1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2:
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: \usepackage{amsfonts}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \usepackage{amsmath}
7: \usepackage{amsbsy}
8: \usepackage{wasysym}
9:
10: % set page size
11: \topmargin=1cm
12: \headsep .75in
13: \voffset=-2.0cm
14: \hoffset=-1.5cm
15: \textheight=23.0truecm
16: \textwidth=16.5truecm
17: \parskip 2ex
18:
19: \catcode`\@=11
20: % This causes equations to be numbered by section
21: \@addtoreset{equation}{section}
22: %\def\theequation{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
23: \def\theequation{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
24:
25: \@twosidetrue
26:
27: \catcode`\@=11
28: \def\section{\@startsection{section}{1}{\z@}{3.5ex plus 1ex minus
29: .2ex}{2.3ex plus .2ex}{\large\bf}}
30:
31:
32: \def\thesection{\arabic{section}}
33: \def\thesubsection{\arabic{section}.\arabic{subsection}}
34: \def\thesubsubsection{\arabic{section}.\arabic{subsection}.\arabic{subsubsection}}
35:
36: \def\appendix{\setcounter{section}{0}
37: \def\thesection{\Alph{section}}
38: \def\theequation{\Alph{section}.\arabic{equation}}
39: \def\thesubsection{\Alph{section}.\arabic{subsection}}
40: \def\thesubsubsection{\Alph{section}.\arabic{subsection}.\arabic{subsubsection}}
41:
42: \def\section{\@startsection{section}{1}{\z@}{3.5ex plus 1ex minus
43: .2ex}{2.3ex plus .2ex}{\large\bf}} }
44:
45: \newcount\minutes
46: \newcount\scratch
47:
48: \def\timestamp{%
49: \scratch=\time
50: \divide\scratch by 60
51: \edef\hours{\the\scratch}
52: \multiply\scratch by 60
53: \minutes=\time
54: \advance\minutes by -\scratch
55: %\the \month/\the\day$\,$
56: ---$\,$\hours:\null
57: \ifnum\minutes< 10 0\fi
58: \the\minutes}
59:
60: \def\sla#1{\ifmmode%
61: \setbox0=\hbox{$#1$}%
62: \setbox1=\hbox to\wd0{\hss$/$\hss}\else%
63: \setbox0=\hbox{#1}%
64: \setbox1=\hbox to\wd0{\hss/\hss}\fi%
65: #1\hskip-\wd0\box1 }
66:
67: %=============================================================================
68:
69: \begin{document}
70: \begin{titlepage}
71: \nopagebreak
72: {\flushright{
73: \begin{minipage}{5cm}
74: KA--TP--35-2007 \\
75: SFB/CPP-07-94 \\
76: \end{minipage} }
77:
78: }
79: \vfill
80: \begin{center}
81: {\LARGE \bf %\sc
82: \baselineskip 0.5cm
83: QCD corrections to hadronic WWZ production with leptonic decays
84: }
85: \vskip 0.5cm
86: {\large
87: V. Hankele and D. Zeppenfeld
88: }
89: \vskip .2cm
90: {\it Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,
91: Universit\"at Karlsruhe, P.O.Box 6980, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}
92: \vskip 1.3cm
93: \end{center}
94:
95: \nopagebreak
96: \begin{abstract}
97: Multi-lepton signatures appear in many new physics searches at the Large
98: Hadron Collider.
99: We here consider WWZ production with subsequent leptonic decay of the
100: three vector bosons as a SM source of multi-lepton events. We have calculated
101: the next-to-leading order QCD corrections for the full
102: $p p\to 6$~lepton production cross sections in hadronic collisions.
103: Results have been implemented
104: in the form of a flexible parton-level Monte-Carlo program which allows
105: to calculate the QCD corrections for arbitrary distributions and acceptance
106: cuts.
107: \end{abstract}
108: \vfill
109: %\today \timestamp
110: \hfill
111: \vfill
112:
113: % PACS: 14.80.Bn
114: \end{titlepage}
115: %
116: \newpage
117: %
118: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
119: %
120: \section{Introduction}
121: \label{sec:intro}
122:
123: With the start of the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) a trove of new
124: data is anticipated, which can be used to search for new physics
125: and also to further probe the Standard Model (SM).
126: For the interpretation of these data, precise predictions for both
127: the desired signal processes and backgrounds are needed, and this
128: necessitates the calculation of next-to-leading order (NLO) QCD
129: corrections. In order to determine cross sections for non-trivial
130: acceptance cuts, it is most useful to cast these NLO calculations
131: into fully flexible Monte-Carlo programs which
132: can calculate cross sections as well as distributions.
133:
134: WWZ production with subsequent leptonic decay of the vector
135: bosons is a background to supersymmetric processes with several
136: leptons in the final state. In addition, it is an excellent probe of the
137: quartic electroweak $W^+ W^-\gamma \gamma$, $W^+ W^- Z \gamma$ and
138: $W^+ W^- Z Z$ couplings.
139: Constraints for some of these couplings are already available from the Large
140: Electron Positron collider (LEP) at CERN~\cite{Alcaraz:2006mx} and analogous
141: measurements have been suggested for proton antiproton collisions at the
142: Fermilab Tevatron collider~\cite{Han:1995es}. However, the LHC will be able
143: to improve these measurements considerably and therefore more accurate
144: predictions are needed~\cite{Eboli:2000ad}. As we will see, QCD corrections
145: increase the WWZ cross section by more than 70\% and, thus, any
146: quantitative measurement of quartic couplings will have to take QCD
147: corrections into account.
148: This sizable enhancement is not surprising in view of the similarity with diboson
149: production~\cite{Ohnemus:1995gb,Campbell:1999ah}. Furthermore QCD
150: corrections to ZZZ production at the LHC have already been
151: calculated and increase the LO cross section by about 50\%
152: \cite{Lazopoulos:2007ix}.
153:
154: We here present first results on the NLO QCD corrections to the full $2\to 6$
155: process $p p \to \nu_e \, e^+ \, \mu^- \, \bar{\nu}_\mu \,
156: \tau^- \, \tau^+$ (or any other combination of leptons from three distinct
157: families). All resonant and non-resonant matrix elements as well as
158: the spin correlations of the final state leptons are included in our
159: calculation. For simplicity, we neglect any identical lepton effects
160: which might appear when using the results for final states with leptons from
161: one or two generations only. The calculation is performed with the
162: Catani-Seymour subtraction algorithm~\cite{Catani:1996vz} and uses
163: the virtual amplitudes derived in Refs.~\cite{Oleari:2003tc,Jager:2006zc}.
164: Further details of the calculation and the checks we
165: performed will be given in section 2. First determinations
166: of cross sections, distributions and $K$-factors are presented in section 3.
167:
168: %
169: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
170: %
171: \section{The Calculation}
172: \label{sec:Calc}
173:
174: We have considered in our calculation the full set of Feynman graphs
175: for the process $p p \to \nu_{\ell_1} \, \ell_1^+ \, \ell_2^- \,
176: \bar{\nu}_{\ell_2} \, \ell_3^- \, \ell_3^+$ up to order $\alpha_s\;
177: \alpha^6$. This includes the Higgs contribution and all off-shell
178: diagrams.
179: However, interference terms due to identical particles in the
180: final state have been neglected. Including such effects at LO we find
181: that this is an excellent approximation: LO cross sections change by
182: less than 0.1\% when interference terms are integrated over the Breit
183: Wigner peaks. Interference terms show strong cancellations between
184: contributions below and above the Breit Wigner peaks, but even their
185: absolute values contribute at the few percent level only, which is
186: below the scale variation of our final NLO cross sections.
187: We also neglect any fermion mass
188: effects. In particular, the Higgs Yukawa coupling to tau leptons is set
189: to zero. Because of the large number of Feynman diagrams we use the
190: helicity method of Ref.~\cite{Hagiwara:1985yu} for the evaluation of the
191: matrix elements.
192:
193: Some representative tree-level Feynman diagrams are given in
194: Fig.~\ref{fig:LO}. The 181 tree-level graphs can be grouped into
195: three distinct topologies. In
196: Fig.~\ref{fig:LO}a three vector bosons with subsequent decay are
197: emitted from the quark line. The polarization vectors of these vector
198: bosons are the decay currents describing the respective decay leptons, and
199: these decay currents appear in many different Feynman graphs. In order to
200: speed up the calculation, they are determined numerically at the beginning
201: of the evaluation of the matrix elements for a given phase space point
202: and reused wherever they appear.
203: In Fig.~\ref{fig:LO}b two vector bosons are attached to a
204: quark line and then decay into two or four leptons. All the Feynman graphs
205: for a 4-lepton decay can again be combined to an effective polarization
206: vector. For all subprocesses like $u \bar{u} \to 4 \, \ell + 2 \, \nu$ or
207: $\bar{d} d \to 4 \, \ell + 2 \, \nu$ these polarization vectors are
208: the same for one specific phase space point and they do not depend on
209: the quark polarization. Furthermore they appear in various Feynman
210: diagrams. In our code these polarization vectors are therefore
211: calculated once per phase space point, stored and reused wherever possible.
212: The last topology is the one where only one vector boson is attached to
213: the quark line. The polarization vector corresponding to the ``decay'' of
214: this virtual vector boson can be calculated once per phase
215: space point, stored and reused.
216: The method of precalculating effective polarization vectors renders our
217: code for the Born processes about 4 times faster than a direct evaluation
218: with {\tt MadGraph}~\cite{Stelzer:1994ta}. %without this procedure.
219:
220: \begin{figure}[tbp]
221: \includegraphics[scale = 1]{fig1.eps}
222:
223: \caption[]{\label{fig:LO}
224: {\sl Some representative tree-level Feynman diagrams of the process $p p
225: \to 4 \, \ell + 2 \, \nu$. They show the three
226: different topologies appearing in this calculation.}
227: }
228: \end{figure}
229:
230: The full NLO cross section consists of real
231: emission contributions, virtual contributions and a finite remainder
232: from the factorization of collinear singularities into the parton distribution
233: functions (pdfs).
234: The real emission contributions have to be integrated
235: over an (m+1)-particle phase space with $m=6$ leptons,
236: and the other two contributions only involve an
237: m-particle phase space.
238: \begin{align}
239: \sigma^{NLO} = \int_{m+1} d\sigma^R + \int_m d\sigma^V +
240: \int_m d\sigma^C
241: \end{align}
242: The virtual and the real emission contribution are
243: separately infrared divergent and only their sum gives a well
244: defined finite result. We have used the dipole subtraction algorithm
245: proposed by Catani and Seymour \cite{Catani:1996vz} in order to handle
246: these divergencies in our Monte-Carlo program.
247:
248: The real emission matrix elements can be obtained from the Born level
249: matrix elements by either attaching a gluon to a quark line or having a
250: gluon in the initial state which then splits into a quark anti-quark
251: pair. The method of precalculating the effective polarization vectors for
252: leptonic decays, described above for the tree-level diagrams, has also
253: been used for the more complicated real emission diagrams. Here an increase
254: in computational speed by about a factor of 12 is reached.
255:
256: The ``virtual'' contribution consists of the square of tree-level diagrams
257: and the interference between tree-level diagrams and the virtual
258: one-loop diagrams.
259: In the calculation of the one-loop diagrams, three different types of
260: contributions corresponding to the three topologies in Fig.~\ref{fig:LO}
261: appear. For the simplest topology, with one vector boson attached to the
262: quark line, only vertex corrections appear. In this case the one-loop
263: contribution is proportional to the Born matrix element. The second
264: topology, Fig.~\ref{fig:LO}b, leads to propagator corrections, vertex
265: corrections and boxes. In the calculation, the sum of these
266: corrections to one specific tree-level subamplitude is grouped
267: together and will be called a boxline contribution in the following.
268: The most challenging topology, Fig.~\ref{fig:LO}a, leads to quark propagator
269: corrections, vertex corrections, boxes and pentagons. As in the previous
270: case the sum of all these corrections to one specific tree level Feynman graph is
271: grouped together and called pentline contribution in the following.
272:
273: The boxline contribution has the same structure as in the vector
274: boson fusion process $qq\to Vqq$, which was considered in
275: Ref.~\cite{Oleari:2003tc}. Similarly the pentline contribution
276: is obtained by crossing from the results of Ref.~\cite{Jager:2006zc},
277: where QCD corrections to the vector boson fusion processes $qq\to qqVV$ were
278: determined. The singular contributions of all of these
279: three types of virtual contributions are proportional to the Born matrix
280: element and the complete virtual one-loop contribution for the three topologies
281: is given by
282: \begin{align}
283: M_V = \tilde{M}_V + \ \frac{\alpha_S}{4 \pi} \ C_F \ \left( \frac{4
284: \pi \mu^2}{s} \right)^\epsilon \ \Gamma{(1 + \epsilon)} \ \left[
285: -\frac{2}{\epsilon^2} - \frac{3}{\epsilon} - 8 + \frac{4 \ \pi^2}{3}
286: \right] \ M_B,
287: \end{align}
288: where $M_B$ denotes the full Born amplitude, $s$ is the square of the
289: partonic center of mass energy, i.e. it corresponds to the invariant mass
290: of the 6-lepton system, and $\tilde{M}_V$ is the finite part of the virtual
291: boxline and pentline amplitudes, which are obtained by crossing and analytic
292: continuation from the results of Refs.~\cite{Oleari:2003tc,Jager:2006zc}.
293: In the calculation of the boxline routine the usual
294: Passarino-Veltman tensor decomposition~\cite{Passarino:1978jh} is
295: applied, whereas in the pentline routine the method proposed by Denner
296: and Dittmaier~\cite{Denner:2002ii} has been used for the tensor
297: coefficients of pentagon diagrams.
298:
299: Since the pentagon routines are quite time consuming we have employed a
300: method suggested in Ref.~\cite{Jager:2006zc} to reduce the magnitude of the
301: true pentagon contribution.
302: It is possible to shift the polarization vectors or respectively the
303: decay currents of the vector bosons by terms proportional to their momenta,
304: \begin{align}
305: \epsilon_{V}^\mu = x_{V} \, q_{V}^\mu +
306: \tilde{\epsilon}_{V}^\mu. \label{eq:eps}
307: \end{align}
308: The pentagons
309: contracted with the momenta instead of the polarization vector
310: (terms proportional to $x_V)$ can then
311: be expressed in terms of boxes via Ward identities for the loop integrals
312: and the magnitude of the remaining pentagon contribution is
313: reduced to a numerically less challenging level.
314: In practice we choose
315: \begin{align}
316: \tilde{\epsilon}_{W^\pm} \cdot (q_{W^+} + q_{W^-}) = 0 \label{eq:eps2}
317: \end{align}
318: which means that the shifted polarization vectors have zero time
319: component in the center of mass system of the W-pair.
320:
321: We have checked our calculation at numerous levels.
322: All the matrix elements for the LO process and the real emission part
323: have been compared with {\tt MadGraph}~\cite{Stelzer:1994ta} output.
324: For individual matrix elements we find agreement at the $10^{-15}$ level. In
325: addition, the total LO cross section has been checked against
326: {\tt MadEvent}~\cite{Stelzer:1994ta} and {\tt
327: HELAC}~\cite{Cafarella:2007pc}.
328: For the real emission part the
329: LO process $p p \to 4 \, \ell + 2 \, \nu + j$ has been compared
330: against {\tt MadEvent}. Results agree within the statistical accuracy of the
331: Monte-Carlo runs (0.5\% for {\tt MadEvent} and 0.2\% for {\tt HELAC}).
332:
333: The finite collinear terms have been checked by exploiting the fact that
334: they are generic for all Drell-Yan type processes and hence should be
335: exactly the same for WW production. We have independently programmed NLO
336: QCD corrections for WW production and compared our
337: results with {\tt MCFM}~\cite{Campbell:1999ah}. We
338: find full agreement for different factorization and renormalization
339: scales. As a further check we have taken advantage of the fact that we can
340: integrate terms proportional to the Born matrix element either together
341: with the real emission part, by integration over the (m+1)-particle phase
342: space, or together with the virtual part, by integrating over the m-particle
343: phase space. Resulting cross sections are independent of this choice of
344: procedure.
345:
346: For the virtual contributions Ward identity tests have been
347: implemented as a flag for numerically unstable evaluation of tensor
348: coefficients. In the case of pentagon diagrams, for example, the pentline
349: contribution can be expressed in terms of boxes if one of the external
350: polarization vectors is replaced by its momentum. We discard the pentline
351: contribution at phase space points
352: where the two ways of calculating these terms disagree by more than 10\%.
353: The resultant loss in cross section is negligible: extrapolating its size
354: we estimate the resultant relative error on the NLO cross section to be
355: below $10^{-4}$.
356:
357: Many of the critical elements of our calculation also appear in the related
358: process $p p \to$ ZZZ for which NLO QCD corrections have recently been
359: presented in Ref.~\cite{Lazopoulos:2007ix}, albeit without further decay
360: of the leptons and neglecting any Higgs contributions.
361: As a last and very powerful test we have modified our code to describe
362: ZZZ instead of WWZ production and checked against the results of
363: Ref.~\cite{Lazopoulos:2007ix}. Using the same pdfs
364: and $\alpha_s \, (m_Z) = 0.119$ at NLO we find complete agreement for
365: all of the given renormalization and factorization scales.
366: %
367: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
368: %
369: \section{Results}
370: \label{sec:res}
371: %
372: The complete next-to-leading order calculation has been implemented in
373: the framework of a
374: fully flexible Monte-Carlo program, {\tt VBFNLO}, which then has been used
375: to determine the QCD corrections to WWZ production at the LHC.
376: For the generation of our results we set the electroweak parameters to the
377: following values:
378: \begin{align}
379: &m_W = 80.419 \ \mathrm{GeV} &&m_Z = 91.188 \ \mathrm{GeV} \nonumber\\
380: &G_F = 1.16639 \cdot 10^{-5} \ \mathrm{GeV}^{-2}
381: &&m_H = 120 \ \mathrm{GeV}. \label{eq:ew}
382: \end{align}
383: The other electroweak parameters, $\alpha^{-1} = 132.507$ and
384: $\sin^2{(\theta_W)} = 0.22225$, are calculated in the program by using LO
385: electroweak relations.
386: The default value for the renormalization and factorization
387: scale is the invariant WWZ mass, which is given by
388: \begin{align} \label{eq:WWZmass}
389: \mu_F = \mu_R = \sqrt{(p_{\ell_1} + p_{\ell_2} + p_{\ell_3} + p_{\ell_4} +
390: p_{\nu_1} + p_{\nu_2})^2}.
391: \end{align}
392: For scale variation studies of the total cross section, we also
393: consider fixed renormalization and factorization scales, which we set as
394: $\mu_F = \mu_R = \xi\cdot m_Z$.
395: We use the CTEQ6M parton distribution with $\alpha_s(m_Z) = 0.118$ at NLO and
396: CTEQ6L1 for the LO calculation ~\cite{Pumplin:2002vw}. All fermions are
397: treated as massless and we do not consider contributions involving
398: bottom and top quarks. The CKM matrix is approximated by a unit matrix
399: throughout, which is appropriate when neglecting fermion mass effects in
400: a neutral Drell-Yan type process.
401:
402:
403: In order to keep most of the cross section we apply only minimal
404: cuts to the final state leptons. This means that besides a cut on
405: the minimal transverse momentum and the maximal
406: rapidity of the charged leptons we only require that the invariant
407: dilepton mass, $m_{\ell \ell}$, of any combination of the charged leptons is
408: larger than 15 GeV, thus steering clear of the virtual photon singularity
409: in $\gamma^* \to \ell^+ \, \ell^-$ at low $m_{\ell \ell}$. Specifically,
410: we require
411: \begin{equation}
412: p_{T_\ell} > 10 \ \mathrm{GeV} \qquad\qquad |y_\ell| < 2.5 \qquad\qquad
413: m_{\ell \ell} > 15 \ \mathrm{GeV} \label{eq:cuts}
414: \end{equation}
415: in all subsequent figures. All results given here have been calculated for the
416: process $p p \to \nu_e \, e^+ \, \mu^- \, \bar{\nu}_\mu \, \tau^- \,
417: \tau^+$, i.e. interference terms due to identical particles have been
418: neglected. In order to obtain cross sections for the phenomenologically
419: more interesting case of final states with four electrons and/or muons,
420: we have multiplied these results by a combinatorial
421: factor of 8 in all figures.
422:
423: \begin{figure}[tbp]
424: \centerline{
425: \includegraphics[scale=1]{fig2.eps}
426: }
427:
428: \caption[]{\label{fig:Scale}
429: {\it Left:} {\sl Scale dependence of the total cross section for
430: $p p \to WWZ \to 4 \, \ell+\sla{p}_T$ at LO and
431: NLO for $m_H = 120 \ \mathrm{GeV}$ and the cuts of Eq.~(\ref{eq:cuts}).
432: The factorization and renormalization scales are taken at a fixed value
433: which is varied in the range from $0.5 \cdot m_Z$ to $10 \cdot m_Z$.}
434: {\it Right:} {\sl Same as in the left panel but for the different NLO
435: contributions.}
436: }
437: \end{figure}
438:
439: In the left panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:Scale} the scale dependence of the
440: cross section at LO and NLO is shown. The LO scale dependence
441: severely underestimates the uncertainties of the LO cross section
442: due to the fact that no $\alpha_S$ appears in the LO calculation and that
443: the pdfs are determined in a Feynman-$x$ range of small factorization scale
444: dependence.
445: The right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:Scale} shows the scale dependence of the
446: different contributions to the NLO cross section. The
447: virtual contribution is split up into one part proportional to the Born
448: matrix element, one part with boxline contributions and a third part
449: which includes only the true pentline contribution after the reduction
450: described in equations~(\ref{eq:eps}), (\ref{eq:eps2}). This pentagon
451: contribution amounts to 1 - 2\% of the total NLO cross section.
452: The real emission contribution in the plot includes the additional
453: finite terms from the factorization of collinear singularities into the pdfs.
454: The scale dependence of the NLO cross section is mainly due this real
455: emission contribution.
456:
457: \begin{figure}[tbp]
458: \centerline{
459: \includegraphics[scale=1]{fig3.eps}
460: }
461:
462: \caption[]{\label{fig:pT}
463: {\it Left:} {\sl Transverse momentum distribution of the highest-$p_T$ charged
464: lepton for $m_H = 120 \ \mathrm{GeV}$, $\mu_F = \mu_R = m_{WWZ}$ as
465: given in Eq.~(\ref{eq:WWZmass}) and the cuts
466: given in Eq.~(\ref{eq:cuts}) at LO and NLO.}
467: {\it Right:} {\sl Differential $K$-factor as defined in
468: Eq.~(\ref{eq:kfactor}) for the two distributions in the left panel.}
469: }
470: \end{figure}
471:
472: \begin{figure}[tbp]
473: \centerline{
474: \includegraphics[scale=1]{fig4.eps}
475: }
476:
477: \caption[]{\label{fig:4lmass}
478: {\it Left:} {\sl Invariant mass distribution of the four charged
479: leptons for $m_H = 120 \ \mathrm{GeV}$, $\mu_F = \mu_R = m_{WWZ}$
480: %as given in Eq.~(\ref{eq:WWZmass})
481: and the cuts given in Eq.~(\ref{eq:cuts}) at LO
482: and NLO.}
483: {\it Right:} {\sl Differential $K$-factor as defined in
484: Eq.~(\ref{eq:kfactor}) for the two distributions in the left panel.}
485: }
486: \end{figure}
487:
488: The $K$-factor, defined as the ratio of the NLO cross section over the LO
489: cross section strongly depends on the factorization and renormalization
490: scale. It is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Scale} for a fixed scale choice,
491: $\mu_R=\mu_F=\xi\cdot m_Z$. One finds variations of the $K$-factor
492: between 1.7 (for large scales) and 2.2 (for small scales).
493: A qualitatively similar scale dependence is found if instead of the
494: Z-mass the invariant 6-lepton mass as given in Eq.~(\ref{eq:WWZmass}) is
495: taken as reference scale choice. The mean value of this dynamical
496: reference scale is substantially larger than the Z-mass and the K-factor for
497: $\mu_F = \mu_R = m_{WWZ}$ is 1.74. Since the WWZ invariant mass is the scale
498: of the Drell-Yan type subdiagrams in Fig.~1, it may be considered the most
499: natural scale choice in the present calculation. We leave a more thorough
500: investigation of scale dependence of the NLO cross section to a future
501: publication~\cite{wwz_long}, however.
502:
503: The size of the NLO QCD corrections shows a marked phase space dependence.
504: Two examples are shown in the remaining figures.
505: In the left panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:pT} the transverse momentum
506: distribution of the highest-$p_T$ charged lepton is shown for the cuts given in
507: Eq.~(\ref{eq:cuts}). The right panel shows the differential $K$-factor,
508: defined as
509: \begin{align}\label{eq:kfactor}
510: K = \frac{d \sigma^{NLO}/ dx}{d \sigma^{LO} /dx}.
511: \end{align}
512: The $K$-factor increases with $p_T$ by almost a factor 2, indicating
513: that a simple multiplication with a constant overall $K$-factor
514: would seriously change the shape of lepton $p_T$ distributions.
515: A somewhat more benign behavior is found for the 4-lepton invariant
516: mass distribution which is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:4lmass}. Here
517: the differential $K$-factor varies between 1.4 and 1.9 and most of the
518: rise is in the threshold region. For 4-lepton invariant masses above
519: 250~GeV a constant $K$-factor would be an adequate approximation for the
520: $m_{4 \ell}$ distribution.
521:
522: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
523:
524:
525: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
526: %
527: \section{Conclusions}
528: \label{sec:concl}
529:
530: WWZ production with subsequent leptonic decays is an important
531: source of multi-lepton events and of great interest for the
532: measurement of quartic electroweak couplings at the LHC.
533: In this letter we have presented first results on the NLO QCD
534: corrections to the process $p p \to \nu_{\ell_1} \, \ell_1^+ \,
535: \ell^-_2 \, \bar{\nu}_{\ell_2} \, \ell_3^- \, \ell_3^+$.
536: %, generated with a fully flexible Monte-Carlo program, {\tt VBFNLO}.
537: For
538: the WWZ invariant mass as renormalization and factorization scale, the overall
539: $K$-factor is about 1.7 and therefore has to be taken into account in
540: any analysis involving WWZ production.
541:
542: The scale dependence of the NLO cross section is substantially larger
543: than the variation observed for the LO results. This can be quantified by
544: increasing and lowering the renormalization and factorization scale by a
545: factor of 2 around $3 \cdot m_Z$ as central value. At LO the scale
546: dependence is very small with a variation of less than $\pm$ 1.5\%,
547: whereas at NLO variations of $\pm$ 5\% appear. The NLO uncertainties
548: which are indicated by the scale dependence are, thus, typical for a NLO
549: QCD prediction, while the LO case must be considered as
550: anomalous. Indeed, the WWZ cross section provides another example where
551: the scale variation of a LO cross section does not give a good
552: estimate for the corrections due to higher order effects.
553:
554: The NLO QCD corrections do not only change the normalization of the
555: total WWZ cross section, they also lead to substantial shape changes of
556: distributions: the differential $K$-factors show a sizable variation
557: over phase space. Reliable modeling of the lepton distributions arising
558: from WWZ production at the LHC thus requires the inclusion of NLO QCD
559: corrections. These corrections are now available in the form of a
560: flexible parton level Monte Carlo program, which will be incorporated
561: into the publicly available {\tt VBFNLO} package~\cite{vbfnlo} in the
562: near future.
563:
564: %
565: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
566: %
567: \section*{Acknowledgments}
568: We would like to thank Frank Petriello for his help in comparing the
569: ZZZ production cross sections, Malgorzata Worek for the comparison
570: with {\tt HELAC} and Carlo Oleari for many useful discussions.
571: This research was supported by the Deutsche
572: Forschungsgemeinschaft via the Sonderforschungsbereich/Transregio
573: SFB/TR-9 ``Computational Particle Physics'' and the Gradu\-iertenkolleg
574: ``High Energy Physics and Particle Astrophysics''.
575: %
576: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
577: %
578:
579: %\newpage
580: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
581: %-----------1------------
582: %\cite{Alcaraz:2006mx}
583: \bibitem{Alcaraz:2006mx}
584: J.~Alcaraz {\it et al.} [ALEPH Collaboration],
585: % {\it A combination of preliminary electroweak measurements and constraints on
586: % the standard model},
587: arXiv:hep-ex/0612034.
588: %%CITATION = HEP-EX/0612034;%%
589: %-----------2------------
590: %\cite{Han:1995es}
591: \bibitem{Han:1995es}
592: See for example T.~Han and R.~Sobey,
593: % {\it Triple electroweak gauge boson productions at Fermilab Tevatron
594: % energies},
595: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52} (1995) 6302
596: [arXiv:hep-ph/9507409];
597: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D52,6302;%%
598: %\cite{Dervan:1999as}
599: %\bibitem{Dervan:1999as}
600: P.~J.~Dervan, A.~Signer, W.~J.~Stirling and A.~Werthenbach,
601: % { \it Anomalous triple and quartic gauge boson couplings},
602: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 26} (2000) 607
603: [arXiv:hep-ph/0002175].
604: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G26,607;%%
605: %-----------3------------
606: %\cite{Eboli:2000ad}
607: \bibitem{Eboli:2000ad}
608: See for example O.~J.~P.~Eboli, M.~C.~Gonzalez-Garcia, S.~M.~Lietti
609: and S.~F.~Novaes,
610: % {\it Anomalous quartic gauge boson couplings at hadron colliders},
611: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} (2001) 075008
612: [arXiv:hep-ph/0009262];
613: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D63,075008;%%
614: %\cite{Green:2003jz}
615: %\bibitem{Green:2003jz}
616: D.~Green,
617: % {\it Triple vector boson production at the LHC},
618: arXiv:hep-ex/0310004.
619: %%CITATION = HEP-EX/0310004;%%
620: %-----------4------------
621: %\cite{Ohnemus:1995gb}
622: \bibitem{Ohnemus:1995gb}
623: See for example J.~Ohnemus,
624: %{\it QCD corrections to diboson production},
625: arXiv:hep-ph/9503389;
626: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/9503389;%%
627: %\cite{Dixon:1999di}
628: %\bibitem{Dixon:1999di}
629: L.~J.~Dixon, Z.~Kunszt and A.~Signer,
630: %{\it Vector boson pair production in hadronic collisions at O(alpha(s)):
631: %Lepton correlations and anomalous couplings},
632: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60} (1999) 114037
633: [arXiv:hep-ph/9907305];
634: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D60,114037;%%
635: %\cite{Dixon:1998py}
636: %\bibitem{Dixon:1998py}
637: L.~J.~Dixon, Z.~Kunszt and A.~Signer,
638: %{\it Helicity amplitudes for O(alpha(s)) production of W+ W-, W+- Z,
639: %Z Z, W+-gamma, or Z gamma pairs at hadron colliders},
640: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 531} (1998) 3
641: [arXiv:hep-ph/9803250];
642: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B531,3;%%
643: %\cite{Ohnemus:1994ff}
644: %\bibitem{Ohnemus:1994ff}
645: J.~Ohnemus,
646: %{\it Hadronic Z Z, W- W+,and W+- Z production with QCD corrections
647: %and leptonic decays},
648: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50} (1994) 1931
649: [arXiv:hep-ph/9403331].
650: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D50,1931;%%
651: %-----------5------------
652: %\cite{Campbell:1999ah} - MCFM
653: \bibitem{Campbell:1999ah}
654: J.~M.~Campbell and R.~K.~Ellis,
655: % {\it An update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders},
656: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60} (1999) 113006
657: [arXiv:hep-ph/9905386].
658: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D60,113006;%%
659: %-----------6------------
660: %\cite{Lazopoulos:2007ix} - QCD corrections to ZZZ
661: \bibitem{Lazopoulos:2007ix}
662: A.~Lazopoulos, K.~Melnikov and F.~Petriello,
663: % {\it QCD corrections to tri-boson production},
664: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76} (2007) 014001
665: [arXiv:hep-ph/0703273].
666: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,014001;%%
667: %-----------7------------
668: %\cite{Catani:1996vz} - Catani, Seymour Dipole formalism
669: \bibitem{Catani:1996vz}
670: S.~Catani and M.~H.~Seymour,
671: % {\it A general algorithm for calculating jet cross sections in NLO QCD},
672: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 485} (1997) 291
673: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 510} (1998) 503]
674: [arXiv:hep-ph/9605323].
675: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B485,291;%%
676: %-----------8------------
677: %\cite{Oleari:2003tc}
678: \bibitem{Oleari:2003tc}
679: C.~Oleari and D.~Zeppenfeld,
680: % {\it Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to W and Z production via
681: % vector-boson fusion},
682: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69} (2004) 093004
683: [arXiv:hep-ph/0310156].
684: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D69,093004;%%
685: %-----------9------------
686: %\cite{Jager:2006zc} - VVjj processes - Barbara
687: \bibitem{Jager:2006zc}
688: B.~Jager, C.~Oleari and D.~Zeppenfeld,
689: % {\it Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to $W^+$ $W^-$ production via
690: % vector-boson fusion},
691: JHEP {\bf 0607} (2006) 015
692: [arXiv:hep-ph/0603177];
693: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0607,015;%%
694: %\cite{Bozzi:2007ur}
695: %\bibitem{Bozzi:2007ur}
696: G.~Bozzi, B.~Jager, C.~Oleari and D.~Zeppenfeld,
697: %``Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to W+Z and W-Z production via
698: %vector-boson fusion,''
699: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 75} (2007) 073004
700: [arXiv:hep-ph/0701105].
701: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D75,073004;%%
702: %-----------10------------
703: %\cite{Hagiwara:1985yu}
704: \bibitem{Hagiwara:1985yu}
705: K.~Hagiwara and D.~Zeppenfeld,
706: %{ \it Helicity Amplitudes For Heavy Lepton Production In
707: % E+ E- Annihilation},
708: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 274} (1986) 1;
709: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B274,1;%%
710: %\cite{Hagiwara:1988pp}
711: %\bibitem{Hagiwara:1988pp}
712: K.~Hagiwara and D.~Zeppenfeld,
713: %{\it Amplitudes for Multiparton Processes Involving a Current at
714: % e+ e-, e+- p and Hadron Colliders},
715: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 313} (1989) 560.
716: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B313,560;%%
717: %-----------11------------
718: %\cite{Stelzer:1994ta} - MadGraph
719: \bibitem{Stelzer:1994ta}
720: T.~Stelzer and W.~F.~Long,
721: % {\it Automatic generation of tree level helicity amplitudes},
722: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 81} (1994) 357
723: [arXiv:hep-ph/9401258];
724: %%CITATION = CPHCB,81,357;%%
725: %\cite{Maltoni:2002qb}
726: %\bibitem{Maltoni:2002qb}
727: F.~Maltoni and T.~Stelzer,
728: % {\it MadEvent: Automatic event generation with MadGraph},
729: JHEP {\bf 0302} (2003) 027
730: [arXiv:hep-ph/0208156].
731: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0302,027;%%
732: %-----------12------------
733: %\cite{Passarino:1978jh} - Passarino Veltman reduction scheme
734: \bibitem{Passarino:1978jh}
735: G.~Passarino and M.~J.~G.~Veltman,
736: % {\it One loop corrections for $e^+$ $e^-$ annihilation into $\mu^+$
737: % $\mu^-$ in the Weinberg model},
738: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 160} (1979) 151.
739: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B160,151;%%
740: %-----------13------------
741: %\cite{Denner:2002ii} - Denner Dittmaier method
742: \bibitem{Denner:2002ii}
743: A.~Denner and S.~Dittmaier,
744: % {\it Reduction of one-loop tensor 5-point integrals},
745: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 658}, 175 (2003)
746: [arXiv:hep-ph/0212259];
747: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B658,175;%%
748: %\cite{Denner:2005nn}
749: %\bibitem{Denner:2005nn}
750: A.~Denner and S.~Dittmaier,
751: % {\it Reduction schemes for one-loop tensor integrals},
752: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 734}, 62 (2006)
753: [arXiv:hep-ph/0509141].
754: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B734,62;%%
755: %-----------14------------
756: %\cite{Cafarella:2007pc}
757: \bibitem{Cafarella:2007pc}
758: A.~Cafarella, C.~G.~Papadopoulos and M.~Worek,
759: %``Helac-Phegas: a generator for all parton level processes,''
760: arXiv:0710.2427 [hep-ph];
761: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0710.2427;%%
762: %\cite{Papadopoulos:2006mh} - HELAC
763: %\bibitem{Papadopoulos:2006mh}
764: C.~G.~Papadopoulos and M.~Worek,
765: % {\it HELAC: A Monte Carlo generator for multi-jet processes},
766: arXiv:hep-ph/0606320;
767: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0606320;%%
768: %\cite{Kanaki:2000ey}
769: %\bibitem{Kanaki:2000ey}
770: A.~Kanaki and C.~G.~Papadopoulos,
771: % {\it HELAC: A package to compute electroweak helicity amplitudes},
772: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 132} (2000) 306
773: [arXiv:hep-ph/0002082].
774: %%CITATION = CPHCB,132,306;%%
775: %-----------15------------
776: %\cite{Pumplin:2002vw} - CTEQ6
777: \bibitem{Pumplin:2002vw}
778: J.~Pumplin, D.~R.~Stump, J.~Huston, H.~L.~Lai, P.~Nadolsky and W.~K.~Tung,
779: % {\it New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from
780: % global QCD analysis},
781: JHEP {\bf 0207} (2002) 012
782: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201195].
783: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0207,012;%%
784: %-----------16------------
785: \bibitem{wwz_long}
786: V.~Hankele and D.~Zeppenfeld, in preparation.
787: %-----------17------------
788: \bibitem{vbfnlo}
789: The {\tt VBFNLO} program is available at \\
790: http://www-itp.particle.uni-karlsruhe.de/$\sim$vbfnloweb/
791:
792: \end{thebibliography}
793:
794:
795: \end{document}
796: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% end %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
797: