1: %
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 03 Nov 99
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.0 LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.0 document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the default manuscript style,
14: %% which will produce a double-spaced document on one column.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17:
18: %\documentclass{aastex}
19:
20: %% preprint produces a one-column, single-spaced document:
21:
22: \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %%\usepackage{rotating}
29:
30: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
31: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
32: %% the \begin{document} command.
33: %%
34: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
35: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
36: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.0 Author Guide
37: %% for information.
38: \newcommand{\chandra}{\mbox{\it Chandra}}
39: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
40: \newcommand{\myemail}{swolk@cfa.harvard.edu}
41: \newcommand{\eg}{\mbox{e.g.}}
42: \newcommand{\ie}{\mbox{i.e.}}
43: \newcommand{\<}{$<$}
44: \newcommand{\minusone}{$^{-1}$}
45: \newcommand{\LOH}{$L_{OH}$}
46: \newcommand{\LFIR}{$L_{FIR}$}
47: \newcommand{\I}{\protect\small I \normalsize $\!\!$}
48: \newcommand{\II}{\protect\small II \normalsize $\!\!$}
49: \newcommand{\HI}{\mbox{\rm H\I}\ }
50: \newcommand{\NH}{\mbox{$N_{\rm H}$}}
51: \newcommand{\nh}{\mbox{$N_{\rm H}$}}
52: \newcommand{\SII}{\ion{S}{2}}
53: \newcommand{\HII}{\ion{H}{2}}
54: \newcommand{\skipthis}[1]{}
55: \newcommand{\jj}[2]{\mbox{$J = #1 \rightarrow #2$}}
56: \newcommand{\uco}[1]{\mbox{$^{#1}$CO}} % ie \uco{13}\ -> 13co
57: \newcommand{\cuo}[1]{\mbox{C$^{#1}$O}} % ie \cuo{18}\ -> c18o
58: \newcommand{\Msun}{M_{\odot}}
59: \newcommand{\pcc}{{\rm cm}^{-3}}
60: \newcommand{\percc}{\rm \,cm^{-3}}
61: \newcommand{\psqcm}{{\rm cm}^{-2}}
62: \newcommand{\persqcm}{\rm \,cm^{-2}}
63: \newcommand{\gpersqcm}{\rm \,g\,cm^{-2}}
64: \newcommand{\gpercc}{\rm \,g\,cm^{-3}}
65: \newcommand{\ps}{{\rm s}^{-1}}
66: \newcommand{\ccps}{{\rm cm}^{3} {\rm s}^{-1}}
67: \newcommand{\kmps}{{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}}
68: \newcommand{\erg}{{\rm ergs}}
69: \newcommand{\kb}{k_{\rm B}}
70: \def\micron{\hbox{$\mu$m}}
71: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
72: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
73: \newcommand{\e}{et al.\ }
74: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.\ }
75: \def\cf{{c.f.\ }}
76: \def\etc{{etc.\ }}
77: %\def\etal{\mbox{\it et al.\,}}
78: \def\ie{{i.e.\ }}
79: \def\noi{{\noindent}}
80: \def\ra{{\rightarrow}}
81: \newcommand{\asec}{$^{\prime\prime}$}
82: %\newcommand{\deg}{$^{o}$}
83: %\newcommand{\arcsec}{$^{\prime\prime}$}
84: %\newcommand{\arcmin}{$^{\prime}$}
85: %\newcommand{\micron}{$\;\mu $m}
86: \newcommand{\amin}{$^{\prime}$}
87: \newcommand{\ks}{~km s$^{-1}$}
88:
89:
90: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
91:
92: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
93: \slugcomment{\today}
94: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
95: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
96: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
97: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
98: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
99: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
100:
101: \shorttitle{RCW 108}
102: \shortauthors{Wolk et al.}
103:
104:
105: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
106: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
107:
108: \begin{document}
109:
110: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
111: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
112: %% you desire.
113:
114: \title{X-ray and IR Point Source Identification and Characteristics \\
115: in the Embedded, Massive Star-Forming Region RCW 108}
116:
117:
118: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
119: %% author and affiliation information.
120: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
121: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
122: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
123: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
124:
125: \author{Scott J. Wolk,
126: Bradley D. Spitzbart,
127: Tyler L. Bourke, Robert A. Gutermuth}
128: \affil{Harvard--Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
129: 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
130: \author{Miquela Vigil}
131: \affil{Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
132: Lexington, MA 02420}
133: \author{Fernando Comer\'on}
134: \affil{European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild Strasse 2,
135: D-85748 Garching bei M\"unchen, Germany}
136:
137: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
138: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
139: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
140: %% affiliation.
141:
142: %\altaffiltext{1}{Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
143: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
144: %\altaffiltext{2}{European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild Strasse 2,
145: % D-85748 Garching bei M\"unchen, Germany}
146:
147:
148: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
149: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
150: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
151: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
152: %% editorial office after submission.
153:
154: \begin{abstract}
155: We report on the results of an approximately 90~ks {\it Chandra}
156: observation of
157: a complex region that hosts multiple sites of recent and active
158: star formation in ARA OB1a. The field is centered on the embedded
159: cluster RCW~108--IR and
160: includes and a large portion of the open
161: cluster NGC 6193. We detect over 420 X--ray
162: sources in the field and combined these data with deep near-IR,
163: $Spitzer/IRAC$ and MSX
164: mid--IR data. We find about 360 of the X-ray sources have near--IR counterparts.
165: We divide the region into 5 parts based on the X-ray point source
166: characteristics and extended 8\micron\ emission. The most clearly
167: defined regions are the central region -- identified by embedded sources
168: with high luminosities in the both the near--IR and X-ray as well as high X-ray
169: temperatures ($\sim$ 3~keV) and the eastern region --
170: identified by low extinction
171: and $\sim$ 1~keV X-ray temperatures. Other regions, identified by their
172: directional relationship to RCW~108--IR are less uniform --
173: representing combinations of the first two regions, independent star
174: formation epochs, or both.
175: The cluster members range in X-ray
176: luminosity from $~10^{29}$ to $ 10^{33}$ ergs s$^{-1}$.
177: Over 18\% percent of the cluster members
178: with over 100 counts exhibit flares.
179: All sources with over 350 counts are variable.
180: %The variable fraction drops to about 37\% over 100 counts and
181: %about 25\% of cluster members with over 30 counts are variable.
182: Overall about 10\% (16\% in RCW~108--IR) appear to have optically thick
183: disks as derived from their position in the (J$-$H), (H$-$K) diagram.
184: The disk fraction becomes much higher when IRAC data are employed.
185: %but biases are obvious due to the shallow nature of the IRAC data.
186: The largest fraction of X-ray sources are best
187: described as possessing some disk material via a more detailed extinction fitting.
188: We fit the bulk of the X-ray spectra as absorbed Raymond-Smith
189: type plasmas and
190: find the column to the RCW~108-IR members varies from $10^{21}$ to
191: $10^{23}\persqcm$.
192: We find that the field contains
193: 41 candidate O or B~stars and
194: estimate that the total number of pre--main sequence stars in the
195: field is about 1600
196: $\pm$ 200. Approximately 800 are confined to
197: the 3\amin\ ($\sim$ 1.1~pc) central region.
198: \end{abstract}
199:
200: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
201: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
202: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
203: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
204:
205: \keywords{\ion{H}{2} regions -- ISM; individual (RCW~108) -- stars; formation --
206: X-rays; point sources -- X-rays; stars}
207:
208: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
209: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
210: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
211: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
212: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
213: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
214: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
215: %% each reference.
216:
217: \section{Introduction}
218:
219: Ara OB1a may be one of the best examples of
220: triggered star formation in the local galaxy. The triggering in the
221: most active portion is easily imagined from images of the
222: % $\sim$ 3 Myr (Vazquez \& Feinstein 1992)
223: NGC~6193/RCW~108-IR complex such as Figure~\ref{introfield}.
224: Ara OB1 was first studied in detail by Whiteoak (1963) using
225: photographic photometry and objective prism spectroscopy to identify
226: about 35 O and B star members. He identified OB1a with a relatively
227: nearby cluster associated with open clusters NGC~6193 and NGC~6167
228: while Ara OB1b was found to be about twice as distant.
229: Whiteoak's work was a follow up to an
230: H$\alpha$ survey by Rodgers, Campbell and Whiteoak (RCW; 1960) who cataloged
231: 181 H$\alpha$ emission regions in the southern sky.
232: %which is identified as a region of H$\alpha$ emission over 2 degrees on a side.
233: % about 15\arcmin west of NGC 6193.
234: NGC~6193 is an open cluster dominated by a pair of O stars, HD 150135
235: (O6.5V; Walborn 1972) and HD 150136 (O3+O6V; Niemela \& Gamen 2005). These are the brightest optically revealed O stars in
236: the association and are thought to be responsible for ionizing the
237: bright rim of emission to the west (NGC 6188), which separates NGC 6193
238: from RCW 108. The youth of the region is clear in sky survey plates
239: and Figure~\ref{introfield} which show concurrent regions of ionized gas and
240: dust lanes.
241:
242: Ara OB1a is a compact association covering about 1 sq. degree ($\sim$
243: 25~pc on a side) around a
244: central cluster -- NGC 6193.
245: The distance to NGC 6193 is 1.3$\pm$0.2 kpc
246: and the cluster is associated with the HII region RCW 108
247: (Herbst \& Havlen 1977).
248: %It is generally thought to be about 1.3
249: %kpc away and can be equated with RCW~108.
250: There is some confusion in the literature as to what is actually
251: meant by RCW~108. The original
252: definition of Rodgers, Campbell and Whiteoak (1960) refers to all the
253: region where H$\alpha$ nebulosity is detected, for which they give a size
254: of 210\arcmin\ $\times$ 120\arcmin\ centered at: l, b= 336.49, --1.48. Straw et
255: al. (1987) used RCW~108--IR to refer to the embedded IR cluster about
256: 15\arcmin\ to the west of the O stars in NGC~6193 that has been
257: identified with IRAS~16362-4845. The confusion arises when
258: RCW~108--IR is abbreviated by dropping the ``--IR''. For the remainder of
259: this paper we will refer to the embedded cluster as RCW~108--IR.
260:
261: \subsection{NGC~6193}
262: NGC~6193 is the open cluster to the east of the bright emission rim NGC~6188.
263: In a region about 40\amin\ ($\sim$ 15~pc) on a side,
264: Herbst \& Havlen (1977) measured over 700 stars photometrically. Of these,
265: 59 had photometric distances and reddening consistent with cluster
266: membership. Their survey appears complete to spectral types earlier than A0.
267: Their best fit to the photometric distance was 1320$\pm 120$pc.
268: Several other groups have estimated the distance to the cluster
269: using photometric parallax techniques and obtain results
270: ranging from $\approx$1100 to
271: $\approx$ 1400pc (Moffat \& Vogt 1973, Fitzgerald 1987,
272: Kalcheva \& Georgiev 1992).
273: Vazquez \& Feinstein (1992) obtained an age of about 3 Myr by fitting
274: the upper main sequence, they also determine a distance of about 1410
275: $\pm 120$pc. We will use 1.3 kpc for this paper to be consistent with
276: recent studies. For linear distances we will usually use parsecs,
277: 1\amin = 0.38~pc at 1.3 kpc. The mean extinction is low towards
278: NGC~6193 (A$_V \sim 0.5$).
279:
280: From the X-ray perspective, there is an image from
281: the zero--order of a 100~ks $Chandra$ observation (Skinner \e 2005).
282: Since the effective
283: area of the HETG zero-order is only about 15\% that of the unobscured
284: ACIS-I, this observation is relatively shallow.
285: Still, the observation should be fairly
286: complete to 1 solar mass. It reveals 43 X-ray sources in the central square
287: 0.76~pc on a side.
288: Only 11 of these had previous optical identifications, however all 43
289: were detected at H band by 2MASS and are likely cluster members. In addition to
290: those sources cataloged by Skinner et al.~there are about 30 X-ray
291: point sources visible outside of the central 0.8~pc on a side
292: region in this data set. Most of these have I-band magnitudes
293: consistent with cluster membership and are between 0.8~pc and
294: 2.58~pc from HD 150136.
295:
296: \subsection{RCW~108--IR}
297:
298: A bright rim (NGC~6188) marks the border between the \HII\ region and a
299: dark nebula containing RCW~108--IR.
300: The bright rim is produced by the ionization
301: of the molecular cloud hosting RCW~108--IR by the two central stars
302: of NGC 6193.
303: % The dark cloud contains a high emission measure knot (Wilson et
304: % al. 1970) which appears to be a compact \HII region (Frogel and
305: % Persson 1974).
306: Herbst and Havlen (1977) proposed this was a site of active star formation.
307:
308:
309:
310:
311: RCW~108--IR is a young, compact cluster partially embedded in its parent molecular cloud.
312: Straw et al. (1987) used photometry at IR wavelengths (1.2-100 $\mu$m)
313: to perform the first survey of the cluster.
314: They reported on 55 objects; of which $<$ 20 have optical counterparts.
315: In addition to the point sources, there is diffuse IR emission,
316: The total luminosity of the cluster is about 1.8$\times 10^5
317: $L$_\odot$, dominated by two early O stars.
318: The full aggregate of O and B stars appears responsible for the
319: ionization of the diffuse emission (Comer\'on et al. 2005). The
320: primary exciting source star, identified by Straw \e as IRS~29, is
321: resolved into multiple sources by Comer\'on et al. The brightest of these
322: is a probable O9 star.
323: Straw et al. also identify at least 1 protostar based on high
324: luminosity and low temperature. They put forward a
325: physical model of the region in which photoionization of the older
326: stars in the Ara OB1a association ionized the bright rim (NGC 6188)
327: which lies at the edge of a finger of molecular material which
328: thickens from east to west.
329: IRS~29 is the second strongest
330: water maser seen by SWAS (second to the BN object on Orion;
331: Melnick-private communication) with a peak flux of over 7000 Jy in the
332: 557 GHz line. A follow up study suggests that gaseous H$_2$O is
333: largely restricted to a thin layer of gas near the cloud surface.
334:
335:
336: %Several studies at radio wavelengths have been completed to understand
337: %the physical properties of the dark cloud. Goss and Shaver (1970)
338: %detected continuum emission at 5 GHz, Whiteoak and Gardner (1974)
339: %detected H2CO absorption at 4830 MHz, and CO emission at 115 GHz was
340: %detected by Whiteoak and Otrupcek (1982). The hydrogen recombination
341: %lines H109$\alpha$ and H166$\alpha$ were also measured (Wilson et
342: %al. 1970; Cersosimo 1982).
343:
344:
345:
346:
347: There have been two recent near-IR through mm studies of RCW~108--IR.
348: Urquhart \e (2004) compared the 2MASS and MSX observations of the
349: cloud with radio recombination lines and radio continuum using the
350: Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA). With synthesized beamwidths
351: of 12\asec\--20\asec, they find
352: RCW~108--IR is an ultracompact \HII\ region,
353: less than 0.1pc in scale with a core--halo morphology.
354: They discuss 8 new sources within the UCHII region and three
355: 25~$\mu$m\ sources set back about 0.95~pc from the bright
356: rim. A more detailed study has been recently published by Comer\'on
357: et al. (2005). From their high resolution ($\sim$ 25\asec) CO map they estimate a
358: total mass of the cloud at 8000 M$_{\odot}$ with $< 200 $M$_{\odot}$
359: in the molecular
360: concentration harboring the compact \HII\ region. They produced a
361: high resolution JHK$_s$ map of the region and identify 25 stars whose luminosities suggest
362: spectral types earlier than A0 under the assumption that there is no significant
363: circumstellar contribution to the K-band flux within the diffuse
364: IR nebula. Comer\'on \e conclude that the ionization of the UCHII region is provided
365: by this aggregate. Strangely, they detect no stars later than A0 in
366: the core. They suggest that low--mass star formation has yet to
367: commence here. Deeper adaptive optics
368: imaging does reveal fainter members of the cluster, but not in the large
369: numbers that would have been expected from an extrapolation of the K luminosity
370: function of the brightest members toward fainter magnitudes
371: (Comer\'on \& Schneider 2007).
372: IRS 29 is found to be an O9 star from the visible
373: spectrum of the compact \HII\ nebula,
374: which is in agreement with its infrared photometry. Urquhart \e (2004)
375: confirm the O9 spectral type via radio flux measurements.
376: Out of 4365 stars brighter than K$_s$=14.5 in the whole 13\arcmin
377: $\times$ 13\arcmin\ field ($\sim$5~pc on a side), 87 are found to have strong disk signatures, most being
378: located in the molecular cloud that contains RCW108--IR and along the
379: inside of the bright rim -- NGC~6188.
380:
381:
382: We recently observed RCW~108--IR, the southwestern portion of NGC 6193
383: and the dividing rim -- NGC~6188 using the $Chandra$ X-ray
384: Observatory. The goals of the observation were to:
385: i) detect the effects of triggered star formation
386: ii) identify deeply embedded PMS stars via their X--ray emission and
387: derive an initial mass function and an X-ray luminosity function
388: and iii) investigate the X--ray properties of the embedded sources.
389: In \S 2, we outline the X-ray observations made specifically
390: for this paper and supporting IR
391: and mm wave observations. In \S 3, we combine these data to understand the
392: basic morphology of the region, dividing the field into five regions
393: based on a core region and the
394: cardinal directions which are well aligned to NGC~6188. The X-ray
395: characteristics of the X-ray sources and their regional dependencies
396: are discussed in the next two section. In \S 6, near-IR and mid-IR data are
397: brought in to study the gas to dust ratio, K-band luminosity functions
398: and OB stars among the X-ray sources. The more extreme X-ray sources
399: are discussed in \S 7. We compare our work with other recent results
400: in \S 8 and summarize our results in \S 9.
401:
402:
403: \section{Observation and Data Reduction}
404:
405: This paper will focus on X-ray observations of RCW 108-IR and NGC 6193
406: made by the $Chandra$ X-ray Observatory (CXO). But we will also
407: incorporate several other observations, many of which have not been
408: discussed in the published literature. The observations include
409: %CXO observations of an adjacent field,
410: near-IR photometry, Mid-IR observations by $Spitzer/IRAC$ and MSX,
411: as well as mm--wave observations performed at the Swedish-ESO Submillimetre Telescope
412: (SEST). After detailing the reduction of the primary X-ray data, the
413: other data reduction is summarized in this section.
414:
415: \subsection{X-ray Data}
416: The field was observed by $Chandra$ on October 25 2004 starting at 02:37
417: UT for 92.2 ks of total time and 88.8 ks of so called ``good-time''
418: (ObsId 4503). The ACIS was
419: used in the nominal imaging array (chips I0-I3) which provides
420: a field of view of approximately 17\arcmin $\times$ 17\arcmin\ ($\sim$
421: 6.5~pc on a side).
422: The aimpoint was at 16:39:58.7, -48:51:54.4 (J2000.0).
423: In addition, the S2 and S3 chips were on and located over
424: IRAS~16379--4856. About 20 point sources were detected associated
425: with this object, however the analysis of these data are not presented
426: here because they are far off-axis.
427:
428: The background was slightly variable during this observation.
429: For the first 5 ks the background
430: was about 5\% higher than the median, and a similar high period
431: which lasted about 2ks occurred about 20 ks into the observation.
432: The background was about 3\% lower than the median for the last 10 ks.
433: The data used in these analysis were reprocessed using the default
434: ``repro 3'' provided by the Chandra X-ray Center (CXC) data systems.
435: As such, they were processed through the standard CIAO pipeline at the
436: CXC, using their version DS7.6. This version of the
437: pipeline automatically incorporated a noise correction for low energy
438: events. It has been noted that this filter can remove good events
439: from the cores of bright point sources, resulting in an
440: underestimation of the X-ray flux (L. Townsley private communication).
441: This proved not to be an issue in this case since the count rate did
442: not exceed 0.04 counts per second for any source.
443:
444: To identify point sources, photons
445: with energies below 300 eV and above 8.0 keV were filtered out.
446: The excluded energies
447: generally lack a stellar contribution due to the low instrumental
448: throughput and the relatively cool thermal spectra of coronal
449: emission. By filtering the data as
450: described, contributions from hard, non-stellar sources and
451: monochromatic detector background are attenuated.
452: A monochromatic exposure map was generated in the standard way using an
453: energy of 1.49 keV which is a reasonable match to the expected
454: peak energy of the sources and the $Chandra$ mirror transmission.
455: WavDetect was then run on a series of flux
456: corrected images binned by 1, 2 and 4 pixels. The resulting
457: source lists were combined and this resulted in the detection of 429 sources.
458: For the bulk of the X-ray analysis we will restrict ourselves to the
459: 337 source detections with significance greater than 3.5\footnote{The
460: src\_significance given by the CIAO tool WavDetect is not in
461: units of $\sigma$ so no false alarm probability is associated. While the
462: relative value of src\_significance is meaningful,
463: it is not clearly defined in a
464: statistical sense (V.~Kashyap Private communication).}.
465: These are tabulated in Table~\ref{XSources}. However, all X-ray
466: sources returned by WavDetect are statistically significant and
467: we present follow-up information on the faint sources as well. The
468: fainter sources are listed in Table~\ref{XSources_faint}.
469: In each of these tables, The first column contains a running src
470: number, the second an official IAU style designation. Columns 3 and 4
471: are the R.A. and Declination of the centroid of the X-ray source
472: followed by the off axis angle in column 5.
473: At each source position an extraction ellipse was calculated following
474: Wolk \e (2006) updated for the appropriate satellite roll
475: angle \footnote{$Chandra$ roll angle is the angle between the detector
476: vertical and north. The point spread function is strongly dependent
477: on {\em both} the off-axis angle ($\Theta$) and the rotation angle
478: ($\Psi$) of the incident point source}. This provides an
479: extraction ellipse containing 95\% of the source flux. The number of
480: counts in this region are listed in column 6.
481: For each of the 429 sources, a background ellipse is identified.
482: The background is an annular ellipse with the same center, eccentricity, and
483: rotation as the source. The outer radius is 6 times the radius of the source
484: and the inner radius is 3 times larger than the source. From this region any
485: nearby sources are subtracted with ellipses 3 times the size of the source
486: ellipse. The net counts are calculated by subtracting the background
487: counts (corrected for area) and multiplying the result by 1.053 to
488: correct for the use of a 95\% encircled energy radius. This is the
489: value given in column 7. Table~\ref{XREF} contains a cross-referencing
490: for all X-ray sources with a counterpart found in the SIMBAD database
491: with an offset of $<$ 2\arcsec.
492:
493:
494:
495:
496:
497:
498:
499:
500: \subsection{MSX observations}
501: The Midcourse Space Experiment (MSX) obtained observations of
502: RCW~108--IR and its surroundings
503: at 8.3, 12.1, 14.7 and 21.3 $\mu$m as part of its Galactic
504: Plane survey (Price \e 2001). The four bands
505: are labeled A (6.8-10.8$\mu$m), C (11.1-13.2 $\mu$m), D (13.5-15.9
506: $\mu$m), and E (18.2-25.1 $\mu$m). The A and C band emission is a
507: combination of thermal dust emission and emission from polycyclic
508: aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) bands at 7.7, 8.6 and 11.2 $\mu$m. The D
509: and E bands trace thermal emission of cool dusty objects. The details
510: of the reduction of these data are discussed by Price \e (2001).
511: % Price, S. D., Egan, M. P., Carey, S. J., Mizuno, D. R., & Kuchar,
512: % T. A. 2001, AJ, 121, 2819
513:
514: \subsection{Near--IR observations}
515: In the near-IR we use J, H and K$_s$ photometry obtain from 2MASS
516: project and from a deep pointed observation of RCW~108--IR. The latter
517: data are discussed by Comer\'on \e (2005) while the 2MASS point source
518: catalog reductions are summarized by Cutri \e (2003).
519: JHK$_s$ photometry of sources in the central
520: region of RCW 108-IR is taken from deep adaptive optics observations carried
521: out with the VLT and described in Comer\'on and Schneider (2007).
522: We will discuss the details of the matching of the near-IR
523: point sources and X-ray sources in \S6.
524: %\bibitem[Cutri et al.(2003)]{2003tmc..book.....C} Cutri, R.~M., et al.\
525: %2003, The IRSA 2MASS All-Sky Point Source Catalog, NASA/IPAC Infrared
526: %Science Archive.~http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/Gator/,
527:
528: % The MSX
529: %observations for are compared to the
530: %1.2 mm emission to understand morphology and interactions of gas and
531: %dust in the regions. MSX 8 $\mu$m observations are four times more
532: %sensitive than previous IRAS 12 $\mu$m observations.
533:
534: \subsection{Spitzer/IRAC observations}
535: RCW~108--IR was observed with the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC;
536: Fazio \e 2004) on--board the $Spitzer$ Space Telescope (Werner \e 2004).
537: A very shallow IRAC map of RCW 108-IR and the surrounding region
538: was made as part of the $Spitzer$
539: ``Early Release Observations''. These were very limited programs
540: primarily with aesthetic, not scientific, goals.
541: The mean exposure was about 3.2
542: seconds per band and total observing time of about 30 minutes.
543: Observations were made in September 2005 (PID~112). The total area
544: covered with 4 band coverage was roughly 23\arcmin\ ($\sim$8.75~pc)
545: on a side,
546: aligned roughly north-south. Two band coverage extends 5\arcmin\ to the
547: north and south - band~2/4 ([4.5\micron] and [8.0\micron] respectively)
548: in the north and
549: band~1/3 ([3.6\micron] and [5.8\micron] respectively) in the south.
550: Mosaics and related data were downloaded
551: from the $Spitzer$ archive in software version S12.4.0. Additional
552: processing to remove artifacts and perform point source photometry
553: was performed using customized
554: software described by Gutermuth \e (2007; PhotVis see \S 2.1).
555: Sources were then classified into infrared disk class (c.f. Lada \&
556: Adams 1992, Allen \e 2004, Megeath \e 2004) following the prescription
557: in Gutermuth \e (2007; \S 4.1) which uses cuts in a multidimensional
558: color space including J, H, K$_s$, and all 4 IRAC bands. About 2600
559: sources were detected in all four band within
560: the full IRAC field. About 20,000 sources were detected in at least one IRAC
561: band. Diffuse emission is
562: clear in the 5.8 and 8.0 \micron\ bands and traces the
563: lower resolution MSX data.
564:
565:
566: \subsection{Millimeter--wave Observations}
567:
568: Observations at 1.2 mm were obtained in September 2002 and November 2002
569: with the 37-channel hexagonal bolometer array SIMBA at the Swedish-ESO
570: Submillimetre Telescope (SEST) located in La Silla, Chile at an altitude of
571: 2370 meters. SEST, now defunct, was a 15 m diameter telescope and operated in
572: the frequency range 70 - 365 GHz with a typical pointing accuracy of
573: 3$\arcsec$ in azimuth and elevation. The HPBW of a single SIMBA element was
574: about 24\arcsec, and the separation between elements in the sky is
575: 44\arcsec. In the final maps, pixels were 8\asec\ on a side with a beamwidth of
576: 24\arcsec\ and a sensitivity of 235 mJy/beam rms.
577: SIMBA was set to fast scanning mode and the size for each map
578: was 20\arcmin$\times$ 20\arcmin\ with a scanning speed of 160\arcsec/second.
579: Four maps
580: were made of RCW 108 with different scanning angles. The data reduction and analysis was carried out using the
581: MOPSI\footnote{Mapping On-Off Pointing Skydip is a software package
582: for infrared, millimeter and radio data reduction developed and
583: constantly upgraded by R. Zylka.} software package (Chini \e 2003).
584:
585:
586:
587: \section{Morphology}
588: It is clear from Figure~\ref{fullfield} that the X--ray sources toward
589: the center are harder than those towards the outside. Further, there
590: is a remarkable hourglass shaped region, $\sim$3~pc in extent, virtually
591: devoid of sources except for those sources in the core. This is
592: indicative of tremendous extinction. In this section, we investigate
593: the relationship of this extinction to mid-infrared emission as
594: observed by MSX and mm emission seen in the SEST observations. We also study
595: whether the X-ray sources to the south and west are similar to those to the
596: north and east. This would be expected if RCW~108--IR sits in a dark
597: cloud in front of the larger NGC 6193 cluster and if sources from the
598: older, more
599: revealed cluster are seen around all sides of RCW~108--IR.
600:
601: \subsection{Long Wavelength Morphology}
602:
603:
604: The most extensive mid-IR emission is seen in the MSX A band data
605: (Figure~\ref{smoothzoom}).
606: These data show linear emission running south to north through the
607: ACIS field, coincident with NGC~6188.
608: The emission has a very sharp edge on the east side
609: where the emission rises by a factor of about three (to about 4$\times 10^{-6}$
610: W m$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$) over a single resolution element. Emission
611: levels remain elevated throughout the western two-thirds of the ACIS
612: field. The A band emission peak is nearly coincident with the O star within the IRS~29 complex
613: at 4.5$\times 10^{-4}$W m$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$.
614: MSX C and D band data trace the A band data at about 2/3 and 1/5 the irradiance
615: level respectively. Since the D band excludes PAH emission,
616: this indicates that the emission is dominated by thermal dust.
617:
618:
619:
620:
621:
622: The morphology of MSX E-Band emission roughly follows the A--band emission.
623: However, the 21 $\mu$m emission is concentrated in one fairly circular clump
624: coincident with a concentration of emission at 1.2 mm.
625: The extent of the 21 $\mu$m
626: emission is about the same as the A--band emission in the east--west
627: direction, and about 1~pc less in the north--south direction (in
628: radius). The resolution in the A and E bands is about 20\asec,
629: hence the E band emission is truly more circular.
630: The MSX E band emission does not show evidence of the dust ridge,
631: however the core region is bright.
632: In addition to the south--north ridge (NGC~6188) and the core region
633: (RCW~108--IR),
634: there are three local maximum that are clear in all four bands. Table~\ref{MSX}
635: lists the intensity of the emission in the various regions as observed
636: by MSX. The IRAS data are included for completeness, however IRAS did not
637: resolve RCW~108--IR.
638:
639: RCW~108--IR was observed at 1.2 mm to investigate the cold dust emission
640: and morphology.
641: Figure~\ref{k108} shows an NTT K$_s$--band image of RCW 108 with 1.2 mm
642: contours. The stellar population coincident with the 1.2 mm emission is
643: extremely sparse, probably obscured by dust. However, several bright
644: sources can be seen clustered near the peak of the 1.2 mm emission.
645: The peak of the dust
646: emission coincides with the central stellar population in the K$_s$--band
647: image. The extension to the south is not coincident with any visible
648: or X-ray source. The $^{13}$CO data from Comer\'on \e (2005) are
649: peaked at the same location, slightly offset from the brightest
650: near-IR sources and have a similar aspect ratio. However, the
651: long axis of the $^{13}$CO emission runs from the northwest to the southeast.
652:
653:
654: %\subsubsection{Comparison of 1.2 mm with 8 and 21 $\mu$m emission}
655:
656: We compare the dust emission to mid-infrared observations
657: to understand the interactions between the different
658: components of the regions, specifically the cold dust traced by the 1.2
659: mm emission and the warmer dust traced by the MSX mid-infrared
660: observations.
661: The 1.2 mm emission is concentrated in a linear
662: ridge running northeast to southwest, about 0.75~pc west of NGC~6188,
663: approximately 1~pc in
664: length with an extension to the east at
665: the southern edge. From Figure~\ref{k108}, the north--south
666: extent of the 1.2 mm
667: emission is approximately 0.6 parsecs. The cold dust emission from RCW 108 is
668: concentrated around one region without any secondary clumps and only
669: the slight extension in the south. The peak emission is about 5 Jy at
670: the center of the ridge. The bulk of the emission is within
671: a ridge with the 21 $\mu$m emission extending slightly more
672: toward the east than the 1.2 mm emission. The morphology of RCW~108
673: at 1.2 $\mu$m, 10-20 $\mu$m and 1.2 mm show the bulk of the emission
674: concentrated in one location near RCW~108--IR.
675:
676: Color temperatures were derived from the ratios of the fluxes of the
677: MSX bands assuming the regions followed a blackbody energy
678: distribution. The contamination of the A band from PAH emission leads
679: to unexpectedly high ratios, thus the color temperature of 224~K
680: was calculated using the C/D ratio. This indicates that the warmer dust
681: is externally heated, probably by photoionization from the O stars in
682: NGC~6193. Meanwhile the dense dust in the center of RCW~108--IR remains
683: thermally shielded
684: even from the stars forming within it, with dust temperatures $\sim$ 20K.
685: %and then colder dust of temperature 20~K outside the gas ridge.
686:
687:
688:
689: \subsection{Dust Emission and Mass}
690:
691: The dust mass and density distribution in the molecular cloud was
692: calculated using the 1.2 mm emission. Dust masses were
693: calculated using the relation below, assuming the emission is
694: optically thin
695: ($\tau \sim$ 1 at 1.3 mm when $N_H{_2} \sim 10^{26}\psqcm$;
696: Hildebrand 1983, Mezger 1994) :
697:
698:
699: \begin{equation}
700: M_{dust}=\frac{S_{\nu}D^{2}}{\kappa_{\nu,d}B_{\nu}(T_d)}
701: \end{equation}
702:
703: \noindent where D is the distance to the cluster, $S_{\nu}$ is the observed dust emission,
704: $\kappa_{\nu,d}$ is the dust opacity per unit mass column density and
705: $B_{\nu}(T_d)$ is the Planck function for a dust temperature $T_d$
706: (Chini et al. 2003).
707: The masses were calculated assuming a dust
708: temperature of 20 K for the cold dust the SEST observations are
709: sensitive to. While there are a range of possible dust opacities, we chose
710: 0.37 cm$^2$~g$^{-1}$ (Chini et al. 2003)
711: which is a value consistent for the diffuse ISM but may increase by up
712: to a factor of 10 in dense regions or protostellar environments
713: (Ossenkopf $\&$ Henning, 1994).
714:
715:
716: The vast majority of the 1.2 mm emission from RCW 108 is concentrated
717: in one extended feature.
718: The total mass of the region was determine from the flux within
719: a contour of 30$\%$ of the maximum flux in the region which is 29.5
720: $\pm$ 0.4 Jy.
721: %Assuming
722: %spherical symmetry, the total volume of this region is 0.014~pc$^3$, the flux
723: %from the region was 189.6 $\pm$ 0.4 Jy.
724: The total dust mass was determined to be 23.1 $\pm$ 4.8 solar masses of
725: cold dust. This gives a total mass of about 2300 M$_\odot$ assuming a
726: gas to dust ratio of about 100.
727:
728:
729: \subsection{X--Ray Morphology\label{sec_xraymorp}}
730:
731: The typical method of model independent spectral analysis is to use X-ray colors in the form of hardness ratios,
732: HR=(Cts$_h$-Cts$_s$)/(Cts$_h$+Cts$_s$) where ``h'' and ``s'' refer to the hard and soft bands respectively.
733: In absorbed regions, hardness ratios are of inherently limited value
734: because of biases in the selection of bandpasses which
735: lead to very non-uniform errors and limited dynamic range. Sources
736: with low counts tend to be driven toward the center of the
737: distribution and there
738: is a fundamental difficulty in breaking the degeneracy between temperature and absorption.
739: To compare X-ray sources in the various regions of the cluster
740: we use a quartile analysis technique for model--free analysis of
741: X-ray data explored by Hong \e (2004).
742:
743: In this form of quartile analysis,
744: one starts with the full ACIS band pass of E$_{lo}$= 0.3 keV
745: and E$_{up}$ =8.0 keV. These are the same bandpasses that we used in
746: our previous study of RCW~38 (Wolk \e 2006).
747: $E_{x}$ is defined as the photon energy below which x\% of
748: the photon counts are found and
749: $Q_x = {E_{x}-E_{lo}\over E_{up}-E_{lo}} $
750: is defined to be
751: the normalized quartile\footnote{Formally, $Q_x$ is a
752: ``quantile'' however, the quantiles of 25, 50 and 75 percent are
753: specifically known as ``quartiles.''}.
754: In essence, the median compares the hard and soft portions of the
755: spectrum.
756: The ratio of the bottom to top quartile (x= 25 and 75
757: respectively) is representative of a two-point slope of the spectrum.
758: For the case of a single temperature, the median energy is more sensitive
759: to the absorption. However,
760: quartiles are not independent, as the absorption changes the quartile
761: ratio for a given temperature is different. Hong \e\ plot the data
762: by normalizing the quartile ratio axis as $3\times Q_{25}/Q_{75}$
763: while the compressed median is expressed as $\log (m/(1-m))$ where
764: $m$ is the median. On such a plot one
765: can distinguish changes in temperature from extinction and can even
766: distinguish thermal and non-thermal changes.
767:
768:
769: Based on the colors of the sources as shown in
770: Figure~\ref{fullfield} it is clear that
771: the center of the field has more embedded and/or hotter sources while the
772: eastern field seems cooler and less embedded.
773: We quantify this using the quartile values.
774: These regions are defined as shown in Figure~\ref{fullregions}. The bulk of
775: the sources are in the region east of R.A.\
776: 16:40:19, A second large region is west of R.A.\
777: 16:39:41. The final two areas are a region to the north of declination
778: -48:48:34 and a region south of declination -48:54:47. The latter
779: two region are chosen to exclude sources in the other regions. Thus
780: the northern region is roughly coincident with the northern extension
781: of the warm dust ridge. In Figure~\ref{quantiles_sides} quartile
782: values of the sources in cardinal regions of the fields are compared.
783:
784:
785: The bulk of the sources to the east of the central region
786: are associated with NGC 6193. Figure~\ref{fullregions}
787: shows a sharp increase in 8~\micron\ emission along NGC~6188 which, at
788: closest approach, is $\sim 1.2$~pc
789: from the central O star of RCW~108--IR (in the IRS~29 complex).
790: Based on this, and the distinct change in the
791: quartile values for data between $\sim 1.15$~pc and $\sim 1.5$~pc
792: the core region is defined to be within about 185\arcsec of the central O star.
793: The inner region is defined as a roughly square region $\sim 2.3$~pc across
794: so that all sources are included in one of the five regions. This is essentially coincident with RCW~108--IR and will henceforth be referred to as such.
795:
796: The values of $\log (m/(1-m))$ and $3\times Q_{25}/Q_{75}$ are
797: tabulated in Table~\ref{quantin} and shown in
798: Figure~\ref{quantiles_sides}.
799: The errors for the quartile values are estimated using the method
800: of Maritz \& Jarett (1978) which has been found to reflect the
801: results of simulations, including those of Hong (2004).
802: Composite quartile values for each region are shown in
803: Table~\ref{Region_Q}.
804: The difference between the central region and eastern region is very
805: pronounced and indicates to a large statistical significance
806: that these regions contain different
807: kinds of sources or sources under difference circumstances.
808: Comparing the sources among the other 3 cardinal directions
809: indicate a similarity among them and that they are intermediate
810: between those in the central region and those in the east.
811: %We also compare two definitions of the inner region to confirm that
812: %there is no distinction of these regions at the bulk level.
813:
814:
815: These intermediate quartile values are indicative either of mixing or that
816: these regions contain different evolutionary stages. In either event
817: it is clear that the central region is not simply a foreground object
818: over a background of younger sources stretching across a field.
819: Further, it is noted by Wolk \e (2007) that IRAS
820: 16348-4849, which lies about 3.8~pc west of RCW108--IR, is
821: connected to RCW108--IR by tendrils of warm dust, which are clear in
822: the MSX A--band data (Figure~\ref{smoothzoom}). IRAS 16348-4849 has IRAS
823: colors consistent with its being a star forming region. Thus,
824: X--ray sources in the south, north and west could have IRAS 16348-4849 as
825: their origin.
826:
827:
828:
829: \subsection{Diffuse X-ray Emission}
830:
831: Diffuse X-ray plasma has been previously observed in several regions
832: of massive star formation (Townsley \e 2003).
833: It is thought that OB stars excavating
834: an \HII\ region
835: may generate diffuse X-rays as fast winds shock
836: the surrounding media (Weaver et al. 1977). $Chandra$ observations have
837: recently revealed parsec-scale diffuse emission in
838: Galactic high-mass star-forming regions RCW~38 (Wolk \e 2002),
839: M17 and the Rosette Nebula
840: (Townsley \e 2003). This high energy diffuse plasma
841: plays a role in the evolution of the cluster by selectively clearing
842: gas and dust.
843:
844: To search for diffuse X-ray emission in the vicinity of RCW~108--IR,
845: we selected 6 circular regions in zones without an X-ray source, within 35 arcseconds of the cluster center (16:40:00,-48:51:40). The diameter of
846: the zones varied from 8\asec\ to 12\asec. The total area of these 6
847: regions is 510.5 arcsec$^2$. The CIAO tool $dmextract$ was used to count
848: the number of photons in the composite region. The total was 200
849: photons with a Gaussian error of photons in the composite region of
850: 0.391$\pm$0.027 counts arcsec$^{-2}$.
851: An annular background region was created centered on the cluster
852: center with an inner radius of 148
853: arcsec and an outer radius of 408 arcsec for a total area of
854: 4.36$\times 10^5$ arcsec$^2$ which was clearly not effected by diffuse emission.
855: Counts were extracted from the region with sources removed. The
856: background region contains 133465$\pm$365 counts (0.307 $\pm 8\times
857: 10^{-4}$ counts arcsec$^{-2}$). This suggests a 30\% excess of counts in RCW~108--IR which is about 2 $\sigma$ above the expected level. This is
858: only about 20 counts and can easily be accounted for by the $>$
859: 100 stars which are not detected in the X-ray data but
860: should be present based on the detection of 35 X-ray sources in this
861: highly absorbed region (see \S~\ref{secxlf}). We conclude that there is no
862: significant diffuse plasma within this region.
863: This is consistent with expectations
864: discussed by Townsley \e (2003) in which they concluded winds and mass
865: loss consistent with an O6 star or earlier would be required to
866: generate such a plasma, unless there had been a recent supernova. Here
867: the central star has been determined to be O9.
868:
869:
870:
871:
872: \section{Spectral Analysis}
873:
874: X-ray sources were fitted with spectroscopic
875: models using {\it Sherpa} (Freeman \e 2001).
876: Background regions were generally selected
877: as annuli around the source regions. Source and background pulse height
878: distributions in the total band (0.3-8.0 keV)
879: were constructed for each X-ray object. The
880: final fits were done with CIAO version 3.3.0.1.
881: The CIAO script {\it psextract} was used to extract
882: source spectra and to create Ancillary Response
883: Function (ARF) and Redistribution Matrix Function (RMF) files which
884: compensate for local and temporal variations in the ACIS response.
885: Background corrected data
886: from each region were fitted with an absorbed one-temperature
887: Raymond--Smith plasma (Raymond \& Smith 1977). Such models were found by
888: Wolk \e (2006) to have the lowest residual $\chi^2/{\rm (degree~of~freedom)}
889: -1$ in a comparison of several available models. The photoelectric absorption
890: cross-sections ($\sigma(E)$) were taken from Morrison \& McCammon
891: (1983). Models were fitted both unbinned, using the C-statistic
892: (Cash 1979) and binned using the data variance form of the
893: $\chi^2$ statistic ($\chi$--DVAR). In the case of the binned data,
894: data for each source were grouped into energy bins which
895: required a minimum of 8 counts per bin and background subtracted.
896: $\chi$--DVAR is a statistic with variance computed from the data and
897: is appropriate if the number of counts in each bin is large
898: ($ >$ 5) and the shape of the Poisson distribution from which
899: the counts are sampled tends asymptotically towards that of a
900: Gaussian distribution. For the binned and unbinned cases,
901: the optimization method was set to Levenberg-Marquardt and Powell
902: respectively. Absorption and temperature
903: were simultaneously fitted for each
904: observation and the resultant 95\% emergent flux was calculated and
905: then scaled to 100\%. Formal flux errors are about 4\% at 2000
906: counts, about 35\% at 100 counts and errors reach 100\% below
907: about 30 counts. Formal errors underestimate the real uncertainty as
908: demonstrated by the variance in the temperatures and hydrogen columns
909: measured using difference techniques. This variance can exceed the
910: formal errors by about 50\%.
911:
912:
913: Two advantages of the C-statistic method are that the data
914: are unbinned and thus sources with a small number of counts may be
915: fitted and the errors are symmetric and so should not
916: effect an ensemble analysis of the dataset. A drawback is that
917: the goodness--of--fit information suffers when unbinned data are used
918: (Heinrich 2003). In the end, we generally used unbinned C-statistics
919: for the sources with over 3.5 ``$\sigma$'' significance.
920: In a few cases, the temperatures found using C-statistics was
921: above 15 keV while $\chi$--DVAR
922: temperatures were more reasonable, below 7 keV. In other cases C-statistic
923: fits were indeterminate in \nh. In these cases, again
924: the $\chi$--DVAR results were used.
925: %INPROCEEDINGS{2003sppp.conf...52H,
926: % author = {{Heinrich}, J.},
927: % title = "{Pitfalls of Goodness-of-Fit from Likelihood}",
928: %booktitle = {Statistical Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology},
929: % year = 2003,
930: % pages = {52-+},
931: % adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2003sppp.conf...52H&db_key=AST},
932: % adsnote = {Provided by the Smithsonian/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
933: %}
934: The result of the
935: single--temperature fits using C-statistics are listed in
936: Table~\ref{1t}. Column 1 gives the source name from
937: Table~\ref{XSources}, Column 2 gives the goodness--of--fit to an
938: absorbed one--temperature Raymond--Smith plasma in terms of
939: $\chi^2$/degree of freedom (but note the caveat above).
940: Columns 3--7 give the fit parameters \nh,
941: kT, associated errors and the log of the unabsorbed flux.
942: The luminosity of each source is calculated based
943: on the derived unabsorbed flux and the cluster distance of
944: 1.3 kpc and listed in column 8. Fluxes and luminosities are corrected
945: for the 95\% encircled energy radius. The sources in
946: Table~\ref{1t} are subdivided by their region as
947: described in \S \ref{sec_xraymorp}.
948:
949: Two issues are present throughout the fitting process. First, there is a
950: fundamental degeneracy in the fits between \nh\ and kT. It is
951: possible that fits of
952: similar quality can be obtained by increasing \nh\ and
953: an appropriate increase in the temperature. While this is especially true in
954: regions of high absorption such as the core region RCW~108-IR the
955: temperature range in question is typically about 2 keV. Temperatures
956: between 3 and 8 keV or less than 1 keV are very robust given enough data.
957: Second, since there is little
958: sensitivity to X-rays above 10~keV, model fits are not very reliable
959: much above this energy range. Because of this, if the fitted
960: temperatures exceed 15 keV we simply label them ``$>15$'' in the
961: tables.
962:
963:
964: \subsection{Two--Temperature Fits}
965: %(REFIT USING CHI DVAR APPROPRIATE FOR >5 counts per bin)
966: In many cases of stars with high flux rates, a second thermal
967: component is clearly needed to fit a deficiency in the temperature
968: model seen at low energies.
969: In addition to the single temperature fits, absorbed two-temperature fits were
970: made for 73 sources with over 100 net counts.
971: Of these, only 54 were
972: considered true two-temperature fits with temperatures different by
973: more than 10\% and each component contributing at least 10\% of the
974: flux. Twenty--two of these were rejected for having poor formal
975: constraints on the temperatures (formal errors exceeding 10~keV).
976: The absorbed two--temperature fit was deemed superior to the
977: one--temperature fit for 22 X--ray
978: sources (Table~\ref{2t}). The first six columns of Table~\ref{2t}
979: are identical to those of Table~\ref{1t}. Columns 7 and 8 are the
980: high temperature component.
981: Columns 9 -- 11 are the
982: log of the absorbed and modeled unabsorbed fluxes. Columns 12 and 13
983: list the log of the emission measure for the cooler and warmer
984: components respectively and column 14 gives log of
985: the luminosity. Again, the sources are subdivided by their region as
986: described in \S \ref{sec_xraymorp}.
987:
988: The results of the two
989: temperature fits show that given sufficient flux, about one third of the
990: sources are better represented as two--temperature models. The key
991: datum from these fits is that the global extinction is much better
992: constrained. The eastern sample is large enough (14) to look
993: at the group statistically.
994: To the east $<$\nh$> = 0.42\pm 0.24 \times 10^{22}\psqcm$, while in the
995: center \nh\ $> 2.4\times 10^{22}\psqcm$.
996: Also interesting is that the cool components
997: are about 700 eV ($\pm$ 30 eV), while the warmer components are about
998: 2.45~keV ($\pm$ 1.07 keV). This indicates much more variability in the
999: temperature of the hot component than the cool component. In the
1000: case of the cool component, this result is consistent with earlier X-ray
1001: studies of young stars which show a stable $\sim$ 800 eV corona distinct from the
1002: high temperature corona (Sanz-Forcada \e 2003). The difference in the high
1003: temperature component may be indicative that the sources to the west
1004: are younger than those to the east.
1005: The high temperature component in the X-ray sources to
1006: the north and south are more consistent with those in the east.
1007: The temperatures of the cool coronae in the core region
1008: are harder to evaluate due to the higher absorption present there,
1009: the high temperature components are similar to those in the west.
1010: The variability in the high temperature component may also be
1011: indicative of different levels of flaring. As will be shown in \S5.1,
1012: several of these sources flared.
1013:
1014: \subsection{Temperature and Hydrogen Column Density Distribution}
1015:
1016: Because so few sources were well characterized by two--temperature
1017: spectra, we use the one-temperature fits to analyze the overall
1018: nature of the sources. We confined the analysis to high quality data
1019: as described below.
1020: Since formal goodness--of--fit is inappropriate for the C-statistic,
1021: the quality of the fits is evaluated using three metrics. First the
1022: net counts need to exceed 50 so that a meaningful fit is possible.
1023: The second and third metrics are the ratio of the
1024: formal errors to the measured values \nh\ and kT. These act as
1025: a statement on the quality of the measurements and limits the effect
1026: of errors in the evaluation of global properties. Overall, about 90 spectra
1027: have errors of less than 50\% in \nh\ and kT. The mean \nh\ of these
1028: $\sim$ 90 sources is 5.3 $\times 10^{21}\persqcm$. But almost 25\% of the
1029: sources were rejected from this calculation because they were more
1030: than 3$\sigma$ from the mean. This indicates a very non-Gaussian
1031: distribution of sources -- as expected from the quartile analysis.
1032: To study the changes in the spectral characteristics of the X-rays
1033: sources spatially across the field we divided the regions described in
1034: \S \ref{sec_xraymorp}.
1035:
1036:
1037: A global comparison of the spectral fits for the sources in the
1038: regions is summarized in Table~\ref{Region_Spec}. In this Table,
1039: restricted to bright sources with over 50 counts and formal errors in
1040: kT and \nh\ of $<$ 50\%, column~1 indicates the source
1041: region, column~2 indicates the number of qualifying sources in the
1042: region. Columns 3--5
1043: list the mean kT, median absolute deviation
1044: (MAD; Beers 1990)\footnote{The median absolute deviation is the
1045: average deviation from
1046: the median measured as absolute values. It is an outlier resistant
1047: measure of the
1048: variability, making it useful for describing the variability of data
1049: with outliers.
1050: It is a common measure of forecast error in time series analysis.}
1051: and the number of 3-$\sigma$ outliers in each
1052: region. Columns 6--8 list the mean \nh, MAD and the number of
1053: 3-$\sigma$ outliers. This spectroscopic
1054: summary confirms the evidence given by the quartile analysis that the
1055: 5 regions contain at least 3 types of sources. Hot and embedded in
1056: the center, cool and low extinction to the east, while the other
1057: three regions are intermediate. We note that while thermally the three
1058: intermediate regions are ordered west, south and north (hottest to
1059: coolest) the hydrogen columns are ordered south, north and west
1060: (highest to lowest). The differences among the hydrogen columns in the
1061: south and west regions are statistically
1062: insignificant.
1063:
1064: %***********KT and NH histogram plots***************
1065:
1066: These results are displayed schematically in Figures~\ref{nh_hist} and
1067: \ref{kt_hist}. In these figures, the results are broken down region by
1068: region using histograms. From Figure~\ref{nh_hist} it is clear that
1069: there are no bright
1070: X-ray sources with column densities $< 10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-2}$ in the
1071: entire field. This means that there is little foreground contamination among the
1072: bright sources. The distinction between RCW~108--IR and eastern
1073: region is clear with moderate overlap in log(\nh) between 21.5 and
1074: 22 cm$^{-2}$. Columns densities to the north are completely consistent with
1075: those in the east while the southern and western regions possess some
1076: more absorbed sources. Figure~\ref{kt_hist} again shows that the
1077: sources in RCW~108--IR and eastern regions form fairly distinct groups.
1078: There are a few very hard sources in the eastern region. Overall,
1079: there are 8 high quality sources with measured temperatures in excess
1080: of 5 keV ($\sim$ 50~MK), three of these are in RCW~108--IR , two
1081: are to the south and one each are in the eastern and western regions.
1082: While the sources in the central region tend to be more absorbed and
1083: hotter, region-by-region analysis shows
1084: there is no strong correlation between \nh\ and kT.
1085:
1086:
1087: \subsection{X-ray Luminosities\label{secxlf}}
1088:
1089: As clusters age, the luminosity of their members will drop
1090: at different rates for stars of different masses and this will be
1091: reflected in the cumulative distribution of X-ray luminosities
1092: -- the X-ray luminosity function (XLF).
1093: Feigelson \e (2005) have attempted to understand the X-ray luminosity
1094: function as a global property of star forming regions. For
1095: regions at very young ages, similar to that of NGC 1333 or the Orion Nebular Cluster
1096: (ONC), they
1097: find that when high-mass stars are excluded,
1098: the XLF follows a somewhat flattened
1099: log-normal distribution with a mean of log L$_X ~\approx 29.3$ and a standard
1100: deviation of $\pm$ 1.0. Our analysis of the XLF of RCW~38 was
1101: consistent with this log-normal distribution (Wolk \e 2006).
1102:
1103: We calculate luminosities for each source using the fluxes and
1104: line--of--sight absorptions, determined from the C-statistic
1105: fits and assuming a distance of 1.3 kpc. While we do not explicitly
1106: exclude high-mass stars as done by Feigelson \e (2005), we expect them
1107: to be few in number relative to the low-mass stars and to have a
1108: negligible impact which is uniform across all luminosity bins --
1109: as seen by Feigelson \e (2005).
1110: Below about 50 counts, the individual estimates have errors exceeding a
1111: factor of 2. This is mostly due to the poor determination of \nh.
1112: There is no evidence that such errors are markedly biased by the
1113: C-statistic and thus the XLF derived using data with such low counts
1114: is still valid. We do not include the 87 faintest sources in this
1115: analysis since luminosities were not calculated for them.
1116:
1117: In figure ~\ref{xlf} the XLFs of the 5 regions and the whole field are
1118: shown. On the left-hand plot the cumulative totals are shown, region
1119: by region. The dotted line shows the cumulative total of a log-normal
1120: distribution %$ L_X=A(*EXP(-Z^2/2)$
1121: along with observed distribution. The cumulative total of a
1122: log-normal distribution has been scaled to equal the observed data in
1123: the bin where Log(L$_X$)= 30.5. We expect the data to complete in
1124: this bin and the adjacent bins (see below), thus log-normal
1125: distribution indicates what
1126: would be observed in an observation that
1127: was sensitive to all low luminosity sources.
1128: Fitting the observed and complete portion of
1129: the XLF with the `global' XLF offers the intriguing possibility of
1130: estimating the total cluster size and/or distance. Since the
1131: distance to this cluster is not in dispute ($\pm 10\% $) we can
1132: estimate the total number cluster members in the field at about 1600
1133: $\pm 200$, with about 800 $\pm 100$ in the central region.
1134:
1135:
1136: Such extrapolations become very uncertain due to completeness issues.
1137: Feigelson \e (2005) provide a rough estimate of the $Chandra$ sensitivity as:
1138: \begin{equation}
1139: log~L_x = 28.7 + 2 log (d/kpc) - log (t_{exp}/100. ks) +0.4 (log~
1140: \nh -20) {\rm ~ergs~sec}^{-1}.
1141: \end{equation}
1142: Assuming a distance of 1.3 kpc and estimating log \nh\=
1143: 21.5 cm$^{-2}$ in most of the field, we derive a
1144: sensitivity limit of about
1145: $log L_x=29.6 {\rm ~ergs~sec}^{-1}$ in the bulk of the field and $log L_x=29.8 {\rm ~ergs~sec}^{-1}$ or
1146: so in the core where we assume log \nh$\sim$ 22 cm$^{-2}$. This latter
1147: value is clearly too small since we only estimate the absorption to the
1148: sources that we detect. The true mean absorption to the core region
1149: is much higher, perhaps as high as 23.5 in log based on the IR data.
1150: This is reflected in
1151: the cutoff in the luminosity function near log (L$_x)\approx
1152: 30.5$. The luminosity is corrected for spotty absorption and we can
1153: estimate completeness based on the location of the break in the
1154: observed XLF from the log--normal form. This lack of precision in
1155: this completeness estimate leads to the error estimates given above.
1156:
1157: The eastern region lacks the high luminosity tail.
1158: Our sample of the XLF is taken from the southern portion
1159: of NGC~6193 and appear to be ``missing'' sources as the high
1160: luminosity/high mass end. This implies that the sample is depleted
1161: in early G stars, relative to K stars. Since we are not sampling the
1162: central region of NGC~6193, and only the southwestern portion, it
1163: appears that mass segregation has kept the most luminous
1164: members towards the center of the cluster outside of the field of view or
1165: moved the low luminosity sources away from the cluster center and
1166: into the field of view.
1167: Thus, we obtain an incomplete view of this cluster.
1168: This inference is supported by the X-ray observations of the core of NGC~6193
1169: that were made as part of the HETG observation of the HD~150135/6 O star
1170: pair at the center of NGC~6193. Skinner \e (2005) report 43 X-ray point
1171: sources of which,
1172: at least five are identified with OB counterparts. This is as many OB
1173: stars as we identify with over 100 X-ray sources in the southwestern
1174: portion of NGC~6193. Further, the earlier Chandra observation
1175: is only about 15\% as deep as the observation we analyze here, so a smaller fraction
1176: of B stars were detected by Skinner \e (2005).
1177:
1178: The XLF in the west seems to also be biased away from high
1179: luminosity sources though the limited number of stars in the region
1180: makes the determination difficult.
1181: The XLFs in the north and south regions are increasingly more
1182: poorly described by a log--normal. This is indicative that X-ray selection
1183: is incomplete for these sparse populations.
1184:
1185:
1186:
1187:
1188:
1189:
1190: \section{X--Ray Variability}
1191:
1192: In this section, we examine the variability of the X-ray source
1193: population. Variability studies allow us to begin to assess the
1194: plausibility of X-ray generation mechanisms. These can be constrained
1195: by the timescales and flux changes observed in the
1196: variability. Variability also offers corroborating evidence that a
1197: source is stellar in nature and hence a possible cluster member.
1198: Unlike other X-ray sources almost all coronal sources vary given
1199: a long enough observation (see Getman \e 2005). These variations
1200: can either be stochastic or impulsive deviations from a constant rate.
1201:
1202: Various methods can be employed to investigate variability.
1203: This topic has been reviewed briefly by Wolk \e (2005)
1204: and more thoroughly by G\"udel (2004)
1205: and Favata \& Micela (2003). One rigorous technique commonly used is a
1206: one--sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test to identify if the photon
1207: arrival times are consistent with a constant rate. The KS test does
1208: not give any information on the nature of the variability in objects.
1209: Thus we prefer the use of Bayesian Blocks (BBs; Scargle 1998).
1210: Bayesian Blocks not only detect variability, but
1211: provide a method of flare detection without the biases inherent in
1212: binning the data.
1213:
1214: These techniques are
1215: discussed in some detail by Wolk \e (2005, 2006), so we do not repeat
1216: the discussion here. We tested each lightcurve with a ``prior
1217: ratios'' set to approximate both 95\% and 99\% confidence that a
1218: flux change had occurred. Overall 61 sources on the I array
1219: required more than one BB at greater than 95\% confidence.
1220: We also tested the Gregory \& Loredo (1992) method.
1221: This method uses maximum-likelihood statistics and evaluates a
1222: large number of possible break points from the prediction of
1223: constancy. The number of sources found to vary at a given confidence
1224: level agreed with the Scargle method, which is still our method of choice.
1225: The variability results using BBs are tabulated in column~8
1226: of Table~\ref{XSources} which lists the number of BBs for each
1227: source. A number greater than one indicates that the source varied
1228: at the 95\% confidence level during the observation.
1229:
1230:
1231: \subsection{Flaring}
1232: Amongst the brightest 30 sources (those with over 200 total counts),
1233: 20 (66\%) were variable at $>$ 95\% confidence.
1234: The variability rate drops among the 56 sources with between 100 and 200 net counts, of which
1235: 12 (21\%) were variable at $>$ 95\% confidence.
1236: Overall, 41\% of the bright sources are detected as variable in 88.8 ks.
1237: The BB method converts the lightcurve to temporal periods of constant
1238: flux, thus, one can measure the amount of rise between the blocks and
1239: estimate the rate of change between blocks. In their study of the
1240: extremely deep COUP data set, Wolk \e (2005) found that most stellar
1241: sources have a characteristic rate, R$_{char}$ and found sources were
1242: at their characteristic levels for about 75\% of the time. They
1243: further found that a normalized rate of rise
1244: \begin{equation}
1245: \Delta \equiv 1/R_{char}\times dR/dt > 10^{-4} \rm{s}^{-1}
1246: \end{equation}
1247: was indicative of a flare.
1248: Following Wolk \e (2005) we define dR as the difference between the rates of
1249: adjacent blocks and dt as the shorter of the two blocks. We choose the
1250: value of the minimum block as the characteristic rate since we do not
1251: have the long observation time to define a true characteristic level.
1252: We also require the latter period to have a higher count rate --
1253: although the opposite may be indicative of a post flare decline.
1254: Twenty-eight sources have this form of impulsive variability (see
1255: Figure~\ref{flares}). No star was seen to flare twice. Thirty--four
1256: other stars were detected as variables (with 95\% confidence) but were
1257: not seen to flare.
1258:
1259:
1260:
1261: \subsection{Flare Rates}
1262: These data can be used to assess flare rates. We
1263: constrain the following analysis to sources with over 100 counts
1264: to prevent biases since we are less sensitive to flares in stars with
1265: low counts.
1266: Thirteen of 72 (18\%) probable cluster members with over 100
1267: counts flared in $\approx$ 90~ks. %This represents exactly half of
1268: %the bright cluster members ($>$ 100 counts) that are detected as variables.
1269: Assuming that all stars are the same and that there are no
1270: stars more prone to flare than others then we conclude there are about
1271: 510~ks between flares. This is similar the values obtained for
1272: Solar mass stars in the ONC (one flare per 640 ks; Wolk \e 2005)
1273: and the very young and embedded cluster RCW 38 (one flare per 775 ks;
1274: Wolk \e 2006).
1275:
1276: A 100 Myr cluster, NGC~2516, was studied using a similar method and
1277: found to have a
1278: somewhat lower flare rate, about 1 per megasecond (Wolk \e 2004).
1279: The flare rate might also be lower due to a sampling bias present in
1280: the NGC~2516 study -- the lack of a low count limit. Indeed, when we
1281: calculate a flare rate base on 28 flares observed on 337 stars in the
1282: full RCW108 field, the
1283: composite flare rate seen is about 1 per 1.11 megasecond. A similar
1284: pattern was recently found by Caramazza \e (2007) when examining
1285: low mass (K \& M) stars
1286: in the COUP field -- flare frequencies are lower in low count rate
1287: samples. This occurs because the sensitivity to flares depends on
1288: source statistics. When examining low mass stars with between 100 and 200
1289: counts, Caramazza \e find a flare frequency of about 1/680 ks -- very
1290: close to the rate we find at similar count rates in the full RCW~108
1291: field. The COUP rate is about 1/800 ks below 100 counts.
1292: This is somewhat higher than the 1 per 1100 ks reported here.
1293: But the data presented here have not been filtered to exclude
1294: high mass stars and background objects.
1295:
1296:
1297:
1298: \section{Infrared Properties of X-ray Sources}
1299:
1300: Near-infrared (NIR) data were taken from three sources, the 2MASS
1301: catalog, NTT/SOFI observation of Comer\'on \e (2005) and VLT/NACO adaptive
1302: optics data over the very central region of RCW~108--IR (Comer\'on \&
1303: Schneider 2007).
1304: The latter data indicate NIR counterparts to 5
1305: additional X-ray sources and show that at least 3 X-ray sources are
1306: associated with near--IR pairs.
1307: These data are very recent and included solely for completeness. The NTT/SOFI data
1308: cover a 13\arcmin $\times$ 13\arcmin\ ($\sim$5~pc) field centered on RCW 108-IR with
1309: a somewhat deeper exposure for the central 5\arcmin ($\sim$1.9~pc).
1310: The observation
1311: and reduction of these data are discussed by Comer\'on \e (2005).
1312: Each X-ray source was matched to the nearest counterpart in each list.
1313: Matches were accepted if the offset between the X-ray and IR sources
1314: fell within the following empirically
1315: determined curve.
1316: \begin{equation}
1317: \ {\rm offset} < 0.0003~\theta^{1.55} + 1\arcsec \
1318: \end{equation}
1319: where ``offset''
1320: is the distance in arcseconds between the X-ray
1321: and NIR position and
1322: $\theta$ is the off--axis distance of the X-ray source, also in arcseconds.
1323: This curves allows offset of about 1\arcsec\ on-axis. We impose a hard
1324: limit of 2.5\arcsec\ offset toward the edge of the field.
1325:
1326: Once good matches were determined for each catalog the NIR catalogs were merged.
1327: When NIR counterparts were well observed by both primary input
1328: sources astrometry was
1329: taken from the global 2MASS program and photometry was taken from the
1330: deeper study by Comer\'on \e (2005) which lacks high precision astrometry. NIR
1331: counterparts were detected for 303 of the 337 brighter X-ray sources
1332: on the imaging array (about 90\%).
1333: Among the additional 87 faint sources listed on Table~2, 56 (65\%)
1334: had matches in either to 2MASS or Comer\'on \e catalogs. This gives
1335: confidence to the veracity of the detected faint sources. The lower NIR
1336: detection of the faint sources has multiple origins. First of all, the
1337: likelihood of false X-ray detections is certainly higher. Within 4\amin,
1338: 6 counts is a clear detection at the three-sigma level. However, as
1339: $\theta$ becomes higher the area and the background count level
1340: increases, hence more counts are
1341: required for a detection. The matching radius also goes up so the
1342: possibility of a false match increases. If the IR sources are spread
1343: uniformly over the field, then the area available for matching goes as
1344: the square of the offset in eq 4. Thus, the chance of
1345: random coincidence goes up nearly tenfold as $\theta$
1346: increases from 60\arcsec\ to 240\arcsec.
1347: This is
1348: mitigated by the fact that the NIR and X-ray sources {\em are} centrally condensed.
1349: Secondly, since the
1350: X-ray luminosity loosely follows the bolometric luminosity, the NIR
1351: counterparts of faint X-ray sources also become fainter.
1352: The mean J magnitude of the X-ray faint
1353: group is 15.8 while the mean J magnitude of the nominal X-ray group is
1354: 14.4. This is especially a concern in the 40\% of the X-ray field not
1355: within the NTT/SOFI field of view since the 2MASS data have
1356: a brighter limiting magnitude.
1357: Finally, as the fluxes get fainter, detection of background objects such as AGN
1358: become more likely.
1359:
1360:
1361: The NIR data for all X-ray sources are
1362: tabulated in Table~\ref{nir}. In this table, column~1 is the
1363: X-ray source ID, columns 2 and 3 are the RA and Dec of the NIR source,
1364: columns 4 and 5 are the offset between the X-ray and NIR position and
1365: the off-axis distance respectively. Column 6-11 are the J, H and K$_s$
1366: band magnitudes and errors. For photometry taken from 2MASS
1367: the last column carries the 2MASS
1368: quality flags, otherwise if the photometry is taken from the NTT or
1369: VLT data
1370: the notation ``NTT'' or ``VLT'' is used. Table~\ref{nir} is broken up into the five
1371: cardinal regions.
1372:
1373: These data are used in Figure~\ref{irccd}, which shows NIR
1374: color--color diagrams for each of the regions.
1375: RCW~108--IR has the
1376: highest extinction, with some sources exceeding A$_V$ of 20. The
1377: western region also shows significant extinction with A$_V$
1378: approaching 8. The other
1379: four regions have more mild extinction but contain a few stars with
1380: anomalously high extinction seeming to
1381: indicate that they may be members of RCW~108--IR. We also note
1382: the lack of background giants, these are usually indicated by highly
1383: absorbed sources that lie just above the upper track of the reddening
1384: box -- which is set for normal dwarfs and not giant stars. The only
1385: region that shows such sources is RCW~108--IR and we conclude
1386: such sources as certainly associated with the active star formation in
1387: RCW 108--IR. In the remaining fields there are few background giant
1388: candidates among the X-ray sources.
1389:
1390:
1391: The IR color--color diagram provides global information about
1392: reddening, but does not provide much insight about the masses of the
1393: various sources. To get a sense of the masses of the stars in the
1394: field we use the IR color--magnitude diagram shown in Figure~\ref{ircmd}.
1395: This figure uses isochrones from Siess \e (SDF; 2000)
1396: set at 1.0 Myr and the ZAMS for reference only.
1397: The dashed lines indicate 20 magnitudes of visual extinction.
1398: The stars to the east are very
1399: tightly confined and most are consistent with little extinction.
1400: These stars range in mass but the bulk appear below the 2.5 M$_\odot$ line.
1401: Stars in the north, south and west are more scattered. RCW~108--IR
1402: shows a near perfect anti-correlation with the east. RCW~108--IR
1403: also shows a large number of sources with masses above 2.5 M$_\odot$.
1404: Either the stars in this region have a very different mass function,
1405: or we are only seeing the most massive sources due to extinction.
1406:
1407: Following
1408: Comer\'on \e (2005) we can assess the amount of infrared excess using
1409: the reddening free quantity:
1410: \begin{equation}
1411: Q=(J-H) - 1.70 \times (H-K_s)
1412: \end{equation}
1413: Column 12 of Table~\ref{nir} lists $Q$ for each source.
1414: Values of $Q <-0.10$ are indicative of an infrared excess consistent
1415: with a disk. Overall about 33 of the over 330 X-ray sources with
1416: good infrared colors ($\approx$ 10\%) have $Q <-0.10$. There are
1417: about 55 sources with $Q <-0.10$ and no X-ray detection. There is some
1418: field--to--field variation. In RCW~108--IR
1419: the fraction is somewhat higher, 13 out of 81 (16\%). The
1420: eastern and southern regions have the lowest fraction of low $Q$ sources
1421: at about 6\%. The fractions in the west and north are 10\% and 13\%
1422: respectively. From all of these assessments,
1423: it would appear that a relatively small fraction of
1424: sources have disks which are optically thick at K$_s$. These results
1425: are consistent with Comer\'on \e who found 87 such sources among over
1426: 4300 in the central field. However $Q$
1427: cannot distinguish among stars with less extreme optically thick disks.
1428: %This distinction is possible by combining the NIR and X-ray data
1429: For this, mid-IR data are useful.
1430:
1431: \subsection{Mid-Infrared Properties of X-ray Sources}
1432: For each source in the $Chandra$ source list, the nearest IRAC
1433: counterpart was identified.
1434: For X-ray sources with off--axis angle ($\theta$) less than
1435: 200\arcsec,
1436: the maximum X-ray/IR offset allowed was 1\arcsec.
1437: For off-axis angles between 200\arcsec\ and 600\arcsec, the maximum offset was 2.5\arcsec.
1438: %For X-ray sources within 200\asec\ of
1439: %on-axis offset between the X-ray and IR sources of 1\asec\ was
1440: %allowed. For X-ray sources between 200\asec\ and 600\asec\ of on-axis
1441: %and offset of 2.5\asec.
1442: Overall, 236 X-ray sources were matched to
1443: the IRAC source list which included about 2600 detections.
1444: Of the 236 counterparts, 33 of these are associated with stars with
1445: normal photospheres while there are 58 Class~II objects and five Class~I
1446: objects. Two are identified as probable galaxies.
1447: The remaining 140 sources are of unknown type due to incomplete data in
1448: the IRAC channels. Many of these sources only have detections in 1 or
1449: 2 bands.
1450:
1451: The infrared
1452: characteristics of the X-ray sources are listed in Table~\ref{XIRAC}.
1453: The IRAC Class~I sources are particularly intriguing as they should identify sites
1454: of the most active star formation. The key color for the
1455: determination of Class~I sources via IRAC is the [4.5]-[5.8] color
1456: ($>$0.5) with [3.6]-[4.5] color being used as a secondary indicator.
1457: This is shown in the bottom of Figure~\ref{IRACCCD}.
1458: The color cutoffs are determined empirically from low mass young
1459: stellar objects (Gutermuth \e 2007).
1460: %The 4.5\micron\ channel
1461: %is chosen as central since it is less affected by dust and PAH
1462: %emission than the 3.6\micron\ channel and 5.8\micron\ channels.
1463: The Class~I sources are clear as outliers in
1464: H-4.5\micron\ color (top of Figure~\ref{IRACCCD}). However, as discussed in
1465: \S~\ref{OBCAN}, the Class~I status derived from this color index is dubious
1466: since most of the Class~I candidates are OB star candidates and the
1467: empirical colors used for class determination come from low--mass stars.
1468:
1469:
1470: We cannot detect
1471: transition disks since we lack 24~\micron\ data.
1472: The IRAC data are also not very deep, complete to about magnitude 12
1473: in channel 1 [3.6\micron]. This is about magnitude 12 in $K_s$ for a Class~III
1474: object. These are identified as having [3.6]-[5.8] and [4.5]-[8.0]
1475: colors of near zero, $< 0.4$ and $< 0.75$ respectively. Assuming a distance modulus of 10.6,
1476: this is about abs(K)=1.4 or about 1.2 M$_\odot$ at 1 Myr (Siess,
1477: Dufour \& Forestini 2000).
1478: One result of the shallow nature of the IRAC map is a bias toward detecting
1479: stars with disks. Hence, even in the nominally older eastern region, 68\% of
1480: IRAC detected sources for which disk class could be determined were
1481: found to have disks -- meanwhile no Class~III objects were detected in
1482: RCW~108--IR. Because of biases inherent in the shallow IRAC data,
1483: we focus on the deeper JHK data for most of the further analysis.
1484:
1485:
1486:
1487: \subsection{A$_V$ --\nh\ Relation}
1488: If the IR data are of high enough quality (Mag$_{err} < 0.2$)
1489: they allow a tentative extinction estimate. Following Wolk \e (2006),
1490: we simply calculate the
1491: amount of reddening required to move the object from the observed
1492: location on the JHK color--color diagram to a location consistent with
1493: zero reddening. The zero reddening location is different for
1494: a star with and without a disk and varies depending on spectral type
1495: for pure photospheres.
1496: To calculate the extinction, we first assume the least
1497: absorbed case, that all the stars have disks and deredden the
1498: photometric colors until they intersect the cTTs locus (Meyer \e 1997).
1499: This is the only possible solution for stars outside the
1500: pure reddening box (Lada \& Adams 1992). We calculate the extinction for
1501: stars inside the box for each of three
1502: hypotheses (disk, M star, or higher mass star).
1503: For stars which lie either below
1504: the cTTs locus of to the left of the main-sequence or outside of the
1505: pure reddening box by more than 2$\sigma$, no estimate of
1506: extinction is possible.
1507: The error in the extinction estimate of stars under the higher mass
1508: hypothesis is larger because the angle between the
1509: ZAMS and the extinction curve is very shallow.
1510:
1511: To choose among the three hypotheses we use the measured \nh\ column.
1512: In our previous work (Wolk \e 2006) we found
1513: $N_{\rm H}/A_V = 2.0\times10^{21} {\rm ~cm}^{-2}$.
1514: %\nh = A$_V \times 2.0 \times 10^{21} {\rm ~cm}^{-2}$
1515: This is intermediate to results derived using $ROSAT$ data (Ryter
1516: 1996) and those of Vuong \e (2003).\footnote{$N_{\rm H}/A_V =
1517: 1.6\times10^{21}{\rm ~cm}^{-2}$
1518: was found by Vuong \e (2003). This value lead
1519: to the same result, in terms of hypothesis choice, but has a larger
1520: residual, in terms of the value of A$_V$ as derived from \nh\ minus the
1521: A$_V$ measure directly from the IR data (Wolk \e 2006).}
1522: The expected \nh\ is calculated for each of the three hypotheses noted
1523: above and the one with the minimum difference with the fitted \nh\ is
1524: chosen as the ``correct'' extinction.
1525:
1526: One hundred and twenty--nine stars have both good JHK$_s$ measurements
1527: (with K$_s$ errors $<$7\% in about 100 cases and $<$20\% in all cases)
1528: and X--ray spectral fit residuals of $< 30$\%. The
1529: mean deviation between the A$_V$ calculated by converting
1530: the \nh\ column and the values calculated with the color--color diagram
1531: technique (with outliers removed) was about 0.45 visual magnitudes.
1532: %similar if 1.6 is used 0.48
1533: The A$_V$ and the preferred model hypothesis (disk, M star, higher mass
1534: star; HMS) are listed in columns 13 and 14 of Table~\ref{nir}. In cases
1535: where the \nh\ is not constrained by at least 50\% by the X-ray spectral fits,
1536: no preference is given (``--'') and the minimum A$_V$ is listed in the table.
1537:
1538:
1539: We can test the robustness of our results by comparison with
1540: extinction measurments
1541: published by Comer\'on \e (2005).
1542: They publish extinctions for six sources in our ``inner'' region using the
1543: Rieke \& Lebofsky (1985) extinction law and the (H-K$_s$) color index.
1544: In all cases, our results show less extinction that that reported by Comer\'on \e (2005)
1545: The mean difference was 2.8$\pm$1.3 magnitudes of visual extinction.
1546: %and is understood to be a result
1547: %of our models stopping in five of the six cases with a model of either
1548: %an M star, or a Star+disk due to input from the X-ray spectral
1549: %modeling (\nh). Comer\'on \e assumed a high mass photosphere.
1550: An explanation for some of the deviation is that all of the
1551: comparison stars are assumed by Comer\'on \e to be O or B stars, while
1552: our data found that three of the stars lacked sufficient precision to
1553: deredden the stars in a manner consistent with their being an O star.
1554: In terms of the K-band luminosity the differences are small,
1555: less than 0.2 magnitudes at K$_s$.
1556:
1557: The extinctions and hydrogen columns
1558: for the stars with good X-ray spectral fits are summarized
1559: in Table~\ref{Region_avnh}. In this table, column~1 indicates the source
1560: region, column~2 indicates the number of sources in the region with
1561: \nh\ error $< 0.3$ and photometric errors below 20\%. Columns 3--5
1562: list the mean A$_V$, MAD and the number of 2-$\sigma$ outliers in each
1563: region. Columns 6--8 list the mean \nh, MAD and the number of
1564: 2-$\sigma$ outliers. The \nh\ values listed here differ slightly from
1565: those listed in Table~\ref{Region_Spec} since measurement error and not
1566: flux rate is used as the inclusion criteria. Among the high quality
1567: measurements with \nh\ errors $<$30\% and photometric errors $<$ 7\%,
1568: 75 (58\%) are found to
1569: be most consistent with having an optically thick disk at K$_s$. These
1570: are much higher rates than indicated by the Q
1571: parameter alone but below the IRAC determined rates.
1572: The disk fraction is highest in RCW~108--IR 65\%
1573: (24/37), but not significantly so. This may indicate a bias in bright
1574: X-ray sources possessing disks. This would run counter to results from
1575: the Orion nebula studies which found X-ray sources with disks to be
1576: systematically fainter than those without disks (Kastner \e 2005). It is more likely an age
1577: effect. We note that only 37 of 105 sources in the eastern region were
1578: bright enough for X--ray spectral fits with residuals of $< 30$\%.
1579: Meanwhile 47 of 76 X-ray sources in RCW~108--IR could be fitted
1580: at that level of accuracy. Overall we obtain a
1581: higher disk rate, 70\% if we additionally limit ourselves to the 42
1582: cases in which the net number of X-ray counts exceed 100. The fraction
1583: of optically thick disks as determined by the $Q$ parameter is 12\%
1584: under these restrictions.
1585: This indicates there is no bias in the $Q$ parameter with respect to the
1586: X-ray data.
1587:
1588: The derived values of \nh\ and A$_V$ were compared among the
1589: regions. We fitted \nh\ as a function of A$_V$ using an
1590: outlier-resistant two-variable linear regression,\footnote{The IDL
1591: procedure robust\_linefit.} weighting the variables used in the fit
1592: proportionally to their distance from the fit line. The results,
1593: summarized in Table~\ref{Region_avnh_rel}, are consistent with
1594: $N_{\rm H}/A_V = 2.0\times10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-2}$
1595: %\nh = A$_V \times 2.0 \times 10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-2}$
1596: and generally indicate no significant
1597: change in the gas--to-dust ratio among the regions. This is
1598: consistent with our previous result in RCW~38 (Wolk \e 2006) of
1599: $N_{\rm H}/A_V = 2.0\times10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-2}$
1600: %\nh = A$_V \times 2.0 \times 10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-2}$
1601: with a MAD of
1602: 0.29. For the present observation the region to region MADs exceed
1603: that of RCW~38, but
1604: the fit of the overall dataset is the same, with a smaller MAD.
1605:
1606: However, an anomaly is seen at high values of A$_V$ in RCW~108--IR
1607: shown in Figure~\ref{avnh}.
1608: While the bi-square weighted fit to these data is
1609: $N_{\rm H}/A_V = 2.2\times10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-2}$,
1610: %\nh = A$_V \times 2.2 \times 10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-2}$,
1611: there is a set of
1612: outliers with A$_V > 11$ and \nh\ significantly below the
1613: fit. Others sources at high A$_V$ fall directly on the fit line.
1614: Two additional sources, one to the east and one to the south also fall on this
1615: secondary line. A similar
1616: behavior is seen in Serpens (Winston \e 2007) and NGC 1333 (Getman \e
1617: 2002, Winston \e $in~prep.$), where at high A$_K$
1618: sources seem highly depleted in gas. Winston \e (2007) point out that an alternate
1619: possibility to gas depletion is a flattening of the reddening law at
1620: high extinction. A third possibility, which stems from the
1621: fundamental degeneracy in the fits between \nh\ and kT, is that the sources are at much
1622: higher plasma temperature than the X-ray fits indicate. This would require a
1623: higher \nh.
1624: In RCW~38, Wolk \e (2006) report
1625: five sources with high quality A$_V$ and \nh\ measurements with A$_V
1626: >$ 12, none show significant deviation from
1627: $N_{\rm H}/A_V = 2.0\times10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-2}$ .
1628: % \nh = A$_V \times 2 \times 10^{21}$.
1629:
1630:
1631:
1632:
1633:
1634: \subsection{The K--band Luminosity Function}
1635:
1636: We create an intrinsic K-band luminosity function (KLF)
1637: by correcting the observed K$_s$ band
1638: magnitude for extinction by A$_K=0.109 \times $A$_V$ (Bessell \& Brett
1639: 1988) and the distance modulus of 10.57.
1640: We separately construct KLFs for each of the five regions
1641: plus the overall field. %We exclude the
1642: We find the KLF for the full field has a mean
1643: absolute magnitude in the K$_s$ band of 1.66 (3 $\sigma$ outliers excluded).
1644: However, it is clear from Figure~\ref{klf}, that the mean of the
1645: KLF varies from region to region.
1646: In addition to comparing the mean value of the extinction
1647: corrected K$_s$ magnitude in each field, we examine the magnitudes
1648: which define the 90$^{th}$ and 10$^{th}$ percentiles as a way to gauge
1649: the spread in the luminosities of a given region.
1650: The break down is shown in Table~\ref{tab_klf}.
1651: Here, columns 1 and 2 identify the region and the number of good corrected
1652: K$_s$ band measurements,
1653: columns 3--5 given the mean value
1654: of K$_s$ the MAD and the number of outliers rejected in the
1655: calculation of the mean.
1656: Column 6 is the value of K$_s$ for the
1657: 90$^{th}$ percentile in the region. This value should provide a sense
1658: of the high mass stars in each region. Column 7 is the value of K$_s$ for the
1659: 10$^{th}$ percentile -- this should be indicative of the completeness
1660: of each region and have less dispersion. The last column is the spread
1661: in magnitudes between the 90$^{th}$ and 10$^{th}$ percentile.
1662:
1663: Focusing on the mean of the KLFs and the value of the 90$^{th}$ percentile,
1664: the data indicate that the central field is the brightest and hence
1665: most likely the youngest. It is clear that the distribution
1666: in RCW~108--IR is cut off at the faint end by dust extinction. Thus, it
1667: is plausible that the distributions in the central region is the same
1668: as for other regions. While it is plausible, it is not likely.
1669: If we assume the observations are complete in
1670: the eastern region to an absolute K$_s$ magnitude of zero
1671: it would require that the total number of stars
1672: in RCW~108-IR cluster be at least 6 times the number of stars in the
1673: eastern region to account for the 12 sources
1674: seen in RCW~108-IR with absolute K$_s$ magnitude $<0$ compared with two
1675: such sources in the eastern region. This would be more than 3,000
1676: total stars which is not compatible with the log-normal XLF
1677: shown in \S~\ref{secxlf} which predicts about 800 stars in
1678: RCW~108--IR, nor the independent line of evidence that the highest mass star in
1679: RCW~108--IR is about O8/O9 (Comer\'on \e 2005). A more likely
1680: scenario is that mass segregation has deprived the sampled portion of
1681: the east region of its high mass stars while extinction renders the
1682: fainter population of RCW~108--IR undetected in X-rays.
1683:
1684: The southern and western fields are
1685: very similar to the eastern field with the possible inclusion of a
1686: few brighter stars from RCW~108--IR to the south. The
1687: northern field appears also to possess a mixture of stars at
1688: low absorption and high mass stars.
1689: These results, derived, primarily from the NIR data,
1690: echo the quartile results discussed in \S3.3 as well as the regionalized
1691: results of the one--temperature spectral fits.
1692:
1693: For all fields except the north and the south the 10$^{th}$ percentile
1694: is about K$_s$ of 3.2. The 10$^{th}$ percentile to the south achieves
1695: K$_s \approx 3.7$, while in the north the 10$^{th}$ is a magnitude
1696: brighter. The similarity in the depth of the KLFs is essentially a
1697: reflection that X-ray luminosity tracks photospheric luminosity
1698: (cf. Feigelson \& Montmerle 1999 and references therein) and
1699: there is an X-ray luminosity limit in the 90 ks observation.
1700: The fact that the brightest sources are to the center
1701: is taken as evidence of the relative youth of this region.
1702: The large range in values to the south is probably indicative of
1703: some mixing, the brightest sources coming from the young, central
1704: region, while the faintest sources are from the older
1705: population.
1706:
1707: Still it is surprising that the KLF to the south goes half
1708: a magnitude deeper than the eastern region. A point to understanding
1709: this comes from the different evolutionary timescales of the X-ray and
1710: IR flux from young stars. %The X-ray luminosity drops with time
1711: %at what would be the same rate as the K band luminosity and is essentially
1712: %constant over the first 10-20 million years.
1713: The {\em maximum} X-ray
1714: luminosity or saturation level of the corona, appears to be a
1715: function of the stellar diameter and hence is linearly related to the
1716: photospheric luminosity. But the median X--ray luminosity of G
1717: stars is the same in Orion and $\alpha$ Persei
1718: (Favata \& Micela 2003, G\"udel 2004). The X-ray
1719: observations of the RCW~108/NGC~6193 field are sensitive to
1720: similar X-ray luminosities (modulo
1721: extinction) in each region. These X-ray luminosities correspond to
1722: similar masses (following Feigelson \e 2005). On the other hand, the
1723: K magnitudes of younger sources are brighter than their photosphere due
1724: to the contribution of disks. Hence reach lower masses.
1725: As the stars age over the first few
1726: million years, their disks vanish and the KLF tracks the photospheric
1727: luminosity. However for their first 1 Myr, a substantial fraction
1728: of the stars are over-luminous in K relative to the X-ray luminosity
1729: which is being used as the selection criteria.
1730:
1731:
1732: \skipthis{
1733: %If one assumes that
1734: %stars in the south are older than stars to the east due to the
1735: %roughly 1-2 pc additional distance between the south region and the O
1736: % stars HD 150135/6 -- in other words, the stars to the south are part of
1737: %the NGC~6193 cluster but have had more time to move from their
1738: %formation sites and hence have moved
1739: further -- then we expect stars at the X-ray luminosity limit
1740: to be fainter in K band. From the theoretical isochrones of Siess \e
1741: (SDF; 2000) with metallicity =0.02 and no convective overshooting
1742: we find that an age difference of 1 million year leads to a decrease in
1743: K-band luminosity of about 0.25 magnitudes for a 0.5M$_\odot$
1744: star.\footnote{All manner of evolutionary tracks are estimates and
1745: concerns about accuracy of the estimates become larger at younger ages
1746: (see Hillenbrand \& White 2004 for a full discussion) We use the theoretical isochrones of Siess \e
1747: (2000) with metallicity =0.02 and no convective overshooting
1748: strictly for comparative use. These are the same tracks we used to
1749: study RCW~38 (Wolk \e 2006).}
1750: Hence the observation that the 10$^{th}$ percentile in the south is
1751: 0.47 magnitudes fainter than the same metric to the east could be the
1752: manifestation of the older stars in the southern
1753: group being up to 2 Myr older than the stars to the east. % while the
1754: %youngest stars in that region may be related to the ongoing star
1755: %formation in RCW~108IR.
1756: This line of reasoning is cast into doubt since it does {\em not} explain
1757: why the faint end of the distribution to the north is relatively
1758: {\em bright}. The northern region is intermediate in distance to HD
1759: 150135/6, hence one might expect an intermediate depth to the KLF.
1760: But, as shown in Figures~2 \& 7, the bulk of
1761: this region is filled with 8~\micron\ emission and apparently opaque
1762: dust. Hence the sample in the region is small, shallow and probably
1763: non-representative.
1764:
1765:
1766: Further, one might expect that the western region
1767: should show the most extreme effect since it is the furthest region from the O
1768: stars. Stars in the west, if born near HD 150135/6, would have to have
1769: traveled 5 additional pc and hence might be assumed to be, on average,
1770: 5 Myr older than stars in the east. However, the 10$^{th}$ percentile
1771: is nearly identical. If these stars originated near HD~150135/6
1772: they represent a faster moving sample. Alternatively, they may not have
1773: originated near HD~150135/6. Using the $Q$ parameter,
1774: the western region appears to be younger, 10\% of the measured stars
1775: in the west have $ Q <$ -0.10, while only about 6\% of those
1776: in the east have the same
1777: disk indicator. Thus, the stars to the west may be younger -- perhaps
1778: associated with IRAS 16348-4849.
1779: }
1780:
1781: \subsection{Possible Late-O and B Stars \label{OBCAN}}
1782:
1783: Using the extinction corrected KLF we performed a survey of the
1784: cluster for O and B star candidates. On the ZAMS a star of 2.7
1785: M$_\odot$ is a late B star.
1786: To convert the effective temperatures resulting from the models to
1787: colors, we used the conversion table from Kenyon and Hartmann
1788: (1995). Both mass and luminosity were derived from the models using
1789: the extinction corrected K$_s$ magnitude of the X-ray selected members
1790: and the distance modulus of
1791: 10.57. On the SDF mass tracks, at 0.5 Myr a 2.7
1792: M$_\odot$ star has an absolute K band luminosity of -0.22 as
1793: calculated using the on-line SDF model isochrones.
1794:
1795: We start by assuming than an age of 0.5 Myr and solar metallicity ($Z$=0.02) is
1796: representative for RCW~108--IR due to the observed disk fraction
1797: %Values of $Q <-0.10$ are indicative of an infrared excess consistent
1798: %with a disk.
1799: (i.e. $Q < -0.1$). We then
1800: estimate the mass of the high mass candidate stars independently for their
1801: corrected J, H and K colors. This showed
1802: a trend of higher mass estimates at longer wavelength,
1803: indicative of an age underestimate. This trend was not present if we
1804: estimated the age of RCW~108--IR is 1 Myr.
1805: This age also gave consistent results
1806: for the all regions except for the eastern region where 3 Myr was
1807: found to give the most consistent results.
1808:
1809: This leads the identification of 41 X-ray
1810: sources as candidate high mass stars in the field, excluding the eastern
1811: region. These are listed in Table~\ref{OB}. Only five are candidate
1812: O stars with masses $>7$M$_\odot$. Three of the 41 were
1813: excluded when VLT adaptive optics data revealed that they were multiples.
1814: For the remainder, the consistency of the mass estimates among the three colors gives us
1815: confidence in the technique, although we are skeptical of
1816: the absolute age estimate due to the high measured values of A$_{V}$
1817: in RCW~108--IR. This table list the observed magnitudes, then the
1818: extinction estimate, followed by the corrected absolute magnitudes
1819: and finally the masses estimated from the absolute magnitudes.
1820:
1821:
1822: We plot the locations of the high mass star candidates in
1823: Figure~\ref{NTT_plus_OB_Xcont}.
1824: Seven of the high mass star candidates are found just to the south of the
1825: 8~\micron\ emission region plus an eighth source is located in the southern
1826: tip of this region.
1827: This area covers about 2.5\% of the field so the fact that about
1828: 20\% of the sources are found here indicates a causal relation
1829: between this region and the high mass stars -- i.e. this region itself is a
1830: sub-cluster of relatively recent star formation, independent of either
1831: the HD stars at the center of NGC~6193 or the core of RCW~108--IR. Note
1832: also in this region several non--X-ray detected
1833: possible O stars identifiable as
1834: 8\micron\ point sources in the MSX data.
1835:
1836: %This
1837: %is consistent with the finding of Comer\'on \e (2005) that of the 87
1838: %stars they found with excesses indicative of dust disks, a plurality
1839: %ran along the northern part of this ridge (see their Figure~20)
1840:
1841: About twenty of the high mass star candidates lie in the inner/core region. Four
1842: of the high mass star candidates are also found to be Class~I protostars on the
1843: basis of there IRAC colors, especially 4.5\micron\ excesses.
1844: Since they are also identified as high mass star candidates, their
1845: classification as Class~I objects is dubious. This is because the
1846: empirical colors which are used for the stellar classification are
1847: drawn from low mass stars. We speculate the luminosity of the hot
1848: stars may lead to detectable emission from cooler portions of disks
1849: than is detectable around cool stars. This gives high mass stars
1850: with disks IRAC colors similar to low mass protostars.
1851:
1852: Most of the 20 high mass star candidates identified here, have been previously
1853: identified as such by Comer\'on \e (2005).
1854: However, Comer\'on \e confined themselves to the central 30\asec.
1855: Of the 20 high mass star candidates, nine (sources with IDs between 112 and 131; see
1856: Figure~\ref{NTT_plus_OB_Xcont}) are associated with the more active
1857: western subsection of the core and only one with the eastern
1858: subsection of the core (Src~100). The remaining sources are somewhat further from the core.
1859: Among those stars a little further from the core,
1860: Src~52 is among the most interesting as it resides in
1861: relative isolation, about 0.76~pc from the core region and 0.4~pc from
1862: the 8~\micron\ ridge which separates the active star formation from
1863: NGC~6193, but centered on a diffuse peak of the 8~\micron\ emission (NGC~6188).
1864: Source~52 may be the leading part of a new sub-cluster.
1865: Sources 60, 61 and 62 are also associated with enhancements in the
1866: 8~\micron\ emission.
1867: While these sources do not appear centered on the 8~\micron\
1868: enhancement, Src~61 does not appear well resolved in either the X-ray
1869: or NTT observations and might be part of a complex associated with the
1870: 8~\micron\ peak.
1871:
1872:
1873: An age of
1874: 3.0~Myr is taken as representative for the bright stars to the East.
1875: There are 15 stars with an absolute magnitude in the K$_s$ band consistent
1876: with being a B star in the eastern region.
1877: However, due to the non-monotonic relation between mass and IR luminosity for
1878: these photospheres, 11 of these stars are somewhat below 2.7 M$_\odot$ once data
1879: from the other colors is compared.
1880: Four stars of the $\sim$ 100 in this region, which
1881: represents a sample of the outlying region of a more evolved group of
1882: young stars are found to be high mass stars. One of these, Source~40 is very
1883: much associated with the NGC~6188 ridge and thus may be much younger
1884: and lower in mass. The bulk of the remainder of the X-ray sources are
1885: expected to comprise a fairly complete sample of the G and K
1886: membership of NGC~6193.
1887: The detection of only 3-4 high mass star candidates to the east (including Source~262 in the north),
1888: is again indicative of mass segregation in the NGC~6193 cluster.
1889:
1890: From the X-ray perspective the high mass stars run the gamut ranging from
1891: over 1000 counts to $<$16 as well as
1892: covering a wide range in kT. The overall mean (2 outliers rejected)
1893: is about 2.15 keV. About 25\% of the sample is cool with
1894: one--temperature component fits below 1~keV.
1895: This is consistent with the standard model of X-rays originating in
1896: shocked material in line-driven spherically symmetric winds (MacFarlane et al. 1991).
1897: Typical temperatures in these models are about 10MK ($\sim$ 900 eV).
1898:
1899:
1900: A similar number have temperatures
1901: above 4 keV. Hot X-ray emission from high mass stars
1902: is a somewhat recent finding. The hard, embedded sources of
1903: RCW~108--IR resemble the central sources in NGC~2024 (Skinner et al. 2003).
1904: Schulz \e (2001, 2003) reported temperatures of
1905: about 5 keV from $\Theta^1~Orionis~C$. Schulz \e conclude
1906: that the component of the emission at this temperature must be formed
1907: ``near the terminal velocity of the wind,''
1908: at about 7 stellar radii from the photosphere.
1909: Gagn\'e et al. (2005) show that they can be fitted by a two-dimensional
1910: MHD magnetospheric wind model due to ud-Doula \& Owocki, (2002). % ApJ, 576, 413
1911: Several other examples of X-ray hot O and B stars have since been found
1912: (Lopes de Oliveira \e 2006, Rakowski \e 2006). % A&A 454, 265-276 (2006)
1913: Mullan \& Waldron (2006) %he Astrophysical Journal, 637:506-517, 2006
1914: %January 20
1915: have proposed a two component scenario by which the cooler X-ray
1916: emission is generated by line-driven spherically symmetric winds, and
1917: a second component of the wind emerges from magnetically active
1918: regions in polar caps which may extend as low as 45$^{\rm o}$.
1919: In such a scenario whether an O star is found to be a relatively hot
1920: or soft source may simply be a function of viewing angle.
1921:
1922: Most of the hotter stars are associated
1923: with RCW~108--IR (see Figure~\ref{OBHIST}). There is a
1924: certain selection effect in RCW~108--IR
1925: where the mean temperature is about 2.8 keV (two outliers
1926: rejected) and only 1 cool high mass star is found. This selection effect arises
1927: because local absorption can exclude the detection of bright, but soft X-ray
1928: sources when they are located deep within or on the far side the
1929: absorbing material (i.e. star forming cloud).
1930: However, the inclusion of 75\% of the high mass
1931: stars with X-ray temperature above 3~keV in the inner group indicates
1932: that young high mass stars as observed in RCW~108--IR have hotter
1933: X-ray emission than their older, field counterparts. %This is in
1934: %contradiction to models that propose that the observed temperature may
1935: %be a function of the line--of--sight observation unless the extent of
1936: %the polar cap decreases in time.
1937: We note in the eastern region that
1938: all the high mass stars have temperatures below 3~keV, including Source~243 with
1939: moderate \nh\ and a kT of about 300~eV.
1940: %Stars 1, 12 and 32 are among the hottest X-ray sources in the region
1941: %all with temperatures above 4 keV (C-statistic).
1942: %Similarly, source
1943: %62, embedded within a possible subcluster has nearly 1100 counts and a
1944: %kT of 3.65 keV.
1945: %Overall trends are not obvious.
1946: In the southern region, Sources 269 and the embedded Source~104 are
1947: bright with kT $>$4. Yet the remaining high mass star candidates all have X-ray
1948: temperatures below 1.2~keV.
1949: Nearly a quarter of the X-ray sources detected in RCW~108--IR are high mass stars.
1950:
1951:
1952:
1953:
1954:
1955: \section{Specific Interesting Sources}
1956: While the bulk of the X-rays sources have similar characteristics,
1957: well described in a statistical sense by Tables~\ref{Region_Q},
1958: \ref{Region_Spec} and \ref{Region_avnh}, there are outliers.
1959: We examined the data set of bright X-ray sources looking specifically
1960: for unusual sources which had enough counts for credible spectral
1961: fits. Of about 75 X-ray sources with 100 net counts, we found only
1962: six well fitted as plasma of $<$ 1 keV. Conversely, only
1963: five sources were best fitted as a thermal plasma of over 10 keV,
1964: while 13 were fitted to coronal temperature between 4 and 10 keV.
1965: Eleven sources, including 6 of the hot sources counted above had
1966: measured \nh\ columns of greater than 2$\times 10^{22} \psqcm$
1967:
1968:
1969:
1970: \subsection{Cool Objects}
1971: %RS 243 ob ,246ob ,158,230,267,231,286ob,254, 37 ob
1972: The six sources with over 100 net counts and fitted temperatures of
1973: $<$ 1 keV are Sources 158, 243, 254, 260, 267, and 294. Most of
1974: these have clear counterparts with moderate magnitudes in the 2MASS
1975: survey. Two (243 and 267) were identified as candidate OB stars in the
1976: previous section.
1977: %For those stars, their emission is consistent with a model of X-ray emission
1978: %from O stars in which
1979: %This is consistent with the standard model of X-rays originating in
1980: %shocked material in line-driven spherically symmetric winds (MacFarlane et al. 1991).
1981: %Typical temperatures in these models are about 10MK ($\sim$ 900 eV)
1982:
1983: The other four may be examples of young ($\sim$ 3 Myr) stars with no hot coronal
1984: component. This might be indicative that a fraction (perhaps 10\%)
1985: of stars no longer have a hot corona by this age (Jeffries \e 2006).
1986: As a group they are not remarkably bright at
1987: near-IR wavelengths so we consider them probable cluster members and
1988: not foreground dKe/dMe stars.
1989:
1990: \subsection{Very Hot objects}
1991: At the other end of the spectrum, there are five bright sources which
1992: were best fitted, by all techniques, as extremely hot. The binned
1993: data variance spectral fits as well as the unbinned C-statistic
1994: returned temperatures in excess of 10 keV.
1995: They are Sources 53, 266, 281, 284, \& 341.
1996: Source 53 is very hard with no optical/IR counterpart making it a
1997: very good candidate for a background AGN. It was fitted with a power
1998: law with an index $\Gamma$= 1.23 $\pm$ 0.14 which had a very similar reduced $\chi^2$
1999: to the thermal fits. Similarly sources 281 and 284 have no optical counterpart,
2000: and show fairly high extinction, ($\sim 2-5 \times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$)
2001: even though they are far from the active star forming cloud,
2002: indicating that they are being seen through an absorber which lies
2003: behind the region of observed star formation.
2004: They were also fitted with a power law ($\Gamma$= 0.68 $\pm$ 0.16 and
2005: $\Gamma$=0.21 $\pm$ 0.42 respectively), which had a very
2006: similar reduced $\chi^2$ to their thermal fits.
2007: The optical/IR counterpart to Source~266 is offset
2008: from the X-ray source by 1.85\asec\ which is near the limit of our
2009: matching requirement and may be a chance superposition, this
2010: interpretation is enhanced by the high extinction observed to the X-ray
2011: source, despite the fact that it is away from the main cloud. Again,
2012: this is an indication that background absorption is being detected.
2013: The interpretation is much the same for Source~341, in addition it
2014: shows a bright Fe line near 6.7 keV and is most likely
2015: an AGN.
2016:
2017: Five (or six -- see below) of the brightest 75 objects
2018: appear to be AGN, or other hard,
2019: absorbed, non-stellar sources.
2020: Hence a little less than 10\% of the bright sample of PMS ``stars''
2021: are not stars at all. This is consistent with
2022: expectations derived from the Champlane survey (Hong \e
2023: 2005). Assuming the minimum detection required an average of 10
2024: counts, then in $\approx$ 90ks,
2025: the RCW~108 observation reached a mean flux limit of about
2026: $1 \times 10^{-15}~ \erg\ \ps \psqcm$ (0.5-8 keV) averaged across the
2027: field. Preliminary results from the Champlane survey for $Chandra$
2028: %fields in the plane of the Galaxy BUT away from the galactic core
2029: indicate
2030: that we can expect to find about 70 background AGN, cataclysmic
2031: variables, neutron stars, black holes, and other non--PMS star
2032: point sources in a sample of 15 ACIS observations in the galactic
2033: plane, but not pointed at the
2034: galactic center, (90$^{\rm o} < l < 270^{\rm o}$), sensitive to flux levels of
2035: 10$^{-15} \erg\ \ps \psqcm$
2036: from 0.5-2.0 keV. In the harder band, the result is similar.
2037: Due to the nearly opaque nature
2038: of the dust clouds in the central $\sim$40\% of the field,
2039: we expect that number to be significantly lower in this field,
2040: perhaps 45 total -- a little more than 10\% of the total population of
2041: objects. Many of these are among the faint X-ray sources,
2042: X-ray sources with no
2043: optical/IR counterparts or the sources with offset between the
2044: X-ray position and optical/IR position exceeding 4\asec.
2045:
2046:
2047: %CSTAT 53, 266A, 281 284A 341 - extreme
2048:
2049:
2050: %CSTAT 12 F ,70, 298F, 269, 157 (popst flare), 280ANOIR, 84AF,167F,1
2051: %ob,131AobF, 278V, 104A ob,151F
2052: %1WF, 12F, 70F, 84F, 104O, 131OF, 151F, 157NOC, 167F, 269O, 278Conf, 280AGN and
2053: %298F.
2054:
2055: A second group of bright X-ray sources is less extreme. Thirteen have coronal
2056: temperatures between 4 and 10 keV (Sources~1, 12, 70, 84, 104, 131,
2057: 151, 157, 167, 269, 278, 280 and
2058: 298). Of these, only source 280 appears to be a clear AGN, with no
2059: counterpart and high extinction. It is well fitted by a power law
2060: $\Gamma$ = 1.72 $\pm$ 0.14 with a reduced $\chi^2$ equal to that of
2061: the one--temperature fit. Like the other AGN candidates
2062: it has no observed variability.
2063:
2064: Several of the other hot X-ray sources (104, 131
2065: and 269), have been identified as high mass star candidates.
2066: Among the others, Src~131 is only
2067: about 30\asec\ from the apparent core of RCW~108--IR (IRS~29)
2068: while Src~104 is well to
2069: the south ($\sim$ 2~pc) of the cluster center but lies
2070: along the same line of sight
2071: of the 8~\micron\ diffuse emission. Source 269 is an additional
2072: 1.1~pc to the south of Src~104, but still overlaying dust absorption,
2073:
2074:
2075: Several other hard sources (12, 70, 84, 131, 151, 167
2076: and 298) all show strong X-ray flares while Src~278 is an X-ray variable.
2077: Temperatures of between 4-10 keV
2078: (50-110MK) are not unusual in such flares (Favata \e 2005).
2079: %Source~1 also shows signs of flaring, although below the 95\%
2080: %confidence level.
2081: Such flares are somewhat unusual among high mass stars, as such
2082: Source 131 does seem a bit unusual but variability has been observed in
2083: other hot O stars, notably $\Theta^1~Orionis~C$ (Schulz \e 2001).
2084:
2085:
2086:
2087: \skipthis {
2088:
2089: Hi Scott,
2090: Here are the powerlaw fit results. Plots are in the individual source
2091: directories:
2092: /data/ANCHORS/AExtract/YAXX/04503/data/obs4503/src*/abs_pl.ps
2093:
2094: src, nh, nh_err, gamma, gamma_err,chi2/dof
2095: #, 1022/cm2, 1022/cm2, G G+- X^4
2096: 53, 1.3251, 0.2746, 1.2306, 0.1392, 0.2021=
2097: 266, 2.1270, 0.5673, 1.1990, 0.5486, 0.3896=
2098: 281, 0.8330, 0.3835, 0.6832, 0.1609, 0.3781=
2099: 284, 1.7186, 0.6884, 0.2133, 0.4150, 0.9011=
2100: 341, 0.3846, 0.2049, 1.4477, 0.2287, 0.5578=
2101:
2102: 1, 0.4080, 0.1873, 1.3594, 0.2259, 0.2853
2103: 12, 0.2764, 0.0502, 2.0189, 0.1074, 0.5996
2104:
2105: 70, 1.3045, 0.1584, 2.0300, 0.1090, 0.5445
2106: 84, 4.4056, 0.4472, 2.0110, 0.3062, 0.5233
2107: 104, 2.5550, 0.4845, 1.5607, 0.4743, 0.4150
2108: 131, 2.4370, 0.2422, 1.9072, 0.0841, 0.5852
2109: 151, 0.7111, 0.0800, 1.7004, 0.0794, 0.5141
2110: 157, 0.8217, 0.2298, 1.7959, 0.2262, 0.5159
2111: 167, 1.2214, 0.1553, 1.8654, 0.1033, 0.5578
2112:
2113: 269, 0.6374, 0.1209, 2.4289, 0.1829, 0.6245
2114: 278, 0.3673, 0.1312, 2.0943, 0.2315, 0.2424
2115: 280, 2.8716, 0.5666, 1.7156, 0.1443, 0.6477
2116:
2117:
2118:
2119: }
2120:
2121: \subsection{Very embedded sources}
2122: There are five additional sources that are quite absorbed but not
2123: extremely hot. Three of them, Src~116, Src~118 and Src~120 are
2124: associated with IRS~29. This has been resolved by
2125: Comer\'on \e (2005) into at least 6 sources and
2126: by the new VLT observations into more than 10 sources
2127: (Comer\'on and Schneider 2007).
2128: Three other components of IRS~29 have X-ray fluxes below the 100 count
2129: cutoff for quality X-ray spectra used for this analysis.
2130: In addition, Src~116 has
2131: been identified as high mass star candidates in \S\ref{OBCAN}. Source~120 lacked sufficient
2132: flux at J band for classification in \S\ref{OBCAN}, however it was classified
2133: by Comer\'on \e as a B0-B5 (their source 10) based on its H and K band colors.
2134: Our Source 124 is about 15\asec\ from IRS 29 and associated with
2135: IRS 15 of Straw \e and source 7 of Comer\'on \e which the latter
2136: group classified at B5-A0. The only outlying source (literally) in this group is
2137: Source~92 (IRS 27) which is about 60\asec\ away from IRS 29 (See Figure \ref{core}).
2138: %92ob, 116ob , 120, 124ob , 118ob
2139:
2140:
2141: \section{Comparison to Other Star Forming Regions}
2142: Since 2000, the high resolution of $Chandra$ and the large collecting
2143: area of XMM--Newton have been used to systematically study many of
2144: the active star forming regions within 2 kpc of the Sun (see review by
2145: Feigelson \e 2007). $Chandra$ is especially
2146: adept at younger, denser and more embedded regions including
2147: RCW~108.
2148: %Five key areas of contribution have been:
2149: %1)
2150: %2) The temporal evolution of magnetic activity.
2151: %3) The existence of hot gas in regions of star formation.
2152: %4) Allowing a complete census of the stellar populations and
2153: %5) The effect of X-rays on planet formation.
2154: Key among the contributions of these studies has been the
2155: understanding of the role of accretion and disks in flare generation
2156: as well as the impact of flares on the developing disk system.
2157: In addition, X-ray studies give us a independent pathway, relative to
2158: IR observations to evaluate cluster membership and the IMF.
2159: In this section, we discuss the relationship of the observed results
2160: from RCW~108 in the context of these global questions.
2161:
2162: Nominally, the presence or absence of a K-band emitting inner disk
2163: does not appear to affect X-ray emission.
2164: However, the presence of accretion appears to have negative impact on X-ray
2165: production (Flaccomio \e 2003; Stassun \e 2004;
2166: Preibisch \e 2005). This is manifested as a
2167: statistical decrease in X-rays by a factor of 2--3 in accreting vs.
2168: non-accreting PMS stars which are otherwise similar. In these observations,
2169: we are
2170: sensitive to the K-band excesses, but not the accretion indicators
2171: as a result of high optical absorption and the paucity
2172: of near-IR spectra.
2173: We have 17 sources
2174: with $Q<$-0.10 indicative of a thick disk and good X-ray spectra with
2175: errors in \nh\ and kT \< 33\%. The log average flux of these sources
2176: is -13.26$\pm 0.41 \erg\ \ps \psqcm$. There are 130 X-ray source with similar quality
2177: spectra and Q$>$-0.10, the log average flux of these sources with no
2178: indication of a disk
2179: is -13.44$\pm 0.47$. While the sources with thick disks appear
2180: brighter, the difference is less then 1 standard deviation.
2181: Overall, we only detected about one-third of the $Q<$-0.10 (disk
2182: possessing) stars known in
2183: the field. From this we can conclude that accretion is not the primary
2184: X-ray production mechanism since this sample should include the most
2185: active accretors and viewing angle effects should not absorb X-rays
2186: on two--thirds of the population unless disk flaring exceeds about
2187: 60$^{\rm o}$.
2188:
2189: Selecting sourced with $Q>$0.0 so that we are clearly looking at disk free
2190: stars
2191: % distinction between the source with thick disk and no disks
2192: does not change the average flux significantly.
2193: Among the 17 X-ray bright sources with thick
2194: disks, 3 flared (17.6\%), and they were among the brighter 50\% of
2195: the flares. Among the 120 X-ray bright sources with high Q, 7 flared
2196: (5.8\%). The statistics flatten out a bit if we include X-ray
2197: sources with flares, no such flares are seen among the 20 such
2198: sources with low Q, but 9 are seen among the 120 fainter X-ray
2199: sources with high Q. It would appear that the presence of a disk is
2200: conducive to strong flares, but may suppress our ability to see
2201: weaker flares, or suppress the mechanism of weaker flares
2202: altogether. We re-examined the data from RCW~38 to look for this effect
2203: and found flares among 11 of 172 ($\sim$6\%) of stars with high
2204: $Q$. This is a slightly higher rate in an observation that was about
2205: 10\% longer. But there were no flares among the 23 stars with
2206: $Q <$-0.10. So while
2207: weak flares certainly seem suppressed in stars with disks in
2208: RCW~38 as well, there were no corresponding strong flares.
2209:
2210:
2211: In other comparisons with RCW~38, despite the fact that RCW~108 field has
2212: 75\% the number of X-ray sources {\it and} is closer, the regions
2213: as a whole, are comparable. We estimated
2214: between 1400--2400 total members of RCW~38. The current full
2215: RCW~108 $Chandra$
2216: field contains 1400--1800 sources because it includes members of
2217: up to three separate star forming regions, including
2218: a large contribution from NGC~6193, which is probably similar in number
2219: to RCW~38 based on the two O6 stars near its center. There is
2220: evidence that the O4-5 star in the center of RCW~38 is triggering a
2221: new generation of star formation. RCW~108--IR appears to owe its
2222: triggering to the O6 stars in NGC~6193 and
2223: contains of order 800 stars. However due to the highly variable
2224: extinction the sampling of the stars near the cluster center is much
2225: less uniform as manifest in the very choppy KLF shown in Figure~14 for
2226: RCW~108--IR.
2227:
2228: The similarities continue when we examine the high mass star population.
2229: In RCW~38, Wolk \e (2006) identified 31 high mass star candidates in the
2230: field, consistent
2231: with the number of high mass stars expected for a cluster with about 2000
2232: members. We detect 15 high mass star candidates in RCW~108--IR for which we
2233: project about 800 candidates. This is in concurrence with the result of Comer\'on \e
2234: (2005) and it is very consistent with the results in RCW 38.
2235: The overall finding of about 42 high mass star candidates in the RCW~108
2236: $Chandra$ field indicates that the mass function may be a bit
2237: weighted towards high mass stars relative to RCW~38 and its
2238: surroundings. This is especially notable in light of the evidence that the sample
2239: from NGC~6193 is depleted in high mass stars due to mass
2240: segregation. We estimate in \S~\ref{secxlf} that the
2241: south and west regions contained a total of about 750
2242: PMS stars. The identification of 17 high mass star candidates
2243: causes the regions to appear to have a top
2244: heavy mass function.
2245: %4+4+15+8+9
2246:
2247: Two comparable star forming regions which
2248: have been recently reported on
2249: are Cepheus~B (Getman \e 2006) and IC~1396N (Getman \e 2007).
2250: They were observed to a similar flux limit as the X-ray data presented
2251: here and have some physical similarities.
2252: Cepheus~B is one of the most active star forming regions within a kpc.
2253: It is an optically dark cloud subject to ionizing radiation, similar
2254: to RCW~108-IR.
2255: About 390 X-ray
2256: sources are found in Cepheus~B, including 64 associated with the embedded cluster.
2257: The biggest surprise of this dataset was the somewhat lower mass XLF with
2258: an excess of low-mass (M$_\odot \sim 0.3$) stars relative to the ONC.
2259: Our data are not deep enough to detect such a discrepancy. Like
2260: RCW~108, the diffuse X-rays in this region are entirely attributable
2261: to the integrated contribution of fainter PMS stars. This is not
2262: surprising since the region has only 1 known O star and it is removed
2263: from the embedded region.
2264:
2265: IC~1396N is a much lower mass region. Getman \e argue that the star
2266: formation in the embedded region has been triggered via a
2267: radiation-driven implosion in which photoevaporation of the exterior
2268: of the cloud by an O star, in the case of IC~1396N about 10 pc away,
2269: induces a shock that compresses the interior leading to
2270: gravitational collapse (Reipurth 1983; Gorti \& Hollenbach 2002).
2271: This is similar to the geometry seen in RCW~108 where in O6 stars
2272: HD~159135/6 are seen in the MSX A band data, to be
2273: clearly evaporating the edges of the cloud and small
2274: concentrations of dust are forming interior to this (See Figures~3 and
2275: 5). Also several of the smaller mid-IR peaks do seem to be
2276: independent sites of star formation, as discussed in the previous
2277: section and as predicted by radiation-driven implosion models.
2278: An alternative approach to triggering star formation, in which the photon loading
2279: of the O stars compresses the cloud (see review by Henney 2006),
2280: is not as clearly supported by the data as the concentrations of warm dust interior to
2281: NGC~6188 appear distributed in several locations in addition to the
2282: main core of RCW~108--IR.
2283:
2284:
2285:
2286: \section{Conclusions}
2287: We observed the massive, embedded young cluster RCW~108--IR and the
2288: surrounding region using
2289: the $Chandra$ X-ray Observatory and in the IR using the NTT/SOFI
2290: photometry and MSX as well as mm wave data from SEST.
2291: Over 420 X-ray sources were detected within the 17\amin $\times$
2292: 17\amin\ $Chandra$ ACIS-I field of view in an 88ks exposure.
2293: We expect 90\% of these to be cluster members. Near-IR
2294: counterparts were identified for 361 of the X-ray sources.
2295: We performed one-temperature spectral fits to nearly 340 X-ray sources
2296: and two-temperature spectral fits to the brighter
2297: sources. Since we used the C-statistics we describe high quality data
2298: on the basis of small error instead of standard goodness-of-fit
2299: parameters. We looked for, but did not find, biasing of kT with respect
2300: to \nh. Here we summarize our results.
2301:
2302: \begin{itemize}
2303:
2304: \item NGC 6193 is
2305: seen through a uniform, foreground absorption, while the inner
2306: region, RCW~108--IR, is embedded in a locally highly variable absorber. Further,
2307: there is a high column density cloud ($\sim 2-5 \times 10^{22}$
2308: cm$^{-2}$) behind the observable
2309: the star forming region
2310: through which hard AGN are seen.
2311:
2312: \item The warm ($\sim 225K$) dust observed along NGC~6188
2313: is externally heated, probably by photoionization from the O stars in
2314: NGC~6193. The dense dust in the center of RCW~108--IR remains
2315: thermally shielded, even from the stars forming within it. There is
2316: about 23.1 M$_\odot$ of cold dust in RCW~108--IR. This implies a total
2317: gas reservoir of about 2.3 $\times$ 10$^3$ M$_\odot$.
2318:
2319:
2320: \item Intermediate temperatures among the sources in the western
2321: region as well as a physical connection between
2322: RCW~108--IR and IRAS 16348-4849
2323: indicate that the X-ray sources to the west of RCW~108--IR might have
2324: formed in association with IRAS 16348-4849.
2325:
2326: \item There is no significant hot (or X-ray emitting), diffuse plasma within this region.
2327:
2328: \item We find evidence of mass segregation in NGC 6193. Only three
2329: high mass star candidates were found in the southern portion of
2330: this cluster while the existence of over 500 total stars is inferred.
2331: In addition, if one assumes a log-normal XLF, there is a deficit of
2332: sources with log L$_x > 31.5$ relative to sources with 31.0 $>$log L$_x > 30.0$.
2333: This implies that the sample is depleted
2334: in early G stars, relative to K stars.
2335:
2336: \item The X-ray flare rate among brighter stars in the cluster is
2337: about 1 per 510 ks. This is similar to the flare rate for G stars in
2338: the Orion Nebular Cluster and for lower mass stars in the ONC at a
2339: similar X-ray count rate. Seven of the flares have temperatures in
2340: excess of 50MK. There is a tendency for stars with disks to show
2341: either large flares or no flares at all. The presence of a disk is
2342: conducive to strong flares, but suppresses our ability to see
2343: weaker flares.
2344:
2345: \item The gas to dust ratio does not change perceptibly among the five
2346: regions and is consistent with
2347: $N_{\rm H}/A_V = 2.0\times10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-2}$
2348: %\nh = A$_V \times 2.0 \times 10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-2}$
2349: as was found in
2350: RCW~38. However, there seems to be a change in the relation at high
2351: A$_V$ for some stars. This indicates either a gas depletion,
2352: a flattening of the reddening law at high A$_V$ or may be a
2353: manifestation of a fundamental degeneracy in the fitting of X-ray
2354: spectra. The astrophysical phenomena should be
2355: investigated further in other embedded star forming regions.
2356:
2357: \item Only a small fraction ($<$10\%) of the X-ray sources in the field have
2358: large optically thick disks as indicated by a $Q$ parameter of $>$
2359: -0.1. However, the evidence indicates that a much
2360: higher fraction
2361: of stars, perhaps as high as 50\%--65\% do have optically thick
2362: disks. Most these
2363: disks are not luminous enough to move the stars outside of the
2364: Lada \& Adams (1992) reddening bands. Data from the IRAC bands indicates
2365: an even larger fraction of the stars may have disks. This makes
2366: the region a good area for the study of transition disks.
2367:
2368: \item Hard X-ray emission seems more common from young embedded high mass stars
2369: than from the more dispersed population of OB stars. This may
2370: indicate an evolutionary effect in the X-ray emission from high mass
2371: stars. Overall the region has more high mass star candidates than expected,
2372: especially in specific regions to the south and west. This
2373: indicates that small episodic star formation is taking place
2374: independently in several locations within the field. This form of star formation is
2375: predicted by radiation-driven implosion models for star formation.
2376:
2377: \end{itemize}
2378:
2379:
2380: \acknowledgments
2381: We acknowledge many helpful comments by referee M.~Gagn{\'e}.
2382: This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All
2383: Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of
2384: Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, funded
2385: by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National
2386: Science Foundation.
2387: CXC guest investigator program supported this work through grant GO4-5013X.
2388: SJW was supported by NASA contract NAS8-03060.
2389:
2390:
2391: Facility: CXO(ACIS), Spitzer(IRAC), SEST, 2MASS
2392: \begin{thebibliography}{}
2393:
2394:
2395: \bibitem[Niemela et al.(2004)]{2004ApJS..154..363A} Niemela, V.S. \& Gamen, R.C.,\ 2005, \mnras, 356, 974
2396:
2397: \bibitem[Walborn (1972)]{2004ApJS..154..363A}Walborn N.R.,\ 1972, \aj, 77, 312
2398:
2399:
2400:
2401:
2402:
2403: %\bibitem[Cersosimo(1982)]{1982ApL....22..157C} Cersosimo, J.~C.\ 1982, \apj, 22, L157
2404: %\bibitem[Frogel \& Persson(1974)]{1974ApJ...192..351F} Frogel, J.~A., \& Persson, S.~E.\ 1974, \apj, 192, 351
2405: %\bibitem[Hillenbrand and Carpenter(2000)]{2000ApJ...540..236H} Hillenbrand, L.~A., Carpenter, J.~M., 2000, ApJ 540, 236-254.
2406: %\bibitem[Shaver \& Goss(1970)]{1970AuJPA..14..133S} Shaver, P.~A., \& Goss, W.~M.\ 1970, Australian Journal of Physics Astrophysical Supplement, 14, 133
2407: %\bibitem[Whiteoak \& Gardner(1974)]{1974A&A....37..389W} Whiteoak, J.~B., \& Gardner, F.~F.\ 1974, \aap, 37, 389
2408: %\bibitem[Whiteoak et al.(1982)]{1982PASAu...4..434W} Whiteoak, J.~B., Otrupcek, R.~E., \& Rennie, C.~J.\ 1982, Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 4, 434
2409: %\bibitem[Wilson et al.(1970)]{1970A&A.....6..364W} Wilson, T.~L., Mezger, P.~G., Gardner, F.~F., \& Milne, D.~K.\ 1970, \aap, 6, 364
2410:
2411:
2412: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2004)]{2004ApJS..154..363A} Allen, L.~E., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 363
2413:
2414: \bibitem[Beers et
2415: al.(1990)]{1990AJ....100...32B} Beers, T.~C., Flynn, K., \& Gebhardt, K.\ 1990, \aj, 100, 32
2416: \bibitem[Bessell \& Brett (1988)]{1988PASP..100.1134B} Bessell M.~S.,
2417: Brett J.~M., 1988, PASP, 100, 1134
2418: \bibitem[Caramazza et al.(2007)]{2007A&A...471..645C} Caramazza, M.,
2419: Flaccomio, E., Micela, G., Reale, F., Wolk, S.~J., \& Feigelson, E.~D.\
2420: 2007, \aap, 471, 645
2421: \bibitem[Cash(1979)]{1979ApJ...228..939C} Cash, W.\ 1979, \apj, 228,
2422: 939
2423: \bibitem[Chini et al.(2003)]{2003A&A...409..235C} Chini, R., et al.\ 2003,
2424: \aap, 409, 235
2425: \bibitem[Comer{\'o}n et al.(2007)]{2007A&A...433..955C} Comer{\'o}n, F., \& Schneider, N., 2007, \aap ~$Accepted$
2426: \bibitem[Comer{\'o}n et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...433..955C} Comer{\'o}n, F., Schneider, N., \& Russeil, D.\ 2005, \aap, 433, 955
2427: \bibitem[Favata \& Micela (2003)]{2003SSRv..108..577F} Favata F., Micela G., 2003, SSRv, 108, 577
2428: \bibitem[Favata et al. (2005)]{2005ApJS..160..469F} Favata F., Flaccomio E., Reale F., Micela G., Sciortino S., Shang H., Stassun K.~G., Feigelson E.~D., 2005, ApJS, 160, 469
2429: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2005)]{2005Fazio..313F}Fazio, G.G., et al., 2004, ApJS, 154, 10
2430: \bibitem[Feigelson et al.(2007)]{2007prpl.conf..313F} Feigelson, E.,
2431: Townsley, L., G{\"u}del, M., \& Stassun, K.\ 2007, Protostars and Planets
2432: V, 313
2433: \bibitem[Feigelson et al. (2005)]{2005ApJS..160..379F} Feigelson E.~D., et al., 2005, ApJS, 160, 379
2434: \bibitem[Fitzgerald(1987)]{1987MNRAS.229..227F} Fitzgerald, M.~P.\ 1987, \mnras, 229, 227
2435: \bibitem[Flaccomio et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...582..398F} Flaccomio, E., Damiani, F., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., Harnden, F.~R., Jr., Murray, S.~S., \& Wolk, S.~J.\ 2003, \apj, 582, 398
2436: \bibitem[Freeman (2001)]{2001SPIE...4477..76} Freeman, P.E., Doe, S. \& Siemiginowska A.,SPIE Proceedings vol.4477, 76
2437: \bibitem[Gagn{\'e} et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...628..986G} Gagn{\'e}, M., Oksala, M.~E., Cohen, D.~H., Tonnesen, S.~K., ud-Doula, A., Owocki, S.~P. Townsend, R.~H.~D., \& MacFarlane, J.~J.\ 2005, \apj, 628, 986
2438: \bibitem[Getman et al. (2005)]{2005ApJS..160..319G} Getman K.~V., et al., 2005, ApJS, 160, 319
2439: \bibitem[Getman et al.(2006)]{2006ApJS..163..306G} Getman, K.~V., Feigelson, E.~D., Townsley, L., Broos, P., Garmire, G., \& Tsujimoto, M.\ 2006, \apjs, 163, 306
2440: \bibitem[Getman et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...654..316G} Getman, K.~V., Feigelson, E.~D., Garmire, G., Broos, P., \& Wang, J.\ 2007, \apj, 654, 316
2441: \bibitem[Gorti \& Hollenbach(2002)]{2002ApJ...573..215G} Gorti, U., \& Hollenbach, D.\ 2002, \apj, 573, 215
2442: \bibitem[G{\" u}del (2004)]{2004A&ARv..12...71G} G{\" u}del M., 2004, A\&ARv, 12, 71
2443: \bibitem[Gutermuth \e (2007)]{guter07} Gutermuth R.A., Myers, P.C., Megeath, S.T., Allen, L.E., Pipher, J.L., Muzerolle, J. Porras, A. Winston, E., Fazio, G., 2007,
2444: \apj ~$Submitted$
2445: \bibitem[Heinrich(2003)]{2003sppp.conf...52H} Heinrich, J.\ 2003, Statistical Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology, 52
2446: \bibitem[Henney(2006)]{2006astro.ph..2626H} Henney, W.~J.\ 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0602626
2447: \bibitem[Herbst \& Havlen(1977)]{1977A&AS...30..279H} Herbst, W., \& Havlen, R.~J.\ 1977, \aaps, 30, 279
2448: \bibitem[Hildebrand(1983)]{1983QJRAS..24..267H} Hildebrand, R.~H.\ 1983, \qjras, 24, 267
2449: \bibitem[Hillenbrand \& White (2004)]{2004ApJ...604..741H} Hillenbrand L.~A., White R.~J., 2004, ApJ, 604, 741
2450: \bibitem[Hong et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...635..907H} Hong, J., van den Berg, M., Schlegel, E.~M., Grindlay, J.~E., Koenig, X., Laycock, S., \& Zhao, P.\ 2005, \apj, 635, 907
2451: \bibitem[Hong, Schlegel, \& Grindlay (2004)]{2004ApJ...614..508H} Hong J., Schlegel E.~M., Grindlay J.~E., 2004, ApJ, 614, 508
2452: \bibitem[Kaltcheva \& Georgiev(1992)]{1992MNRAS.259..166K} Kaltcheva, N.~T., \& Georgiev, L.~N.\ 1992, \mnras, 259, 166
2453: \bibitem[Kastner et al.(2005)]{2005ApJS..160..511K} Kastner, J.~H., Franz, G., Grosso, N., Bally, J., McCaughrean, M.~J., Getman, K., Feigelson, E.~D., \& Schulz, N.~S.\ 2005, \apjs, 160, 511
2454: \bibitem[Lada \& Adams (1992)]{1992ApJ...393..278L} Lada C.~J., Adams F.~C., 1992, ApJ, 393, 278
2455: \bibitem[Lopes de Oliveira et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...454..265L} Lopes de Oliveira, R., Motch, C., Haberl, F., Negueruela, I., \& Janot-Pacheco, E.\ 2006, \aap, 454, 265
2456: \bibitem[Maritz \& Jarett (1978)]{2004ApJS..73..194}Maritz, J. S. \& Jarett. R. G. 1978, J. of the American Statistical Association, 73, 194
2457: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2004)]{2004ApJS..154..367M} Megeath, S.~T., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 367
2458: \bibitem[Meyer, Calvet, \& Hillenbrand (1997)]{1997AJ....114..288M} Meyer M.~R., Calvet N., Hillenbrand L.~A., 1997, AJ, 114, 288
2459: \bibitem[Mezger(1994)]{1994Ap&SS.212..197M} Mezger, P.~G.\ 1994, \apss, 212, 197 \bibitem[Moffat \& Vogt(1973)]{1973A&AS...10..135M} Moffat, A.~F.~J., \& Vogt, N.\ 1973, \aaps, 10, 135
2460: \bibitem[Morrison and McCammon(1983)]{1983ApJ...270..119M} Morrison, R., McCammon, D.\ 1983.\ ApJ 270, 119-122.
2461: \bibitem[Mullan \& Waldron(2006)]{2006ApJ...637..506M} Mullan, D.~J., \& Waldron, W.~L.\ 2006, \apj, 637, 506
2462: \bibitem[Preibisch et al.(2005)]{2005ApJS..160..401P} Preibisch, T., et al.\ 2005, \apjs, 160, 401
2463: \bibitem[Price et al.(2001)]{2001AJ....121.2819P} Price, S.~D., Egan, M.~P., Carey, S.~J., Mizuno, D.~R., \& Kuchar, T.~A.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 2819
2464: \bibitem[Rakowski et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...649L.111R} Rakowski, C.~E., Schulz, N.~S., Wolk, S.~J., \& Testa, P.\ 2006, \apjl, 649, L111
2465: \bibitem[Raymond \& Smith (1977)]{1977 ApJS..248...564} Raymond, J.C. and Smith B.W., 1977, ApJS 35, 419
2466: \bibitem[Reipurth(1983)]{1983A&A...117..183R} Reipurth, B.\ 1983, \aap, 117, 183
2467: \bibitem[Rieke \& Lebofsky(1985)]{1985ApJ...288..618R} Rieke, G.~H., \& Lebofsky, M.~J.\ 1985, \apj, 288, 618
2468: \bibitem[Rodgers et al.(1960)]{1960MNRAS.121..103R} Rodgers, A.~W., Campbell, C.~T., \& Whiteoak, J.~B.\ 1960, \mnras, 121, 103
2469: \bibitem[Sanz-Forcada et al.(2003)]{2003ApJS..145..147S} Sanz-Forcada, J., Brickhouse, N.~S., \& Dupree, A.~K.\ 2003, \apjs, 145, 147
2470: \bibitem[Scargle (1998)]{1998ApJ...504..405S} Scargle J.~D., 1998, ApJ, 504, 405
2471: \bibitem[Schulz et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...549..441S} Schulz, N.~S., Canizares, C., Huenemoerder, D., Kastner, J.~H., Taylor, S.~C., \& Bergstrom, E.~J.\ 2001, \apj, 549, 441
2472: \bibitem[Schulz et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...595..365S} Schulz, N.~S., Canizares, C., Huenemoerder, D., \& Tibbets, K.\ 2003, \apj, 595, 365
2473: \bibitem[Siess, Dufour, \& Forestini (2000)]{2000A&A...358..593S} Siess L., Dufour E., Forestini M., 2000, A\&A, 358, 593
2474: \bibitem[Skinner et al.(2005)]{2005MNRAS.361..191S} Skinner, S.~L., Zhekov, S.~A., Palla, F., \& Barbosa, C.~L.~D.~R.\ 2005, \mnras, 361, 191
2475: \bibitem[Stassun et al.(2004)]{2004AJ....127.3537S} Stassun, K.~G., Ardila, D.~R., Barsony, M., Basri, G., \& Mathieu, R.~D.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 3537
2476: \bibitem[Straw et al.(1987)]{1987ApJ...314..283S} Straw, S., Hyland, A.~R., Jones, T.~J., Harvey, P.~M., Wilking, B.~A., \& Joy, M.\ 1987, \apj, 314, 283
2477: \bibitem[Townsley et al. (2003)]{2003ApJ...593..874T} Townsley L.~K., Feigelson E.~D., Montmerle T., Broos P.~S., Chu Y.-H., Garmire G.~P., 2003, ApJ, 593, 874
2478: \bibitem[ud-Doula \& Owocki(2002)]{2002ApJ...576..413U} ud-Doula, A., \& Owocki, S.~P.\ 2002, \apj, 576, 413
2479: \bibitem[Urquhart et al.(2004)]{2004A&A...428..723U} Urquhart, J.~S., Thompson, M.~A., Morgan, L.~K., \& White, G.~J.\ 2004, \aap, 428, 723
2480: \bibitem[Vazquez \& Feinstein(1992)]{1992A&AS...92..863V} Vazquez, R.~A., \& Feinstein, A.\ 1992, \aaps, 92, 863
2481: \bibitem[Vuong et al. (2003)]{2003A&A...408..581V} Vuong M.~H., Montmerle T., Grosso N., Feigelson E.~D., Verstraete L., Ozawa H., 2003, A\&A, 408, 581
2482: \bibitem[Weaver et al.(1977)]{1977ApJ...218..377W} Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P., \& Moore, R.\ 1977, \apj, 218, 377
2483: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2005)]{2005Werner..313F}Werner, M.W., et al., 2004, ApJS, 154, 1
2484: \bibitem[Winston \e (2007)]{winston07} Winston, E., Megeath, S.T., Wolk, S.J., Muzerolle, J, Gutermuth, R., Hora, J.L., Allen, L.E., Spitzbart, B., Myers, P., Fazio, G., 2007, \apj ~$Accepted$
2485: \bibitem[Whiteoak(1963)]{1963MNRAS.125..105W} Whiteoak, J.~B.\ 1963, \mnras, 125, 105
2486: \bibitem[Wolk et al. (2002)]{2002ApJ...580L.161W} Wolk S.~J., Bourke T.~L., Smith R.~K., Spitzbart B., Alves J., 2002, ApJ, 580, L161
2487: \bibitem[Wolk et al. (2004)]{2004ApJ...606..466W} Wolk S.~J., et al., 2004, ApJ, 606, 466
2488: \bibitem[Wolk et al. (2005)]{2005ApJS..160..423W} Wolk S.~J., Harnden F.~R., Flaccomio E., Micela G., Favata F., Shang H., Feigelson E.~D., 2005, ApJS, 160, 423
2489: \bibitem[Wolk et al. (2006)]{2006AJ....132.1100W} Wolk, S.~J., Spitzbart, B.~D., Bourke, T.~L., \& Alves, J.\ 2006, \aj, 132, 1100
2490: \bibitem[Wolk et al. (2007)]{2006ASP} Wolk, S.~J., Comer\'on, F., \&
2491: Bourke, T.~L., Handbook of Star Forming Regions Vol. II. The Southern Sky -B. Reipurth ed. {\it submitted}.
2492:
2493:
2494:
2495: \end{thebibliography}
2496:
2497:
2498:
2499: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%FIGURES%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%figures%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2500:
2501:
2502:
2503:
2504: \begin{figure}[t]
2505: \plotone{fig1.eps}
2506: \caption{An optical image of the RCW~108 region (adapted from image by
2507: Robert Gendler and Martin Pugh 2006;
2508: http://www.robgendlerastropics.com/NGC6188MP.html). The ACIS-I field of view is
2509: outlined as a square about 17\arcmin\ on a side. The bright stars to the
2510: east are the HD 150135/6 complex of O stars. These stars are the
2511: center of NGC 6193 (circle), NGC 6188 is identified as the ridge of
2512: emission. The inset shows an IRAC image of
2513: RCW~108--IR showing the detail of the ionization front
2514: (BGOR=3.6\micron, 4.5\micron, 5.8\micron\ and 8.0\micron\
2515: respectively). The edge of the diffuse emission is fairly sharp.}
2516: %Bottom - The central 45\arcsec of RCW~38. IRS 1 and 2 are labeled.
2517: %Bottom -- The central 90\arcsec. IRS 1 and 2 are labeled. Contours are
2518: %from 6cm observations using ATCA (Vigil \e in prep.).
2519: %The contour levels are 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 percent of
2520: %the peak emission which is 3.501 Jy/beam.
2521: %The restored beam size of the 4800 MHz continuum image is
2522: %10\arcsec\ by 10\arcsec.}
2523: \label{introfield}
2524: \end{figure}
2525:
2526: \begin{figure}[t]
2527: \plotone{fig2.ps}
2528: \caption{An adaptively smoothed version of the X-ray data.
2529: Photon energies between 300eV and 1.1 keV are plotted in red,
2530: 0.9 -- 2.4 keV in green and 2.1 -- 8.0 keV in blue. Note the
2531: concentration of blue sources in the middle and a marked absence of
2532: source to the north and the south of this core. The eastern region
2533: has a multitude of sources at a variety of colors.}
2534: \label{fullfield}
2535: \end{figure}
2536:
2537:
2538: \begin{figure}[t]
2539: \plotfiddle{fig3a.ps}{0.0in}{0.}{270.}{270.}{122.}{0.}
2540: \plotfiddle{fig3b.ps}{0.0in}{0.}{315}{270.}{100.}{0.}
2541: %\plottwo{fig4_ACE_V2_RGB.ps}{fig3.ps}
2542: \caption{Top: An MSX image of approximately the same area as
2543: Figure~1. (BGR= A Band (8.28\micron),
2544: C Band (12.13\micron ). and
2545: E Band (21.3 \micron) respectively. Two IRAS sources in the
2546: region are identified. The smaller box coincides with RCW~108--IR, shown in the lower panel.
2547: Bottom: A smoothed X-ray image of the central
2548: 3~pc $\times$ 3~pc region of RCW~108--IR (RGB=, 0.5-1.1 keV,
2549: 0.9-2.4 keV and
2550: 2.1-8.0 keV respectively).
2551: The bright source near the center is IRS~29, an O9 star.
2552: The contours represent MSX A band data at
2553: 4.7$\times 10^{-6}$,
2554: 8.9$\times 10^{-6}$,
2555: 1.3$\times 10^{-5}$,
2556: 1.7$\times 10^{-5}$,
2557: 5$\times 10^{-5}$,
2558: 1$\times 10^{-4}$ and
2559: 2$\times 10^{-4}$ W m$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$.}
2560: %convert to W/M^2 by dividing by 8.4615e-10 sr/pix
2561: %Bottom - The central 45\arcsec of RCW~38. IRS 1 and 2 are labeled.
2562: %Bottom -- The central 90\arcsec. IRS 1 and 2 are labeled. Contours are
2563: %from 6cm observations using ATCA (Vigil \e in prep.).
2564: %The contour levels are 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 percent of
2565: %the peak emission which is 3.501 Jy/beam.
2566: %The restored beam size of the 4800 MHz continuum image is
2567: %10\arcsec\ by 10\arcsec.}
2568: \label{smoothzoom}
2569: \end{figure}
2570:
2571:
2572: \begin{figure}
2573: \epsscale{1}
2574: %\plotone{fig3.ps}
2575: \plotone{fig4.ps}
2576: \caption{RCW 108 with 1.2 mm contours are 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 192 $\times
2577: \sigma$ (235 mJy/beam). The contours are overlain on the NTT K$_s$
2578: band image of Comer\'on \e (2005) The beam size for the 1.2mm
2579: observation is shown at the lower right.
2580: \label{k108}}
2581: \end{figure}
2582:
2583:
2584:
2585: \begin{figure}[t]
2586: \epsscale{.9}
2587: \plotone{fig5.ps}
2588: %\plotone{fig5_234_V2_RGB.ps}
2589: \caption{Definitions of regions overlain on the $Spitzer$ image
2590: (BGR= 4.5~\micron, 5.8~\micron\ and 8.0~\micron\ respectively)
2591: The $Chandra$ field of view is indicated by the blue square.
2592: %the contours are from MSX A band data and defined in
2593: %Figure~\ref{smoothzoom} with the innermost contours removed for clarity.
2594: The eastern region is
2595: clearly part of NGC~6193. The northern region contains bright dust
2596: emission.}
2597: \label{fullregions}
2598: \end{figure}
2599: \clearpage
2600:
2601:
2602:
2603: \begin{figure}[t]
2604: %plotone{fig6.ps}
2605: \plotfiddle{fig6.eps}{0.0in}{00.}{450.}{520.}{0.}{-100.}
2606: \caption{Quartile analysis of X-ray sources for the regions defined in Figure~\ref{fullregions}.
2607: region. The first four frames are the extreme 3\arcmin\ to the
2608: west, north, east and south respectively. The last two figures show
2609: the inner region and the whole field.
2610: In each frame, the Y axis is 3 Q$_{25}$/Q$_{75}$,
2611: the X-axis is the scaled median log(m/1-m), the blue lines indicate
2612: lines of constant Hydrogen column, the red lines indicate lines of
2613: constant temperature.
2614: The data for the first four frames are statistically similar
2615: %as shown by a KS test.
2616: but distinct from the extreme central region (frame 5).}
2617: \label{quantiles_sides}
2618: \end{figure}
2619: \clearpage
2620:
2621:
2622:
2623:
2624: \begin{figure}[t]
2625: \plotone{fig7.eps}
2626: %/data/swolk/OBSERVATIONS/XRAY/RCW108/ANCHORS_3
2627: %Jan24.pro - fir 7, 8, 9a,9b
2628: %\plotfiddle{../ANCHORS_3/fig7.eps}{0.0in}{90.}{400.}{520.}{0.}{0.}
2629: \caption{Histograms of hydrogen absorption column, \nh, derived
2630: through spectral fits of X-ray sources with over 50 counts and formal errors
2631: $<$ 50\%. Bin size is 0.25 dex.
2632: The six panels are marked to
2633: indicate the location of the X-ray sources with respect to the field
2634: of view, see Figure~\ref{quantiles_sides} for details.}
2635: \label{nh_hist}
2636: \end{figure}
2637:
2638:
2639:
2640: \begin{figure}[t]
2641: %\epsscale{.8}
2642: %\plotfiddle{../ANCHORS_3/fig8.eps}{0.0in}{90.}{400.}{520.}{0.}{0.}
2643: \plotone{fig8.eps}
2644: \caption{Histograms of coronal temperature, kT, derived
2645: through single temperature spectral fits of X-ray sources with over 50 counts and formal errors
2646: $<$ 50\%. Bin size is 0.25 keV.
2647: The six panels are marked to
2648: indicate the location of the X-ray sources with respect to the field
2649: of view, see Figure~\ref{quantiles_sides} for details.}
2650: \label{kt_hist}
2651: \end{figure}
2652:
2653: \clearpage
2654:
2655: \begin{figure}[t]
2656: \epsscale{1}
2657: \plottwo{fig9a.eps}{fig9b.eps}
2658: \caption{X-ray luminosity distributions segregated by region. Left:
2659: The cumulative distribution for each region is shown as the solid
2660: histogram. The dotted histogram is from a log--normal function normalized
2661: to equal the observed distribution at log L$_x$ $\sim 30.5$ (31 for
2662: the inner region). Right: A non-cumulative
2663: distribution of the observed luminosities.
2664: The solid histogram indicates the luminosity
2665: distribution of bright sources with low errors in kT and \nh. This
2666: figure emphasizes deviations from a Gaussian profile of the XLF in the
2667: north and the south.}
2668: \label{xlf}
2669: \end{figure}
2670:
2671: \begin{figure}[t]
2672: \epsscale{.9}
2673: \plotone{fig10.ps}
2674: \caption{The 28 sources seen to flare. The lightcurves are plotted
2675: with an average of 5 (raw) counts per bin with the Bayesian
2676: blocks (95\% confidence) overplotted as the thick line. Sources are
2677: ordered by the metric for flare intensity, $\Delta$ (see text),
2678: decreasing across and then down.}
2679: \label{flares}
2680: \end{figure}
2681: \clearpage
2682:
2683:
2684:
2685: \begin{figure}[t]
2686: \epsscale{.8}
2687: %\plotone{ccd_aug28.eps}
2688: \plotone{fig11.eps}
2689: %/data/swolk/OBSERVATIONS/XRAY/RCW108/IDL
2690: % plot_comeron_2mass_07.pro
2691: \caption{Infrared color-color diagrams (J-H vs. H-K) for counterparts to all
2692: X--ray sources in the RCW~108 $Chandra$ field. For each panel, the
2693: solid line indicates the main sequence, the dashed line runs
2694: parallel to the reddening vector and the dot-dashed line is the cTTs
2695: locus (after Lada \& Adams 1990 and Meyer \e 1997). A reddening vector
2696: indicative of A$_V = 10$ is marked. Sources marked as points have
2697: errors $<$ 0.25 magnitudes. Sources marked also with squares have
2698: errors of $<$ 0.10 magnitudes at K$_s$. The six panels are marked to
2699: indicate the location of the X-ray sources with respect to the field
2700: of view, see Figure~\ref{quantiles_sides} for details.}
2701: \label{irccd}
2702: \end{figure}
2703:
2704:
2705: \begin{figure}[t]
2706: \epsscale{.8}
2707: \plotone{fig12.eps}
2708: %/data/swolk/OBSERVATIONS/XRAY/RCW108/IDL
2709: %plot_comeron_2mass_07.pro
2710: \caption{Infrared color-magnitude diagrams
2711: (K$_s$ vs. H-K$_s$) for counterparts to all
2712: X--ray sources in the RCW~108 $Chandra$ field. For each panel,
2713: the 0.5 Myr (open squares) 1.0 Myr (open triangles) and ZAMS (filled circles) isochrones for 2.5 M$_\odot$ to 0.08 M$_\odot$ are plotted (Siess \e 2000).
2714: Extinction of 20 visual magnitudes for a 2.5 M$_\odot$ star
2715: indicated by the dashed lines. The dot dashed lines indicate 20 visual
2716: magnitudes for 0.08 M$_\odot$ stars at ages of 0.5 Myr. High mass
2717: stars are predominately seen in the inner region.}
2718: \label{ircmd}
2719: \end{figure}
2720:
2721:
2722: \begin{figure}[t]
2723: \epsscale{.8}
2724: \plotone{fig13.eps}
2725: %//data/swolk/OBSERVATIONS/IR/SPITZER/rcw108/ClusterGrinder
2726: %matchIRACX.pro
2727: \caption{Plot of near and mid infrared colors for 236 sources with
2728: detections by 2MASS and IRAC. Class~I sources are indicated by
2729: ``+'', Class~II by ``*'', Class~III sources are diamonds. Sources
2730: of unknown type or suspected galaxies are marked with small dots.}
2731: \label{IRACCCD}
2732: \end{figure}
2733:
2734:
2735: \begin{figure}[t]
2736: \epsscale{.8}
2737: \plotone{fig14.eps}
2738: %/data/swolk/OBSERVATIONS/XRAY/RCW108/IDL
2739: %Jan25_AV_NH.pro
2740: %plot_and_fit_avnh_region.pro
2741: \caption{Plot of extinction derived from JHK colors vs. \nh\
2742: column. Hydrogen column is measured via X-ray spectral fits, these
2743: have been used to choose from various possible NIR extinction
2744: measures. The lines are fits to the data.}
2745: \label{avnh}
2746: \end{figure}
2747:
2748: \begin{figure}[t]
2749: \plotone{fig15.eps}
2750: %/data/swolk/OBSERVATIONS/XRAY/RCW108/ANCHORS_3
2751: %klf_rev.pro
2752: \caption{K$_s$ band luminosity functions for the X--ray sources in the
2753: RCW~108 $Chandra$ field. The observed magnitudes are corrected for
2754: the distance modulus of 10.63. The hatched region in the histograms indicated
2755: the data are also corrected for the
2756: measured extinction. While the
2757: most luminous sources are all toward the inner region, there are
2758: several sources with absolute K$_s$ magnitudes brighter than 0 in the
2759: western and southern regions.}
2760: \label{klf}
2761: \end{figure}
2762:
2763:
2764: \begin{figure}
2765: \epsscale{1}
2766: %\plotone{../FITS/OB_on_2mass_wmsxcont_lab.ps}
2767: \plotone{fig16.ps}
2768: \caption{High mass stars in the $Chandra$ field. The large black box indicates the
2769: ACIS-I field of view. Circles indicate the locations of high mass star candidates.
2770: The underlying image is about 6.5~pc on a side and was adapted from
2771: the 2MASS K$_S$ data,
2772: Contours are from the MSX A band data.
2773: X-ray bright high mass stars are numbered except for the cluster in the
2774: central field (see Figure~\ref{core}). There is
2775: also a clustering to the south. The eastern part of the
2776: field is almost free of X-ray bright high mass stars.}
2777: \label{NTT_plus_OB_Xcont}
2778: \end{figure}
2779:
2780:
2781: \begin{figure}
2782: \epsscale{1}
2783: %\plotone{../FITS/}
2784: \plotone{fig17.ps}
2785: \caption{High mass stars in the inner region. Field of view is about
2786: 1~pc on a side.
2787: Boxes indicate the locations of high mass star candidates in the
2788: heart of RCW~108--IR.
2789: Contours indicate X-ray count rates of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, etc.
2790: counts per pixel. The underlying image is adapted from the NTT K$_s$ data
2791: of Comer\'on \e (2005). A dark lane splits the nebula. }
2792: \label{core}
2793: \end{figure}
2794:
2795: \begin{figure}
2796: \epsscale{1}
2797: \plotone{fig18.eps}
2798: \caption{Histogram of the temperatures found by one temperature
2799: spectral fits to candidate high mass stars. Stars in the inner region (RCW~108--IR)
2800: are
2801: indicated by the hashing. These clearly represent a warmer subset
2802: of the group.}
2803: \label{OBHIST}
2804: \end{figure}
2805:
2806:
2807: \clearpage
2808:
2809:
2810:
2811: %%%%%%%%%%%%TABLES%%%%%%%%%%%%tables%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2812:
2813: \input{table_1_stub}
2814:
2815: \input{table_2_stub}
2816:
2817: \input{table_3}
2818:
2819: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
2820:
2821: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
2822:
2823: \tighten \tablewidth{0pt}
2824:
2825: \tablecolumns{8}
2826:
2827: \tablecaption{MSX and IRAS Intensity of RCW 108 \label{MSX}}
2828:
2829: \tablehead{
2830: \colhead{Region} & \colhead{Area}
2831: & \colhead{MSX A} & \colhead{IRAS 12\micron} & \colhead{MSX C} &
2832: \colhead{MSX D} & \colhead{MSX E} &\colhead{IRAS 25\micron} \\
2833: \colhead{} & \colhead{arcsec$^2$}
2834: & \colhead{Jy} & \colhead{Jy} & \colhead{Jy} & \colhead{Jy} & \colhead{Jy} & \colhead{Jy}
2835: }
2836:
2837: \startdata
2838: A & 3,996 & 6.81 & & 8.74 & 4.10 & 11.39 & \\
2839: B & 2,268 & 6.40 & & 7.98 & 4.42 & 20.29 & \\
2840: C & 1,080 & 2.72 & & 3.97 & 2.06 & 3.96 & \\
2841: Core & 2,844 &101.37 & & 216.6 & 326.0 & 2,063.4 & \\
2842: Entire & 187,416 &286.31 & 208.3 & 510.2 & 489.0 & 2,999.2 & 2,978 \\
2843: \enddata
2844:
2845: \end{deluxetable}
2846:
2847:
2848:
2849:
2850:
2851: \input{table_5_stub}
2852:
2853: \begin{deluxetable}{lrcrcr}
2854: %\tabletypesize{\normal}
2855: \tablecaption{Median Quartile Value -- by Region \label{Region_Q}}
2856: \tablewidth{0pt}
2857: \tablehead{
2858: \colhead{Region} &\colhead{\#}&\colhead{ $\log (m/(1-m))$}&\colhead{$\pm$}& \colhead{$3\times Q_{25}/Q_{75}$}
2859: &\colhead{$\pm$}}
2860: \startdata
2861: North &31& -0.58& 0.09& 1.02 & 0.07 \\
2862: South &41& -0.59& 0.07& 1.22 & 0.05 \\
2863: East &106 & -0.77& 0.01& 1.23 & 0.04 \\
2864: West &63& -0.60& 0.05& 1.11 & 0.08 \\
2865: Inner 1\arcmin\ &31& -0.30 &0.06& 1.56& 0.06 \\
2866: annulus from 1\arcmin\ to 3.5\arcmin\ &65& -0.30& 0.04& 1.34 & 0.05\\
2867: Field &337& -0.67 &0.27 & 1.32 & 0.33 \\
2868: \enddata
2869: \end{deluxetable}
2870:
2871:
2872:
2873:
2874: \input{table_7_stub}
2875:
2876: \input{table_8}
2877:
2878:
2879:
2880: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrr}
2881: %\tabletypesize{\normal}
2882: \tablecaption{X-ray Spectral Properties by Region \label{Region_Spec}}
2883: \tablewidth{0pt}
2884: \tablehead{
2885: \colhead{Region} &\colhead{\#}&\colhead{kT} &\colhead{MAD}
2886: &\colhead{Rejected} &\colhead{\nh} & \colhead{MAD} &
2887: \colhead{Rejected}\\
2888: \colhead{ } &\colhead{ }&\colhead{[keV]} &\colhead{ }
2889: &\colhead{ } &\colhead{[$\times 10^{22} $cm$^{-2}$]} & \colhead{} &
2890: \colhead{ }
2891: }
2892: \startdata
2893: North &7 &2.78& 0.49 & 0 & 0.54 & 0.09 & 0\\
2894: South &12 &2.79& 0.66 & 0 & 0.69 & 0.10 & 1\\
2895: East &29 &1.44& 0.15 & 3 & 0.41 & 0.04 & 1\\
2896: West &20 &2.87& 0.39 & 0 & 0.53 & 0.06 & 3\\
2897: RCW~108--IR &21 &3.07& 0.29 & 0 & 2.29 & 0.28 & 2\\
2898: Field &89 &2.54& 0.17 & 0 & 0.53 & 0.04 & 20\\
2899: \enddata
2900: \end{deluxetable}
2901:
2902:
2903:
2904:
2905: \input{table_10_stub}
2906: \input{table_11_stub}
2907:
2908: \begin{deluxetable}{lcrrrcrr}
2909: %begin{deluxetable}{123456789}
2910: %\tabletypesize{\normal}
2911: \tablecaption{Bulk Near-IR Extinction and Hydrogen Column -- by Region \label{Region_avnh}}
2912: \tablewidth{0pt}
2913: \tablehead{
2914: \colhead{Region} &\colhead{Number of}&\colhead{Mean A$_V$}& \colhead{MAD}
2915: &\colhead{Rejected} &\colhead{Mean \nh}& \colhead{MAD}
2916: &\colhead{Rejected}\\
2917: \colhead{ } &\colhead{good fits}&\colhead{ }& \colhead{ }
2918: &\colhead{ } &\colhead{[$\times 10^{22} $cm$^{-2}$]}&
2919: \colhead{ } &\colhead{ }
2920: }
2921: \startdata
2922: North &8 &4.58& 1.11 & 2 & 0.67& 0.17 & 2\\
2923: South &16 &3.31& 0.36 & 3 & 0.92& 0.12 & 3\\
2924: East &35 &3.01& 0.22 &6 & 0.75& 0.06 & 2\\
2925: West &22 &4.66& 0.44 &2 &0.84& 0.09 & 1\\
2926: RCW~108--IR &36 &10.99& 1.01&1 & 1.98 & 0.20 & 2\\
2927: Field &117 &4.07& 0.23 &29 &0.92& 0.05 & 22\\
2928: \enddata
2929: \end{deluxetable}
2930:
2931:
2932:
2933: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
2934: %\tabletypesize{\normal}
2935: \tablecaption{\nh -- A$_V$ relation -- by region \label{Region_avnh_rel}}
2936: \tablewidth{0pt}
2937: \tablehead{
2938: \colhead{Region} & \colhead{Number of}&\colhead{slope}&\colhead{variance$^2$}\\
2939: \colhead{ } & \colhead{good fits}&\colhead{[$\times
2940: 10^{21}$]}& \colhead{ }
2941: }
2942: \startdata
2943: North &8 &2.3& 0.39 \\
2944: South &16 &2.9& 0.43 \\
2945: East &35 &2.1& 0.24 \\
2946: West &22 &1.8& 0.30 \\
2947: RCW~108-IR &36 &2.2& 0.80 \\
2948: Field &117 &2.0 & 0.24 \\
2949: \enddata
2950: \end{deluxetable}
2951:
2952:
2953: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
2954: %\tabletypesize{\normal}
2955: \tablecaption{Details on the KLF -- by Region \label{tab_klf}}
2956: \tablewidth{0pt}
2957: \tablehead{
2958: \colhead{Region} &\colhead{\# -in region}&
2959: \colhead{Mean K$_s^a$}& \colhead{StDev$^b$}
2960: &\colhead{Rejected} &\colhead{90$^{th}$percentile}&
2961: \colhead{10$^{th}$Percentile}&{Spread}}
2962: \startdata
2963: North &18 &1.48& 0.26 & 0&-0.27 & 2.83& 3.10 \\
2964: South &34 &1.96& 0.26 & 1&-0.41 & 3.68& 4.10 \\
2965: East &91 &2.14& 0.09 &4 &0.94 &3.21 & 2.27 \\
2966: West &41 &2.07& 0.20 &1 & 0.64 &3.34 & 2.70 \\
2967: RCW~108--IR &60 &1.24& 0.21 &1 &-1.06 & 3.17& 4.43 \\
2968: Field &244 &1.85& 0.09 &6 &-0.15 & 3.21&3.36 \\
2969: \enddata
2970: \tablenotetext{a}{Absolute K$_s$ magnitude.}
2971: \tablenotetext{b}{Three sigma outliers excluded.}
2972: \end{deluxetable}
2973:
2974:
2975:
2976: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrcrrrrrr}
2977: %begin{deluxetable}{123456789012345}
2978: \tabletypesize{\small}
2979: \tablecolumns{12}
2980: \tablewidth{0pc}
2981: \tablecaption{Probable High Mass Stars \label{OB} }
2982: \tablewidth{0pt}
2983: \tablehead{ \colhead{SRC\#} & \colhead{J} & \colhead{H} &
2984: \colhead{K} & \colhead{A$_V$} & \colhead{\nh}& \colhead{Abs. J}
2985: & \colhead{Abs. H} & \colhead{Abs. K} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{[M$_\odot$] Est.$^a$}\\
2986: \colhead{ } & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Observed} &
2987: &\colhead{[$\times 10^{22}$cm$^{-2}$]}
2988: & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Ext. Corrected}
2989: & \colhead{J} & \colhead{H} &\colhead{K} }
2990: \startdata
2991: % EAST J H K Av Nh J H K Mass 3Myr
2992: % # obs corrected J H K
2993: East & & & & & & & & & & & \\
2994: 29 & 11.59& 10.14 & 9.48 & 7.53 & 0.16 & -1.11 & -1.75 & -1.93& $>7$ & $ >7$ & $>7$ \\
2995: 40 & 12.46& 11.17 & 10.22 & 3.11 & 0.29 & 1.01 & 0.05 & -0.70& 2.2& 2.5& 2.7\\
2996: 243 & 8.98& 8.85 & 8.76 & 0.00 & 0.34 & -1.59 & -1.72 & -1.81& $>7$ & $ >7$ & $>7$\\
2997: 245 & 10.15& 9.74 & 9.54 & 0.00 & 0.16 & -0.42 & -0.83 & -1.03& 6.0& 7.0& $>7$\\
2998: \tableline
2999: North & & & & & & & & & & & \\
3000: 60 &16.42 & 13.78 & 11.57& 11.51& 8.31& 2.60& 1.20& -0.27& $<$2& $<$2& 3.25\\
3001: 61 &12.56 & 11.23 & 10.48& 5.18& 0.81& 0.52& -0.25& -0.66& 3.0 & 3.25& 3.5\\
3002: 146 &11.70 & 11.13 & 10.85& 0.31& 0.37& 1.04& 0.50& 0.24& 2.5 & 2.5 & 2.7\\
3003: 262 &12.67 & 11.61 & 11.22& 4.30& 0.25& 0.88& 0.29& 0.18& 2.7 & 2.7 & 2.7\\
3004: \tableline
3005: RCW~108--IR & & & & & & & & & & & \\
3006: 52 &15.43 & 13.20 & 11.73& 11.87& 2.77& 1.52& 0.55& -0.15& 2.0 & 2.5 & 3.25\\
3007: 62 &14.49 & 12.17 & 10.72& 13.24& 1.11& 0.18& -0.72& -1.30& 3.25 & 3.5 & 4.0 \\
3008: 64 &11.86 & 10.89 & 10.52& 3.30& 0.62& 0.36& -0.26& -0.41& 3.25& 3.25& 3.5\\
3009: 69 &16.11 & 13.98 & 12.76& 18.80& 3.84& 0.24& 0.12& 0.12& 3.25 & 3.0 & 3.0\\
3010: 76 &18.56 & 14.95 & 12.88& 26.01& 2.24& 0.65& -0.17& -0.55& 3.0 & 3.0 & 3.5\\
3011: 92 &12.86 & 11.20 & 10.27& 10.31& 2.22& -0.61& -1.17& -1.44& 3.75 & 4.0 & 4.0\\
3012: 100 &13.65 & 11.95 & 11.13& 9.81& 1.77& 0.32& -0.34& -0.52& 3.25 & 3.25 & 3.5\\
3013: 111 &15.47 & 12.85 & 11.52& 18.34& 2.23& -0.27& -0.92& -1.06& 3.5 & 3.75 & 4.0\\
3014: 112 &11.58 & 10.26 & 9.07& 1.59& 3.24& 0.56& -0.59& -1.67& 3.0 & 3.5 & 4.0\\
3015: 114 &12.41 & 11.95 & 10.23& 0.00& 3.95& 1.84& 1.38& -0.34& $<$2 & $<$2 & 3.25\\
3016: 116 &13.07 & 11.15 & 10.28& 12.39& 2.34& -0.99& -1.59& -1.66& 4.00 & 3.75 & 4.0\\
3017: % 118 &10.87 & 9.20 & 8.36& 11.46& 3.10& -2.93& -3.38& -3.47& $>$7 & $>$7 & $>$7\\
3018: % 121 &13.04 & 11.90 & 11.23& 5.87& 0.97& 0.81& 0.31& 0.01& 2.7 & 2.7 & 3.0 \\
3019: 124 &15.79 & 13.41 & 12.24& 16.15& 2.49& 0.66& 0.02& -0.11& 3.0 & 3.0 & 3.0\\
3020: % 125 &12.39 & 12.12 & 10.16& 0.00& 3.48& 1.82& 1.56& -0.41& $<$2 & $<$2 & 3.25\\
3021: 131 &13.95 & 11.79 & 10.57& 12.96& 2.27& -0.28& -1.05& -1.43& 3.5 & 4.0 & 4.0\\
3022: 136 &11.67 & 10.54 & 9.79& 2.42& 0.52& 0.42& -0.45& -1.05& 3.5 & 3.5 & 3.75\\
3023: 140 &12.83 & 11.39 & 10.40& 4.70& 0.94& 0.93& 0.00& -0.68& 2.5 & 3.0 & 3.5\\
3024: 143 &12.99 & 11.95 & 11.38& 4.69& 0.75& 1.09& 0.56& 0.29& 2.5 & 2.5 & 2.7\\
3025: 144 &17.88 & 14.62 & 12.79& 27.35& 5.78& -0.40& -0.73& -0.79& 3.5 & 3.5 & 3.5\\
3026: \tableline
3027: South & & & & & & & & & & &\\
3028: 54 &11.71 & 10.94 & 10.65& 1.39& 0.39& 0.75& 0.12& -0.08& 2.7 & 3.0 & 3.0\\
3029: 104 &14.75 & 12.41 & 11.17& 15.32& 2.63& -0.14& -0.84& -1.08& 3.5 & 3.75 & 3.75\\
3030: 222 &12.91 & 11.85 & 11.40& 5.16& 0.98& 0.88& 0.38& 0.26& 2.7 & 2.7 & 2.7\\
3031: 259 & 8.88 & 8.39 & 8.17& 2.74& 0.66& -2.46& -2.66& -2.70& $>$7& $>$7 & $>$7\\
3032: 263 &12.72 & 11.67 & 10.94& 5.84& 1.19& 0.50& 0.07& -0.28& 3.0 & 3.0 & 3.25\\
3033: 267 & 9.01 & 8.48 & 8.31& 0.00& 0.40& -1.56& -2.09& -2.26& $>$7& $>$7 & $>$7\\
3034: 269 &11.29 & 10.22 & 9.84& 4.59& 0.21& -0.58& -1.16& -1.24& 3.75& 4.0 & 4.0 \\
3035: 318 &12.63 & 11.66 & 11.23& 5.42& 0.94& 0.53& 0.15& 0.06& 3.0 & 3.0 & 3.0\\
3036: \tableline
3037: West & & & & & & & & & & &\\
3038: 162 & 9.77 & 8.85 & 8.39& 6.42& 1.69& -2.61& -2.84& -2.88& $>$7 & $>$7 & $>$7\\
3039: 215 &11.23 & 10.89 & 10.80& 0.00& 0.22& 0.66& 0.32& 0.23& 3.0 & 2.7 & 2.7\\
3040: 171 & 9.63 & 9.11 & 8.81& 0.00& 0.29& -0.94& -1.46& -1.76& 4.0 & 4.0 & $>$4\\
3041: 172 &12.77 & 11.30 & 10.33& 5.21& 0.70& 0.73& -0.18& -0.81& 2.7 & 3.25 & 3.5\\
3042: 174 & 8.59 & 8.56 & 8.52& 0.00& 0.06& -1.98& -2.01& -2.05& 5.0& 5.0& 5.0$^b$\\
3043: 217 &10.41 & 10.17 & 10.04& 0.00& 0.75& -0.16& -0.40& -0.53& 3.5 & 3.5 &3.5\\
3044: 286 & 8.91 & 8.69 & 8.25& 0.00& 0.01& -1.66& -1.88& -2.32& $>$7& $>$7 & $>$7\\
3045: 289 &13.01 & 11.87 & 11.22& 3.46& 0.38& 1.46& 0.69& 0.27& 2.0 & 2.2 &2.7\\
3046: 296 &13.67 & 11.96 & 11.23& 10.55& 1.26& 0.12& -0.46& -0.50& 3.25& 3.5 &3.5\\
3047: \enddata
3048: \tablenotetext{a}{Age estimated to be 1 Myr for all regions except
3049: east, 3 Myr used for east.}
3050: \tablenotetext{b}{Consistent mass estimate only found for 0.5 Myr.}
3051: \end{deluxetable}
3052:
3053:
3054:
3055:
3056:
3057: \end{document}
3058:
3059:
3060:
3061:
3062:
3063:
3064:
3065:
3066: