1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
5: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
6:
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: % Some extra macros we need
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
10: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{km s$^{-1}$}}
11: \newcommand{\etal}{\mbox{et al. }}
12: \newcommand{\Msun}{\mbox{$M_{\sun}$}}
13: \newcommand{\Lsun}{\mbox{$L_{\sun}$}}
14: \newcommand{\um}{\mbox{$\mu$m}} % micron
15: \newcommand{\skipthis}[1]{}
16: \newcommand{\hh}{\mbox{H$_2$}} % H_2
17: \newcommand{\hii}{\mbox{\ion{H}{2}}}
18:
19: \shortauthors{Trejo and Rodr\'\i guez}
20: \shorttitle{The Non-Thermal Radio Jet Toward NGC 2264}
21: \slugcomment{To appear in {\em The Astronomical Journal}}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: %Draft \today
26:
27:
28: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
29: % TITLE and AUTHORS
30: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
31:
32: \title{The Non-thermal Radio Jet Toward the NGC 2264 Star Formation Region}
33:
34: \author{Alfonso Trejo and Luis F. Rodr\'\i guez}
35: \affil{Centro de Radioastronom\'\i a y Astrof\'\i sica, UNAM,
36: Apdo. Postal 3-72, Morelia, Michoac\'an, 58089 M\'exico}
37:
38: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
39: % Abstract
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41: \begin{abstract}
42:
43: We report sensitive VLA 3.6 cm radio observations toward the
44: head of the Cone nebula in NGC~2264, made
45: in 2006. The purpose of these observations was to study
46: a non-thermal radio jet recently discovered, that appears to emanate
47: from the head of the Cone nebula.
48: The jet is highly polarized, with well-defined knots, and one-sided.
49: The comparison of our images with 1995 archive data indicates no evidence
50: of proper motions nor polarization changes. We find reliable flux
51: density variations in only one knot, which we tentatively identify as the core
52: of a quasar or radio galaxy. An extragalactic location seems to be the
53: best explanation for this jet.
54:
55: \end{abstract}
56:
57: \keywords{radio continuum: galaxies --- jets: non-thermal emission}
58:
59: %\vfill\eject
60:
61: \section{Introduction}
62:
63: Reipurth \etal (2004) searched for radio continuum emission
64: from proto-stellar objects in eight regions of star
65: formation. In the NGC 2264 region they discovered a remarkably collimated
66: radio jet, less than one arcminute away from the head of the well-known
67: Cone Nebula and apparently emanating from it (see Fig. \ref{cono-hst}).
68: Furthermore, the total flux density of the jet at 3.6 cm is $\sim$11 mJy
69: and the \sl a priori \rm probability of finding a background source with
70: this flux density in a region of $2' \times 2'$ is only 0.0004 (Windhorst
71: \etal 1993), suggesting a possible association between the jet and the Cone
72: Nebula.
73:
74: The Cone nebula, discovered in 1784 by William Herschel, is believed to be
75: a pillar of gas and dust whose head is most probably externally ionized by
76: S Mon, a massive O-type binary (Gies \etal 1997) located about 30$'$ to
77: the north of the nebula.
78: The head of the Cone Nebula is a dense ($\sim 10^4$ cm$^{-3}$) molecular
79: core with an estimated mass of 16 $M_\odot$ (Pagani \& Nguyen-Q-Rieu 1987).
80: The position where the jet is located has one of the highest
81: surface densities of T Tau stars in the region (Dahm \& Simon 2005).
82: These circumstances suggested that the radio jet could be physically
83: associated with a young stellar object of the region.
84: Spectacular optical jets emanating from the head of dust pillars
85: have been found in the Trifid (e. g. Yusef-Zadeh, Biretta, \& Wardle 2005)
86: and in Carina (http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070430.html).
87:
88: The overall extent of the jet is about 28$''$, and (with subarcsec
89: resolution) it seems to be composed by eight knots.
90: Reipurth \etal (2004) found that assuming that the jet
91: was in the NGC 2264 region (at a distance of 760 pc; Sung \etal 1997)
92: and that the knots were moving with a velocity of 100 km s$^{-1}$ in the plane
93: of the sky, an ejection every 60 years was implied. This timescale is
94: consistent with that found for knots in jets associated with young stellar
95: objects (e. g. Curiel \etal 1993).
96:
97: On the other hand, due to the non-thermal nature of its emission and that
98: the jet also presents a high degree of polarization, Reipurth \etal (2004)
99: concluded that these characteristics were consistent with an extragalactic
100: jet. The authors found no obvious counterparts in the IRAS catalogs or at
101: 2.2 $\mu$m emission, nor with the {\it HST} observations.
102: A search in the SIMBAD database shows only two stars;
103: V367 Mon and NGC 2264 LBM 6255 (Lamm \etal 2005) in the region of the jet,
104: but neither clearly associated with any of the knots (see Fig. \ref{cono-hst}).
105:
106:
107: In this work we report an analysis of this jet, using both
108: new as well as archive VLA radio data. Our main goal was to compare images
109: taken at two different epochs to search for proper motions and variability
110: that could allow us to favor a galactic or an extragalactic nature for
111: the jet. For example, the presence of large proper motions
112: in the knots would favor a galactic location. We first
113: searched for 3.6 cm data in the VLA archive
114: and found three epochs (1990, 1995 and 2002) where the
115: source was included in the primary beam of the
116: observations. These data
117: did not result appropriate for a reliable
118: search for proper motions and variability because
119: they have different wavelengths, pointing centers, and phase calibrators.
120: In order to make a reliable, high
121: precision comparison we made new VLA observations in 2006 that
122: match the parameters of the 1995 data.
123: In this paper we present a comparison of these data taken with a time
124: separation of 10.72 years.
125:
126:
127: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
128: % OBSERVATIONS
129: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
130:
131: \section{Observations}
132:
133: Our new observations were made with the NRAO\footnote{The National Radio
134: Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation
135: operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.} Very
136: Large Array, in the B configuration at the wavelength of 3.6 cm, on 2006
137: September 7 (we will refer to the epoch of these data, taken under
138: VLA project code AR599, as 2006.68).
139: These data have an on-source integration time of 4.9 hours. The 1995
140: December 16 (epoch 1995.96 taken under
141: VLA project code AW420) data have, as we noted before, the same
142: observational parameters and has
143: an on-source integration time of 3.4 hours.
144: The {\it uv} coverage of both data sets is
145: roughly the same, even when the 2006 data had two antennas missing at the
146: center of two of the arms at the time of the observations.
147:
148: To obtain two images for reliable comparison we convolved
149: both images to the same angular resolution, resulting in
150: a beam with half power full width of $0\rlap.{''}86$. These images were made
151: with the ROBUST parameter of the task IMAGR set to 0.
152:
153: The absolute amplitude calibration accuracy of the images is
154: uncertain at the $\sim$10\% level. However, due to the good uv coverage,
155: the relative strength of features in an individual image is measured
156: to higher accuracy. Thus, to allow a direct comparison of the images,
157: we have solved for a relative scale factor which brings the two images
158: into best agreement. Specifically, we combined the images
159: (subtracting the 1995.96 image from the 2006.68
160: image) in order to get the smallest
161: rms value in the difference image. The final factor for
162: scaling was multiplying the 1995.96 image by 0.93.
163: In the following section we present and discuss these images.
164:
165: To gain a better undestanding of the region
166: as a whole, we searched in the VLA archive for
167: radio continuum observations of lower angular resolution than those discussed
168: here. For the epoch 1984 August 31 we found observations taken at 6 cm
169: under VLA project code AS204 in the
170: D configuration (angular resolution of $\sim 15''$). These observations have
171: been published and discussed by Schwartz et al. (1985) and our conclusions,
172: discussed below, confirm their interpretation.
173: These data were reduced following the standard VLA procedures.
174:
175: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
176: % RESULTS
177: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
178:
179: \section{Results and discussion}
180:
181: We looked for flux density and degree of polarization variations
182: as well as proper motions between the 1995 and 2006 images. In Figure
183: \ref{tres-I} we show the continuum emission from both epochs as well as the
184: difference image (2006 - 1995).
185: \subsection{Flux Density Variations and Search for Proper Motions}
186:
187: The difference image shows no significant variation in the flux density
188: at a 5-$\sigma$ level of 0.1 mJy, except
189: for one of the knots, located at $\alpha(2000) = 06^h~ 41^m~ 15\rlap.{''}60$,
190: $\delta(2000)$ = $09^\circ~ 26'~ 45\rlap.{''}774$, that we identify as the
191: nucleus of the source. In contrast, none of the other knots shows variation
192: above the 5-$\sigma$ level of 0.1 mJy,
193: that implies upper limits to any variability
194: in the range of 3 to 15 \%, according to their flux density.
195:
196: We also searched for proper motions in the knots, setting typical 3-$\sigma$
197: upper limits of 1.6 mas yr$^{-1}$. If the source was located at the distance
198: of NGC 2264, these upper limits would imply 3-$\sigma$ upper limits of 5.8
199: km s$^{-1}$ for the motion in the plane of the sky. Knots in outflows
200: associated with star formation regions are known to move at velocities in
201: the range of 100 to 500 km s$^{-1}$ (Rodr\'\i guez \etal 1989; Curiel \etal
202: 2006). In the case of galactic microquasars (Mirabel \& Rodr\'\i guez 1999),
203: the velocities are much larger, comparable to the speed of light.
204: We conclude that the observed lack of flux density variations
205: and in particular the stringent upper limits to any proper motions
206: argue strongly against a galactic nature for this jet.
207:
208: As mentioned before, the only knot that is found to be variable in flux density
209: most probably traces the nucleus of this extragalactic jet. This component
210: increased its flux density from 2.3$\pm$0.1 to 3.7$\pm$0.1 mJy over the period of the
211: observations.
212:
213: \subsection{Linear Polarization}
214:
215: On the other hand, the jet presents highly polarized emission, in some knots
216: up to 30\% (see Figure \ref{dos-P1}), including the single knot (most probably
217: a lobe) seen to the west (see Figure \ref{dos-P2}).
218: One important fact is the absence of detectable polarized emission in the knot
219: presenting variations in flux density (see Figure \ref{dos-P1}). This supports
220: the idea that this knot is probably the core of a quasar or radio galaxy, that
221: are known to be rapidly variable and to show a small degree of linear
222: polarization, of order 1\% (Saikia \& Kulkarni 1998). Figure \ref{dos-P1} shows
223: that the magnetic field is almost parallel to the jet along most of its extension,
224: except in the final knot where it turns to be almost perpendicular. This
225: polarization behaviour is similar in orientation and percentage to that observed
226: in the jet of the well-known quasar 3C 273 (Conway \etal 1993).
227: Due to the ratio of the fluxes of both sides of the jet, we classified this jet as
228: being one-sided, applying the rules given by Bridle \& Perley (1984) and
229: Fanaroff \& Riley (1974). This jet seems to be also of type FR II, but the
230: classification implies bright hot spots in the outer regions, which are not
231: present in this jet.
232:
233: \subsection{Large Scale Radio Emission}
234:
235: An image of the VLA archive data
236: is shown in Figure \ref{cono-dss}. This image is superposed on the STScI Digitized
237: Sky Survey (DSS) red image for the same region.
238: From this overlay, we can see that the Cone nebula is associated with two
239: types of radio emission. The compact double source to its NE is the radio jet
240: discussed here. The more diffuse radio emission associated with the optical
241: emission from the head and the
242: ``shoulder'' of the Cone is most likely free-free emission from gas
243: photoionized by S Mon, the massive O-type binary located about 30$'$ to
244: the north of the nebula.
245: This diffuse radio emission has a total flux density of $\sim$10 mJy.
246: If we assume that it is coming from optically thin free-free emission
247: at an electron temperature of $10^4$ K, and that the region is located
248: at a distance of 760 pc, an ionizing photon rate of
249: $5 \times 10^{44}$ $s^{-1}$ is required. Furthermore, assuming
250: that the region of diffuse free-free emission subtends an angular
251: diameter of 1$'$ with respect to the angular separation of 30$'$
252: from S Mon, a solid angle correction
253: factor of $1.4 \times 10^4$ gives a total ionizing photon rate of
254: $7 \times 10^{48}$ $s^{-1}$ for S Mon. This is consistent with the
255: rate expected from an O7V star, as S Mon is classified (Pagani 1973).
256: We then conclude that these estimates corroborate that the ionization of
257: the Cone is produced by S Mon. Similar conclusions have been reached before
258: by Schwartz et al. (1985) and Schmidt (1974).
259:
260: There are two relatively bright (about 20 mJy at 6 cm; Girart et al. 2002)
261: sources about 8$'$ to the NW of the Cone Nebula.
262: These sources are known to have non thermal spectra
263: (Schwartz et al. 1985) and most probably are background galaxies.
264: This result suggests that the non thermal jet may be associated with
265: one of the galaxies of a extragalactic background cluster.
266: Unfortunately, given the large obscuration of the region, there are no
267: optical counterparts to any of these sources to test further the
268: possible presence of a cluster.
269:
270: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
271: % CONCLUSIONS
272: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
273:
274: \section{Summary}
275:
276: We searched for proper motions and flux variability in the NGC 2264 non-thermal
277: radio jet. We found no proper motions larger (at a 3-$\sigma$ upper limit)
278: than 1.6 mas yr$^{-1}$. This stringent upper limit appears to rule out
279: a galactic location for the jet, either in the case of a thermal jet emanating
280: from a young star or a relativistic microquasar.
281: We found flux variations only
282: in one knot of the jet, that we identify as the core
283: of the source.
284:
285: The high degree of linear polarization in the jet and its spatial structure are
286: comparable with other cases of extragalactic jets. With this evidence,
287: we believe that this object is an extragalactic jet seen in the
288: line of sight toward the NGC 2264
289: star forming region, even when the \sl a priori \rm probability of such
290: coincidence is very low.
291:
292: \begin{acknowledgements}
293:
294: We thank an anonymous referee for many valuable suggestions.
295: LFR acknowledges the support
296: of DGAPA, UNAM, and of CONACyT (M\'exico).
297: This research has made use of the SIMBAD database,
298: operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.
299: The Digitized Sky Survey was produced at the Space Telescope Science
300: Institute under U.S. Government grant NAG W-2166. The images of these surveys
301: are based on photographic data obtained using the Oschin Schmidt Telescope on
302: Palomar Mountain and the UK Schmidt Telescope. The plates were processed into
303: the present compressed digital form with the permission of these institutions.
304:
305: \end{acknowledgements}
306:
307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
308: % REFERENCES
309: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
310:
311: \newcommand\rmaap {RMA\&A~}
312: \newcommand\aujph {Aust.~Jour.~Phys.~}
313: \newcommand\rmaacs {RMA\&A Conf. Ser.~}
314:
315: \begin{references}
316:
317: \reference{}
318:
319: %\reference{} Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Sridharan, T.K., Menten, K.M., Walmsley,
320: % C. M., \& Wyrowski, F. 2002, A\&A, 383, 892
321:
322: \reference{br84} Bridle, A. H. \& Perley R. A., 1984, ARA\&A, 22, 319
323:
324: \reference{co93} Conway, R. G., Garrington, S. T., Perley, R. A., \& Biretta, J. A.
325: 1993, A\&A, 267, 347
326:
327: \reference{cu93} Curiel, S., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Moran, J. M., \& Cant\'o, J.
328: 1993, ApJ, 415, 191
329:
330: \reference{cu06} Curiel, S. \etal 2006, ApJ, 638, 878
331:
332: \reference{da05} Dahm, S. E., \& Simon, T. 2005, AJ, 129, 829
333:
334: \reference{gi97} Gies, D. R., Mason, B. D., Bagnuolo, W. G., Jr., \etal
335: 1997, ApJ, 475, L49
336:
337: \reference{gi02} Girart, J. M., Curiel, S., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., \& Cant\'o, J.
338: 2002, RevMexA\&A, 38, 169
339:
340: \reference{fa74} Fanaroff, B. L. \& Riley, J. M., 1974, MNRAS, 167, 31
341:
342: \reference{la05} Lamm, M. H., Mundt, R., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., \& Herbst, W. 2005, A\&A, 430, 1005
343:
344: \reference{mi99} Mirabel, I. F., \& Rodr\'\i guez, L. F. 1999, ARA\&A, 37, 409
345:
346: \reference{pa73} Pagani, N. 1973, AJ, 78, 929
347:
348: \reference{pa87} Pagani, L. P. \& Nguyen-Q-Rieu. 1987, A\&A, 181, 112
349:
350: \reference{re04} Reipurth, B., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Anglada, G., \& Bally, J.
351: 2004, ApJ, 127, 1736
352:
353: \reference{ro89} Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Curiel, S., Moran, J. M., Mirabel, I. F., Roth, M. \& Garay, G. 1989, ApJ, 346, L85
354:
355: \reference{sa98} Saikia, D. J., \& Kulkarni, A. R. 1998, MNRAS, 298, L45
356:
357: \reference{sc74} Schmidt, E. G. 1974, MNRAS, 169, 97
358:
359: \reference{sc85} Schwartz, P. R., Thronson Jr., H. A., Odenwald, S. F.,
360: Glaccum, W., Loewenstein, R. F., \& Wolf, G. 1985, ApJ, 292, 231
361:
362: \reference{su97} Sung, H., Bessell, M., \& Lee, S.-W. 1997, AJ, 114, 2644
363:
364: \reference{wi93} Windhorst, R. A., Fomalont, E. B., Partridge, R. B., \& Lowenthal, J. D. 1993, ApJ, 405, 498
365:
366: \reference{yu05} Yusef-Zadeh, F., Biretta, J., \& Wardle, M. 2005, ApJ, 624, 246
367:
368:
369: \end{references}
370:
371: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
372: % TABLES
373: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
374:
375: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
376: % FIGURES
377: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
378:
379: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
380: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
381: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
382: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
383:
384: \begin{figure}
385: \epsscale{1.0}
386: \plotone{f1.eps}
387: %\vspace{0.0mm}
388: \caption
389: {This optical image shows in greyscale the Cone Nebula, as observed
390: by the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) aboard the HST.
391: The white contours at the top left come from our radio image of the jet (see Figure
392: \ref{tres-I} for a
393: detailed description of these contours).
394: HST image Credit: NASA, Holland Ford (JHU), the ACS Science Team and ESA.
395: \label{cono-hst}}
396: \end{figure}
397:
398: \begin{figure}
399: %\epsscale{1.0}
400: \includegraphics[scale=0.6,angle=-90]{f2a.eps}
401: \includegraphics[scale=0.6,angle=-90]{f2b.eps}
402: \includegraphics[scale=0.6,angle=-90]{f2c.eps}
403: %\vspace{-30.0mm}
404: \caption
405: {3.6 cm VLA images of the jet, as seen in the 2006 ({\it top}) and 1995 ({\it center)} data.
406: The residual image (2006 - 1995) is shown in the bottom panel. The half-power contour
407: of the restoring beam (shown in the bottom left corner) was set to
408: $0\rlap.{''}86 \times 0\rlap.{''}86$ ; PA = $0^\circ$ in order to make a reliable
409: comparison between both epochs. The levels are -4, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 times the rms noise
410: (16.3, 13.5, and 21.1 $\mu$Jy, respectively) of each image.
411: \label{tres-I}}
412: \end{figure}
413:
414: \begin{figure}
415: \epsscale{1.0}
416: \plotone{f3a.eps}
417: \plotone{f3b.eps}
418: %\vspace{-30.0mm}
419: \caption
420: {VLA images showing the polarization of the east side of the jet for
421: 2006 ({\it top}) and 1995 ({\it bottom}). The contours are the same as in Figure
422: \ref{tres-I}. The
423: vectors represent the electric vector and its length is proportional to the degree of
424: polarization (0.20 arcsec is 25\% linear polarization).
425: \label{dos-P1}}
426: \end{figure}
427:
428: \begin{figure}
429: \epsscale{1.0}
430: \plottwo{f4a.eps}{f4b.eps}
431: %\plotone{f4b.eps}
432: %\vspace{-30.0mm}
433: \caption
434: {VLA images showing the polarization of the west side of the jet for
435: 2006 ({\it left}) and 1995 ({\it right}). The parameters are as in Figure \ref{dos-P1}.
436: \label{dos-P2}}
437: \end{figure}
438:
439: \begin{figure}
440: \epsscale{1.0}
441: \plotone{f5.eps}
442: \vspace{-5.0mm}
443: \caption
444: {This figure shows the Cone nebula in greyscale taken from the red image
445: of the DSS archives. The greyscale bar at the top indicates the
446: intensity of the optical image in arbitrary units. The
447: contours comes from 6 cm VLA-D archive data. The bright, compact double-source
448: to the NE of the head is the non thermal radio jet studied in this paper.
449: The diffuse radio emission associated with the head and ``shoulder'' of the Cone
450: nebula is most probably free-free emission from gas photoionized by the massive O-type binary S Mon,
451: located about 30$'$ to
452: the north of the nebula.
453: The contours are -4, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 times 112.7 $\mu$ Jy, the rms noise
454: of the radio image. The half-power contour of the synthesized beam of the radio image
455: ($18\rlap.{''}5 \times 15\rlap.{''}0; PA = 0^\circ$) is shown
456: in the bottom left corner.
457: \label{cono-dss}}
458: \end{figure}
459:
460:
461: \end{document}
462: