1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \title{Hyperon bulk viscosity in the presence of antikaon condensate}
6: \author{Debarati Chatterjee\altaffilmark{1} and
7: Debades Bandyopadhyay\altaffilmark{1}}
8: \affil{Theory Division, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, 1/AF Bidhannagar,
9: Kolkata-700064, India}
10: \altaffiltext{1}{Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Saha Institute of Nuclear
11: Physics, 1/AF Bidhannagar, Kolkata-700064, India}
12:
13: \begin{abstract}
14: We investigate the hyperon bulk viscosity due to the non-leptonic process
15: $n + p \rightleftharpoons p + \Lambda~$ in $K^-$ condensed matter and its
16: effect on the r-mode instability in neutron stars. We find that the hyperon
17: bulk viscosity coefficient in the presence of antikaon condensate is suppressed
18: compared with the case without the condensate. The suppressed
19: hyperon bulk viscosity in the superconducting phase is still an efficient
20: mechanism to damp the r-mode instability in neutron stars.
21: \end{abstract}
22:
23: \keywords{dense matter - stars:neutron - stars:oscillations - instabilities}
24:
25: \section{Introduction}
26:
27: The study of r-modes in rotating neutron stars has generated great interest
28: in recent times from two points of view. On one hand, r-modes of rotating
29: neutron stars could be possible sources of detectable gravitational waves. On
30: the other hand, the gravitational radiation driven instability of r-modes
31: \citep{Chan,Fri1,Fri2,Fri3,Fri98,Lin98,And98,And99,Kok,And01,Ster}
32: might play an important role in regulating spins of
33: young as well as old, accreting neutron stars in low mass x-ray
34: binaries(LMXBs). The latter situation has been strengthened by the fact that
35: the spin distribution of pulsars has an upper limit at 730 Hz \citep{Cha2,Cha}.
36: It is worth mentioning here that the fastest rotating pulsar has a spin
37: frequency 716 Hz \citep{Hes}.
38:
39: The bulk viscosity of neutron star matter is an important issue in
40: connection with the damping of the r-mode instability in rotating neutron stars.
41: The r-mode instability may be suppressed through different mechanisms.
42: It was shown that the damping of the instability by the large hyperon bulk
43: viscosity coefficient could be an efficient mechanism
44: \citep{Jon1,Jon2,Lin02,Han3,Dal,Dra,Nar,DR1,DR2}. However, it may be suppressed
45: by several orders of magnitude when neutrons, protons or
46: hyperons are superfluid \citep{Han1,Han2,Han3,Nar,And06}. This study was
47: later extended to the
48: calculation of bulk viscosity due to other exotic forms of matter
49: such as unpaired quark matter \citep{Mad92,Mad00,Don1,Don2}, quark-hadron
50: mixed phase \citep{Dra,Pan} and color superconducting quark matter
51: \citep{Schm,Alf,Alf3,Bas,Bas2}. Another
52: possibility of damping the r-mode instability is the mutual friction between
53: inter-penetrating neutron and proton superfluids \citep{Lin00,And06}.
54:
55: The superfluidity of neutron star matter plays a significant role on the
56: damping of the r-modes in neutron stars. It was shown that superfluid particles
57: taking part in non-leptonic weak processes involving hyperons might reduce the
58: hyperon bulk viscosity coefficient by several orders of magnitude
59: \citep{Han3,And06}.
60: Recently, we have investigated the bulk viscosity due to the non-leptonic
61: weak process $n \rightleftharpoons p + K^{-}$ in $K^-$ condensed matter
62: \citep{DR3}.
63: The kaon bulk viscosity was suppressed in the condensed phase by several orders
64: of magnitude and could not damp the r-mode instability. This motivates us
65: to further investigate how the bulk viscosity due to the
66: non-leptonic process $n + p \rightleftharpoons p + \Lambda~$ behaves in
67: antikaon condensed matter and how it influences r-modes of neutron stars.
68:
69: We organise the paper in the following way. In section 2, the
70: field theoretical models of strong interactions, different phases of dense
71: matter, the bulk viscosity coefficient and the corresponding time scale are
72: described. Results of our calculation are discussed in section 3. Section 4
73: gives summary and conclusions.
74:
75: \section{Formalism}
76: Our motivation is to calculate the hyperon bulk viscosity due to the
77: non-leptonic process $n + p \rightleftharpoons p + \Lambda~$ in a
78: superconducting phase i.e. antikaon condensed phase. This process was
79: extensively investigated in hadronic matter by several groups
80: \citep{Jon1,Jon2,Lin02,Dal,Nar,DR1,DR2}. In this case,
81: we consider a first order phase transition from hadronic
82: to $K^-$ condensed matter. Both
83: the pure hadronic and $K^-$ condensed matter are described within the
84: framework of relativistic field theoretical models. The constituents
85: of matter in both phases are neutrons ($n$), protons ($p$), $\Lambda$ hyperons,
86: electrons and muons. The baryon-baryon interaction is mediated by the exchange
87: of $\sigma$, $\omega$ and $\rho$ mesons and two strange mesons, scalar meson,
88: $f_0$(975) (denoted hereafter as $\sigma^*$) and the vector meson
89: $\phi$(1020) \citep{Sch}.
90: Both phases maintain local charge neutrality and beta-equilibrium conditions
91: whereas these conditions are satisfied globally in the mixed phase. Further
92: baryons are
93: embedded in the $K^-$ condensate phase. We describe the equation of state (EoS)
94: in the antikaon condensed phase using the following Lagrangian density for
95: baryons \citep{Sch}
96: \begin{eqnarray}
97: {\cal L}_B &=& \sum_B \bar\Psi_{B}\left(i\gamma_\mu{\partial^\mu} - m_B
98: + g_{\sigma B} \sigma - g_{\omega B} \gamma_\mu \omega^\mu
99: - g_{\rho B}
100: \gamma_\mu{\mbox{\boldmath t}}_B \cdot
101: {\mbox{\boldmath $\rho$}}^\mu \right)\Psi_B\nonumber\\
102: && + \frac{1}{2}\left( \partial_\mu \sigma\partial^\mu \sigma
103: - m_\sigma^2 \sigma^2\right) - U(\sigma) \nonumber\\
104: && -\frac{1}{4} \omega_{\mu\nu}\omega^{\mu\nu}
105: +\frac{1}{2}m_\omega^2 \omega_\mu \omega^\mu
106: - \frac{1}{4}{\mbox {\boldmath $\rho$}}_{\mu\nu} \cdot
107: {\mbox {\boldmath $\rho$}}^{\mu\nu}
108: + \frac{1}{2}m_\rho^2 {\mbox {\boldmath $\rho$}}_\mu \cdot
109: {\mbox {\boldmath $\rho$}}^\mu + {\cal L}_{YY}~.
110: \end{eqnarray}
111: Here $\psi_B$ denotes the Dirac bispinor for baryons $B$ with vacuum mass $m_B$
112: and the isospin operator is ${\mbox {\boldmath t}}_B$. The scalar
113: self-interaction term \citep{Bog} is
114: \begin{equation}
115: U(\sigma) = \frac{1}{3} g_2 \sigma^3 + \frac{1}{4} g_3 \sigma^4 ~.
116: \end{equation}
117: The Lagrangian density for hyperon-hyperon interaction (${\cal L}_{YY}$)
118: is given by
119: \begin{eqnarray}
120: {\cal L}_{YY} &=& \sum_B \bar\Psi_{B}\left(
121: g_{\sigma^* B} \sigma^* - g_{\phi B} \gamma_\mu \phi^\mu
122: \right)\Psi_B\nonumber\\
123: && + \frac{1}{2}\left( \partial_\mu \sigma^*\partial^\mu \sigma^*
124: - m_{\sigma^*}^2 \sigma^{*2}\right)
125: -\frac{1}{4} \phi_{\mu\nu}\phi^{\mu\nu}
126: +\frac{1}{2}m_\phi^2 \phi_\mu \phi^\mu~.
127: \end{eqnarray}
128: As nucleons do not couple with strange mesons,
129: $g_{\sigma^* B} = g_{\phi B} = 0$.
130:
131: Similarly we treat the (anti)kaon-baryon interaction in the same footing as the
132: baryon-baryon interaction. The Lagrangian density for (anti)kaons in the
133: minimal coupling scheme is \citep{Gle98,Gle99,Bani1,Bani2},
134: \begin{equation}
135: {\cal L}_K = D^*_\mu{\bar K} D^\mu K - m_K^{* 2} {\bar K} K ~,
136: \end{equation}
137: where the covariant derivative is
138: $D_\mu = \partial_\mu + ig_{\omega K}{\omega_\mu} + ig_{\phi K}{\phi_\mu}
139: + i g_{\rho K}
140: {\mbox{\boldmath t}}_K \cdot {\mbox{\boldmath $\rho$}}_\mu$ and
141: the effective mass of (anti)kaons is
142: $m_K^* = m_K - g_{\sigma K} \sigma - g_{\sigma^* K} \sigma^*$.
143:
144: We perform this calculation in the mean field approximation
145: \citep{Ser}.
146: The mean meson fields in the condensed phase are denoted by $\sigma$,
147: $\sigma^*$, $\omega_0$, $\phi_0$ and $\rho_{03}$. The expressions for mean
148: fields can be found in Ref. \citep{Bani2,DR3}.
149: The in-medium energy of
150: $K^-$ mesons for $s$-wave (${\vec k}=0$) condensation is given by
151: \begin{equation}
152: \omega_{K^-} = \mu_{K^-} = m_K^* - g_{\omega K} \omega_0 - g_{\phi K} \phi_0
153: + I_{3K^-} g_{\rho K} \rho_{03} ~,
154: \end{equation}
155: where $\mu_{K^-}$ is the chemical potential of $K^-$ mesons and the isospin
156: projection is $I_{3K^-} = -1/2$.
157: The chemical potential for baryons $B$ is given by
158: \begin{equation}
159: \mu_{B}^{K} = \left(k^2_{F_{B}} + {m_B^{*K}}^2 \right)^{1/2} + g_{\omega B}
160: \omega_0 + g_{\phi B} \phi_0 + I_{3B} g_{\rho B} \rho_{03}~
161: \end{equation}
162: where effective baryon mass is $m_B^{*K}=m_B - g_{\sigma B}\sigma
163: - g_{\sigma^* B} \sigma^*$ and
164: isospin projection for baryons $B$ is $I_{3B}$.
165:
166: We obtain the mean fields in the hadronic phase putting
167: source terms for $K^-$ mesons equal to zero in corresponding equations of
168: motion \citep{Bani2,DR3}.
169:
170: The total energy density and pressure in the antikaon condensed phase are given
171: by
172: \begin{eqnarray}
173: {\varepsilon^{K}} &=& \frac{1}{2}m_\sigma^2 \sigma^2
174: + \frac{1}{3} g_2 \sigma^3
175: + \frac{1}{4} g_3 \sigma^4 + \frac{1}{2}m_{\sigma^*}^2 \sigma^{*2}
176: + \frac{1}{2} m_\omega^2 \omega_0^2 + \frac{1}{2} m_\phi^2 \phi_0^2
177: + \frac{1}{2} m_\rho^2 \rho_{03}^2 \nonumber \\
178: && + \sum_{B=n,p,\Lambda} \frac{2J_B+1}{2\pi^2}
179: \int_0^{k_{F_B}} (k^2+{m_B^{*K}}^2)^{1/2} k^2 \ dk
180: + \sum_{l=e^-,\mu^-} \frac{1}{\pi^2} \int_0^{K_{F_l}} (k^2+m^2_l)^{1/2} k^2 \ dk
181: \nonumber \\
182: && + m^*_K n_{K^-}~,
183: \end{eqnarray}
184: and
185: \begin{eqnarray}
186: P^{K} &=& - \frac{1}{2}m_\sigma^2 \sigma^2 - \frac{1}{3} g_2 \sigma^3
187: - \frac{1}{4} g_3 \sigma^4 - \frac{1}{2}m_{\sigma^*}^2 \sigma^{*2}
188: + \frac{1}{2} m_\omega^2 \omega_0^2 + \frac{1}{2} m_\phi^2 \phi_0^2
189: + \frac{1}{2} m_\rho^2 \rho_{03}^2 \nonumber \\
190: && + \frac{1}{3}\sum_{B=n,p,\Lambda} \frac{2J_B+1}{2\pi^2}
191: \int_0^{k_{F_B}} \frac{k^4 \ dk}{(k^2+{m_B^{*K}}^ 2)^{1/2}}
192: + \frac{1}{3} \sum_{l=e^-,\mu^-} \frac{1}{\pi^2}
193: \int_0^{K_{F_l}} \frac{k^4 \ dk}{(k^2+m^2_l)^{1/2}}~.
194: \end{eqnarray}
195:
196: We describe the mixed phase of hadronic and $K^-$ condensed matter using the
197: Gibbs conditions for thermodynamic equilibrium along with global charge and
198: baryon number conservation laws
199: \citep{Gle92,Gle99}.
200:
201: Now we focus on the calculation of bulk viscosity due to the non-leptonic
202: process. It was shown that the real part of bulk viscosity coefficient was
203: related to relaxation times of microscopic processes \citep{Lan,Lin02} by the
204: relation,
205: \begin{equation}
206: \zeta = \frac {P(\gamma_{\infty} - \gamma_0)\tau}{1 + {(\omega\tau)}^2}~,
207: \end{equation}
208: where $P$ is the pressure, $\tau$ is the net microscopic relaxation time and
209: $\gamma_{\infty}$ and $\gamma_0$ are 'infinite' and 'zero' frequency adiabatic
210: indices respectively and their difference
211: \begin{equation}
212: \gamma_{\infty} - \gamma_0 = - \frac {n_b^2}{P} \frac {\partial P}
213: {\partial n_n} \frac {d{\bar x}_n} {dn_b}~,
214: \end{equation}
215: is determined using EoS as input. Here $\bar x_n = \frac {n_n}{n_b}$ gives the
216: neutron fraction in the equilibrium state and $n_b = {\sum}_{B} n_B$ is the
217: total baryon density. We are interested in (l,m) r-mode. In this case,
218: the angular velocity ($\omega$) of the mode is related to the angular velocity
219: ($\Omega$) of a rotating neutron star as
220: $\omega = {\frac {2m}{l(l+1)}} \Omega$ \citep{And01}.
221:
222: The partial derivatives of pressure with respect to neutron fraction in both
223: phases are calculated using the Gibbs-Duhem relation \citep{DR3}.
224: In the pure hadronic phase, this relation gives
225: \begin{equation}
226: \frac{\partial P^h}{\partial n_n^h} = n_n^h \alpha_{nn}^h
227: + n_p^h \alpha_{pn}^h + n_{\Lambda}^h \alpha_{\Lambda n}^h~,
228: \end{equation}
229: where $\alpha_{ij}$ is defined by
230: $\alpha_{ij} = \left(\frac{\partial \mu_i}{\partial n_j}\right)_{n_k,k\neq j}$.
231: Similarly, in the pure condensed phase, it is given by
232: \begin{equation}
233: \frac{\partial P^K}{\partial n_n^K} = n_n^K \alpha_{nn}^K
234: + n_p^K \alpha_{pn}^K
235: + n_{\Lambda}^K \alpha_{\Lambda n}^K
236: + n_{K^-} \alpha_{K^- n}^K~.
237: \end{equation}
238: In the mixed phase, this relation has the form
239: \begin{equation}
240: \frac{\partial P}{\partial n_n} =
241: \frac{\partial P^h}{\partial n_n^h} +
242: \frac{\partial P^K}{\partial n_n^K}~,
243: \end{equation}
244: where $n_n = (1 - \chi) n_n^h + \chi n_n^K$.
245:
246: Next we calculate relaxation times of the non-leptonic process in different
247: phases. In this case, we express all perturbed quantities
248: in terms of the variation in neutron number density ($n_n$) in the
249: respective phase. The relaxation time ($\tau$) for the
250: non-leptonic process is given by \citep{Lin02}
251: \begin{equation}
252: \frac{1}{\tau} = \frac{\Gamma_{\Lambda}}{\delta \mu}
253: \frac{\delta \mu}{\delta n_n^j}~.
254: \end{equation}
255: Here, $\delta {n_n^j} = n_n^j - {\bar n}_n^j$ is the departure of neutron
256: fraction from its thermodynamic equilibrium value ${\bar n}_n^j$ in the
257: j-th (=hadron, $K^-$ condensed) phase. The reaction rate per unit volume for
258: the non-leptonic process in question was already calculated by others
259: \citep{Lin02,Nar}. The relaxation time ($\tau$) for the process in the hadronic
260: phase is given by \citep{Lin02}
261: \begin{equation}
262: \frac {1}{\tau} = \frac {{(kT)}^2}{192{\pi}^3} {p_{\Lambda}}
263: {<{{|M_{\Lambda}|}^2}>} \frac {\delta \mu}{\delta{n_n^h}}~,
264: \end{equation}
265: along with
266: \begin{equation}
267: \frac {\delta \mu}{\delta{n_n^h}} =
268: \left(\alpha_{nn}^h - \alpha_{\Lambda n}^h\right)
269: + \left(\alpha_{np}^h - \alpha_{\Lambda p}^h\right)
270: \frac {\delta {n_p^h}}{\delta{n_n^h}}
271: + \left(\alpha_{n \Lambda}^h - \alpha_{\Lambda \Lambda}^h\right)
272: \frac {\delta {n_{\Lambda}^h}}{\delta{n_n^h}}~,
273: \end{equation}
274: where $p_{\Lambda}$ is the Fermi momentum for $\Lambda$ hyperons and
275: $<{|M_{\Lambda}|}^2>$ is the angle averaged matrix element squared in the
276: hadronic phase given by Ref.\citep{Lin02,Nar}. In pure hadronic phase, the
277: second term in Eq.(16) vanishes because $\delta n_p^h = 0$. However, the
278: calculation of the hadronic part of the mixed phase is a little bit involved
279: and described below.
280:
281: The relaxation time in the antikaon condensed phase has the same
282: form as in Eq.(15). In this case,
283: the angle averaged matrix element , $<{|M_{\Lambda}|}^2>$ and $p_{\Lambda}$ are
284: to be calculated in the condensed phase. Also, we calculate
285: $\frac{\delta \mu}{\delta {n_n^K}}$ from the chemical potential imbalance due
286: to the non-leptonic hyperon process $n + p \rightleftharpoons p + \Lambda~$ and
287: it is given by,
288: \begin{eqnarray}
289: \delta \mu &=& \delta \mu_n^K - \delta \mu_{\Lambda}^K \nonumber \\
290: &=& \left( \alpha_{nn}^K \delta n_n^K + \alpha_{np}^K \delta n_p^K
291: + \alpha_{n \Lambda}^K \delta n_{\Lambda}^K + \alpha_{n K^-} \delta n_{K^-}
292: \right) \nonumber\\
293: &-& \left( \alpha_{\Lambda n}^K \delta n_n^K + \alpha_{\Lambda p}^K
294: \delta n_p^K + \alpha_{\Lambda \Lambda}^K \delta n_{\Lambda}^K
295: + \alpha_{n K^-} \delta n_{K^-}\right)~.
296: \end{eqnarray}
297: We express $\delta {\mu}$ in terms of $\delta{n_n^K}$ and obtain
298: $\frac {\delta \mu}{\delta{n_n^K}}$ using the following constraints,
299: \begin{eqnarray}
300: \left(\delta n_n^K + \delta n_p^K + \delta n_{\Lambda}^K \right)
301: &=& 0~, \nonumber \\
302: \left(\delta n_p^K - \delta n_{K^-}\right) &=& 0~.
303: \end{eqnarray}
304: and the chemical equilibrium in the strangeness changing process
305: $n \rightleftharpoons p + K^-$,
306: \begin{eqnarray}
307: \delta \mu_n^K - \delta \mu_p^K - \delta \mu_{K^-}
308: &=& \left( \alpha_{nn}^K \delta n_n^K + \alpha_{np}^K \delta n_p^K +
309: + \alpha_{n \Lambda}^K \delta n_{\Lambda}^K
310: + \alpha_{n K^-} \delta n_{K^-} \right) \nonumber \\
311: &-& \left( \alpha_{pn}^K \delta n_n^K + \alpha_{pp}^K \delta n_p^K +
312: + \alpha_{p \Lambda}^K \delta n_{\Lambda}^K
313: + \alpha_{p K^-} \delta n_{K^-} \right) \nonumber \\
314: &-& \left( \alpha_{K^- n} \delta n_n^K + \alpha_{K^- p} \delta n_p^K +
315: + \alpha_{K^- \Lambda} \delta n_{\Lambda}^K
316: + \alpha_{K^- K^-} \delta n_{K^-} \right) = 0~.
317: \end{eqnarray}
318:
319: Next we calculate $\alpha_{ij}$ in the hadronic as well as $K^-$ condensed
320: phases using the EoS. We can write down these quantities for both phases in
321: generalised forms. For $B = B'$, we get
322: \begin{eqnarray}
323: \alpha_{BB'}^P &=& \frac{\partial \mu_B^P}{\partial n_{B'}^P} \nonumber \\
324: &=& \left(\frac{g_{\omega B}}{m_{\omega}}\right)^2
325: + \frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{g_{\rho B}}{m_{\rho}}\right)^2
326: + \left(\frac{g_{\phi B}}{m_{\phi}}\right)^2
327: + \frac{\pi^2}{k_{F_B} \sqrt{k_{F_B}^2
328: + {m_B^{*P}}^2}} \nonumber \\
329: &-& {\frac {m_B^{*P}}{\sqrt{k_{F_B}^2 +
330: {m_B^{*P}}^2}}}\left(g_{\sigma B}{\frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial n_{B'}^P}}
331: + g_{\sigma^* B} {\frac {\partial \sigma^*}{\partial n_{B'}^P}}\right)~,
332: \end{eqnarray}
333: and for $B \neq B'$
334: \begin{eqnarray}
335: \alpha_{BB'}^P &=& \frac{\partial \mu_B^P}{\partial n_{B'}^P} \nonumber \\
336: &=& \left(\frac{g_{\omega B} g_{\omega B'}}{m_{\omega}^2}\right)
337: - \frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{g_{\rho B} g_{\rho B'}}{m_{\rho}^2}\right)\nonumber \\
338: &-& {\frac {m_B^{*P}}{\sqrt{k_{F_B}^2 +
339: {m_B^{*P}}^2}}}\left(g_{\sigma B}{\frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial n_{B'}^P}}
340: + g_{\sigma^* B} {\frac {\partial \sigma^*}{\partial n_{B'}^P}}\right)~,
341: \end{eqnarray}
342: along with the following relations applicable for both cases
343: \begin{equation}
344: \frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial n_{B'}^P} =
345: \frac{\left(\frac{g_{\sigma B}}{m_{\sigma}^2}\right)
346: \frac{m_B^{*P}}{\sqrt{k_{F_B}^2 + {m_B^{*P}}^2}}}{D - D' \times D''}~,
347: \end{equation}
348: \begin{equation}
349: \frac{\partial \sigma^*}{\partial n_{B'}^P} = -D''
350: \frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial n_{B'}^P}~,
351: \end{equation}
352: where
353: \begin{equation}
354: D = { 1+\frac{1}{m_\sigma^2}\frac{d^2U}{d \sigma^2}
355: + \sum_{B=n,p,\Lambda} \frac{(2J_B+1)}{2 \pi^2}\left(\frac{g_{\sigma B}}
356: {m_\sigma}
357: \right)^2 \int_0^{K_{F_B}} \frac{k^4 dk}{(k^2 + {m_B^{*P}}^2)^{3/2}}}~,
358: \end{equation}
359: \begin{equation}
360: D' = \sum_{B=n,p,\Lambda} \frac{(2J_B+1)}{2 \pi^2}
361: \left(\frac{g_{\sigma B}g_{\sigma^* B}}{{m_\sigma}^2}
362: \right) \int_0^{K_{F_B}} \frac{k^4 dk}{(k^2 + {m_B^{*P}}^2)^{3/2}}~,
363: \end{equation}
364: \begin{equation}
365: D'' = \frac {\sum_{B=n,p,\Lambda} \frac{(2J_B+1)}{2 \pi^2}
366: \left(\frac{g_{\sigma B}g_{\sigma^* B}}{{m_\sigma^*}^2}
367: \right) \int_0^{K_{F_B}} \frac{k^4 dk}{(k^2 + {m_B^{*P}}^2)^{3/2}}}
368: { 1+ \sum_{B=n,p,\Lambda} \frac{(2J_B+1)}{2 \pi^2}\left(\frac{g_{\sigma^* B}}
369: {m_\sigma^*}
370: \right)^2 \int_0^{K_{F_B}} \frac{k^4 dk}{(k^2 + {m_B^{*P}}^2)^{3/2}}}~.
371: \end{equation}
372: Here $B$ and $B'$ denote baryons and P stands for hadron ($h$) or antikaon ($K$)
373: phase. Further nucleons do not couple with strange strange mesons i.e.
374: $g_{\sigma^* N} = g_{\phi N} = 0$. Similarly, $\Lambda$ hyperons do not couple
375: with $\rho$ meson i.e. $g_{\rho \Lambda} = 0$. The results for other $\alpha$s
376: in the antikaon condensed phase are given below,
377: \begin{eqnarray}
378: \alpha_{B K^-} &=& \frac{\partial \mu_B^K}{\partial n_{K^-}} \nonumber \\
379: &=& -\left( \frac{g_{\omega B}g_{\omega K}}{m_\omega^2}\right)
380: \pm \frac{1}{4}\left( \frac{g_{\rho B}g_{\rho K}}{m_\rho^2}\right)
381: -\left( \frac{g_{\phi B}g_{\phi K}}{m_\phi^2}\right) \nonumber \\
382: &-& {\frac {m_B^{*K}}{\sqrt{k_{F_B}^2 +
383: {m_B^{*K}}^2}}}\left(g_{\sigma B}{\frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial n_{K^-}}}
384: + g_{\sigma^* B} {\frac {\partial \sigma^*}{\partial n_{K^-}}}\right)~,
385: \end{eqnarray}
386: \begin{eqnarray}
387: \alpha_{K^- B} &=& \frac{\partial \mu_{K^-}}{\partial n_B^K} \nonumber \\
388: &=& -\left( \frac{g_{\omega B}g_{\omega K}}{m_\omega^2}\right)
389: \pm \frac{1}{4}\left( \frac{g_{\rho B}g_{\rho K}}{m_\rho^2}\right)
390: -\left( \frac{g_{\phi B}g_{\phi K}}{m_\phi^2}\right)
391: - \left(g_{\sigma K}{\frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial n_B^K}}
392: + g_{\sigma^* K} {\frac {\partial \sigma^*}{\partial n_B^K}}\right)~,
393: \end{eqnarray}
394: \begin{equation}
395: \alpha_{K^- K^-} = \frac{\partial \mu_{K^-}}{\partial n_{K^-}} \\
396: = \left( \frac{g_{\omega K}}{m_{\omega}} \right)^2
397: + \left( \frac{g_{\phi K}}{m_{\phi}} \right)^2
398: + \frac{1}{4}\left( \frac{g_{\rho K}}{m_{\rho}} \right)^2
399: - g_{\sigma K} \frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial n_{K^-}}
400: - g_{\sigma^* K} \frac{\partial \sigma^{*}}{\partial n_{K^-}}~,
401: \end{equation}
402: where,
403: \begin{eqnarray}
404: \frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial n_{K^-}} &=& \frac{\frac{g_{\sigma K}}
405: {m_{\sigma}^2} - \frac{g_{\sigma^* K} D''}{m_{\sigma}^2}}{D- D' \times D''},
406: \nonumber\\
407: \frac{\partial \sigma^*}{\partial n_{K^-}} &=& \frac{\frac{g_{\sigma^* K}}
408: {m_{\sigma^*}^2}}{F} - D'' \frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial n_{K^-}}~,
409: \end{eqnarray}
410: and
411: \begin{equation}
412: F = { 1 + \sum_{B=n,p,\Lambda} \frac{(2J_B+1)}{2 \pi^2}
413: \left(\frac{g_{\sigma^* B}} {m_\sigma^*}
414: \right)^2 \int_0^{K_{F_B}} \frac{k^4 dk}{(k^2 + {m_B^{*P}}^2)^{3/2}}}~.
415: \end{equation}
416: In the second term in Eq.(27) and (28), +ve sign corresponds to neutrons and
417: -ve is for protons. With the given $\alpha_{ij}$, we can now calculate
418: relaxation time for the non-leptonic process in hadron as well as antikaon
419: condensed phases. As soon as we know the relaxation time, we can calculate the
420: bulk viscosity coefficient in each phase.
421:
422: Now we focus on the calculation of relaxation time and bulk viscosity in the
423: mixed phase. For this, we have to express the chemical imbalance
424: ($\delta {\mu}$) in the non-leptonic hyperon process as given by Eq.(17) in
425: terms of $\delta{n_n^K}$ from the following constraints,
426: \begin{eqnarray}
427: (1-\chi)\left(\delta n_n^h + \delta n_p^h + \delta n_{\Lambda}^h \right)
428: + \chi \left(\delta n_n^K + \delta n_p^K + \delta n_{\Lambda}^K \right)
429: &=& 0~, \nonumber \\
430: (1-\chi)\delta n_p^h + \chi ( \delta n_p^K - \delta n_{K^-}) &=& 0~,
431: \nonumber \\
432: \delta \mu_p^h &=& \delta \mu_p^K~, \nonumber \\
433: \delta \mu_n^h &=& \delta \mu_n^K~, \nonumber \\
434: \delta \mu_{\Lambda}^h &=& \delta \mu_{\Lambda}^K~, \nonumber \\
435: \delta \mu_n^K - \delta \mu_p^K - \delta \mu_{K^-} &=& 0~.
436: \end{eqnarray}
437: Here we have $\delta \chi = 0$ because number densities
438: deviate from their equilibrium values only by internal reactions \citep{Lin02}.
439: First two constraints follow from the conservation of baryon number and
440: electric charge neutrality. The last constrain is the result of the chemical
441: equilibrium involving $K^-$ condensate as already shown by Eq.(19). The
442: other constraints are due to the equality of neutron, proton and $\Lambda$
443: chemical potentials in the hadronic and condensed phases and
444: we can rewrite them as
445: \begin{eqnarray}
446: \left(\alpha_{pn}^h \delta n_n^h + \alpha_{pp}^h \delta n_p^h
447: + \alpha_{p\Lambda}^h \delta n_{\Lambda}^h\right) -
448: \left(\alpha_{pn}^K \delta n_n^K + \alpha_{pp}^K \delta n_p^K
449: + \alpha_{p\Lambda}^K \delta n_{\Lambda}^K +
450: \alpha_{p K^-} \delta n_{K^-}\right) &=& 0~, \nonumber \\
451: \left(\alpha_{nn}^h \delta n_n^h + \alpha_{np}^h \delta n_p^h
452: + \alpha_{n \Lambda}^h \delta n_{\Lambda}^h \right) -
453: \left(\alpha_{nn}^K \delta n_n^K + \alpha_{np}^K \delta n_p^K
454: + \alpha_{n \Lambda}^K \delta n_{\Lambda}^K +
455: \alpha_{n K^-} \delta n_{K^-} \right) &=& 0~, \nonumber \\
456: \left(\alpha_{\Lambda n}^h \delta n_n^h + \alpha_{\Lambda p}^h \delta n_p^h
457: + \alpha_{\Lambda \Lambda}^h \delta n_{\Lambda}^h \right) -
458: \left(\alpha_{\Lambda n}^K \delta n_n^K + \alpha_{\Lambda p}^K \delta n_p^K
459: + \alpha_{\Lambda \Lambda}^K \delta n_{\Lambda}^K +
460: \alpha_{\Lambda K^-} \delta n_{K^-} \right) &=& 0~.
461: \end{eqnarray}
462: We express $\delta n_n^h$, $\delta n_p^h$, $\delta n_{\Lambda}^h$,
463: $\delta n_p^K$, $\delta n_{\Lambda}^K$ and $\delta n_{K^-}$ in terms of
464: $\delta n_n^K$ using above six constraints. For this purpose, we solve
465: a 6 $\times$ 6 matrix constructed out of above six relations and obtain
466: $\frac{\delta \mu}{\delta {n_n^K}}$. Similarly, we obtain
467: $\frac{\delta \mu}{\delta {n_n^h}}$ in the mixed phase from the above
468: constraints. This completes the calculation of relaxation time and bulk
469: viscosity in the mixed phase.
470:
471: Next we calculate critical angular velocity as a function temperature and mass
472: of a rotating neutron star. The bulk viscosity damping timescale ($\tau_B$)
473: due to the non-leptonic process involving $\Lambda$ hyperons and the bulk
474: viscosity profile as a function of $r$ are obtained following the
475: Ref. \citep{Lin99,Lin02,Nar,DR1}. Further we take into account time scales
476: associated with gravitational radiation ($\tau_{GR}$) \citep{Lin98}
477: , bulk viscosity due to modified Urca process ($\tau_U$) involving only
478: nucleons \citep{Saw,Kok} and the shear viscosity ($\tau_{SV}$)
479: \citep{Lin98,Kok,And06} and define the overall r-mode time scale ($\tau_r$) as
480: \begin{equation}
481: {\frac {1}{\tau_r}} = - {\frac {1}{\tau_{GR}}} + {\frac {1}{\tau_B}} +
482: {\frac {1}{\tau_U}} + {\frac {1}{\tau_{SV}}}~.
483: \end{equation}
484: Finally, solving $\frac {1}{\tau_r}$ = 0, we calculate the critical
485: angular velocity above which the r-mode is unstable whereas it is stable below
486: the critical angular velocity.
487: \section{Results and Discussion}
488: For this calculation, nucleon-meson coupling constants are taken from
489: Ref.\citep{Gle91} and this set is known as GM. Nucleon-meson coupling
490: constants are determined by reproducing nuclear matter saturation
491: properties such as binding energy $E/B=-16.3$ MeV, baryon density $n_0=0.153$
492: fm$^{-3}$, asymmetry energy coefficient $a_{\rm asy}=32.5$ MeV,
493: incompressibility $K=300$ MeV and effective nucleon mass $m^*_N/m_N = 0.70$.
494: Further we need to know kaon-meson coupling constants and determine them using
495: the quark model and isospin counting rule. The vector coupling constants are
496: given by
497: \begin{equation}
498: g_{\omega K} = \frac{1}{3} g_{\omega N} ~~~~~ {\rm and} ~~~~~
499: g_{\rho K} = g_{\rho N} ~.
500: \end{equation}
501: The scalar coupling constant is obtained from the real part of
502: $K^-$ optical potential depth at normal nuclear matter density
503: \begin{equation}
504: U_{\bar K} \left(n_0\right) = - g_{\sigma K}\sigma - g_{\omega K}\omega_0 ~.
505: \end{equation}
506: Antikaons experience an attractive potential whereas kaons has a repulsive
507: interaction in nuclear matter \citep{Fri94,Koc,Bat97,Waa,Li1,Li2,Fri99,Pal2}.
508: The analysis of $K^-$ atomic data using a hybrid model \citep{Fri99} which
509: combines the
510: relativistic mean field approach in the nuclear interior and a phenomenological
511: potential at low density, yielded the real part of the antikaon potential as
512: large as $U_{\bar K}(n_0) = -180 \pm 20$ MeV at normal nuclear matter density.
513: It was predicted that $K^-$ condensation might occur in neutron star matter for
514: strongly attractive antikaon potential $\sim -100$ MeV or more.
515: In this calculation, we adopt the value of antikaon optical potential depth
516: at normal nuclear matter density as $U_{\bar K}(n_0) = -160$ MeV.
517: We obtain kaon-scalar meson coupling constant $g_{\sigma K} = 2.9937$
518: corresponding to this antikaon optical potential depth.
519:
520: On the other hand, hyperon-vector meson coupling constants are determined using
521: SU(6) symmetry of the quark model \citep{Dov,Sch94,Sch} and the scalar $\sigma$
522: meson coupling to $\Lambda$ hyperons is calculated from the hyperon
523: potential depth in normal nuclear matter $U_{\Lambda}^N (n_0)$ = $-30$ MeV
524: obtained from hypernuclei data \citep{Dov,Chr}. The hyperon-$\sigma^*$ coupling
525: constant is determined from double $\Lambda$ hypernuclei data
526: \citep{Sch93,Sch}.
527:
528: The strange meson fields also couple with (anti)kaons.
529: The $\sigma^*$-K coupling constant determined from the decay of $f_0$(925)
530: is $g_{\sigma^*K}=2.65$
531: and the vector $\phi$ meson
532: coupling with (anti)kaons $\sqrt{2} g_{\phi K} = 6.04$ follows from
533: the SU(3) relation \citep{Sch}.
534:
535: The onsets of $K^-$ condensate and $\Lambda$ hyperons in neutron star matter
536: are sensitive to the composition of matter and the strength of antikaon optical
537: potential depth \citep{Bani2}. It was further noted that the early appearance of
538: either $\Lambda$ hyperons or the $K^-$ condensate delayed the onset of the
539: other to higher densities. In this calculation, for
540: $U_{\bar K}(n_0) = - 160$ MeV, $\Lambda$ hyperons appear just after the onset of
541: $K^-$ condensation. The $K^-$ condensation sets in at a density 2.23 $n_0$ and
542: the mixed phase ends at 4.1 $n_0$. On the other hand, $\Lambda$ hyperons appear
543: at a density 2.51 $n_0$. It is worth mentioning here that we obtained
544: qualitatively similar results with the GM parameter set corresponding to
545: $K = 240$ MeV and
546: $U_{\bar K} (n_0) = -140$ MeV. However, this led to a soft EoS resulting in a
547: neutron star mass below the accurately measured mass \citep{DR3}.
548: The composition of $\beta$-equilibrated and charge neutral
549: matter in the presence of $K^-$ condensate for $U_{\bar K}(n_0) = -160$ MeV
550: is displayed in Figure 1. Negatively charged particles such as electrons and
551: muons are depleted from the system with the onset of $K^-$ condensation
552: and its rapid growth there after. At this stage, the proton density
553: becomes equal to the density of $K^-$ mesons in the condensate. It is evident
554: from the figure that $\Lambda$ hyperons populate the system just after the
555: onset of $K^-$ condensation.
556:
557: The relaxation time for the non-leptonic process
558: $n + p \rightleftharpoons p + \Lambda~$ is plotted with normalised baryon
559: density in Figure 2 for $U_{\bar K}(n_0) = -160$ MeV and temperature
560: $T = 10^{10}$ K. Here equations of state
561: enter as inputs in the calculation of relaxation time in different phases. In
562: particular, partial derivatives of pressure and chemical potentials with
563: respect to neutron number density are calculated using EoS according to the
564: prescription as discussed in section II. This figure shows relaxation time in
565: different phases i.e. the pure antikaon condensed phase (light solid line) and
566: the hadronic (bold solid line) and antikaon condensed parts of the
567: mixed phase (dashed line). We find that the values of relaxation time in the
568: pure and mixed antikaon condensed phases are significantly smaller than that of
569: the hadronic phase involving non-superfluid $\Lambda$ hyperons
570: \citep{Nar,DR1}. The relaxation time for the non-leptonic weak process
571: involving hyperons is inversely proportional to $T^2$ as given by Eq.(15).
572:
573: Figure 3 exhibits the hyperon bulk viscosity coefficient as a
574: function of normalised baryon density at a temperature $T = 10^{10}$ K. Similar
575: to Fig. 2, the bulk viscosity in the pure antikaon condensed phase
576: (light solid line) and the hadronic (bold solid line) and antikaon condensed
577: parts of the mixed phase (dashed line) are shown here. One can immediately see
578: that the hyperon bulk viscosity in the antikaon condensed matter, irrespective
579: of whether it is in the
580: pure or mixed phase, is suppressed compared with that of hadronic phase. This
581: suppression may be attributed to the superconducting phase i.e the $K^-$
582: condensed phase. The role of superfluidity on hyperon bulk viscosity was
583: studied at length by several groups \citep{Han3,Nar,And06}. They also obtained
584: significant suppression in the hyperon bulk viscosity because one or more
585: superfluid particles were participating in non-leptonic weak processes
586: involving hyperons. In our calculation, $K^-$ mesons in the Bose-Einstein
587: condensed state is not a member of the non-leptonic weak process
588: $n + p \rightleftharpoons p + \Lambda~$. Therefore, the suppression of hyperon
589: bulk viscosity in our case originates from the EoS in the $K^-$ condensed phase
590: which enters into the calculation of the chemical imbalance as given by
591: Eq.(17). We further add that the factor $\omega \tau$ in
592: the bulk viscosity coefficient given by Eq.(15) is negligible compared with
593: unity over the whole range of baryon densities considered here. This leads to
594: a $1/T^2$ temperature dependence of the hyperon bulk viscosity. However, the
595: inversion of the temperature dependence was observed in some calculations
596: \citep{Han3,Nar} when the factor $\omega \tau$ is much greater than unity.
597: We find a jump in the bulk viscosity coefficient at the upper phase
598: boundary of the mixed phase and pure $K^-$ condensed phase. This is attributed
599: to kinks in the EoS and discontinuities in ($\gamma_{\infty} - \gamma_0$).
600:
601: Now we discuss the results of damping time scale due to the hyperon bulk
602: viscosity
603: and critical angular velocity. This calculation needs the knowledge of
604: the energy density profile, hyperon bulk viscosity profile and the structure
605: of the rotating neutron star in question. For this purpose,
606: we consider a neutron star of gravitational mass 1.60$M_{\odot}$ having baryon
607: rest mass 1.76$M_{\odot}$ and central baryon density 3.50 $n_0$ and rotating at
608: an angular velocity $\Omega_{rot} = 2652 s^{-1}$ from the sequence of rotating
609: neutron stars calculated by the model of Stergioulas \citep{Ster95}.
610: This neutron star contains both $\Lambda$ hyperons and $K^-$ condensate in its
611: core as its central baryon density is well above the threshold densities of
612: $K^-$ condensation and $\Lambda$ hyperons. The hyperon bulk viscosity profile
613: of this neutron star as a function of equatorial distance for $T = 10^{10}$ K
614: is displayed in Figure 4. The hyperon bulk viscosity in the hadronic and
615: antikaon condensed parts of the mixed phase are shown by bold solid
616: and dashed lines, respectively.
617: Further we note that the bulk viscosity profile drops to zero value beyond 3.5 km
618: because the baryon density beyond this distance decreases below the threshold
619: density of $\Lambda$ hyperons.
620:
621: As soon as we know the energy density and bulk viscosity
622: profiles, we obtain the damping time scale corresponding to the hyperon bulk
623: viscosity and critical angular velocities as a function of temperature solving
624: $1/\tau_r = 0$ for a rotating neutron star mass 1.60$M_{\odot}$.
625: Besides the hyperon bulk viscosity, we also consider the
626: bulk viscosity due to modified Urca process involving nucleons as well as the
627: shear viscosity to the total r-mode time scale as given by Eq.(34).
628: The bulk viscosity due to modified Urca process plays an important
629: role to damp the r-mode at higher temperatures. However, this process can not
630: suppress the r-mode instability below $10^{10}$ K because the corresponding
631: damping time scale is longer than the
632: gravitational radiation growth time scale. On the other hand, the shear
633: viscosity coefficient is proportional to $T^{-2}$ and the damping time scale
634: $\tau_{SV}$ is also larger than $\tau_{GR}$ in the temperature range considered
635: here. The bulk viscosity damping time scale ($\tau_B$) due to the non-leptonic
636: process $n + p \rightleftharpoons p + \Lambda~$ and $\tau_{GR}$ are comparable
637: at T $\sim 4 \times 10^{9}$ and below. Consequently, the r-mode instability is
638: damped in this temperature regime by the hyperon bulk viscosity in $K^-$
639: condensed matter. Though the hyperon bulk viscosity is suppressed in the
640: antikaon condensed phase, it is still a very efficient process to damp the
641: r-mode instability.
642:
643: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
644: We have investigated the hyperon bulk viscosity due to the non-leptonic weak
645: process $n + p \rightleftharpoons p + \Lambda~$ in a $K^-$ condensed phase and
646: later applied it to study the r-mode instability in neutron stars.
647: For the parameter set adopted here and antikaon optical potential depth
648: $U_{\bar K}(n_0) = -160$ MeV, $K^-$ condensation occurs before $\Lambda$
649: hyperons are populated in the system. We find that the hyperon bulk
650: viscosity coefficient in $K^-$ condensed matter is significantly suppressed
651: compared with the non-superfluid hyperon bulk viscosity
652: coefficient in the hadronic phase. Further we note that the hyperon bulk
653: viscosity in the superconducting phase is still an efficient
654: process to damp the r-mode instability.
655:
656: \acknowledgments
657:
658: DB thanks the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for the support. He also
659: thanks Horst St\"ocker and Walter Greiner for their support and
660: acknowledges the warm hospitality at the Institute for Theoretical Physics,
661: J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main and Frankfurt Institute for
662: Advanced Studies (FIAS) where a part of this work was completed.
663:
664:
665: \begin{thebibliography}{}
666: \bibitem [Alford \& Schmitt (2007a)]{Schm} Alford, M. G., \& Schmitt, A. 2007a,
667: J. Phys. G, 34, 67
668: \bibitem [Alford et al. (2007b)]{Alf} Alford, M. G., Braby, M., Reddy, S., \&
669: Schafer, T. 2007b, Phys. Rev. C, 75, 055209
670: \bibitem [Alford et al. (2007c)]{Alf3} Alford, M. G., Schmitt, A., Rajagopal,
671: K., \& Schafer, T. 2007c, preprint (arXiv:0709.4635)
672: \bibitem [Andersson(1998)]{And98} Andersson, N. 1998, \apj, 502, 708
673: \bibitem [Andersson et al.(1999)]{And99} Andersson, N., Kokkotas, K. D., \&
674: Schutz, B. F. 1999, \apj, 510, 846
675: \bibitem [Andersson \& Kokkotas(2001)]{Kok} Andersson, N., \& Kokkotas, K. D.
676: 2001, Int. J. Mod. Phys., D10, 381
677: \bibitem [Andersson(2003)]{And01} Andersson, N. 2003, Class. Quant. Grav.,
678: 20, R105
679: \bibitem [Andersson(2007)]{And06} Andersson, N. 2007, Astrophys. Space Sci.
680: 308, 395
681: \bibitem[Banik \& Bandyopadhyay(2001a)]{Bani1} Banik, S., \& Bandyopadhyay, D.
682: 2001a, Phys. Rev. C, 63, 035802
683: \bibitem[Banik \& Bandyopadhyay(2001b)]{Bani2} Banik, S., \& Bandyopadhyay, D.
684: 2001b, Phys. Rev. C, 64, 055805
685: \bibitem[Batty et al.(1997)]{Bat97} Batty, C. J., Friedman, E., \& Gal, A.
686: 1997, Phys. Rep., 287, 385
687: \bibitem[Boguta \& Bodmer(1977)]{Bog} Boguta, J., \& Bodmer, A. R. 1977, Nucl.
688: Phys., A292, 413
689: \bibitem [Chakrabarty et al.(2003)]{Cha} Chakrabarty, D. et al., 2003, Nature,
690: 424, 42
691: \bibitem [Chakrabarty(2005)]{Cha2} Chakrabarty, D. 2005,
692: in ASP Conference Series 328, Binary Radio Pulsars, ed. F. Rasio, \& I. Stairs
693: (Aspen,Colorado:ASP), 279
694: \bibitem [Chandrasekhar(1970)]{Chan} Chandrasekhar, S. 1970, Phys. Rev.
695: Lett., 24, 611
696: \bibitem [Chatterjee \& Bandyopadhyay(2006)]{DR1} Chatterjee, D., \&
697: Bandyopadhyay, D. 2006, Phys. Rev. D 74, 023003
698: \bibitem [Chatterjee \& Bandyopadhyay(2007a)]{DR2} Chatterjee, D., \&
699: Bandyopadhyay, D. 2007a, Ap\&SS, 308, 451
700: \bibitem [Chatterjee \& Bandyopadhyay(2007b)]{DR3} Chatterjee, D., \&
701: Bandyopadhyay, D. 2007b, Phys. Rev. D 75, 123006
702: \bibitem[Chrien \& Dover(1989)]{Chr} Chrien, R. E., \& Dover, C. B. 1989,
703: Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 39, 113
704: \bibitem [Dalen \& Dieperink(2004)]{Dal} Dalen, van E. N. E., \& Dieperink, A.
705: E. L. 2004, Phys. Rev. C, 69, 025802
706: \bibitem [Drago et al.,(2005)]{Dra} Drago, A., Lavagno, A., \& Pagliara, G.
707: 2005, Phys. Rev. D, 71, 103004
708: \bibitem [Dong et al.(2007a)]{Don1} Dong, H., Su, N., \& Wang, Q. 2007a,
709: Phys. Rev. D, 75, 074016
710: \bibitem [Dong et al.(2007b)]{Don2} Dong, H., Su, N., \& Wang, Q. 2007b, J.
711: Phys. G, 34, 6643
712: \bibitem [Dover \& Gal(1984)]{Dov} Dover C. B., \& Gal, A. 1984, Prog. Part.
713: Nucl. Phys. 12, 171
714: \bibitem[Friedman et al.(1994)]{Fri94} Friedman, E., Gal, A., \& Batty, C. J.
715: 1994, Nucl. Phys. A, 579, 518
716: \bibitem[Friedman et al.(1999)]{Fri99} Friedman, E., Gal, A.,
717: Mare\v{s}, J., \& Ciepl\'y, A. 1999, Phys. Rev. C, 60, 024314
718: \bibitem [Friedman(1978)]{Fri1} Friedman, J. L. 1978,
719: Commun. Math. Phys., 62, 247
720: \bibitem [Friedman \& Schutz(1978a)]{Fri2} Friedman, J. L., \& Schutz,
721: B. F. 1978a, \apj, 221, 937
722: \bibitem [Friedman \& Schutz(1978b)]{Fri3} Friedman, J. L., \& Schutz,
723: B. F. 1978b, \apj, 222, 281
724: \bibitem [Friedman \& Morsink(1998)]{Fri98} Friedman, J. L., \& Morsink, S. M.
725: 1998, \apj, 502, 714
726: \bibitem[Glendenning(1992)]{Gle92} Glendenning, N. K. 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 46,
727: 1274
728: \bibitem[Glendenning \& Schaffner-Bielich(1998)]{Gle98} Glendenning, N. K., \&
729: Schaffner-Bielich, J. 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 4564
730: \bibitem[Glendenning \& Schaffner-Bielich(1999)]{Gle99} Glendenning, N. K., \&
731: Schaffner-Bielich, J. 1999, Phys. Rev. C, 60, 025803
732: \bibitem[Glendenning \& Moszkowski(1991)]{Gle91} Glendenning, N. K., \&
733: Moszkowski, S. A. 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett., 67, 2414
734: \bibitem [Haensel et al.(2000)]{Han1} Haensel, P., Levenfish, K. P., \&
735: Yakovlev, D. G. 2000, A\&A, 357, 1157
736: \bibitem [Haensel et al.(2001)]{Han2} Haensel, P., Levenfish, K. P., \&
737: Yakovlev, D. G. 2001, A\&A, 372, 130
738: \bibitem [Haensel et al.(2002)]{Han3} Haensel, P., Levenfish, K. P., \&
739: Yakovlev, D. G. 2002, A\&A, 381, 1080
740: \bibitem [Hessels et al.(2006)]{Hes} Hessels, J. W. T. et al., 2006,
741: Science, 311, 1901
742: \bibitem [Jones(2001a)]{Jon1} Jones, P. B. 2001a, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 1384
743: \bibitem [Jones(2001b)]{Jon2} Jones, P. B. 2001b, Phys. Rev. D, 64, 084003
744: \bibitem[Koch(1994)]{Koc} Koch, V. 1994, Phys. Lett. B, 337, 7
745: \bibitem[Landau \& Liftshitz(1999)]{Lan} Landau, L. D., \& Lifshitz, E. M.
746: 1999, Fluid Mechanics (Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann)
747: \bibitem[Li et al.(1997a)]{Li1} Li, G. Q., Lee, C.-H., \& Brown, G. E. 1997a,
748: Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 5214
749: \bibitem[Li et al.(1997b)]{Li2} Li, G. Q., Lee, C.-H., \& Brown, G. E. 1997b,
750: Nucl. Phys. A, 625, 372
751: \bibitem [Lindblom et al.(1998)]{Lin98} Lindblom, L., Owen, B. J., \& Morsink,
752: S. M. 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 4843
753: \bibitem[Lindblom et al.(1999)]{Lin99} Lindblom, L., Mendell, G., \&
754: Owen, B. J. 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 60, 064006
755: \bibitem [Lindblom \& Mendell(2000)]{Lin00} Lindblom, L., \& Mendell, G. 2000,
756: Phys. Rev. D, 61, 104003
757: \bibitem [Lindblom \& Owen(2002)]{Lin02} Lindblom, L., \& Owen, B. J. 2002,
758: Phys. Rev. D, 65, 063006
759: \bibitem [Madsen(1992)]{Mad92} Madsen, J. 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 46, 3290
760: \bibitem [Madsen(2000)]{Mad00} Madsen, J. 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 10
761: \bibitem [Nayyar \& Owen(2006)]{Nar} Nayyar, M. \& Owen, B. J. 2006, Phys.
762: Rev. D 73, 084001
763: \bibitem[Pal et al.(2000)]{Pal2} Pal, S., Ko, C. M., Lin, Z., \& Zhang, B.
764: 2000, Phy. Rev. C, 62, 061903
765: \bibitem [Pan et al.(2006)]{Pan} Pan, N. N., Zheng, X. P., \& Li, J. R. 2006,
766: \mnras, 371, 1359
767: \bibitem [Sa'd et al.(2007a)]{Bas} Sa'd, B. A., Shovkovy, I. A., \& Rischke, D.
768: H. 2007a, Phys. Rev. D, 75, 065016
769: \bibitem [Sa'd et al.(2007b)]{Bas2} Sa'd, B. A., Shovkovy, I. A., \& Rischke, D.
770: H. 2007b, Phys. Rev. D, 75, 125004
771: \bibitem[Sawyer(1989)]{Saw} Sawyer, R. F. 1989, Phys. Rev. D, 39, 3804
772: \bibitem[Schaffner et al.(1993)]{Sch93} Schaffner, J., Dover, C. B., Gal, A.,
773: Greiner, C., \& St\"ocker, H. 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 1328
774: \bibitem[Schaffner et al.(1994)]{Sch94} Schaffner, J., Dover, C. B., Gal, A.,
775: Millener, D. J., Greiner, C., \& St\"ocker, H. 1994, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 235, 35
776: \bibitem[Schaffner \& Mishustin(1996)]{Sch} Schaffner, J., \& Mishustin, I. N.
777: 1996, Phys. Rev. C, 53, 1416
778: \bibitem[Serot \& Walecka(1986)]{Ser} Serot, B. D., \& Walecka, J. D. 1986,
779: Adv. in Nucl. Phys., 16, 1
780: \bibitem [Stergioulas(2003)]{Ster} Stergioulas, N. 2003, Liv. Rev. Rel., 6, 3
781: \bibitem[Stergioulas \& Friedman(1995)]{Ster95} Stergioulas, N., \& Friedman,
782: J. L. 1995, \apj, 444, 306
783: \bibitem[Waas \& Weise(1997)]{Waa} Waas, T., \& Weise, W. 1997, Nucl. Phys. A,
784: 625, 287
785: \end{thebibliography}
786: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
787: \clearpage
788:
789: \begin{figure}
790: \epsscale{.80}
791: \plotone{f1.eps}
792: \caption{Particles abundances are plotted with normalised baryon density for
793: antikaon optical potential depth at normal nuclear matter density
794: $U_{\bar K}(n_0) = -160$ MeV.}
795: \end{figure}
796:
797: \clearpage
798:
799: \begin{figure}
800: \epsscale{.80}
801: \plotone{f2.eps}
802: \caption{Relaxation time is plotted with normalised baryon density for the
803: non-leptonic process $n + p \rightleftharpoons p + \Lambda~$ and
804: antikaon optical potential depth at normal nuclear matter density
805: $U_{\bar K}(n_0)= -160$ MeV. The contributions of the pure antikaon condensed
806: phase and the hadronic and antikaon condensed parts of the mixed phase
807: are shown by light solid, bold solid and dashed lines, respectively.}
808: \end{figure}
809:
810: \clearpage
811:
812: \begin{figure}
813: \epsscale{.80}
814: \plotone{f3.eps}
815: \caption{Hyperon bulk viscosity coefficient is exhibited as a function of
816: normalised baryon density at a temperature $10^{10}$ K and
817: antikaon optical potential depth at normal nuclear matter density
818: $U_{\bar K}(n_0) = -160$ MeV. Different lines have the same meaning as in
819: Fig. 2.}
820: \end{figure}
821:
822: \clearpage
823:
824: \begin{figure}
825: \epsscale{.80}
826: \plotone{f4.eps}
827: \caption{Hyperon bulk viscosity profile is shown with equatorial distance for
828: a rotating neutron star of mass 1.60 M$_{\odot}$ at a temperature $10^{10}$ K
829: and antikaon optical potential depth $U_{\bar K}(n_0) = -160$ MeV. The
830: hadronic and antikaon condensed parts of the mixed phase
831: are shown by bold solid and dashed lines, respectively.}
832: \end{figure}
833:
834: \clearpage
835:
836: \begin{figure}
837: \epsscale{.80}
838: \plotone{f5.eps}
839: \caption{Critical angular velocity for 1.60 M$_{\odot}$ neutron star is
840: plotted as a function of temperature.}
841: \end{figure}
842:
843: \end{document}
844: