1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% A Statistical Study on Optically Faint Variable Object found with Subaru Suprime-Cam %%
3: %% Morokuma, T., Paper I %%
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{emulateapj}
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7: %\slugcomment{Draft Version 4}
8: \shorttitle{Optically Faint Variable Object Survey in the SXDF
9: }
10: \shortauthors{T. Morokuma et al.}
11: %
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13: \begin{document}
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
16: \title{
17: The Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey (SXDS) - V. Optically Faint Variable Object Survey
18: \footnote{Based in part on data collected at Subaru Telescope,
19: which is operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
20: Based on observations (program GN-2002B-Q-30) obtained at
21: the Gemini Observatory, which is operated by the Association of
22: Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative
23: agreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership:
24: the National Science Foundation (USA), the Particle Physics and
25: Astronomy Research Council (UK), the National Research Council
26: (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the Australian Research Council
27: (Australia), CNPq (Brazil) and CONICET (Argentina).
28: }
29: }
30: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
31: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
32: \author{
33: Tomoki Morokuma\altaffilmark{1,2},
34: Mamoru Doi\altaffilmark{2},
35: Naoki Yasuda\altaffilmark{3},
36: Masayuki Akiyama\altaffilmark{4},
37: Kazuhiro Sekiguchi\altaffilmark{1,4},
38: Hisanori Furusawa\altaffilmark{4},
39: Yoshihiro Ueda\altaffilmark{5},
40: Tomonori Totani\altaffilmark{5},
41: Takeshi Oda\altaffilmark{5,6},
42: Tohru Nagao\altaffilmark{1,6},
43: Nobunari Kashikawa\altaffilmark{1},
44: Takashi Murayama\altaffilmark{7},
45: Masami Ouchi\altaffilmark{8,9},
46: Mike G. Watson\altaffilmark{10},
47: Michael W. Richmond\altaffilmark{11},
48: Christopher Lidman\altaffilmark{12},
49: Saul Perlmutter\altaffilmark{13},
50: Anthony L. Spadafora\altaffilmark{13},
51: Greg Aldering\altaffilmark{13},
52: Lifan Wang\altaffilmark{13,14},
53: Isobel M. Hook\altaffilmark{15},
54: Rob A. Knop\altaffilmark{16}
55: }
56: \altaffiltext{1}{Optical and Infrared Astronomy Division, National Astronomical Observatory, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
57: \altaffiltext{2}{Institude of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan}
58: \altaffiltext{3}{Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8582, Japan}
59: \altaffiltext{4}{Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 650 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA}
60: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}
61: \altaffiltext{6}{JSPS Fellow}
62: \altaffiltext{7}{Astronomical Institute, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
63: \altaffiltext{8}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA}
64: \altaffiltext{9}{Hubble Fellow}
65: \altaffiltext{10}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK}
66: \altaffiltext{11}{Physics Department, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA}
67: \altaffiltext{12}{European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile}
68: \altaffiltext{13}{Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA}
69: \altaffiltext{14}{Physics Department, Texas A\&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA}
70: \altaffiltext{15}{University of Oxford Astrophysics, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK}
71: \altaffiltext{16}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, P.O. Box 1807, Nashville, TN 37240. USA}
72: \email{tmorokuma@optik.mtk.nao.ac.jp}
73:
74: \begin{abstract}
75: We present our survey for optically faint variable
76: objects using multi-epoch ($8-10$ epochs over $2-4$ years)
77: $i'$-band imaging data obtained with Subaru Suprime-Cam over $0.918$ deg$^2$
78: in the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Field (SXDF).
79: We found $1040$ optically variable objects by image subtraction for all
80: the combinations of images at different epochs.
81: This is the first statistical sample of variable objects at depths
82: achieved with 8-10m class telescopes or HST.
83: The detection limit for variable components is $i'_{\rm{vari}}\sim25.5$ mag.
84: These variable objects were classified into variable stars, supernovae (SNe),
85: and active galactic nuclei (AGN),
86: based on the optical morphologies, magnitudes, colors, and optical-mid-infrared colors
87: of the host objects, spatial offsets of variable components from the host objects, and light curves.
88: Detection completeness was examined by simulating light curves
89: for periodic and irregular variability.
90: We detected optical variability for $36\pm2\%$
91: ($51\pm3\%$ for a bright sample with $i'<24.4$ mag)
92: of X-ray sources in the field.
93: Number densities of variable obejcts as functions of time intervals $\Delta{t}$
94: and variable component magnitudes $i'_{\rm{vari}}$ are obtained.
95: Number densities of variable stars, SNe, and AGN are
96: $120$, $489$, and $579$ objects deg$^{-2}$, respectively.
97: Bimodal distributions of variable stars in the color-magnitude diagrams indicate that
98: the variable star sample consists of bright ($V\sim22$ mag) blue variable stars of the halo population
99: and faint ($V\sim23.5$ mag) red variable stars of the disk population.
100: There are a few candidates of RR Lyrae providing
101: a possible number density of $\sim10^{-2}$ kpc$^{-3}$
102: at a distance of $>150$ kpc from the Galactic center.
103: \end{abstract}
104: \keywords{stars: variables: other --- supernova: general --- galaxies: active --- surveys}
105:
106: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
107: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
108: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
109: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
110: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
111: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
112: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
113: It is well-known that there are a wide variety of objects showing optical variability
114: by various mechanisms in various time scales in the universe.
115: For example, stars in the instability strip in a color-magnitude diagram show periodic variability
116: by pulsations (Cepheids and RR Lyrae),
117: while cataclysmic variables show emergent variability induced by accretion flows
118: from companion stars (novae), magnetic reconnection or rotations (dwarf stars).
119: Thermonuclear or core-collapse runaway explosions of massive stars are
120: observed as supernovae (SNe).
121: Recent studies on optical afterglows of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), which are extremely
122: energetic phenomena, are starting to reveal their nature.
123: Active galactic nuclei (AGN) show irregular flux variability not only in the optical but also in other wavelengths.
124: Optically variable objects described above change their intrinsic brightness,
125: but observed variability can be caused by other reasons.
126: Searches for microlensing events have aimed to test the hypothesis that a significant fraction of the dark matter
127: in the halo of our Galaxy could be made up of MAssive Compact Halo Objects (MACHOs) such as
128: brown dwarfs or planets.
129: Many asteroids in solar system have been found as moving objects.
130: Many surveys for these optically variable objects have been carried out and have
131: contributed to many important astronomical topics.
132:
133: The {\it cosmic distance ladder}, for example, were established partly based on studies of
134: optically variable objects which are {\it standardizable} candles.
135: Observations of variable stars in nearby galaxies enable us to determine distances to them by
136: period-luminosity relations of Cepheids \citep[][and references therein]{sandage2006}.
137: Recent deep high-resolution monitoring observations with Hubble Space Telescope (HST) increased
138: the number of nearby galaxies whose distances were measured using Cepheids.
139: Well-sampled light curves of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) in galaxies with distance measurements
140: by Cepheids \citep{saha2006} showed empirical relationships between their light curve shapes
141: and their luminosity: intrinsically brighter SNe Ia declined more slowly in brightness \citep{phillips1993}.
142: These relations led to the discoveries of an accelerated expansion of the universe by
143: two independent SN Ia search teams \citep*{perlmutter1998,riess1998}.
144: In ongoing and planned SN surveys, SNe Ia are expected to set tight constraints
145: on the value of the dark energy and its cosmological evolution if any.
146:
147: Variable stars have been also used to trace Galactic structure as standard candles.
148: RR Lyrae are old ($>8$ Gyr) bright ($M_V\sim0.6$ mag) low-mass pulsating stars with blue colors of $B-V\sim0.3$
149: and are appropriate for tracing structures in the halo.
150: They can be selected as stars showing large variability ($0.5-1.0$ mag in $V$-band)
151: in short periods of $0.3-0.5$ days \citep{vivas2004}.
152: RR Lyrae selected using multi-epoch imaging data obtained by the Sloan Digital Sky
153: Survey \citep[SDSS;][]{york2000} provided a possible cut-off of the Galactic halo
154: at $\sim65$ kpc from the Galactic center \citep{ivezic2000}.
155: The subsequent studies on RR Lyrae by SDSS \citep*{ivezic2004a,ivezic2005,sesar2007}
156: and the QUasar Equatorical Survey Team \citep[QUEST;][]{vivas2004,vivas2006}
157: found many substructures of the Galactic halo including those already known.
158:
159: Optical variability of the first luminous AGN (quasar) 3C 273 were recognized \citep{smith1963}
160: just after its discovery \citep{schmidt1963}.
161: Since then, it has been known that almost all quasars show optical variability;
162: indeed, it is one of common characteristics of AGN.
163: Quasar surveys such as SDSS and the 2-degree Field Quasar Redshift Survey \citep[2QZ;][]{boyle2000}
164: have been carried out mainly using optical multi-color selections.
165: These surveys have made large catalogs of quasars
166: \citep*{croom2004,schneider2005} and also found very high-$z$ quasars
167: close to the reionization epoch \citep{fan2006a,fan2006b}.
168: But efficiency of finding lower-luminosity AGN using color selections
169: are expected to be low because AGN components get fainter compared with their host galaxy components.
170: On the other hand, recent deep X-ray observations with ASCA, XMM-Newton, and Chandra satellites effectively
171: found many distant low-luminosity AGN as well as obscured AGN.
172: This high efficiency owes to faintness of host galaxies in X-ray and high transparency
173: of dust to X-ray photons.
174: X-ray observations can identify faint AGN easily while finding even unobscured AGN is
175: difficult using optical color selections.
176: However, since deep X-ray surveys over wide fields require
177: a lot of telescope time \citep[e.g. $2$ Ms exposure in the Chandra Deep Field-North;][]{brandt2001},
178: optical variability is being recognized again as a good tracer for AGN.
179: Some studies have succeeded in detecting optical variability of quasars \citep*{hook1994,giveon1999,hawkins2002},
180: and finding many quasars by optical variability with the completeness as high as classical
181: UV excess selections \citep*{hawkins1993,ivezic2003}.
182: Comparison of SDSS imaging data with older plate imaging data \citep*{devries2003,devries2005,sesar2006}
183: and SDSS spectrophotometric data \citep{vandenberk2004} showed a clear anti-correlation between
184: quasar luminosity and optical variability amplitude, as indicated in previous studies \citep*{hook1994,giveon1999}.
185: Therefore, optical variability can be an efficient tool to find low-luminosity AGN
186: if variable components can be extracted.
187: Ultra-deep optical variability surveys with Wide-Field Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2)
188: installed on HST actually found 24 galaxies with variable nuclei down to $V_{\rm{nuc}}=27.5$ mag
189: and $I_{\rm{nuc}}=27$ mag, which are as faint as nearby Seyfert
190: galaxies ($-15<M_B<-19$) at $z\sim1$ \citep*{sarajedini2000,sarajedini2003}.
191: \citet{cohen2006} also found several tens of AGN by optical variability
192: using multi-epoch data with Advanced Camera for Survey (ACS) on board HST.
193: The number densities of AGN selected via optical variability can be of the same order
194: as those selected via deep X-ray observations \citep{brandt2005}.
195: However, samples from the HST imaging data were not large enough for statistical studies.
196: The comparable number densities of variability-selected AGN may indicate that there could be
197: several populations of AGN with different properties.
198: Furthremore, a search for faint transient objects with Suprime-Cam \citep{miyazaki2002}
199: on Subaru telescope revealed very faint
200: AGN variability in the nuclei of apparently normal galaxies,
201: and found that such nuclei show very rapid ($\sim$ a few days) nuclear variability
202: with a large fractional amplitude \citep{totani2005}.
203: Such behavior is similar to that of the Galactic center black hole, Sgr A$^\ast$,
204: rather than bright AGN, possibly indicating different physical nature of
205: accretion disks of very low luminosity AGN and very luminous AGN.
206:
207: Object variability could affect searches for
208: rare objects using non-simultaneous observational data.
209: \citet{iye2006} and \citet{ota2007} searched for Lyman-$\alpha$ emitters
210: (LAEs) at $z\sim7.0$ by comparing narrow-band data
211: with broad-band data obtained more than a few years earlier.
212: They succeeded in identifying a bright candidate spectroscopically as a LAE at $z=6.94$.
213: Another candidate without spectroscopic identifications could be just a transient object
214: and the authors treated it as a marginal candidate.
215: SN rate studies based on optical variability
216: \citep*{pain2002,dahlen2004,barris2006,sullivan2006,poznanski2007,oda2007}
217: have sometimes confronted problems in classifying events due to
218: insufficient observational data such as
219: spectroscopic identifications, sufficient time samplings, and multi-wavelength measurements.
220: Given limited time on large telescopes, one cannot make spectroscopic observations
221: of all variable candidates; thus,
222: multi-wavelength imaging data and light curves in year-scale baselines are
223: very useful to separate SNe from other kinds of variable objects.
224:
225: Recently, many optical variability surveys with dense time samplings
226: have been conducted for various astronomical purposes.
227: Dividing exposure time into multiple epochs in extremely deep surveys using large or space
228: telescopes also enables us to explore optical faint variability.
229: Projects conducted recently or ongoing are
230: Faint Sky Variability Survey \citep[FSVS;][]{groot2003},
231: Deep Lens Survey \citep[DLS;][]{becker2004},
232: Supernova Legacy Survey \citep[SNLS;][]{astier2006},
233: Great Observatory Origins Deep Survey \citep[GOODS;][]{strolger2004},
234: Groth-Westphal Survey Strip \citep[GSS;][]{sarajedini2006},
235: Hubble Deep Field-North \citep*[HDF-N;][]{sarajedini2000,sarajedini2003},
236: Hubble Ultra Deep Field \citep[HUDF;][]{cohen2006},
237: Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II (SDSS-II) Supernova Survey
238: \citep{sako2007}.
239: Densely sampled observations targeting GRB orphan afterglows
240: also have been carried out \citep[e.g.,][]{rau2006}.
241: We focus here on our survey for optically faint variable objects since 2002
242: in the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Field \citep[SXDF,][]{sekiguchi2004,sekiguchi2007}.
243: The data have been taken by the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey (SXDS) project.
244: Our study described in this paper provides the first statistical sample
245: of optically faint variable objects and is unique among studies using 8-10m class
246: telescopes and HST in its combination of wide field coverage and depth.
247: The Suprime-Cam imaging data and the analysis for finding optically variable objects are described
248: in \S\ref{sec:ofvos}, followed by other observational data in \S\ref{sec:addobs}.
249: We describe object classifications in \S\ref{sec:objclass}
250: and detection completeness in \S\ref{sec:completeness}.
251: The results are discussed for statistics of the whole sample in \S\ref{sec:overall_nc}
252: and for variable stars alone in \S\ref{sec:varistar}.
253: We summarize our results in \S\ref{sec:summary}.
254: In this paper, we adopt throughout the AB magnitude system for optical and mid-infrared photometry.
255:
256: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
257: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
258: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
259: \section{Optically Faint Variable Object Survey with Subaru Suprime-Cam}\label{sec:ofvos}
260: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
261: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
262: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
263: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
264: \subsection{Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Field (SXDF)}\label{sec:sxdf}
265: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
266: We are carrying out an optically faint variable object survey using a wide-field camera, Suprime-Cam,
267: on the prime focus of Subaru 8.2-m telescope.
268: The widest field-of-view ($34'\times27'$) among the optical imaging
269: instruments installed on HST and 8-10m telescopes provides us a unique
270: opportunity for statistical studies of rare and faint objects which are
271: less affected by cosmic variance than those derived from smaller fields.
272:
273: The SXDF is
274: centered on (02$^{\rm{h}}$18$^{\rm{m}}$00$^{\rm{s}}$, -05:00:00) in J2000.0,
275: in the direction towards the Galactic halo, $(l,b)=(169^\circ,-60^\circ)$.
276: The SXDF is an on-going multi-wavelength project from X-ray to radio \citep*{sekiguchi2004,sekiguchi2007},
277: exploring aspects of the distant universe
278: such as the nature of the extragalactic X-ray populations \citep*{watson2005,ueda2007,akiyama2007},
279: large-scale structures at high redshift \citep*{ouchi2005a,ouchi2005b} and
280: cosmic history of mass assembly \citep*{kodama2004,yamada2005,simpson2006b}.
281: The field coverage is $\sim1.2$ deg$^2$, which consists of five pointings of Suprime-Cam
282: (SXDF-C, SXDF-N, SXDF-S, SXDF-E, and SXDF-W, respectively, see Figure \ref{fig:sxdfimage2}).
283: We use the $i'$-band-selected photometric catalogs
284: in $B$, $V$, $R_C$, $i'$ and $z'$-bands,
285: which are summarized in \citet{furusawa2007}.
286: The depths of the catalogs which we use are almost the same among the five fields,
287: $28.4$, $27.8$, $27.7$, $27.7$, and $26.6$ mag ($3\sigma, 2\farcs0\phi$)
288: in $B$, $V$, $R_C$, $i'$ and $z'$-bands, respectively (Table \ref{tab:surveyarea}).
289: Optical photometric information used in this paper except for variability measurements is derived from these catalogs
290: and are not corrected for the Galactic extinction in the SXDF direction,
291: $E(B-V)=0.019-0.023\ \rm{mag}$ \citep[][see \citealt{furusawa2007}]{schlegel1998}.
292: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
293: \subsection{Subaru Suprime-Cam Imaging Data}\label{sec:spcamdata}
294: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
295: Our survey for optically faint variable objects in the SXDF is based on multi-epoch
296: $i'$-band Suprime-Cam imaging data, starting in September 2002 \citep*{furusawa2007,yasuda2007}.
297: The Suprime-Cam observations are summarized in Table \ref{tab:spcamobs}.
298: These observations include those for an extensive high-$z$ SN search using well-sampled $i'$-band
299: images in 2002 \citep*{yasuda2003,yasuda2007} with which \citet{doi2003} reported
300: the discoveries of $13$ high-$z$ SNe.
301: In addition to observations used to make the catalogs in \citet{furusawa2007},
302: we carried out $i'$-band observations in 2005.
303: The final images were taken in October 2003 in the two fields (SXDF-N and SXDF-W)
304: and in September 2005 in the remaining three fields (SXDF-C, SXDF-N, and SXDF-E).
305: The numbers of the observational epochs ($N_{\rm{epoch}}$)
306: in the five fields are $10$, $8$, $8$, $10$, and $8$, respectively.
307: Time intervals of the observations are from $1$ day to $3$ years in observed frame.
308:
309: In each epoch, stacked images were made in a standard method for the Suprime-Cam data
310: using the NEKO software \citep{yagi2002} and the SDFRED package \citep{ouchi2004}.
311: Some images taken on different dates
312: were combined together to make all the depths almost the same.
313: Then, we geometrically transformed the images using {\it geomap} and {\it geotran} tasks
314: in IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories,
315: which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy,
316: Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}
317: in order to match the coordinates in better accuracy each other.
318: The root-mean-square of residuals of the coordinate differences are typically $0.4$ pixel.
319:
320: Typical exposure times of one hour provide limiting magnitudes of
321: $m_{\rm{lim}}=25.2-26.8$ mag ($<m_{\rm{lim}}>_{\rm{median}}=26.0$ mag, $5\sigma, 2\farcs0\phi$).
322: The full-width-at-half-maxima (FWHM) of point spread function (PSF) were
323: $\theta=0\farcs52$-$1\farcs54$ ($<\theta>_{\rm{median}}=0\farcs70$, see Table \ref{tab:spcamobs})
324: \footnote{Pixel scale of Suprime-Cam is $0\farcs202$ pixel$^{-1}$.}.
325:
326: For our variability study, we used regions overlapping in all the epochs in each field.
327: Considering saturation and non-linearity of CCDs at high signal levels,
328: we excluded regions around bright objects to ensure reliable detection of object variability.
329: The total effective area is $0.918$ deg$^2$ (Table \ref{tab:surveyarea}) shown as
330: light gray and dark gray regions in Figure \ref{fig:sxdfimage2}.
331: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
332: \begin{figure}[htbp]
333: \begin{center}
334: \epsscale{.8}
335: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.40]{f1.eps}
336: \caption{The Suprime-Cam imaging fields (light gray and dark gray regions) in the SXDF,
337: superimposed XMM-Newton EPIC imaging fields (black solid line) and Spitzer IRAC imaging fields
338: (light gray region).
339: The coordinates are measured relative to the center of the SXDF,
340: ($02^{\rm{h}}18^{\rm{m}}00^{\rm{s}}$, -05:00:00) in J2000.0.
341: Our optically variable object survey has been carried out in
342: the entire Suprime-Cam fields over $0.918$ deg$^2$ except for regions around bright objects (white blanks).
343: The five pointings of the Suprime-Cam, SXDF-C, SXDF-N, SXDF-S, SXDF-E, and SXDF-W, are described.
344: \label{fig:sxdfimage2}}
345: \end{center}
346: \end{figure}
347: %\clearpage
348: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
349:
350: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
351: \subsection{Variability Detection}\label{sec:varidetect}
352: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
353: The Suprime-Cam images have different PSF size (and shape) in every epoch
354: because of time-varying atmospheric seeing.
355: Therefore, we can not measure variability of objects by simply comparing flux
356: within a fixed small aperture as \citet{sarajedini2000} and \citet{sarajedini2003}
357: did for the HST WFPC2 images.
358: \citet{cohen2006} used total magnitude for variability detections
359: in the images obtained with the Advanced Camera for Survey (ACS) on HST
360: because the PSF varied with locations on the CCDs of ACS.
361: Accurate photometry itself of any kind for extended objects is often difficult.
362: Since variable components are almost always point sources, the light from non-variable
363: extended components just increases the noise for variability detections.
364: Hence, we used an image subtraction method introduced by \citet{alard1998}
365: and developed by \citet{alard2000} instead of using total magnitudes of objects.
366: This subtraction method using space-varying convolution kernels,
367: which are obtained by fitting kernel solutions in small sub-areas,
368: enables us to match one image against another image with a different PSF.
369: We can then detect and measure variable objects in the subtracted images.
370: We applied this method for all the possible two pairs
371: \footnote
372: {
373: The number of the combinations is $_{N_{\rm{epoch}}}C_2$.
374: }
375: of the stacked images at different epochs
376: and detected variability of the objects in each field.
377: Figure \ref{fig:imsub} shows examples of the image subtration for three of the variable objects.
378: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
379: \begin{figure}[htbp]
380: \begin{center}
381: \epsscale{.8}
382: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.40]{f2.eps}
383: \caption{Examples of variability detection.
384: In each row, an image on a reference date, an image on another date,
385: and subtracted image are shown from left to right.
386: Variable objects are clearly seen as positive or negative residuals in the right panels.
387: All these three objects were spectroscopically identified.
388: The top object is a M dwarf star, the middle object is a broad-line AGN
389: at $z=2.150$, and the bottom object is a SN Ia at $z=0.606$.
390: The spectra and light curves are shown in the top row of Figure \ref{fig:specvaristar},
391: the third row of Figure \ref{fig:specagnvari},
392: and the bottom row of Figure \ref{fig:specsnvari}, respectively.
393: The box sizes are $20$''.
394: \label{fig:imsub}}
395: \end{center}
396: \end{figure}
397: %\clearpage
398: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
399:
400: We now describe details of the procedures for variability detection and
401: our definitions of variable objects.
402: First, we smoothed all the subtracted images with the PSFs and
403: detected positive and negative peaks of surface brightness in subpixel unit.
404: Then, in all the subtracted images, we selected objects whose aperture flux
405: in a fixed diameter of 2\farcs0 were above $5\sigma_{\rm{bf}}$
406: or below $-5\sigma_{\rm{bf}}$ of
407: the background fluctuations ($\sigma_{\rm{bf}}$) within the same aperture.
408: The background fluctuations $\sigma_{\rm{bf}}$ is obtained by calculating
409: the standard deviation of 2\farcs0 aperture flux in $\sim200$ places
410: around each positive or negative peak in the subtracted images.
411: We inspected these variable candidates visually to exclude candidates around mis-subtracted regions.
412: Second, we defined the central coordinates of the variable object candidates as the flux-weighted
413: averages of all the coordinates where significant variability were detected
414: in the subtracted images in the first procedure.
415: Third, we did 2\farcs0-diameter aperture photometry for all these variable object
416: candidates in the subtracted images, the reference images of which were an image
417: with the smallest PSF size in each
418: field\footnote{They are images obtained on 02/09/29 and 02/09/30 for all the fields.},
419: and scaled the aperture measurements to the total flux
420: assuming that the variable components were always point sources.
421: The factors to scale 2\farcs0 aperture flux to total flux were calculated as ratios
422: between 2\farcs0 aperture flux and total flux for point sources in each image
423: (typically $\sim1.1-1.3$).
424: We constructed total flux light curves of all the candidates and defined
425: optically variable objects as objects showing more than $5\sigma_{\rm{lc}}$
426: ($\sigma_{\rm{lc}}$: photometric errors in the light curves)
427: variability in at least one combination of the epochs in the light curves.
428: We note that some variable objects have unreliable photometric points in the light curves.
429: In the subtraction method, very slight offsets (even $\sim0.05$ pixel) for bright objects between two images
430: which are used for the subtraction could provide significant {\it dipole} subtractions.
431: When an object has both a positive peak above $5\sigma_{\rm{bf}}$ and a negative peak below $-5\sigma_{\rm{bf}}$
432: locally (around $\sim10$ pixel square) in a certain subtracted image
433: used to make the light curve,
434: the photometric point of the object at that epoch are regarded as unreliable.
435: These epochs were not used in evaluating variability.
436:
437: We followed these procedures for all the five fields.
438: Finally, we made an optically variable object catalog consisting of $1184$ objects
439: in the area of $0.918$ deg$^2$ ($1290$ variable objects deg$^{-2}$).
440: However, for widely spread galaxies or bright objects,
441: subtracted images are sometimes insecurely extended and show bumpy features
442: although saturated or non-linearity pixels were removed from the detections in advance.
443: Variability of these objects are considered marginal.
444: When we exclude such marginally variable objects, the number of variable objects is $1040$
445: ($1133$ variable objects deg$^{-2}$).
446: These $1040$ variable objects have $9236$ photometric points in their light curves,
447: and $359$ unreliablly measured photometric points ($3.9\%$) of $169$ objects were not used in evaluating variability.
448: In the following discussions, we use this secure sample of $1040$ variable objects.
449: We note that detection completeness is discussed in \S\ref{sec:completeness}.
450:
451: In principle, variability should be measured as changes of luminosity of objects.
452: To do so, it is necessary to measure total flux of variable objects.
453: However, this is possible only for point sources such as variable stars and quasars whose
454: luminosity is much larger than that of their host galaxies.
455: To measure variable
456: AGN separately from their host galaxies is difficult
457: using ground-based imaging data especially when the flux of variable object is faint
458: compared to the flux of the host.
459: We measure the flux of the variable component ($\Delta{f}\equiv f_1-f_2$) as describe above.
460: In this paper, we use variable component magnitudes
461: ($i'_{\rm{vari}}\equiv-2.5\log(|\Delta{f}|)+m_{\rm{zero}}$)
462: to describe object variability,
463: and we adopt the total magnitudes which are measured in the SXDF catalogs
464: as the magnitudes of host objects.
465:
466: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
467: \subsection{Assignment of Host Objects}\label{sec:assignhost}
468: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
469: In order to investigate how far the variable components are located from the centers
470: of possible host objects, and their properties such as magnitudes and colors in the catalogs,
471: we assigned host objects to all the variable objects.
472: In general, AGN and SNe have their host galaxies while variable stars have no host objects.
473: In this paper, we defined variable stars themselves as host objects
474: to treat all the variable objects equally.
475: We calculated projected distances of the variable components from the surrounding objects
476: in the stacked images taken when the variable objects were in the faintest phases,
477: and defined the nearest objects as the host objects.
478: The positions of the host objects were measured as peaks of surface brightness
479: of the images smoothed by the PSFs.
480: In the faintest phases of variable objects which may disappear (i.e. SNe),
481: host objects should be detected, but high-$z$ SNe which ocuur in diffuse galaxies
482: seem hostless in some cases.
483: Assigned host objects for such SNe may not be real host galaxies.
484: It is also possible that transient objects on faint host objects may have no equivalent
485: host objects in the SXDF catalogs because the SXDF $i'$-band images
486: for the catalogs were made by stacking all the exposures except for those in 2005.
487: Among $1040$ variable objects, the number of such objects, which do not have
488: equivalent objects in the SXDF catalogs, is $8$.
489: These possible transient objects may be hostless SNe and
490: are treated as SNe if their light curves satisfy
491: a criterion described in \S\ref{sec:criteriasnagn2}.
492: The number of the possible transient objects is small
493: and we do not exclude or discriminate them in most of
494: the following discussions.
495: In \S\ref{sec:overall_nc}, we discuss number densities of transient
496: objects, which are defined as objects not detected in their faint
497: phases; objects appear in some epochs at positions where there are no
498: objects detected in other epochs.
499: In this paper, the number of detections for each transient object
500: is not considered in the definition of transient objects.
501:
502: Information on host objects, such as total magnitudes and colors, is derived
503: from integrated images which were obtained
504: in various epochs in each band as shown in \citet{furusawa2007}
505: and they are averaged over the observational time spans.
506: Therefore, properties of objects are appropriate for statistical studies
507: and could be inaccurate if we focus on a certain object.
508:
509: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
510: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
511: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
512: \section{Additional Observational Data}\label{sec:addobs}
513: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
514: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
515: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
516: The SXDF project has carried out multi-wavelength observations from X-ray to radio
517: and follow-up optical spectroscopy.
518: In this paper, optical spectroscopic results and X-ray imaging data
519: are used to confirm the validity of our object classifications.
520: X-ray data is also used for evaluating the completeness of AGN variability detection.
521: We use mid-infrared imaging data
522: to classify optically variable objects in \S\ref{sec:objclass}.
523: In this section, we summarize these observations and cross-identifications of optically variable objects.
524: The summary of the X-ray and mid-infrared imaging data is given in Table \ref{tab:surveyarea}.
525:
526: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
527: \subsection{Optical Spectroscopy}\label{sec:optspec}
528: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
529: Since 2002, the follow-up optical spectroscopic observations have been conducted
530: with many telescopes and instruments
531: \citep*{yasuda2003,yamada2005,lidman2005,watson2005,ouchi2005a,ouchi2005b,yasuda2007}.
532: Instruments and telescopes used are
533: the Two-Degree Field (2dF) on the Anglo-Australian Telescope (AAT),
534: the Faint Object Camera And Spectrograph \citep[FOCAS;][]{kashikawa2002} on Subaru telescope,
535: the VIsible MultiObject Spectrograph \citep[VIMOS;][]{lefevre2003}, and
536: the FOcal Reducer/low dispersion Spectrograph 2 (FORS2) on Very Large Telescope (VLT),
537: the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph \citep[GMOS;][]{hook2004} on Gemini-North telescope,
538: and the Echellette Spectrograph and Imager \citep[ESI;][]{sheinis2002} on Keck-II telescope.
539: All the observations except for the Keck-II ESI, which is a high-dispersion
540: echellete spectrograph,
541: have been carried out in relatively low spectral resolution mode ($R\sim 500$).
542: Most of the spectroscopic observations were done in multi-object spectroscopy mode.
543:
544: Out of $1040$ variable objects, $119$ objects were targeted for spectroscopy.
545: Of these $119$ objects, $99$ objects were identified and the redshifts were determined.
546: The spectroscopic sample includes $3$ stars, $14$ host galaxies of SNe, $6$ of which are
547: spectroscopically identified as SNe Ia \citep*{lidman2005,yasuda2007},
548: $53$ broad-line AGN, $4$ \ion{[Ne}{5]} emitting galaxies and $25$ galaxies.
549: Strong \ion{[Ne}{5]} emission lines are only observed among AGN,
550: which emit strong ionizing photons above 97.2 eV,
551: and \ion{[Ne}{5]} emitting galaxies are considered to host AGN.
552: Other galaxies which appear to be normal galaxies also can host not only SNe but also AGN
553: because many AGN in our sample are faint compared to the host galaxies
554: so that the spectra may not show significant features of AGN origin.
555: The redshifts of $96$ extragalactic variable objects are $0.240<z<4.467$.
556: We show $11$ examples of the spectra obtained with FOCAS on Subaru and FORS2 on VLT
557: in Figure \ref{fig:specvaristar}, Figure \ref{fig:specagnvari}, and Figure \ref{fig:specsnvari}.
558: The top two rows of Figure \ref{fig:specvaristar} are those for M dwarf stars showing bursts in 2002
559: with red optical colors of $B-V=1.34$ and $1.36$.
560: The bottom row of Figure \ref{fig:specvaristar} is an early-type star with $B-V=0.44$.
561: We also show spectra of four broad-line AGN at $z=0.867$,
562: $1.066$, $2.150$, and $3.553$ in Figure \ref{fig:specagnvari},
563: and those of SN host galaxies at $z=1.239$, $0.505$, $0.517$, $0.606$ in Figure \ref{fig:specsnvari}.
564: The light curves are also shown in the figures.
565: The photometric points in these light curves are measured as differential flux in the subtracted images.
566: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
567: \begin{figure}[htbp]
568: \begin{center}
569: \epsscale{.8}
570: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.320]{f3.eps}
571: \caption{Spectra in arbitrary unit and light curves of three variable stars.
572: All the spectra were obtained with FOCAS on Subaru telescope.
573: The observational configurations were the 300B grism and SY47 order-sort filter for the top two
574: stars and the 150 grism and SY47 order-sort filter for the bottom star.
575: The top two rows are M dwarf stars with $B-V=1.34$ and $1.36$.
576: The bottom row is an early-type star with $B-V=0.44$.
577: The light curves of differential flux were plotted in filled circles in linear scale (in ADU)
578: because we can not plot magnitudes in their faintest phases.
579: The zeropoint is $34.02$ mag.
580: Unreliable photometric points are plotted in open circles.
581: \label{fig:specvaristar}}
582: \end{center}
583: \end{figure}
584: %\clearpage
585: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
586: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
587: \begin{figure}[htbp]
588: \begin{center}
589: \epsscale{.8}
590: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.320]{f4.eps}
591: \caption{Spectra in arbitrary unit and light curves of four extragalactic variable objects
592: which are classified as AGN based on their light curves and variable locations ({\it central variability}).
593: All the spectra were obtained with FOCAS on Subaru telescope.
594: The observational configurations were the 300B grism without any order-sort filters for the top and third
595: AGN and the 150 grism and SY47 order-sort filter for the second and bottom AGN.
596: The redshifts are $0.867$, $1.066$, $2.150$, and $3.553$, from top to bottom.
597: Dashed lines indicate detected emission and absorption lines.
598: The zeropoint the light curves is $34.02$ mag.
599: \label{fig:specagnvari}}
600: \end{center}
601: \end{figure}
602: %\clearpage
603: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
604: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
605: \begin{figure}[htbp]
606: \begin{center}
607: \epsscale{.8}
608: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.320]{f5.eps}
609: \caption{Spectra in arbitrary unit and light curves of four extragalactic variable objects.
610: The top three objects are classified as SNe based on their light curves and variable locations
611: ({\it offset variability}).
612: The bottom object was spectroscopically identified as a SN Ia, SN 2002km \citep{lidman2005},
613: but we can not determine
614: whether they are SNe or AGN because baselines of their light curves are not long enough
615: (see \S\ref{sec:criteriasnagn2}).
616: The top three objects were observed with FOCAS on Subaru telescope.
617: The observational configurations were the 150 grism without any order-sort filters for the top
618: and third objects,
619: and the 300B grism and SY47 order-sort filter for the second object.
620: The bottom object were observed with FORS2 on VLT
621: using the 300I grism and the OG590 order-sort filter
622: (see Figure A.32 in \citealt{lidman2005} for the SN component).
623: The redshifts are $1.239$, $0.505$, $0.517$, and $0.606$, from top to bottom.
624: Dashed lines indicate detected emission and absorption lines.
625: The zeropoint is $34.02$ mag.
626: \label{fig:specsnvari}}
627: \end{center}
628: \end{figure}
629: %\clearpage
630: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
631:
632: Since spectroscopic observations of variable objects were mainly targeted
633: for X-ray sources and high-$z$ SN candidates, the spectroscopic sample of
634: variable objects are biased for those classes of variable objects.
635: Therefore, we can not discuss much about fractions of variable objects
636: only from the spectroscopic sample.
637:
638: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
639: \subsection{X-ray Imaging}\label{sec:xraydata}
640: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
641: X-ray imaging observations in the SXDF were carried out
642: with the European Photon Imaging Camera (EPIC) on board XMM-Newton satellite.
643: They consist of one deep ($\sim100$ ks) pointing on the center of the SXDF and six shallower ($\sim50$ ks)
644: pointings at the surrounding regions.
645: In total, X-ray imaging covers most of the Suprime-Cam imaging fields
646: (see Figure \ref{fig:sxdfimage2}).
647: The details of the XMM-Newton EPIC observations, data analyses, and optical
648: identifications are described in \citet{ueda2007} and \citet{akiyama2007}.
649: The limiting fluxes are down to $1\times10^{-15}$ erg$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$
650: in the soft band (0.5-2.0 keV) and $3\times10^{-15}$ erg$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$
651: in the hard band (2.0-10.0 keV), respectively.
652:
653: In this paper, we use a sample which was detected with likelihood
654: larger than nine in either the soft or hard band and also within our variability survey fields.
655: After excluding objects in the regions not used for variability detection (Table \ref{tab:surveyarea}),
656: we have $481$ X-ray sources over $0.808$ deg$^2$
657: Among $936$ variable objects within the X-ray field, $172$ objects were detected in X-rays
658: ($165$ and $91$ objects detected in the soft and hard bands, respectively, see Table \ref{tab:surveyarea}).
659:
660: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
661: \subsection{Mid-Infrared Imaging}\label{sec:mirdata}
662: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
663: Mid-infrared imaging data in $3.6\mu$m, $4.5\mu$m, $5.8\mu$m, and $8.0\mu$m-bands with
664: the InfraRed Array Camera \citep[IRAC;][]{fazio2004} on Spitzer space telescope
665: were obtained in the SXDF as a part of the Spitzer Wide-area
666: InfraRed Extragalactic \citep*[SWIRE;][]{lonsdale2003,lonsdale2004} survey.
667: The IRAC data covers almost the entire Suprime-Cam field except for a part of SXDF-W.
668: The covered field is $0.889$ deg$^2$ ($97\%$ of the Suprime-Cam field) shown as gray regions in Figure \ref{fig:sxdfimage2}.
669: The reduced IRAC images were obtained from the SWIRE Archive and the catalogs were made by \citet{akiyama2007}.
670: They used the IRAC imaging data for optical identifications of X-ray sources.
671: In this paper, we use only the $3.6\mu$m-band data for the object classification in $\S$\ref{sec:objclass}.
672: The limiting magnitude is $\sim22.0$ mag (total flux, $5\sigma$ for point sources).
673: Among $1040$ variable objects, $1028$ objects are within the IRAC field
674: and $995$ objects are detected in the $3.6\mu$m-band (Table \ref{tab:surveyarea}).
675: Spatial resolution of the IRAC $3.6\mu$m-band is not high, $\sim1''$,
676: but we can assign IRAC identifications to almost all the optically variable objects with good accuracy.
677:
678: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
679: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
680: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
681: \section{Object Classification}\label{sec:objclass}
682: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
683: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
684: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
685: The variable object sample includes several classes of variable objects.
686: In this section, we classify these variable objects into variable stars,
687: SNe, and AGN using optical and mid-infrared imaging parameters.
688: The procedures described in \S\ref{sec:starselect} and \S\ref{sec:snagnseparate}
689: are summarized in a flow chart of Figure \ref{fig:classificationflowchart}.
690: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
691: \begin{figure}[htbp]
692: \begin{center}
693: \epsscale{.8}
694: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.38]{f6.eps}
695: \caption{Flow chart of object classification.
696: See the text in \S\ref{sec:starselect} and \S\ref{sec:snagnseparate} for details.
697: If an object satisfies a criterion at some point along the path,
698: it goes to the left; if not, to the right.
699: In the first criteria, the IRAC data is necessary,
700: so that we can classify variable objects in $97\%$ of the overall field.
701: The last criteria, using light curves for extragalactic objects,
702: requires time baselines over longer than three years,
703: and therefore only objects in the three fields, SXDF-C, SXDF-S, and SXDF-E can be classified.
704: \label{fig:classificationflowchart}}
705: \end{center}
706: \end{figure}
707: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
708:
709: We note again that the object photometric information is averaged
710: over the observational time spans, but its effect on our statistical
711: classifications and discussions is small even if objects are variable.
712:
713: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
714: \subsection{Star Selection}\label{sec:starselect}
715: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
716: We extracted variable stars from the variable object sample
717: using the Suprime-Cam optical imaging and the IRAC mid-infrared imaging data.
718: Since the IRAC data covers $97\%$ of the variability survey field in the SXDF,
719: we concentrate on the $1028$ variable objects in the overlapped region of $0.889$ deg$^2$
720: for the following discussions such as object classifications and number densities.
721: Star selection is based on the optical morphologies, optical magnitudes, optical colors,
722: and optical and mid-infrared colors of the variable objects.
723: We used total magnitudes in both optical and mid-infrared wavelengths to make this selection.
724:
725: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
726: \subsubsection{Criteria on Optical Morphology, Magnitude, and Color}\label{sec:criteriastar1}
727: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
728: First, we assigned to all the variable objects {\it morphological scores} ($m_{\rm score}=0-10$)
729: and {\it color scores} ($c_{\rm score}=0.00-1.00$)
730: using a method described in \citet{richmond2005}.
731: The {\it morphological scores} $m_{\rm score}$ were calculated based
732: on magnitude differences $\delta\equiv m_2-m_3$
733: between 2\farcs0 aperture magnitudes ($m_2$) and 3\farcs0 aperture magnitudes ($m_3$),
734: and the CLASS\_STAR values in all the five broad-bands from the SExtractor \citep{bartin1996} outputs
735: in the SXDF catalogs.
736: If an object has $0.10<\delta<0.20$, we add $1$ to $m_{\rm{score}}$.
737: If a CLASS\_STAR value of an object is larger than some value
738: (typically $0.90$, small variations from field to field)
739: we also add $1$ to $m_{\rm{score}}$.
740: The {\it color scores} $c_{\rm score}$ were assigned based on the distances from the stellar loci
741: in two color-color planes, $B-V$ versus $V-R$ and $V-R$ versus $R-i'$, using the SExtractor output IsophotMag.
742: The stellar loci were defined using colors of a small set of bright stars.
743: The color score represents the probability that each object is inside the stellar locus
744: in color-color space using a Monte Carlo approach.
745: A measure of the degree to which the colors of an object
746: (including their uncertainties) fall within the stellar locus at the
747: point of closest approach. Values range from $0.0$ (color is completely
748: outside the stellar locus) to $1.0$ (color is completely within the locus).
749: Objects with larger values for both scores are more likely to be stars,
750: and the most likely stars should have $m_{\rm score}\ge9$ and $c_{\rm score}\ge0.90$.
751: However, faint, red or blue stars are likely to have lower values
752: for both the scores because of the low signal-to-noise ratio of photometry in some bands.
753: In this classification, stars redder than G stars were not used for determining the stellar loci.
754: The reddest stellar locus is at $R-i'\sim1.7$.
755: Therefore, red stars with $R-i'>1.7$ can not have high values of $c_{\rm score}$
756: and we do not use $c_{\rm{score}}$ values for red stars with $R-i'>1.7$.
757: Galaxies with similar colors can contaminate into the sample.
758: However, they can be excluded by an optical-mid-infrared color selection described below.
759: Another problem is color differences of stars due to differences in their metallicity.
760: Bright stars used for determining the stellar loci are mainly disk stars,
761: while fainter stars are likely to belong to the halo population.
762: Color differences in $R-i'$ caused by the population difference appear at $R-i'>1.0$,
763: so, faint red stars with $R-i'>1.0$ tend to have low $c_{\rm{score}}$ values;
764: we decided to classify point-like objects with $R-i'>1.0$ as stars.
765: Hence, we first assigned stellar likelihood to all the variable objects
766: through five criteria using only optical photometric information,
767: \begin{itemize}
768: \item[a)] stars with $m_{\rm score}\ge9$ and $c_{\rm score}\ge0.90$ (point-like objects with stellar colors),
769: \item[b-1)] probable stars with $9>m_{\rm score}\ge6$ and $0.90>c_{\rm score}\ge0.60$
770: (less point-like objects with less stellar colors),
771: \item[b-2)] probable stars with $m_{\rm score}\ge9$ and $R-i'>1.0$ (point-like objects with red colors),
772: \item[c)] possible stars with $R-i'>1.7$ (objects with very red colors),
773: \item[d)] non-stellar objects which do not satisfy any criteria above. %, and
774: \end{itemize}
775: Objects satisfying one of the criteria, a), b-1), b-2), or c) are considered as stars.
776:
777: In order to check the validity of our star selections based on only optical imaging parameters,
778: we used a population synthesis model \citep[Besan\c{c}on model;][]{robin2003}.
779: We investigated the expected distributions of stars including non-variable stars in the SXDF
780: which were selected in the same criteria
781: in a $B-V$ versus $V$ color-magnitude diagram.
782: The distributions contain three sequences and two of them, sequences for younger
783: disk population and older halo population are reasonably duplicated by the model.
784: Another sequence of faint blue point-like objects has
785: almost the same distribution as more extended galaxies in this diagram.
786: Then, we concluded that these faint blue point-like objects are galaxies,
787: and adopted one more criterion, $B-V>0.08\times V-1.59$
788: (dashed line in the top panel of Figure \ref{fig:colorcolor}), to exclude them
789:
790: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
791: \subsubsection{Criteria on Optical-Mid-Infrared Color}\label{sec:criteriastar2}
792: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
793: Second, we investigated optical-mid-infrared colors of the variable objects
794: in a $R-i'$ versus $R-m_{3.6\mu\rm{m}}$ color-color plane.
795: As shown in previous studies on object distributions in optical and mid-infrared
796: color-color planes \citep*[][]{eisenhardt2004,rowanrobinson2005},
797: stars and galaxies are more distinctly separated in optical-mid-infrared
798: color-color planes than in purely optical color-color planes
799: because of the very different temperatures of stars and dust.
800: Figure \ref{fig:colorcolor} shows color-color diagrams of the variable objects
801: for $R-i'$ versus $i'-z'$ in the bottom left panel and
802: $R-i'$ versus $R-m_{3.6\mu\rm{m}}$ in the bottom right panel.
803: A galaxy sequence extends widely from bottom to top in the blue side of $R-i'$ colors
804: in the $R-i'$ versus $R-m_{3.6\mu\rm{m}}$ color-color plane
805: while stellar sequence shows sharp distribution below the line in the figure.
806: We defined variable objects satisfying a color criterion,
807: $R-m_{3.6\mu\rm m}<2.6\times(R-i')-0.5$, as stars.
808: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
809: \begin{figure}[htbp]
810: \begin{center}
811: \epsscale{.8}
812: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.30]{f7.eps}
813: \caption{
814: Color-color diagrams of variable objects in $R-i'$ versus $i'-z'$ (left panel)
815: and $R-i'$ versus $R-m_{3.6\mu\rm{m}}$ (right panel).
816: We plot all the variable objects in small gray triangles,
817: {\it probable stars} in large open circles, and {\it reliable stars} in large filled circles.
818: A criterion indicated in a dashed line in the top panel, $B-V>0.08\times V-1.59$,
819: is adopted to exclude point-like blue galaxies.
820: Dot-dashed line in the bottom right panel is a line separating stars and galaxies,
821: $R-m_{3.6\mu\rm{m}}=2.6\times(R-i')-0.5$.
822: A large ellipse indicates a region of SDSS quasar ($0.1<z<5.2$)
823: colors, $r-i:r-m_{3.6\mu\rm{m}}$,
824: in \citet{hatziminaoglou2005} and \citet{richards2006}.
825: \label{fig:colorcolor}}
826: \end{center}
827: \end{figure}
828: %\clearpage
829: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
830:
831: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
832: \subsubsection{Results of Star Selection}\label{sec:criteriastar3}
833: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
834: Finally, we combined two independent criteria for stars
835: and classified the variable objects into four categories;
836: \begin{itemize}
837: \item[1)] {\it reliable stars}: variable objects which are selected as stars a)
838: and have stellar optical-mid-infrared colors ($78$),
839: \item[2)] {\it probable stars}: variable objects which are selected as probable stars
840: b-1) or b-2) and have stellar optical-mid-infrared colors ($24$),
841: \item[3)] {\it possible stars}: variable objects which are selected as possible stars c)
842: and have stellar optical-mid-infrared colors ($5$),
843: \item[4)] {\it non-stellar objects}: variable objects which do not have stellar
844: optical-mid-infrared colors or are categorized in non-stellar objects d) ($921$).
845: \end{itemize}
846: All the objects in 1), 2), and 3) satisfy the optical color-magnitude critetion ($B-V>0.08\times V-1.59$).
847: The numbers of selected variable objects in each selection are given between parentheses.
848: In Figure \ref{fig:colorcolor}, filled circles show 1) {\it reliable stars} and
849: open circles show 2) {\it probable stars} and 3) {\it possible stars}.
850:
851: We have three spectroscopically identified variable stars; an early-type star and two M dwarf stars.
852: All these stars are securely classified as stars.
853: The early-type star and one M dwarf star are classified as 1) {\it reliable stars}.
854: Another M dwarf star is classified as a 2) {\it probable star} with a red color of $R-i'=1.14$,
855: a high {\it morphological score} of $m_{\rm score}=9$ (i.e. a point source), and
856: a low color score of $c_{\rm{score}}=0.34$.
857:
858: The stellar and galaxy sequences in the $R-i'$ versus $R-m_{3.6\mu\rm{m}}$ color-color
859: diagram join together around $R-i'\sim0.2$ and $R-m_{3.6\mu\rm{m}}\sim0$.
860: Objects in this region can be contaminated with galaxies.
861: There are several spectroscopically identified galaxies in the region,
862: although they are not recognized as stars due to their optical extended morphologies.
863: Point sources showing optical variability can be luminous quasars,
864: but optical-mid-infrared colors of quasars are red enough to be discriminated from stars.
865: All the 35 SDSS quasars at $0.2<z<3.7$ \citep{hatziminaoglou2005}
866: and 259 SDSS quasars at $0.1<z<5.2$ \citep{richards2006}
867: have redder optical-mid-infrared colors
868: ($r-m_{3.6\mu\rm{m}}>0.35$, shown as a large ellipse)
869: as well as quasars in our sample than stars with similar optical colors.
870: We also examined the robustness of star selections by comparing the star
871: count in $V$-band with that predicted by the Besan\c{c}on model.
872: Stars in the SXDF were selected from the catalogs in the same criteria as for the variable objects.
873: Star counts including {\it reliable stars}, {\it probable stars}, and {\it possible stars}
874: in the SXDF reasonably agree with the model prediction in $21<V<24$.
875: In the bottom right panel of Figure \ref{fig:colorcolor}. there can be seen several
876: $R-i>0.6$ point sources with stellar optical-mid-infrared colors and
877: low color scores $c_{\rm{score}}$ on the stellar sequence (gray circles below the dot-dashed line).
878: These low color scores $c_{\rm{score}}$ may derive from non-simultaneous observations
879: \footnote{For example, V-band observations have been mainly carried out after those in other broad bands
880: were almost finished \citep{furusawa2007}.} and their variability.
881: In this way, our classifications based on colors of objects could be inaccurate
882: because of non-simultaneous observations,
883: but many facts described above indicate that variable stars are securely selected
884: through the criteria with small contaminations and high completeness.
885: The {\it reliable stars}, {\it probable stars} and {\it possible stars}, $107$ objects
886: in total ($0.889$ deg$^2$, $120$ objects deg$^{-2}$),
887: make up our sample of variable stars in subsequent discussions.
888:
889: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
890: \subsection{SN/AGN Separation}\label{sec:snagnseparate}
891: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
892: After we selected variable stars,
893: we classified non-stellar variable objects into SNe and AGN based on two parameters from the optical imaging data:
894: the offset of the location of variable component from the host object and the light curve.
895:
896: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
897: \subsubsection{Criteria on Variable Location}\label{sec:criteriasnagn1}
898: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
899: First, we examined the offsets between the variable components and their host objects.
900: Variability should be observed at the centers of the host objects for AGN as well as stars,
901: while SNe can explode at any position relative to the host objects.
902: In order to estimate the errors of the locations of variable components for AGN,
903: we examined the offsets for optically variable X-ray sources.
904: Most of the X-ray sources are considered to be AGN.
905: Some of them can be stars emitting X-ray, but for our purposes, that is not a problem:
906: variable stars also should show variability at their centers.
907: Almost all of the X-ray detected variable objects ($\sim97\%$) have spatial offsets
908: below $1$ pixel ($0\farcs202$), and the offsets distribute with a scatter
909: of $\sigma_{\rm{offset,X-ray}}=0.29$ pixel.
910: We also examined offsets for simulated variable objects
911: used in calculations of detection completeness in \S\ref{sec:completeness},
912: and found that their offsets from the located positions range with a scatter of
913: $\sigma_{\rm{offset,sim}}=0.51$
914: pixel, slightly larger than that of X-ray sources.
915: We set the threshold between
916: {\it central variability} (variability at the central positions)
917: and {\it offset variability} (variability at the offset positions)
918: to $1.2$ pixel,
919: which is $3\sigma_{\rm{offset}}$ (using the average of these two error estimates).
920:
921: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
922: \subsubsection{Criteria on Light Curve}\label{sec:criteriasnagn2}
923: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
924: We also used light curves to discriminate SNe from AGN.
925: Bright phases where we detect object variability should be limited to
926: within one year for SNe for two reasons.
927: First, multiple SNe very rarely appear in a single galaxy within our observational baselines.
928: Second, any SNe should become fainter than our detection limit within one year after
929: the explosions in the observed frame.
930: SNe Ia, the brightest type except for hypernovae and some of type-IIn SNe, can be seen
931: at $z\sim1.4$ at our detection limit ($i'_{\rm{vari}}\sim25.5$ mag).
932: One year in the observed frame corresponds to five months in the rest frame
933: at $z=1.4$ due to the time dilation by cosmological redshift.
934: Therefore, SNe should fade by more than $4$ mag below the maximum brightness \citep[e.g.,][]{jha2006}.
935: This decrease of brightness is a minimum value of observed declining magnitudes of SNe
936: and is almost the same as the dynamic range of our detection for variability ($i'_{\rm{vari}}=20.5-25.5$ mag).
937: Hence, we defined objects which are at bright phases for less than one year,
938: and are stably faint in the remainder of the observations, as
939: ''objects with SN-like light curves''.
940: In order to apply this criterion for the variable objects,
941: it is necessary for light curves to cover more than three years at least.
942: In two fields (SXDF-N and SXDF-W), our images cover only two years, 2002 and 2003;
943: therefore, variable objects in these two fields can not be classified as like or unlike SNe.
944: Hence, we concentrate on the other three fields (SXDF-C, SXDF-S, and SXDF-E)
945: to discuss number densities of SNe and AGN based on robust classifications.
946: Among $693$ variable objects in these three fields, $619$ objects are classified as non-stellar objects.
947: Out of $619$ non-stellar variable objects, light curves of $27$ objects
948: cover only two years because of insecure subtractions in some epochs.
949: Therefore, we use $592$ objects in the following section when
950: separating SNe from AGN.
951: The number densities derived below can increase
952: by a factor of $1.05 (=619/592)$ to account for the objects lost to poor subtractions.
953: We also note that these criteria provide mis-classifications for objects with light curves of
954: poor signal-to-noise ratios.
955:
956: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
957: \subsubsection{Results of SN/AGN Separation}\label{sec:criteriasnagn3}
958: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
959: We combined these two criteria; the position offsets and the light curves,
960: and applied them for $592$ objects over $0.566$ deg$^2$ to classify variable objects as SNe and AGN.
961: Variable objects with significant ($>1.2$ pixel) offsets and SN-like light curves
962: (case 1: $158$ objects) are highly likely to be SNe, while those with small
963: ($\leq1.2$ pixel) offsets and non-SN-like light curves
964: (case 2: $228$ objects) are highly likely to be AGN.
965: There are no clear contaminations in each case in our sample;
966: we have no X-ray sources or spectroscopically identified broad-line AGN classified as case 1,
967: and also have no SNe with spectroscopic identifications or
968: spectroscopic redshift determinations of their host galaxies in \citet{yasuda2007} classified as case 2.
969:
970: Objects with small offsets and SN-like light curves
971: (case 3: $160$ objects) or significant offsets and non-SN-like light curves
972: (case 4: $46$ objects) are hard to judge.
973: In our time samplings and baselines, AGN can be classified as SNe in terms of light curves
974: and objects in case 3 can be either SNe or AGN.
975: Out of $14$ SNe with spectroscopic identifications or spectroscopic redshift determinations
976: of their host galaxies,
977: $8$ objects are classified as case 1 (significant offsets and SN-like light curves)
978: and $5$ objects are classified as case 3 (small offsets and SN-like light curves).
979: Only 1 object are classified as case 4 (significant offsets and non-SN-like light curves)
980: probably because the variable component of this object is the faintest
981: among these $14$ SNe ($i'_{\rm{vari}}=25.3$mag).
982: Through our criterion for offsets of variability, $36\%\ (=5/14)$ of SNe are recognized
983: as {\it central variability}, although spectroscopic observations for SNe should be biased
984: to {\it offset variability} to avoid AGN.
985: If we use this ratio, about $88\ (=158\times5/9)$ of $160$ objects in case 3
986: are considered to be SNe.
987: On the other hand, among $644$ variable objects in these fields whose light curves
988: covering longer than three years, the number of X-ray sources is $128$.
989: Out of $128$ optically variable X-ray sources -- which we believe are AGN --
990: $89$ objects are in case 2, $37$ objects are in case 3, $1$ object is in case 1,
991: and $1$ object is in case 4.
992: Thus, $30\%\ (=(37+1)/128)$ of AGN have SN-like light curves.
993: If we assume that this same fraction of all AGN have SN-like light curves,
994: then about $96\ (=228\times(37+1)/(89+1))$ of $160$ objects in case 3 are considered to be AGN.
995: The expected total number of these SNe and AGN in case 3 is $184\ (=88+96)$ and
996: reasonably consistent with the real number ($160$) in case 3.
997: Hence, we made number densities of SNe and AGN by scaling those for well-classified samples
998: (case 1 for SNe and case 2 for AGN) by factors of $14/8$ for SNe and $128/89$ for AGN,
999: as shown in Figure \ref{fig:varinum_time1} for the host object magnitudes and
1000: Figure \ref{fig:nc_varicomp} for the variable component magnitudes.
1001: We discuss these figures in \S\ref{sec:overall_nc}.
1002: We obtained these number densities of $489$ and $579$ objects deg$^{-2}$
1003: for SNe and AGN, respectively.
1004:
1005: Nature of objects in case 4 is mysterious.
1006: We have only two spectroscopic data for objects in case 4 and both of the two spectra
1007: indicate that they are normal galaxies at $z\sim0.5$.
1008: Their offsets from the centers of the host objects are significant.
1009: The light curves have marginal parameters around the threshold between those of SN-like light curves and
1010: non-SN-like light curves, and they may be misclassified as non-SN-like light curves due to measurement errors.
1011: On the other hand, only one object in case 4 is detected in X-ray.
1012: This object and some others have offsets from the centers of their host galaxies
1013: just above the threshold ($1.2$ pixel).
1014: Another possible reason why some objects are classified as case 4 is
1015: misidentifications of the host objects due to their faintness.
1016: Such objects might be also transient objects.
1017: The number of objects in case 4 is not large and we do not include them for discussions of number densities.
1018:
1019: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1020: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1021: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1022: \section{Detection Completeness of Optically Variable Objects}\label{sec:completeness}
1023: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1024: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1025: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1026: We intensively studied two types of completeness in this paper.
1027: One is completeness of variability detection itself, which should be
1028: functions of PSF sizes and background noise of the images, and
1029: should be independent of properties of object variability.
1030: Another completeness depends on behaviors of object variability and observational time samplings.
1031: It is not easy to estimate this type of completeness because properties of variability
1032: are complicated and differ from object to object.
1033:
1034: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1035: \subsection{Variability Detection Completeness}\label{sec:detectionitself}
1036: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1037: The first type of completeness is simply estimated
1038: by locating artificial variable objects (point sources with PSFs of the same size as those in the real images)
1039: randomly in the stacked images using the {\it artdata} task in IRAF,
1040: and detecting them in the same manner as for the real images.
1041: Three examples
1042: are shown in Figure \ref{fig:completeness}.
1043: We can almost completely detect variable objects whose flux differences in magnitude unit
1044: are brighter than $\sim25.0-25.4$ mag.
1045: The cut-offs at the bright ends around $i'_{\rm{vari}}=20.0-20.5$ mag are caused by masking bright objects
1046: to avoid false detections of variability.
1047: The detection completeness decreases down to zero at $i'_{\rm{vari}}\sim26.0-26.3$ mag.
1048: The shapes of completeness curves are similar for all the subtracted images,
1049: although there are slight offsets in magnitude axis due to differences of
1050: limiting magnitudes of the stacked images.
1051: The completeness is almost uniform in the whole regions of the subtracted images
1052: where we investigate object variability.
1053:
1054: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1055: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1056: \begin{center}
1057: \epsscale{.8}
1058: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.3640]{f8.eps}
1059: \caption{Detection completeness of variable objects as a function of variable component
1060: magnitude $i'_{\rm{vari}}$ calculated by adding artificial objects in the images
1061: and detecting them in the same manner as for the real images.
1062: Three cases are shown in the figure.
1063: The limiting magnitudes of the images before subtractions are given between the top parentheses
1064: and drawn in dot-dashed lines.
1065: FWHM of PSF are also described between the bottom parentheses.
1066: Cut-offs at bright magnitudes are caused by masking bright objects
1067: in order that our detection are not affected by saturation or non-linearity of the CCD pixel.
1068: \label{fig:completeness}}
1069: \end{center}
1070: \end{figure}
1071: %\clearpage
1072: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1073: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1074: \subsection{Detection Completeness for Variable Stars, SNe, and AGN}\label{sec:completenessstaragn}
1075: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1076: Variability detection completeness depends on shapes of light curves of variable objects
1077: and observational time samplings.
1078: We want to know detection completeness for each class of variable objects.
1079: It is difficult to do so for objects showing burst-like variability
1080: such as dwarf stars, SNe, and AGN, while we can easily simulate light
1081: curves of pulsating variable stars showing periodic variability.
1082: AGN optical variability has been often characterized by the structure function
1083: \citep*{kawaguchi1998,hawkins2002,devries2003,vandenberk2004,devries2005,sesar2006},
1084: and we can simulate AGN light curves to estimate the detection completeness.
1085: Hence, we consider two types of simulated light curves; periodic variability for
1086: pulsating variable stars and variability characterized by the structure functions
1087: for AGN and estimate completeness.
1088: We also evaluate variability detection efficiency using real light curves and the X-ray source sample for AGN.
1089:
1090: In our time samplings and depths, SNe Ia up to $z\sim1.4$ can be detected in efficiency of a few tens of percent.
1091: Detection efficiency of SNe will be examined in detail in our following paper on SN rate.
1092:
1093: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1094: \subsubsection{Periodic Variability}\label{sec:period}
1095: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1096: Detection completeness for pulsating variable stars whose variability are
1097: periodic is easily calculated.
1098: Simulated light curves are parameterized by magnitude amplitudes $A=0.0-1.0$ mag,
1099: periods $T=0.01-20000$ days, and averaged magnitudes $m_0=21-26$ mag
1100: \footnote{Light curves are expressed as $m(t)=\frac{A}{2}\sin(2\pi t/T)+m_0$.}.
1101: We have roughly two types of time baselines of observations,
1102: and then we show the completeness for the two fields,
1103: SXDF-C with observations from 2002 to 2005, and SXDF-N with those from 2002 to 2003,
1104: in Figure \ref{fig:complvari_1}.
1105: There are slight differences between the detection completeness for the two fields,
1106: but, both the completeness are almost the same on the whole.
1107: In all the five fields, some dark spikes indicating low sensitivity to those periods
1108: can be seen because our observations have been carried out only in fall.
1109: The completeness is a strong function of magnitudes and amplitudes.
1110: We can detect only variable stars with large amplitudes ($A>0.4$ mag) for faint stars of $i'>24$ mag.
1111: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1112: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1113: \begin{center}
1114: \epsscale{.8}
1115: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.30]{f9a.eps}
1116: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.30]{f9b.eps}
1117: \caption{Detection completeness for variable objects showing periodic variability with periods $T$,
1118: amplitude $A$, and averaged magnitude $m_0$ in SXDS-C (10 epochs from 2002 to 2005, upper 6 panels)
1119: and SXDS-N (8 epochs from 2002 to 2003, lower 6 panels).
1120: \label{fig:complvari_1}}
1121: \end{center}
1122: \end{figure}
1123: %\clearpage
1124: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1125:
1126: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1127: \subsubsection{AGN Variability}\label{sec:variagn}
1128: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1129: Unlike pulsating stars, AGN usually show burst-like variability aperiodically.
1130: Behaviors of AGN variability depends on rest-frame wavelength.
1131: Generally, AGN variability are larger in shorter wavelength.
1132: Considering the time dilation of cosmological redshift,
1133: detection efficiency of AGN by optical variability in a certain
1134: broad band, in $i'$-band in this study, is not clear.
1135: To the zeroth approximation, effects of wavelength dependence and time dilation
1136: are cancelled each other.
1137:
1138: Quasar variability has been often described in the form of the structure function,
1139: \begin{eqnarray}
1140: SF(\Delta{t}){\equiv}\left[{\sum}\left\{m(t+{\Delta}t)-m(t)\right\}^2
1141: /N(\Delta{t})\right]^{0.5},
1142: \end{eqnarray}
1143: where $N(\Delta{t})$ is the number of objects with time intervals of $\Delta{t}$.
1144: As far as we focus on time scales of months to several years (not several decades),
1145: a power-law form of the structure functions, $SF(\Delta{t})=(\Delta{t}/\tau_0)^\gamma$,
1146: parameterized by a characteristic time scale of variability, $\tau_0$,
1147: and a power-law slope, $\gamma$, is well fitted to observational data.
1148: The structure functions begin to show a turnover around the rest-frame time lag of a few years
1149: and this power-law approximation slightly overestimates the variability \citep*{ivezic2004b,devries2005,sesar2006}.
1150: However, our observational data span over only three years at longest in observed frame
1151: and this simplification is good enough for our estimation of AGN detection completeness.
1152: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1153: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1154: \begin{center}
1155: \epsscale{.8}
1156: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.30]{f10a.eps}
1157: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.30]{f10b.eps}
1158: \caption{Detection completeness for variable objects whose variability are characterized
1159: by the structure functions
1160: in SXDS-C (10 epochs from 2002 to 2005, upper 6 panels)
1161: and SXDS-N (8 epochs from 2002 to 2003, lower 6 panels).
1162: Typical values of $\gamma$ and $\tau_0$ for quasars are $0.2$ and $6\times10^5$ days, respectively,
1163: these values are plotted as stars.
1164: \label{fig:complvari_3}}
1165: \end{center}
1166: \end{figure}
1167: %\clearpage
1168: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1169:
1170: The slope of structure function provides us important keys to the origin of their variability
1171: \citep{hughes1992,hawkins1996,kawaguchi1998,hawkins2002};
1172: accretion disk instability \citep{rees1984},
1173: bursts of SN explosions \citep{terlevich1992},
1174: and microlensing \citep{hawkins2002}.
1175: Therefore, the slope of structure function has been investigated in many previous studies.
1176: Monitoring observations of Palomar-Green (PG) quasars \citep*[][]{giveon1999,hawkins2002} and variability
1177: studies of enormous number of SDSS quasars between SDSS imaging data and older plate imaging data
1178: \citep*{devries2003,devries2005,sesar2006}, or SDSS spectrophotometric data
1179: \citep{vandenberk2004} set constraints on characteristic behaviors of variability.
1180: They obtained slopes of $\gamma\sim0.2$.
1181: We simulated light curves satisfying the structure functions
1182: with $5\times10^4<\tau_0<1\times10^6$ days and $0.05<\gamma<0.6$
1183: for averaged apparent magnitudes $m_0=21-26$ mag for AGN components,
1184: and calculated detection completeness in our observational time samplings.
1185: We show results in Figure \ref{fig:complvari_3} for two cases
1186: (4-year baseline for SXDF-C, -S, and -E and 2-year baseline for SXDF-N and -W)
1187: done for periodic variability in \S\ref{sec:period}.
1188: Values of the slope obtained in previous studies indicate that
1189: main origin of AGN optical variability is accretion disk instability or microlensing
1190: and the typical values of $\tau_0$ and $\gamma$
1191: are $\sim6\times10^5$ days and $\sim0.2$ in observed frame, respectively,
1192: which are indicated as stars in Figure \ref{fig:complvari_3}.
1193: These values were derived from observations in bands bluer than $i'$-band which is used in this work.
1194: In $i'$-band, it is expected that $\gamma$ stays roughly constant and $\tau_0$ become slightly larger.
1195: Determination errors of $\tau_0$ and $\gamma$ are not small here
1196: and we infer that the completeness for our data is not less than $\sim50\%$ for $m_0<24$ mag.
1197:
1198: The detection completeness for quasars were also estimated using observational light curves
1199: of $42$ PG quasars in $B$ and $R$-bands over seven years obtained by \citet{giveon1999}.
1200: The photometric points were well sampled and their observational time baselines are much longer than ours.
1201: They lacked time samplings in time scales of days and we interpolated the light curves.
1202: Their quasars are at relatively low redshift ($0.061<z<0.371$) with luminosity of $-26.3<M_B<-21.7$ mag.
1203: The well-sampled light curves are very useful for calculating the completeness in our survey.
1204: In our estimations of the detection completeness, we assume the photometric errors of our surveys
1205: considering the time dilation and dependence of variability on rest-frame wavelength which was indicated
1206: in \citet{vandenberk2004} using the SDSS quasars.
1207: Variability depends on rest-frame wavelength that quasars are
1208: about twice as variable at $1000$\AA\ as at $6000$\AA\ as shown in their Equation 11
1209: \footnote{variability $v(\lambda) \rm{[mag]}=0.616\exp(-\lambda/988\rm{\AA})+0.164$.} and Figure 13.
1210: We obtained detection completeness curves as a function of observed $i'$-band magnitude as shown in Figure \ref{fig:complvari_giveon1999varidep}.
1211: From top left to bottom right, the redshifts are $z=0$, $1$, $2$, $3$, $4$, and $5$.
1212: The results for the two fields, SXDF-C from 2002 to 2005 and SXDF-N from 2002 to 2003, are plotted.
1213: There are some differences between these cases and the longer baselines give us higher completeness.
1214: In this simulation, our detection completeness for AGN is down to zero at $\sim24.5-25.0$ mag.
1215: Redshift dependence of the completeness are very small due to cancellation of time dilation and
1216: dependence of variability on rest-frame wavelength.
1217: We note that dependence of variability on AGN luminosity are not considered.
1218: In our detection limit, we can observe Seyfert-class AGN at low redshift and
1219: our estimates of completeness here may be lower limits for them
1220: because of the anti-correlation between AGN luminosity and variability.
1221: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1222: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1223: \begin{center}
1224: \epsscale{.8}
1225: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.344]{f11.eps}
1226: \caption{Detection completeness for $42$ PG quasars using real light curves over seven years
1227: obtained by \citet{giveon1999}.
1228: In the cases of objects at $z=0$, $1$, $2$, $3$, $4$, and $5$,
1229: we calculated the detection completeness considering cosmological time dilation
1230: and variability dependence on rest-frame wavelength \citep{vandenberk2004}.
1231: We show the results for time samplings in SXDF-C in open circles and
1232: for those in SXDF-N in filled triangles.
1233: The fitted lines are $1/[1+a\times\exp\{({\rm{mag}}-b)/c\}$, parameterized by $a$, $b$, and $c$.
1234: \label{fig:complvari_giveon1999varidep}}
1235: \end{center}
1236: \end{figure}
1237: %\clearpage
1238: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1239:
1240: Optical variability of $172$ X-ray sources are detected, while
1241: we have $481$ X-ray sources in our variability survey field.
1242: The fraction of objects showing optical variability among X-ray sources is $36\pm2\%$.
1243: All of the X-ray detected variable objects are brighter than $i'=24.4$ mag.
1244: Then, we also limit X-ray sources to those with $i'<24.4$ mag, the number is $334$.
1245: Simply assuming that all the X-ray sources can show large variability enough to
1246: be detected, the detection completeness for X-ray sources is $51\pm3\%$.
1247: \citet{vandenberk2004} found that X-ray detected quasars show larger variability
1248: than quasars which are not detected in X-ray.
1249: This tendency is true for our sample;
1250: X-ray brighter sources show larger optical variability
1251: than X-ray fainter sources in a certain optical magnitude.
1252: Variable objects not detected
1253: in X-ray should have lower completeness than variable objects detected in X-ray.
1254: Some of the X-ray sources are type-2 populations whose optical variability are
1255: more difficult
1256: to be detected given the unified scheme of AGN and
1257: detection completenss of type-1 AGN can be higher than these estimates.
1258:
1259: These three estimations of detection completeness for AGN are roughly consistent with each other
1260: and strongly depend on apparent magnitudes as well as that for pulsating variability.
1261: Inferred completeness is $\sim1$ at $i'\sim21$ mag and slowly decreases down to zero at $i'=24-25$ mag
1262: with uncertainty of a factor of a few.
1263:
1264: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1265: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1266: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1267: \section{Overall Sample}\label{sec:overall_nc}
1268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1269: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1270: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1271: We found $1040$ variable objects including possible transient objects
1272: in $i'$-band in the SXDF down to
1273: variable component magnitudes of $i'_{\rm{vari}}\sim25.5$ mag.
1274: In the top left panel of Figure \ref{fig:varinum_time1}, the number densities $N$
1275: of all the detected variable objects are shown
1276: as a function of time interval $\Delta{t}$ of observations
1277: when we compare only two separated images.
1278: We also draw a line fitted in the form of
1279: $N(\Delta{t})=a[1-\exp\{-b(\Delta{t})^c\}]$ %\footnote{Parameters are $a,b$,and $c$.}.
1280: Number densities as a function of $\Delta{t}$ for SNe are expected to bend over
1281: at a certain time interval because variability time scales of SNe are roughly common to each other,
1282: a few months, in rest-frame.
1283: Then, we introduce such function forms for all the kinds of variable objects.
1284: Detection limits for variable objects are slightly different for each combination
1285: of observational epochs and it can affect obtained number densities.
1286: Then, we also show number densities of variable objects with variable components
1287: brighter than $25.0$ mag in the right panels.
1288: Monotonic increases of number densities in observed frame
1289: indicate that objects showing variability in time scales of years are
1290: dominant in this magnitude range (and in the SXDF direction; the Galactic halo).
1291: The number densities for variable stars are shown
1292: in the second row, SNe in the third row, and AGN in the bottom row
1293: after classifying variable objects in $\S$\ref{sec:objclass}.
1294: Variable objects for calculating number densities used in this figure are $644$ objects with light curves
1295: in long baselines from 2002 to 2005 enough to discriminate SNe from AGN, and are within the IRAC field.
1296: These SN and AGN number densities are corrected for case 3 objects.
1297: Typical time scales of variability are from days to months for variable stars and SNe
1298: while AGN show variability in time scales of months to years \citep[e.g.,][]{vandenberk2004}.
1299: The flat distributions for variable stars indicate that
1300: stars showing variability in short time scales are mainly included in the sample.
1301: The SN number densities arrive at plateau in time scales of about a few months as expected from
1302: time scales of SN light curves.
1303: On the other hand, significant increases towards time scales of years are seen for AGN.
1304: Fitted lines for AGN in the same form of function as for SNe show possible turnovers
1305: at $\Delta{t}\sim1000$ days.
1306: Results of SDSS quasars \citep{ivezic2003} indicated turnovers of structure functions
1307: at $\Delta{t}\sim1000$ days in rest-frame and these possible turnovers in our results
1308: may be real.
1309: These results indicate that long time baselines of years make the completeness
1310: significantly higher only for AGN.
1311: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1312: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1313: \begin{center}
1314: \epsscale{.8}
1315: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.384]{f12.eps}
1316: \caption{Number densities of variable objects as a function of
1317: time intervals of $\Delta{t}$ in $i'$-band imaging observations.
1318: We plot them for objects showing variability above $5\sigma_{\rm{lc}}$ in the left column,
1319: objects with variable component magnitude $i'_{\rm{vari}}$ brighter than $25.0$ mag in the right column.
1320: These points are fitted in the form of $N=a\times\exp\{-b(\Delta{t})^c\}$ (solid lines).
1321: The fitted line in the top left panel is shown in gray lines in every panel as a reference.
1322: \label{fig:varinum_time1}}
1323: \end{center}
1324: \end{figure}
1325: %\clearpage
1326: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1327:
1328: We show the number densities of variable objects as a function of
1329: variable component magnitude $i'_{\rm{vari}}$
1330: in the left column of Figure \ref{fig:nc_varicomp}.
1331: Number densities after classifying variable objects into variable stars,
1332: SNe, and AGN in three time scales, $\Delta{t}<10$ days in the second column,
1333: $10<\Delta{t}<50$ days in the third column,
1334: $50<\Delta{t}<200$ days in the fourth column,
1335: and $\Delta{t}>200$ days in the right column, are also plotted.
1336: All the number densities drop around $i'_{\rm{vari}}\sim25$ mag and
1337: our variability detections are reasonably consistent with simulated
1338: completeness as shown in Figure \ref{fig:completeness}.
1339: In the bottom row of Figure \ref{fig:nc_varicomp}, the number densities of
1340: transient objects are plotted.
1341: %Transient objects are defined as objects which are not detected in the faint phases;
1342: %objects appear in some epochs at positions where there are no objects detected in other epochs.
1343: By definition of transient objects (see \S\ref{sec:objclass}) ,
1344: variable component magnitudes of them
1345: correspond to total magnitudes in their brighter phases.
1346: The transient object sample can include not only objects showing
1347: transient phenomena such as flare-ups of
1348: faint dwarf stars but also less slowly moving Kuiper belt objects
1349: than $\omega\sim1''$ hour$^{-1}$ (a typical value of seeing size per
1350: exposure time for each stacked image), corresponding to a semimajor
1351: axis of $>100$ AU.
1352: These estimates of numbers of variable objects provide us the expected numbers of variable objects
1353: contaminated into interested samples using non-simultaneous observational data.
1354: For example, \citet{iye2006} and \citet{ota2007} investigated
1355: the possibility of variable object contaminations
1356: into their LAE sample at $z\sim7.0$ in the Subaru Deep Field \citep[SDF;][]{kashikawa2004},
1357: which were obtained comparing broad-band imaging data taken before 2004
1358: with narrow-band NB973 imaging data in 2005.
1359: From the bottom row of Figure \ref{fig:nc_varicomp}, a few or less
1360: than one objects in the SDF ($\sim0.3$ deg$^2$)
1361: can be just transient objects and misclassified as narrow-band excess objects in their sample.
1362: Their plausible candidates with narrow-band excess are two.
1363: One of them were spectroscopically identified and turned out to be a real LAE at $z=6.94$.
1364: Spectroscopic identification for another candidate should be done.
1365: Whether this candidate is a real LAE or not, the number of narrow-band excess objects they found is
1366: consistent with expected number from the statistics of number densities of transient objects.
1367: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1368: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1369: \begin{center}
1370: \epsscale{.8}
1371: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.33124]{f13.eps}
1372: \caption{Number densities of variable objects as a function of variable component magnitude $i'_{\rm{vari}}$.
1373: We plot those for all the variable objects in the top row,
1374: variable stars in the second row,
1375: SNe in the third row, and AGN in the bottom row, respectively.
1376: Number densities in each time scale, $\Delta{t}<10$ days in the second column,
1377: $10<\Delta{t}<50$ days in the third column,
1378: $50<\Delta{t}<200$ days in the fourth column,
1379: and $\Delta{t}>200$ days in the right column,
1380: as well as in the case using all the observational data in the left column, are also plotted.
1381: Number densities of possible transient objects are shown in the bottom row.
1382: \label{fig:nc_varicomp}}
1383: \end{center}
1384: \end{figure}
1385: %\clearpage
1386: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1387:
1388: The fractions of variable objects to the overall objects in the SXDF are shown
1389: in Figure \ref{fig:fracvari}.
1390: Magnitudes used in this figure are the total magnitudes of host objects.
1391: About $5\%$ of objects at $i'\sim21$ mag show optical variability,
1392: and the fractions rapidly decrease towards fainter magnitudes.
1393: These declines are caused by detection limit for variability.
1394: Large variability relative to the host objects are necessary to be detected for faint objects.
1395: Almost all of objects in the SXDF are galaxies, not stars (the fraction of stars is $\sim4\%$).
1396: Then, the fraction of variable AGN is $\sim3\%$ around $i'\sim21$ mag,
1397: where the detection completeness is $\sim1$.
1398: \citet{sarajedini2006} found that $2.6\%$ of galaxies have variable nuclei
1399: down to $V_{\rm{nuc}}<27.0$ mag without completeness corrections
1400: using two-epoch observations separated by seven years.
1401: Their fraction is consistent with ours.
1402: \citet{cohen2006} also used four-epoch ACS imaging data in time baselines of three months
1403: down to $V_{\rm{total}}<28$ mag and detected variability of $\sim1\%$ of galaxies.
1404: This small percentage in \citet{cohen2006} is consistent with ours
1405: if we consider their short time baselines because most of AGN vary in brightness in longer time scales
1406: of years as shown in Figure \ref{fig:varinum_time1}.
1407: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1408: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1409: \begin{center}
1410: \epsscale{.8}
1411: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.3741]{f14.eps}
1412: \caption{Fractions of all the variable objects to the whole objects in the SXDF
1413: as functions of $i'$-band magnitude, $B-V$, and $R-i'$ colors in the top row.
1414: Fractions after classifying variable objects are also plotted in the second, third, and bottom rows.
1415: \label{fig:fracvari}}
1416: \end{center}
1417: \end{figure}
1418: %\clearpage
1419: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1420:
1421: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1422: \section{Variable Stars}\label{sec:varistar}
1423: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1424: The sample of variable stars used in this section includes $153$ objects
1425: which were classified as 1) {\it reliable stars}, 2) {\it probable stars},
1426: and 3) {\it possible stars} in \S\ref{sec:starselect}.
1427: The top panels of Figure \ref{fig:colormaghist} show color-magnitude diagrams
1428: of $i'$ versus $R-i'$ in the left panel and $V$ versus $B-V$ in the right panel
1429: for variable stars (black circles) and non-variable stars in the SXDF (gray dots).
1430: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1431: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1432: \begin{center}
1433: \epsscale{.8}
1434: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.34]{f15.eps}
1435: \caption{Top panels show distributions of variable objects (black circles) in color-magnitude
1436: diagrams, $V$ versus $B-V$ in the left panel and $i'$ versus $R-i'$ in the right panel.
1437: Non-variable stars are also shown in gray dots.
1438: The criterion for excluding contaminations of galaxies, $B-V>0.08\times V-1.59$,
1439: is drawn in a dotted line in the $V$ versus $B-V$ diagram.
1440: Number counts and fractions of variable objects for $i'$ and $V$ magnitudes are shown
1441: in the second and third rows, respectively.
1442: \label{fig:colormaghist}}
1443: \end{center}
1444: \end{figure}
1445: %\clearpage
1446: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1447: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1448: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1449: \begin{center}
1450: \epsscale{.8}
1451: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.34]{f16.eps}
1452: \caption{Histograms of numbers of variable objects are shown in the upper panels.
1453: The fractions are also plotted in the lower panels.
1454: The left column is for $R-i'$ color and the right column is for $B-V$ color.
1455: \label{fig:colormaghist2}}
1456: \end{center}
1457: \end{figure}
1458: %\clearpage
1459: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1460: These non-variable stars are selected through the same criteria as for the variable stars.
1461: Number counts and fractions of variable stars are also plotted in the rows below.
1462: Figure \ref{fig:colormaghist2} shows color distributions and fractions of variable stars
1463: for $R-i'$ and $B-V$.
1464: The number count in $i'$-band has a relatively steep peak at $i'\sim21.5$ mag
1465: and decreases towards fainter magnitudes.
1466: This cut-off is partly caused by the variability detection limit.
1467: The dot-dashed lines indicated in the left columns of Figure \ref{fig:colormaghist}
1468: are total magnitudes of objects with variable components of the detection limit, $i'_{\rm{vari}}\sim25.5$ mag,
1469: in the cases of variability amplitudes of $0.05$, $0.1$, and $0.3$ mag from left to right.
1470: Thus, limiting magnitudes can be as shallow as $\sim22.2$ mag for
1471: variable objects with low variability amplitudes of $\sim0.05$ mag.
1472: Poor time samplings of our observations prevent us from determining
1473: amplitudes of variability in cases of periodic variability.
1474: Assuming that amplitudes roughly equal to magnitude differences of
1475: objects between their maxima and minima in our samplings,
1476: amplitudes of almost all of variable stars are less than $0.1$ mag as shown in Figure \ref{fig:amplstar}.
1477: These variable stars with low amplitudes can be detected above $\sim22.2$ mag.
1478: Variable stars with larger amplitudes can be detected for fainter stars.
1479: The top right panel of Figure \ref{fig:amplstar} clearly
1480: indicates this tendency of variability selection effects.
1481:
1482: Bimodal distributions are clearly seen in the figures of color-magnitude diagrams (Figure \ref{fig:colormaghist})
1483: and color distributions (Figure \ref{fig:colormaghist2});
1484: there are two populations of blue bright ($V\sim22$ mag) variable stars
1485: and red faint ($V\sim23.5$ mag) variable stars.
1486: From comparison with the Besan\c{c}on model prediction, stars in the upper sequence
1487: belong to the thick disk populations rather than thin disk
1488: because stellar sequence of the thin disk is expected to be redder than
1489: the observed sequence by $B-V$ of $\sim0.3$.
1490: The red variable stars are considered to be dwarf stars
1491: showing flares or pulsating giant stars.
1492: On the other hand, stars in the lower sequence belong to the halo populations.
1493: The blue variable stars are considered to be pulsating variable stars such as $\delta$ Scuti,
1494: RR Lyrae, and $\gamma$ Doradus stars,
1495: within the instability strip in color-magnitude diagrams.
1496: Eclipsing binaries may be also included.
1497: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1498: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1499: \begin{center}
1500: \epsscale{.8}
1501: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.34]{f17.eps}
1502: \caption{Variability amplitudes of variable stars as function of apparent magnitude ($i'$-band and $V$-band)
1503: and colors ($R-i'$ and $B-V$).
1504: These amplitudes are defined as magnitude differences between maxima and minima in our time samplings
1505: and give lower limits of real amplitudes.
1506: \label{fig:amplstar}}
1507: \end{center}
1508: \end{figure}
1509: %\clearpage
1510: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1511:
1512: \citet{ivezic2000} selected RR Lyrae candidates using SDSS multi-epoch wide-field imaging data
1513: in short time scales of days, and found a cut-off magnitude at $r^\ast\sim21$ mag.
1514: They indicated that this cut-off magnitude
1515: corresponds to a distance of $\sim65$ kpc from the Galactic center,
1516: which might be the edge of the Galactic halo.
1517: Our time samplings are too poor to determine their periods of variability as well as real amplitudes.
1518: Maxima of magnitude differences in our time samplings shown in Figure \ref{fig:amplstar}
1519: are expected to be smaller than real amplitudes by a factor of $\sim1.2$ from simulated light curves.
1520: Our typical exposure time of one hour, which is not much longer than variability periods of RR Lyrae
1521: \citep[$0.3-0.6$ days,][]{vivas2004}, also makes these magnitude differences small.
1522: Moreover, variability in $i'$-band are smaller than those in $V$-band
1523: for RR Lyrae \citep[$0.5-1.0$ mag in $V$-band,][]{vivas2004}
1524: by a factor by $\sim1.5$ \citep[interpolation of values in Table 7 in][]{liu1990}.
1525: In total, the maxima of magnitude differences in $i'$-band are expected to be less than
1526: $0.2-0.5$ mag for RR Lyrae in our time samplings.
1527: Given the variability amplitudes of blue variable stars with $B-V\sim0.3$ in our sample,
1528: there are one or a few RR Lyrae candidates with amplitudes as large as those of RR Lyrae
1529: (the bottom left panel of Figure \ref{fig:amplstar}).
1530: Variability amplitude of the spectroscopically identified blue variable star with $B-V=0.44$ shown
1531: in the bottom panel of Figure \ref{fig:specvaristar} is small and can not be a candidate of RR Lyrae.
1532: If these RR Lyrae candidates in our sample are really RR Lyrae,
1533: the distances from the Galactic center, which are calculated by
1534: apparent $V$-band magnitude, are larger than $\sim150$ kpc.
1535: The inferred number densities of RR Lyrae are $\sim10^{-2}$ kpc$^{-3}$
1536: at a distance of $\sim150-250$ kpc from the Galactic center towards the halo,
1537: and consistent with extrapolations of results by \citet{ivezic2000}
1538: and \citet{vivas2006} in spite of our poor statistics.
1539: They are candidates of the most distant Galactic stars known so far.
1540: Other types of blue variable stars in the halo population than RR Lyrae
1541: are considered to be included in the sample such as Population II $\delta$ Scuti stars,
1542: $\gamma$ Doradus stars, eclipsing binaries, and so on.
1543: In order to examine nature of these faint blue variable stars,
1544: dense monitoring observations for determinations of pulsating periods and amplitudes,
1545: and/or follow-up spectroscopic observations are necessary.
1546:
1547: Two of the red variable stars with $B-V=1.36$ and $1.34$ were spectroscopically observed
1548: and identified as M dwarf stars (Figure \ref{fig:specvaristar}).
1549: The $B-V$ colors of the red faint variable stars are $\sim0.8-2.0$, which are those of K or M type stars.
1550: The $V$-band absolute magnitudes of these stars are widely spread, for example, $M_V=8-12$ mag
1551: for M stars with colors of $1.3<B-V<1.7$ in the case of main sequence from the Hipparcos data \citep{koen2002}.
1552: Assuming that almost all of these red variable stars are dwarf stars, not red giant stars,
1553: the inferred distances to the stars are $\sim1.5-4$ kpc from the Galactic plane,
1554: where the thick disk population is dominant \citep{chen2001}.
1555: The number density of the variable dwarf stars is $\sim2\times10^3$ kpc$^{-3}$.
1556: Magnitude and color distributions of stars from the model predictions are
1557: consistent with those stars in the SXDF selected through our criteria
1558: and it might indicate that a few percent of the whole dwarf stars show optical bursts
1559: in our time samplings as shown in the bottom rows of Figure \ref{fig:colormaghist2}.
1560:
1561: Fractions of variable stars are one of interesting results.
1562: Fractions of variable stars as functions of colors of $R-i'$ and $B-V$
1563: are nearly flat at a few percents as shown in Figure \ref{fig:colormaghist2}.
1564: \citet{tonry2005} investigated fractions of variable stars as a function
1565: of quartile variability down to variability of $0.015$ mag.
1566: They examined variability of stars in sequential 14-day observations
1567: down to $R\sim20$ mag at a superb photometric precision of $0.002$ mag.
1568: Their result indicates that a fraction of $0.016$ mag$/x$ of stars show variability
1569: above quartile variability of $x$ mag.
1570: Our detection threshold for variability of point sources corresponds to about $0.05-0.10$ mag
1571: and expected fractions are $\sim0.02-0.03$ using this equation.
1572: The fraction obtained by our survey for blue stars is $\sim0.03$ while that for red stars
1573: is $\sim0.05$ on average, and are slightly larger than the expected fraction.
1574: This discrepancy might be derived from some reasons described below.
1575: A young open cluster NGC2301, which \citet{tonry2005} targeted, is only 146 Myr old,
1576: where there should not be many variable populations.
1577: On the other hand, our pointings are towards the halo,
1578: where main components observed are old populations.
1579: Another reason can be the difference of time samplings;
1580: their observations are 14 consecutive days while our observations are sparse over years.
1581: Time scales which can be examined by each study are clearly different,
1582: which can cause these differences.
1583: FSVS studies recently investigated fractions of faint variable stars down to $V\sim24$ mag
1584: \citep*{moralesrueda2006,huber2006}.
1585: Their survey depths and directions are similar to ours,
1586: and their results for fractions of variable stars, $5-8\%$ \citep{huber2006}
1587: are also consistent with ours.
1588:
1589: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1590: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1591: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1592: \section{Summary}\label{sec:summary}
1593: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1594: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1595: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1596:
1597: We investigated optical variability of faint objects down to $i'_{\rm{vari}}\sim25.5$ mag
1598: for variable components over $0.918$ deg$^2$ in the SXDF.
1599: Multi-epoch ($8-10$ epochs over $2-4$ years) imaging data obtained with Suprime-Cam on Subaru 8.2-m telescope
1600: provided us the first statistical sample consisting of $1040$ optically variable objects by image subtraction
1601: for all the combinations of images at different epochs.
1602: We classified those variable objects into variable stars, SNe, and AGN, based on the optical morphologies, magnitudes,
1603: colors, optical-mid-infrared colors of the host objects,
1604: spatial offsets of the variable components from the host objects, and light curves.
1605: Although not all the variable objects were classified because of short time baselines of observations in the two fields,
1606: our classification is consistent with spectroscopic results and X-ray detections.
1607:
1608: We examined detection completeness for periodic variability and AGN variability.
1609: The completeness strongly depends on apparent magnitude.
1610: The completeness for AGN is $\sim1$ at $i'\sim21$ mag and deceases
1611: down to zero at $i'\sim24.5$ mag.
1612: Redshift dependence of the completeness calculated using light curves of PG quasar
1613: is small due to cancellation of time dilation and anti-correlation
1614: between rest-frame wavelength and variability.
1615: Among X-ray sources in the field, $36\pm2\%$ ($51\pm3\%$
1616: for the bright sample with $i'<24.4$ mag) show optical variability.
1617: Variability detections of X-ray sources also show similar
1618: dependence on apparent magnitude to that from light curves.
1619:
1620: Number densities of variable objects for the whole sample, variable stars,
1621: SNe, and AGN as functions
1622: time interval $\Delta{t}$ and variable component magnitude $i'_{\rm{vari}}$ were obtained.
1623: About $5\%$ of all the objects show variability at $i'=21-22$ mag including host components
1624: although decreasing fractions towards fainter magnitude are caused
1625: by the detection limit for variable components.
1626: Number density of variable stars as a function of time interval $\Delta{t}$
1627: is almost flat indicating that
1628: time scales of variability of these stars are short.
1629: Number density of SNe arrives at platau in time scales of a few months and
1630: that of AGN increases even in time scales of years.
1631: These results are consistent with expectations from typical time scales
1632: of their variability.
1633: Total number densities of variable stars, SNe, and AGN are
1634: $120$, $489$, and $579$ objects deg$^{-2}$, respectively.
1635:
1636: Variable stars show bimodal distributions in the color-magnitude diagrams.
1637: This indicates that these variable stars consist of blue bright ($V\sim22$ mag)
1638: variable stars of the halo population
1639: and red faint ($V\sim23.5$ mag) variable stars of the disk population.
1640: We selected a few candidates of RR Lyrae considering their large magnitude differences
1641: between maxima and minima and blue $B-V$ colors,
1642: The number density is $\sim10^{-2}$ kpc$^{-3}$ at a distance of $>150$ kpc from the Galactic center,
1643: which is consistent with extrapolations of previous results.
1644: Follow-up observations to determine the amplitudes and periods of variability might
1645: show that these candidates are at the outermost region of the Galactic halo.
1646:
1647: Our statistical sample of optically variable objects provides us unique opportunity for the studies
1648: such as AGN properties and SN rate, which will be topics in our following papers.
1649: There are planned large surveys such as
1650: Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System \citep[Pan-Starrs;][]{kaiser2002},
1651: Large Synoptic Survey Telescope \citep[LSST;][]{tyson2002},
1652: and SuperNova Acceleration Probe \citep[SNAP;][]{aldering2002}.
1653: This work also provides basic information for such future wide and
1654: deep variability surveys.
1655:
1656: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1657: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1658: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1659: \acknowledgements
1660: This work was supported in part with a scientific research grant (15204012)
1661: from the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, and Sports of Japan (MEXT).
1662: M.A. is supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) from JSPS (18740118).
1663: This work is also supported in part with a scientific research grant (18072003) from the MEXT.
1664: We appreciate useful comments by Kimiaki Kawara and \v{Z}eljko Ivezi\'{c}.
1665: We are grateful to all members of the SXDS project.
1666: We also thank the anonymous referee for useful suggestions, which improve the manuscript.
1667: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1668: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1669: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1670: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1671: \bibitem[Akiyama et al.(2007)]{akiyama2007}
1672: Akiyama, M., Ueda, Y., Sekiguchi, K., Furusawa, H., Morokuma, T., Takata, T., Yoshida, M., Simpson, C., \& Watson, M. G. 2007, in preparation
1673:
1674: \bibitem[Alard \& Lupton(1998)]{alard1998}
1675: Alard, C., \& Lupton, R. H. 1998, \apj, 503, 325
1676:
1677: \bibitem[Alard(2000)]{alard2000}
1678: Alard, C. 2000, A\&A, 144, 363
1679:
1680: \bibitem[Aldering et al.(2002)]{aldering2002}
1681: Aldering, G., et al. 2002, SPIE, 4835, 146
1682:
1683: \bibitem[Astier et al.(2006)]{astier2006}
1684: Astier, P., et al. 2006, A\&A, 447, 31
1685:
1686: \bibitem[Barris \& Tonry(2006)]{barris2006}
1687: Barris, B. J., \& Tonry, J. L. 2006, \apj, 637, 427
1688:
1689: \bibitem[Becker et al.(2004)]{becker2004}
1690: Becker, A. C., et al. 2004, \apj, 611, 418
1691:
1692: \bibitem[Bartin \& Arnouts(1996)]{bartin1996}
1693: Bertin, E., \& Arnouts, S. 1996, A\&AS, 117, 393
1694:
1695: \bibitem[Boyle et al.(2000)]{boyle2000}
1696: Boyle, B. J., Shanks, T., Croom, S. M., Smith, R. J., Miller, L., Loaring, N., \& Heymans, C. 2000, \mnras, 317, 1014
1697:
1698: \bibitem[Brandt et al.(2001)]{brandt2001}
1699: Brandt, W. N., Hornschemeier, A. E., Schneider, D. P., Alexander, D. M., Bauer, F. E., Garmire, G. P., \& Vignali, C. 2001, \apj, 558, 5
1700:
1701: \bibitem[Brandt \& Hasinger(2005)]{brandt2005}
1702: Brandt, W. N., \& Hasinger, G. 2005, \araa, 43, 827
1703:
1704: \bibitem[Chen et al.(2001)]{chen2001}
1705: Chen, B., et al. 2006, \apj, 553, 184
1706:
1707: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(2006)]{cohen2006}
1708: Cohen, S. H., et al. 2006, \apj, 639, 731
1709:
1710: \bibitem[Croom et al.(2004)]{croom2004}
1711: Croom, S. M., Smith, R. J., Boyle, B. J., Shanks, T., Miller, L., Outram, P. J., \& Loaring, N. S. 2004, \mnras, 349, 1397
1712:
1713: \bibitem[Dahlen et al.(2004)]{dahlen2004}
1714: Dahlen, T., Strolger, L-G., Riess, A. G., Mobasher, B., Chary, R-R., Conselice, C. J., Ferguson, H. C., Fruchter, A. S., Giavalisco, M., Livio, M., Madau, P., Panagia, N., \& Tonry, J. L. 2004, \apj, 613, 189
1715:
1716: \bibitem[Doi et al.(2003)]{doi2003}
1717: Doi, M., et al. 2003, IAUC, 8119, 1
1718:
1719: \bibitem[Eisenhardt et al.(2004)]{eisenhardt2004}
1720: Eisenhardt, P. R., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 48
1721:
1722: \bibitem[Fan et al.(2006a)]{fan2006a}
1723: Fan, X., et al. 2006a, \aj, 131, 1203
1724:
1725: \bibitem[Fan et al.(2006b)]{fan2006b}
1726: Fan, X., Strauss, M. A., Becker, R. H., White, R. L., Gunn, J. E., Knapp, G. R., Richards, G. T., Schneider, D. P., Brinkmann, J., \& Fukugita, M. 2006b, \aj, 132, 117
1727:
1728: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{fazio2004}
1729: Fazio, G. G., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
1730:
1731: \bibitem[Furusawa et al.(2007)]{furusawa2007}
1732: Furusawa, H., et al. 2007, \apjs, accepted for publication
1733:
1734: \bibitem[Giveon et al.(1999)]{giveon1999}
1735: Giveon, U., Maoz, D., Kaspi, S., Netzer, H., \& Smith, P. S. 1999, \mnras, 306, 637
1736:
1737: \bibitem[Groot et al.(2003)]{groot2003}
1738: Groot, P. J., et al. 2003, \mnras, 339, 427
1739:
1740: \bibitem[Hatziminaoglou et al.(2005)]{hatziminaoglou2005}
1741: Hatziminaoglou, E., et al. 2005, \aj, 129, 1198
1742:
1743: \bibitem[Hawkins \& Veron(1993)]{hawkins1993}
1744: Hawkins, M. R. S., \& Veron, P. 1993, \mnras, 260, 202
1745:
1746: \bibitem[Hawkins(1996)]{hawkins1996}
1747: Hawkins, M. R. S. 1996, \mnras, 278, 787
1748:
1749: \bibitem[Hawkins(2002)]{hawkins2002}
1750: Hawkins, M. R. S. 2002, \mnras, 329, 76
1751:
1752: \bibitem[Hook et al.(1994)]{hook1994}
1753: Hook, I. M., McMahon, R. G., Boyle, B. J., \& Irwin, M. J. 1994, \mnras, 268, 305
1754:
1755: \bibitem[Hook et al.(2004)]{hook2004}
1756: Hook, I. M., J\o rgensen, I., Allington-Smith, J. R., Davies, R. L., Metcalfe, N., Murowinski, R. G., \& Crampton, D., \pasp, 116, 425
1757:
1758: \bibitem[Huber et al.(2006)]{huber2006}
1759: Huber, M. E., Everett, M. E., \& Howell, S. B. 2006, \aj, 132, 633
1760:
1761: \bibitem[Hughes et al.(1992)]{hughes1992}
1762: Hughes, P. A., Aller, H. D., \& Aller, M. F. 1992, \apj, 396, 469
1763:
1764: \bibitem[Ivezi\'{c} et al.(2000)]{ivezic2000}
1765: Ivezi\'{c}, \v{Z}., et al. 2000, \aj, 120, 963
1766:
1767: \bibitem[Ivezi\'{c} et al.(2003)]{ivezic2003}
1768: Ivezi\'{c}, \v{Z}., Lupton, R. H., Johnston, D. E., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., Schlegel, D., Fan, X., Munn, J. A., Yanny, B., Strauss, M. A., Knapp, G. R., Gunn, J. E., \& Schneider, D. P. 2003, astro-ph/0310566
1769:
1770: \bibitem[Ivezi\'{c} et al.(2004a)]{ivezic2004a}
1771: Ivezi\'{c}, \v{Z}., Lupton, R., Schlegel, D., Smol\v{c}i\'{c}, V., Johnston, D., Gunn, J., Knapp, J., Strauss, M., \& Rockosi, C., 2004a, in Satellites and Tidal Streams, ASP Conf. Ser., vol. 327, eds. F. Prada, D. Martinez Delgado, \& T. J. Mahoney (ASP, San Francisco), 104
1772:
1773: \bibitem[Ivezi\'{c} et al.(2004b)]{ivezic2004b}
1774: Ivezi\'{c}, \v{Z}., Lupton, R. H., Juric, M., Anderson, S., Hall, P. B., Richards, G. T., Rockosi, C. M., vanden Berk, D. E., Turner, E. L., Knapp, G. R., Gunn, J. E., Schlegel, D., Strauss, M. A., \& Schneider, D. P. 2004b, in The Interplay Among Black Holes, Stars and ISM in Galactic Nuclei, ed. T. Storchi Bergmann, L. C. Ho, \& H. R. Schmitt, 525
1775:
1776: \bibitem[Ivezi\'{c} et al.(2005)]{ivezic2005}
1777: Ivezi\'{c}, \v{Z}., Vivas, A. K., Lupton, R. H., \& Zinn, R. 2005, \aj, 129, 1096
1778:
1779: \bibitem[Iye et al.(2006)]{iye2006}
1780: Iye, M., Ota, K., Kashikawa, N., Furusawa, H., Hashimoto, Tetsuya, Hattori, T., Matsuda, Y., Morokuma, T., Ouchi, M., \& Shimasaku, K. 2006, \nat, 443, 186
1781:
1782: \bibitem[Jha et al.(2006)]{jha2006}
1783: Jha, S., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 527
1784:
1785: \bibitem[Kaiser et al.(2002)]{kaiser2002}
1786: Kaiser, N., et al. 2002, SPIE, 4836, 154
1787:
1788: \bibitem[Kashikawa et al.(2002)]{kashikawa2002}
1789: Kashikawa, N., et al. 2002, \pasj, 54, 819
1790:
1791: \bibitem[Kashikawa et al.(2004)]{kashikawa2004}
1792: Kashikawa, N., et al. 2004, \pasj, 56, 1011
1793:
1794: \bibitem[Kawaguchi et al.(1998)]{kawaguchi1998}
1795: Kawaguchi, T., Mineshige, S., Umemura, M., \& Turner, E. L. 1998, \apj, 504, 671
1796:
1797: \bibitem[Kodama et al.(2004)]{kodama2004}
1798: Kodama, T., et al. 2004, \mnras, 350, 1005
1799:
1800: \bibitem[Koen et al.(2002)]{koen2002}
1801: Koen, C., Kilkenny, D., van Wyk, F., Cooper, D., \& Marang, F. 2002, \mnras, 334, 20
1802:
1803: \bibitem[Le Fevre et al.(2003)]{lefevre2003}
1804: Le Fevre, O., Saisse, M., Mancini, D., Brau-Nogue, S., Caputi, O., Castinel, L., D'Odorico, S., Garilli, B., Kissler-Pat
1805: ig, M., Lucuix, C., Mancini, G., Pauget, A., Sciarretta, G., Scodeggio, M., Tresse, L., \& Vettolani, G. 2003, SPIE, 484
1806: 1, 1670
1807:
1808: \bibitem[Lidman et al.(2005)]{lidman2005}
1809: Lidman, C., et al. 2005, A\&A, 430, 843
1810:
1811: \bibitem[Liu \& Janes(1990)]{liu1990}
1812: Liu, T., \& Janes, K. A. 1990, \apj, 360, 561
1813:
1814: \bibitem[Lonsdale et al.(2003)]{lonsdale2003}
1815: Lonsdale, C. J., et al. 2003, \pasp, 115, 897
1816:
1817: \bibitem[Lonsdale et al.(2004)]{lonsdale2004}
1818: Lonsdale, C. J., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 54
1819:
1820: \bibitem[Miyazaki et al.(2002)]{miyazaki2002}
1821: Miyazaki, S., et al. 2002, \pasj, 54, 833
1822:
1823: \bibitem[Morales-Rueda et al.(2006)]{moralesrueda2006}
1824: Morales-Rueda, L., Groot, P. J., Augusteijn, T., Nelemans, G., Vreeswijk, P. M., \& van den Besselaar, E. J. M. 2006, \mnras, 371, 1681
1825:
1826: \bibitem[Oda et al.(2007)]{oda2007}
1827: Oda, T., Totani, T., Yasuda, N., Sumi, T., Morokuma, T., Doi, M., \& Kosugi, G. 2007, in preparation
1828:
1829: \bibitem[Ota et al.(2007)]{ota2007}
1830: Ota, K., et al. 2007, submitted to \apj, arXiv:0707.1561
1831:
1832: \bibitem[Ouchi et al.(2004)]{ouchi2004}
1833: Ouchi, M., et al. 2004, \apj, 611, 660
1834:
1835: \bibitem[Ouchi et al.(2005a)]{ouchi2005a}
1836: Ouchi, M., et al. 2005a, \apjl, 620, 1
1837:
1838: \bibitem[Ouchi et al.(2005b)]{ouchi2005b}
1839: Ouchi, M., et al. 2005b, \apjl, 635, 117
1840:
1841: \bibitem[Pain et al.(2002)]{pain2002}
1842: Pain, R., et al. 2002, \apj, 577, 120
1843:
1844: \bibitem[Perlmutter et al.(1998)]{perlmutter1998}
1845: Perlmutter, S., et al. 1998, \nat, 391, 51
1846:
1847: \bibitem[Phillips(1993)]{phillips1993}
1848: Phillips, M. M., \apjl, 413, 105
1849:
1850: \bibitem[Poznanski et al.(2007)]{poznanski2007}
1851: Poznanski, D., et al. 2007, submitted to \mnras, arXiv:0707.0393
1852:
1853: \bibitem[Rau, Greiner, \& Schwarz(2006)]{rau2006}
1854: Rau, A., Greiner, J., \& Schwarz, R. 2006, A\&A, 449, 79
1855:
1856: \bibitem[Rees(1984)]{rees1984}
1857: Rees, M. J. 1984, \araa, 22, 471
1858:
1859: \bibitem[Reid et al.(1991)]{reid1991}
1860: Reid, I. N., et al. 1991, \pasp, 103, 661
1861:
1862: \bibitem[Richards et al.(2006)]{richards2006}
1863: Richards, G. T., et al. 2006, \apjs, 166, 470
1864:
1865: \bibitem[Richmond(2005)]{richmond2005}
1866: Richmond, M. 2005, \pasj, 57, 969
1867:
1868: \bibitem[Riess et al.(1998)]{riess1998}
1869: Riess, A. G., et al. 1998, \aj, 116, 1009
1870:
1871: \bibitem[Robin et al.(2003)]{robin2003}
1872: Robin, A. C., Reyl\'{e}, C., Derri\`{e}re, S., \& Picaud, S. 2003, A\&A, 409, 523
1873:
1874: \bibitem[Rowan-Robinson et al.(2005)]{rowanrobinson2005}
1875: Rowan-Robinson, M., et al. 2005, \aj, 129, 1183
1876:
1877: \bibitem[Saha et al.(2006)]{saha2006}
1878: Saha, A., Thim, F., Tammann, G. A., Reindl, B., \& Sandage, A. 2006, \apjs, 165, 108
1879:
1880: \bibitem[Sako et al.(2007)]{sako2007}
1881: Sako, M., et al. 2007, submitted to \aj, arXiv0708.2750
1882:
1883: \bibitem[Sandage \& Tammann(2006)]{sandage2006}
1884: Sandage, A., \& Tammann, A. G. 2006, \araa, 44, 93
1885:
1886: \bibitem[Sarajedini et al.(2000)]{sarajedini2000}
1887: Sarajedini, V. L., Gilliland, R. L., \& Phillips, M. M. 2000, \aj, 120, 2825
1888:
1889: \bibitem[Sarajedini et al.(2003)]{sarajedini2003}
1890: Sarajedini, V. L., Gilliland, R. L., \& Kasm, C. 2003, \apj, 599, 173
1891:
1892: \bibitem[Sarajedini et al.(2006)]{sarajedini2006}
1893: Sarajedini, V. L., Koo, D. C., Phillips, A. C., Kobulnicky, H. A., Gebhardt, K., Willmer, C. N. A., Vogt, N. P., Laird, E., Im, M., Iverson, S., \& Mattos, W. 2006, \apjs, 166, 69
1894:
1895: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{schlegel1998}
1896: Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
1897:
1898: \bibitem[Schmidt(1963)]{schmidt1963}
1899: Schmidt, M. 1963, Nature, 197, 1040
1900:
1901: \bibitem[Schneider et al.(2005)]{schneider2005}
1902: Schneider, D. P., et al. 2005, \aj, 130, 367
1903:
1904: \bibitem[Sekiguchi et al.(2004)]{sekiguchi2004}
1905: Sekiguchi, K., (SXDS) 2004, AAS, 205, 8105
1906:
1907: \bibitem[Sekiguchi et al.(2007)]{sekiguchi2007}
1908: Sekiguchi, K., et al. 2007, in preparation
1909:
1910: \bibitem[Sesar et al.(2006)]{sesar2006}
1911: Sesar, B., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 2801
1912:
1913: \bibitem[Sesar et al.(2007)]{sesar2007}
1914: Sesar, B., et al. 2007, arXiv:0704.0655
1915:
1916: \bibitem[Sheinis et al.(2002)]{sheinis2002}
1917: Sheinis, A. I., Bolte, M., Epps, H. W., Kibrick, R. I., Miller, J. S., Radovan, M. V., Bigelow, B. C., \& Sutin, B. M. 2
1918: 002, \pasp, 114, 851
1919:
1920: \bibitem[Simpson et al.(2006a)]{simpson2006a}
1921: Simpson, C., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 741
1922:
1923: \bibitem[Simpson et al.(2006b)]{simpson2006b}
1924: Simpson, C., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 21
1925:
1926: \bibitem[Smith \& Hoffleit(1963)]{smith1963}
1927: Smith, H. J., \& Hoffleit, D. 1963, Nature, 198, 650
1928:
1929: \bibitem[Strolger et al.(2004)]{strolger2004}
1930: Strolger, L.-G., et al. 2004, \apj, 613, 200
1931:
1932: \bibitem[Sullivan et al.(2006)]{sullivan2006}
1933: Sullivan, M., et al. 2006, \apj, 648, 868
1934:
1935: \bibitem[Terlevich et al.(1992)]{terlevich1992}
1936: Terlevich, R., Tenorio-Tagle, G., Franco, J., \& Melnick, J. 1992, \mnras, 255, 713
1937:
1938: \bibitem[Tonry et al.(2005)]{tonry2005}
1939: Tonry, J. L., Howell, S. B., Everett, M. E., Rodney, S. A., Willman, M., \& VanOutryve, C. 2005, \pasp, 117, 281
1940:
1941: \bibitem[Totani et al.(2005)]{totani2005}
1942: Totani, T., Sumi, T., Kosugi, G., Yasuda, N., Doi, M., \& Oda, T. 2005, \apjl, 621, 9
1943:
1944: \bibitem[Tyson(2002)]{tyson2002}
1945: Tyson, J. A., 2002, SPIE, 4836, 10
1946:
1947: \bibitem[Ueda et al.(2007)]{ueda2007}
1948: Ueda, Y., et al. 2007, submitted to \apjs
1949:
1950: \bibitem[Vanden Berk et al.(2004)]{vandenberk2004}
1951: Vanden Berk, D. E., Wilhite, B. C., Kron, R. G., Anderson, S. F., Brunner, R. J., Hall, P. B., Ivezi\'{c}, \v{Z}., Richards, G. T., Schneider, D. P., York, D. G., Brinkmann, J. V., Lamb, D. Q., Nichol, R. C., \& Schlegel, D. J. 2004, \apj, 601, 692
1952:
1953: \bibitem[Vivas et al.(2004)]{vivas2004}
1954: Vivas, A. K., et al. 2004, \aj, 127, 1158
1955:
1956: \bibitem[Vivas \& Zinn(2006)]{vivas2006}
1957: Vivas, A. K., \& Zinn, R. 2006, \aj, 132, 714
1958:
1959: \bibitem[de Vries et al.(2003)]{devries2003}
1960: de Vries, W. H., Becker, R. H., \& White, R. L. 2003, \aj, 126, 1217
1961:
1962: \bibitem[de Vries et al.(2005)]{devries2005}
1963: de Vries, W. H., Becker, R. H., White, R. L., \& Loomis, C. 2005, \aj, 129, 615
1964:
1965: \bibitem[Watson et al.(2005)]{watson2005}
1966: Watson, M. G., Roberts, T. P., Akiyama, M., \& Ueda, Y. 2005, A\&A, 437, 899
1967:
1968: \bibitem[Yagi et al.(2002)]{yagi2002}
1969: Yagi, M., Kashikawa, N., Sekiguchi, M., Doi, M., Yasuda, N., Shimasaku, K., \& Okamura, S. 2002, \aj, 123, 66
1970:
1971: \bibitem[Yamada et al.(2005)]{yamada2005}
1972: Yamada, T., Kodama, T., Akiyama, M., Furusawa, H., Iwata, I., Kajisawa, M., Iye, M., Ouchi, M., Sekiguchi, K., Shimasaku, K., Simpson, C., Tanaka, I., \& Yoshida, M. 2005, \apj, 634, 861
1973:
1974: \bibitem[Yasuda et al.(2003)]{yasuda2003}
1975: Yasuda, N., et al. 2003, AAS, 203, 8211
1976:
1977: \bibitem[Yasuda et al.(2007)]{yasuda2007}
1978: Yasuda, N., et al. 2007, in preparation
1979:
1980: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{york2000}
1981: York, D. G., et al. 2000, \aj, 120, 1579
1982: \end{thebibliography}
1983:
1984: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1985: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
1986: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1987: \tablewidth{0pt}
1988: \tablecaption{Imaging Data Other than Optical Variability}
1989: \tablehead{
1990: \colhead{Wavelength} &
1991: \colhead{Telescope/Instrument} &
1992: \colhead{Band}&
1993: \colhead{Detection Limit} &
1994: \colhead{Area\tablenotemark{a} [deg$^2$]} &
1995: \colhead{Variable\tablenotemark{b}} &
1996: \colhead{Detection\tablenotemark{c}}
1997: }
1998: \startdata
1999: optical & Subaru/Suprime-Cam\tablenotemark{d}
2000: & $B$,$V$,$R_C$,$i'$,$z$ & $28.2$,$27.2$,$27.6$,$27.5$,$26.5$ mag\tablenotemark{e} & $0.918$ & $1040$ & $1040$ \\
2001: X-ray & XMM-Newton/EPIC & 2.0-10.0 keV & $3\times10^{-15}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ & $0.808$ & $936$ & $165$ \\
2002: X-ray & XMM-Newton/EPIC & 0.5-2.0 keV & $1\times10^{-15}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ & $0.808$ & $936$ & $91$ \\
2003: mid-infrared & Spitzer/IRAC & 3.6$\mu$m-band & $22.0$ mag\tablenotemark{e} & $0.889$ & $1028$ & $995$ \\
2004: \enddata
2005: \tablenotetext{a}{Area overlapping with the variability survey field.}
2006: \tablenotetext{b}{Number of optically variable objects within the area.}
2007: \tablenotetext{c}{Number of optically variable objects detected in the bands within the area. }
2008: \tablenotetext{d}{Derived from preliminary version of the SXDF catalogs in \citet{furusawa2007}.}
2009: \tablenotetext{e}{Detection limits for optical and mid-infrared imaging are measured in AB magnitude.}
2010: \label{tab:surveyarea}
2011: \end{deluxetable}
2012: %\clearpage
2013: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2014: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2015: \begin{deluxetable}{crcrrcc}
2016: \tabletypesize{\normalsize}
2017: \tablewidth{0pt}
2018: \tablecaption{Summary of Subaru Suprime-Cam $i'$-band Imaging Observations
2019: for Variability Detections}
2020: \tablehead{
2021: \colhead{field} & \colhead{epoch} & \colhead{date (UT)\tablenotemark{a}} &
2022: \colhead{$\Delta{t}$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$t_{\rm{exp}}$ [sec]} &
2023: \colhead{$\theta['']$\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{$m_{\rm{lim}}$\tablenotemark{d}}
2024: }
2025: \startdata
2026: SXDF-C & 1 & 02/09/29,30 & 0.0 & 2700 & 0.54 & 26.19\\
2027: SXDF-C & 2 & 02/11/01 & 32.6 & 1860 & 0.92 & 25.76\\
2028: SXDF-C & 3 & 02/11/02 & 33.5 & 1800 & 0.68 & 25.85\\
2029: SXDF-C & 4 & 02/11/05 & 36.7 & 2400 & 0.70 & 26.11\\
2030: SXDF-C & 5 & 02/11/09 & 40.5 & 2460 & 0.60 & 25.77\\
2031: SXDF-C & 6 & 02/11/27,29 & 59.8 & 4200 & 0.72 & 26.38\\
2032: SXDF-C & 7 & 02/12/07 & 68.4 & 3000 & 0.78 & 26.32\\
2033: SXDF-C & 8 & 03/10/20 & 385.7 & 5760 & 1.14 & 26.53\\
2034: SXDF-C & 9 & 03/10/21 & 386.5 & 7500 & 0.58 & 26.71\\
2035: SXDF-C & 10 & 05/09/28 & 1094.6 & 3600 & 1.00 & 26.04\\
2036: \hline
2037: SXDF-N & 1 & 02/09/29,30 & 0.0 & 3300 & 0.56 & 26.26\\
2038: SXDF-N & 2 & 02/11/01 & 32.4 & 2640 & 0.96 & 25.88\\
2039: SXDF-N & 3 & 02/11/02 & 33.3 & 1800 & 0.68 & 25.86\\
2040: SXDF-N & 4 & 02/11/09 & 40.3 & 2100 & 0.64 & 25.78\\
2041: SXDF-N & 5 & 02/11/29 & 60.3 & 3300 & 0.74 & 26.27\\
2042: SXDF-N & 6 & 03/09/22 & 357.5 & 4264 & 0.60 & 26.37\\
2043: SXDF-N & 7 & 03/10/02 & 367.6 & 1500 & 0.70 & 25.88\\
2044: SXDF-N & 8 & 03/10/21 & 386.5 & 3000 & 0.72 & 26.14\\
2045: \hline
2046: SXDF-S & 1 & 02/09/29,30 & 0.0 & 3000 & 0.52 & 26.28\\
2047: SXDF-S & 2 & 02/11/01 & 32.5 & 3600 & 1.04 & 25.91\\
2048: SXDF-S & 3 & 02/11/02 & 33.4 & 1800 & 0.70 & 25.83\\
2049: SXDF-S & 4 & 02/11/09 & 40.4 & 2580 & 0.66 & 25.60\\
2050: SXDF-S & 5 & 02/11/29 & 60.6 & 1500 & 0.82 & 26.00\\
2051: SXDF-S & 6 & 03/09/22 & 357.6 & 4500 & 0.54 & 26.45\\
2052: SXDF-S & 7 & 03/10/02 & 367.7 & 2040 & 0.68 & 26.00\\
2053: SXDF-S & 8 & 05/09/28 & 1094.6 & 3900 & 0.96 & 26.04\\
2054: \hline
2055: SXDF-E & 1 & 02/09/29,30 & 0.0 & 3000 & 0.60 & 26.25\\
2056: SXDF-E & 2 & 02/11/01 & 32.5 & 3000 & 1.04 & 25.97\\
2057: SXDF-E & 3 & 02/11/02 & 33.4 & 1800 & 0.70 & 25.83\\
2058: SXDF-E & 4 & 02/11/09 & 40.4 & 2820 & 0.66 & 26.78\\
2059: SXDF-E & 5 & 02/11/29 & 60.6 & 1800 & 0.80 & 26.03\\
2060: SXDF-E & 6 & 02/12/07 & 68.6 & 1209 & 1.54 & 25.19\\
2061: SXDF-E & 7 & 03/09/22 & 357.6 & 6000 & 0.62 & 26.58\\
2062: SXDF-E & 8 & 03/10/02 & 367.7 & 1271 & 0.68 & 25.71\\
2063: SXDF-E & 9 & 03/10/21 & 386.7 & 1400 & 0.88 & 25.51\\
2064: SXDF-E & 10 & 05/09/28 & 1094.6 & 3600 & 0.96 & 26.11\\
2065: \hline
2066: SXDF-W & 1 & 02/09/29,30 & 0.0 & 2400 & 0.54 & 26.14\\
2067: SXDF-W & 2 & 02/11/01 & 32.7 & 3000 & 0.96 & 25.96\\
2068: SXDF-W & 3 & 02/11/02 & 33.5 & 1800 & 0.66 & 25.84\\
2069: SXDF-W & 4 & 02/11/05 & 36.8 & 3060 & 0.76 & 25.98\\
2070: SXDF-W & 5 & 02/11/09 & 40.5 & 2100 & 0.64 & 25.97\\
2071: SXDF-W & 6 & 02/11/27,29 & 59.8 & 4200 & 0.74 & 26.39\\
2072: SXDF-W & 7 & 02/12/07 & 68.5 & 6483 & 1.04 & 26.34\\
2073: SXDF-W & 8 & 03/10/20,21 & 386.5 & 5460 & 0.66 & 26.46\\
2074: \enddata
2075: \tablenotetext{a}{Observed date in yy/mm/dd. When the images were stacked together
2076: with those at different dates, both dates are included.}
2077: \tablenotetext{b}{Days from the first observation in each field.}
2078: \tablenotetext{c}{FWHM of PSF in stacked images.}
2079: \tablenotetext{d}{\rm{L}imiting magnitude of $5\sigma$ in $2\farcs0$ aperture.}
2080: \label{tab:spcamobs}
2081: \end{deluxetable}
2082: %\clearpage
2083: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2084:
2085: \end{document}
2086:
2087: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2088: %% End of file %%
2089: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2090: