1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \def\gtsima{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}
44: \def\simgt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{GOODS~850-5 lies most probably at z$\sim$4}
58: \shortauthors{Dannerbauer et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{Interferometric detections of GOODS~850-5 at 1~mm and 1.4~GHz\altaffilmark{1}}
70:
71: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
72: %% author and affiliation information.
73: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
74: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
75: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
76: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
77:
78: \author{H. Dannerbauer, F. Walter}
79: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie,
80: K\"onigstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany; email: dannerb@mpia-hd.mpg.de,walter@mpia-hd.mpg.de}
81:
82: \and
83: \author{G. Morrison}
84: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA; email: morrison@ifa.hawaii.edu}
85: \affil{Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope, Kamuela, HI, 96743, USA;
86: email: morrison@cfht.hawaii.edu}
87: %\email{aastex-help@aas.org}
88:
89: %\and
90:
91: %\author{R. J. Hanisch\altaffilmark{5}}
92: %\affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218}
93:
94: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
95: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
96: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
97: %% affiliation.
98:
99: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations carried out with the IRAM Plateau de
100: Bure Interferometer. IRAM is supported by INSU/CNRS (France), MPG (Germany)
101: and IGN (Spain). The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the
102: National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
103: Universities, Inc.}
104:
105: \begin{abstract}
106: We have obtained a position (at sub-arcsecond accuracy) of the submillimeter
107: bright source GOODS~850-5 (also known as GN10) in the GOODS North field using
108: the IRAM Plateau de Bure interferometer at 1.25~mm wavelengths
109: (MM~J123633$+$6214.1, flux density: $S_{1.25~mm}=5.0\pm1.0$~mJy). This source
110: has no optical counterpart in deep ACS imaging down to a limiting magnitude of
111: i$_{775}=28.4$~mag and its position is coincident with the position found in
112: recent sub-millimeter mapping obtained at the SMA \citep{wan07}. Using deep
113: VLA imaging at 20~cm, we find a radio source ($S_{20~cm}=32.7\pm4.3~\mu$Jy) at
114: the same position that is significantly brighter than reported in Wang et
115: al. The source is detected by Spitzer in IRAC as well as at
116: 24~$\mu$m. We apply different photometric redshift
117: estimators using measurements of the dusty, mid/far-infrared part of the SED
118: and derive a redshift z~$\sim4$. Given our detection in the millimeter and
119: radio we consider a significantly higher redshift \citep[e.g.,
120: z~$\sim6$][]{wan07} unlikely. MM~J123633$+$6214.1 alias GOODS~850-5
121: nevertheless constitutes a bright representative of the high-redshift tail of
122: the submillimeter galaxy population that may contribute a significant fraction
123: to the (sub)millimeter background.
124: \end{abstract}
125:
126: \keywords{Galaxies: formation --- Galaxies: high-redshift --- Galaxies:
127: starburst --- Galaxies: individual (MM~J123633$+$6214.1) --- Infrared: galaxies --- Submillimeter}
128:
129: \section{Introduction}
130: Research in the last decade showed that to understand the assembly and
131: formation of massive galaxies it is critical to study Submillimeter Galaxies
132: \citep[SMGs; see][for a review]{bla02}. Since their first detection ten years
133: ago \citep{sma97}, more than three hundred dust-enshrouded high-z objects (z
134: $>$2) have been detected by SCUBA and by MAMBO in the submillimeter and
135: millimeter regime
136: \citep[e.g.,][]{hug98,ber00,dan02,dan04,sma02,gre04,wan04,pop06,cop06,ber07}. Due
137: to the large beam size in the (sub)mm (SCUBA: 15\arcsec, MAMBO: 11\arcsec), it
138: is impossible to do a proper identification in other wavebands (such as the
139: optical and near-infrared) based on bolometer data only. Thus, typically
140: interferometric observations at radio wavelength with the VLA were used to
141: identify the location of the SMGs, yielding a radio identification rate of
142: $\sim50-70$\% \citep[e.g.,][]{sma00,dan04,wan04,pop06,ivi07}, depending on
143: both the depths of the radio and the bolometer maps. The main drawback of this
144: technique is, however, that the radio flux is redshift dependent, whereas the
145: (sub)mm flux density at z~$\ge1$ is not \citep[due to the inverse K
146: correction; e.g.,][]{bla93}: one would thus expect the highest redshift
147: (z~$>3$) sources \citep[e.g.,][]{bar00} to be very faint at radio wavelengths
148: if they were to follow the radio-FIR correlation \citep[e.g.,][]{con92}. We
149: note that the radio-identified SMG with the highest redshift lies at
150: z~$\sim3.6$ \citep{cha03,cha05}. Based on this sample, CO observations of
151: radio identified SMGs \citep[e.g.,][]{ner03,gen03,gre05} lead to the main
152: conclusion that SMGs are massive galaxies in formation and \citet{cha05} argue
153: that the contribution to the star-formation rate density (SFRD) from this
154: population is missed by UV-selected surveys. If one only uses
155: radio-identified sources \citep[e.g.,][]{cha03,cha05} one thus has to be aware
156: of the fact that the radio selection introduces a bias towards the low end of
157: the true redshift distribution. To summarize, our knowledge about the nature
158: and properties of the SMG population is mainly based on radio-identified SMGs
159: --- a biased sample.
160:
161: One of the open questions in the investigations of SMGs is if there exists a
162: significant very high-redshift tail \citep[z~$>4$;
163: e.g.,][]{dan02,dan04,val07,you07}. The existence of such a tail would not be
164: in contradiction to constraints from measurements of the cosmic infrared
165: background \citep{gis00}. Interferometric observations in the (sub)mm hold
166: the promise to locate the positions of bright SMGs to sub-arcsec
167: accuracy. One of the brightest SCUBA sources in the GOODS North field is
168: GOODS~850-5 (Wang et al. 2004; this source is labeled GN~10 in Pope et
169: al. 2005\footnote{The distance between these two positions is 2.8\arcsec\/,
170: i.e. within the SCUBA bolometer position uncertainties.}) with a submm flux
171: $S_{850~\mu m}=12.94\pm2.14$~mJy \citep{wan04}\footnote{\citet{pop05} report
172: $S_{850~\mu m}=11.3\pm1.6$~mJy}. Until very recently this bright SMG did not
173: have a known counterpart which motivated observations with the IRAM Plateau de
174: Bure Interferometer \citep[PdBI;][]{gui92} to obtain an
175: accurate position for this source. In the meanwhile, \citet{wan07} reported
176: the location of GOODS~850-5 through SMA observations. Based on their detection
177: in the submm (and subsequent identification in IR observations) and a
178: 2~$\sigma$ detection in the radio ($S_{1.4~GHz}=18.7\pm8.6~\mu$Jy),
179: \citet{wan07} argue that the redshift of GOODS~850-5 is z~$>4$ and could even
180: lie between z~$=5.6-8.0$ - with a much lower probability at z$<4.5$.
181:
182: Here we report the results based on our PdBI observations. We adopt the
183: cosmological parameters $\Omega_{matter}=0.27, \Omega_{\Lambda}=0.73,$ and
184: $H_{0}=71~km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}$ \citep{spe03,spe07}. Furthermore, we assume a
185: Salpeter initial mass function from 0.1 to 100~$M_{\sun}$. We use the AB
186: magnitude scale \citep{oke83}.
187:
188: \section{Observations}
189: The final map resulting from our observations between December 2005 and August
190: 2006 with the Plateau de Bure millimeter interferometer in C and
191: D configuration are based on 6.8~hours of on-source observing time. The
192: phase center (see Table \ref{tab:position}) was set at the nominal SCUBA
193: position published in \citet{wan04}. The source was observed in the 1~mm and
194: 3~mm band simultaneously. The 1~mm receiver was tuned at 240.000~GHz
195: (corresponding to 1.25~mm) to obtain an accurate position. The 3~mm receiver was
196: tuned to 98.3188~GHz, i.e., the frequency of the CO(2-1) transition redshifted to z~$=1.3448$.
197: This is the redshift of the optical source GOODS850-5a \citep{wan04} which is
198: situated close ($\sim2.4\arcsec$) to the SCUBA bolometer position. The total
199: bandwith of 580~MHz covers a redshift space of $\Delta z=0.0138$ at that
200: redshift (i.e. within the redshift uncertainty of the source, cf: z~$=1.344$
201: in Cohen et al. 2000 and Pope et al. 2006; z~$=1.345$ in Wang et al. 2004;
202: z~$=1.34476$ in Wirth et al. 2004).
203:
204: The data were calibrated through observations of standard bandpass (3C273,
205: J0418$+$380), phase/amplitude (1044$+$719, 1150$+$497) and flux calibrators
206: (CRL~618, 3C273, 1044$+$719, 1150$+$497) and reduced with the GILDAS software
207: packages CLIC and MAP. The FWHM of the beam is $1.4\arcsec\times1.1\arcsec$ at
208: 240~GHz and $3.4\arcsec\times3.2\arcsec$ at 98.3~GHz.
209:
210: We detected the dust continuum emission of GOODS~850-5 at 5 $\sigma$
211: significance at $S_{1.25~mm}=5.0 \pm 1.0$~mJy. The derived position is
212: RA(J2000)$=$12:36:33.45, DEC(J2000)$=$\- 62:14:08.95 (hereafter:
213: MM~J123633$+$6214.1) with an estimated position uncertainty of
214: $\pm$0.3\arcsec\/. The position and flux density of MM~J123633$+$6214.1 are
215: derived from point source fits of the visibilities in the UV plane and are
216: consistent with the values derived in the image plane. The difference between
217: the SCUBA \citep{wan04} and our millimeter interferometric position is only
218: --0.02~\arcsec\/ in RA and --0.48~\arcsec\/ in DEC, and our position is
219: consistent with the SMA position from \citet{wan07}, see summary in
220: Table~\ref{tab:position}. In the 3~mm band no line was detected down to a rms
221: of 0.8~mJy~beam$^{-1}$ (channel width: 40~MHz, 120~km~s$^{-1}$) on the
222: position of the optical source at z~$=1.3448$ (and also at the position of
223: GOODS~850-5). This corresponds to an upper limit (3~$\sigma$) of the
224: integrated flux intensity of 1.2~Jy~km~s$^{-1}$, adopting a typical CO width
225: for a SMG of 500~km~s$^{-1}$ \citep[e.g.,][]{gre05}. However, we note that a
226: number of CO detections of SMGs have even lower integrated flux intensities
227: than this 3~$\sigma$ upper limit \citep[e.g.,][]{gre05}.
228:
229: We have used new, deep VLA radio continuum observations (Morrison et al. 2008)
230: to constrain the radio flux density of GOODS~850-5. These observations reveal
231: a highly significant radio source ($S_{1.4~GHz}=32.7\pm4.3~\mu$Jy); i.e. a
232: source that is significantly brighter than the upper limit reported in
233: \citet{wan07}. Our derived flux density is however in agreement with the
234: 3~$\sigma$ detection reported in \citet{pop06}. The radio emission is
235: unresolved with a FWHM~$\sim1.7\arcsec$.
236:
237: In our analysis, we use the exquisite multi-wavelength dataset available for
238: the GOODS North field (e.g.,
239: Alexander et al. 2003; Giavalisco et al. 2004; Dickinson et al., in
240: preparation) and have corrected these data products for the offset of
241: --0.38\arcsec\/ in declination between VLA and the GOODS imaging products
242: \citep[see also][]{pop06}.
243:
244: \section{Discussion}
245: \subsection{Multi-wavelength Properties of MM~J123633$+$6214.1 alias GOODS~850-5}
246: The PdBI/VLA source is undetected in the deep ACS images down to
247: $i_{775}=28.4$~mag. However GOODS~850-5 is detected at low significance in
248: Spitzer IRAC measurements at the few $\mu$Jy level \citep{pop06} as summarized
249: in Table \ref{tab:flux}. The source is also detected at 24~$\mu$m
250: (Table~\ref{tab:flux}) but undetected both at MIPS 70~$\mu$m and 160~$\mu$m at
251: a 3~$\sigma$ level ($S_{70~\mu m}<2.0$~mJy and $S_{160~\mu
252: m}<15.0$~mJy). However, due to the large beam size (18\arcsec\/ at 70~$\mu$m and
253: 40\arcsec\/ at 160~$\mu$m) our source would be confused with other objects
254: within the beam. We conclude that the IRAC counterpart presented in
255: \citet{pop06} is the proper counterpart of MM~J123633$+$6214.1\footnote{The
256: IRAC and MIPS 24~$\mu$m fluxes by \citet{pop06} are consistent within
257: 1.5~$\sigma$ with the measurements reported by \citet{wan07}}.
258:
259: Due to the lack of a spectroscopic identification, we apply several
260: photometric redshift estimators focusing on different parts of the SED in
261: order to put constraints on the possible redshift--range of the
262: source. Applying the radio/(sub)millimeter index \citep{car99,car00} on the
263: PdBI flux and the radio flux we estimate a redshift
264: z$=3.81^{+2.04}_{-1.25}$. Furthermore, we use the infrared galaxy SED
265: templates from \citet{char01} to fit the SED of our source (using the
266: MIPS~24~$\mu$m, SCUBA, PdBI and VLA flux) and this method proposes a redshift
267: of z~$\sim3.3\pm1.0$, --- within the errors consistent with the radio/(sub)mm
268: spectral index estimates --- and infrared luminosity
269: $L_{IR}\sim1\times10^{13}L_{\sun}$. We obtain the same result by only using
270: the MIPS~24~$\mu$m and the VLA flux. The use of the 850/1.2~mm ratio as a
271: proper redshift indicator is very limited \citep[see Fig.~13
272: in][]{gre04}. However, the SCUBA to PdBI flux ratio of 2.6 limits the possible
273: redshift range from z~$\sim0-4$ \citep[see plot in][]{gre04}. As \citet{wan07}
274: we have also applied the widely used photometric redshift code {\it hyperz}
275: \citep{bol00} on the optical/near-infrared data from ACS and IRAC. Our
276: redshift estimates give a redshift z~$\sim6$, i.e. consistent with the range
277: of values proposed by \citet{wan07}. However, we note that with this method
278: only the stellar component of the source is fitted and the applied templates
279: do not reflect the characteristic properties of infrared galaxies.
280:
281: Assuming a redshift z~$\sim4$, taking into account the optical/near-IR
282: measurements from ACS/Spitzer and applying the reddening law by \citet{cal00}
283: we estimate the extinction to be A$_{V}\sim3$. For comparison, \citet{sma04}
284: and \citet{swi04} derived for SMG samples mean reddening of A$_{V}\sim1.70$
285: and 3.0, based on optical/near-IR colors.
286:
287: The source is undetected both in the soft (0.5-2~keV) and hard (2-8~keV) bands
288: in the 2~Ms Chandra observations of GOODS North
289: \citep[e.g.,][]{ale03}. However, the lack of X-ray detection cannot exclude
290: the presence of an heavily obscured AGN in GOODS~850-5. Using IRAC,
291: \citet{ivi04} proposed a diagnostic tool in order to distinguish between AGN
292: and starburst as dominating energy source. Applying this tool on
293: MM~J123633$+$6214.1 would propose an AGN at redshift z~$\sim2$. However, we
294: note that \citet{lac04} and \citet{ste05} pointed out that starbursts at
295: z~$\sim4$ contaminate the IRAC selection for z~$\sim1-2$ AGNs.
296:
297: Using either the template fitting from \citet{char01} (resulting in an
298: infrared luminosity $L_{IR}\sim1\times10^{13}L_{\sun}$ and taking into account
299: the conversion between infrared luminosity $L_{IR}$ and SFR \citep{ken98}), we
300: derive a star formation rate SFR~$\approx 1800~M_{\sun}~yr^{-1}$. By simply using
301: the PdBI flux of 5.0~mJy at 1.25~mm we obtain a star formation rate
302: SFR~$\approx 2200~M_{\sun}~yr^{-1}$ \citep{ber03}. This is consistent with the
303: SFR derived from the radio flux for a source at z~$\sim4$ of SFR~$\approx
304: 2000~M_{\sun}~yr^{-1}$ (see discussion in Ivison et al. 2002).
305:
306: We conclude that the multi-wavelength data suggests that MM~J123633$+$6314 is
307: a starburst at z~$\sim$4.
308:
309: \subsection{Radio Faint SMGs in GOODS North}
310: A total of 21 SMGs in GOODS North are securely identified \citep{pop06}. In
311: addition to MM~J123633$+$6214.1 there are four SMGs that have even fainter VLA
312: 20~cm fluxes ($\leq 33~\mu$Jy) than our source. Similar to the counterpart of
313: MM~J123633$+$6214.1 none of them has an ACS counterpart and their IRAC fluxes
314: are faint ($\leq 20~\mu$Jy). One of these SMGs is the well-studied source
315: HDF850.1 \citep{hug98,dow99,dun04} which is one of the excellent candidates to
316: lie at z~$\sim4$ or higher. To summarize, about 20\% of securely identified
317: SMGs could lie at high redshift z~$\sim4$ or higher. \citet{dan02,dan04} and
318: \citet{you07} also reported the discovery of reliable candidates of redshift
319: z~$\sim4$ or higher in other deep fields.
320:
321: \section{Conclusion}
322: We have used the IRAM Plateau de Bure Interferometer to obtain an accurate
323: position and flux at 1.3~mm wavelengths of the SMG MM~J123633$+$6214.1 alias
324: GOODS 850-5 ($S_{1.25~mm}=5.0\pm1.0$~mJy). This source is coincident with a
325: source detected in deep VLA radio continuum observations at high significance
326: ($S_{1.4~GHz}=32.7\pm4.3~\mu$Jy). The source has also been detected by recent
327: observations obtained at the SMA \citep{wan07} and by Spitzer \citep{pop06} in
328: the IRAC and 24~$\mu$m bands. The photometric redshift indicators using the
329: MIR- and FIR SED of MM~J123633$+$6214.1 all point towards a redshift of
330: z~$\sim4$. Based on our millimeter and radio detection, we consider a much
331: higher redshift (z~$\sim6$, as proposed by Wang et al. 2007)
332: unlikely. However, only future facilities with wide mm-receivers planned
333: e.g. the upgraded PdBI or the LMT will unambiguously solve the question of the
334: true redshift of GOODS~850-5 (ALMA will unfortunately not be able to reach
335: GOODS North). In any case, GOODS~850-5 represent one of the few solid
336: candidates of a high-z (z~$>3$) SMG that contribute to the cosmic SFRD at
337: early cosmic times.
338:
339: \acknowledgments
340: We would like to thank the IRAM staff for help provided during the
341: observations and especially Arancha Castro-Carrizo and Roberto Neri for
342: helpful support during the data reduction at IRAM Grenoble. Furthermore, we
343: are grateful to Dave Frayer for 70 and 160~$\mu$m measurements on the PdBI
344: position and Emanuele Daddi for instructive conversations and help in applying
345: the \citet{char01} SED templates on GOODS~850-5. Finally, we appreciate the
346: comments of the anonymous referee which clarified a number of points and
347: improved our manuscript.
348:
349:
350: {\it Facilities:} \facility{IRAM:Interferometer}, \facility{VLA}, \facility{HST (ACS)},
351: \facility{Spitzer (IRAC, MIPS)}, \facility{CXO (ACIS)}.
352:
353:
354: %\appendix
355:
356: %\section{Appendix material}
357:
358:
359: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
360: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
361: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
362: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
363: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
364: %%
365: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
366: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
367: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
368: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
369: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
370: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
371: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
372: %% place of the \cite commands.
373:
374: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
375: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
376: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
377:
378: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
379: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
380: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
381: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
382: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
383:
384: \begin{thebibliography}{}
385: \bibitem[Alexander et al.(2003)]{ale03} Alexander, D.~M., et
386: al.\ 2003, \aj, 126, 539
387:
388: %\bibitem[Alexander et al.(2005a)]{ale05a} Alexander, D.~M., et al.\ 2005a, \nat, 434, 738
389:
390: %\bibitem[Alexander et al.(2005b)]{ale05b} Alexander, D.~M., et al.\ 2005b, \apj, 632, 736
391:
392: %\bibitem[Aretxaga et al.(2003)]{are03} Aretxaga, I.\
393: %2003, \mnras, 342, 759
394:
395: \bibitem[Barger et al.(2000)]{bar00} Barger, A.~J., Cowie,
396: L.~L., \& Richards, E.~A.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 2092
397:
398: \bibitem[Bertoldi et al.(2000)]{ber00} Bertoldi, F., et al.\
399: 2000, \aap, 360, 92
400:
401: \bibitem[Bertoldi et al.(2003)]{ber03} Bertoldi, F., Carilli,
402: C.~L., Cox, P., Fan, X., Strauss, M.~A., Beelen, A., Omont, A., \& Zylka,
403: R.\ 2003, \aap, 406, L55
404:
405: \bibitem[Bertoldi et al.(2007)]{ber07} Bertoldi, F., et al.\
406: 2007, \apjs, 172, 132
407:
408: %\bibitem[Biggs \& Ivison(2006)]{big06} Biggs, A.~D., \&
409: %Ivison, R.~J.\ 2006, \mnras, 371, 963
410:
411: \bibitem[Blain \& Longair(1993)]{bla93} Blain, A.~W., \&
412: Longair, M.~S.\ 1993, \mnras, 264, 509
413:
414: \bibitem[Blain et al.(2002)]{bla02} Blain, A.~W., Smail, I.,
415: Ivison, R.~J., Kneib, J.-P., \& Frayer, D.~T.\ 2002, \physrep, 369, 111
416:
417: \bibitem[Bolzonella et al.(2000)]{bol00} Bolzonella, M.,
418: Miralles, J.-M., \& Pell{\'o}, R.\ 2000, \aap, 363, 476
419:
420: %\bibitem[Borys et al.(2003)]{bor03} Borys, C., Chapman, S.,
421: %Halpern, M., \& Scott, D.\ 2003, MNRAS, 344, 385
422:
423: %\bibitem[Borys et al.(2004)]{bor04} Borys, C., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 485
424:
425: %\bibitem[Capak et al.(2004)]{cap04} Capak, P., et al.\ 2004,
426: %aj, 127, 180
427:
428: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2000)]{cal00} Calzetti, D., Armus,
429: L., Bohlin, R.~C., Kinney, A.~L., Koornneef, J., \& Storchi-Bergmann, T.\
430: 2000, \apj, 533, 682
431:
432: \bibitem[Carilli \& Yun(1999)]{car99} Carilli, C.~L., \& Yun,
433: M.~S.\ 1999, \apjl, 513, L13
434:
435: \bibitem[Carilli \& Yun(2000)]{car00} Carilli, C.~L., \& Yun,
436: M.~S.\ 2000, \apj, 530, 618
437:
438: \bibitem[Chapman et al.(2003)]{cha03} Chapman, S.~C., Blain,
439: A.~W., Ivison, R.~J., \& Smail, I.~R.\ 2003, \nat, 422, 695
440:
441: \bibitem[Chapman et al.(2005)]{cha05} Chapman, S.~C., Blain,
442: A.~W., Smail, I., \& Ivison, R.~J.\ 2005, \apj, 622, 772
443:
444: \bibitem[Chary \& Elbaz(2001)]{char01} Chary, R., \& Elbaz,
445: D.\ 2001, \apj, 556, 562
446:
447: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(2000)]{coh00} Cohen, J.~G., et al.\ 2000, \apj, 538, 29
448:
449: \bibitem[Condon(1992)]{con92} Condon, J.~J.\ 1992, A\&RA, 30,
450: 575
451:
452: \bibitem[Coppin et al.(2006)]{cop06} Coppin, K., et al.\
453: 2006, \mnras, 372, 1621
454:
455: \bibitem[Dannerbauer et al.(2002)]{dan02} Dannerbauer, H., et al. 2002, \apj, 573, 473
456:
457: \bibitem[Dannerbauer et al.(2004)]{dan04} Dannerbauer, H., et al. 2004, \apj, 606, 664
458:
459: %\bibitem[Dannerbauer et al.(2005)]{dan05} Dannerbauer, H., PhD Thesis,
460: % Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit\"at M\"unchen, 2005
461:
462: \bibitem[Downes et al.(1999)]{dow99} Downes, D., et al.\
463: 1999, \aap, 347, 809
464:
465: \bibitem[Dunlop et al.(2004)]{dun04} Dunlop, J.~S., et al.\
466: 2004, \mnras, 350, 769
467:
468: \bibitem[Frayer et al.(2007)]{fra07} Frayer, D., et al. 2007, in preparation
469:
470: \bibitem[Genzel et al.(2003)]{gen03} Genzel, R., et al. 2003, \apj, 584, 633
471:
472: \bibitem[Giavalisco et al.(2004)]{gia04} Giavalisco, M., et
473: al.\ 2004, \apjl, 600, L93
474:
475: \bibitem[Gispert et al.(2000)]{gis00} Gispert, R., Lagache,
476: G., \& Puget, J.~L.\ 2000, \aap, 360, 1
477:
478: \bibitem[Greve et al.(2004)]{gre04} Greve, T.~R., et al.\ 2004, \mnras, 354, 779
479:
480: \bibitem[Greve et al.(2005)]{gre05} Greve, T.~R., et al.\
481: 2005, \mnras, 359, 1165
482:
483: \bibitem[Guilloteau et al.(1992)]{gui92} Guilloteau, S., et
484: al.\ 1992, \aap, 262, 624
485:
486: %\bibitem[Ho et al.(2004)]{ho04} Ho, P.~T.~P., Moran, J.~M.,
487: %\& Lo, K.~Y.\ 2004, \apjl, 616, L1
488:
489: \bibitem[Hughes et al.(1998)]{hug98} Hughes, D.~H., et al.\
490: 1998, \nat, 394, 241
491:
492: \bibitem[Huynh et al.(2007)]{huy07} Huynh, M.~T., Pope, A.,
493: Frayer, D.~T., \& Scott, D.\ 2007, \apj, 659, 305
494:
495: %\bibitem[Iono et al.(2006)]{ion06} Iono, D., et al.\ 2006,
496: %\apjl, 640, L1
497:
498: \bibitem[Ivison et al.(2004)]{ivi04} Ivison, R.~J., et al.\
499: 2004, \apjs, 154, 124
500:
501: %\bibitem[Ivison et al.(2002)]{ivi02} Ivison, R.~J., et al.\
502: %2002, \mnras, 337, 1
503:
504: \bibitem[Ivison et al.(2007)]{ivi07} Ivison, R.~J., et al.\
505: 2007, \mnras, 380, 199
506:
507: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{ken98} Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1998,
508: \araa, 36, 189
509:
510: %\bibitem[Lutz et al.(2001)]{lut01} Lutz, D., et al.\ 2001,
511: %A\&A, 378, 70
512:
513: \bibitem[Lacy et al.(2004)]{lac04} Lacy, M., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 166
514:
515: \bibitem[Morrison et al.(2008)]{mor08} Morrison, G. et al. 2008, in
516: preparation
517:
518: \bibitem[Neri et al.(2003)]{ner03} Neri, R., et al.\ 2003, \apjl, 597, L113
519:
520: \bibitem[Oke \& Gunn(1983)]{oke83} Oke, J.~B., \& Gunn,
521: J.~E.\ 1983, \apj, 266, 713
522:
523: \bibitem[Pope et al.(2005)]{pop05} Pope, A., Borys, C., et al. 2005, \mnras,
524: 358, 149
525:
526: \bibitem[Pope et al.(2006)]{pop06} Pope, A., et al.\ 2006,
527: \mnras, 370, 1185
528:
529:
530: %\bibitem[Scott et al.(2002)]{sco02} Scott, S.~E., et al.\
531: %2002, \mnras, 331, 817
532:
533: \bibitem[Smail et al.(1997)]{sma97} Smail, I., Ivison, R.~J.,
534: \& Blain, A.~W.\ 1997, \apjl, 490, L5
535:
536: \bibitem[Smail et al.(2000)]{sma00} Smail, I., Ivison, R.~J.,
537: Owen, F.~N., Blain, A.~W., \& Kneib, J.-P.\ 2000, \apj, 528, 612
538:
539: \bibitem[Smail et al.(2002)]{sma02} Smail, I., Ivison, R.~J.,
540: Blain, A.~W., \& Kneib, J.-P.\ 2002, \mnras, 331, 495
541:
542: \bibitem[Smail et al.(2004)]{sma04} Smail, I., Chapman,
543: S.~C., Blain, A.~W., \& Ivison, R.~J.\ 2004, \apj, 616, 71
544:
545: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2003)]{spe03} Spergel, D.~N., et al.\ 2003, \apjs, 148, 175
546:
547: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2007)]{spe07} Spergel, D.~N., et al.\
548: 2007, \apjs, 170, 377
549:
550: \bibitem[Stern et al.(2005)]{ste05} Stern, D., et al.\
551: 2005, \apj, 631, 163
552:
553: \bibitem[Swinbank et al.(2004)]{swi04} Swinbank, A.~M.,
554: Smail, I., Chapman, S.~C., Blain, A.~W., Ivison, R.~J., \& Keel, W.~C.\
555: 2004, \apj, 617, 64
556:
557:
558: \bibitem[Valiante et al.(2007)]{val07} Valiante, E., et al.\
559: 2007, \apj, 660, 1060
560:
561: %\bibitem[Wagg et al.(2007)]{wag07} Wagg, J., et al.\ 2007, \mnras, 375, 745
562:
563: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2004)]{wan04} Wang, W.-H., Cowie, L.~L.,
564: \& Barger, A.~J.\ 2004, \apj, 613, 655
565:
566: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2007)]{wan07} Wang, W.-H., et al. 2007, \apjl, 670, L89
567:
568: \bibitem[Wirth et al.(2004)]{wir04} Wirth, G.~D., et al.\
569: 2004, \aj, 127, 3121
570:
571: \bibitem[Younger et al.(2007)]{you07} Younger, J., et al.\ 2007, \apj, in press
572: (astro-ph/0708.1020)
573:
574:
575: \end{thebibliography}
576:
577:
578: \clearpage
579: %==========
580: %Table1 - Position of the SMG
581: \begin{table*}
582: \tiny
583: %\centering
584: \caption{Positions of the SMG MM~J123633$+$6214.1 alias GOODS~850-5\label{tab:position}}
585: \begin{tabular}{lcllcl}
586: \hline\hline
587: ID&Instrument&R.A.&Decl.&Offset&Reference\\
588: &&(J2000.0)&(J2000.0)&$\Delta PdBI-Other$&\\
589: \hline
590: MM~J123633$+$6214.1&PdBI&12:36:33.45$\pm$0.04&62:14:08.95$\pm$0.3&---&{\bf this paper}\\
591: \hline
592: VLA Counterpart & VLA & 12:36:33.42$\pm$0.01& 62:14:08.70$\pm$0.1&0.33\arcsec&{\bf this paper}\\
593: GOODS~850-5&SMA& 12:36:33.45$\pm0.03$&62:14:08.65$\pm0.2$&0.30\arcsec&\citet{wan07}\\
594: GOODS~850-5&SCUBA&12:36:33.45$\pm$0.73&62:14:09.43$\pm$5.1&0.48\arcsec&\citet{wan04}\\
595: GN~10
596: (SMMJ123633.8$+$621408)&SCUBA&12:36:33.8$\pm$1.14\tablenotemark{\Diamond}&62:14:08$\pm$8.0\tablenotemark{\Diamond}&2.63\arcsec&\citet{pop05}\\
597: %MAMBO-Position&MAMBO&12:36:3?.?$\pm$0.??&62:12:0?.??$\pm$?.??&&Greve et
598: %al.(2007, in preparation)\\
599: \hline
600: \end{tabular}
601: \tablecomments{
602: Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds, and units of
603: declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds.}
604: \tablenotetext{\Diamond}{The given
605: position uncertainty is the search radius for counterparts of 8\arcsec\/ applied by \citet{pop06}.}
606: \end{table*}
607: %==========
608:
609:
610: \clearpage
611:
612: %Table - Fluxes
613: \begin{table*}
614: \tiny
615: %\begin{center}
616: \caption{Fluxes of the SMG MM~J123633$+$6214.1 alias GOODS~850-5\label{tab:flux}}
617: \begin{tabular}{lrccl}
618: \tableline\tableline
619: Band&Unit&MM~J123633$+$6214.1&Instruments&Reference\\
620: (1)&(2)&(3)&(4)&(5)\\
621: \tableline
622: $X-Ray_{0.5-2~keV}$&$10^{-17}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$&$<$2.5&Chandra&\citet{ale03}\\
623: $X-Ray_{2-8~keV}$&$10^{-16}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$&$<$1.4&Chandra&\citet{ale03}\\
624: %$U$&mag&$>$??.?{\bf (measure)}&KPNO 4m&???\\
625: $B_{435}$&mag&$>$29.1&ACS&\citet{gia04}\\
626: $V_{606}$&mag&$>$29.1&ACS&\citet{gia04}\\
627: %$R$&mag&$>$??.?{\bf (measure)}&SUBARU Suprime-Cam&???\\
628: $i_{775}$&mag&$>$28.4&ACS&\citet{pop06}\\
629: $z_{850}$&mag&$>$27.9&ACS&\citet{gia04}\\
630: %$HK'$&mag&$>$??.?{\bf (measure)}&UH~2.2~m QUIRC&???\\
631: $S_{3.6~\mu m}$&$\mu$Jy&1.21$\pm$0.39&IRAC&\citet{pop06}\\
632: $S_{4.5~\mu m}$&$\mu$Jy&1.96$\pm$0.36&IRAC&\citet{pop06}\\
633: $S_{5.8~\mu m}$&$\mu$Jy&2.72$\pm$0.88&IRAC&\citet{pop06}\\
634: $S_{8.0~\mu m}$&$\mu$Jy&5.11$\pm$1.14&IRAC&\citet{pop06}\\
635: $S_{24.0~\mu m}$&$\mu$Jy&30.7$\pm$5.4&MIPS&\citet{pop06}\\
636: $S_{70~\mu m}$&mJy&$<$2.0&MIPS&\citet{huy07,fra07}\\
637: $S_{160~\mu m}$&mJy&$<$15.0&MIPS&\citet{huy07,fra07}\\
638: $S_{850~\mu m-Wang04}$&mJy&12.94$\pm$2.14&SCUBA&\citet{wan04}\\
639: $S_{850~\mu m-Pope06}$&mJy&11.3$\pm$1.6&SCUBA&\citet{pop06}\\
640: $S_{870~\mu m}$&mJy&12.0$\pm$1.4&SMA&\citet{wan07}\\
641: $S_{1.25~mm}$&mJy&5.0$\pm$1.0&PdBI&{\bf this paper}\\
642: $S_{1.4~GHz}$&$\mu$Jy&32.7$\pm$4.3&VLA&{\bf this paper}\\
643: \hline
644: \end{tabular}
645: \tablecomments{
646: Col. (1): Band in which flux is measured. Col. (2): Units of the flux
647: density measurements. Limits are 3~$\sigma$. Optical/near-IR magnitudes are
648: measured in a 0.2\arcsec\/ diameter aperture and are on the AB system
649: \citep{oke83}, see also \citet{gia04}. IRAC fluxes are measured in a
650: 4\arcsec\/ diameter aperture. MIPS 24~$\mu$m flux is measured within a
651: 5.7\arcsec\/ aperture. For the MIPS 70 and 160~$\mu$m a 18.5\arcsec\/ and
652: 40.0\arcsec aperture were used. (3): Measurements for the SMG
653: MM~J123633$+$6214.1. Col. (4): Instruments. Col. (5): References.}
654: \end{table*}
655: %==========
656:
657: \clearpage
658: %---------- PdBI on top of Images ------
659: \begin{figure}
660: \begin{center}
661: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.7]{f1.eps}
662: %goods5_cutouts_paper_rev.eps
663: \caption{$20\arcsec\times20\arcsec$ ACS $z_{850}$, IRAC 8.0~$\mu$m, MIPS~24~$\mu$m
664: and radio images of the field of MM~J123633$+$6214.1. PdBI contours of 1.25 continuum emission of MM~J123633$+$6214.1 overlaid on
665: the ACS $z_{850}$ image and start at 3$\sigma$ with steps of
666: 1~mJy. 3.0\arcsec\/ circles are drawn on the PdBI position in the IRAC 8.0~$\mu$m, MIPS~24~$\mu$m
667: and radio images.}
668: \label{fig:cutouts}
669: \end{center}
670: \end{figure}
671: %------------------------
672:
673:
674:
675:
676: \end{document}
677:
678: %%
679: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
680: