectively, 93\% and 91\% of the age of the Universe.
198:
199:
200:
201: \section{Computational method}
202:
203: In the nonrelativistic limit and for infinitely heavy point-like
204: nucleus all atomic transition frequencies are proportional to
205: the Rydberg constant, $\mathcal{R}\approx 109737.3$~cm$^{-1}$. In this
206: approximation, the ratio of any two atomic frequencies
207: does not depend on any fundamental constant. Relativistic
208: effects lead to the corrections to an atomic energy which are
209: proportional to the product $(\alpha Z)^2\mathcal{R}$, where
210: $Z$ is atomic number.
211: Corrections accounting for the finite nuclear mass
212: are proportional to $\mu \mathcal{R}$.
213: For atoms these corrections are typically much smaller than
214: relativistic corrections, but they become important for molecules.
215:
216: To study the dependence of atomic frequencies on $\alpha$ it is
217: convenient to expand them near the present-time value of $\alpha$
218: in the co-moving reference frame:
219: \begin{equation}\label{EQ3}
220: \omega_{\rm z} = \omega + q x + \dots, \quad x \equiv
221: \left({\alpha_{\rm z}}/{\alpha}\right)^2 - 1\, .
222: \end{equation}
223: Here $\omega$ and $\omega_z$ are the frequencies corresponding to
224: the present value of $\alpha$ and to a change
225: $\alpha \rightarrow \alpha_z$ presumably at epoch $z$. The parameter $q$
226: (so-called $q$-factor) is individual for each atomic transition
227: (Dzuba et al. 2002).
228:
229: If $\alpha$ is not a constant, the parameter $x$ differs from zero.
230: In linear approximation, $|\Delta \alpha/\alpha| \ll 1$,
231: the corresponding frequency shift, $\Delta\omega = \omega_z - \omega$, is given by:
232: \begin{equation}\label{EQ4}
233: {\Delta\omega}/{\omega} =
234: 2 {\cal Q}\,{\Delta\alpha}/{\alpha}\, ,
235: \end{equation}
236: where ${\cal Q} = q/\omega$ is the dimensionless sensitivity coefficient,
237: and $\Delta \alpha = \alpha_z - \alpha$.
238:
239: For distant objects such a frequency shift
240: would cause an apparent change in the redshift
241: \begin{equation}\label{EQ4a}
242: {\Delta\omega}/{\omega} = -\Delta z/(1+z)\, ,
243: \end{equation}
244: where $\Delta z = \tilde{z} - z$ is the difference between an apparent redshift
245: $\tilde{z}$ and its true value $z$.
246: If $\omega'$ is the observed frequency from a distant object,
247: then the true redshift is given by
248: \begin{equation}\label{EQtrue}
249: 1+z = \omega_z/\omega' \, ,
250: \end{equation}
251: whereas the shifted (apparent) value is
252: \begin{equation}\label{EQfalse}
253: 1+\tilde{z} = \omega/\omega' \, .
254: \end{equation}
255:
256: Relativistic corrections grow with atomic number $Z$, but for
257: optical and UV transitions in light elements they are small:
258: ${\cal Q} \sim (\alpha Z)^2 \ll 1$. For example, the UV
259: \ion{Fe}{ii} lines
260: used in the \daa\ measurements have sensitivities
261: $|{\cal Q}| \sim 0.03$ (Porsev et al. 2007).
262: All other metal lines usually observed in quasar spectra have
263: even lower values of ${\cal Q}$ except for
264: some of the \ion{Fe}{i} or
265: \ion{Zn}{ii} transitions (Dzuba et al. 2002; Dzuba \& Flambaum 2007),
266: which are, however, too weak to be suitable for precise measurements
267: of redshifts from quasar spectra.
268:
269: However, in the radio and FIR ranges one can significantly increase
270: the sensitivity to $\alpha$-variation by
271: looking at transitions between the fine-structure levels.
272: In the nonrelativistic limit ($\alpha \rightarrow 0$) such levels are
273: exactly degenerated. The corresponding transition frequencies
274: $\omega_{\rm fs}$ are proportional to $(\alpha Z)^2$ what means that
275: for these transitions ${\cal Q} = 1$,
276: i.e. they are about 30 times more sensitive to changes in $\alpha$ than UV lines.
277: This gives
278: \begin{equation}\label{EQ5}
279: {\Delta\omega_{\rm fs}}/{\omega_{\rm fs}} =
280: 2 {\Delta\alpha}/{\alpha}\, .
281: \end{equation}
282:
283: In order to utilize high sensitivity of the fine-structure transitions
284: in differential measurements of $\alpha$, we need an independent
285: reference source.
286: Good candidates for this purpose are
287: low-lying rotational lines of CO: carbon monoxide is the second abundant
288: molecule after H$_2$,
289: it is observed in many extragalactic objects\footnote{Emission lines
290: from the rotational transitions of CO were detected in $\sim$40 galaxies
291: at $z > 1$ (for a review, see Solomon \& Vanden Bout 2005), and recently at
292: $z = 5.0267$ towards SDSS \object{J033829.31+002156.3} (Maiolino et al. 2007)
293: and $z = 5.7722$ towards SDSS \object{J0927+2001} (Carilli et al. 2007).}, and
294: frequencies of the rotational transitions of CO (hundreds GHz) fall close
295: to the frequency of the [\ion{C}{ii}]
296: fine-structure transition $^2$P$_{3/2} \rightarrow ^2$P$_{1/2}$ at 1900.539 GHz.
297:
298: In a good approximation,
299: the frequencies $\omega_{\rm rot}$ of the rotational lines of light
300: molecules are independent of $\alpha$, but
301: sensitive to the electron to proton mass ratio $\mu$:
302: $\omega_{\rm rot} \sim \mu \mathcal{R}$, i.e.
303: \begin{equation}\label{EQ6}
304: {\Delta\omega_{\rm rot}}/{\omega_{\rm rot}} =
305: {\Delta\mu}/{\mu}\, .
306: \end{equation}
307:
308: If $\alpha$ and/or $\mu$
309: changes in course of cosmic time,
310: the apparent redshifts for the fine-structure line(s)
311: and for the rotational line(s) will
312: differ. Using Eqs.~(\ref{EQ4a}), (\ref{EQ5}), and
313: (\ref{EQ6}), one finds
314: \begin{equation}\label{EQ7}
315: (\tilde{z}_{\rm rot} - \tilde{z}_{\rm fs})/(1 + z) \equiv {\Delta z}/(1 + z) =
316: 2 {\Delta\alpha}/{\alpha} - {\Delta\mu}/{\mu}\, ,
317: \end{equation}
318: where $z$ is a reference redshift.
319:
320: By introducing the parameter $F = \alpha^2/\mu$, we can rewrite Eq.(\ref{EQ7})
321: in the form
322: \begin{equation}\label{EQ8}
323: {\Delta z}/(1+z) = {\Delta F}/{F}\, .
324: \end{equation}
325: One can also
326: keep in mind that variation of $\mu$ is by far larger than that of $\alpha$, as
327: predicted by some GUT models (e.g. Langacker et al. 2002; Flambaum 2007).
328:
329:
330: \section{Results}
331:
332: Now we apply Eq.(\ref{EQ8}) to the observations of [\ion{C}{ii}] 158 $\mu$m
333: and CO emission lines from the quasars \object{J1148+5251}
334: and \object{BR 1202--0725}
335: to obtain a limit on variation of the parameter $F$.
336:
337: The spectral
338: observations of the [\ion{C}{ii}] 158 $\mu$m emission line in the quasar \object{J1148+5251}
339: were carried out with the Institut de Radioastronomie Millim\'etrique (IRAM) 30-m telescope
340: at the frequency of 256.1753 GHz covering a bandwidth of 1~GHz with 256 channels
341: spaced by 4~MHz (Maiolino et al. 2005). At this frequency the resolving
342: power of the telescope is
343: 9.6 arcsec (Half Power Beam Width) and the 1~GHz bandwidth corresponds to 1170 \kms.
344: The resulting spectral resolution and the noise in the
345: coadded and rebinned spectrum were, respectively, 56 \kms\ and 0.3 mK (2.8 mJy),
346: leading to a 30\% accuracy of the flux density scale.
347: The [\ion{C}{ii}] line was detected at a significance level of $8\sigma$ for
348: the total exposure time of 12.4~h.
349: The redshift and the peak intensity of the [\ion{C}{ii}] line
350: are $z_{\rm fs} = 6.4189 \pm 0.0006$ and $I_{158} = 11.8$ mJy.
351: The reported error $\sigma_z = 0.0006$ corresponds to the uncertainty of the line
352: position measurement of $\sigma_v \sim$24 \kms, which is about one bin size in
353: the [\ion{C}{ii}] spectrum at the Nyquist limit of 2 resolution elements.
354:
355: Observations of the CO (7$\rightarrow$6) and (6$\rightarrow$5) emission lines were
356: obtained with the IRAM Plateau de Bure interferometer at the frequencies 108.724 GHz
357: (the total integration time $T_{\rm exp} = 22$ h) and
358: 93.206 GHz ($T_{\rm exp} = 14$ h),
359: respectively (Bertoldi et al. 2003). At about 5 arcsec angular resolution
360: ($5.7''\times4.1''$ at 3.2 mm)
361: the CO emission line is unresolved and coincides within the astrometric uncertainties of
362: $\pm0.3$ arcsec with the optical position of the quasar given by Fan et al. (2003).
363: The coadded 3~mm data were rebinned to 64 \kms\ ($J=7\rightarrow6$) and
364: 55 \kms\ ($J=6\rightarrow5$) resulting in the accuracy of the line position
365: measurements of $\sigma_v \sim$36 and 24 \kms, respectively.
366: These uncertainties are again of a bin size in the reduced spectra.
367: The redshifts and the peak intensities of the CO (7$\rightarrow$6)
368: and (6$\rightarrow$5) lines are, respectively,
369: $z^{(7-6)}_{\rm rot} = 6.4192 \pm 0.0009$, $I_{(7-6)} = 2.14$ mJy, and
370: $z^{(6-5)}_{\rm rot} = 6.4189 \pm 0.0006$, $I_{(6-5)} = 2.45$ mJy.
371:
372: Weighting the reported rotational redshifts with these peak intensities,
373: one obtains the mean
374: $z_{\rm rot} = 6.4190 \pm 0.0005$. We will take this value for the
375: quasar's systemic redshift $z$.
376: Using the reported redshift $z_{\rm fs}$ and the averaged $z_{\rm rot}$,
377: Eq.(\ref{EQ8}) yields
378: ${\Delta F}/{F} = (0.1 \pm 1.0)\times10^{-4}$.
379:
380: The second [\ion{C}{ii}] line was detected at $z_{\rm fs} = 4.6908$
381: towards the northern component of the quasar \object{BR 1202--0725} (Iono et al. 2006).
382: The profile of this line is similar to the
383: CO (5$\rightarrow$4) and (7$\rightarrow$6) lines seen at
384: $z_{\rm rot} = 4.6916$ from the same component (Omont et al. 1999).
385:
386: The [\ion{C}{ii}] 158 $\mu$m emission was observed
387: with the Submillimeter Array interferometer (SMA, Ho et al. 2004).
388: The total exposure time at a redshifted [\ion{C}{ii}] frequency of 333.969 GHz
389: was $T_{\rm exp} = 19.6$~h, and the angular resolution was $3.4''\times2.7''$.
390: The coadded spectrum was averaged using 120 \kms\ bin size resulting in
391: the rms noise of 7.5 mJy, or the signal-to-noise ratio S/N$\sim 3$ (the peak flux
392: density $\sim$23 mJy as shown in Fig.~1 in Iono et al.).
393: Assuming the uncertainty of the [\ion{C}{ii}] line position
394: as $\sim$1/4 bin size, one gets the error $\sigma_v \simeq 30$ \kms.
395:
396: The CO $J=5\rightarrow4$ line observed with the IRAM interferometer
397: is detected at the $\sim 5\sigma$ confidence level
398: ($T_{\rm exp} \sim 16$~h), and
399: the CO $J=7\rightarrow6$ line observed with the IRAM 30-m telescope~--
400: at the $3\sigma$ confidence level.
401: The angular resolution in the interferometric observations was $5.0\times2.5$ arcsec, and
402: velocity resolution of about 60 \kms. The redshift of the northern component is
403: $z_{5-4} = 4.6916$. The uncertainty of this value is, probably, 25-30 \kms, i.e.
404: approximately one resolution element, considering
405: rather noisy line profiles shown in Fig.~2 in Omont et al.
406: The angular resolution of the 30-m telescope for the 2-mm beam is 17 arcsec.
407: The error of the reported redshift $z_{7-6} = 4.6915\pm0.001$
408: corresponds to the radial velocity uncertainty of 53 \kms.
409:
410: Taking into account that the angular resolutions are similar in observations
411: of the [\ion{C}{ii}] and CO $J=5\rightarrow4$ emission lines, we can use their
412: redshifts
413: $z_{\rm fs} = 4.6908\pm0.0006$ and $z_{\rm rot} = 4.6916\pm0.0006$
414: (both errors correspond to $\sigma_v = 30$ \kms) to calculate
415: ${\Delta F}/{F} = (1.4 \pm 1.5)\times10^{-4}$.
416:
417: \section{Discussion}
418:
419: While comparing the redshifted frequencies of {\it different species} to
420: measure hypothetical variations of physical constants, one must
421: account for random Doppler shifts of the line positions
422: caused by non-identical spatial distributions
423: of species (referred to as the Doppler noise hereinafter)
424: which can mimic non-zero signals in \daa\ or \dmm\ or
425: in a combination of these quantities (e.g., Levshakov 1994; Carilli et al. 2000;
426: Bahcall et al. 2004).
427: To quantify uncertainties induced by the Doppler noise
428: a sample of $(\Delta\alpha/\alpha)/(\Delta\mu/\mu)$ measurements
429: is to be collected.
430:
431: The main problem here is how to estimate
432: the dispersion of random velocity shifts $\sigma_{\rm v}$ for
433: a given system of spectral lines.
434: In case of a large sample size the value of $\sigma_{\rm v}$ can be found
435: from the scatter of points.
436: For a single measurement, a guess for $\sigma_{\rm v}$
437: comes from the comparison with data on velocity differences between
438: spectral lines of similar species in nearby clouds.
439: Observations of local galaxies show that the
440: intensity of [\ion{C}{ii}] is strongly correlated with the intensities of
441: the low-lying rotational lines of CO,
442: the fine-structure lines of [\ion{C}{i}] $\lambda\lambda370, 609$ $\mu$m and
443: [\ion{O}{i}] $\lambda\lambda63, 146$ $\mu$m
444: (Malhotra et al. 2001), and the fine-structure line of
445: [\ion{N}{ii}] $\lambda205$ $\mu$m (Petuchowski \& Bennett 1993; Abel 2006).
446: However, the surface distribution of the [\ion{C}{ii}] emission may not precisely
447: follow the actual $^{12}$CO contours (Stacey et al. 1985).
448: The CO rotational lines, if optically thin,
449: are emitted throughout the whole molecular cloud.
450: As for the [\ion{C}{ii}] emission,
451: it is usually enhanced at the edges of the molecular cloud
452: in the photodissociation regions (PDRs). Additionally,
453: diffuse gas from the \ion{H}{ii} regions
454: can contribute to the intensity of the `PDR' lines (Kaufman et al. 1999).
455: However, the impact from the diffuse gas decreases with increasing gas densities and drops
456: from $\sim$30\% at $n_{\rm H} \sim 1$ \cmm\ to $\sim$10\% at
457: $n_{\rm H} \sim 10^3$ \cmm\ (Kaufman et al. 2006).
458:
459: Because both considered high-redshift [\ion{C}{ii}] emitters belong to the
460: giant molecular gas complexes with $M \sim 10^{10}M_\odot$ (Omont et al. 1999;
461: Walter et al. 2004),
462: the contribution to the integrated observed intensity of the
463: [\ion{C}{ii}] emission from the \ion{H}{ii} regions is probably negligible.
464: In particular, Iono et al. (2006)
465: note an excellent agreement between the [\ion{C}{ii}] and CO
466: profiles at $z = 4.69$.
467: At $z = 6.42$, Maiolino et al. (2005) favor $n_{\rm H} \sim 10^5$ \cmm\
468: to explain the observed luminosities in FIR, CO, and [\ion{C}{ii}] lines.
469:
470: Our estimate of the value of the Doppler noise
471: for the CO and [\ion{C}{ii}] emission lines at $z \sim 6$ is based
472: on typical parameters
473: of the interstellar molecular clouds with similar gas densities:
474: $n = 10^2-10^4$ \cmm, $M = 10^2-10^4M_\odot$, size $L = 2-20$ pc (Table~1 in Mac Low
475: \& Klessen 2004).
476: Using the velocity dispersion and region size relation,
477: $\sigma_v$(\kms)~= $1.10 L^{0.38}$(pc), empirically derived for molecular
478: clouds by Larson (1981) and then studied in detail by Solomon et al. (1987)
479: and by other groups (e.g., Falgarone et al. 1992;
480: Miesch \& Bally 1994; Caselli \& Myers 1995; Frieswijk et al. 2007),
481: we find $\sigma_v \sim 1-3$ \kms.
482: Thus, we may assume that if the [\ion{C}{ii}] and CO lines
483: arise co-spatially, then the velocity
484: offset between them does not exceed the velocity dispersion
485: within the cloud which is of order of a few \kms.
486: On the other hand,
487: our derived limit $|\Delta F/F| < 10^{-4}$
488: corresponds to $\sigma_v = 30$ \kms which is the error
489: of the line position measurement.
490: From these values, we are confident that
491: the quotient $F = \alpha^2/\mu$ remains constant at the level of 0.01\%
492: to a look-back time of 13 Gyr.
493:
494: The reliability of the result obtained can be compared with previous
495: radio observations of molecules at intermediate redshifts.
496: Kanekar et al. (2005) used
497: observations of \ion{H}{i} 21~cm and OH 18~cm
498: lines from two absorbers at $z \simeq 0.7$ and found
499: $\Delta f/f = (0.44\pm0.36_{\rm stat}\pm1.0_{\rm syst})\times10^{-5}$.
500: Here $f = g_{\rm p}(\alpha^2/\mu)^{1.57}$, and $g_{\rm p}$
501: is the proton gyromagnetic ratio.
502: The systematic error was set from the assumption
503: that the Doppler noise is 3 \kms.
504: However, this seems to be too optimistic taking into account
505: observations of the nearby diffuse/translucent gas clouds in our
506: Galaxy. For instance, absorption profiles of the OH 18 cm and HCO$^+$ 3 mm
507: lines studied at 140-240 \ms\ resolution towards extragalactic compact
508: continuum sources (Liszt \& Lucas 2000) exhibit, in general, similar
509: complex structures over the radial velocity interval of $\sim$10-20 \kms,
510: while showing small differences in details on the scale of 1-2 \kms.
511: However, comparison of HCO$^+$ absorption with \ion{H}{i} 21 cm
512: absorption towards the same targets reveals significant discrepancies.
513: Figs.~6 and 7 from Liszt \& Lucas show that there are rather wide
514: velocity intervals ($\sim$20 \kms) where \ion{H}{i} absorption is seen
515: but HCO$^+$ is absent. It seems quite possible that the Doppler noise
516: for a sample of \ion{H}{i} 21 cm and molecular lines could be
517: as large as 10 \kms.
518: Another set of observations of local warm gas clouds within 15 pc around the Sun
519: (Redfield \& Linsky 2007) show that
520: the distribution of cloud velocity difference
521: has a width of $\sim$10 \kms.
522: This means that in lower resolution observations of quasar
523: intervening systems the line-of-sight
524: velocity differences of order 10 \kms\ may occur on
525: a rather short linear scale of $\sim$10-100 pc.
526:
527: The limit on $\Delta\mu/\mu = -0.6\pm1.9$ ppm
528: by Flambaum \& Kozlov (2007) was estimated from
529: the NH$_3$ transitions near $\lambda = 1.26$ cm
530: and mm-wave lines of CO, HCO$^+$, and HCN detected from
531: one absorption-line system.
532: In this case $\Delta \mu/\mu = 0.289 \Delta v/c$, which means
533: that the uncertainty of 2 ppm corresponds to $\Delta v \simeq 2$ \kms.
534: As discussed above, the systematic error from the Doppler noise
535: can be of the same order or even larger.
536:
537: To avoid the influence of the Doppler noise on differential measurements of
538: physical constants, lines of only one element should be utilized.
539: For instance, ground state FIR fine-structure transitions
540: of [\ion{C}{i}] $\lambda\lambda370, 609$ $\mu$m,
541: [\ion{O}{i}] $\lambda\lambda63, 146$ $\mu$m,
542: [\ion{N}{ii}] $\lambda\lambda122, 205$ $\mu$m,
543: [\ion{O}{iii}] $\lambda\lambda52, 88$ $\mu$m, and
544: [\ion{Fe}{ii}] $\lambda\lambda15, 26$ $\mu$m
545: can be used to directly constrain \daa.
546: The sensitivity of this procedure to $\alpha$-variation will be
547: discussed in the following paper.
548:
549: Up to now, [\ion{C}{i}] was detected in five high-$z$
550: objects where CO has been observed:
551: \object{H1413+117}, $J$=1-0 line (Barvainis et al. 1997;
552: Wei\ss\ et al. 2005) and
553: $J$=2-1 line (Wei\ss\ et al. 2003) at $z = 2.557$;
554: IRAS \object{F10214+4724} and SMM \object{J14011+0252},
555: $J$=1-0 line at $z = 2.285$ and 2.565, respectively (Wei\ss\ et al. 2005);
556: \object{APM 08279+5255}, $J$=1-0 line at $z = 3.913$ (Wagg et al. 2006);
557: \object{PSS 2322+1944}, $J$=1-0 line at $z = 4.120$ (Pety et al. 2004).
558: Unfortunately, low signal-to-noise ($\la 10$) and
559: large uncertainties of
560: the positions of [\ion{C}{i}] and CO lines
561: ($\sim$25 \kms) prevent
562: us from constraining relative changes in constants
563: with an accuracy better than $10^{-4}$.
564:
565:
566: \section{Conclusions}
567:
568: In this letter we propose
569: to use the FIR fine-structure lines of atoms and ions in conjunction with
570: low-lying rotational lines of CO for probing the cosmic time evolution
571: of the fundamental physical constants, namely
572: the quotient $F = \alpha^2/\mu$.
573:
574: The reported constraints on ${\Delta F}/{F}$ are obtained for two
575: [\ion{C}{ii}] emitters recently discovered at $z = 6.42$ (Maiolino et al. 2005)
576: and
577: $z = 4.69$ (Iono et al. 2006). We found no evidence for
578: the variability of $F$ at the level of $10^{-4}$ over a period of 13 Gyr.
579: The statistical reliability of this limit seems to be high enough since the expected
580: value of the Doppler noise for the co-spatially distributed [\ion{C}{ii}] and CO
581: emission lines, $\sigma_v \sim$ a few \kms, is less that the error of
582: the line position measurement, $\sigma_v = 30$ \kms.
583: However, to be completely confident it should be tested whether
584: the empirical relationship between
585: the velocity dispersion and region size derived on base of local measurements is also
586: applicable to high-$z$ galaxies.
587:
588: The result obtained is to be compared with
589: other tests at extremely high redshifts:
590: bounds from the height and the positions of the first and subsequent
591: acoustic peaks of the spectrum of the cosmic microwave background radiation
592: fluctuations
593: ($z \sim 1500$, look-back time 13.8 Gyr),
594: and from the relative abundances of light elements
595: predicted in the big bang nucleosynthesis ($z \sim 10^{10}$) restrict
596: the fine-structure constant variations at the level of only 2-3\%
597: (Ichikawa et al. 2006; Dent et al. 2007; Mosquera et al. 2007).
598: Thus, the proposed method ensures a significant gain in the accuracy
599: and works at the time scales
600: comparable with the total age of the Universe.
601:
602: The limits on ${\Delta F}/{F}$ can be improved by measuring the line
603: positions with better precision~-- as high as 1-3 \kms\ to be comparable
604: with the expected Doppler noise.
605: The advantage of radio observations for such precise spectral
606: measurements is twofold: firstly, distant objects inaccessible to
607: optical observations can be probed, and, secondly, spectral
608: resolution available in cm- and mm-range
609: is much higher than in the optical.
610: Additionally, the sensitivity to $\alpha$-variation in FIR band is
611: further increased by roughly a factor of 30 due to larger
612: ${\cal Q}$-factors, as compared to optical band.
613: In conclusion, the method proposed in this
614: letter holds the promise of a higher accuracy than obtainable at present
615: with QSO metal absorption lines.
616:
617: It is to note, that observations of both
618: [\ion{C}{ii}] and CO lines in quasars and
619: high-redshift galaxies will be one of the key tasks at the
620: the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy
621: (SOFIA)\footnote{http://www.sofia.usra.edu/},
622: the Herschel Space Observatory
623: (HSO)\footnote{http://herschel.esac.esa.int/}, and
624: the Atacama Large Millimeter Array
625: (ALMA)\footnote{http://www.eso.org/alma/}
626: which is widely discussed in the literature.
627: Thus, we can expect that these upcoming observations will
628: contribute much to clarifying whether fundamental constants vary with cosmic
629: time or not.
630:
631: \begin{acknowledgements}
632: SAL, MGK, and SGP gratefully acknowledge the hospitality
633: of Hamburger Sternwarte while visiting there.
634: This research has been partly supported by
635: the DFG projects SFB 676 Teilprojekt C and RE 353/48-1,
636: the RFBR grants No. 05-02-16914, 06-02-16489, and 07-02-00210,
637: and by the Federal Agency for Science and Innovations grant
638: NSh 9879.2006.2.
639: \end{acknowledgements}
640:
641: \begin{thebibliography}{}
642: %
643: \bibitem{}Abel, N. P. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1949
644: %
645: \bibitem{}Bahcall, J. N., Steinhardt, C. L., \& Schlegel, D. 2004, ApJ, 600, 520
646: %
647: \bibitem{}Barvainis, R., Maloney, P., Antonucci, R., \& Alloin, D. 1997,
648: ApJ, 484, 695
649: %
650: \bibitem{}Bertoldi, F., Cox, P., Neri, R., et al. 2003, A\&A, 409, L47
651: %
652: \bibitem{}Blain, A. W., Frayer, D. T., Bock, J. J., \& Scoville, N. Z. 2000,
653: MNRAS, 313, 559
654: %
655: \bibitem{}Boselli, A., Gavazzi, G., Lequeux, J., \& Pierini, D. 2002, A\&A, 385, 454
656: %
657: \bibitem{}Carilli, C. L., Neri, R., Wang, R., et al. 2007, ApJ, 666, L9
658: %
659: \bibitem{}Carilli, C. L., Menten, K. M., Stocke, J. T., et al. 2000,
660: Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 5511
661: %
662: \bibitem{}Caselli, P., \& Meyers, P. S. 1995, ApJ, 446, 665
663: %
664: \bibitem{}Chand, H., Srianand, R., Petitjean, P., et al. 2006, A\&A, 451, 45
665: %
666: \bibitem{}Dent, T., Stern, S., \& Wetterich, C. 2007, J. Phys. G Special
667: Issue, in press, arXiv: astro-ph/0710.4854
668: %
669: \bibitem{}Drinkwater, M. J., Webb, J. K., Barrow, J. D., \& Flambaum, V. V. 1998,
670: MNRAS, 295, 457
671: %
672: \bibitem{}Dzuba, V. A., Flambaum, V. V., Kozlov, M. G., \& Marchenko, M. 2002,
673: Phys. Rev. A, 66, 022501
674: %
675: \bibitem{}Dzuba, V. A., \& Flambaum, V. V. 2007, arXiv: physics.atom-ph/0711.4428
676: %
677: \bibitem{}Falgarone, E., Puget, J. L., \& Perault, M. 1992, A\&A, 257, 715
678: %
679: \bibitem{}Fan, X., Strauss, M., Schneider, D., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1649
680: %
681: \bibitem{}Flambaum, V. V. 2007, arXiv: physics.atom-ph/0705.3704
682: %
683: \bibitem{}Flambaum, V. V., \& Kozlov, M. G. 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 240801
684: %
685: \bibitem{}Frieswijk, W. W. F., Spaans, M., Shipman, R. F., Teyssier, D., \& Hily-Blant, P.
686: 2007, A\&A, 475, 263
687: %
688: \bibitem{}Fujii, Y. 2005, Phys. Lett. B, 616, 141
689: %
690: \bibitem{}Garc\'ia-Berro, E., Isern, J., \& Kubyshin, Y. A. 2007,
691: A\&A Rev., 14, 113
692: %
693: \bibitem{}Gould, C. R., Sharapov E. I., \& Lamoreaux, S. K., 2006,
694: Phys. Rev. C, 74, 024607
695: %
696: \bibitem{}Ho, P. T. P., Moran, J. M., \& Lo, K. Y. 2004, ApJ, 616, L1
697: %
698: \bibitem{}Ichikawa, K., Kanzaki, T., \& Kawasaki, M. 2006,
699: Phys. Rev. D, 74, 023515
700: %
701: \bibitem{}Iono, D., Yun, M. S., Elvis, M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, L97
702: %
703: \bibitem{}Kanekar, N., Carilli, C. L., Langston, G. I., et al. 2005, Phys.
704: Rev. Lett., 95, 261301
705: %
706: \bibitem{}Kaufman, M. J., Wolfire, M. G., \& Hollenbach, D. J. 2006,
707: ApJ, 644, 283
708: %
709: \bibitem{}Kaufman, M. J., Wolfire, M. G., Hollenbach, D. J., \&
710: Luhman, M. C. 1999, ApJ, 527, 795
711: %
712: \bibitem{}Langacker, P., Segr\`e, G., \& Strassler, J. 2002,
713: Phys. Lett. B, 528, 121
714: %
715: \bibitem{}Larson, R. B. 1981, MNRAS, 194, 809
716: %
717: \bibitem{}Levshakov, S. A. 1994, MNRAS, 269, 339
718: %
719: \bibitem{}Levshakov, S. A., Molaro, P., Lopez, S. et al.
720: 2007a, A\&A, 466, 1077
721: %
722: \bibitem{}Levshakov, S. A., Agafonova, I. I., Molaro, P., \& Reimers, D.
723: 2007b, A\&A, submitted
724: %
725: \bibitem{}Liszt, H., \& Lucas, R. 2000, A\&A, 355, 333
726: %
727: \bibitem{}Loeb, A. 1993, ApJ, 404, L37
728: %
729: \bibitem{}Mac Low M.-M., \& Klessen, R. S. 2004, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 125
730: %
731: \bibitem{}Maiolino, R., Neri, R., Beelen, A. et al. 2007, A\&A, 472, L33
732: %
733: \bibitem{}Maiolino, R., Cox, P., Caselli, P., et al. 2005, A\&A, 440, L51
734: %
735: \bibitem{}Malhotra, S., Kaufman, M. J., Hollenbach, D., et al. 2001, ApJ,
736: 561, 766
737: %
738: \bibitem{}Marciano, W. J. 1984, Phys. Rev. Lett., 52, 489
739: %
740: \bibitem{}Miesch, M. S., \& Bally, J. 1994, ApJ, 429, 645
741: %
742: \bibitem{}Molaro, P., Levshakov, S. A., Monai, S., et al. 2007, A\&A, in press
743: %
744: \bibitem{}Mosquera, M. E., Sc\'occola, C. G., Landau, S. J., \&
745: Vucetich, H. 2007, A\&A, in press, arXiv: astro-ph/0707.0661
746: %
747: \bibitem{}Mota, D. F., \& Barrow, J. D. 2004, MNRAS, 349, 291
748: %
749: \bibitem{}Murphy, M. T., Webb, J. K., Flambaum, V. V., et al. 2001,
750: MNRAS, 327, 1244
751: %
752: \bibitem{}Nagamine, K., Wolfe, A. M., \& Hernquist, L. 2006, ApJ, 647, 60
753: %
754: \bibitem{}Omont, A., Petitjean, P., Guilloteau, S., et al.
755: 1999, Nature, 382, 428
756: %
757: \bibitem{}Papadopoulos, P. P., Thi, W.-F., \& Viti, S. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 147
758: %
759: \bibitem{}Peik, E., Lipphardt, B., Schnatz, H., et al. 2006,
760: arXiv: physics/0611088
761: %
762: \bibitem{}Petrosian, V., Bahcall, J. N., \& Salpeter, E. E. 1969, ApJ, 155, L57
763: %
764: \bibitem{}Petrov, Yu. V., Nazarov, A. I., Onegin, M. S., Petrov, V. Yu., \& Sakhovsky, E. G.
765: 2006, Phys. Rev. C, 74, 064610
766: %
767: \bibitem{}Petuchowski, S. J., \& Bennett, C. L. 1993, ApJ, 405, 591
768: %
769: \bibitem{}Pety, J., Beelen, A., Cox, P., et al. 2004, A\&A, 428, L21
770: %
771: \bibitem{}Porsev, S. G., Koshelev, K. V., Tupitsyn, I. I., Kozlov, M. G.,
772: Reimers, D., \& Levshakov, S. A. 2007, Phys. Rev. A, 76, 052507
773: %
774: \bibitem{}Redfiled, S., \& Linsky, J. L. 2007, ApJ, in press,
775: arXiv: astro-ph/0709.4480
776: %
777: \bibitem{}Schaeres, D., \& Pell\'o, R. 2005, in {\it The dusty and molecular universe:
778: a prelude to Herschel and ALMA}, ed. A. Wilson (Noordwijk, Nitherlands: ESA Pub. Division), p.121
779: %
780: \bibitem{}Solomon, P. M., Rivolo, A. R., Barrett, J., \& Yahil, A. 1987, ApJ, 319, 730
781: %
782: \bibitem{}Stacey, G. J., Viscuso, P. J., Fuller, C. E., \& Kurtz, N. T. 1985,
783: ApJ, 289, 803
784: %
785: \bibitem{}Stark, A. A. 1997, ApJ, 481, 587
786: %
787: \bibitem{}Suginohara, M., Suginohara, T., \& Spergel, D. N. 1999, ApJ, 512, 547
788: %
789: \bibitem{}Tzanavaris, P., Murphy, M. T., Webb, J. K.,
790: Flambaum, V. V., \& Curran, S. J. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 634
791: %
792: \bibitem{}Varshalovich, D. A., \& Potekhin, A. Y. 1996, Astron. Lett., 22, 1
793: %
794: \bibitem{}Wagg, J., Wilner, D. J., Neri, R., Downes, D., \& Wiklind, T.
795: 2006, ApJ, 651, 46
796: %
797: \bibitem{}Wei\ss, A., Downes, D., Henkel, C., \& Walter, F. 2005, A\&A, 429, L25
798: %
799: \bibitem{}Wei\ss, A., Henkel, C., Downes, D., \& Walter, F. 2003, A\&A, 409, L41
800: %
801: \bibitem{}Walter, F., Carilli, C., Bertoldi, F., et al. 2004, ApJ, 615, L17
802: %
803: \end{thebibliography}
804:
805: \end{document}
806: